5.  The applicant was born in 1955 and lives in Užice.
6.  The applicant was employed by Raketa-Putnički Saobraćaj AD, a company based in Užice (hereinafter “the debtor”).
7.  On 15 June 2008 the applicant was dismissed from his employment.
8.  On unspecified dates the applicant instituted three separate sets of civil proceedings against the debtor, seeking payment of his salary arrears and various social security contributions.
9.  On 2 March 2007 the Užice Municipal Court ruled in favour of the applicant and ordered the debtor to pay him:
(a)  salary arrears in the amount of 8,232 Serbian dinars (RSD) for June 2006, RSD 9,408 for July 2006, and RSD 8,232 for August 2006, plus statutory interest;
(b)  RSD 900 for his legal costs; and
(c)  the pension, disability, health and unemployment insurance contributions due for the period June to December 2006.
10.  On 22 September 2007 the judgment became final.
11.  On 2 October 2007 the applicant filed a request for the enforcement of the above judgment before the Požega Municipal Court.
12.  On 16 April 2008 the court accepted the applicant’s request and issued an enforcement order.
13.  On 26 July 2007 the Užice Municipal Court ruled in favour of the applicant and ordered the debtor to pay him:
(a)  salary arrears in the amount of RSD 8,800 for February 2007, RSD 9,680 for March 2007, RSD 9,240 for April 2007, and RSD 10,120 for May 2007, plus statutory interest;
(b)  employee meal benefits (naknada za ishranu na radu) in the amount of RSD 4,385 for December 2006, RSD 4,385 for February 2007, RSD 4,385 for March 2007, and RSD 4,385 for April 2007, plus statutory interest;
(c)  holiday pay (regres za godišnji odmor) in the amount of RSD 25,000 for 2006, plus statutory interest from 1 January 2007;
(d)  RSD 1,950 for his legal costs; and
(e)  the pension, disability, health and unemployment insurance contributions due for the period February to May 2007.
14.  On 11 September 2007 the judgment became final.
15.  On 2 October 2007 the applicant filed a request for the enforcement of the above judgment before the Požega Municipal Court.
16.  On 7 February 2008 the court accepted the applicant’s request and issued an enforcement order.
17.  On 24 August 2007 the Užice Municipal Court ruled in favour of the applicant and ordered the debtor to pay him:
(a)  salary arrears in the amount of RSD 10,648 for February 2007, RSD 10,648 for March 2007, RSD 10,648 for April 2007, and RSD 10,648 for May 2007, plus statutory interest;
(b)  employee meal benefits (naknada za ishranu na radu) in the amount of RSD 4,620 for September 2006, RSD 4,620 for December 2006, RSD 4,620 for January 2007, RSD 4,620 for February 2007, RSD 4,620 for March 2007, RSD 4,620 for April 2007, and RSD 4,620 for May 2007, plus statutory interest;
(c)  holiday pay (regres za godišnji odmor) in the amount of RSD 35,135 for 2007, plus statutory interest from 24 June 2007;
(d)  RSD 6,748.50 for his legal costs; and
(e)  the pension, disability, health and unemployment insurance contributions due for period October 2006 to June 2007.
18.  On 20 September 2007 that judgment became final.
19.  In January 2009 the applicant filed a request for the enforcement of the above judgment before the Municipal Court in Požega.
20.  On 12 May 2009 the court accepted the applicant’s request and issued an enforcement order.
21.  On 12 July 2010 the Užice Commercial Court opened insolvency proceedings in respect of the debtor, which led to the ongoing enforcement proceedings before the Požega Municipal Court being stayed.
22.  In July 2010 the applicant duly registered a claim for the sums specified in the judgments referred to above.
23.  On an unspecified date he was recognised as a secured creditor.
24.  On 17 April 2012 some of the debtor’s property was sold. A sale of the remaining assets was advertised in the newspapers and a public bid opening procedure was scheduled for 29 June 2012.
25.  On 30 December 2002 the debtor was privatised.
26.  On 17 July 2007 the contract for the sale of the debtor was annulled because the buyer in question had failed to fulfil his contractual obligations.
27.  Following the annulment of the debtor’s privatisation the State owned 58.18% of the debtor’s shares.
28.  On 11 December 2008 the State sold its shares to a private company.