|
=== asac_ is now known as asac |
|
[14:57] <asac> fta2: libxul-embedding == 1.9 .... libxul-embedding-1.9.1 == 1.9.1 |
|
[14:57] <fta> asac, ? |
|
[14:57] <asac> thats at least my understanding for now |
|
[14:57] <asac> 00:15 < fta> how can i force an app using libxul-embedding to use xul 1.9 when I have both xul 1.9 and 1.9.1 installed ? |
|
[14:58] <fta> nope, it doesn't work |
|
[14:58] <asac> fta: what doesnt work? |
|
[14:59] <fta> i build with the 1.9 sdk, so with libxul-embedding but once installed, if i have 1.9.1, this is what is used |
|
[14:59] <fta> bug 295490 |
|
[14:59] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 295490 in liferea "Liferea doesn't start with "Aborted" error." [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/295490 |
|
[14:59] <asac> oh |
|
[14:59] <asac> fta: yeah. fix maxVersion |
|
[14:59] <fta> maxVersion in liferea ? |
|
[14:59] <asac> 1.9.* was wrong ... should have been 1.9.0.* |
|
[15:00] <asac> yeah |
|
[15:00] <asac> in the glue code |
|
[15:00] <fta> oh |
|
[15:00] <fta> cool |
|
[15:00] <asac> let me get it ;) |
|
[15:00] <asac> sigh. my network is soooooooooooo slow |
|
[15:00] <asac> 00:15 < fta> how can i force an app using libxul-embedding to use xul 1.9 when I have both xul 1.9 and 1.9.1 installed ? |
|
[15:00] <asac> oops |
|
[15:00] <asac> 1293B/s 21min21 |
|
[15:01] <asac> i think i have to reset my router |
|
[15:01] <asac> bb |
|
[15:02] <asac_> ok lets try ;) |
|
[15:03] <asac_> that worked ;) |
|
[15:03] <asac_> 2s |
|
[15:04] <asac_> fta: ./src/mozilla/mozsupport.cpp |
|
[15:04] <asac_> http://paste.ubuntu.com/72380/ |
|
[15:04] <asac_> ;) |
|
[15:04] <asac_> maybe we should detect that during built |
|
[15:06] <fta> damn, this could have saved me some hours :( |
|
[15:07] <asac_> fta: the other way would have been to make ls /etc/gre.d/ first spit out the 1.9.0 conf |
|
[15:07] <asac_> and not the 1.9.1 conf |
|
[15:07] <asac_> (which i expect is the case for you?) |
|
[15:07] <asac_> hmm |
|
[15:07] <asac_> fta: what does ls /etc/gre.d give you? |
|
[15:08] <fta> 1.9.0.4.system.conf 1.9.1b2pre.system.conf 2.0a1pre.system.conf libxul0d.conf |
|
[15:08] <fta> 1.9.1b2pre-restored.system.conf 1.9a8pre.system.conf.dpkg-bak firefox.conf |
|
[15:08] <asac_> a bit strange. xulrunner just tests file-by-file and first match is used |
|
[15:09] <asac_> so 1.9.0.4.system.conf should have been used. not sure if ls always gives the same order as 'C' dir listings |
|
[15:09] <asac_> though |
|
[15:09] <fta> i thought it preferred the newest version, which would make sense |
|
[15:10] <asac_> fta: from what i know it doesnt prefer newest |
|
[15:10] <asac_> e.g. in the past i had to make 1.9.0 configs illegal to test with 1.9.1 |
|
[15:11] <asac_> personally, I agree that newest would make more sense. we should look into fixing this |
|
[15:12] <asac_> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsGREGlue.cpp#156 |
|
=== asac_ is now known as asac |
|
[15:13] <asac> fta: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsGREGlue.cpp#527 |
|
[15:13] <asac> so its really just readdir and then match first that suites |
|
[15:14] <fta> in my case, 1.9.1 always wins |
|
[15:14] <asac> fta: please do a strace -eopen -f liferea |
|
[15:15] <asac> and check whether 1.9.0.4.conf is actually looked at |
|
[15:15] <asac> otherwise readdir doesnt return in alphabetic order, but inode or something |
|
[15:21] <asac> fta: #include <sys/types.h> |
|
[15:21] <asac> #include <dirent.h> |
|
[15:21] <asac> fta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/72386/ |
|
[15:21] <asac> ;) |
|
[15:21] <asac> fta: try that code |
|
[15:21] <asac> and see which order it gives |
|
[15:21] <asac> here it seems like its "random" ;) |
|
[15:21] <asac> most likely your 1.9.1 preceeds the 1.9.0 stuff |
|
[15:22] <asac> http://paste.ubuntu.com/72387/ |
|
[15:22] <asac> ^^ thats my garbage struck dir |
|
[16:09] <fta> i'm fighting against a scons |
|
[16:15] <armin76> asac: any idea about my bug? :( |
|
[16:23] <asac> armin76: which? |
|
[16:23] <asac> armin76: i think you never came back when i looked at a bug ;) |
|
[16:23] <asac> but now i forgot |
|
[16:24] <armin76> yeah, had to run fsck on a reiser |
|
[16:24] <armin76> gentoo bug 234110 |
|
[16:24] <ubottu> Bug 234110 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/234110 is private |
|
[16:24] <armin76> meh |
|
[16:24] <armin76> bug gentoo 234110 |
|
[16:24] <armin76> stupid bot |
|
[16:25] <armin76> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234110 |
|
[16:25] <asac> heh |
|
[16:25] <ubottu> bugs.gentoo.org bug 234110 in Applications "www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.0* USE=xulrunner - hangs on first start" [Normal,New] |
|
[16:25] <asac> armin76: i would guess that those folks have a dirty install |
|
[16:25] <armin76> why? |
|
[16:25] <asac> its one of those things that regularly pop up |
|
[16:25] <asac> e.g. nothing works -> reinstall works |
|
[16:25] <asac> -> compreg.dat in pkglibdir |
|
[16:25] <asac> or some other cruft |
|
[16:26] <armin76> saw the strace? |
|
[16:26] <asac> armin76: they should attach a strace -eopen -f |
|
[16:26] <asac> no |
|
[16:26] <asac> only see a huge list of config options ;) |
|
[16:26] <armin76> comment 19 |
|
[16:27] <asac> yeah still |
|
[16:27] <asac> its meaningless |
|
[16:27] <asac> when people strip strace they always post unimportant parts ;) |
|
[16:27] <asac> hmm |
|
[16:28] <asac> armin76: /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/components/libpipboot.so |
|
[16:28] <asac> whats taht? |
|
[16:28] <asac> debug build? |
|
[16:29] <asac> armin76: they should attach a complete strace -eopen -f firefox to the bug |
|
[16:30] <armin76> dunno, i have that file, want it? :D |
|
[16:30] <armin76> k, i'll say so, thanks |
|
[16:30] <asac> armin76: you ahve that file? |
|
[16:30] <asac> armin76: is that a debug build?` |
|
[16:30] <armin76> nop |
|
[16:30] <armin76> e |
|
[16:31] <asac> armin76: how do you install stuff? |
|
[16:31] <armin76> make install? :) |
|
[16:32] <asac> armin76: well. i wouldnt trust make install to do the right thing for mozilla ;) |
|
[16:32] <asac> armin76: that file should be wrapped into libxul.so |
|
[16:32] <asac> and not be there |
|
[16:32] <asac> dpkg -L xulrunner-1.9 | grep pip |
|
[16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/chrome/pippki.manifest |
|
[16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/chrome/pippki.jar |
