| === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away | |
| [04:27] <pitti> Good morning | |
| [05:59] <larsu> pitti: wow, you were up very early today. Good morning! | |
| [05:59] <pitti> hey larsu | |
| [05:59] <pitti> yeah, couldn't sleep any more :) | |
| [06:33] <jdrice> mhall119 I have an idea for a new hardware bios, not sure how or where to ask for help | |
| [07:54] <didrocks> good morning | |
| [07:55] * larsu waves to didrocks | |
| [07:55] <didrocks> happy Friday larsu! | |
| [07:55] <larsu> thanks! | |
| [08:06] <pitti> hey didrocks, bonjour -- c'est tard pour toi ! | |
| [08:08] <didrocks> pitti: oui, j'ai regardé une émission scientifique sur rosetta ce matin :) | |
| [08:08] <pitti> didrocks: héhé, comme moi hier matin :) | |
| [08:10] <seb128> good morning desktopers | |
| [08:10] <seb128> hey didrocks pitti | |
| [08:10] <pitti> bonjour seb128 ! | |
| [08:10] <seb128> wie gehts? | |
| [08:10] <seb128> happy friday! | |
| [08:11] <didrocks> salut seb128 | |
| [08:11] <didrocks> bon vendredi :) | |
| === dbarth_ is now known as dbarth | |
| [08:32] <seb128> larsu, is your gtk/o-s scrollbar the bug Laney assigned you which has a mp up for review? | |
| === dupondje_ is now known as dupondje | |
| [08:58] <larsu> seb128: hm, which one is that? | |
| [08:59] <larsu> btw, this is not merhed yet? https://code.launchpad.net/~larsu/overlay-scrollbar/only-enable-for-supported-themes/+merge/228666 | |
| [09:01] <willcooke> morning all | |
| [09:01] <seb128> larsu, bug #1386255 | |
| [09:01] <ubot5> bug 1386255 in overlay-scrollbar (Ubuntu) "devhelp and many other apps crash with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() due to overlay-scrollbars" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1386255 | |
| [09:01] <seb128> willcooke, hey | |
| [09:02] <larsu> willcooke: morning! | |
| [09:03] <Laney> hey hey hey HEY | |
| [09:03] <larsu> hi Laney | |
| [09:04] <larsu> I mean, hi hi hi HI | |
| [09:05] <Laney> what's up | |
| [09:05] <larsu> tiredness | |
| [09:05] <seb128> hey Laney, happy friday! how are you? | |
| [09:06] <Laney> pretty alright, but my emails haven't come through yet ;-) | |
| [09:07] <Laney> only 47! | |
| [09:09] <Laney> pitti: thanks for the LO retry | |
| [09:13] <larsu> seb128: nice, that's it. No need for me to file a bug then :) | |
| [09:13] <seb128> larsu, shame that you didn't notice earlier, it has been opened/assigned for some days | |
| [09:13] <seb128> but good that it's an easy fix ;-) | |
| [09:14] <seb128> larsu, the theme enabled o-s changes didn't land no, I was unsure in what orders things were supposed to land and then got busy on other things and forgot about it | |
| [09:14] <seb128> we should land those this cycle though | |
| [09:14] <larsu> right, no worries | |
| [09:14] <seb128> theme needs to go first I guess | |
| [09:14] <larsu> let's land it now, though | |
| [09:15] <larsu> seb128: yes, otherwise light-themes won't have o-s enabled until o-s gets updated | |
| [09:15] <seb128> k, makes sense | |
| [09:44] <Sweet5hark> Moin! | |
| [09:44] <Laney> [moin] | |
| [09:44] <seb128> hey Sweet5hark | |
| [09:45] * Sweet5hark wonders if we should play the IRC variant of a new hip game here. Rules go like this: send /me too or be kicked from the channel in 24 hours. | |
| [09:45] <Sweet5hark> probably not. Its not Friday yet. | |
| [09:46] * seb128 tries to figure out where Sweet5hark is living | |
| [09:46] <larsu> seb128: the past | |
| [09:46] <seb128> it's like 2 hours before California, is that middle of the pacific ocean? | |
| [09:47] <seb128> larsu, or that ;-) | |
| [09:47] <Sweet5hark> seb128: hrhr | |
| [09:47] <Sweet5hark> seb128: actually I am quite close to you and didrocks right now. Sitting in a hotel lobby in Toulouse. | |
| [09:48] <seb128> south of France? | |
| [09:48] <seb128> close from didrocks then ;-) | |
