Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/768

Tito Chinchan

Storm

muchocine

The Swedish film shows, once again, that can be just as bad as anyone else, including the Spanish.

UY uy, uy, go towel with the poster of yore. A Lady of Orange hair that screams as if you were to give a host and melt you. A guy with hand cut into position in the fight, and a pale man with idly seems bad. And an aesthetic Matrix, this seems action in abundance, coups and others. Ja, ja, ja, as always nothing to do with reality.The movie not be that is. Leaves a woman with orange hair that gives to another a cube (not of scrub, if not as a square but in three dimensions) and then give a beating and try to burn. But she escapes and is mounted in a taxi where there is one face silly. The silly face then going to a campus of those party and dies a girl before him, which is why everyone believes that he is. These flees and leaves a fat telling you that either returns a few movies or miss you your home. And then remember its past with the Orange hair and finally girl just and you think "do the cualo?"Well, nothing, than this is a drama of a kid who does bad things in youth and then go you to invoice at maturity. The Swedish film shows, once again, that can be just as bad as anyone else, including the Spanish, and many sexual liberation, but nothing respingón nipple nipples. The actors are rare, rare, highlighting the taxi driver, which could well be Spanish. I was waiting for all the movie that put the COPE or el Fary in the cassette, but has not failed. That Yes, driving as the here. The action scenes are pretty sad and pathetic, apart from having scenes that could well be mess. I.e., that pull the scenes outdoor and mounted them in another way, the movie would the same poop.In short, nothing of the cow in a Swedish drama that has nothing to envy to any national or imported shit.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/281

Jesus Lens

Factotum

muchocine

Function words, concepts and the idea, but naufragan the images, are not able to transmit the feeling of loneliness, emptiness and existential anguish counted by Bukowski

Is there anyone out there who still has not read Bukowski? Big mistake. Because Charles Bukowski is one of the great writers of the last century, one of these geniuses who, with his stark prose and loaded with sex stories, fights, gambling and alcohol, rose to the top that realism more dirty merely dirty, so loved went to many American writers of the 1980s.And, however, if you see the adaptation of some of their stories that shows "Factotum", you will be somewhat disappointed the film. Starring a Mat Dillon that is aging with enormous dignity, as we had occasion to see in "Crash", in this case only work really well the words written by Bukowski, placed in the mouth of his alter ego, the savage and unclassifiable Chinaski.Funcionan words, concepts and the idea, but naufragan the images, are not able to transmit the feeling of lonelinessempty and existential anguish counted by the author of books as excellent (and explicit) as the own "Factotum", "Fuck machine" or "erections, ejaculations, exhibitions". The picture is too perfect, the atmosphere is too light, there is too much light. How does not miss the fascinating, cloudy and dark "Barfly", starring some emotionally agonizing Mickey Rourke and Faye Dunaway?The case is that the film is well, has brilliant moments and conceptual, very suggestive images as when each of the two protagonists riot to vomit in the toilet, while the other is espatarrado in bed. There are dialogues and kafkianas situations appear dirty and cruel humor abduction and, in general, not you get bored. But Bukowski deserved much more than a simple "not boring".Best of "Factotum" is that voice which talks about life, literature, creative radicality and, at the same time, laperseverancia commitment and effort. with the important things in life: writing, fucking, drinking and gambling. A movie that, beyond their frames, makes it very desirable to return to re-read the intense pages written by the author and are invited to revisit that glorious "Barfly" of Barbet Schroeder.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4217

Ana Belén Pacheco

En el valle de Elah

muchocine

Interesting proposal of Paul Haggis that probably lasts little in theaters. If there is possibility is highly advisable to visit the room to delight with such superb performances.

Tommy Lee Jones is going to win the nickname of iron man as follows choosing roles that choose lately. First start with in the Valley of Elah to continue with the tape of the Coen brothers. In both most of the time doesn't change the rictus. But in both cases it is brilliant. (Other that has crept into the two films is Josh Brolin, that this preserved a discrete second level but that has had a year round completed with American Gangster) and has become a fundamental part of the gear of all tape quality self-respecting.In the Valley of Elah a father looking for clues about the disappearance of his son after his return from Iraq. A fairly sympathetic father is because he is the second son who loses and Moreover the entire family has a significant military tradition so it will be constant and incisive in all stages of their research. Help a young police officer that after initial reluctance just seeing that truly the death of Michael looks more than suspect. Formal and informal research along with the videos of the mobile of the deceased soldier will be able to do little by little fit the pieces of a rather soulless puzzle of the cruelty of the human race.Despite his clear independent tone (exclusively in terms of investment) the solvency of script and actors get an almost perfect finish in this military thriller that leaves little rest to the Viewer. Alternate intimate moments of confession with the harshness of reality between war and everyday life which becomes difficult to fit. Interesting proposal of Paul Haggis that probably lasts little in theaters. If there is possibility is highly advisable to visit the room to delight with such superb performances. He dare not do advocacy of good and bad in a raked so as the war theme, or the goodness of man.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/661

Alvaro Oliva

La dalia negra

muchocine

There are times that a novel can be very interesting, but carried screen does not have the same effect. A quality product which was expected much more.

Everything did foresee that we would be faced with a more than interesting proposal from the director of trapped by its past, that with him we find big names within the film world, but still the Black Dahlia fails stand out as film.Josh Hartnett, Scarlett Johannson, Aaron Eckhart and Hillary Swank under the direction of De Palma and with a screenplay by Josh Friedman based on the novel by James Ellroy, (who wrote the magnificent novel L.A. confidential), we introduced in the 1940s, in the streets and the problems that exist in the Mecca of cinema, from the hand of a tandem of police and good fighters such as Harnet and Eckhart (Lee Blanchard and Bucky Bleichert/Mr. ice /)Mr. fire). A crime desatará vicious circles and the possible forks that must interpret the good Bucky to solve it. But one thing is to do the character and another spectator, that halfway through the film begins to be quite lost and that often envy policemen you see on screen, his book and his pen need to sign up and do the necessary schemes for end not disoriented. There are times that a novel can be very interesting, but carried screen does not have the same effect. In the technical section no objection, a good photography, art direction in line with the time and with each character social conditions and the area in which moves, costumes and others also comes into play to perfection. In the interpretive section the truth is that they are also correct, a good casting with many familiar faces and that we have already discussed. Many will wonder that then how it is possible that the result is not excellent? And the answer is simple: the script. Normally all movies we have professionals who manage the majority of technical sections are good enough to pass unnoticed, and when something fails or us does not end like us the film, usually by the same endemic: the script. Definitely a quality product which was expected much more. Fortunately next week we get new movies from other two masters such as Allen and Scorsese.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1695

Tito Chinchan

Piratas

muchocine

Strange experiment of film of hackers who at that time was a commercial failure with good reason. Only saves the performance of Walter Matthau, which has great moments.

With great enthusiasm we had to see this movie, my half Zucchini and me. The pirates always are interesting, that guarantee you good espadazos and naval battles (matches the pirates porn movies are nabales, ji, ji, ji), as well as interesting arguments on treasures of incalculable value. The only thing that I mosqueaba much is not having heard talk about this film in life, but no one will know more than the imdb.The film is about a pirate of pata de palo and his faithful squire, a little charlatan but effective kid. It turns out that he is the famous pirate network, which was given by dead years ago and it now returns. On his way, he meets a throne of Aztec gold, which makes him obsessed with him and pursue him to the ends of the universe (more or less).As I read out there, Roman Polanski took 10 years to make this film, given that no producer was wanted catch. They predicted a tremendous commercial failure of the same, as it was. And no wonder. One when he sees one of the pirates expected something very different to what is this film. The thing is made with a sense of humor, with quite sympathetic scenes (blows and things as well), but for the part epic, is far from a good thing. The argument is very strange with a lame pirate fat and prone to cannibalism which makes patochadas everywhere. No, I do not like the experiments here, we need a bad-tempered, sober and heartless pirate. Then the issue of the soundtrack, not paste anything with the movies of the genre nor liked.In short, strange experiment of film of hackers who at that time was a commercial failure with good reason. Only saves the performance of Walter Matthau, which has great moments.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1346

Caruco

El libro negro

muchocine

It is a domesticated, happy Verhoeven back home and, as a rookie, apply to please with a telefilm of luxury.

After more than 6 years back Paul Verhoeven, and also involves the return of the Dutch to Europe. Some topics we tend to apply to films made in Hollywood, which is limited to follow guidelines, only seeks to sell or limits the creative capacity of the author take overland passage.Because it could dispatch this criticism by saying that "The black book" is a drama of intrigue, sex, love, loyalties and betrayals with Nazism and the resistance as a backdrop, and as effective as simple. And although there are elements of the film, they are much less abundant, risky, daring, provocative and non-conformist than be expected.Any of his works in the United States contains more interest, with the exception of the disappointing "Hollow man", that this work told with a neatness and formal beauty as remarkable as it anodina. Its virtues are limited to comply as entertainment, to discover a good actress, Carice van Houten, and a couple or three scenes and notable ideas, without which, it would be a film as flat as the concept of globe that were our forefathers. survivors!Paul Verhoeven has become to like, and not clash too with a story of espionage and passions that contemplates, far, Hitchcock on his horizon.It is the sequence of the protagonist, a sort of mata-hari marbling in the headquarters of the Gestapo in the invaded Holland, tiñiéndose the hair of their most intimate parts of rubio to raise its charms as men consuming; submitting good Nazis, because not all were in favor of the horrors of Hitler; or the controversy include the humiliations of the population violated the collaborators, tired of so much time of invasion and fears, once finished the contest.But its archetype is that of the Nice couché paper, where even a barrel of human feces is so embellished it seems delicious chocolate. Unfortunately, there is also the idea that wars never end, in a spiral of violence and intolerance infinite. And the need for survival, understanding thereby the ability to adapt to circumstances but at the same time being true to oneself. It is in a way more compromised, as Rachel, the protagonist, or more frivolous, as his friend, Ronnie (Halina Rejin). But it is not the best Verhoeven, is a domesticated, happy Verhoeven back home and, as a rookie, apply to please with a telefilm of luxury.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1446

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Matinee

muchocine

Hybrid between the science fiction of the 1960s, pobretón and pathetic, film and drama on adolescents. A naïve film, funny, advisable to always, which gives a very accurate view of an era.

Matinee must be taken very seriously, even if take frivolous ways and his style is a bet radioactive blatant by the film pulp of 1950s and 1960s where Americans slept with the fear to be abducted or to tap manara water that become them capitalist beetles. The seriousness of Matinee lies in its context: the usual films such dressing is prolific serie B scurfy and shabby-looking, low budget and beat fantasy that abounded during the cold war in the us as decompressor cultural war tension and noise shocking of bombs, not falling, aimed at all sides.Shudders thinking that the fiction of Dante is seasoned with everyday terrors extracted from that reality convulsed by the dispute between Russians and Americans, and the mob of countries attached to one side or the other to torpedeaban stability with small interested civil wars. The cold war was the threat to escombrar the world and Lawrence Moosley, a prodigious John Goodman, is the wizard of deception, the genius big fairs of people who mislead families buy their concoction, which is movie popcorn, off film of any claim of durability, as Dante's own cinema and this film. We have thus film within the film, a film that talks about the films from a time where Bruce Banner, the hero of Marvel, the Green Hulk affected by radiation in a military trial, was the icon of a blurry future. Mant, the film Moosley advertised superbly on Matinee talks about all this: Atomic ants and perverse, dream on the Moon and rays of working men that much open eyes when they sit in a movie theater to leave that the magic, the lie, falsehood, deceit, withdraw them from the barbarism of the world for two hours.They are the morning now lost for the sake of the new youth, historical then you aversions technology that they appeal to individualism, social segregacionismo and some elitist exclusivism. Dante, who was the first cartoonist and later editor for Roger Corman, who learned that they could make good film at low cost, he has a style casual, generous in winks to the television series and in children and adolescents, rico 13th–15th in that with his mentor Spielberg, although this is more bombastic in the message, guignolesco, grandiose and refined.Matinee is a disguised burlesque satire of a society agitated horse between the nuclear scare (Bay of pigs, the Cuban missiles, the Soviets on the beaches of California as a Supreme threat) and the healing of the wounds of World War II. And the film splendidly helps nothing traumatized in excess. What makes Woosley is what Dante, in the background, aims, although they may be other times and threats and fears are also others and other costumes. Dante is an inspired worker who has entrusted entertain the troops while arming the barricades: entertain is distract, move, suggest, inspire, teach and, in any case, seek the joy that steal us the teletypes.Matinee is a very wise costumbrista portrait of the "cold" America seasoned with the salt of more crude humor (which is seen in the film in black and white of Woosley) and other humor, corrosive this time, hard, although not hurtful, it explains the pathology of a people entrenched in wonder about the future.During the development of the story, it is possible to smell a Viet Nam in budding and discover that teenagers doing the session have no bloody clue what is communism and if that ideology can disassemble the american way of life that his parents have built with blood, sweat, bars and many stars.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2745

Kiko de España

Dead silence

muchocine

Monchito, The Killer. Disappointment in all rule this Dead Silence directed by James Wan, the type that shot the first Saw and here returns to the Viewer as if moron.

Disappointment in all rule this Dead Silence directed by James Wan, the type that shot the first Saw and here returns to the Viewer as if moron. The only reason why I held my until the end was to confirm that in the 15 minute movie "seen the Duster" and already know absolutely everything, so go bitch friend Wan. A ridiculous scene with a Lord, that I will not spoilear if any reader of debauchery with less than thirteen years wants to see it, says it all.At ridiculous times to most ridiculous moments.And fucking mania of the Wan rolling with his fetish actor Donnie Wahlberg, an authentic gañán.Nor the first ten minutes, which is more acceptable are cool. Wan will have to put aside his facet of scammer if you want to go to see that (a priori) ochentada with Kevin Bacon making Charles Bronson entitled Death Sentence.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2573

José A. Peig

Jindabyne

muchocine

Although unsuccessful, it is interesting and recommended film for the movie buff, the good intentions of the author and the attempt to create something that goes beyond the usual patterns.

