Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3397

Kiko de España

Michael Clayton

muchocine

Halfway between the complaint and the entertainment Michael Clayton can be seen very easily because in the end it is not Syriana. Luckily.

Michael Clayton (George Clooney) solves problems effectively to the important firm of New York, which worked for years. It does not exert lawyer. It is a "Solver" when Arthur Edens (Tom Wilkinson), work colleague and personal friend of Michael discovers that a multinational agrochemical which defend is killing people with your product all leaves mother and the consequences will be terrible.As Michael Mann with his extraordinary the dilemma here is rookie Tony Gilroy that surrounded by elegance and good ways to tell another story of threats, corruption, lies and deception.You can have a balance problem because if in Mann's, which lasted for forty minutes, the problem of the multinational was constantly on screen passes a little on tiptoe by the affair that criticism without daring to enter a sack in the complaint and it shows in the rhythm, indecisive and slow at times in the first hour.It is in the second hour of movie when Gilroy removes complexes, decides to entertain the viewer and the film becomes an interesting and exciting very enjoyable thriller that shine above all Clooney, Wilkinson and a pair of types that levan out a grisly work.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/607

Javier Saz

Camino a Guantánamo

muchocine

Winterbotton and Whitecross manage a denunciation film hard, dry and aggressive. Sales of the film thinking that your problems are less than nothing, and you open a little bit your eyes in this inhumane and consumerist society.

Great película-denuncia of Michael Winterbotton and Mat Whitecross.Se could classify as documentary fiction, and let me explain. "Road to Guantanamo" part of a real event of the innocent voyage of four friends from England to Pakistan in September 2001, to attend the wedding of one of them, as they are first taken prisoner by the Northern Alliance and later by the Americans. This is a fact that step. Leave real people being interviewed, and in the end. But the recreation of the facts is fiction, they are four actors playing with Mise en scène. And it manages a denunciation film hard, dry and aggressive. Sales of the film thinking that your problems are less than nothing, and you open a little bit your eyes in this inhumane and consumerist society.The film goes in line with the work that I like most about Winterbotton, "In This World" (5), but without his poetry here dispenses with her to go straight to the point, to denounce. And as much as I dislike "In this World", comparisons are odious. And it is because "In this World" I think one of the best films of the last decade, invariably essential. "Road to Guantanamo" accomplishes its far, although the impact is me in the short term, perhaps is that the depth of "Saraband" do not leave me. But it is highly recommended.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2780

José A. Peig

El capitan blood

muchocine

A delicious narrative around the adventure understood as an evolution within a vital process.

Say that the pirates film has in this movie its best exponent, the ideal model that has inspired and may inspire forever when it comes to shape and build a héroe-antihéroe. That is the point that most strikes me of "El Captain Blood", a delicious narrative around the adventure understood as an evolution within a vital process.The great qualities of this film are all those which will be a good adventure movie: sharp and witty dialogues, built and antagonistic characters with fair efficiency and complexity, rate fluid, fast and at the service of the intensity of the different phases. With a good script, achieving the optimum result is the sea of easy; hero, heroine, bad, friends of the hero, enemies, the powerful good-natured, etc. A large number of characters, built with simplicity and unpretentious empty ending by spoiling the whole something very typical of most modern productions, trying to manufacture complex characters and what comes out is a pale, insubstantial and deadpan, churro as in "Alatriste".No, here appear here many characters and many pieces (Patriotic and political elements including) that play a role in history, structured in such a way that the viewer acknowledges to everyone in its role, forming a whole very well developed. To make a great movie you need the elements that will be part of the same are the fair and necessary, not on not missing anything: all, during and at the end of the story have been configuring the destiny and fate of the central character around which the narrative is organized.Above all, the story of a man more than "cinema of pirates", "adventure", "action", etc, the film by Michael Curtiz is a not insignificant history of intimacies, contradictions and secrets. The rebel personified by Errol Flyn - ideal romantic archetype as freedom, the stateless person feeling, service to those who have been excluded by a particular political order-, to have lived a past of military adventures, which denies, is involved in an Odyssey to save the oppressed that will lead to the creation of the way of pirate life, seeking freedom and community coexistence, but in the end it is discovered as an act of spite and revenge against the suffering and injustice generated by the established order. But the hero is aware and knows of the lives that it has cost your company awareness fueled by the female character, here is something more than a cliché which complies with the timely significance: the reproach to the immoral and life uprooted from the hero, contributing to the redemption of the same. All adventure film must have a core of humanity, a process in which the hero WINS is wrong, and returns to the origin. And in this story all the characters that surround the protagonist must play a role to obtain that all significant, playful, but also metaphorical, so that the héroe-antihéroe is a reflection of our lives, our lives are or cease to be. And thus, "The captain Blood" is a remarkable adventure film and a model to imitate.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1651

Silvia Giner

El último rey de Escocia

muchocine

At times the film has managed to absorb in the oppressive situation that arises. I must point out the makeup and the soundtrack, especially this last is probably one of the best I've heard so far during 2007.

"The last King of Scotland" is United to the tonic Hollywood of chastising facts with an end guess social complaint, although there are some who say that for political ends.As I have just said, based on real events, this film tells a formidable display the time in which General Idi Amin Dada was to the power of Uganda.El climax of the film becomes overwhelming for the Viewer, although probably is due to the colorful interpretation of Forest Whitaker, which has earned him an oscar and without which certainly complicity with the viewer that I always speakIt would not be the same.At times the film has managed to absorb in the oppressive situation that arises. I must point out the makeup and the soundtrack, especially this last is probably one of the best I've heard so far during the itself interpretation of all actors is actually achieved and except the Forest there are none on exit from another, all are great, there is a constant pulse between the characters, something that as a viewer fills muchisn't just an actor playing a role, is a character showing the vital crisis of its existence, and all these existencialidades are mixed at a key moment for the life of all of them.It is one of the films of this year you must see. I therefore recommend its viewing.For more geeks will tell that Gilliam Anderson Ex Agent Scully, has small membership. Of blonde and extremely thin (eat a pucherito Gilliam, thus not molas).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3136

Iñaki Bilbao

Siete Mesas de Billar Francés

muchocine

Nice film of Gracia Querejeta. For my taste, and simply as entertainment, the best of the Festival of cinema of Donostia 2007 official section.

Very nice film, beautifully directed by Gracia Querejeta (simple but masterly form of cut scenes) and superbly performed. Now that you know that he has won at the recent International Festival of cinema of Donostia 2007 Award for best screenplay, it is easy to say that it has a very well-written idem, but the truth is that it is. It perfectly combines drama with humor, perhaps winning the latter, but rather by the sympathy and entrañabilidad of his very well profiled characters, as the Fund is predominantly dramatic. A drama with the paternal figure present at all times (a constant film of Querejeta), now defunct physically, but that pulula, hurting and struggling with the happiness of their relatives. Painful memories, accounts pendienes not yet been overcome, vivid memories of tenderness and sadness, are present, without that seems easy to leave them behind. Good dialogues, especially the protagonist couple: Maribel Verdú-Blanca Portillo (this marvelous, with great naturalness in his declamations and an overflowing humanity in his character, Amen of hilarious scenes as of the Chinese, humorous and hilarious, restaurant make you share laughter). True is what was said at the time during the Festival, it sometimes seems that it tends to how easy, making everything fits to seem more friendly and more liked by the public, but the truth is that love and leaves very good taste. For my taste, and simply as entertainment, the best of the official section of the competition.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3774

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Soy leyenda

muchocine

Good, good film, which could have been very good and even wonderful if it had not fallen into misfortune of wanting to twinning undeniable success in box office and exclusively goer taste. As if it were impossible to twinning quality and pasta.

The apocalyptic story often adorn messianic prose biblical passages and iconography medievalist. Even the eschatological story, the book of the end of times long-caressed by all enlightened literature since the Apostles until this betrayed Matheson, requires a component mystical, religious or spiritual than war. And here, in this poetic sense, is where I am Legend displays their best weapons, their heightened respect for the beauty of a few absolutely hypnotic images, shot to the memory of a fed enough of enduring scenes spectator to be very critical when it comes to expand the hard disk and allow some few megs more plasticity. To I am Legend spare you plasticity, him too much honesty and have too you melancholy. Lacks it perhaps everything else. Francis Lawrence film is not much less a round work. Lacks an internal order that justified: there are sections of scandalous tedium, episodes credited to apathy, blunt boasts of pure nihilism. Who go to the cinema to see a display of special effects, a lesson in action with bottom of popcorn cinema will not find what you want. Hollywood has gone by the tangent with this installment of minimalist cinema, indie almost, amateur, although charged with the necessary budget and marketing seasonings to give the pitch at the box office, but neither this I have it clear after having enjoyed (and reviled in equal parts) commitment. Or dreadful action or psychological Interior, and Lawrence has drawn a fine middle way not just convince those that opt for these two vertices in a way difficult to converge. The devastated New York City shot like never before: that perhaps the claim that hunt the unsuspecting Viewer, who (like me) it has not hurgado in the literature, hagiography, in the milestone in science fiction intrahistoria, conducted (appears for the third time, I'm not definitely put in the subject) to the big screen. The film fails in the recreation of the action you want to uniquely link to be the blockbuster of bells. Vampiric creatures are only a start in the already if decelerada plot. These zombies smell lab too much: as if those responsible for the technical side had decided to downplay any possibility of credible, of humanity, say. In fact therein lies, in my opinion, the most unacceptable missteps: abandonment (I have no doubt that intentional) of the reasons of evil, of the reasons for the Wolf, as you would say the classic tale. I am legend is a story about loneliness of man. Gives equal which is represented on the rubble of Manhattan that in half of a carpeted Avenue of pedestrians. Loneliness considered an instrument of madness, loneliness even as a perversion of the modern society which has produced the evil which has demolished their strongest moral and civic principles. Neville (an immeasurable Will Smith) scientist has created a universe around his crusade: going to the video store and executes with impeccable rigor mechanical acts all do when we go to the video store. The mannequins are disturbing and anticipate the true image of the world: a huge chessboard where an adversary has been reduced to a single piece. There are no metaphors beyond the strictly permissible: the film scales among its commercial vocation and its undeniable intimate pull between certain open-minded moviegoers who will come to the film to devour images, digest them later and not be contaminated by any current of opinion that steal them formidable have discovered pleasure (themselves), the misery and the glorythe pain and the joy. All that there is in this ambitious (and ambitious, failed) modern horrors and psychologies of apocalyptic avant-garde film. Intermediate politically correct: Papa Bush sail by our dreams. His heroes filmed at 24 frames per second and even dare, in the solitude of a cellar, in the grim certainty of a dismembered world, to come up with the definitive antidote, a kind of masterful multicultural Coca-Cola formula. It will Smith contributes to the purpose with good manners that often lately and seems fantastic demiurge of a world made up to suit. To say of those who adore the book by Richard Matheson I am legend is a fiasco. Probably. I have not had the pleasure of reading it. I have known of its existence after the usual fire of artifice of advertising and its unstoppable propaganda machine. And I saw her on notice, aware my purity of spirit and a complete lack of expectations. Perhaps the best way to watch movies. A to which not always we pay when we went to the room and we give to the miracle of the figurative representation of life. Then left perplexed: halfway between the fascination of images and the boredom of a plot Misty, devotee of a cumbersome specific of what could have been counted in much less time. As is a television episode of quality on a cable channel. There is light outside.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/741

Vsancha

La matanza de Texas: el origen

muchocine

Nonsense would be the word to describe this exercise of ineptitude in the form of video clip whose realization only makes sense if it is not so that Mr Michael Bay fills the pockets.

Nonsense would be the word to describe this exercise of ineptitude in the form of video clip whose conduct only makes sense if it isn't so that Mr Michael Bay fills their pockets by exploiting a series does not give for more ideal. The great mistake of this film is its very existence, i.e., this film is totally unnecessary, adds nothing new, teaches nothing we have not seen before and attempting to explain the origin of the family, maniacs and Leatherface is a serious mistake, as one of the great successes of La Matanza was exactly not know because these people were acting that way. And also later, once you finish watching the film, you realize account there a few minutes of single origin and most of the footage is repeated over and over again the same formula that we of course already know of memory. The film is boring from beginning to end and that which takes least time and a half, but is so repetitive and predictable that all get boot staff are a few yawns far their claims something provocative of viscera and blood that nowadays is the least you can ask to a tape of terror of these features. But the thing is getting worse as boredom takes over the Viewer, starting with the futility of the Lord which is behind the camera, not is that demons will have wanted to make this film Mr Liebesman, but it is very harmful to the view the continuous level/contraplano and dizzying camera movements and if that join the darkness that invades every scene of the filmhardly we can identify the figure of Leatherface. A caracuero that, like his entire family of disruptors and sickly murderers, in is film loses all the charisma that had as a symbol of the horror movies & mythical figure of the slashers movies becoming a ridiculous character. I won't delve into the stupid couple of bikers that just show the narrative awkwardness of a script makes no sense. Or in the bland gang of young victims. The origin is just pure guts prefabricated, a commonplace innards show that distorts the true spirit and origin of the massacre of Texas.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/772

Elena Suárez

Ficción

muchocine

A film about feelings that the only thing that made me feel was a considerable drowsiness.

Have you ever thought of being unfaithful to your partner? Do has been playing to be the almost-loving someone? Does he decided to finally do nothing? Therefore if you are married and with children, in addition to being a complete cocoon, might be the protagonist of the last film of director Cesc Gay.Jugando to be Isabel Coixet and trying to make a good movie about deep feelings, the Catalan director has concluded a mediocre folletín about the romance of a few snobs who are dedicated to the art world, he directs films and her playing the violin.The film tries to show how the feelings that do not pass, that frustrated so we keep for ourselves, have the same importance as those we expose ourselves to others. The problem is when these feelings stem from characters in addition to not have very clear what they want in this life surrounding the selfishness. Fruit of this interpretation the Viewer may feel rejection by what feel the protagonists.Much more rich and interesting is the intense relationship of friendship that we see in the characters played by Javier Chamber and Carme Pla and of which the director just shows a few scraps.Apart from the minor that gave me the beautiful alleged love relationship, other components of the film also helped me to digest her. Slow, too slow (only the character of Santi lighten some scenes), a little working script (when one falls in love with someone I understand that the communication flow between the two is of vital importance and the dialogues that keeps the couple recall a little to the "mythical" series out of class) and, as a final auction, a desperate and unnecessary morreo (more than love what seemed the jacuzzi of big brother).In short, a film about feelings that the only thing that made me feel was a considerable drowsiness.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1867

Oscar Cantero

300

muchocine

A beautiful movie, with magnificent games camera and excellent aesthetic finish. Sorry to not respond to the story in a more reliable manner.

After directing a few years ago the baleful shadowing of dawn of the dead, Zack Snyder received a poisoned candy that could catapult his faltering career or sink it definitely Warner. The American picked up the glove and assumed the leadership of the umpteenth the film adaptation of a comic book of success, moreover, achieving a result acceptable oddball. The box-office success in its premiere, which achieved a revenue of almost $ 28 million in a single day, caused it not repaired in media for the global promotion of the film.Protest of Iran to UNESCO as offensive image showing of the Persians has helped feed the curiosity and therefore to increase the expectation already alone had produced the premiere of the film. Grosso mode, 300 recounts the battle of Thermopylae in which a small number of Spartans fought against the multitudinous troops of the Persians, causing the Union of Greeks against the invaders with his heroic performance. A very elaborate aesthetics, an easily intelligible argument and a quite sober interpretation are the main virtues of the production.On the negative side, a little in keeping with the whole soundtrack and remember in excess to productions as a Gladiator or similar, artificially lengthened footage and the lack of historical accuracy in the story of the story both in the characterization of the characters. Perhaps in this has been able to influence the lack of experience of the director, who has preferred to err on the side of conservative than of avant-garde. With everything and this, 300 is a good movie, very showy, with an impeccable aesthetic finish and some superb camera games. Arguments more than enough to see it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3115

Hombre Lobo

Disturbia

muchocine

All faults are minimal compared to the surprise that has been found in this film one of the most enjoyable premieres of the season, one that is worth recommending.

As happened last year when a stranger (2006) calls, those responsible for Disturbia (2007) have created with his film an update key teenager of a famous thriller of yesteryear. While never explicitly mentioned that this film is a remake of rear window (1954), the influence of the Alfred Hitchcock classic is more than evident, the extent to which certain specific scenes reproduced quite faithful way the adventures that had to pass James Stewart as a result of being fisgoneando there where it should not. The obsession of the character by expose all the evil that lurks in the figure of its neighbour is also an ode to night of fear (1985), and although this time the threat does not hide a supernatural origin, not so we leave find winks more obvious to the tape by Tom Holland, which curiously almost nobody mentioned when speaking of film we are discussing today.What makes Disturbia, however, more than a simple bastardization of a masterpiece is that he has taken advantage of the chronological distance that separates it from its predecessor to introduce some new elements. It is no coincidence the fact to show us that its young protagonist, isolated from the world because of the six months of house arrest that you have fallen over, has achieved a window to the outside not only through binoculars, but also thanks to technological gadgets of our time. IPods, camcorders, mobile phones and Internet connection are there (in addition to outright examples of product-placement) as essential elements for the development and staging of very specific moments. Even the small Locator subject to the leg of the protagonist, and that communicates their movements to the police is used as a catalyst for the conflict. And it is precisely this technology that delves into the paranoia that will gradually seizing the character; the moment in which Disturbia reproduces one of the most agonizing sequences of rear window is an even more disturbing Philo precisely thanks to technology and our obsession for image.At the climax, however, is when the film achieves divorced of its main references and reach its own value. The moment in which the audacity of the protagonist gives off and began digging in the horror that has sensed is, without a doubt, the best and most outstanding. Then when the film leaves virtually all adolescent subtlety and converts the calm surface of the outskirts of class middle/high into a real nightmare that is displayed as a game of Chinese boxes, one horror after another showing to anyone you want to scratch a little more glamorous cover of the bourgeois Idyll. It is then when we really understand the title and then is when the tape takes flight and largely compensates its previous shortcomings. These shortcomings are latent, of course, in the superficiality with which play some seemingly important plot aspects, such as e.g. alleged despair of the protagonist product be locked and that, ultimately, is what leads him to become obsessed with the life of its neighbors. Perhaps also we can accuse him a fairly slow start and an excessive recreation in long comic moments that seem to be there for abultar time footage to an hour and a half. But all these defects are minimal compared to the surprise that has been found in Disturbia one of the most enjoyable premieres of the season. Even in the case alleged that the teenage versions of old classics are not pleased that read this, just for the ingenious update of the reckless voyeurism and this angusioso climax, this is a movie that is worth recommending.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3093

Iñaki Bilbao

Un plan brillante

muchocine

Mediocre, although more or less entertaining film of Michael Raddord which, undoubtedly, has known better times.

Mediocre, although more or less entertaining film of Michael Raddord which, undoubtedly, has known better times. Here is limited to narrate a story of "great robberies", with little imagination, though aided by good make that interpretive monster that is Sir Michal Caine. When he leaves, the film is frankly, being a real pleasure to hear him in original version.In his scenes, especially the time in which attempts to enter the vault where the diamonds, while the guard is eating something rather than looking at the screens that has front, the excitement and intrigue lurks with force. This I said is a totally incredible moment, but that is the film. However, the rest of the narrative is more conventional you can see, having in addition a great handicap: it takes enough to enter in the field, perhaps because it is necessary to know the various characters, but in my opinion it would have been better to start with a prologue with force to engage the Viewer.This is not true and so the Ribbon is more cold, seeing as who hears rain: without any passion. You spend the time and not bored, certainly, but knows little and forget the five minutes.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2788

José A. Peig

El quinto elemento

muchocine

There are many moviegoers winks in a recapitulation that resembles a parody of the genre at the same time seems to want to apply a renewal on it.

