coastalcph/lex_glue huggingface dataset:
5.  The applicant was born in 1952 and lives in Velenje.
6.  On 20 December 1995 the applicant was injured in a car accident. The perpetrator of the accident had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZTi.
7.  On 16 July 1997 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZTi in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 3,212,150 tolars (approximately 13,400 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 9 December 1997 and 1 February 2001 the applicant lodged three preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
On 16 June and 23 November 1998 he made requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Of the two hearings held on 9 April 1999 and 2 February 2001, none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings, the court appointed a medical expert.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 25 April 2001.
8.  On 9 May 2001 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). ZTi cross-appealed.
On 18 July 2002 the court dismissed the applicant’s appeal and upheld ZTi’s appeal as far as the costs of the proceedings were concerned.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 11 September 2002.
9.  On 19 September 2002 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče) and requested that the Supreme Court’s judge be recused.
On 23 October 2003 the court dismissed the applicant’s appeal.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 26 November 2003.
5.  The applicant was born in 1959 and lives in Velenje.¸
6. On 26 June 1995 the applicant was injured in an accident at work.
7.  On 11 December 1997 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against his employer ZT in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 3,833,150 tolars (approximately 15,980 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 27 December 1999 and 29 January 2002 the applicant lodged four preliminary written submissions.
Between 30 September 1998 and 11 January 2001 he made six requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Of the four hearings held between 3 April 2001 and 12 March 2002 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant. However, a hearing scheduled for 22 June 2000 was called off on the applicant’s request since he had received the employer’s reply to his claim only one day before this date.
During the proceedings, the court appointed a medical expert.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 29 April 2002.
8.  On 13 May 2002 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). ZT cross-appealed.
On 21 April 2005 the court allowed the applicant’s appeal in part and increased the damages awarded.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 24 May 2005.
9.  On 16 June 2005 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
The proceedings are still pending.
5.  The applicant was born in 1978 and lives in Rogaška Slatina.
6.  On 18 July 1996 the applicant was injured in a car accident. The perpetrator of the accident had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 7 September 1998 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 7,715,240 tolars (approximately 32,200 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 10 May 1999 and 26 April 2002 the applicant made three requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Between 26 April 2002 and 16 January 2003 he lodged three preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
Of the four hearings held between 11 September 2002 and 21 March 2003 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
The hearing scheduled for 23 March 2001 was cancelled further to the request of both parties, lodged on 8 March 2001, in order to attempt to settle the case out of court. On 26 April 2002 the applicant informed the court of the unsuccessful negotiations with the defendant and requested the court to schedule a hearing.
During the proceedings the court appointed a medical expert.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 15 July 2003.
8.  On 18 July 2003 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). ZT cross-appealed.
On 12 May 2005 the allowed in part the appeals and rejected the reminder. The judgment was served on the applicant on 28 June 2005.
9.  On 5 July 2005 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
The proceedings are still pending.
5.  The applicant was born in 1927 and lives in Šentjur.
6.  On 14 December 1995 the applicant was severely injured in a car accident. The car, driven by the applicant’s husband, was insured with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 20 May 1997 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 21,763,835 tolars (approximately 91,000 euros) for the injuries sustained.
On 25 September 1997 the judge presiding the case was appointed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju) and the case was transferred to a new judge.
Between 16 March 1998 and 16 November 2000 the applicant made five requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Between 13 June 1999 and 26 October 2000 she lodged five preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
Of the five hearings held between 5 June 1999 and 18 December 2000 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court appointed a medical expert.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 26 February 2001.
8.  On 14 March 2001 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court. ZT cross-appealed.
On 20 September 2002 the court rejected the applicant’s appeal, allowed in part ZT’s appeal and decreased the awarded damages.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 25 October 2002.
9.  On 14 November 2002 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
On 19 February 2004 the court allowed the applicant’s appeal in part.
The judgment was served on the applicant’s lawyers on 24 March 2004.
