Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1786

Florinda Chic

El buen pastor

muchocine

Political thriller which, like the dark events that relates, is very cumbersome and requires the attention of the viewer and a some background on recent American history.

The magic of the cinema takes us back to an era in which the polígrafos were used to save the world and not to determine if the descendant of a folk resorted to moral distracted Demoiselles services while its progenitor relieved the nasal cavities behind the scenes.De Niro, while that remind us of the first uses of this device, performed in the good Shepherd a tour of 30 years of intrigue, secrets and lies in a political thriller which, like the dark events which he relates, is very cumbersome and requires the attention of the viewer and a some background on recent American history, and that the film has many narrative ellipsis and a bunch of characters.The first thing that makes De Niro is demystify the romantic idea that Ian Fleming, or Le Carré have been spies. Just as in the lives of others, the Spy - is red or blue, red and white - is a lonely, being with the State as the only friend and lover.The film features the fictional biography of one of the founders of the CIA which is forced to secrecy since childhood and is recruited at the University to join the OSS - the forerunner of the CIA--during World War II. Do do just becoming a leading member of the Agency during the war cold and well learned the motto:? but that look like an accident? combats the KGB, the advance of communism and becomes a player of chess efficient, calculating and emotionally dead.Save the world takes its toll and Wilson is not able to reconcile work and family life: his wife does not want him, his son is afraid and his friends simply do not exist. So the good Shepherd is a history of resignation, which, given that Matt Damon unchanged expression in the 160 minutes of footage, we do not know if the sacrifice was worth or not, if it is happy or if it is a wretched.Apart from leaving the room with this debate, there is another question unanswered: where's Max Factor? Rarely I have seen in movies so bad old characters and if you want a story that takes place over 30 years to be credible you makeup well the protagonists or occur moments as the father and teenage son seem to colleagues in the AUL and the mother - Angelina Jolie-, a cheer leader with 50.Los actors are not saints of my devotion, to Damon that seems relative of Dorian Gray doesn't move a brow lift, because I can hardly believe it to me. Do angelina for its part, does not have much presence and is rather decorative and example that the? celebrity? the actress has eaten.The other side is a wonder: John Turturro that should have taken more court, William Hurt, De Niro himself, Alec Baldwin, Joe Pesci, Tammy Blanchard, and curiously Martina Gedeck passing of spy - the lives of others - spy.In short, highly recommended, the film keeps the interest during the long footage, has an excellent invoice and secondary are luxury, given American cinema recently, a delight.PS: As curiosity sign "Skulls and bones" secret society to which belongs the Matt Damon character actually exists and its members include the Bush, father and son, and democratic presidential candidate Senator John Kerry.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1021

Daniel Galindo

Mia Sarah

muchocine

Seeing it have the feeling of being before a fable of another time, a quite sweetened tape which seems out of a chest that will return soon.

A newcomer in the direction can choose to risk in the staging or relax and play with a cluster of related cultural and, above all, cinema. Gustavo Ron Madrid opts for the first.His fable about love and all its stages (the first contact, seduction, delivery) manages to draw a permanent smile, but lacks strength to tear away us any other grimace. It is not surprising that recounts nor does, and that in the times, can be more than reason enough for your tape passing on tiptoe through the Billboard.The touch magical, supernatural, is not able to sustain the footage of this work for dreaming minds who feel fondness for the small details. And the Viewer to lose by other worlds instead of being attentive to the amorous entanglements between the characters of Veronica Sanchez, his first protagonist of weight, and Daniel Guzmán, in a more friendly tone and less barriobajero can fall in that? said with affection - than in previous works.Agoraphobia to love there is a step and who see the film will know why I say this. Not going here to uncover the few surprises that treasures this production filmed in Galicia - the periphery also exists, fortunately - where appears a Fernando Fernán-Gómez, who increasingly are lavished less. Ron relies on the complicit relationship established the veteran performer with the teenager Manuel Lozano, who was a child in the tongue of the butterflies. Another of the charms it Yes can reveal, resides in see in action a Phyllida Law, mother of Emma Thompson, in the epilogue to this story.Under the designs of an illustrious parallel with the name Amélie and multiple desires as to inculcate the love for the books and the desire for improvement. So are two stories intertwined, passionate stories each with drama and comedy in its fair measure and separated by comic parentheses provided by the character of Diana Palazón (Central Hospital), an actress who should have more opportunities in the cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2910

Francisco Bellón

Un Corazón Invencible

muchocine

An invincible heart is a film whose only reason being is the showcasing of Angelina Jolie, and not even reach that goal

Make a film based or inspired by a historical event always has its risk, mainly the controversy may cause if it is reliable or not. This applies especially to the films based on historical facts more important and longstanding. But Hollywood also leads to the big screen most recent real life stories, some of them recorded in the memory of the people, which must overcome a serious handicap: the public known in advance to the final.An invincible heart narrates the kidnapping of an American journalist in Pakistan in 2002, and does so through his wife (which by the way has provided its unconditional support to the film). It is a terrible indeed, but unfortunately in the world are kidnapped and murdered dozens of journalists per year, which is why the Daniel Pearl case isn't very remembered outside United States. Has then, why from the international distribution of the film was he stressed both emphasize the fateful outcome of the kidnapping? Leaving aside such digressions, it is difficult to recognize in A heart invincible so provocative as Michael Winterbottom film. It is not that it is Saint of our devotion, but it would have been very thank that this story would have addressed a very unconventional look like yours. Instead, the film is not more than a mere vulgar police investigation with the family drama as a backdrop. In the film is foreshadow the serious conflicts that led to the tragedy, but fails to deepen them. The reason that this story has come to the big screen is that it would provide a great opportunity for showcasing its protagonist, but not even that is achieved. Angelina Jolie does a good job, without fanfare, but neither is that his character has shades, depth, or emotional or dramatic development.An invincible heart is a film whose only reason being is the showcasing of Angelina Jolie, and even reaches that goal. The rest is simply a more disguised as historical complaint film police story

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1865

Iñaki Bilbao

El buen pastor

muchocine

Very interesting film of political gender, although it seems that he speaks of things past, is no doubt it has connotations of cutting today.

Rober de Niro is telling us the life (apparently based on one of the bosses of the CIA) of a man off, solo, sad aspect of an honored official going to theirs, without messing with anyone.Nothing more distant to the reality in some aspects but also close in others.Nearby on the sad and lonely, having placed to their homeland, uses, to his personal life, his family and friends. And distant because his life is full of violent events from the suicide of his father until the attempted invasion of Cuba at the Bay of pigs, to overthrow the regime of Fidel Castro.De Niro achieves a good film, perhaps a bit long, but full of good times (very hard interrogation to the is false, true?) Valentin Mironov), with a clear narrative, great performances (Michel Gambon extraordinary and very well Anjelina Jolie, with only the look expressing all the pain and loneliness that dominates his empty life), and a use of lively Assembly that gets the Viewer to follow the story forward. Inter alia because de Niro gets good dose of intrigue, with this little clear recording that throughout the film they try unravel the members of the CIA."The technical aspect is impeccable, with a perfect ambientaciòn thanks to excellent work in the chapter of costumes and make-up and hairdressing.""The good Shepherd" requires that the viewer knows that it will be many minutes in the room watching this tape, but if you already know it, it will succeed in getting involved in a story that will no doubt fill you and leave satisfied.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1336

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Quo vadis, baby?

muchocine

The title does not deserve the repudiation all because (I insist) has ways of another film. Worthy Telefilm, small film, entertainment video store, in any case.

Do I saw this Quo vadis, baby? with some reluctance: it came the title, more debtor of the comedietas of crude humor and scurfy eroticism of an Ozores than of what the film intends to, a thriller or an intimate drama, there's both. Disappointment took to arrive, but attended your appointment: not can one hold good feelings, let go by the intuitions and suspect, between the marasmus of dish or heavy, European cinema film of interest to gain my (lately negative and extremely) opinion of Italian cinema, which once sought me so many good moments when one of watch movies with some regularity and lot of passion in this.Quo vadis, baby? It is a strange hybrid between the detective story, careful detail and predictable, but sobrellevable script, and the depth with pretensions of the drama of characters, where I let me carry by Cassavetes or Ivory and not by Salvatores, which wants to give much in much scope and is just few meters.It seems (that impression I had during the last half stretch of the film) that the director has pulled some solucionario problems and has tackled by the shortest route, which usually coincides with the worst and the most obvious. Saved the boot, which is twisted with threads more personal and where are reflected more earthly concerns of an overly moved by the telefilms director, valid school for some tiny demands and tours short film.The title does not deserve the repudiation all because (I insist) has ways of another film, which already we would like, but we do not see. The argument could have been stretched to round out a pure noir and ignore any dramatic intention: we already know that the detectives are harsh and tender at the same time and that, as said Ruben Blades in his immortal Pedro Navaja, "if were you born pa' Hammer of Heaven you fall nails".These nails leave the coffin to half close or half open, but the corpse not atufa too much: is left wanting, cares about desentumecer his devastated body and make the Viewer (with a healthy Samaritan spirit) leave the film confident that next time (her will) not give opportunities so nefarious titles. There is much film to see: tonight, go no further, shooting to see Babel, which everyone has opinion of the tape and I, two candles, can not enter the coffee talks with friends.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1072

Vsancha

Brick

muchocine

Brick is one of the most original products, bold and fresh from last year, everything failed Palm giving us with his Black Dahlia, has given it us Rian Johnson in Brick, a dark, clever, twisted, bizarre and hypnotic film.

Not lying if I said that one of the major problems, not to say the elder, of the current Hollywood industry, is the dearth of ideas original and daring. The most interesting products we get mostly through the small screen, TV is becoming a constant source of ideas to the world of cinema. All years leaving a pair or three of a series of high quality. One of the most interesting series of recent years is Veronica Mars, once I already read that writing on it. A series who got very well move the spirit that enjoyed the first seasons of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, adding touches of the best film noir, what has come to be called the teen-noir. And there is, in part, the success of Veronica Mars to learn together so brilliantly, two worlds, in completely different appearance such as the classic film noir and the movies and series on adolescents, adding the factor of serial television and the offer us every week a piece of that mystery. This year we have left behind, it brought us many disappointments, but also some surprises, films that a priori expected little or nothing, or that we even desconocíamos its existence, one of those gratas, wonderful surprise is "Brick", the movie of rookie and promising filmmaker Rian Johnson, the closest thing that can find Veronica Mars film, but in contrast to this, "Brick" away much more than the teen and gets to film noir, something that initially can remove you realism, but "Brick" makes a fun with a few touches of humor really made whole and occasionally product. All topics on film noir and each of his characters, the tormented detective, the femme fatale, confident partner, "mafioso", we are in "Brick" the bully? but this time it's simple adolescents. Brick not only demystifies the genre as their characters, if not also in their locations, here there is no dark alley of large cities like Chicago or Los Angeles, here we are in a small village in Southern California, and the action is set in long corridors of Institute, large open spaces, fields of football, long roads, etc? The atmosphere recalls occasionally to the movies of the Coen brothers and David Lynch (for larger example the House of The Pin) and it is that it resembles the sordidness of "TP: fire walk with me" and in general the visual elegance of David Lynch and his film. Brick is one of the most original products, bold and fresh from last year, everything failed Palm giving us with his Black Dahlia, has given it us Rian Johnson in Brick, a dark, clever, twisted, bizarre and hypnotic film. A film shot with a huge sense of elegance and the narrative pulse, with brilliant scenes as the fight of the protagonist with the leader of the football team or the chase through the corridors of the Institute. Two small samples of the virtues of Brick and what a future can offer us Rian Johnson.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2992

Rafa Ferrer

Hairspray

muchocine

It is not only recommended, it is necessary, to brighten the face in the times in which we are, with both disgust and roll in our lives.

This week that on a personal level what are not going too well, we wanted to go to the cinema to disconnect and perhaps the best way to leave the concerns for a while was a musical comedy, "Hairspray" had all the ballots for that, for letting us enjoy with its history, its music and its cast for 90 minutes.Honestly the tape get, and not just one happens throughout the film "half bailoteando" under the seat, but that also the great music, where any, so well accompanies the actors on screen, that does not understand a thing without the other, logical, clear, we have a musical, one of the most famous of Broadway.La history, all integration from beginning to endwhere a girl entradita in kilos (though beautiful in all the aspects, newcomer Nikki Blonsky) seeks to eliminate racial segregation, racist 1960s in Baltimore (USA), accompanied by Blonsky, John Travolta, as his mother, perhaps the least I liked, and is, unfortunately not I have been able to separate the idea every time you saw him appear on screen that was thatJohn Travolta in disguise, has its merit dancing in that suit, and move the way it moves, but I say, could not separate the idea and instead of seeing Edna saw Travolta regalia.The rest of the cast comprises it a staff of most amazing, from Michelle Pfeiffer, incredible as villain role, and that has not lost one iota of its beauty or charm sexy on screen, Amanda Bynes, one of the Queens of the romantic comedy today, Queen Latifah who already sang in Chicago's Rob MarshallChristopher Walken, parked his serious roles and giving a cool touch of comedy, his dancing with Travolta will be among the remembered scenes of the film for years, James Marsden "Código" of X-Men, which embarrasses me admit that he sings wonderfully and danced also excellently well and Zac Efron, already a famous face of the musicals through the television phenomenon "High School Musical".Adam Shankman manages to harness track, after a full career of romantic comedies and tapes without too much film interest with this friendly and at the same time amazing music, leaving the narrative weight of tape and in music the approach that a good feature of these features need in his actors.I think it shows very well that I loved, so I I do not alargaré more than enough properly, you're happy and cheerful, cinema in addition to humming the successes of the soundtrack, it is not only recommended, it is necessary, to brighten the face in the times in which we are, with both disgust and roll in our lives.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/933

Emilio Calvo de Mora

El ilusionista

muchocine

She is a worthwhile term medium, in a limbo of dignity that all paledeemos, without fanfare, without the flourish of the goer gourmet that everything puts buts, tape (I insist) lovely.

The illusionist strokes of film in height a lot has and contains moments when that excellence is crisp and clear. On the other hand, the magician is a film's commercial spirit, equipped after a commercial argument calmly drawn mounted, and executed as a wholly commercial film. That the commercialism is a burden for the sublime makes us subtract epithets to this tape of Neil Burger, although well look, referred to with aftertaste of having spent two hours of pleasure in a movie theater, the illusionist is a product back, enjoyable in all their masks, which has some, and easily recommended for two types of public: one that does not lose any candy and going to the movies by ethical obligation (and éstetica)(, and moral, and vital) and one that is not never. For that last, is the magician and, maybe, he sneaks the bug of drop from time to time by a movie theater: they are dark, have magic, such as the scene in which Eisenheim (Edward Norton) work their wonders and inoculated in the viewer a more enduring, more slow, slow venom.Very intelligently completed, despite the fact that at some point it seems that everything is going to go to hell, the illusionist convinces with a playful, sentimental and human competent, credible proposal (despite the fantasy of butterflies, scarves disappear and the spectral emanations that populate the stage of the Wizard).The story is good, but Navy tricks, on screen, in the script, in the words that are said to be and in the gestures made: homage to the magic, in these times of sober minimalism or fire of infographic artifice in the film proposals calling the audience to the film. The illusionist is a worthwhile term medium in a limbo of dignity so that all paledeemos, without fanfare, without the flourish of the goer gourmet that everything puts buts, tape (I insist) charming, and the word has Fund and a dove flies the sky of the page and drops a Platypus.Ballast in their says, by a not overly clear political history (nor is its purpose: could not), the tape is left wanting for the absolute clarity of Exposition to reel off the history: gives equal to appreciate to inquire into the history a little Burger to lie a little. The film or literature manipulate reality to suit: they deform her amplify, arroban the legitimate right to speculate and here, that is abundantly clear, there is speculation, and much.I conclude with a final thought: Paul Giamanti, this step is going to be my favorite actor. Edward Norton is good (without more) as the magician in love and Jessica Biel, the beloved, is a nice vase in a Rococo table. In these times in which films are not made, it will make time. Slight.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1319

Raúl Rubio

Banderas de nuestros padres

muchocine

They can spare you as about ten minutes of footage. Are you to decide if the movie is good or not, to my I liked, and what also narrated.

It is clear that I am not going to enlighten anyone at this point in the film if I make a comment about if Clint Eastwood (Million Dollar Baby) is a good director or not, is why what I am not neither annoy me because I lose the time, but if I can say that you for this film it has decided to not having a particularly spectacular castDespite lead it Ryan Phillippe (chaos), actor who I have mediocre but that also excels, and accompany him Paul Walker (the proof of the crime) of which anything is can comment, because that just squeal a couple of words on the tape. It is clear that Eastwood does not need nothing but shake his wand so that what logic would be a chaos begins to take sense if only, and I think it is, not for history which has, if not as, and from that perspective the account, many consider in the resemblance of the staging of another known film dealing also with incombustible WWII, but here there is not bitter that may be a war that is already counted in the other, in save soldier Ryan, here delves more, and is trying to throw a little bit of that background that covers the track central great circus show, bands and Fireworks, is not more than simply the great savior of Nazi-occupied Europecommanded by their great generals as they did something more than one century with its 7th Cavalry.The history that tells us, is as simple and everyday, as some soldiers converted into heroes in order to get and manipulate the masses to be able continue to finance its war, and so have the control and power needed to reach where today they have arrived. Gives us to see that once things were not so different from current, soldiers turned into heroes of the time, what they were or not, they end up being forgotten both by his country by his Government, because the important thing is not the individual, is dead or not in compliance with its duty to defend the homeland, the important thing is the goal that is marked, and we must achieve this it any way whatsoever, even if we have to play the bass drum and tambourine marking the passage of the "Heroes" more cowards of the conflict. The aim is that people go to war mass and also her finance for the benefit of those who declare, already said the enlightened absolutists, "Everything for the people, but without the people".There is only one aspect more than I'm going to highlight of the film, and is that in my opinion to Eastwood can spare you as about ten minutes of footage, those that agglutinate sentimentaloides stories of those that he likes his friend Spielberg. Sean you to decide if the movie is good or not, to my I liked, and also what narrated, what if I believe that it is essential, is to see its media naranja to make a global computation of outcomes.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1852

Tito Chinchan

Doom

muchocine

I am not going to say that you expected me more, given that lying vilely, why I am not going to be cruel with the film. Can be seen but without many pretensions.

The game of the castle that the nazis that killing the ibas person I liked (I think it was exhaust from wolftein). Then came from Doom and hooked me a lot, but with loudspeakers began to acojonar. It was later released one was Duke Nuke (more or less) and already I didn't, given that I was more scared than seven old boards. Finally (for me) the second part of Doom came out and I spent directly already play, these sounds through the speakers I ended up twitching in making me be now you know. Neither the genetic experiments.The film is very direct. It's about a group of elite soldiers who enter on Mars (with two balls) given that some excavations we have there been problems. So the 10 minutes we are already task, without even introducing us to the protagonists. So they caught the pistolones and engaged to kill everything they can. Unlike in the game, but more slowly.Let's see, things that I liked. The protagonists are professional soldiers, we do not have any scientist who give him a gun and it seems Rambo. A point in its favour. The time in which the protagonist takes the vision of the game is the effect of the game between horny and stupid, but very accomplished. Another point in their favor. And the rest is hell. My girl says that it can be seen, meaning that the level of disgust is low and that little scary. I say that you from me a piece of Alien, a piece of Resident Evil and a shredded brain and we have a reef with this series. I am not going to say that you expected me more, given that lying vilely, why I am not going to be cruel with the film.In short, be seen but without many pretensions.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2335

Ramón Balcells

Shrek Tercero

muchocine

Shrek the third is, perhaps, the film most intelligent of the three, because life is not complicated and intended to be what it is: an animated film for the family so that is what happens in large during one hour and a half.

We are in summer and reach us all palomiteras blockbusters of the year. The people have no desire to see Russian documentaries nor Polish dramas. People have wanted to have fun, and in a way, I understand. But what happens is that this desire to have fun the producers of such surpluses used to get slice. Examples of this would be year Transformers, Harry Potter 5, Caribbean pirates 3 or Shrek the third. However, I must admit that I crave some of them see them, more than anything because they are very entertaining and very well done. That does not mean that you go to see wonders how history of a crime of which you speak very soon. The case is that the last of these palomiteras movies is a real delight, because it follows the fantastic line of their previous two deliveries.In Shrek the third, so called and not Shrek 3, her could be called as the jewel in the entertainment and fun. And it is that I was not going with the intention of finding me a complicated plot very well thought out, but with very good and hilarious, although not exactly original gags. And that I found. This is a fresh, entertaining and hilarious movie. I, at least, am not asking more. Luckily I found not a boring, pedantic and far-fetched film. Moreover, he preferred to see one thing nothing complicated, but it is very entretnida, which make me think every joke released. Here the jokes may not be more original and strange, but I came to tears of laughter (especially with Merlin, who ate organic things!). In Shrek and Shrek 2 the laughs were more contained, although, of course, movies, not only fun, but also very good. This third perhaps don't have as good script, but I assure you that if you want to pass you big, go to see her, you did not disappoint. Special mention, not only to Merlín, but also to el Gato con botas, which here makes a really fun role and not as tired in the second part.In this third adventure, there are three parallel stories: that of Shrek in search of Arthur with his two colleagues (donkey and the cat); waiting for the return of the OGRE Fiona and the Princesses (Disney?) and then, interrupted by the third story, Prince charming and his evil friends who want to seize of very, very distant. Not expect more complicity which there is. However, these stories are perfectly compinchadas and once they collide, the chaos and the entertainment cause the viewer a feeling of incredible satisfaction. Here the problems are well resolved, with a series of endless and hilarious gags by in the Middle, and once comes the end you're too satisfied of the show that has been to see this marvel of the entertainment and fun.New and hilarious characters appear in Shrek the third: the first to mention (for the second time already) is Merlin, who helps Shrek and his friends to solve a small problem that makes them arriving late to save Fiona. It is curious that I has laughed so much with this character, because he had never done both from the Dori in finding Nemo. I beg that you fijéis in blood teeth of Merlin, due to eating stones, or the sequence in which puts a half romantic half dramatic melody to help Shrek to Arturo console. The problem is that the absent-minded Wizard puts at full speed, which is why not let the OGRE talk with each other it. It's great! Another excellent incorporation is the princesses friendly Fiona, all them a few believed and posh Gothic. With them I had big, seeing as they prepare to fight the Prince charming or when they give Fiona the gifts by her pregnancy, where snow white looks with a phrase (a gift!) really delicious. Personally, the character of Arthur (the core of the journey of Shrek and company) I had not fallen as well as others, but I recognize that it is well done and there, at any time, any kind of creeps nor is pedantic in any of her scenes (do well, perhaps in the Crown a little?). As it is expected, the other characters remain in its most comical line, or are even more fun and not so heavy, as it is the case of the donkey and puss in boots.Another of the strong points are the incredible graphics presents. As well as the first two, the image quality was very good, here is still more, much more. Only start already you're speechless with magnificent resolution images and excellent expressions showing. The staging is also great, but this feature could already see in the other installments. Music, of course, could not be bad, so they have followed on the same line, the introduce songs from artists several and also a soundtrack performed by the always correct Harry Gregson-Williams.No know as the majority of people this film they found, or extremely tired either unnecessary, but I find that, in what could beIt is an entretenidísimo, fun film and nothing pretentious. It is perhaps not so good film quality as the two previous installments, but Shrek is and will remain a myth in the animated film. It has the appropriate duration and gags are introduced in an intelligent manner. Is Shrek the third, perhaps, the film most intelligent of the three, because life is not complicated and intended to be what it is: an animated film for the family so that is what happens in large during one hour and a half. No more. He has energy, it has rhythm, has fun and charming characters. And that is precisely what I wanted to see.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2600

Tito Chinchan

El pico

muchocine

Tough film must see if you want to know pieces of history Spain contemporanea. I note that people scenes leave by injecting into the vein that may be violent on the raw and natural appearing.

What more expressive, while sinister poster.The film is the life of two kids in the vicinity of the age of majority in Bilbao. These, one son of a guardia civil and the other a member of abertxale, get into the heroine a bad day and need to steal and smuggle to continue their addiction.That tougher film, my mother. From my point of view, what is notable about the tape is the way so crude to treat two very topical issues in the early 1980s in Spain. On the one hand, the heroine that ravaged this generation, doing away entire groups of friends. On the other hand, the problem of the independence of the Basque country, which reached its highest level of violence by those dates. The development can be done something heavy, especially the younger players are not too good (I was surprised very negative bad serving the young Henry San Francisco). But the overall vision of the film, seen more as that documentary as film itself, offset more than this little problem.In short, tough film must see if you want to know pieces of history Spain contemporanea. I note that people scenes leave by injecting into the vein that may be violent on the raw and natural appearing.ImprescindibleBesitos.P.D: The scene of the baby pacifier puts hairs as hooks.Pd2: The end I liked a lot, Tad cakes, but what the hell, is not going to be all pain and suffering, a bit of compassion with the Viewer.P.D.3: From the movie the Lord of the rings I guess that the name of Urko will have fallen into oblivion, is not it? I had to make a joke, this has been more sad than the day died Chanquete.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/555

Oscar Cantero

Serpientes en el avión

muchocine

Full of vulgar jokes, incoherent dialogues and abrupt changes of plane, snakes on a plane is a film so grotesque and ridiculous causing curiously just the opposite of what he intended.

Sometimes David r. Ellis has directed films that have at least been entertaining, as they were the cases of Cellular and Final destination 2. This time he has been behind the camera for shooting snakes on the plane, a film whose only attraction lies in the presence of the Samuel l. Jackson always correct, and if I tightened the curiosity to see Elsa Pataky tried to prove that it is also an actress as well as beautiful. And I say this because we are before one of the films most absurd and ridiculous that they can imagine. The argument is surreal (giving surreal an extremely pejorative nuance), that narrates the adventures of a policeman who guards the witness of a murder during a flight. To avoid his statement, the criminal fills the plane of snakes to ensure that does not arrive alive at their destination. With this crazy approach dealt more than 100 minutes this nonsense does lose to that see. Full of vulgar jokes, incoherent dialogues and abrupt changes of plane, snakes on a plane is a film so grotesque and ridiculous causing curiously just the opposite of what he intended. And it is what gives is more than terror, laughter see vast quantities of snakes moving through the interior of an aircraft causing the hysteria of the passage; how hilarious is the improbability of the story. Full of clichés and a public-oriented teen, it fits in the genre known as Serie B, and while it may arouse some curiosity at the beginning, his interest is diluted as it progresses the footage, to the point that one has just asking for time. But of course, as they say, the book of tastes is blank.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2725

Emilio Calvo de Mora

White Noise 2

muchocine

Painful sequel to a painful tape which becomes doubly painful experience. And there will be third punishment. Will we be masochists?