|
[16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/pipnss.xpt |
|
[16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/pippki.xpt |
|
[16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/pipboot.xpt |
|
[16:32] <asac> dpkg -L xulrunner-1.9 | grep so$ |
|
[16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libpyxpcom.so |
|
[16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libjemalloc.so |
|
[16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libxpcom.so |
|
[16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libmozjs.so |
|
[16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/python/xpcom/_xpcom.so |
|
[16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/libimgicon.so |
|
[16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/libdbusservice.so |
|
[16:32] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/libpyloader.so |
|
[16:33] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libxul.so |
|
[16:33] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/plugins/libunixprintplugin.so |
|
[16:33] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/plugins/libnullplugin.so |
|
[16:33] <asac> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libnssckbi.so |
|
[16:33] <asac> sry ;) |
|
[16:33] <asac> armin76: which configure flags do you pass? |
|
[16:33] <asac> --enable-optimize |
|
[16:33] <asac> --disable-debug |
|
[16:33] <asac> is important |
|
[16:33] <armin76> sec |
|
[16:34] <asac> fta: do you have a built tree lying around for xul 1.9? |
|
[16:34] <armin76> http://rafb.net/p/5ar7KI50.html |
|
[16:35] <fta> asac, hm, not sure, i trashed a lot of my stuff to make some room for chromium |
|
[16:35] <fta> asac, why ? |
|
[16:36] <asac> fta: just wondere where libpipboot.so would be lying around in it ;) |
|
[16:36] <asac> building my own 1.9.0 stuff now |
|
[16:36] <asac> fta: e.g. gentoo ships /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/components/libpipboot.so |
|
[16:36] <asac> we dont have that |
|
[16:36] <asac> ;) |
|
[16:36] <asac> we have pipboot.xpt |
|
[16:36] <asac> which makes sense and i assume that we have it in libxul.so |
|
[16:36] <asac> armin76: do you have libxul.so at all? |
|
[16:37] <asac> armin76: urgh. you asked for a paste of the output? ... thats really really long ;) ... attaching would have been more readable i guess |
|
[16:38] <fta> asac, i ship components/libpipboot.so in sm2 and tb3, not in xul1.9*/ff3* |
|
[16:39] <fta> i see i have it in my openkomodo 5 tree too |
|
[16:39] <asac> oh |
|
[16:39] <asac> --disable-libxul |
|
[16:39] <asac> armin76: ^^ why that? |
|
[16:39] <asac> fta: yeah. i think its a libxul component |
|
[16:39] <fta> do we need that? |
|
[16:39] <asac> so those that dont use libxul, still have it |
|
[16:40] <asac> fta: no :) |
|
[16:40] <asac> fta: gentoo is doing something a bit wrong imo |
|
[16:40] <asac> --with-default-mozilla-five-home=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9 |
|
[16:40] <asac> i dont think that that is still needed either |
|
[16:40] <armin76> asac: not sure |
|
[16:41] <asac> armin76: anyway. lets wait for the strace |
|
[16:41] <armin76> asac: yup, i have it |
|
[16:42] <asac> armin76: you have libxul.so ? |
|
[16:42] <armin76> yup |
|
[16:42] <armin76> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so |
|
[16:42] <armin76> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/sdk/lib/libxul.so |
|
[16:42] <asac> armin76: and also the .so files? |
|
[16:42] <asac> e.g. libpipboot.so |
|
[16:43] <armin76> yup |
|
[16:43] <fta> booouh, that's not upstream scheme, it looks like ice* |
|
[16:43] <asac> armin76: what size does libxul.so have for you? |
|
[16:43] <asac> fta: huh? |
|
[16:44] <fta> /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/sdk/ |
|
[16:44] <asac> fta: i dont think that debian ships all components + libxul |
|
[16:44] <asac> fta: yeah ... a bunch of distros do it that way |
|
[16:44] <armin76> asac: 132k |
|
[16:45] <asac> fta: its a bit of a shame and alrewady caused discussion when people kept using -rpath |
|
[16:45] <fta> i'm facing the same problem with chromium |
|
[16:45] <asac> armin76: yeah thats tiny. a |
|
[16:45] <asac> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18201928 2008-11-12 19:49 /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libxul.so |
|
[16:45] <asac> armin76: but is in line with the --disable-libxul thing |
|
[16:46] <asac> not sure why there is libxul.so at all when you built that way |
|
[16:46] <asac> armin76: but its definitly not supported upstream |
|
[16:46] <armin76> i'm not sure where does the --disable-libxul thing comes... |
|
[16:46] <asac> fta: what do chromium folks do? |
|
[16:46] <armin76> oh, i see it |
|
[16:47] <asac> armin76: have you looked at what we pass as configure flags? |
|
[16:47] <armin76> yup, in fact i think i copied it from there :P |
|
[16:47] <fta> asac, so far, nothing. binaries are just in the objdir and all libs are static, i'm trying to change that |
|
[16:47] <asac> armin76: oh ;) |
|
[16:48] <asac> fta: does upstream want to provide ABI tracked libs? |
|
[16:48] <asac> otherwise linking them into main binary makes a bit of sense |
|
[16:48] <fta> good question |
|
[16:48] <fta> the binary is huge |
|
[16:48] <fta> > 250MB |
|
[16:48] <asac> fta: is that a problem? |
|
[16:48] <asac> (on its own ;)) |
|
[16:49] <asac> fta: i think we would like to keep v8 in a system lib |
|
[16:49] <fta> well, no, in the sense that it runs |
|
[16:50] <fta> asac, i already landed some system libs: http://codereview.chromium.org/10626 |
|
[16:50] <fta> but most create regressions |
|
[16:52] <asac> fta: why are your comments empty? |
|
[16:53] <fta> asac, because i just updated the patch |
|
[16:53] <asac> ok |
|
[16:53] <fta> i like that site, it's nice to do patch reviewing |
|
[16:54] <fta> imho, far better than bugzilla |
|
[16:54] <asac> yean |
|
[16:54] <fta> google splits bugs and patches |
|
[16:56] <fta> bugzilla should learn from this ;) |
|
[16:56] <fta> [reed], ^^ |
|
[16:56] <fta> mconnor, ^^ |
|
[16:59] <asac> armin76: what does gentoo do on unemerge? does it track files installed by make install? |
|
[17:02] <armin76> asac: it uses a sandbox system, so it keeps track of everything merged to the real system |
|
[17:03] <asac> armin76: do you ship .autoreg? |
|
[17:05] <armin76> asac: http://rafb.net/p/RMgPlv30.html |
|
[17:06] <fta> damn, patching those scons files is too much python in unknown territory. i need to step back a little bit. |