We served the request from one of our readers that we talk about the fifth element with certain slackness by the references that we had until then the Luc Besson film was a "deceptive" and quite overused product in its approach. Other fields emphasizes in its thematic richness, but they are the least, and now, after the screening, we conclude that it has been one of the most profitable requests, and we must do justice to one of the misunderstood films by antonomasia in recent times.Starting from the assumption that we are before a film halfway between science fiction and pure and simple action, the so-called thematic richness would perhaps best defined if we speak of many lectures that converge in a structure of tones articulated perfectly. (The thematic richness refers to the isolated concepts, the structure of tones more affects the polyhedral character of its global texture). One method (among others possible) whether we are dealing with a good movie, mediocre or bad for artistic purposes, is to check the diversity of readings produced in the mind of each spectator, provided different interpretations are at its base a verifiable film content in the eyes of the spectators. To greater diversity, higher quality, unless there is some kind of inconsistency in this internal structure, and this inconsistency not depend on whether the themes are compatible or incompatible, but if are valid with regard to the purpose pursued.It speaks the fifth element as object of entertainment, film shots, harassment, call and gossip at the service of Bruce Willis, actor here this in its sauce more than ever. Refers to the playful look that envelops the story from beginning to end and also refers to a transcendent message about the current state of civilization. All these readings are as certain as the visual and plot fluidity of the film material this prepared and organized according to the above-mentioned thematic characteristics, and importantly is that Besson achieved effectiveness at all levels proposed. The most obvious result is a happy combination of science fiction, mythology, and humor from the earliest moments in which we see a group of archaeologists in a temple and the spacecraft descended, with the subsequent parade of aliens walk with debauchery. Often criticized that plumbous and humorous tone that dominates the narrative pulse, but since the first scenes the work reveals his intention to be a delusional and sardonic look to a genre and its clichés. It is not a defect of the film, but an attribute set out with such effectiveness that becomes the true spirit of the work, its differential feature of other similar products and which gives the uniqueness. From a global perspective, the film is a representation of a universe with identity and own uniqueness which brings together elements of universes moviegoers as the original star trilogy with irony wars, Blade Runner, Star Trek or other products whose enclave this closer to the comic book or the so-called "series z", why warn in many passages tics scurfy film which serve as a springboard to introduce characters who rallan - with consistency and sense of set - in the grotesque, as, for example, played by Gary Oldman or histrionic and irritating color shemale participation. There are many moviegoers winks in a recapitulation that resembles a parody of the genre at the same time seems to want to apply a renewal on it.Thus, as action movie - humor, a playful object not lacking wit whose sarcasm is the main attraction that configures a script dotted with sharp dialogues, sometimes, inclusive, bitter irony. The visual section, highlights the designs of Moebius and an exotic and exuberant Futurism of colours and shapes, a stage in perfect concordance with shades of history: myth, irony, acid humor and parody unhealthy. Therefore the integration of the scenario with the history is another of its virtues, of how plastics resources and dramatic content form a whole for an irreverent and dynamic genres crossing. Merit of narrating fluently and great pace a very simple story (attention also to the use of mounting, superb) on a Savior of the world and an anonymous salvador that they discover, fight and end up falling in love with, should be added the wisdom of using the tone humorous to offer a critical on human society look, banality facing us and the chaos that US rules when the machinery of the universe plays against us. What it says is a ridicule of the human system and their myths not devoid of some bitterness, as we see in the scene of the female protagonist looking at photographs of war and death, and the expression of pain on his face, we come to the end and discovered that the smile and the sardonic despiporre hide a tear in the future.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2415

Bruji

Flyboys: héroes del aire

muchocine

Technology can never compensate for the failure occurring in a screenplay adaptation

While is correct that the great films of dogfights were always filmed by real pilots? and the November Bill Tony is-, nor it is a lie that its stereotyped and bland script, lacking in verisimilitude, to Flyboys becomes an amorphous hybrid between the Pearl Harbor of Michael Bay and the legends of passion of Edward Zwick. An irreparable nonsense, that the away from mythical titles to which could overcome.Do do scary everytime people like Michael Bay or Dean Devlin (producer of Godzilla) determine that? long ago is not a war film?. Do the first, already played to the? chicken? in his particular Pearl Harbor; While in this case, the intention of Devlin was non other than the pay homage to the legendary Lafayette Squadron, one that, with more courage than media, fought the Germans in the first world war. Of course, the result leads to the belief that it is fortunate that no member of the glorious squad can see the film. Let's say that the tribute is lost in the production notes, without reaching transcend to the screen, because of an ill-fated script. What, no doubt?Do c? est an dommage!, I'd say the beautiful Luciana.Con ambitious pretensions, not exempt of goodwill, Flyboys is dedicated to search for references in the classics. Is a significant and worthy fact to deal with the management of the project to a professional driver, as they were the mythical William Wellman, Howard Hawks and Howard Hughes, who left us titles like wings (first film winning an Oscar in the history of the cinema in 1929), the dawn and Los Angeles the hell Squad (widely recreated by Martin Scorsese in the Aviator)respectively. Years later, Welman shot another film with the title of La squad Lafayette. Having Tony Bill after cameras guarantees a technical virtuosity in the airspace that isn't continuity on the Mainland. It is precise to emphasize subjective levels which gives this tape, the choreography that draw the little planes in the air, the close-up of the pilots, both reminiscent of silent film scenes, and the obsession for showing the precariousness of those flying kites that must have been the first aircraft of war, as always did Howard Hawks. The truth is that they yearn more minutes of flight in the footage.On the other hand, it would not be fair to mention important historical advice, apparently, also the work of Bill. ?Knights of the air?, as agreed in calling these bunnies of Indian historians, were the last to show a code of Honor in the heights, in these last medieval tournaments, which are so well reflected in the film. If both aspects, add them the spectacular soundtrack of Trevor Rabin, the perfect photography Henry Braham (only have to remember the reflection of the squadron in the transparent waters of the river), its excellent sound effects, the good work in the interpretation of Martin Henderson, the acceptable art direction; and, in addition, we consider that the air and the aircraft of the first world war never managed to great works of art in film, we realize that this could really be the great tribute that he deserved the squad noble. However, it is not. Technology can never compensate for the bug that occurs in the adaptation of a screenplay, and Flyboys violates the great message which derived of the best war productions, which already enacted Wellman in 1929, which ratified master Kubrick in paths of glory, which issued Lewis Milestone in without quiet on the Western front. ?Nothing does the heroism that involves losing everything by the way?. Instead, we have a modern version light of the facts, to justify participation in any war when you're winning. Thanks to it, are achievable goals that always dreamed. Neither more nor less than what usually happens when a story set in the France of 1917 is transformed into an americanada. Independence Day type.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1266

Caruco

María Antonieta

muchocine

The pity is that depth, modernez and passion, in the hands of Sofia, are limited to a lavish catalog of dresses and shoes of the 18th century.

Elongated is the shadow of "The godfather", or his father, Francis Ford Coppola; that has inoculated in Sofia the passion for audiovisual art, to it has generated you amount of detractors and admirers. "" Lost in Versailles ", Sofia Coppola transports US to the France pre-and revolutionary to show us another passion from a 14 year old girl forced to leave behind all objects in his native Austria to become wife of Louis XVI and future Queen of the Gallic nation.""If have no bread to eat cakes", read a popular phrase of the time, forged by a starving people (which also named Madame Guillotine it) and attached these words to the lips of a Queen who considered frivolous, malgastadora, nimfómana and ruin. Therefore, the Coppola is human looking, tinted naivety to a historical myth treated with little MIME by history, and closing, incidentally, a kind of trilogy about girls who become women. And with eyes on "Barry Lyndon", one of his favorite films, also wide his career tanned in video clips with the groundbreaking idea of including current songs, The Strokes, New Order or Siouxie & Banshees between such straitened and last fashionable melody of the Court of King Louis XV and Louis XVI.Sensitivity Sofia.La pity is that depth, modernez and passion, in the hands of Sofia, are limited to a lavish catalog of dresses and shoes of the 18th century, of festivals and sweets. "To contemplate a Kirsten Dunst walking through Versailles more lost than Scarlett Johansson in Tokyo, and to equip, or rather, remove characters and script the more minimal relevance, covering the vacuum by an aestheticism of a postcard.""Lost in Versailles", I say, "Marie Antoinette", is a leisurely proposal that not entertains, an exercise in scarcely memorable historical memory and a vision of some human beings relegated to mere comparsas by its low physical or psychological entity.But confirms the main talent of Sofia Coppola: is a Director of details, attentive to looks and gestures. In "Lost in Versailles", most are trivial, but one there is excellent as the occurrence of Marie Antoinette of applauding without having completed an opera, bypassing a life full of cumbersome protocols and ceremonies (and that it be the first look of admiration and her powerless husband do lust?).Or the gesture from the Versailles balcony real to make a bow to his revolucionado people, sign of the maturity of a character which, in their 30s, just of face to face with reality.The virtue of Sofia is the sensitivity, but if his intention was to make us see that Marie Antoinette was not so superficial, often bump!.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3422

Ana Belén Pacheco

Un Corazón Invencible

muchocine

Michael Winterbotton has opted for the simpler and less risky giving the role protagonist Jolie with that style of House so pseudodocumental it is divinely when you want to make a serious film.

I am sugestionada. It is the fact that I have lived in a hippie commune surrounded by French who knew better or worse to speak English, so when I heard Angelina Jolie trying to imitate gabacho accent I've felt a little upset. The story that revolves around to an American to strive to portray a foreign role when there are so many actresses of the Gallic country could do so without having to resort to subterfuges such regrettable, well, help a little your husband put the peel to make the movie is funny. Although doing so loaded the credibility of the main role, but who cares! If Americans are going to herd everyone they will praise while having no or remotest idea of how talks about a Frenchman in English. Or you can to happen what really happened and the people feel much better ignoring the tape and going to see less committed and hard fiction.The main weak point is precisely that Angelina is the center of the world. Understanding that the aim of the film is to denounce a regrettable situation in Pakistan through the drama of Mariane, a French journalist still intended there has to undergo the abduction of her husband and the desperation of the uncertainty is while expecting their first child. In the drama, there are many ways to approach a story ten terrible and deep and Michael Winterbotton has opted for the simpler and less risky giving the role protagonist Jolie and neglecting a good roster of side for greater showcasing of Mrs. Pitt with that style of House so pseudodocumental it is divinely when you want to make a serious film.An invincible heart is a film inspired by the novel A Mighty Heart: The Brave Life and Death of My Husband Danny Pearl written in first person by the own Mariane Pearl so better not they could have captured the experiences of the couple but there is something that seems distant and insubstantial in everything what counts. Much was said during the filming and seemed rather a media circus so that at the end unless the objective was that people speak of what was happening in Pakistan even if it were only to go down to the illustrious couple and the Entourage of kids but is a pity indeed drama ends up devouring the complaint.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3205

Silvia Giner

Adiós pequeña, adiós

muchocine

Ben Affleck made his debut with success in the direction of this film whose plot is based on the novel by the author of Mystic River.

Ben Affleck ebuta successfully in the direction of this film whose plot is based on the novel by the author of Mystic River. Great sound editing for a film whose peak is located within the first hour the next half-hour film, it seems that you rate down considerably to lead us to a final intuíble "than not predictable".I liked especially the view that Ben decided to tell this story. Tension is maintained and not lost the plot thread at any time.Ben puts in charge of the film to his adorable brother Casey Affleck (assumed his first protagonist and must say that it supports the weight of the film in a manner more than commendable) who plays a private detective who along with his wife managed his own business of private detectives. His routine is altered when the family of a missing girl hire their services to suspect that the police is not throwing all the light that should be the case of the disappearance.The protagonist will be involved in a game of lies and opportunistic, finally committed and indecisive played between what "is right" and "what should".Recommended film seems to me profitable for Ben. We'll see far gets. I imagine that the choice of history is preceded by the success garnered Mystic River, perhaps hoping that on this occasion this fact be repeated.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2879

Antoni Messa

La Jungla 4.0

muchocine

Although not establishing anything of what can happen to this type, hardly go one to aburrise. And this is a good guarantee within the coordinates of an action thriller.

John McLane is a hard COP; a type of expeditious and easy trigger and, at the same time, a gafe of volume and spine that his own daughter can not see nor in painting. As he quotes one of the bad guys of the jungle 4.0, "again returns to be in the wrong place and at the improper time". With the passing of the years, McLane has become a caricature of himself. Anchored in the past, in his car even listening to blaring Fortunate Son of the Creedence. Hates his job, but doing it with unparalleled professionalism: adrenaline, bad milk and the abruptly are the best allies of a solitary cowboy like him, by far, after each of its turbulent and unexpected missions, ending spending a good part of his salary in gel, shower, dry and shredded. There are things that will never change.That is, a brief outline, Bruce Willis, who gives life to the police detective in New York that, the hand of Jim McTiernan and in 1988, his debut in the big screen with Crystal jungle. Almost 20 years have passed and the man still endures almost as fresh and lozano as the first day, despite his constant references to the inevitable physical weight caused by two decades of seeing their best t-shirts made pieces. The spirit remains the same; even their intentions, because pues entretener entertain is the only goal that has always sought the film series.It is undeniable that the jungle 4.0 distracts and faithful to its constants and the age of the character, commitment to a more classical realization and with fewer digital effects than other more current titles in action. All right here, because Len Wiseman, director, has been able to put aside the technology used for their two Underworlds-without giving up 100% to it - entering in a much more formal and less visually computer style. Computer science, in this case, becomes part of the core plot of the film that, through it, a group of terrorists, captained by a resentful hacker, is prepared to lead, with its network of computers, unsurpassed chaos worldwide. Such is the love of McLane in prehistory, in one particular scene, arriving to ask what noses means the word hacker; a scene from which and taking advantage of the curious presence of Kevin Smith, it pays homage to Clerks and default Star Wars.El big problem of this fourth installment is located in the story that raises, is excessively unlikely in too many aspects. Everything seems very by hairs and some of their most hair-raising passages (as the car desmadre inside a tunnel or walk McLane), due to its excess, caught by the wing of an aircraft offer a zero credibility. Anyway, and following the formal tone of the series, this widespread desmelene just becoming one of its most attractive constants (in the background). The jungle 4.0 has lost claw and force on script refers. This is almost non-existent, while their dialogues and, above all, the comments of McLane everytime he is in danger, sounding forced; almost as forced as the construction makes his apayasado character Justin Long who, collecting the testimony of Samuel l. Jackson in the penultimate jungle, brings to life the accidental partner of Willis. In fact, this chapter is a clear example of how to hold a formula film with minimum effort and, however, to work correctly as a mere hobby and not seek three toes the cat. Jungle there is only one, the first, the genuine and unsurpassed jungle of glass: a model film and the birth of a scoundrel and horny, modeling, hero almost exclusively for the showcasing of Bruce Willis who, fortunately, and throughout his career, has shown that it can do more and better roles outside of his celebrated heroes in action. Later, the series was lengthening is degenerating, but without ever falling into error offer a boring product to leave your audience wanting to distance himself from his more humorous poli and brutote. Precisely and despite its errors, the jungle 4.0 is a compendium of what they have been (and can be) the adventures of the detective as a Christmas Eve lost her shoes and stayed locked in the interior of an ultramodern skyscrapers. Although not establishing anything of what can happen to this type, hardly go one to aburrise. And this is a good guarantee within the coordinates of an action thriller.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2752

Ramón Balcells

Fracture

muchocine

Notable legal thriller with truly good moments and a masterful interpretation of Anthony Hopkins. Perhaps Fracture we will be in the memory for a long time, but I do not think that Hoblit intends. This is a movie to watch and comment out of the film. Point.

It looked like the typical legal thriller without the slightest grace and originality directed without hardly any personality. The case is that it is nothing out of this world, but nor is it a bad film, nor much less. This air to the thrillers of the 90s with great interpretive duels and intrigue of the good is certainly appreciated. What most stands out here is, without a doubt, great performance by Anthony Hopkins who, as always, catches the viewer with his ferocious looks and phrases of English humor really disconcerting. It is not cast, Ryan Gosling, teammate cheapen being named, but is that Mr. Hannibal eats it alive just appearing half of footage that the protagonist of Half Nelson. Perhaps one of the key scenes of the film is that conversation both remain in prison, where Hopkins psychologically caught that Gosling talking everything what he knows about his life and what he sees as weakness. As you can see, Fracture has its moments, some brilliant, other correct and others left over. It never becomes boring, what is more, this is a very entertaining film, just without action. It is not that too many there are sudden changes of argument, although there are several unexpected turns. The end, very characteristic also of intense films of the 90s, reminds us that we are seeing a hundred percent legal film and its message more clear and critic is that there are many ways to get to the truth through justice, whether they are good or bad.The script is what, in my opinion, most falters in this interesting film. It has a truly intriguing start, but there are several aspects of the knot which cannot convince me come. I am not going to appoint them now, but for example, the character of Rosamund Pike does not look too, moreover, is as the female complement which, undoubtedly was to appear in the film. Gosling plays a winning type, which has had the working life and now cares more about his salary that to resolve cases as a lawyer that is (quoting one of the phrases that the great David Strathairn named in the film). And everything changes when she meets the Hopkins manipulator, which makes it radically change to the point of obsession with the fact if there is really the perfect crime. Reminds me the first feature film by Hoblit, two sides of the truth, a correct movie of trials with an interpretative duel between Richard Gere and Edward Norton really amazing. And is that you for what deny it: the majority weight of Fracture lies in the doomed Hopkins, and of another film in the also condemned Norton (received a nomination Oscar for her performance). It is not that "prosecutors" have misinterpretations, but there is no denying that the bad guys end up being better than the "good guys". Perhaps in the new film is not as in depth the theme of human psychology as it clearly noted on both sides of the truth, but they do have several points in common that are, at the same time, somewhat suspicious. Comparisons aside, and focus on Fracture, say that without being a wonder, get beat most thrillers which have been released over the past years (except for teachers like Fincher or Greengrass), obtaining a remarkable outcome, very conviencente and nothing Manipulator. After all, I was going with the intention of seeing an entertaining film and that is what I found. Perhaps his main mistake is that they can spare you a few minutes. Two hours was too much for telling a story like this, but the truth is that it is not heavy. And not to forget the great side of which highlighted the already named Stratharin and Pike, and the always magnificent Fiona Shaw in the role of judge.A notable legal thriller, with really good moments and a masterful interpretation of Anthony Hopkins. Perhaps Fracture we will be in the memory for a long time, but I do not think that Hoblit intends. Finally, this is a movie to watch and comment out of the film. Point.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2735

José A. Peig

Naturaleza muerta

muchocine

A very honest and precise, work which each level is intended to evoke the idea of the central theme, although unable to transcend the obviousness of his own speech and reiterated in excess the same idea.

A film can find its raison d ' être in alternative to the narrative fields, you can have a purpose purely expository, lyrical or metaphorically build a State of being. In some of these areas - and depending on the treatment - the laws of narrative were outside to emphasize a more concrete aspect than the of telling a story; Eastern cinema has a clear tendency towards the contemplative glances and the connection between spiritual state and scenery is a single resource for a wealthy, but not necessarily whimsical visual presentation.Nature dead, directed by the Chinese author Jia Zhang Ke, is a film of processes and divergences, looks and subtle thoughts, not of facts that are developed on the basis of the scheme that subordinates us the script as often. To be contemplative film, the author used and abused the flat long, slow, flat sequence that run profiles with the simplicity and naturalness of the typical story of manners, or fix a landscape of Fund that serves as a reference for the visual significance. It is logical that the film is boring, and is not recommended for those who want to go to the movies to entertain, and perhaps gives the impression that Chinese filmmaker gets carried away by arbitrariness and the comfort of limited shooting situations repeatedly.But the truth is that, broadly, the visual composition and the use of the Assembly are designed based on a concept, and an expressive idea that encompasses humanity with the landscape under a bleak tone. A too simple idea, and although this represented a devoid of redundant devices accurately, the result and expressed no longer too obvious, so best to assess this film is opting for a midpoint between the intellectual honesty of the author, and the obviousness of his proposal.The film exposes the process of two lives, a miner in search of her ex - woman and a girl looking for her sentimental partner. Separation and informalization is the central theme in all relations, both romantic relationships at the landscape level - human being. Social psychology has defined how the destruction of the landscape affects negatively the spiritual and mental state of its inhabitants, and almost the whole corpus of images that form the film is intended to express the disorder in the human-landscape relationship. It is true that the representation does not have explicit dramatic tension, but we are dealing with an atonal gaze, filmmaker exposes a few situations in a given context, without manipulating the emotions of the Viewer. This does not imply a cold look - at all-, and on the contrary, the atonal rawness is its best asset as film expression.All visual resources are in function of expressing such dissociation: the landscape background of the Lake and the mountains that characterize the enclave are the frame of reference for introducing two characters who bear the weight of the speech, and configure a visual parallel which is to be the most common stylistic resource: a man or a woman, and a landscape in the background. The ruins, house demolitions, the mists that hinder the view of nature, work and hobbies in a place in which it seems that there is not much to do or nothing interesting to say, these elements correlate with the separation and the difficulty of understanding with others or with the beloved, the search for something that never comesa society so apathetic and dam of becoming imposed by the changes, such as the permanent mists and buildings that collapse without that nobody can do nothing to prevent it.In short, a very honest and precise, work which each level is intended to evoke the idea of the central theme, although unable to transcend the obviousness of his own speech and reiterated in excess the same idea. It is a film that may be sleeping for a large part of the audience, but would not be fair to ignore a very conscientious and work meticulously designed for the purpose of a concept clearly expressed.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/280

Rafa Ferrer

Ella es el chico

muchocine

Do every week have to suffer this type of poster movies?

Yet another revisitación a classic Shakespeare, translated into a teen comedy, (from "Poisoned maze" or "10 reasons to hate you") the greatest playwright of the universe has been checking as his works became romantic comedietas for the teenage audience. Taking advantage of the world of Germany, this revolves around football, where a girl, played by Amanda Bynes unknown poses as his brother, is true that in the room where I saw the film had more femininity to "feminos" and latter we looked quite bored with, since neither understood the jokes, or lack that made us, that the tapethe more predictable and better better than sosa.Finally, one more, that will change your life, or change gender or wait more than there are, by the way why every week we have to suffer this type of poster movies?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1818

Bloody Will

Shooter: El Tirador

muchocine

?Shooter: the shooter? It is a film of the lot, not higher than the average, but that does not mean that one will sleep after paying 6 euros and peak.

I have a serious problem of critical decision with this film. It is not to raise me put her back and a half by poor quality or bad performances, although it is really so, but is that not being no wonder, at the end I has been entertaining, and is one of those mysteries surrounding the film buff tastes of each. ?Shooter: the shooter? It is a film of the lot, not higher than the average, but that does not mean that one will sleep after paying 6 euros and peak. One of the major problems facing this film is its director, Antoine Fuqua, and taste so good that he left after?Training Day? or?King Arthur?. So one hopes that this form of cinema extends his following works, but as it happens with all directors, always be flaque.In?Shooter: the shooter? Fuqua has encountered a very bad adaptation of a novel, and that brings consequences. Without having read one captures that events, and not the action unfolds so fast that sometimes leaves a few startling gaps. If we had that prosecute the film for his screenplay pararíamos not remove defects, but even so, the way that Fuqua attempts to save the dishes is very commendable. Get a history requetevista and atolondrada give a rate that does not convert its 120 minutes in a unbeatable drink.If you have seen the trailer, practically you have seen the film. They are two pillars on which the film unfolds: an old retired military is betrayed by the Government to endorse a dead, and their endless flight will find in a good ally for desenmascar the plot.How many movies have seen with equal history, too. Do the initial sequence is a classic of? here smells like dead?. The next half hour is the ABC of Government treason USA and the escape and revenge is book. Nor has it?Shooter: the shooter? surprising to leave you open-mouthed, elements and the conclusion is more than predictable, but I feel hopelessly attracted to the development for a good reason: that touch of John Rambo has the film. Do do I missed already the persimmon along with foliage of the forest, where a hidden shooter is brushing one by one without dialogue, and to cure thugs? home? the wounds of the protagonist only lacks see Whalberg biting a machete. What memories.Unlike of?Do Training Day?, Fuqua has put in hand more explosions than dialectical warfare, but is that counting Mark Whalberg in superb physical condition leads to punches, kicks and other caresses are luxury. Nevertheless, and at the level of interpretation, is not the best film of Whalberg. A plain script and a sometimes stupid sentences leaves him as a mass of muscles with a target style of the donkey with the carrot ahead. Michael Peña is the another prota, and highlight your scene with a gimmick that seem designed by the very same Jigsaw. Elias Koteas, who gets in this film is as schizophrenic federal agent with an ending worthy of entering the Gallery of?Best execution?. Danny Glover is not a paragon of phrases of Oscar, and the girl, Kate Mara can do little other than put face of scared. Be grateful to see Ned Beatty.Tras read all this perhaps you can explain to me why so much debate between the Yes or no. Sometimes I think it has more eighties dyes than a film of action more according to the times, but even this approach has done that we do not see a new show of fireworks without sense. It is a good action movie, but it is not the movie's action this season. I have seen it to evade me awhile, and it has taken effect. For lovers of the genre of shooting distance or very loving of the anatomy of Whalberg.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1830

Tito Chinchan

Isi Disi: Alto voltaje

muchocine

Comedy to the torrent which did very good box office in his day. It has a sole motivation, the fun to the Viewer, beyond of hidden aspirations. Escape completely American stereotypes, as she proclaims.

