coastalcph/lex_glue huggingface dataset:
4.  The applicant was born in 1946 and lives in Roubaix.
5.  On 21 March 2002 the applicant was arrested by the police on the public highway and taken in the course of the evening to Lommelet de Saint-André Psychiatric Hospital, where she was compulsorily admitted at the request of a third party.
The Government submitted that the applicant had been “picked up” on the public highway by a police officer who had asked for her to be admitted to hospital. They added that her admission had been ordered on the basis of two medical certificates issued by different doctors to the effect that she required hospital treatment.
The applicant disputed that account and stated that she had been arrested while cycling to the shops and taken to the police station, where she had promptly been examined by a doctor who had been requisitioned to draw up a medical certificate for her admission to hospital.
6.  She submitted that after her admission at the hospital she had immediately been undressed and made to lie down with all four limbs attached to the bedposts in a seclusion cell, without being given any explanation. She had not undergone a medical examination on arrival but had been injected with unknown substances. She had remained in that position for five days, and was released only briefly at mealtimes.
7.  She remained in the hospital until 8 April 2002, without being allowed to receive visits or to make or receive telephone calls.
8.  In the meantime, on 23 March 2002, the applicant's mother applied by registered letter to the President of the Lille tribunal de grande instance for her daughter's immediate discharge. The parties have been unable to establish the date on which the letter was received. However, in a letter of 8 April 2002, Lille State Counsel replied that he was not empowered to deal with the subject matter of her correspondence and that her daughter was required to apply directly to him to be discharged.
On 28 March 2002 Afcap in turn applied to the President of the Lille tribunal de grande instance for the applicant's immediate discharge.
9.  On 22 April 2002 State Counsel's Office decided to take no further action on that application as it was devoid of purpose.
10.  Neither the President of the Lille tribunal de grande instance nor the judge responsible for matters relating to personal liberties and detention (juge des libertés et de la détention – “the liberties and detention judge”) ever gave a ruling on the applications.
5.  The applicant was born in 1963 and lives in Velenje.
6.  On 6 May 1993 the applicant was injured in an accident at work. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
On 5 April 1994 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje Basic Court, Celje Unit (Temeljno sodišče v Celju, Enota v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 1,600,000 SIT (approximately 6,670 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 24 November 1994 and 19 January 1996 the applicant lodged three preliminary written submissions.
Of the five hearings held between 1 December 1994 and 12 April 1996 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, rejecting the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 8 July 1996.
7.  On 12 July 1996 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju).
On 23 January 1997 the court allowed the appeal, quashed the first-instance court judgment and remitted the case to the first-instance court for re-examination. The decision was served on the applicant on 4 March 1997.
8.  Between 3 December 1998 and 8 January 1999 the applicant filed three preliminary written submissions in the proceedings in the re-examination proceedings before a new first-instance court judge.
Of the four hearings held between 13 January 1999 and 2 June 1999 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written interim judgment. The judgment, holding the applicant’s adversary absolutely liable for damages sustained by the accident, was served on the applicant on 15 July 1999. The court did not rule on the amount of damages and the costs of the case.
9.  On 13 August 1999 ZT appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju).
The appeal was dismissed on 17 February 2000.
10.  On 28 April 2000 ZT lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
On 24 January 2001 the court rejected the appeal.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 26 February 2001.
11.  Between 17 April 2000 and 8 September 2000, in the continued proceedings before the first instance court, the applicant made three requests that a date be set for a hearing.
On 5 May 2000 and 27 February 2001 he filed preliminary written submissions.
A hearing scheduled for 28 March 2001 was cancelled at the applicant’s request in anticipation of out of court settlement.
At the hearing held on 4 July 2001 the applicant withdrew his claim since the case was settled out of court on that same day.
5.  The applicant was born in 1955 and lives in Šoštanj.
6.  On 15 June 1992 the applicant was injured in an accident at work. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
On 22 December 1993 the applicant instituted civil proceedings with the Celje Basic Court, Celje Unit (Temeljno sodišče v Celju, Enota v Celju) against ZT seeking damages in the amount of 5,399,253 tolars (approximately 22,500 euros) for the injuries sustained.
On 1 April 1994 the court held a hearing and decided to issue a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 16 May 1994.
