Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

Follow

Grupo de investigación en Sistemas Inteligentes de Acceso a la Información (SINAI) de la Universidad de Jaén 12

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/261

Carlos Pumares

Superman returns

muchocine

How are hoeing this man with Hat suit, shirt, tie, skyjama and layer? Maybe Superman not mea?

Superman in comics, film, young and not so much has been always present in our lives. The first actor who became famous playing the character in television was George Reeves, which is one of the Tarleton brothers who wants to dance with Scarlata O´Hara in what the wind, at the beginning of the film, in the atrium of the plantation.The actor committed suicide and the film (Christopher Reeve) you know what happened.I usually ask several things about the character in any medium in which it appears: the skyjama wearing it beneath the costume. It is a bitch. but it's worth do Y LA layer?!!!! Where does it lead it?And when flies where METE EL costume?! But there are more inconsistencies.If Krypton atomizó where does so Kryptonite??And finally, when will the water as Clark Kent how are hoeing this man with Hat suit, shirt, tie, skyjama and layer?? Maybe Superman not mea?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2138

Patri

Oceans 13

muchocine

Despite being entertaining and charismatic which are its protagonists, Ocean´s Thirteen will become part of the list of third parties that had never shoot.

This time the guys from Ocean meet to take revenge on the owner of a casino, played by Al Pacino, who has betrayed his friend Reuben. At first I was surprised that you move them revenge, although as it was advancing the film I I was understanding, although in reality in this film unimportant is the motivation that have the characters, no matter why, matter how.Ocean´s eleven was a good remake of the gang of eleven, funny, witty and entertaining, the second part was also a fun film, this third uses the same formula of the other two, same style and same characters, exploit a same formula nauseam can tire the audience, however, is you can have a fun time seeing itabove all for who has not seen the other two.The cast is very powerful, George Clooney and Brad Pitt bring elegance and charisma that characterizes them, accompanied by a group of secondary that they wanted already to many films, with the exception of Matt Damon, an actor of the batch of Orlando Bloom and expressionless others, in an unexplained way have triumphed in the film. Deserves special mention Al Pacino, "bad movie", whose character resembles at certain moments that played in agree with the Diablo.Hay two things that are missing in this film: the female presence who gave Julia Roberts and Catherine Zeta Jones and the sense of humor that has marked the second installment in other deliveriesthe comic vein of Clooney and Brad Pitt is missed and was one of the best tricks that could play Soderberg.A despite of being entertaining and charismatic which are its protagonists, Ocean´s Thirteen will become part of the list of third parties that had never shoot.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1822

Antoni Messa

Alpha Dog

muchocine

An interesting film; a different way and original of telling a story already seen several times on the big screen. A criticism of an empty youth and without aspirations; of those teenagers who have had everything from his early childhood.

Two years after the sweetened the diary of Noa, Nick Cassavetes returns to the address with a completely opposite to this, Alpha Dog title. Slightly inspired by a real case, the filmmaker - also screenwriter on this occasion - takes to devise a cruel portrait on the more posh adolescence of Palm Spring focusing also on the influence parents (directly or indirectly) on their children. And all this makes rhythm of thriller; a thriller that never hides influences from films such as two days in the Valley and, above all, of the magnificent The Chumbscrubber, a product that was not released in Spain and which, fortunately, ended up being released on DVD.Youth gangs, drug war between bands, sex, violence, an atypical abduction and a deadly misunderstanding, are the main thematic ingredients that supports Alpha Dog. As was the case in the Brick failed, those who manage the roost are almost immature young, but in contrast to this, not intended to any forced homage to film noir, because the interest of Cassavetes lies in mostar, clearly, that the threads that move the actions of its teenage protagonists are managed by their own parents. This has (almost anecdotal) presence of a splendid Bruce Willis, Sonny Truelove in the film, a dealer of marijuana that hiding their craft using his son Johnny (a surprising Emile Hirsch) as main camel; a young man totally independent, with a large group of boys acting as hired assassins at your service and ready to mount any chicken to the minimum of change. A new Tony Montana has just been born.Raised as a false story, Cassavetes is interspersed with small fragments of television interviews conducted to the protagonists of the film. This makes it in a moderate way, not abused at all and with the intention of putting the Viewer on the track of what you will discover during the following minutes of projection. Step by step, step to step, filmmaker is shaping a tragedy Sung some time before. You don't want to catch anyone by surprise. And when that time comes, it does somewhat surreal, as if it were a children's story. Breaks the naturalness and realism that sketched the film for, at that moment, give it an extremely dreams to the situation: one night bluish and crashed, a Rocky Mountain and three characters face to face. Consciously, the night is one chroma cantankerous and the mountain a simple decor of papier-mache. Somewhat curious soften a brutal act.An interesting film; a different way and original of telling a story already seen several times on the big screen. A criticism of an empty youth and without aspirations; of those teenagers who have had everything from his early childhood, and to those who are not interested in anything else other than their own well-being; "well-being" in quotes, the only have known since childhood and thanks to his "great" (also quoted) parents. Drugs, alcohol, ultra-modern mansions and luxury cars: the comfort of the villains. Not only the purria know make a fist with a weapon. And this proves perfectly Nick Cassavetes in Alpha Dog. pity that mazacote make-up and false Gill who, towards the end of the tape, you encasquetan an aged Sharon Stone. Pity, I repeat, because all the rest (and despite its simplicity) works and fits perfectly.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/469

Juan David

Grizzly man

muchocine

Although is a dramatic history and terrible in its outcome, is a testament to the dignity that there is something extremely worthy to die doing what you love.

The recent death of the "crocodile hunter" Steve Irwin is a good context to speak of this documentary film directed by Werner Herzog, director known for films like Fitzcarraldo and Aguirre, the wrath of God and that recounts the life, work and death of activist Timothy Treadwell.Treadwell was a guy obsessed with the protection of bears grizzly in Alaska and every yearfor thirteen years, he traveled to Alaska to spend the spring and summer only in the middle of the bears, not just looking for studying them but to live with them and in a sense be one bear; Treadwell recorded in video and audio all his travels and in his spare time traveling free schools and television programmes teaching about these animals and the need to protect them.However the risks that ran Treadwell passed him the account and in October 2003, almost at the end of one of his trips, the and his girlfriend Anne Huguenard were killed and devoured by one of the bears who swore to protect. The documentary, narrated by the own Herzog, both grouped Treadwell filming as interviews with friends, relatives and detractors, as well as the forensic study of the remains of Treadwell and his girlfriend; in this sense the documentary does not seek to glorify the Treadwell figure it is clear by their way of thinking that the type was not entirely in their comprehensive.Maybe the more salvageable of the documentary is that at the end we can understand that they meant these animals for Treadwell and while it is a dramatic history and terrible in its outcome, is a testament to the dignity that there is something extremely worthy to die doing what you love. This is an unmissable film, five stars and this DVD in zone 1.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2133

Patri

Desmontando a Harry

muchocine

The episode portrayed by Tobey Mcguire, with death knocking on their door, in a scene typically alleniana is quite fun.

Harry Block is a writer who uses their sentimental and family experiences to write his works. As a result, their families and their ex-mujeres hate you. Its ancient University will honor and he is not with whom go, so he kidnaps her son and hires a prostitute to go with them.Woody Allen plays her character, a neurotic depressive and hipocondríaco and it makes us laugh, as always, but fails to be as good as might have been that the film has quite a few ups and downs, there are very good moments and other extremely boring.The reality is mixed with the fictional stories of the novels of the protagonist, and these stories are the best of the film.Deconstructing Harry has some small actors in Hollywood, such as Demi Moore, Robin Williams, Billy Crystal and Tobey Mcguire, all of them make small roles in small episodes of the novels of the protagonist.The episode portrayed by Tobey Mcguire, with death knocking on their door, in a scene typically alleniana is quite fun and is also of Robin Williams, an actor who is out of focus, reflecting the State of mind of the writer.Another great moment: the descent into hell of Woody Allen, that lift and the conversation with the devil, Billy Crystal.Cuando the film returns to reality, the history lapses slightly, partly because it is not easy to imagine Woody Allen as a conqueror.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4088

Rafa Ferrer

Constantine

muchocine

While the film is brilliant and this solidly shot and well built the end is a tad Cansino... I expected more of the tape and I left a tad disappointed... is that my tastes are changing to another type of cinema?

We already have other hero carried the film, this time by newcomer Francis Lawrence, although it differs somewhat from the character of the comic, while constantine in the comics by DC Comics ("Superman" "Batman" "Wonderwoman") is rubio and London, in the film is moreno and American, in the end, it will be for the American public fit with the wanderings of this eccentric game IMPS. Addition to Revees refused to dye blond (so I can't imagine, sic).The film begins quite well, and although I have not read even a single comic "Hellblazer" environment that Devils and Angels through the streets of L.A. make the tape a film quite promising, but. It always has to be a but?As if! The ending is a bit "Insulso" those who have seen the movie know that I mean, you want to cover much in a very short time and cover all aspects of the life of "Constantine" at a single stroke (by certain Keanu to make other types of films, because at the beginning as soon as I saw him appear came me to mind Neo Matrix)(, come that this most typecast that Michael Landon in "Highway to heaven") is the best tape perhaps 420 levels made by computer, is that these demons as well-made and ends so well you. XD XDEn end, in short, which is gerund, while the film is brilliant and this solidly shot and well built the end is a tad Cansino. I expected more of the tape and I left a tad disappointed. Could it be that my tastes are changing to another type of cinema?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3637

Andrés Pons

Combat Shock

muchocine

The enormous brutality with which treats the situations the characters linked to the extreme violence of the final part with one of the most sad and macabre and moments viewing offers a product distributed by troma well above expectations.

BUDDY GIOVINAZZO premiered at the cinema with is exploitation that has many points in common with the RAMBO saga. Actors do not professionals that most did not act perform meritorious performances in their roles of losers.A tiny budget which sings in the aspects of photography, music or makeup is not obstacle for what seemed a priori a typical exploitation of action of the era is over giving a true criticism the poor veterans left to their fate.The enormous brutality with which treats the situations the characters linked to the extreme violence of the final part with one of the most sad and macabre and moments viewing offers a product distributed by troma well above expectations. The director reappeared in the 1990s with the recommended without turning back.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4111

Emilio Calvo de Mora

This is England

muchocine

Raw, honest, organic, emotional: This is London is an uncomfortable film, which do not forget...

Despite what the advertising, poorly reported, counts, This is England is not about the origin of the skinhead in England movement. Even he recreates in excess illuminate our ignorance with cityscapes burned by unemployment, racism, drugs and the tedium of endless not never know what to do. Also informs about the way in which youth lost innocence and hocica your discomfort in permeable, warm and fraternal membership of a group. What makes This is England is to offer a rough and sincere, emotional and realistic portrait of affection or love or friendship. And it does so with the reliable packaging of the skinhead and their heads to zero, his boots and his ignorant, learned nationalism at foot of birra, proceedings of Foundation without bureaucratic committees that estabulen. Little emotional interweaving people, but who share strong codes based on a slight incline to the violence, street hedonism and similar patterns of image.Tony Richardson, Ken Loach and Mike Leigh, Michael Winterbottom Danny Boyle already before prefijaron an English tone of proletarian class and handled stories of simple people, asphyxiated by unemployment or mental anorexia of a gray, prudish, society doomed to fail in the management of their own happiness and devoid of horizons outside the neighborhood, of the industry on the outskirts, bar with generous pints and folk on the radio, but Shane Meadows makes a more modest exercise initiation, has a voice of their own, shedding proudly all influence of classic British realism (those illustrious names in greater or lesser extent) and offering a more modern style model, giving psychological keys (the father died on the front of the Malvinas or Falklands) or even historical (the skins of racism)(, but is the extreme right which manipulates and became what we know today). And in addition Meadows paints a few skins wanting to fun, colleagues of his colleagues, little interested in afear life more than it is. In fact, the gang splits in two: those who seek good vibes and beers Saturday night under the vacilón pace of Jamaican ska and those seeking to assemble camorra, stone pakis and paint rhetoric that do not understand in the underpasses of the grey city in which they live. Both factions live, however, in the orphan, deprived of family ties strong and thrown to a hotbed of violence where fanaticism burrow into mediocrity to remove fear.The oppressed working class (the working class heroes of Lennon) lacks glamour, they drink in the third bottle and they walk dresses with style (believed to be) while the city collapses and crushes them. Their children are confessed losers: Meadows attaches to these anti-heroes humanity others denied, it gives them humility, a heart almost. Gun salute, cheers and cannons to the interpretation: characters that give life actors in State of grace, acting almost effortlessly, impregnating of faith life routine, grey and toxic of these losers of quarter.Thomas Turgoose, the kid of twelve years which opens and closes the function, leave the noqueado Viewer. If they can see the film in English, subtitled. Hence wins more integers even. The score of the film is prodigious (Ludovico Einaudi) and its soundtrack is a generous compilation of ska, soul, funk and folk rock (Toots and The Maytals, scraps of Soft Cell, Dexys Midnight Runners.) The eighties were screwed, were ain't they?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/503

JohnTrent

La máquina de bailar

muchocine

It is not, at all, a good movie and I do not think that it intends. Do that, is certainly atypical comedy within the so-called? patriotic humor?, and that is welcome.

You have never gone through some recreational and you have seen a handful of people watching (some laughing, others flipping, others without knowing very well what happens) to poor characters dancing in a machine and putting face to something as well as a dance contest winners? Well, this here is thing, as I have already said, a few guys, but back in the country of the rising sun appears to be a real phenomenon which has up among their ranks experts and competitions. "Dancing machine" it comes to tell all this.It is curious as Spanish cinema has evolved in recent years. The almost unanimous trend from the pathetic Academy has been put less than green film is done in United States and prevail above that the quality of the Spanish without giving reason to believe them. As well, seeing the latest proposals of the Spanish film, even to speak about things very patriotic "Alatriste" or "Salvador", you notice a tangible approach towards, precisely, the American film to box office.We will, that criticize much to not get anything clear and at the end, try to imitate the criticized enemy. But ojo! view "Alatriste" has almost nothing to do with movies such as "Gladiator", "Kingdom of heaven" or "Trojan", but it is a kind of "The dog in the Manger" with two or three pseudo battles that stays halfway all kinds of claims, both artistic and show (and the three films that I have appointed is not that they are peliculones precisely)(, but are even superior to the film directed by Diaz Yanes) and the most controversial of all, do so if they get both with American cinema, hire to interpreters Americans to star in his films with eagerness to make box office?. "Because, in reality, they are the same that they or at least they try and want that their cinema also reaches the masses.""Dancing machine" is another case of these comment, although I doubt that its director be has sworn to American cinema, moreover, he is a declared fan of teenage comedies made in that country. Therefore, it is not uncommon to see many of the clichés of this type of film, and even more, a lot of cinematic cinéfagas references to mythical classics from the seventies and eighties that much like in this blog as "Rocky", "Karate Kid", "Battle Royale" or other more dubious as "Flashdance" in this film. All seasoned with a style close to the of the Farrelly brothers, with its eternal losers who are not so, these "pringá you" that end up doing great things (Santiago Segura is a clear example of this, a character very close to which be construed Whoddy Harrelson "Go couple of idiots").But, beware, "Dancing machine" is not the typical Spanish comedy type "Torrente" many just wait to see to safe between its protagonists. Nothing of the sort. In reality, are facing a rather bittersweet film, which alternates the madder surrealism (this giant snake which ends by exploiting, "flash back" which recalls the accident of the Segura dance partner when he was young) with degrading and sad moments (the successive times in which the villain role, played by Corbacho, strip full of shit W.C the ring so look it safe or lonely coexistence of this last)(, with dolls released by way of family).It is not a film of laughter, but smiles. It is not a humor crazy, but something strange. Probably for these reasons, the film won't work too well at the box office (although even this to be seen), by far, without being much, than rather than nonsense as the third installment of "Torrent" or other comedietas starring Santiago Segura lately as "The amazing world of Borja Mari and Pocholo" or "Isi Disi". It is possible that the proposal is risky in terms of expectations can arouse in some sector of the audience, but it is a risk that seems assumed by those responsible and by the same safe, away from his typical roles.After this Oscar Aibar cameras, a few years ago directed the interesting "flying saucers", also starring Jordi Vilches (that, no mistake, he is the protagonist of film over Segura, and this may be another factor in that the public did not react as expected) and a film that I pass quite unnoticed entitled "Quagmire", who paints really surrealWhat seems to be a constant in his career.The most notable of this proposal lies in the magnificent picture of Mario Montero, that has nothing to envy to greater invoice films, giving the impression that the results at the technical level in the Spanish film do not have to see many times with the spent budget or available media, but with an average budget can do things that are similar to the"return, American cinema.""Dancing machine" is not for nothing, a good movie. Nor do I believe that he intends. We are, that if, before a certainly atypical comedy within the so-called "patriotic humor", and that is to be welcomed. A film which speaks of pathos from an optimistic and even heroic side that many of these "geeks" arcades or those who put the ears of Captain Spock in each new release in the series "Star Campiña" will show reflected, although it is not very well defined if it is to make fun of them or to give them a tribute.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/761

Daniel Galindo

Gal

muchocine

Too based on real facts and get us it all done. Even they repeat a couple of times if we have not heard. And that the Viewer is not stupid, bored him.

The exaggerated histrionics stain this thriller which, however, can function in the same way that the Wolf, although only if one forgets to historical accuracy.After that story about the infiltrator Mikel Lejarza, had another episode related to the terrorist group ETA which should deal with their corresponding frames. An approximation in GAL that does not meet expectations.The case of the known anti-terrorism liberation groups arrives sifted by the look of Miguel Courtois who works the world of evidence. Possible realities assumed as certainties and corrupted by the torn apart at the same time commitment staff of Melchor Miralles, head of world fiction and one of the architects of the journalistic investigation of 12 years that brought to the fore the GAL case. Too often, a good writer (Antonio Onetti) does miracles.Watching the film one has the feeling that it is not fair, but at this point we know that there is no objectivity and less on film, a field open to all sorts of subjectivities to abide by the principle of creativity. Without entering the substantial historical matter? you will see as cuesta-, GAL delves into the journalistic profession: which is independent, the are trying to manipulate, which has interests. No one is free from sin.Plot starring gunmen, hardened reporters, confidants and victims are also executioners comes to rhythm of video clip as a sequence that squeaking above the others to be treated in parallel murders and luxuries funded card coup. We leave behind the characters stereotyped to the maximum. At this point we are not fulfilling promised and fall into the similarities with the story: an example, always convincing Jordi Mollá who here gives life to a being that Jose Amedo, recalls the Superintendent with the effrontery to torrent and José María Aznar.Es stop the most caricatured a hilarious cast: Abel Folk gets into the body of Pedro j. Ramírez; José Ángel Egido works a character half way between the former Ministers of Interior Corcuera and Barrionuevo; the? man of the tonic? do gives life to the parody of Felipe González - that accent, please - and relates the? wrong abduction? of second Marey. Most achieved are secondary to those who give life Ana Álvarez, Mercé Llorens, and Mar Regueras. But the couple protagonist weakens: not you think manual released claims the character of Verbeke and ridiculous are the winks of the enamoradizo played by García. anyone miss that behind this film is much of the people who rode the world of the 21st century but are so clear the references not being left via free the imagination and much less interpretation. It is too based on real facts and get us it all done. Even they repeat a couple of times if we have not heard. And that the Viewer is not stupid, bored him.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4284

Christian Sandoval

Someone Is Watching Me!

muchocine

A Carpenter tribute to the work of Hitchcock, which sets out how dangerous that can be the loss of privacy.

"Someone is watching me!" (1978), is a film directed and written by John Carpenter. It is one of their least appointed films, not because of its quality, but because it was a production made for television, so it wasn't so mass consumption. It is perhaps the only film of the director that falls into the genre of suspense as such, noting a clear inspiration in some works of Alfred Hitchcock.En Los Angeles a woman named Leigh (Lauren Hutton) purchased an apartment on a high floor, which has a beautiful view. After getting a job as Director of television, he receives a strange call from a stranger. These calls will continue to receive them in his Department, which joined a few strange gifts that begin to leave in your door, end up worrying about her.Her friend Sophie (Adrienne Barbeau) advises him to go to the police, but as the harasser has not threatened they can do nothing. What Leigh does not know yet, is that his bully the notes what she does through a telescope from the front building.There are many similarities of this film with some of the work of Hitchcock, starting with the theme of voyeurism, which immediately reminds us to the film "Rear window" (1954), especially in the scene where Leigh is in the Department of his bully and begins to see what what happens in her apartment with her friend. A very similar sequence will be repeated later in the film, Brian De Palma "Body double" (1984). In addition to this, we can also see certain similarities in the style of the opening credits and the soundtrack composed by Harry Sukman, at times sounding similar to the compound by Bernard Herrmann.A despite the above, we are not dealing with a copy outright by Carpenter, who is responsible for printing their own label to the film. The director here deals than the headdresses by Hitchcock in his film. The theme of this production Fund, is how easy that can be invaded the privacy of someone by using existing technology, that the instruments used were quite obviously in that time precarious compared the existing instruments of the day today. These were limited to a tape recorder, a small microphone, a telescope and the phone which is the object with which the harasser is responsible for tormenting Leigh. Of course, now with the Internet and the existing technology is much easier to access the privacy of individuals.Another feature of the film is that the bully is not shown until the end of the film. He is dedicated to psychologically torment Leigh, especially through constant telephone calls to her apartment. Here is where the sentence uttered by Sophie in the film takes on a special meaning: "Rape is when a man consciously frightens a woman". Leigh during the film is gaining a growing phobia to the phone. Everytime this sounds, she is shudders completely submerging it in a State of despair and helplessness.However, is portrayed as Leigh as a triumphant, independent woman in a race led by men, a symbol of the reigning women's Liberation at the time in the United States, in a determined moment, she decides to confront the person who insists in harassing her, by what he tried by all means find out the identity of his bully.Carpenter does a great job after cameras, making the viewer becomes one "stalker" more, following each of the movements made by Leigh. On other occasions, we see through the eyes of the protagonist, which helps to feel their anguish, as for example when it is trapped in his Department, seeking desperately to her stalker in the darkness, that thanks to the movements of camera is achieved in better shape the desired effect.This is a very good director film, full of suspense, which manages to keep interested spectators during the course of this. The end is quite abrupt, very much in the style of television productions, but not why it is bad. Unfortunately for this film, it is difficult to avoid comparisons with the masterpiece of Hitchcock, situation ending overshadowing a little to this film. However, it is a good entry to the Filmography of the director for both the genre of suspense.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3236

Kiko de España

Diary of the dead

muchocine

Romero returns to be the slowest. His movies are on autopilot in almost sonrojante manner. But are not very hard with me, it is only my opinion.

God (and you) to forgive me, but personally the Romero film increasingly interest me less. His latest work neither excites me and I get bored in most parts of the footage, not to say throughout the film.The usual speech and staging of always with a new point of view that has been common in many proposals this year, live camera, the reality and the manipulción. Who is telling the truth? Where do we find it? It may seem a boldness, but my I like more the new batches to the style of the pattern: Zack Snyder fascinated me with its frantic review of dawn of the dead and Danny Boyle me enthusiastic about his cutting 28 days later.Movies with similar speeches were (in the case of the remake, because the same) and had a devilish pace and a spice of reinvento (to siiii, how difficult it had done Romeeeero) situation that made them shine so hard that they became related films and new classics of cinema in general and in particular of the fantastic.Here the time returns to be slow, as if it were "the ballad" a furious drive and that is why I finished getting tired.Even Shaun of the dead seems superior to the two last works of a director, we will become crazy, have more than one peñazo important, as the face of revenge not. You know I'm not lying.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/486

Kiko de España

Cache Escondido

muchocine

A couple of moments "Made in Haneke" great is crowned the function causing the usual anxiety.

Michael Haneke is not an easy, but I like. After getting one of the most important films of the nineties, "Funny Games" (essential and in my particular TOP3 of that decade with "Pulp Fiction" and "Ed Wood") and works of notable impact as "Unknown code" or "The pianist" (the weaker in my opinion) again, after the apocalyptic "Time of the Wolf", to sour the existence of his characters.This time it's a marriage that is beginning to receive videos with recordings of his home and threatening letters, with their consequent paranioia ration. Haneke, as always, places the camera and "gives the REC", shooting 75% of the film with its usual levels sequence extremely long and desperate to first-time.A couple of moments "Made in Haneke" great is crowned the function causing the usual anxiety. A phrase: "I called because I wanted you were". A 7.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1256

Yojimbo

The rookie

muchocine

Was Million Dollar Baby a film about boxing? The same goes for it and baseball.

Dennis Quaid, a good actor so untapped as Kurt Russell stars in this story of second chances perfectly directed by John Lee Hancock (to his credit the wonderful script for A perfect world) and masterfully written by Mike Rich, apparently expert in histories of the same nature.The history of The Rookie (rookie) can not be simpler and more trite: Jimmy Morris is a child whose military father does more than change of residence for business reasons, but they come to Texas to stay. Jimmy is passionate about baseball and there there is little interest in the sport. However he still practiced and eventually became a Professor of Sciences and coaches the baseball team of the Institute. But a good day reaches an agreement with his students to enable them to earn one minor league. And that will change your life and will be given a second opportunity could never expect.Many will see the typical Yankee history "bigger than life", as it is based on real events. But the screenplay, dialogues and interpretations are the very best and do a reality may seem even a great piece of fiction. Was a large jewel which I adueñaré as soon as you find a dvd.¿Million Dollar Baby a film about boxing? The same goes for it and baseball. Highly recommended. To highlight the music of Carter Burwell, who on more than one occasion wears (Fargo, conspiracy) and on which I will do a small post to add a couple of wonderful songs.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4278

Ivan Villamel

Bosque de sombras

muchocine

A great movie, that despite light bugs script and that constant feeling of "déjà vu", introduces us without problems in the history of these two couples and makes us spend a truly uncomfortable time, which is what you were looking for its director.