Into slaughter, conjurado to make something positive of this hodgepodge of acústico-imbécil inspiration - is the first time that marriage those two adjectives, perhaps not the last-, White noise 2: the light escapes from the trash of terrifying intent covering the expectations of many teenagers aborregados and eager for strong emotions which release them its insipid leisure of last generation consoles. There is no barbies of generous chest fleeing a spasmodic psycho-killer.There is no incipient acne heroes pivoting between the love to the presumed victim and the censorship of their venereal impulses. Why this summer film we install a higher stage: on the sparsely demanding adult who feels comfortable in the role of compulsive consumer of anything supernatural vocation. Gives equal come ghosts of middling, esoteric conspiracies or Merovingian secrets hidden in a basement for at least a thousand years. Literature amply supplied these frivolous exercise of historical foolish. I said literature and perhaps should have used another word less noble. Something similar happens with the film. I have no doubt that this film is film, of course, but is so brazenly invoiced for their consumption and so far from artistic parameters that would need to go looking for another word that accommodate her. Film, understood as something intelligent and beautiful, there is no or perhaps I had not taken the day more appropriate to appreciate it and, indeed, true cinema located by one of their frames and to me, what going you to do, I caught yawning, slightly closing the eyes, thinking in something else, friends I don't see long or the time that makes that not floor a Museumfor example.This history of premonitions and more or less achieved hearing scares has no heart or soul. Brain not to engage in an honest conversation. Everything gets carried away by this hobby already niponizar hartible terror and give height fantasmagoria packaging, when what they achieved is to surrender an infamous hodgepodge of mediocrity sold as Excellencies, pathetic scares and characters debilísimos, barely sustained by an invisible fabric that stretches to get bored and wish end of the footage and one can go into the blessed Street and breathe the urban realitythat is more prosaic than the string of lies told to us, but which excites infinitely more. The supernatural genre, that they are trounced by regardless, is likely to become telefilm desktop balance, although (ay) notes of production I've read after seeing the tape insist in the novelty of the special effects and the exquisite love professed by the entire team by this kind of argument. They have therefore blunder, and have a little more enfangado the summer Billboard, which shines neither in excess. But that already knew.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/879

Plissken

El perfume

muchocine

A wonderful demonstration of power of the German film, which by the way gives us a Campion and teaches us that the secret of a good adaptation is, as good perfumes, in its essence: tells the story and respect for it.

In an end of year in which things I I've swallowed as 'Los Borgia', 'Alatriste' or 'The illusionist', he already played a film of time in which to look for something rather than the wardrobe or the picture. The German Tom Tykwer directs an afortunadísima adaptation of 'Perfume', the archifamosa novel by Patrick Suskind, than with Office of veteran has caught me off-guard or simply I loved. I think that the second rather than the first. Treatment of reasoning.For the two or three stragglers who have not read the book, 'perfume' has the life of Jean-Baptiste Grenouille, a kid who is given birth between heads of fish rotten in a suburb of the pre-revolutionary Paris. Hated by all without apparent reason and systematically beaten since the born, Grenouille has a wonderful olfactory gift, and an obsession: knowing all the smells, dissect the world in which they live through their aromas and odor. Grenouille is called to a mission beyond his own life (and that of others): find the perfect perfume, ideal fragrance.In one of the best (by faithful and cinematographic) adaptations that have been made in recent years, Tykwer establishes a strongly visual narrative code from the minute and leading to its logical conclusion, supported, that Yes, in a narrative voice-over in some moments (necessary, on the other part, and never abused). You will not find in this film cansinos explanatory dialogue, flashbacks offensive, nor spectacular script turns. the pace leisurely but firmly Tykwer, always counting, always showing, get the two and a half hours of footage to pass in a sigh, and keep you on the edge of the seat while you know the outcome in advance. Nothing mount videoclipero (well, a little bit at the beginning for rhythm), just a way of telling the story apropiadísima for the text narrates.Then there are the actors. Ben Wishaw is the perfect Grenouille, of nondescript appearance and andares simiescos, but a dramatic expressiveness. Help a lot this actor does not have to tell things with the voice-over, sometimes a simple smell him enough to understand the character. They wrapped him Dustin Hoffman at your leisure with the character of the decadent Baldini; Alan Rickman always Manor; and the young Rachel Hurd-Wood not at odds with the rest, which is already fairly. Special mention to the beautiful (further enhanced by the photo and makeup) and brief appearance of Karoline Herfurth.Todos the technical aspects of the film scratch at high altitude: photography and planning of Frank Griebe, at times, evoking the odors without words; music by Reinhold Heil, Johnny Klimek and the same Tom Tykwer supplementing the action perfectly; and the enormous artistic direction by Uli Hanisch (the art director of 'The experiment'), helped by 50 million of? budget, clear. All less Hanisch form the usual team of Tom Tykwer.Una wonderful demonstration of power of the German film, which by the way gives us a Campion and teaches us that the secret of a good adaptation is, as good perfumes, in its essence: tells the story and respect for it.9. By putting a but there is one key aspect on the personality of Grenouille which is not sufficiently well explained, in my opinion. My own things.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2262

Patri

Piratas del Caribe: En el Fin del Mundo

muchocine

You can enjoy quite seeing this film, although it is clear that it is not a great movie and that there is really absurd and pathetic, scenes such as the wedding on the boat.

The third part of Caribbean pirates is a cierre(¿?) worthy of the trilogy, it replied to questions that was left in the air in the second part. Entertainment and fun are guaranteed, thanks to the great performance by Johnny Depp, with his unique style makes the Pirate Jack Sparrow one of the funniest characters I've seen ever, is only for him worth seeing this film, although at times it may be a little child. Completely opposite is the performance of Orlando Bloom, as deadpan as always, is clear that his presence only serves to the delight of quinceañeras and fans.The film is quite long, and until he makes his surreal appearance (best film) Jack Sparrow becomes a little heavy, then the story takes place with a frenetic pace and the plot becomes confused and tangled, as happened in the second part, there comes a time when it is not known who is betraying who, or what characters are in a ship or another.You can enjoy quite seeing this film, although it is clear that it is not a great movie and that there is really absurd and pathetic, scenes such as the wedding on the boat.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3142

Francisco Bellón

Un plan brillante

muchocine

A brilliant Plan is first and foremost a divertimento directed by a filmmaker of great category and with the participation of one of the finest living actors on the planet, Michael Caine.

In the film classic entertainment, British films of thefts and robberies are prominently on their own merits. Some of them are more favored by the comedy by the drama, becoming real jewels as gold in bars or the quintet of death. Currently, this type of film has been relegated to the background until it appeared George Clooney and his charismatic bunch of crooks.A brilliant Plan is first and foremost a divertimento directed by a filmmaker of great category and with the participation of one of the finest living actors on the planet, Michael Caine. It was quite complicated with similar ingredients, the end result was bad, and the expectations for once met. The film manages to get hooked from the beginning, and what is more worthwhile, manages to keep attention until the end. Michael Radford guide the development of a convoluted and intriguing history without artifice or free and unnecessary effect blows with strong pulse. The scent of classic film that follows the film is very suggestive, and is part of the appeal of the narration. The only that I can put the tape is its outcome, a somewhat soft end that somehow lackluster been achieved previously. Demi Moore fulfils its role, and Michael Caine returns to offer a master class of interpretation.In Un Plan Brillante, Michael Radford recovers the spirit of those English movies of thefts and robberies of the 1950s and 1960s. Recover in addition a cinema of entertainment that does not insult or despises the Viewer, a type of unpretentious film making have fun to the audience.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1963

Jose Contreras

La maldición de la flor dorada

muchocine

The message is an ode to conformism and frustration, a hymn to the contempt of the rebellion, and the individual. The film, in short, is not more than a defence of the submission against the power, worse, against any power.

The Empress desperately weaves flowers of Chrysanthemum. The Chrysanthemum is a symbol of the rebellion. The soldiers of the Emperor wear all the same spotless red, the adversaries are golden, moving in unison in a dance and fill the immense courtyard of the forbidden city. Yimou film is littered with symbols, and I think this is the first time that scored it as a default. The idea of a plague defines the aesthetics of this Yimou, abuse of the colors of the myths of the armies. Each element is there to crush the viewer with the excess.It runs the 10th century c.e. in the Court of the Chinese imperial family. The Empress has to hurry the medicine to the bottom. The Emperor puts his honor at stake in enforcement of rules down to the last detail. The Viewer does not take to discover that the Empress is being poisoned. Three children have to choose between his ambition, his love for his mother, not always convinced, and blind obedience to a wicked father.The approach of Yimou bothers me deeply, and is not the first time. Behind the sumptuous sets until the Vertigo of the costumes Carnival of the indecent pageantry of the pneumatic courtesans of the warlike choreography of the macedonia of Greek myths and Venezuelan clamoring, Oedipus and a restored Macbeth, Palace intrigue and paternal tyranny, there is a monstrous message behind the veils. The message is suitable, only for viewers alienated, able to make pants for five euros and grow economically to eleven per cent per annum without making a Holy strike. The message is an ode to conformism and frustration, a hymn to the contempt of the rebellion, and the individual. The film, in short, is not more than a defence of the submission against the power, worse, against any power.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4001

Francisco Bellón

XXY

muchocine

Lucia Puenzo a decision that the honors, avoids completely the way the easy curiosity, limited to narrate the story of a teenager who feels different, marginalized by a cruel and intolerant society.

A few years ago the Argentine cinema lived a period of great splendour, in which all movies arriving we were interesting, intelligent and innovative proposals. However, this wave was losing strength, and now almost all arriving us are or comedies rather simplistic and vulgar or stories are not but mere cheap psychoanalysis.At this point in the decline of Argentine cinema, arrives XXY, the directorial debut of Lucia Puenzo, a proposal very risky, different and somewhat provocative. The story of parents who must flee to protect his hermaphrodite daughter could be an excellent bait for a filmmaker that focus the history from the sensational point. But a decision to honor Lucia Puenzo, avoids completely the easy morbid way, limited to telling the story of a teenager who feels different, marginalized by a cruel and intolerant society towards everything that is different and does not understand. Puenzo also falls in the melodrama or in the easy tear, but it is also true that the film does not acquire the dramatic and emotional strength that might assume you, the final result being something weak and disappointing. Best of the tape, and what sustains it, they are actors, and between them is impossible not highlight an extraordinary Ricardo Darín, is able to convey more with a look that all the dialogue of the script.XXY is a different proposal and risky that we hope will help revitalize an Argentine film found in low hours. It is also the opportunity to see the promising debut of Lucia Puenzo, and the privilege of attending another master class of interpretation of Ricardo Darín, that if he had been born a few thousand kilometers to the North, would be considered one of the best actors in the world without any discussion.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2063

Patri

El número 23

muchocine

Aims to play the trump card of the surprise ending, but it senses too soon what is going to happen.

The number 23 is the story of the obsession of a man by the number 23, believed that it pursues and it is everywhere. Becomes rather tiresome obsession, all added 23 and if not, we multiply and divide the times make lack until you exit 23?Jim Carrey is not bad, but it is a pity that it does not end succeed as a serious actor, because it has talent, as demonstrated in the Truman Show and forget about me, but with such films as the number 23 will never take you seriously.The secondary characters are empty and poorly built, some do not contribute anything to the story.The screenplay is terrible, full of gaps everywhere. There are really absurd situations and a dog that is intended to cause concern, but what causes is laughter. Aims to play the trump card of the surprise ending, but it senses too soon what is going to happen.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/44

Ivan Sainz-Pardo

Munich

muchocine

There are some sequences nailing in the hearts of those who shared the movie theater

To write about a movie like "Munich" it is recommended to send to sleep at least eight hours first to neurons, but I can not tell you everything. Tell you that the film has left me a bad too evident body. Is that eight hours will not be enough. Is that eight weeks will not be. There are some sequences, some images, some pieces broken nailing in the hearts of those who, by my side, shared the cinema today.There is a particular message before, and almost three hours of a consistent and fiercely tenacious spirit behind. The violence only trigger more violence. Violence is not spectacular. Violence is simply something terrifying. A nightmare that is hidden under the mattress for our bed, inside the TV or our phones. A dream become a terrifying reality, disguised as a religion, homeland, of courage, of heroism. A piece of rotten becoming ill the human heart. Spreading tirelessly. Destroying everything. There are no winners, there is no innocent, there is no hope in a conflict in which the different political and economic interests, they descarrían and they catapulted the answers, do jump through the air solutions to lethargic and prolong human suffering eternally. A grim, cold, cruel, bitter and brutal message emerged from the darkest part of a masterful director, which remains in its untiring search of the master, the genius that has inside.Narrated murders are not spectacular, the shootings are crude, chaotic, realistic. Terrorist acts saturate the footage. They saturate the mind of the Viewer. The narrative structure of the settling of accounts is reiterated. These are repetitive, pervasive, in a monstrous routine and desasogante. All this in a stretched and dense footage. Without concessions. No room or space for romanticism, or the epic, not even for the respite from the Viewer. In the tape no good. There is bad. There are only victims. The home is expensive. Peace has no price in a world in which life if you don't have it.Spielberg, of known Jewish origin, is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but it doesn't stop there, because you know that the war of which speaks is fronts opened in many other places. Wound is a sea of clone sores, open sores, and while it heals a new ones arise, and much worse at his side. The message is therefore a universal message. And in this way focuses on telling the Interior of one of the terrorist conflicts. Conflicts that all direct we understand, humanizing a drama that makes us all participate.Not all the technical aspects in the film are my taste, that damn difuminador filter that tarnished images of almost all their latest productions. Aesthetic taste that seems to share with his faithful director of photography Janusz Kaminski. Neither find nor necessary already commented excess footage. But we are, without a doubt, in front of one of the most important and brave of this outrageous director sentenced for merits to be remembered along with the masters of the seventh arte.¿Pero that fuck is the movie?Friends, go to see her. Suffer with the "beautiful" discovery of the terror of such violence as, unfortunately, the order of the day on the other side of our newscasts. Acongojar you with the true face of State terrorism. Discover the poignant sense of feel, for a few minutes, closely akin to those who really suffer from the reality of violence from all different aspects with your own eyes. Go to the cinema to also witness an eternal tragically topical.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/458

Darthz

United 93

muchocine

It is not a great film, but meets its objective, which is to gain many currencies at the expense of a "tribute to the victims" and expose what was the largest disaster that shook the world in a single day.

On September 11, 2001, the world suffered a great shock. United States was the largest terrorist attack victim and shocked virtually the entire planet. We all remember what we were doing on that fateful day, in which our eyes are posed on the TV, or our ears on the radio or people. And even after five years is still honoring victims, with films such as which we can now see in Billboard: United 93. It is not a good movie, or something that will happen to the story, what if he spent was the same event tells us, but it may be shocking view in a closer way it could have been anything. Still, the movie sins of charisma and repetitive in many moments and can get bored, they say that the ending is more entertaining, the last half-hour is fast-paced, well then, if we assume that we like blood and macabre, Yes. As I said, it is not a great film, but meets its objective, which is to gain many currencies at the expense of a "tribute to the victims" and expose what was the largest disaster that shook the world in a single day. Before we delete this image of our head, especially for those who really suffered and still suffer, are those still living tormented by the memory of that infamous event. Perhaps never be erased already history. And the distance of what happened has calmed the thirst for revenge of some, although they already left the trail of blood spread the world. But will always be on our memory the indifferent flight of an aircraft, and its subsequent explosion, marking an earlier and a later in the story.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1527

Elena Suárez

Más extraño que la ficción

muchocine

The essence of his mastery lies in an original argument transmitted through a good script, and something that makes it even more worthwhile, is not based on any novel.

I know that it was released more than one month ago but due to a series of job changes, already I can not go to press releases for which, as any mortal, I should put me in the conventional cinema, while I organize my time, so I saw this film a month after its premiere and, frankly, seemed so extraordinary to me it would be difficult not to mention him.The essence of his mastery lies in an original argument transmitted through a good script, and something that makes it even more worthwhile, is not based on any novel. It is why I am not going to reel off the magic of history and, moreover, I recommend not to see the trailer. Directly, arriesguensen and go to the movies.Not to Sin from selfish, let me give some clues, rattled with "The Truman show"?, they enjoyed with "forget me!"? If the answer is Yes, and they have not seen yet, "Stranger than fiction", run because, as it is often the case in many cinemas, good thing not always last long (in Madrid only a room that expose, the rest go you know). Anyway, we will always the legal vacuum when the bad distribution prevents us pay for what we buy (you will tell me, that after several weeks looking for the CD soundtrack without any result, I saw forced to type on my computer and voilà! morphed appeared?)I only stay to make one point, do you know what I liked the movie? Something very simple: the protagonist is realized that he was alive, and then became a hero. I would like to try to explain that feeling to different grey midgets that have passed my lifetime (companions of work, ex-boyfriend, acquaintances?) but it would be impossible, and you know why? Because most are zombies and want to remain so; they prefer to have a mediocre life but smoothly. That is why that give you the congratulations to all the Harold Crick who have the courage to say what they feel, goes for them.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2353

Oscar Cantero

Forajidos

muchocine

The film which saw the consecration of Ava Gardner and Burt Lancaster, as well as one of the peaks of film noir. Little more can ask for.

It is not the first time that I write a few lines on a film of those that fall in the so-called black film, who so brilliantly understood the fantastic Fritz Lang, undisputed master of the genre. Outlaws is headed by a monster of the screen, Robert Siodmak, makes a display of narrative resources, games with cameras, the handling of changes in level and the combination of drama and action in this film.The presence of two colossi, although by then not so recognized, as Burt Lancaster and Ava Gardner beautiful, help provide greater packaging a story already in itself is interesting and that manages to convey the sensations at each time experienced performers, which combine the anger, satisfaction, frustration, love, fear.The dense atmospheres, the contrasts in the characterizations and undeniable nostalgia that awaken some of its scenes make outlaws a film in which other elements such as music, M.Rozsa, are essential in the full Assembly of one of the works of film noir in general, and by Siodmak summits, in particular.The history of the gangster and Pimp, with a fatal woman is one of the recurring arguments of the genus, and undoubtedly one of those offered by larger game. And more if the script is based on a short story by Hemingway. For this reason, we can say that outlaws is a great movie; not a masterpiece, because it fails to do so. But it is a good movie.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2057

Oscar Cantero

Alta sociedad

muchocine

As often happens, the fact that script and direction appeals on the same person help that the viewer has the feeling of being before a circle closes without leaving fissures.

Directed by Martha Fiennes and performed by an impressive cast, headed by his brother Ralph Fiennes, Ben Chaplin and Kristin Scott Thomas, among others, comes to Spanish cinema screens high Sociedad.Este film is an Anglo-French co-production whose plot revolves around the life of a traditional family and high London rank who sees threatened its darkest secrets in a world in which the surname isn't important enough to get respect a society acting moved by economic interests and a modus vivendi imported from the Unidos.A States despite that its important duration (exceed more than two hours) they could make something heavy, the impeccable direction and agility in the development of his script get that at any moment the viewer experience feeling of boredom or boredom. In this aspect, it is necessary to stress the importance of the fact that direction and screenplay belong to the same person, which allows a perfect Assembly between the two fields of production. In the interpretative aspect, magnificent Fiennes, Ian Holm and Kristin Scott, rather than correct Ben Chaplin and acceptable (already is enough in it), Penelope Cruz. In any case, on this occasion we have a quality product, that performs a deep analysis of the prevailing social psyche and the existing interrelations between different levels of the apparently rigid and stiff British urban bourgeoisie. For all these reasons, high society is a good characteristically European on the Cadence in his developing film and that the perfect combination of entertainment and quality.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4235

Rafa Ferrer

Good luck Chuck

muchocine

Jessica Alba, penguins and a story midway between the cinema of the brothers Farrelly and compulsive liar...

Lions Gate not only make film of terror (Saw and all its damn sequels), but which in the USA has unmarked with this comedy starring Jessica Alba and Dane Cook unknown, one of those romantic comedy that at times recalls situations mad, absurd and eschatological film of the Farrelly and also something like what did Tom Shadyac in "Compulsive liar" together these 2 films and is obtained which today brings us.And is this tape has raised in the USA ($35,017,297) and it worked relatively well there, being 8 weeks at the box office, at full capacity, yet not premiered in our country, so we write a more to this endless list of releases that cross the pond when the distributor of shift want you (in this case the Lions Gate) and then protesting because results at box office, they are expected, nor are as rewarding as I thought initially, and is that the panacea of the cinema today, not only does harm in piracy and all that stuff, but in the release dates that are becoming increasingly blurred.After this allegation which, as always, will fall on deaf ears, and only serve to be a little thatched in criticism of the critical turn, continue with the film stars Jessica Alba, here, brilliant in the role of a clumsy and clueless beauty (for that has to work much, nor lack that makes.), also join in the film working with penguins, they are always my favorite animals, and you will know without work you as minimum that the tape, as well as entertain me a lot (the hour and a half short are happened to me flying) found it me very fun and rewarding.About Dane Cook (almost protagonist of the film, rather than Alba), we could be before an out, like Jim Carrey of the Saturday Night Live actor, which could, as Jim be these actors, histrionic, but not power, and with 4 gestures get, like the actor of Ontario, provoke laughter from the audience for my part, I loved his performance, and in some moments (of the Oronda girl) of the best comedy I've seen in a long time.And of course, the topics of boy meets girl, boy and girl fall in love, boy loses girl, and boy recovers (or not) girl.In short:!Which I has encantao, cojona!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1543

Jesus Lens

Cartas desde Iwo Jima

muchocine

Eastwood has specialized in the death of a masterfully touching, exciting, thoughtful way, so raw as poetically realistic and mature. Thanks, Clint, for continue giving birth masterpieces.

My brother asked me if, to see and enjoy "Letters from Iwo Jima", it is necessary to have previously seen "Flags of our fathers" given that, as it is known and notorious, Clint Eastwood has shot two different, both films inspired by the same facts.And the answer is that not. To enjoy that piece of masterpiece undisputed, lucid and exciting (to not sentimental) that is "Letters from Iwo Jima" is not necessary to have seen the previous, but is highly recommended to see the two as both are feedback one to the other, complement each other, they speak to each other, something of what discussed in another article.On this occasion, to tell the Japanese point of view on events in Iwo Jima, Eastwood Yes has filmed a strict and canonically war film with the particularity that, for once, the "good guys" are those Japanese who often were the bad guys. I entrecomillo about "good" because, as in every war movie self-respecting, the border between the hero and the villain must be tenuous enough as so things do not end in a pamphlet.And in that sense, the last film of Eastwood continues to be exemplary. Starring Ken Watanabe in State of grace, that manages to breathe your character all the grandeur, melancholy, decision and abatement that it requires, "Letters from Iwo Jima" shows, fears, hopes, fears, the flatulence, the cagaleras, laughter and tears that prevent a handful of young soldiers who, simplythey have done a bitch calling rows. Although it is by comparing with the already referential "Saving private Ryan", a film if foster kinship this "letters from Iwo Jima" is with the terrible "paths of glory" by Stanley Kubrick, with whom he has many points in common, above all, when it comes to denounce the injustice, the foolish and the mental closure of both military with the uploaded gallons of the bib to the blunt.Eastwood tells of a society, rigid and hierarchical, which faded shouting Banzai! to possibly not return to reappear anymore. Speaks of ideals of the samurai, of temperance, resignation to misfortune, of heroism, the Picardie cowardice. and through the characters of general Kuribayashi and his junior Olympic rider, speaks of the absurdity of a struggle facing people who were once friends, colleagues and supporters. Two sequences are especially foresight in this sense: that of the delivery to Kuribayashi a colt by some American servicemen that pay you homage before returning to Japan, told in flash back and, of course, of the Charter of the American soldier that is read aloud by one of the Japanese.With these cards, just like that with M$ B or without forgiveness, Eastwood has specialized in the death of a masterfully touching, exciting, thoughtful way, so raw as poetically realistic and mature. Thanks, Clint, for continue giving birth masterpieces.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3737

Jesus Lens

Deseo, Peligro

muchocine

A great movie that consolidates Ang Lee as one of the most interesting of the current global film scene and libérrimos directors.

Importantly, the comma in the title. If not, "Desire, danger" would otherwise. How important is seeing a movie in good condition! Just what viewers last Sunday we went to the Granada Center multiplex can not say. Film blurred, cut and rebobinada, lights and dialogues lost for the sake of a nefarious projection. And as the movie lasts about three hours, this type of accidents, as they fuck especially. So, if I say that the film seemed somewhat long and that for my taste sobrarían you 30 minutes, many staunch defenders of the last film by Ang Lee could tell me that no, that was the culprit of both Court and so much discomfort. Really, the film seemed excellent. An example of special classic film, film in the old style of cinema of spies in distant and exotic landscapes. And that "I would like to, danger" is another very serious risk: of that talk of the warm their sexual sequences and the censorship that has been mutilated in native China of the director, this enigmatic and surprising Ang Lee. Because while we have an exercise in classicism at old-fashioned, Lee has foregone the moral false that prevented to Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman wallow as descosidos, giving free rein to his tormented love. And, thus, the protagonist of "Desire, danger" uses not only their seduction skills, but the benefits of his splendid body and the fogosidad of his youthful soul to achieve woo the Chinese collaborationist with aspect of hard, insensitive and undaunted. But each frame of this film distills the classic breath which, unfortunately, is no longer the style. We speak of a classicism in the best sense of the word, well managed and not this pantomime that starred George Clooney in "The good German". Classicism as aesthetic choice, with a Shanghai that, in comparison with the postmodern city today, seems a more distant antiquity people. And a story, at the same time, very simple and very complex. The story of an infiltrator and the risks that it entails, challenges, dangers, the anxieties and sorrows. Is funny, the amount of excellent recent films that have an infiltrator as protagonist, from the eponymous film from Scorsese to one of the great masterpieces of 2007: "Eastern promises". Perhaps because we live in an age of simulation, deception and double faces in which nothing is what it seems. I like the melancholy of the games play the Précieuses of their suits and dresses, women, throughout the film's production design and, above all, the interpretation of the two protagonists, searching, avoiding indulging, loving it, repelling. A great movie that consolidates Ang Lee as one of the most interesting of the current global film scene and libérrimos directors.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4167

Kiko de España

John Rambo

muchocine

Stallone has returned. Rambo has become. Who can not enjoy the news? Who can not enjoy before a movie of the old? So violent as amusing. Stallone is for awhile.