7.  On 26 May 1994 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). ZT cross-appealed.
On 19 October 1994 the court dismissed both appeals.
The decision was served on the applicant on 15 November 1994.
8.  On 28 November 1994 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče). ZT cross-appealed.
On 29 November 1996 the court dismissed the applicant’s appeal, but allowed the ZT’s appeal and reduced the awarded damages.
The decision was served on the applicant on 6 January 1997.
9.  On 5 March 1997 the applicant lodged a constitutional appeal.
On 26 January 2000 the Constitutional Court (Ustavno sodišče) declared the case admissible and on 7 December 2000, ruling on the merits, dismissed the appeal.
 The decision was served on the applicant on 28 December 2000.
10.  On 18 November 1993 the applicant was injured in an accident at work. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
On 27 December 1996 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje Local Court (Okrajno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 1,560,000 tolars (approximately 6,500 euros) for the injuries sustained.
11.  On 1 June 1997 ZT instituted proceedings in the Celje Local Court (Okrajno sodišče v Celju) against the applicant seeking 500,000 tolars for access payment of damages in the first set of proceedings.
12.  On 4 September 1997 the court decided to join the two cases.
On 15 March 1999 the applicant requested that a date be set for a hearing.
On 15 June 1999 the court held a hearing and decided that it would issue a written judgment.
The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part and ZT’s claim in whole, was served on the applicant on 24 June 1999.
13.  On 28 June 1999 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court.
On 10 May 2000 the court dismissed the appeal.
The decision was served on the applicant on 5 June 2000.
14.  On 4 July 2000 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court.
On 5 April 2001 the court dismissed the appeal.
The decision was served on the applicant on 14 May 2001.
15.  On 8 June 2001 the applicant lodged a constitutional appeal.
On 18 November 2002 the Constitutional Court declared the case admissible.
4.  The applicants were born in 1961 and 1983 respectively and live in Zagreb.
5.  On 4 January 1992 I.P., the first applicant’s husband and the second applicant’s father, died in a traffic accident.
6.  On 10 February 1992 the applicants brought a civil action against the insurance company C.O. with the Zagreb Municipal Court (Općinski sud u Zagrebu) seeking damages.
7.  The Municipal Court held hearings on 6 April and 2 December 1992, 3 May, 20 June and 19 September 1994 and 10 November 1997.
8.  On 17 September 1998 and 10 February 1999 the applicants filed two rush notes requesting the court to schedule a hearing and deliver a decision.
9.  The hearings scheduled for 9 February 1999 and 19 January 2000 were adjourned due to the illness of the judge. The hearings scheduled for 10 May 2000 and 19 September 2000 were adjourned for absence of the summoned witnesses. At the hearing held on 9 February 2001 the court heard those witnesses.
10.  On 23 March 2001 the Municipal Court closed the main hearing and gave judgment dismissing the applicants’ claim. The judgment was served on the applicants on 12 April 2001.
11.  On 25 April 2001 the applicants appealed to the Zagreb County Court (Županijski sud u Zagrebu).
12.  On 18 February 2003 the County Court quashed the first-instance judgment and remitted the case. The decision was served on the applicants on 30 April 2003.
13.  In the resumed proceedings, the Zagreb Municipal Court held hearings on 10 October 2003, 7 April 2004 and 20 May 2005.
The Government submitted that the court also had held a hearing on 10 December 2003. According to the applicants that hearing never took place.
14.  It appears that the proceedings are still pending before the Municipal Court.
15.  Meanwhile, in 2002 the applicants lodged a constitutional complaint with the Constitutional Court (Ustavni sud Republike Hrvatske) complaining about the length of the proceedings.
16.  On 11 April 2003 the Constitutional Court declared the applicants’ complaint inadmissible, since the Municipal Court had given its judgment in the case while the complaint had been pending before the Constitutional Court.
5.  The applicant was born in 1951 and lives in Velenje.
6.  On 7 August 1994 the applicant was injured in a traffic accident. The perpetrator of the accident had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 16 November 1995 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 2,610,359 Slovenian tolars (approximately 10,880 euros) for the injuries sustained.
8.  Between 21 October 1996 and 22 May 1998 the applicant lodged four preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence. She also modified her claim on three occasions.