|
[17:06] <asac> /etc/gre.d/1.8.1.18.conf |
|
[17:06] <asac> ? |
|
[17:07] <armin76> hrm...sec |
|
[17:07] <asac> ok |
|
[17:07] <asac> 1.9 is further down |
|
[17:07] <asac> armin76: where is ffox 3? |
|
[17:07] <asac> (only see mozilla-firefox) |
|
[17:08] <armin76> asac: http://rafb.net/p/s48RV614.html and mozilla-firefox is ff3 |
|
[17:10] <asac> /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/.autoreg |
|
[17:10] <asac> so does that get installed by make instakk |
|
[17:10] <asac> ? |
|
[17:11] <armin76> sec |
|
[17:13] <armin76> asac: yes |
|
[17:14] <armin76> was checking if it got installed by some patch, but nope |
|
[17:15] <fta> seems impossible to build shared and static at the same time with scons :( |
|
[17:16] * asac wonders why scons is considered better than automake ;) |
|
[17:16] <fta> all in python |
|
[17:16] <fta> which is good.... if you like python |
|
[17:17] <asac> i dont see how that can qualify as better |
|
[17:17] <asac> i think they think that its better because of windows |
|
[17:17] <asac> well ... at least those that think that python build system is better ;) |
|
[17:18] <fta> scons brings in even more magic than make, debhelper and cdbs combined |
|
[17:18] <asac> i hate magic |
|
[17:18] <asac> well ... if its pure declarative its good |
|
[17:18] <asac> but thats not magic |
|
[17:19] <fta> i meant it's even more obscure |
|
[17:19] <asac> like maven for java |
|
[17:19] <asac> compared to ant |
|
[17:19] <asac> lol |
|
[17:19] <asac> http://crupp.de/?p=15 |
|
[17:19] <asac> rewad the first paragraph |
|
[17:19] <asac> the guy said he used autotools by ... |
|
[17:20] <asac> "I used hand-written makefiles...." |
|
[17:20] <asac> So I looked for alternatives, and decided to settle on SCons instead of GNU Autotools |
|
[17:20] <asac> he |
|
[17:20] <asac> "And now I decided to revert my decision. Why? Because SCons is far more complicated than it looks, while autoconf/automake is far more simple than it seems." |
|
[17:20] <asac> good guy |
|
[17:20] <fta> patching v8 build system promises to be a challenge |
|
[17:27] <asac> @time |
|
[17:27] <ubottu> Current time in Etc/UTC: November 15 2008, 17:27:00 - Next meeting: Americas Regional Board in 2 days |
|
[17:27] <asac> @time berlin |
|
[17:27] <ubottu> Current time in Europe/Berlin: November 15 2008, 18:27:03 - Next meeting: Americas Regional Board in 2 days |
|
[17:39] <armin76> asac: porting ff to arm? :D |
|
[18:04] <fta> armin76, i monitor the arm builds, so far, xul just failed: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19673125/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-armel.xulrunner-1.9_1.9.0.3%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz |
|
[18:05] <fta> -so far |
|
[18:06] <fta> i was about to say, so far, xul is waiting for gnome, but not anymore |
|
[18:07] <armin76> fta: same as hppa did.... |
|
[18:08] <armin76> failing on cookie stuff wrt warning treated as err |
|
[18:09] <fta> like for hppa, i don't have access to arm, so i don't plan to blindly try to fix it |
|
[18:11] <armin76> may want to file a bug, then :) |
|
[18:12] <armin76> fta: or filter -Werror :) |
|
[18:13] <fta> no, not the good cure |
|
[18:14] <armin76> in fact |
|
[18:14] <armin76> mozilla bug 417345 |
|
[18:14] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 417345 in XPCOM "build broken on sparc" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417345 |
|
[18:14] <armin76> ah, now that i remember |
|
[18:15] <armin76> i did a "patch" for that |
|
[18:15] <armin76> mozilla bug 436133 |
|
[18:15] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 436133 in Networking: Cookies "Cookies build failure on hppa" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436133 |
|
[18:16] <armin76> guess arm needs to be there as well :) |
|
[18:21] <armin76> asac: see the gentoo bug plz |
|
[18:22] <fta> probably but i have no idea how arm and armel differs in term of flags |
|
[18:23] * fta is going to lurk in #ubuntu-arm for a while |
|
[18:58] <jdhore1> What's going on with Firefox 3.0.4 in any version of Ubuntu (specifically Hardy)? |
|
[19:15] <armin76> omg |
|
[19:15] <armin76> asac: OMG BUMB! |
|
[20:02] <asac> jdhore1: all ready. security team missed to push it on Thu and since we dont release on Fri we have to wait till Mon |
|
[20:02] <jdhore1> ah |
|
[20:02] <asac> armin76: the strace -eopen -f would be helpful regardless of whether it works or not |
|
[20:03] <asac> armin76: you have fixes for the alignment issues? |
|
[20:03] <asac> we see them on arm now |
|
[20:03] <asac> (armel) |
|
[20:04] <armin76> asac: see mozilla bug 436133 |
|
[20:04] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 436133 in Networking: Cookies "Cookies build failure on hppa" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436133 |
|
[20:04] <armin76> asac: i punted --disable-libxul and now it works according to the guy |
|
[20:05] <asac> armin76: hmm. |
|
[20:05] <asac> armin76: still . i think he has garbage in his pkglibdir |
|
[20:06] <asac> most likely he will run into issues sooner or later again |
|
[20:15] <armin76> asac: http://rafb.net/p/PiQoTI26.html |
|
[20:15] <armin76> -r0 is with --disable-libxul, -r1 is without |
|
[20:15] <asac> yeah |
|
[20:15] <asac> armin76: http://paste.ubuntu.com/72517/ |
|
[20:16] <armin76> asac: i don't know about armel, you guys should ask if its safe to run -Wcast-align on arm or not |
|
[20:16] <armin76> s/arm/armel |
|
[20:17] <asac> armin76: who would be able to tell that thats "safe" i ngeneral? |
|
[20:17] <asac> i mean if it was safe then its a gcc bug that it warns at all ;) |
|
[20:17] <armin76> whoever maintains arm on ubuntu or debian |
|
[20:18] <asac> well. debian just did it i think |
|
[20:18] <asac> not sure if they seriously considered whether its safe or not ;) |
|
[20:18] <armin76> look the patch i did |
|
[20:19] <asac> yeah |
|
[20:19] <asac> easy enough to do |
|
[20:19] <asac> INTEL_CC? |
|
[20:20] <asac> who supports that? ;) |
|
[20:20] <armin76> hppa,ia64 and sparc give errors if stuff is unaligned |
|
[20:20] <asac> sure |
|
[20:20] <armin76> i didn't know arm did as well |
|
[20:20] <asac> armin76: armel does apparently |
|
[20:20] <asac> armin76: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19673125/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-armel.xulrunner-1.9_1.9.0.3%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz |
|
