| [07:46] <dholbach> good morning | |
| [08:13] <dpm> morning | |
| === popey_ is now known as popey | |
| === allison_ is now known as wendar | |
| [19:25] <ajmitch> morning | |
| [20:57] <cielak> morning | |
| [20:57] <cielak> I got confused by https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppReviewBoard/Agenda | |
| [20:57] <cielak> it says the meetings take place on the last friday of every month | |
| [20:58] <cielak> and that the next one is on Friday 29th February | |
| [20:58] <cielak> but 29th February is actually Wednesday | |
| [20:58] <cielak> am I missing something? | |
| [20:59] <ajmitch> no, you're not, it was edited wrong | |
| [20:59] <cielak> okay, thanks :) | |
| [20:59] <ajmitch> I think highvoltage must have a different calendar to the rest of us :) | |
| [21:00] <cielak> ahh... silly timezones! :))) | |
| [21:03] <highvoltage> hi! | |
| [21:03] <highvoltage> oh crap | |
| [21:03] <ajmitch> highvoltage: yeah, it should be this friday | |
| [21:04] * highvoltage updates it | |
| [21:04] <ajmitch> might be worth sending out a mail to the list about it | |
| [21:04] <highvoltage> will do | |
| [21:04] <ajmitch> thanks :) | |
| [21:05] <cielak> maybe you've meant the 31st of February? that would indeed be Friday :) | |
| [21:06] <highvoltage> hah, I messed it up again (only noticed it as I sent the email) | |
| [21:06] <ajmitch> should be Octember imho | |
| [21:06] <highvoltage> (made it for 22 Feb, *this* wednesday) | |
| [21:06] <micahg> TB discussion of ARB exceptions for lenses and scopes for those interested | |
| [21:07] <micahg> #ubuntu-meeting | |
| [21:07] <stgraber> highvoltage: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=App+Review+Board+Meeting+&iso=20110127T18 says Thursday ;) | |
| [21:08] <cielak> stgraber: isn't it the previous meeting's day? | |
| [21:10] <highvoltage> stgraber: that's fixed too now :) | |
| [21:10] <stgraber> highvoltage: thanks | |
| [22:09] * ajmitch needs to work out what was actually agreed on at that TB meeting & what we need to decide this week | |
| [22:24] <mhall119> stgraber: wendar: do you want me to add this item to the ARB agenda? | |
| [22:25] <wendar> mhall119: yes, please do | |
| [22:25] <wendar> mhall119: and thanks! | |
| [23:41] <ajmitch> stgraber: one thing that jumps to mind when having everything in one source package - everytime you want to add a new lens or scope you have to rebuild the lot, and everyone has to download the rebuilt binary package | |
| [23:41] <stgraber> ajmitch: yeah, I mentioned it at the end of the mail | |
| [23:42] <ajmitch> oh you did too :) | |
| [23:42] <stgraber> ajmitch: in the case of unity stuff, we're talking 2kB python scripts mostly, so may be a bit annoying to the user but it won't kill their or our bandwidth | |
| [23:42] <stgraber> and it may been seen as a feature as they'll see the lens get updated and so will know that something new is available for it (if they actually read the changelog) | |
| [23:43] <ajmitch> right, source package per lens may not be too bad, depending on the lens & how popular it is | |