9.  On 26 April 1996 she made a request that a date be set for a hearing.
10.  Before the first hearing, the judge was promoted and the case was reassigned to another judge.
11.  Of the two hearings held on 17 April 1997 and 26 May 1998 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
12.  During the proceedings the court appointed a medical expert.
13.  At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 2 September 1998.
14.  On 15 September 1998 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). ZT cross-appealed.
15.  On 16 June 1999 the court dismissed both appeals concerning non-pecuniary damage, but allowed ZT’s appeal concerning pecuniary damage and remitted the case in this part to the first-instance court for re-examination.
16.  The judgment was served on the applicant on 8 September 1999.
17.  On 28 September 1999 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče). ZT cross-appealed.
18.  On 6 July 2000 the court dismissed both appeals.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 19 September 2000.
19.  In the meantime, in the re-examination proceedings, the applicant on 9 September 1999 and then on 13 November 2000 lodged preliminary written submissions. She also partly withdrew her claim.
20.  At the hearing held on 28 November 2000, the Celje District Court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim, was served on the applicant on 20 December 2000.
5.  The applicant was born in 1954 and lives in Velenje.
6.  On 10 April 1996 the applicant was injured in an accident at work.
7.  On 20 January 1998 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against his employer GVV in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 5,053,330 Slovenian tolars (approximately 21,060 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 12 April 2001 and 10 April 2002 the applicant lodged six preliminary written submissions.
Between 24 September 1998 and 16 January 2001 he made five requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Of the three hearings held between 12 April 2001 and 23 May 2002, none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings, the court appointed a medical expert. The court also sought an additional opinion from the appointed expert.
At the last hearing, the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 4 September 2002.
8.  On 5 September 2002 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju).
On 23 March 2005 the court allowed the applicant’s appeal in part.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 26 May 2005.
9.  On 22 June 2005 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
The proceedings are still pending.
5.  The applicant was born in 1943 and lives in Jesenice.
6.  On 27 December 1994 the applicant lodged a request for promotion with the Ministry of Education and Sport.
On 10 November 1995 the Ministry rejected the applicant’s request.
7.  On 16 February 1996 the applicant instituted proceedings against the Ministry in the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče) seeking an amendment of the Ministry’s decision.
According to the information supplied by the Government, the applicant three times adduced written evidences between 8 December 1997 and 10 February 2000.
Between 10 December 1998 and 16 June 1999 he three times requested information about the state of the proceedings.
Following the legislative reform concerning the judicial review of administrative acts, the case was in September 2000 reassigned to the Administrative Court (Upravno sodišče).
On 18 April 2001 the court delivered a judgment rejecting the applicant’s claim.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 26 April 2001.
8.  On 9 May 2001 the applicant lodged an appeal with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
On 5 November 2003 the court dismissed the applicant’s appeal.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 20 December 2003.
9.  On an unspecified date in 2004 the applicant lodged a constitutional appeal.
On 2 June 2004, the Ministry granted to the applicant the requested promotion.
On 11 May 2005 the Constitutional Court (Ustavno sodišče) dismissed the applicant’s appeal.
It is not clear from the case-file when the decision was served on the applicant.
5.  The applicant was born in 1956 and lives in Velenje.
6.  On 30 June 1994 the applicant was injured in an accident at work. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 5 December 1995 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje Local Court (Okrajno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 1,243,411 tolars (approximately 5,180 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 26 April 1996 and 27 December 2001 the applicant made six requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Between 13 November 1996 and 7 February 2000 she lodged ten preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
On 8 March 1999 the court declared the case out of its jurisdiction, because the applicant increased her claim to 3,243,411 in the submission of 24 February 1999. The case was transferred to the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju).
At an undetermined time in late 2000 or early 2001 the judge presiding the case was appointed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju) and the case was assigned to a new judge.
Of the six hearings held between 20 November 1996 and 5 June 2002 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court appointed a medical expert. The court also sought an additional opinion from the appointed expert.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 17 October 2002.
8.  On 30 November 2002 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court. She requested the first-instance court to correct the judgment and also issue a supplementary judgment. ZT cross-appealed.
On 30 September 2003 the first-instance court corrected the judgment.
On 15 October the applicant appealed against the decision of the first-instance court to correct the judgment.