[20:20] <armin76> yup |
|
[20:20] <asac> thats where i have the paste from |
|
[20:21] <asac> wonder if the code could be fixed to properly case |
|
[20:21] <asac> cast |
|
[20:22] <armin76> you are better than me at that |
|
[20:23] <armin76> the difference between debian and ubuntu is that debian isn't using -Werror |
|
[20:23] <armin76> while ubuntu does |
|
[20:23] <asac> i remember that they had the same issues on armel when it popped up |
|
[20:23] <asac> i think they then just deliberately passed -Wno-error |
|
[20:23] <asac> not sure if its really a gcc default |
|
[20:25] <asac> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsVoidArray.h#193 |
|
[20:25] <armin76> -CXXFLAGS += $(WARNINGS_AS_ERRORS) <- thats from debian |
|
[20:25] <asac> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsVoidArray.cpp#142 |
|
[20:25] <asac> armin76: thats in xulrunner right? |
|
[20:26] <armin76> yes |
|
[20:27] <armin76> they're just doing that on xulrunner-1.9.0.3/netwerk/cookie/src/Makefile.in |
|
[20:28] <asac> char mAutoBuf[sizeof(Impl) + (kAutoBufSize - 1) * sizeof(void*)]; |
|
[20:29] <armin76> asac: and btw, sparc is still sigbusing |
|
[20:30] <asac> armin76: in cookie? |
|
[20:31] <armin76> no... |
|
[20:31] * armin76 thinks asac has really bad memory |
|
[20:31] <asac> i can confirm that ;) |
|
[20:31] <armin76> mozilla bug 448658 |
|
[20:31] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 448658 in Phishing Protection "nsUrlClassifierDBService has bad alignment, causes SIGBUS" [Critical,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448658 |
|
[20:31] <asac> now i remember ;) |
|
[20:32] <asac> armin76: but dont remember everythign. didnt we fix that? |
|
[20:32] <asac> ;) |
|
[20:33] <fta> our gcc has -Wformat -Wformat-security by default now |
|
[20:33] <fta> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CompilerFlags |
|
[20:34] <armin76> asac: not too much, you made me try with some patch that just delayed the sigbus 45 mins |
|
[20:35] <fta> on sparc ? |
|
[20:35] <armin76> yeah, see that bug |
|
[20:35] <asac> armin76: what was that patch? |
|
[20:36] <asac> did i just paste that or post it somewhere? |
|
[20:36] <armin76> one like debian's |
|
[20:36] <armin76> let me see the logs |
|
[20:42] <armin76> asac: you pasted me a patch, and then i saw the debian bug, and you told me that was the patch you pasted |
|
[20:44] <armin76> asac: then you got stuck in the canada thing, but you mainly said that with 45 mins you could live with it, i filed that bug at upstream's bugzilla and you didn't say anything after that |
|
[20:45] <asac> oh thats long time ;) |
|
[20:47] <armin76> asac: then we talked about it at the end of september, but you didn't said anything new |
|
[20:49] <armin76> i just asked you if you'd think 3.0.2 will sigbus, since it was released at that time |
|
[20:49] <armin76> and it did, so... |
|
[20:49] <armin76> asac: btw, bumb! |
|
[20:49] <armin76> why you didn't bumb 3.0.4 yet!!!! |
|
[20:50] <asac> armin76: in jaunty -> my lazyness in holiday mode |
|
[20:50] <asac> everywhere else: |
|
[20:50] <asac> 1:02 < asac> jdhore1: all ready. security team missed to push it on Thu and since we dont release on Fri we have to wait till Mon |
|
[20:50] <asac> armin76: ^^ |
|
[20:50] <asac> armin76: the lines dont match anymore :( |
|
[20:51] <armin76> heh |
|
[20:51] <armin76> go fix the sigbus on sparc :P |
|
[20:52] <asac> looking ;) |
|
[20:52] <asac> armin76: is it still the same? |
|
[20:54] <armin76> asac: considering that the file(nsurlclassifierdbservice.cpp) hasn't been changed since 25th august, i'd say yes |
|
[20:54] <armin76> well, it got changed today |
|
[20:54] <asac> armin76: the lines dont match though |
|
[20:55] <armin76> ah |
|
[20:55] <armin76> the patch fails? |
|
[20:55] <asac> no ... the lines in the backtrace dont match anything sensible in the code ;) |
|
[20:56] <asac> at lesta the nsTArray line matches ;) |
|
[20:56] <asac> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsTArray.h#590 |
|
[20:57] <armin76> okay, let me run it again |
|
[20:57] <armin76> but i saw at the logs that you told me it didn't make any sense |
|
[20:57] <asac> yeah ;) |
|
[20:57] <asac> at least i found the line where the static cast happens |
|
[20:57] <asac> (i think) |
|
[20:58] <asac> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsTArray.h#182 |
|
[20:59] <asac> hmm. so what does new Type ... do? |
|
[20:59] <asac> (e.g. wihtout ()) |
|
[21:00] <asac> new (static_cast<void *>(e)) E; |
|
[21:00] <asac> what does that do :)? |
|
[21:00] <armin76> you ask me? :P |
|
[21:00] <asac> without assigning it anywhere :/ |
|
[21:00] <asac> fta: ^^ ;) |
|
[21:01] <asac> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsTArray.h#178 |
|
[21:04] <asac> fta: any clue if the cast implicitly binds the constructed thing to "e" = |
|
[21:04] <asac> = |
|
[21:04] <asac> ? |
|
[21:05] <fta> nope, i fried my brain earlier today inside a SConstruct file |
|
[21:10] <asac> something more simple ;) .... cout ... iostream doesnt have that? |
|
[21:11] <asac> ah ... namespace ;) |
|
[21:16] * armin76 is upgrading to jaunty |
|
[21:32] <asac> armin76: dont know. if you have a up-to-date backtrace of sigbus please show |
|
[21:32] <armin76> yeah |
|
[21:32] <armin76> gdb doesn't seem to run fine on jaunty, trying intrepid now |
|
[21:50] <asac> armin76: heh. now our toolchain guy kicks me for fixing armel + xulrunner |
|
[21:51] <asac> funny thing is that our toolchain needs xulrunner to bootstrap ;) |
|
[21:51] <armin76> you fixed something? :D |
|
[21:51] <asac> armin76: no he wants me to fix that |
|
[21:51] <armin76> thats interesting |
|
[21:51] <armin76> ah |
|
[21:51] <fta> xulrunner used in the bootstrap ??? |
|
[21:51] <asac> i think they made an ugly hack and copied xulrunner binaries from debian for the bootstrapping ;) |
|
[21:51] <armin76> s/for/to |
|
[21:51] <asac> fta: yeah :) |
|
[21:51] <fta> what for? |
|
[21:52] <asac> fta: its not required to be functional, but its required to build the huge gcc package |
|
[21:52] <armin76> i can't remember how i made the backtraces... |
|
[21:52] <asac> e.g. gcj provides a plugin ;) |
|
[21:52] <fta> lol |
|
[21:52] <asac> armin76: you need dbgsym ;) |
|
[21:52] <armin76> yeah...but its not available for sparc |
|
[21:52] <asac> fta: this reminds me. we have a new approach -> we go for -dbg packages again for jaunty |
|
[21:53] <fta> asac, already done in 3.1 |
|
[21:53] <asac> fta: good |