| [09:48] <seb128> you are probably closer from me when you are at home | |
| [09:48] <seb128> Sweet5hark, what are you doing in Toulouse? | |
| [09:49] <larsu> seb128: probably?! | |
| [09:50] <larsu> ah wait, you're not in France right now, are you? :P | |
| [09:50] * seb128 was waiting for this one :p | |
| [09:50] <didrocks> pffffffff | |
| [09:50] <larsu> seb128: HAHA | |
| [09:50] <larsu> seb128: still closer, you're right | |
| [09:50] <seb128> larsu, either way, doesn't make a difference | |
| [09:50] <didrocks> 5 hours by train, how that can be close? :) | |
| [09:50] <Sweet5hark> seb128: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Hackfest/Toulouse2014 | |
| [09:50] <seb128> but I don't remember where Sweet5hark lives in germany | |
| [09:50] <Laney> deepest bavaria | |
| [09:50] <larsu> seb128: in the north (Hamburg) | |
| [09:51] <Sweet5hark> Laney: NO!1!!one!!eleven | |
| [09:51] <seb128> larsu, Metz<->Berlin ~ Metz <-> Toulouse | |
| [09:51] <seb128> but Bavaria is closer | |
| [09:51] <Sweet5hark> Laney: bavaria isnt even germany | |
| [09:51] <larsu> right | |
| [09:51] <Laney> :D | |
| [09:51] <larsu> Sweet5hark: ts ts | |
| [09:51] <seb128> oh | |
| [09:51] <larsu> bavaria is as german as you can get if you listen to people not living in Germany | |
| [09:52] <seb128> google maps iteneraries include flights now! | |
| [09:52] <larsu> probably more people know about oktoberfest than the existence of Hamburg :P | |
| [09:52] <Laney> haha | |
| [09:52] <seb128> Berlin-Metz = 800km | |
| [09:52] <Laney> I think it is a valued piece of German culture for lots of Brits, indeed | |
| [09:52] <seb128> Toulouse-Metz=930km | |
| [09:52] <seb128> so yeah, Toulouse is further either way | |
| [09:53] <Sweet5hark> larsu: well, probably more people now about "Hamburger" as food. Just not the origin of that word (Fischbroetchen of german immigrants in the US) | |
| [09:53] <seb128> I've been told about some "fest of the strong beer" happening also in like february | |
| [09:53] <seb128> is that a famous one as well? | |
| [09:53] <larsu> Sweet5hark: certainly :) | |
| [09:54] <larsu> seb128: it's year round. We call it "a weekday" | |
| [09:54] <Laney> ummmmmmmm february german sprint? | |
| [09:54] <seb128> lol | |
| [09:54] <larsu> Laney: I'd prefer Berlin to Germany | |
| [09:54] <Laney> ha | |
| [09:54] <Laney> you make a similar distinction as I do with London :p | |
| [09:55] <seb128> you Berlin snob! | |
| [09:55] <Sweet5hark> seb128: thats likely carnival in the rhine/ruhr area. They dont have any other reason to have fun there, so they made up a reason to get drunk. | |
| [09:55] <larsu> Laney: but the other way around | |
| [09:55] <seb128> Sweet5hark, does that have a german name? | |
| [09:55] <larsu> Laney: you like !London, I dislike !Berlin | |
| [09:55] <Laney> I think the people /in/ London are the same | |
| [09:55] <Laney> ya | |
| [09:56] <Sweet5hark> seb128: ... which actually involves people dressing up in fancy fantasy uniforms which is a tradition that goes back to making fun of the french occupation in napoleonic times ... | |
| [09:56] <larsu> I've never heard anyone that lives in London responding to "Where do you live?" with "in England" | |
| [09:56] <larsu> so yeah... | |
| [09:56] <seb128> Sweet5hark, I guess it's Starkbierzeit | |
| [09:56] <seb128> http://www.beerfestivals.org/articles/dest/munich_strong_beer.html | |
| [09:57] <larsu> beerfestivals.org. of course that exists | |
| [09:57] <seb128> :-) | |
| [09:58] <seb128> Sweet5hark, you are probably right, that page mentions Napoleon as well | |
| [09:58] <seb128> you guys just like to hate on the french! | |
| [09:59] <seb128> ever been there? ;-) | |
| [09:59] <Sweet5hark> seb128: no hate on the french from Hamburg. Napoleon gave us one of the biggest red light and party districts of europe. Not complaining. | |