Saturday morning, the baby rises to an immoral hour from any point of view. My medium Zucchini tells me to "go down, now I'm going". While I realize counts that I have cheated as a Chinese and that it has been sleeping. It's okay, I'm a Daddy with resources. I rebusco in the deuvedeteca something that can be educational for the small and I find nothing more and nothing less than the second part of the movie of Florentine and Segura. This is educational 100%, that verily I.The film is about a group of jevis calling the dead rat. By avatars of fate, faced with a stratospheric fine, leading them to participate in a new television contest seeking the heavy ever more brutal rock band. But after this, hide the Machiavellian ideas of a billionaire, who only wants to enrich themselves at the expense of these pringá you.I like these films, given that they are made by and for the divertimento. They have everything to like me, like women in leather, grumosos, dropping and famous jokes in various roles, cañamero humor, etc. I think that not me djo nothing. The argument is unimportant, although it has a script which continues at least in a straight line, with a small meltdown in the latter part. Famous payroll is very good, the stream style, with Luis Coll (in his last movie) of drunk, porn stars of porn actresses, Gran Wyoming wrong that acts of wonder, Arévalo of police (this not killing me), and a few more we should go looking for them (such as Mono Burgos). Not be why, but I left the box throughout the film, while the baby looked at hallucinating.In short, comedy to the torrent which did very good box office in his day. It has a sole motivation, the fun to the Viewer, beyond of hidden aspirations. Escape completely American stereotypes, as she proclaims.It is bad to die, but I I mondé laughter.Besitos.P.D: For more than 300 reviews I started the blog with the first part of this precisely. As time goes on.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3771

Emilio Calvo de Mora

La Búsqueda: El Diario Secreto

muchocine

More of the same, but at worst. Already.

To say of those who look forward with stories as counted here, search 1.0 (delivery Disney affiliate fashion of Templars, treasures and various Rosicrucians) meant a fresh air in the languid picture of teen movies with pretensions of liven up the eventual adult. I agree with that the the one point zero left me a pleasing impression because I recognized an interest in renewing the genre and produce something always desirable: that people go to the movies and leave with the deep feeling that has not been misled and that the time, among the many that disfigure us life, has been pleasant and even advisable. I understand that sometimes just what I say to that film, understood as pure evasion, hold itself only the fragile building of leisure in this our age of Plenipotentiary gadgets, broadband in the pocket of the jacket and downloads of speed adrenalítica another effortlessly than a desultory click. So I went to see this two zero point delivery with a sincere enthusiasm saca. I knew that they could give me cat for a ride, as it is; I knew that the savvy geniuses of the Disney could ride a theme in the form of frame Park, a kind of Shrine of the loop: everything that has been tested and has given results should not be changed. In the absence of lavish treasures (which there are, how not) it was to find an unexpected twist, an ACE in the jewelled manga of the chieftains of the producer, which did not hesitate to throw checkbook to bring Helen Mirren or Ed Harris, who along with Jon Voight or Nicolas Cage collaborating to movie buff package (Oh, what hyperbole) the then provable engendrillo. What, ultimately, is check a free family film of folds, well packaged and adorned with a livianísimo Fund enciclópedico of cultured aftertaste and, ultimately, easily removable. What was once a passion for archaeology, mixture of Kipling, London, the better Verne and up a blade of Indiana Jones urbanite, here is a Christmas filler not completely negligible, but repeated ad nauseam and lacking, behold the true pain of the sanísimo spirit of adventure of the first franchise. They have failed or have not wanted to give a stronger dramatic body and have conformed with present situations that do not differ little from those already referred to in the work which opens the series (since there are more searches, was please this) and that are also based on pillars of very weak credibility (that seek the lost honour and restore the name to the place it deserves in the history)(this is what has to be, that there cannot be enter in this domestic review).The patriotic stench does not leave the sensitive spectator to be swayed by the mere fascination of the ups and downs of the adventure: there is an excess of montuno nationalism that threatens a minimum sense of that story which push us as if it were a chapter from the diary of session of the Congress of the United States of America. In the absence of several centuries of history, the American people amplifies title of show that theirs, yet succinct, has to deal with pages in school text books. There is in this film a unbearable (at times) hodgepodge of chapters, to engage, creaking in excess and disorient the reasonable monitoring of the only truly important thing: entertain without handle, offer a decent show (nor is it is not) without offending who, apart from the necessary dose of evasion, want the required training. It is one thing to not tell the truth and another, quite different, symbolically punishable carried to its extreme, seeking to sneak us butterflies in flight when what is perched on the ground is a advises and nothing orchestrated mob of flies. Deception, the little effort of the managers of the plot, is also the fragility that confront us the tracks, keys, secrets revealed and leading to the final pirotecnica, not tell here, but that solves Turteltaub with the same aquatic and Baroque texture with that finiquitaba the previous delivery. Jerry Bruckheimer, the new Midas visual pirotecnica and the greedy box office, has put his eye divine on a product of proven acceptance between the épila and even the sometimes little demanding section adult. It is unforgivable that the movie purchase vigor and get contaminated by the same excellent sins when we already have an hour of footage from the first: up there all bored, everything gets carried away by a not knowing what to do that it exacerbates the avid action public and it helps to forget this misleading Christmas candy of family spirit and commercial breath until boredom ahead of schedule. Only (repeat) the concoction becomes a lasting taste when the action runs and the characters (lacking a real link, pushed to move in the plot as soldiers, as vapid puppets) enter in caves (Mount Rushmore) that hidden passageways, traps, keys and - ultimately - the Opera and guignolesca retahila of archetypes that usually adorn all films of the genre. The entering the oval office for the face and reckless daring walk by Buckhingham Palace without the witless police machinery of his Majesty alert of the mess sounds like excess, it take a Parliament of you to you with the President of the United States and abduct him for three minutes for him to become entangled in a viscous matter sounds to roll the House brand Disney. Hence this modestly sensation (one is good, basically) to feel disappointed, reasonably disappointed. Read more: all the treasures that appear in these films, friendly and patient reader, are in caves. Up there everything perfect. Mother nature cela basements unfathomable, others to the intrusion of curious citizens to the casual managed of an inspired treasure hunter, and scale all the treasures (repeat) are for centuries the uncomfortable eye safe and waiting to Nicolas Cage, what hair, what gestures, and that everything crumbles. Up the ad hoc in a wonderful well since oil and it enlightens the roost sounds added formidably animated fantasy of yesterday and today. I can not help (a couple of days ago I saw) remember laughter (I just, without that nobody backed me) gave when Indians gold illuminated the room screen. What fill. What appalling tired. What grotesque. Do want to make money and what effort justify the ganancia.addenda: and I have had none of the 47 page, but that is already part of the 3.0 delivery and that will come with the next polvorones.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1781

Dragon negro

The messengers

muchocine

The child who sees ghosts already became better in Poltergeist, the stereotype of a girl rebel believes anybody already tired, about the Ravens did in the birds and the pale under savannahs ghosts and climbing up the walls in The Ring and the curse.

Many were the expectations created by see the premiere in Hollywood of the Pang brothers and see if they could make a tape of terror in a position under its umbrella. The Pang brothers, Oxide and Danny, became world famous thanks to the movie The Eye, which is already prepared its corresponding remake with Jessica Alba as the protagonist.A family, parents, rebellious teenage daughter and the youngest son, moved to a farm almost in ruins with the intention of rebuilding their lives and start from scratch after being virtually bankrupt due to causes which is already explained in the film. There are intended to make a planting of sunflowers, which I am even asking the because that could have been just as parsley that the film would be the same, because I already explain get a plantation of pipes or oil which will bring economic benefit, but in the end, that that is not the point. Total that the House is full of ghosts which only seems to see the raised apart this traumatized and no word from causes which are also explained throughout the film. Then without coming to tell it sister also begins to see ghosts, but clear, nobody believe being a girl problems and such. Then there are more appearances of ghosts and half a loads of crazy crows who attack whoever menea. And everything ends with an explanation of the most silly and predictable, no, I will not tell which it is, a sea of easy and simple final and finished.As you may have deduced the film has been a total disappointment, a tape of terror that adds nothing new to the genre and that is equal to or worse than any other with haunted house of medium. The characters are as flat and predictable, what the child he sees ghosts already became better in Poltergeist, the stereotype of rebel girl that no one believes already tired, about the Ravens did in the birds and the pale under savannahs ghosts and climbing up the walls in The Ring and the curse. other failed horror movie and already have a few since the beginning of the yearto see when that film which again surprises us all and is not more of the same. I hope that now the adventures separately from the brothers able to give offer something better.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/209

Nisuyaves

El código Da Vinci

muchocine

A story that hooks without introductions of any kind, with an impressive principle that does not let you remove the view a moment

As it could not be otherwise, forced me to go to the premiere that had read the book, but this time not put many impediments because I knew that day I was special, why? very simple, was the only one of the six that had not read me the book, and more importantly I had remained on the sidelines of comments on this (something like with the Lord of the rings, although there was much more difficult), so that no ideas movie and book, that if this was not in the bookIf have counted you wrong, etc. So I just watch a movie. And I came across a story that hooks without introductions of any kind, with an impressive principle that does not let you remove the view a moment, and try to find out what happens with the old dead.There was Audrey Tautou that according to reported 20 minutes even was presented to audition for the film because she was convinced her would not take, only after insisting did the test and there is now. With it I also remember that I read in a newspaper that the President of the French Republic when negotiating the shootings in the interior of the Louvre, suggested for the role of Tautou to his daughter's best friend (if colaba) what a mug.The case is that the actress portraying Sophie Neveu pretty well to my taste too pronounced French accent, there were times that not her it was understood well. To its dismay stars in the scene which I liked less, and I guess it would be something imposed from above (that we speak of Hollywood), when fleeing from the police with the car backwards and is between two trucks I think, that she is ridiculous and out of sync, they could flee in a more normal way, he moved forward and advancing cars. But good also starred in two of my favorite scenes, in which suddenly drops "Cuá?" haha I could laugh. Another scene is at the end when puts the foot in the water and says something similar to "will be that not", terrific.Tom Hanks has been criticized for his performance which I think of as normal, nothing wrong to claim, and support him to not Kiss Sophie, although you have to be in their shoes to retain impulses. So the script is right in that, to my taste, and succeeds in the pace of the film that fails to get bored at any time. Ian McKellen (Gandalf for friends) appears to explain one of the most important things in the plot which is the table of the last supper, and does spectacularly well, I take my hat off with this Mr. It is a very important moment and without getting his character, appears on screen and steals all the protagonism to the two Portas, with a magnetism to the important spectator.Among the cast meeting an actor I like Alfred Molina, with plenty of movies to their backs that I have seen many less that they would like to (remember now the piece of Coffee and Cigarettes, or Chocolat), it always does a buenísmia action, becomes his character of the feet to the head, in the Da Vinci Code and always. Jean Reno is a film that comes that you no hair, a French policeman, could not fail. And Paul Bettany gives you a tremendous tirri, which is what he has to do, so perfect, when he castigates hurts even me.The theme of this film hooked to believers and non-believers because it is an issue that is always on everyone's lips, and interest. I remember a quote from Hanks that I liked and that I use in my conversations (very occasionally) about religion, spoke of when he fell in the well and the only thing that calmed him was thinking in the afterlife or pray (not port well what), and it is that religion is truth or lie, makes people who have nothing or in limit situations cling to something that gives him strength. Highly recommended for all types of public, and for the people who say it makes many historical mistakes with the Church and others, and notice that novels are fiction and is the author invents a story, so do not say nonsense.I forgot to comment on the scene in which Shopie and Robert Langdon are directed at the Church where at the end stop to Sir Leigh Teabing, director mix on the same ground that happened long time ago and our protagonists walk, tremendous scene I really liked.After so much thinking I like the end, is that another, other possibilities create too many questions there is, there will be second part?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1640

Isabel Aparicio

Pequeña miss sunshine

muchocine

One of the things that fascinate me most of this film is the evolution of each character, perfectly symbolized by the road (a journey to the interior of each). These disparate personalities together are van complemented each other, to conform to the end of the film, as if it were a puzzle, the structure of family.

One of the films that lately has captivated me is little Miss Sunshine, Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris, independent film very well received by the various international film festivals. Winning two Oscars, for Best Original Screenplay and best supporting Actor (an impeccable and amazing Alan Arkin), swept a day earlier at the Spirit Awards, the equivalent to the Golden statuette of independent film.The hope and enthusiasm of a girl by make their dreams come true, together with their fear of mediocrity, are the starting point of this wacky adventure. Olive is summoned to participate in a child beauty pageant, so ludicrous family full embarks on a dilapidated yellow van bound for California.Una of the things that fascinate me most of this film is the evolution of each character, perfectly symbolized by the road (a journey to the interior of each). These disparate personalities together are van complemented each other, to conform to the end of the film, as if it were a puzzle, the structure of family.All actors shine with their own light. Olive (Abigail Breslin) is a sweet girl and plump who lives in a world of fairies and dreams of being a Princess. His brother Dwayne (Paul Dano) is an eccentric teenager, angry with the world, which meets a strict vow of silence to get their greatest aspiration, to be pilot. Although he hates everyone, needs his family, and you wish to in their own way. The character of badass Grandpa and drug addict (Alan Arkin) is a turning point in the evolution of the protagonists (family who gets involved in a mess together, stays together), and more confidence has deposited in the talent of the girl. The picturesque Uncle (Steve Carell), homosexual depressed after being rejected by his great love, stars in a failed suicide attempt, which leads him to become part of the clan. It works as a link between the members of the family, trying to soften the conflicting episodes. The father (Greg Kinnear) is a seller of stories on the success doomed to failure. Their vain attempts to control the situation and lay on the triumph Chair rub pathos. And finally, the mother (Toni Collette), only normal character with a very special vocation: to care for his family.I believe that the substance of the story is of great importance. The feeling of being a loser in a society obsessed with success. The script is masterful. Combines satirical dyes with black humor, situations that invite laughter and images that leave footprint: all members of the family pushing and going up, one by one, the old van without a door, underway. In my opinion it comes to represent, even if the external structure (the wrapper, surface) is obsolete and damaged, if you struggle teamwork by a common goal, the goal can be achieved. The final sequence which Olive shows her skills as a dancer is that shocked me. Despite being very funny, caused me a knot in the stomach. The reaction of the family of the girl is brilliant and unexpected. It is reflected that support and affection are shown not only with words but also with acts. And also the misunderstanding by firecracker of society (participants and jury of the beauty contest) and the more superficial sector is clear.If still you have not had the opportunity to enjoy this film, I advise you to not be her escape.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3058

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Los burdeles de Paprika

muchocine

Sincere praise of meat, lit portrait of prostitution under the ironic and humorous prism of a director vocationally equipped to eroticism.

Tinto Brass, in a sense, is an old green with a camera: one of the type that changes the annals of Tacitus or the complete works of Giacomo Leopardi by a saccharine Playboy issue, although perhaps the magazine Queen of the Guild is not his ideal erotic. The pattern that governs their indisimulado Vice is the bombastic woman of meats, morbid, reasonably female, but without falling into excesses, stereotypes designed by fashion. This voyeur you passionate about the sunlight seeping through the blinds, the bidets, the big ass under a narrow waist and depilatory laziness among a groin and another. All his films - and brothels of Paprika are a perfect example - scales between realism kitsch and tacky that it here outboard Bigas Luna cafre and hyperbolic realism of Russ Meyer. The aesthetic concerns of this gourmet of the lúbrico go a miss without underwear walking bike against a group of candorosas nuns to the most genuine portrait of brothels, absolute temples from sin which tends his rampante spirit. Tinto Brass voyeur and filmmaker was first law degree and up was an Assistant Director of a heavy weight (do not look double meaning) of the world Cinematography: Robert Rossellini. None of these lines in your resume betrayed the director that was to come, the man that looks as it is also called one of his many films, the passionate eye that captures the light, their size, their most burning volutes to illuminate the female body, which is always an absolute devotion.Except Caligula, torrid pornographic aspirations and, in my view, falsely historical and unusually excessive exercise of Tinto Brass film is generous with the Viewer. It seems as if he just wanted the chiquillada of making the film that he himself would love to see. I.e., a delighted its own type. And somehow, he meets his intimate Word. The deliberate abandonment of glamour, the provincial Canticle of the romps in the NAPs, the colorful parade of bizarre characters, lunatics, cynical, savvy are recurrent in all its sweet work, paid to the controversy, to the scandal. Anything that dislike you in excess.The brothels of Paprika is not a good movie to the way in which it isn't gentleman without sword, the law of desire or breeds crows, for bringing the magnifying glass to the own field, but in these jewels of the seventh art there is no praise of meat and that, like it or not, is part of the discourse of serious cinema or frivolous pajilleros propsprompting Brass term. The Ascension of the accidental slutty Paprika to the throne of the Italian brothels (just as they are more seriously threatened by the Government) and the ups and downs of this libidinosa crusade is the fundamental issue of the tape. The same breath that arrima tape to the Olympus of the erotic film (chabacano erotic or erotic scurfy, if prefer you the gentle reader) is that the departure of aspiring to one higher quality, but Brass narrates with sobriety and advances without prejudice by the plot, deploying his recognizable eccentricities (these bidets, those close-ups of always bristles sex of their females)(, this breast wealth of the protagonist over-farmed) and offering, as colorful soundtrack, moans of pleasure escorted by songs happy talk of happy Gelee. It is impossible to not feel stunned by the cast of women of hasty nudity and tongue. The movie buff also joins, could say Berlanga to dignify the genre. What happens is that the abuse in definite stuns: that happens. The carnal desparpajo can be considered at its absolute, even counterproductive end for an erotic film who knows at all times that public to which it is addressed. If we see a porn tape, we understand that the film does not exist, so there are mechanisms of industrial production in place make cakes of Alcázar or Albacete knives dedicated filming of some dedicated athletes of the fornication sweats. We know to what we come from and Tinto Brass, in this exclusive mercantilist aspect, not disappointed. Nor misleading. No I have the Italian Director as capital piece of my you aversions cinematic nor am I Berlanga in my remarks, but I distinguish personal traits that give preference to his film against the infamous barque of Brats with budget and high definition cameras that are released to record episodes of eroticism light, unbearable and bigoted for chains like Playboy or the always hungry corner of rated DVD.There is no pornography in the brothels of Paprika: everything is supercharged hormones, everything is lean and trophism demonstration of a pair of great tits formidable weight. Beyond, nothing, the fields of strawberries forever John Lennon, walks on the shore of a river in autumn, verses of Neruda and york with Flash cure cheese ham sandwiches. Madness. I have no doubt of the cause.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1221

Yojimbo

Un franco, 14 pesetas

muchocine

A very decent film and a debut very interesting and personal, which is what gives originality and strength to this film.

The good thing about meeting people from the audiovisual sector and keep in touch with them is that can give you pleasant surprises. One, because you are invited to the premiere of a film in which are co-producers with a Madrid company composed by Eduardo Campoy and José Manuel Lorenzo. The second, because there are occasions in which they don't have to lie and deserve give them in person your congratulations.This is the case of my former colleagues from guess productions of La Coruña. The production company, led by Jorge Algora and Susana Maceiras, takes years devoted to the audiovisual sector responsible for spots, institutional videos, offering HD and high-end postproduction services? among many other things. Now have gotten involved in the production of films, starting a couple of years old with Camino de Santiago, the origin, feature-length documentary in which I participate during the filming and post-production. It was a very strong bet that had a decent result, above all by the magnificent photography, Suso Bello. Subsequently fell it to fiction, beginning with the nines lying to life and now with the debut of Carlos Iglesias in the direction of feature films: A franco, 14 pesetas.The story is simple: Martín and Pilar are a couple living in a basement in the Spain of the 60 Argüelles. But a couple of events will Martin immigrating to Switzerland in order to earn money and send it to his family in Spain. He will be with his friend Marcos and together you will see that they are not only working in Switzerland: also found another way of life which contrasts greatly with the "spanish way of life" which had at the time of the Alcántara. Lo first it transmits this film during his viewing is authenticity. Along the same lines as Habana Blues, film that gives the impression of being a very successful portrait of Cuba. Many Cubans are or have lived there in fact say that it comes very close. Because the same applies to this film. I've never been to Switzerland, but it seems that it is so well portrayed that the power of real and plausible come together to make one story more interesting.On the other hand there to highlight glitches of pace to lengthen unnecessarily the film. It is not long, but it gives the impression that the Assembly could have been more agile. The work of actors is great, the Mise en scène is worked and the setting is very successful. Mario de Benito composed a kind and melancholy music that you may have too much presence in the film, but continues to be an interesting job. Special mention to Isabel Blanco, actress who personally knows the circumstances on which is based the screenplay of the film and composed the character more grateful and better composed of all. A real gift for the actress and a totally adorable character for the Viewer. Nominations should be.Another of the most interesting aspects of the film is that it presents emigration in little "current" circumstances. It is the case of people who cannot find work and is not forced to go abroad to look for life, but for anything it has to do with the emigration we see and that many try to sell as the only: arising from absolute poverty and whose table of salvation is to go to another country with nothing. In the case of this film are about characters who are out of work and know the opportunity to continue doing what they know but in another country. But the least seen and more "educational" film aspect is the way of life of the host country and respect "imposed" and that there are also profess. It is very significant for the time in which the old woman that picks up some papers that have thrown the protagonists to the ground to throw it in the trash. If something must be thanking this film, the slap that many feel to see us more than purely cinematic aspects, is identified with the protagonists and the way of life that are: totally nice, orderly, logical and (this is already more staff) full. Best thing about the film is that all those who have not been in Switzerland we are migrants and ignorant in many sequences.In short, a very decent film and a debut very interesting and personal, which is what gives originality and strength to this film. I at least have a desire mad I go to visit Switzerland? I hope that does not in the circumstances of the protagonists.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4218

Ivan Villamel

Skinwalkers

muchocine

A mediocre film, in which, no technical aspect superimposed on a very limited ability to suggest, a flat performance, lousy actors and child treatment of popular legends.