Jindabyne is the place where coexist different strata making up the story, and which is dominated by the general level representing the serene evolution of the nature of that region, the arid fields, the waters of the lake or the mountains that surround the River. According to the visual approach of director Ray Lawrence, the natural landscape is the true protagonist of the story, seen through long flat and the contemplative Cadence whereby the eye of the camera immerses us in its geography, it almost looks respond to an ideal animist of return to nature, the same kind that holds varied human profiles. Thus, Jindabyne is not so much a film about the emotional or ideological conflict between human beings as an allegorical representation of nature in conflict with the artificial world and human culture, including. The level which opens the narrative - the nature of the landscape segment and limited by a thread of wire - expresses the conflict that will also have a correlative closure in the simple act of murdering an insect trapped in the interior of the truck, whose owner homicide will be the trigger for the crux of the story.In this way, Lawrence aims to weave a network of interconnected phenomena; connection between human beings, in a secondary stratum, and connection between humans, human culture and nature, in the main stratum, the most significant for narrative purposes it is which could encompass all the structure latent. The speech progresses while it addresses topics varied from angles opposite depending on what character is used to emphasize a certain aspect of the narrative: costumbrista story, coral melodrama, reflection on human feelings and choices that arise when extraordinary events interfere in daily life, social conventions and the problems arising from the Act of rape them, moral dilemmas because of conflicting beliefsEcology, racial motives and a long etcetera. An idea of masterpiece but that it does not have the necessary packing, primarily because the director, confused often subtle with the scattered and indefinite, and although it is likely that in the minds of Lawrence everything has a sense consistent with an idea of very clear basis, as it is developed on the screen, not collecting the required clarity. Subtlety is not use the silences to trot and moche or omit some aspects of the argument are key to organise the motivation and development of the characters properly. Subtle means ingenuity and versatility, and no such routine dialogues and a repetitive pattern of omissions and silences which ultimately tarnish the good intentions of the author: this entails the dispersion of the story and the final grey, with the consequent burden for narrative purposes.The corpse of a girl floating in the waters of the River refers to the interaction be human, often unpleasant and violent, incompatible, as seen in the tense representation of electrical towers that destroy the landscape, and fear raised in one of the protagonists of the tour, animist beliefs. The murderer, is precisely an electric company worker. In the end, all the characters meet in a field of beautiful nature, in an Aboriginal ceremony culminating with a love song in memory of the murdered (is so priceless capricious as the fact that the homicide is present at the ceremony), which becomes the basis of general reconciliation.Quite apart from all this, Jindabyne, although unsuccessful, is an interesting and recommended film for the movie buff, by the good intentions of the author and the attempt to create something that goes beyond the usual patterns. That Yes, everything becomes an attempt.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1131

Kahzrrak

La alianza del mal

muchocine

You can wait to hang out with her, but since then I have known before, would have not gone to see her movies or joke.

Good afternoon, dear readers. Here comes again your dear colleague and neighbor. i.e., I. Today we come to talk about cinema. The truth is that I'm a little late but, with my apologies, not I have written earlier by that "labour issues". Let's talk about a partnership that, unfortunately, and much to my regret, seems to me that won't be as famous as some had hoped.We are talking about a story primarily of science fiction, at least to my mind, that (as someone told me there): but wasn't terror?. because the truth is that it tries to, but of fear gives more but little, except for a couple of sustillos of low level (course, from that I saw on a large surface, the film "Outbreak" classified as terror, I believe anything). The truth is that I went to the cinema with intention to watch another movie, but when I saw that the investigation was not, however, had just planted on Billboard "Alliance of evil", said: because this I had also wanted to see her, as announced on TV were a couple of scenes that were very good. As well: the truth is that the effects are not bad, although it is not that they are wonderful, but the script is disastrous. I don't know how you can lose in nothing an idea that, although repeated, could give so much of themselves for a few geeks like us. He is a series of families, the "sons of Ipswich", generation after generation ranging through is "powers" of parents to children. These families are United not only by friendship, but also by such secret, because in modern times they were persecuted and killed for witchcraft. Some supposed powers of this depth and a typical cast of teenagers (supposedly teenagers, because I doubt that anyone has less years than I) guaperas, even if they are already very seen, they could have given more than Yes, of course with little more than an hour and a half of duration, all good intentions would be nothing (do anything any producer and/or director thought that a good movie that isn't child can develop in such a short time?).By the way, because I have a joint with my colleagues page, take this opportunity to complain: who would think that making the film six euros is a good idea? really will think that economics is to risk again to go see a film of which I doubt any? From now on, and with prices that are being theaters (and make clear that I know in Madrid and Catalonia it will be still more expensive, which seems even more chilling) gives me the feeling that more than one we will rethink very much if we are going to return to go to the movies (and they will be able to tell me now that the number of clients has not lowered?)(, because that what I do not think), except to see authentic peliculones (i.e. one of thousand.).Putting already here my complaint, step to summarize the issue: the synopsis I her I said and, although found me little, the truth is that not I tell you more without risk of spoiling you the movie (logically, a movie of an hour and a half, slightly more must have). In short, you can expect to hang out with her, but since then I have known before, not would have gone to see her movies or joke.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3196

Silvia Giner

Cabeza de perro

muchocine

The intention has been to do something mystical plan and the result is a shit worthy of producing the largest of the somnolencias before viewing.

The other day I had the brilliant idea of seeing this movie and narrowly not dying of fright to see such garbage.It is amazing as it may occur in Spain this type of pointless movies. Santi Amodeo paste the blunder directing a movie heavy to say enough is enough. Crappy up to despair and a direction of actors that makes you want to vomit. Adriana is a piece of (poorly exploited) actress is well below its potential and Juan José Ballesta, much to my regret because I love, paste the greater petardazo of his career playing this absurd role in plan "I want and I can not" be a deep and mystical character.Here I have the impression that was intended to do something mystical plan and that the result is a shit worthy of producing the largest of the somnolencias before viewing. Comment also the complete lack of feeling between the two actors. Juan José not help anything to Adriana, noticeable to the League.Sometimes I regret that it is not able to give negative scores, this film is worth to be punctuated with a - 5 stars.The light, photography, screenplay, locations, everything sucks so badly.Do not waste your time and save yourself some nausea deep.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2334

Hartigan

Shrek Tercero

muchocine

Nevertheless, the product is. Classic gags are still his grace and there are some that another worth to be repeated.

The responsibilities of married life have come to the quiet world of Shrek, for whom his only concern was to have something tasty to put in the mouth and a good pond of mud where take a bath. The sapo-suegro of the most famous ogre of the Kingdom it has died and to Shrek is not forced to find an heir to the throne if you don't want to deal with sceptre and Crown game. Adventure that arises is not so simple, as the said heir is a pardillo teenager who can that you of more headaches that rule the Kingdom of very, very far, so similar to Sunset Bulevard. On the road he will face to charming, determined to occupy a throne that does not correspond, and all his offspring renegade story. But pardillo cousin and the image of a shampoo advertisement will not be the main concern of the ogre, who magically (others call it natural law) is going to be dad. Something that is mournful. Luckily, that can always count on the invaluable help of his two favorite minions, Puss in boots and donkey. And Fiona? Because pregnant women of Shrek, far from staying in Palace making sock while waiting to her amantísimo husband return with the heir gets to guardian of the Kingdom in his absence. That Yes, account with the well-intentioned collaboration of other fairy tale princesses. Read more Rapunzel, Cinderella, sleeping beauty?Under the title of Shrek the third comes the third (forgive the redundancy) adventure of the Green ogre, whom the marriage not has sat as well as expected. And it is that our OGRE has lost part of his spark to make way for a kind of sentimentality that clashes with his appearance. This new chapter in your life is too ñoño to maintain tone thug from its predecessors, although it still has his grace. So much headache if will be a good father to their shoots or sweet eyes that look at Fiona a little break the magic of the anti-tradicional tale that we always wanted to sell. Nevertheless, the product is. Classic gags are still his grace ("better was that inside" is already part of our vocabulary) and there are some that another worth to be repeated. As for the characters, they are the same with some that another incorporation as the princesses of fairy tale or the bad (do Captain Hook, the stepmother?). In conclusion, only make them a recommendation: see the dubbed version. The dubbing of ass by the moreno of Cruz y Raya, far exceeds, Eddie Murphy. No point of comparison. (M. J. TO.)

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/658

Berto

Click

muchocine

Such an approach half seriously that they try to give at the end and grab the viewer completely confused, is the more successful that they could have done with it, that it was losing bellows alarmingly.

I went to the movies to see Click thinking that I would find a new Disney comedy very in the style of its protagonist, Adam Sandler, and the truth that the principle was very disappointing. As in all comedies in which usually participate Sandler, thanks are more or less based on "teta-culo - pis" and is the beginning of the movie, where place us him as an architect too busy to take care of his family, is based on these so past fashion gracietas that are no longer grace. When the "universal" remote enters the life of the protagonist, the film is winning some integers, although still with this pattern of scatological jokes. Is the long half of the film where things change, surprisingly better, and attempting to copy the Christmas story, Dickens, trying to teach a lesson of moralina the protagonist, recalling the transience of life, and for that there is no best thing in this world that seize every moment and not miss anything, because it can produce dismal results. This second part, which remotely I get reminded films as interesting as trapped in the time and like God, but that if, bridging the gap, I liked a lot more than the beginning, and that half-serious approach trying to give at the end that grab the viewer completely confused, is the more successful that they could have done with it, that it was losing fuelle alarmingly.Adam Sandler is in this film quite correct, in his usual tone, you will not give any Oscar but do to see interesting films would have not gone to see this, not? Kate Beckinsale, gorgeous as always if I liked a lot and is in the role of wife of Sandler the perfect vehicle for, without too strive, succeed in the interpretation. Christopher Walken, great actor deserves special mention and in their little speeches transmitting much strength to his character, something that for a film of this kind is appreciated not had taken his role too to messing. By David Hasselhoff little I can say, because simply seeing this face and the role of this great horny and macho head, although his character is badly exploited and the rest of the cast is the more loose without any doubt.In short a very recommendable to see film but want to see movies with pretensions, although an unexpected end and that "Carpe Diem" which distills the film make it highly recommended for a boring afternoon.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4272

Carlos Giacomelli Puig

No es país para viejos

muchocine

A monster from the film, an almost perfect movie that stays in the retina hours after having been seen.

Reaches our charts a few weeks of the Oscar ceremony, one of the strongest candidates to win. "Isn't country for old men", the last genius of the Coen brothers, obviously boasts no less than eight nominations, including that of best film.Based on the eponymous book by Cormac McCarthy, the film puts us in a time of change. In this new West no longer bandits or outlaws, if not drug traffickers armed to the teeth, and the small U.S. villas are no longer peaceful places in which the Sheriff can walk unarmed, now need a gun for his own safety. In one of these villages, in the State of Texas, Llewelyn Moss (played by a Josh Brolin who lives its second golden age) is done with a Briefcase full of money which is among a handful of bodies caused by an unsuccessful sale of drugs. Without knowing it, thus draws the attention not only of the Group of traffickers to whom belongs this money, but also of the murderous psychopath Anton Chigurt (apotheosis Javier Bardem) and Sheriff Bell (Tommy Lee Jones). Thus begins a brutal persecution without truce, which will not stop at nothing, 8–10 of blood, pain, and death.Let me say before we start: very, very well have to do other nominees to snatch some of the statuettes at this authentic marvel.Because "No country for old men is" it is film with capital letters. The first minutes of the film already warn the viewer of what is about to see. The voiceover of a depressed Tommy Lee Jones accompanies a succession of various levels of the desert, real pictures of the sunrise in the arid fields in which shrubs are shaken by the wind. When the camera at the end moves, it does so slowly, to show us the arrest of a mysterious Bardem in charge of a police of the people. Continues playing the voice of Lee Jones mixing with ululations of the breeze, and the car moves away from the scene. All this at a very leisurely, without background music, elegant and sober pace. And so, one realizes that we are faced with a new and true colossal of the Coen brothers; that "Is No country for old" intends to join the group formed by the master "the man that wasn't there" or "Death entre las Flores", away from the easy comedies to which we were accustomed in recent years. There is no shortage which already doubted the ability of managers to return to surprise to the public. This film should serve all them to dispel doubts, which not only has sufficient quality to belong to this select group of works of art, if not even likely to overcome them.Because, I repeat, what has created the tandem of Directors is a monster of the film, an almost perfect movie that stays in the retina hours after having been seen.Just for its technical and artistic level, "Is No country for old" is longer with the label of masterpiece. The Coen brothers prove once more that make better use of the panoramic format, offering impossible levels in every inch of what appears on screen is essential to compose what are authentic paintings. All without exception, since the more bombastic level to the more intimate (Bardem washing their hands in the sink of the Police Office), are of great beauty. And obviously, fused together with a sophisticated and intelligent use of the camera able to almost become one secondary protagonist of the story. Pay attention to the sequence of the hotel.But even better it works everything is in their argument and mix of genres. Because "Is No country for old" is, after all, a film of the West (1). He is simply a thrilling Chase in which three gunmen (and any more that it joins the party) they seek to seize its prey, be it a suitcase of money, one death in the box, or one criminal less in the streets.What is surprising, is that on a basis so (seemingly) simple, the film achieves propose doubts and questions, and very difficult to answer (or is perhaps its title the best response?), both moral and social levels. What would you do? Who is really good? So how can you trust a stranger?. do something to prevent that crazy as Chygurt deambulen by our streets?Oh, and Javier Bardem outboard its role. Not only it is impossible to find out the true nationality of the actor (his English is much better than many Americans), if not his character of authentic AWE. See how decides if a person lives or dies, with that look of crazy thirsty of blood, gives authentic chills. The Acme, the gas station scene, with such terrible dialogue between him and the owner of the same.(1)The same Joel Coen says that "is as close as we are never do an action film".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/318

Verolindapechocha

Cars

muchocine

From Toy Story I keep wonder at the level and quality that have reached the animations. The details, the scenery, everything is so real and so perfect. It is simply magical...