5.  The applicant was born in 1961 and lives in Grobelno.
6.  On 2 February 1996 the applicant was injured in a car accident. The perpetrator had insured his liability with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 7 April 1997 the applicant instituted civil proceedings with the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) against ZT seeking damages in the amount of 2,623,290 SIT (approximately 10,950 euros) for the injuries sustained in the car accident.
Between 11 June 1997 and 26 June 2002 the applicant filed seven preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
On 1 September and 12 October 1997 the applicant requested that a date be set for a hearing.
Of the four hearings held between 22 January 1999 and 8 July 2002 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
On 1 February 1999 the Court appointed a medical expert. The court received the expert’s opinion on 30 March 1999. The court also sought an additional opinion from the appointed expert on 22 June 2000.
Between 13 April 1999 and 19 November 1999 the court urged the applicant three times to pay the advance money for the expert’s fees. On 27 December 1999 the applicant submitted evidence that she had paid the advance.
On 14 December 2000 the court appointed an expert, a clinical psychologist.
At the last hearing the court decided to issue a written judgment. The judgment, upholding in part the applicant’s claim, was served on the applicant on 22 October 2002.
8.  On 5 November 2002 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju) and requested that the first-instance court issue a supplementary judgment addressing the issues the court failed to address in the first judgment. ZT cross-appealed.
On 6 March 2003 the first-instance court issued a supplementary judgment. The judgment was served on the applicant on 12 March 2003.
On 25 March 2003 the applicant appealed against the supplementary judgment.
On 1 July 2004 the Celje Higher Court allowed the applicant’s and ZT’s appeals.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 15 September 2004.
9.  On 8 October 2004 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
The proceedings are still pending.
5.  The applicant was born in 1960 and lives in Zgornji Dolič.
6.  On 9 January 1993 the applicant was injured in an accident at work. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 30 August 1995 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 8,009,850 tolars (approximately 33,300 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 1 October 1996 and 8 January 1999 the applicant lodged eight preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
Between 14 November 1996 and 1 October 1998 she made six requests that a date be set for a hearing.
On 25 September 1997 the judge presiding the case was appointed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju) and the case was assigned to a new first-instance court judge.
Of the three hearings held between 13 December 1996 and 13 January 1999 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court appointed a medical expert.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 1 March 1999.
8.  On 16 March 1999 ZT appealed to the Celje Higher Court contesting the part of the judgment referring to costs and expenses of the proceedings.
On 16 February 2000 the court allowed the appeal in part and remanded the case back to the first-instance court for re-examination.
The decision was served on the applicant on 21 March 2000.
9.  Between 6 July 2000 and 13 March 2001 the applicant lodged four rush notices with the first-instance court.
On 6 April 2001 the first-instance court issued a new decision on costs and expenses. The decision was served on the applicant on 11 April 2001.
10.  On 11 May 2001 ZT appealed to the Celje Higher Court.
On 18 July 2002 the court rejected the appeal. The decision was served on the applicant on 28 August 2002.
5.  The applicant was born in 1963 and lives in Velenje.
6.  On 15 February 1996 the applicant was injured at work. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZA.
7.  On 13 October 1997 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZA in the Celje Local Court (Okrajno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 1,512,973 Slovenian tolars (approximately 6,310 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 13 July 1998 and 25 October 2002 the applicant lodged sixteen preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
 On 5 February 1998 and 17 November 1998 he made requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Of the eight hearings held between 23 June 1998 and 14 January 2003, none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings, the court appointed four medical experts and sought two additional expert opinions. The applicant and ZA objected to the appointment of certain experts.
At the last hearing, the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 24 January 2003.
8.  On 7 February 2003 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). ZA cross-appealed.
On 7 April 2005 the court allowed both appeals and remitted the case to the first-instance court for re-examination.
The decision was served on the applicant on 6 May 2005.