James Isaac takes the reins of a new project related to the topic of the werewolves, the argument that many films has given, and so unsatisfactory in most cases, removing specific inputs from the classic film ("The Wolf Man" (1941) or "The curse of the werewolf" (1961)), or worthy revisitaciones during the 1980s as "Howls" (1981), or "An American Werewolf in London" (1981). In this case the picture was not very promising given the charge of trying to advance modestly or not, so suggestive idea of the werewolf, is a director whose previous proposal was the horrendous "Jason X", and that previously in this film, only had shot one of the terrible aftermath of the estimable "House, an amazing House". Therefore, that is not too surprising the ill-fated final product that has emerged from name "Skinwalkers".The plot of the film, obviously absurd by the way, shows us to a new breed of human marked by a curse, beings that nightly transform into Werewolves thirsty for human blood, devoid of all morality by a group of Renegades, and controlling whether by another faction of such enigmatic race. The latter precisely, are responsible for protecting a child that will soon meet the indicated age of thirteen years, day in which, according to reads an ancient prophecy of the native American Indians, a change that will give a new meaning to their species. This constant struggle between protectors of a better future for all of them, and the Renegades who refuse to stop being what they are, is the basis of the story.Isaac, in his work as a director, not craves the gift of originality at all, and this is why, although it may seem contradictory, which boasts the only thing salvageable from the film, the inconsequential assumed by the director creates a referential visual style, without any notion of personality, but made way correct, functional and without claiming to never engage in more complex tasks. Say that this is more a film positivio, says quite the level of mediocrity that distills the film for all and each of its pores.Perhaps the acting work would have been a little more decent if they had had the opportunity to work with a hyphen rather more elaborate, as we face the clear example of script written in so radically referential way, in the bad sense of the word, which seems to have been written with the autopilot on, or failing that, during a night watching movies of genre, and shooting here and there. In addition, with the aggravating circumstance that was written at three hands, being so insane proposal which furthermore were radically distant in their approaches to writing and previous proposals, having worked some in films of police gender or thrillers and some other comedies of most vapid. Another nonsense which logically not has gone well.The acting level, helps too that the interest of the viewer rise much, showing the cast, and when I say everything is all, tremendously superfluous, apathetic and nuances that might give a minimum of interest to the future of its protagonists. Interestingly, is a tanning cast already the most fantastic Court productions, although that if any especially remarkable. Elias Koteas is perhaps the most gifted actor for the performance of the Repertoire of beautiful faces that adorn the history, although it is not able to overcome a poorly drawn character horribly described in his ambiguous personality and level as the music of the news. The carnal Rhona Mitra, little to say, taking into account that never showed the lowest level of acting ability (and hopefully to improve although it is a little bit on the expected "Doomsday" Neil Marshall), but that if, its spectacular beauty creates an inevitable symbiosis between instincts more primary of any man and his physique. The rest of the actors, so little to say, some familiar faces of American television (the also beautiful Sarah Carter and Jason Behr roswelliano), and an actress, whose choice of roles for the film has struck me forcefully, it's the Norwegian Natassia Malthe (another is actress? powerful physical presence), which in addition to this "jewel" before us appeared in the television behalf "Bloodsuckers" crappy, in "Dead or Alive" (the adaptation of the game, not the film of Miike adrenalítica) and eye, two sequels to tremble, "Bloodrayne II" and "Alone in the dark II". It must have courage to intervene in two sequels to films of Uwe Boll, which should be the ultimate in film shabbiness, as to change agent ipso facto.This referential aspect to which both referred in previous lines, left note clearly not only in the subject of the film, but even in levels or scenes side previous productions, especially in the 1980s for the fantasy film prolíficios. Influences of films such as "The night travellers" and substitutes (latter damage made to the fantasy film), visual aspect in the transformations debtor of films such as "Sleepwalkers" or "Wolf Howl" (which referred to the principle), or a tone supposedly camp in the bad sense of the word, are too heavy Remora to overcome his own autodelimitación and save this tremendously failed production.In addition, even the mythology of the native American Indians, is treated in a very superficial way. For more effective treatment of the subject, recommend the vision of a production television of the year 2002, of the same name ("Skinwalkers"), and directed by Chris Eyre, a direct descendant of the tribe of the Cheyenne, and who also has a very interesting experience dealing with issues related to its culture throughout its limited but productive filmography.Few good aspects has the film, perhaps missed requiring the story and mythology that appears only on very rare occasions, and some scene of effective action, as this confrontation in the town, with echoes of the more thuggish western and, again, general reference in history.Ultimately, a mediocre film completely, in which, no technical aspect superimposed on a very limited ability to suggest, a flat performance, lousy actors and child treatment of popular legends.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1896

Iñaki Bilbao

Sólo para hombres

muchocine

Extraordinary comedy the great Fernando Fernán Gómez hilarious during the footage.

"In the year 1895, in Madrid, the political situation is unstable, happening continuous changes in the direction of the nation." People do what's always, gossip in visits, try to know a good boyfriend girls, and vice versa boys.However, a lady, virtuosa, but courageous and determined, not willing to take the lives of other women, making la tonta, smiling constantly before the crap of the hombres.y not working. So, neither short nor lazy, it is directed to the Ministry to ask for work. Such unprecedented, known, will lead a discussion at the national level on whether women should and/or can work along with the men. And again, nothing less servant. "Well, it is accepted and began to work in the post offices, being infinitely more diligent, hardworking than men, which will cause both praise and strong hatred".Extraordinary comedy the great Fernando Fernán Gómez, hilarious all the footage. You laugh a lot a good number of scenes (all occurring at the post office with simpar Erasmo Pascual de official first), and you smile all the time. Beautifully directed, with some superb performances (Erasmo Pascual, Analía Gadé, Joaquín Roa) at the head, a perfect ambiance in charge of the great Santiago Ontañón, and a beautiful picture in black and white of Ricardo Torres. It leaves a sediment of bienhestar hardly managed to film today.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2374

Bruji

La dalia negra

muchocine

Despite being a blockbuster in 2006, the Black Dahlia is an impressive sample of the black film of the 1940s.

Despite being a blockbuster in 2006, the Black Dahlia is an imposing example of the black film of the 1940s; a film genre par excellence, which owes its name to an invention of the critics of Cahiers du Cinema. In this film, meet some of the best elements of the Brian De Palma film, although the worst mistake of the filmmaker is also incurred: starting from a bright idea to achieve outstanding development, and top it off with an ending that doesn't convince, far removed from the mastery of English genius of suspense, often chased by who signs this tape.All those people who, after the first viewing, get set an exact mental outline of the full plot of this movie, enjoy, from this moment and forever, my admiration. I it would be reassured to know that James Ellroy wrote some chapters in a State of drunkenness, as he confessed to having made Raymond Chandler in the sleep eternal, but I'm content to think that there is dirty in the approach, impossible to tie cabos, deception, or simply a basic component inherent in film noir: the complexity of their arguments.Do effectively, we are faced with a stream of ambiguous auxiliary frames, without prior notice, converge in an infinite number of first and last names, into a single plot base, the murder of the Short Dalia.Betty? character real would be the reference classic "Holly is it mounted in Hollywood"? fictional - body double in 1984, by the same director. The repeated story of an aspiring actress who is wrong door and enters a world of seedy and not recommended. The life of this character? and all - are described through the dialogues. Essential and impressive conversations that are never uttered at random, and Yes as an essential part of a whole developer.His career shows in white and black, with the projection of its tests of casting, in which the researcher takes the role of "intruder", in the purest style of the window Indiscreta.Su death, the spectator becomes indirect witness, thanks to a stunning flat impossible: no one would have liked being in that his blood-soaked mattress.As the crime fits within the film, are continuous references made to the world of the celluloid. Mentioned on numerous occasions to producer David o. Selznick to Mack Sennett, or resorts to La Dalia blue, starring Veronica Lake, which the novelist feels genuine weakness in history that Curtis Hanson to adapt for the screen: L.A. Confidential. Although perhaps more existing parallels between both arguments, be referred to the traumas that drag their characters. Remember (for example) the role of Russell Crowe, who lost the nerves to the cases of ill treatment delivered to women, and relate it to the role of Aaron Eckhart, who leaves an important case to focus on capturing the murderer of the young actress.The discovery of the corpse, is on display at a spectacular level synthesis, which links the main plot with another important adjacent narration. Both scenes appear in crows as annoying and unwelcome animals in an illustrious nod to the birds. Finally, not to conclude this section dedicated to Betty, without explicit reference to the good work of Mia Kirschner in their interpretation of a bad actress. A curious paradox.Gender experts, say every good film noir movie requires the presence of a woman, without being the protagonist, always marking patterns of action; and here is where comes in the meter-sixty blonde... and how do it!. A camera movement without hover on his back, discusses her from the left side and focuses on the wing of a hat, which rises to pronounce an indifferent hello! with a hoarse voice. Et voilà miss Johansson. More than a great actress, she is a great product that is forged in the moment in which his mother her baptizes with the name of the protagonist of what the wind. A myth that is kept by demonstrations implausible, but effective, as the funeral who said having organized for his annoying of colors. Without any doubt, an indisputable diva, inside and outside the screen, protagonist of "inventions" that already derided master Lubistch be or not Ser.Sin however, the real star (the femmes fatales are always moray eels) is Hilary Swank. Poor rich girl!. Sometimes fragile and unprotected; at times, ruthless and lethal, with a characterization and an acting suspiciously reminiscent of the Italian Alida Valli, to star in the process Paradine 1.947, of how not? Alfred Hitchcock.Dentro of this footage of important technical values, is necessary to draw attention to its installation, key to the best films of De Palma. Nor has lacked an exceptional photography, faithful to the classic chiaroscuro of the genre, constantly oscillating between the shadows lamps and vague. A photograph in which have managed to sneak, very rightly, images captured through blinds or between the handrails of the stairs of the strange family, which looks through a foreboding subjective level...And here I write about the history of a homage to the classic films made in the 21st century. A movie that will enjoy the lovers of this genre, the complexity and the loose. For my taste, too.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2809

José A. Peig

Death Proof

muchocine

Tarantino laughs at himself as well as viewers seeking to take the film seriously. But always on the basis of a concept ideation macabre and funny at the same time, regains their ingenuity when it comes to ridicule certain aspects of American society and the film as a product of entertainment.

Piece of Robert Rodriguez set your images to evoke pure nostalgia from the image and the clichés of the genre, aesthetic retro, pure sensationalism and free morbid sensations and taking advantage of the expectations with which the viewer digest the visual Porterhouse. I.e. evoke exclusively from the form, which limits the product to a mere hyperbolic statement of actions and ICTs themselves from the scope which intends to pay homage. I.e., in last instance, emptiness and game jamaipanese lacking a personal stamp. Quentin Tarantino wants to become involved as a film lover and as a filmmaker contributing their drives to the set, and manages to reduce the imbalance between form and substance, so evident in Planet Terror. The history of the conductive psychopath of cars of death that pursued and harassed girls good see is ideal plot support for Mr Tarantino develop their neuro and remain exposed through a film treatment which appeals to sarcasm and parody.Tarantino laughs at himself as well as viewers seeking to take the film seriously. But always on the basis of a concept ideation macabre and funny at the same time, regains their ingenuity when it comes to ridicule certain aspects of American society and the film as a product of entertainment. The representation of the psychopath and the muchachitas responds to an intention to talk about repressed machismo and the consequent remorse. I.e. Tarantino exceeds the model to emulate, to bring it to a binge of sickly tones, brutal satire and sharp characters. Lo de Rodriguez went from being a Mimetic exercise. Death Proof mimics from rabies and the comical, creates a concept through images. Therefore, beat the theatrical and manages the film validity.Perhaps the main virtue is balance and thematic consistency between the action and the dialogues that precede. The construction of characters and tones emerge directly from a few dialogs that may seem, at first glance, tasteless, but analyzed carefully see the playful plot that hide the puns, the winks, and the emergence of reasons that "explode" in the subsequent action scenes. I.e., is not a narrative mess at the service of the spectacular action and the morbid (as in the case of Planet Terror), but possessing a deliberate narrative structure according to the satirical content. One possible interpretation of the film material would be that we we have a sardonic Elegy about the struggle between sexes in its most primitive strata; pure testosterone, wish to intimidate, influence, not be less than the others. In short, pathetic and natural aspects of the gregario-borreguil instinct premium in a spree of weekend in this america profound Tarantino both loves and hates both.In any case, like it or not, his toy is expressive. The filming of the persecutions by car transmitted the entire load of insanity and neurosis inherent in the story (often recalls the mastery displayed by Spielberg, for similar purposes, in "Duel"), perfect example of that to create frenzy and climax is not necessary to move the camera in excess - case by Paul Greengrass - and how you can create a psychological climate that covers the whole range of profiles in a specific situation: great example is the scene in the bar, in which the second group of girls has a long conversation (conversation which sets out the two issues resolution in the subsequent duel of cars that nobody be fooled in this film all this tied up and well tied) camera describes a travelling in a circle, until at one point we see Kurt Russell in the backgroundsitting at the bar than moments later he leaves.That scene summarizes, for dialogues that there are condensed and so it is visually expressed in a significance (precisely, a good filmmaker uses his camera to create meanings, not for the theatrical, resource of less artistic value) the macabre and at the same time satírico-cómico nature of the work, which, despite its weaknesses and abusing elitists elementsIt does not lose sight the possibilities of exploration of a genre and the style of the author.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1260

Silvia Giner

Apocalypto

muchocine

One of the great films of this year 2007 a remarkable result which can only achieve a visionary and outstanding director as Mel. We pay to your master feet.

Few times I give 5 stars to a film and this time I will do. We have a talent for the address. UNRWA Mel has done again it! It has embroidery project. It is an example to be followed by those actors that are introduced in the world of the address. Mel has exceeded the limits of what is called "Make movies". His later works, merged with a documentary that make unique your tapes.Tell what is having, not counts for a lot, but my God, as the account is abysmal, with a production of Titans and artistic direction of Oscar, Mel shows the fall of an empire through a family history, love, struggle and perseverance by beliefs.See Apocalipyto is not advisable, but essential. 90% Of the cast is also rookie and indigenous origin, and believe me that not has due be nothing easy.The fact that is shot in Maya, is one attractive but do not expect philosophical parrafadas in this language that talks are "very basic".I've loved the scarifications (reliefs) and implants indigenous, "so fashion today". They are very achieved, in some cases, I have my doubts that are part of the props of makeup, for me that had more than one and more than two reales.My discovery in this faithful is Rudy Youngblood, the actor who plays the agile and intelligent "Claw of Jaguar" which only is known "Spirit: The Seventh Fire" (African American mother and father Indian American) will give much to talk about, their interpretation is totally organic, not doubt for a moment of the image that you are selling and the physical form (absent from steroids) is a naturalness and perfection only Mel could be achieved. There are directors who care a radish if muscle is credible or not, brings them fresco showing a native with muscles that reeks of cycles, but Mel, no, the carer, mima every detail. The rotten dentures are identical to how they were great, and are in reality (for which has seen some in live once). All this is more than admirable, especially considering that this guy managed to overcome a childhood cancer. He graduated from Belton High School in 2000 and changed his surname "Gonzalez" by the current (more artistic).Another discoveries is the beautiful Dalia Hernandez (the wife of Jaguar claw, he expected to be rescued in the well of the village) who debuted in this film (by the door) and let it grow eyebrows to more accurately embody their role, I am sure that we will see it more than once?Also noteworthy was the emergence of María Isabel Díaz (Masala) which we have seen recently in "Volver" Almodóvar in where he played Regina, a neighbor of the character who plays the actress Penélope Cruz. In addition her seen in Series as Central Hospital and clunkers as "Crazy for sex" in any case this Cubana is an excellent actress and proof of this is that he has worked with the best.In conclusion one of the great films of this year 2007 (delay of months Made in Spain) a remarkable result which can only achieve a visionary and outstanding director as Mel. Do we pay to your feet teacher, Ole your lame? s.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1674

Txapulin

Una verdad incómoda

muchocine

Do do feel me bad say this so crude form, but the film is a political pamphlet of Al Gore, who, as he presented himself,? was going to be the next President of United States? in the 2000 elections.

I have a few mixed feelings about this movie I'm not sure know to express. Basically I'd rather talk about the movie than the film itself. So I would like to be brief about the movie and then I extend on climate change.Feel me bad saying this so crude form, but the film is a political pamphlet of Al Gore, who, as he himself presents, "would be the next President of United States" in the 2000 election, Bush won by only a few votes in Florida. In a way the movie is a version of a presentation (a slideshow) that Gore has been doing since that same year worldwide, a talk that anti-Bush scales in its objectives among a consciousness on climate change decision-making and a plea. If you focus only on the first goal would be great, but the second adds that touch of tension so in keeping with the times, that do nothing but fill a little more my level of tired of politics in general. To me the latter undermines first thing, and is a shame that, in the end, each bar for your home.On the subject of climate change and global warming, will not be me who deny it, when it is evidence: just have to see the spring winter we spent and the drought that we have, and that looking out the window of House, to which we are to look at the TV we see how badly distributed rainfall. In addition to the known data, Gore provides interesting data in the movie, as the drying up of large lakes in Africa and Asia, the graphics of possible floods by melting and sea level rise, or oceanic flows that regulate the temperature of the Earth due to salinity, a large machine that can stop if a large amount of fresh water as the one on Greenland in the form of ice came pouring to the sea, something that already happened in the latter was glacial. After putting so of apocalyptic, the documentary ends with a "this can still save: saves energy, go by bicycle, recycle, uses an electric car, join an NGO, and especially not votes to Bush" (the latter does not say so clear, but means it obviously).In this topic I'm extremely pessimistic from the point of view human (this is cannot save) but optimistic from the point of view of the Earth as a "living organism" (call it gaia). If the land to survive, have to load all the humans, it will do. In other words: we are part of one larger system that we can not load, but that it can make of us if we are doing putadas. Ultimately, we are the first victims (or the fourth after the whales, seals and penguins), but there will be new species stronger and resistant to whatever it is that we have caused that they make this planet still alive. What is more, even think that you we need to make it so.Of course, this reasoning does not give us letter free to pollute, go by car to buy bread and the newspaper, spend loads of light and water, not recycle and vote to Bush, and to another level, doing wars for oil, build throughout the coast, hunting whales, etc., because the more we delay the revenge of Gaia, therefore better.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3334

Oscar Cantero

Return to house on Haunted Hill

muchocine

Another of these continuations meaningless, where attempts to mix mythology with science and classic horror, and just getting mediocrity, aburrimieno and predictability.

If I have no remedy. Even though I say I won't swallow movies that Intuit will always be a crappy at the end just watching everything I gets ahead; and of course, with this lack of criterion that I admit that I sometimes dominates, as it happens what happens.Perhaps is that I start now one of my criticisms shorter for this space so beloved that is for me Muchocine, but precisely because of that love I feel by this place on the network, I do not want wasting their space littering it with words about the mediocrity of this aberration I took today.Return to house on Haunted Hill is a bad sequel to a film that already by itself was a bad remake of the classic of terror that back in the year 1958 he directed William Castle, and which attracted assets, among others, Vincent price and Richard Long.Como would say the great Tito Chin-Chan, is little more than guts, ROAR, and liters of ketchup parading across the screen. Nothing notable in the interpretation, or an evil wink to its predecessors in the script. Nothing at all.Tremendously obscure scenarios, absence of sub-plots of interest and multiple defects of filming, screenplay and post-production, is the only thing that occurs to me highlight this transatlantic chestnut that I has crept in surreptitiously between tapes had planned for these days where the trouble with despair and apathy my last moments of holidays that have known unless nothing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/83

Tito Chinchan

Sky high

muchocine

A very entertaining movie to see youth-minded

These things of superpowers have always I hallucinated. That prefer, elastic man or superfuerza? Depends on the time, right? Although from a purely sexual point of view, I believe that I have clear, very clear, heh, heh.The film is about a kid son of major superiors who has known history, the Commander and Supersónica. This will be the first year that enters the Institute of superheroes and is very distressed. On the one hand, his father giving him grilled and overshadowing him completely. On the other hand, still has no superpowers and believes that he is going to ridicule. This new Institute, becomes a natural selection, heroes and curritos (helpers of the hero, type Robin with Batman). And the first humiliate seconds.Well, that most surprising film. I warn that we must see it with teenage mentality, not with mentality of cincuentón bearded Lord who supports the Mahou in the belly while scratches the scrotum with your free hand. It is a film for youth or children's minds. I saw clearly two similar, "The incredible" and "Harry Potter". The first, by the subject of the family superpowers. The second, on the issue of students, superpowers, bad, good, teachers, etc. To highlight the soundtrack, which is pretty funky and in keeping with the film. The actors have currado and history, though ultimately unoriginal hooked enough. The best of the film is the scene of selecting currito and heroes (great similarities to the Harry Potter Sorting Hat). As default, it becomes a little bit long, especially in the time of love.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4352

Alex Baldoví

Monstruoso

muchocine

Not disappointed in anything: is what you expect, neither more nor less. The expected forward the film going to pass a very good hour and a half in the armchair of the film. That Yes, he does not seek the "why" of things. Look at her and enjoy.

I come from the press pass and I must say that the movie I loved it. I was eager to see her, with high expectations and I was not disappointed in anything: is what you expect, neither more nor less. What is recorded in hand camera looks good, and is the elemental of the movie to see the event from the point of view they want us to give. It is a mixture of "The project of the Witch of Blair" and "REC" but surpassing them in far. The theme of the video tape is generally very well treated, is date, recorded under "film", and details that give credibility to the subject (as these seconds of video that shows what is recorded under the current when you stop recording, rebobinas and see what you have grabado.no know if I can explain xD). The film keeps you tension all the time (not counting the first 20 minutes in which you presented the characters), with the point of view of the camera, not seeing exactly what is happening and to listen to those sounds that leave you ice cream, and ice cream that leave the protagonists. Players that make it very well, the truth. Come see the dubbed Spanish copy and I must say that dubbing is not as bad as they make us believe in the trailers. Vale there is a couple of characters and scenes in which dubbing is not right, but ultimately is what have worked hard. And recognise one thing: would see this kind of movies in g.w. us cost much recognize the characters, that on many occasions they are not on screen. And if you have the voice in Spanish and put them a face, already you recognize them when you hear them. So to the final grateful to see it dubbed, and check that the dubbing is not as bad as we thought it was. Or at least I thank you. Another thing of sound: soundtrack. There. And what makes me more strange is that not is missing, for nothing. Mira music is a very important factor to create tension in a movie, but in this we can see how it creates the same tension but without music, using other techniques. The monster? The truth is that it is OK, after so many rumors and so many guesses, the monster suits, and already we can say, is clear. And same thing happens with the small bugs. Come on, that the film is very well. There are only a couple of details that I liked, and that at least my I have dislocated. And I already notice: care, SPOILERS! Do not expect to find "by Fishbone", that the film is only the point of view of the characters, nothing more. And with that the film, for my taste, earn a lot. I say that not tells us the origin of the monster, who not tells us that it happens to the monster at the end, than anything else, not tells us almost nothing. And why? Because, again, it is the point of view of a group of people that have been found in the middle of everything, and I, as a geek of video cameras, and be always recording birthdays, meetings, and others, have to say that I love. I love it. I love that this is the case and left as is. END SPOILERS! If you expect her so much like me, the movie will not disappoint and you pasaréis a good hour and a half in the armchair.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2407

Tito Chinchan

TMNT: Las tortugas ninja

muchocine

If we have 4 turtles large ninjas as pigs, a rat as a San Bernardo, 13 deadly monsters, thousands of little ninjas, 4 brothers of stone and an immortal brother, why not spend the whole film distributing sopapos? Long roll and little match. Although I liked it.