Lovers of animated films long ago were waiting for Cars (2006), because in theory was the last film that Disney and Pixar would produce boards. The companies had been divorced for great sadness of many and this was going to be his last son, therefore, the expectations were great. However, months before the release of Cars, Disney and Pixar returned to marry and I think that we are going to be very happy, for always? Meanwhile. Disfrutemos.para start, before the movie went a short film by Pixar called the man Orchestra, which was terrific and if someone wishes to find on the internet, you will be eternally grateful. I am very bad surfer, so far do not know to search for videos on the network. Sorry for you. Without more introductions, let's see what is Cars. Here the "actors" are cars with distinct personalities. I never thought that a few machines as "square" as the cars could humanize, but do.The protagonist is Lightning McQueen, a rookie very talented race car, but self-worshiping up over not being able to. His dream is to get the Pixon Cup, as it would happen in history for being the first rookie in get this achievement. I Lightning McQueen surrounded by mass media. It is the car of the moment.Lightning McQueen has it all, except the most important thing. friends. In his world all it's him, despises his technical team who considered unimportant to his triumphs, doesn't even know their names. Also to his little chic sponsor, a brand of antioxidant, belittled because rusty cars are the worst.The race for Pixon is a triple tie which must be solved in a great final race in California.Rayo McQueen and his two experienced rivals.On the way to California, while Lightning McQueen is transported in his trailer, faithful Mack, an accident occurs that makes our protagonist get out of interstate and go to fall to a people lost in the middle of the desert, Radiator Springs, where it will be trapped serving a sentence and learning much more than expected. Not more or I will become in a spoiler story. But do not believe that I'm not dying of desire. The film is so, so, so pretty.Well, go to see it and discover that and much more. A security that there is no lost with this movie is that the team Director is the same of the also fabulous The Incredibles and Finding Nemo. What more guarantee?From Toy Story I keep wonder at the level and quality that have reached the animations. The details, the scenery, everything is so real and so perfect. It is simply. Magical. And laborious, because for this film drew 43,000 sketches, nothing less.Fact: If they see in English, the voice of Ferrari Michael Shumacher is the real Michael Shumacher.Toy Cars Story: do not lift from their seats before the end credits. As always the Pixar guys want to recognise the work of the entire team and give us some surprises. In this case, a funny version of Toy Story with actors cars.Tires: another tribute to Toy Story can appreciate this brand of tires of career: Ligthyear.Y one more: the number that holds the protagonist McQueen on his side is 95, this is on purpose that Toy Story was released in 1995.Otros tributes: named after the hero was released in memory of Glenn McQueen, an animator from Pixar who died in 2002. The genial character Mater plaque, reads "A113", which is a reference to the Salon of animation from the California Institute of the arts, where many Pixar animators studied.Eye with flies: until the bugs are car shaped!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4285

Rafa Ferrer

Alvin y las Ardillas

muchocine

Although fun and reconciliante with the kid that lives within us, is a bit disappointing, you know the saying, to where you were not you should return, better remember it as it was, to not annoy her on his return.

Already many years perhaps 20? I continued on television (the canal which is now called "intelligent channel" which is the 2 TVE), an animated series that used to put many Sunday afternoons, starring 3 sympathetic squirrels with strident voices that he wore to the poor John (his caretaker and "father") and their adventures and misadventures, once again, and perhaps thanks or not, the lack of ideas in the Mecca of cinema has brought to the big screenreplacing the original Chipmunks animated characters in CGI.I admit that in my case Garfield, despite having seen 2 movies as my wife loves the cat, not called me the minimum, and yet this film and moved by a bit of nostalgia, has led me to see her knowing, in advance, what was I going to find.On the one hand have to Jason Lee (already mayor man), that here portraying the legendary role of John, then the 3 squirrels in CGI, sincerely well recreated, do 3 bugs "with charisma" through a Pc isn't feat, then we have David Cross, secondary in countless films, that here is the villain of the role andof partner Lee bellisima Cameron Richardson, to which we have not seen too many movies, but that I bet that will be a face (beautiful, beautiful) we will accompany from now onwards.Honestly, when I heard about the project I thought it was a joke, and was not until I saw the first trailer I record that this was "serious", and that has worked excellently well in box office will have sequel? Squirrels will return to TV as when I was small? Big questions unanswered.The film certainly does not give much, it is clear what is going to give a tape where 3 squirrels are the protagonists? That's normal, sincerely did not expect to see Macbeth, Romeo and Juliet, nor a remake of Citizen Kane, but, however at the end of viewing have a feeling that it has missed the characters, were much more charisma in his animated series, and here are dull, desdibujados and firmly poorly aimed, besides the fact that I do not remember that squirrels obsession because John (do era John not?) was his fatherrather, until where comes my memory were devoted to bitching you and make your life impossible, within the rules and coexistence, given that we are talking about a series of drawings for children, and you know that everything you see a child, like a monito, copy.On the soundtrack I was lacking the main theme, something that is completely unforgivable, and that many thirtysomethings had no illusion have recovered, although the Chritsmas Time sounds me that also went in any episode of the series.Finally, although fun and reconciliante with the kid who live in our interior, is a little disappointing, because we know the saying, to where you were you should not return, better to remember it as it was, to not annoy her on his return.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2096

Ramón Balcells

El novio de mi madre

muchocine

If there is something that stands out in the film is his cast, everything else is pretty mediocre.

Do all the romantic comedies have to be equal? This is the question that should be asked the Director of the boyfriend of my mother before shooting her. According to my theory, it, ready to completely change this habit that all love American stories are very similar or almost identical, decides to shoot a film of the genre, but innovative, smart gags and some interpretations of quality. For now, this, for my taste, only has achieved it, during these years, Director Nancy Meyers (exemplary filmmaker of the wonderful when you least expect). Amy Heckerling, of the movie in question, gets halfway. Initially, the chemistry between the actors and the script seemed to be well coordinated, and I even got to thinking (only at first, again) that this would be an interesting and more than pleasant romantic comedy to the Love actually. Unfortunately, the film dives into the typical clichés of the genre and starts rolling with loves and proverbs, deception and disappointments, obviously not llegana any part. As the film progresses, the script will becoming more simple and stupid, although interpretations never cease to be bad, on the contrary, in general are more than acceptable.From the flower of evil (2002) not saw Michelle Pfeiffer acting on the big screen. If you want to tell you the truth, the waiting was worth it and her has not earned at the same time. Let's see, the boyfriend of my mother is nonsense, but the fact that 49 actress appears in she already is a plus, since not only retain their naturalness and funny faces to the Act but remains under a surgeon, I suppose, an incredible beauty. Amater film speaking on the subject of liposuction and ends up doing it with something else, and that is where is clearly seen that the film, without the contract of Pfeiffer, had not existed. Yes, Paul Rudd can be fun and nice that you like girls, but it is that she eats it live. In addition, Tracey Ullman appears as the "help on love issues" of Pfeiffer, and is really fun. As you will see, if there is something that stands out in the film is his cast, everything else is pretty mediocre.I stretch no more because you can not. We have a simple film, the cast that it filled with some really funny dialogue and situations somewhat less common than usual where only can highlight. Not recommended for those who hate Michelle Pfeiffer (I hope that ye may be few) and those who hate the romantic comedies.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1739

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Descubriendo a los Robinsons

muchocine

Direct to DVD. No more. And there it rock. Disney has these requiebros of fate, his Philo to continue the legend.

Walt Disney needs to greening its reputation, lost, in part, by the merits of Pixar (John Lasseter to the head) and Dreamworks (with Steven Spielberg at the controls) factory. It will not be this tape that regurgite fugal fame, but gives a fun time (for that matter) and will settle who attend the cinema to enjoy with hour and a half of honest evasion.Discovering the Robinsons comes to be a camouflaged self-help manual of animated feature film. As if Paulo Coelho (the juggler of the sentimental solucionarios, that impostado guru who sold as coconut biscuits their files for needy) had gotten the finger into the script and provide their very particular vision of the sentimentality human.Like (and long) by Parties: is very successful and is with greedy delectation in a first moment, when raising the crux of the plot, that is, the orphan who wants a family and ends in the future discovering the Robinsons, a family troubled, eccentric, sobrevitaminada of steroids estérales or, if you like, simply written, crazy tie. The film is without displeasure, not tired, produces (everything is said) a sense of déjà vu, as if everything had already seen in other adult movies, but here the Disney puts their correct vision of the family, which has always given him the quarterfinals, and produces a correct film, without more, that will not go to the history of the firm and not to the memory of the Viewer. Children included.In addition, finiquitando is all enrevesa far is thick.The time, severe judge, her place instead, on its store shelves easy neighborhood video store rental products in those treacly evenings of heat which are already our summer.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/207

Daniel Galindo

Remake

muchocine

Characters brought to the end and that is not torture with the enough rawness to this pessimistic fresco shot with digital camera

Roger Gual made his first feature film solo - a project that flees of cinematographic standards to use - moving to nine players to a micro-universo away from civilization, anchored to Earth by the idea that young people we are heirs of the failures of our film on parents.History repeats itself, in this case the yearnings and betrayals to oneself. The title alludes to it, a new version of those films of personal search, with same stray if characters. If these belong to two different generations, the emotional shock may be greater. But however much proposed it Gual, his film does not cause the impressions that cause other choral drama.Do the touch of authenticity supported in the naturalism of the actors? constitute the real wealth - and scarcity of technical resources has just become modus operating both helpings. While the initial idea has strength, the development is carried out with ups and downs, full of questions without answers or resolved hastily, as the escape of the sector is young as an alleged act of rebellion, wasting such a good dramatic material.Tragic comedy about what are the ideals that one day were persecuted far is clear on the script but the result on screen is not much: imagine a terrarium with bugs or Simulator with virtual beings managed to our own liking and that they leave you live; but make that no mistake, his paltry existence depends on the above. Gives the impression that the auction is unfortunate and Gual is resting on its laurels to relying too heavily on his dialogues: eccentric, funny, curious, but without the claw of the writings with July Wallovitz for Smoking room. Yet the proposal does its component of originality, although it also deceives easily? as it is known, in the country of the blind. It is not a title whose wake go to shine with great force but nevertheless serves as a double touch of attention: industry notifies necessary renewal formal and plot; the creators to Gual in this case, that not be must abused with this type of formulas although of course, they say that there is no two without three.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1508

Kiko de España

The host

muchocine

Monster, Macguffin, lie M M m. I not finish very well understand the critical and commercial impact of a film that does not reach you the height of your shoes to the best examples of the fantasy genre.

Said Alfred Hitchcock if you start big, with a large Boom!, the public will not stand up seat and them you will have for all footage looking at the screen.However, Bong Joon-ho has done just that: a big Boom! and later. After a succession of nonsense about a dysfunctional family (and go) and anything but a monster-movie.Term not understand very well the impact of criticism and public of a film that does not reach you the height of the shoes to the best samples of the latest fantasy genre, either The Descent, or the hills have eyes or film of Rob Zombie.Y I'm not worth the "is that it is not a movie monsters to use" because on the cover, among other pearls, appears "the best film of monsters of history or was first shark and then Alien". Show me. Shark and Alien are two of the best movies of horror of the history of the cinema and The Host, to begin with, does not play in the same League. This is humor of the absurd, which I think is very appropriate for a movie about a vendor of matches, but not a movie Monster.Specific: Yes may be humor (you must have, the movies of monsters have to be, above all, fun) in this type of movies, but is that maybe I do not understand the yellow humor, I do not know.Ah, the monster, by the way, does not exist for the other characters, more concerned of the virus (another Macguffin) or contaminated family.I leave for the final final, with random deaths for those present at the time of the amarillo.¿Tanta smoke Grill for how it ends the move? I was more afraid seeing Rosa Spain in hands to work.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/276

Alejandro Salmerón

Superman returns

muchocine

Sometimes it is better to let superheroes where they have always been (on paper) and be more conscientious and consistent with the responsibility associated with resurrect a myth

Brian Singer is still trying to show their inner scholar, but the truth is that, the genius of the lamp has not just wake up after "Usual suspects". Cataloging and his X-men and its Superman as quite normal films.The man of steel, for many, symbolizes the hero par excellence, perhaps by their paradoxical humanity, proximity, buenhacer and because what is humans anela dream, such as fly, resolve the conflicts in the world, etc..Then Superman acquires megalomaniac dimensions and is when the genius Richard Donner comes into action after its "The Omen" and with a filmography quite modern and outstanding; Donner would create their version of hero that since my opinion has not yet been beaten.Comparisons are odious, but Singer has attempted to resurrect two personalities such as Brando and Reeve which is somewhat morbid, giving green light to enable one to dispatch to taste and to realize that attempts to make lasting works are far to simple blockbuster dunces.Observe for example in the vision of Singer trend of aberration of the colors in the film or that new suit so fluffy style "gum boomer" stripping that proximity or nearness that Reeve had mortals; and being a little more fussy and as something personal, were needed such modern refinements in styling and costume of the man of steel?The most worrying thing is a script as progresses, one can notice the decline of printed clear interest, to the point of seeing inconsistent things little you worthy of the Superman saga. And luckily, that despite everything, the film remains supported a Brandon Routh and Kevin Spacey with some pretty awesome homonimos faces and to some extent giving very well the size and new airs or nuances to the series; except the henchmen of Lex, which I think that they were not a good choice as well as the discrete soundtrack, which despite of having as a legacy of Williams, without penalty and without glory.The rest of details such as special effects, little worthy today, taking into account that in Hollywood is the only thing that lately do and of course the good dirección-dominio of the House of Singer, give me to think that sometimes it is better to leave to the superheroes where have been always (on paper) and be more conscientious and consistent with the responsibility associated with resurrect a myth that perhapsbest not be awakened. "(See next installments with the new asthmatic son of Superman.)"

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3291

Matías Cobo

Promesas del Este

muchocine

Cronenberg deals with how the tentaculares mafia environments prevent its abandonment to who one day formed part of them or how extends to the lives of those who relate some, if you want side, with its surroundings

A history of violence as this Eastern promises demonstrate a manifest interest in David Cronenberg in the vicinity of the violent world of the mafia. Last two tapes of this director of granado in the fantasy genre last not strive to address these criminal clans with a similar to emblematic works like the Godfather depth charge. But yes choose them as a framework for more concrete stories about characters caught up in the Web of the underworld.In complicity with the splendid work of the chameleonic Viggo Mortensen, star of both films, the Canadian filmmaker discusses how these tentaculares environments prevent its abandonment to who one day formed part of them or how extends to the lives of those who relate some, if you want side, with its surroundings. The character of Naomi Watts, a midwife at a London hospital, will happen this last in Eastern promises. After bringing to the world the son of a Ukrainian teenager who died after giving birth, she, also of Russian origin, lies in the moral obligation to come up with a family who entrust the care of the newborn orphan, at the time that can communicate you the news of the death of the mother.The track of a newspaper in the hands of the young dead mother will lead to Anna Khitrova up to a family of the Russian mafia who used this girl to prostitution and then threw it as commodity disposable having her become a junkie. There will encounter with the mysterious Nikolai Luzhin (the character of Mortensen), a chófer-recadero - thug in the service of the spoiled son of the boss of the clan (a great Vincent Cassel). His father, played by Armin Mueller-Stahl, skillfully represents the iconic figure of the leader of the family clan, as well as of prominent CAPO between the various Mafia families. In this relationship as father and son remain during the film is enough film topic while isn't anything new in the film shear stress between a strict mafia leader and his wayward little exemplary son.Khitrova findings through the daily dangerously converge you to this world with own rules away altogether from the other that we agree to call normal. Only one-man parco, with neat typical aspect of Russian mobster, records of compass and protection to not interfere more than we. Nikolai, who claims to be only a driver, knows a lot more than what counts and silent as you can to survive in a community where disputes are often settled with the body of the opponent dumped into the River.Without being a film of a continuous violence, yes onscreen raw violence the House brand Cronenberg, who usually does not hurt him in clothes show more rough details. Icy photography in a modern London and a good general choice of the cast are the guarantees of this Cronenberg film with similar plot paths passing to the of his magnificent, and perhaps higher, predecessor.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/873

Yojimbo

Borat

muchocine

Does do both left a lot to be enviable compositions of characters? really? provocateurs.

