coastalcph/lex_glue huggingface dataset:
5.  The applicant was born in 1954 and lives in Laško.
6.  On 21 July 1993 the applicant was injured in an accident at work. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 15 December 1995 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 9,422,552.80 tolars (approximately 39,300 euros) and a life annuity of 215,148 SIT (approximately 900 euros) for the sustained injuries.
On 29 March and 6 November 1996 the applicant requested that a date be set for a hearing.
On 25 September 1997 the judge presiding the case was appointed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju).
On 30 June and 14 September 1998 the applicant lodged preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
On 15 March 1999 he requested that a date be set for a hearing.
Of the three hearings held between 19 November 1997 and 22 March 2000 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court appointed a financial expert. The court also sought an additional opinion from the appointed expert.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 5 June 2000.
8.  On 19 June 2000 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court. ZT cross-appealed.
On 25 January 2001 the court allowed the applicant’s appeal in the part referring to costs and expenses of the proceedings.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 28 February 2001.
9.  On 29 March 2001 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
On 7 March 2002 the court dismissed the applicant’s appeal.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 22 April 2002.
4.  The applicants live in the Voronezh Region.
5.  They are in receipt of welfare payments for their children. In 1999 – 2001 the applicants brought separate sets of civil proceedings against a local welfare authority, claiming arrears in those payments.
6.  On the dates set out in appendix 1 the domestic courts granted the applicants’ claims and ordered the welfare authority to pay them the respective amounts. The enforcement proceedings were commenced accordingly.
7.  On 26 July 2001 the bailiffs discontinued the enforcement proceedings in respect of the judgments in the applicants’ favour and returned them the writs of execution referring to the lack of the debtor’s funds.
8.  Thereafter the applicants unsuccessfully applied to various public bodies seeking to have the judgments in their favour enforced.
9.  In January and February 2004 the applicants were paid the amounts due pursuant to the writs of execution.
5.  The applicant was born in 1954 and lives in Rečica ob Savinji.
6.  On 6 March 1998 the applicant was injured in a car accident. The perpetrator of the accident had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 2 November 1998 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 3,107,000 tolars (approximately 13,000 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 3 September 1999 and 11 June 2003 the applicant made eight requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Between 13 June 2000 and 11 June 2003 he lodged ten preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
Of the three hearings held between 27 July 2000 and 11 September 2003 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court appointed two medical experts. The court also sought an additional opinion from one of the appointed experts.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 2 October 2003.
8.  On 3 October 2003 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). ZT cross-appealed.
On 30 March 2005 the court allowed in part the applicant’s appeal and increased the awarded damages.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 5 May 2005.
9.  On 9 May 2005 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
The proceedings are still pending.
5.  The applicant was born in 1940 and lives in Celje.
6.  On 1 January 1998 the applicant was injured in a car accident. The perpetrator of the accident had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 1 April 1999 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 2,069,320 tolars (approximately 8,600 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 1 June 1999 and 2 December 2003 the applicant lodged seven preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
On 10 April 1999 he also requested that a date be set for a hearing.
On 5 November 2001 the presiding judge was appointed to the Celje Higher Court and the case was assigned to a new judge.
Of the five hearings held between 6 June 2001 and 15 December 2003 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court appointed two medical experts.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 3 May 2004.
8.  On 5 May 2004 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). ZT cross-appealed.
On 13 July 2005 the court allowed the applicant’s appeal in part and dismissed the ZT’s appeal.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 7 September 2005.
9.  On 3 October 2005 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
The proceedings are still pending.
5.  The applicant was born in 1954 and lives in Velenje.
6.  On 5 December 1995 the applicant was injured in an accident at work in a mine. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 3 July 1997 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 9,177,050 tolars (approximately 38,000 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 31 July 1997 and 6 September 2000 the applicant lodged six preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
On 31 August 1998 and 3 November 1998 he requested that a date be set for a hearing.
Of the three hearings held between 26 March 1999 and 25 September 2000 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court appointed two medical experts.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 29 November 2000.
8.  On 11 December 2000 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). On 13 December 2000 he amended the appeal. ZT cross-appealed.
On 14 March 2002 the court allowed both appeals in part, annulled a part of the first-instance court judgment and remitted the case to the first instance court for re-examination.
9.  On 27 June 2002 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče). ZT cross-appealed.
On 25 March 2004 the court dismissed both appeals.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 12 May 2004.
10.  On 31 January 2005 the first-instance court held a hearing and decided to deliver a written judgment.
The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 3 February 2005.
11.  On 4 February 2005 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court against the part of the judgment concerning costs and expenses of the proceedings.
On 15 February 2006 the court dismissed the appeal. The decision was served on the applicant on 6 March 2006.
