We repeated the plasma pressure calculation presented by Schwadron et al. (2011) and Fuselier et al. (2012) for the new ENA energy spectrum. The results for the downwind hemisphere and for the Voyager 1 region are summarized in Table 3. The measured intensity 






j


ENA




 of neutralized hydrogen at a given energy translates into a pressure of the parent ion population in the heliosheath times the integration length along the line of sight, ΔP × l, in the following way:
3




Δ
P
×
l
=



4
π


3


n


H







m


H


v





j


ENA


(
E
)


σ
(
E
)



Δ
E



c


f






4






c


f


=





(
v
+


u


R


)


2






v


4





(


v


2


+
4


u


R


2


+
2


u


R


v
)
.


In Equation (3), ΔE denotes the width of the respective energy bin; for the typical radial velocity of solar wind in the flanks and the downwind hemisphere of the inner heliosheath, we assumed uR = 140 km s−1 as measured by Voyager 2, whereas uR = 40 km s−1 for the heliosheath in the Voyager 1 direction (Schwadron et al. 2011; Gloeckler & Fisk 2015). For the density of neutral hydrogen in the inner heliosheath a constant nH = 0.1 cm−3 is assumed (Schwadron et al. 2011; Gloeckler & Fisk 2015). The charge-exchange cross section between protons and neutral hydrogen decreases from (4 to 2) × 10−15 cm−2 for 0.015 to 1.821 keV (Lindsay & Stebbings 2005). The integration length l for ENA production in the plasma is approximately the thickness of the inner heliosheath. The part of Equation (3) without the velocity factor cf can be interpreted as stationary pressure. The total pressure or dynamic pressure is the stationary pressure times this factor. Integrating over all energy bins in Table 3, we obtain the total plasma pressure times heliosheath thickness as P × l = 304 pdyn cm−2 au for the downwind hemisphere and 66 pdyn cm−2 au for the Voyager 1 region (1 pdyn cm−2 au = 0.015 N m−1). If we want to put these numbers into the context of other studies, we face two problems. First, the uncertainty of the total pressure is large given the upper limits in the two lowest energy bins. Second, heliosheath plasma more energetic than 2 keV will produce ENAs that cannot be detected with IBEX-Lo. We therefore used the observed median j = 0 cm−2 sr−1 s−1 keV−1 for heliospheric ENAs in the two lowest energy bins of IBEX-Lo and relied on the study by Livadiotis et al. (2013). They compared the expected plasma pressure from a kappa distribution of protons with the plasma pressure derived from IBEX-Hi energy spectra: the energy range between 0.03 and 2 keV, roughly corresponding to the IBEX-Lo range, covered more than half of the total plasma pressure predicted from a kappa distribution. The authors found a total plasma pressure of P = 2.1 pdyn cm−2 for all sky directions except for the ENA Ribbon. Gloeckler & Fisk (2015) presented a multi-component plasma model for the heliosheath to explain Voyager and IBEX observations. At low energies they assumed the ENA energy spectra provided by Fuselier et al. (2012). They derived a total pressure of 2.5 pdyn cm−2 in all three plasma regions in the nose of the heliotail (Gloeckler & Fisk 2015). Pressure contributions from the slowed solar wind, magnetic pressure, and the pressure exerted from pickup ions and anomalous cosmic rays all had to be taken into account to obtain this total pressure.
Citation: Schwadron et al. 2011
Citation function: Uses
Citation: Gloeckler & Fisk 2015
Citation function: Uses
Citation: Schwadron et al. 2011
Citation function: Uses
Citation: Schwadron et al. (2011)
Citation function: Uses; Uses
Citation: Gloeckler & Fisk 2015
Citation function: Compare/Contrast; Compare/Contrast
Citation: Gloeckler & Fisk 2015
Citation function: Uses
Citation: Schwadron et al. 2011
Citation function: Uses