It goes without saying that to me the idea of a Mutant Ninja turtles seemed to me always a stupid. It was funny that the master was called sphincter and was a rat, but little else. Nor made me grace his humor, his fights or na na. A sinsorguez of superheroes.The film is about a few large turtles as gentlemen with a moustache who have a father who is a rat of the same port. Apparently are slightly separated, when their leader went to Latin America to strengthen, remaining that made a sindios. Upon his return, must recover the spirit family, to save the world from monsters, more about ninjas, more about Lords of stone with bad milk, most do not remember what. Come on, a mogollon to about tortuguitas.Let's see, the film has entertained me enough to not bore me. I personally think that has lacked a lot action and that they have rolled in the problems of the families in excess, especially with the turtles. The superheroes must not have as rich inner lives, we like es den of mamporrazos against unlikely wicked and things as well. Let's see if they succeed understand the writers. Otherwise, the argument is interesting, not original and is facilitated. It is directed towards a rather juvenile, since that is too dark and public menace for kids.In short, if we have 4 turtles large ninjas as pigs, a rat as a San Bernardo, 13 deadly monsters, thousands of little ninjas, 4 brothers of stone and an immortal brother, why not spend the whole film distributing sopapos? Long roll and little match. Although I liked it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/896

Red Stovall

Déjà Vu

muchocine

A bad, greatly disappointing film in its realization. Move explanations, they forget characters and even offers a minimally decent show.

Is true that Tony Scott has not yet flown as high as his brother Ridley, but I have always defended him as a more than interesting director. Someone with personality to lead good tape of action. Does unfortunately has made it me go very wrong with things like?Do days of Thunder??Top Gun? or?Do fan?, but I've spent big with ribbons like?Love at point-blank range?,?The last Boy Scout? or?Do Spy Game?, and films like?Public enemy?,?The hunger? and?The fire of vengeance? they are decent entertainment. Do I was recently disappointed a lot with that entitled visual delirium?Do I know?, and when I saw the trailer of?Déjà Vu? I thought that Scott was returning to their good times.Because if there is something to note about the last film by Tony Scott is that your trailer is perfect, a masterpiece of mounting very intelligently using the plot of the film in the construction of the own trailer. It I not tired of seeing it and certainly got eager to see the film, good, as virtually all the trailers, but this in particular stands out above the average. Do so, last Friday, happy and satisfied, I went to the premiere of?Do Déjà Vu?, and after two long hours of footage left with a face of perplexity that still lasts me. This film seems the confirmation that Mr Tony Scott is lost, and nothing does predict that someday again to find the way.Do talk about the argument of?Déjà Vu? It would be cited a lot of plot inconsistencies, as well indicated in the comments on the post about the film made by my colleague Beatrice, we should not have in mind, something with which I agree to an extent. But come on, we could say that the film goes a nutty terrorist who wants to fly a ferry and a policeman who travels in time tries to stop them, at the same time that falls in love with a woman who died in the attack. Because Yes, because the writer has given out there, she had read somewhere that the great love stories are timeless and taken it to the letter.Everything that raises the film has been seen a thousand times in other films of identical theme of time travel. However, this would not be any default if all narrated were shown with a minimum of credibility and professionalism, something that does not happen at any time. It is as if the own writers of event, Billy Marsilii and Terry Rossio, not believe in the material that they have between hands, and what is worse, Mr Tony Scott not know material that staging. The film is hasty, with an irregular rhythm and would not taking no time to reflect on certain points of history, something which have been very well. Perhaps this is the case because so many viewers not would realize the enormous bug that has the ridiculous script, so in my opinion, the film is a little silly to the long-suffering public.There are two moments in the film that you can see the errors in a scandalous manner. First, the scene in which the character of Denzel Washington explain absolutely everything about the possibilities of time travel and whether you can change the past or not. This scene seems ridiculous that it is a comedy, and is also too long, basking in its own default. The other time is quite long, that we can say that it is from some intervention by the main character, the film will slope down at high speed and ends up crashing hopelessly. Move explanations, they forget characters and even offers a minimally decent show.Regarding the actors say that Denzel Washington is as always, or protesting at all. Jim Caviezel seems to shift a bit of registry, although personally I am not convinced that terrorist mixture of psychokiller and Rambo. And who since then is truly disastrous is the main actress, Paula Patton, with nothing drawn character despite the hours and hours passed noting her. This in my opinion is greatly missed some chances of history. Something that also happens in a Chase scene certainly original, although only the idea, that viewing by Scott is the weaker throwing land which could have been one of the most spectacular chases and sorpendentes of how many have been made.In short, a bad, greatly disappointing film in its realization. That Yes, I insist that the trailer is a gem. And by the way, is it entitled?Déjà Vu? as could you have entitled?Ham sandwich with sausage? or?Persecution at the time? or anything else, and they even talk about déjà vu, which has noses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/410

Javier

Alatriste

muchocine

As can you write a script so boring taking as a backup four books and almost unconditional support from the author of the novels?

I remember how, when I began to part in this film, he devoured everything that had something to do with a movie that I had enjoyed. I did it with many of Almodóvar, with the twilight of the gods of Wilder, but above all I did with Pulp Fiction. He was seeing her in the film (twice) and start my mass consumption of elements of the film: the script, soundtrack, posters, interviews to Quentin Tarantino and Roger Avary, the avalanche of criticism that led to the film. and of course the tape in VHS, CD with the movie in DivX and DVD for when it went out. I say all this because there was a time, not so distant, in which there were movies that it was worthwhile to do all this. From a few years to this part, can not find anything that I fill as before filled me a simple hour and a half of entertainment. I have to rely on the classic film (I mean not only the film made until the 1960s, but classics in the sense that I understand by classic: lands as you can is a very good example of classic) to see something that not sounds me, something that surprised me, something that does not make me feel a little more asshole. Yesterday, seeing Alatriste, I did again many questions, somewhat justifying all this introductory tirade: how is it possible that can be disappoint in this way to the Viewer? do as a promotion as well done (for his arrival at the spectator level) can be done then not meet even half of expectations? as can you write a boring taaaaan script taking as a backup four books and almost unconditional support from the author of the novels? where is the hand of the director in this mess? Because I know, Agustín Díaz Yanes was a good director, or at least made a very good first film. Stroke of luck will call one, competent team will call others, but there is no doubt that there is nothing of what there was.Everything is great in this movie. The light, the costumes, the make-up, the atmosphere, the music, the locations. All, less what has to be large (and which is not achieved with money, as above): the script. Not is if someone from the team has ever heard talk of the three acts. Or the dramatic progression. Or stoppages in the narrative play. Apparently not. And that makes that during more than two hours that lasts the film, you you ask constantly when going to get the pivot point, where is the premise of the characters and why the secondary plots are not interested at all. Really did not need put the four books in the film. It had not been bad to choose a main story for the personjae of Alatriste and one compendium of others for the secondary plots, and having taken all at once and they confluyeran at some point, and thus to solve them in a logical manner. Instead, the script condenses (more well apretuja) four books in parts of the film, half an hour approximately, with a parallel plot (from the love of Alatriste) that lasts throughout the film. This makes the emotion shine by their absence in all and each one of the moments: fencing struggles, battles, nor love scenes or dialogue are the more minimal emotion. Everything just in, as stated earlier, the ambiance, the music, costumes, makeup, lighting and Javier camera. A nonsense that hurts, by expectations that had been, and makes no more than confirm the Spanish film will remain dependent on Almodovar and Amenábar during most time of the desired.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1296

José A. Peig

Volver

muchocine

Putting the look in its four female protagonists, none is without form an integral part of a narrative that progresses from a starting point to an ending in which the four reunited-discover-be reconciled with something or someone, giving way to a different State.

With the time Pedro Almodóvar has become an icon and figure the Spanish industry media on which have been said and written perhaps too much fanfare understandable taking into account the ideological positioning and the constant bombardment to tale of the awards, the galas, the tributes, bla bla bla bla. From a certain intellectual sector - very grounded in the Internet network - has been custom underline the overvaluation of its role as a filmmaker, but it should get nuances to not mislead too. If someone wants to place Almodovar in a position of "great film", obviously hang him the epithet of "overrated filmmaker" will be a great success. If we compare his work with prevailing mediocrity in the Spanish film, Almodovar, without doubt, among the Spanish filmmakers most talented and significant of the last thirty years.First and foremost, Almodóvar makes film, and precision rather than claim they do. It should start from an inescapable knowledge: that a film with a well-organized structure is already almost a good movie (in the absence of analysis of contents and meanings). In "Volver", as in a large part of the Filmography of the director manchego, was a el igual que en una gran parte de la filmografía de el director manchego, se hace ago patent immediately touch and care of the characters in relation to the story you want to tell. Putting the look in its four female protagonists, none of them ceases to be an integral part of a narrative that progresses from a starting point (in which the four are in a very specific and defined psychological state through facts and words) until a final in which the four reunited-discover-be reconciled with something or someone, giving way to a different State.That is telling a story, and Almodovar does so with an honesty and a commendable clarity of ideas. It is not a capricious filmmaker, but has a few stories to him more than anyone affect you and you are interested in (loaded with pain by the hidden past or present agonizing inanity and disorientation), and than any viewer who has the ability to perceive "in tune" with the sensitivity of the author can enjoy equally.Yes, "Volver", he is not a genius, it's a typical story about a hidden past that from one moment in which certain variables affect and they break into the routine of events (the death of aunt), progresivamense is revealing, starting with images in a cemetery in which evokes a crucial fact. And that is the reason that drags us throughout the development. The image that closes the film shows us, and ultimately an alma en pena (Carmen Maura moving inland the manchega casona, suppressing tears because "the ghosts never cry," a few words at all arbitrary, that are defining the psychological state of the character, and also with the appropriate turn metaphorical) that encloses a dramatic story and is doomed to pay their debts, its particular cemetery. Beginning and end of the visual narrative overlap in the configuration of the meaning, the endpoint showing that Almodovar knows to use the language of cinema for a few purposes very specific and personal, his film is intimate, you take or you leave it.It is very commendable treatment and the orchestration of the female cast (as usual in Almodovar), as we have said, he is not extra or missing anything. The story is tragic, the characters are equipped with that dimension of the real to away them from the mere scheme, and all their reactions are consistent with its features. What gives more versatility throughout this set is the look halfway between the coldness and sensitivity. It is a film about a deep Spain, with its folklore and its myths, its everyday discontents, subjected to a treatment of bitter nostalgia, with these La Mancha village houses that saved the past, that Almodovar recreates with flat overall, the courtyard of the corridors, the winds that sweep the streets photographs of those who are no longer lights, the superstition of the neighbors.I.e., a narrative scheme so clear and concise, Almodóvar added his own Poetics, fruit of its landscapes, autobiographical roots. and your pain. Will not go down in history as a genius, probably given more awards you deserve (and those yet to come), but no longer a narrator with an exquisite by their own landscapes taste, whether a particular geographic area or a female soul (their interior landscapes). Therefore, his films have character of author, and we have a good exponent of his film in "Volver".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4121

Iñaki Bilbao

Los Crímenes de Oxford

muchocine

Interesting film of intrigue, targeted at the technical level by the Bilbao Álex de la Iglesia.

nteresante film, especially on paper, targeted on the technical side by Álex de la Iglesia, although not convinced at all in their exposure to images.It is based on a good novel by Guillermo Martínez, and its translation to the celluloid was no easy undertaking given the argument, where numerous dialogues and situations have to do with mathematics and its derivatives full.Read it is a thing, and see it on screen quite another. Alex has tried, but the printed pace and the irregularity of situations make interest come and go in a vague way.The beginning is really good, and their first 20 minutes or so are displayed with agility, showing great dialogues and a presentation of the characters, especially the mother and daughter, perfectly explanatory of their psychology.However, little by little the film glides towards an undefined territory, with dialogues and scenes that extend more than due (many scenes with the police inspector), struggling with the pace and making the interest was diluted somewhat, though, and this do not know if it comes in the novel or is the product of the imagination of Alex and George, writers of the film, occasionally enriched with truly subjugating sub-historias, as in the old criminal case of the tailor and his wife. A fascinating story, I do not know happened in real or invented life, but in any case has great strength and no little black humor, if it reflects.And this is perhaps what we miss you less to this film, being directed by Álex de la Iglesia, not have more humor. Probably because the original story does not, but it would have not been bad insert fun sometime, although the perplexity shown by the police inspector before the reflections of two mathematicians, seem to be going by that site. But the truth is that they do not laugh (do not know if it is what is intended).Anyway, it is an appreciable, not inconsiderable, film that entreteniene at all times and one always wants to know what will happen later, how will finalize everything. And this end is not to be very beyond. The movie ends somewhat abruptly and with some coldness. I guess that the novel has more force but in screen could even leave a sediment of disappointment.Excellent interpretation of John Hurt and the music by Roque Baños.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1459

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Funny Games

muchocine

Transgressive, uncomfortable, necessary, inadmissible, terrifying, intelligent... Let's find more adjectives and put them here. In any case, convulsive film as life. If were you born pa' Hammer, the sky will fall nails...

The entire film is already summarized in its first minutes: a bourgeois couple with a son directs with his Range Rover to his house on a lake. They crawl a sailboat of obscene proportions. The entertainment is to go guessing, joyful, appetite, what pieces of Opera are playing on the cd player. Suddenly classical music stops sound and the soundtrack of the film overwhelms with an insistent steamroller of hard industrial rock, noise rested on dubious melodic bases.The rest is an uneasy thriller whose consistency lies in the moral implications and the social justification for a pair of psychopaths that address the placid aburguesada life of a family with the inescapable task kill them without that in any circumstances of the film we are informed about the nature of the crime or the consequences of its implementation. To that effect, Funny games is provocative and is delicately, without hardly strictly cinematographic resources, places trodden by other films, but here they are ampulosamente carried a brutal, though never end us millstone no scene because carry entail an explicit violent component: here not be pornographic and truculenta gore of other champions of the provocation as the Tarantino's Pulp Fiction and Reservoir dogs or pseudointelectual Oliver Stone's Natural born killers. Haneke obvious gloating: settles in lengthy, static levels almost, of characters stranded in the darkness of the immorality (yuppies who assail the House and running their always absurd plan) and characters pitifully anchored in the incomprehension and helplessness of not knowing the object of the game that have been pushed.The episode of the Opera mutated into metal noise is the reference: there is, although I read that Haneke didn't have clear at all, the storyline of the film: how life is based on very fragile foundations and how random (what if not) can vary accommodative deserved leisure of these bourgeois lovers of the bel canto to unmitigated tragedy. Without solution to escape.What tape plasma with some eloquence is not the reason for these bastards who use violence as a game, a fun game, as the title says. Kubrick made a Clockwork Orange with a very clear idea of what intended this apparent advocacy of violence. The novel's title already principiaba a solid departure from any frivolous idea of violence. Droogs and nadsat distressed the streets in search of fun as these Brats of Funny games. There is even a tribute to the film in this: Alex (Malcolm McDowell) is foul-mouthed, lively, cultured and refined, and has an adlátere lerdo, fofo and primitive, its "fractured". As is the case here. The two characters are built with identical mimbres psychological if any psychology can be used for reasoning the behavior of such a rabble. Haneke deconstructs the grammar of the thriller with psychopath and prisoner that we know that he will die before the opening credits: does so by removing all signs of erotic free: the woman is forced to undress but there is never more enseñada skin than is necessary. Nor merciless in the deaths that are produced: aseptically, portrays them almost without a commitment to denounce them. The last one, which seems an accident of the weather that the tragic loss of a human being is significant.The hostage-takers or murderers or the morons yuppies (matter) also play with the spectator, which is a piece in the plot: what they mean in the game, they force you to determine a position or reason the logic of what is happening with them. There is even a scene in which the film autorebobina: what seems to a happy ending, or at least, the way to this happy ending occurs is violently censored by the murderer. When his friend is escopeteado, nervously search the TV remote control to back what has just happened (we see how the tape goes back actually) and delete this discomfort (which his friend dies). This aggressive and uncomfortable tape promises is a transgressive show like few others: exquisite education of the assailants is going aditamentazo his schizoid behavior, its criminal impulse. It hurts thinking a mind awake and cultured enough as to ask eggs please and excuse for view misbehaved then be able to shoot a child or burst a future with this appalling ease.Cannot escape this cloudy observation that the world is evil and anyone in it are fagocitamos the same weak promises that perhaps someday will be better of being catalogued as the unbearable film that dwells in our collection of films to the waiting that a friend eager to thrill ask us some nightly entertainment. Talking exclusively about film, Funny games is not film: it is a kind of experiment based on the techniques of cinema, but it escapes from this conceptual category when Haneke contradicts any logical sense of narration and stays two minutes standing in a frame, which might well appear a dialog box. I felt desasistido, alien suddenly to everything he had seen before. I wanted (and did so vehemently) to rewind the tape to the front. I regretted not to have a remote control (do the picture do??) in order to move forward a few minutes and lose sight of the level fixed, blowout, infuriating, tedious, abusive, of a man with his leg shattered in a Chair or a woman near the corpse of his son, who have been killed, but we have not seen.In very concise words, must be eager to have a bad time to be caught up in Funny games. Event that such desire exist or that one does not have no bloody idea of what's the matter (thing which happened to me), must be apencar then with the bad time. Know carry the rest of the day. Sleep in loose leg after seeing her without nightmares dark on the evil and the bad milk of many, some of which are just hopeless and unfortunately close to our placid life.Haneke seems to fly to Hollywood to do a remake of its Funny there games with stars on celluloid (Tim Roth and Naomi Watts). I do not know completely if I have seen a movie good or bad. Do not fit here qualifications, hierarchies, subjugation to a scale that sometimes is not reliable. It must be wary of everything here. We must swallow saliva. We must close our eyes. Or open them much. Or not to think. Or think of all blow and at a very fast speed.What mundo.addenda: have not read (now go) critique of Funny games in cinema of this noble and valuable website of friend Victor. We could, what reasons there are for otherwise, make a special "Funny Games". Or not?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2674

José A. Peig

El mito de Bourne

muchocine

Do it is a trick very used by mediocre filmmakers: when there is no visual imagination, nor a history to play with truly original and significant elements, put him cane to the viewer with a music video? televisero? and you'll be foolishly while she devours the cone of popcorn.

Paul Greengrass directs this continuation to the history of the amnesiac spy, who in a new cycle of enigmas and persecutions focuses its investigations in order to understand and know his true past and the true reasons for the secret operation of the CIA, marinated with the theme of revenge and reconciliation through the knowledge of the truth. Bourne is an alma en pena has already begun a desperate race to nowhere, prisoner of the manipulation that he himself helped to keep.In film you he cannot forgive the repetition of a previous scheme with the same essential content and, above, reducing the quality of stylistic resources. The film does not really have anything that was not already implicit in its precedent, and limited its objective to develop a bland plot which just moved up from the first to the last level. The confused man who wakes up at his home in the India in primeas them images, is the same man confusing that rambles through the streets of New York, leaving patent vacuous narration and blatant stretching of a product exclusively designed to entertain with spectacular scenes of action and some timely point of effective suspense. The protagonist spends the entire film fleeing, and the rest, they pursue him and conniving depending on a plot that deals with politics and corruption in the oil companies. Worst of all is that the Viewer already knows who is the "bad", in advance, and the other characters, such as hierarchical characterization and flat, just provide a counterpoint or some life to the springs of the predictable script. If outside, we also have the bad direction of Greengass, with excess of close-up, use and abuse of antitheses, zoom and sudden twists of the camera, style sloppy videoclip. I.e., everything in this movie is intended by and for the "theatrical", not for the benefit of a narrative and constructive effectiveness of an emotional state or specific tone in keeping with the theme that aims to address. It is a trick very used by the mediocre filmmakers: when there is no visual imagination, nor a history to play with truly original and significant elements, put him cane to the viewer with a video clip "televisero" and you'll be foolishly while she devours the cone of popcorn (added the role of a repetitive soundtrack you are looking for a well known from psychology effect)() aimed at, literally, "Captivate" the Viewer. Then leave the film and commented that the film is good.Finally, worst things say.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1074

Oscar Cantero

La central

muchocine

Mathematics do not fail, and in the cinematographic field tell us that when joined many absurdities in a same film, the result can only be a hodgepodge of huge caliber, as it turns out this monstrosity.

The truth is not expected much from this film. He supposed that it would be typical of desinhibidos teenagers who spend time making apology of drugs, alcohol and the chabacanería; one thing similar to 13 Friday, but the Spanish and more modern. But I was wrong.Not even in the worst scenario could be me of course the magnitude of the crappy that I was going to find lighting certainly in the light of any State subsidy such that Governments attach to certain artists as payment for services rendered (see never Mais, No to war, etc.).A movie as the Central will roll, produce and release in Spain is an indecency, the least. In addition to an absurd script that relies on all existing topics and far exceeds the tolerable limits, the characters are heinous subjects that give a picture of the deplorable and vomit youth, until the point that greater arouses sympathy is the killer that is passing a knife slowly to the gang of Brats who make up the castwhich is to be welcomed. Constant obviously and retahílas no sense are the basis of the screenplay, seasoned with a bit of tomato sauce and a lot of nonsense.The interpretation is more artificial, without giving any do actors? at no time sense of credibility, while the soundtrack is non-existent. Perhaps the only thing that can save a little, and only in certain moments is the picture, but that being very generous.This monstrosity, as it is only natural, spent with more penalty glory by theaters. But the simple fact that has been planned already is of itself irritating. And is that this film there is no where on take it, because everything in it is disastrous: from the script to the characterization of the characters, the purported shocks or constant hysteria of the rabble that appears on screen. But above all, that claim to give a touch of cheap Americanism (children of dad with huge mansion, which they drink beer, smoke marijuana without stop and rest corners) make the Central infumable rubbish which is only capable of awakening contempt and cause torpor in the courageous who manages to reach the final.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1790

Rafa Ferrer

Descubriendo a los Robinsons

muchocine

A tape seems Pixar, but it is not, it could have been more, but it is not, and that I like, and I recommend, but will quietly, so nobody is excited too.

I have taken part of Holy week just ended to drag my family (in mass) to the film, which is that it did not see the day to go to see her, I know that the shadow of Pixar is elongated, and more in this, where one seems to sometimes watching a tape of the flexo label, perhapsone missing a more slow narrative pace and is that, at times, excessive speed and the excessive dynamism of the tape, override with his narration a tape that although it is not perfect could have been.On the other hand, dubbing, (I've heard today that it was also dropping of rigour), not annoying at all, and the story, okay, I admit that I am passionate about the futuristic film, and that some things left me absorbed not only minutes after the end of the screening, but days also. (these tubes to travel I would certainly help correct my embarrassing problem of tardiness).Of course, are facing a movie Disney and final moralina, as the characters have to be more sugary that our teeth to gnaw, although it is inevitable to feel appreciation for some of them, without going further by the friend and roommate of the protagonist, who know in that becomes then for all those who have seen the tape.Finally, a tape seems Pixar, but it is not, it could have been more, but it is not, and that I like, and I recommend, but will quietly, so nobody is excited too.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1802

Luis Zueco

El buen pastor

muchocine

The movie is good, but who wait an adventure movie in the style of the "Holy" or "Case Bourne", precisely with the same actor will be disappointed. De Niro says ways, however will have to wait for new developments to see where can be reached.

