| === MacSlow_ is now known as MacSlow | |
| [09:49] <huats> morning everyone | |
| [12:46] <crevette> hello | |
| [12:46] <crevette> salut huats | |
| [12:46] <crevette> salut seb128 | |
| [12:47] <crevette> ca va seb128 ? pas trop submergé ? | |
| [12:47] <crevette> j'ai utilisé f-spot hier et la trad est desastreuse | |
| [12:47] <crevette> j'ai pas regardé d'ou elle venait mais je pense que ca vient de launchpad, | |
| [12:48] <crevette> j'essayerai de corriger ca ce soir parce que c'est pas top | |
| [12:49] <seb128> lut crevette | |
| [12:50] <seb128> crevette: y a pas mal de bugs mais ca va ;-) | |
| [12:50] <seb128> crevette: et tout de suite à accuser launchpad, non ca vient d'upstream, http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529673 | |
| [12:51] <crevette> pas les pb de string not traduites mais des traductions approximatives | |
| [12:51] <crevette> j'avoue que j'ai pas chercher | |
| [12:52] <seb128> crevette: https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/epiphany-browser/+pots/epiphany/fr/+translate?batch=10&show=changed_in_launchpad | |
| [12:52] <crevette> ah | |
| [12:52] <seb128> crevette: 0 strings changées sur launchpad | |
| [12:52] <crevette> on peut voir ca | |
| [12:52] <seb128> oui | |
| [12:53] <crevette> c'est epiphany :) | |
| [12:53] <crevette> apareil pour f-spot | |
| [12:54] <crevette> bon ca craint encore pire | |
| [12:54] <seb128> crevette: erreur de copié, collé ;-) | |
| [12:54] <seb128> ou de manip plutot | |
| [12:54] <crevette> desolé d'avoir accusé launchpad :) | |
| [12:54] <seb128> crevette: pourquoi ca crait plus, tu peux le corriger direct upstream non ? ;-) | |
| [12:55] <crevette> oui maintenant | |
| [12:55] <crevette> mais ca veut dire que ces trad ont sur pas mal de distro | |
| [12:55] <seb128> de toute façon vu que f-spot a une centaine de strings même pas translatable | |
| [12:58] <crevette> tu l''utilises pour gerer tes photos ? | |
| [13:00] <seb128> oui | |
| [13:03] <shan__> Could some one point me to documents on how to configure my broadcom 4306 wlan card on ubuntu 8.04? | |
| [13:05] <crevette> hello | |
| [13:06] <seb128> shan__: hi, that's not an user support chan, try #ubuntu | |
| [13:09] <shan__> ok thanks | |
| [13:12] <crevette> seb128, do you know who could I contact to have liberation fonts included in standard ubuntu ? | |
| [13:13] <Hobbsee> crevette: you can't. they're in multiverse. | |
| [13:13] <seb128> hey Hobbsee ;-) | |
| [13:13] <Hobbsee> hey seb128! | |
| [13:13] <crevette> Hobbsee, hello | |
| [13:13] <crevette> Hobbsee, licencing issue ? | |
| [13:13] * Hobbsee waves to crevette | |
| [13:13] <crevette> I thought it was solved | |
| [13:13] <Hobbsee> crevette: i presume so. i've not looked carefully | |
| [13:14] <crevette> Hobbsee, I advice you to try them | |
| [13:14] <Hobbsee> crevette: i'm using them now. | |
| [13:14] <crevette> their shape are very nice and professional | |
| [13:14] <Hobbsee> crevette: they're in multiverse for hardy release. | |
| [13:14] <crevette> Hobbsee, ah | |
| [13:14] <crevette> :à) | |
| [13:14] <crevette> Hobbsee, yeah I know | |
| [13:14] <Hobbsee> so, i presume it's not solved. | |
| [13:14] <Hobbsee> but i really don't know | |
| [13:18] <Hobbsee> crevette: i'm finally even liking the bold fonts. | |
| [13:18] <crevette> about liberation ? yeah bold is nice, not too bold | |
| [13:19] <crevette> it is the best font we had | |
| [13:19] <crevette> have | |
| [13:19] <huats> o/ crevette | |
| [13:20] <Hobbsee> hmm. now changed for irc. | |
| [13:20] <huats> hello Hobbsee too :) | |
| [13:20] <Hobbsee> huats: heya! | |
| [13:23] <crevette> Hobbsee, :) | |
| [13:23] <Hobbsee> man this looks weird. | |
| [13:23] <crevette> I use them everywhere | |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | |
| [14:09] <seb128> hey pedro_ | |
| [14:09] <pedro_> hello seb128 | |