A mockumentary have an undeniable success in box office is something that attracts much attention. And are usually those lockers that some call "transgressors" and others call directly hooligans. There are many ways to shoot "film hooliganism". Either is like torrent, Santiago Segura converted transoceanica franchise, or as Borat character, the character of Sacha Baron Cohen from a perspective more irreverent than rude, apparently, get uncomfortable and violent moments.Borat is a reporter from Kazakhstan to make a story about USA, or as he says US and a. beyond goes with their customs (do someone know Kazakh customs?) and collides frontally with American society and by extension, Western. The reporter is misogynistic, cruel, violent, etc? and why is so well with people from Texas, religious fanatics? and so badly with Jews, women, etc?As any product which must conceal its budget, is shot in a way it is concerned, almost documentary and hidden camera sometimes. Anyway, the fact of knowing is a documentary fiction remains important to the memory of this film that is quite enjoyed during viewing, but loses his bellows to be a fun almost of "innocent innocent" with an intended script Fund.The success of this film can pave the way to the American remake of torrent or be a reference film rude, extreme and even unpleasant and bad taste to remove possibilities to the character of Santiago Segura. Since then I'll stick with Borat, but it is a dilemma, eye, purely commercial. Both have a lot to be enviable compositions of "really" provocative characters.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2354

Antoni Messa

Entre mujeres

muchocine

It is clear that the intentions are very good, although Daddy Lawrence should give some lessons to his son before embarking on a second title. Surely, everyone would come out winning.

Among women is the Opera prima Jon Kasdan, son of the renowned director and screenwriter Lawrence Kasdan; an inconsistent work containing very little of the film his father's wisdom that, in his debut, apart from a topic too trite in other similar titles, shows have very little narrative nerve and certain inability to baste a minimally attractive argument with hook.Under the false guise of cinema, among women is a species of bland movie desktop which tells the awakening to the life of a young writer of 27 years who, abandoned by his girlfriend and tired of working for television by-products of three to the fourth, decides to move away from its usual scope to take refuge, over a long seasonin his grandmother's House, which begins to detonate many memory problems. There, while he devotes part of his time to take care of it, it will start writing the book always ansió and will begin an unequal relationship with the females of the family of the House front: a woman mature, unhappy in his marriage, and his two daughters: a beautiful teenager and a small early.The screenplay, written by the filmmaker himself, opting for a realistic tone, but precipitation and predictability as exhibits, the little entity of its male protagonist (a decaffeinated Adam Brody) and that feeling of empty end that leaves the Viewer, make forget even the perfect performances of an atypical Meg Ryan and an excellent and fun Olympia Dukakis who, giving life to a senile old woman, stands as the best of the stereotyped product.Ultimately, this is a new and failed approach to that air of family and collective disappointment that Sam Mendes reflected a charm, in his magisterial American Beauty. It is clear that the intentions are very good, although Daddy Lawrence should give some lessons to his son before embarking on a second title. Surely, everyone would come out winning.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3274

Patri

El Orfanato

muchocine

The mixture of horror and drama in the orphanage is what more drew me attention, with an ending that makes more than one tear.

The horror genre has experienced many ups and downs throughout its history, good horror movies have been made but many more have been which could be described as "commercial basurilla". The orphanage, though it is commercial, can be included among the films of terror by quality, full of elements already seen thousands of times in other films such as doors closing alone, sounds strange in a house alone, a child who sees dead, etc, but despite these elements the movie doesn't become one rehash of others of its kindThanks to a good script, an excellent photography and some notable performances, especially that of Belén Rueda, which carries the entire weight of the film on it. The mixture of horror and drama in the orphanage is what more drew me attention, with an ending that makes more than one tear, is one of the best endings I remember, but I think it might have been spared the last scene, which gives us information that we really don't need, but it would have been a great climaxbeautiful and sad, very sad.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1553

Lady Winter

El buen alemán

muchocine

A plot of intrigues and passions without too much mystery and quite predictable that, despite everything, it is entertaining.

Steven Soderbergh is back with the good German, a failed homage to Casablanca. At this point in the film do something different in the film is virtually impossible. Casablanca was already shot, more than 60 years ago, and there is only one, as there is only a Borgart or an Ingrid Bergman. Try to compare the charismatic George Clooney with the nerve of Bogart may have a pass. But what is unforgivable is trying to make us believe that Cate Blanchett (Lady of ice) can have a shred of class, beauty and talent of the Bergman. Is true that Blanche comes as the character of cold German ring to the finger. Because this coldness in performance is precisely what characterized you (demonstrated in other movies like Babel or various of the rings). But his deadpan face does not transmit sensations or feelings, and therefore not fit for according to what roles. Despite all levels placed strategically so that the viewer wait to hear from one moment to another piano by Sam, the movie is not bad and may come to be regarded even innovative, by being shot to the old-fashioned. Ironic, isn't it?The good German is nothing more than a history of war, in which four vertices of a same square fight over succeed. Three men who love one woman, that handles them all to his own liking. Tobey Maguire is draws the meshes of the man Spider to become an American soldier that considers itself superior to all and is nothing more than a pardillo. Blanche is a German Jew from a dark past that must resort to prostitution during the war to be able to succeed after the disappearance of her husband, a skull privileged for the numbers to which both sides want in their power. And, finally, George Clooney, an American journalist who already shared bed with the girl in the movie before the war and returns to a bombing Berlin to make known to the world the signing of the peace that will mean the end of the second world war. A plot of intrigues and passions without too much mystery and quite predictable that, despite everything, it is entertaining. The best is, without doubt, Clooney, to which black and white I feel pretty good and makes him forget about his longtime role of mature interesting that served to launch to stardom. But Berlin stands out on all possible actions. A city coming down of which everyone wants to escape. The atmosphere is perfect and the way of filming to give more realism to the story requires a round of applause. Resource insert images taken from the documentary technique give this history of victims of war of a greater drama, although without being tear. This is perhaps the most unforgivable mistake, which there is no identification with any of the characters, as all seem too distant in time and space.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3079

Yul B.

Guardianes del día

muchocine

Piece of suckling pig, friends. A crappy by the four costa I. Unbearable sequel of a franchise that has had an international impact through its trumpeted visual similarity to a trilogy that devised the Wachowski brothers whose original name you know very well.

Piece of suckling pig, friends. A crappy by the four costa I. Unbearable sequel of a franchise that has had an international impact through its trumpeted visual similarity to a trilogy that devised the Wachowski brothers whose original name you know very well. However, this is still resemble 'Matrix'. And at this rate will remain without it looking like I'm afraid (already in production is the third installment of 'Twilight Watch'). And I speak of 'Matrix' as a whole.It is true that 'Guardians of the day' imitate with effectiveness in several minutes of his footage the technique hermanísimos which has both influenced the action movie of this decade that is still unfinished. But very few for February as a China advantaged student of this phenomenon, not even to see her as a worthy successor.The success of the copieteo visual also benefited 'Guardians of the night', who also drank of that influence giving the film pitch inside and outside the USSR to surprise the audience with some effects of the very Hollywood. Timur Bekmambetov has been perhaps the more profitability has brought to this duología, getting to Universal Pictures him the direction of adaptation of 'Wanted' responsible.But neither has what has 'Matrix': plot coherence within the fiction.The film not only can live images, very spectacular to be. You can count things exclusively with images, that Yes, but must make sense. And it seems that it has not fallen Bekmambetov, either before the original film, nor now with this continued. 'Guardians of the day' is a montage of images with missed artistic pretensions, that even Squeak repeatedly falling indeseablemente for the viewer in shameful moments of series B, and between which is totally lost the plot. The ida pot of Timur is such that during many times is difficult to understand what we are seeing and for others it is pathetic to watch mounted chaos.That the paper seemed a fairly interesting story, with a strip and tug of war between peace and conflict of the forces of light and darkness, where the protagonist character, Anton struggles to regain the love of his son, Egor, who has joined the ranks of the darkness, and Svetlana, who represents the hope of light, on screen is an amalgamation of scenes, completely unstable, awkwardly continuing and quite soporific times.Four scenes, literally counted are that have surprised me (briefly) by their occasional good done. Three hundred scenes, badly told by their large number, made me think seriously about how it is possible that this film has had such a quantity of rooms in our country (249) at your disposal.Only sorry to have lost almost two hours of my time to see this film. Especially because I have shamefully fallen into the trap of the triumphalist promotions, feeling like a real fool. And unfortunately it will not be the last time to fall (involuntarily).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3493

Iñaki Bilbao

La tumba de las luciérnagas

muchocine

Good film from the same creator as "Heidi" and "Framework", but completely different in its immense drama.

Drama of father and very Mr. mine, too away from the animated film for children, to the point of being qualified for over thirteen years.It is made by the same man that he entertained us (and also quite empachó), being children (who have certain years, clear) with "Heidi" and "Framework", but the spirit of the film is completely different, at least in your background.It is thus the extreme living conditions of some human beings in need of all, during the world war, are exposed in a clear and tough. With scraps of poetry and lyricism, such as the scene in which the two brothers provide light arising fireflies at night, inside the shelter in which are installed, but not save scenes of high drama.The drawings are precious although there is that statism in the distant strokes, so common to Japanese animation. But the dialogues are successful and various avatars are the two main characters are exposed with singular clarity, using for this right, paused, but never slow pace.Nice music and great sadness that encompasses this cruel story, real as life itself.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4287

Iñaki Bilbao

Juno

muchocine

Very estimable comedy with a tinge of drama, but without that never reaches the blood River.

A veritable filigree guionística of Diablo Cody, and the wise conduct of Jason Reitman, that does not elucubra with the script adocenando you absurd shots to try and give a patina of qualité, make that "Juno" it is little bit but without possibility of escape, with the heart of the Viewer.At the beginning, the first fifteen minutes, appears will be a "yanquilandada", a story only possible in the United States of North America, far from other countries. However, and as a result the confession of Juno parents, on its current state, the story takes some byways impresivislbes, continuously changing direction, of gender, of situations, from humor to drama, romantic comedy, to the socio-cultural notes and very sensitive scenes such as Jennifer Garner playing the bulging belly of Juno while this look you at but satisfied. A scene which will be vital in the final decision of perfectly tack Juno.Todo, with great dialogues, excellent performances, with special mention to two actresses: Ellen Page, simply superb in his role as talkative teenager, which serves as a catalyst for some personjaes, somewhat lost / s in their wrong lives, and Allison Janney, wonderful in her role as Juno's stepmother (simple and vibrant escema ultrasound)an actress already with proven experience but that, I'm afraid, so far it had passed fairly unnoticed for the public (myself included, although her he remembered other jobs).Entertaining anytime the interest increases with every minute, offering us a life lesson in the most entertaining way, without absurd morals, moments riídiculos or children's condescencias.It is nominated for several Oscars, being the cheapest film that has crept into the list of nominees. It is difficult, but in the section on the best screenplay I think have real

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/668

Emilio Calvo de Mora

La dalia negra

muchocine

Disappointed by two causes: by the film itself (bad, no uncertain terms) and the cluster of good feelings and indulgent expectations has been building among the public.

The criminologist genre conventions are not many, but are solidly established in the collective imagination of film. Corrupt cops. Offices of detectives with immense black smoke curtains. Corpses on the shore of a river, preferably near a factory. Fatal, Blondes, women in many times. Film noir has nourished of these topics to affirm his nombradía in the history of the seventh art, but Brian de Palma has given them entirely aside. He's gone for the tangent, have been fool by a pedestrian writer that confuses the gender series black lands as you can, and gives us a pathetic our black film made to the modern, i.e. with media, with actors with hook, with an admirable picture, although desasistido in his most explicit evidence: the script.Part Brian de Palma a true story that is still attending its byways in posh criminologists and several fans to the mysteries of the classic Hollywood: the murder of aspiring actress Elizabeth Short, the Black Dahlia, found on a site, the body split in two, with signs of Burns and obscenely painted mouth to ear knife to another. The material is convincing, but marra of Palma in the treatment of the story. Dealt with in excess of the two protagonists policemen (pugilistic top is long, tedious and distracted too much) and vacate greatly characters think that they will have a weight, but later they leave, leave altogether and only colorín overlooking the plot (the role of the exuberant Johannson). Brian de Palma has wanted to compose an epic noir and has Loopy a boring collage whose decor makes us remember the glorious black series of yesteryear (or now: L.A. confidential, masterful).The film disappointed for two reasons: by the film itself (bad, no uncertain terms) and the cluster of good feelings and indulgent expectations has been building among the public, eager to return to a kind of films that (unfortunately) already not abound. It has been one hoping this caramel several months and then it turns out it is overused, old and the strawberry promised is not such but a bitter, sticky, bland flavor after several licking.They tintineaban in our memory admirable movies from the same director as the untouchables of Eliot Ness or trapped by their past, which also touch this topic, but here Brian de Palma has damaged the material of first order of James Ellroy (bore L.A. confidential, without going any further) and has drowned, knowing swimming in dangerous waters.Not worth its excuse that the script is dense and very populous characters. Not supported that the stylistic speech of De Palma refocile in powerful images, in a plot still familiar in his work. Not worth all this because we have already seen on other occasions that Brian de Palma has sobrado talent to aerate these drawbacks with undisputed creative effectiveness. Even products of one lesser in his extensive work order rezumaban, in installments, all of their quality. I remember their mission impossible, or Femme fatale, the pastelazo flags in total heater plan. Then takes one findings that do not support replicas: the man wanted to have lacked, or (as it is often the case) they have gotten hand on the project many hands and in the end went frog when it principiaba Prince, valga this sonsonete helpings. He came to say Woody Allen in a recent interview that in Europe his work was infinitely more autonomous because the producers gave him money and a blank cheque of ideas to go where I like to form wishing. Maybe De Palma has let fall by London or Paris and sign around here his most personal film. It may be.We have what we have: a missed opportunity, a disappointing film. This film requires more cloudiness, so somehow: calls for less contention in the forms, a more Extrovert air. It is not enough that the decorations are portentous. Nor with which there is a blonde dead and a fatal woman who blur it and enfanga everything.The best (to finish this quartering) is the part of fiction within fiction: the scenes in black and white of the aspiring actress Elizabeth Short, reburying then murdered, in its tests of casting. This character, in its brevity, convinces more than the other % and peak minutes of boredom. All very regrettable. All very sad. So I like Sam Spade.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2644

El mágico

Los Simpson: La Película

muchocine

Is to spend a moment nice, if you are not a fan of the series, otherwise, what can you say? I certainly odiarás for writing my opinion! Acceptable but nothing out of this world...