|
[21:53] <armin76> i think i used gentoo for them...hrm... |
|
[21:53] <asac> fta: so we have xulrunner-1.9-dbg there? |
|
[21:53] <asac> err |
|
[21:53] <fta> i was sick about missing dbgsym in ppa :( |
|
[21:53] <asac> 1.9.1 |
|
[21:53] <asac> ;) |
|
[21:53] <asac> fta: i am almost dead because of that ;) |
|
[21:53] <fta> yes, xul + ff |
|
[21:54] <armin76> so it wasn't jaunty, it was ff sigbusing at the start :D |
|
[21:54] <asac> armin76: heh |
|
[21:54] <asac> armin76: somewhere else? |
|
[21:55] <asac> fta: well done |
|
[21:55] <asac> fta: are they ok? |
|
[21:55] <fta> yes |
|
[21:55] <armin76> asac: no clue, no dbg symbols |
|
[21:55] <asac> (i assume you already used them with success) |
|
[21:55] <asac> armin76: for intrepid there should be dbgsym packages |
|
[21:55] <asac> its still in the main component |
|
[21:56] <asac> err i mean in intrepid branch (not -updates/-security) |
|
[21:56] <armin76> for sparc? |
|
[21:56] <asac> yeah |
|
[21:56] <asac> unless it didnt build at all |
|
[21:57] <asac> Alpha 1 freeze ahead |
|
[21:57] <asac> ;) |
|
[21:57] <asac> funny |
|
[21:58] <asac> fta: how many uploads did you do for jaunty? |
|
[21:58] <fta> none |
|
[21:58] <asac> same same |
|
[21:58] <asac> http://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html |
|
[21:59] <asac> appears to be easy food in universe |
|
[21:59] <fta> persia wants fennec in REVU, but i need xul 1.9.1 in universe 1st |
|
[21:59] <asac> everything green |
|
[21:59] <asac> in REVU? |
|
[21:59] <fta> yep |
|
[21:59] <asac> what kind of idea is that? |
|
[22:00] <fta> no idea, it seems he wants motu to have a look 1st |
|
[22:00] <asac> create an empty ubuntu-dev branch ... request merge there for review ;) |
|
[22:00] <fta> ah? |
|
[22:00] <fta> eh? |
|
[22:00] <armin76> hardy sparc Failed to build |
|
[22:00] <armin76> fail |
|
[22:00] <asac> fta: if he wants the ability for motus to take a look and discuss the packaging, we can do that in launchpad code review |
|
[22:01] <asac> no need to use REVU for bzr packages |
|
[22:01] <fta> tell him |
|
[22:01] <asac> fta: i can do that. though i would rather not put that through motu |
|
[22:01] <asac> fta: isnt mozillateam maintainer? |
|
[22:01] <fta> it is |
|
[22:02] <asac> fta: where is the policy for NEW packages in universe? |
|
[22:02] <asac> so trolls are on wiki.ubuntu.com |
|
[22:03] <asac> all russian on start page |
|
[22:03] <asac> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ |
|
[22:04] <asac> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages#Packaging%20it%20yourself |
|
[22:04] <fta> it means "This page is created for people living in Uzbekistan." |
|
[22:04] <asac> fta: ^^ |
|
[22:04] <asac> ok sounds at least a bit honourable ;) |
|
[22:05] <armin76> asac: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/firefox-3.0 <- i don't see the dbgsym packages |
|
[22:05] <asac> fta: ok i dont like the idea to just ignore that policy (though i did in the past for sure - unknowingly) |
|
[22:05] <asac> fta: i will talk to MOTU leaders about adapting that policy to allow review of bzr branches through merges to empty branches |
|
[22:06] <asac> maybe we should test if that works |
|
[22:06] <asac> armin76: they are not there. l00ser |
|
[22:06] <armin76> die! |
|
[22:06] <asac> armin76: sec |
|
[22:06] <asac> armin76: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs#Crashes |
|
[22:07] <asac> adjust the apt lines !!!! |
|
[22:07] <asac> ;) |
|
[22:07] <asac> i guess that dbgsym archive should be added to software repositories |
|
[22:08] <asac> in update manager UI |
|
[22:08] <armin76> asac: there's no sparc binaries! |
|
[22:08] * armin76 shoots asac |
|
[22:08] <asac> hoho |
|
[22:08] <armin76> http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/universe/f/firefox-3.0/ |
|
[22:08] <asac> now i really feel ashame ;) |
|
[22:08] * asac shoots around too |
|
[22:08] <fta> i can't push it to revu if xul 1.9.1 is not in 1st |
|
[22:08] <asac> fta: heh ;) |
|
[22:08] <asac> fta: right |
|
[22:09] <fta> it's not that i don't want to, it's a dep |
|
[22:09] <asac> fta: so basically this means that xul 1.9.1 has to go through REVU too ;) |
|
[22:09] <asac> see how that makes sense |
|
[22:09] <fta> oh god |
|
[22:09] <asac> fta: will revu complain if you upload with unfullfilled debs? |
|
[22:09] <asac> deps |
|
[22:10] <asac> or will reviewers just be pissed if they cannot "test" on their own? |
|
[22:10] <fta> revu itself no, but reviewers most probably |
|
[22:10] <asac> fta: well. reviewers should review not test ;) |
|
[22:10] <asac> if they want to test they can do ppa |
|
[22:10] <fta> btw, i only used revu twice, it was an horrible experience |
|
[22:11] <asac> fta: yeah ;) |
|
[22:11] <fta> i had to beg for weeks for reviews |
|
[22:11] <asac> fta: well. fennec will be quick i am sure |
|
[22:11] <armin76> lol |
|
[22:11] <asac> but that isnt the point |
|
[22:11] <asac> those are no MOTU packages ;) |
|
[22:11] <armin76> who can it beeeeee now! |
|
[22:11] <asac> those are MT packages and its understood that there isnt much know-how in MOTU |
|
[22:14] <asac> fta: how lintian clean are our packages :) :-P |
|
[22:14] <asac> ? |
|
[22:14] <fta> i guess for xul, it's ugly.. the usr/share vs usr/lib 1st |
|
[22:14] <fta> fennec should be quite clean |
|
[22:15] <fta> let me try it |
|
[22:15] <asac> fta: but fennec ships everything in usr.lib too |
|
[22:15] <asac> fta: we should add overrides |
|
[22:15] <asac> if we go through REVU i dont want people to start complaining about this kind of stuff |
|
[22:15] <asac> that would give me too much heart-pain for sure |
|
[22:17] <fta> just 2: |
|
[22:17] <fta> W: fennec source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.7.3 (current is 3.8.0) |
|
[22:17] <fta> W: fennec: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fennec |
|
=== mib_wug8ke is now known as asac_the_bumber |
|
[22:17] <fta> i don't see the point of a man page for fennec |
|
[22:18] <asac> thats ok |
|
[22:18] <asac> those dont need to be dealt with |
|
[22:18] <asac_the_bumber> you guys packaging fennec? |
|
[22:18] <asac> its all there |
|
[22:19] <fta> for months, i packaged it in june |
|
[22:19] <asac_the_bumber> why? is it fun? :D |
|
[22:21] <fta> asac, oh, i want to close mozilla-devscripts 0.11 before i start new devs, could you push it in jaunty for me? |
|
[22:21] <asac> its fun + its a proof of concept thing for more complex xulapps |
|
