5.  The applicant was born in 1961 and lives in Ljubljana.
6.  On 12 April 2001 the applicant instituted enforcement proceedings against her former husband before the Šmarje pri Jelšah District Court as the legal guardian and representative of her two sons who were both minors seeking the payment of alimony awarded by a judgment of 26 January 1996. These proceedings were conducted under the reference number In 19/2001.
7.  On 12 May 2001 the court requested the applicant to complete the request with additional information. The up-dated request was sent to the court on 28 May 2001.
8.  On 21 June 2001 the court issued the writ of execution, granting enforcement on immovable property. The applicant appealed against the calculation of court fees.
9.  On 28 August 2001 the applicant withdrew the appeal.
10.  On 26 September 2001 a decision rejecting the appeal was issued based on the above-mentioned withdrawal.
11.  On 23 January 2002 the court issued a decision requesting the applicant to submit a down payment for a property valuation.
12.  On 15 February 2002 the applicant sought the exemption from paying the fee for the valuer.
13.  On 28 February 2002 the court issued a decision on exemption from fees.
14.  On 15 April 2002 the court appointed a valuer specializing in agricultural land.
15.  On 5 September 2002 the valuer submitted his report to the court which was sent to the applicant for comments. The applicant submitted comments on 1 October 2002.
16.  On 4 February 2003 the applicant lodged a submission with the court objecting to the expert report and requesting the appointment of a valuer specialized in valuating building land.
17.  On 10 February 2003 the applicant lodged a new enforcement request on the debtor’s movable property. The proceedings were conducted under the reference number In 122/2003. The writ of execution was issued on 7 April 2003. The request was subsequently amended and the applicant requested enforcement on immovable property.
18.  On 3 March 2003 the court received the planning information from the Šmarje pri Jelšah Municipality where it was stated that the property in question was not agricultural land but building land.
19.  On 27 May 2003 the court issued a decision on the value of the immovable property. Both parties appealed.
20.  On 8 October 2003 the Higher Court upheld the appeal and remitted the case for re-examination.
21.  On 4 February 2004 the court requested further information from the Municipality regarding the planning information. The Municipality informed the court on 9 March 2004 that the immovable property in question was indeed building land and not agricultural land.
22.  On 29 April 2004 the court issued a decision appointing a valuer specialized in building land to value the property. The report was delivered on 17 June 2004.
23.  On 16 August 2004 the court issued a decision joining the two enforcement proceedings (In 19/2001 and In 122/2003) since they concerned the same immovable property.
24.  On 14 October 2004 a decision was issue on the determination of the value of half of the property. The applicant appealed and the court considered the appeal as a request to determine the value of the whole property.
25.  On 28 October 2004 the decision on the value of the whole property was issued.
26.  On 4 March 2005 the court issued an order for a public auction.
27.  On 25 April 2005 an order on the recognition of a winning bid was issued.
28.  Between 15 June 2005 and 7 March 2006 the case was pending before the Land Register due to the requirement of the ex officio notice of the writ of execution in the Land Register.
29.  On 8 March 2006 the court issued a delivery of immovable property order in favour of the applicant’s sons.
30.  On 9 May 2006 a decision was issued in land registration proceedings entering the immovable property in the name of the applicant’s sons in the Land Register.
31.  On 5 June 2006 the court issued a decision on payment of the creditors. The applicant appealed.
32.  On14 December 2006 the Celje Higher Court upheld the appeal and remitted the issue for re-examination.
33.  On 12 February 2007 the court issued a decision on payment, determining the costs of the proceedings, the taxes to be paid and the final amount of money to be awarded to the creditors.