Again the letter of presentation of a novel director, and again a great movie despite you who gets upset, are faced with a letter for the commendable presentation by the director bilbaino Koldo Serra, which after surprise with his excellent short "The Witch's train" gives us a film full of interest despite some logical defects of an opera prima.The plot of the film we situated somewhere in the 1970s Spain mountain, where arrive two British couples to spend a few days in the middle of the nature and enjoying the tranquility of the landscape. The two couples are different, the older couple formed by Gary Oldman and Aitana Sanchez Gijon is described as the typical couple where the man takes clearly the weight of the relationship, even in a dominant and authoritarian way, instead the youngest pair formed by Paddy Considine and Virginie Ledoyen have constant relationship problems, show two people with little personality evenbeing the male character very deferential and lack of decision and character, something that will be key in the course of history.Everything takes place at a classic pace with precision of Swiss watch in showing us the small and subtle disputes between couples, without ever being embarrassing or forced, without why it no longer exists a latent threat in the form of inhabitants of the village, as that scene in the tavern of the people where the arrival of foreigners is greeted with some suspicion by the clientsespecially by the character of Lluis Homar and his brothers. The discovery by two couples of a girl in the wild in a barn enclosed with food and drink like any animal desatará the dramatic events of history, when the people try to recover the girl and the two couples turn protect it and bring it to the Commissioner of police.The best aspects that we can find in this film are many and varied, with small subtle details that I have said before, as when character Ledoyen wet his shirt leaving transparent its anatomy and enters the tavern in the town, in a scene that causes an uncomfortable feeling in the spectator, that manages to be smooth on the skin of the character of her boyfriend, and as his own lack of character and personality prevent him from dealing with this situation in a different way than shut up.There are brilliant staging elements, as in the debut of Nacho Cerdá, which function somewhat unusual in the Spanish film, and that some Miss, that normally in our country the synonym of good cinema is associated with a shabby appearance and walk at home, which I shall never take it. Its visual appearance is excellent, the Mise en scène previously commented and created by Serra is a formal perfection surprises, even in some complicated levels, where the outside field create a feeling of discomfort and constant threat in that forest that hides many secrets. The work of actors on the other hand is brilliant subtlety, which is creating unrest growing without seem forced or expresiveness, except for this lousy actress, almost always, that it is usually Aitana Sanchez Gijón. on the other hand, soundtrack, is also very remarkable with so few elements and so minimalist sound, as well complete with pictures from the filmanother success more and a are few. All the technical elements shine in this uncomfortable and violent film.The references that are based on this debut of Serra are so obvious that any film lover could mention them with closed eyes, progressive violence of the typical urbanite when found isolated and pressured by a situation to the limit of "Straw dogs" Peckinpah and the intrusion of an external element in a medium as it is the nature of "Deliverance (defence)" by John Boormana medium so as to prove extreme as when the character of Gary Oldman says in this life just what hunters or hunted. And in general a large part of the cinema of the 1970s, in which the hardness and dry and direct style created a certain fear of the Viewer without even borrowed elements of fantasy film, as some reference to "Visitors", the year 1972 film directed by Elia Kazan with James Woods of main character.On the side of the few aspects that do not just function in the film, that even if they are few, any, we find that the script occasionally is not fluent narrative pace that should get (well, or what was left of the script to move it to the screen), due to an excellent first half an hour, then occasionally force any situations in excess. Also some attitude and intentions ambiguous in some scenes, as the rape scene where it does not explain how a woman can leave that they violate to another without flinching, out of fear or for any other aspect, which logically only found one possible explanation on their more rational side of human attitude, without this being fully convincing.The other problem, and perhaps greater, in the history the fact that Serra manufactures his film from the cinephiles, i.e., chooses the path to film on the cinema, and that sometimes when you're too reverential, and not opt for the alternative of making films simply about life, creates an artificial feeling and a constant feeling that because you've seen that before, and I am not referring only to these two films mentioned above, because scenes such as rape or a character without personality or character to take a path so direct and violent already were clearly present in "Straw dogs" with the attitude of Dustin Hoffman, and that sees anyone in a blatant way.Anyway this attitude of violence in crescendo disagree with certain sectors that her have labeled violence without justification, term it carries of if two words completely contradictory to me, as if there were some way to justify any kind of violence. Violence occurs, occurs, there is no justification for anything, and this demonstration of good movies so testifies.In short, a great movie, that despite light bugs script and that constant feeling of "déjà vu", introduces us without problems in the history of these two couples and makes us spend a truly uncomfortable time, which is what you were looking for its director. A story with many crumbs and much more underground substance which seems at first glance. And above all, a sample Spanish Cinema should continue to create a truly interesting industry and not just for wealthy bourgeois and their cries when they see social dramones that are aesthetically and morally reprehensible in many cases.Great debut and a new hope in the form of a breath of fresh air for the film Spanish in general, and of the genus in particular.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1646

Jesus Lens

Hannibal: El origen del mal

muchocine

The return of Hannibal the Cannibal, popularly known among us as Hannibal the Cannibal, has left us cold. A notable boredom, dotted with cuajarones of blood, that ends up leaving a bad taste in mouth, honestly.

The return of Hannibal the Cannibal, popularly known among us as Hannibal the Cannibal, has left us cold. As everyone will know at this stage, "Hannibal, the origin of evil" does, precisely how the famous Doctor Lecter became the monster to which all have known and feared in the film, with the face of Anthony Hopkins.¿Por what expected something important from this film? Well, mostly because the script is printed the signing of Thomas Harris novel father of the character, what did predict a good development of the plot, a logical origin of the character and furthermore in the cannibalism myth so good and so bad times has made us enjoy and suffer in theaters.And the thing starts well, counting the death of the family of Lecter in World War II and, subsequently, the humiliation suffered by his sister and him from the hands of a group of Nazi sympathizers. Their flight is well and synthetically told, as well as his arrival in France, where he begins a contradictory relationship with her aunt of Japanese ancestry, performed by the attractive Gong Li, that does but win in beauty and magnetism with each film.This first part is very well told, is interesting and can be seen with great interest. But then. Oh then! After the episode of the butcher, very revealing of the future hannibaliano nature, everything gets out of hand and the film banalized, becoming a stupid and unbelievable story of revenge that only relies on gruesomeness and jets.The trip to the USSR and the episode of the hut marked a turning point that turns what was an interesting and worthy film that was elaborating on the keys of a series as interesting as Hannibal the Cannibal, in a Masque of death and destruction quite idiotic, poorly told and worse resolved.Arrive yawning, eyes to the phone to display the time, the roar of guts asking chicha and uncomfortable movements in an armchair that already click. He began a remarkable boredom, dotted with cuajarones of blood, that ends up leaving a bad taste in mouth, honestly.A penalty, to sum up, note how the Laurentiis, holder of the rights to the character of the Doctor Cannibal, are ending credit in the series, in an attempt to exploit the goose that lays the golden eggs that their latest sunsets you are smelling to rotten. More and more.In short, a disappointment.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3960

Josini

Memorias de Antonia

muchocine

Wild memories, 1995 for best foreign film oscar

With a heart overwhelmed after the last imágten and uncredited accompanying music of violins, begin to write about one of those movies that we retain and we interview, and also won an Academy Award in 1995 for best foreign film. It is also known under the title of "Antonia".Antonia is a strong and warm woman who returns to the village where he grew up on the occasion of the death of his mother, and has just settled with her daughter.In her town, nothing has changed. Its inhabitants live the horrible routine some - the more wretched - or the stupid routine others, the more ignorant. Antonia and her daughter begin being observers but end up becoming actors of change in attitudes, relationships, and behaviors that occur in the workplace. Later, her granddaughter tells in off the transit of their elders, the pain of these and their doubts at the time that, as innocent little girl, interrogates them on death.Death, is it that reminds me wild strawberries of Ingmar Bergman. Death begins and ends a tour in which the suffering of life, his main constant, and the time lag imperturbable and unavoidable, are interrogated by the most brilliant characters of the people.Next to these existential reflections comes undoubtedly lucid social commentary. Advocates criticize film to those who offer answers instead of doubts, i.e. those who do not. Christian morality, the drawer of patterns of behavior and the human relationship, leaves limping the thirty-six-minute audiovisual drama.I think that those who these days is revealed to the traditional family would have to exercise moral courage reflect with films like this. Here is reflected the harsh reality of the existence of so many well done families which, however, are a nest of moral disease, a house inhabited by horrors that hurts name.The narrated proposal ensures that the family model does not guarantee stability or health to their human products, at least necessarily. Invited to accept family next to the old proposed new sisters, because does not necessarily have to give birth to children desestabilizados, transtornados or disabled to live.Couples are forming in the town of Antonia. These are sometimes joined without love but for friendship, sometimes without love by sexual interest, and sometimes without prejudice but by love. All of them share the denominator of respect and understanding. These new family structures that arise in the narrated history are based on a unique moral, and that is important, because it is nothing bad seems out of them. The village church can not leave them to step holding the old moral order because, as it is archidemostrado, maniene a moral double.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/468

Alberto Concepción

La joven del agua

muchocine

Regardless of whether the story can like it or not, and without ever noted, "The water boy" has more substance than many other tapes that are overblown

There are many directors who, after a success at the box office, are encasillados, both by critics and by the public. To M. Night Shyamalan has happened exactly that: after his second film, the famous 'The sixth sense', always it has waited him horror, suspense, twists inesperados.miedo. And this is probably the main cause of the ongoing attack since then, as many viewers and critics. 'The water young' is a Fable: a tale for adults. Anything terror, scares (do or maybe this Yes?).just a beautiful story, full of drama and details. A metaphor of life, human relationships, explained through a fiction that can still be somewhat absurd if analyzed coldly, does have a deep message. And this happens in all of his films: see beyond visual enjoyment that could give the film, consider how people, the deal between them have evolved. If 'The sixth sense' were overcome fears, and with 'The forest', una historia de amor, now 'The water boy' explores the part more personnel each, in their purposes.The interpretation of Paul Giamatti is excellent: this, previously eternal secondary, shows once more that he has talent to spare to star him only a film. His characterization is such, that becomes impossible to think of another actor for his character, and that requiring nor too difficult work, as not in Bryce Dallas Howard, compliant without too much clarity. The rest of the cast, everyone with its important role within the film, properly carry out their task, even Shyamalan, who was always reserved a small role in his films, acts more of what it is customary, and to tell the truth, not clashes.But if there is something that stands out in this movie is the beauty of certain passages that allows the soundtrack to the film. Priceless pair Shyamalan - j. Newton Howard: what there capacity to transmit, what waste of talent, allowing to be memorable cinematic moments, how I had already been in 'The forest'.Regardless of whether the story can like it or not, and without never highlight, 'La Joven del Agua' has more substance than many other tapes that are overblown: If you go to the cinema waiting for terror, forget about take you a good impression. Only see without prejudice, pending that you have a historia.y enjoy it. It is worth the trouble.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1470

Mala Besta

Juegos secretos

muchocine

We think that we have been of the few that have not had a religious experience during viewing, and we have not seen God at the bottom of the cardboard of popcorn, we shall confine ourselves to say that it is quite boring.

"Secret games" is one (again) "sour look to the typical American family", "a harrowing and nothing complacent look to the daily hell of matrimonial relations", "a modern Fable" or the last work of the "new cinema neoindependiente USA". Me I have not invented it. All of this is said in there, in the press specialized. We think that we have been of the few that have not had a religious experience during viewing, and we have not seen God at the bottom of the cardboard of popcorn, we shall confine ourselves to say that it is quite boring.Illegitimate daughter of "Crash" and "American beauty", the film of Todd Field x-ray the life of a quiet and typical American residential neighborhood, those that at this stage all already know that they are full of psychopaths, unhappy, dissatisfied housewives, onanistas, procaces girls and ice cream cart. In this case, the story focuses on lathe to two parents now already not to say parents; A parent is Brad (Patrick Wilson), a young man without a job, married to the wealthy Kathy (Jennifer Connelly), a quite castrante wife. (B) parent is Sarah (Kate Winslet), young and educated woman who has married Richard (Gregg Edelman), a husband who should be castrated. Both are walking to their kids, and taking into account the vital boredom where they live, is what needs to happen. Background there is also a pederast just reintegrate, Ronnie (Jackie Earle Haley), and a somewhat radical police and intransigent but which ultimately is good, Larry (Noah Emerich). Typical of one of these neighborhoods.Although both parents clearly are the protagonists, each of the characters has its own history, which fully develops throughout the entire film. This helps a lot to it lasts for more than two hours, so anything about going to the cinema with piles, say what you say the announcement of that cream. All frames are quite waterproof and are United because the director wishes to place one of the protagonists always on screen. With which the movie lacks practically structure, jumping from person to person and from place to place without end. What Todd Field allows certain luxuries, as shooting a football game, although relatively integrated into the story, giving a still more heterogeneous finish the set.But all this is not truly annoying. Even the dull tone pedantuelo and throughout the film, with scenes gafapasta visually very gimmicky and requiring the characters make pirouettes by the frame to place as God sends, or the fact that everybody walk around quoting Flauberto or Tolstoy. Worse and unbearable is the insidious voiceover that Todd Field like the Viewer. Anytime there is a man telling us in the background, with all kinds of detail, what they feel each of the characters that appear on screen. Awful. still, "Secret games" has managed three nominations to the Academy Awards, one for his screenplay and two more for his cast, as it is normally the case in these films comes to be the most notable. Kate Winslet, who get naked and with little makeup, and that always gives idea of it gives everything for art is most thankful role. Moreover, it is a fairly conventional performance, however he has managed a nomination the best protagonist.Jackie Earle Haley has the same but for supporting actor for his portrayal of a pederast that same thing could have been ludópata, drug addict, Kleptomaniac or journalist of the heart. Although his performance probably is the best of the film, the character is not too well drawn. But that certainly is a pederast, who always rate very high on this new neocine.The male protagonist, Patrick Wilson, said in an interview, a time ago, one of its goals for the new year was in films that didn't undress. Again will be.Both husband and wife, Jennifer Connelly and Gregg Edelman, are simply appear, and for her to show off body, by contrast with Kate Winslet, which is what Todd Field, that it would be looking, seeks to make us overlook the attractive entering meats and little women.In short, a pretentious and boring film, that nominations will be resolved as will begin to fall into oblivion. Recommended for people who live in neighborhoods bad, so they know there is nothing worse than being upper-middle class.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3421

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Fracture

muchocine

More of the same, infinite loop of the same patterns, even if there is a desire to introduce something new, some unexpected twist... Everything easy and friendly, pleasant to see and easy to forget. Very nice, very simple, very elegant.

Fracture, unlike other thrillers judicial or tapes moved by the hypothetical perfect crime, not abused clichés: confined to loitering the gender patterns and solve any possible affinity with the trash usual tape billed on identical parameters with a lower, more adjustable to the classic melodrama impact end - where the bad guy always pays, but no gruesomeness or moral writhing - which in the film black or to the aforementioned film of dedicated lawyers subgenre criminal and them know all.Anthony Hopkins outboard the role of rich bored of his life of rico and pissed by the infidelity of his wife, which kills a dry shot in the head after surrender. Between the shot and accountability the perverse murderer built a monumental plan to sneak in the prison and the film recounts, impeccable technical Bill and predictable in their narrative twists, the alembic of inquiries and mcguffins of winks to the intelligence of the viewer - not overly forced, dígamoslo here will not be that someone thinks that this is a prodigy of modern noir - and mild strokes of moralina Christian in which the criminal not out by yours by the stubbornness of a curious lawyer, at least. It happens that when the yuppie picapleitos works moved by the cravings of the triumph and its hierarchical and personal prestige does not give foot with ball and get inevitably defeated. Instead, when he realizes the deepest roots of evil and pain, is work the miracle as his stubborn intelligence of lawyer know-it-all glows and is gaining positions in the race towards the unmasking of the culprit. The script, while not bad, does not always work and there is significant attention slippages, forgetfulness calculated to administer the (scarce) effect of the plot coups and, finally, cheap fumetti unnecessary notes as the romance of Fund in the offices of the firm or the tribulations of the nothing tapped character of the police unwittingly added to the criminal case. Hopkins is a case apart: already not outboard roles. It is even possible to say what has happened to work in the chapter to update its dramatic register and adapted to the profile of the character that should be interpreted. Hopkins is a plenipotentiary Lecter, Lecter, a modeled Lecter of one film to another. Even hinted at an effort of production by extending ad nauseam the Machiavellian, cunning and disturbed character of Thomas Harris Sir Anthony created in the basic film by Jonathan Demme. Gregory Hoblit is not a craftsman, but complies with what you ask. The two faces of truth, previous work semillado by the same interests, exceeds this review of the perfect crime, without that it needed here loa because it was not great in its genre. I remember Tyrone Power, Charles Laughton, Elsa Lanchester, Marlene Dietricht and the sublime hand of Billy Wilder and then my heart (inevitably) shakes and feels rewarded

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3576

Oscar Martínez

La brújula dorada

muchocine

An agglomeration of characters and events that never come to capture our attention, only highlights its sober special effects with the hope of future deliveries to offer that this first part only hinted.

Based on the novels of Philip Pullman, directed by Chris Weitz and starring the young Dakota Blue Richards with a long cast of characters played by Nicole Kidman, Daniel Craig, Sam Elliott, Eva Green, Tom Courtenay, Simon McBurney, Jim Carter, Ben Walker or Clare Higgins among others, this early December bridge reaches our billboards the Golden Compassfilm that starts a new fantastic saga in the line of the Chronicles of Narnia, the six signs of light or the everlasting Harry Potter.La movie, first installment of a trilogy, puts us in a world parallel to our own, in which humans are a sort of alter ego known as daemon, represented in animal form. Lyra, the protagonist of this story, embark on an adventure without precedents to save two missing friends and expose the Magisterium, an entity which aims to avoid all things that the world knows the existence of dust called an aura, through the daemon, allowing travel to humans through the different parallel worlds.Sad start of fantastic saga is the Golden Compass.Already ignoring the similarities to the adaptation of northern lights it has with the increasingly more prolific fantastic franchises featuring children that flooded our charts in recent years, Chris Weitz film takes place slowly despite the constant agglomeration of events and the saturation of secondary characters that appear and disappear throughout your footage.Thus, although the film succeeds to approach a relatively more mature than other fantastic titles, this isn't more than a sequence of events, but predictable, yes usual, arriving at almost no time to grab our attention: history is monotonous, and only the impressive while sober digital effects achieved that we not depart the look of the screen too oftenin a world with echoes of Victorian London already seen in the franchise of the young Wizard Potter, while more slum, as if of a fantastic key of Dickens novel concerned.On the other hand, it must be said that the approach the Golden Compass offers 'long-term' is far more attractive than the immediate product, with a multitude of parallel worlds barely mentioned in this first installment and the interesting duality between humans and their daemons, which represent the strengths and weaknesses of their owners and maintain a vital link with them. Special mention deserves the criticism that presumably the Golden Compass made to the Catholic Church, disguised under the figure of the Magisterium, as the film (the book, no idea) just Yes allows us to interpret the message, and were it not for the impact this news has had on certain media, doubt rather that no one truly taken it into account.As regards interpretative paragraph refers, we find a solvent but something detestable Dakota Blue Richards in some moments, a totally laughable Nicole Kidman, Daniel Craig anecdotal although very a nice Sam Elliot and a quite sad Eva Green not by your interpretation, but rather by the role that he has had to exercise.In short, barely could highlight the Golden Compass a few sets about extremely credible and friendly daemon, as well as a fairly successful match between polar bears and fantastic.I give it a 5 out of 10.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1333

Francisco Bellón

Quo vadis, baby?

muchocine

Do Quo vadis baby?, in spite of its limitations, no longer a worthy film of intrigue and mystery

In film, like everything else in life, the best one can do is not to pigeonhole, people did not know in advance what's new that will offer a director. Thus, if you have a radical change of registration, no one will be surprised drastically. And this is the case of Gabriele Salvatores, with his latest work, Quo Vadis Baby?, surprises both to public criticism, since it's a history of mistereio and intrigue, with dramatic poso that Yes. Italy the film has been a great success, so much that it is planned to do a television series from the character. Giorgia Cantini (Angela Baraldi) is a detective ruda, scruffy and almost social life, until he receives a package which will give a turn to his life. The package contains the newspaper his sister Ada (Claudia Zanella) recorded on video tape, and Giorgia searched them a reason to explain the why her sister committed suicide 16 years ago. Soon, Giorgia discovers that the seemingly perfect life of Ada was not such, and had a lover, the mysterious to perhaps involved in his death. Thus begins a search that will make Giorgia reconsider his life and face the truth that has been hidden all these years. Gabriele Salvatores offers us a proposal interesting and attractive, at least in principle, and not only the typical story of mystery. Unfortunately, in a few minutes that attraction is diluted, the pace seems to stop in the space time continuum, and the tape falls into the predictable and the obvious. Salvatores navigates between two waters, between the pure and simple thriller and social background, the message that contains the film, and this dualism ends up significantly affect the story. Do Quo Vadis Baby?, despite its limitations, it is still a more than worthy film of intrigue and mystery, it will keep entertaining the Viewer, but that he will forget her five minutes out of the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1155

Elena Suárez

Luces al atardecer

muchocine

Do they have ever known someone that puts the other cheek receive a slap in the face? Do ask you because if the answer is Yes, it is likely that the known is the protagonist of?Lights at dusk?

Do they have ever known someone that puts the other cheek receive a slap in the face?I ask you because if the answer is Yes, it is likely that the known is the protagonist of "Lights at dusk", a film with pseudo-intellectuals pretensions and that, therefore, the rest of mortals, far away from the divine hand see the art there where it is, we may be quite boring.The argument could be summed up in the following way: a man that gets very badly with everyone but not because sing the forties to all borderlines who is on his way, he simply does nothing. He sits and watching life passing, they laugh at him, well okay, that they stick, then okay, they will cheat, well okay, there is only a person who wants, as it passes from that person. In short, as they can see what it says is an intelligent type. This very interesting story is added the expressivity of his actors, static factions that like silicone breasts, gives equal how are, where they are and who they are, they always remain the same.That Yes the picture is very nice and the protagonist is very paltry, very miserable, and already why one should assume that the film is good? I, personally, to see stagnant images of very paltry people prefer to give me a tour of the Museo del Prado and observe Goya's black paintings (although that Yes, the plot is more interesting and critical). Ah! By the way, if you know someone well, tell him to change because it does enough damage to the human condition.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3758

Carlos Giacomelli Puig

Halloween El Origen

muchocine

One of the good, or very good remakes of those who do have something to say and contribute to the original. If not for its excessive length, almost two hours, we would talk about a round film.

The alarming lack of ideas Hollywood remakes makes one constant increasing weekly releases. If you visit this page, you can get an idea of how things are, but as a good example suffice it to say that it has already been announced the American revision of "[Rec]" (1).Most times, the remake is usually a pretty and sweetened, version forgets the identity of the original and becomes a product of mass consumption for all jovencillos more willing to throw popcorn each other than to enjoy a film session in conditions. However, sometimes the movie Yes worth, as demonstrated Aja, Snyder, or Nispel. On this occasion, has the turn it to "Halloween", carried out by semi-novato Rob Zombie. But he has not limited itself to tell us the same story which in its day was attended by Carpenter.Para present as God commands, Michael Myers has opted to split the film into two parts of almost equal length (one hour each). The second does not have too many plot developments over the previous version (note, I'm not saying that it is a bad thing), and is the first that we find the largest number of news. Because "Halloween" is rather a kind of prequel, which focuses on developing what the other was left in the attic. With his usual style, dirty and badass, Zombie writes and directs the early years of Michael Myers, in an attempt to justify this unhealthy behavior that led to so many deaths. Thus, the first hour is an oppressive atmosphere, full of negativity, heat, and flies, and is in this type of environment we grow and mature the young man obsessed with masks that will end up killing his sister and stepfather, to then be locked in the mental Institute of Richmon for fifteen years. But the thing it does not end there. During the next half hour, continue assisting the formation of the monster, through the interviews that Dr. Loomis (played by a chameleonic and - heroic (2)-Malcolm McDowell) is doing it. Everything until suddenly, in a bloody act of rebellion, Myers escapes after ending all resistance that occurs, and returns to his hometown, Haddonfield.A starting from here the low film a little its up impeccable point level, since the history is the same as the "Halloween" by Carpenter, and a couple of victims more and more blood and sex are not an excuse to extend one extra hour his (already itself pretty) (long) footage. For very well done that everything, that it is.And it is that Zombie manages to give a physical change to Myers, becoming a forzuda mole of two meters high, long, dirty hair and undone mask by the passage of the years. Thus, better accepted the fact that it is so animal and don't show any mercy with their victims. Because deaths are quite extreme, in the case of production which is (remember that behind all this are the fearsome Weinstein = easy money and censorship to the singing), and as with his previous two films, the director does not cut in showing close-ups and blood to GLUGs. Good for Rob!So, together we talk about one of the good, or very good remakes of those who do have something to say and contribute to the original. If not for its excessive length, almost two hours, we would talk about a round film, but that problem distance something to the Viewer, which it just seeing their final minutes with some coldness and impair their proper enjoyment. Even so, it is worth much. Look at the several cameos in the film. From Forest Whitaker ("the rogue of the devil"), Danny Trejo ("Machete"), Sid Haig (Captain Spaulding), or the historic Ken Foree ("zombie").7,5/10 (1) that Yes, not everything is bad news: between the long list of remakes, some promise. The creators of "À L 'Intérieur" are doing a revision of the classic "Hellraiser" charge, and Aja continues rolling "Mirrors", with Kiefer Sutherland in the lead role.(2) Those who continue the series "Heroes" associate you immediately to Linderman, because in the second part of the film it is going with the same Court of beard.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3559

Ramón Besonias

Leones por Corderos

muchocine

A declaration of principles.

Lions for Lambs seems a priori a play, not only because their personajes-arquetipo (the press, politics and citizenship) are defined by the discursive position that represented the political universe of his filmmaker, but also because it seems to build on three fixed scenarios (University, White House and Afghanistan) from which these characters recrearán his dialogue. Redford is aware at all times to offer a personal, intentional, discursive work and without more action than that necessary to explain or illustrate the political arguments that the characters are desmadejando over the tape.Characters not interested in his private life, even if they are beings of flesh and bone. Do not describe emotions of intimate interest or illustrate the mechanisms of certain relationships. Lol Characters are defined by public or political positioning in Lions for Lambs, and are recognized as a decision making capacity which necessarily entails an ethical attitude toward social life (American), in this case embodied in the when less dubious international policy of President Bush. University, the Senator and journalist (and partly the young military serving as nexus and emotional storytelling claim) are political archetypes that compel the Viewer to reflect and, if they so wish, take party (or not) of the premises that hold those characters.Lions and lambs is a committed, in the sense of morally urge the three most important political classes of any modern democracy (politics, press and civil society) to take sides and make Act of contrition about his passivity or on the contrary its unjust action against acts that insult the most basic sense of human right. We are all guilty (responsible, would be more correct but less effects) of omitting or act without considering consequence of our approach.A Government that is installed in the lie, failure by a fourth power more concerned by the share of screen that by telling the truth and serve with this honest mediators between citizens and political power is guilty.And the citizen is guilty when you prefer to be numbed by the TV stop to think what is going on with their country and what has that to do with him. Redford is a convinced democrat. And when I say Democrat I am not referring to the formal democracy (institutions, elections, etc.) model, but to the active role of civil society in the construction of social life, that will not let the politicians to make decisions without being heard before.Lions for Lambs is an idealistic film that not utopian. Idealist because imagine the possible that hypothesis a day given to journalists and citizens by think twice things and exercise their right to think and express themselves freely, and say no to be complicit in a power that based on smiling sophistry wants to convince us that beat is the same as having the reason (be on the side of good).We cannot fault him Redford its sesentera, own naivety as soon of all fable that seeks to revive the morality of the Viewer, but this does not mean his honesty as an artist and its more than good intentions to offer us a product so (although it seems lie in the times they run) risky. In fact, Redford had to count on the independence of the United Artists which directs Cruise to your project to come to light. No such luck, everything would have been problems.Even so Redford cannot, if you want that your political cinema cale in the spectator, less that allow licenses narrative and dramatic inertia who are somewhat tramposillas clearly. This is the case of the two soldiers dying with their boots on, or before progressive journalist now illuminated by an outburst of integrity. They are things that go with the moralistic Fables.However, this statement of principles of Lions for Lambs a film made necessary, but not to the use of what you might expect in a movie theater. The average viewer is more accustomed to think that when he goes to the movies offered a story, not a speech. Lions for Lambs can be disappoint the viewer go believing that obtain a suggestive political plot in the style of all the President's men. It is not the case. Not why it would be a suggestive and reflexive experience close to the video store and watch it when it comes out on DVD.Dare, not lose much by think about things twice.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2383

Silvia Giner

The Kingdom

muchocine

The Kingdom mixes the reason, faith, work and love. Although at the beginning you may seem a firecracker I recommend you to continue seeing, they are only 5 chapters that is worth seeing.