Against all odds, Sylvester Stallone will turn into a craftsman of those who no longer have. I say it's against all odds because from Copland, was not the perfect film, have spent more than ten years and Sly seemed in danger of extinction as their countrymen gener-action. And became Rocky Balboa, an emotional tribute to one of the most beloved characters of the film.With the return of the Boxer were many who took a surprise fat, but bigger still is the return of another classic but much darker character: John Rambo.En this fourth adventure, less than 90 minutes, return to the cinema to see one of those movies that are not already filmed and leaving in diapers for example, the disappointing and also fourth adventure of another old John: McClane. Now Rambo, which remains locked inside and outside all the shit that is found in the world, must rescue a group of volunteers who travel to Burma to cooperate on humanitarian mission. If the hallmarks of exceeding the Stallone classic saga is lost in the jungle 4.0, in Rambo its director and protagonist (and screenwriter) gives a punch on the table and scream so loudly a here I am, let's smear of blood that can be seen with taste.Because there is so much blood that he may be the most violent of the four, with violations, episode in the film torture and killings as not we saw from the frika of the Cannon, everything with an enviable narrative pulse in which no time for the Midlands in a colossal all or nothing that it leaves a huge climax to remember of the pre. An exercise of nostalgia and style that should not take a joke. Rambo has become.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3354

Kiko de España

The Lookout

muchocine

It is more enjoyable than First snow, which is clearly less dark and much less noir.

Pleasant surprise The Lookout, pure and simple thriller that I like much more than First snow, for example.Directs his first movie Scott Frank, who was from the scripts still die Out of sight or Minority report, three super great genre movies. My first dvd was the Soderbergh movie, do yours? "Brick" Joseph Gordon-Levitt is Chris Pratt, a kid that it had everything until an irresponsible accident cut off his wings who works washing (pasta store) Bank of the people. As a result of the accident almost so fucking go of memory as Leonard and their ability to be someone in life away to any host. Share floor and penalties with Lewis (Jeff Daniels), a man who is blind almost all life. A suspicious guy named Gary (Matthew "Watchmen" Goode) seduces him with girls, praise and money in exchange for a special collaboration. And already I do not more, although I do not think it is very difficult to know already what happens.Very entertaining and noticeably filmed is a thrill for everyone as Brick, which is trying to introduce the noir (without being especially Lookout noir despite sharing some element with the do subgenre?) in the muchachada.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2311

Tito Chinchan

Pequeños grandes héroes

muchocine

The film focused on a public very often. Of those who make the imagination of children and we jump the seams of the mouth to the elderly of yawning. Suitable only for children.

Is the girl on the cover not that was a gymnast in the movie that I saw a school of gymnasts, that she was a rebel girl that or went to school or had to go to jail? I leave the question in the air, that intrigues me more to know how put you the gas in the soda.The film is about a few super heroes that were treated with a radioactive move a few years ago, causing that two brothers battle between them as if it were the same good and evil. Over the years, which was evil returns for more and the good has to train a group of kids to be superheroes and to stop his brother. And this is, is have not tronchado meninges, no. what want tell you? I bored me a bit with the movie, the children seem repellent, especially small. The super power of el gordo is offensive and absurd. Do not leave pechis or anything you like (what else gives it a movie for children?, a few nipples always encourage and not offend). Total, that thought crucify her, but told me my medium Zucchini "has been well the movie, right?" And I I have less psychological strength that a celery, I said, "psssi". So now I can not enact, ja, ja, ja.In short, film focused on a public very often. Of those who make the imagination of children and we jump the seams of the mouth to the elderly of yawning. Suitable only for children.Child exclusive use.kisses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2604

Bruji

Turistas

muchocine

Taking advantage of the good reception of shit I like?Do Hostel?, and with zero geographical and historical knowledge, the American writers, once more, insist on insulting the international intelligence. Disappointing, even for the most ardent lovers of the subgenre.

Kind of project of end of career which, inexplicably, obtained financing and subsequent distribution. Taking advantage of the good reception of shit like "Hostel", and with zero geographical and historical knowledge, the American writers, once again, they insist on insulting the international intelligence. Disappointing, even for the most ardent lovers of the subgenre. Based on the typical formula of "what seemed a paradise vacation, became a nightmare," in the paranoid obsession of Americans by found always in danger, especially in those places where the magic words "I am a citizen of the United States of America" mean nothing, and the exploitation of international fears; Tourists is not any horror film.In reality, it is not more than a crude collection of all kinds of situations and dialogues inherent in this kind of stories, based on the classic faces of "die" all that, by its improbability, lead, inevitably, to the tedious mock.Do so in quite a few passages, the tape of John Stockwell (the air in his youth Idol) does not reach the category of "movie", translating into a kind of project of end of career which, inexplicably, obtained financing and subsequent distribution, perhaps, to make use of the pull of clunkers as the saga of Hostel.Su script? from beginning to end - not only is the paradigm of unbelief, but that consistently, persistently in insult the intelligence and common sense of the Viewer. In this aspect, we accept the unlikely possibility that a group of mindless teenagers, after suffering an accident that puts them in the middle of nowhere, focus their energies and concerns in the way of enjoying the sexual and gastronomic delights of a place unknown (significant level of a used condom). "The occurrence" to be executed by eight cuarentones, however must be the lemon pear. By the same token, we accept the existence of a luxurious mansion which is located in the interior of poverty, although it belongs to the uncle of a humble young man found on the beach. Clear, that the cottage is equipped with security cameras of latest technology, rich delicacies, ron añejo and jeans of the exact one of the protagonists, size must be reasons more than enough to start suspecting its inhabitants. It gives the feeling of that USA children never read the House of Chocolate. As the Swedes did, these are them leads bound and muzzled, in the purest style of Apocalypto. On the other hand, would not be more Stockwell is devoted to explain at what exact point of Brazilian geography join the sea and the jungle, why in ten hours of hiking the intensity of sunlight remains unchanged and in what historical time the Swedes, Australians and Americans sack Brazilian rubber and sugar. (This last assumption, fear would have to give the Spanish summer in Latin America). Without the bad taste that situates the action somewhere in Brazil, as if the Bush Empire did not exist this type of practices, psychopathies and "altruistic" nationalists. For this reason, even convinced the alleged social criticism that proposed, nor the original twist seen in the mythical indent of Coma, the famous story of Robin Cook, which carried Michael Crichton screens.The development of the plot, for its part, fruit of an accurate and infuriating irregularity, crowned by the uncertain measurement of time, contributes to finish an ill-fated product, totally dispensable to the history of the cinema, that should never cross its borders. or see the light. Surprisingly, the simplicity with which is approached the outcome, as well as the brazenness with which truncates the factor surprise, the sickly natives rear recreation, painful events planning. Given the fact, moreover, of even the magnificent underwater scenes to lose his brilliance to be repetitive, incurring another error of script, which makes it possible that foreigners get poke fun at the locals in their own caves.A film, in short, that does not convince you to lovers of suspense, terror, or the followers of Peter Jackson, master of al gore. A history that not even the addicts and unconditional of some of these genres can be defended.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3518

Andrés Pons

Hospital Satán

muchocine

What they want to tell hospital Satán? Nonsense since the start that even going to worse especially when the devil makes an appearance noticing this echo of plasticine.

Sometimes we think that already be a dandruff of the 1970s or 1980s it has to be something at least endearing or contribution entertainment. Because this is not the case that after the cameras lies one of the biggest useless of the horror film that goes by the name of William girdler which among other holdings decided to assassinate the Exorcist to take it to the black market. "What is called blackxplotation with the film Abby" was so blatant copying that the director was even denounced by plagiarism "." After some other type Grizzly disaster where the adventures of a killer bear that looked like a fucking cat I have on that occasion. With all this what they want tell hospital Satán? Nonsense since the start that even going to worse especially when the devil makes an appearance noticing this echo of plasticine. Among the actors only charles kissinger would make more movies, i.e. all the director's "nobody else do I contract". It is not surprising that none of them would act seeing levels of interpretation offered.Music, photography as nonexistent as an address or script. In short one of the worst films I've seen lately.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4264

Rafa Delgado

Expiación: Más Alla de la Pasión

muchocine

Would we be talking about one of the best films year-round, if it were not because the viewer patiently paid weight of the pomposity of a director that has given an attack of egocentric inspiration.

Would we be talking about one of the best films year-round, if not because one of their actions (splits into three, highly visible) is absolute rubbish and a lack of respect for the patience of the spectator, who has to pay the grandiloquence of a director that has given an attack of egocentric inspiration. I'm talking about the endless Act that takes place during World War II (which includes, of course, that flat sequence that, Yes, Dear Joe, is a prodigy of the technique, the address and all what you want, but which is UNNECESSARY), and is tedious and boring to say enough is enough, breaking with the fabulous rhythm which until then was carrying the film. The pace again, but late. In addition, after the ordeal, the end that has known to joke. Mmmm, isn't me not like the end, on the contrary, I love: but if the film does not fail miserably in the second act the end would be less. "offensive".The cast is not bad, although there is a significant lack of chemistry between a flojita Keira Knightley (thank God that her have not nominated for an Oscar) and a correct James McAvoy. The best without a doubt is Saoirse Ronan, nominadísima best supporting actress, which is out of the screen and eats all veteran performers with potatoes and fried eggs. The soundtrack is certainly a gift from heaven, and a breath of fresh air in the film's weakest moments.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2032

JLO

Star Wars Episodio III

muchocine

If one is not a fan of the series, or not wallows with small details of continuity between films, it is difficult to be deliver the enjoyment of a film at times bland, impossible to stand on its own.

Star Wars was, and is, a phenomenon like few others in today's world of the film Trilogies (comparable only to Mr. of the rings). Returns the factory of George Lucas (filmmaker if not mediocre, the less uneven) industry go & Magic creator, with the famous sequels (or calls now prequels) of his saga rompe lockers, which generate a legion of fans mas grande at every step.He had to see ingeniaba them Lucas to surprise us, knowing that the storyline of his series was already defined in advance (the step of Anakin to the dark side), the birth of twins Skywalker, etc.. But it does not. Perhaps the achievement of Episode III is the be the mejorcita of prequels them. Too little.Visually stunning, scenes strung from the beginning as a kind of infinite necklace of fights, swath clean and everyone in a new arena ever more spectacular (simile video game), with much color but with little emotion. Hayden Christensen (Anakin) continues to do what they can (which is very little). The omnipresent music of John Williams flooded all of triviality, as well as dialogues (error already quite repeated in the series) and a story of a dramatic simplicity, spent and which taken as a whole, can never be told in six! films. The expected conversion of Anakin in Darth Vader (that Yes, one of the best characters in fiction in the history of the cinema) is resolved only by a fear of dubious taste and pulled their hair. Its presence is also reduced at last - and few - minutes of the film.If one is not a fan of the saga, or not wallows with small details of continuity between films, it is difficult to be deliver the enjoyment of a film at times bland, impossible to stand alone without this Galactic fable which in its first parts (the old), I had a certain poetry and idealism naif. And that in the latter - primarily Episode II - stained political issues, violence and a single value: the so famous "force" is the greed of power at all costs, both the "good" and "bad". Too similar to the real world.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1312

Puspus

Rocky Balboa

muchocine

Which clichés abound, then Yes. Given some side pity, then also. That everything follows true whiff to eighties movie, of course. But Stallone is very decent as protagonist and very intelligent as director.

Direct and sencillota as a punch in the jaw, "Rocky Balboa" means the return to the screens of the unparalleled Sylvester Stallone. Undisputed star in the 1980s, tramp without direction in the 1990s and mysterious unknown today, the "Italian Colt" bequeathed us with this film his film Testament. And it is that the sixth installment of Rocky could well be understood, not only as the end of a saga, but also as the farewell of the venerable fibriliation voice actor. Not by another thing the movie is loaded with nostalgia. Nostalgia for a time that never again, where the box office always responded and worldwide chanted his name; Nostalgia for a face that had not yet shown the ravages of botox and the scalpel. Nostalgia, finally, by those muscles that were betraying him with the passage of time, to become the unfortunate flap now looking. As the old Balboa customers of his restaurant, Stallone gets tired in that first hour full of crepuscular dialogues, platitudes and cheap fussiness, but it is a toll to be paid so that the feelings overflowing in his exciting second half. And it is ringing the "Gonna fly now" and llenár you the eyes of tears, Lene. Which clichés abound, then Yes. Given some side pity, then also. That everything follows true whiff to eighties movie, of course. But Stallone is very decent as protagonist and very intelligent as director. Recover that old film for all ages, truffles of good advice and best feelings, and get the applause of the public in this impossible final match where, to not miss, there is no shortage or logos the PayPerView and HBO. The script is insane, we know it, but the movie unsuspectedly works and is so easy to digest that nobody get angry. Children, believe in fairies and not fuméis crack, tells it your dear Uncle Rocky.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/88

Tito Chinchan

La pantera rosa

muchocine

It has the necessary touch of sobriety and fair thanks

Always it has intrigued me much a matter. The original Pink Panther Film dates back to the 1960s, and it already was like a diamond to the Pink Panther. And I wonder, that relationship did the diamond with the cartoon? Since then, the name, and I have to give thanks to the creator of such series, as funny as the Panther after having gotten into the washer and look like a giant pink bubble Imaging. That's nice.The film is about a diamond known as "The Pink Panther", obviously because it is that color. During the celebration of the French football victory over China (World's great power of table tennis), coach and owner of such Boulder is killed and the same, stolen. For reasons which are not the case, the search for the murderer and the jewel is responsible for dumb and clumsy all researchers Paris, Inspector Clouseau.Tiene fair thanks and the necessary touch of sobriety so that a film not embarrassed. I was afraid I find myself with a retaila of facilones, without much grace jokes, that made me want to be anywhere else. But no, pleasant surprise took me to see that the jokes were more or less ingenious and everything was still a logical dash, dotted with the sympathetic inspector incompetences. And clear, if you have the Renó aside, the thing is likely to pretty good movie. And it is that this actor is incredible. It is a comedy which not smile in no time. And look that you have time to smile, but nothing. Notably, dancing sticking (terrific) upholstery and classes of accent of Clouseae, which are somewhat excessive, but they have their point.In short, for a laugh with a comedy of good level. Or if only to see the scandal of the Beyoncé body.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/890

Elena Suárez

Ratónpolis

muchocine

Approaching the format of the goose that lays the golden eggs (animated films aimed at a child audience but with winks for adults), British not clear as much irony as others of its kind.

Are already here Christmas and the holidays of children, time that is tapped by the film producers to make films devoted to the children, something which seems absurd because not only in holiday children can go to the movies (another thing is that parents prefer to put them in front of the TV so that they can learn with educational series such as the Simpsons or Shin-chan)(, which comes on the other hand out them cheaper and also can feel proud when their monsters are almost so stupid like them).Approaching the format of the goose that lays the golden eggs (animated films aimed at a child audience but with winks for adults), British not clear as much irony as others of its genus (Shrek, monsters S.A, Ice Age or the latest and most fantastic incredible but true story of little Red Riding Hood). The fundamental reason is that, although situations and chistesdestinados to the older (terrific of the cockroach reading of Kafka's metamorphosis), the target audience for this story is more often.Following an infographic design very similar to the of Toy Story (simple textures and a repeated use of household objects that bring us closer to a contextual reality), the characters in this nice story will be almost in its entirety animal (humans only appear), and small (mice, frogs, slugs, etc.)The message is is the Association of individuals as the best vehicle to achieve a genuine personal development. Perhaps, the way in which it will not be very creative and missed some that another added value that implied the urgency to curiosity and research (our rodents are very courageous but barely make use of his imagination).Very important and interesting is the soundtrack of the film, played mostly by a cheerful slugs that will make us remember classics from the likes of Tina Turner. Not so interesting has been the idea of choosing players for dubbing (María Esteve shows us that not only does not know interpret but that either, is good in this double films).In short, look at the various options presented for this month (still enough to come) and choose the most appropriate (also may choose to place the baby in front of programs from the category of big brother or the search engine, total, if tomorrow is going to get beaten teachers and burn it on the mobile)(soon to be witless, much better).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4354

Andrés Pons

Pozos de ambición

muchocine

Nothing you is this huge work which draws one of the darkest and most terrible of the human condition canvases.

I suddenly thought that KUBRICK resucitaba to rescue the film with his usual bombast. Minutes after I realized that I have too much imagination because the director is none other than the idolized magnolia PAUL THOMAS ANDERSON author possessed by the spirit of the unforgettable Director of Clockwork Orange.Wells of ambition breathes classicism on all four sides with all the features that will make it a magnum opus with the passage of time an essential title which shows that from time to time the film if it is an art.A REMAKE of giant last of revolutions with the impressive DANIEL DAY LEWIS returning after one of its periods of silence after GANGS OF NEW YORK, occasionally seemed to me see on screen very MARLON BRANDO as the British shell composed one of these characters with the bowels that eats the camera with the force of a freight train.A work mastodontica from the portrait of characters driven by greed, corruption and lack of ethics where you walk into a destructive Dynamics where dementia takes over all the characters in a descent into hell that takes you to the end little Orthodox but truly terrifying.A somewhat austere photography although it reflects perfectly the arid landscapes, nothing you is this huge work which draws one of the darkest and most terrible of the human condition canvases.Obviously it is not film for all ages must recognize you a dense work but if you go on it you can not leave.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2357

Ramón Balcells

La vida de los otros

muchocine

I wish all films intended to explore human sensitivity were like this. And he explores not only her, but also her it conveys us. A masterpiece.

Within my ideals, I achieve perfection is impossible. Florian Henckel von Donnersmark fails with the lives of others, but yes reaches a level of absolute pulidez of contents feelings and of exceptional beauty that, no doubt, deserves a well deserved Oscar. Germany has always been a country where cinema that takes place is rather controversial. There are small wonders of blockbusters, more or less, such as Good bye Lenin!, but I think that if we had noted a European country with the highest level, cinematically speaking, end up opting for France or England. But with this powerful and sensational movie, I don't to think that the film of this country begins to like me more. It is true, too, that many of the most famous German films have tended to opt for political issues (not saying the lives of others to do so, because the espionage here is a pure and simple backdrop), most of them located in the fall of the Berlin wall or the time of Nazism (behold the)(, considerably recent sinking). Yet and so, I acknowledge that I have not seen enough movies belonging to Germany as to compare or judge if they are better than those of other countries.I do not think, or rather, do not agree with those who call cinema in its purest form, for example, the Lord of the rings. It will be visually speaking, but I believe that to reach the Summit of the best film you have to explore many more aspects. Donnersmark film, by ponero another example, yes would reach this totalism. And it is that it is really difficult to talk about the life of others focusing on a single point. The good thing about this film is that everything is perfectly done, everything is absolutely dazzling. And this is what they have the masterpieces. I, unlike some, who think that this is an overrated film (very few, that is also true), believe that this powerful mental exercise, this metaphor on human decisions and the distinction between good and bad, is honestly, masterful. In addition, not only it is directed by this, so far unknown, Florian Henckel von Donnersmark, but also written. Perhaps not coincidiis with me, but is that the cinema is always deeper, more creative and, above all, more staff. Yes, there will be directors who do not write their scripts and are authentic teachers, but I at least see Unlike them those who are authors. Author cinema is more risky, perhaps simpler and less spectacular and, finally, I've noticed that many times is the best thing that previously did not so clear. But I am not going to be child. I recognize that there are infindad of filmmakers who directed and not write his films that are, without doubt, overflowing creativity (I am not going to give examples, there are too many). What is clear, and let shift me, is that the lives of others belongs to this type of cinema, risky, difficult, concise, graph, apparent simplicity and very, very deep. And is that you one of these strong points (which are all, rather) of those who spoke about the film is Florian Henckel von Donnersmark, creator of a disturbing, atrapadora, realistic and together formidable atmosphere.The lives of others is a necessary film, a kind of the secret life of words without hope as the main theme, a relationship between two people, albeit here without touching, between two worlds, though here, one of them empty and another not so much. It is this envy, that fear of loneliness and that fear of losing more dear, rather than you hope. And not only necessary, it is also very intelligent. A film like this has to be addressed with awareness and knowledge, not only with regard to policy, also about the human feelings of deeper. Here presence that feeling be living what happens on the screen, are these two terrible and atrapadoras stories which keep you in tension during these 135 minutes, and not political frames (which are well easy to understand). The connection between parallel lives, behind that, already old, backdrop which are, in this case, these political intrigues, yes it is difficult to understand at all, and is not that the film presents a structure to the Arriaga, but maintains strong classical approach, knot and outcome composition, but this complexity of the personalities of each and their intentions that make the lives of others is a film so extremely deep. As I mentioned before, what predominates here are contendias emotions. You sometimes do not know if what is happening is as desired by the / actors. It is this containment, to no less pride, which makes you delve that perverse inner world of the protagonist and the private lives of the pair of artists, spied on at the same time for the professional spy and by us.It could be the end of this movie as a teacher. Belongs to that kind of late that are absolutely round, without being grandiose, above all. Those in which you have to stand to think in an instant, not because of the speed with which advances the matter, but with extreme difficulty to which the characters are subjected. I desvelaré any detail about what happens, but I assure you that you quedaréis people, especially that no physical contact with these emotions so contained and expressive at the same time, this discovery of the terrible facts occurred. And attentive, especially to the situation and final phrase, a little gem that rounds out this masterpiece.Also be considered brutal entregadísimas interpretations of the cast. It would be unfair to not start by Ulrich Mühe, the protagonist and spy for the work. His performance is indescribable, or rather, so superb that it seems to be real. It is certainly a terrifying character, without a penalty own life that manages to arouse their feelings watching the lives of others. And not only exemplified us with the aesthetics of your floor, also with the most chilling expressions shows to hear the couple's intimate scenes or the aforementioned end. It is not only the central character of the film, that referred to the goodness and the apparent naivety, but it also puts more difficult entregación, because with a few words penalties conveys what is transmitted, and, that certainly deserves a long applause. Although I will not mention also wonderful interpretations of Sebastian Koch and Martina Gedeck, two completely different characters, however, joined by the complexity of the feelings and pain. They simulate that apparent perfect, Bohemian couple where everything goes well and that in fact, both need outside help. He who really needs is support and does not wish to, in any way the solitude. She, on the other hand, wants to ending his terrifying (at least for her) life, wants to, once and for all, stop feeling that pressure inside (also present, in some way, therein) and you don't want more lies, but not lying. Without doubt, this trio of characters, to which more complex, is perfectly which develops the story, because without them it would not be anything. It is as I said, this is a movie where everything stands out and every aspect needs the support of others, since all of them which are brighter.A unforgettable movie in all its senses, exciting and at the same time contained. Sensitive and atrapadora, terrifying and human, contained and no grandstanding. Her final, absolutely masterful and emotional (not corny), reminds us that this is an absolute masterpiece of modern cinema. I wish all films intended to explore human sensitivity were like this. And he explores not only her, but also her it conveys us. A masterpiece.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3689

Calaf

Arma Fatal (Hot Fuzz)

muchocine

A comedy, a parody, which however is able to maintain tension, action, even drama. A little gem.

Strange mix of genres. A comedy, a parody, which however is able to maintain tension, action, even drama.The must of the parodic comedy has always been the history itself. Soon the gags or jokes just taking prominence, relegating that tells the background. Only rarely, when the comic intensity down a point, and with something to tell, of course, gets the balance just to interest the viewer more than making people laugh.This film succeeds, with very funny moments, but with a pace of action, based on the development of a detective intrigue, which also keeps us interested, and that certainly makes you leave the film in a good mood.I can only recommend it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4250

Rafa Ferrer

Pelotas en Juego

muchocine

It is a bullshit movie, but at least you laugh.

Juntesé the film "Dead or Alive" with "The Quest" of Van Damme, aportese all the nonsense that can put in a tape based on ping pong and we already have the enesima tontuna arrival of the USA, we have tapes on "Balon prisoner" (Dodge Ball), and now on the table tennis, as well as with Dan Fogler, Christopher WalkenGeorge Lopez and Maggie Q.A Dan Fogler saw you yesterday with Jessica Alba in "Good Luck Chuck", as Christopher Walken begins to be worrisome, since it begins to appear in any film, perhaps believing that only their presence a project comes "palante", the funny of Latin origin George Lopez and the actress bellisma Eastern Maggie Q.El argument does not give much, the script either, and situations, do not give for more typical tape to get the brain out, should not ask more, frankly is of those movies that when they finish one reconnects with the real world and cares 3 noses that has seen on-screen.In short: It is a bullshit movie, but at least you laugh.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2829

Kiko de España

Tenacious D: Dando la nota

muchocine

To see in subtitled Original version. It produces Ben Stiller and is already on my bookshelf, and Hot Fuzz Blades of Glory.

It should have been released the same weekend as the movie of the Simpsons, but the criterion of the Spanish distributors will have certainly been "direct to dvd" in another brilliant demonstration that not only Spanish film also weakens the conditions in which is displayed the foreign.The film starred by the without par duo is a species of sunset on the day of the immortal The Blues Brothers adapted for the young rockers fumetas inhabiting on the globe.Perhaps the deeper can Jigsaw is the message, la moraleja, that my personally I have come to the soul SPOILER: by very brilliant to be what you do, if not the pauntas in a paper you are going to forget after you smoke a cachimba.Two losers (one more than another) join forces to make with the secret of the rock: a Satanic spike built from a comillo of the Beelzebub himself is responsible for the success of the largest in the history of the Rock.JB and KG put hands to work to reach the Rock Museum, warned of the danger for a brilliant cameo that not I deberiáis lose.The start of the movie includes a musical number which removes the hiccups: she gave Meat Loaf and a JB baby that was already in Super Nacho.Para see in subtitled ORIGINAL version. It produces Ben Stiller and is already on my bookshelf, and Hot Fuzz Blades of Glory.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1755

Ramón Besonias

El buen alemán

muchocine

Anyway, isn't that any last film is better, but at least leave them where are without cross-dressing under the thin veil of postmodern. We will always be the original.