| [10:00] <seb128> hehe | |
| [10:01] <larsu> psst, I don't think they really like Napoleon anymore | |
| [10:02] <seb128> you haters! | |
| [10:02] <seb128> the poor guy tried to build Europe | |
| [10:03] <Sweet5hark> seb128: thats what Merkel does these days! | |
| [10:03] <Sweet5hark> *cough* | |
| [10:03] <seb128> :-) | |
| [10:03] <seb128> good that it's friday ;-) | |
| [10:04] <larsu> :D | |
| [10:12] * Sweet5hark is living on the edge today: Lets see if this hotelwifi kickbans me for 2 LibreOffice source uploads in a row ... | |
| [10:13] <seb128> happyaron, hey, could you review https://code.launchpad.net/~brunonova/ubuntu/trusty/ibus/lp1240198/+merge/241742 ? | |
| [10:18] <seb128> Laney, pitti, does https://code.launchpad.net/~ken-vandine/ubuntu-system-settings/rtm-lp1337200/+merge/241749 make sense to you? | |
| [10:18] <seb128> "Disconnect from upower on suspend and connect on resume" | |
| [10:18] <Laney> I commented on the other version | |
| [10:18] <seb128> that shouldn't be needed... | |
| [10:18] <seb128> hum | |
| [10:18] <seb128> I wonder why I sometime don't get those emails | |
| [10:18] <seb128> I didn't get your comment | |
| [10:19] <seb128> and I'm pretty sure I didn't delete it | |
| [10:19] <seb128> oh, found it | |
| [10:19] <seb128> Laney, thanks | |
| [10:19] <seb128> Laney, do you understand why the disconnected is needed? | |
| [10:19] <seb128> that seems like a workaround to me | |
| [10:20] <seb128> if the system is suspended the code shouldn't be running anyway? | |
| [10:20] <Laney> The application receives all of the signals when it resumes | |
| [10:21] <Laney> Although actually, I'm a bit confused | |
| [10:21] <Laney> we only subscribed to device-added and device-removed | |
| [10:21] <Laney> why are those sent so much? | |
| [10:22] <seb128> yeah, that seems like the real issue | |
| [10:22] <seb128> no such signal should happen while the device is suspended | |
| [10:22] <seb128> or in normal use | |
| [10:22] <Laney> ah | |
| [10:23] <Laney> they aren't | |
| [10:23] <Laney> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-system-settings/+bug/1337200/comments/28 | |
| [10:23] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1337200 in ubuntu-system-settings (Ubuntu) "High CPU due to excessive device changed signals from upower" [High,In progress] | |
| [10:23] <Laney> pitti suggested this in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-system-settings/+bug/1337200/comments/27 | |
| [10:26] <larsu> wow, that sounds ridiculous. Why would the kernel generate that many events? | |
| [10:27] <Laney> ya... | |
| [10:27] <seb128> right | |
| [10:28] <seb128> those changes feel like a workaround, other clients are going to have the same issue | |
| [10:28] <seb128> we need to fix the kernel or driver or whatever generate the noise | |
| [10:28] <larsu> having upower filter them will already help a lot | |
| [10:28] <larsu> but it's still unnecessary wakeups (of upower) | |
| [10:28] <larsu> every 10s... | |
| [10:30] <pitti> seb128: I saw the MP, and based on ken's theory yesterday it makes sense; however, we didn't actually confirm that one | |
| [10:30] <pitti> seb128: I sent some log requests (udevadm, upower --monitor-detail, dbus-monitor) to the bug report which would prove or disprove that theory | |
| [10:30] <seb128> pitti, does it mean we need similar workaround in every single upower consumer codebase? | |
| [10:30] <seb128> that seems crazy | |
| [10:30] <pitti> seb128: however, ken then said that system-settings doesnt' actually listen to battery change events | |
| [10:31] <pitti> so that rather tends to "disprove" | |
| [10:31] <seb128> right | |
| [10:31] <seb128> we listen to added/removed iirc | |
| [10:31] <pitti> seb128: yeah, and those just don't happen often enough to explain this | |
