metadata

pretty_name: ATOMIC
annotations_creators:
  - crowdsourced
language_creators:
  - crowdsourced
language:
  - en
license:
  - cc-by-4.0
multilinguality:
  - monolingual
size_categories:
  - 100K<n<1M
source_datasets:
  - original
task_categories:
  - text2text-generation
task_ids: []
paperswithcode_id: atomic
tags:
  - common-sense-if-then-reasoning
dataset_info:
  features:
    - name: event
      dtype: string
    - name: oEffect
      sequence: string
    - name: oReact
      sequence: string
    - name: oWant
      sequence: string
    - name: xAttr
      sequence: string
    - name: xEffect
      sequence: string
    - name: xIntent
      sequence: string
    - name: xNeed
      sequence: string
    - name: xReact
      sequence: string
    - name: xWant
      sequence: string
    - name: prefix
      sequence: string
    - name: split
      dtype: string
  config_name: atomic
  splits:
    - name: train
      num_bytes: 32441878
      num_examples: 202271
    - name: test
      num_bytes: 3995624
      num_examples: 24856
    - name: validation
      num_bytes: 3629768
      num_examples: 22620
  download_size: 19083782
  dataset_size: 40067270

Dataset Card for An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then Reasoning - Atomic Common Sense Dataset

Dataset Description
Dataset Structure
Dataset Creation
Considerations for Using the Data
Additional Information

Dataset Description

Homepage: https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~msap/atomic/
Repository: https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~msap/atomic/
Paper: Maarten Sap, Ronan LeBras, Emily Allaway, Chandra Bhagavatula, Nicholas Lourie, Hannah Rashkin, Brendan Roof, Noah A. Smith & Yejin Choi (2019). ATOMIC: An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then Reasoning. AAAI

Dataset Summary

This dataset provides the template sentences and relationships defined in the ATOMIC common sense dataset. There are three splits - train, test, and dev.

From the authors.

Disclaimer/Content warning: the events in atomic have been automatically extracted from blogs, stories and books written at various times. The events might depict violent or problematic actions, which we left in the corpus for the sake of learning the (probably negative but still important) commonsense implications associated with the events. We removed a small set of truly out-dated events, but might have missed some so please email us (msap@cs.washington.edu) if you have any concerns.

For more information, see: https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~msap/atomic/

Supported Tasks and Leaderboards

[More Information Needed]

Languages

Dataset Structure

Data Instances

Here is one example from the atomic dataset:

{'event': "PersonX uses PersonX's ___ to obtain", 'oEffect': [], 'oReact': ['annoyed', 'angry', 'worried'], 'oWant': [], 'prefix': ['uses', 'obtain'], 'split': 'trn', 'xAttr': [], 'xEffect': [], 'xIntent': ['to have an advantage', 'to fulfill a desire', 'to get out of trouble'], 'xNeed': [], 'xReact': ['pleased', 'smug', 'excited'], 'xWant': []}

Data Fields

Notes from the authors:

event: just a string representation of the event.
oEffect,oReact,oWant,xAttr,xEffect,xIntent,xNeed,xReact,xWant: annotations for each of the dimensions, stored in a json-dumped string. Note: "none" means the worker explicitly responded with the empty response, whereas [] means the worker did not annotate this dimension.
prefix: json-dumped string that represents the prefix of content words (used to make a better trn/dev/tst split).
split: string rep of which split the event belongs to.

Data Splits

The atomic dataset has three splits: test, train and dev of the form:

Dataset Creation

Curation Rationale

This dataset was gathered and created over to assist in common sense reasoning.

Source Data

Initial Data Collection and Normalization

See the reaserch paper and website for more detail. The dataset was created by the University of Washington using crowd sourced data

Who are the source language producers?

The Atomic authors and crowd source.

Annotations

Annotation process

Human annotations directed by forms.

Who are the annotators?

Human annotations.

Personal and Sensitive Information

Unkown, but likely none.

Considerations for Using the Data

Social Impact of Dataset

The goal for the work is to help machines understand common sense.

Discussion of Biases

Since the data is human annotators, there is likely to be baised. From the authors:

Other Known Limitations

While there are many relationships, the data is quite sparse. Also, each item of the dataset could be expanded into multiple sentences along the vsrious dimensions, oEffect, oRect, etc.

For example, given event: "PersonX uses PersonX's ___ to obtain" and dimension oReact: "annoyed", this could be transformed into an entry:

"PersonX uses PersonX's ___ to obtain => PersonY is annoyed"

Additional Information

Dataset Curators

The authors of Aotmic at The University of Washington

Licensing Information

The Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Citation Information

@article{Sap2019ATOMICAA, title={ATOMIC: An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then Reasoning}, author={Maarten Sap and Ronan Le Bras and Emily Allaway and Chandra Bhagavatula and Nicholas Lourie and Hannah Rashkin and Brendan Roof and Noah A. Smith and Yejin Choi}, journal={ArXiv}, year={2019}, volume={abs/1811.00146} }

Contributions

Thanks to @ontocord for adding this dataset.

Datasets:
atomic