5.  The applicant was born in 1975 and lives in Velenje.
6.  On 24 August 1996 the applicant was injured in an accident at work. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 3 April 1997 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje Local Court (Okrajno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 1,200,0000 tolars (approximately 5,000 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 10 September 1997 and 14 January 1999 the applicant made three requests that a date be set for a hearing.
On 24 June 1998 and 4 March 1999 the applicant lodged preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
Neither of the two hearings held on 10 June 1998 and 24 March 1999 was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court appointed a medical expert.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 8 April 1999.
8.  On 23 April 1999 ZT appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju).
On 28 October 1999 the court allowed the appeal, annulled the first-instance court-s judgment and remitted the case to the first-instance court for re-examination.
The decision was served on the applicant on 6 December 1999.
9.  Between 17 January 2000 and 10 May 2002 the applicant lodged five preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
Between 1 February 2000 and 13 February 2003 she made six requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Of the four hearings held between 3 January 2001 and 17 March 2003 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding in part the applicant’s claim, was served on the applicant on 20 June 2003.
10.  On 2 July 2003 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court.
On 18 November 2004 the court allowed the applicant’s appeal in part and increased the amount of the damages awarded.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 13 January 2005.
4.  The applicant was born in 1937 and lives in Volgodonsk, Rostov region.
5.  The applicant receives an old-age pension. The Law on Calculating and Upgrading State Pensions of 21 July 1997 (the “Pensions Law”) introduced, since 1 February 1998, a new method of calculating pensions. This method, “Individual Pensioner Coefficient” (“IPC”), was meant to link a person’s pension to his previous earnings.
6.  On 22 April 1999 the applicant brought proceedings against the Volgodonsk labour and social development authority (Департамент труда и социального развития) before the Volgodonsk Town Court. He argued that his IPC should be fixed at 0.7, which would result in an increase in his pension.
7.  The Town Court found for the applicant and ordered the defendant authority to re-calculate the applicant’s pension from 1 February 1998 based on the IPC equal to 0.7 and pay the arrears of 3,186.36 roubles. According to the applicant and the documents submitted by him, the judgment was dated 25 October 1999 and came into force on 8 December 1999. According to the Government, the judgment was dated 25 November 1999 and came into force on 5 December 1999.
8.  On 14 January 2000 the Town Court issued a writ of execution. On 26 January 2000 the Volgodonsk bailiff’s service instituted enforcement proceedings. As the payments in enforcement of the judgment had not been made the applicant complained to various authorities. In letters of 10 June and 3 October 2000 the enforcement proceedings supervision department of the Rostov region division of the Ministry of Justice informed him that the judgment debt would be paid to him upon receipt of funds from the State budget.
9.  According to the Government, the Volgodonsk labour and social development authority lodged an application with the Town Court for re‑consideration of the judgment given in the applicant’s case due to discovery of new circumstances. The authority argued that such a circumstance was an instruction of the Ministry of Labour and Social Development of 29 December 1999, which interpreted the Pensions Law in a way different from that in the judgment. On 29 September 2000 the Town Court granted the authority’s application and quashed the judgment due to discovery of new circumstances, notably the above ministerial instruction.
10.  According to the applicant, he was never informed of the court decision of 29 September 2000.
11.  On 5 January 2001 the Volgodonsk bailiff’s service terminated the enforcement proceedings. It stated in its decision as follows:
“The proceedings [instituted on the basis of the writ of execution in favour of A. K. Sukhobokov] should be considered as terminated in connection with remitting the writ of execution, without enforcement, at the request of the court.
On the basis of the foregoing, being governed by Section 27 (2) of the Federal Law on Enforcement Proceedings, decided that:
12.  According to the applicant, he received a copy of that decision on 24 March 2001.
13.  According to the applicant, the amount of his monthly pension was 1,523 roubles as of 1 May 2001.
5.  The applicant was born in 1952 and lives in Velenje.
6.  On 29 November 1994 the applicant was injured in an accident at work. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 4 November 1996 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 4,935,306 tolars (approximately 20,500 euros) for the injuries sustained.
On 13 February 1997 the judge presiding the case was appointed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju) and the case was assigned to a new judge.
On 30 January 1997 and 2 April 1998 the applicant made requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Between 30 January 1997 and 3 February 1999 the applicant lodged four preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
Neither of the hearings held on 14 May 1998 and 10 November 1998 was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court appointed a medical expert.
The court issued a written judgment on 19 February 1999. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 13 April 1999.
8.  On 19 April 1999 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court. ZT cross-appealed.
On 18 November 1999 the court allowed both appeals in part and remanded the case back to the first-instance court for re-examination.
The decision was served on the applicant on 28 December 1999.
9.  Between 8 March 2000 and 3 December 2002 the applicant lodged six preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
Of the four hearings held between 13 April 2000 and 23 October 2003 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court appointed two medical experts.
On 3 December 2002 the court issued a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 13 January 2004.