| [10:31] <pitti> so I think we are back to "someone pretty pleeeeease collect some logs" | |
| [10:31] <Laney> does powerd use upower? | |
| [10:31] <pitti> yes | |
| [10:31] <Laney> could be this then | |
| [10:31] <pitti> Laney: it even subscribes to change signals | |
| [10:32] <pitti> as that bit required some porting | |
| [10:32] <Laney> oh yes, this was what I noticed the other day | |
| [11:07] <larsu> seb128: are you in ayatana-scrollbar-team? I reviewed and tested the patch for bug #1386255, but can't top-approve | |
| [11:07] <ubot5> bug 1386255 in overlay-scrollbar (Ubuntu) "devhelp and many other apps crash with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() due to overlay-scrollbars" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1386255 | |
| [11:10] <happyaron> seb128: yes I can, but I'm still hesitate with that change | |
| [11:42] <willcooke> screw this - I'm putting the heating on | |
| [11:42] <LocutusOfBorg1> Hi, I see there is a patch to fix the gnome-terminal transparency issue | |
| [11:42] <LocutusOfBorg1> bug 1292282 | |
| [11:42] <ubot5> bug 1292282 in gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) "background transparency is not working on gnome terminal" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1292282 | |
| [11:42] <LocutusOfBorg1> I guess if somebody can use this one https://bug695371.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=274727 | |
| [11:44] <LocutusOfBorg1> debian/patches/0001-Restore-transparency.patch | |
| [11:45] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg1: I don't understand the problem | |
| [11:45] <Laney> can you explain it? | |
| [11:46] <LocutusOfBorg1> the 0001-Restore-transparency.patch is just a revert AFAICS | |
| [11:47] <Laney> no | |
| [11:48] <LocutusOfBorg1> so what is the difference with the patch I linked above? | |
| [11:48] <LocutusOfBorg1> following the upstream bug discussion seems the best patch https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695371 | |
| [11:48] <ubot5> Gnome bug 695371 in Profiles "Transparent option disappears in 3.7.x" [Normal,Resolved: notabug] | |
| [11:49] <LocutusOfBorg1> I'm wondering if we can replace it with a (better?) more minimal and more tested patch... | |
| [11:50] <Laney> Our patch adds proper UI back, and it's the one Fedora has. | |
| [11:50] <Laney> It's http://debarshiray.wordpress.com/2014/05/15/transparent-terminals-back-in-fedora/ | |
| [11:52] <Laney> And the LP bug talks about gnome-terminal 3.6 which still had the option upstream | |
| [11:52] <Laney> Soooo I think there's some confusion | |
| [11:52] <LocutusOfBorg1> gnome 3.6 has the option, but doesn't work | |
| [11:55] <Laney> http://people.canonical.com/~laney/weird-things/gt.png | |
| [11:58] <LocutusOfBorg1> doesn't work on gnome-shell | |
| [12:01] <Laney> let's talk in here | |
| [12:02] <Laney> I think it's best if you work with Ubuntu GNOME guys for shell specific issues | |
| [12:02] <Laney> so, LocutusOfBorg1 meet darkxst | |
| [12:02] <LocutusOfBorg1> thanks, I wasn't aware this was a gnome shell bug :/ | |
| [12:03] <Laney> no worries, it was confusing at first | |
| [12:04] <LocutusOfBorg1> moreover upstream closed it as "wontfix" | |
| [12:04] <LocutusOfBorg1> so I didn't ever try to use with unity | |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | |
| [12:59] <willcooke> Laney, can you give me some bullet points from the release planning session for the summary plenary? | |
| [12:59] <larsu> Laney: this is the source of your g-t troubles, btw: https://git.gnome.org/browse/vte/commit/?id=cb038a92719f0c84460ceed78a4197e798633a5d | |
| [13:00] <larsu> Laney: "use color from theme" means explicitly "use @theme_bg_color" | |
| [13:00] <Laney> willcooke: release schedule https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VividVervet/ReleaseSchedule | |