Robert De Niro gets us into the dark world of the CIA, with the novelty that makes it at the root of this powerful spy agency, for years I control, led and put Presidents on half the world. The context is the end of the second world war and the Postguerra.Los actors are Matt Damon and Angelina Jolie in addition to the director, Robert De Niro. While it is a spy film isn't a spy to use film, because we are at the beginning of the CIA and this activity was not even as professional as today, and see scenes of family life, unthinkable for a spy in the modern world. There is le film sins of boring.In fact, Matt Damon seems anything but a spy, not be if in those early years of the CIA they were really so, but the truth is that more seems an official that a spy. But the truth is that the the idea that gives me spying in Spain. But the image that occurs in the film is always much more than one hero, especially in U.S.A. Not to mention that his relationship with Jolie is impossible to believe too you cold, too distant, too little credible that he not die for her. on the other hand is too ridiculous scenes, in which appears regalia. For me, the movie is quite good, highlights the anti-Castro operation of Bay of pigs, or rather his failure, which also marks the storyline of the plot, because they will think it fails because of a snitch that must be found.It is artistically appreciated the recreation of the London of the world war or the post-war Berlin.Highlight the important actors who appear in supporting roles: John Turturro, Alec Baldwin, Billy Crudup, William Hurt Tammy Blanchard, Michael Gambon and Joe Pesci. The movie is good, but who wait an adventure movie in the style of the "Holy" or "Case Bourne", precisely with the same actor will be disappointed.To be his second film as director, De Niro suggests ways, however we should expect new developments to see where you can get.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3046

Emilio Calvo de Mora

El asesinato de Richard Nixon

muchocine

Unpleasant, desaprovechada, sometimes formidable, heavy at times, the assassination of Richard Nixon is saved by a recommended Sean Penn and its history, which interests itself, although we have the certainty that the director her desastra by err on the side of right, of educated, simple...

According to apesasumbrado this Chronicle on American disenchantment autobiographical, the story is written in the margins, on the outskirts, others textbooks and the political literature. This is the story of an American medium, tasteless and boring, sad and cordial, but violent and misaligned. Samuel j. Bicke (a sobreactuado but attractive Sean Penn) acquires sufficient despair as to find in the hijacking of an airplane and its subsequent landing at the White House the only way to overcome the anonymity, fear, pain and gain the respect that seeks his personality not to by more than, stubbornly, he strive.Payne, Di Caprio and Cuarón financed this product almost indie not lasting, mature, cold impostado documentalism. The assassination of Richard Nixon speaks of the American dream, of the promised land. The landscape is sick. What is relevant, what is the most notable success of this ochre film of good intentions and acceptable consequences is the description of a fading, affordable, marketable, society reduced to objects of consumption. Bicke is not the type without integrating De Niro mauve with its immortal Travis Bickle, but shares with him a similar mismatch: both are perfect amateurs, a teenage sentimentality, needy of affection and constantly skirting the pathos.The charisma voiceover of the omniscient protagonist clogging in excess: disarm the information capacity of a sober pictures, filmed with asepsis and inspired by tapes as the aforementioned Taxi driver or all those so counter-cultural seventy realistic material. Nor the secondary material is exploited: some very briefly profiled characters, Elmer Bernstein as recipient of the daily spoken of the confessed psychopath and that Bicke reviews, with surprising depth the ups and downs of a country wounded in Viet Nam and disenchanted at home, épicamente installed in a land of promise but devoid of references heroic. Bicke, in this sense, reluctantly, is not a pioneer, one of those thrown the founding western jeans, when the side of a river, a grass or a vein of gold were growing cities. America, in the late 20th century, cela morons as Bicke: seems that you take care of them, you train them to burst the system with infamous acts or impossible to domestic terrorism. Only be reviewed the sentimental doctrinaire of weapons of fire and snipers with University card rogue geography. Thoughts spoken aloud are determined to interfere with a simple, dull plot in excess, but effective in their skilful demonstration of cancer crosses, as bitter patina, the footage, everything what counts.The Sung true, decomposes the coldness with which we contemplate, but sets stricter their sustainability, not the film, which is flat, bit so ambitious and sadly missed. We will not know what would have happened to this project in a world without the 11-S. Because, ultimately, what are are the reasons for the Wolf, the arguments of the killer Wolf that he wanted to spoil the State of the welfare of the herd

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3709

Francisco Bellón

Soy leyenda

muchocine

I am legend is the new producto-espectáculo which offers Hollywood for winning the battle in the Christmas box office, but despite his good start, turns out to be a predictable and sleeping more film.

Approaching the holiday season, and if not enough with the constant bombardment of ads, the hustle and bustle that is created day if and day also in the shopping areas, and the night lighting in each city, the Billboard arrive which plague the big betting Hollywood by the box office.After the failures (always speaking in language Hollywood) of Beowulf and the Golden Compass, arrives to us I am legend, introduces us to Will Smith as the last human alive on the face of the Earth. With a very encouraging approach, in which up to the cinema of catastrophes already through our country (albeit only the appearance of a Madrid devastated in a poster in Seoul theaters I am Legend), starts a film unsuitable for most staunch critics of Will Smith as he appears in almost all of the frames. In honor of the truth, the film has a few minutes that hooked by its intensity, largely thanks to well boulders are a soulless New York City levels. Unfortunately, the intensity will falling as the story becomes monotonous and repetitive, and is that you have as protagonist the last living man on the planet does not give much game for a film of entertainment. And at the moment they appear infected, by the screen parade a series of persecutions and several shootings that will only cause one to those viewers who had fallen victims of the sleepy show. All this ends in a final filled with American morality and with a strong religious emphasis.I am legend is the new producto-espectáculo which offers Hollywood for winning the battle in the Christmas box office, but despite his good start, turns out to be a predictable and sleeping more film. Ideal for a warm afternoon in the film and take a good NAP to the health of a long-suffering Will Smith.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2146

Rafa Delgado

Rocky Balboa

muchocine

Stallone grows, and gives us the better, more emotive and worthy end the saga of the Italian Colt might have.

'Rocky Balboa' ends up being the best and most emotional episode of the entire series. Despite the slow (although charmingly nostalgic) it becomes for its first hour, rhythm sticks a rush in all directions from the already mitiquísima sequence of training, to the rhythm of "Gonna fly now". Then Stallone grows and gives us some of the best boxing of the history of the film sequences, experimenting with the camera and photography, to trigger in the best, most emotional and most dignified end the saga of 'Rocky' might have. A true love letter, written to own handwriting and with love for all the rockymaníacos, which are not (we are) few.Although clear, if you haven't seen the predecessors (the appalling 'IV' and 'V' included), little will tell you this movie, where the nostalgic element is vital.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1002

Dragon negro

Pequeños grandes héroes

muchocine

An entertaining comedy and little else to see a Sunday afternoon

Zoom tells us the story of Jack Shepard, aka Captain Zoom, superhero who lost his powers and currently living in oblivion. The arrival of a threat to the Earth will be for the Government agency that deals with these issues to go to him so you train a group of young people with powers to combat this threat.Zoom is a family comedy, with all that that implies, i.e. script loose and predictable jokes not exits of tone, love story of means and a topical outcome. The grace is that the protagonists are young people with superpowers, a special effects-laden production and a few winks geeks. The film also gets flying lasts little more than eighty minutes and note his prologue in the form of comics drawings explaining the history from which we left in the film.Tim Allen stars in the tape next to an aging Chevy Chase, making doctor in charge of the project, a role quite funny and ridiculous, but without a doubt the best role is that of Courteney Cox in the skin of a scientific lover of comics with the most geek. Of the tiny group of four children without a doubt the most funny is the little girl with Super strength and which caused most of the gags due to its power.An entertaining comedy and little else to see a Sunday afternoon.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/179

Tito Chinchan

Matador

muchocine

A film which has an introduction by almost an hour, a plot of 20 minutes and the final ten

By God, who has combed so to Pierce Brosman? With the Pura and those sideburns. Not to mention the clothes. My mother cutrez you have given to this actor who came to make James Bond. With a poster, with painted things to boli not can be very far, not.The film is a Hitman who soon Gets a job in Mexico and for this reason is known to a businessman who is about to close good business. For various reasons, it has to work killing people that others close business. And for designs of fate, their lives are uniting at times during the hour and a half of the film. I think it is the most crappy summary I have ever done.This has been one of the few times that I have started to tell what is the film and I've been blank, given that it is very complex to explain it without her whole. And is that when it was already half an hour I thought "if still not be that will". And indeed, we have a film which has an introduction by almost an hour, a plot of 20 minutes and the final ten. And that crashes. On the other hand, the story is that it does not give much, because it has no subtramas or similar. A very linear story, whose single grace is that they have given cuts the Ribbon to keep the interest of the public about a particular moment. On the positive side, the tape has quite a few funny points, which are given either by absurd situations or clotted expressions of the protagonist. Pierce Brosman makes a very good role, saving to a large extent this slightly mediocre movie.In short, a curiosity that will not go to the annals of the history of the cinema, and possibly you delete the head as soon as you leave the room.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1888

Bloody Will

Tu la letra, yo la música

muchocine

Isn't the comedy that will make you stalks you, and you matter it immediately, but it has is something that takes you to view it two or three times without problems and cogiditos in hand with your partner.

We must officially appoint Hugh Grant as the Heartthrob of the comedies of the last 10 years. It Will Ferrel, Adam Sandler, Chris Rock, or Jack Black, which used a more crude humor, unlike Grant takes years and years parading with the most many-colored actresses of Hollywood romantic comedies that used the basic story of us know - something happens - eat partridges. Do already almost forgotten their incursions into the drama, as?Sense and sensibility? or?Do rowing to the wind? to have the actor rather than typecast in this type of genre that we are usually drawn by third parties. But not all films are equal, and with?Your letter, I music? Grant has managed to start me a few laughs, and that already says a lot...The director of this comedy, Marc Lawrence already has caught the point to the British and the type of story told. Do went you in?Love with notice?, but has also written?Forces of nature? or?Miss special agent?. All have their faults, and one of them is a genuine rollazo, but the best of?Your letter, I music? is that Lawrence is daja give many turns and going to the direct: a simple plot, allowing few gaps, and whose end is more than resabido, but that unlike other products, is extremely effective and highly entertaining, or at least so seemed it to me.Do do can not stop thinking that the director has been on the VH1 network one of those documentaries about the rise and fall of certain groups of the 1980s, and specifically of Wham!, band formed by George Michael and? if the skinned man?Andrew?Andrew Ridgley. This is all just about the film: the Wham Moreno. Alex Fletcher (Hugh Grant) is a former star of Pop lived better times with a group that was a success but disappeared after their singer's solo. Now, 15 years later is presented a golden opportunity when a star for teens, Cora Carmen, he commissioned the lyrics of a song, and Fletcher will make use of an insecure aspiring writer, Sophie (Drew Barrymore) to create the success that will return to the covers.With this premise, it may seem unoriginal is mounted a comedy without edges, without cheating and for its restrained duration even arriving to be a heaviness. Lawrence has thrown popular: singers ovlidados and clones of new stars, as such the Cora Carmen, whose got to the Brtiney Spears are tremendous. The scenes with Grant playing a crappy and ochenteras canciocillas rub the ridiculous and hilarious, especially when you see as their teenage fans are now señoronas something salidillas. The character of loser that distills the actor in the footage makes that you feel genuine devotion and sympathy for the protagonist, which I appreciate after seeing so many streams that they end up get you rile. Do still preferring in?Notting Hill? or?Does Bridget Jones?, but éstá infinitely much better than in most of the last carried out.And we say Barrymore. Also the girl in comedies lately is leathers, however in this film in particular could have been any different. Barrymore does not give your character the charisma that Yes gives Grant to their own. As a girl in love, hypochondriacal and hysterical is equal to another heap. It is not to do wrong, simply stays in a flat line. It is the weakest of the film and his smile is usually save the dishes, but that lack of personality joins with Hugh Grant has questionable chemistry. Sometimes it stick, but others think that the girl is dealing with his father. The truth is that the 15 years that separate both actors is too, and with another actress this film could have been muchísmo better. Perhaps is this lack of chemistry what has made your box office has been a disaster.?Your letter, I music? It is this offer that occurs on the Bulletin Board as a completely valid option to the pretentiousness of other proposals. With both requetevisto, both mystery thriller that isn't, and so many empty special effects, this film is the most simple and uncomplicated you are going to see. Isn't the comedy that will make you stalks you, and you matter it immediately, but it has is something that takes you to view it two or three times without problems and cogiditos in hand with your partner is extremely entertaining. Do something deeper we have to Aronofski next week?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/221

Alvaro Oliva

Xmen3

muchocine

Brett Ratner takes good pulse saga, although the script in some cases does not help it too

The new installment of the adventures of these mutants idolatry is captained by Brett Ratner (hour, Red Dragon) at the expense of Bryan Singer, director of the previous two films and has shifted from superhero to take care of Superman Returns. The result, in my view, is a film less than two previous deliveries, where Ratner has focused more to show than in delving deeper into the characters. Despite that X-Men: the final decision, has a very interesting social and political content, and which continues to be topical. The action is based on found the cure to the problem of the mutation, so anyone who has this anomaly can become "normal". Of course this discovery will leave supporters and detractors. Among these, they appear Magneto and his henchmen, which allege that there must not be cure, since there is no disease, and that in any case they are the cure.With this approach one can discern what is going to happen, but nevertheless does have some surprises and interesting parts, as see the aspect more humans Logan (Wolverine) that make for a return to lead to Jean Grey next to the good, because it is converted in Phoenix and is a danger for humanityincluding the mutants contrary to the cause of better Magneto.Lo of the film are his battles, something which many fans will appreciate, especially those who go in search of spectacle, by logic it is they are looking for the spectators who come to this kind of films. Within these battles stresses the new weapons that used the army to try to stop them.A point that has created some controversy are the new characters that appear, because they have changed enough to adapt the comic book and because some participations are ephemeral. Among those who have a prominent role is beast, played by Kelsey Grammer, (the fantasy Doctor Frasier and usual cheers) and is also the young protagonist of Hard Candy, Ellen Page, as well as the usual Famke Janssen, Hugh Jackman, Sir Ian Mckellen and Halle Berry, which have increased their participation due to their complaints.In final Brett Ratner taken with good pulse saga, although the script in some cases not helps too, and prepares us for a more than likely fourth delivery, while there in project movies as Wolverine, and some of its protagonists say that they do not believe that there will be a new adventure for the X patrol.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4094

Monica Jordán

La vida sin Grace

muchocine

Where the hypocrisy wins the battle of morally.

"Grace is gone" starts with a scene of pseudo-desnudo emotional hand a group of women whose husbands are soldiers in the Iraq war. The lightness of his speech (remember laughing sexual farewell given to his men) and the appearance on screen of a serious John Cusack with gaunt appearance, point to a rather ironic film treatment: are we going to talk about something hard, but using the flag of humor., or so it may seem. The breakdown of this alleged ironic speech comes not so much by the impending news of the death of the wife of Stanley (Cusack) and his hurt reaction but with chords of the music of Clint Eastwood (Yes, the director, actor, producer, the already ubiquitous Eastwood) composed especially for Grace is Gone. Say chords, giving two-round twist over to melodrama to convert it (thanks also to address decisions) in one tear history.And is that "Grace is gone" is consumed in his bisexual as it progresses and carries with it to his characters. Stanley is presented to us already from the beginning from the point of view of who drew the unsuccessful: works at a store without ambition, suffers from a major limp (metaphor for lack of stability caused by the absence of his wife), does not know how to talk and hides all his faults (including the not be part of the army) under a false sense of security that raya despotism. It is a soul lost in the chaos while preaching the straight life that taught him the marines. No doubt, thus sees the director (James C. Strouse) and thus wants to see the viewers through their angular anaphoric and bursts of planes in empty rooms: Stanley is alone and plunged into the chaos of who does not know how to deal with a situation.The dilemma of Stanley (an expressionist less but more expressive Cusack) is to stop being one to become the leader of a clan that does not know how to apply, i.e., their daughters. Fleeing from the time of the confrontation that has to tell the girls that her mother is dead, decides to start a trip that will be used to gain time, take confidence and as a means of personal growth (what are but the travel film?). During this journey, the melodramatic moments will appear (especially among the eldest daughter - Heidi - and his father) and will be lightened by Dawn (small) who will be responsible for subtracting drama to the set of the film. A tandem perfect to prepare the Viewer for let go the tear at the peak: the conversation between father and daughters.It is right there where Strouse is overcome by hypocrisy and you can not hide that he is a rookie director. Full conversation between Stanley and her daughters, the director takes the decision to show their faces in the foreground to remove the sound to average conversation, certainly with the intention to give their characters a moment of intimacy. But it is not hypocritical to show average conversation and leave the viewer with the faces of girls crying bereaved? Do not been less pornographic emotionally withdraw right at the start and let the three a place of real intimacy? Strouse dubitación as the duality of his decision was more than clear: staying with his camera in the center of the action but covering the ears of the Viewer; I see but I do not listen. It is at that moment when one wondered where was the wise Council of Eastwood at the time of filming that scene. Perhaps Strouse saw no "Million Dollar baby" and did not learn of the composer of his film that ethics and morality in the film starts at the point of view that takes the camera. And Eastwood, knows that a while.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4004

Victor Trujillo

Rec

muchocine

Get scare and in what way. REC will be a before and an after in the genre.

Nothing to do with that is soft history proposed by the orphanage, REC starts without presentations, bareback and takes us by the hand of the intrepid reporter until the first bite of the old, that honestly I impresiónó by the realism with which it is shot.It is true that the use of the camera in hand had already seen before in the blair witch project, but nothing to see hear. The project next to REC is an episode of the Smurfs at 3 and a half in the afternoon. If the draft masca tension, but the end is the closest thing to a coitus interruptus. You scared for more than one hour and then leave you on tenterhooks.Fortunately REC manages to scare and in what way. The lost girl scene is impressive, the camera approaching his face is priceless. Personally I had never seen filming the horror so closely. Great work once again of Balagueró, not so great performance of some actors, somewhat forced. And the plot what I can tell, does absurd?, the truth is that I do not care, for frames I read a book. Terror Cine-Espectáculo to 100%.At the moment we are already seeing the sediment that is leaving this movie in the cinema in films like Cloverfield (Monstruoso) and many more will continue to the technique of the genius of Spanish terror. Balagueró and olé.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/327

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Silent Hill

muchocine

Don't like to spectators of life film or usual video game console they want to see on the big screen hot flushes exisenciales of its heroine, lost in a ghost town

Without knowing yet if we are seeing a movie or a game dramatized, Silent Hill not convinces or viewers of film of life or to usual game consoles that want to see on the big screen hot flushes exisenciales of its heroine, lost in a village of ghosts in search of a daughter. Neither sinks as it would like its narrative discourse in the romantic traditions of tale to the Propp. He wasted the dramatic texture of the characters, coming out here and beyond with virtually nothing to contribute to the argument. The aesthetic expensive videoclip mtv abused in two hours and little of apotheosis of superficiality. I prefer the sublime fog covers Silent Hill. Who go to the cinema to find pure gore, will discover a languid hybrid whose structure is dispersed, when not, empty. The protagonist is a woman, the director commentary, gave one greater than its mission credibility, that is, find the lost daughter. Scratching these sentimental fringes, hurry the constructivist vision of cheap melodrama rather than give packaging to the product, so trivialize, makes for a sad height. We were not to watch movies, said a friend. Time could have better wasted at home, taking videos, the grapes of wrath, by John Ford. Tonight I I'm going to put and again enjoy another vision of the deep America, so trite, but this time with infinite tenderness and art, thus, in uppercase. Blessed is the cinema which has jewelry to relieve the soul.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3255

José A. Peig

El pasaje

muchocine

Forgotten and unknown to a large part of the public of today, The Passage remains a strong exercise of film halfway between the "JohnFordiano" Classicism and decadent aestheticism of the early 1970s.

Forgotten and unknown to a large part of the public of today, The Passage remains a strong exercise of film halfway between the "JohnFordiano" Classicism and decadent aestheticism of the early 1970s, sporadically, showing similarities to the cinema verité style. It was a time of transition and the road to reformulations remained open on hold while this type of product on such somewhat coarse grounds, marked the charts waiting for the new craft.To highlight the conciseness and simplicity of their structures, is a film of action and adventure in a framework of war film, but not the work within this genre inspired by the spirit of the introspective epic rather than the collectivism of the honor and the strategy can frame. In the first images we see home to the Basque Shepherd between the Pyrenean nieves, receives two American officers requesting his service to save and hide a scientist persecuted by the nazis. The idea of the renegade hero, the archetype of humanity hidden behind the gesture of roughness (paper which as well has been given to Anthony Quinn) of its initial negative. In the images that close the story, we see the same pastor wrapped between the snows of his home, seeing leaving, with gesture of satisfaction, the doctor and his family. The adventure road and process towards redemption or self-knowledge, topic presented here with more lukewarm on John Ford, but the absence of claims and the millimeter disposition of each element at stake compensated, to some extent, the simplicity of the story.J lee-Thompson leads effectively and makes a quite remarkable use of the mountainous landscape, it would seem that claustrophobic while he recreates with good taste in the Majesty of the geographic reliefs, creating the sense dramatic with a theme as eternal and always agonizing as the persecution, the atosigante shadow of the pursuer and the hopelessness of the persecutedin this case, a family whose mother, in one of the most emotional scenes, flees to his doom to save loved ones, with the silent accomplice of the observer, Basque Shepherd whose look impartial and comprehensive embodies the objective sensitivity of who knows where arrive the limits and the pain of a mother. On the other hand, and in exchange for a certain bucolic lyricism, passages starring Malcolm Mcdowell (in a stereotyped and something sobreactuada a nazi soldier, but extremely sharp in all his gestures and glances representation) reinforce a tone of sordidness and fascist megalomania, counterpoint to the down-to-Earth rudeness of the Basque Shepherd.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3780

Renegado

Beowulf

muchocine

An entertaining story that bored, with good moments of action, not enough blood, and much heroic fantasy. Recommended as experience to see a different format on the big screen.