9.  The proceedings are pending before the first-instance court.
5.  The applicant was born in 1942 and lives in Celje.
6.  On 1 April 1992 the applicant was injured in an accident at work. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 29 September 1993 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje Basic Court (Temeljno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 2,111,949 tolars (approximately 8,800 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Before 28 June 1994, the day the Convention entered into force with respect to Slovenia, the court held one hearing and appointed an ophthalmologist.
Between 9 September 1994 and 26 November 1996 the applicant lodged four preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
Between 9 September 1994 and 7 May 1996 he made four requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Neither of the hearings held on 9 December 1994 and 3 December 1996 was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
On 1 January 1995 the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) gained jurisdiction in the present case due to the reform of the Slovenian judicial system.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 13 February 1997.
8.  On 24 February 1997 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). ZT cross-appealed.
On 26 November 1997 the court quashed the first-instance court’s judgment and remitted the case to the first-instance court for re-examination.
The decision was served on the applicant on 8 January 1998.
9.  On 11 June 1998 the applicant lodged preliminary written submissions with the Celje District Court.
On 22 June 1998 the court held a hearing. The court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 24 September 1998.
10.  On 2 October 1998 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court. ZT cross-appealed.
On 21 April 1999 the court quashed the first-instance court’s judgment and remitted the case to the first-instance court for re-examination.
The decision was served on the applicant on 31 May 1999.
11.  On 14 June and 23 November 1999 the applicant lodged preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
Neither of the hearings held on 14 June 1999 and 13 December 1999 was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court sought an additional opinion from the appointed ophthalmologist.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 9 February 2000.
12.  On 14 February 2000 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court against that part of the decision rejecting his claim.
On 21 March 2001 the second-instance court rejected his appeal.
13.  On 21 May 2001 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
On 13 June 2002 the court dismissed the applicant’s appeal.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 28 August 2002.
5.  The applicant was born in 1963 and lives in Stranice.
6.  On 12 November 1996 the applicant was injured in an accident at work in a lignite mine. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 15 May 1997 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje Local Court (Okrajno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 764,506 tolars (approximately 3,190 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 10 September 1997 and 9 March 2000 the applicant made six requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Between 31 May 1999 and 12 March 2001 he lodged four preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
Of the four hearings held between 20 May 1999 and 13 March 2001 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court appointed a medical expert.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 7 May 2001.
8.  On 15 May 2001 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju).
On 5 June 2002 the court dismissed the applicant’s appeal.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 9 September 2002.
9.  On 18 September 2002 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče) and requested the withdrawal of one of the judges.
On 4 September 2003 the president of the Supreme Court rejected the request for the withdrawal of a judge.
On 6 November 2003 the Supreme Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal.
The decision was served on the applicant on 10 December 2003.
5.  The applicant was born in 1980 and lives in Šoštanj.
6.  On 9 September 1994 the applicant was injured in a car accident. The perpetrator of the accident had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 16 December 1997 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje Local Court (Okrajno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 1,104,192 tolars (approximately 4,600 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 23 March 1998 and 21 March 2001 the applicant filed seven preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
From 6 September 1999 and 21 May 2001 he made six requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Of the three hearings held between 6 April 2000 and 2 October 2001 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court appointed two medical experts. The court also sought an additional opinion from one of the appointed experts.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim, was served on the applicant on 25 October 2001.
8.  On 9 November 2001 ZT appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). ZT cross-appealed.
On 3 December 2002 the court dismissed the appeal.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 27 December 2002.
9.  On 15 January 2003 ZT lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
On 20 May 2004 the court dismissed the appeal.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 21 June 2004.
5.  The applicant was born in 1950 and lives in Prebold.
6.  On 24 June 1995 the applicant was injured in a car accident. The perpetrator of the accident had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 25 August 1997 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 9,561,000 tolars (approximately 40,000 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 6 February 1998 and 14 April 1999 the applicant made four requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Between 24 June 1999 and 7 November 2000 he lodged four preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
Of the three hearings held between 18 June 1999 and 29 March 2001 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court appointed a medical expert. The court also sought an additional opinion from the appointed expert.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 27 June 2001.