| [13:00] <larsu> Laney: with a higher prio than Ambiance, because it comes from the application | |
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | |
| [13:00] <willcooke> Laney, perfect. | |
| [13:01] <Laney> larsu: interesting, can we re-override it in gt? | |
| [13:01] <larsu> Laney: yes, but we might as well in g-t, no? | |
| [13:01] <Laney> ? | |
| [13:01] <larsu> what's the issue here? We want purple, not @theme_bg_color? | |
| [13:02] <larsu> but we want that purple specified by the theme? | |
| [13:02] <Laney> right | |
| [13:02] <larsu> weird | |
| [13:02] <larsu> the theme knowing about applications is wrong imo | |
| [13:03] * didrocks goes for a run before the rain | |
| [13:03] <larsu> we could either patch vte to not insert @theme_bg_color but something like @theme_terminal_bg_color | |
| [13:03] <larsu> didrocks: enjoy! | |
| [13:03] <didrocks> thanks :) | |
| [13:04] <larsu> Laney: I actually don't have another non-insane solution | |
| [13:04] <didrocks> … or not just started to rain :( | |
| [13:04] <larsu> suck it up! | |
| [13:04] <larsu> :P | |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | |
| [13:05] <didrocks> well, it's not a light rain though | |
| [13:06] <larsu> Laney: on second thought, vte putting this in there is stupid | |
| [13:46] <larsu> Laney: why do we want the color specified by the theme? Ambiance and Radiance use the same color... | |
| [13:46] <larsu> can't we just ship a default profile for gnome-terminal? | |
| [13:46] <larsu> seb128: ^^ ? | |
| [13:47] <xnox> i thought there was commented out ambieance/radiance themes for gnome-terminal which are different | |
| [13:48] <xnox> and there was a request to enable the other one. | |
| [13:48] <Laney> erm | |
| [13:48] <Laney> you want to disable the "Use colours from system theme" support, which is upstream? | |
| [13:50] <larsu> no, I want the "system theme" to not include colors specific to one application | |
| [13:50] <larsu> thinking about it, when I chose "system theme", I really want the bg color of the rest of the apps, no? | |
| [13:52] <Laney> It means that the "system theme" defines a default background colour for terminal windows | |
| [13:57] <larsu> Laney: meh. I'm just trying to avoid patching | |
| [13:57] <larsu> could ask chpe's opinion about this :D | |
| [13:57] <Laney> I think it should be valid, as it always has been up to now, for the theme to say that it wants a specific colour for terminal screens | |
| [13:58] <Laney> would it break if the vte one had a lower priority than the theme? | |
| [13:58] <larsu> no | |
| [13:58] <larsu> but would be a patch | |
| [13:58] <larsu> I guess you're right, though. This should at least be possible | |
| [13:58] <Laney> hahaha | |
| [13:59] <Laney> the Egmont (?) guy seems nice | |
| [13:59] <larsu> Egmont? | |
| [13:59] <Laney> other vte maintainer | |
| [13:59] <larsu> don't know him | |
| [13:59] <Laney> he's been commenting on some LP bugs | |
| [13:59] <larsu> do you know his nick? | |
| [14:00] <Laney> I don't | |
| [14:00] <Laney> This guy: https://launchpad.net/~egmont-gmail | |
| [14:01] * Laney tries a patched vte | |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | |
| [14:03] <larsu> Laney: install the provider with GTK_STYLE_PROVIDER_PRIORITY_FALLBACK | |
| [14:03] <Laney> exactly that | |
| [14:03] <larsu> ^5 | |
| [14:04] <Laney> indeed, that fixes it | |
| [14:05] <larsu> I hesitate to file an upstream bug, as noone ever answers those | |
| [14:07] <Laney> I don't fully understand the issue the breaking change was meant to fix | |
| [14:07] <Laney> otherwise I would do it | |
| [14:07] <Laney> Adwaita removed a terminal/vte specific rule in favour of using @theme_base_color? | |
| [14:07] <larsu> apparently | |
| [14:08] <larsu> but really, vte should set the background class to get those | |