After a reasonable time of non-assistance to the cinemas because I am a person very very busy and, most importantly, that had not released anything to my liking (actually I wanted to go see "Halloween: the beginning", but my wife decided not to accompany me more when are films of the horror genre because, in his own words)(, "Enters into panic", and I do not I like going to the cinema only), I'm back in the ring.The film chosen in this case was, as says it in the title of the post that says there (read the title top there. eeeesa ).First and foremost (why is in the first place), should be noted that this film has no actors. I.e. it has, but they are not there. No, it is not a cachada. Of truth.Real actors only provided its physiognomy and their voices for, then, using a technique called "motion capture" (or "Performance capture" in inglish, bicos ai spik inglish very guel okay?), be digitized, i.e. converted into virtual si figures themselves. Is it understood? Those who are on the screen are not real types, but some digital animations of the types. Seriously. I swear. It's crazy thing. The result of all this was a visually interesting product, big savings for producers with regard to costumes, set design, catering, life insurance and other things, and a way to original and distinct from presenting a classical epic story.Personally, it is not be hinchapelotas or anything of the sort, but I would have preferred a thousand times see her starring actors of flesh and blood.It is not be bad animation, on the contrary, it has a level of detail really so extraordinary that at times you forget what is actually being there; but on the other hand, and at other times, if one turns in fucking, get all the impression that back of a table will appear Shrek and the donkey and are going to make a joke.The issue with digital animation is that, without a doubt, it has become an essential tool in order to create magnificent scenery, impossible scenes or inconceivable creatures, but in their ability to grasp in its entirety the essence of the human figure, still you long way to go and in a production entirely done thus, it shows and pretty.Expressions, subtle gestures, texture and brightness of the skin and, fundamentally, the brightness of "life" of the eyes, are still far from both resemble reality as to get to the point of imitating to perfection (for my noted especially in the face of the Queen).With regard to the story itself, is based on an old English epic poem of over 3000 verses (one thing well half crappy type "El Cid Campeador" but there), written more or less for the first half of the century sees stick stick DC (after eating).It's a classical legend, sung from generation to generation, which chronicles the heroic adventures of the brave warrior Beowulf, a type so re pulenta, camorrero, egocentric and swaggering as the single, reaching the lands of King Hrothgar to liberate them from a monster rompebolas that walked out there killing people.The thing was more or less like this: is that he was King Hrothgar dele DELE celebrate with the bar of chums in a bolichón that had armed (with public funds, such as here) exclusively for use of quilombo and have fun in private there sucking, eating with the hand, burping with his mouth full, and voleteándose mines of airy life.In a moment, in any meeting of drunks, are put into singing and hitting the tables, which terribly annoying to Grendel, a deformed, slimy and ugly monster who lived in a cave as at 30 km. of distance but was more fussy than the shit with the subject of loud noises and people who sings. So much so that the bug this hot re sends to bowling to see if you can do them shut up a little.When he arrives, the door patova tells that it cannot let it pass because it's a private party, because it has no brand clothing and also because a type of more than two metres, deform, unclean, and it is falling to pieces does not fit the profile of the local Grendel responds to what descuartizando of a handshake.There just kicks the door, is sent to inside screaming (because shouts constantly in a very annoying way) and comes to kill, devour, gutting, and dismember the majority of those present, less to the King, to retire after making pasito murga.Hrothgar, when it recovers more or less of the fart that had and cagazo that stuck, offers half of the gold of his Kingdom to anyone that can free them of the cortamambo of Grendel. There is when Beowulf arrives (it is known that he is because all the time shouts "I am Beowulf!") with his boys, all hooligans equal to him, ready to fulfill the Mission (and incidentally suck free and make a tirito to the Queen which is girl) (and it looks eager).The thing is, indeed, at night a jodita arman, turn to suck as goats and made to sing again.Grendel listens to them and said "good Ah.!" But these guys are taking me to the chacota. Will now see! ", and get the farts willing to break everything again."Arriving, again begins to kill anyone who crosses, unless confronted with Beowulf which had been balls because it was very hot and, incidentally, to introduce you to the friend to the Queen. Are they interwoven in combat (in a clear insinuation of homosexual and that both are unnecessarily into balls, while Grendel does not have), and pineapple is, pineapple comes almost middle of fart, Beowulf defeats the monster and he also starts an arm (could make the horrible joke then Grendel is running for Governor of the region more important of the Kingdom, but I'm not going to do).Thanks to this fact, he is considered a hero and the King, in person, gives you award a species of chopp gold re lindo with a figure of a dragon and all.And if me are whoring up in Aramaic, that them recontra and withstand, because the film does not end there.The monster all shit sticks, manco and dying, returns to the cave tells everything to MOM and stretch the leg.The old, which apparently is a fucking recontra demonia, gets like crazy, because although had gone you for the ass like it was his only son, and flies to avenge covered at night and taking advantage of that they are all sleeping the mona.Dawn found the bowling of the King become a butcher, all covered in blood and guts.As a result, namely that the curse of the Kingdom will still persist while the mother of Grendel remains alive, the King tells Beowulf must go to confront it directly to his Lair, because but that he was going to look half bad for having received the award even without having completed their mission.Beowulf he complains:-crazy Eh, me cagaste! It was to kill one only. This is another dad-good price - says the King - if terminás with everything I leave the Kingdom, the Queen and the writing of my house in Punta. Do Ta well? - Dale - says Beowulf - Quedamo' machine as well.Spit the Palm and join hands to seal the deal.And up there, just the review.I do not follow that then walk not saying I tell the end and that.Anyway, isn't complicated taaaaaaan a plot that one not be account to the touch which comes hand in hand, but hey, just in case, veanlo for yourselves.As I said at the beginning, there is no action to analyze all the characters are generated by computer, but even so they were actors which is prestsaron to give them life and voice, be referred to by what you deserve (and incidentally to make identifiable them to see the movie).To Beowulf used it to Ray Winstone; the great Anthony Hopkins was King Hrothgar (sometimes it shows, sometimes not); John Malkovich was Unferth (although sometimes thought it was William Dafoe); Brendan Gleeson was Wiglaf, Crispin Hellion Glover made Grendel's (although well could have been either because to digitally create such deformed monster of the actor is not much), and finally, as a grand finale, as the dessert frutillita, to create the beautiful demoiníacamente Grendel mother, used to Angelina Jolie, who is so but so beautiful that even drawn is to give.The film was directed by Robert Zemeckis, that was her quite played to decide to do it in this format, but again, if the hubeira made with real actors would have been much better.Rating: 3 virtual forsaken (good.) An entertaining story that bored, with good moments of action, not enough blood, and much heroic fantasy. (Recommended as experience to see a different format on the big screen.)Recommendations: If you are half nerd and loves the medieval fantasy and video games, this is your movie. Don't miss her.If you don't like the film with many computer-generated special effects, no go. This whole movie is a great effect generated by computer.If you don't understand why the actors move medium rare and they appear with little life, it is because he does not pay attention, do not read the criticism and lives in a cloud of farts.If you are a man (or woman, some are also recorded) and when it comes on screen the OGRE mother based on Angelina Jolie, felt a true tingling and had morbid thoughts even knowing that it was a virtual character created in a computer, don't worry; We went to all.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3388

Ana Belén Pacheco

Driving Lessons

muchocine

With the exception of a couple of fans of the apprentice magician will enjoy with Ron Weasley doing a role more agreement with its age the rest we are heart broken trying to understand and admire his companion on the road with little success.

It is a disgrace to be a niño-actor. If your colleague of Daniel Radcliffe fatigue opted to undress on the London stage always covered by his tireless and orondo Uncle Vernon, forgiveness, is the subconscious meant sponsored by Richard Griffiths, Rupert Grint has decided to be seduced by an old woman who is also anecdotally his mother in Harry Potter. What a lovely coincidence! That my "I would say English". Ben Marshall lives in an average family in London. Her mother is a kind of addict Italy and his father. His most beloved and overbearing mother played masterfully by Laura Linney maintains his son with overbooking of tasks between the religious meetings and the household chores concluding with his particular driving lessons. When Ben Gets a use of "boy for everything" to Evie, an old actress that actually seeks a friend, the even brightest Julie Walters (Yes, the same who taught dancing at Billy Elliot, age and the characterization also take their toll) that will return his world upside down trying to provoke a reaction extreme in his lethargic life which has just reached a sort of psychedelic Road Trip to Escocia.Parafraseando this misunderstood genius of the small screen that is Homer Simpson: "I aburrooo!". And it is that British trajicomedias have a double edged sword, or are very good or very bad and with the exception of a couple of fans of the apprentice magician will enjoy with Ron Weasley doing a role more agreement with its age the rest we are heart broken trying to understand and admire his companion on the road with little success. Very easy tear and too much addiction to the common places of films aimed at copar Saturday afternoon hours (Yes, those based on real facts that accompany the NAPs after opíparas meals for the weekend).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/227

Hombre Lobo

El código Da Vinci

muchocine

A Council: when someone say that a film is "fresh, unpretentious," to hang out and relax run as soul that leads the devil

For reasons of travel and move I have come late to the discussion, but I cannot make a brief comment addressed to all those who, in one way or another, have met their children good work doing its small contribution to the immense fortune of Dan Brown. These lines, as you will have guessed, are dedicated to all those who, like me, have the particular experience of watching the Da Vinci Code (2006). Some have not only suffered firsthand this event, but they have been seduced by the temptation to write a few lines and even more (as Gandica, which to date has gone a whopping three consecutive innings).And I will just forgive Mr Gandica, but on this occasion I will have to disagree with the statement made by him in his article widely. Assess a work (called cinema, literature, painting or whatever) only by its controversial factor is, in my view, a critical defect inexcusable. That the book of Brown or Ron Howard movie have put the willies to the Catholic Church or the members of Opus Dei undoubtedly has its anecdotal value, but not enough to save this unclassifiable disaster that have tried us to sneak as a summer blockbuster from the bonfire (certainly the most publicized since the beginning of the year)(, because looks that we have been up to their noses with this code). I have no idea where to start to disassemble this film made nonsense, but as well to flight bird occurs to me launch deserved stones against a boring Tom Hanks (whose hair cutting is without doubt the most controversial point of the tape), a dreadful script work of not less deplorable Akiva Goldsman (who has A brilliant mind)(, but let us also Batman & Robin, not forget) and an unbearably sosa Audrey Tautou (I will say it without fear: Amelie, a film so cloying that I would leave stiff a diabetic can not stand) whose role is reduced to put face of astonishment every ten minutes. Not to mention the laughable Paul Bettany as the monje-psicópata or the misguided Jean Renó in her role as police of the Opus. The solitary soul makes more or less something to save the day is Ian McKellen, who is apparently the only one that is not this pantomime psuedo-conspiracy as if out Shakespeare.Pero go back to the starting point: what is the merit of this film? The answer is simple and painful: none. The less timid have attempted to defend it (as advocated in his day the book) arguing that you it's a work of fiction, a superficial divertimento which should not be taken in serious (**). Those who say this fall in a double mistake: firstly because your comment is redundant to be precisely the seriousness with which many take everything this story the main reason of dismay from those who rant against the book by Dan Brown, and secondly because Dan Brown himself noted on the first page that what he is writing is based on real documents and factsso that from the beginning the work aspires to more than mere entertainment. Any person with a minimum of general culture and four fingers in front (which also serve to make a quick Google search) will know that the arguments about whether Jesucristo had children to Mary Magdalene are based on a conspiracy theory that is recognized as humbug up by themselves agnostics, i.e. the people whom you most suda cock (never better said) if Chuíto left or not offshoots worldwide. Not to mention the numerous descriptions throwing both book and film of works of art, historical and other facts, deliberate falsehoods (or at least Frank ignorance) that could deny to a high school student. I do not speak of this because it was already in charge of Rodrigo Fresán item, and if looking for sure they are au article out there. And anyway, I don't think that the mere fact of opposing something, create controversy and cause is in itself and by itself a good thing (and you that lee should not believe it, because that when much is outdated rhetoric of the French may).But all this would certainly be forgivable (generous I am today, almost nor I admit) if not were to a sleeping, pretentious, boring movie, without the more minimum sense of rhythm or character, a disaster continued arriving to balance up three different endings and whose greatest detallazo has been awakening the wrath not only of the Church (which proves once more be the best history advertising agency)(, because you have to see the tantrum of a spoiled child that has been mounted, of course causing more people to go see the movie) but also a happy national organization of albinos (where but in United States?) who are tired of the "non-pigmented" always appear as the bad guys in movies.And certainly more fool of all am I, that I have fallen into the trap even after having read the book two years ago and know in advance that this smelled of catastrophe. One scene in particular made me shudder of horror: the moment when a priest (very bad bad very bad) says "the blood is being dumped" and to highlight his brilliant phrase, spilled wine on the table. From there the tears began to fall. What I was coming over was luxury.I will give you advice: when someone say that a film is "fresh, unpretentious," to hang out and relax run as soul that leads the devil, because it will probably be the worst crappy have seen in his life.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3288

Alex Largo

Los Simpson: La Película

muchocine

Define "Los Simpsons: the movie" is very simple: 6 chapters of the series on a "common grounds".

The FOX figures sink is more than obvious. Others produce (and increasingly more often) true JUMBLES (dícense "Night at the Museum", "Eragon".) the FOX is no longer what it was. In fact, his last great taquillazo was "Ice Age II", in 2006, that even raising 650 million did shadow competition (being, for example, more than 100 million of "The Da Vinci Code" and to more than 400 of "Pirates of the Caribbean II" ".")"The Simpsons: the movie" was not a risky bet. The more sympathetic family of television would have to arise effect at the box office. The FOX began to dream (and how) and to "imagine" the profits from this film (in box office) were placed over the 720 million dollars. And today, many months since its release, the film will doubtfully 530 million.After these data (trivia, rather), talk about the film.Define "Los Simpsons: the movie" is very simple: 6 chapters of the series on a "common grounds". In fact, the film is not more than a rehash of situations that we have seen a thousand times in the series. How many times have Homer and Marge fought? How many times have ended on the edge of divorce to end up understanding that for the other are made? How many times have saved the world the Simpsons? How many times have they repeated the same gags, causing the same laugh in public.? COUNTLESS.Why the movie is this: a very long chapter (happens very quickly), very entertaining and produces the same sensation that viewing of a chapter.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1774

Iñaki Bilbao

Un hombre fenómeno (Wonder man)

muchocine

A good movie, really funny, given that the various genres that converge on the tape do spin, seamless of any kind, with a managed rate of comedy, by what is enjoyable from beginning to end.

"A not very awake student is persuaded by the ghost of his twin brother, to take his place as a nightclub showman and wengue his death".Appreciable film, which is perhaps one of the best three performances at the Danny Kaye film, what many won't say much because it is, according to the acerbo popular "supposedly comedian who falls worse than toothache". It is, I think, a good movie, really funny, given that the various genres that converge on the tape do spin, seamless of any kind, with a managed rate of comedy, so it becomes enjoyable from beginning to end. This is always really hard to achieve, so it has much merit. The film was a huge success and view many years later is not surprising. The truth is love enough, despite Kaye, although much credit must be given to a beautiful and always good actress Stonewall may. The rest of the interpretive cast is not feat. I recommend it to have a good time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/481

Alberto Concepción

Jarhead

muchocine

Although it is not probably his best film, yes it deserves a remarkable, especially for the quality of the picture and the perspective from which shows us the armed conflicts.

Each year, usually release an average of five war films. Soil dividarlas in those claiming to show us the cruel reality of the wars, and which focus on feelings and human reactions that give rise to those moments.Jarhead is a film about the war, but not of war. Those who love war films in his more typical concept, perhaps this is not your movie: there are no harsh and bloody battles or scenes and more loaded with action scenes. What us aims to show is actually what's Fund in all these soldiers, Lieutenant and one of the men (and women, although in this case there) that form part of any command or operation of war.The film is based on the story of Tony Swofford, a young American who, after his enlistment in the army and service in the Gulf war, arriving back home decided tell in their own words and from their own experiences, what the army inside: how is the life in the desert, how after months and months of isolation the human being changes to the point of going crazy.They are not the battles that take precedence, but every day: everything revolves around own loneliness and the coexistence with the rest of companions. Despite having an interesting startup, is missing more detail: us occurs the protagonist enters the barracks, without knowing any data about their past and seems insufficient representation of training which is submitted; something that may seem precipitate to the Viewer for the speed with which events happen. However, this also to be noted the total disconnection with the world and the radical change, and so helps in some moments of films such as "The metal jacket" and "Apocalypse Now", which makes certain references in order to demonstrate the vision of own soldiers of the war: lust for killing.With the arrival in the desert of Saudi Arabia to fight in the Gulf war, and especially with the passage of time, begins to see the real sense which has the film, that message that begins and ends the film:-this is my rifle, and although there are many, this is only mine. Many things you do in life, although he can love a woman, build a casa.siempre should have the rifle in my hands, and I will always be a "cabeza-bote".Sam Mendes us reflects from the eyes of Swofford (Jake Gyllenhaal) and his fellow snipers, all situations that daily living hundreds of men in the army: how different and at the same time equals the personas.las wars. How is assumed with the time that life is leaving behind, and once back home, no longer equal.It is another way of seeing the war. A real form, taking into account that it is based on real events. Lies, jealousy, thoughts, wishes, the temores.todo shows as realities that pass the soldiers. Despair, the paranoia, the locura.se become central in the life of each one of them, and we reflected, with doses of humor but also of cruelty, as when see the first burned corpses.The director takes advantage of one of the characters to add these critical touches (though certainly not delves into it) to the film: is how some raised the political reason why are there, the censorship to which are subjected, and as the senior commanders of battalions (commanders and generals) obviate them. It is not what matters: is the war and there is no objection nor possible criticism.But if there is something that stands out from the film is photography. Beautiful desert scenes. Striking of the rain of oil. Great work by Roger Deakins, with a few contrasts that may still seem confusing initially, we come to give one signal of the difference between the living and the dead. As for the soundtrack of the film, it is very good, with songs by Public Enemy, among others, and typically military compositions that manage to arouse in the viewer a "rush" in the previous battles scenes. or, at least, "alleged" battles.In the interpretations section, the prominence of Swofford makes we see the excellent work done by Jake Gyllenhaal (to who will soon see in Brokeback Mountain, and remembered by the general public for "The day of tomorrow"), to reflect how the character is winning in charisma and attitude with the stay in the desert and comes to show that this actor is one of the future starsIf not present, Hollywood. Also mention rather than positive for Jamie Foxx for his portrayal of Sergeant Sykes, and Peter Sarsgaard as partner of combat by Swofford.Sam Mendes, with his latest work, change log (American Beauty, road to perdition) to reflect the human side of the war. Although it is not probably his best film, yes it deserves a remarkable, especially for the quality of the picture and the perspective from which shows us the armed conflicts.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4340

Emilio Martín Luna

3:10 to Yuma

muchocine

Highlight the part final film, very exciting and frenetic and the chemistry between the two main characters played by Russell Crowe and Christian Bale is great absolumente. Great movie.

In 1957, Delmer Daves believe the train of the three and ten, film starring Glenn Ford and that became a film of cult, by having a different treatment, a western psychological, closer only to danger and roots deep, a tension which produce, to the prevailing westerns at the time. It was an imperfect film, something improbable, but really fun. Fifty years later and in full fashion do remakes of all existing film, James Mangold is proposing a new version of this classic, and the film is surprisingly very good. Nothing changes from the original, perhaps delves more into the characters and the plot becomes more contemporary although calcada to the original pero.¿Es better than the original?Really if the chemistry between the two main characters played by Russell Crowe and Christian Bale is great absolumente, it is undoubtedly the best of the film, their conversations and their relationship. Russell Crowe gives Ben Wade, this nuance of bad buenote, intelligent and eager to leave his life of Bushranger, which makes you fall it well. Christian Bale gives many strength and credibility to his Dan Evans, a man in search of reconseguir respect both their own as his family, very honest man and interpretation of the Welsh actor you do that also you identiques with him. Colossal this duo. But these two actors not just the thing, the side are also sensational, Ben Foster making bad malísimo with great charisma and Logan Lorman making son of Bale with much poise. Apart from the performances, highlights much both photography and the setting that makes you're the dangerous and old West, as well as a great soundtrack for Marco Beltrami. The address is sober, direct and with a frenetic pulse.James Mangold an artisan than a director, demonstrates his talent in this film, and redo of earlier works giving an own label, with personality and taking the best of a good script and great cast.I want to highlight the part final film, very exciting and frenetic, perhaps the last final twist is not liked by everyone, and during the film can cross out of some inverosimiles of the actions of the protagonists, but is a film adventures in the West as a whole life, and so have to see it. I really enjoyed and I was thrilled it history. I recommend it to everyone.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/997

Oscar Cantero

Volver

muchocine

Finally we see an Almodóvar which portrays scenes of real life, unadorned, without extrañezas. A loa to the women of his house in the background are the backbone of our society gets upset who gets upset.

It is not that I do not like, but I admit that I've always thought that Almodóvar is a director overrated. I particularly enjoy more with Garci, Trueba or Julio Médem, but as I said my grandmother, something will have water when they bless. And that is if we talk about film blessings, this manchego, almost as universal as the cheese, them all. None of the major festivals of cinema of Europe or America has overlooked in its work.The truth is that return is the film that I liked how many they've seen him, which have been almost all. And I think that it has been the case because in this film presents a more realistic view of the world. It is a story that has greater veneer of verisimilitude, and that finally it has detached excessively histriónicos characters that usually pulular pos his films.Return is a film full of sensitivity, where the women return to be the pillars of the work removing arrests for bills with life and move forward with everything. It is a tribute to the Spanish woman from his home. That which does not aspire to the cover of Vogue magazine or to be received by Zapatero. That woman who is which maintains homes, families, struggling every day and that seems to embarrass much zagal converted to yuppie desagradecido (and unfortunate).From the impeccable, technical point of view. The silences that speak for themselves, changes in level, the close-ups and the subtle game of lights where there.And interpretations, only praise. Carmen Maura IMHO it shines above the rest, and possibly she and Almodóvar do know, although the Maura is already everything and looking back to a possible nomination to the Oscar, Penelope Cruz sells more. All this without diminishing one iota the interpretation of the latter, which despite not being my devotion to his usual inexpressiveness santa, performed a commendable work. Perhaps this is the greatest merit of Almodóvar: get that Penelope Cruz is convincing. Chus Lampreave and Lola Dueñas, seems that even they are acting, natural that get them every gesture, every word, every move.Return reflects everyday life. That life that many people want to flee desperately but that sooner or later you just hoping precisely that, again.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2423

Taliesin

28 semanas después

muchocine

If you expect Fresnadillo would give a personal touch to the recipe that masterfully prepared five years Danny Boyle, you can already become to the idea that the only thing new you will see is a Real Madrid shirt.