Lars Von Trier dares with everything from ejerver a harassment subbliminal female gender in their movies to do a horror series for TV via clunkers as Dogville (q forgive me scholars).The Kingdom reaches to nunestras stores DVD stores in his Spanish-dubbed version. A series that despite having not renewed for a second season by its success excaso to my cool me and so here I am recomendandola.It is a series of science fiction and terror issued by the ABC channel during the second quarter of 2004 with an audience of close to 10 million, although it fell every week.The series is based on a novel by the famous writer Stephen King and the episodes of the series correspond to those of the series, who tried to recreate the climate of fear and despair of the original book. The series has been in Spain in the "night of series" of Canal Plus in the fall of 2005 and some regional channels. Lars, presents this series with a Light touch, taking into account recharged his aesthetic. There is who defines this series as a film world that must be raised as one of his finest works.The Kingdom mixes the reason, faith, work and love. Although at the beginning you may seem a firecracker I recommend you to continue seeing, they are only 5 chapters that is worth seeing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3778

Luna

Death Sentence

muchocine

James Wan returns to remove stomachs and consciousness with his last film.

The last film by James Wan, director of "Saw" returns to comply with the principles of the Group given by Total Film magazine called "Slat Pack". If you've seen "Saw" you know I am referring to what trend: films extremely violent in to put to test the stomach of the viewer with explicit acts of aggression. Many of them have a marked character terrifying.Personally the violence does not attract me, but I left me seduced by the plot of the film: one father any of that crazy American society has bad luck with his son in the wrong, at the wrong time place and sees how his offspring dies at the hands of a few robbers. Fruit of chance is trapped in a vast Web of violence and the descent to the underworld make him deal with his own nature. Increasingly more animal, more and more like the murderers of his son, we are witnessing brutal "eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" between him and the violent group of assassins, until that can only be one.To narrate this fast-paced story Wan opts for the camera in hand in most of the shots. Ian Jeffers signed the script, based on the novel by Brian Garfield, making use of an overflowing imagination to make each murder more grotesque than the previous.Kevin Bacon has some memorable moments from the interpretative standpoint, as when bids farewell to his young son. However, when it becomes "Terminator" the viewer has to make a remarkable effort imaginative by believe in such circumstances and starring in such actions.Appeal to lovers of action, weapons and the images a bit gores. If you are one of those who you tides with blood, better absten you see.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1796

Ricardo Marquina

Toxic Avenger II

muchocine

At times fun by the delusional at times boring and undeniably absurd, this film is a classic, along with the entire saga, which, without offering anything new or interesting, has become by popular acclaim in one of those titles venerated for the lovers of beer fattening.

For a super hero live without enemies, without bad bad, is a real shit. And that is exactly what he was going to "Toxie", our hero protagonist son of climate change and the sub industrial products. Become bedel of an institution for the blind to his beloved city "Tromaville", our little graceful protagonist needed psychoanalyst to continue with their day to day. The destination as well, but is bad very bad again try to implant his empire of pollutant terror in "Tromaville", but, as the experience is a degree, know that with "Toxie" in the city have the lose, so that, taking advantage of our hero is rather short, not to say openly asshole, make believe by dastardly tricks, that his father is in TokyoCity where will depart our palurdo and carcinogenic colleague, along with his MOP inseparable, to find his "father". So is "Toxic Avenger 2" (El Vengador Toxico 2), Lloyd Kaufman and Michael Herz film in 1989, sequel to eponymous film of great impact. Surprisingly, entrance, trying to shit movie without pretensions beyond messing frykandeliko, equipped with a few resources nothing despicable. At times fun by the delusional at times boring and undeniably absurd, this film is a classic, along with the entire saga, which, without offering anything new or interesting, has become by popular acclaim in one of those titles venerated for the lovers of beer fattening.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2117

Bruji

Retrato de una obsesión

muchocine

Through a long flashback, creates a fantasy - at times, ridiculous-, on the transformation of the protagonist.

It was only a matter of time before an atypical director repair in the strange work of an unusual photographer. As it was expected, the result away from formal biopic, to build one of these cinematic oddities which are much appreciated. "Dignify that others despise, what it is if not"politically correct"?.""I have a secret?"I tell you one. The heart of a woman is full of them. Stanley Kubrick knew it and, in his usual line (i.e., better than anyone else), he explored them in Eyes Wide Shut, his latest work. In reality, are many, "that not they fit in the immensity of the ocean" (Titanic), and many of them derive from the question Ernst Lubitsch made Jennifer Jones in the sin of Cluny Brown: "What is your site?". Does anyone know what is yours? And if it were wrong?At the end of the 1950s, Diane Arbus, wealthy family, decides to change the course of his life. Perhaps because "we only have a heart and we must be faithful" (loving dangerously), perhaps because there is only a life and need to decide how to use.It is precisely in the fictional characters of Rose (Kate Winslet) and Sarah Jordan (Angelina Jolie), in which we find the film references of this real character, a woman who, having everything you may want, drowns in a world which is not compatible. But, as the worst reality always beat the best of the fictions, here there will be a powerful cause to abandon, and itself an exemplary husband prevents it. It is pointless to position itself next to one or the other, because the two will be right. or none.Original way, the film part of one of the photographs of Arbus, a portrait of naked in the living room, this time in movement. And, through a long flashback, creates a fantasy - at times, ridiculous-, on the transformation of the protagonist in Butterfly. It is known that there are two stories that contribute in the jump, Alice in the country of the wonders of Lewis Carroll and the film by Tod Browning La Parada de los Monstruos, to contain the presence of "other worlds". Those are who she is interested, those in which they live "aristocrats" of the unusual. But, above all, know that there is a person that influences his work irreversibly, Lisette Model, which is none other than the mysterious neighbor (bear) who stars in this story; an outstanding success of the script.This new life, as all insecure of their self-worth genius, leads to self-destruction. And it is at this point where the director wins respect for this movie fan, the same he shows by the character that is. The respect with which deals with Olivier Dahan the figure of Edith Piaf in La Vie en Rose. Which Miguel Hermoso in Lola, the film was never given. And it is that our film is different because we are.From this moment, the footage becomes a succession of portraits, predominating the close-ups of the characters, impossible frames and an exquisite photography. Another success of the direction, basically, indicating that this film is not a walk through the life of the photographer, but an accurate overview of their work.The third hit is the artistic direction and the fourth and last, Nicole Kidman.Sin, however, the first three are declared insufficient to save a story which, inevitably, sinks. The subtlety of Wilson to show a Model as the clear reference in the bisexuality of Diane, fades to develop an account of diffuse and directionless technique of rhythm, with the inclusion of an element taken from a film by Cocteau, beauty and the beast, which will only serve to that film critics fill their columns. The director, for his part, always strange and, in other works, brilliant (Secretary), not unify the various pieces of gear, constantly using the main actress who, at any time, fits the character. The character suits the actress. For this reason, the tribute, more than for own photographer, is, in not few occasions, for Nicole. Nicole in jeopardy, the others; Nicole as housewife, Las women perfect; Nicole, tormented, the hours. Nicole has cost us an eye of the face and her we squeeze to a lemon. Nicole, a white combination of straps and a coat of hair (from what part of the hair would be the neck of the coat?) in some unforgettable frames that remind us of Elizabeth Taylor in A marked woman, by Daniel Mann. His partner, Robert Downey Jr, will be most convincing cat than human.The result translates into an abject failure at the box office at United States. In any case, ignoring this fact, they should know that this is a rare movie, similar people. I recommend it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2900

Naty Buqué

Los Simpson: La Película

muchocine

In short, I believe that the film was successful. But of course, I am not who to determine. I am like a woman talking about football. Non--listen to me.

Well, as one of the few people no-fanáticas of the series who already saw the movie (as well as fans children's parents, but do not count), I am in a privileged position to say some things it above a radically subjective cloak of fanaticism.Firstly, I do not know what expect fans of a film series. A longer chapter, a more closed structure, some a little more transcendent fact, the limitation of the chistes-códigos, as sectarian, which always leave me out. And nothing more. Expected that Homer had in the film some transcendental truth that exposing to the world, were it acting course irrationally due to fanaticism. And they will be left disappointed.I think that the appeal to a different audience in the film than in the series clearly. A wider audience, not necessarily following the series, most children of a time. This is seen especially in quotations and allusions to the real world - action characteristic of the series if any-, which are in the film much more accessible than in the series. In this last swarm American characters maybe not so known out quotations from films more or less worship, etc. In the film are Spiderman, Harry Potter, Tom Hanks, Green Day, Titanic. The difference is clear.An aggregate to the obvious change of the series for the film was the constant reference and allusion to the film as such. Not only through the use of certain cinematic clichés but through explicit jokes, from the mouth of the characters. I thought it was an interesting and above all reliable resource as soon as he became auto-parodia.Finally, I believe that there was a good dose of transcendence in the film for the series. Breakdown of things in the TV series always stayed the same, I say. A surprise effect well implemented and measured. I will not give you examples to not say that Bruce Willis is dead.In short, I believe that the film was successful. But of course, I am not who to determine. I am like a woman talking about football. Non--listen to me.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3451

Rafa Ferrer

Cuando llama un extraño

muchocine

It must be very benevolent to qualify this monstrosity as film, worst of the year 2006.

You have to be very benevolent to qualify this monstrosity as film, without feet, or head, with a script made for a 4-year-old boy and an address that rather than be scary, give laughter, or fear of bad which is, as you look at it.It is true that the tape provides a small dose of tension, I believe that rather than the film, by moral obligation to enjoy the 6 entry. The protagonist to hand open hostiarla (wanted during the projection that her kill once and for all) and the argument a sort of "rehash" of tapes as "Scream", "Halloween" and "Friday the 13th".Well, the worst I've seen in what he took in 2006.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2173

JLO

¡Al ataque!

muchocine

The tone of social commitment and including class struggle, with manners plot and a pace that reminds at times (and much) to Pedro Almodóvar comedies but with results perhaps something lower.

The marseillais director Robert Guédiguian we are accustomed to light comedies without an apparent social background - only apparent - as in previous films as Marius and Jeannette (1997) and la vie, à la mort! (1995). The attack! It continues along the same lines accentuating its political side. This time under the guise of showing the process of creating between Xavier and Yvan (screenwriter and director respectively), interacting among themselves to tell the plot of a political film in which a family and neighbors, try to save his mechanical workshop "Moliterno & Cía." from the clutches of a multinational company that intends to expropriate for failing to comply with quotas for a credit.Agility is the mixture of the characters of one and another layer in parallel, with their various problems behind him, as well as also the problems of their own creators. The tone of social commitment and including class struggle, with manners plot and a pace that reminds at times (and much) to Pedro Almodóvar comedies but with results perhaps something lower. With doubts and differences between fictional filmmakers, with repetitions and turns back they get the more comical moments and also, her turn a little slow despite its standard length. Added to all this the hybrid gender - really a comedy-drama - ago Miss quite some depth and does not help in any of the two cases being halfway from both. Starring a convincing Ariane Ascaride in the role of Lola (Madam and fetish of the director himself) and a smooth deal with good performances both leading and secondary, highlighting Jacques Boudet as Pépé Moliterno, a beloved senile grandfather and likable. Released in Argentina in a difficult date and next to a tank as the Lord of the rings, it will go unnoticed in poster and rigour, nor is it too unfair. Anecdotally, Guédiguian used the same actors for the city is quiet (2000), filmed almost simultaneously with this and released with difference of months in France.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1915

Iñaki Bilbao

La maldición de la flor dorada

muchocine

Excellent film by Yimou Zhang, which returns for its best charters after a stage something uncertain and irregular.

Excellent film by Yimou Zhang, which returns for its best charters after a stage something uncertain and irregular.Terrible story, told in the manner of the great classical tragedies, where their characters are not just peace and quiet, and must face both his own demons Interior as to the danger they pose their closest relatives.Yimou achieves an extraordinary movie in its formal package, with a beautiful colorful, magnificent use of lighting and costumes and exquisite make-up, which lead us to an extinct world where squabbles and political ambitions were the daily bread.But Yimou does not stop to achieve a stunning formal plasticity, but manages to fascinate through a story a thousand times view, but, certainly, it is nothing more than a soap opera, with their loves, hatreds, secret inconfensables, etc, displayed with a formal verve, uncontainable excitement and great interpretations, especially in charge of their wonderful actresses. In this sense, the admirable Li Gong manages, once again, a retrospective interpretation as a woman victim of misfortune, but able to fight using all weapons that are available.Characters in the hands of their inexorable fate, who can not escape his fate even though they try.Bright and dry dialogues and marvelous direction in the scenes of fighting and battles, with wonderful moments, such as the magnificent final battle. A battle that not only has nothing to envy to, for example, the of the vaunted "300", but that is obviously exceeds them by far in intensity and imagination and formal brilliance. I don't think there is doubt on this point.In short, that my understanding of "The curse of the Golden Flower" is a great film, fails to be a masterpiece, for example, by some falls in the central part of its rhythm, but that leaves the film uniqueness of Yimou Zhang, that record us has once again delight, but also to stop aching to show us some elements of the worst thing about being human. In this sense, the end of the film is totally conclusive and meaningless, I think, of moral.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/616

Silvia Giner

El laberinto del fauno

muchocine

Good interpretation, magic management, very good special effects, a beautiful story to tell, an end to double dimension and the authentic brand staff of Guillermo del Toro.

I have to say, that "The laberinto del fauno", reminded me much "The Devil's backbone" as well as working with children again, the Toro again this vague feeling of two-dimensional final, i.e. a final that according to the dimension that you choose to interpret it is going to look like an appallingly cruel end or an end never better said, fairy tale. This is what happened to me when I saw the spine and again repeat sensations with the labyrinth of the Fauno.Es a film very William, with his personal stamp, without the pressure of large producers as it could happen in Hellboy and Blade II (whose second part is doing at the moment, release planned for 2008), has been fully released to be dropped into this magical world that has inside and that it has when wheel with freedom. Del Toro is possessed by his work and reveals a perhaps imaginary world, perhaps not, that rocks with a cruel reality for a time bitter in the Franco.Llega Spain the time talking about the fragile Ofelia (Ivana Vaquero), which looks like a lint on upper lip that I crave mustachioed according to plans (take into account light)(do, the foci? that increases or decreases the visibility of the lint) and have to shout from the rooftops that I constantly distracted and I took out of context. Because of this fluff, I had constant stomach protrusion. The question then is: why a director of the stature of Guillermo del Toro, misses the fact that there are some levels where the girl wears moustache?, please forgive me Ivana which is a fantastic actress, but this has no forgiveness, a director who cares both his aesthetics, I'm not worth the excuse that it was to give realism, because a girl of that age with a moustache is absolutely horrible, could be having put a bit of andina (dye for hair on upper lip) and having it to the less "disguised", the moustache been equally realistic, but more beautiful to be blonde hair instead of negrooooo!Sergi López? sublime, as always. Did me that grace the cameo of Federico Lupi, seated on his throne but very short time sequence is for a big actor. I have nothing bad to criticize the movie in general as well as the existential void that leaves you, because the end of double dimension.Good interpretation, magic management, very good special effects, a beautiful story to tell, an end to double dimension and the authentic brand staff of Guillermo del Toro, director that grows with each tape runs and for me one of the best currently in the fantasy genre. Round film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/734

Jose Luis

Manderlay

muchocine

A tape is not for everyone, but quite interesting for those who, at the end, may be the subject of a long discussion.

Toward the year of 1865 abolished slavery in United States, freeing thousands, if not millions, of African-Americans on its soil. Was undoubtedly just as more human? But were ready to be free? Manderlay, Lars von Trier's new tape, begins with that question, then do many others and thus raise once again his criticism towards United States, country which by the way, has never visited.The tape is part of a trilogy that began with Dogville, starring Nicole Kidman, whose character now takes Bryce Dallas Howard, with a fine and accurate performance by the way. Trilogy which will give end next year with the von tape (thus without h.). This new misadventure of Grace, the main character, begins with to find travel with her father and his followers of gangsters arrive to a cotton plantation in the middle of nowhere, where slavery continues 70 years after be abolished.In a matter of minutes Grace with the help of his cronies, frees the slaves, but as this about to continue with his trip, discover new freemen need something more.I'm afraid of what will happen now. -It confesses one of them. ? I don't know if we're ready for a new way of life. When we were slaves we cenábamos every day at 7. What hours dine freemen?So Grace decides to stay in Manderlay and help the community learn to live in freedom, striving to install equality between men, healthy coexistence and democracy, almost by Decree.And so chapter by chapter, we see as von Trier happens by weapons the american way of life, slaves soon cease to be slaves to sign contracts and be workers, who will have to work forcibly to cover their debts, suddenly Grace has the same interventionist attitude of his country, trying to convince everyone that the best is to be as she and her country. But soon their new society plays background and made other "American thank you" hand as justice and the death penalty, that Grace will suffer firsthand.Again, Lars von Trier, made hand in hand with the concept of Dogville, to roll the tape in a huge black study, with some lines on the ground showing the Division of the different places and just some scenic elements, i.e. as if it will be a play of Bertolt Brecht, which is not well received by many, but which in my view adds several degrees to its already if dense atmosphere.And although, as dictates it the Dogma begun by the director himself, the lighting is quite elementary, will create a beautiful and rather appropriate picture for tape and helps to faithfully recreate the atmosphere of a plantation of the 1930s.This is a perhaps more palatable tape the first, at least not so bloody, but step by step, the tension grows up to resemble the dramatic limits of Dogville, with a couple of surprising turns of nut as well as grace, we will stop with the mouth open.A tape is not for everyone, but quite interesting for those who, at the end, may be the subject of a long discussion.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3651

Andrés Pons

The Zombie Diaries

muchocine

We already know what is exploitation of low-budget film, if something gets fashion minimally have clever director or producer of the moment pointing to this fashion to see if it sounds the flute.

We know that was the exploitation of low-budget film, if something gets fashion minimally we to clever director or producer of the moment pointing to this fashion to see if it sounds the flute.It is and not another is the purpose of the rookie couple MICHAEL BARTLETT and KEVIN GATES that after pseudocumentales of success with undead as REC, the next film of romero DIARI OF THE DEAD or as not the American Remake of ECN to carry by title QUARANTINE, the couple launches to the pool to continue the open road to see if they get a success in this way.Away from that proposal ever to work in box office or not, we have an absolute mediocrity in a film shot in any way with a script which is the same as always, its technical aspects are non-existent, the makeup is amateur in a film that seems shot in a week-end in a bad way.Some moments of terror well done that surprises at some point level but it fails to save a set bored where everything is already seen.The actors include JONNIE HURN seen in PENETRATION ANGST or ANIMALS and JAMES FISHER to feature on HOOLIGANS. All are very young performers to begin their careers, the truth is that as they fail to participate in best titles they do crude oil.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2588

José A. Peig

Indiana Jones y El templo maldito

muchocine

It has almost everything to be a bad movie, but it is not. The good work of Spielberg, the magnificent work of mounting, production design and the overwhelming musical accompaniment by John Williams manage to make this film a very worthy divertimento.

The temple damn situated action a year before the search for the Lost Ark, so can have the nickname "prequel", a kind of marginal adventure hero Indiana Jones is involved in a plot around dark rituals of the India. The prologue, at a restaurant in Shanghai, is anthology and mark the boot of a rhythm unwavering in one of the more frenetic films in the Filmography of Spielberg, without giving respite to the Viewer, is sequencing situations to each more zacchia, without losing the ability to entertain, but with less style in the Ark lost.Its predecessor, as we already said, had virtues in abundance in the different facets that can offer this type of film. A show articulated through a simple but vivificada story based on characters - model handled with ease, some of them too stereotyped, and yet the film never fell into a ridiculous or topical saturated binge. Unfortunately, and is something that both Spielberg and Lucas have said with regret, in this occasion were not so fine.We said that the important thing was not the complexity, but characterize characters with claw and without falling into cliché. Kate Capshaw, unfortunately for all Queen's function, not only is a stereotypical and annoying character by their expressive excesses, it becomes a figurine of ridicule in the form of crazy that happens all the time hitting screaming and saying stupid number. The character of Willie is a major setback in the style, which ends up invading most of the sequences. On the other hand, the new companion of the hero is a child that contributes little apart from having tear re-examine, in the line of the weaker Spielberg and helpings, and also knows kung-fu. With all this we have the film loses bellows because there is not a single charismatic character accompanying to Indiana Jones, unlike that in the Lost Ark, where the set of profiles accompanied perfectly, configuring a collective spirit of adventure. Here, instead, the mouthed blonde and the child make mere anecdotal comparsa, are not integrated into the style that characterizes to Indiana Jones and was held singularity of a paradigmatic work. In short, the tone of the adventure degenerates in banality and circus vulgar, if we look at the action scenes.When the imagination is scarce, it is natural to resort to designs and spaces of park attractions (or game), riding to the viewer in a roller coaster, as we see in the persecution carried out by the henchmen of Mola Ram in a scene, however, equipped with a frenetic pace and infantiloide humor. Forced and too contrived situations with which the writer is seen the Duster: plug always stomping and puts his hand where it should not at the time just., Willie puts the ass in less place. They are stereotyped and easy tricks that banalizan the overall tone.On the physiognomy of the elements in game - topical, situations and characters too stereotypical and devoid of imagination - the Temple of Doom has almost everything to be a bad film, but is not. The good work of Spielberg, the magnificent work of mounting, production design and the overwhelming musical accompaniment by John Williams manage to make this film a very worthy divertimento. The scenes of the ritual in the interior of the temple are impressive, the choreography, the presence of Mola Ram (a bad circus and topical, but has its moments), the brilliance of diamonds in the interior of the sacred stones, the transformation of Indiana in henchman of dark power, and the liberation of enslaved children, preceded by a frame in which we see Indiana with omnipotent expressionAfter herding the proper punch. A scene which expresses eloquently the resurgence of the hero and the supernatural character that is own.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3231

Andrés Pons

El hombre con rayos X en los ojos (The man with X-ray eyes)

muchocine

Every time you are appointed to Roger Corman one should perform reverences, maybe wasn't the best director but I dedicate his entire life to serie b in all kinds of genres with full passion in directing and production.

Every time you are appointed to ROGER CORMAN one should perform reverences, maybe wasn't the best director but I dedicate his entire life to serie b in all kinds of genres with full passion in directing and production.Gave us small jewels "pendulum and death, terror," in is occasion accompanied one of the greatest interpreters of the film, also great history in a number of roles in the horror genre.RAY MILLAND "Obsession, the haunted mountain, sea serpent" made up another of his fascinating work in the skin of the scientist who plays to be God.A fairly harmless initially only shows the characters, explaining the theory of experiment of fairly light way. To gradually enter into the self-destruction of the man who does not know to stop his research on time.This narrated reliably without artifice or a big budget, nobody as CORMAN bag so imaginative way his films always scarce media. It is allegory leads to a bottom of a harrowing brutality where man realizes his abuse in the pain he feels in his eyes already useless. The film suffers from some absurd dialogues and the technical ways unconvincing, although only for the final part accompanied by that great actor visiona welcome and causes great concern.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/242

Raccord

Marnie la ladrona

muchocine

After this film he entered a creative slump that already not recovered

There seems to be a general rule in the movies, which ensures that with a bad script as a starting point, it is impossible to shoot something good. I agree with the sentence, but it would be "Marnie, the thief" as an exception: a dash of suspense from the lot to the good of Hitchcock behind the camera, turns into something quite interesting. The story is predictable, at times flat, but instead has one (or more) great sexual perversion sub-tramas.The first and most obvious is that the character are Connery, most Pigmalion (or Pretty Woman, which is to be the same), the role of protective galán style really is a child rather than get aroused by someone so far from his world as a ladronzuela. The girl also has a point of sophistication and inaccessibility that probably only do take firewood to the fire of his passion. This explains his behavior throughout the film much better than if there had been a kind of father to her, only willing to put him in life. The second and more hedging is that Marnie does not support men (for reasons that are revealed in the film) and diverts their sexual attentions towards horses. I do not speak of bestiality, but simply that your subconscious is the substitute for sex in horseback riding. And it does not seem to be what Hitchcock intended to hide; do we see it riding horse several times, petting horses, betting at the racetrack? She is obsessed. We then have two protagonists much more interesting by the semi-pervertidos, that even if the plot is a little glib, the subtext gives much of itself.The work of the director is admirable as it could not be otherwise in the case of Hitchcock. It makes a good direction of actors, supported by their sequences planned millimeter giving much quality to the product. A detail that caught me my attention are the brazen double funds, in other films in English are conspicuous by his absence. They should not walk very well of money at that time in the producer. But less good (repeat) is the script. Minor characters from cardboard, very little brilliant dialogues, a couple of deadlocks? They say that after this movie came in a creative slump that already could not recover, but it wasn't bad. It is clear that fails in many things, but it is not much less a bad film, although the shadow of chained or death in the heels is elongated.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1228

Yojimbo

Dark blue

muchocine

A well shot thriller that loses its bellows at the bottom.

The movies discrete, when they are in film, are in almost all media. And I found this in Digital Plus.Dark Blue, Ron Shelton with Kurt Russell is a police thriller got in dark business and corruption of the body in blue uniform. The character of Russell, Eldon Perry, is in charge of a new "cub" of police, Bobby (Scott Speedman). It will discover the methods that follows its "master" to solve certain problems or to provide the security that they represent.However everything has a much more visible structure. And its maximum authority it stars the always disturbing Brendan Gleeson. The appearance of this mafia-like character changes us the vision we have of the Eldon. The good work of Russell makes us it clear that many of these police thugs (in Los Angeles in 1992, at the time of the racial lynching) are not in fact. They are mere little who down look to their heads and obey without complaint. But they reach both believe what they do they lose the sense of what they do. Certainly lose it unless they themselves are a problem. So when you look at risk, absolutely everything changes.Family in the life of these agents is also a factor. How some take home their misery or simply do not carry them, taking a woman and a child completely unattended.A well shot thriller that loses its bellows at the bottom with a sequence absolutely naive and impossible. But serving for the redemption of the character, obviously. Let us not forget that after these characters as corrupt will always be honored others who want to do their job. And they will want to do well.Interesting.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2027

Iñaki Bilbao

De hombre a hombre (De uomo a uomo)

muchocine

The principle becomes a tad heavy, with scenes filled with nothing, bland and somewhat puzzling. Not sure if it will be a hodgepodge, an example of pedantry, or maybe lead into something positive. And, thank God, this happens last

"During a stormy night, a few bandits kill an entire family, except for the youngest son, of ten years;" "it shall be fixed in the image of the bandits, and years later, would seek them to take revenge, with the help of a man betrayed by those and also wants revenge."This spaghetti western is not that it differs very much from the rest of the rest, but the address, carried out by Giulio Petroni, is more fortunate than the average in this type of product. As well and all, to the principle becomes a tad heavy, with scenes filled with nothing, bland and somewhat puzzling. Not sure if it will be a hodgepodge, an example of pedantry, or maybe lead into something positive. And, thank God, this happens last, with final third that is the best of the film, getting interest really in the violent confrontation between beings despiados, lacking at that time of any shred of humanity. A film too irregular, that has good scenes and denotes know to be behind the cameras. Unfortunately the pace is not appropriate and the script gives quite fits.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1066

Rafa Ferrer

Noel

muchocine

A tape, which can perfectly cast as a Christmas episode of any television series, but which moves and entertains.