| [14:08] <larsu> instead of having its own rule | |
| [14:09] <larsu> but I guess it does all its drawing itself, without gtkstylecontext | |
| [14:11] <larsu> Laney: ya. Want to go with the PRIORIY_FALLBACK patch for now? | |
| [14:14] <Laney> larsu: Lemme think | |
| [14:15] <Laney> It's right to use FALLBACK because you actually do want to let the theme override this, and it's going to work because Adwaita doesn't have a VteTerminal rule | |
| [14:15] <Laney> 'kay, I'll submit this after lunch | |
| [14:15] <Laney> biab | |
| [14:15] <larsu> yes | |
| [14:15] <larsu> cool | |
| [14:36] <didrocks> ok, I finally risk for a run outside, wish me luck! :) | |
| [14:37] <seb128> didrocks, oh, it made you bail out earlier? ;-) | |
| [14:37] <seb128> good luck! | |
| [14:37] <didrocks> seb128: well, it was a really heavy rain :) | |
| [14:37] <seb128> I see | |
| [14:38] <seb128> south of France is not what it used to be: | |
| [14:38] <seb128> ! | |
| [14:38] <didrocks> and even if I'm not made from sugar last time I checked, I prefer to avoid catching a cold :) | |
| [14:38] <didrocks> exactly ! | |
| [14:38] <didrocks> It's not like Toulouse :p | |
| === davidcalle_ is now known as davidcalle | |
| [14:38] <seb128> ;-) | |
| [14:48] <i-rinat> Hello, Marco, I'm here again. | |
| [14:50] <i-rinat> short introduction: I'm making freshplayerplugin, a wrapper which allow using PepperFlash from Chrome in Firefox. | |
| [14:50] <i-rinat> Recently there was a discussion on Ubuntu summit about Flash Player's EOL in 2017 and what to do with it. | |
| [14:51] <larsu> seb128: did you see my ping about the overlay-scrollbar patch earlier? | |
| [14:51] <i-rinat> So if there are questions about it, feel free to ask, I'll try to answer. | |
| [14:52] <seb128> larsu, yeah, sorry but I'm not part of that team either :/ | |
| [14:52] <larsu> ok, I'll embark on the quest to become one | |
| [14:53] <seb128> larsu, https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-scrollbar-team/+members | |
| [14:53] <larsu> because really, nobody seems to be maintaining it | |
| [14:53] <seb128> right | |
| [14:53] <seb128> you can get kenvandine or didrocks or tedg to approve it, it seems | |
| [14:53] <larsu> kenvandine: hi! Can you add me to ~ayatana-scrollbar-team s.v.p.? | |
| [14:53] <larsu> didrocks: ^^ ? | |
| [14:53] <larsu> oh, he's running | |
| [14:53] <seb128> yeah | |
| [14:54] <larsu> Cimi is also an admin *cough* | |
| [14:54] * tedg doesn't respond to French acronyms | |
| [14:54] <larsu> tedg: would've asked you, but you're not admin | |
| [14:54] <larsu> tedg: also, hi | |
| [14:54] * tedg just added larsu | |
| [14:55] <larsu> nice! tedg has superpowers | |
| [14:55] <larsu> thanks ;) | |
| [14:55] <tedg> np | |
| [14:55] <larsu> I guess that doesn't have auto merging turned on? | |
| [14:55] <seb128> that concept doesn't exist anymore | |
| [14:56] <larsu> because ci merges when tests pass? | |
| [14:56] <tedg> larsu, Sorry, I mean: pas de probléme (according to Google translate) ;-) | |
| [14:56] <seb128> tedg, how did you do that without being an admin? did you hack into kenvandine's account? ;-) | |
| [14:56] <larsu> haha :) | |
| [14:56] <larsu> omg. tedg and kenvandine are the same person! | |
| [14:56] <seb128> larsu, no, because things go through ci train when you click buttons to publish and merge | |
| [14:56] <tedg> larsu, Have you ever seen us together? | |
| [14:56] <seb128> larsu, I knew something was going on between those 2! | |
| [14:57] <tedg> seb128, I imagine I'm in a team that is admin. | |
| [14:57] <larsu> seb128: ah, but for this I need to merge manually? | |
| [14:57] <larsu> tedg: no! | |
| [14:57] <larsu> tedg: oh wait, yes I have... | |
| [14:57] <kenvandine> NO! | |
| [14:57] <seb128> lol | |
| [14:57] <larsu> :D | |