The first thing to say is that "The Simpsons" is a film of difìcil evaluation. Me I crossed with fans of the series in the corridors of the multiplex cinema complexes these past holidays and all of them were bursting of happiness to see her favorite family on screen, arengando to see the tape and mercilessly attacking his detractors acusandolos say lightly without in-depth knowledge of the history of each character brings. Difficult place of critical eh? I must admit that I have intimidated! In part at least. Actually, don't see cinematically the value of "The Simpsons" to take place on any bulletin board, except the honor their adaptive capacity to be the most-watched of the planet cartoon series. No one can argue the Simpsons as a product: they may like you or not, but they are good, they have lot arrival and a legion of fans of all ages. The question es.su movie worth to go see the film or is a long chapter of 87 minutes that might be on TV if one could? Mmmm.complicado question not? It must be said that this is the first feature film of this famous family, since that it broke into our homes in 1991 it has garnered multiple Emmy Awards and as we know is a satire which criticizes society American in all its aspects, with emphasis on the family environment and in the relationships of his characters. It is a creation of Matt Groening, brain responsible for having kept this series 2D at the top of the most popular programs in the history of global television. His cunning is always incorporate new side-shaped elements, while respecting the essence with which viewers are identified. On this occasion, its creation is directed by the interesting David Silverman, who already has chapters in the saga for television and has been responsible for Monsters Inc and The Road to El Dorado, subject who knows a lot of cartoons and how to bring them to the big screen and it shows. The plot in "The Simpsons-(the movie)" is a simple excuse (there is an accident which pollutes Lake Springfield, an isolation of the place by the Government, a persecution to those responsible, a struggle to restore order-?- and regain the place of the city and of the own family in this story), seems that the book (screenplay) plucked thinking gags first, and then generating in base to the storyline. This means that viewers will shake with laughter in their seats most of the time because the film features humor in successive waves intended not to let glimmer as to doubt the effectiveness of the proposal.But the film is empty of interest for those who do not seek more of the same, but some kind of different approach, where the central idea has more flight and the action is not entirely spasmodic concerning the infinite succession of jokes at several levels. May they say that "The Simpsons" is environmentalist, critical of American politics is correct, pero.a his followers that cares? The Simpsons offer a similar show (dangerously if we think that this is not TV and film) to the offer in Fox or Telefé everyday, fun, likable and very clever. Now, from there to think that this is quality cinema.I think that there are differences! In any case, should be the film as one moment in the course of the Simpsons legend in one larger 42 "screen and a room with accompanying the tribute. Is to spend a moment nice, if you are not a fan of the series, otherwise, what can you say? I certainly odiarás for writing my opinion! Acceptable but nothing out of this world (movie buff, disappointed at the lost opportunity).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3379

Plissken

La Luna en Botella

muchocine

'The Moon in the bottle' is notable letter of Grojo, a type that has fought against all odds to see made his own "cosmic Utopia": released his first feature.

I see a small, beautiful and brave movie like 'La Luna in the bottle', and I'm beginning to believe that this year has been, however, a good year for the Spanish film. It is true, there is almost taquillazos, but at least there are people debuting (Felix Viscarret, Nacho Cerdá, j. a. Bayona, Grojo) willing to raise the national quality standards.In 'La Luna in the bottle' follow the story of a handful of characters at the beginning of the hand of Zeta (an aspiring writer become "black") and then each one on its own. Their comings and goings of the cabaretero coffee Rossignol, their crosses and shocks, their small dramas and their minimum victories. Everyone seems to inhabit a limbo which will come only when they find a way to say "Yes" and to move forward with their lives.The feature film debut of Grojo, director forged in the world of advertising, and the short is a choral story that surprises, above all, by the force of its staging, trabajadísima at all levels, from the opening credits to the touches of FX. The Rossignol Café atmosphere is impeccable: their music, their decorations, lighting, its colourful clientele. the truth is that you can only congratulate the team of the Madrid director to achieve an atmosphere very close to the universe of Jeunet and Caro, without fear of the inevitable comparisons. A 10 for all.In addition to the powerful technical invoice, the screenplay by Grojo hits to the not be carried away by the easy melodrama or cryptic symbolism with a few simple characters, specific problems and credible reactions within the logic of the film. Each of them separately, directly linked to the last of 'La Luna in the bottle' thesis: a "no" can destroy you life, and "Yes" can restore the sense. Perhaps some plot is something raised, but is worthwhile the effort to have so many intimate deeds without falling or in the boredom nor in the pretentiousness. Special mention deserve the fun flashbacks to the purest style 'Amélie'; the history of the character of Pep Jové which both refers to 'Live', this masterpiece of Kurosawa; the intense musical numbers (perhaps too close together); and the recadito institutional art, bent on monuments to the absurd capable of ending old theatres.In the interpretive section is where the weak point of 'La Luna in the bottle'. Zeta, the protagonist, the character which should be the link between the viewer and the rest of inhabitants of the Rossignol coffee, is poorly played by Edu Soto, the famous "Neng de Castelfa". And the truth is that this character is large at almost all times, to the point that the film works best for all parties in that it does not appear he. Edu Soto strives, but simply isn't at the height, and more in comparison with the rest of the cast, a sober Bárbara Goenaga and a spectacular cast of side: Dominique Pinon, Pep Jové, Leigh Zimmerman, Michael Jenn or two of our most illustrious side, Joan Dalmau and María Elena FLores. And not forgetting the participation of Federico Luppi or Paco Algora, to not compliment at all. A pity about Edu Soto.Pero when it comes to the final assessment, there are more pros than cons, in this occasion. 'The Moon in the bottle' is the remarkable letter of Grojo, a type that has fought against all odds to see made his own "cosmic Utopia": released his first feature. Congratulations and continue the winning streak. A 6'5.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/431

Yul B.

Monster house

muchocine

When you contrapones the child aspect of the House with such a serious air, adult and real scenes completely breaks the climax of the film.

I read recently in a blog in which they usually visit the more critical a film by bad, more is the public to see. It seems that we are a few moviegoers masochists. In my case nothing happens at all. By deformation blogger I'm aware of the criticisms of the greater impact of the film scene movies to contrasting views; and that makes me quite the choice to see one or the other in the film.However, there are tapes so overwhelming that they are criticisms against do me not desist in my decision to watch her. And one of them was this. The fact that Robert Zemeckis and Steven Spielberg are his godparents are part of blame. The trailer for the film got with me the effect I wanted (the desire to see it), and the story also: D.J. Walters, a twelve-year-old boy, has too much free time and he has gotten in his head that there is something strange in the House of the elder Nebbercracker on the other side of the street.Just a day before Halloween, D.J. and his friend Croquette have a meeting with Mr Nebbercracker after releasing the ball from basketball to your garden and mysteriously arrives at the interior of the House. When the House comes swallow to his new friend Jenny and no one believes what he says the three children, who claim that the House has something evil, they rush to the task of investigating what's happening.The visual invoice of the film is impressive. Animation of motion capture, which is used with an incredible master, here manages to insurmountable levels of perfection to date. Do the magnificent rendering of each character and its surroundings and the amazing handling of the camera, getting this absolutely amazing flat, do us believe that we are witnessing a film? real? of real actors. My friends, everything around?Monster House? has personality and life of its own; here a 10 as a House.With regard to the development of the plot, another success. Who has not had any time in his childhood ghostly fantasies with abandoned houses?; and, who has resisted to enter these houses, with more fear than value, to discover his secret?. In the latter perhaps not so many have dared, but this film plays with this approach and shows you a charm, with a frenetic pace, what is what might happen in that situation.Do we have a product created with a clear mix of horror and adventure, and with clear references to movies of these two genera belonging to the 1980s, with?The Goonies? and?Night of fear? at the head. At this point it shows the League the hand of her godparents, Zemeckis and Spielberg; and, in this regard, I enjoyed as a child.Then, in what it fails the film?, why her qualify as mediocre?. Because, in my opinion, it fails the main thing: the House.Let me explain. ?Monster House? is not a child tape; do not we are before a movie? disneyniana?, type?Looking for Nemo? or?The Little Mermaid?, with white and sensibleros moments. We speak of a product aimed at teenagers and adults who retain something that teens. Because from the very beginning of the film, and during the rest of its duration, we will witness harrowing scenes, those that transmit some trepidation. It's a light fear, but sufficient to create an atmosphere of uneasiness, sure would provoke more than one nightmare to more than one child.Bearing in mind this premise, not block too that what causes that fear, the House, represents form humanized and caricatured, or infantilizada llamemoslé (SPOILER: yea, yea, Windows are the eyes, the door is the mouth, the tongue is a carpet and timber with which it is built are twisted to make gestures and expressions).It is clear that there is a reason for why it is, that I do not desvelaré, but when you contrapones this child aspect of the House with the air so serious, adult and real scenes completely breaks the climax of the film. Do do i.e., at that time ceases to be credible, and not perfect? motion capture animation technique? She is saved. In any case, knowing this fact and opening your mind to the fantasy, you'll spend with her a fun time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4325

Monica Jordán

Hacia rutas salvajes

muchocine

Towards wild routes is an honest and direct proposal at the same little complacent. Enters a dangerous game that goes airy: there are no bisexual, cheap tears, nor imposed dogmatic speeches, only broad suggestions.

It is not accidental nor free to wild routes have as prelude a quotation from Lord Byron, one of the banners of English romantic literature that exemplifies the spirit of which baby the new film as director of Sean Penn in his ideals and poems. And it is towards wild routes history who lives in the 20th century completely anachronistic way, with ideals and ways of thinking own clandestine meetings of Byron and Shelley than of the Vortex industrial and surface of the contemporary age. Chris/Alex (a more committed than ever Emile Hirsch) is a young family man rather than following a set of vital disappointments decides to unleash your adventurous spirit and embark on a journey of extreme survival towards Alaska. Obviously the travel is the excuse to show the personal growth of Chris, who is also formally separated creating blocks in the film with the different stages of learning of the human being (birth, adolescence, age adult.) thus proposing a clear structure to the viewer and making a gesture honest to show the purpose of the trip: more that a shift is learning in search of happiness and/or the flight of a past not just to accept.All the romantic draught (important here the uppercase) the film is hypervideo with landscape plans where nature is formed as another character in the story. The camera captures humans (small and insignificant) before the immensity of the wild mother nature in an exercise of trip to aesthetic romanticism in search of painters as Friedrich with Walker on the sea of clouds or monk at the edge of the sea. It is clear that Penn has been surrounded by large cultural references to bring to the screen the novel of Kracauer on which this film is based, but more certain is that the story of Chris McCandless was already written with letters from their mere existence. The history is overwhelming in itself but Penn knows not to fall into the easy and manages to find the distance needed to reach out to the intimacy of Chris without turning a hero nor an anti-hero. Chris is, as good romantic, purely and simply a human being and so as shows it us Sean Penn, without praise and without admirations; with their strengths and their weaknesses; with the wisdom of who knows what he wants and selfishness of who does not measure the consequences of their actions. The eyes of Penn is anthropocentric virtually throughout the film to give the power to the enlightened that through the experience learns and understands the chaos which conforms the real world but also opens the door to metaphysics and spirituality without cerrár is none and giving a whole to set that few films get the protagonist.The great evil of the romantic is the society which imprisons it, and Chris has been devoured by a way of life that can not sustain: Chase you the lies of the past which has failed to deal with the problems with his parents (Marcia Gay Harden and William Hurt), and therefore decides to flee from them at a stadium in absentia. It breaks with everything and everyone to look for himself, to find happiness in small things and the apparently empty images from scratch. It will be his sister (Jena Malone) who tells us through a voice in off the prior to the departure of Chris as well as the consequences that this has in it and in your home. The multitude of points of view narrative that has wild routes surprised by its complexity and the well that Penn solves this problem. In the film we get a plurality of narrators diegetic makes it surprise unanimous result. There is no good nor bad, neither victims nor executioners. Each explains his story from his point of view but all contribute to understand the total, even when they talk about their personal stories the link found with the plot of Chris is important.Towards wild routes is an honest and direct proposal at the same little complacent. Enters a dangerous game that goes airy: there are no bisexual, cheap tears, nor imposed dogmatic speeches, only wide in which suggestions fit all ideologies, all forms of interpreting take place and where the truth is made up of the plurality that is life. Something that is welcome and that it was difficult to be a film with all the weight in a surrounded by secondary main character exercise of satellites (highlights Catherine Keener as delicious as always or Vince Vaugh in one of the most entertaining of recent times detective "fighters"). The film accompanies giving the viewer the ability to pose look before on celluloid than of centrár, with the exception of those intimate scenes in which small workplaces are oppressors for Chris and the spectator, closing to the observation of the specific levels.The story of a vagabond solo and idealistic could lead many to hastiar only of thinking in which two hours and media is a long time sitting in an armchair, but towards wild routes get know little by well built of his gear. He is not already of that add all the pieces of the puzzle, but that Penn has formed a patchwork with remnants of different origins. Therein lies the great magic of this film which, sometimes sweet and sometimes bitter, get to do a portrait of melancholy of a way of life that has little to do with the times. Something that would have loved to Byron or Friedrich and which is now part of a common imaginary. Rest in peace.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2730

Matías Cobo

El ultimátum de Bourne

muchocine

The pace of almost constant urgency not leaves no room for boredom, but so much speed going to the detriment of a more substantive account.

There are few findings that the amnesiac spy Jason Bourne (Matt Damon) makes in this third film about their identity prior to entering the military program Treadstone. The Bourne Ultimatum, directed by Paul Greengrass with nerve, verismo and rigor that are themselves, maintains intact the structure of the spy flight constantly harassed by a large rotten fabric of the CIA. Bourne is still not know much, but begins to tying up while in the dome of the American spy agency there is nervousness before a possible and compromising uprising of carpets. In sum, and without wishing to be simplistic, you could say that the game of mouse and cat offered in two previous deliveries remains the leit-motiv of the last sequel of the character created by novelist Robert Ludlum.Montaje agile, nervous movements of camera and exemplary score by John Powell for seasoning the joint are the main guarantees of these tapes of action shot style Greengrass. A style consistent with the first film directed by Doug Liman (now executive producer of the two continuations) but improved by the sober varnish of British director. In addition, the prospect of a European filmmaker seems key in a realistic and identifiable recreation of the locations used in the follow-up of the itinerant Bourne. If to all this we add a Pleiad of magnificent actors, led by the talented Matt Damon and supported by side luxury as Albert Finney, Joan Allen, Scott Glenn, Brian Cox or the last to join the list, a master David Strathairn, the result is a function of spies of high quality film and located one step above the average in its genre.Despite all its virtues technical and interpretative, tape weakens in its history. The structure of persecution and flight ends to make the story into a loop where only change the landscapes of Fund (different European train stations and two buildings of the CIA in Langley) and the enemies of Bourne by the pursuing party. Is true that the pace of almost constant urgency not leaves no room for boredom, but so much speed going to the detriment of a more substantial story. Discover small details of the biography of the main character prior to its transformation into Jason Bourne, they will suggest us that the use of this as a murderer on behalf was much more chilling inferred in the previous chapters, but not much more progress this story whose epilogue leaves the door open for possible future sequels. Not in vain, Robert Ludlum, who died in 2001, endorsed author Eric Van Lustbader to continue writing about this character that has already published two novels after the death of the latter: The Bourne Legacy (2004) and The Bourne Betrayal (2007). I suspect that, given its good reception on the big screen, film will be followed by interested tell more things about this enigmatic spy joined already, by its own right, the collective imagination with renowned colleagues as the legendary 007.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2056

Jeremy Fox

Zodiac

muchocine

A great film that perhaps disappoint to those who seek a thriller like the others but would be glad, I hope much, that seeking the good film.