It does not require much cunning or movie buff love recognize the good German as tribute to those films that beyond by the 1940s and 1950s (especially of the Warner), a rigorous black and white, with easily recognizable characters and music, they portrayed the difficult of its tormented protagonists loves under the backdrop of the second world warwithout diminishing among so much tragedy a melancholic and romantic look on the impossible love. Insurance Soderbergh enjoyed these films when young he was smiling in the darkness of a theater in his hometown Atlanta. It is not surprising that himself is the director of photography for many of his films.Since the beginning of the good German, when we see how the format of the huge screen is revealed as the unusual and square 1.33:1 (after the closing credits widens slightly, to a 1. 66: 1, approaching a little more our usual panoramic), and the color of the frames takes the documentary texture of a black and white lit the old-fashionedWe know that it is more than insurance Soderbergh aims to restore us to then, as if to this we recorriéramos with him that movie fan memory that one day (and today) was thrilled: the romanticism of Casablanca, the sewerage systems of the third man, the German capital destroyed by the bombings of Berlin West, the Dietrich shaming the Knights (when not to the ladies). All the frames in the good German are elected, framed and photographed for this purpose, as if an enthusiastic lover of the works of Velázquez had mixed (not without intelligence or passion) the surrender of Breda, the forge of Vulcan and the waterseller of Seville, paying this an intended homage to the master. As you can imagine, the resulting work as well as almost impossible a priori seems a collage without its own entity rather than a painting. This is the problem of the good German. His passionate formalism becomes cold the proposal, deleting the whole soul and depth Yes possessed their referents. In fact, could almost say that a yincana of moviegoers winks that us back to the beauty that do provide Tourneur, Wilder, Curtiz or Reed.En films is not substantially a film, but rather all scenes of the good German there is a rift that grates on the analytical rather than the creative. His characters are emerging acartonados, despite the strength of the character of Maguire or the always disturbing and magical presence of Blanchett. Clooney is not adapted to the sizing (both physical and psychological) of his character. Photography tries to emulate the expressionism of their original referents, but sometimes sobreimpresiona light, or flattens her without giving the scene of emotion. Note in excess will imitate, forgetting that a film is doing just that.Also happens with the narration, linked too much to the previous scripts. This hidden husband in the sewers recalls! to the Laszlo in Casablanca, but the Soderbergh Ilsa is less prim and more stormy (to the Dietrich) than the Curtiz. But the height of the emulator effort it is overflowing with the final scene. If at least Soderbergh had taken the Russian General Sikorsky as the endearing prefect of police Louis Renault in Casablanca, perhaps the tone affected the film had won in sense of humor and irony. But, all in the good German lacks the tyrannical rigidity of the geek.The good German marks the only mission to dust off our cinematographic memory, encouraging us to return to enjoy these delights of post-war which survives much of the current film, created mostly by European filmmakers who had fled from one of the two wars. In addition, another suggestion that feeds (although not many proteins) is the image of Berlin as a source of inspiration for many other films, distant in time (one, two, three, Germany, year zero) and not so much (Cabaret, Himmel über Berlin, Good bye Lenin!, the life of the other, Berlin blues, Berlin is in Germany).That said, the good German is more a document that pays homage to the film to a film about the gender of mimics. It is no good that Soderbergh used wireless giraffe instead of microphones, incandescent lights and fixed focal length lenses. This fact only underlines the impression of having more well attended Museum representation on the cinema of those times. But I fear that it is not enough to make us believe that she herself is a film. Fetish formalism of Soderbergh connects with other proposals of the current film, bent on repeating or recreate master formulas already shot and unnecessarily reproducible. In my memory is the monstrosity that tries to revive Gus Van Sant with his psychosis. Or the crematística fans of American cinema by the remake of successful European and Oriental films. Even the excellent Scorsese infiltrators rebuilds from its antecedent Hong Kong Infernal Affairs. However, rather than a nod or remake Soderbergh is a Faustian Frankenstein remendado filmic essences that isolated they exude beauty, but that malpegadas smell weird.Anyway, isn't that any last film is better, but at least leave them where are without cross-dressing under the thin veil of postmodern.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2061

Patri

300

muchocine

I have nothing against special effects, on the contrary, they are very useful in certain movies to achieve a more realistic effect, but it should not be forgotten that special effects should be at the service of the story told.

I read somewhere that someone believed that film of the 21st century will turn into this, and'm me afraid that this could be true because this is not cinema, are just a lot of special effects mixed with violence and video game aesthetics. I have nothing against special effects, on the contrary, they are very useful in certain movies to achieve a more realistic effect, but it should not be forgotten that special effects should be at the service of the story told, and the less they notice more good are, however, in 300 and some other current films, there is no storyWe only go to movies to see what well facts are the effects, and that's very sad, cinema must be something that excited, that makes you throb and stay glued to the Chair, that makes you feel emotions, and me 300 has left me completely indifferent, gave me like all the characters and what happens to them, and something fundamental in a film of truth is for the Viewer to get involved somehow in the historynow tell me someone if he has been implicated in the history of this film? 300 is a show empty and meaningless, with typical discourses on the honor, glory, and bla, bla, that anyone convinced already. A nice wrapper but with nothing more absolute in its interior.Many times I read the typical argument that "is pure entertainment and nothing else", and I wonder do people only you they entertain the bad movies?, I do not understand, me me entertains more see a good movie that makes me think and tell me something, rather than a simple and empty blockbuster season, will be that I am a bit rare.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3025

Hombre Lobo

Desmembrados

muchocine

It is no exaggeration to say that this movie (to some extent) does for the survival horror which in turn made Shaun of the Dead (2004) by the zombie genre.

Despite the fact that it has come to our charts with nearly a year of delay, dismembered (2006) landing at a very appropriate time, not only by the fact that in Spain has released in a double session seeking to capitalize on the failure of the Tarantino/Rodriguez Grindhouse phenomenon, but also because the recent proliferancia (with its consequent tired) of survival horror and torture-porn makes that we necessarily have to welcome a film which takes all a topicazos series and the parody in a way only we can qualify as brilliant. And best of all is that at no time feels that a contempt for the genus there is in particular, but just the opposite: humor is so well run and the conventions of this type of story are so well managed (and reverse) that it is no exaggeration to say, as he has already been said since its premiere, this film (to some extent) makes for the survival horror which in turn made Shaun of the Dead (2004) for the zombie genre.Also taking advantage of the recent rush to shoot low-budget productions in the countries of Eastern Europe, the story of Desmembrados part of a same premise of all these films: a group of people trapped in a strange land where one by one are massacred by a local threat. The difference is that this time the protagonists are not horny teenagers or an idyllic middle-class family, but a group of executives of a multinational of weapons which have begun to prove violence which can cause the industry of death which are engaged in their own flesh. Such social satire, in the hands of more "serious" had been laughable and adoctrinante, here is a field of laughs thanks to the use of the most hackneyed Office estreotipos brought to the field of horror: from the useless leader of team until the ball corporate, from the guardian of political correctness to the fingered in the joints and fungi, all must work as a team for the first time in their lives if they want to get unharmed from that experience. But clear, unlike other attempts at parody, dismembered never ceases to be a horror film (and in fact, there is a good piece of the film in which laughter conspicuous by their absence), offal and graphic violence levels are quite high, courtesy of the British Christopher Smith, who had already given a preview in when its least interesting Creep (2004). Perhaps the only downside that I can put to Desmembrados is that, in the end, its ambitions remained short, that history gave to much more. The disaster of the corporate spirit in a real survival situation could have reached epic instead of staying in a few specific references proportions (the Chief is a tough guy at work proves to be a real coward arrival time of the truth), which makes me think that Christopher Smith has not wanted or has not been able to give his film a greater thematic resonance. Even the original title, Severance, refers to Deliverance (1972), which although it is not a film of terror to the use, it is one predecessor to clear the survival horror. Instead, we have to make do with a very good cross between The Office and Hostel (2006), with including Hungarian macizorras.If something can be attributed to him is that, occasionally, his humor can be somewhat bufo and too basic (which does not get to the levels of mastery of Shaun of the Dead, for example), but despite its flaws is appreciated, it is a tape which I, in particular, did not expect much. In a year in which the really outstanding premieres of terror have not been many, a movie like Desmembrados comes to fill a void. I also believe that, with a little more promotion and separated from his partner of double session, sheep you asesinas (2006) could have been a very pleasant surprise.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2043

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Retrato de una obsesión

muchocine

Ambiguous, desvaido, sad and honest, at the time, portrait of an obsession, Yes, but filmed with icy breath documentalist, unattractive as film entertainment.

Gradually detached from the initial charm, portrait of an obsession is positioned in this very slippery limbo of unclassifiable movies that don't deserve applause, but not the neglect, disinterest. It is of a more than free photographer Diane Arbus biopic, there are licenses that do not conform to the linearity of the forms (the whole movie is an estomagante flashback) as well as disproportionate allegories on the freedom of expression, decision making and the will on changing the course of our lives for more than a supraterreno or invisible fate seem stubbornly strive give us. In this, the film is exemplary, in what is subversive of transgressive. We must understand this love strange between the beautiful Kidman and the ugly Robert Downey Jr. as the real subject of the film, although he then desbarre in occasional demonstrations of what not worked enough script can cause to the general impression that causes us a film. To Cocteau's beauty and the beast you should not be imported sign the relationship of these characters.The relevant label of fictionalized biography which opens the title of the film suggests to us that the director, Steven Shainberg, offender of the also eccentric Secretary, going to sneak us a sobrevitaminado story about human relationships. And indeed, this happens, but Shainberg prefers to dive into fantastic, in the Ethereal part of the soul, in that in which abnormal attracts and beauty, unsettled or not, as I said Breton, happens to occupy a necessarily secondary level.The progressive process of afeamiento of the diva Kidman in the role of photographer suddenly illuminated by the freak is worthy to be included in the private collection of any fan to the kitsch. Special mention to the neighbor disturbing, amoral, incorporated in his suit of solitude and compassion, which introduces the world of celebrity without make any circus of people props to this crucial transformation.Sadly burdened by their unequivocally unconscious title in Spanish, Fur (skin) is a curious work, a punto y aparte in the inventory of movies that we see on a daily basis. This is not going to swell our particular altar of jewels, it won't be highly recommended to our friends when we talk about film (Yes, still is great to talk about cinema around some reeds in a bar), but is not possible, in an act sincere, her crush, impose the dubious "capricious" epithet.This tale about the fascination of the rare evidence forced as the kind, gentle and always correct Diane Arbus matrimonia not with the indomitable spirit, an accomplice with deviant from the norm, the film wants to show us and already its actual photographs were commissioned to do. You can see some wonderful here. Copy this curious mind disturbed by the infinite beauty of ugliness is suicide in 1971 and the urban legend circulating in the gossip of the Guild of the culture cotillas is that he photographed while he was losing in the more beyond. We are not here to deny this rumor.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/803

José Córdoba

El ilusionista

muchocine

The most topical and predictable movie I've seen in a long time, a complete disappointment, although ideal for a little loving and demanding public to reverse serials.

As it already happened previously two similar themed movies they premiere in a short space of time. After cases of Deep Impact and Armageddon, bugs and Antz or the dangerous liaisons and Valmont, arrive the illusionist and The Prestige, both set in the world of magic. The second, directed by Christopher Nolan (Memento director) and starring Scartlett Johansson, Hugh Jackman and Christian Bale, Michael Caine, will not arrive until January, but the first is already among us.As in the detailed examples above, when agree two similar films one usually being the younger sister of the other, the duckling ugly a priori, trying, in addition, advance in its premiere to his older sister. The illusionist falls into this category. With a limited budget (for American cinema) of $ 16 million and with a cast full of familiar faces (Edward Norton, Paul Giamatti, Rufus Sewell and Jessica Biel), solvent, the film is made by the unknown on these lares Neil Burger and tells the story of impossible love between the fiancée of the future emperor of Austria and a mysterious magician newcomer to Vienna. Hacía time had no feeling that I had nothing more start the film. On the quarter hour or so, already not me was liking. In those fifteen minutes the shortcomings of the film were already patent: clichés and platitudes everywhere and a realization flat, unable to provide rate or visual innovation to the flashback of the children of the wizard, which is all foreseeable that one can imagine. Unfortunately the film was not clear of that feeling during the footage.Already during the film also leaves out the lack of means which has been filmed. Filming took place in Prague, pretending to be Vienna, but, and this reminded me to Alatriste, just a couple of foreign enclaves, showing the budgetary shortcomings of the film. Something which is not negative per know, if the rest of the elements might make up for it, but this is not the case.By structure, the film refers to the usual suspects: two characters, one of them narrates the events that have taken place up to that point, to which we return at the end of the film, and from which continues the narrative with included final twist to flashback mode. In addition the film's story refers to Casablanca, including triangle and with a corrupt representative of the law but of good heart, as Captain Renault played by Claude Rains, and that in this film is played by Paul Giamatti.El script is riddled with clichés: young lovers separated by their difference of classes, their reunion years later still she promised and he under another identity which gives much success, the jealousy of the powerful and future husband, etc, etc. This series of elements would add the magical element of the matter, as an original element, to the nor is it takes party. It is a dispassionate script, there is no great tragedies, there are no edges, there is conflict, little everything is shades of gray. The characters are barely drawn, do not evolve, and you know little more of them apart from its generic description. And is also predictable, including final surprise.Neil Burger is flat, worthy of TV, unable to give some life to the subject, and clumsy directly at the trigger time of the entire fabric to be shot so typical and obvious, prevents that you enter in the game because you know what has happened and what will follow. Also the realization of the tricks of magic, something that should be surprising or disturbing, is artificial and incredible, then opt for a solution via computer, that it is entirely impossible already not for his time but for the current also, because if something makes clear in the film, is that the magician is a magician, not a be with special powers.The cast is correct, little more can be asked actors with papers that have, although maybe Giamatti is a little past thread on the final stretch.Photography, costumes, art direction are very appropriate, referring back to old cinema, even with tones and mounts solutions specific to the time of the film silent. Music on the other hand, composed by Philipp Glass, nor help, due to the style of the composer, perhaps not the most appropriate for a project as well. Glass a prestigious and innovative composer of the minimalist genre has a very distinctive style based on the repetition of patterns that achieved wonders in a movie like the hours, whose soundtrack is prodigious, but this pattern is here wrong due to the absence of the film life. So the music rather than enhance the images power weary rhythm, constant, gray throughout the film.In summary, the most topical and predictable movie I've seen in a long time, a complete disappointment, although ideal for a little loving and demanding public to reverse serials.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/577

Txapulin

A scanner darkly

muchocine

It occurs as a plea against drugs originally written by Phillip k. Dick. Boring and quite unnecessary.

A priori this film draws attention by its, say, new animation system (although Ralph Bakshi would have much to say about it), based first in filming the movie with real actors normally and then pass a few photoshop filters to each frame to make it look as if they were a sort of cartoon. I personally understand that this technique, in the film, only serves to disguise a seemingly important special effect in the plot, which is the use of a suit that diffuses the external appearance of the characters who want to pass unnoticed. This effect would sing much if the movie was photographed normally and with this aesthetics of animation the movie is further with an air ohh-what-cool-what-different-we are.The movie is presented as a plea against drugs originally written by Phillip k. Dick, who at the end list us the names of their friends killed or seriously damaged by the abuse of narcotic drugs. A list incredibly long, by the way. Thus the movie somewhat widely understood, but that not is saved from being boring and quite unnecessary.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4361

Ivan Villamel

El Orfanato

muchocine

Exceptional, that is the adjective that should give this piece of jewellery, which works perfectly from the beginning of austere and manners, style to a poetical without why not be bleak ending.

Very appropriate choice of this film from the debutante at the long Juan Antonio Bayona (of Barcelona's origin) to inaugurate the new edition of the Sitges Festival, a clear statement of principles concerning the quality that promises a pageant, a priori occurs for the best, but the best, in terms of film proposals referred to. And once again, and not get tired of repeating myself, a new hit full in the diana of the tasteful film, again the debut of a Spanish director in the fantasy genre, and again one exceptional film. After attending the screening of a gem like this, one finds answers about the expectation that had created this new film of terror Spanish, so well received in Cannes and with distribution on a large scale in Usa for upcoming dates.History us situated in the skin of Laura (Belén Rueda), a woman of 37 years returns to inhabit the orphanage where he grew up, in this case to convert it, as well as your home, a home for disabled children. After a start where we see that it was adopted by some family sienda girl, Bayonne takes us without further ADO when Laura is living in the old orphanage alongside her husband and their son Simón, which we will shortly discover later that it was also adopted, and that he is ill, which forces him to take his medication every day. Advances the film and quite subtly, we are discovering as Simon speaks to parents of imaginary friends, something which does not pose the slightest concern to parents, considering it more a typical attitude of a lonely child than anything else. But everything changes from the moment in which Laura and Simón visit an ancient cave close to the beach, where the child tells his mother that has met a new invisible friend. This causes various confrontations between mother and child, thing that is twisted completely in the moment in which Simon disappears for months, without knowing their parents which remedy to that situation, but feeling that it isn't as far as may seem.Exceptional, that is the adjective that should give this piece of jewellery, which works perfectly from the beginning of austere and manners, style to a poetical without why not be bleak ending. The story is developed with an impeccable narrative pace, this narrated with a voltage increase, including a couple of scares that cause one adjournment of the armchair as a spring, and a capacity for the description simply impeccable.Bayonne creates a visual style that makes the economy of means a virtue, because always round a sense of hopelessness in the characters on the screen and that is due to put them in those gray and austere, environments where the contrast with large spaces, as this brilliant scene of the beach and la cueva, creates a sensation of constant oppression.It is not intended in this film a visual appearance very ornate or even with a beauty of the images that stands out above the history (which is partially in some other directorial debut of patriotic filmmakers). I.e., the virtue of Bayonne, if we are guided by his first film (already we will see how it evolves in the future), is to penetrate inside of their characters drama and terror, not so much a mise en scene especially bright, but rather a large counter of stories.Many layers has the film, as the special connection established by nature between a mother and her children, although in this case it is taken, and that is so hard seeing on screen display as effectively as in this film, or references to children's stories from the perspective of an adult, as his constant allusions to Peter Panwhere the final is particularly significant. The constant threat of madness pervades the images of the film, where even the end of the film could be much talk about whether we're seeing something real experienced by the characters or is an insane vision, with a suggestive ending that could not rule out in my opinion the second option.About actors, to say that all are especially prominent, with special consideration for Belén Rueda, her role as mother traumatized by the loss of the son, or of own Simon, which gives his child character certain nuances which are not usually watchword of the genus precisely that outboard. They both operate at a strictly physical level acting as in scenes of internal torment, impeccable.Some of the scenes of the film are a capacity of synthesis in if same of the horror genre insultingly bright and frightening, as the scene where a mysterious hooded child, then we will know who it is, is coming slowly to Laura emitting animal sounds that are frightening, shown with a voltage and an ability to shoot scenes of this amazing type in a newcomer. Or one of the best of the film, where almost at the end recalls the game which enjoyed as a child in the orphanage, and what appears on his back puts hairs tip anyone. Simply brilliant.Perhaps the only but that is you could put as bright debut, consists in the own plot of the film, reminiscent of films already treated many times previously and that subtract the virtue of originality (we could remember as recent "The boarding school", although with many worst results of final finish), since known as argument of a threat from the past which manifests itself in the present in a cursed placewhich it always tends to be an isolated House, an orphanage and a hospital, it is present the film consistently (I will not appoint some film based on the novel by Henry James to be already very repetitive).In short, a brilliant film, a demonstration that we are faced with a director with a bright future in the breeding ground to fantasy films, with a special ability in storytelling and a very direct style with no concessions in the form of topics, where despite the "but" mentioned in the previous paragraph looks to offer us one of the best films of terror in a long time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/722

Alvaro Oliva

Yo soy la juani

muchocine

The best of the film undoubtedly Verónica Echegui and Dani Martín, as well as the aesthetic that presents us, including scenes at discos, overprints of sms are sent the protagonists, tuning meetings, and the discovery of Madrid by the two friends.

Bigas Luna returned to the screen with "Yo soy la Juani". History of neighborhood in which the protagonist has craving for overcoming, there comes a time in your life that needs take a radical turn and change everything that surrounds. Their environment, marked by the marginalization, with a father who want to expropriate the House, which usually drunkard is and mount at Jamborees, as being a mother who decided to take care of her husband and start a family rather than luck as a singer, a boyfriend (Dani Martín) that despite desvivir by it, does not mean that it is a Gulf and put the horns have tried naturally contributes to this. To all this we must add that Juani (Verónica Echegui) works in a supermarket and that what he wants is really becoming an actress, and unless you do something with his life is going to become a reflection of his mother, wasting few opportunities he had, and with the consequent remorse for not having tried. After deciding together with his best friend and leave his neighborhood to move to the capital, Juani will realize that achieve their dreams will not be as easy as she believed. This is what presents has Bigas Luna, that Yes, supported in an aesthetic characteristic of the world of tuning, and the most junior, where often the protagonists can be confused with prostitutes, because of their outfits, and where the boys are having fun making races with their highly modified cars. Then it presents a world away from all this, where reality becomes harder, and show us the difficulties to achieve our goals.The best of the film undoubtedly Verónica Echegui and Dani Martín, as well as the aesthetic that presents us, including scenes at discos, overprints of sms are sent the protagonists, tuning meetings, and the discovery of Madrid by the two friends among other things.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3434

José A. Peig

El graduado

muchocine

The interpretation of Dustin Hoffman, as straitened monochord register, more repetition in a series of plans laying down excessive narration, make the same emotional core that holds the film is reduced to a stereotype, very suitable for the late 1960s countercultural sensibility, but that already shortly can provide a current perspective.

I want to be different. The silence as a single response while Simon and Garfunkel harmonize their music with the emotional state of the protagonist, a young man of 20 years with life by discovering and without a defined direction. His face is all a long plain first until that becomes broadly to define the man in society. Arrives at the House of his parents, congratulations, the camera does not lose or a detail of its expression apathetic to the reiteration of the social informality that overwhelm him, almost the image of a society reduced the gesture conventional, without capacity to understand what really is concerned about a young man who isn't yet prisoner that hypocrisy and that accommodating thought. When it seems that there is no way out and that the rite is going to follow the logic of social correction, an attractive woman (Anne Bancroft), friend of his family, will be the element that dinamite the situation to encourage violation of established schemes. I wanted to be different, and the challenge is presented under the figure of woman naked and irrational, point at which begins the adventure of being young: lack of preset plans and flow with the temptations.It seems that Mike Nichols (1967) is interested in both build a convincing and exemplary character of a generation as a caricature of the niño rico faced with gaps of the family system and the relationships between people money altogether. Dominate the flat long in order to emphasize the introspective impulse towards the central character, but the interpretation of Dustin Hoffman, as straitened in monotone registration, more repetition in a series of levels that set the narrative in excess, make the same emotional core that holds the film is reduced to a stereotype suitable for the late 1960s countercultural sensibility, but already little contribution from a current perspective.The final race in search of the forbidden bride and the violation of the space and the rictus sacred in a church, with the cry that breaks the tranquility of the normal course of events, is the final reaffirmation of that young man, wanting to be different, ending to love through wild impropriety, including the snatch cross of his sacred room that will serve as a tool to shake the pressure of a social majority.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2578

Plissken

Patinazo a la gloria

muchocine

'Blunder to glory' is a very effective comedy of thick stroke, with moments of true embarrassment and delirious (some even improvised) dialogues conducted by the owner of the role, Will Ferrell.

Yes, I admit I liked 'Talladega Nights' (brilliantly translated here as 'Last lap'). It will not be a classic comedy, but I had enough funny gags, some excellent secondary scratching surrealism (Gary Cole, John C. Reilly, Sacha Baron-Cohen) and an acceptable recreation of paleto American NASCAR scene. It is not one of those unforgettable movies, but more than enough for a warm afternoon of summer.With those expectations started to see 'Blades of Glory' ('blunder to glory' in North Africa), the last product of the factory Ferrell. And once again not left disappointed experience: 'Blunder to glory' is a very effective comedy of thick stroke, with moments of true embarrassment (looking at the dress of Peacock of John Heder, for God's sake) and delirious (some even improvised) dialogues conducted by the owner of the role, Will Ferrell.La history, for the umpteenth time, responds to the cliché of the genuinely American genus of overcoming, sports subgenus (baptized correctly as "hero-to-zero-to hero"): mass idols fallen from grace must learn to work as a team to return to the top. Variations, two: the sport chosen this time is the ice rink (which already had been brought to the screen in the cutronga 'Passion for the triumph') and the number of heroes, two in the absence of one: the angelic novels Jimmy MacElroy (absurd and funny John Heder) and the rebel addicted to sex Chazz Michael Michaels (unstoppable and delusional Will Ferrell). Both, world figure skating champions coming unless, again to fight for the gold in the competition for couples, where await them their archrivals, Stranz and Fairchild Van Waldenberg siblings (brilliantly ridiculous 'Arrested Development' Will Arnett and Amy Poehler 'SNL'), to prevent his victory by the usual means in this beautiful sport.The truth is that the film does not stand a serious dramatic nor stylistic analysis. But the truth is that it matters little, in this case. In the hallucinogenic choreographies on ice of the protagonists, with its priceless pints and macarrónicas chosen songs ('Don´t wanna miss a thing' of Aerosmith, 'Flash' of Queen, or Marky Mark & The Funky Bunch!), the horterísimas comments from sports reporters, even by computer effects, all raya at high altitude during competitions, pity there is no more. It also has other really big moments like the surreal persecution on roller skates ice or the presentation of the technique of the "iron Lotus". Tremendo.Resumiendo, 'Blades of Glory' offers nothing more nor nothing less than fun at the expense of one of these sports naff in themselves and in charge of the number one of the time American comedy. Look no more cause to see if you'd or excuses to loathe it if you don't like (you know to what they were).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4114

Moebius

Perros de paja

muchocine

Civilization against ignorance, the city opposite to the field, roots that accompany us throughout life, fear of the unknown, the other "I" hidden after our typical face... Straw, a great work of Peckinpah dogs.