| [14:57] <kenvandine> i'm much better looking :) | |
| [14:57] <seb128> larsu, "manually"? no, somebody needs to do a train landing like for anything else | |
| [14:58] * tedg grows a beard to be as sexy as kenvandine | |
| [14:58] <seb128> I was going to say :p | |
| [14:58] <seb128> is all the beard! | |
| [14:58] <larsu> seb128: complicated. Want to do it for me? :P | |
| [14:58] <seb128> larsu, sure can, I'm going to delay a bit though | |
| [14:58] <kenvandine> it's so much more than the beard | |
| [14:58] <larsu> seb128: ya, no worries. Just making sure it's being taken care of at some point | |
| [14:58] <seb128> larsu, trying to land the theme first so we can include the key/theme support | |
| [14:58] <larsu> makes sense | |
| [14:59] <larsu> kenvandine: it's the beard. | |
| [14:59] * larsu is in the know now that he has one | |
| [14:59] * seb128 is working on that as well | |
| [14:59] <tedg> kenvandine, I'm not going to say that larsu was talking smack, but he did mention that his is bigger. | |
| [14:59] <seb128> beard ftw! | |
| [14:59] <kenvandine> haha | |
| [14:59] <Trevinho> willcooke: i-rinat is the plugin guy | |
| [15:01] <larsu> seb128: oh yeah! | |
| === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley | |
| [15:02] <willcooke> thanks Trevinho, hi i-rinat | |
| [15:02] <i-rinat> hi | |
| [15:06] <i-rinat> willcooke: Trevinho proposed to ping you for discussion. But I don't know what about particularly :) | |
| [15:06] <willcooke> :) | |
| [15:06] <willcooke> He was talking to me about your flash wrapper | |
| [15:07] <willcooke> It's in a PPA at the moment, right? | |
| [15:07] <willcooke> I'd like to have a play with it | |
| [15:07] <willcooke> also, any news on the HW accel video playback? | |
| [15:10] <i-rinat> There are couple of PPA I know about, https://launchpad.net/~andykimpe/+archive/ubuntu/freshplayerplugin-daily and https://launchpad.net/~thad-fisch/+archive/ubuntu/freshplayerplugin | |
| [15:10] <i-rinat> But I don't do any packaging myself. | |
| [15:10] <willcooke> ok, no worries | |
| [15:11] <willcooke> I'll have a play with it and see if we can work out how it should fit in with our overall flash strategy | |
| [15:12] <i-rinat> I didn't touch HW accel decoding yet. | |
| [15:12] <willcooke> ok, I was getting excited when I read about it :) | |
| [15:13] <i-rinat> There are two kinds of hardware acceleration, one is HW decode, other is HW presentation. | |
| [15:14] <i-rinat> I implemented 3d interface, which is used by PepperFlash to do scaling. But it's disabled by default — there some rendering issues for offscreen EGL pixmaps. | |
| [15:15] <i-rinat> You can enable it by adding "enable_3d = 1" line to ~/.config/freshwrapper.conf | |
| [15:16] <Trevinho> i-rinat: yes, that's a little bugged now (unless you enable EGL rendering) | |
| [15:17] <i-rinat> Trevinho: if you have Gallium based driver, adding "EGL_DRIVER=egl_dri2" to environment may help. | |
| [15:19] <i-rinat> willcooke: as far as I know, desktop version of Chrome (and Chromium) have HW decode disabled. | |
| [15:20] <willcooke> ok | |
| [16:02] <didrocks> back and avoided the rain \o/ | |
| [16:03] <Laney> dodged the drops one by one | |
| [16:03] <Laney> The One | |
| [16:04] <didrocks> tedg: « pas de problème » actually | |
| [16:05] <didrocks> tedg: but, as you are coming from Texas, I guess the accent can match people pronouncing "bléme" ;) | |
| [16:05] <tedg> Ha! GOOGLE!!!!! | |
| [16:06] <didrocks> tedg: maybe it's Texan Google messing up with you? Here it's translated to "pas de problème" :) | |
| [16:13] <tedg> Oh, I probably used the compose key incorrectly. | |
| [16:15] <didrocks> what a weird keyboard layout if you need a compose key for é or è… </trolling> ;) | |
| [16:16] <chrisccoulson> qengho, what's happening with the chrome / chromium gpu-process startup crash I mentioned before? :) | |