I have that thank, once again, the Warner Bros. Spain and muchocine.net the invitation to the press pass, already two weeks ago, of "Zodiac", the new film that already consiero one of the best directors of the present: David Fincher.La film tells the Zodiac killer crimes and the subsequent investigation by the police and journalists.A cursory look at the synopsis comes to understand the reasons that led Fincher to make this your next project. Crime, the unhealthy atmosphere, the macabre are present in the story and are reflected on screen effectively. Especially shocking and desasosegantes are the scenes of crimes, able to put in tension the Viewer as only Fincher and a few more can do. An oppressive atmosphere the director also transferred to other moments of the story.But that nobody expected of "Zodiac" a new "Seven" because it's two movies with few elements in common. It is clear that Fincher not likes repeated and advocates here more for the epic of the research, by the inner journey experience character, rather than thrillers of suspense to the use.It is assisted in its work by the millimeter screenplay by James Vanderbilt, based on the book by Robert Graysmith, which is able not to let up loose ends in a very extensive history and that lasts many years. This gives the film an air of "biopic" which is his biggest problem because it can cause a certain distance between the viewer and the story. In any case, the writer should be aware of this problem because it adds a couple of subtle touches to the history that make be more round.A great script again, that brilliantly drawn characters of flesh and blood, not flat and are beautifully interpreted. Jake Gyllenhaal is a good actor who perhaps lack a tad of charisma (this side of pasmarote not help much) but in this case fit you his character. Also Anthony Edwards and Mark Ruffalo offer good performances but are perhaps overshadowed by the talent and charisma of a Robert Downey Jr. is experiencing one of its best moments. In more supporting roles, but seeing also solid performances, can see Brian Cox (in a role initially awarded to Gary Oldman), John Carroll Lynch, Elias Koteas or Chloë Sevigny.Pero if else weren't enough, the element that I liked most, which the rises above many other films, is its pace. Few times two hours and forty minutes I have moved so quickly. The narrative moves so naturally, in a manner so fluid and you catch in such a way that when you realize you are watching the end credits.This detail demonstrates, to me, the brilliance of the work of direction and mounting (Angus Wall) of a film of which I would highlight also the soundtrack of David Shire and the musical selection.In short, a great film that perhaps disappoint to those who seek a thriller like the others but would be glad, I hope much, that seeking the good film.Final evaluation of moonfleet.es: 8.5 out of 10.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/562

Matías Cobo

El diablo viste de Prada

muchocine

Halfway between the soft comedy and sentimental drama, the tape is as predictable as little incisive in the approach of their conflicts.

The presence of Meryl Streep in the cast or its original poster took me to discard the idea that this would be a topical movie about Affairs so repeated as the dichotomy between personal and professional life. But I was wrong. The Devil Wears Prada account view history already hundreds of times in the film and does so with the lack of originality of this kind of movies. Halfway between the soft comedy and sentimental drama, the tape is as predictable as little incisive in the approach of their conflicts. Anne Hathaway plays the role of the inexperienced and pretty girl who lands on a job interview to be eligible for the post of Secretary of the Chief Editor of the magazine's fashion reference, the surreal world of this publication Runaway.En, where the despelleje partner is the daily bread of those who work there, Miranda Priestly (Meryl Streep) directs "runaway" as if it were the cómitre plaguing a galley rowers. And its employees are a characteristic of the middle ages vassalage. In a unique world, the labour requirement begins from early hours of the day, when employees of the magazine strive to fashion dress and dress with the most exclusive accessories. After presenting this particular world, the plot of the film follows a more predictable development. The girl inverorsímilmente landed in the Runaway universe is a good daughter, a good friend and a good girlfriend. He says not to feel part of all this 'troupe', but the challenge of overcoming the demands of his labor slavery will seducing him by this "dark side" to media which becomes more effective and resolute.So the conflict is served: the more he implies in his absorbing full-time work, its principles and more personal life will be scuttled. You must choose between good, his personal life, or the vicious, the superficial world of egos that seems to have been abducida. Manichean and stereotypical, the film not delves into none of the issues placed on the table and the profile of his characters is as prototypical nor worth valuing the work of sharing, simply effective. The Streep makes bad malísimia head, but as the movie is very squishy and so well-intentioned as all of its class, in its moral the medium rescue of the diabolical glow which had enveloped during all the footage. And the beautiful Hathaway, whose background can only emphasize his work in Brokeback Mountain, learn the leccioncita of life of rigour. And it makes sense that the tape is so flojita and relama both in the world of 'glamour', because its director, David Frankel, has hardened in the direction of episodes of series like sex in New York or the Entourage.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2034

Antoni Messa

Tu la letra, yo la música

muchocine

Simple but effective comedy that will delight, especially those who still, today, we continue enjoying with the music of the 1970s and 1980s. A fresh degreaser that deserves to be enjoyed without complexes or cultural hampered false.

You the lyrics, I music opens with a video-clip in the style of those that were done in the 1980s. In fact, thanks to this funny music video, its Director and screenwriter, Marc Lawrence, recalls and satirizes, unconfessed way and in unison, the universe of Wham!, a British duo of short-lived career and which the popular George Michael was one of its members. The truth is training disbanded when he decided to start his solo career, ruining the future musical of his partner, a such Andrew Ridgeley.Aquellos they lived - as well as a server - explosion pop of the 80s through the television mass in part of them - by that time-are newly born vídeo-clips, will discover in Alex Fletcher - the character played by Hugh Grant — to the unsuccessful Ridgeley of Wham!. In the film, the actor gives life to the aforementioned Fletcher, a singer and songwriter frustrated, which, after live their moments of glory, two decades earlier and as a member of the Pop group dismembered!, will have to swallow quina before the unstoppable success achieved by his old partner of fatigue. Currently, Fletcher earn the living acting, solo, in small teatrillos and amusement parks, places in which offers the four forties captivated in her day, a small repertoire of songs that launched the Pop duo! to fame.From this pathetic character, Marc Lawrence develops a plot simple but effective; a plot that will bring closer the rickety musician the possibility to achieve the success that lost for more than 20 years. And that possibility, will come in the form of musical challenge. A challenged atypical in that involved a couple of women: a young and insecure writer and a provocative and eccentric fashion in full effervescence singer; a character, the latter, to which the viewer will identify with more than one of the female stars of the current Top 10: these clone girls that, always showing his muslamen and suggesting her smooth buttocks, sing similar songs with the same tonality and rhythm.Did not expect much of you the lyrics, I music and, however, succeeded in making me disconnect from the outside world during his footage. His proposal is linear, without surprises or plot twists, but pleasantly enjoyable to follow. As a sentimental comedy works perfectly, despite not contribute anything new to the genre. His dialogues are nice, sparkling, and the chemistry that develops between Hugh Grant and Drew Barrymore exudes true surround tone. He fulfills his role to perfection: the role of Idol dropped, covered even in the 1980s, will of pearls and Moreover, if little, outside shows her good and unexpected gifts as vocalist. And she, Barrymore, is more charming than ever: breaks a bit with his usual roles and through the funny character of the writer Sophie Fisher, transforms into a sort of endearing alter ego of Diane Keaton; but a Keaton of ancient times, just when was funny clown in first-time follies of Woody Allen.Una comedy simple but effective it will delight, especially those who still, today, we continue enjoying with the music of the 1970s and 1980s. A fresh degreaser that deserves to be enjoyed without complexes or cultural hampered false. The ideal product to slow down a little, the demoralizing effect that causes the tiresome and unstoppable invasion of acids and sharp melodramas in the Billboard. I, at least, let me carry and spent a while certainly delicious. And even during their slide, up came to believe (dreamer from me) that, maybe someday, Hugh Grant would be a good actor.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2294

Natalia Eseverri

Bajo las estrellas

muchocine

I prefer the name of this director, Felix Viscarret, because I think it will give much to talk about and that his peculiar style will be worth seeing in the movies that he intends.

Many days I've been criticizing Alberto San Juan, for being an actor that does much of its part to promote films made in various interviews that have done you, but I have to admit that criticism disappear in my mouth as soon as yesterday I saw this wonderful film, in which he plays one of the best roles of his life, along with the hours of light. ´Bajo the stars is an ode to the second chance we all renew our lives, when by the circumstances, have had to make decisions against our will. In the case of Alberto San Juan, she plays a trumpet player who had to go in Estella (Navarra) to pursue his career as a musician in Madrid. The death of his father, makes it back to the people and revive all that childhood so hard that he had to support his brother.In addition, some magnificent interpretations of Alberto San Juan, Julián Villagrán y Emma Suárez, we find a beautiful story that is told in a close manner and whose photograph is worth seeing, reminding far Obaba, along with this, the most significant of the film are the relationships that are established between each of the characters, focusing on Alberto San Juanalmost appears in every scene.Notably, this wonderful musical interpretation of Enrique Morente singing the main theme of the film to the Raphael with Aquarius and truth, I stay with the name of this director, Felix Viscarret, because I think it will give much to talk about and that his peculiar style will be worth seeing in the movies that he intends.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3579

Francisco Bellón

La brújula dorada

muchocine

The Golden Compass is the umpteenth attempt to Hollywood by copying the monumental success of the Lord of the rings, but stays in attempt for the story so poor that it offers, devoid of any fantasy or magic.

The monumental, and for many unexpected, success of critics and public of the Lord of the rings has led to studies should be launched to the desperate search for new sagas-franquicia similar to that envisioned Tolkien. Thus explains the proliferation of films most successful as the Chronicles of Narnia or Stardust, and others completely dispensable such as Beowulf, Eragon or the six signs of the Golden Compass Luz.La adapts the first volume of the trilogy his dark materials, Philip Pullman, a fantastic work of but with profound metaphysical and religious references. But as it's been converted into fairy tale film, have eliminated the mentions of these so thorny issues, which have earned the animosity of the fans of the saga of Pullman. Having said that, the Golden Compass is a fairly simple and vulgar, story that does not stand out by its magic or fantasy or by its originality. Even the most lively tire soon of a plot so child (said in the worst sense) that if it were analyzed in depth would cause more laughter astonishment. The brief appearance of actors such as Derek Jacobi and Christopher Lee does foresee a more dramatic development in the following installments, but even that manages to recover the interest. Visual and narrativamente, the Golden Compass drinks from countless sources, such as the wars (attention to the final moment of the Empire strikes back), the Chronicles of Narnia or Lord of the rings. If outside little, ownership rests with Da kota Blue Richards, which at times becomes unbearable Kinderman. Although to unbearable, we already have the appearances of a Nicole Kidamn and digitally bluish eyes. It is a pity that they have not given more presence a Daniel Craig is the best of the film, as well as its short length.The Golden Compass is the umpteenth attempt to Hollywood by copying the monumental success of the Lord of the rings, but stays in attempt for the story so poor that it offers, devoid of any fantasy or magic.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/995

Tito Chinchan

Eragon

muchocine

Film aimed at a teenage audience, with dragons, swords, wizards and magic, Kings tyrants and plebeian malcontents, resistance and invincible armies, heroes and villains, etc. Facilitated something to do between polvorón and marzipan.

Today I will roll cultural and I will tell you that this movie is based on a series of juvenile books, so it was intended to compare it with Harry Potter, Narnia, and the Lord of the rings. Well, it seems to me that it has very substantial differences, this is first focused towards youth audiences as Harry Potter, not as Narnia was more child (and for me I wear white) or the Lord of the rings which is more adult. On the other hand, is one short film not as the others. Perhaps too short. And the theme addresses if it is of the style of the others, magic and fantasy with a type that without knowing as he comes his time in life. Its momentazo I would say. In comparison I think it is the weaker of the first four parts, but it is not bad.The film is a kid who suddenly dropped a gem like a giant melon in the hands, so, without more. Living in a difficult time, in which a King took command of the world (or the country or the region or that are I) thanks to the Dragons then destroyed to stay as the sole holder of one. Total, which is that the giant gem is not a gem (was obvious) if not an egg of dragon that you chose him so he gallop. So a loins of a Blue Dragon named Safira has to destroy the evil King that and to its powerful army of ugly guys and evil and dark magicians. The repanocha, right?Being the very original approach, the film is enjoyable. We know that at the end we won the good and the bad, lost in all of this style, but we have to do as they do and special effects used to reach that end. The environments are quite well done, with landscapes of those who put the willies. Special effects we are not too good and it is that you aside from the Dragon (Dragon, forgiveness) and the final battle, there is little else. The actor protagonist is to turn boinazos to expel him from the recording, but as it is the axis of history, we have to hold us. As default the film would put that development is a little hasty, as if they were putting many things in the hour and a half long. If it had been longer had happened nothing.In short, film aimed at a teenage audience, with dragons, swords, wizards and magic, Kings tyrants and plebeian malcontents, resistance and invincible armies, heroes and villains, etc. Facilitated something to do between polvorón and marzipan.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3486

Iñaki Bilbao

El aviador

muchocine

Very estimable Scorsese work.

It was not easy to translate, since all, not even a part of the life of magnate got to Howard Hughes film producer and inventor. His life was, until his voluntary retirement from the madding, a continuing challenge to social and business conventions. By the way, as so many times when a man rich and therefore with much power blinded in given possession or social recognition, he left a trail of broken feelings and friendships.Scorsese moves away of hagiography, but it is undeniable that, although don't judge you does have some sympathy with his protagonist. Perhaps because he remembered himself in the fight that have or had in the past with the film industry, who postponed her glory on numerous occasions.His narrative is fluid, with notable moments of humor (the prologue or dinner with the family of Hepburn) and prodigious dialogues, quick and incisive. Various social and business sectors are subjected to mockery, chanza, or simply criticism, exemplary showing the viewer what was some kind of people in those fascinating times of the, perhaps better or at least more pure, Hollywood.Las interpretations are fantastic, easily highlighting its protagonist Leonardo di Caprio, always good actor though occasionally well-off in how easy. Here he demonstrates an immense variety of nuances that strip the soul of such a complex character. Anyway, I would stress, even above him, Cate Blanchett as Katharine Hepburn. It is curious, not resembling physically nothing to it, thanks to its stylized gestural composition sometimes its like not be already great but that even resemble as two drops of water.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/904

Tito Chinchan

Los fantasmas de Goya

muchocine

Or the great Bardem, in one of his worst roles, is able to get out of the mediociridad and the anodismo to this tape.