Neither Heaven nor Earth have feelings; they are the things of the world as if they were dogs of straw (Laozi).Civilization against ignorance, the city opposite to the field, roots that accompany us throughout life, fear of the unknown, the other "I" hidden after our typical face. Straw dogs, one of the films most violent of Sam Peckinpah (although most of this violence is not on-screen) revolves around these issues and their interpretations can be varied. Everything depends, obviously, eye with that look.A young American mathematician David Sumner (Hoffman), moved with his wife Amy (Susan George) to the home town in Britain to escape chaos and violence of the United States. However his life will not be as idyllic as they could have expected, and they will soon have to face the attacks and abuses of the townspeople.Peckinpah knows very well build the image of a young man sobered to whom his wife accused of cowardice, to then turn the character. David is the human citizen, is the civilization and the law, but wrapped in a dangerous and hostile environment and under an extreme situation is displayed as a predator that defends its territory. It is no accident that your home becomes a fortress, a position of strength from which to defend themselves.If David is the mind, Amy is the body, attached to life, and with a system of values that clash with her husband. When it is attacked by Charlie, it will use its own methods and their own weapons out of the trance. Also represents a sort of duality: he escaped from his people to seek other life, and married a man not handsome, intelligent, but on the other hand you can not escape their past, their own codes of honor and her own education. Asked David to fight for her, that faced with the killers.In the midst of all this gunpowder only need a trigger, and that will be Henry Niles (my dear David Warner), a sort of diminished psychic that he has had problems with the law by harassing some girls, and whose encounter with the daughter of Tom Hedden will end up causing the siege at the home of the Sumner.En those first moments again emerge the confrontation between two different worldsthe David and Amy's. He appeal to justice, what most of us would have in mind in this case. She, much more pragmatic, is like a harassed animal, and asks David to give what they want to the Hedden. "Really you do not mind, isn't it?", says David. But how far you can trust one act? Isolated from everything and everyone, it seems that the only law that can survive at that time is the primary law of retaliation.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/554

Berto

La increíble historia de Caperucita Roja

muchocine

Very entertaining film that demonstrates two things: that neither animation is exclusively for children, and stories, by well known they are, might be counted in a totally fresh and surprising way.

The cinema of animation has always been considered for a child audience. Do since the advent of Shrek on our screens, many people changed the chip insofar that I publish this kind of films, is directed which knew well already fans of the anime?The case is arrives to our screens, and under the envelope of what would be a review of one of the children's classics more loved by all of us, little Red Riding Hood, or as her call in this film, Caperu, from now on, the incredible but true story of little Red Riding Hood, takes already with the title, that although it is animation, hides more than typical amusement for children.The film baby sources of great classics of all time in terms of narrative structure, now come to mind, Rashomon, captives of the evil or Citizen Kane, since the story this told from four different points of view, the lumberjack, the Granny, the Wolf and the own Caperu because as if in a chapter of CSI wereThis police in full investigation of an evil that is dedicated to stealing recipes cooking throughout the forest, and at full scene of the crime to try to discover that it hides each one of them and if anyone really is behind these terrifying thefts who are leaving to forest with nothing sweet to carry to the mouth.The film is not have an excessive bad milk, can be easily seen by the kids of the House, but if that can mislead them the history itself, because the relationship with the original story are the protagonists and little else? Tucked in the garlic have an actor of ads, an undercover journalist, an addict to the risk, and of course a bad malísimo that only in the last moments of the film revealed their Machiavellian plans James Bond style. In the movie there continuous winks to other titles more or less known, being one of the best dedicated to Triple xXx, although it may even be a game to discover details of other films that the filmmakers have left throughout the footage.In short, a very entertaining movie, which shows two things, that neither animation is exclusively for children, stories, by well known they are, might be counted in a totally fresh and surprising way.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1885

Enrique Colmena

Seduciendo a un extraño

muchocine

Correct thriller that plays with that unwritten rule of the intrigues of the past twenty years which requires a turnaround in the script in the last scenes, and the truth is here Gets the surprise total emphatically effect. But it is also true that this quest for the shocking surprise must generally pay the toll of the lack of verisimilitude.

James Foley is on its way of becoming the great white hope of American independent cinema; author of the magnificent "Glengarry Glen Ross", has also left his personal mark in most commercial products, such as "Men face to face" and "Sealed Chamber", and even out well of an envite so complicated as it was to address "Who is that girl?", vehicle for the greater glory of Madonna. But he has failed to break into the great filmmaker who had been inside, and lately already there are several commercial products without greater relevance in which has been immersed. "Seducing a stranger" is a correct thriller that plays with the unwritten rule of the intrigues of the past twenty years requiring a turnaround in the script in the last scenes, and the truth is here Gets the surprise emphatically total effect. But it is also true that this quest for the shocking surprise must generally pay the toll of the lack of verisimilitude and a solidly armed script, and in both cases here cannot reasonably: suspects of being the villain of the film are all profiles that could indict them (less that really ends so, of course, as usual), but these profiles are often caught by the hairs are unlikely and are provided exclusively to try to bring some coherence to a story that certainly suffers from it. Anyway, it is clear that to "Seducing a stranger" can not ask you more than you you entertained for a while, preferably without taking you too the hair not to insult your intelligence, and little else. Of course that is what you will be asked to Joel Schumacher and other filmmakers professional but impersonal, but James Foley you would have to be able to ask for much more. Maybe already is has happened the rice? As for the actors, Halle Berry get airy of his character, while arguably has more holes than a gruyere cheese; You can not say the same Bruce Willis, do not know if because the character is a very important type, or simply because it has become carajote, it is unpresentable. Giovanni Ribisi, usual secondary, skillfully composed his character, though, surely the more glassy terceto protagonist.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3061

Hombre Lobo

The messengers

muchocine

apparently the Pang brothers have decided to go for the easy way and emulate each and every one of the old tricks of Asian terror hoping to start an easy shock to the Western Viewer

Earlier this year The Messengers (2007) caught some attention being the entrance in the West of Danny and Oxide Pang, the twins hongkoneses that have risen to the chariot of the fashion of the Asian horror films as the (for me) ill-fated The Eye (2002) or the (new to me) much more interesting anomaly (2003). His arrival in Hollywood was marked by some hype to wonder more what they could do with such film machinery at its disposal. The result, however, is not the most desired; Although the film fails to be so disastrous to make your viewing torture, it is probably the largest cluster of common places of Eastern terror ever brought to the screen. Made almost as if they followed a formula at the foot of the letter, the English language and the American setting rural is the only thing that the direrencia of their counterparts from far Oriente.Parte of the error was coming from far behind. A pretty crappy advertising campaign, much highlighted the alleged thematic Center of The Messengers that children have the power to more easily contact the spirits who wander through the world of the living. This phenomenon is not the center of the film, which rather focuses on the experiences of a teenage girl who, after moving with his parents to a farm of sunflowers in the middle of North Dakota in search of a new life, begins to perceive the presence of a few ghosts in his new House, apart from making the impossible lifeThey seem to take it little by little to the resolution of a secret that comes from the past. If it sounds familiar, it is because this same plot has been reproduced endlessly virtually unchanged.Forms should be new, but apparently the Pang brothers have decided to go for the easy way and emulate each and every one of the old tricks of the Asian horror hoping to start an easy shock to the Western Viewer, mainly in what refers to the ghosts of white skin moving in staccato. The twins have even resorted to the auto-cita to include, at a certain point of the footage, a scene exactly equal to one that gave more fear in The Eye, without any change, and who had worked not having been used already five years earlier. Cheap scares nor help a lot, to tell the truth, and the final twist that takes the plot is coming to leagues.It is a pity that the start in Hollywood of these directors has resulted a film so vacuous and so expendable like this. Its zero originality and its plot half-hearted betray her as little more than the vehicle for showcasing for teenage actors, in this case Kristen Stewart, whom I always remember as the androgynous daughter of Jodie Foster in panic (2002) room. Any other consideration is incomprehensible. The Messengers is not a remake of any Eastern tape, but may well be.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3752

José A. Peig

1408

muchocine

Interesting and at times fascinating horror film, with a display of imaginative and absorbent, but unfortunately is check the terrible imbalance: so brilliant in its form, but as unfinished and indefinite in its background.

With 1408 return to the damn place to taste a supposedly Kafkaesque tale in the tradition of horror film based on the introspective look: or terror from within outward (i.e., on the basis of the psychology of the or of the central characters), alternative to the tradition of the terror induced by manifestly external phenomena. From this point we can realize the incongruity that throws rushing one of the best visual work that we have seen in recent months.Surprisingly, this is a film to discuss plans, framing and focus of the entire visual field. His mise en scène is imaginative and take advantage of every angle and the room object to create the atmosphere in which the central character defines his delirium. As a work of horror, goes beyond the feeling to entangle a paranoia of contours oniric and often sentimental (and often, also, childish). The first thirty minutes are a virguería narrative in which synthesizes and defines the time of the central character, writer descreído on Paranormal subjects that conceals a murky past and which is dominated by the family drama. John Cusak prepares a fresh and versatile performance with the accompaniment of Samuel l. Jackson, and the relationship established between both characters reaches a remarkable ease thanks to the good work of the writers. In fact, the best of this movie - what home looked like it was going to be the best - is its ability to address profiles and stereotypical situations of the clichés of the horror film without stagnate in clichés.The relationship described between the Manager of the hotel and the skeptical writer, for its credibility and versatile sketching, showed great promise in this story. And on the other hand, as the narration goes into terrifying dream that shapes their dream the psychological trauma of the protagonist, everything is confuses towards the ground of the dramatic, or a mere display of visual virtuosity without internal consistency, without specify the tone or the thematic thread that offers us a defining idea and, hence, a raison d ' être of the product. Worst of all is that, as regards the content, is limited to passing on two levels of meaning without reaching any port: when ends the first segment (with John Cusak unconscious after the crash on the beach) narration, explicitly noted the psychic nature of everything that has happened, something that, on the other hand, was already implicit - because of the Kafkaesque pulse that inspires - in the same exhibition of history (this bland redundancy that both) (us it bothers and that nothing brings to the set, but simplifies). And then takes longer, ends the movie in the worst way possible: recording on magnetic tape that shows that what we have seen - and that the character has lived - has a literal meaning, and not psychic or symbolic. This final contradiction - which aims to be a plot twist - is too free to be the defining range that must be the last image, so even is a turning point in the argument, but a resolution, to put it in some way, aborted.Ultimately, interesting and at times fascinating horror film, with a display of imaginative and absorbent, but unfortunately is check the terrible imbalance: so brilliant in its form, but as unfinished and indefinite in its background. And not angry you: If this were a tale of terror "to dry" the rating of this film could have uploaded a couple of points. The problem is that he wants to be too many things at the same time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/229

Pablo

Hard candy

muchocine

I fell in love with the way such a direct and raw be filmed this movie is the kind that not only impress with images but it also impacts with a dialog

With this movie I enjoyed by the time did it not. For time since I spent by a film and I wanted to see something fun that get me away from the real world if only for awhile. From seeing this movie even knowing that some of my colleagues not had liked at all. Immediately, I fell in love with, so direct and raw be filmed this movie is such that not only impress with images but it also impacts with a dialog added formidably realistic (at least before the first pivot point) that made me an accomplice of his Machiavellian and vengeful plot.The history is tour environment to "boy meets girl" (via internet) are to take an ice cream and spend a nice time together. The problem is that "chico" is a photographer of 32 years and "girl" is a young woman of 15. At first the viewer assumes what will happen when "kid" decided to take home "girl" to do a photo shoot. But as an as predictable script could do with Sitges award? very easy, because this story will not this stick, here the innocent "girl" it turns a vengeful soul that waited to be home of the photographer to make you suffer in ways unexpected to find out if this has any relationship with a case of paedophilia that been in the area recently.In my view is a quite original film both approach and approach to the public to which it is not stupid like the majority of American films of recent times. It is very radical in its approach, which reinforces that mystery that envelops the young protagonist in a mantle that it avoids to see if it is a righteous or a psychopath without scruples. In this film there is no good deeds, just some less evil than others.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2095

Jesus Lens

Piratas del Caribe: En el Fin del Mundo

muchocine

In this third, not I've heard almost nothing, what is certainly my problem. I do not deny.

Is it over? Hopefully Yes, because I do not think that I able to see me a quarter of the adventures of Sparrow & Co, mostly because I do not understand was anything. Already in the second, to the laughter of the respectable to me not me saying anything, it gave me account that was not in the garlic and I was losing jokes, winks and things.But it is that already, in this third not I've heard almost nothing, what is certainly my problem. I do not deny. If the film was full of kids less that of chest, and they held unabated two hours and average of film without leave, cry or get bored, it is clear that the film has something. But to me I had trouble finding it.I.e. Apart from the undeniable and undisputed power of many images and sequences. And that makes me remember a polemic armed in the Blog of Oti Rodríguez dealers, called precisely one of pirates, on account of a concept so confused as do revolutionary?: the Postcine.Si I I learned fairly well, that of the Postcine would be something as well as Vertigo of the images, the accumulation of sequences as spectacular as overpowering when a Cancel to the previous, without that there is time to store them in the retina. Why the postcine is starred by advertising and video clips, many of whose most famous filmmakers end up directing feature films, that, generally, the protagonists would most the sound and the fury unleashed. would the saga of Sparrow, or Spiderman, me and other franchises for the style, the representatives of this Postcine? Because it is so, they warn. I am under I. I recognize that the spectacle of some sequences of this Pirates of Caribbean is disarmingly beautiful and there are time that you alucinas in big screen movies. But history is heavy, the characters are boring and what have happen to everyone, the truth, I brought without care. I liked the Octopus man. Not be what Jones called. And I like the boats. The design and production. And some sequences of approaches. But do not ask me who are the good guys, who the bad guys, who betray who or why. Not knowing, I do not know who is living and who killed, or who are zombie or undead.I liked the sequence of the ship, the desert and the crabs by the same surreal. So monkey disneyano. The bad milk of some approaches. do but I do not think a round film, half of the jokes do not make me the slightest grace and there thanks sonrojantes, own Ozores movie like el mirón peering the crotch of heroin through some tablas.¿Merece, therefore, going to see the movie? Yes. It is worth because it is one of the pirates, because some sequences are memorable and because it is always worth going to the cinema. But, Hey, if someone was is lost, it would not be to have a trauma either.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2991

Ivan Sainz-Pardo

La Jungla 4.0

muchocine

She is forgetful, of course, as the second, as the third, but well met claims and current expectations. The rest is generational nostalgia.

On the basis that "The jungle of glass" is one of my 10 favorite movies of all time and also my number one absolute in the action genre, is understandable to understand that the consequences of this saga only have managed to get me a smile an accomplice and little else. Someday I will speak of the first part of the original, the forerunner, the great and far better film of Mc Tiernan, but now it is the turn of the fourth installment of the saga that exalted Bruce Willis to the top.Many say that this quarter is a fairly cold film without charisma, conventional, that the script is predictable, schematic, this time the bad guy is very wobbly, it lacks more nasty than the rating for all ages has been a burden and that ultimately does not seem "the jungle". They are right. But I said that actually none of its previous sequels already resembled in its essence the master part.2 Jungle was a kind of commercial calcamonía and without the first talent, a chapter any James Bond nonsense that pulled by land the terrifying feeling of realism and authenticity of the original story. The jungle 3 was elite, again spectacular, vibrant, but of others and that it could have happened also perfectly as any part of the saga of "Lethal weapon". And we get this quarter and I really don't expect anything beyond a good action film, like its predecessors, and they actually offer us a light script, something so a bit like "Eraser", that it was like "Terminator 2", and they mix it with another bit of "Risky lies" and. Nothing surprising in this wave of plagiarism, sequels, remakes, you prequels, grindstones, caries and fillings Hollywood. Do even rumored out there that the script of this fourth installment was, not so long ago, a guioncillo sad action that took time collecting dust and stains of coffee by los Angeles Studios, while it is decided or not to action saga is could recycle, "Transporter 3"?, does "2 risky lies"? And at the end they thought that if they managed to put Willis in some way in the project could sell as "The jungle 4" and make sure the taquillazo. Not be whether it will or not true, but the result knows exactly the ingredients of this urban legend and the taquillazo this be ordago. Still, the truth is that this is a film that resists, entertains more than and powered by empathy and nostalgia for the character of John Mc Clane, its irony and this sentiment so witty, gross and close. The action is fast-paced and the show visually very attractive. She is forgetful, of course, as the second, as the third, but well met claims and current expectations. Else is generational nostalgia, because we see that Willis aging along with his saga and recedes in each attempt a little more and quite possibly already forever of the origin of the starting point, the first adventure of a good man caught in the wrong, the birth of a work place and the exact time of teacher action cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3275

Plissken

Las 13 Rosas

muchocine

Correct adaptation of Emilio Martínez-Lázaro in which parties shine more than the whole, and that at least shakes almost pamphleteering tone of any similar production.

Emilio Martínez-Lázaro is one of my weaknesses. As director is probably not the most incendiary, but certainly has an innate talent for urban comedy. 'Amo tu cama rica', 'The worst years of our lives' or 'The other side of the bed' you are backed up in this field. Now just change log for returning to drama with 'Las 13 Rosas', which tells the tragic story of thirteen women shot in 1939 by the simple fact of being related to the Socialist Youth and the SGP.The sensation that leaves 'Las 13 Rosas' ends, is ambiguous: feel pity for the historical fact that counts, that goes far beyond any ideology: the execution of 56 persons (43 men were sentenced to die like them) as a response to the murder of three others is hardly justifiable today, but speaks clear of how were the spirits then, and how much that worked the grudge as the main engine of the civil war and post-war.But you also alegras that the point of view that has chosen Martínez-Lázaro is not the topic of "the heroic defenders of freedom crushed by Franco hordes": the Madrid director is concerned, more than militancias relations and human reactions. And Socialists or Communists or fascists who are the characters that run by the Madrid of the postwar, Martínez-Lázaro and Ignacio Martínez de Pisón, its screenwriter, have been able to speak to us about normal people in extreme circumstances, and no icons of resistance or personifications of evil. This is the great success of 'Las 13 Rosas'. Others call it warmth, I think it's balance.So much interest for having "normal" life of the young protagonists has its pros and cons. On the one hand, the manners and alien narration largely due to the drama that is its outcome allows a very meritorious reconstruction of a Madrid fresh out of a war, and José Luis Alcaine makes magic on the picture (sometimes too much), with a very good art direction and a few digital effects above our national average. The downside is that the events prior to the capture of the Roses end up being something already seen, with a feeling of watching an episode of luxury 'Amar en tiempos revueltos' which is not shaken until the last half hour, much more interesting. This point is precisely the weakest of the film, feeling that all this already have seen you before.Apart from the great work in the technical section, highlight the interpretive effort of the protagonists. Verónica Sánchez and Pilar López de Ayala maintain a good tone, without exaggeration, but for me that really shine are Marta Etura (somo always), Bárbara Lennie (idem), Nadia De Santiago and Gabriella Pession.En summary, correct adaptation of Emilio Martínez-Lázaro, in which parties shine more than all, and unless is shaken almost pamphleteering tone of any similar production. A 6.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/816

Silvia Giner

El ilusionista

muchocine

A film that was expecting something more, ideal to watch on Saturday afternoon at home after stand food which fattened pigs.

Entertaining film, ideal to watch on Saturday afternoon at home after stand food which fattened pigs. Witty but predictable story that there is nothing special that stands out.Edward Norton (fight club) comes packed with magnetism and charisma, next to a Jessica Biel (3 Blade) which I love but I see that it has suffered the syndrome of the copy. And what is this? because that this actress is a triangles and has artistic personality to spare, made him the slaughter of characterizing it as Scarlett Johanson, if you look in the hair, the makeup, the expressions are a copy of the aforementioned actress. Even I would say that you there are approximately 4 CC of extra Hydrogel on his upper lip to accentuate even further the resemblance. And why is this? Does Scarlett refused this role?, or perhaps the culprit is the new film by Hugh Jackman (Wolverine, X-Men), which bears some similarities to "The magician", time will tell.In any case is a film that I expected something more?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/8

Victor Trujillo

La llave del mal

muchocine

Afraid my phone bill

The key to evil is not a bad film, but disappointed if you're going to see a horror movie. Presentation of the House and the main characters becomes very long and boring and also the theme of witchcraft and Voodoo isn't very well represented. In the movie it shows some skewed vision of the phenomenon of witchcraft, with an American stench to the series "haunted" that pulls back, especially at the end of the film. Above are invented that roll of the judú which is like Voodoo but was born in New Orleans. What is the difference between Voodoo and the judú? Well no, it's clear.It is true that the film becomes heavy in many sections, but it must be acknowledged that in other history regains interest and some intensity. The character that leaves better standing in the key of evil is the old woman whose persecution by dragging down the aisle is most notable and "scary" movie. While the ending is totally predictable, in the end "evil triumphs", which thank lately with both script pastelón.There are many things that do not fit in this film and one of them is the young protagonist's relationship with the old man. The temporary madness of the protagonist at the end of the film that the blind explains nor very well to act as an energúmena. There is much difference between sanity that shows the girl at the beginning and the last scene of the mirror. The director, Iain Softley, incurs many clichés of the genre such as the haunted house, doors, locks and keys, noises, antesustos-scares to lead us to a final climax that can more action than terror.Ultimately, the key to evil is a good paranormal thriller but you cannot make shade to the glorious "The ring" of the same writer.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/248

JohnTrent

Cuando un extraño llama

muchocine

?When to call a stranger? It is, therefore, an elongated version of the scene telephone Scream but not as effective

I have a standard that I always try to meet, it's not to see a remake before seeing the original film that is based. I usually meet, although I must say that in this case I breached this rule. Anyway I do not think that he assess differently the original after seeing the remake that happened to comment on, and it is that "When a stranger calls", as I understand, just grab the original the first minutes to extend them for an hour and a quarter.In the 1990s, "Scream" had used for his spectacular opening scene the idea of that film of the 1970s which discussed. The scene in which saw Drew Barrymore be harassed by telephone by a psychopath until finally massacred, only lengthened one ten minutes but their effectiveness was absolute. "When called a strange" comes to be, therefore, an elongated that scene but not so effective version.Anyway, we are not in a movie so bad and expendable as they have committed to say many. The first thing that surprised me was the photography of Peter Menzies Jr, especially in the first fifteen minutes, where also highlights Simon West planning after the cameras, more solvent than expected. "After these first minutes the thing is divided into more or less disturbing moments, several scares and no surprise given that they already gut us everything in the trailer.""When called a stranger" is far from being a notable film, but does not damage your viewing. In fact, that it writes spent it well seeing this "slasher" without a punishment deaths not a drop of blood, and that already is something to take into account, because a "slasher" without those two aspects may have a fairly small interest. Simon West is a mediocre, but within what should be saved the ballot without excesses, without trying something more that see you a screen, i.e., a "teen movie" squishy and accessible to everyone, which is as fast as it is forgotten and where there is no seek nothing more than entertainment.Interpretations and the script does not have been mentioned over the criticism, as you already adored because there to give them the most minimal importance. Few performers coming out only are there to make gestures and, from time to time, drop a sentence that could be avoided and the script puts in the mouth of those performers these sentences that could be avoided and, incidentally, is a mere excuse to set up an approach and reach a "standard" length.I will try to get soon the "When called a strange" original and already I will give my opinion in this regard, but I doubt that it has great similarities with this remake. Anyway, "When called a strange", the remake, suffers greatly from that "air noventero" so clean and well checked makes no great favors to the film's genre, or at least to the "slasher" of series b that so many joys gave amateur beyond by the 1970s and 1980s. I.e. in this film is imposed at all times political correctness, being notoriously precast everything to get out of kitchen and serve without problems. The end result could be worse.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3694

Ana Belén Pacheco

Hitman

muchocine

Half naked beautiful girls, many truncheons and a scene of action every quarter of an hour. Meets basic standards of the genre at foot juntillas.

Agent 47 is a weapon kill trained since childhood to be the best assassin. In his last Commission, something seems to have gone wrong and his shot white reappears while he becomes the person more search Russia and average Europa.Hitman is a succession of scenes of action, gunfights and quite aburridillas persecutions that have above that whiff to wanting to be a good script which makes it even more despicable. But as the action is to consume it with popcorn not can throw overland addicted to the film adaptations viewers video games (Yes, another one). And the truth is within the bad even entertaining. Half naked beautiful girls, many truncheons and a scene of action every quarter of an hour. Meets basic standards of the genre at foot juntillas. Let's be honest, a person who buys a ticket to see a movie in which leaves a bald mazado guy with two trabucones does not expect to see a tape of nouvelle Jaja, and I guess that the intricate turns of script are not either their primary objectives so it is going to throw two hours demanding that people die of entertaining and violent ways without give him a shred of creativity. and who has not wanted to one time see a flat to entertain movie which cast the first stone against happy spectators who come to the Hall to see Hitman and potentials. They enjoy.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/109

El mágico

Firewall

muchocine

Discreet thriller that promises a lot of boot and will languish

And one day returned Harrison Ford, which is not little. He returned to the film of suspense, which historically is that has produced more regular dividends throughout his extensive career. "Firewall" is a discreet thriller that promises a lot of boot and will languish as it progresses the tape, wasting many tips of a script that promised much and only manages to sustain the tension toward the final moments of the film. Little known here, "Firewall" is directed by Richard Loncraine ("My house in Umbria", very interesting - can be seen on HBO every both — "Wimbledon" - here released in DVD and other small TV in the U.S. jobs, so far don't know whether this man will take off or dark side of the industry) and has in its cast as respectable as Paul Bettany people (here for the first time as a villain seriously)Virginia Madsen and Robert Patrick (speaking returns!). The plot of Firewall is quite predictable. Jack Stanfield (Ford, good father and honest man, in its classical position already bored) is in charge of computer security of a prestigious Bank that is about to create a fusion with another company to increase its assets. Jack has a perfect family, and will be the target of a group of extortionists with skilled computer skills who will take his family hostage pressing him to commit a crime on a large scale. To my item in your home found me quite interesting, look at the world of computer security from the inside is very didactic and access a bit the back of all this great business, and their vulnerabilities. That point is strange, because the script by Joe Forte promises much and resolves certain issues complicated (in the end, for example, the Tracker GPS which has the family dog), relatively easy dodging turns and simplifying all the time, I guess that to get the viewer average who doesn't know fund the technical language of the speaker. "Firewall" is a predictable thriller that will only meet your expectations if you're a fan of Harrison Ford or you are interested in having a superficial and film idea of how the safety devices in the banking system. Very little to justify the price of a ticket. It remains to be seen whether Ford finally dares to bring the chest of memories to his Indiana, in the light of his last performances, as you should be writing himself the script for the quarter...