| [14:10] <seb128> pedro_: don't freak out about the number of bug watch updates, I talked to the launchpad guys some days ago because I had the impression it was not working correctly and they fixed it now ;-) | |
| [14:10] <pedro_> thanks god | |
| [14:10] <pedro_> haha | |
| [14:10] <pedro_> thanks for let me know I was just starting to | |
| [14:10] <seb128> so that was a catchup run | |
| [14:10] <seb128> and it should be normal again | |
| [14:11] <seb128> and I spend the morning triaging those changes, so I recommend that you mark just all read or something | |
| [14:11] <pedro_> everything makes sense now | |
| [14:11] <pedro_> thanks you! | |
| [14:12] <seb128> you are welcome ;-) | |
| [15:54] <proppy> Hi, I've got some wierd theming issue (with gtk) | |
| [15:54] <proppy> I can't manage to set some GtkTreeView background | |
| [15:54] <proppy> only in Ubuntu | |
| [15:55] <proppy> http://proppy.aminche.com/rhythmbox.png | |
| [15:55] <proppy> gtkrc here | |
| [15:55] <proppy> http://pastebin.com/m6043c76c | |
| [15:55] <proppy> what it should be: http://benjamin.sipsolutions.net/tmp/rhythmbox.png | |
| [15:56] <proppy> could someone give it a try: by saving http://pastebin.com/m6043c76c to gtk-debug file and call GTK2_RC_FILES=gtk-debug /usr/X11R6/bin/rhythmbox | |
| [15:56] <proppy> ? | |
| [15:57] <proppy> It sounds like a gtk ubuntu bug, what do you think ? | |
| [15:58] <seb128> no it doesn't | |
| [15:58] <seb128> ubuntu has no rhythmbox nor gtk change that could create a such issue | |
| [15:59] <proppy> I reproduced in an hardy fresh vm btw | |
| [15:59] <proppy> +it | |
| [15:59] <seb128> seems to be an upstream bug | |
| [15:59] <proppy> rhythmbox or gtk ? | |
| [16:00] <seb128> I'm not sure that rhythmbox is using a standard GtkTreeView | |
| [16:00] <proppy> because I reproduced the same issue with evolution | |
| [16:00] <seb128> they might have a custom widget | |
| [16:00] <seb128> ok, gtk then | |
| [16:00] <proppy> http://proppy.aminche.com/evolution.png | |
| [16:00] <seb128> or a theme one | |
| [16:01] <proppy> debian unstable, as not this issue, nor gentoo | |
| [16:02] <proppy> seb128: do you have the same issue on your computer ? | |
| [16:03] <seb128> (I hate when people use $random_distro_works_differently as an argument) | |
| [16:03] <seb128> you most likely don't have the same configuration on this distros | |
| [16:03] <seb128> don't use the same gtk theme engine or something | |
| [16:04] <seb128> I don't know, I've no clue what is right or wrong | |
| [16:04] <proppy> seb128: this is not an argument, I just try to figure out where should I report the bug, and the submit a patch | |
| [16:04] <seb128> rhythmbox seems to be displayed correctly for me | |
| [16:04] <seb128> where, bugzilla.gnome.org | |
| [16:05] <proppy> I'm not implying at all that it is a distro issue, | |
| [16:05] <proppy> I'm implying that knowing it work on another distro, could help to figureout which version of the upstream is faulty | |
| [16:05] <seb128> we have gtk in almost sync on debian and no rhythmbox distro specific change which could create that | |
| [16:05] <seb128> debian unstable and hardy have the same gtk | |
| [16:05] <proppy> I uploaded the gtkrc to http://proppy.aminche.com/gtkrc-debug | |
| [16:06] <proppy> for convenience | |
| [16:06] <proppy> One could test with: wget http://proppy.aminche.com/gtkrc-debug | |
| [16:06] <proppy> and GTK2_RC_FILES=gtkrc-debug /usr/X11R6/bin/rhythmbox | |
| [16:07] <proppy> Can you confirm me that the left treeview as a blue background ? | |
| [16:08] <seb128> it hasn't | |
| [16:08] <proppy> that's the bug :) | |
| [16:08] <seb128> nothing has a blue background, only the selection and the search entry | |
| [16:08] <proppy> oh | |
| [16:09] <seb128> and it works if I switch to the clearlooks theme | |
| [16:09] <proppy> you don't have a blue background on the down treeview | |
| [16:09] <seb128> everything is blue | |
| [16:09] <seb128> left sidebar included | |
| [16:09] <proppy> http://proppy.aminche.com/rhythmbox.png | |