Yesterday I was dinner with the co-workers and to which it came, my medium Zucchini I was waiting for. Not with the roller to knead bread in his hand, as in the comics of Zipi y Zape, if not tell me that this film is a truño. That he had seen with his mother and was very bad. Clear, his mother whose light reading the Iliad is not too similar to my reference, but if my half kiwi says that it is bad, is that it is.The film I have no idea of what trafficking. The poster comes Bardem with face of be sucking lemons, as well as little manly. With male who is this man and aflautado that have drawn you. And of course, if it goes from Goya's ghosts, and Bardem isn't Goya, surely the above (of the brush and the palette of painter of fine brush) is going to be what Goya. The Middle I have no idea who is, that I am very hurt. Well, it puts it's Natalie Portman, but I say that not is what makes. what want tell you of a film that I managed not to see? Well no idea, I think that my career as a film critic has bottomed out. Many people thought that he had already done it, but I bought a shovel to dig more in the background, ja, ja, ja.In short, my Paraguayan media that says the movie is a truño, so I am going to apply the suegril influence factor, I'll see what other blogs have given to the movie and released an average of stars for those who do not read the criticism you think it is bad. Terrible it is to have the power to influence the masses;-)

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1477

Rafa Ferrer

Juegos secretos

muchocine

With enough care dialogue (although sometimes are a tad stupid), and with a predictable argument, so entreabierta plot deserved a more notable end, shows what as known that "we all have secrets", s, is still less.

I do not know very well the reason why I became interested in the movie, perhaps because the poster I love, and to see her with both Prize and so much hype I said, unsure that I like, referred once I only think I liked to 50% and is expected more than the 2nd movie of Todd Field, a drama with several intermingled stories "Lives Crusades" style of Robert Altman (RIP)a reference in this kind of gimmicky stories.To begin its excessive length, for my taste elongated nauseam with that indecent Narrator, more reminiscent of a story than to an adult film, and where it shows in parathyroids the transition from novel to film, sometimes it is better to guess than tell us loud.I break a lance in favor of Jennifer Connelly and Kate Winslet, the latter perhaps the best of the film, the Connelly is mention, and it is that only appear, though it appears little, I drop the baba with her.With enough care dialogue (although sometimes are a tad foolish), and with a predictable argument, so entreabierta plot deserved a more notable end, shows what so know that we all have secrets", pity that at times, which is silent otorga, leading to his actors to situations it limit which does not always know out with ease.In short: a good exercise of film, very badly resolved.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/50

Tito Chinchan

The Jacket

muchocine

Very good to convince you that you should not ever entering a psychiatric

Why have given eyes so red the Lord of the poster? That fear. The film is a man who has died twice. The first time in the Gulf war and the second in a strange case with a police officer while hitchhiking toward. Total, as he does not die at all, falls a little crazy by him he admitted in a psychiatric hospital. The doctor dealing with him must be cousin of Menguele, given his therapy consists of drugging him, tying him with a straitjacket and put him in an archive in the basement. Then remove you and so has to be cured. Raaaarrroooo, raaaarooooo.¿Que you want tell you? As you you have left brain at home, or you occurs enter, this is thinking. To my me bored sovereignty, given that history not hooked until near the end. The script is not bad in everything, but the truth that does not kill. The actors curran it much, and do very well, but you spend throughout the film thinking of that's happening?. And that is the problem, that you do not understand why was recorded this film. Do not know if it is a criticism of the war, criminals, the psychiatric or what. And if laugh, because you still entenderías, but it is a kind of very strange love drama. Already at the end improves, and makes a curious approach to travel to the future, which saves the rest of the footage.In short, if they make a movie about travel to the future with this idea, you can get something good. Of course, this is not the best way of telling a story. And if wanted that we angustiasemos, what they have achieved, I spent the entire film looking at the clock to see what was left.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2166

Luna

Tideland

muchocine

It will please all those stalwarts of Terry Gilliam. Those who do not have a stomach bomb-proof are going to go really wrong...

With two years of delay leads to our screens on June 8 "Tideland", the latest film by Terry Gilliam. Neither the prize FIPRESCI he got at the San Sebastian Film Festival in 2005 have managed to make a hole in the Spanish chart to this film, hard to digest, and it provokes reactions found in the spectators who have opportunity to see him.For a sample button. When the film became Donostia more than half of the spectators left the room. Even critics left the projection with the scrambled eggs with stomach. Gilliam also gained appreciation of journalists when in the press conference after the film described as stupid to viewers who had left the room for not be able to endure more avatars of the girl and the corpse.Freely inspired by the novel by Mitch Cullin, the film tells the story of a girl whose parents are junkies in the city and by avatars of fate left orphaned in the field. However this time the director of films as emblematic as "12 monkeys" or "Brazil" gets almost to sadism more gore and macabre to narrate this story he says have to do with "eyes of a child" and where the line between reality and fiction is very close.Despite its passage by Donostia and the award he received there, this film has not enjoyed critical acclaim and supposes a point and separate in the career of this filmmaker. From my point of view there are too gruesome moments that they border on sadism and they provide nor really anything to history (as everything that happens to the cadaver) and also convinces me the interpretation of Jodelle Ferland, who by then had 10 years old, and that sometimes seems too exaggerated. Perhaps like all those unconditional (but really unconditional) of Terry Gilliam.Sin however, all those who do not have a stomach bomb-proof are going to go really wrong because there are really macabre moments in the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3813

Ana Belén Pacheco

Across The universe

muchocine

For all those who have lived the era of The Fab Four, for the nostalgic sesenteros and declared to be pacifists is compulsory viewing.

There are two types of people in the world, those who are fans of the Beatles and "the rest". Why was matter of time before someone decided that it was a brilliant idea to make a musical that used the best songs of the best musical group of history as a thread of a film that takes its title from a 1968 recording made for charity. Obviously and how it could be otherwise is set in the 1960s. Jude, a young worker in the shipyards of Liverpool decides to leave his native England to seek a better life in United States. Since then the music will be a key part of his new life in New York. You will find their ideals, will face with the ghosts of the time: Vietnam, drugs, love, life,... those items which are always much better behind a veil of psychotropic substances.The film is delicious and risky. Virtually unknown actors accompanied on screen by major music committed, what would a film for peace and dialogue without Bono singing in it?, what greater pleasure that Joe Cocker singing in the subway?, what man has not fantasized with Salma Hayek to the Pin up multiplied by six?, all of them are well seasoned da Across The Universe a vibrating base and an explosive start. Possibly that pace will be broken with the psychedelic trip in the bus and in the surrealist aesthetics of the circus (from my point of view the only totally dispensable point).Across The Universe I loved because the conciliator from the epoch spirit intact and gives a personal touch to the songs of the legendary group. The actors are simply magnificent and Jim Sturgess is the revelation of the year with a delicious accent and a warm and enthusiastic voice jumping from directly below the first division category television productions.For all those who have lived the era of The Fab Four, for the nostalgic sesenteros and declared to be pacifists is compulsory viewing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3311

Ana Belén Pacheco

Stardust

muchocine

With a hectic pace the adventure story is able to link all its characters in an entertaining tape that blends comedy, action and romantic style of the Princess Bride.

For a time this part I I realized that the relationship between my desire to see a film and printing is just leaving me is inversely proportional. I.e. when I'm dying to see something usually turn out to be a hodgepodge of very careful. For this reason and to the expectations raised by the promotion, criticism and reception in Stardust United States I've become very cautious and I tried to hide my excitement to mislead the statistics.Seems that it has been well it is fantastic fable has fulfilled my highest hopes. Usually normal when a filmmaker decides to hide his proposal after the label of "Fable or tale" there are two possible outcomes: a boring and infantiloide firecracker anchored in the newest FX (as an unfortunate misfortune or the Chronicles of Narnia series) or on the contrary an adventure magic and entertaining (such as Big Fish, Chocolat or Charley and the Chocolate factory to name a few). I would put the object of this critique in the second group.Tristan (Cox) wants to conquer the love of victory (Miller) why promises that you bring you as a gift a star fall from the sky. So an American in love with England should enter into a magical world where you will find endearing as the pirate characters Shakespeare (DeNiro) and hides a dark secret, or terrible witches (Pfeiffer) that aware of the magical star power decided to pursue her and do with it without the sons of a King of a distant planet that are intended to kill each other to be able to inherit (and travel together with their ghosts to the) (search for the Medallion that will give them the power). When our young Heartthrob is its star it isn't exactly what I expected that to fall into the magical area has become a damsel named Yvaine (Danes) who can give you as many headaches as headaches.With a hectic pace the adventure story is able to link all its characters in an entertaining tape that blends comedy, action and romantic style of the Princess Bride. If he is also a classification for all ages and the best cast side we found on the big screen in many years the Christmas movie was clear but her they premiere in October, we'll see what happens.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2554

Tito Chinchan

Locos por el surf

muchocine

High technical quality, stresses in each and every one of the possible aspects. Being a film to an audience often, has plenty of funny winks to the elders, making it essential in this summer.

The other day my friend Rafa called me and told me that if we passed through the release of crazy by the surf, which was in the afternoon. Certainly, with that name, and after seeing the poster, I thought it very much, and after staying no excuses give it, I had to say Yes. Hey, that hit big. To begin with, that like go to the room that has Sony next to industrial in the Castellana. Seats-ready wide back fat, a tiny room with a screen that fulfills its mission. In addition to giving us a complete cd with the movie data. Very happy with the people of Sony.La film is about a small teenage Penguin named Cody who since that he met the greatest surfer of Big Z history, just want to be like him. His family mocks him, especially that live in Antarctica, until that day comes mounted on whale turn, a great surf to worldwide competition. After quite a few problems, our Cody manages to get to the contest, but before it receives a strong drubbing, makes him know a fat Penguin with a strange philosophy of life.Great movie, if Mr. And I do not come with the roll that I see the movies of animation with too many good eyes. To begin with, the technical section is spectacular and impressive. They have a very rare thing, which is that the effect of water and character mix perfectly. And that is not at all simple. The effects of the sand are also destables, in the same way as the hair of the characters. Let's say that plated for the effects. The plot level is a bit experimental, given that it is recorded as a documentary film. I.e., we see the film through the camera of a journalists recording everything that happens. This gives rise to very funny situations, such as the small penguins talking about. Speaking of funny scenes, flat comic is great, with a very memorable shot. And not just for children. Finally, the soundtrack deserves separate mention. At all times it is more than adequate, and gives a cache for very important film.To sum up that today is very necessary, documentary film about the life of a penguin who wants to be champion of surfing. High technical quality, stresses in each and every one of the possible aspects. Being a film to an audience often, has plenty of funny winks to the elders, making it essential in this summer.Besitos. information adicionalYa have given me a cd full of interesting information, a couple of notes. For starters, the website is complete, giving us an idea of the magnitude of the project that we have from manos:http://www.locosporelsurf.comteneis games to piles, screenshots, trailers, and plenty of information about the characters and the film.Finally, the choice of characters is very large. On the one hand we have the typical graciosillos of all the movies of this style, a patilargo bird and a chicken fumeta me mondo with him. The bad ones are tad prototypical, until delve a little in his life, where begin to give more unfortunate that fear. Good, there is everything. Since the fat with its philosophy, until the impetuous, passing through the pingüinil beauty small. And not to mention the "extras", as the Cody family, the participants in the competition, indigenous or toddlers who are the Peel.And not I roll it I up more.PS: The cover of the Anglo-Saxon version I like much more than the Spanish, so I put.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4326

Jefe Dreyfus

Fast food nation

muchocine

Hard coral movie that tries to cover more than what can be, but that is recommended to the end and all.

Good morning, I am the Chief Dreyfus and again with another release on dvd, that will help to lose weight to anyone who has taken a few quiilitos during these past festivals (damn family dinners), because I assure you that not come it very in taste return to stop by a fast food restaurant for a while, because today: Fast food nation started! One of the bosses of a fast food chain calls one of its executives to travel to the deep America to investigate the plant which produces the raw material because, apparently, outside the company analyses have detected a high volume of shit in their burgers. Yes, Yes, shit, pure and simple, exactly cow excrement. At the same time, some Mexicans be played life trying to cross the border and enter illegally in the United States in search of the American dream. Both, initiators face to face with a harsh reality. This would be the starting point of a choral film, directed by Richard Linklaker, a director whose filmography looks like a fucking roller coaster with both slowed (personally I'll stick with its peak in "before sunset") and full of faces known with more or less role as: Greg Kinnear (little Miss Sunshine), Ethan Hawke, Kris Kristofferson, Patricia ArquetteCatalina Sandino Moreno (full Maria are one of grace), Bruce Willis, Avril Lavigne (if, if, singer, what is ), and many others seems as if Linklaker, also in the script, along with the author of the book on which the film is based had wanted to put much of the things you dislike their country and split to taste in less than two hours. The film talks about fast food, true, but is also criticizing the animal abuse, illegal immigration, labor exploitation, the despotic multinational (globalization), sexual harassment at work, the discouragement of American youth, etc, etc, etc even to the new hippies tontosdelculo! So, the film, which well might be called "Blow to the American dream 2", is somewhat weakened by that of wanting to fight on too many fronts, and fails to tie everything well tied, leaving half some of the open plots or medium gas leaving the others. And I warn, for sensitive stomachs and/or friends of cows in general, that the last five minutes of film are, to put it mildly, something durillos. Summing up: Recommended (despite everything) and hard coral film that attempts to cover more than what it can, but, at the end and after, behind good manners and intentions.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1354

Yojimbo

Malas temporadas

muchocine

A fairly honest film that is out of the middle of the Spanish film.

