The calculation of mass outflow rates, especially in the ionized gas phase, have often come from measurements using integrated fibre or long-slit spectra, where several assumptions are invoked in the outflow modelling. These assumptions, briefly described here, result in ‘time-averaged global mass outflow rate’ with large systematic uncertainties. First, due to the limitations of the current instruments even on large telescopes, an accurate modelling of the outflow geometry is not possible. This is especially true for high redshift galaxies (z∼2) where, with currently available adaptive optics (AO) technology, one can at best achieve a spatial resolution of ∼2 kpc where the bulk of the outflow might reside (e.g. Brusa et al. 2016; Davies et al. 2020b). Therefore, the outflow geometry is either assumed to be a uniformly filled conical, bi-conical, or spherical thin shells (e.g. Veilleux, Shopbell & Miller 2001; Fischer et al. 2013; Riffel, Storchi-Bergmann & Winge 2013; Ishibashi & Fabian 2015; Thompson et al. 2015; Bae & Woo 2016; Husemann et al. 2019; Mingozzi et al. 2019). Secondly, if the data are obtained from fibre and single-slit spectroscopy, the size of the outflow is largely unconstrained. For long-slit observations, as an example, the outflow size depends on whether the slit is oriented along the outflow direction. This can be mitigated by using integral field spectroscopy (IFS) which is being increasingly used for extragalactic studies (e.g. Liu et al. 2013; Rupke & Veilleux 2013; Harrison et al. 2014; Maiolino et al. 2017; Husemann et al. 2019; Schönell et al. 2019; Rupke, Thomas & Dopita 2021), although there could still be projection effects with the IFS data. Thirdly, accurate determination of electron density and electron temperature is required for the ionized mass outflow rate calculations. Electron density is usually derived from emission lines that arise out of two closely spaced ‘metastable’ energy levels such as [S ii]λλ6716,6731 ([S ii] doublet hereafter). Density measured from the [S ii] doublet is sensitive to values between ∼10 and 5000 cm−3, typical in the Narrow Line Region (NLR) of AGN host galaxies (e.g. Osterbrock & Ferland 2006; Perna et al. 2017; Baron & Netzer 2019; Davies et al. 2020a). The [S ii] doublet is significantly weaker than the lines used to trace ionized outflows such as the [O iii]λ5007 and H α. In high redshift galaxies, it is extremely challenging to detect these doublet lines, despite hours of observations on a single target. Therefore, nominal density values are often assumed in mass outflow rate calculations, resulting in systematic uncertainties of up to 2–3 orders of magnitude. Furthermore, the density structure within the outflowing medium is often non-uniform, when resolved in low redshift galaxies (e.g. Kakkad et al. 2018). Therefore assuming a constant density within the outflowing medium often leads to inaccurate outflow rate and kinetic energy values. Collectively, these assumptions result in a systematic uncertainty of approximately 3–4 orders of magnitude (e.g. Harrison et al. 2018). This implies that the quoted values of coupling efficiency in the literature have a wide range, with the actual efficiency still an unknown in most of the studies.
Citation: Husemann et al. 2019
Citation function: Background; Background