| [16:10] <seb128> again, what theme are you using? | |
| [16:10] <proppy> seb128: how do you switch to clearlooks theme ? | |
| [16:10] <seb128> system, preferences, appearance | |
| [16:10] <seb128> I clicked on clearlooks | |
| [16:11] <proppy> I thought that overriding GTK2_RC_FILES was a way to force the theme by application | |
| [16:12] <seb128> a theme is not only a gtkrc | |
| [16:13] <proppy> seems that the pb is with "Human" theme | |
| [16:13] <proppy> in conjonction with this gtkrc | |
| [16:13] <seb128> right | |
| [16:14] <proppy> Human theme is in gnome-themes ? | |
| [16:14] <seb128> no | |
| [16:14] <proppy> gnome-ubuntu-themes ? | |
| [16:14] <seb128> gtk2-engines-ubuntulooks | |
| [16:15] <proppy> so it might be an engine bug | |
| [16:15] <seb128> could be, but your gtkrc specify to use the pixmap engine | |
| [16:15] <proppy> yep, | |
| [16:15] <proppy> let's try without | |
| [16:16] <proppy> same issue | |
| [16:16] <seb128> it's due to the Human gtkrc | |
| [16:17] <proppy> wonder how gtkrc are prioritized when you override GTK2_RC_FILES | |
| [16:18] <proppy> seems that the theme one is applied "after" and then override the GTK2_RC_FILES one | |
| [16:19] <seb128> not sure, maybe the human gtkrc has extra nuances and your doesn't define enough things | |
| [16:19] <proppy> then it is not really a bug | |
| [16:21] <seb128> right | |
| [16:23] <seb128> you can look to the Human gtkrc | |
| [16:23] <proppy> yep looking | |
| [16:23] <seb128> it has a note about evolution and some other deprecated widgets using wrong color for listviews | |
| [16:23] <proppy> and trying to comment lines | |
| [16:23] <seb128> try to comment those | |
| [16:23] <proppy> to figure out which declaration override mine | |
| [16:24] <proppy> commenting #class "GtkWidget" style "clearlooks-default" | |
| [16:24] <proppy> made GtkTreeView blue | |
| [16:27] <proppy> it seems because of | |
| [16:27] <proppy> # GtkTreeView::odd_row_color = "#F5F2ED" | |
| [16:27] <proppy> # GtkTreeView::even_row_color = "#FAF9F7" | |
| [16:28] <seb128> it's easier a bug in gtk which doesn't use your definition over those, or your gtkrc which doesn't handle some cases where theme have extra definitions | |
| [16:28] <seb128> s/easier/either | |
| [16:29] <proppy> when I do provide these definition in my gtk-debug | |
| [16:29] <proppy> it works | |
| [16:29] <proppy> GtkTreeView ::odd_row_color = "#00ff00" | |
| [16:29] <proppy> GtkTreeView ::even_row_color = "#0000ff" | |
| [16:30] <proppy> so it's ain't a bug :) | |
| [16:30] <proppy> I just assumed wrongly that overriding bg/fg and base/text will override all theme color | |
| [16:30] <seb128> good ;-) | |
| [16:30] <proppy> seb128: thanks a lot for your help | |
| [16:31] <seb128> you are welcome | |
| [16:31] <proppy> seb128: I would not have been able to figure that out, without your guidance :) | |
| [16:44] <seb128> pedro_: why did you close bug #224198 as an user question? | |
| [16:46] <pedro_> seb128: works fine on two of my installations he's probably doing something wrong | |
| [16:47] <seb128> pedro_: works fine for me too, but we are frustrating some users with abusing this stock reply I think (I tend to do it too), we should use the one asked for exact steps, etc saying it works correctly on other installations | |
| [16:48] <pedro_> seb128: ok, will do it next time | |
| [16:48] <seb128> thanks ;-) | |
| [16:49] <proppy> back to my evolution theming bug | |
| [16:49] <pedro_> you're welcome ;-) | |
| [18:35] <proppy> see you later | |
| [18:35] <proppy> thanks seb128 | |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | |
| [20:20] <chains_> I feel obligated to mention that the new elvish sorceress 10*4 is too powerful against undead. | |
| [20:24] <chains_> wrong window of course :) | |
| [20:43] <Nafallo> quite :-) | |
| [22:17] <seb128_> re | |
| === seb128_ is now known as seb128 | |
| === ember_ is now known as ember | |