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4115

Sara Rodriguez

Los Crímenes de Oxford

muchocine

Good atmosphere, good start, good performances... but in the end everything was deflated with a last intrascedente section and let the viewer cold.

Each time I am more and more convinced that going to the cinema with expectations is the worst there is. But what it does when you're with a promotion as the crimes of Oxford? It is not that I am a big fan of Alex de la Iglesia but I like enough to want to see any of his movies and much more if you leave my beloved Eleanor Watling.eso without Fro.digo to mention Elijah Wood and John Hurt.Basada in the book of Guillermo Martínez "Murders", the film tells the story of Martinan exchange student who travels to Oxford with the hope that the brilliant Professor Arthur Seldom help you with his thesis. When it already gave everything for lost, the mysterious assassination of his landlady - intimate friend of Seldom - becomes Martin and Professor fellow detectives in an attempt to solve a mystery that seems specifically designed to challenge them.The film begins with force with that plane sequence in which you presented the characters think: well, after a movie that is worth what I paid! It moves at a good pace, featuring John Hurt so sure of himself that seems that you'll reveal all the mysteries of the universe and Elijah Wood right, but with the same face of scare of Frodo. The character of Eleanor, much to my regret appears without coming to story and the rest of interventions in the film are stuck with shoehorn (that not to mention costumes.)Yes, Yes, it is set in 1993 but that does not mean that they will cease to view a color blind xD). The script is not bad, but this mathematical gibberish and the verbiage about series logical blablabla that initially are as well giving pace and they get scheming in the end become against distracting us from the crux of the matter.Basically you could say that I was a little disappointed. Generally is not bad: the actors are correct, despite better function separately; It has a couple of winks very to the Hitchcock, but even so at the end it is deflated and loses all interest that had been keeping from the beginning making even more evident the lack of originality.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/232

Alvaro Oliva

La profecía

muchocine

An entertaining film that will delight all those fans to the genre who have not seen the original

The hour of the remakes long has begun, and which Apocalypse signals indicate that creativity has been terminated and that it is preferable to pulling titles yesteryear successful to try to stick something and repeat formula now. The "best" of this is that increasingly more remakes of films that do not have or twenty years old. On this occasion, with such significant date 6 of 6 2006, us it comes to screens "Prophecy" with the added title of ubiquitous evil number (666).First this new revision part with disadvantage, that the extraordinary 1976 film directed by Richard Donner, has become an icon and one of the best movies of fear in the history of the cinema. To this must be added the special cast which took the original, captained by Gregory Peck and Lee Remick and featuring Harvey Stephens as Damien. There was never a better chosen child, as anyone who has seen this film will recall the face of bastard who had the "sweet" creature.Another fundamental aspect of this classic is the score composed Jerry Goldsmith, with which he manages to get the willies. So John Moore is placed the habit and try this new version does not fall into hell. The truth is that comparisons are odious and in this case there would be no rival, but to all those viewers who have not seen the first and take "The omen 666" as a new and original film, you will find a worthy product and hook them in his armchair, due to history and some scares that introduces at certain times in history. Liev Schreiber and Julia Stiles are the marriage has to take care of the small Demian, portrayed by Seamus Davey-Fitzpatrick. This trio it must be added to Pete Postlethwaite (in the name of the father) and Mia Farrow as the nanny. The direction of actors is correct to achieving the main goal which is to us what we believe, although the child there are sometimes that just not convincing at all. Since I have spoken of Goldsmith, his "replacement" is Marco Beltrami, composer who became known for the Scream saga, and also meets creating interesting atmosphere, although he occasionally employs the shock, elevating music and giving a blow.I have to say that one aspect that stands out is the artistic direction, continuously emphasizing the colors red, both with insignificant elements and other more explicit as the wine (pours at the scene of the suicide), strawberries come Damien and that leave remains in the mouth before committing an act that we all know, is also used in the nightmares faced by the tormented parents, especially the mother. And finally a detail which although it passes unnoticed seems to me that it is too explicit are forms that have been used to wallpaper a room with Damien, leaving clearly see the silhouettes the sixes by way of ears of wheat.To sum up "The 666 prophecy" is an entertaining film that will delight all those fans to the genre who have not seen the original, (although really lovers of terror will be already viewing the masterpiece of Richard Donner), and for those who did: because one film more, with some interesting moments.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/739

Elena Suárez

Los fantasmas de Goya

muchocine

I liked the end result of the work, and pretty, but would have to give a good slap to the director Milos Forman for not having documented correctly in various aspects on the life of Goya.

I heard the other day on the street, while waiting to enter the press pass of the documentary "The great silence", (which I, personally, would have entitled "The great pestiño") to a group of prestigious media film critics commenting on his impressions of the film "Goya's ghosts": "What horror! - read one - if Goya painted 'Saturno devouring his son' on a wall and not on a canvas." And how bad that war is represented. The worst, a pure garbage. "And Goya seems an artisan than a genius--said another - go film horror!, I think Bardem does not want nor do interviews with embarrassed that is."It is true that we should give a good slap to the director Milos Forman have not been properly documented in various aspects on the life of Francisco de Goya (is true that Goya was known as black paintings on the walls of the fifth of the deaf and later moved to the oil (producing deteriorations in the paintings).) Also, the vision that is done on the Spanish war of independence is very incomplete (seems we won thanks to the English and while it is true that, together with other countries, England helped US quite as not interested in France had more power, the real weapon that won was the so-called "war of guerrilas").Having said all that, the logical thing is that you think that I did not like the film, however, in contrast to what most of the criticism is saying, I have to tell you that the end result of the work I liked, and also pretty.This is not a biography of Goya, or it tries to be: the painter is a character rather than live a given historical time but agrees that he left us in his legacy the vision of what I thought. That is why, so Goya is important to the film. First of all, Francisco de Goya y Lucientes was a condemn champion of ignorance. And when this ignorance is exercised from power, also has another denominator in common: the abuse.The protagonist, Ines Bilbatua, is a fictional character that Goya is just an acquaintance. And the narrative lies in what happens to it and not in the life of Goya. This makes that the historical mistakes that has the movie can be forgiven, but not forgotten, (hope that the Magi you bring to the Lord are a book on the life and work of the great painter as well as one on the history of Spain in the 18th and 19th centuries).Bardem is impressive and Natalie Portman almost reaches him. The setting is quite correct and the end leaves a good impression. Worst, the errors of which we have spoken and the white actress Portillo that unconvincing in her role of María Luisa Parma.Como curiosity indicate you that the movie is based in her novar the eponymous written by the director himself and writer Jean-Claude Carrière and, curiously, it has gone on sale sharing with the movie premiere.Incidentally, for those critics who are connoisseurs of art created not just them say that Goya did his black works on the walls of his house (we already know all), if they want to be more pedants quibble I would recommend warn another error of the film, which by the way, not I heard nothing during the conversation of the Council of wise men: the greater plundering of pictorial works undertaken by the French army does not fall on Velázquez but Murillo.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3879

Andrés Pons

Viaje a Darjeeling

muchocine

I think it is a due the attempted suicide of Owen Wilson, none of drugs or traumatic fractures. I almost cut myself the veins and that I was not obliged to read me the work.

WES ANDERSON will surely go down in history as one of the most imaginative authors and acids of the recent film, where camouflaged in comedy authentic urban tragedies always under a same cast who understands their ideas by very Martian arising.OWEN WILSON, ANGELICA HUSTON, BILL MURRAY always present in his filmography as unorthodox titles of AQUATIC LIFE or the TENENBAUMS.Add other recognized faces in the pianist BRODY or the much vaunted naked of NATALIE PORTMAN apparently not requiring that they sever it to the delight of fans who stayed with honey on the lips in CLOSER. The husband of Maria Antonieta JASON SCHWARTZMAN also appears.Mr. ANDERSON maintains his imagination intact but completely loses the direction in his humour that shines here by their absence in a real brick where you you spend almost all footage trying to understand the hell wants to count.A few impossible dialogues do not help in an unclassifiable film which causes yawning in the room or that we agree in the mother of the director.I think it is to that was due the suicide attempt of OWEN WILSON, none of drugs or traumatic ruptures, the poor man try to understand the script of his friend being so foolish decision I can understand because I almost cut myself the veins and that I was not obliged to read me the work.Save the brick the magnificent landscapes of india. A 3.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1500

Jesus Lens

Ases calientes

muchocine

Do is that?Hot ACEs? It is not more than a Grand Guignol grace without any sense. A collection of bizarre characters that not hesitate to massacre each other without the slightest consideration or modesty.

You have to fuck, man. A few months ago I rented "Narc" and I was shocked by a film crushing, harsh and Spartan to the core. An empty film of any artifice in which Ray Liotta, pulling to obese, was superb. A film about friendship, love, loyalty and betrayal that, with a few doses of violence very tight to what it was, was at the fair, with the appropriate pace speed.That is why, when I saw that it was premiered this "Hot ACEs", written and directed by the same Joe Carnahan's "Narc", me Terry hands. And when I read that the thing was mafia and organized crime. because almost levité that one has weakness, confesa, and notorious for that genre.And yet, what a disappointment most brutal and tremendous! It is that "Hot Ases" is nothing more than a Grand Guignol grace without any sense. A collection of bizarre characters that did not hesitate to slaughter each other without the slightest consideration or modesty, without that at any time we come to understand the reasons and, what is worse, us irrespective of a damn. It is the shadow of too elongated Tarantino? Perhaps. But "Hot ACEs", rather, connects with lysergic dementia of the worst Oliver Stone, of monsters as "Alexander" or "Ex officio assassins". Aesthetics of violence seeking to overlook the graciosa and that is pathetic; he tries to impress and just bored.Shots here, tattoos there, gadgets by now. pseudo-místico-intellectuals parliaments delivered by characters supposedly rolled I and such regrettable cartoon pictures such as the three brothers psychopaths.Dear Joe: what happened in your head between the formal restraint and emotion without limits "Narc" and this "Hot ACEs" bobada? Suffered a stroke and still you do not recuperaste? You have a bad trip with an expired tripi? How you convenciste good Liotta, the less interesting Andy Garcia or the alternativillo of Ben Affleck so join this cluster of nonsense?Male, do you see because according to the magazines in the industry, you'll be that roll the next adaptation for the screen of a James Ellroy novel: "White Jazz". And look, if this "Hot ACEs" slapstick is you can apologize because we are all entitled to spend a cold streak or to get us drunk one night and ridicule; not playing with Ellroy. So, friend Joe, be very careful there outside.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3498

Rafa Delgado

Rec

muchocine

A save who can shot and played with great skill. Effective and forceful. A real Dragon Khan located in the interior of a tunnel of terror, with the only drawback that there are no harnesses or seat belt...

Jaume Balagueró I always has left me indifferent. Darkness was so loose that I sleep almost in the film (in fact, a colleague of mine did), and fear, rather little. Fragile was correctita, but not fulfilled, at least to me, his goal of acojonar; rather, it made me laugh, because the final bisho was a copy made wrong typical Spectra ghostly - overrated-Japanese horror, which is both fashion - copy-now. Not to mention OT: the movie. And the unnamed, yet have not seen.But REC, his last creation together with Paco Plaza, has left me fascinated. and mournful xD.El catalanovalenciano dynamic duo get recycle a genus which needed several electroshocks to pull in this entertainment business with great success. One of the top used for this movie, is the format of the fake documentary camera in hand, to what the project of the Blair Witch. And as I said, works.Currently, very little people is afraid to see four or five hungry zombie blood and viscera chasing staff. But as they have shot the film Balagueró and Plaza, get gives that whole (at least 98%) the room up to a climax of tension in darkness, hysteria, and uncertainty. Get the Viewer to be considerate and put nervous; It shrink in the armchair and cover the eyes. either to stay completely flabbergasted before the screening, without blinking and without losing any detail, no shadows, no fright. All ignore altogether where the shots go. Because we have a movie that has predictable situations that ultimately end up not being, then surprise you from behind. And that in a film of this genre is appreciated a lot.The pace is a non-stop; not it decays in no time. Only a quarter of an hour of relaxation in the eighty minutes of footage. The rest, a save who can shot and played with great skill. Effective and forceful. A real Dragon Khan located in the interior of a tunnel of terror, with the only drawback that here there, nor the witches have brooms to hit you, only his bare hands and their foul JAWS harnesses or seatbelts.We are, by its refined environment and because it is fucking great and entertainingly frightening, one of the best horror films of the Decade, and one of the best Spanish films of the year, making him shade in a way admirable aplaudiblemente to the commercial Titan for the orphanage.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2464

Antoni Messa

Harry Potter y la orden del Fénix

muchocine

Harry Potter has lost the sense of humor and, at the same time, that art almost magical that it hooked to millions of viewers of all ages. We must encourage this guy that is doing most to forced marches, albeit based on Prozac or similar.

Harry Potter is depressed. And its writer also. Or at least that is the impression I got after seeing Harry Potter and the order of the Phoenix, the fifth, and at the moment, latest film installment of the character created by writer j. k. Rowling children's literature and which opens tomorrow in the Spanish screens.Voldemort has returned from the darkness, while Potter - by use magic outside Hogwarts School of witchcraft and wizardry, in defence of his hateful cousin Dudley - can be punished with the possible expulsion of the Centre. Bad rolls are installed in his head: the death of a fellow student; the memory of his murdered parents; the thirst for revenge and personal contempt which is submitted by the director Hogwarts after having reinstated this in his Academy, will be making it into a sad, gray and lonely.David Yates, the director, for the first time facing the universe of Potter and company. And does so in a pesarosa manner, a bit under this abatement which marks the own Harry Potter. The film, apart from owning a pace alarmingly slow, is confusing and wrong narrated in many of its passages. His lack of consistency in the script, makes it look equipped with a number of characters in any developed and unnecessary. A good example of this is what happens with the ghostly presence of Helena Bonham Carter that, giving life to the tantalizing and evil Beatrix Lestrange, seems stuck under pressure in the history with the sole intention of having another famosillo to give a little more than brilliance to its, already alone luxurious credits. Things of the marketing and the box office, I say.Harry Potter and the order of the Phoenix costs it a lot to boot. And when it does, it is halfway inks. All the (theoretical) tension that goes accumulating over your footage, explodes in his last twenty minutes of projection. It is undeniable that, at that time, the tape acquires a caliber more vibrant and interesting but, despite trying to trace this narrative heaviness with her has been developing, the situations of action that offers at its apex, remain dark and with little force.If something positive is this chapter, it is located in the good intention to break somewhat with the classic plot scheme defined by the four previous titles. In fact, the tape begins and ends in the city and the subsurface of London, giving less prominence to the familiar grounds of Hogwarts School, place in which unfolds the central part (and more pesarosa) of the same.A splendid and promising, prologue filmed outdoors and using a tone very close to the Steven Spielberg film; a wonderful and very visual scene inside of a gigantic overshadowed room, littered with shelves filled with balls of glass, and the delirious presence of an unbeatable Imelda Stanton in the role of a pathetic woman with dictatorial cravings, is more remarkable work that denotes the fatigue of a series that still missing two chapters ahead. Harry Potter has lost the sense of humor and, at the same time, that art almost magical that it hooked to millions of viewers of all ages. We must encourage this guy that is doing most to forced marches, albeit based on Prozac or similar. A visit to the psychiatrist would not go you bad. Someone has to get the pit which has sunk. And, surely, insofar as it is achieved, we will gain all face coming titles.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4050

Javier G. Pasamón

Deseo, Peligro

muchocine

Excellent romantic thriller of Ang Lee, with a wonderful classical, a remarkable narrative structure, a photograph of r. Prieto impeccable and some major interpretations of aupa. The flat end is simply memorable!.

Ang Lee is, without a doubt, one of the few Directors of today which has a more sensible and regular work environment to the genre of melodrama. A filmmaker tremendously comprehensive and capable of amazing reflect "The ice storm" average American family life, presenting a nearly utopian western and offender (in terms of plot) full of bravery in "Brokeback mountain", adapt to the screen of a memorable, dynamic and sensitive the vignettes of "Hulk" or present an atypical Wuxia Pian, with moments full of lyricism in "Tiger and Dragon". Lee always proposes films with multiple readings, full of depth and emotional charge (although some seem cold, there lot of internal tension between bodies) and a formal finish flawless. And that is "Desire, danger," a film with an impressive classical invoice, with a script joining seamlessly with a very remarkable narrative structure (much based on elaborate flashbacks) and stands as one of the tapes more reflective, moral and subtle energies from the year. With a reconstruction of the Chinese of the 40 memorable, Ang Lee proposed a story that moves between (1) espionage thriller and melodrama, with moments of sex filmed in a truly exemplary manner and sometimes metaphorical intent. As well the title indicates, the tape speaks of desire, anger, hatred, love and despair. Also speaks of the Monster (Tony Leung), a perfectly fabricated character, in as love can also dent therein and the absence yet can be more painful for persist in his "moral" ideology. There is a game clear between morality and desire, that all this is linked to the danger that lurks to both (her by being discovered and he be carried away by an alleged spy).Mention that party are the main actions, both Tony Leung Chiu Wai and Wei Tang are immense. Tony Leung plays the evil Mr Yee, a traitor to the country which resistance followed by long time. Its interpretation is restrained and fierce at the same time, building a perfect monster that unites elegance with brutality (in bed, where really unmasks the sadistic and bloodthirsty monster). One of the best actors of the time, always excellent it.As to Wei Tang, a surprise to be his debut. Impressive role of femme fatale, which leads to his back all the weight of the film in an incredible way, a character that mutates and using seduction always takes control. A performance that unites (sexual) hard moments with others more emotive. Sensational creation, one of the best mataharis that a server has seen on screen.As the biggest moments I would stress above all four. First bed scenes, shot extraordinarily, worthy of the Cronenberg more hardcore (which learn Mr Winterbottom). The way they have become "entangled" bodies, almost as if they were a single body, the forms that they draw and so acrobatic positions are nothing more than an example of a relationship forged by desire and danger, carrying to the limits of the precipice sexual intercourse as their own lives. She will learn to live with her "dress" of femme fatale/spy, delivered to his new role, using as a main weapon the sex appeal that produces in the sr Yee.Segundo, the sequence of the killing by the Group of friends, in a scene of extremely distressing. Thirdly, the sequence where she accompanies him to the jewelry, moment in which resistance will act, starting with a beautiful idling and ending with that look sincere it is supposed and that escape him. One of the most beautiful scenes of the film, in where through their eyes cross concepts such as love, repentance, forgiveness, surprise and danger. Fourth, the final sequence, one of the most beautiful and subtle year-round. That Tony Leung in a room full of obscurity until then avoided, noting the traces of the absence and consumed by hatred towards his person.However, both arguably technically part of the excellent formal finish and interesting proposal (great work of Rodrigo Prieto in the picture or Tim Squyres in editing - to highlight the initial departure of Mah jong-), the tape is at times somewhat devoid of soul and sensibility, providing moments excessively cold, as well as having an excess of footage as a whole (remember the first part of the tape unnecessary passages). However, despite lacking something to be considered as an excellent film, Lee delivery another notable film about struggle between morality and desire drawing an emotional game on the edge of the precipice.Ang Lee comes to say in the film, as it already did in "Brokeback mountain", that love makes us vulnerable, makes us change and while Ennis (Heath Ledger) embraced the shirt of Jack (Jake Gyllenhaal), here we have Tony Leung asking if same because renunciation of love and not its corrupted ideals. Here she is who is sacrificed, but do it for love, and that's what stuns sr Yee (Leung).(1) With (more or less) similarities to other tapes of the genre as "Suspicion" and "Encandenados" of Hitchcock, "Matahari" by George Fitzmaurice, "The Paul Verhoeven black book" or some of the teacher Fritz Lang.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3499

Rafa Delgado

El sueño de Cassandra

muchocine

Comes a "key" in the history of time itself forced, that force which is now forced, justifying it in the script with a single sentence of a character with less depth and intelligence that Peter Griffin.

Cassandra's dream continues with the current londinenca of Match Point "serious" line, but is very far from that. The address is correct, but loses quite a few kilos of bellows as it progresses the film. Dialogues I liked, but there are some pretty pretentious and good cheap moralina any movie desktop may contain. In addition, the history is nothing out of this world, and it is forzadísima. And if we didn't have enough, brings a "key" moment in history that force which already is forced, justifying it in the script with a single sentence of a character with less depth and intelligence than Peter Griffin.Por not to mention the end (which is so suddenly that one gets the feeling that the tito Woody moved escopeteao towards Barcelona unfinished film)(, leaving her at the mercy of the technical team, that he managed as he could) and cast, quite limitadillo, especially the duo protagonist Colin Farrell (absolutely pathetic) and Ewan McGregor, which demonstrates once again that, although he has charisma and is handsome, is a man with only a couple of interpretative records.Everything they've released would make anyone think that the film I did not like anything at all. It is not true. Found me a salvageable for the minimum film, you know to capture the viewer's attention during his footage, and does not seem fair to cancel it (peladísimo 5). In addition, this creative maturity of Allen of recent years, where everything is elegant and sophisticated, dazzles me. But ultimately, it turns out to be a rather disappointing film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/464

Merce

Tan lejos, tan cerca

muchocine

To see the singer in a film or television screen, we dog a concert DVD? Of course, it is the logical possibility. But, and if I want to see the man behind the singer?

Lou Reed is? nuevayorkino, new New York, whatever the proper demonym, note that I've never been in New York, although Lou Reed Yes you listened. To see the singer in a film or television screen, we dog a concert DVD? Of course, it is the logical possibility. But, and if I want to see the man behind the singer?In this universe our fiction and reality, the appearance is confused with the costume, by mistake, because an actor is the person of truth, is liberated from the mask. But the talent to capture this brightness, not WINS of the night the day. I think that Wim Wenders dares to bare the actor, or singer in this particular case.Lou Reed, dressed in leather, as you walk any day or overnight any walking by a Berlin Street. Unlike reality, he walks led by a stage director. "It stops against a man lying on the ground, someone sunk, forgotten by everyone and by himself, Cassiel, the Angel fallen from the sky of Berlin.""Stand up", or "moods", says the singer to the Angel. Perhaps the firmament covering the German city, is the whole of the European sky. Do do covers the history, the French, the Spanish, the Italian? already seems increasingly absurd? differentiate the site? in any metro station one can find with fallen angels.The film is called so far so close. And every angle provides a different picture. It is waiting for an interpretation permanently. Why can't I be good I'd like to look in the mirror With a feeling of pride Instead of seeing to reflection Of failure a crime I don't want to turn away To make sure I can not see I don 't want to hold my ears When I think about meWhy can' t be good I. Once again, the talent of the German director power with the presence of large soundtracks, for example the "why not can't be good", "why can´t I be good".It's a walk up a video library and rent the film. It has already had its time in the film, everything has its time, as it reflects Daniella, the less human Angel, and everything has a beginning and end. Exclusive qualities of reality, intended.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2084

Ramón Balcells

Zodiac

muchocine

Do do a masterpiece calculated from beginning to end and above all very, but very? fincheriana?.