10.  On 28 January 2004 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court. ZT cross-appealed.
On 6 April 2005 the court upheld the applicant’s appeal in part and dismissed ZT’s appeal.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 16 May 2005.
11.  On 13 June 2005 the applicant lodged and appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court.
The proceedings are still pending.
5.  The applicant was born in 1952 and lives in Velenje.
6.  On 6 January 1994 the applicant was injured in an accident at work. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 27 December 1995 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 4,400,000 tolars (approximately 18,300 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 15 January 1996 and 3 December 1997 the applicant lodged five preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
Between 24 March 1997 and 9 April 1998 he made three requests that a date be set for a hearing.
On 25 September 1997 the presiding judge was appointed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju) and the case was transferred to a new judge.
Of the six hearings held between 19 November 1997 and 10 June 1998 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant. Four hearings were adjourned because a witness failed to appear before the court.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 14 July 1998.
8.  On 22 July 1998 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). ZT cross-appealed.
On 14 April 1999 the court allowed the appeals, quashed the first-instance court judgment and remitted the case to the first-instance court for re-examination.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 10 June 1999.
9.  During the re-examination proceedings before the first-instance court the applicant made preparatory written submissions and/or adduced evidence on 26 August 1999 and 9 September 1999.
On 22 September 1999 a hearing was held and the court decided to deliver a written judgment.
On 2 December 1999 the judgment was served on the parties.
10.  On 13 December 1999 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court. ZT cross-appealed.
On 18 October 2000 the Celje Higher Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal. The judgment was served on the applicant on 12 December 2000.
11.  On 27 December 2000 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
On 17 January 2002 the court allowed the applicant’s appeal in part.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 26 March 2002.
5.  The applicant was born in 1975 and lives in Zidani Most.
6.  On 28 July 1995 the applicant was injured in a car accident. The perpetrator of the accident had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7.  On 3 December 1997 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 2,900,000 tolars (approximately 12,000 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 9 December 1999 and 17 April 2002 the applicant lodged four preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
Of the four hearings held between 23 November 1999 and 21 May 2002 none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings the court appointed a medical expert and a road traffic expert.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 17 June 2002.
8.  On 2 July 2002 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). ZT cross-appealed.
Upon the request of the Celje Higher Court, the Celje District Court amended the flaws in its judgment on 19 December 2003.
On 2 March 2005 the Celje Higher Court allowed the applicant’s appeal, dismissed the ZT’s appeal, and increased the damages awarded.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 24 March 2005.
9.  On 14 April 2005 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
The proceedings are still pending.
5.  The applicant was born in 1959 and lives in Velenje.
6.  On 8 September 1994 the applicant was injured in an accident at work. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company ZT.
7. On 12 February 1996 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against ZT in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 2,411,312 Slovenian tolars (approximately 10,050 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 29 August 1996 and 2 April 2001 the applicant lodged thirteen preliminary written submissions.
On 1 April 1998 she made a request that a date be set for a hearing.
Of the seven hearings held between 18 September 1998 and 27 February 2002, none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings, the court appointed three different medical experts. The court also sought additional opinions of the appointed experts.
At the last hearing, the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 6 May 2002.
8.  On 20 May 2002 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju).
On 15 October 2003 the court allowed the applicant’s appeal in part and increased the damages awarded.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 17 December 2003.
9.  On 16 January 2004 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
On 9 June 2005 the court dismissed the applicant’s appeal.
The decision was served on the applicant on 5 July 2005.
10.  On 20 July 2005 the applicant lodged a constitutional appeal.
The proceedings are still pending.
5.  The applicant was born in 1968 and lives in Velenje.
6.  On 7 June 1995 the applicant was injured in an accident at work. The applicant’s employer had taken out insurance with the insurance company A.
7.  On 28 December 1995 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against A in the Celje District Court (Okrožno sodišče v Celju) seeking damages in the amount of 1,050,000 tolars (approximately 4,380 euros) for the injuries sustained.
Between 14 August 1996 and 14 December 2001 the applicant lodged eight preliminary written submissions and/or adduced evidence.
Between 26 November 1996 and 30 March 2001 he made seven requests that a date be set for a hearing.
Of the four hearings held between 21 October 1996 and 9 January 2002, none was adjourned at the request of the applicant.
During the proceedings, the court appointed two medical experts.
At the last hearing the court decided to deliver a written judgment. The judgment, upholding the applicant’s claim in part, was served on the applicant on 6 May 2002.
8.  On 8 May 2002 the applicant appealed to the Celje Higher Court (Višje sodišče v Celju). A cross-appealed.
On 15 October 2003 the court rejected the applicant’s appeal and partly upheld the A’s appeal, and accordingly decreased the damages awarded.
The judgment was served on the applicant on 4 December 2003.
9.  On 9 December 2003 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
On 24 November 2005 the court upheld the applicant’s appeal in part.
The judgement was served on the applicant on 13 February 2006.