[22:21] <asac> fta: what are the changes? |
|
[22:22] <fta> asac, quite a lot: http://paste.ubuntu.com/72566/ |
|
[22:22] <asac> fta: btw, i was a bit scared during this security update because i didnt keep my eyes on whether we took extra care that orig tarballs are 100% backward compatible (e.g. because of the artwork) |
|
[22:22] <asac> fta: so we should definitly take extra care, that whatever we do with the tarballs, they should be compatible ;) |
|
[22:22] <asac_the_bumber> permet à tous Bumb |
|
[22:22] <asac> so we can use the same for hardy+intrepid+jaunty |
|
[22:23] <fta> asac, i think it is |
|
[22:24] <asac> fta: i think it is too. just as a reminder that we should keep that in mind ;) |
|
[22:24] <asac_the_bumber> Fennec utilisations xul 1.9.1, n'est-ce pas? |
|
[22:24] <asac> yeah |
|
[22:24] <asac> oui |
|
[22:24] <asac> the only word i know ;) |
|
[22:24] <asac_the_bumber> yay, ASAC sait français: D |
|
[22:25] <asac> asac_the_bumber: so do you have a better backtrace? |
|
[22:25] <fta> lol, -sait+connait |
|
[22:25] <asac> dico |
|
[22:25] <fta> -sait+connait le |
|
[22:25] <asac> dicet |
|
[22:26] <asac> from me the "latin" n00b ;) |
|
[22:26] <asac_the_bumber> ASAC: il ne s'est pas écrasé encore, de manière surprenante, c'est avec 3.0.2 |
|
[22:26] <fta> is that from google translate ? |
|
[22:26] <asac> please stop non-english languages |
|
[22:26] <asac_the_bumber> lol |
|
[22:26] <asac> i have a bug open where the reporter uses google translate from russian |
|
[22:27] <asac> and insisted that its good to do that and that it would be harsh not to proceed |
|
[22:27] <asac_the_bumber> fta: this thing has a translator embedded |
|
[22:27] <asac_the_bumber> asac: i said that it didn't crash yet |
|
[22:28] <asac_the_bumber> and that i'm using 3.0.2 until the system is upgraded |
|
[22:28] <fta> asac, so, m-d, can i close it ? |
|
[22:28] * armin76 tries to build fennec |
|
[22:28] <asac> fta: you can always close ;) |
|
[22:29] <asac> i have no feature requests for now |
|
[22:29] <asac> except that i would like to move our branches to use in-package variables to define the orig behaviour |
|
[22:29] <asac> but thats most likely for 0.12 |
|
[22:29] <asac> and we stilll need to support the apps for the old branches of course |
|
[22:30] <asac> armin76: take our orig |
|
[22:31] <asac> armin76: are you using 3.0.2 without the original patch? |
|
[22:31] <asac> (i assume you have it ;)) |
|
[22:31] <armin76> what original patch? |
|
[22:31] <asac> armin76: well. the obvious one ;) |
|
[22:31] <armin76> debian's? |
|
[22:31] <asac> the one debian has ;) |
|
[22:31] <asac> right |
|
[22:32] <armin76> yeah, i think its without 3.0.2 |
|
[22:32] <armin76> err |
|
[22:32] <armin76> its without the patch |
|
[22:32] <asac> ok |
|
[22:32] <armin76> we'll see if it crashes on 45 mins |
|
[22:32] <asac> wired ;) |
|
[22:32] <fta> oh damn, hell, damnation |
|
[22:32] <asac> weird |
|
[22:32] <fta> ix:~/bzr/mozilla-devscripts$ bzr push |
|
[22:32] <fta> Using saved location: bzr+ssh://fta@bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/mozilla-devscripts/mozilla-devscripts/ |
|
[22:32] <fta> bzr: ERROR: KnitPackRepository('bzr+ssh://fta@bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Emozillateam/mozilla-devscripts/mozilla-devscripts/.bzr/repository/') |
|
[22:32] <fta> is not compatible with |
|
[22:32] <fta> KnitPackRepository('file:///src/bzr/.bzr/repository/') |
|
[22:32] <fta> different rich-root support |
|
[22:32] <asac> fta: what branch type do you use? |
|
[22:32] <asac> err repo type |
|
[22:33] <asac> did you upgrade the repo with 0.92 branches inside? |
|
[22:33] <fta> i had to upgrade my repo to import chromium from svn |
|
[22:33] <asac> thats a bad thing ;) |
|
[22:33] <armin76> 17 + 45 |
|
[22:33] <asac> fta: i made that mistake at some point |
|
[22:33] <asac> now i have ubuntu_bzr and ubuntu_bzr2 ;) |
|
[22:33] <asac> everything was trashed afterwards |
|
[22:33] <armin76> it should crash at 00:05 |
|
[22:34] <asac> i think i could recover by reinstantiating the backup .bzr of repo and branches |
|
[22:34] <armin76> 00:07, sorry *g* |
|
[22:34] <fta> how come my pushes to the fennec branch worked an hour ago ?? |
|
[22:34] <asac> armin76: why 45? |
|
[22:34] <asac> thought after the patch it took 45 min |
|
[22:34] <asac> fta: mere luck? |
|
[22:34] <armin76> asac: yeah...but now it doesn't crash and i think its without the patch :/ |
|
[22:35] <asac> fta: what is different for fennec and mozilla-devscripts (local/remote)? |
|
[22:35] <asac> KnitPackRepository doesnt sound like pack-0.92 |
|
[22:35] <asac> but i might be wrong |
|
[22:35] <asac> sounds more like the even older knit-pack format |
|
[22:36] <fta> why did i ever create a global repo |
|
[22:36] <fta> huge mistake |
|
[22:36] <asac> yeah could be |
|
[22:36] <asac> though it is supposed to boost initial checkout of related branches |
|
[22:37] <asac_the_bumber> jump in my car |
|
[22:37] <asac> fta: just push everything .... then trash everything and start over |
|
[22:37] <asac_the_bumber> i wanna take you home |
|
[22:37] <fta> I can't push |
|
[22:38] <asac> armin76: enable safe-browsing ;) |
|
[22:38] <asac_the_bumber> it is... |
|
[22:38] <asac> do you see the classifier db growing? |
|
[22:38] <asac> maybe you use an already complete profile? |
|
[22:38] <asac_the_bumber> where's that? |
|
[22:38] <asac> which doesnt import stuff |
|
[22:39] <asac_the_bumber> nope, i started over |
|
[22:39] <asac> in profile .... class.*sqli |
|
[22:39] <rzr> hi guys |
|
[22:39] <asac> hi rzr |
|
[22:40] <asac_the_bumber> its 7mb now |
|
[22:40] <asac> growing? |
|
[22:40] <asac_the_bumber> last mod 22:23 |
|
[22:40] <rzr> saw my new revision on flashblock ? |
|
[22:40] <asac> thats long ago |
|
[22:40] <asac_the_bumber> its utc, just 20 mins ago |
|
[22:41] <asac> rzr: yep |
|
[22:41] <asac> rzr: did you ask for review of the changes? |
|
[22:41] <rzr> ok great is it ok ? |
|
[22:41] <asac> not looked yet |
|
[22:41] <asac> rzr: if you have requested a merge of branches i will look now ;) |
|
[22:41] <rzr> i did |
|
[22:41] <asac> ok |
|
[22:41] * asac opens merges |
|
[22:41] <rzr> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/+merge/1683 |
|
[22:41] <fta_> <fta> ix:~/bzr/fennec.head$ bzr info |
|
[22:41] <fta_> <fta> Repository tree (format: rich-root-pack) |
|
[22:42] <fta_> <fta> ix:~/bzr/fennec.head$ bzr info bzr+ssh://fta@bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Emozillateam/fennec/fennec.head/ |