8.  On 5 July 2001 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). ZT cross-appealed.
On 30 January 2003 the court dismissed the ZT’s appeal, allowed in part the applicant’s appeal, and increased the amount of the costs and expenses awarded. The judgment was served on the applicant on 6 March 2003.
9.  On 28 March 2003 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
On 13 May 2004 the court rejected the appeal.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 3 June 2004.
5.  The applicant was born in 1964 and lives in Velenje.
6.  On 1 September 1992 the applicant was working as a safeguard and a security officer at a swimming pool in Velenje. He was brutally beaten by three individuals. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 30 August 1995 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT, the attackers and the parents of the attackers who were minors, in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 3,400.000 tolars (approximately 14,200 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 7 January 1998 and 11 March 2002 the applicant lodged eight preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
On 12 and 21 December 2000 he requested that a date be set for a hearing.
Of the six hearings held between 2 October 1998 and 22 May 2002 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court appointed two medical experts, a neurologist and an orthopaedist. The court also sought an additional opinion from one of the appointed experts.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 28 August 2002.
8.  On 11 September 2002 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). All other parties to the proceedings cross-appealed.
On 19 November 2003 the court allowed the appeals and remitted the case to the first-instance court for re-examination.
The decision was served on the applicant on 23 December 2003.
9.  On 14 January 2004 the first-instance court held a new hearing on a re-examination of the case.
On 18 February 2004 a medical expert was appointed, but was replaced by a new expert on 6 May 2004.
On 18 July 2005 the applicant lodged preliminary written submissions.
The proceedings are still pending.
7.  The applicant was born in 1958 and lived in Warszawa. He died in 2000.
8.  On 28 June 1994 a bill of indictment in respect of the applicant, then a police officer, and four other individuals was submitted to the Warsaw District Court (sąd rejonowy). They were charged with accepting bribes.
9.  The court placed the applicant under police supervision.
Despite the applicant’s numerous petitions the District Court did not hold any hearings.
10.  On 11 October 2000 the applicant died.
11.  On 12 February 2002 the Warsaw District Court issued a decision to discontinue the proceedings with respect to the applicant due to his death.
4.  The applicant was born in 1948 and lives in Komárom.
5.  On 3 July 1994 criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant and his accomplices on charges of instigation to smuggling of weapons and of other offences.
6.  On 6 December 1994 a bill of indictment was preferred.
7.  The Tatabánya District Court held hearings on 20, 21 April, 9 May and 13 June 1995. On the latter date it ordered that the investigation be resumed. The time-limit for the completion of the investigation was prolonged on 7 September and 27 October 1995, and also at the hearings on 7 December 1995, 4 June and 13 November 1996. Simultaneously, legal assistance was being sought from the Slovak authorities.
8.  Further hearings took place on 17 April, 7 October, 13 November and 11 December 1997. At the hearing on 22 January 1998 the case against two co-defendants was separated since they were abroad. Another hearing was held on 29 January 1998.
9.  On 4 February 1998 the District Court acquitted the applicant.
10.  On appeal, on 20 March 2000 the Komárom-Esztergom County Regional Court quashed this judgment, essentially for procedural shortcomings, and remitted the case. It ordered that the case be given priority.
11.  In the resumed proceedings the case fell within the Regional Court’s jurisdiction acting at first instance due to a legislative change.
12.  The Regional Court held hearings on 7 February and 26, 27 and 28 June 2001. On the latter date it appointed a medical expert. A further hearing was held and another expert appointed on 27 September 2001.
13.  Additional hearings took place on 1 March, 12 April, 30 August, 22 November and 20 December 2002, and 22 January, 25 February and 9 May 2003.
14.  On 22 May 2003 the court finally acquitted the applicant.