A film that premieres unprecedented in DVD, film and television at the same time, "Noel", directed by Chazz Palminteri (which reserves a cameo) and starring Alan Arkin, Robin Williams, Penélope Cruz, Susan Sarandon and Paul Walker.Dividida in several stories (such as the winner "Crash") has a series of Christmas dramas, and, as in the majority of these films all degenerates into a "Happy End", most of the stories are "as real as life itself," from the Solitaire who thinks the hospital is the solution to their problems, the isolation between mother and daughter, loneliness and hope. Everything is reflected in this film.A tape, which can strain perfectly as a Christmas episode of any television series (these special in which it participates all living bug), but which excites and entertains.Happy 2007

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/158

Ivan Sainz-Pardo

Crash

muchocine

A portrait deliciously well set deep sensations of confronted feelings of realities crudely exposed

Only an accident, a whim of fate, a shock, perhaps the two cars in a city like los Angeles, where one without an engine with wheels is hardly anyone, is today able to make personal universes of every citizen. Violence is only capable of savvy a city of undead. Crash is a choral film where several stories intersect, following the pattern of "Grand Canyon", "Magnolia", "Vidas cruzadas" or "loves dogs". In this case, all the stories are good measures and collide pointing to the same place, in a portrait delightfully set deep sensations of confronted feelings of realities crudely exposed. A sincere and disturbing portrait on a city characterized by chaotic mixing of ethnic groups, racism, fear and lack of principles. A superb portrait on the agonizing loneliness of these solitary souls and prisoners of a dysfunctional society, violent, armed to the teeth, sadly dehumanization and in which all happen to be victims. But Crash also speaks of the intolerance and the loss of innocence. How there is room, however, for hope, for the magic, and as survives even the possibility us, freedom to always the worst or give the best as human beings. Also reminds us that the man is a very complex being that sinks in an impersonal and hostile society. Where victims of the confusion, the good are also becoming or discover as bad and the bad guys at the same time, as good. Where the moral line and the ethics of the current American society seem to be deleting dangerous and inevitably as the stroke of a chalk in the rain. And at the same time, is this a portrait of modern societies around the world.Paul Hagiis, who came to know for writing the script of "The million dollar baby", here performs a low budget film without that technically you notice at any time in the footage, full of intelligence and emotion. With a casting that works, some superb performances, a round and perfectly structured script, a successful look, a very successful and consistent atmosphere and a well-managed pace, which maintains the required tension and gives us glorious moments. A breath of air for the so predictable and boring Oscars and a pleasant surprise that demonstrates once again that, from Hollywood, in the meantime Boulder and much mud, still continue to arrive some pearls of the seventh art.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1898

Rafa Ferrer

Brigada 49

muchocine

Horrific, made for out of step, poorly planned, worse shot and that transmits not a shred of emotion.

I admit that when it opened not called me attention and I was postponiéndola with a solid "already fall" because that wasn't a movie that could qualify as a Saint of my devotion, today that finally I've seen, felt me horrific, made out of step, poorly planned, worst shot and that transmits not an iota of emotion, that everything that happens on the screen you are unconcerned.It seems that since 9-11 (and in Madrid the subsequent 11-M) firefighters have become heroes (but were already) of American cinema, so that to some listorro of Hollywood was passed by the idea this film to honor the profession (excellent, on the other hand) of these characters that are dedicated to saving lives, the pity is that the result is a decent TV desktop telefilmIt is saved from burning or issued directly in DVD by the presence of Travolta and Phoenix are true "cache" actors.Once I have finished (to harsh penalties) of viewing it, glad to have not done at the time. !God that penalty of film!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/708

Caruco

Gracias por fumar

muchocine

An apology for the freedom and the right to choose, with an excuse, tobacco, which could be interchangeable by others.

Nick Naylor (Aaron Ekhart) is a man of angelical face and wide smile. However, it is also the most hated man in North America. Reason: is the public relations and defender of the (economic) interests of the tobacco industry. A habit, this the smoking, very, very badly seen by public opinion.In addition, Nick meets with a couple of friends with similar works: Polly (Maria Bello), Publisher of the sector of alcohol, and Jack ((Adam Brody), its counterpart in the spread of firearms among the young.) Themselves whether themselves as "the death Squadron" and are aware that their professions make them some rare bugs in the eyes of the people.To complete this fauna of characters is the staunch enemy of Nick, a Senator (William H. Macy) obsessed with his crusade anti-smoking. His new proposal is the force that totdas the cacetillas of cigars bearing printed a drawing with a skull and the letters "poison". And as a CODA, Nick nor can be considered a model of family guy. "He is divorced, although her son Joey (Cameron bright), sensitive and gifted, admired.""Thank you for smoking" is the promising debut of Jason Reitman, son of Ivan Reitman ("Ghostbusters"), adapting a novel by Christopher Buckley. Do their satirical content against Yankee society point a little against everything, and almost everyone: a double standard that dictates what is good and evil, radical politicians, media (double-edged weapon), tobacco employers only interested in selling their product?First and foremost is an apology for the freedom and the right to choose, with an excuse, tobacco, which could be interchangeable by others; In addition to advocating the need to educate more than to ban. Yes, tobacco kills, but you can also do cholesterol, pollution or cell phones.Thank you for smoking is a film absolutely recommended, but it is also harmless. The bullets fired, although accurate, do not contain enough lead. Too complacent and Nice, especially in its outcome. With the addition that is already weary this to hear that the protagonist does what he does because he is "which is better". Also reminded it us Yuri Orlov / Nicolas Cage as dealer of armament in the recent "Lord of war".It is of course a much smarter comedy that average American comedies and his argument traps with a twist included that leads us in the fall and public defenestration of the protagonist until its rebirth from the ashes.It exhibits good dialogues, replicas and ingenious situations. And there are notable secondary characters of those that leave footprint as the Marlboro man (Sam Elliott) whom her been diagnosed with lung cancer; or a recovered Rob Lowe as the Executive of Hollywood fascinated by the new fashion, i.e., anything that has an Asian design, and one of the exponents of this Hollywood dominated not by the artists but also businessmen.Do do some of the funniest moments come from winks to the? star system? as a divertídisimo mounting of photographs in black and white with classic and immortal stars (such as Marlene Dietricht and Cary Cooper) where smoking is has been replaced by other elements, such as treats or mugs! "" And interestingly enough I refuse not also to highlight an almost subliminal mounting: in one scene, the protagonist sitting on a plane is tempted by a sinuous stewardess offering you its services "for what you want" and then shows us a plane with the Obelisk of Washington. Phallic symbol indicating the State that will have been Nick after the offer.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2738

Kiko de España

El ultimátum de Bourne

muchocine

The Bourne Ultimatum is an entretenidísimo and fast-paced tour de force, a frantic flight and persecution does not give respite to the spectator, which assimilates already better than the camera causes Cassius Clay.

If I had balls to the second part of the adventures of Jason Bourne was because I caught her by surprise to have discovered shortly before its premiere the Bourne, the first of the three and the most classical case. Why the jump from the first (and great, while it may seem that no one remember it today, it seems that only the director of the boring Bloody Sunday had "approached" the absent-minded spy), great entertainment, directed by Doug Liman to the "chaos" of the second upset me a bit.But the thing is that the Bourne Ultimatum is an entretenidísimo and fast-paced tour de force, a frantic flight and persecution does not give respite to the spectator, which assimilates already better that the camera causes Cassius Clay.Efectivamente and reads the poster, Matt Damon is Jason Bourne, the work of the actor as fantastic as well as that of the rest of the castin particular David Strathairn and Joan Allen.El final (of the film and the box office) can ensure the continuation of the saga, but the continuity of Jason Bourne?. If this is a spoiler or you must not find out paying the entry. It is worth the trouble.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/351

Bloody Will

Super Nacho

muchocine

It is not a Jack Black, but Jared Hess film written and directed by what their mood touches the absolute idiocy, and can fall from grace in Spanish public.

If I said, nothing good comes out of the Jack Black-Jared Hess hybrid. I don't want to do advocacy of alcoholism, but a couple of mixed drinks, two or three compadres and eager to joke are necessary to hold the film from beginning to end.The director of the invention is also President of "Napoleón Dynamite", and met with a boom unexpected after becoming the film cult for the "losers", nickname are typical losers geeks of movie of American Institute.That does not mean that it was good, and the bad news is that Hess so believed, giving it carte blanche for this product is now "Nacho Libre", entitled of incomprehensible manner as "Super Nacho", perhaps looking for the morbid thematic superhérose, which completely lacks, and leads to a severe delusion to the Viewer.A simple summary: come to the cinema with the mind blank, if not, her odiaréis you. A folio and half is no script, and the first 20 minutes contain as much 6 complete sentences, everything else are grimaces and poses of un-day so-called King of comedy, Jack Black, removing that verbiage that made him so well-known. His throne falters in favour of Will Ferrel, which also premiered film this weekend in Spain. I will like to know by who opts the cañí public.What we are going, Ignacio (Jack Black) is a monk of Mexican village that plays the role of chef in an orphanage. His dream however is to be star of Mexican wrestling, that put on Galavisión on Sunday afternoon, and that that fight was a real circus. With the help of a real tiráo, (Hector Jimenez) will form the duo Nacho-Esqueleto, plundering sticks everywhere, but very well paid. At the same time it tries to impress the nun cañona (Ana de la Reguera) from the orphanage, will fight to reach the combat with more superstar of the fight and get money to orphans.Piece argument, simpleton over not being able to, and that effortlessly fills the entire footage from the tape. The best moments gives them the magnificent Hector Jimenez, which only has teeth and eyes, hence the right nickname of skeleton. What they volean up and down, while the Black belly can do much to save him.Atypical comedy to more not being able to see without complexes or pretensions. Not espereis chuckle I constantly is not such. If not cojeis to the grace principle, you shall not do this throughout the film, and you seem it long as none. It is not at all the type of comedy that has made Jack Black over these years, and I stress, it is not a Jack Black, but Jared Hess film written and directed by what their mood touches the absolute idiocy, and can fall from grace in Spanish public.The penalty is to lose something fundamental: the efforts of Black to speak at inglés-mexicano, which is the only thing really funny film. Dubbing it will turn into "manito" meat, "andele" and other mustache arrocet coletillas.A note: my wife fell into a deep sleep after 10 minutes of psicodélica-mejicana environmental musiquita with Black circulating on a motorcycle. I followed until the end of incomprehensible for her form. So is this movie: you look like a stone is going to your head, but you did not take off.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3857

Patri

Soy leyenda

muchocine

Seems a simple Christmas blockbuster, but in the background has a lot more worth seeing it although average film is not as good as the other half and remain many questions in the air, but it is worthwhile to see what it does Will Smith.

Recently most of the releases are remakes or sequels, and I am legend, a film which for the public at large is new, there are already other 2 previous versions based on the same novel, by Vincent Price and starring Charlton Heston. In this new version of the last man on earth are noticed many irregularities, the first part of the film is great but then the history gives a twist makes no worse the film which had started so well. In the first scene we see Will Smith driving a sports car while trying to hunt a deer that walks loose by the city, I read in forums and blogs how useless that is this scene, however, I think that it does have a useful, us is presenting the character, and describing certain aspects of his personality, though admittedly, given the amount of food that had been in his home had no need to hunt. During the first hour the absolute protagonist is Will Smith with the dog accompanying him, the weight of history rests on him and confirms that he is an actor of enormous, as already demonstrated with "In search of happiness", to my I loved this first part, the description of the relationship between the protagonist and the dog Sam and how the loneliness and the lack of human contact are beginning to make dent in their health mental. When the monsters appear, something not just might fit the aspect they have, too digital and the fact that there is a "head" which seems much more intelligent than the other monsters that only move by instincts. So that ultimately, I think it is a film that seems a simple Christmas blockbuster, but basically has much more, worth seeing her even if average film is not as good as the other half, and remain many questions in the air, but see what it does Will Smith worth. The second part of the film begins when the dog is infected and the protagonist is forced to kill her, in a tremendous scene, with an enormous emotional burden. After this the protagonist totally loses the head and attempts to commit suicide, here well, but when it comes to the girl child, everything is damaged, the script gives a few laps without sense incredible and it seems that at this point was when the writers began the strike leaving half a script which could have been great, as well as including the typical speech that God is very good and very bad humanYou can spoil any movie.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3598

Ana Belén Pacheco

The Nanny Diaries (Diario de una Niñera)

muchocine

The problem of this failed film is that not have been fool by a child dye and despite the deal, which is to shoot rockets, not just take off in no time.

I'm going to be very bad with this film because for misfortune of the writers being Nancy is something very common for our country when we do this attempt to learn another language. So given that I had the misfortune and at the same time care for kids (9 to be exact as I gave with my bones at a day-care center instead of in a house) and dealing with parents, grandparents, teachers and derivatives.Yes, I admit that put me before that so divine Scarlett playing a role commensurate with its age causes me a certain child excitement that ten minutes has disappeared almost completely. The film narrates the adventures of Annie in the big city. She lives in Jersey with his mom who has taken care to eliminate the Institute and now they have to start their first steps in working life. A little anxious that crisis that nobody in e real world may have decided to take the summer to find herself and by a small accident in the Park ends up being internal Babysitting at a home in the fifth Avenida.Y here is where I get pejiguera that with such mediocre raw at least I hope that me they entertained and a little fun and do not succeed. The writers are going in directions that little or nothing have to do with comedy losing in a tape that rides between the children films and teen film. A product that they dare even to copy (put them on foot) to Mary Poppins, Idol of any Nanny in looming or exnanny that boasts with two staggering references: the umbrella and Supercalibragilisticoespialidoso. I would already like to the Johansson having grace with the children who, even today, continues to have Julie Andrews.El this failed tape problem is that not have been fool by a child dye and despite the deal, which is to shoot rockets, not just take off in no time. Fails a single genuine laughter of the public more than 10 years that to succeed in the Christmas billboard is very well but in the resumes of Scarlett, Laura Linney, Paul Giamatti and even for the idol of teenagers Chris Evans (who is not annoyed or teaching torso so that it entertains me awhile). A penalty have so much and so little.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3256

Adrian Bravo

An American Crime

muchocine

It is a necessary film in times in which torture and the harassment are justified for political ends and is taken for granted that ethically correctness always dwells in the West, but seeing it we stir the stomach and we sacrifiquemos dinner.

One of the precepts of the fundamentalist Baptist Church is as follows: practical loyalty to the Christian faith in everyday life, at work, family and society, and commitment to preach to every creature of Word and by example. Mrs Gertrude Baniszewsky, a widow, ill and with seven children behind him, decided to preaching, with the complicity of all his children, his good news an innocent girl of 16 years-based harassment, torture, mutilation and sexual abuse of the most diverse, involucandro it to the neighborhood of a lost people of Indianapolis, back in the 1960s. The girl in question was Sylvia Likens, who had been in the care of Gertrude with his younger sister, that her parents had to leave for work during a season. Big mistake. They were leaving their daughters in the hands of the evil personified evil of a society which justified their facts arguing that such punishments were necessary to put right a lost soul. It could be the plot of a horror film, but it happened in United States. A ruthless and authentic American crime. Under the skin of the horror of the final result emit rotten vapors sexual repression, the lessons imbibed with sticks and humiliation, the railway imposition of Christian ideas travestidas precepts fundamentalists and above all, the injustice of being human when violence it seizes him, and can't stop. In the room were heard sighs attempting to relieve the sensation of nausea while the body was looking for accommodation in the armchair of the cinema, we were forced to watch how nearly an entire people can to agree to torture an innocent girl. The list of abuses is endless, but although Tommy O'Haver shows much of what happened, we are just at the tip of the iceberg. If one investigates a little, it notes that the inhabitants of Indianapolis considered this crime as the Dantesque perpetrated against a person throughout its history and what he suffered the child exceeds the tolerable limits. Why Tommy O'Haver prevents us we revolvamos more than enough and shows us just so we realize what we can be able to do in our supposedly democratic and civilized worlds. It is hard to talk about anything else other than the history, but it is worth noting the excellent work of Catherine Keener as Gertrude Baniszewsky (Capote, Being John Malkovich) and Ellen Page (Hard Candy) as Sylvia. The clash is Titanic, although winning is Keener. His eyes cold and loss is overwhelming, and achieves the desired effect. In summary, An American Crime is a necessary movie in times in which torture and the harassment are justified for political ends and is taken for granted that ethically correctness always dwells in the West, but seeing it we stir the stomach and we sacrifiquemos dinner.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1434

Francisco Bellón

Juegos secretos

muchocine

Secret games is a failed dissection of the American media society.

There are some situations in life that produce us a curious sensation of something already lived experience of déjà vu, as if we were protagonists of a flashback, for using cinematic language. The presence of games secrets in the 79th Edition of the Oscars is one of those situations, since that five years ago, the previous work of Todd Field, in the room, also had a presence at the annual awards of the Academia.En games secrets, Todd Field adpata the novel by Tom Perrotta, which has also participated in the script. The calm and tranquillity of a residential neighborhood is truncated when Ronnie j. McGorvery (Jackie Earle Haley), a pedophile fresh out of prison. Some residents concerned about children, create a Committee whose objective is staying alert monitor to Ronni, and try to throw him in the neighbourhood. Meanwhile, routine life of Sarah Pierce (Kate Winslet) gives a turn when she meets Brad Adamson (Patrick Wilson). Todd Field presents us with a story that explores the hidden side of the lives that take place in a peaceful residential neighborhood American lives full of lies, deception and broken dreams. The initial proposal of the film, despite a disastrous form of voice-over narration captivates the viewer with a very attractive first half hour. However, little by little the plot is goes weakening, without take too much to break down completely. The script, where there is not a hint of originality, which weakens ostensibly, lapses and quickly produces a great narrative abyss, which collapses the attention and interest of the Viewer. For its part, the characters are flat, mere caricatures, without motivation or ability to evolution. The slow pace prints Todd Field history and the duration of the tape are the elements that give the lace to games secrets. b > only interpretations and some unhealthy curiosity and somewhat masochistic keep the public in his armchair. Kate Winslet done a brilliant job, as we are accustomed of great restraint and sobriety, interpretation which has earned his fifth nomination to the Oscar with only 31 years old. For its part, Jackie Earle Haley makes human character, which already is commendable and worthy of applause. Patrick Wilson performs a correct interpretation, while a Jennifer Connelly, as usual, there is no who is created.Secret games is a failed dissection of American media society full of well-worn situations and common places. Todd Field again disappoint five years later, proving unable to live up to expectations. As then, the unique appeal of the film are interpretations of its actors.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/671

Emilio Calvo de Mora

El laberinto del fauno

muchocine

The film by Guillermo del Toro is an absolute prodigy, a spell of one hundred twelve minutes, a climb to the sky of the fairy tales and a descent to the hell of the human soul.

Ophelia has a chalk that opens doors in the walls of a rural house which serves as a national detachment headquarters. Out in the forest, are the maquis and a maze with a Faun and the fairies. There is a captain of phalangists that, in reality, is a demon, though he shaves with delectation and mimo, is cleaned with exquisite cleanliness their command and listening on a rickety turntable ' COPLA ' boots. Ofelia's mother is pregnant with her second husband, the captain. The son next has it sick. A plant of Mandrake bathed in milk Ophelia placed underneath his bed can cure it. This remedy is confesses the Faun the girl back to focus on its true mission: pass three tests.In one test, there is a toad. In the two, a pale man with eyes in the hands. The three, a maze. The film by Guillermo del Toro is an absolute prodigy, a spell of one hundred twelve minutes, a climb to the sky of the fairy tales and down to hell for the soul human, contaminated by the barbarism of the war, but the fantasy of Ophelia, his world of happy insects and portals that awarded for game play happiness in another worldit its real and overlaps it in such a way that what happens in one just by modifying the events of the other. Del Toro she wears with master these two tones, the adult and the child, and not fracture can be seen in the narrative fluidity of both.The actors are in State of grace. We have not seen work so to Maribel Verdú. Nor to Sergi López. Ariadna Gil, in his brief role, borda his mother haunted by welfare and sacrifice.Alex Angulo, the doctor. And can not not mind to Ivana Baquero, the girl that was for Princess and is stepdaughter of Captain fascita: makes a marvelous performance. Guillermo del Toro has had to revisionarla seventy times (!) and that she cried in the same scenes in each pass. I will have been the last españolitos who have stepped on a movie theater to see, but I'll be also hope that many who before they withdraw it passes again through box office and very gladly leave the euros of rigour to return to feel the same emotions, the same pain, the same feeling of incontenida happiness. Imitar me, please.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/531

Juan Nadie

World Trade Center

muchocine

Stone achieved a masterpiece of about 45 minutes lost intensity as it progresses the footage to recover the tone towards the end.

September 11, 2001. A plane of the company America Airlines United Airlines are abducted and scrambled against the World Trade Center. More than 2,000 people were killed in that attack from Al - Qaeda which shocked the world. Only two dozens of people were rescued alive from the debris of the twin towers was came down shortly after the collision. They will Jimeno (Michael Peña), agent of the authority airport of the Department of police of New York, and Sergeant John McLoughlin (Nicolas Cage) are two of those victims who managed to leave with life, after 24 hours half, to be able to tell the world that occurred on that fateful day. Director Oliver Stone has been responsible for bringing to the screen the story of these two men who fought against the death to get out of the hell of rubble and flames that were. But not only their history, but also of those hundreds of men and women who fought to find any hint of life amid the prevailing chaos.Everyone knows by now that occurred five years ago at the World Trade Center and also how lived in a city that was collapsed by the magnitude of the events. The novelty of the film is to know how experienced citizens and, above all, the security forces, who received only part of the information. They thought that it was an accident. Who came to help the first attacked Tower did not know that the same scene had been in the second. The chaos that was experienced in the scene of the tragedy is alternated with continuous images of how saw it the family and the rest of the world before the television. This part is the most interesting of all the film narrative. Stone shoots a magnificent beginning of the movie that falls when it focuses only on the lives of the two protagonists. It is not to fall in (on the other hand predictable) sentimentality but for the way in which recount the things and how the flash-back of their lives are linked with their situation under the rubble. It is too shocking and lost the drama. Although it is just recognize that this remedy is necessary to avoid the tedium of a same ongoing delirium image two people semienterradas wanting to get out of there, but they are gradually losing the hope of achieving it.Cage outboard his role seriously and little sympathetic, but his man of his duty until the last moment. While Michael Peña, touches him the role of chicano fun that some point should take charge of the situation to lend a hand to his sergeant. Both are correct and sober, but best performance is Maggie Gyllenhaal (Allison Jimeno), the wife of officer Jimeno, which reflects to perfection as it must have been the agony of the families that they did not receive news of their loved ones. Aesthetic quality (which is a lot) and narrative (slightly less) movie apart, more emotion that manages to boot Stone the Viewer is the memory. A feeling of deep sadness appears to return to see images of people launching into the void to escape the flames or the chill that runs along the back to contemplate as the first tower collapses. And, inevitably, even though it is not the intention of the director, is the memory of the Madrid bombings. The chaos, fear, outrage, solidarity?Stone achieved a masterpiece of about 45 minutes lost intensity as it progresses the footage to recover the tone towards the end. Worst of all is that for those who are not American that eternal exalted patriotism, even here, a bit exaggerated. A former marine who moves to ground zero to help in the search for victims is responsible, as no, giving life to this somewhat stale Americanism squeaking even in the midst of a tragedy as well. His final sentence to the phone says it all: "Do again?" No, not yet. "Here they will need many people to avenge this". The best, without doubt, happy for the protagonists, although only end in part.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3386

Ramón Balcells

Un funeral de muerte

muchocine

Hilirante, black up to but not power, with a dramatic tinge of truly desirable and endearing characters that go really wrong and either at the same time.

Frank Oz, a director not too prestigious but always effective, is back with an incredibly funny black comedy. Death at a funeral is an exercise in English taste (though, anyway, American) that it does not stop at any time and get more than a smile, a laugh in each of her scenes. Hilirante, black up to but not power, with a dramatic tinge of truly desirable and endearing characters that go really wrong and either at the same time. This film is, above all, a waste of very intelligent talent, a kind of English drama told in an exquisite way. It can cross out of being out of sync in some of their scenes (of the uncle on the toilet, very thing Farrelly), or rather present dyes nothing own Hollywood in an environment so typically English. It is also somewhat repetitive, but it already is.Its main objective is to let us pass the best possible, although no doubt the final speech leaves us with hair-raising. It is what it seems, entirely. And it is that black comedies are not intended to be nothing more than samples of a smart and mischievous smile. Your script is extremely wild, although does not lack detail. Without doubt, enviable and completely round, and even manages to make us cry with laughter with several of his scenes. This is an English humor more than American, a humor where the Viewer makes more than cry of laughter: think. And I am not saying that death at A funeral is the height of the depth. By God! This is a first class entertainment, but not have touches that can out. Yes, perhaps the death treated as something with which you can play. But I doubt that Oz is going down this path. He is poised to introduce an alocadísima comedy in an apparent tragedy, and this is, without doubt, irreproachable and very successful.Situations that happen to the characters in the movie may be too out of control, but I assure you that taking into account the set of the film, not worth stopping to think if they are or are not at all appropriate. They are simply great. And enough to utter the word "valium" to understand that, perhaps, more this causative element of such tragedy, the death of the Patriarch with his, do terrible?, consequences. Screenwriter Dean Craig, rather than rely on a bàsico topic such as death, represented in such a way that it remains secluded behind the family entanglements.And, finally, to say that all the cast of the film perfectly fulfills its duty. The figure of the main comic is here left band to offer all them properly and similar ownership. In addition, none of them is particularly famous, so glad sight to a server to be realize that many of them are true and new stars of the black comedy. Let Steve Martin or Eddie Murphy.En final, a great American English style comedy that it will provoke any viewer who sees more than a simple smile. A prank done, above all, way careful with humor that seems to be a mix of American with the English. This is probably one of the most entertaining of recent years films.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2068

Rafa Ferrer

El hundimiento

muchocine

Effective film that recounts the last days almost with historical rigor of a decrepito Adolf Hitler in a bunquer in Berlin.

Effective film that recounts the last days almost with historical rigor of a decrepito Adolf Hitler in a bunquer in Berlin, it is curious to see many of the gestures that we have seen in historical reports excellently played by Bruno Ganz, director Oliver Hirschbiegel that already address the amazing "The experiment" used for the film some blue tones and are becoming softer towards the end of the tapea staff of excellent actors and a soundtrack that although brief is fully satisfactory.Perhaps the only downside I see to the tape is their excessive duration 150 min and its a little slow and linear development with some situations do not do more than repeat during the footage until the satiety (although, in a war, to be honest, nor is there much creativity).Powerfully calls me attention to where comes the total eccentricity of Hitler, which gives equal to 80% and although completely decentered get carried much of his men ahead. !!If it is that this man was a little asshole!In short, an excellent movie to see the other side of that be petty that it was Adolf Hitler.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1448

Alberto Concepción

María Antonieta

muchocine

Sofia Coppola makes his last work an object of worship for certain snobs, with some virtues (in addition to the aforementioned soundtrack, must also be applauded show a different point of view); but with notable defects.

The fact that Sofia Coppola is the daughter of someone so important in the cinema of the last century, has probably helped her to put a dent in the world of cinema. But it is also true that much of the blame has herself: her first film, 'the Virgin suicides', he was already somewhat controversial, but liked it. However, was ' Lost in translation' the film that made him make the leap to fame: good script great Bill Murray.Pero with 'Marie Antoinette' wanted you give a very peculiar touch to your movies. Characteristic, no doubt. Different, original.aburrido. Groundbreaking, controversial. ñoño. Bland Atrevido.Pero. Coppola wanted to make his personal vision on the life of the Queen, but with a dash of 3 pages and an almost non-existent plot can be little to do. Well, be content to his faithful seguidores.pero few.The last film by Sofia Coppola shows us the more personal side of the French sovereign: arrival to Palace, their problems in bed with her husband, Louis XVI; their love tryst with Dukes extranjeros.su fans to the game. Everything quite differently from that film we are accustomed: original, yes but sleepy over not being able to. I understand that you wanted to give his 'vision', but by the way has been left a little attention to the interest of the Viewer.The performances are more justitas: a correct Kirsten Dunst brings pretty face and little else. The rest of side are little known (thanks) and have a not very complex role. However, the most talked about point since the submission of the film at Cannes, is the subject of its soundtrack. And tell verdad.es best. Music modern, striking with the classicism of the time, but quite grateful.And is that little more can be said: Sofia Coppola makes his last work an object of worship for certain snobs, with some virtues (in addition to the aforementioned soundtrack, must also be applauded show a different point of view); but with notable defects: I'm still waiting realized me that actually tell me more of what I saw.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2231

Iñaki Bilbao

El hombre sin fronteras (The Hired Hand)

muchocine

Interesting revisionist western is not narrated in the usual way. It is made with few resources and fewer characters.