|
[22:42] <armin76> gonna try without gdb |
|
[22:42] <fta_> <fta> Repository branch (format: unnamed) |
|
[22:42] <fta_> <fta> it doesn't work either |
|
[22:42] <rzr> asac: is this the right way to request merges ? |
|
[22:42] <asac> rzr: its already merged |
|
[22:43] <asac> rzr: i think you did it the wrong way |
|
[22:43] <asac> rzr: you have to request a merge on your branch to the ubuntu-dev |
|
[22:43] <rzr> right |
|
[22:43] <asac> not the other way around (which you did from what i can tell) |
|
[22:43] <rzr> i wasnt sure |
|
[22:43] <rzr> i suspected i was wrong |
|
[22:43] <asac> rzr: well. navigate to your branch and click on propose ofr merge |
|
[22:43] <rzr> when I set my branch as target |
|
[22:44] <asac> go to your branch and use ubuntu-dev as target |
|
[22:44] <asac_the_bumber> asac: it grow from 32k at the beginning to 1.2mb atm |
|
[22:44] <rzr> ok this makes sense |
|
[22:44] <asac_the_bumber> 2.7mb |
|
[22:44] <asac> asac_the_bumber: not sure what you mean. you said 8mb? |
|
[22:45] <asac_the_bumber> yeah, i started over without gdb |
|
[22:45] <asac> asac_the_bumber: good. must be mere luck or your sparc doesnt care about alignment that much ;) |
|
[22:45] <asac> or the patch is applied |
|
[22:46] * asac feels good about using his original ffox profile again ;9 |
|
[22:46] <rzr> There is already a branch merge proposal registered for branch ~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu to land on ~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu that is still active. |
|
[22:46] <asac> rzr: where? |
|
[22:46] <rzr> i suppose this is the hardy backport |
|
[22:46] <rzr> let me cancel it |
|
[22:46] <asac> let me check |
|
[22:46] <asac_the_bumber> asac: doubt it...i think i tested 3.0.2 and it sigbused...the only thing that has changed is that i now use a kernel 2.6.26 |
|
[22:46] <asac> rzr: dont need to i think |
|
[22:47] <asac> or does it complain? |
|
[22:47] <asac_the_bumber> anyway, 3.0.4 is the one important now |
|
[22:47] <rzr> it can't : error |
|
[22:47] <asac> rzr: ok then cancel and rerequest |
|
[22:47] <asac> we have to create stable branches anyway i think |
|
[22:47] <asac> rzr: which revision was released to hardy? |
|
[22:47] <fta_> bzr: ERROR: Cannot convert to format <RepositoryFormatKnitPack1>. Does not support rich root data. |
|
[22:48] <asac> rzr: 7? |
|
[22:48] <rzr> 12 |
|
[22:48] <asac> fta_: i cannot help you ;) ... i did what i said above (backup.bzr) |
|
[22:48] <asac> rzr: to hardy? |
|
[22:49] <rzr> welll forget about this one |
|
[22:49] <rzr> https://code.launchpad.net/~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/+merge/431 |
|
[22:49] <asac> rzr: which package version is current in .hardy? |
|
[22:49] <rzr> I have to check |
|
[22:49] <asac> rzr: why do you include the backport to hardy in that branch? |
|
[22:50] <asac> that should be in a separate branch |
|
[22:50] <rzr> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/flashblock/1.3.9a-0ubuntu1 |
|
[22:50] <rzr> yes |
|
[22:50] <asac> based on the actual hardy released revision |
|
[22:50] <asac> oh |
|
[22:50] <asac> let me think for a moment |
|
[22:50] <rzr> I reverted this since I didnt pushed to a .hardy branch |
|
[22:51] <rzr> LP is confusing sometime |
|
[22:51] <asac> ok its as i said. we have to create those .hardy branches and then merge from .ubuntu for backports |
|
[22:51] <rzr> well can we put this hardy branch on hold |
|
[22:51] <rzr> and backport latest one ? |
|
[22:51] <asac> rzr: we can. but we need to remove those revisions ;) |
|
[22:52] <rzr> which one ? |
|
[22:52] <rzr> there are none |
|
[22:52] <asac> 11 and 12 |
|
[22:52] <asac> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/+merge/431 |
|
[22:52] <asac> let me check |
|
[22:52] <rzr> ok i understand |
|
[22:53] <rzr> then I must push r12 to LP right ? |
|
[22:53] <rzr> in a .hardy branch |
|
[22:53] <rzr> then we'll sync latest one ? maybe you're busy now are you ? |
|
[22:55] <asac> phone |
|
[22:57] <asac> rzr: well. i dont mind. to do it properly we should dump revision 11 and 12 |
|
[22:58] <asac> push revision 7 to .hardy .... push revision 10 to .intrepid .... then merge .intrepid to .hardy and name that hardy-backports |
|
[22:58] <asac> rzr: but i can do that infrastructure stuff for you |
|
[22:58] <asac> i have to do that anyway i think |
|
[22:59] <rzr> ok please do, but I think I can do this |
|
[22:59] <asac> rzr: well. i have to push to the ~ubuntu-dev branches first. if you could give me the revisions that match the released versions for hardy/intrepid that would be helpful |
|
[22:59] <rzr> ok |
|
=== fta_ is now known as fta |
|
[23:01] <fta> ok, everything recovered |
|
[23:01] <asac> :-P |
|
[23:02] <fta> asac, m-d closed, rev 190 |
|
[23:02] <rzr> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashblock |
|
[23:02] <rzr> hardy 7 : http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/revision/7 |
|
[23:02] <fta> now, i'm getting rid of that bzr repo |
|
[23:03] <rzr> intrepid : looking for 1.3.10a~snapshot20080611-0ubuntu2 |
|
[23:03] <asac> rzr: ok i think i have them |
|
[23:03] <rzr> I missed to merge ? |
|
[23:03] <asac> its 7 for hardy and 11 for intrepid |
|
[23:03] <asac> ok |
|
[23:03] <asac> so |
|
[23:03] <rzr> i dont see it |
|
[23:04] <asac> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.hardy-backports |
|
[23:04] <rzr> not 11 : |
|
[23:04] <rzr> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/revision/11 |
|
[23:04] <asac> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.intrepid-backports |
|
[23:04] <rzr> ok then I didnt merge this branch |
|
[23:04] <asac> rzr: not sure. i looked at the ~ubuntu-dev brtanch |
|
[23:05] <rzr> grr |
|
[23:05] <asac> rzr: so ... do the new upstream on top of current .head |
|
[23:05] <rzr> I didnt know it existed :) |
|
[23:05] <asac> rzr: well. i created them right now |
|
[23:05] <rzr> where is head ? |
|
[23:05] <asac> rzr: but the ~ubuntu-dev always must be the base for your work |
|
[23:05] <asac> rzr: head is always ~ubuntu-dev .... .ubuntu |
|
[23:05] <rzr> i then it's ok |
|
[23:06] <asac> rzr: no it cant be ok if your revision 11 is different from the ~ubuntu-dev branches ;) |
|
[23:06] <asac> rzr: 1. merge new upstream to https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu |
|
[23:06] <rzr> I shouldnt commited backport in 'my main' ~rzr/*.ubuntu branch then ? |
|