| [16:23] <qengho> chrisccoulson: is it the i9xx bug? | |
| [16:23] <chrisccoulson> qengho, yeah | |
| [16:27] <didrocks> chrisccoulson: hey! while you are around: is the appmenu patches for firefox an extension or just a patch? | |
| [16:27] <chrisccoulson> didrocks, it's a patch | |
| [16:27] <didrocks> chrisccoulson: context: I was thinking about integration the firefox developer edition to udtc | |
| [16:27] <didrocks> but for that, I can't really apply a patch on the fly as we dl binaries | |
| [16:27] <qengho> chrisccoulson: I thought it was better. I haven't seen it lately. I'm using a Haswell i915 right now. | |
| [16:27] <didrocks> chrisccoulson: ok, I'm sad panda then ;) | |
| [16:28] <chrisccoulson> didrocks, well, they repurposed the aurora channel as the developer edition, which is packaged here https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/firefox-aurora | |
| [16:29] <chrisccoulson> that does replace the stock firefox though | |
| [16:29] <qengho> brb, reboot | |
| [16:30] <didrocks> chrisccoulson: you do apply the patches automatically daily? | |
| [16:30] <chrisccoulson> didrocks, yeah, it's all there | |
| [16:30] <didrocks> chrisccoulson: interesting, so I should just link udtc to add that ppa and install from there I guess | |
| [16:30] <didrocks> thanks :) | |
| [16:31] <qengho> chrisccoulson: back! | |
| [16:38] <chrisccoulson> qengho, it's still broken here. If I delete my profile and restart, I see "GPU process was unable to boot: GPU access is disabled in chrome://settings" and "GpuProcessHostUIShim: The GPU process crashed!" in chrome://gpu | |
| [16:39] <chrisccoulson> "Disabled Features: all" | |
| [16:39] <chrisccoulson> I can't even use webgl, and trying to watch videos with it is painful | |
| [16:42] <mdeslaur> qengho, chrisccoulson: I hit it daily | |
| [16:46] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, it's not just every day for me - it's every time I start chrome (or chromium). it hasn't worked since I upgraded to utopic | |
| [16:46] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, qengho, interestingly, it doesn't crash if I run it with --in-process-gpu | |
| [16:47] <chrisccoulson> or --no-sandbox | |
| [16:48] <qengho> chrisccoulson, mdeslaur: That's the problem, the GPU driver tries to do more than the chrome-sandbox allows. | |
| [16:48] <seb128> chromium trigger an apport prompt every time I start it here | |
| [16:48] <seb128> not sure it's the same issue | |
| [16:48] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: I only open chromium once a day to try something out :P | |
| [16:48] <pitti> seb128: me 2 | |
| [16:49] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, qengho, I'm just going to keep opening and closing chrome until google notice it (it sends 3 crashdumps each time) :) | |
| [16:49] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: oh! you can script that :) | |
| [16:49] <chrisccoulson> yeah, I was just thinking that | |
| [16:49] <chrisccoulson> lol | |
| [16:50] <mdeslaur> brute-forcing a bugfix, nice :) | |
| [16:50] <chrisccoulson> :) | |
| [16:51] <qengho> :) They know of it. Cr team got keithp on the line. He wrote about it: http://keithp.com/blogs/chromium-dri3/ | |
| [16:52] <qengho> chrisccoulson: I'll see if there's anything I can do about it. | |
| [16:53] <chrisccoulson> qengho, ah, thanks | |
| [16:54] * didrocks waves good evening and good night | |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|errand | |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | |
| === MacSlow|errand is now known as MacSlow | |
| [19:37] <willcooke> and we outta here | |
| [19:37] <willcooke> g'night all | |
| [20:39] <darkxst> LocutusOfBorg1, terminal transparency should work fine on gnome-shell | |
| === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away | |