"Harry Collings returns home after wandering with his friend, Arch." His wife, who had given him missing, allows to stay together to it believing that everything would be as before. But then Harry has to make a difficult decision regarding their loyalties and priorities.Interesting revisionist western is not narrated in the usual way. It is made with few resources and fewer characters. However, although strange sometimes, it contains scenes full of passion and good movies. It is quite irregular, but it is worth seeing her. Verna Bloom is great and Warren Oates, immeasurable. Good and very nice music. Anecdotally, tell that when I saw in the film Burceña (Barakaldo, Bizkaia) gave us the first two rolls changed, i.e., we knew how terminated without knowing how it started.Us looking all surprised, then we descojonamos and accepted. We are all human.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2204

Tito Chinchan

La leyenda del minotauro

muchocine

Film with few pretensions (I guess) of a Minotaur fed mancebas and virginal mancebos, musculitos and tattooed beauty. For a silly day of those who do not know if cut you the veins or left you them long.

The world of the DVD is a SAC bottomless for films of those that you doubt that really have recorded or that they are simply pieces of others stuck with greater or less master. The work today is without place to doubt, of these. By the way, the cover of the DVD promises promises unless it puts it. This seems more than what it is then, that I will head to other paths.The film is about an imaginary Empire which worships the Bull. As the village is becoming unbeliever, rather than creating the football to dominate the beasts, they do their God Bull copule with his Queen as well getting a semi God tangible for the Plebs. A Minotaur with very bad milk that feeds on blood and other viscera out them of these. So what they enclose in a maze and you are throwing Virgin both insofar as that the boy go desfogando. A young man decides to save his girlfriend and offers to be sacrificed.My mother, peliculón video club meat (I think it was released directly on DVD) that we have swallowed as well as stupid. The beginning is very promising, with a very interesting history and a woman in porretas. But as it is advancing the thing loses bellows, disappears the action and we can only a deformed Minotaur that gives particularly to anyone who catches. The end is very absurd, but it leaves the movie a nice aftertaste.In short, film with few pretensions (I guess) of a Minotaur fed mancebas and virginal mancebos, musculitos and tattooed beauty. For a silly day of those who do not know if cut you the veins or left you them long.With this morlaco I would like to see more than one Bullfighter.kisses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2778

Kiko de España

La cosecha de hielo

muchocine

The script weakens on all four sides, the actors passed through there, the story is boring, predictable and stupid, and is headed by someone who does not know to shoot a "film noir", leaving in the air what could have been done with this story Bryan Singer, or Christopher Nolan.

"The harvest of ice", Harold Ramis, is a film failed in all and each one of its aspects.Narrates in forzadísima way the blow given, although it never look, a picapleitos buddy of the mafia, Charlie Arglist (Cusack) and his friend, Vic Cavanaugh (Thornton) at the expense of the capo of Kansas City.El script weakens on all four sides, the actors passed through there, the story is boring, predictable and stupid, and is headed by someone who does not know to shoot a "film noir"leaving in the air what could have been done with this story Bryan Singer, or Christopher Nolan.Ramis has proven to be a good director of comedy with his debut "The club of the crackpots", or the adventures of Chevy Chase and his family and it has been shown that if it sounds the flute, you can also direct master comedies, such as the glorious "Trapped in time"in 1993.El script, it seems impossible, it is Robert Benton, featuring fantastic stories in his belt, as "Bonnie Cyde", "Superman" or the more recent "A hair of silly" or "the falling Sun", but there is no where catch it.The characters have no relationship, we do not have the remotest idea of whether they are friends, acquaintances, from when it trapichean together or when is it lie with their wives without the other knows as spectators.Echoes of the Coens, especially of "Easy blood" or "Fargo", but in a desperate attempt to "it" was recognized and play in the same Division.What you should not know Ramis, apparently, is the only one that has played in that Division and has conquered a title was huge Sam Raimi with its huge "A simple plan", in par 1998.Un of flat beautiful, an emotional moment with Christmas gifts (the action takes place on Christmas Eve) and one or two jokes are very little background for a movie with this casting and this photograph (get the viewer has cold) of Alar Kivilo, interestingly, was the man behind the light of "A simple plan".That's funny, right?. A phrase: "You're dead, not you pretend you're not".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1517

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Juegos secretos

muchocine

His descending tone, their expectations failed, not recognize, in the end, as the good movie that is is attractive in its approach and very well done... Memorable scenes along with flat resolutions lowered the final print...

The emotional turbulence of the placid and bourgeois residential neighborhoods of the United States have occupied numerous films. All digging in the same pathologies: apathetic marriages who seek air in new adventures, are sexual hidden bass facades respectable, adolescents who at an adult age calcada their parents...It abounds in this narrative material rico, but stays halfway by the half-heartedness of its conclusions. All that in a glorious first half hour points to heights significant dramatic then becomes exciting and instructive exercise of containment, where thin models described mere clichés, to forms of the more trite stereotype.Before that happens, before that we unplug the interest, there is a prodigious album frustrations and fears, of characters victimized by the routine who live at a distance happiness and never dare to address the risk to give a bit of life to its disenchanted days.The newly freed paedophile who returns to his neighborhood and does not hide its deviation, departures housewives that rest on the bench in the park with an eye on their children and a handsome dad entertain them the other, the unbalanced ex whose job is to harass the pervert and, above all, the love story of intervenor of Brad (Patrick Wilson) and Sarah (Kate Winslet) to which refers the inconvenient Spanish title (in English, we found a more conformity) (to the plot of Little Children), which takes a lot of this excessive footage, but just turned into an abusive (although well photographed) carnal fray hidden from the children.Sarah is not the Emma Bovary believed: her aura of inevitability is different and their ways of housewife frustrated by a non-existent marriage (there is not a single scene in which both occur as such unless the husband is caught with the panties in his face doing digital onanism) also differ from the character of Flaubert.Brad is a loserpending content his wife and now finally get his title of lawyer and spilled by his role as father responsible and pigeonholed in the routine that, in the eyes of society which lives, it is up to his wife.Secret games delivered moments of exquisite film, well filmed, beautifully built and very beautiful invoice. The scene in which the pedophile enters the pool is, apart from an indisimulado shark Spielberg tribute, a magnificent detail of what Todd Field wants to count, and that he already noted in the overvalued in the room, the hypocrisy of the community, which defenestra the neighbor for the sake of safeguarding their State of life and morality that carried about when what they are witnessing is an exhibition they of sins that laceran. Ultimately, Field even dares to draw the profile of pedophile in a more humane way (great actor Jackie Earle Haley) to put on the table the labyrinth of emotions of those who assume the right to prosecute others. Very revealing is, at this level of things, the scene in which the Group of housewives who love literature houses sit down to discuss Madame Bovary when we know (perhaps knows all) that Sarah is Emma and who are evaluating is herself.The movie suffers by the little finesse when it comes to drawing the conjugal portrait of two marriages: there is a clear vision of what they are experiencing. The slight drops of information we are given are not enough. Field is not the seasoned director that I would like the film to explain much with the minimum elements. However, it not fragmenting that now already announced as a voice to listen to in the American cinema.These sleepwalkers characters that roam a neighborhood of green porches and plácido well-being, say little maturity so that you can deposit on his shoulders the difficult task of educating their children. None cares about that.In the end, a series of calamities that now is not necessary to disclose lead to all addressing his Vertigo, its inertia to throw away because they want to aspire to be more happy or expressed more conveniently, to find happiness anywhere else because in the living have not found a life.A voice in off impostada and false uncomfortable too, but not Field abused. The problems of Hispanic dubbing made that we imagine Kevin Costner behind the voice. I promised, at that time, wherever possible, return to that custom mine see original movies with their subtitles, but that's another story.A tone more indie than the top American Beauty (whose screenplay was much more than Yes), secret games is a great proposal to go to the movies, but not to leave as a castanets or to promise us to see her again after a while prudencial.addenda: went to see the room nothing more complete these secret games. It has similar features, but the intentions are others. The first film of Todd Field is more raw, less lightness in the imprint of the characters. Recommended both and, luckily, huge easy to find in any video club room.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3529

José A. Peig

Rec

muchocine

If any quality could have this film is its significant capacity to create the atmosphere. But after the first sequences of horror, it stagnates in a few repetitive efectistas tricks, thus the narrative becomes repetitive and mechanical.

Jaume Balagueró and Paco Plaza present us this new immersion in the myth of the "loss of the soul", which removes many unconscious fears in humans, fearful of degenerate until losing the humanity, and that in the cinéfaga culture has taken the form of the zombie, mostly (since Romero Lamberto Bava, Argento, Stuart Gordon), or the other great classic and which have recently spoken on these pages, the invaders of bodies.The Fund is always the same, although the plot pretext varies and it can go thematic ranging from science fiction to the religion or the sociological ínfula. Balagueró and Plaza proposal refers to more than one reason, but, however, the intention of the authors is not build a parable about collective psychosis post-9/11, but a reality show of horror that induces a one-dimensional and permanent record of sensations.The film opts for a disproportionate strident tone, puts so much emphasis on being "realistic", in the end, the critical Viewer discovers easily emptiness behind the feeling. Cinema of sensations, feeling of fear, with passages loaded with a murky and insane horror. If any quality could have this film is its significant capacity to create the atmosphere. But after the first sequences of horror, it stagnates in a few repetitive efectistas tricks with which the narrative becomes repetitive, mechanical, and under a visual treatment and a few without intentions of singularity (Blair Witch Project, among others). Another rule of thumb for intelligent but cheats filmmakers: If you don't have imagination to develop the story without falling into the esquematismos, can increase the intensity of the induced sensations. Thus, at least nobody can say be a boring film. It is not. But, although the feeling is the foundation of the horror film, the history of this film genre has shown that it is more than that. The human set offers some nuances about the reactions in extreme situations, addressing attitudes such as selfishness, empathy or xenophobia with a commonplace treatment, almost a routine to try to save - without success - clear plain of this expression Mannerist and plagiadora.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2704

Dragon negro

TMNT: Las tortugas ninja

muchocine

Director Kevin Munroe and the newly created Studio Imagi start with right foot, which makes their upcoming projects, command G or Astro Boy, is wait more eager even.

Returning back to the big screen, and after a few notable sequels, Ninja turtles, and this time come fully digitized. Input is appreciated that we never again have the birth of the turtles and as they got their powers and it seems that the previous films have been taken into account to get in position. The story begins one year after that Shredder has been expired, with a few turtles away from their tasks of superheroes and surviving as you can. Leonardo, leader of the band, had just returned after spending a year isolated in a jungle in South America where he was sent to complete his training, Rafael has continued the steps as hero and is dedicated to monitor the streets at night and face hidden crime, which makes that clash with Leonardo by their different points of viewDonatello deals with technical troubleshooting and Miguelangelo masquerading as turtle and performs at children's parties. Each goes to his roll, until a new threat will be that they should again return to fight together.Turtles have grown and are no longer crazy teenagers who were now have real problems of survival and coexistence, and Leonardo will have to try if you can be the leader of the band and not to disappoint his mentor, which brings us a new vision of the characters, more serious and real, turtles do not stop being beings with problems and questions, and each one of them with its own cargo. But not everything is seriously in the film, dumb jokes, action and spectacle. Everything is distributed, a film that will like children who come for the first time to a movie theater to see the characters, both the veterans and nostalgic that we come to see our characters of childhood again.Technical invoice is really successful and it is spectacular at times, and with some very detailed plans and some action scenes that are seen and understood perfectly, while the camera is nothing mareante, although that fails in the same aspect to many productions of this kind, humans are still too reliable.Turtles have a worthy adaptation in this film and also leave you wanting the thing continued in a new film. Director Kevin Munroe and the newly created Studio Imagi start with right foot, which makes their upcoming projects, command G or Astro Boy, is wait more eager even.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/811

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Blade runner

muchocine

Say once they have seen things no one has seen, that beyond of Orion ships on fire fall like tears of gods on the scorched earth of despair. Or something like that.

1. A brief review of the film géneroEl came to birth with Julio Verne, Mélies header reading. Science fiction, at least the more powerfully rooted in popular taste, came to birth with cinema, although fantasy literature had given noble deliveries of space adventure and epic beyond where our eyes are.The trip to the Moon, founding film, real exercise of film sleight to tenor of the rudiments in use and technical logistics precarious tenure, became a brief, but imaginative miracle that revolutionized a way look that he had not suffered any transformation and had the painting as almost only valid reference element.This science fiction arming of pure series (b) chewy and frivolous to engolosinar a virginal audience that embebecía with the magical showcase of fiction. Few more subscribers for narrative imagination and terrain for the showcasing of the technique that this science fiction.Celluloid was of documentalism: invested in news images. Film, as entertainment, due to the fantastic narrative almost all their primitive ingenuity. The shortage of mounting a film show of height, that appeared not ridiculous and restituyese in images the huge potential of the written arguments of pure literature, slowed in dry a boom of the genre.From the founding movie until 2001, an Odyssey in space, the Kubrick master, there is a sci-fi truly colossal, with one greater height of view, when other genres (comedy, adventure, horror, thriller...) had delivered indisputable masterpieces from well early open unstoppable career of what we have become known as the seventh art.George Lucas gadgets lowered gender to divertimento with popcorn: we entered the new era of the film franchise squarely and money, for the first time, became the basic parameter on which the success or failure of one film all time science fiction itself required that magnificence to demonstrate absolute Vertigo of its literature with sharpness and likelihood pivotaría.Ridley Scott had become the Duelists and the vigorous and warmness Alien, the eighth passenger, which revived fabulous effectively the pulse of science fiction.In 1982 he makes Blade Runner.2. Electric sheep, divine pastors.Blade Runner is the adaptation of the Philip k. Dick story "Do Androids Dream electric sheep?", written in 1968. . Dick, Bradbury and Haxley are the triad of worship in futuristic literature authors.Metaphysical reflections and the visual poetry of the film is melancholic, almost bucolic tone heritage, history of Dick.Blade Runner is a unblemished mixture of science fiction and pure noir.The action takes place in Los Angeles, a city ravaged by acid rain that a lead neon illuminates with laziness.Detective Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford) seeks to Replicants, mutinous droids who want to become human. Which modern Prometheus, Dick (and Scott in the prodigious translation of the tale in images) we refer to the history of Shelley, to his Frankenstein emerged from the hand of the man, who wants to emulate God. Dekcard falls in love with a replicant (Sean Young, in the role of atypical and disappointing career).The company of Deckard, withdraw (remove) the roids in absentia, whose desire is to find Tyrell, the demiurge, its fantastic creator, the father in the shadow, his Doctor Frankenstein locked in his secret Castle. One of his works most singular is Roy Batty, that proverbially recreates an inspired Rutger Hauer, whose subsequent career has not had any worthy continuation.All amateur film (and gives equal what age who has always had the pleasure huge having seen Blade Runner) recalls the monologue of Batty. "I have seen things that you have not." Attack ships on fire beyond of Orion. I've seen C rays shine in the darkness near the door of Tanhäuser. All those moments will be lost in time like tears in the rain. It's time to die "." Remember his sacrifice, his redeeming flight, the recitative of the English visionary poet William Blake. The Dutch actor brings a physical immeasurable: somehow, Blade Runner is his face under the lluvia.3. The Blade Runner universe: Mystic cyberpunk. The thematic complexity of the film lastró his commercial career. The almost thirty million dollars that it took drawing the future and rewriting the fantasy of Dick, devastated his city, his particular obsession by the ethics of robotics, did not have an immediate consideration. The film was vapuleado in the criticism of the time. It was hoped that the newly encumbrado director Scott printing a quicker pace, more in line with a play action, but Blade Runner is an inquiry of first order on the nature of the human soul and religion as an engine of the existence. The Android Batty looking for their God, which sacrificed because not provides the metaphysical answers calls. This thick consideration not within (or with latest shoehorn) the book of style of action films. Eventually, Blade Runner earned a well-deserved fame. He knew how to present a series of moral questions which are now, two long decades after its premiere, reflection on the cultural forums to use.The image of the death of the replicant Roy leaving escape a symbolic Dove is a contemporary film icons par excellence, in my very humble opinion of the film like that have passed ESA collective memory the scenes of Bogart and Rains in the airport of Casablanca, Cary Grant, fleeing from an airplane in a desert wasteland or Vivien Leigh vowing to never again go to hunger.The voiceover of Deckart refers directly to Raymond Chandler, to film noir of the 1940s. The raincoats with long necks and blades fans in the detective Office create the illusion that we are witnessing a film by John Huston and Bogart may appear at any time, disenchanted of life and disgusted to see so much horror. Either lack the femme that is the aforementioned replicant Young.La possibility that own detective is a replicant, expressed on occasion by Ridley Scott, fatal, delivers one object of worship. Apocalyptic and dystopian, Blade Runner resists multiple viewings. Moviegoers Pro agree that there are films with letterhead of classics that hardly manage to overcome the test be seen continuously by the Viewer. I have a good friend who swears to having seen Blade Runner four times in a row and have found a reason for different joy in each pass. I have I declared fan. I've seen enough times to hate her, but it has gained in stature, height artistic. 4. Newslists Legion of fans of Blade runner are in luck: it was announced by the end of November, a limited version of the disc with a sound restitution more according to these times of digital sophistication.In 2007, Ridley Scott himself will take care of the design and the contents of a Final Cut edition, which promises to be a landmark in the marketing of DVDs of classic cinema. We hope that the review of Scott is not so farrullera and little attractive as that made Alien.El price will not be abusive. I read that it will be around the fifteen euros and not contain (for this future revision in 2007) of any bonus disc with additional exclusive content. Either way, there to celebrate it in style. Make therefore tail, come to the nearest video store, save a rainy night to reverse in the promised restoration noise and chromatic.Say once they have seen things no one has seen, that beyond of Orion ships on fire fall like tears of gods on the scorched earth of despair. Or something like that.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2433

JLO

Saw

muchocine

Low cost, with a rookie director - film James Wan, fresh out of an Australian film school which also collaborated on the story - that gives us hope for a genre, that increasingly makes a best effort to be what it was.

This original thriller, mix in equal parts of terror with the now more famous psychological thriller, is a pleasant surprise in the genre.Not by its idea, which refers immediately in its first minutes to Seven but to its construction, full of all the known clichés but this time used in a very beneficial dose. Unlike the aforementioned film, does so with unknown or eternal actors side: only the face of Cary Elwes is barely recognized (slips in Twister, Robin Hood, the shadow of the Vampire, liar, liar, etc.) being the best actor by far film. Danny Glover appears as the only exception - and unnecessary - the Gallery of celebrities. With almost a single scenario, an underground bathroom where the two protagonists are prisoners and who are victims of a macabre game and difficult resolution. These first moments, oppressive and loaded with flashbacks gores, are defined the dark film with a pace that not decays almost miraculously.The use of a nervous camera in some passages seems to undermine the narrative, but then it is used as a resource to make more fluid passages and not as a vacuous modernity, winning also in agility.The successes of the script - for the also co-star star Whannell - make it solid, no potholes or loose, nothing obvious and that with the arrival of the famous "turns of the screw" don't you lose the line and coherence obtained in the footage.The game of fear - the original English is Saw: "sierra" (original are here in Argentina in names!)-It is a low-cost film and with a rookie director - James Wan, fresh out of an Australian film school which also collaborated on the story - that gives us hope for a genre, increasingly makes a best effort to be what it was.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2426

Francisco Bellón

Suspiros del Corazón

muchocine

Sighs of the heart part of a good premise that unfortunately not been known shape or develop properly in the film, making it predictable and slightly boring.

Currently, a large number of comedies from the Hollywood of the 1940s and 1950s us are really endearing naivety that characterized. Yes, agree, in the majority of cases this ingenuity was part of a major advertising campaign: had to show the American dream without a hint of sordidness, corruption or vice. A clear example is the great sighs Capra.Con heart Frank, Enrique Gabriel intentionally takes the path that marked those classics through a modern utopian fable. Fernando Valbuena Montijos (Roger Coma) is a young and promising businessman who is about to close the best deal of your life, but this disrupts completely when he sees all his horoscope forecasts are met, and goes to his neighbor (Alejandro Awada) in search of Council. Finally, Fernando desperately seek the Publisher of the magazine to get his next horoscope before closing the contract. Enrique Gabriel raises the film as an homage to a photoromance (Idyll publication) magazine that actually existed in the Buenos Aires of the 1950s, as well as some of the people who made it possible. Sighs of the heart has a promising start, but gradually the story loses bellows. It's another example of something very abundant in the film, a good initial idea which has not been able develop or translate into a good film. Enrique Gabriel also you has gone hand in hand with ingenuity, and it has finally become a sticky cake not suitable for diabetics to the tape. It has ups and downs in the pace, and there are some scene than other which can cause embarrassment, as the confrontation between the two old exiled fighters, one Italian and another Spanish. The interpretations are generally correct, but two stand out, unfortunately for different reasons: while Roger Coma is seen forced at all times, to the newcomer Maria Dupláa is seen with ease, making a very natural and fresh interpretation.Sighs of the heart part of a good premise that unfortunately not been known shape or develop properly in the film, making it predictable and slightly boring.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1908

Matías Cobo

Sunshine

muchocine

Perhaps does not comply completely excellent expectations of its beginning, but returns some dignity to the space cinema after years of drought in this type of topics.

Read the synopsis of Sunshine? a ship manned by eight astronauts intended revive the ailing Sun through a powerful explosive charge and avoid the freezing of the Earth in the year 2057? parallelism might seem logical with films like Armageddon. But both tapes just share its proposal for planetary salvation, because Danny Boyle's aims is to package and pay homage to the best version of the science fiction film and space. His brilliant and aesthetic decor, with a crew member sitting in front of an impressive stamp of the Sun as seen from a great sala-observatorio of his ship, is already a declaration of intentions.So, for much of its length, tape try to evoke space movies more realistic and philosophical as 2001: a space Odyssey. The Icarus II will not find heroes muscular and dicharacheros in the style of the gang of Bruce Willis, but qualified scientists and characters with attributes as human as the instinct of survival.However, in this desire to 'homenajeador' so typical of the director of Trainspotting and 28 days later, the tape revolves in its last half hour to try to add to the story a little space horror the unbeatable Alien style. And it is here where both tribute converted the set in a deslavazado collage that reaches, even ruin the interesting virtues targeted previously. This ingredient of terror seems a strange annexed more than an element of continuity perfectly integrated into a coherent story.With a little-known cast, Excel where a regular film of Boyle as Cillian Murphy or Chris Evans, and a tight budget, Sunshine may fail to comply altogether excellent expectations of its beginning, but returns some dignity to the space cinema after years of drought in this type of topics.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1625

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Café irlandés

muchocine

Melodrama with humor, naturalistic printing, social portrait, finally, ideas, feelings of overwhelming screenplay film...

Costumbrismo holds a type of cinema verité, graceful in its very estimable function to prefigure a story naturalist, colorful and entertaining, nothing twisted, convinced of the eminently narrative essence of its proposal. The inventory of avatars never exceeds the daily life of a spectator invariably involved in a plot almost always close, intimate, raya in the biographical. All we can pass what we see as almost nobody him occur things that live Bruce Willis in their crystal jungles or in the epic adventures of Peter O'Toole in his Arabia.El Lawrence abundant merit of Stephen Frears is to handle the history of Roddy Doyle (author of "The Barrytown", trilogy whose first and rough part was that "The commintments" of the once in first row Alan Parker and with an almost identical to this cast) (Irish coffee) and extract powerful localist load (Dublin, 1980s) and deliver a work universal, easy recognition of empathy immediate, without pandering to the political or sank in the topical, while never supply of truth, truth that scales between the comical and dramatic without listing in excess by any of the two. The gentle reader can rest assured that there are generous of both.Frears was returning home, the BBC, after check in "Hero", a one-act farce to the Capra did glory in Hollywood, but that not worthy the whole of his work. Amidst this British, Frears allows licenses and sutilidades, winks with sarcasm and sweetness or emotion in abundance. Everything is permitted. Unlike the other master of manners (Ken Loach), Frears not overwhelmed, not overwhelms with miserable prints with dark portraits of impoverished society and its social corsets.The impressive performance of Colm Meany as father sorry by the pregnancy of his daughter (and his refusal) to give the name of the father gives the film a very considerable humanity sediment and that gets to this "brat" (The snapper, is the original English title) is entretenidísimo, very well done and film of indelible memory in our movie fan memory. Great chairs can be with few mimbres.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3176

Ramón Balcells

Promesas del Este

muchocine

Wonderful sample of good doing, one further step in the complete Filmography of the Canadian. A quasi perfect, crude and wildly concienciador film.

Violence has always been a fairly useful subject in this of the seventh art. One of the clearest examples has been the Canadian David Cronenberg, capable of surprise, may trouble and stalk the viewer with acclaimed as inseparable or fly, or rather raise with his penultimate and masterful A history of violence. Eastern promises one could expect less. It might be the second part of the latter, but the truth is that you for me, this time has exceeded even further, giving us a film perfect quasi, crude oil and wildly concienciador. There are two scenes of violence extreme (and so extreme) that appear in the film. Two samples that leave us enough clear that violence is not something free, nor something that benefits no one. But Cronenberg falls not only short with this subject, but explores the depths of its protagonists (particularly those of a superb Viggo Mortensen) and consciousness as something hard to pay. And is that the character of Nikolai is a cold, calculating and finally amazing. With Mortensen, highlight the presence of Armin Mueller-Stahl, whose character sadistic and unpleasant, but with his apparent peaceful face, makes create us even more fear and tension. This is a film, moreover, perfectionist and calculated from beginning to end, which has a script by Steven Knight truly incredible with some really fascinating dialogues with a poetic air. It contains already mythical scenes such as the search for the baby by the hospital or the barber shop, without letting me the best of all, that in a warm and bloody sauna.It could condemn the film have an end somewhat far-fetched, but think, believe and agree that could not be less successful. This is a drama criminal, realistic, and hard, very hard, which deals with the subject of violence with pulse and stark way. If that conclusion not League too with the outline of the film is because the surprise factor is as it should be, surprise, not because Cronenberg decide aparar of its principal subject (very attentive to the bright flat end).Eastern promises is a wonderful sample of the good to make, one further step in the complete Filmography of the Canadian and, finally, the real demonstration by Mortensen is an actor first.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3714

Rafa Ferrer

Sunshine

muchocine

One can feel completely stupid to delocalised, glad to have left parked at its premiere, and taking advantage of already on DVD pick up more calmly...

I admit that I have a strange relationship between love-hate, difficult to qualify for a movie buff, while "Trainspotting" and "28 days later" seem large films, as well as risky on your bill with Danny Boyle, I could not with "The beach" and although I tried to endure its almost 2 hours of footage, I became heavy and boring but not power.With this, after their first minutes, we find a well made, debtor, tape in equal parts as "Solaris" and tape at the same time to others with a conscience (the film "Live" is the further reference that comes to mind right now), although clichés fantasmagoricos space and that Boyle subjected to his actoral (politically correct) cast are sometimes extremely outdatedthey are not bad in this kind of fantasy sci-fi, even "sing" more than what one could imagine.The tape seems divided into 2 segments, on the one hand we have the promising start, where in addition to presenting us characters we reveal the mission with all kinds of detail, to then (perhaps after a test-screening where the expected result was not achieved) it becomes the typical space fantasy where the consciousness, in the purest style "live" has the leaduntil you reach the "Monster" part and where the ones who left, have to fight, and there is where the film becomes something that we have seen before.A tape that I left it parked at its premiere, and taking advantage of already on DVD I decided to resume more calmly, because I did not wanted to pass me as when I went to see the epic and strange tape of George Clooney, that while I was impressed by the film, had to listen to my about the incessant murmur of disappointment, which may sound as poetic you want, but when have left you almost 7 on screen, one can feel completely stupid to delocalised.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1839

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Anacondas: la cacería por la orquidea sangrienta

muchocine

Crappy, crappy, crappy, crappy, crappy, crappy, crappy, crappy, crappy.