[23:06] <asac> rzr: 2. merge flashblock.ubuntu to flashblock.intrepid-backports |
|
[23:06] <asac> rzr: 3. merge flashblock.ubuntu to flashblock.hardy-backports |
|
[23:07] <asac> rzr: rzr well. the name of your branch doesnt matter |
|
[23:07] <asac> rzr: you need to create one branch for each of the 3 steps above |
|
[23:07] <asac> rzr: after they are merged you should delete them from launchpad and locally |
|
[23:07] <rzr> ok |
|
[23:07] <asac> so you start from ~ubuntu-dev next time again |
|
[23:08] <rzr> Is there a document on the workflow , I'll double check it |
|
[23:08] <asac> rzr: the workflow is like above ;) |
|
[23:08] <asac> 3 steps |
|
[23:08] <rzr> ok |
|
[23:08] <asac> plain and simple |
|
[23:08] <asac> maybe step 0. update .upstream branch |
|
[23:08] <asac> rzr: do you have a proper upstream branch? |
|
[23:08] <rzr> yes |
|
[23:08] <asac> ok |
|
[23:09] <asac> rzr: should be quite quick then i guess |
|
[23:09] <rzr> but i am on debian, now I'd like to test it to make sure |
|
[23:10] <rzr> and when you said : |
|
[23:10] <rzr> <asac> rzr: 1. merge new upstream to https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu |
|
[23:10] <rzr> I can push to ~ubuntu-dev |
|
[23:11] <asac> rzr: no merge to always means: |
|
[23:11] <asac> 1. branch the target branch |
|
[23:11] <rzr> and request merge ? |
|
[23:11] <asac> 2. merge the branch locally |
|
[23:11] <asac> 3. push to ~rzr |
|
[23:11] <asac> 4. request merge |
|
[23:11] <asac> yeah ;) |
|
[23:11] <rzr> ok |
|
[23:11] <rzr> i wasnt sure |
|
[23:11] <asac> the name of the ~rzr branch doesnt matter ... it can match the target ~ubuntu-dev ... but doesnt need to |
|
[23:11] <asac> its your choice |
|
[23:12] <rzr> ok |
|
[23:12] <rzr> let's destroy my current branches then |
|
[23:12] <asac> heh ;) |
|
[23:15] <rzr> humm upstream is active |
|
[23:15] <rzr> I checked |
|
[23:16] <asac> does that hinder you from updating the branch? |
|
[23:16] <rzr> I think I'll wait a few days , then |
|
[23:16] <fta> done, except the root cause, the chromium upstream branch :( |
|
[23:16] <rzr> well I can merge last week branch since it seems to work |
|
[23:16] <asac> rzr: not sure if we should really wait for upstream being inactive ;) |
|
[23:16] <asac> rzr: yes. thats a better idea |
|
[23:17] <asac> just merge what you know works |
|
[23:17] <asac> and then go on from there |
|
[23:17] <rzr> i havent tested deeply since I am mostly on sid |
|
[23:17] <rzr> you should hate me :) |
|
[23:17] <asac> i dont mind |
|
[23:17] <asac> extensions should be more or less distro agnostic |
|
[23:18] <rzr> if only we were on a same browser :) |
|
[23:18] <rzr> well let's finish this job ... I have some other stuff to be done soon |
|
[23:18] <asac> good |
|
[23:19] <asac> fta: how messy are nspr/nss branches? |
|
[23:20] <asac> fta: did i ever revert the soname stuff somewhere? |
|
[23:20] <fta> i updated nspr and nss 2 days ago to match 1.9.0.4 reqs, all fine for me |
|
[23:20] <fta> yes |
|
[23:20] <fta> weeks ago |
|
[23:21] <asac> fta: is that nss.dev? |
|
[23:23] <fta> no, nspr.head and nss.head |
|
[23:23] <fta> remember we cleaned that up a while ago ? |
|
[23:23] <asac> yeah |
|
[23:24] <asac> was just confused that an nspr.head overwrite removed a bunch of revisions for me |
|
[23:25] <asac> fta: why is .head still at RC ? |
|
[23:25] <asac> nss |
|
[23:25] <fta> because that's what upstream has |
|
[23:25] <asac> really? thought they were at RTM now |
|
[23:26] <asac> fta: so .dev isnt used anymore? |
|
[23:27] <fta> not by me |
|
[23:27] <fta> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/client.mk |
|
[23:27] <fta> NSPR_CO_TAG = NSPR_4_7_3_RTM |
|
[23:27] <fta> NSS_CO_TAG = NSS_3_12_2_RC1 |
|
[23:27] <asac> ok |
|
[23:28] <fta> both are in my ppa |
|
[23:29] <asac> fta: ok i am doing bzr push -r 12.1.26 lp:~mozillateam/nss/nss.intrepid now |
|
[23:31] <asac> and bzr push -r 36 lp:~mozillateam/nspr/nspr.intrepid |
|
[23:31] <fta> intrepid ? |
|
[23:32] <fta> it's meant for jaunty |
|
[23:34] <asac> fta: sure. i created the stable branch post-mortem ;) |
|
[23:34] <asac> see the revisions |
|
[23:34] <asac> will --overwrite the .dev branches for now |
|
[23:34] <fta> but i didn't close nss/nspr.head yet |
|
[23:36] <asac> fta: doesnt matter ;) |
|
[23:36] <asac> i just want to fix the .dev branches which are diverged somewhat |
|
[23:37] <asac> and we will do a release soonish |
|
[23:38] <fta> TypeError: cannot concatenate 'str' and 'instance' objects: |
|
[23:38] <fta> i hate python |
|
[23:39] <fta> this is list damit, not an instance' objects |
|
[23:39] <fta> -list+string |
|
[23:40] <asac> hehe |
|
[23:40] <asac> you have to use concat(...) |
|
[23:40] <asac> dont you? |
|
[23:40] <asac> or .str() |
|
[23:40] <asac> tostr |
|
[23:40] <asac> hmm |
|
[23:40] <asac> cant remember ;) |
|
[23:45] <rzr> dammit I forgot I cant reboot while I am rsyncing large files |
|
[23:46] <fta> hmm, it's a file instance, not a string |
|
[23:46] <rzr> let's chroot and test ... erm erm |
|
[23:47] <asac> fta: i think python is like java and has a generic string method associated with every object |
|
[23:47] <asac> you just have to invoke that explicitly |
|
[23:47] <fta> AttributeError: File instance has no attribute 'tostring': |
|
[23:48] <asac> with some luck file instance returns the proper things |
|
[23:48] <asac> fta: yes. like i said. its str() ... or even str(object) |
|
[23:48] <asac> that does that |
|
[23:48] <asac> or something like that |
|
[23:49] <asac> fta: yeah i think its str(object) |
|
[23:50] <asac> that runs the __str__: function |
|
[23:50] <asac> but i think its not the right way to get he file path reliably |
|
[23:51] <asac> fta: why are we on rc1 again ... i updated to rc2 in revision 78 |
|
[23:51] <fta> read the entire version |
|
[23:52] <asac> heh |
|
[23:52] <asac> ok |
|
[23:52] <asac> fta: hmm. so we dont have the final .1 release |
|
[23:53] <fta> we missed it |
|
[23:54] <asac> obviously ;) |
|
[23:56] <armin76> asac: it crashed |
|
[23:56] <armin76> the sqlite file is 9.8m |
|
[23:56] <armin76> i'll try tommorrow |
|
[23:56] <fta> ix:~/bzr/build-area/chromium-v8-0.4.3.1~svn20081105r696$ scons library=shared PREFIX=/usr DESTDIR=debian/tmp install |
|
[23:56] <fta> scons: Reading SConscript files ... |
|
[23:56] <fta> ['debian/tmp/usr/lib/libv8.so'] |
|
[23:56] <fta> \o/ |
|
[23:57] <asac> fta: please use -version-info in some way ;) |
|
[23:57] <fta> Rome was not built in one day! |
|
|