On 2 December 2003 the Celje Higher Court allowed the applicant’s appeals in part and increased the damages awarded.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 26 January 2005.
9.  On 18 February 2005 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
The proceedings are still pending.
5.  The applicants were born in 1958, 1984 and 1985 respectively and live in Škofja Vas. The first applicant is a mother of the other two applicants. She was a wife of I. Z., who was also a father of the other two applicants.
6.  On 20 November 1997 the first applicant and I. Z. were injured in a car accident. I. Z. died after the accident because of the injures sustained. The perpetrator of the accident, C. D., had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZA.
7.  On 22 May 1998 the applicants instituted civil proceedings against ZA in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 9.789.433,00 Slovenian tolars (approximately 40,790 euros) for the death of I. Z. and in respect of a non-pecuniary damage resulted from the injures the first applicant’s sustained in the accident.
Between 22 February 1999 and 10 June 2003 the applicants lodged fifteen preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
During the proceedings, the applicants partially withdrew their claim.
Between 17 November 1998 and 19 October 2001 they made four requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Of the six hearings held between 12 February 1999 and 7 July 2003, none was adjourned at the request of the applicants.
During the proceedings, the court appointed a medical expert.
At the hearing held on 4 September 2002, the court decided to suspend the civil proceedings until the criminal proceedings against C. D. were concluded. On 16 September 2002 and 2 December 2002 the applicants requested that a date be set for a hearing in the criminal proceedings. On 9 June 2003 the court issued a judgement finding C. D guilty and the civil proceedings subsequently continued.
On 30 October 2003 the court delivered a judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicants on 19 December 2003.
8.  On 22 December 2003 the applicants appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju).
On 24 November 2005 the court allowed the applicants’s appeal in part and increased the damages awarded.
The judgment was served on the applicants on 12 December 2005.
9.  On 15 December 2005 the applicants lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
The proceedings are still pending.
5.  The applicant was born in 1931 and lives in Škofja vas.
6.  On 6 August 1990 the applicant fell in the Celje community health care centre (the “health centre”) and injured herself. The health centre had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 16 December 1993 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against the health centre and Celje Hospital in the Celje Basic Court (Temeljno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 2,111,460 tolars (approximately 8,800 euros) for the injuries sustained, which she unsuccessfully claimed from ZT in the preceding dispute before the same court.
On 5 April 1994 the applicant lodged a preliminary written submission reducing her claim to the amount of 1,561,460 tolars (approximately 8,800 euros).
Between 6 September 1994 and 26 April 1996 she made eight requests that a date be set for a hearing.
On 1 January 1995 the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) gained jurisdiction in the present case due to the reform of the Slovenian judicial system.
8.  On 28 February 1997 the court declared the case out of its jurisdiction and decided to transfer the case, once the decision became final, to the Celje Local Court (Okranjo sodišče v Celju). The decision was served on the applicant on 10 March 1997.
9.  On 5 June 1997 the applicant added a subsidiary claim in the amount of 2,370,296 (approximately 9,900 euros) to her initial claim.
Consequently, on 10 June 1997 the court declared the case out of its jurisdiction and decided to transfer the case, once the decision became final, to the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju). The decision was served on the applicant on 16 June 1997.
On 17 June 1997 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju).
On 18 December 1997 the court dismissed the appeal. The decision was served on the applicant on 22 January 1998.
10.  Between 8 April and 4 June 1998 the applicant made three requests that a date be set for a hearing. On 31 May and 12 October 1999 she filed preliminary written observations.
Of the three hearings held between 19 November 1998 and 9 November 1999 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 2 February 2000.
11.  On 4 February 2000 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court. The health centre and Celje Hospital cross-appealed.
On 1 February 2001 the court rejected the applicant’s appeal, allowed the appeals of the opposite parties in part and rejected the applicant’s claim.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 19 April 2001.
12.  On 14 May 2001 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
On 10 April 2002 the court dismissed the applicant’s appeal.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 13 May 2002.
13.  On 20 June 2002 the applicant lodged a constitutional appeal.
On 11 May 2004 the Constitutional Court (Ustavno sodišče) dismissed the applicant’s appeal. The decision was served on the applicant on 12 May 2004.