Seven were the writers recruited to give birth the monstrosity. One with the head would have been enough. The descabezados who have perpetrated this abomination of film have not resorted to copy previous films of similar matter: have embarked on the Pilgrim idea of making a new film (according to the note of production account) that ends not sacrificing "the astonishment of the spectator" with predictable portions of striking images as the genre often. Therefore, attention, dear reader, here there is no surprise: there is (almost) visual impact. The anacondas are not causing any AWE. Sits one to receive a massive dose of crappy show B or Z and, in return, we receive only a drama of characters agilipollados in a jungle of Borneo that run, they talk, returns to run, they are swallowed up by the fucking bicha, pardon me, and then back to run and talk again. It is the bad selfish which exposes their congeners of race to achieve its purposes materials (a flower that gives eternal youth, here's the crux of the thing) and which, in the end, receive their just deserts, clear is. The silicone of feminists and made testosterone anabolic in the pectoral and biceps of the heroes of the day do not compensate for hour and a half of awkward romance with the foolish. It is that there is no edible bait: the anacondas out little and go wrong. There would be no pasta. The first appearance of the scrutinizing comes to half of the roll. It is as if one suddenly decides to swallow a porno film and the first wild penetration amazing forty-five minutes of footage and hardcore divos, males and females of turn, pull impressive rolls on the unbearable lightness of being and the heavy burden of the soul on a couch well escorted by minimalist music by Michael Nyman. No, please. Hardcore porn, without intellectual excursos. And here, what they want to tell, that I was looking for (Monday night, a digital channel of payment, had already seen the episode of CSI) was lunatic recreation, cathode spasms on the couch with the home cinema bellowing 5.1 the cries of the young girls and waiters (political correctness, eh) when the snack is the dreadful bicha. Goodbye simple pleasures.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/234

Monich

La profecía

muchocine

I left the cinema with the conviction that for a long time did not see a movie as bad as this

Just they are 11 and 20 at night and although still missing 40 minutes to the start of the film, Leuzor and I must be in the positions 61 and 62 of the anxious waiting the Avant Premiere of the prophecy, the remake of the classic 1976 blockbuster. But then the only possession demon that seems obvious in the narrow corridor of Cineplanet Alcazar is the novelero spirit with their dose of nostalgia ochentera - as in my case--that encourages eating popcorn waiting for the beginning of the peliculeta of yore more than one, or most.Following the game to the urban legends of 666, journalists are on the hunt for those who want to talk about the end of the world. Several photographers ignite the lights of their cameras and blind to average concurrency. It was the only thing that dazzled me that night, because after almost two hours I left the cinema with the conviction that for a long time did not see a movie as bad as this.To the point: the only thing salvageable: gestito of damn nanny Baylock, coach incanzable of the adorable Damien Thorne in their first wickedness, for the sake of modernity no longer made, for example, with tricycle but with Scooter. With their respectable wrinkles, Mia Farrow has built the face of the "apostate of Satan" nadita resembles the Rosemary from the end of the 60´s that one day bore innocent and victim the son of the devil. It dishonored the poor Roman Polansky to putting it in the roll of film B. The thing is that the former blonde of Woody Allen has the unique performance, say, salvageable.Because the others. Ay, others. Lev Schereiber is miles to match the performance of Gregory Peck in the role of Robert Thorn, the alleged father of Damien. New and sustained earthly stepfather demonstrates his lack of resources at the time of the dramatic progression. There are no shades, everything is flat in the face and the body language and is also unable to convince us in its disjunctive final remove or not the son of the beast.Although a little more successful in the moments of tension, Julia Stiles, who plays Kate Thorn does not arrive or ten per cent of the interpretation of Lee Reemick in the original version.It is assumed that with all the technology available, this could be a Ribbon ready to bristle us hair every second. However the theatrical thrashed too the only thing he did was to make it more predictable than it already was to have better addressed earlier. However, the Artistic Director and photography had their successes to show us scenes and atmospheres cold and surreal moments, as the psychiatric clinic where the Thorn went in search of answers to the incomprehensible conduct of the adorable creature.It was not that expected more than this product, the original becomes, in my opinion a great movie, or a cult movie, but I think that some respect should be to try a new version of those works that somehow stayed in memory of the spectators of the world and are part of the history of the cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1311

José A. Peig

Inteligencia artificial

muchocine

Intelligence is Artificial, Steven Spielberg, probably the most underestimated film of recent years, but now, since certain sectors moviegoers, is us it is warning is announced as a future masterpiece, a classic for posterity, a jewel squandered and America in our time.

The genre of science fiction is a suggestive instrument to explore the wishes and concerns of the human soul, especially within the framework of the space age, opening up an infinite number of possibilities in the creative field, a projection of fantasies or fears or an excuse to develop the potential of the new firing techniques, everything has been and will be. "Artificial Intelligence", by Steven Spielberg, is probably the most underestimated film of recent years, but now, since certain sectors moviegoers, is us it is warning is announced as a future masterpiece, a classic for posterity, a jewel squandered and America in our time. From the hand of science fiction more philosophical and poetic, never before abandonment and the realization of unattainable dreams had a treatment so direct, heartbreaking and felt in this story about an entity who dreams to become what is not, a distinctly religious idea and one of the basic pillars of a very dense conceptual framework. Our goal, however, is not give lessons in philosophy. Let us focus on the immediate content. Fairy tale twilight?. Metaphor about God and man?. Both things at the same time. The story is divided into three segments that offer a contrast at different levels: after the prologue that leads us on the philosophical discourse to develop, the first segment (the warmth of family, home, peace and security environments), second segment (the dangers of the world, the darkness of a forest, loneliness, violence), third segment (journey to the "end of the world")(return to the origin, end of the search). Different parties serve as a structure for channelling a vital process that encompasses various facets and levels of human existence, represented in the life of the niño-robot: its creation, of the initial rejection of the progressive acceptance of his family, the awakening of the consciousness that ama (imprint), the inherent dangers of being sensitive and aware (the idea that love makes us vulnerable)(, jealousy, fear of staying alone, the fear of death), the discovery of the differential fact and the search for a higher status (becoming "a child of truth"), the loneliness and the search for a meaning to life. As we can see, Spielberg moves in convoluted terrain, themes and critical reasons for a filmmaker who prefers the spectacle and excitement with a dense and complex content, in intellectual values. Now however, as we will explain later, in this case has the ability to combine all that so get to take it to the ground that you are interested in without too much mess up. It has been said and written many times, and is necessary to repeat it once again: the first segment of the narration, about the first forty minutes (from inception to the level which shows the image of David reflected in the mirror of the car) is a true wonder and virguería narrative, which is very useful as exemplary in all schools of cinema exhibition: it is an example of effectiveness and ability, a cinematographic language so devoid of unnecessary artifice as illustrative of the plot and emotional content that contains and unfolds along the first fragment. The story of a family who has lost his "real" son and adopts a "artificial" child, the progression from initial rejection in Monica (mother), appreciation and subsequent acceptance (process which culminates in an act so everyday as a dinner, a spaghetti hanging in the corner of the lip, which leads to spontaneous David laughter)(, a sign of humanity that ends with move to the family), the jealousy that accentuate the vulnerability of David, the misunderstanding and the most absolute helplessness depicted in this image of the mirror away gradually, darkens, becomes deeply dramatic. One of the most beautiful moments of the film (and one of the best moments of the Filmography of Spielberg), deserves special mention the imprint that glows in the consciousness of David through invocation and recitation of unconnected words: the hand of Monica in the neck of David, the hieratic and deadpan posture of the child against the expression of fear in the face of the mother, the time in which the face of David transfiguring from the hieratic empty feelings until sensitive of being aware that she loves and that, Furthermore, this will be his tragedy, knows that he loves. The wonderful frame of Spielberg shows us the embrace between mother and son in a central position, bathed by the light of a window. Concise visual imagination of Mr Spielberg, but in addition, direct, honest, efficient and simple, communicating what deserves to be expressed under a prism of intimate sensibility. Spielberg, is too often accused of being tear or "ñoño", big mistake, at least in the film we are discussing today, there is nothing more than sincere sensitivity. And which is it created, that go through the scene in question, among others. (Sure, most of the public and critics need to explain the difference between emotional manipulation and sensitivity). Without hardly dialogues, without explanation, reiterations or unnecessary underlined, through plans and frames containing the visual information needed to understand what is happening and understand why Monica thinks what think, why his thoughts on David begin to change, why the brother feels jealousy, why David feels different and needs a fantasy in the form of fairy tale to justify his desires. The huge visual expressiveness of Spielberg is also evident in the scene in which David submerged at the bottom of a swimming pool, after involuntary assault on the brother because of a fear caused by an excess of vulnerability in the invocation of the imprint, prior to the pain of the knife: the subjective camera puts us in the perspective of Davidalone and helpless with regard to human, waters which impedes that perception serve as a symbolic expression of his alienated State, the desestructuración-desconexión among his intimate world and the world of others. Then comes the general plan of the pool with David alone and lost in its Center, with open arms, hoping an affection has no, the perfect visual expression of helplessness. I said: there are so many the cinematic qualities of those first forty minutes that we would be eternal. The second part of the story, perhaps the most problematic, tells the adventure of David to find the blue fairy. In contrast to the home and family, after being abandoned, David confronts a dark and hostile world: the wolves that chase the protagonists through forest, the dustbin of the "Mecca", the Moon emerging threatening in a horizon of shrubs, the fair of the meat. A curious mixture of elements of science fiction and the clichés of the traditional fairy tale, although there is nothing that is fascinating beyond look subjective of each spectator. In this piece, the visual imagination of Spielberg is reduced to the possibilities of an atmosphere that generates a strange mixture between the cybernetic and the ensoñador: Tedy bear running through the hills in search of David, a cradle song that sounds from the top, the raucous rock at the fair of the meat. all this gives rise to many impressions and suggestions, but the decor isn't at the height of the material used. I.e., Spielberg, without losing the narrative strength, not maximized the chances of certain passages. The passage of the fair of the flesh, certainly grotesque, but if what Spielberg intended was to provoke empathy and drama in the mind of the Viewer, the failure is complete. The executed droids are reduced to a bunch of animated gadgets without a personality that is significant, therefore, fails to generate an emotional connection in this regard. This is one of the usual criticisms: the tone used by Spielberg in the passage of the fair of the meat is not appropriate, the characterization of the robots mutilated and tortured (?) is too banal, when no child, for a scene that would have a much more sordid tone. But look, the goal of the film, and the scene above a purported drama is the reflect that David is a robot unlike the others, he is the robot with a soul, the rest are junk. Precisely for this reason, the girl identifies David in the cell. As we see, although the scene of the fair of the meat will probably never us be satisfactory enough, Spielberg not deviates a bit of essential purpose. Gigolo Joe deserves a paragraph separate. It is not a character that has too much weight in the narrative, simply makes the function of accompanies David in their quest. But the truth is that its got, his couplets, the stunts and the cold bonhomie of its gestures hide a unforgettable character, or, if less, leaves a very good taste, although that is a character that integrates with the story picking it up with pins: look at how and where disappears from the narrative. I said: caught with pins. Ending the second segment, we have the impression that drags on too long, they occur too much surplus: the arrival to Rouge City, a futuristic variant of Blade Runner but brings nothing new to the narrative or the design, the visit to the well-known doctor of science philosophical fiction went to Disney's own iconography. The problem is not the well-known doctor, the problem is the design and the setting of the scene (the tone), very infantilizada and, consequently, devoid of that fascinating power to be the oracles, even more so the Oracle who shall indicate the path to the origin and the end. The reunion with Professor Hobby (the creator), which embodies the essential discourse: dreams and religious faith as distinctive attribute of the human species. The agony of David is the agony of the human being, that it wants to be more than it is and believe in things that do not exist, the great human error. David discovers his origin, as Adam facing the creator becomes aware of being the first of a new kind of droids. In this order of things is one of the most important meanings of the tape: somehow, "Artificial Intelligence" tells a process of expansion of the consciousness of the niño-robot, from the inert, artificial and empty life of a mechanical doll until the discovery of conscious love, resulting in the revelation of his true creator, its purpose and origin. It is not so much a religious movie as mystique. Devastating images of New York City devastated by waters accompany the loneliness of David. His encounter with the blue fairy in the submerged depths of the city, is not devoid of a great lyricism; its appearance between the darkness of the waters, and the image of the face of David that becomes one with the fairy blue reflected in the glass of the vehicle, is another great moment of visual inspiration, unifies to be he yearns with what desired, the beginning and the end of the dream. Many moviegoers have opined that the film should have finished at that point, with David front to the fairy of stone and cardboard, hoping for a response that will never come. They forget, in this case, that Spielberg is a filmmaker of dreams, and is a constant in his filmography: what reality can not give us, we can achieve it in the dream, in hope, in another life, in another world. Not in vain, Stanley Kubrick commissioned the project to Spielberg because he knew the story of Brian Aldiss to fit better with the sensitivity of the American director. On the other hand, we tend to think that David has a too one-dimensional facet, which does not correspond to the intended speech; i.e. at any given time, the stepfather of David says that's "if it is capable of love also may feel hatred". But it turns out that David is a loving being in essence, their actions are almost exclusively oriented towards the love and tenderness. Do exist, therefore an inconsistency between the discourse and the story? Is David a too flat character? In principle seems to be Yes, but let us not forget the scene in which David is facing one of its replicas; When it is aware if not the only, it tilting with violence against his counterpart. "It will never be yours". Jealousy are born of love, and lead to hatred. But it is nothing more than a timely moment, the character is not over curdling a complex profile. Although Spielberg meets a minimum with regard to the personality of David, not he ceases to be a too simple profile for a complex content and a thorny ground. This is one of the defects of the film. It is not that David is a character badly built in a functional sense, but the film would have been much better if had added you more edges, more ambiguity, more dynamism to its development. In certain aspects and passages of the film, the complexity of discourse and the plot reasons encounter with an address too flat (a complex content needs more than an attractive frame and some moments of pure sensationalism, to understand us). Following the rescue undertaken by a new group of droids, two thousand years later, David gets modified to the blue fairy stone and cardboard, and this, in another bleak scene, it cracks and reveals her falsehood. David discovers that the blue fairy is as artificial as himself. Metaphor of the human being against the false gods and the end of hope: that the gods can give us our dreams. Spielberg doesn't support the harsh reality and needs a happy ending. The last plot Pirouette hand of science fiction more toned, and has been widely discussed. Taking care that we are dealing with a metaphoric fairy tale, has no sense to say that such Pirouette breaks the rules of the genre or the overall tone; reproduce the life of a dead person recovering the information of his conscience in the fabric of spacetime is no more implausible than the fact of manufacturing robots endowed with consciousness. It is, therefore, nothing forced, and in addition serves to channel the history towards the end desired by the author, and in this area soon or nothing can be said the critic. Let us not forget; in the context of the fantasy genre, it isn't more courageous or has greater intellectual value a realistic ending to an idealized ending, we would be, in any case, speaking of two different intellectual equal speeches provided filmmaker respects the tone and laws with which this building his narration. You could even say that a happy ending is a creative act of value: Spielberg wants to succeed the hope placed in dreams, and thus shows it us openly. It is the nature of the work which will define the rules and criteria for assessment, and Spielberg is not intended to show a harsh resolution, but hopeful. The encounter of David with his mother, and the tears of one against the words of love that had always wanted to listen to, justify the Odyssey. It is the moment of happiness that articulates with the great moral dilemma posed in the prologue: how much responsibility requires the establishment of an entity capable of love, which needs a correspondence?. And yet, the end is not as happy as it seems: the last dream of Monica hope dies. Monica was just a memory recovered during a single day from among the thousands of times and memories lost in the cosmos. David, as a single specimen, with the human race has disappeared, only it is loneliness and sleep? That is the profound despair that it beats at the end: that there is no choice but to dream to live of the wishes, and ultimately, David is alone in a vacuum cosmos of any entity that may correspond to their nature. Halfway between hope and desolation, Spielberg concludes his story with an end of meaning polyhedral, building a lyrical work, sincere sensitivity, and the sense of helplessness that can get to experiment with the viewing of this film is unmatched with any other piece of the fantasy genre. Her beauty is beyond current and immediate perception that we now give him. They are analysts and fans of the future who placed it in the position it deserves. "Artificial Intelligence" is the current equivalent to "Blade Runner". I.e., a film of fantástico-filosófico genus which has been made very little case in his day, but will it become a classic and a work of vital worship. Time to time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3348

Emilio Calvo de Mora

The invasion

muchocine

I was about to sleep me and swear that I was afraid that the alien bug invaded my drowsiness and end up waking me at all. I however, I have seen much worse, clear. And when there is a dream, not worth trompetería Haydn or from AC/DC live.

Perhaps (I say only maybe) science fiction cultured, intellectual depth and mythological practical need a low budget, a profile of serie B and, above all, a completely disconnected treatment of palomitero film, cars that make tops on a banana peel and aliens of posh, they invade as he does not want the thing and, in a few days, dominate the planet Earth and to hold shares in Dow-Jones and eat hamburgers with Coca-Cola out of one movie theater. The pandemic that we slip is in fact, the mirror in which man must look, once the 20th century has closed its balance of dead, his account of injustices and their inventory of wars, guerrilla, riots and varied coat and formidable propaganda cultural suicide.I say that this version of (Don Siegel, 1.956) body snatchers spare, it adds nothing. And this appreciation strictly personal (as all the expressed by this chronicler of their vices) does not report that the film is bad or mediocre. I even arriesgaré to express that, at times, it kept my attention and made me enjoy in my armchair. Everyone knows that the illusions are marked letters and there is always a cabronazo with poker face incendiary who discovers the risk and you put in evidence in front of the mob of thugs in timba. From there to the alley and the alley to the hospital or the sky. I do not think that we merezcamos hell for us, Mount head inside, a booklet different to that gives us life. Write (and write about film even more) is a tiring business, which rarely compensates, but which provides to the disturbed perpetrated it unspeakable joys, júbilos of the size of the head of Charles Laughton. Nor should go by these branches we both like. Let's go back to the thieves of bodies: invasion is a tape with pretensions. Producers (Joe Silver to the distraught head) threw by Oliver Hirschbiegel - renowned, highly reputed, after the convincing and damning the last days of Hitler called the collapse--biography. They believed it obsolete that so useful intellectual air draft to turn commercial products into products of worship. They marraron: they got too many views in a simple story in excess. It has been a hybrid between thriller without shaft and cinema arthouse with the tap open inspiration. The message: man is a wolf to man. The alien invaders bodies bring a sort of nirvana in which there is no illuminated or disturbed, heterodox or memos, or geniuses: all clustered around a univocal concept of the sentimentality, all abalconados in the unpolluted air. And hete here that heroin Kidman, immaculate in her role as mother courage, not hugs the discourse of the invading bug and runs along streets and squares, laboratories and supermarkets, to find his son, and on the way, save the world. In this case, sorry, there is no cheerleader, but that is another movie and tonight plays invasion. not going to be me giving the Conference on the benefits of science fiction when it comes to witness the fragility of a society, but it must be admitted that the film fulfils that function with honours. We have the impression that we are selling a documentary about the dangers of technology or excessive moral apathy plaguing our consciences. Mine, for now, is safe, well entrenched in my laptop, listening to the music of Bill Evans and delaying a long drink (that was said before) while outside the streets not exhibited no sign of alien threat, but let's focus. Invasion: the argument is a hack of some script hired at the last minute and, apparently, poorly paid. This is where the individual, lacking in narrative, but sobrado ingenuity of nasty business, has sprayed poison the body of the story. There is more than one inconsistency and there are more than two dramatic gaps that leave the viewer out of the picture, if ever has come to feel, really, part of the entertainment. For do not burst the possibility for the gentle reader to give him an opportunity, it is not give no stroke, albeit mild, at the end, but cost me a lot, really, keep quiet and not gloat I to argue with hairs, slime and slimy bodies of outer space the sloppy end have mounted. I swear that until that end I was reasonably happy. Did not expect much, so the disappointment would not be Symphony. Even Opera. But the end came and with it the relief of the abandonment of the room - which was, moreover, empty: I saw the movie with my wife, already - and the certainty that these people of Hollywood gets into marshy lands and then they cannot exit and end up with mud up at the same end of labor pride. It is a saying. Now can one understand that the writers of the Mecca of cinema have long since strike. Or I do not understand at all. At this point, it is better to understand little and be exclusively carried away by feelings. The mine, in this obviable remake of the great original body snatchers, deserving separate criticism, are easily hospedables into the box for the failed experiences. There are so many. Last night, without going any further, I sat in my favorite chair with legitimate claim to see a fun bit of television and spent almost an hour of my life contemplate pigswill. Another failed experience. Or the invention of DTT, which has just entered in my village, I resarce of the thrashing of abuses that involves keeping entertaining a television. Why movie theaters are shelter and warm womb to the wounded for the sweetness of the always beloved frame. I am afraid that it has left me a spirited overview, without the usual technical deployment. It will be that a foreign body has crept me laryngeal track and hopes to I sleep to become one of them. Tomorrow as my criticisms are cold and hallucinated. By the influence of galaxies and quasars blessed.The collective fears story told here malconvence: he joins the inertia of having already seen similar messages in very identical tapes and then the effort is lower. Both of which makes the film and which provides.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3026

Hombre Lobo

The host

muchocine

The average viewer is warned: If you have a little patience with its peculiar rhythm of narration and its deliberate dosage of horror, is one of face to face with one of the most interesting of gender of what far this year.

It may not be the definitive monsters tape The Host (2006), the most successful film in the history of Korean cinema and the darling of the latest edition of Sitges, but there is no doubt that this is a serious competitor to be among the best the genre has given us this year. That Yes, this is not a film of creatures in the style, and many of its features could leave cold to the average viewer who goes to the film waiting for a repetition of the classical scheme of the majority of the monster movies that come to us from United States, where virtually the only thing that changes is the nature of the bug to remove.The truth is that tape Bong Jon-hoo is not a typical copy of this genre of film, to start because it is not focused absolutely on the monster, but also on the tribulations of a dysfunctional family in Seoul, which necessarily bind when a horrible Monster (product of a mutation caused by chemical waste from a U.S. military base) emerges from the waters of the River have and cause a massacre between the peaceful passers-by of an idyllic sunny afternoon, after which takes the little girl of the family clan for later consumption. After declaring the national emergency, the family discovers that the small is alive somewhere in the labyrinth sewers of Seoul, and passivity official decide to undertake a search which Quad Final Fantasy in pursuit of the girl.After this initial attack, the Ribbon leaves take a while before we see the monster again, and rather focuses on the pain and the Union of the family, a drama that is seasoned with samples of a humor that sometimes reaches levels of real bizarrada, as for example the entire stream of a night vigil in memory of the victims of the mutant of the have. Also, the personalities of the members of the family clan are disparate over not being able to, and the movie takes its time to follow each in its particular search the small; It is the entrepreneur grandfather and natural leader of the group, the reckless and irresponsible father, hardened and unthinking Uncle (which also has a past as a leader in University riots) and silent aunt and quasi-champion of archery. All the discourse about the family joins the not very subtle environmental subtext which of course not let very obvious criticism to American interventionism (is not chance, as the event which begins the story actually happened in the year 2000 when an officer of a United States base dumped illegally in have hundreds of litres of adulterated formol), but at least not product of this no mutant has gone. (yet). But beyond family dramas and eco-sociological criticism, there is something unavoidable, and is that a monster film, the real protagonist has forcibly that the creature. In this sense, Jon-hoo is her played to show the apparitions of the monster in full light of day, eluding accustomed for subtlety, on many occasions, to conceal the failures of special effects. Such a thing does not happen in The Host, in fact, the monster far from being perfect at a technical level, although miraculously these defects do not influence anything in our appreciation. The appearances of the creature are so well managed that they produce an authentic and genuine tension that does not go away when we see him again. While it is true that the appearances of the monster are not so frequent as we are accustomed, it is also true that this creature is laid at the service of a story that goes in other directions, and that their presence is not only to ward off the staff, something that this film shares with which no doubt is one of their sources of inspiration and point of comparison of a large critical sector: the original version of Gojira (1954), by Japanese Ishiro Honda, a film on which it is necessary to return as soon as possible.Either way, a viewing of The Host is advisable, but the average viewer is warned that you will not find therein another exemplary more typical film monsters (reason why has not found, apparently, the enthusiasm that triggered in Sitges). But if you have a little patience with its peculiar rhythm of narration and its deliberate dosificiación of horror, is one of face to face with one of the most interesting of gender of what far this year. And hurry, because the storm is coming: the corresponding American remake is already inevitable.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3580

Francisco Bellón

Arma Fatal (Hot Fuzz)

muchocine

Fatal weapon should be the typical film should prescribe psychologists for patients suffering from depression, because after two hours of laughter, who is not you happy mood and spirit?

It is curious the case of Zombies Party, a film when it premiered in theatres passed without penalty or glory, but that when it came out on DVD it became something more than a transient phenomenon and became throughout a cult film praised by critics and public. The combination of fine English humor with the purest parody was an explosive mixture.Now comes a Fatal weapon (again the translation of titles has crime), the new film of Zombies Party responsible for. On this occasion, they launch their darts full of irony and sarcasm against the police film and serial killers. In a year in which fun and intelligent comedies are more rare than the Iberian lynx, weapon Fatal landing is a great joy for the spectators suffered, tired of the jokes for mindless proposed by Hollywood. And is that Edgar Wright with his scathing and ironic vision of things laughs at everything and everyone with a corrosive sense of humour which does not leave puppet head (sometimes literally, and if not they should ask to Tim Messenger). Fatal weapon has a rhythm so increadibly fast that sometimes you lose a joke by laughing be at even the previous. For nearly two hours, the film does not offer even a second of respite between so much laughter, at last twenty minutes absolutely hilarious and surreal.Fatal weapon should be the typical film should prescribe psychologists for patients suffering from depression, because after two hours of laughter, who is not you happy mood and spirit? Certainly one of the comedies of the year, not only for their own quality, but by the lack of the same in almost all others.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2315

Albert Puyuelo

Takehis

muchocine

Takeshis is a surrender to the easy art, or is the confirmation that Kitano has just set some principles for anyone go back?