Some people believe that there are no geniuses. I include myself in this group, although sometimes I hesitate to pass to the side of those who think that David Fincher is a genius, and therefore that there are geniuses. Se7en director a genius or not, the issue is that its new and highly anticipated film is chilling, is practically perfect. Perhaps its best aspect is the Mise en scène, deserving of the recognition and awareness of many directors. Zodiac, so called, in way so suggestive and minimalist, the movie, is absolutmante puzzling, brilliant in all its aspects, obsessive, milimetrada and round.In Se7en, two very different cops penetrated to a dark world full of sins and obsessions with tremendous end. As we all know, having seen the movie or not, its end is at the moment already legendary, one of the most chilling and demolition of the last years, due to the surprise factor. In Zodiac, everything is different. The other film is somehow, dedicated to the Viewer, it was more commercial (and that does not mean bad! I think Se7en is a masterpiece!), and his last film, to somehow put it, is more intimate, obsessive and dense. It is unquestionable that two works are insurmountable, breathtaking from beginning to end, but there is a very clear difference between them, and is the first dedicated to all kinds of audiences, whether Fincher fans or not, and the second is exclusively directed to these. I do, that I think that having seen four of its six films is necessary as to assess whether catch me a director or not, I find that Zodiac is absolute, a masterpiece calculated from beginning to end and, above all, very, but very "fincheriana".As well as in the great, but not great, The Game a character introduced its own and empty mind to realize, at the end, than the life he has done has been both useless, in the film in question, in its third "chapter" specifically, the character played by Jake Gylenhaal undergoes an excessive obsession about the Zodiac killer. And it is, like the other film, which haunts not only the protagonist but also us. More that become obsessed, what I think we are to see Zodiac (or generalizing, any film director) is a feeling of adentramiento, of moral entrapment. Or I at least left with this impression of the film, and still persists me. Its end is not more than a conclusion unfinished everything what we have just submit, an eternal, but not heavy, mental torture filled with unknown symbols and characters as complex as in real life. It is said that the film is inexhaustible, with scenes of violence, perhaps not as extreme as the Se7en, but deeper. I must highlight, first and foremost, all sequences of the murders, because two of them are perhaps two of the best ever shot murders. The film begins with an air of San Francisco at night image. The camera then enter inside a car while you see very blurred and dark streets. In this same car is travelling where a young couple, which will influence the outcome of the film. From there begins the murder scene, filmed with a never before seen accuracy and a really impressive tension. Later, appears the second murder, also devastating and chilling. Pay attention to the disturbing scene of the killer behind the tree?The film's screenplay is based on the novel by Robert Graysmith, the main character of the film, also. Actually, thinking that it was he who became obsessed to leave apart his family, who was the writer of a later novel (which apreço in one of the last scenes of the movie) is strange. Fortunately or not, who has written the film is called James Vanderbilt, and we could describe as to his writing as a true masterpiece. There is a small fissure, little everything is perfect, everything is calculated up to the thousandth. Incredible is the experience of observing during the footage there is no a single one drop rhythm. Moreover, the pace of the film is frantic, claustrophobic and oppressive. From beginning to end, you feel a sense of immediacy absolutely heartbreaking. Zodiac, as a whole, is even more intense and intriguing (namely despite its outcome) than many other films with surprise ending. It is eviente that the direction of the master David Fincher is the best, or even the best of the film, with a start-up milimetrada scene and a general tension is appreciated once you left cinema, with eyes still the screen if something more happens. I will never forget the scene of the car and the woman with the baby. It is own of Fincher, own of a genius with a mind so perverse as disconcerting.The acting work is simply stunning. Stress, above all, to Robert Downey Jr. on custom made paper, complex until its outcome and with some very realistic thoughts. Your interpretation is that most told me, which most I was interested, but he would not fail to mention Mark Ruffalo and Anthony Edwards, a real pair of policemen totally peculiar and very, but very well compinchada. Do not miss the scene where fire, simple but effective. That I not just convince, then, is the protagonist (the last part), Jake Gyllenhaal, who encunetro a magnificent actor and not doubt here is wrong. On the contrary, in Zodiac its interpretation is almost prodigious, but I believe that the role is not very well drawn, or it seems to me. I hate obsessive people, and I guess that why you caught craze to his character in the most conclusive part of the film. Even and thus the cast, including the brief but very good performances of Brian Cox and Chloë Sevigny.Y Finally, highlight the paragraph técncio, where everything is absolutmanete arrogant. Photography, insurmountable. All levels and sequences are cleverly shot too. Assembly, original and calucladísimo (look at that kind of collage in motion where mixed research with the signs of the zodiac). And the music by David Shire inspiradísimo, incredible at all times (I love the songs belonging to different ages).So in short, we have a brilliant, terrifying, chilling, film catcher oppressive. Everything about Zodiac is magnificent, everything comes out from the darkness of the movie, with a calculated staging and a superb script. Do not miss, and even more, if they are fans of Mr. Fincher, now already an absolute genius. I have changed my opinion: there are geniuses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/72

Caty

La tierra de los muertos vivientes

muchocine

More than a horror film is a sign of warning to the society

After many years, George a. Romero (who revolutionized horror with his film "The night of the living dead"), again with a new twist to his idea of the creatures than the rose to stardom: the zombies, and this time, taking on their side all the technological advances that the never had and helped quite this new delivery. Its protagonists the zombies are still slow, but so wild and butchers as always were in the hands of this director. Unlike the current films of the genre, Romero films are much more visceral and violent death is something more painful and more frightening, and that is one of the greatest merits of the director.In this installment, the Earth continues ever more dominated by zombies, and few humans who still resist, are confined in cities, which have become major fiefs markets by walls electrified and defended by armies. In the Centre of the city, in a luxurious Tower, are the rich, living isolated from the poor, who live close to the walls. Supply for these cities (food, clothing, etc.) is carried out by highly trained and militia armed, in surrounding cities dominated by the dead. but things start to get complicated when one of the undead begins to reason, and initiates a kind of "revolution". What has changed with regard to previous films of the director is the degree of maturity of Romero, their dead are not just a few wild human flesh eaters, they begin to unite as a social class, who decides to fight, leaving advance only by issues of instinct, moving forward objectives. They learn to use weapons in their killings, making them more dangerous than they already were.Within the militias, have the person concerned Cholo (John Leguizamo) and the honest Riley (Simon Baker), which have completely different conceptions of how treat the zombies and about his own life in the city: while that Cholo dreams of moving to an apartment with the elite, Riley thought to flee to the North, where the man lived not ever and therefore free of undead. but on two of them, the character more interesting is developed by Dennis Hopper, of Kaufmann, owner of the tower where the rich live and which controls everything. This character represents the role of the economic elites and rich in contrast to the gross and severe reality of poverty and the misery that the vast majority of the world has to live. Phrases like "your will never be one of us" (this Cholo when he tells her that he wants to buy an apartment in the Tower) are perfect examples of how companies and countries try to mainly to the most poor.My conclusion on the works of Romero is that the man is not destroyed by the zombies, but by situations that originates the same human being: the deaths of the film are the result of acts performed by the same man and that happens in all films of the director. The proportion of four zombies portrayed in the film by humans is a sign that men are having an absolute success in his intentions of self-destruction. The main message is that we are immersed in a constant "bestialización", in a process of individualization ever more absurd, where on the other hand, the zombies become one, going to live in society.The land of the living dead is more than a horror film, is also a highly politicized speech and a sign of warning to the society and the directions it is taking.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1373

Florinda Chic

Días de cine

muchocine

Do Cinema days opens Friday in many rooms, but if the blog to blog work? It will not last long.

The team of the other side of the bed, the two sides of the bed and football days mark another originality, cinema days. And it is what promises, nothing. The action is situated on this occasion in the late 1970s where a neurotic film director tries to make a demanding film with a singer who lived his best years as a child prodigy. The pressures of censorship, which puts the pasta and others, make the original idea of the filmmaker - Alberto San Juan - a film of uncover with Martian invasions and other these rants.So at first glance the goer informed well observed, except cañís annotations, the script looks like too much to Ed Wood - one of my favorite movies. But San Juan is Johnny Depp or David Serrano is Tim Burton. They are not even the Ozores brothers who did these things, but at the time had grace. And this film is the kind with two moderately fortunate jokes that appear in the trailer.The main failure that have had this time, is that the public who go looking for another unlikely vaudeville of torbe's couples will find with a melodrama with folk overtones. As well as the characters in his previous works were more or less identifiable stereotypes with the Viewer, in cinema days the time, situations and the characterizations - rub that in some cases the Carnivalesque - will not come to that sector.Do on vis to vis with Serrano, told me that his main references were the aforementioned Ed Wood and? Bullets over Broadway! and he was so taste, Hey. Even in his megalomania reached compare acting to San Juan with Woody Allen. And he proclaimed his teachers Berlanga and Azcona. As ugly as these events was said the director of the film that write you it the direction of his camel, because I enmudecí.That Yes. Gave the nail when I asked him if he made films that he would like to see in the cinema is recurring when you have nothing to ask - and answered me that did not know, that to him him out as well. As churros, I was about to add. As snap said that the last film Spanish that I had seen, not like anything and I did not want to give the title. I suspect that you referred to that acábabamos see was ten minutes.PD: what I must highlight positive is the performance of Nathalie Poza and Fernando Tejero. Do are great as folk of Valladolid and? the artist MOM?. Others - Malena Alterio, Miguel Rellán, San Juan?-are well clear, but their roles are always, be they already know. As the garlic they repeat.Do PDI: days of film Debuts Friday in many rooms, but if the blog to blog work? It will not last long.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2978

Bruji

La Jungla 4.0

muchocine

After twelve years, fans of the series deserved much more than a succession of trailers without sense.

Along with the Crystal, the jungle loses the ability to entertain; main objective? if not only - of the action genre. The specific scenes shot with specialists and the charm? in other scripts, irresistible - Willis - MacClane, unable to avoid the bankruptcy of a thin plot line of cheap Americanism. After twelve years, fans of the series deserved much more than a succession of trailers without sense. What was that phrase of Samuel Goldwing, uneducated and unusual magnate of the Metro?, "Last night went to see Hamlet." "It is full of citations". Comes me to mind everytime I get bored in the film, and is a smart way to repay the more than thousand pesetas cost, the search for "dates" that can be remembered. Here are two memorable: "O tell me everything you want to know, or you since Gee in your own house", and "Going to be Yipi-qui - Yei, son of a bitch". That no one bother looking for more in a jungle so limited.Once again, the American movie industry back to underestimate the Viewer. After twelve years, fans of the Crystal jungle deserved much more than a succession of trailers or sense offline, much more than this hint of a quarter is intended to be and ends up not being. Neither more nor less than what usually happens when any script "worth" to insert "total chaos" scenes of Independence Day, without taking into account that this was never the spirit of the jungle, reinventora of the action genre. Ultimately, that no one forget that Willis is a full and lovely cocoon because the writers invented to John MacClane so wanted.They are welcome, however, the action scenes that are shot with specialists, unique tribute to the original story of 1988. In them, no surprise short and cheats levels including Wiseman to convince bad chinita skilful martial arts, but the male chauvinist, xenophobic, and derogatory comments that dedicates the mythical detective from New York, now unknown. The script fails while the scenes of hit and punch are replaced by a tireless dance of special effects of latest technology, again that end up doing credible the risky lies of James Cameron. Ultimately, Americans love to be in danger, and his cinema continues bad ideas to achieve this. Obsolete, but bad. And is that the story of computer attacks and the certainty that "anybody, from a garage, with a computer, can win the game to security systems, absolutely incompetent" already knew them thanks to products like the network, conspiracy in Ditto, the test or the recent e infumable operation Stormbreaker. We are not unknown starts cheap patriotism; interpretation, perhaps misguided, famously said of President Kennedy, or that another Monroe calling "America for the Americans", which can only add that this type of cinema, also for them.This is a story without its own identity, in not few occasions, presented as a bad collage of topical frame of the genus. A story based on a brittle script, son of an outdated argument that fails to capture the attention of the respectable. Between ridiculous dialogues of sea bream, pathetic monologues and secondary actors in movie, Bruce Willis is feeling as a new Marlon Brando, producer and estrellita, who, with troubled face, does not hesitate to get their hands on a screenplay? already lousy - to complete the sentencing him. And commented the devil that, of all his virtues, vanity was the most satisfied; and with an assertion like this: "If there were someone else, it would let you do it, but we must not" are revealed the actor claims. As he said that genius, there can be a good film if there is a good script. The de La jungle 4.0 is responsible for directly undermine the figure of John MacClane, seductive of the 1990s, annoying entity in the areas police, not to grant any premise that help you to understand the purposes of his adversaries, nor the role of his companions. Although it was not easy to resist the temptation to mention 9/11, stating that the end of USA is the end of the world, that lousy shooters are always on the side of the bad guys and the angels of custody in the of the good, that of the FBI have no idea, and that all flights have landed to avoid suspicionsonly get to precipitate the death of a Guild, the writers, that, in the present century, fails to leave his own incompetence.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1045

Ramón Balcells

Salvador

muchocine

At the start of the film, after these opening titles with the beautiful song I if canto trist, of Lluis Llach, people are pulled tears with handkerchiefs (who had already prepared).

Who was Salvador Puig Antich? This question is not one that is formuláse too much for several years after his death. Today, in the 21st century, the rather unknown director Manuel Huerga (Antarctica) the question arises and carries out cinematically, putting the title of Salvador. For some time a Spanish filmmaker did not pose as to fund the Franco era, and I think very timely that today already talk of such a person as Puig Anitch. And this movie which makes it is an honour to him, a summary of his life perfectly narrated. Perhaps the best part is that unfolds in the jail, where the protagonist, masterfully played by Daniel Brühl (which give the Goya!), feel, obviously only and at times accompanied by that originally took more than evil guardian of the prison, played by a superb Leonardo Sbaraglia.La Salvador Puig Antich life begins with a hope that when detainee will fade, as anyone who's going to jail. But he, a man strong and decisively, not surrender unless you see that there is no possible solution, and that he hoped the death penalty. The film is divided into two distinct parts: the beginnings of Salvador as anarchist and his detention and prison for several years. It is a completely depressing, sad, sensitive film (not sentimental) and very pretty. The problem, for me, is that I experienced not the time nor all Franco what happened with Puig Antich, so that I have been a little more difficult to understand it. I think that I wait a few years to to see her again. But yes I have to admit that, despite all this, found me a film exceptional and very emotional. The interpretations other than those mentioned in Brühl and Sbaraglia, highlight of the beautiful Ingrid Rubio, Leonor Watling, Celso Bugallo (although barely appear less than two minutes and not talk), Bea Segura (one of the Sisters of Puig Antich) and Tristan Ulloa (that even though I fall not very well, I don't know why, it does not hurt).At the exit, after these opening titles with the beautiful song I if canto trist, of Lluis Llach, people is pulled tears with handkerchiefs (who had already prepared). It was really very nice.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/374

Raccord

Alatriste

muchocine

Possibly open the way for new Court Hollywood blockbusters that sell many popcorn. But as a film, it is boring, slow and monotonous.

"Alatriste is for many reasons a film failed, mainly because the most expensive film in the history of the Spanish film from a bad script can do.""Alatriste" is based on the successful series of novels by Arturo Pérez Reverte to recreate the life of a swordsman in the pay of the Siglo de Oro. The logical thing would have been adapting a book, or make a new story, but with the keys and the spirit of the series. Instead, they prefer to adapt all the books in a single film, offering a rehash of scenes taken from the context of the work in which are found, placed one after another and without a common thread that hilvane. This produces that many are characters that parade throughout the two hours of film, while none leave a special sediment or having excessive importance in the plot.Both "Alatriste" fails miserably when trying to create a history consistent (with its introduction, knot and ending) and with a minimum of tension or intrigue. Simply see the captain Alatriste in three types of scenes that are repeated several times in the movie: war stories, conversations with people, and duels in a dark alley, and almost with the feeling that were arranged at random, until the end of the film. But it is up action sequences, by the lack of interest in the plot, lack sufficient claw to draw attention and are below standards of the adventure film. Special mention deserves the battle of the Spades, probably the most stupid war scene of the seventh art.It is a pity that a poor script, tape the quality of the cast, full of names of first row of our industry as well as the meritorious work of make-up, costumes, decorated etc. Photography and montage are good; but a little stiff in the action scenes, especially compared to some static frames more paused sequences, that seem taken from a book of Baroque art.Needed a project so ambitious in our cinema. Possibly "Alatriste" open the way for new Court Hollywood blockbusters that sell many popcorn. But as a film, it is boring, slow and monotonous. And that in the adventure genre is unforgivable.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2664

Iñaki Bilbao

Ratatouille

muchocine

This episode is exemplary and emotional, cinematically splendid, denotes one technical virtuosity of both

Good animated film, directed by the Director of the great "The Incredibles".Here I am not sure that will be able to both crítico-comercial success, but what doubt can be achieved one very disftutable tape, full of good gags and successful dialogues, filled with teachings positive universal as the attempt of overcoming of a humano.o rodent, trust between them or to work that one you love, friendship and love, above all, and continuing with the tradition, the love of the family, that despite differences in criteria among its members, is always a sure to be helped in penalties resource.Perhaps is somewhat long, especially for children, as I could see, not enough patience (the smallest) to endure a story that departs from the simplicity and the easy and forgettable gag.It is imaginative, agile, humorous and dramatic elements, but not stop them, fortunately. Because the playful aspect is that prevails throughout the footage with a psychological path of the characters well measured and studied, as well as a virtuoismo in the layout of the drawing, where the funds they acquire their own life.Perhaps, paradoxically, the best happens in its first third, just prior to the protagonist comes to the restaurant. Family life, Amen from attempts to steal food in the House of a snowing are prodigious in his comical. Everything that happens in the restaurant, then is regular in the rhythm, but never bored or ceases to be interested.That is why that "Ratatouille" is, in my opinion, a very estimable tape of animation, that like and does have a very enjoyable time, with a few last minutes, the preparation and delivery to the hard crírtico of cuisine, the plate surprise asked and which will depend on the future of the restaurant. This episode is exemplary and emotional, cinematically splendid. denoting a virtuosity and emotional técnicocomo, which goes directly to the heart.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1844

Jeremy Fox

El libro negro

muchocine

Film of the old, good, not exempt from depth and whose ironic and disheartening end should make us reflect.

"The black book" (Zwartboek) means the return of Paul Verhoeven to his native Holland and the truth, could hardly be a more happy return because the critical success has accompanied him a remarkable commercial success. More it cannot be.The script tells the story of a young Jew who, after various vicissitudes, joins the resistance fighting against the nazi occupation of Holland. Written by Gerard Soeteman and the Verhoeven himself is part of the gender patterns of spies in its aspect II war Mundial.Verhoeven gives the film a true classic tone while adding his personal, clearly visible touch the frankness of the treatment of violence and sex, two of the recurring themes in his filmography.What elevates the film, in addition to the above, above the average of the films of its genre, perhaps the unusual depth of characters and great performances of the cast, headed by a Carice van Houten that endows his character of beauty, sensuality and unusual in an actress of just 30 years maturity.Her seconded effective Thom Hoffman and Sebastian Koch, in State of grace after also intervene in the winner of the Academy Award for best foreign language film "The lives of others", which gives the necessary human to his role as general nazi and a hard touch. The rest of side are also luxury.Surprisingly, although perhaps it should not be coming from Verhoeven, some moments of pure suspense, entretenidísima which is the film and the ability to tell the epic of the protagonist in a reasonable amount of time, in addition, spent you flying to the Viewer.In short, film before, good film, not exempt from depth and whose ironic and disheartening end (and thereby betraying nothing) should make us reflect.Moonfleet.es rating: 9 out of 10

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2092

Ramón Besonias

Las partículas elementales

muchocine

The dream of the 68 creates monsters.

Elementary particles, with screenplay and direction by the German Oskar Roehler, orbits around the gloomy universe that dominates its literary reference, the controversial writer Michel Houellebecq novel (of the same title). This universe, inevitably condemned to explode into pieces (unless they return to the world his common sense), is a consequence of the unholy legacy received from our fathers of May 1968 - thesis that Sarkozy would he sign with your eyes closed-, that only has left us loneliness, frustration and hypocritical sexual policies. Folk slogan "make love and not war" would be diluted in the advertising claims of suffer on a daily basis on our televisions, selling desire without borders in exchange for the latest model of car. Women is cosificada and doomed to a sex without love, and you will not find this without the prosaic discretion than that. And man, linked to the fateful but for their sexual desire, not more than that, find sex and empty, that will search for camouflage under work, a good table or violence. Now, sooner or later we will have to face the sad but necessary reality of pain, old age and loneliness not deseada.«Aging alone men are much less worthy of compassion than women in the same situation. They drink bad wine, they fall asleep, it smacks them encouragement; they wake up and start again; and they die fairly quickly. Women take painkillers, do yoga, go see a psychologist; they live for many years and suffer much. Their bodies are weak and broken; they know and suffer for it. But they go ahead, because they fail to renounce being loved. They are victims of this illusion until the end. After a certain age, a woman always has the possibility of rubbing against a cock; but it no longer has the slightest chance of being loved. Men are as well, that's todo.» [The particles, p.141]The protagonists: two brothers who in principle do not know that they are, Michael and Bruno. The two in their own way subliman their (sexual, to be more exact) existential anxieties through the intellectual exercise. One as timid scientific geneticist - obsessed with obtaining someday a method of reproduction that does not require contact physical-, unable to express what he feels for a first love of children (played by a deadpan Franka Potente) which still is in love with. The other, Bruno, as depressed and repressed literature professor who dreams to fuck everything that moves, without getting more sex than that which provides the onanism or prostitution, but that soon you will find someone you love (fuck, understand us) without anguish or external claims. The two ends of the desire to illustrate these two brothers: its lack and repression, and their excessive and uncontrolled need. But both are unhappy. Michael wishes to change his life, leaving the University and delivered to an Entelechy; for its part, Bruno leaves his wife, why not already felt the least desire.The two brothers were abandoned by his hippie mother, who saw their children an impediment to express without hindrance their insatiable freedom and their desires. The own writer, Houellebecq, would be abandoned by his parents and raised by his Communist grandmother, of which Museum its simplicity of life and her happiness without more needs to do spend my life and savor (elementary particles, that would say the author). In one scene of the film, the character played by Franka Potente notes with your in love with pusillanimous laborious parents entertained together in their chores of his beautiful country house. She stressed to him the happiness of parents, based on the binomial conservative of "he working, she in the kitchen". This observation contrasts with convulsive anxieties of contemporary man, heir of idealism sexual 68, incapable of being happy and obsessed with give windmills that away it from the elemental.In another scene, a delicious Martina Gedeck reflects smiling at his brand new partner on the miseries of a generation of liberated and revolutionary women of the sixties feminism, which eventually ended up playing what criticized with ferocity. Houellebecq, and with him the director Oskar Roehler, deepen in this paradoxical fracture of the sexual ideals of those years, blaming them? as a triumphant Sarkozy - the current ills of our contemporaries do today. Children of May 1968 official of fine words that insurance is more basic: only labour, the family and respect can make happy and free human beings. The others are progres patochadas are very good on paper, but in reality is showing unable to solve existential problems of men and women of today.The final scene, with all four characters of lying on the beach, smiling happy despite the elementary candor of their joy, says it all. Sex does not give happiness, and even likely that it exists. Just as the naive and sappy dreamers, Bertolucci, trying to uncover the superficiality, snobbery and elitism of the children of father of May 1968, the elementary particles more adult and cane dissects it - without anesthesia or cauterize the lie on which sits that generation and the monsters that has generated. If this thought her read from a political level, implies the need for a revision of the ideals behind one aged (that is what he sees Houellebecq) left, depository so far of values on which settle customs and institutions. But the Viewer is which has to choose whether to read this film as a reflection of psychological about the paradoxes of desire, or as a socio-political critique of the generation of 1968. Or read anything and let go.The best: insurance, Moritz Bleibtreu, winner of the silver bear at the Berlin Festival past. It gives credibility to a character complex, full of nuances and contrary feelings reflected in the same scene without losing quality or depth. Perhaps you remember it for his starring role in disturbing the experiment, or secondary in Munich.Pero the image still I can not remove the head is this goddess called Martina Gedeck, which has matured to the delight of our eyes and neurons. We have enjoyed in the recent life of others or the good Shepherd, or in more distant titles such as delicious Martha or desired man (also committed to desmitologizar humorous social clichés of male sexual desire).The scene: Bruno throwing away your pet. Bruno asking on the street a man what has happened to her partner. The close-up with the face of Martina Gedeck.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1904

Emilio Calvo de Mora

El hombre que se quiso matar

muchocine

The dialogues, as literary desparpajo, produces the sensation of watching some wonderful play...

Her ferrea censorship of the dictatorship of Franco, newly erected as helm of patria morality, saw the immense damage that this film could make: seeped his blasphemous and proposed liberal. That of which a citizen, one very precariously supplied hopes in the world of work and defenestraded by a firmly convinced of the mediocrity of the future bride, decides to commit suicide and proclaim his farewell to this world, not married the Christian idea of endure the hardships of this world waiting to embrace the virtues of the other, i.e., the cósmico-redentora theory of the Catholic Church. And even less than the suicide, in full possession of his mental faculties, be devoted during the entretenidísima time and very little footage to pontificate the happiness of his State of mind and ignored the boring, bland and decadent life of who drowned by misery, tied to an unhappy marriage or enslaved by work that nothing gives them and low-paidthey persist without another benefit that let live melancholic and perhaps gradually.Wenceslao Fernández Flórez, the great Galician writer, recreates the archetype of the rogue of our golden age, in love with his manga tahúr, but reinvents it and transforms into a pícaro-filósofo, foul-mouthed and viperino, judgemental and sane until the Bachelor's degree that demonstrates the enormous sadness of the world in which he has had to commit suicide, one as wealthy enough, discursively speaking, as the weight of the argument it apparent to withstand without fracture: there is no scene that doesn't come out, there is no twist of the plot is not well underpinned in the light of psychological evolution of the character.Anthology, the scene in which Federico Solá decides to make public his drastic decision and instead of talking about armed cement, his professional specialty, uses the rostrum from which has been called to lecture to bother amazed membership with a catechism of truths as fists until that, in the end, pompous, advertise the audacity of your company.Dizzying in their dialogues, the man who wanted to kill is adult film over a film production planted in the rigors of a necessarily poor postwar and where the regime had conceived the strategy to entertain the people with the folk lightness of the sketches, almibarado portrait of the virtues of simplicity and, above all, the scarce artistic demand upon a (the film industry) used to entertain winners and losers, and join them, albeit in the sweet darkness of cinema.(At times, believe one be attending a comedy of the Marx Brothers: sparkling dialogues, delusional surrealism..)

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3454

Iñaki Bilbao

Pitch Black

muchocine

Interesting science fiction film shot with not many dollars, but imaginative and achieved.

2A a stranger and distant planet goes to a space ship with some forty people, among them a dangerous prisoner. The captain of the ship, to save, is attempting to get righted the ship and save himself, launch weight, among them the rest of the passengers, but fails it. Upon landing you will discover that the planet has two Suns that take turns. They see remains of animals, their bones rather, even a ship with no crew. "Soon they discover that they are not alone, as by an inappropriate eclipse will appear thousands of strange creatures that eat humans".Modest but nice product of science fiction, where it passes the time, although it has obvious drawbacks to put him.The worst are clumsy and falsely funny dialogues, more of one topical thousand times seen on the screen and a taciturn and poor psychological study of the characters, something that is crying out the footage because we have just not knowing anything of any of them.The best (and is what gives interest) is the use of the few means at its disposal, with a high climax in the narrative, enhancing the intrigue and the surprise factor. It is not that this is much, but the Viewer does not lose interest in the future of the characters and how the movie is rather short so does not tire in no time.The end, incidentally, although lengthened for free, has certain force and isn't too complacent with the Viewer, what is to be welcomed. In addition, irregular and modest, but entertaining.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2587

Tony Astonish

La Novia Cadaver

muchocine

Without being so fascinating as "Edward Scissorhands", I think the story that presents us with Tim Burton is a delight well designed, well established and that doesn't let us indeferentes...