You can not go to the cinema with expectations. At times the film is what you expect from it, one in every hundred exceeds those expectations and the vast majority of the times salts of the room with some disappointment. What has happened to me with 28 weeks after, although I admit that it is that is blame mine, because expected me one little more than finally stayed in an outline of something else. I alegaré in my favor that 28 days after already offered a novel approach in a genre that did not have much to contribute, except a bit of bloody entertainment. This, added to the director and screenwriter was Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, responsible for the interesting and at times surreal intact, was predisposed to see something entirely new from the magnificent first delivery.Finally, what we have is more of the same with a twist that would say the English, but more of the same to the end and Cape. Not even appreciate differences in point of view and I almost dare to ensure that appropriations could appear as director Danny Boyle without that nobody suspected otherwise. If anything are some novelties in terms of decoration and abound the close-ups that Fresnadillo seems to feel comfortable. On the other hand, the idea is the same: the man is worse than the own infrectados of anger that, at the end and out, can not resist the disease. And that is not bad, but if at the end the film falls on the topic of the Group of strangers who join forces to flee from a disaster, the main idea is diluted and lost all power. After a very promising start, and half an hour of preparation of a frightening scenario occurs a climax that threatens to make you have a bad time if it stays. Unfortunately, the fall is almost chopped and the second half of the film is a package of clichés with some touches of author, to make it clear that they didn't want to do the same as always. Towards the end, everything is quite predictable and at times excessive.The characters are too blurred (especially the aggregates at the end) and this does not will affect the least both if it eats a sick with anger as if they are with a bullet. In addition, suppose that Robert Carlyle cache should be so high that they have been forced to include it in some scenes in which simply does not look anything. On the other hand, there are characters untapped, as the wife of the protagonist and the American military command, which could have lengthened the first part of the film and delayed the explosion which breaks the delicate balance.Ultimately, expected that Fresnadillo given him a touch of personality to this film and it seems that the only thing that has brought is the shirt of Real Madrid of the child protagonist. I see too much ISM and have the impression that good ideas are accumulated in the boot and are exhausted to middle road to the end, leaving a film without soul. It is true that 28 days after (that I think better than this) desbarra at the end, when they arrive at the military camp, but at least it was a more risky than the of 28 weeks later proposal. At the end I was the sour taste of what could have been and was not, although always can fix it in 28 months after, clear.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1286

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Rocky Balboa

muchocine

Marketing, film, redemption and blood on the canvas again. Metacinematográfica, convincing in its legitimate review of the cause, Rocky Balboa will provide a bit of fleeting pleasure to those who attend with an eye on the already talludito Stallone and another in the multi film of 1976.

Between 1976 (Rocky) and 1990 (Rocky V) Stallone drew already predictable and rudimentary lines of a character that would give him fame and, at the time, bitter disputes with the Guild of critique, which heaped with scorn the franchise of the Balboa Boxer to the more rickety shelf of the video store of series B more humble.The public burning of this saga miraculously saved the first installment, which earned the applause of the Academy of Hollywood (three statuettes: - Avildsen - director, editing and photography): Rocky was a noble job on the world of boxing with a Stallone still unpolished (or lack that did) in the role of the solo and stubborn Boxer extricated from the dangers of the street-based call in the ring.The other four deliveries the surplus insisted: Balboa, penniless, returning to the ring; Balboa helping a friend who, in the fourth, come in Moscow; Balboa training a young promising shadowing itself. This fifth part is substantially an equal of disposable film, but contains one sense of admirable dignity that the other lacked completely. Stallone, bad actor, is in this film old dog and knows that turning his personality in the history of the character, or vice versa, what we know, it will make the brainy boom seek three feet to the cat and discovered pasmados by the finding, which is indeed what is the true story of Sylvester Stallone, his glory and its decline, how life you can stop famous but not silly at all.This Rocky death certificate is written in a sober calligraphy and abounds, despite the sad precedent, in too many clichés: the same which was yesteryear flag, anthem and lining of all the minutes. No rhubarb warn some Lair to perpetuate the tremendous phrases which seem copied from any novelón-pastelazo series low B to what Stephanie, but in English and with canvas background.This Balboa of the 21st century is already-fondón, lives in his restaurant, widower with a son he has no account. The moral principles of this new Rocky are the pasta or the redemption: both perhaps. See one in this resucitamiento a very intelligent operation of marketing designed to dovetail with the heroes in decline at the end of life and the coming-out of the myth that returns. Stallone has done out of love for the pasta and in 2007 promises a revitalization of Rambo, which I promise not to go.Sounds inmarcesible Gonna fly now, the immortal melody from the original soundtrack and see Rocky in the staircase of the Museum of art of F ladelfía with the section of Bill Conti wind at full blast.Metacinematográfica, convincing in its legitimate review of the cause, Rocky Balboa will provide a bit of fleeting pleasure to those who attend with an eye on the already talludito Stallone and another in the multi film of 1976. What did you in 1976 when Stallone burst nose of Apollo Creed? I was in elementary and I heard Hotel California of The Eagles, but that is another story and just can count in another review. Oh, and the scenes of pure boxing are successful.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3841

Natalia Eseverri

American Gangster

muchocine

If you have a great story with a brilliant trio, the result obviously can only be more than satisfactory.

My fear before seeing this film is that expectations that fared before her, watch me were in vain and it wasn't as good as I thought. That fear dissipated when nothing more to appear the first scene, so shocking that it predicts the power of magnetizing and evocative force that keeps you in suspense throughout the film.In American Gangster, we see not only the work of a man who manages to impose on the world of the mafia, surpassing classic bosses that not apean throne, but unlike the majority of the films on mafia have been made, looking carefully both sides of this conflict, which pursues the mafioso and of the own mafioso, but with a much more detailed view and involving the Viewer from the first frame.Espectular the two interpretations, with Denzel Washington very convincing since the first moment and a Russell Crowe that eats the screen and in the scenes in which are the two together at the end, is a masterpiece of interpretation as long ago I had not seen.American Gangster is a new twist to the vision that we normally this type of movies, something that is appreciated and more if you can enjoy all that you offer, without having to resort to the blood cheap nor to the stories of always.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3933

Ana Belén Pacheco

This is England

muchocine

This is England is the film revelation of the English film of the past year.It could be defined as a kind of England History X both spirit and conception replacing Edward Norton by Stephen Graham and Eduard Furlong by Thomas Turgoose

This is England is the film revelation of the English film of the past year. It could be defined as a kind of England History X both spirit and conception replacing Edward Norton by Stephen Graham and Eduard Furlong by Thomas Turgoose. Its director, Shane Meadows, had already made another film with similar themes once upon a time in the Midlands. This time the story focuses on a quite conflicting temporary period, the Falklands war, in the 1980s when England sent troops to conquer (I will not meter if legitimately or not) these islands belonged to Argentina. Shaun is a boy of 12 years living with his mother. It has the label failed hanging around his neck. His father died in the army and with the face of Holligan Brewer and a single tooth seems obvious to know because he is the target of all the jokes of the school. As she has no friends when school finishes his life should take sad and boring in the small town where she lives but she meets a group of young people who adopt him (before the adoption of his mother Lady I do not know that this thinking most of the film). A child with so little experience will end up facing the principles being to his around, when Combo released from prison the group is separated. Shaun has to make a decision, opting instead for the more radical group. The movie is tough. There is no way of sweetening certain things. By its language and its violence qualify for adults in England but some cities independently decided to load such protection so that most teenage boys (preferably white) could see it and be aware of what is happening in these neo-Nazi groups that it seems that they back in fashion. He remains curious England, one of the places with the highest number of immigration and foreign and multicultural population don't lead by example on its partnership with tape as well. His dialogues are profanity, vulgar repetitive. I.e. director, realistic and bright. I do not think that the tape fail in no time and the few lyrical concessions that are allowed are delicious (with the prologue and epilogue documentary basically). The film teaches and not indoctrinated, therein lies its perfection. The retaila of awards and nominations has not been waiting British Independent Film Award, Flanders International Film Festival, London Critics Circle Film Awards, London Film Festival, Newport International Film Festival, festival of Bucharest, Paris Festival, Festival of Rome, Festival of Gijón (winning Enfants terrible), and official sections in Toronto or Tribeca to give examples of what has come and what lies ahead. Their best references: American History X and breaking Stomper (excellent Australian film starring by a hitherto unknown Russell Crowe is now cult film).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4230

Ivan Villamel

Juno

muchocine

Great movie as a patchwork of life daily, sweet and sour at the same time that tender, with as good as sharp reflections, a nearly round history, that only light bumps pace prevent achieve absolute excellence. Essential.

During recent years has set a standard in the film American enhance small independent productions (which in fact are not so) in order to become the "sleeper" of the year, stories of great quality, with the help, that Yes, propaganda promoting posed the nominations for the Academy Award. So we have come in recent years films as "American Beauty", "Entre cups" or the more recent, "Little Miss Sunshine". This year it is the turn to the new production by Jason Reitman (after his notable opera prima "Thank you for smoking"), already known for half the world due to their nominations for an Oscar, including a well-deserved nomination as best film, it's "Juno", a film about teenage abortion, full of irony (that not sarcasm) and stands on their own merits in one of the most notable films of the new year. The great risk that this new film by Reitman, as they suffered in certain media productions previously named, is engulfed by its own propaganda paraphernalia in this error routine of being drawn by the impact of the film to expect the absolute end-all of gender, wrong that prevents really appreciate the values of such estimable film.This new film by Reitman, shows us the daily life of Juno MacGuff (surname quite revealing by the way), an insolent and associable teen amateur rock and drop insults and chascarridos for most sharp, that a careless becomes pregnant of Paulie Bleeker (Michael Cera), a deferential and esmirriado shy teenager passing hours training for their athletics competitions. So unexpected situation, Juno (Ellen Page) Decides to look for parents of rent, since that has not had courage to abort time. During the reading of a magazine ads, discover what could be the ideal partner to adopt his son, formed by Vanessa (Jennifer Garner) and Mark (Jason Bateman). But the feelings and the unforeseen loves the history of adoption will be more complicated.Before an argument as given to the work of direction of actors, Reitman shows a wisdom for the comedy beyond doubt, in one of those cases in which demonstrates that a good director does not have to boast of their expertise and stay above the action narrated, they should help you work out smoothly. In that regard, the Canadian director is like a fish in the water to get the best out of themselves of all the actors comprising his films with one simple setting, but always looking for the best framing to make more credible if fits excellent interpretations knows out of their "creatures".Obviously any glorification of the great work of actors wouldn't be possible without a concise, incisive, script with a few dialogues full of irony, sensational turn to tenderness. Keyword this last to describe the tone of the story, while in the majority of times there is an ironic distance events suffered by the characters, everything is covered in a sweet and condescending look, an ambiguity between irony and tenderness that works with the precision of a Swiss watch. Helped that if a distribution in the State of grace, able to give all to each of the characters of his own personality, know refine their ground not to exceed or be minimised by the other characters, although of course, Ellen Page as Juno is the main valuarte of the film. An actress to get very far with a performance throughout this film which shows that we we have the best actress of her generation, able to move from the more radical insolence tenderness more descarnada (special that flat end on the stretcher from the hospital) without apparent minimal effort. The rest of the cast, as discussed above is a high level, especially Jason Bateman in the role of Mark, a frustrated musician caught in a relationship so intense that it drowns you and not allowed to pursue a dream that may turn to feel through the rebellion teenage Juno (the catalyst of the emotions of the characters who star in the film). Perhaps should be an exception to such successful cast, an actress that never proved to be worthy of the position of privilege which has as an interpreter in the American industry. He is Jennifer Garner, whose role as Vanessa is very limited, and not because of the prominence in history, but by the own obvious limitations as this beautiful Texan actress. It is very evident throughout many scenes of the film, as Ellen Page, with fifteen years less and the retail experience that entails, sticking a feast of talent at the expense of the limited Garner.Juno has diverse influences both in its tone and its restrained bet as akin to the more reflective comedy multigenérica choice. In a year in which so successful as "Superbad" or "Embarrassing mess" comedies, gambled on occasions by a moralina prevailing in much of the American film (without therefore subtract them too many merits), Juno ran the risk of passing in the same directions, but in a display of expertise of that fantastic script, known succeed even of any execution moralist, that, although on the one hand the story denies abortion as a valid option, knows that camouflage with so much skill comic (the Asian partner fight alone against abortion in sick ridiculous way), that even the final reason why there is this fact is more motivated by the fear that by no moralist decision or reactionary. Even the final where becomes an absolute Ode to the dysfunctional family as as valid as any other option is a political incorrectness (soft, that if) obvious.The story advances through the characters, as it should be in a good human history, contrary to the great American production of the year, where the development of the action motivates or directs the human decisions of the characters that inhabit. This helps also to develop these wonderful characters, with reflections on love (there where one thought was intense and of strong ties are broken, and against where least expected arises in a latent manner), dreams lost in adolescence and the fear to be self-conscious in the decisions taken by a setback that ballast lives forever. With a great soundtrack, replete with songs of independent Court added rather than remaining, as that great start as a 70s video clip where Reitman gives clear evidence of the insignificant draught of a teenage girl pregnant in our society.Ultimately, a great film to scraps of life daily, bittersweet way while tender, with as good as sharp reflections, a nearly round history, that only light bumps pace prevent achieve absolute excellence. Essential.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2862

Berto

Sigo como Dios

muchocine

This film is quite poor (and I am not referring to budget), if compared with the first, but it is not that it is particularly boring.

Another film, and in this case it's up to "Still as God" which is the sequel to, if you can call sequel, "Like God". He ran the year 2003 when I arrive "like God" screens, that funny comedy actors had Jennifer Aniston, Jim Carrey and Morgan Freeman, all got a smash hit. Well, of the three the only one that remains as God is Morgan Freeman (because interprets God) which shares prominence in this movie with a second from the first part, Steve Carell (in the role of Baxter), Carrey should see the script and would lay to run? mania have studies to sequels where not can be drawn.On this occasion, the argument is that God is presented to Baxter, and tells him to build an Ark to the more pure style Noe (I learned something? look in the Bible Genesis 6.14) and this gets her ride with the help of his family (in which all existing topics for American families are met) and also collaborate the animals that come into the Ark?The question is why rides God that mess? Why not punishing the bad guy directly?, ah! the villain is John Goodman (the flintstones Lord) and is bad for wanting to remove a proposed law to build in the boundaries of national parks, we are that it is a corrupt and wants to make money with the construction. No must dios know marbella? because but already would have 5 or 6 built coffers. Humor, is soft and easy, nothing to do with the humor that had in the first movie thanks to the good of Jim Carrey, this new player has a humor? It has an air of Steve Martin (and is a humor that I do not like). That if the film has a couple of scenes quite entertaining and what I most liked was see navigate to the Ark? and Morgan Freeman's performance in the role of God, with their reflections makes throughout the film and the message that gives to care for the planet. In conclusion, this film is quite poor (and I am not referring to budget), if compared with the first, but it is not that it is particularly boring.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2847

Francisco Bellón

Solos

muchocine

Alone is a failed film, and despite having some good initial ingredients, it has become a slightly vulgar product, one of the lot

Ironies of life, Argentine cinema has lived an era of splendor and expansion in the same years in which a very serious economic crisis whipped Argentina. Thanks to this revival, the general public has been able to meet major filmmakers such as Campanella or Bielinsky, recover others already enshrined as Aristarain, and discover excellent actors as Ricardo Darín, Eduardo Blanco, Mercedes Morán or Ulises Dumont.Muchos of these titles have been co-financed in lesser or greater extent by Spanish producers, which in turn have influenced their cinematic style. But tapes as Solos have come forward nearly of miracle, thanks to the commitment and tenacity of its directors, in this case José Glusman. Own account the history of Henry (Sergio Boris) and Luis (Adrián Navarro), two men of thirty and many forty or few, that they suffer from strong romantic disappointments and decide to live together. What had become a refuge for the sentences of both men, becomes a deep and sincere friendship. The main virtue of José Glusman is that it does not offer situations or stereotypical characters, but showing a credible story that anyone can recognize. Neither falls into the easy mindless singles American-style comedy which is very welcome. However, not opt not for the human comedy or drama, the film loses bellows as the minutes elapse. Good work of its partner lead, which brings even more greater credibility to the whole.Alone is a failed film, and despite having some good initial ingredients, it has become a slightly vulgar product, one of the lot. A real shame that wasted good make interpretive of their protagonists, and a script that could have given much more than themselves.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/747

Joseba

Las colinas tienen ojos

muchocine

Of course that is superior to the original, but only from the point of view of a brain contaminated by al gore as the mio. Because the movie is stuck to the original.

Not bad, but not bad this remake of a child film by Wes Craven classic for now almost 30 years old...30? A moment, have almost 30 years passed since that film than the only thing salvageable today are their sorted covers of classic VHS? Then I start again.Not bad, but bad East remake, but. either we move on. Of course that is superior to the original, but only from the point of view of a brain contaminated by al gore as the mio. Because the movie is stuck to the original. Flags side baked heads? If. Empalamientos wild and fun? Of course! Do lot of tension, at times almost unbearable, especially with babies infants of medium? I can not deny it. But. 12 hours after having seen the movie, I wonder if that is for both. I mean, if a group of music that this fashion, with good pull among young people and a fucking great production, makes a version of some classic of the Ramones. I am sure that many stun you will say that is better than the original only because it is more sugarcane, but slut and more punky, but. Is this remake more punk than the original? If you hear more high, has better production, and much of the good in the carabana gore, but. I guess that 30 years ago thought that the movie was the rehostia, and I guess that Wes not pin flags yanks in the hollow head of the nazi cowboy turn because purportedly even had much to say in the film industry. and so it was clear. Do not want to dwell much more on the same subject, so I can only conclude by saying that you see the movie, which do not need to I tortureis seeing the original, but I guess that that the you have seen, entendereis what I mean. Or not!Despite my misgivings, prota gafoso improves at times until it makes a hole in your heart, the young gunman is unbearable, just like the screams of the sister Dante onstage of the caravan (very jevy!), me much happy when the old is carbonised and a few things that stand out, above all for his regustillo life Gore made with styleIf that is possible.I give a well-deserved 7.5. High tension, the previous film Alexandre Aja, was far better than this, in my humble opinion.And finally, to say that I am a great admirer of the Ang Lee Hulk, and both nuclear mushroom in the prologue of the movie, do not you had a good nuclear bomb molao green sweeping Texas and a charming green coming out from the wreckage bug saying Hulk crushes? Surely if!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3090

Plissken

Supersalidos

muchocine

Judd Apatow, the winner of the summer in the USA, noted another both with this ultragamberra, hilarious and very solid comedy. Over time it will be a classic of the hooligan mood.

If, in his day, 'American Pie' was sunset on the day of the 'Porky´s', 'Superbad' formula ('Supersalidos' will be called here) could be perfectly, the Disney review of a cross between 'All in a day' and ' Jo, what a night '. And I am not exaggerating. The Greg Mottola film sobran le virtues to be considered as something more than a "teen" comedy.The argument, the truth, does not promise much: Seth (memorable Jason Hill) and Evan (another lesson of great pardillismo of Michael Cera) are two kids about to end the Institute, putting course at different universities. But of course, can go more Virgin olive oil, so they DO'URDEN a plan to get drunk to their "girls" at the latest College party and thus to brand new. And to get drunk them, they will need to drink. And in the USA, the country in which you can drive before drink, his goal becomes an odyssey that will test their friendship.One of the great virtues of the indent of Seth Green and Evan Goldberg (Yes, the protagonists are the "alter ego" of the writers) is where to put the focus, diverting the sexual themes that have almost exhausted the famous saga of the pie and the resulting by-products. The search for alcohol occupies more than half of the film, and provides an almost inexhaustible source of gags and surprising characters (that McLovin deserves a nomination for an Oscar). The erótico-festiva plot is in the background, allowing shines the fauna puebla Clark County. If outside, the devilish pace of the film from the first minute just it gives rise to a time-out (Mottola directed several chapters of the brilliant series 'Arrested Development'), and the dialogues very, very tarantinianos add a density and an unusual power in a "youth" film.And there's more: secondary (especially the own Seth Green and Bill Hader as the couple of polis) give more body to the whole, and the direction, music, photography and montage are a far cry from the standard finishing of the genus. 'Superbad' is a product made with great intention, malicious intent, if you press me, but it is always healthy to see something nasty in the meantime sugar. the downside? Leaving aside the dubbing, rather depressing, gives the impression that Seth and Evan (writers) have wanted to lengthen the adventures of Seth and Evan (characters) too, and there is a slump of rhythm in the last third of the film. But without those bugs, 'Superbad' would be a classic of the hooligan mood. In fact, I think that it will be eventually, despite them.Judd Apatow, the winner of the summer in the USA, noted another both with this ultragamberra, hilarious and very solid comedy. an 8.5.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3049

Tito Chinchan

Días de cine

muchocine

Really good, delicious and very chilly strawberries with milk and sugar that I went to to see if it away me the bitterness of a comedy becomes tragedy and destroys the Viewer. Laugh, cry, drama comedy not unimportant.

I remember some time ago a news that came out not be where people who sought to make the poster for this film. How to put an ad "Wanted Designer without charging a penny to a film poster" it seems not encouraged to staff, they decided to give him another touch. "Contest of sketches for the film days poster." "The awarded will be to make the poster of film days". Which does not run here flies. I'm going to do a contest "Contest of licking the penis to the Titus." "The winner may make him complete fellatio" if something falls (a host of my girl as read the blog).The film is about a theater director who wants to make the leap to movies with a political script in the Spanish transition. On the other hand a producer who knows what he wants to the Viewer (as they knew it Ozores) wants a musical with a girl a year above prodigy and naked unnecessary. On the other hand, the star wants to a role that catapulte you back to fame. And on the other hand we are somewhat stunned spectators.The beginning of the movie is fine, with moments in which you ries and don't understand how so many people has branded patatero roll and the Spanish film in low hours. Then advances the film, ending the gracietas and a pain in the ass drama begins but not power, with situations sad (as seen Fernando Tejero do as he cries, the saddest thing that can be seen in the film). The idea of making a film about the filming of a movie is not new. But this in particular is supertriste over not being able to. I mean, a few years ago, the Great Khan released a comic book Super López called the great blockbuster. Coincidentally was the filming of a movie that unfolded in a mine, that everything was a disaster, a girl wanted to be despelotar and ending with all the films congratulating the director (Super López) for his great work. By chance, do not think so (Iker Jiménez dixit).In short, great, delicious and very chilly strawberries with milk and sugar that I went to to see if it away me the bitterness of a comedy becomes tragedy and destroys the Viewer. Laugh, cry, drama comedy not unimportant.This type of comedy is that I can not stand her.Besitos.P.D: why they run to the end of the film? That thing more silly, really.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2855

Nüx

Caótica Ana

muchocine

Pretentious, bland and, above all, ridiculous. Wealth of recorded random disjointed ideas. Absolute chaos. A waste of time and money.

How continue to give opportunities to the film Spanish after watching movies as "Caótica Ana"!The film gives false hopes that we will see something good, perhaps not so much as "Lovers of the Arctic Circle," unforgivable early but something remarkable. Nothing could be further from the truth. There comes a time that Medem is going completely the gripper and literally puts it at Ana on a boat heading to the most absolute film chaos. The film from then on seems a wealth of disjointed ideas recorded at random in a roll of film. Within these ideas we must highlight (negatively) which allude to American policy. "I think that I, like most assiduous viewers, are tired of seeing how the Spanish film is limited to criticize, or rather, to criticize evil.""Chaotic Ana" WINS to pulse adjectives such as bland, pretentious and, above all, ridiculous. The plot is a simpleton aberrant, producing a sense of surprise and such a disbelief before what you see there are even wanting to laugh at pure skepticism. Honestly, I don't think that nobody in their right mind will be able to get into a film which focuses on the theme of reincarnation so absurdly.In short, go see "Caótica Ana" is simply a waste of time and money.