Takeshi Kitano autoreivindica. But it does so with a spoof record really strange and very far from the sobriety that used to present his works (except Getting Any?). Takeshis? It is designed to be hated or praised, according to the public that cross. Takeshi-san wanted to summarize what has been said so far with their previous you films, but adding some necessary proposals for any film buff. The plot of the story, as often happens in most of his films, can be summarized very briefly. A supermarket manager is physically just as a celebrity in the world of the show, and their lives will begin to cross in real spaces and fantasy. Both characters are played by Kitano, a fact which emphasizes even more all auto-paródico content of the tape.Levels and games contraplanos that Kitano us has delighted always, still have their presence in Takeshis?, but in smaller amounts. The film focuses much more on wanting to repeat action scenes over and over again. Think the genre of action, for its part, the final abandonment as get with the reiteration that the viewer reaches the desired distaste. The film is, in itself, a declared immolation. Those looks lost in the horizon are interrupted here by characters who appear from nowhere, nor only gives us time to think what will be in the off field. Behind the camera is the film itself, to put it in some way.It is not advisable to find an exact to every sequence sense, it is easier that it not be tied anywhere. The flashbacks return to deceive in Hana-Bi, the dreamy scenes come and go when want them to? but without falling into the nonsensu nonsense. The pace is hypnotic enough as to be carried away through a delusion something felliniano, and conclusions that draw a whole they vary according to the eyes to look at. There is no specific explanation in the film, but a game of mirrors in a great film montage. The axis is called Takeshi Kitano and more is known to this author, most can scratching of the film to get information. But surely, this is not the real intent of the film. It is advisable to look same autoparódicos eyes with which one of the best directors in the world wanted to sign his work more "rare".Do you know a little wrong discover Takeshis? that is the very same Kitano who wants to bury the yakuza-eiga, fashionable today. Their shots become constellations known worldwide, and his work of extortion are more auditions and fantasies, than not at the Centre of a sane argument. The hilarious joke of the grasshopper appears to synthesize the idea of ending an archetype in particular. But there is another significant change. We are no longer a film before it might seem a set of static images shot with a fixed camera. This time, there is only a character that acts autistamente, the rest move with an unnerving binge. Far are the protagonists of Boiling Point, A scene at the sea or the couple in love of Dolls. And the character that used to interpret Beat Takeshi (name of Kitano when it is credited as an actor), who was the police face-of-stick with outbreaks of violence, becomes a simple oldy clown. With his latest film, he wanted leave patent his facet of iconoclast, perhaps to Japan, once and for all, don't see you as comedian which was yesteryear. Is Takeshis? a surrender to the easy art, or is the confirmation that Kitano has just set some principles for anyone go back?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2804

Enrique Colmena

Caótica Ana

muchocine

Medem cinema is,? per is?, poetic character. But oh!, the line that separates the verse of the gravel is so mild?

Visitors to this site know that I'm an admirer of "Lovers of the Arctic Circle", the masterpiece of Julio Médem, although I'm not a fervent follower of this Basque director film, in which magnificent works such as the aforementioned coexist with other interesting but less interest, such as "Sex and Lucia", or decidedly unsuccessful, as "Land". With this "Caótica Ana" seems that you tap the sand: Medem cinema is, "per are", poetic character. But oh!, the line that separates the verse of the gravel is so mild? The new film by July is very far from approaching, or remotely, to what purpose, a poem about reincarnation, a literal Ibizan girl and topically "ad lib", rescued for art and society by a patron franchute, in love with a Berber tormented by his past, and finally literally emptied of their many (and tragic) past lives through hypnosis. Medem background allow the viewer granted a credit which the donostiarra squandering soon, as soon as we see that history is Martian, what should be poetical is just corny, and there is little a scene with the mark of the House, to remember the powerful visual creativity of the vaunted "Lovers of the Polar circle", and yes a considerable mental empanada. Does chaotic, as its title, soon shows that Medem does not know what tells us in this film, unless we are all not one but thousand, great discovery, entirely as the penicillin? The characters are unfortunate, since the Ibizan catetita who could shout, as in the Bible, that "my name is Legion" (although without demons inside; or it?), that goes from spineless for life, to his patron, a Charlotte Rampling entirely outside the role without a profile, without edges, a species of matriarch (do something interested: 60%, specifically?); the hypnotist, who goes a bit Seraphic Angel, "glam", is true; the empollón Berber with its ethnographic Bleus and its stormy past; the father of the catetita, as soon as they removed from the cave where he lives dying? the only character with any consistency, and better served by her actress, is baby, the friend of the protagonist, a video artist with a peculiar vision of relations between men and women and great desparpajo. Special mention in the negative, in the awful end, in which which Medem, pobretico, come from the makers of the war of Iraq (making use, therefore a kind of doublet of Donald Rumsfeld, "hawk" do Secretary of Defense, supposedly mastermind of that warlike nonsense that is giving so many headaches, and what you rondaré, brunette?), becoming our protagonist give a giftthat we not destriparemos, but that sounds like a boy child tantrum when not enough to give him the kick to the great who abuses him. Finally, each one is very owner of revenge as he sees fit, but not at the cost of bastardear a film with a pegote which not is beside the point. Or perhaps Yes, perhaps the estrambote suits this absurdity inevitably doomed to the costalazo at the box office.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2002

JLO

Robots

muchocine

The story perhaps too simple, this time itself suitable for all audiences, without double reading as it happened for example with the great Shrek.

Responsible for the Era of ice - his opera prima - Chris Wedge, returns to give us another enjoyable, funny, so rhythmic film as lack of heart and a little solvent and attractive script. Characters more flat that its funny prehistoric bugs, these robots are remedos human sleep, work, eat, need money and all the boring things we don't want to see in a movie of animation. More taking as reference to excellent films in this genre that is not worth listing.The story perhaps too simple, this time itself suitable for all audiences, without double reading as it happened for example with the great Shrek. Child/robot/poor who goes to the big city to succeed (does succeed it?). It is not that Robots will lack rhythm or much less, adrenaline is extra. At times it seems one in a game of an amusement park.The beginning is auspicious and even remembers the beginning of Minority Report of Spielberg (remedando his idol Kubrick), with a tone between bleak and winding and a future city mechanized, metallic and cold. The gag of the birth of the protagonist, is the most successful in the 91 minute a hilvanada film of them. But this is just the beginning.Full of cinematic events - music, Rocky, the magician of sickle Tin man, several (too many) to Star Wars - finally stands the gag - indeed very funny - the music of Britney Spears, but like everything else in the film, with little taste. In comparison, it is below the level of the Espanta sharks, Madagascar or bugs, and this is already much say.It could only improve it a little listening to a flawless - see vocal cast sheet below - in its original version, which I could not really enjoy. It is best put the disk of Daft Punk and dance with Robot Rock.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3526

Iñaki Bilbao

Un Final Made In Hollywood

muchocine

Irregular comedy of Woody Allen.

"A film director already mature, who years ago had many successes and won two Oscars, you were out of work due to the fall in chopped to that experienced due to all sorts of problems, both real and invented." His ex-wife still trusts him and convinces her boyfriend, the most powerful Hollywood producer that leave direct a film to create secure success. All starts well but soon director suffers psychosomatic blindness, by what you can that will have help someone who is their eyes. "Everything will of course, be a chaos". Excessively irregular comedy genius Allen. Arguably, it has two distinct parts. The first is agile, very funny, with clever dialogues, full of puns. The comical is high and love. However, it is not known why, suddenly falls rhythm and everything becomes quite dull, with something tedious moments, which is unforgivable in a comedy self-respecting. Its final, despite having Coif seafaring with the subject of French critics, it is too fast and easy, as if Mr. Allen wanted to suddenly end with the realization.Finally, a small step back, although aunque debe must be because Woody Allen, even though it is not 100 per cent, offers more movies in average film than most of his contemporaries in his entire career.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/544

Oscar Cantero

World Trade Center

muchocine

a film quite weak, boring and might well fit into the television table of weekends. Do at least the families of those affected by the infamous terrorist act will some of the benefits that this be? chestnut? produce.

Oliver Stone has always been characterized by the strong political charge that surrounds each of his appearances, and which on occasions has moved to his films. It is a famous of those that stands critical of the system, although in the majority of cases Republicans are the target of their acidic comments. Like other peers, has positioned itself against the aggressive and coercive stance his country adopted after the September 11 attacks, the bloodiest in history (not counting the perpetrators on behalf of the States). Does this time, Stone leave aside his political vein? social and focuses on the story of John McLoughlin and William Jimeno, two officers of the port authority of New York for his work to help evacuate the towers become trapped under the rubble after the collapse of the same. The anguish of families and the hard work of the team in turn covered bail them out they are the linchpin of the argument. Regardless of the reality of the drama that reflects World Trade Center is a fairly weak, boring movie and which might well fit into the television table of weekends.The interpretative aspect, Nicolas Cage is immutable and hieratic, for a change, while the rest either highlights too. At least the families of those affected by the infamous terrorist act will see some of the benefits that this "chestnut" to produce, even if only five percent of the box office in the first weekend of its premiere in United States; one-tenth of what it spent on promotion and nothing compared with what Stone is received. But clear, it all makes for sensitivity with victims. Money is secondary. Or so it says. Do not believe?.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/662

Emilio Calvo de Mora

The guardian

muchocine

Everything runs through old territories, although admittedly a splendid invoice and a quite entire argument fails in the complicity of the Viewer when it lives outside the USA.

Meritorious Escasemente, will not result in very sagging film career of Kevin Costner, ballast from dancing with Wolves, the tour de force of history of the United States, which broke box office and put the actor and director front-page film of the last stretch of the 20th century. As nobody lives of rents, Kevin Costner has been procesionando, with great sorrow and some cash instrument of glory, by tapes whose final hosting was the turn video store shelf. Never memory the movie buff. Here everything runs through old territories, although admittedly a splendid invoice and a quite integer argument, which fails on the complicity of the Viewer when it lives outside the USA and is not recognized in these adventures of bailouts on the high seas, which we here (truly) sounds like propaganda of the American spirit. And of this genre we are unfortunately quite supplied.The hero portrayed is admirable. Do not enter this critical in assessing the strictly epic aspect of the plot, which has. It is not acceptable to question this body of rescue swimmers of the coast guard: deserve our respect to that seen in the film. Da same they come from Sweden or the coasts of Florida.El role of Costner is greedy: is the rescuer expert (and there is no Cangurolandias) who live a dreadful experience (the loss of colleagues, serious injuries in itself) and which it is intended to protect young cadets that principian ways and desperately want to emulate their hero. At this point, nothing new. The thing improved a little bit on the treatment of personal feelings, how people are involved in carrying out their projects and how the educational spirit of Philanthropy elevates the soul of humans and makes it a top example of value and delivers to others. I know that this morass of good intentions is a pastelazo for the Viewer to seek in the film sensations of more intense depth, but The guardian contains scenes of action very successful and why (in that mixture of film to the Frank Capra and cinema to the Renny Harlin) the movie is not bad by principles.The topics handled by the argument are the topics of life, now amplified: converted in Catechism of the would-be hero. Andrew Davis to take the controls of this film guarantees at least a while entertaining, clean, devoid of folds, delivered to the enjoyment of a compelling images and a treatment honest from what he is narrating. Davis provides a very basic psychological profile of actors: can't reach more. It strives to play with imagine that reliable vision the world of this military body. The tape, in that there is no possible doubt margin, manages to involve us in the gesta of its members.In another order of things, or is the same, we deem that the life of Ben Randall, the role of Costner, is the life of Kevin Costner. This is hero come unless provided with commitment to drive other than where he was and where triumphed. The film. The life. What matter.The role of man already hardened in a thousand battles that Kevin Costner left the albur of his followers during his visit to Spain of promotion seemed very significant. I saw a man whole, conscious of its faintness, of decay, for their lack of perspective. Also of his honorable decline. Your comments, I remember some very humorous, emphasize what I say.So we have a film of living legends, that that both excites the public yankee.In Lorca, in Logroño, in Córdoba, in Santa Cruz de Tenerife, The guardian will not arouse passions of those who we call universal. There are feelings very idiosyncratic. It is in an almost extreme mode, but there we have our Almodóvar, a genius, a visionary, making theirs, so typical, the intimate (manchego), universal.Wave to other recent films, The guardian is left poisoned by some fondness towards religion. It seems, in sections of the film, we are witnessing a homily at a liturgy of salvation, to a redemption of the soul through the tridimensionalizados set of wild waves. And hence to me me sobrecogió and was much more impressed by the perfect storm.Ah, I forgot, there is also (how not, how not) romance between graciosito cabin boy and country girl. It takes longer.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1737

Francisco Bellón

El último show

muchocine

The last Show is a vulgar movie, the lot, based on the failed premise of the portrait of characters also failed, and whose sole attraction is the interpretive work.

For some years, the translations of the titles of foreign films have entered a deep downhill. When does the original title, is added the translation as a subtitle, as Adaptation (the Orchid thief), or if not, a "free" interpretation and there are cases like the of forget of my!, whose American title came to be something like eternal shine of an Inmaculada.Pero mind for the last Show, while perfect refers to the story which tells the tape in the translationWe must recognize that it is a detail of titular tasteless as well to the posthumous work of Robert Altman. The film has the problems facing members of veteran radio program when you know the news of the closure of the station. All are counting their glories of yesteryear and their miseries, past, present and future. That is the main livelihood of the last Show, because the initial argument does not offer many alternatives. However, the portrayal of the characters (some absurd and desdibujados, by the way) is distant and cold, devoid of emotions. To treat a human tape, the main defect of the same is that never get to connect with the spectator, does part of the suffering and hopes of his characters, but rather lets indifferent to what takes place on the screen. The actors are the best of the last Show, among them the great Meryl Streep in a new interpretative Pirouette. It also serves to check the star of teen film and the tabloid press Lindsay Lohan can aspire to become a full-fledged actress if it continues the path that began with Bobby and continued with this work.The last Show is a vulgar movie, the lot, based on the failed premise of the portrait of characters also failed, and whose sole attraction is the interpretive work. The end point of the career of Robert Altman not will be especially remembered, on a trajectory of itself full of profound ups and downs, and some small jewel like Gosford Park.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4270

Bloody Will

John Rambo

muchocine

Rambo is 100%, an action of the earlier film.

20 Years have passed since John Rambo appeared for the last time on our screens. I remember perfectly that summer when everyone ran to the capital to see Stallone by pressing the tape of the hair and distributing wood on a single premise: was the best and the only one that could save the situation. 20 Years have passed, and for Rambo, nothing has changed. Let you in the door of the film claims of seeing a movie with deep script, with outstanding performances and an impeccable cinematography. Rambo is Rambo, and give us the opposite is to deceive us. With an aesthetic of serie B and almost camera in hand, Stallone dispenses with script to mount on three sentences a succession of massacres on innocent and the execution of the villains. And what we wanted?, then that. That is 'John Rambo'.The synopsis is simple: when a group of peace activists intend to cross the dangerous river of Burma to reach a village and distribute medicines take hand of John Rambo (Stallone), alone with his boat can guarantee a good trip. Does but once the evil guerrillas raze the village and capture the volunteers, Rambo will be the only one who can rescue them with a group of mercenarios.¿Os reminds something?, because Yes, igualita that 'Rambo III': the prota is the specialist, the prota is the only and there is no one else, why the army of go to know where, and from the hand of the actor Ken Howard, begs his speech. In this sequel to Rambo at least does not put any hits and shows that you will progress. A pity we lack Lieutenant Trautman (Richard Crenna), which is only seen in a flashback-dream of Rambo that puts the willies .The nostalgic, which burst the video store to base rent hundreds of times the saga, it will enchant. It has everything for what you have cried over these years, and Stallone knows had to follow this same path, because that would of contrary the public is you lay on top. I must confess that a 'Rocky' they changed the life and evolved it in the latest installment, but John have not touched you or plush, that still retains.With script, direction and production of Stallone, character eats all the scenes of the film and with just three lines and a couple of memorable statements the film achieves its objective, and that is to entertain who goes to see the immortal Rambo. For the greater glory of the myth, the footage is so little that it is impossible to bore you: 1 hour and 19 minutes, in which does not rest more than 30 seconds and in which dialogs not going beyond 4 lines. Everything happens very fast, so that does not explain where the volunteers come from, does not explain the reason for the presence of villains military in Burma and not explained where Rambo has been, but gives more: bodies are falling one after the other.The great innovation of this sequel is without doubt the violence and harshness with which our protagonist gets rid of his enemies. I'm not saying that previous ones were a tale of Disney's, but you can check the amount of blood is multiplied by 10 and the images are much more explicit. If one of the bad guys gets too to the camera, do not hesitate: Rambo will open from top to bottom, and this time sees everything everything. We have one of the film more gore this year, and Jigsaw does not come out anywhere.I hardly speak of its actors. Stallone is who and the character is not going to now what Jane Austen. The girl is Julie Benz, and from that left 'Angel' only have seen in this type of roles it: inocentona and weak, as in the series 'Dexter', where currently lavished.What the hell, I liked and pretty. Not because it is a human or social background excited (that already saw him last week in Sean Penn), is that it is going bad jokes entertainment, a scene of almost 10 minutes with submachine gun and a girl to save Thai small cab ** s. Rambo to 100%, it is this action of the old movie to 100%. It's Stallone maintaining the essence of the character without touching one iota. It is as it would have been there always, in the jungle, waiting for what it brought again.Refrain addicted to the cinema and lovers of Wim Wenders. This is the opposite. This is RAMBO! and has returned!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/472

Natalia Eseverri

Separados

muchocine

A good option to see a good story with great performances and not feel far removed from reality that represents.

While in Málaga and knowing that within an Anita more or less we will be living in our land, comes this beautiful task of finding floor and that you always have difficulties facing to seek funding, a floor in good condition and your taste and in the shortest possible time because you're noting that are certain these theories and the search will become worse than the Lost Ark adventure of Indiana Jones.Asi soaked magazines and multiple tips that always come in handy, we will get to the task and I will continue as the thing will. In principle, Málaga I like more than Fuengirola but must wait for what emerges, which of these things you never know, first to mourn the Bank to see that they give us and then investigate out there.On the other hand, the poster who heads this day is from the movie "Separated", a film that seems more a comedy by what you are trying to sell in the trailer but is actually a very accurate and realistic vision of what suffers a couple when after many years of coexistence are separated.Vince Vaughn as well as make a surprising interpretation, is one of the authors of a fantastic script in which minimum exaggerations that appear on a situation like that arises serve merely to raise a laugh in the spectator that comforting after many scenes of discussions and confessions that occur in many of the current couples can find us in reality. This mixture together with another fantastic interpretation of Jennifer Aniston (which I already dazzled in "The Good Girl" and again I am not disappointed) makes "Separated" a film with a long hook and that as the only downside would be the unnecessary use in times of a camera in hand that never ceases to continue the dialogue in the scene and the situation of the characters well.As curiosity, of high school you will see a Joey Laurie Adams, that is, lately, not lavished by the film after success with Kevin Smith in "Chasing a Amy" and Adam Sandler in "Big Daddy" and although it has a minimal role, it is appreciated that it has returned to the big screen. Jon Favreau is also amazing with some phrases rather than mythical.A good option to see a good story with great performances and not feel far removed from reality that represents. That Yes, laughter is guaranteed but in very small terms.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/936

Taliesin

Casino Royale

muchocine

A Bond as cool as always but much less sophisticated revives the series from its ashes.

I declare I fan of the James Bond films. I admit. It brings me memories of my discovery of the film from the hand of Sean Connery in from Russia with love and it makes it far more tolerant than the rest with these rants which was suffering from the series. However, I think that I am quite just if I say that this is the best Bond in years and the rest of views that can be found in the network of networks as well attested.The arrival of Casino Royale in theaters has not been accompanied by the advertising noise that came before the premiere of the previous films starring Pierce Brosnan. This, together with the presentation of Daniel Craig as the new Bond, blond with blue eyes, predicted the final thud of the series. However, both the new protagonist and the new air that has taken the Bond universe have been shock and we can talk better delivery of the saga long. Daniel Craig plays a first-time agent, but with the hardness which requires the post. Everything remains as cool has to be Bond but with much less sophistication. Ended the Martini shaken but not removed and the poetic flirtation with the Bond girls. The dialogues as the character, bleeding more than usual to be James Bond, are credible. This does not mean that the film itself is credible, because what you see is one of the premises of the series to be incredible. What happens is that there are differences between this is incredible but both gives me and this is incredible. Damn that it fails! Casino Royale has a few scenes of those that make you grab you into the arms of the Chair and that means that the character has come to you and that you are living through their eyes.Accompanying a surprising Daniel Craig, we have Eva Green (dreamers of Bertolucci) as Bond girl, that this time is more than just a pair of tits with legs. Turn maloso is Mads Mkkelsen and is very convincing, especially in the scenes of the game of poker. Otherwise, the rest of clichés that one can expect from a Bond movie are here: a burst of infarction, persecution, explosions, cities and twists in the plot. It is not that the script is a prodigy, but it meets the expectations and is not long, which was the case in the previous installments. I miss the appearance of R, but it is one of the weights that have been left behind to lighten a package was becoming too heavy.In short, the good of Pierce Brosnan seems a Grandpa when compared with Craig Bond, much harder and less sophisticated. The bet of responsible for Casino Royale has been down to the get smart of the altars and give him a beating from reality, and the result can not be more promising.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4145

Ivan Villamel

The Nines

muchocine

A daring film, not bright, and with the ability to suggest highly interesting reflections on many occasions, and fall at the same time in other many extremely superficial

John August acquired reputed fame writer with that perfect youth film (one of the best in recent years) directed by Doug Liman, named "GO", living without limits (1999), which became the deliciously frivolous on par with Homeric epic of a group of young workers of a common supermarket, a product fresh, original and full of quality as a filmmaker. Then was in charge of the libretti of any animated film ("Titan AE"), on the ill-fated remake of Charlie's Angels, and especially ivory turning by the good scripted way three works of the great director Tim Burton ("Big Fish", "Charlie and the factory..." and "The corpse bride"). In "The Nines", August faces his first work as director of the function, in an attempt that despite the partially failed proposal, stands by its own merit, even with its flaws evident in one of the most daring materials operas of recent years. Failed but exciting, his mental game proposed in such intricate history will awaken passions or rejections in equal parts, but of which there is no doubt, is that it has an interest beyond doubt.The plot of the film, so tangled and complex to describe, shows us three stories with lightweight links in common, by removing the three by the same actor-personaje, Ryan Reynolds being performed. In the first, title "The prisoner", Reynolds embodies an actor frivolous and given to drink, slightly hinting the story that this reason is basically due to the fragility of their emotions when your partner leaves him no reason apparent. In the second, "Reality Tv", embodies to Gavin, a gifted writer of a pilot program of television and its vicissitudes to suffer in the form of setbacks to hire actresses, technicians or your unit tests prior to the antenna of its programme output, all this being recorded in turn by a program reality, with the intention of bringing the creative process itself through a TV live. In the third and final story, Gabriel is a hard-working husband who spends the day outside with his wife and daughter, having to resort to the help of a woman on the road to be able to solve the problems of your own car, taking into account, that this own life is the one shown by the previous writer of the program in its argument.The nexus of the three stories, as characters, Ryan Reynolds in this triad of characters Gary/Gavin/Gabriel, an amiga-amante always present one way or another in all three stories, Margaret/Melissa/Mary (embodied by Melissa McCarthy), and the threat which lurks in one way or another about himself, the actress Hope Davis and his three characters are Sarah/Susan/Sierra.Cuando a film begins with a note so deliciously ironic as the scene of the mirror and the navel, in which Reynolds, or rather his character Gary, makes a call to the nearest hospital to inform them that to look in the mirror has seen that gone his navel, a brilliant metaphor on the self-centeredness of every actor, and his tendency to literally look at the navel and believe the center of the universe, everything that comes below part already in advance unusual due to such successful first scene forward.Once runs the story, failed decisions abound in all the footage, being all the work extremely irregular, lacking a link no longer plot, but metaphorical sometimes, ideological or with a minimum sense of coherence and connection. This does not preclude that despite such shortcomings, the film arises as a risky proposal, as I have mentioned earlier, and is enjoyable to 100% by the lovers of the cinematographic rarities.Of the three stories, undoubtedly the most interesting is showing us the daily evolution of this writer bent on taking forward his pilot television show. It is the story with more depth, more ability to be interested, and Excel with their puns on top of the other two, more illogical and empty in its symbolism. The pressure from his superiors, having to give up the ties of friendship to take forward its work and the grinding work of the creator, come together in such wise proposal, which also has one of the best scenes of the film, that in which Gavin go lost on the street and is only able to see numbers above the heads of all the people that populate to his aroundby way of seeing the world as an impersonal audience, ignoring any emotional attachment and humanist.In this intermediate story, the role of Melissa McCarthy sticks to friendship, to the rupture of friendship, caused by the choice of Gavin become numbers throughout his life and a constant reality false and devoid of emotions. On the other hand, the role of Hope Davis is his boss in the chain, just the step above his work, giving rise to a heartless Harpy capable of anything for his work.The first and third story are quite more loose, and would come to be something as well as dependence on the first and the last love, concepts which together with the friendship of so successful history of screenwriter, make up the trio of feelings that mark throughout the film.In the first, the conclusion to drawn August through the institutionalization of the actor thwarted in a house under house arrest by his addiction to alcohol, it is that they are emotionally unstable beings, insinuating that they are unable to dispense with worship and the constant attention, in this case in the form of Melissa McCarthy, being his friend faithful that helps you overcome bad drinksstill Hope Davis as a threat in the form of spirited neighbour and active sexually, Amen little reluctant to avoid a good drink of any BREW. This first story is shown quite failed, not so much by the proposed symbolism, but by the way of carrying it out, too academic and little transgressive to be believable, more leaving the sense of metaphysical reflection of manual than anything else.In the last story, which supposedly gives meaning to the story, we have the worst of all the film, because despite the fact that the proposal to show us the frustration of a few characters that are part of a fiction upon hearing that everything is unrealistic, idealized and created by another exceed seemed interesting, August doesn't know to conclude the story in a suggestive way, and used to treat Gabriel (the new character of the third story) of divine Envoy (something that on the other hand not reveals anything unusual argument because in the first story, in less than 30 minutes of footage, it has left in the conversation of the actor in the first episodic story). On this occasion, Melissa McCarthy is the wife of Reynolds, who with her daughter spend the day in the field, again finding the character of Reynolds with Hope Davis, which takes you along a path without output with the intention of convincing him that should return to the place where appropriate, assuring him that everything that is living is unreal. Without disclosing the end of the film, only to say that it is a resolution incomplete, inconsistent and more full of absurd modernez new age that a successful symbolic vision which ended rightly the history.That is why reflections such as compare to the creator of any artistic manifestation with a demigod able to decide the fates of his characters, by way of divine yoke exercised by a superior body, not just materialize at all to mingle with unfinished allusions to the wishes of random, the destination or the parallel paths (as these chips placed in its correct order which alludes the girl in the last story). Also referred, quite rightly, that Yes, the number nine on multiple occasions, giving to understand the frustration that causes in all creator "almost perfect" posed by this assessment, in a display place imposed by every artist in achieving their maximum value.A film that although to be failed in much of its footage, excels above other products with regard to interest. A daring film, not bright, and with the ability to suggest highly interesting reflections on many occasions, and fall at the same time in other many extremely superficial. It is all commented in previous lines, despite irregular of the proposal, it is a film to see, a story which despite its appearance of film study, risks, and that is worthy of praise always in all new director that reaches the middle.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4299

Jaime Martínez

Cache Escondido

muchocine

A terror suggestive, since that obvious invisibly fear. Haneke is still obsessed with passing a hard time to the viewer and certainly succeeds.

I have to admit that I love Michael Haneke since I saw the grinding and the brilliant couple film entitled Funny Games, and that he himself has remakeado 10 years after its premiere. But after the viewing of cache, I must say that only created me indifference. At the technical level is impeccable, faithful to its fixed flat continuous so characteristic are his works, and the bright flat sequence which both abound in cache. Haneke maintains his style on his latest tape, a psychological portrait of a family well-off and bourgeois (e.g. not in a film from Haneke), he begins to receive mysterious recordings. With an overwhelming staging (100% Haneke), and disturbing, disturbing atmosphere, mix equal parts classic suspense with a suggestive horror. A terror suggestive, since that obvious invisibly fear. Haneke is still obsessed with passing a hard time to the viewer and certainly succeeds. Succeeds to suggest and not show, as well as longer base towards with Funny Games; and it seems that not given entirely bad. With a tremendously open and ambiguous ending, it forces you to draw your own conclusions. So those people who like it will all masticadito so they can accept it and understand it all before bedtime not come to this work, since it will think long and resting on the various points of view that offers to them. To my personally made me thinking some things and setting me on the last fixed plane that closes the film, I can get an idea that I will not share to not spoil the film to anyone. Some will say that it is extremely pretentious and Haneke plays and laughs at us (I'm not saying that not), but that already knew it to be to see a tape of his. One of the key figures of the modern cinema, both his technique and the pertubadora atomósfera that surrounds his works is undoubtedly Michael Haneke.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/751

Oscar Cantero

Infiltrados

muchocine

Brilliant product that reminds us that there is still room for quality in the current film, and that this need not be at odds with the entertainment.