The universe often submit Tim Burton in his films always has that strange mixture of sadness and joy, and in "The corpse bride" expression of their characters in both sets is very well defined.In the "mortal world" everything is grey and dark; the faces of the men that inhabit it are sad or show anger; everything is monotony and they move to the beat of the "ticking" of a clock. In contrast, the "world of the dead" is inhabited by skeletons and cadaveres which seem to have not lost their lives; the colors both of the sets and the costumes are clear and alive; residents smile and sing jovially, welcoming the newly arrived to make his long stay not "eternal".The tale is about a very trite theme, "true eternal love", and introduces us to a couple of young, Victor and Victoria (embodied by Johnny Depp and Emily Watson respectively) are forced by their parents to marry by the economic interest pure of these. Two young people are apathetic and cold at a marriage of which do not even know your respective partner (how to marry someone that you're not in love!!!)(-wonder). By a misunderstanding, the young Victor "undoes" the spell of Emily (Helena Bonham Carter), a woman who was murdered just as he was going to marry. This event will change his life and the rest of the film's characters.The movie includes twists and very funny gags, such as for example references to the mythical movie "that took the wind", as well as take a joke a taboo as the death. And, of course, missing the macabre touch that characterizes the movies of its director. I loved the attention to detail in the movie: one might say that each drawing or each scene help, in greater or lesser degree, for something that is going to happen. The length of the tape is fair, perhaps too to explain such dramatic change in the way of thinking of the main characters.Without being so fascinating as "Edward Scissorhands", I think the story that presents us with Tim Burton is a delight well designed, well established and that doesn't let us indeferentes.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1172

Tito Chinchan

La lista de Schindler

muchocine

Essential drama that unleashes the most basic feelings in the Viewer. Nothing to write will get any reader capable of approaching the emotion that evokes. To view once and not martirizar more.

I hardly comment on this film, for starters, not be well what to say by way of introduction. That already I know you know that I am easy to tear, so no is if the anecdote that I am going to tell you will illustrate or not, but I tell. The last time I dared to see entire this movie still lived with my mother. Was I sitting on the couch with his eyes swollen and reddened and I approached my mother told me "why you like suffering?". It is one of those phrases that you remain in the memory recorded forever. Not be if was why, but her I have been able to return to see anymore.The film tells the life of Oskar Schindler, a businessman without scruples, who sees a reef in the invasion that makes Germany of Poland at the beginning of World War II. As it has contacts at a high level, it manages to a factory in the newly invaded Krakow. Once there, after having "hired" a game of worker Jews, begins to realize the atrocities that are committed and decided to devote their efforts to save the greatest number of prisoners possible.As said before, no is good to say, given that this film surpasses me in all areas. Like all has their opponents seeking his major point of support in the lack of veracity. Well, I do like the film is based on real events or not. No matter, I believe that it is above the facts. Emotions and feelings that get that they arise in the Viewer, in this case I can not describe with words. That feeling of extreme distress, this suffering by people of fiction based on real people, that joy by small accomplishments, that emotion, that indignation by the events, this compendium of feelings few films manage to transmit them.In short, essential drama that unleashes the most basic feelings in the Viewer. Nothing to write will get any reader capable of approaching the emotion that evokes. To view once and not martirizar more.I have no words.Besitos.P.D: Fuck that llorera has given me so suddenly.Pd2: Urban legend, which not is if it is true, that it was recorded entirely (except for the red coat) in black and white due to the excessive cost which had record it in color.Moments to remember (or not): ** the scene of showers, when you don't know if it will leave water or gas.* Cuado Oskar picks up a child to explain that you need to Polish the bullets by dentro.* at the end of the film, the final Fireworks where the Jews give the farewell and he thrilled, wondered that to how many people could have been saved with that car, or with that joya.* the kiss scene the girl Jewish. ** the time that the Jewish architect says that they are building the building poorly and Commander la mata, to then say to his subordinates do what she had dicho.* the tape transport of corpses. ** even within the previous, has its own impact, the girl in the red coatwhich only comes out twice but you recording to fire in the retina.* the "snow" on Krakovia.* the "game" of the Commander of shooting with the rifle telescopic. ** the time they discover that trains men and women have separado.* the last sequence, in which survivors and children of survivors place stones on the grave of Oskar.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3071

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Mala noche

muchocine

Imperfect, as almost all Opera prima, Mala noche principiaba already the relevant issues in the aesthetic ideas of the author: marginality, the abyss, gays as tortured object of a world apart from the differences...

The paths of the cinematography of an author are inscrutable. Gus Van Sant, that director among the indie and the majors, this kind of poet of the suburban, able to excite My Idaho private or Elephant and let us stunned by the surprise with psychosis (2.0) type pestiños, has removed the trunk of memories and found bad night, his directorial debut, a visceral journey to the dark of human relations background, the story of a gay white man in love with a heterosexual and Mexican illegal immigrant, pure love fou, but firmly hold to swings scoundrels of the reality and lyrical. Cruise lovers morale allows the author investigate the roots of hatred and digging without prejudice and without emitting valuations in the grey and fragmented beauty of marginal beings. Passolini, in its own way, also made a similar film. In fact the way that Van Sant scrutinises male eroticism not incomodaría to the Italian master. Bad night has come here 22 years later, but even in the United States was released shortly after becoming: had to wait for Drugstore cowboy will carry the applause and the unanimous seal of quality of the critics. Gus Van Sant is an irregular, a type used to hocicar his talent in the margins and compose a captivating portrait of disenchantment with the harshness of human happiness, but his films do not speak of engolado love, set to the melody of a song. The music that suits this filmmaker is not sweet: your pulse is forbidding, his breath is poetic, i.e. devoid of meaning, Subscriber to ask questions and to do so with beauty. What is poetry, if not? Van Sant not predicts better worlds, although the end of this film joins the goodness of pure feelings.Etiquedado New Queer Cinema can that even not convenient: they are bonds, encorsetados artifacts of domestic manufacturing that domeñan the instinct and turns art into a bound object of consumption. In this sense, Van Sant is not a director of the gay, thus bounded the term, but an author aware due to the homosexual Guild (he isn't), but without going into artistic militancias as the displayed by Gregg Akari, Fassbinder, Pedro Almodóvar - in good part of his always open filmography - and Passolini, previously cited. What lacks bad night to be a recommended work, it is not an absolute mode, is a most tack script, a less experimental setup. It shows rookie pulse, warn the seams of a too new and checked suit with the haste of beginners. Taking office in the world of cinema adult, commercial, easily exploitable, Mala noche gives added value. You can't impostado minimalism of Elephant. You don't have the burden of cynicism and nasty Drugstore Cowboy. Nor is an apotheosis, uppercase and tough as Last days, the film about Kurt Cobain. Mala noche is incorrect film, but why like, somehow. For his invaluable smell to newly named intelligence.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/614

Ricard Marcet

Palindromos

muchocine

The feeling of discomfort, relocation, seizes the room during all the footage with a mise en scene dealing with familiar characters and situations vetoed in the film more to use.

The last work of the controversial American filmmaker Todd Solondz has come to our screens Palíndromos, two years late. Once again, as it already did with his previous films, it will be capable of dismay, in one way or another, to all kinds of public.Palindromes trafficking history of Aviva, a girl of twelve years who believe to see in the fact of being a mother, the solution to their emotional problems. It will soon become pregnant and parents force him to abort. After the traumatic events, Aviva will escape from the House of his parents and will undertake a journey solo (from those that, in principle, changes life?) for a world strange and full of possibilities.It often refers to the work of Solondz as a critical x-ray of American society (and, by extension, Western) and in turn, as a walk along the border that separates the drama of humor. This definition falls short to Palíndromos, I understand, his most personal work in which expressed an intimate philosophy, intuida but not developed in his previous works. It is from the constants of the film Hollywood (often through his denial) that the American director develops his personal narrative, his own poetry. A concrete example can be found in the use of music on the soundtrack, introduced in the dramatic moments in the more conventional way and suddenly cut, unsettling the Viewer. It is this feeling of discomfort, of relocation, which takes over the room during all the footage with a mise en scene dealing with familiar characters and situations vetoed in the film more to use.The journey of Aviva, as if it were a story, will be explained through a series of episodes. The viewer accustomed to uplifting trips in which the character gives meaning to their existence, will accompany the kind enlivens (and it seems that for Solondz, goodness is the result of ignorance, of unconsciousness) by a few adventures which eventually where started. It will be Mark Wiener, computer scientist and alleged pedophile's deterministic thinking, who, through a few words that seem to exits from the mouth of the director himself, will remind enlivens their inability to change. Nothing will serve the protagonist played by six different actresses, because its history will end at the point from which departed in the same way that occurs with your name and any other Palindrome (for Solondz, metaphor for human nature). In the myriad of characters that accompany the girl during his trip, the viewer intuirá something very familiar not perceived in the heroes of the conventional cinema. In its ambiguity existential, often hidden under a fierce double morality, we see reflected our innermost fears. Thus, these creatures that at first we antojaron grotesque, recall us our most immediate reality. Used to identify us with ideal characters who choose, they transform and give meaning to their existence, Todd Solondz us wakes up from our sweet dream of freedom Earth throwing large speeches that try to justify humans, provide it with meaning, and reminding us of the nonsense that surrounds us. Before such drama, so only we can only laugh.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4096

Monica Jordán

Vértigo

muchocine

The spiral of Vertigo

Vertigo (1958) is the name that he decided to give his Alfred Hitchcock work perhaps think that the original of the novel ("D' between les morts", Pierre Boileau and Thomas Narcejac) usurpaba much of the mystery and intrigue that both baby him in his film the Viewer. Such is the strength of this second baptismo that while in some countries (including Spain) he chose to retain the title in its literary version ("from the dead"), the time and the shadow of the director has managed that his title is finally which give name popularly this story. In this way, and knowing perfectionist was, is not one that understand the change in title for Vertigo is given not an uncertain Hitchcock by mental illness (Pshycho) fetish, but a strategy intended to underline the hypnotic idea that generates Vertigo (and the film).The Hitchcock film has in its clarity one of the fundamental bases for your enjoyment, and is that while the English director handled the information as few have, the viewer never feels cheated or lost in his films. Allowing some plot twist to another (in Vertigo the surprise comes with the Madeleine/Judy impersonation) unexpected in Hitchcock is not limited to the impact on the plot but that leads it to the visual and structural impact. While others had taken advantage of the duality of characters of Kim Novak to finish the film with a surprise (deciphered at the same time for the main character - James Stewart - and for the Viewer) Hitchcock decided to give that information only the public who notes how the male protagonist is launching into an unhealthy abyss in the last half hour of the film. Which until then was an interesting story due to the mystery of Charlotte Valdés, forks into two paths that the viewer has the privilege to go to add the plot of film noir pursued by a unreal ghost detective. This punto y aparte in the film, mark and the interest of the director by the rupture structural bearing its most vivid example in psychosis, in which Hitchcock did not hesitate to kill the lead actress a half-hour of footage in one of the most remembered sequences of the film (the shower scene).This structure of suspense in which elements are showing one by one, in a consequent manner, without repeated and creating a storyline ever more distant from its starting point, responds to the shape of a spiral, hence that the presence of this type of curves in the titles of the home and also at other times of the film (the hairstyle of Madeleine)(, for example) can serve as example that Hitchcock did not leave nothing at random and that this change in title which might seem pure whim, responds to the most intrinsic need for the film. In this same way, and knowing that the Vertigo is characterized not only by the sensation of circular motion suffered by a person but also by "an embarrassment of the trial" (RAE dixit), Hitchcock shows on more than one occasion a filmed reality in large angular (mostly foreign) giving the image that feeling of FishEye that distorts reality. The decorated with steep slopes, the lighting that gradually changes of intensity in the same scene, the constant use of the strips and contrapicados and circular camera movements (the final kiss of the couple, for example) offer a staging that frames the viewer in the own sense of instability that has the protagonist. Thus Hitchcock manages all the elements that make up this movie (also through the Viewer) arrive to lose in this spiral of reality with dreams aspect which is the Vertigo (and film).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3664

Andrés Pons

The girl next door

muchocine

It grips you hatred, frustration to observe human cruelty shown without concessions to the Gallery, crying click you the chest for the realism of cash with a force little seen in the current film.

Gregory Wilson practically debuts in the direction since his previous film HOME INVADERS was an amateur action.This feeds a group of children starting their careers and two veterans of the television in the presences of BLANCHE BAKER view in the series law & order and GRANT SHOW that starred culebron MELROS PLACE.Cast alongside director do not have a too endorsed curriculum, in addition to a synopsis that seems to sell the typical film of horror based on real facts on the pretext of showing a repertoire of atrocities for a demanding GOURMET of extreme GORE.Definitely it is not what he wants the author away totally from clichés in one of the most brilliant films of the year.Set in the 1960s seamlessly in an impeccable reconstruction of the era that you practically dives from the foreground in the recesses and customs of all the characters.The film is clearly divided into two acts: an act I like all these stories of the birth of love in adolescence where already are can view between the youth loves evil characters that give the succession to the terrible events that will bring the second Act. An act which raised the foundations is to teach a final part that leaves you breathless before the collection of torture a woman sick helped their children's Orchestra against a young innocent.It grips you hatred, frustration to observe human cruelty shown without conceptions to the Gallery, crying click you the chest for the realism of cash with a force little seen in the current film.Without a drop of GORE, therefore is not important when an author of enormous talent as demonstrated by WILSON wants to show something truthful, not simply leverages the screenplay for the easy curiosity raises some terrible facts harshly they require.Technically perfect in everything.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2136

Jose Contreras

Half Nelson

muchocine

Do Half Nelson seems a film Professor, as the of?Newspapers of the street?, but in reality is a film junkies, as?Trainspotting??Days of wine and roses?,?Long trip of the day into night?,?Days lost weekend?. Deeply subversive.

Half Nelson seems a film Professor, as the of "diaries of the street", but in reality is a film junkies, like "Trainspotting", "Days of wine and roses", "Long journey of the day into night", "Days without trace". The difference between film made by drug addicts and the no-adictos, is that we always dreamed to improve something: conquer the girl, upload post, fix any problem. The dream of the drug addict is to stop him continue as it is, his dream is one dose. The tranquility that we pay the letter of the Bank is the same with which they are facing the threat of desaucio. Abusers of the film approaching death, physical degradation, with the same concern that the sober arrive late to an appointment.Dunne gives some great classes in a multiracial school. The day that is animated suggests children forces that cause major transformations in history. The day which has hangover falls asleep in front of them. The first half of the film is shot to insist on something that we already know, Dunne is an imperfect man. The explanation of his life seem shot by someone so hung as the protagonist. Some ability to synthesis would have been more than welcome. Instead of so many hangovers have been enough one, instead of so many characters have been enough any conversation.The preambles to prepare us for a retrospective scene. The Professor decides to save one of her students, but when they are we don't know who is the Saviour and who the victim. In her classes explains that the reality is complex, there is a good and an evil, but a dialectic of forces. The entire scene, perhaps throughout the film, is a series of variations on that theme. Teacher and his pupil, the drug addict and the camel, the hero and the girl. All the lines function as a deeply subversive melody within the vital staff of these two stocks to the limit. That penalty that musicians spend one hour tweaking instruments before starting to play.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1691

Alex Largo

El buen alemán

muchocine

To my the movie seems good. Although it has a few aspects to improve. Perhaps with more time to finish the script, and an idea closer to what was going to do, another rooster would have sung, and without place to doubt for the better.

I do not understand the criticism that has been made against this film. Admittedly, it has flaws, as all movies. But all his faults are summarized in one. It seems that no one knows very well where it is.George Clooney makes a very correct of protagonist role, though his character is not someone with whom we can identify. Tobey Maguire is perhaps the most unsympathetic is made to the public. As Cate Blanchett, which is as always superb, only say that at times is a little bland.These, and indeed all stakeholders, seem a little stunned. They act but do not know very well that they are doing, or at least in some moments of the film.Stress also the criticism of "the little chemistry" of the protagonist couple. I wouldn't say that little chemistry there is between them, if not almost to their respective roles to forcing them to maintain that distance.The script perhaps should have "suffered" a couple of more rewrites, as it limps in some plot threads. And seeing the book is adapted (nothing to envy to "what the wind", but in volume) we can say that the work of the writer is not outstanding, but if approved.As regards the direction of Steven Sodebergh. since. bad. Sosa one-way like few, a poor direction, without personality. And that sometimes is very bad (the scenes in which there is a fight or a fight are totally emotion), and is a real shame, because the film could aspire to much more.Best of all is the art direction (some impressive sets and that they have not even received (inexplicáblemente) a nomination for the Oscars) and the band Sonora of Thomas Newman (has this if her nominated to the Oscars, although sometimes not "connect" with images and a little goes outside parva).As for the picture. Yes, it is good. but not maintains the style of the old movies. The camera moves too, restandole credibility to his look.Another problem (which is sometimes otherwise) is the theme of black and white images of file. The film attempts to seem old, Casablanca style, and sometimes succeeds (and how), but other times not, in such a way that the film loses much charm.To my the movie seems good. Although it has a few aspects to improve. Perhaps with more time to finish the script, and an idea closer to what was going to do, another rooster would have sung, and without place to doubt for the better.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3394

Jeremy Fox

Siete Mesas de Billar Francés

muchocine

A good script, good actors and good management offer us a good example of how, without large budgets, film the good in Spain can be done.

Gracia Querejeta is not a Director to which it him has taken the measure due to the lack of knowledge I have of his earlier work. I saw "My side again when" a few years ago and I remember that I had liked but I have not seen "The last journey of Robert Rylands" nor "Hector" despite the good-looking they have a priori. Therefore went to the cinema to see "Seven tables of Carom billiards" without knowing very well what I was going to find and brought only by my good vibrations before the film. And what I found finally? Well, a film which should mark the reference to one of the possible paths that must pass Spanish cinema. I say this because, while it is clear that the public demands more movies of Spanish genus, with large budgets and well done, believe that proposals such as Gracia Querejeta not only have room in our charts but they are necessary. "Seven tables of Carom billiards" it has a good script, work of the Director and David Planell, able to create characters of flesh and blood, of which one feels as their own; and it also has a handful of terrific actors able to give them life. To make a good film need little more, of course a solvent director to carry forward the project. But to be a box office success in the 21st century Yes else need: a good marketing campaign. This is where I think that it is has failed, probably due to lack of a more loose budget. As I say, the script is an example of construction of characters. Why hate me error that I can not understand as the resolution of the story of el tuerto (Enrique Villén) which I believe little consistent with that seen in the rest of the film and somewhat improvised. I also have the feeling of that could have been lessened something the total duration of the fim, which extends some of the stories, as Evelin (an impeccable Lorraine Vindel) despite the predictability of its resolution. Small stick to an exemplary script. That Yes, there in the proceedings, cannot have any downside. Blanca Portillo won the award at the San Sebastian Film Festival for best female performance but could have also gained Maribel Verdú and it had not been an injustice. The two are incredible and the fight by Goya will be really tough this year. The rest of side is equally superb. Of so, in this film, the child, Victor Valdivia one of the promises of Spanish film, acts well. For highlighting someone and take it as a disregard to others, I would like to mention an Enrique Villén it takes several years stealing scenes to his co-stars. Part of the credit must be attributed to the Director who knows how to plan each scene to make the most of the talent of the actors. His calm and almost transparent staging is a demonstration of confidence in the players and a gift for the Viewer. Little more I can add. We have a good example of how, without large budgets, film the good in Spain can be done. Final assessment in moonfleet: 7.5 out of 10

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4291

Daniel Galindo

Déjate caer

muchocine

That gave us the excellent 15 days with you proves that it is a thorough illustrator of cityscapes populated by anonymous beings that represent much of us.

Not hard to identify with whom here, simply are not: neither adults nor children, unemployed or workers, students, neither criminals nor honest people. Jesus Ponce has it very clear: is as simple as they are not.The outline is right, camera Latino with the framing but still no, something happens with this tape: it may be the fact that us not be round because of a somewhat linear footage, in the absence of some much needed shift in history, a breath that should come before the 'expected', the events that precipitate the predictable outcome. Still, these already-not-so-young, representatives of an indefinite generation, is there poured a conscientious work to make anything random. No tags nor claims of cementing a cinematic movement which does not exist (though neither would be wrong). About 'Andalusian neorealism' that acuñen others, that Yes, the third proposal of Ponce - the second, if we neglected the work of custom which was Skizo - maintains parallels with a good number of tapes that, curiously, have been filmed in Andalusia and show, nor this is anecdotal, a social reality extrapolated to other boundaries although, believe me, are characteristic of the Sur.Conste tables who subscribes to these words is AndalusianHence there is no decorum in say anything squeaking in what relates Ponce through a chorus of well defined characters. The filmmaker gets as few do sketches, supported by a rigorous, realistic and sensible interpretation, arman the skeleton of a hangover though interesting panoramic view that complete the already drawn by Virgin, also notable as Carlos against the world and 7 titles.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1529

Oscar Cantero

El grito 2

muchocine

Paradoxically, the cry 2 is the culmination of the process of Americanization that in recent years has been subjecting Hollywood to the Japanese horror film, which had been used as a desperate measure to the ideological exhaustion of his vulgar but prolific writers.

Americans aware of weary that becomes your typical teen horror film, have been proposed in other parts of the world to find new forms, new ideas, new concepts into his worn out machinery. At the end gave with what he wanted, and did so on the other side of the Pacific Ocean. Japanese horror cinema became the new fashion of the big studios. Early adaptations made success in the Japanese country films were fairly reliable, and achieved a success notable (remember, for example, the signal). Later, and with that nationalist incontinence that characterizes the first world power, were progressively, Americanized scripts, frames, the tempos and if neglected, to the very same Takashi Shimizu, director and filmmaker of the original versions and head of the shot to the West. In the end, the result is that they have achieved that new versions of Japanese films do not differ overly from genuinely American products, and that has been largely lost the freshness, the ability to surprise and hit, and above all, the characteristic and the Asian giant's own ambience. Is why cry 2 is a terrible film, in which the picture is mediocre, interpretations, saving Sarah Michelle Gellar, poor, and repetitive special effects. This cluster of absurdities joins an almost non-existent soundtrack and when it appears does so only to alert you that something is going to happen in the next few seconds, thus depriving the viewer of the few upsets that per this new nonsense of Hollywood industry could cause. Bored.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3807

Bruji

Soy leyenda

muchocine

?While New York sleeps?, Will Smith stands out in an innovative overproduction which gives emblematic images to the seventh art.

"While New York sleeps," Will Smith stresses in an innovative overproduction which gives emblematic images to the seventh art. A thriller of action and special effects, in perfect harmony with the script, and in any case recommended for owners and friends of German shepherds.In recent years, half of Europe has been suffering from the barbarian invasions of all kinds of viruses and retroviruses, of various origins, responsible for transforming into little recommended neighbors to the almost all of the population. Front of them, a small group of survivors trying to resist in places such as Germany (Resident Evil 1, 2, 3.), Great Britain (28 days later, 28 weeks later, do 28 years later?) or Spain ([Rec], the next day), in which health authorities, to activate the famous anti-terrorism Protocol, forgot that the father of the angelic snapper criaturita remained outside the sealed building. In each and every case, has to be understood "resist" in the literal sense of the word, by putting the effects of the technique of the script, making sure the box-office success of its thousands of followers in a critical and chronic situation in which an emergency plan B was never screened. The infected-in other times, human beings-are only a goal to break down within an argument clear in unusual message: none. Come the moment in which "We must enlighten the darkness", American cinema will be able to do so, much to us though, with greater intensity. Specifically, with something known as "overproduction", which doesn't hurt in clothes get special dispensation, unprecedented, to stop traffic in New York, recruiting members of the very same army as extras, and plan an actual evacuation of the island, with advice and supervision after cameras highest levels that make up the State security forces. This is America! As little money is still in the coffers, is does not hesitate to hire the best technical team of recent times: the Director of photography of the Lord of the Rings trilogy, the Director of special effects of Matrix, the writer of A wonderful mind. This is cinema! The excuse of such elaborate project, which gives a definitive solution to the pandemic that came to plague Europe unless it is able to lift head, found in a novel, I am Legend, 1954, signed by the writer Richard Matheson, who has two previous film adaptations. It is at this point that would make no sense compare and collate the final result of I am legend with its predecessors, history today discussed, disguised as hateful commercial cinema, being called, from the moment of its conception, to enter into the history of cinema by the front door. That nobody is RIP vestments still, because the explanation is easy to understand. The spectacular deployment of means which strengthens the multimillion-dollar production, excellent picture showing a Fifth Avenue, never seen, flooded vegetation, achieved air intakes that run the ghostly deserted city, the concentration of levels short increasing the anguished feeling of loneliness, the inestimable artistic direction based on the most chaotic of the anarquismos, successful flashback that brings consistency to the story; they would be written on the wind if the entirety of the footage did not have the livelihood of a solid script. Even more, if the synchronization between the images and the plot not rallara perfectly. Us continues to weigh, but we have to recognise that there the Americans know to illuminate the darkness. They are specialists in the genre of disasters, in situations to the limit, in atmospheres of real danger that can only be resolved by individual actions that characterize its own personality. Is not enough to combat the infected, we must heal them, you have to risk the physical integrity of the super hero, that - how could it be otherwise-, is a prestigious scientist, military expert, perfect father and husband and, as if all this were little, exemplary lover of animals. Can you ask something else?. Yes, and we have. An involution in the world of feelings, the special inner journey that any human being experiences after a cathartic process in his life. "God not has done this, but us", and not they scared us monsters cry hipohuracando coming out of a bad version of the Mummy, but the fact of knowing that there are no days off for the thugs that are not persuaded by the power of a song. Despite us or not, it is necessary to admit that, among the many virtues of American cinema, is also that of knowing rummaging in the hearts, be able provide a ridiculous post-apocalyptic story of zombies in a revealing message. If something missing, the direction of casting stake by Will Smith, surrendering to his detractors (including myself) with a memorable performance. All this leads me to recall few times I have dared to recommend a film, but, in this case, what I would like to invite the reader movie buff to repair this. Do not be swayed by the refusal to produce the words "American blockbuster", thinking that paradise lost proposed Truffaut in Fahrenheit 451, and provide an opportunity to draw their own conclusions. Personally, I like to belong to the minority that is immune to the virus of hatred, xenophobia and racism. I like Shrek, and know that people just be them measured on the inside.