Martin Scorsese has always felt predilection for movies in which the mobsters, gangsters and policemen settled their differences by dint of submachine gun, as it already expressed in Casino and more recently in Gangs of New York. He is a man who likes well elaborate frames, and so not repaired in the footage, that rarely drop their creations of two hours. In addition, this former seminarian has the extraordinary ability to surround himself with la flor y nata of interpretation, also realize that Scorsese is a director capable of taking the best of each one of them. The departed is a new version of a hongkonesa film of some years ago, and while it maintains the spirit of the original, the American has endowed it that personal touch that has always characterized their productions. The film tells the story of a police infiltrated the mafia, a mafioso infiltrated the police and all that this entails. With his usual moral ambiguity, the director makes us see that black is neither black nor white is white at all: or the police are Saints nor mafia demons FoPs and narcissistic full of evil. DiCaprio, Wahlberg and Sheen scratch at high level; Jack Nicholson, master among masters deserves special mention and is able to make good a film he only. The musical themes of the Rollings and Pink Floyd (the latter played by Roger Waters and Van Morrison) despite the end result. It would not be strange that after five nominations, Scorsese got finally the Academy, nor Jack added another to his collection. Brilliant product that reminds us that there is still room for quality in the current film, and that this need not be at odds with the entertainment. Brilliant.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/466

JohnTrent

Alatriste

muchocine

A failed movie, a wrong attempt of wanting to give to Spanish Cinema? final overproduction? It falls short in its claims, empty as narration and did not finish the Viewer to reach.

Spanish film has been, generally speaking, a little (quite) useless to bring to the big screen stories who know how to lead the masses to the cinema. Come on, who can not do "blockbusters", i.e., those films made by Americans like hotcakes and premiere with a view to sweeping to victory at box office, giving to the public which, it is alleged, waiting and also releasing such films with advertising campaigns that carried the film to more people better. Removing (esperpénticos) cases like the two sequels to "Stream" or "Mortadelo y Filemon" in recent years, there has been what you might call a true "blockbuster" that has sufficed the doldrums Spanish market expectations. "Alatriste" was born as the film that was to change this, the first Spanish epic blockbuster that was able to cope (both at the box office and results) to American cinema (though not is has been able to ignore so that country star). Seen in the box office results we can say, more or less, that had been achieved. The rest is better to discuss it.I had too many expectations to this film, and the continuous negative criticism in reference to tedious of the proposal, did me presage that my doubts in this regard could be certain. I would have liked to say that "Alatriste" is a bad film, a truño of care, but is not. Certainly not are before a bad film? although it is not good. "Say"Alatriste"is a failed movie, a wrong attempt of wanting to give to Spanish film"the definitive over-production"which falls short on its claims, empty as narration and ending does not reach the Viewer, as much as its interpreters to work.""Alatriste" has two serious problems; the script and Assembly. From these two important elements for the development of a plot, the film starts to water as it progresses and newcomers at the end, one is left with the feeling of seeing a set of sequences chained one after another but which, on many occasions, they have no continuity and seem to be mounted, without much sense, in a random way. Clear that, by what I have read (and using logic) this may have to do with the fact of being based on several novels and, therefore, is intended to summarize all this in 145 minutes, which do not lead to both. From this, it is logical that the supposedly important characters appear and disappear from the plot without coming to story or don't know very well where we want to bring the narrative occasionally.A feeling that gave me to see "Alatriste" was something like this as the see a "Torrente" saga but in serious plan delivery. If I can now explain. Do not you you fijasteis of interpreters, more or less known of the Spanish landscape were left to see screen in supporting roles or anecdotal appearances? It is the same feeling of being attentive to say "Look, that's the kind of that series or looks, this is the actor that". It seems that everyone has embraced this project, even some have left out the final Assembly (case similar to what happened when Terrence Malick was to direct this wonder that is "The thin red line", with the difference of these what they wanted was to work with Malick and the "Alatriste" guess that wanted to join the bandwagon of the taquillazo).However, not everything is negative in "Alatriste", since then that not. Please I can say that, unless something time of boredom, I became more bearable of what was expected and that interpretations are all quite correct, without too much stress in any case, but are always credible, even the of Viggo Monterssen, which feared his American accent and, surprisingly, not noticeable to prison terms at any time. And, of course, the production design is wonderful, as well as the picture (sometimes truly worthy of prize, with these pictorial approaches), leaving to see the money they have been left in her.It shows that they have been able to sell this film, the figures are there, but still do not know how a large overproduction which is really round (or at least good) and you key in the armchair without being a failed attempt to give her reply to "so criticized" (the Academy of Spanish film, means) Americans.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3760

Andrés Pons

Night of the Demons 2

muchocine

A frenetic pace with good development that gives a good entertainment surpassing in many respects to the original showing that sometimes is possible the impossible.

A sequel to the original surpass is really difficult to talk about a series (b) direct the video seems virtually impossible. As a director with Australia coming talent called BRIAN TRENCHARD SMITH which usually shine in aftermath of order that I performed two notable contributions to the LEPRECHAUM saga without forget that her debut was the sympathetic flying bike. A deal higher than the average in this type of product with CRISTI HARRIS television seen in series such as SANSET BEACH or the veteran JENNIFER RHODES participated in the hit series ALLY MACBEAL. The script is even more work to that of his predecessor out of the usual clichés that one abused, again is must outline the technical aspects above all the great work of make-up. A frenetic pace with good development that gives a good entertainment surpassing in many respects to the original showing that sometimes is possible the impossible.Like the previous one very funny.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/417

Jesus Lens

Corrupción en Miami

muchocine

How multinationals of the crime of the 21st century? The answer:?Miami Vice?, thorough and accurate recreation of the drug mafias.

Since the robbery starring De Niro and Val Kilmer in "Heat" gave me the heart to one hundred, I feel real veneration for Michael Mann, an admiration which touched the sky with its wonderful, deep and unique "Collateral". Why he hoped his film version of "Miami Vice" with the same anxiety that Carpanta was eager to dip a juicy roast chicken. The fact is that this summer that we have been seeing several different movie trailers, the "Corruption in Miami" has not been one of the most spectacular, nor much less. Not passes nothing why, the truth that the trailer for "Alatriste" showed great promise and, in the end, the announcement that the movie itself was more exciting.The case is that, still tired and without excessive desire, I dragged to Sacai cinema to enjoy in rigorous premiere this "Miami Vice" which both expected. And the first thing I wanted to see, rather listen to, was this subject that linkamos here.Viewers of my generation, to be sure, will bring echoes and memories of a good handful of nights spent with TV, in the company of Sonny Crocket, Ricardo Tubbs and, above all, mysterious and enigmatic Lieutenant Castle, which ended up gaining favor and affection of all of us.But the great song, that piece of item with which the sinister Total opened up all their powerful live performances, does not appear in the film. And although Sonny is ticking to any host, already not embraga with that decision of yesteryear, while he released and pressed the accelerator with their moccasins of design. is wrong all that? No. Because Michael Mann has gone from nostalgia and has decided to immerse ourselves in the most modern and current Miami, a Miami, as well as the fascinating Los Angeles which showed us in "Heat" and "Collateral", under the eye of her camera, looks like a genuine work of art of post-modernity, subjugating and stunning, images taken from aircraft and helicopters to aerial shotspespunteadas by an excellent soundtrack, you are happily printed in the retina.The visual talents of Michael Mann has no competence, today, the world cinematography. True that it enjoys very high budgets. Truth is that they allow you to do what pleases, but certainly the history aprovecha.¿Y? Direct, blunt and to the point. How multinationals of the crime of the 21st century? The answer: "Miami Vice", thorough and accurate recreation of the drug mafias, their connections and their springs. Without barely a minute to the everyday life of the life of the protagonists, only what is strictly necessary to define the characters and make that the pieces of the script complete fitting in "Miami Vice" everything takes place at breakneck speed. Operations are mounted on the fly, the decisions are stark and orders are fulfilled ipso facto.¿Los characters? Best Ricardo to Sonny, the truth, although it has more prominence. And, above all, Gong Li, magnificent. Up her love story, a priori the most dangerous of the film is credible, torrid and exciting. And also convinced me that Haggard and orondo Lieutenant Castillo.¿Y Tosar? Very well. Disturbing, magnetic, and very of the Earth, reading a newspaper of economic information with news concerning Amancio Ortega, Zara and Caixanova.¿Y action? It is not a "corruption in Miami" is not a salad shot, exactly, but every shot has the strength of a blow. Both the snipers of the principle and the sequence of child abduction are ideally solved. And the final sequence. only a master as Mann, with that narrative pulse for action sequences, is capable of shooting a transaction of drugs and money as if you were counting the Iraq Guerra. Fascinating. Epatante.¿Estamos, therefore before a masterpiece? Lol There are downtime, downs of pace and a certain general coldness that leaves you a bitter, metallic aftertaste. If in "Collateral", Mann achieved a perfect combination between design, sociology, philosophy and action, in "Miami Vice" premium formal on the emotional, the way on the merits. But nothing happens. Mann remains a crack and, of course, four or five sequences of "Corruption in Miami" worth infinitely more than 95% of the films currently on Billboard.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3988

Sandavito

30 días de oscuridad

muchocine

A vampire movie coming out somewhat from the norm, with characters and items closest to the films of George a. Romero, and with abundant blood and scares for all lovers of the horror genre.

The next February to reach our screens the umpteenth adaptation of comic that Hollywood has done lately, "30 days of night", whose provisional title in Spain is "30 days of night". With this so suggestive title appeared not so long ago a comic book in three installments (with its subsequent sequels) presenting us with an unusual history of vampires. More in the style of the genre of zombies, the history of "30 days of night" introduces us to the town of Barrow, Alaska, with one month a year of constant Sun and another month to the year of total darkness. Is taking advantage of this month of darkness that a group of vampires arrive on the scene to give a real feast.David Slade is correct, with a couple of fairly suggestive planes (I love an aerial overview of the city, all snowed in full attack of vampires), but in general feels an abuse of the slow, to the current fashion, in the action sequences, which becomes tiresome. Photography Jo Willems clearly distinguishes us two spaces, interiors and exteriors, with the differentiation of the shades of bluish and cold for snow, and more yellowish, but not so hot for interiors, somewhat in the style that already followed in Hard Candy in 2005. The script, as I say, is more typical of the genre of zombies, and perhaps in this aspect is its originality: a small village is infested with vampires, and the few survivors must resist a month until the Sun again to leave or die in the attempt. It should be noted that they there are, as it is logical and is normally the case in adaptations from comic book to film, differences of characters, relationships, the sub-plots and others, to make them, in the eyes of producers, more attractive to the Viewer (the happy marriage protagonist, for example, happens to be in procedures for separation in the film). However, the greater fault on script is which is usual in all films, calling them, "monsters", in the history of hollywood. The monsters become flat beings, with nothing more than hunger as motivation, without intelligence (as it has happened almost always to Frankenstein's monster). Thus, calcuradores and eloquent in the comic book, vampires have become a Pleiad of pale men suits to the Armani Exchange barely thirty sentences on the tape and the rest of the time is spend it screaming and growling while they teach teeth. Had been "invented" a guttural language for them, as it already did in previous films of vampires (see Blade, for example), to communicate, to make it more extravagant, and fill as well the gap that the sandwiches and the typography of the comic filled perfectly.On the sound side, the incidental music of Brian Reitzell is pretty well done. Reitzell has experience as a musical supervisor for, for example, Sofia Coppola, but this is his first time as a composer of the music for a film. It is not loud or pretentious, as it seems that it is the it style lately in too many productions, and fits perfectly with the dramatic use of sound effects, quite successful, by the way, over all the footage.Interpretive weight rests with the couple Josh Hartnett and Melissa George, with a constant game of attraction contained (remember that they are separating) arriving to be credible at times, and at other times, especially at the beginning of the film, is of zero credibility.In summary, a vampire film coming out a bit of the usual norm, with characters and items closest to the films of George a. Romero, and with abundant blood and scares for all lovers of the horror genre.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1163

Taliesin

Babel

muchocine

Babel its three protagonists are worlds hostile, alone and frustrated by not to break the cultural, social and physical barriers which prevent them from communicating with each other.

Babel is the third in a trilogy that began with Amores Perros year 2000 and continued with 21 grams in 2003. Three films, separated three years together, telling three stories each. In all of them a chance, an accident, makes that the lives of its protagonists, which otherwise would have traveled separately intersect. It is the parable of the chaos Butterfly made reality: a Japanese Hunter gives a rifle to a Moroccan Guide and, years later, this rifle will trigger a series of events that end up affecting people in various parts of the world.In Babel, Iñárritu, its director, returns to use the Assembly to give force to the magnificent script Guillermo Arriaga. The three stories are pieces, in a disorderly manner in time, although at no time the viewer lose sight of what is happening. However, does not occur in Babel as in 21 grams, where the Assembly was above a script that told how classic would have not been so interesting. Babel its three protagonists are worlds hostile, alone and frustrated by not to break the cultural, social and physical barriers which prevent them from communicating with each other. In these situations a look or a hug say more than words and they check that, below what there is in sight, we are all equal.Babel is a film built with silences, so the interpretation of the actors is fundamental to give credibility to the story. And the truth is that there is no objection. Both Brad Pitt, as Mexican Adriana Barraza and Rinko Kikuchi Japanese have gotten into the skin of their respective characters and the viewer enters history fully. The film features several moments of great strength, and despite having dyes of tragedy, finally leaves a sour taste. The work of localization is very remarkable and scenarios in Morocco, Mexico and Japan are shocking.In summary, Babel is a perfect snap for this trilogy that started three years ago, with Alejandro González Iñárritu directing and Guillermo Arriaga as screenwriter, although following very closely throughout the creative process. Indeed, it seems that from now on will work separately, and many are those who think that together total more than by separate. But that will tell the future. For the moment, today we can enjoy this interesting film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3836

Luna

The Jane Austen Book Club

muchocine

Swicord uses Jane Austen to his debut as a film director.

Jane Austen, one of the leaders of the English literature, has been discovered as a real film Philo. His books have been the subject of several film and television adaptations. Even his own life has been a film last year, "Becoming Jane". On this occasion, doing something like that in his day did Stephen Daldry with "The hours", it's see how that wrote this author remains the same of existing at the time that in the 21st century. In fact, even it is based on a book, as the work of Daldry, who in this case wrote Karen Joy Fowler.Un reading club gathers five women and a man on the books of the writer. Each with his tragedies daily, parallel to the daily tragedies that Jane Austen wrote. And it is that human relationships are a universal theme by nature.A nice romantic comedy that makes the little from the point of view of the realization and that nor deeply explores the complexity of the different human characters shown. Characters somewhat stereotyped, interpreted with correction but without applause, by the chosen distribution.It is the directorial debut of Robin Swicord, who has already carved out a name as a writer. Yours are the scripts of Matilda, virtually magic, little women, or memoirs of a geisha. It is a correct debut and not skip any of the rules of the comedy-drama that is so well known Swicord, who also signed the script.A movie to enjoy a Sunday afternoon, but of which there is no wait no ponderous reflection or an innovative staging.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3797

Rafa Ferrer

El Club de los Suicidas

muchocine

One more, that it is more of the same, and that, following my boycott to the Spanish movies in theaters, I have done right thing leaving her DVD.

As I've said a couple of times on this blog, and it is that, we tear us vestments stating categorically how badly that works Spanish cinema, no wonder if what comes to screens is always bad, poorly shot movies worse planned and with arguments that (although surprising) fail to be consistent with what is finally displayed by the Viewer.Myself long ago I threw the towel, and reserve 90% of the Spanish film that opens directly to the DVD (alkyl, I see and appreciate), long decided to that if they (except for things like "The orphanage" "REC" and similar), not decide to risk, not I who leave the uros in similar patochadas.After my complaint number. I don't know, I've lost count, I commented a bit the movie (that's what I paid), say both Fernando Tejero and Lucía Jimenez have pointed out this kind of films, and that kind of characters, Lucia repeats the same role that we have seen it perform in the vast majority of the strips appearing and three quarters of the same can be said of Fernando Tejero, which, although as person I think a type of exceptional, as actor seems that he was going for big and that he stayed on the road, since that is the fourth or fifth time that I see do the same, okay, here cries sometimes, but it seems that from one moment to another will escape the "A little bit of please.".As regards secondary have Luis Callejo (who saw in "Princesses" of Aranoa) and Juanma Cifuentes television, perhaps the only tape that I have come to touch with his character, close the cast Cristina Alcázar (which we have seen in "Tell me") and the young Clara Lake, another who always repeated the role of troubled young.Something I always put special interest is soundtracks, and, as happens in much of the Spanish film, as follows!GENTLEMEN, a soundtrack for a Spanish film is not to put 2 or three known issues! (and ball point), I know that Roque baths must have calluses in the hands of make themes for movies, but I bet that in this country there are hundred of composers that could make themes for movies (and surely at a good price), do not always fall into the same mistakes.Anyway, that one more, that it is more of the same, and that, following my boycott to the Spanish movies in theaters, I have done right thing leaving her DVD.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3027

Robgordon

Disturbia

muchocine

Light and entertaining film. Well made, but unoriginal and which can be enjoyed without time for boredom.

The cinema of orondo genius ahead of his time, Alfred Hitchcock, has always been a reference inevitable for much of the suspense film, since he himself created the genre as such. From the effrontery to Brian de Palma in its arguments and its Visual imitations to this fun hodgepodge of moments purely hitchcockianos that was "what the truth hides" by Robert Zemeckis, which used, among other things, ideas and sequences of the "Rear window".Confined in your room, with a plaster leg and profession photographer, James Stewart was the voyeur Hitchcockiano of that model film of 54, a study on the alien curiosity of the human being, on watch without being seen as desire.Precisely now, that same film, "Rear window" provides a good part of their original material to that covert and not confessed remake which is "Disturbia", starred by the new young figure of American cinema, Shia LeBoeuf in the role of James Stewart. "Disturbia" far become a revamped and educated review of the Hitchcock classic, is a guarantee and enough practice directed to a teenage audience, who probably not know the film on which "Disturbia" elaborates his argument, in the same way that won't be a totally predictable but entertaining film for the viewer more prepared, not only to know the tape of Hitchcock but also because "Disturbia" runs through land hackneyed by the genre of suspense and the teenager moviesthat this already know to imply.There are certain eighties aftertaste in "Disturbia", exemplified in the figure of LeBoeuf, a star emerging on which to build the typical character of adolescent revolutionized hormone that is involved in unexpected adventures with attractive girl of by means, as we have already seen in "Transformers" and as now happen again.In his first piece of footage, "Disturbia" recalls that family film of the 1980s and can remember more to the recent "Monster House" (another eighties revival) that to "Rear window". Moreover, there is a very large difference between the tape of Hitchcock and d.j. Caruso, which demonstrates the intentions of both movies. "Rear window" was the particular analysis of Hitchcock to one of the many obsessions that surrounded him, voyeurism, and the facts in one, arose as a result of a need for physical and/or sexual. The character of James Stewart maintained a relationship with Grace Kelly, but did not seem too pleased. Hitchcock, inteligentísimo as anyone, we were taught a small discussion of this couple, after which Stewart would seek through their binoculars and the Windows of their neighbors, a means of evasion, but also replacement made su, a priori, deteriorating relationship. Stewart was looking for the outside miseries, to not do you feel him so miserable, the beauty of a female body, before the impossibility for that of his girlfriend (Grace Kelly), or the passion of these first-time bride and groom that he makes time who had lost. Nevertheless, it was in the lives of their neighbors in front.In "Disturbia" nothing of the sort happens. Shia LeBouef is a mirror of the current, full of entertainment of last generation and delighted young have a neighbor newcomer to the neighborhood that is attractive in their eyes. Rebel and with a detector GPS prevents him to leave his home, LeBouef mira to neighbors as secondary and residual activity of the punishment that has been imposed (his mother, the actress Carrie Anne Moss, prevented play networked to the console and watch pay channels) and as a result of this new neighbor good looking.It is this difference which away from the Hitchcock film, but her close to the new audience. A maneuver which adapts with expertise to our times plot of "Rear window" with current suspense and family and juvenile 1980s comedy film and is the key that "Disturbia" has been a success at the box office in the United States, and one of the "sleepers" of the year.Characters, moments and elements of "Rear window" are repeated with great thought in "Disturbia", which will not be enough so that the director D.J. Caruso, knows to create good doses of suspense. That's why "Disturbia" will simply not find rebound a murderer in the House opposite (good work of actor David Morse), but you need to leave this home detention to which LeBouf is bound for entering clichés of horror (grim basement, serial killers, etc) that end up being tense for the Viewer.However, "Disturbia" is an entertaining and light film. Well made, but unoriginal and which can be enjoyed without time for boredom, where in addition, confirmed the talent of Shia LeBouf, which gains to major player in the not too distant future, as there is also a new young actress to keep track, Sarah Roemer.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4086

Rafa Ferrer

American Splendor

muchocine

You will like: If you a "snobbish" with glasses of pasta you are going through life as "sobrao", you will not like if the stories that have to do with the life of a stupid whippersnapper you matter less than you think.

The film seeks to be a strange mixture of comedy (a single minute I not laughed) and intense DRAMA (have either cried or felt bad roll), a tape that combines the world of cartoons with actors who interpret the characters and also the real characters, so forming a stranger "Hodgepodge – Underground" surely that like all those who feel identified with that other kind of comic that not tells the exploits superhero.The film has took brand new in Spain, in the USA it did at the beginning of the year 2004 and the truth is that, as I said when I saw "Entre Copas", actor Paul Giamatti is the center of function, and besides the driver link in history!Cone, who is the protagonist! this sensational, showing that cruel and merciless face has Harvey Peckard, the address is sober, the picture carefully and that soundtrack that surrounds the film true smell Jazz makes it curious, that if. !Experiments at home and with raincoat! (I think that I have bostezado of pure boredom as a dozen times during the projection).You will like: If you're a "snob" with glasses of pasta you are going through life as "sobrao" (see stick I'm going to bring to this), you will not like if the stories that have to do with the life of a stupid whippersnapper you matter less than you think.Curious, but so boring that you mirarás over and over again the clock waiting for that hour and 37 min. tape to pass as quickly as possible.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3225

Kiko de España

Stuck

muchocine

Here, as in Dogville, the crappy is to understand that it might have you happened to you or what is worse, it can be that according to which circumstances you reactions in the same way. It is called amorality.

Despite having a career that defines the irregular term always keep in mind to a guy like Stuart Gordon. The director of re-animator and Dolls brings us the best of his films recent, superior King of the ants and Edmond, two interesting but much more unsuccessful than his penultimate proposal titles, the brutal and inspired by real events Stuck.Para to start highlight the casting, which is perfect and all the characters in the film are recognizable: young people with aspirations and bad head, malas compañías, painful labor reality, selfishness, hijoputismo life itself.How to shoot does not vary too much from their jobs, with the camera on his shoulder, the best way to tell this story and put the viewer in the historiaTom (formidable, Stephen Rea) loses his job, his home and his dignity has no choice but to sleep on a bench in the Park because life, despite the fact that one always has the option of choosingIt is a shit that almost always gives more kicks than hugs. While trying to fall asleep the police advised that you get closer to a lodging for homeless people, which have no other way that access.Brandi (Mena Suvari, producer of the film) is a young nurse who works in a clinic and which probably, according to his boss, ends up in a short time as head of nurses. Brandi is romantically linked to Rashid, a dealer of three to the fourth that keeps her happy and her friend Tanya based on all kinds of drugs.To celebrate the possible rise they decide partying, although there has not been the news probably the plan would have been the same, and get into the pub on fashion to get pastis and take copazos.And as this is the real life (again, the film reads a real based on real events) the girl, all borrachuza and placed it, runs over Tom, leaving it embedded in the glass of the car. What makes the girl? Since throwing for House cagando centellas with poor Tom, alive and kicking almost there stuck.Since then the life of Brandi becomes a nightmare as raw as unnecessary (in turn) to avoid helping a poor Devil who only wants to go to the hospital.Here, as in Dogville, the crappy is to understand that it might have you happened to you or what is worse, it can be that according to which circumstances you reactions in the same way. It is called amorality. I guess that it is why get us loose laughter when the events are triggered and everything becomes, if possible, even worse and the only thing you have to do is take the car and go to your House.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/663

Plissken

Monday

muchocine

Turn a bland employee into a walking time bomb, leading him through situations halfway between the Tarantiniano humor and four yellow humor.

'Monday' (2000), of the Japanese director Hiroyuki Tanaka (better known as Sabu (?)) premiered at last in this our third world culture endorsed by the FIPRESCI award of the Berlin film festival of that year (in which reaped up to three awards) and comparisons with the splendid ' After hours' of Martin Scorsese. Man, no I said that does not have nearly the same amount of scenes in a bar than the small classic of Marty, but apart from that, the comparisons are odious pulling. Come on, it is not so much for the film in question.The argument is simple: Takagi wakes up in a hotel room that is his only guest, without knowing why. He does not remember anything of the last hours. In fact, not remember anything since that he attended a surreal funeral, which starred involuntary. Since that hazy memory, Takagi begins to remember the weekend that changed his life forever, because of an explosive mixture of alcohol, weapons and Japanese lounge music.The surprise factor is the best weapon of Sabu in 'Monday': a bland employee becomes a walking time bomb, leading him through situations halfway between humour Tarantiniano (specific references to 'Pulp Fiction' are obvious) and four yellow humor. Also has a couple of really fun scenes, and proves to be a good creator of images (the time of dance is the brightest of the film). But the second half of the film is dominated by predictability, once we know where we want to take the good of Sabu. And to make matters worse, this is one of those movies with multifinal, quite arbitrary, by the way, what definitely deflated a sympathetic but too irregular proposal.5. Not bored, but nor is the PEAR.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2346

Rafa Ferrer

Waynes World

muchocine

One of those movies sleeping in a valda of my childhood, and that's nice to occasionally recover to see that time and 15 years later follows aging with dignity.

Have time to sit in front of the TV to watch a movie in canal plus, is for my almost like a utopia, and is, lately I have little time at home to sit, but today, and revising magazine channel + I found this little gem from the beginning of the 1990s, with Mike Myers, away from the role of "Austin Powers" or the voice of "Shrek" (V.O.) accompanied by Dana Carveya face unknown in Spain, but very famous in the USA thanks to the "Saturday Night Live" a genuine television quarry comicos, and where they have come out among other people as Jim Carrey, Joan Cusack, Robert Downey Jr., Anthony Michael Hall, Randy Quaid.Si well the film brings us, is nothing more than a succession of gags, each more gilipollesco than the previous, stands out among all the great sequence in the car with Queen's "Bohemian Rapsody", also stresses on screen presence among others of the already abandoned by the big screen Rob Lowe and the mythical "Hunting treasures", Tia Carrere Orientale, here plays the role "women vase".Without a doubt, one of those movies sleeping in a valda of my childhood, and that gives pleasure from time to time recover to see that time and 15 years later follows dignity; aging Incidentally, the tape met as well as a sequel to released a year later, a version in video game consoles of the generation of the Super Nintendo Entertainment System.