In the new film by Manuel Martín Cuenca ("the weakness of the Bolshevik"), the co-writer and director he opts for a structure of crossed stories. And manages to make them attractive, which is already an achievement. The most diverse characters but nothing almodovarianos (except for Watling) get plagar history with everyday situations without the current pamphleteering nature that would portray a social worker in work of assistance to immigrants, a Cuban who tries to earn a living and to an ex-convict who tries to get ahead.The actors are great and well chosen, but the worse is surprisingly is Javier camera in a role that doesn't give many options to records (either them would not give). The script is very interesting and is well exploited. However the pace (lasts two hours although it could have removed 15 minutes perfectly) is quite irregular, making some sequences in an authentic invitation to disconnect from the movie. The music is not well used. His aesthetic (grain and very washed colors) gives a more realistic touch.However what most attracted me, and did quite some time not me it happened with a Spanish film, except for "The method", it is the script. The best movie is realizing that human inconsistencies are unlimited and are shown in many ways: social worker who helps immigrants and is not capable of dealing with his own son, the newly out of prison that once released locks himself in memories?A good option to watch on dvd. A fairly honest film that is out of the middle of the Spanish film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/40

Uruloki

En la cuerda floja

muchocine

Interesting at all times and very but very well crafted

This past weekend we went to see a couple of movies of those that are worth being seen, that Yes, each in their own way. On Friday we went to the heinous rooms Valle Inclán in Santiago de Compostela to see a new biopic of those that make the Filmography of the actor graceful with the starring role to go down in history in some way.Tightrope (Walk the line, 2005) is a good / great movie. Interesting at all times, very but very well crafted and very but very typical. Although this is not his fault. Somehow all the famous rockers of the musical universe world artists have reached agreement so that their lives are all virtually identical. They usually start with problems in his youth (a trauma, a difficult childhood, a complex social circle), end up succeeding thanks to its quality, retozando with fanatical females and stuck in drugs to finish out the strength of will that treasure (a few) or by passing a better life (mostly). That is the life of Johnny Cash, Elvis Presley, Jim Morrison, and a long etc.You can personally detach completely from that is a chapter in the long biography of Johnny Cash, the film can be seen as a film based on the life of anyone and it is still a lot of work. Joaquin Phoenix plays its role of pearls, Reese Whiterspoon is also very good and the setting of the film is great. The work done by James Mangold is good, well worth a look. I do not think that you be awards at the Oscars because he has tremendous competitors, but the movie is worth.What I did not like at all is that we hear bits of songs, never completing them and that I don't like. In addition, as I've been saying time immemorial, Valle Inclán theaters are a garbage. This time 2 minutes from the end was cut the movie! 15 minutes after seeing as the lights lit up and they apagaban continuously enjoyed the last sentence and House. missing a bloody phrase! So they spoil any movie. (Grotesque Valle Inclán suffered in the return of the King, grotesque Valle Inclán suffered in Spider-man 2, large grotesque Valle Inclán suffered seeing El Bosque).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2282

Oscar Cantero

Teléfono rojo volamos hacia Moscú

muchocine

A palpable demonstration that with ingenuity and good taste, may be in a playful manner any matter by delicate to be.

While the comedy it it has never been the genre more me has pleased, except for specific exceptions, red phone. We flew to Moscow has been one of the films that most impressed me, in an extremely pleasant way. Surreal, absurd, and humor above all based on the trivialization of a problem that in that historical context atenazaba the world, kept me embedded during the footage of this superb comedy of Stanley Kubrick. basically, the argument is based on paranoia Soviet anti of an American general, which takes you to order a nuclear attack on Moscow without consulting with anyone. Quickly, the Government gets underway to try to prevent the Holocaust.The ridicule of the military, appearing as remaining bellicose, and simplification and minimization of the figure of politicians before they reach glorious points in scenes starring a vehement George C. Scott, who gives great dynamism to the brilliant dialogues that make up the different scenes.A fun, entertaining and extremely ingenious way of dealing with a subject as sensitive as the cold war, that many times was about to take the world to the disaster.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/589

Jose Contreras

El laberinto del fauno

muchocine

The cruelty of the captain does not know any limit, begins as free and just being excessive. The world fantastic of the Princess and the labyrinth does not contain any be so terrifying. That is perhaps why it is less exciting.

At the level of the real, a captain of the army of Franco directed raids to destroy the maquis in the North of Spain. It runs the year 1944. His pregnant wife arrives at the barracks with his daughter from a previous marriage. The baby expected is his obsession. At the level of the fantasy, the daughter is guided by a fairy to the Lair of the Faun that proposes three tests to become Princess.The cruelty of the captain does not know any limit, begins as free and just being excessive. The world fantastic of the Princess and the labyrinth does not contain any be so terrifying. That is perhaps why it is less exciting.In "The time machine" by Welles the protagonist returns from the future without being able to test that it has been there. It could have been a dream, but there is a loose, it brings a flower of your trip. Matter is enough for the reader. Del Toro seems less concerned than Welles that we created in his fantastic creatures. It was probably mesmerized with his monster, this perverse Franco soldier to the core. That makes me wonder how much charm would have lost if the film had been in pure reality.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/632

Tito Chinchan

El laberinto del fauno

muchocine

The trailer that so cool for girls entering the bark of a tree, the Faun, a man with eyes in the hand, etc, is not this movie? Yes, if it is, but that again we have deceived, insofar as this is not necessary for the development of the film...

Guillermo del Toro is like a box of chocolates without pork chop which is which. You can put the hand randomly and get you one of liquor, and the next time it is truffle. If you eat everything no problem, because all his movies you like. If you are more tiquismiquis, perhaps not you like both. To me personally, as daisies, "this Yes, this not".The film is a captain fascist in the beginning of the Spanish post-war. Its role is the exterminate the pockets of resistance remaining at that time, basically known as makis, hiding in the mountains. In these, it reaches the post his new wife, who has a daughter preteen, pregnant (woman, than you perdeis). And the thing takes place between see Captain methods to exterminate the makis and things that will happen to the girl with a Faun and a few more magical beings.Let's see, this has its Crumb. The film is the usual wars, in which there is a side superhipermalo (captained by fucking son of the captain) and a faction fighting for Justice and freedom for the oppressed. Go, as always. If add you to this that it is in Spain, then more of the usual. Then, so this looks not a Spanish post-war film, appears a girl who meets a Faun. The thing however, paint if the magical item not lasted a quarter of an hour, and the rest is dramón father. Then, the trailer such as cool for girls entering the bark of a tree, the Faun, a man with eyes in the hand, etc, is not this movie? Yes, if it is, but that again we have deceived, insofar as this is not necessary for the development of the film. Moreover, it could remove and nobody had heard. The film is a drama about the Spanish post-war and ball point. Very well done, but a tremendous and sometimes unpleasant dramón. In addition, action is well short.In short, that I feel cheated. It is a film about a timely moment in the history of Spain, flavored with a magical fantasy. But not a fantasy set in the point made. I thought a tremendous dramón, which is very well developed, but not liked too. Expect me another very different thing and that pisses me off a lot. Although I have to say that I was very thrilled and I cried when well wet magdalena in the coffee with milk in the morning.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1921

Dragon negro

Sunshine

muchocine

A well run and well shot film with special rather than correct effects that surprisingly change log and when he loses his grace. Highly recommended for fans of science fiction.

The Sun is dying and a spacecraft is launched into space with the mission to detonate a large bomb in the interior of the Sun to reactivate it. But the ship fails in his mission, and seven years later, a new ship is sent with the same mission that represents the last hope of humanity survive. As it is expected not everything will be a hook road.So far all good, the movie promises to be a science film catastrophic fiction where began to emerge unforeseen problems that will be solved with greater or lesser fortune to be able to see if they came to complete the mission or perish in the attempt. The atmosphere and the setting are indicated in a film of these features and it is very well developed, but we reached a point where some plot twist will ruin seen so far and the film loses its final stretch North and comes to crush in excess with Visual tricks and thunderous sound that does not lead to anything and that makes the film be weary and lost all his grace.And it is that resort to the captain of the ship of the first mission and transform it into a crazy obsessive filled with burns that aims to sabotage the mission with lapidary phrases about God that is murdering the crew is loaded all the film. One wonders comes similar plot twist without coming to story and badly raised and longer posts, as her pussy this type has survived so many years and so full of burns. A type which not even we see in detail that suddenly begins to abuse the Visual excesses, the blurred image and sound shrill when so far the film had a sunset scene more than correct.Only from that point is that you desvincules of the film, which so far had developed magnificently in its field, and that you you look from the outside, losing all complicity with the Viewer.A well run and well shot film with special rather than correct effects that surprisingly change log and when he loses his grace. Even and thus highly recommended for fans of science fiction, can be seen despite its patinated end.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1052

Oscar Cantero

Sky Captain

muchocine

Exquisite ambience, combined with a moderate use of special effects and an exemplary translation of the comic to the screen, which makes you feel that you are seeing a comic book or reading a film. Pity that no history of for more.

One of the sub-genres of science fiction with greater profusion in recent times is the one that is dedicated to bringing to the screen the comic book heroes. In some cases, the result has been exceptional, as in Sin City, whose scenes seem to happen as bullets.Sky Captain and the world of tomorrow is set in a time close to the years of the second world war, and narrates the adventures of a young journalist and a famous pilot, the captain Sky, which faced hordes of flying robots and machines of all kinds that they loot the world and appropriate sources of energy of all countries.It should be noted that the atmosphere is very well made, with a set of filter colors and scenarios that seem to be halfway between the film and the role. Another strong point is the originality of the gadgets and the monstrous machines that appear throughout the entire film, which have been fully relocated from the cartoons to the screen, and get at all times give sense of sophistication, but at the same time tune with prevailing aesthetics in the film of the 1940s.Jude Law and Gwyneth Palthrow cover the file with solvency, and the rest of the cast on everything Giovanni Ribisi (many of you will recall the enormous work of this man in "Beyond the Fame"), are at one altitude of more than decent, including Angelina Jolie; Although the appearance of these last two is rather ephemeral. In technical terms, the director makes good use of special effects, which adds to its extent, which causes greater sense of credibility in many scenes, fleeing from the exaggeration that in many films, too, are those which dominate. In short, a good adaptation that fans to the genre not must lose.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1482

Francisco Bellón

Cartas desde Iwo Jima

muchocine

Despite its flaws, letters from Iwo Jima is still a very good film in which Clint Eastwood returns to prove that it knows to shoot as few filmmakers today.

While preparing flags of our fathers, American vision of the battle of Iwo Jima, Clint Eastwood met the existence of a book containing letters from Japanese soldiers of the garrison of Iwo Jima wrote to their families. Then, Eastwood decided to make a second film that received the Japanese vision of one of the bloodiest clashes of the second Mundial.Contar war a same historical fact, more a battle, from two different perspectives is not something new in the cinema, for example as it was done in this great war tape which is Tora, Tora, Tora!. Letters from Iwo Jima promised to fill the gaps of flags of our fathers, and will undoubtedly fill them for those not very smart viewers in historical matters. The story focuses on general Kuribayashi (Ken Watanabe), Commander of troops on Iwo Jima, with a private soldier, Saigo (Kazunari Ninomiya), you only want to survive and return home. The first part of the film focuses on the run-up to the battle, in the feelings of the characters, and the discrepancies between the controls. These minutes do not have the strength that one might expect of a tape of Eastwood, but as soon as the battle begins, the story gains intensity and drama. The atmosphere they create tunnels is oppressive and rarefied, further conveying the suffering of the characters. However, there are several details that squeak, ending not fit very well in history. One of them is the sequence with the captured American soldier. In addition, the flashbacks end not function, that instead of giving more packaging as a whole, they have the opposite effect. In the war scenes tape deteriorates slightly, these scenes are stuck with shoehorn between scenes of flags of our fathers. The picture almost in black and white of Tom Stern again absolutely masterful. For its part, the performances are good, stressing especially that of Kazunari Ninomiya.A despite their failures, letters from Iwo Jima remains a very good film in which Clint Eastwood returns to prove that it knows to shoot as few filmmakers today. And any excuse is good to get into a film and enjoy the work of the last great classic Hollywood

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3011

Jose Contreras

Sin reservas

muchocine

Unreserved says of our century that to the Gallants already useless them for anything candy, and that if they want to fall in love with the players they have another remedy that show clearly whether they are legal or if they aren't.

The recipe for Disney was that the viewer should make him laugh as many times as crying. It would be a recipe of fifty percent, but I think that no one is placed according to the proportion. There are who complains of soft film and who complains of both joke seeing the same movie. The name of the director influences. If it is important as Spielberg we left that it puts us as muffins and then take you the blame to our liking. To me, the proportion tells me things about the authors. The "without reservation" like to suffer a bit.Zeta-Jones plays a Cook of high-level whose culinary talent is inconsistent with a zero interest in human relations. His boss forced to go to a psychoanalyst, but two changes are in its grid world which is going to change. The death of her sister forced to take charge of a niece of ten years, and in his absence, appears in the kitchen a chef like habil she, but with the gift of people that she is missing.The niece interprets the little Miss Sunshine, with their huge big clear eyes. I don't know if it does Celestina because without her aunt would remain the same, or if it is the protagonist, because you eat the screen.Borges said that a novel of the future you servíría to see how the world has changed in that time. "Without reservation" says of our century that to the Gallants already useless them for anything candy, and that if they want to fall in love with the players they have another remedy that show clearly whether they are legal or if they aren't.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4254

José A. Peig

Rambo III

muchocine

Action film completely drowned by stereotypes, a flat script as a folio, devoid of inspiration at the time resolve situations or raise something that equal or exceed as seen in its precedents.

Home, the approach of this third adventure wisely pointed towards the development of the themes that best define the idiosyncrasies of this rebel Warrior, always towards the defence of the values that we humanize beyond brute force. Rambo seems to have found its place in the spirituality of the East, WINS life taking advantage of their physical qualities in the fight to body and silenced the concerns of his mind with the landscape and the spiritual symbolism of Thailand. Colonel Truman (Richard Crenna), who is a Rambo it definitively renounces his Warrior past travels there. Truman is a double-edged: the element still linking to Rambo with the past and the only friend that cling. Precisely, the hero returns to again without another real reason that friendship. Rambo III, however, is a slight variation to place the character in the battle between rival, that here, unlike their previous two, in which predominates the solitude of the hero against the world - it confraterniza with one of them. But, in response to this archetype of the hostile savage civilization, ends up being logical Rambo sympathetic with the Afghan tribes, that they correspond perfectly with this archetype upon which this built the profile of Rambo, and also here the mujahadeen do the role of oppressed who must save the Russian demon, as it could not be otherwise. (And because of all this, what evil has aged this film, and the hilarity that produced us all this in a world post 11-S.je).Moreover, action film completely drowned by stereotypes, a flat script as a folio, devoid of inspiration at the time resolve situations or raise something that equal or exceed as seen in its precedents. It contains some time of outpouring of the more or less worthy hero, and some segments filmed with success, as the assault on the Afghan fortress. He forgets his attractive approach and ends in a joke of spare parts, which crude imitation of the great moments of the trilogy.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2443

Jose Contreras

En algún lugar de la memoria

muchocine

The subject should really consider is the price of pain what is a daughter who died in a September 11 plane?

The character of Adam Sandler lost his wife and their three daughters in one of the planes on September 11. The question is: would we mind both if had lost them in a traffic accident, or on a train of the 11 M? I regret the cynicism, but the answer is no.There are pains and headaches. And Dr. Fineman suffers the pain of all sorrows, suffers from the open wound of a nation in mourning, suffers pain of epic proportions, the pain of a nation that he slept thinking that it was the largest in the world and woke up knowing that he was vulnerable.The argument is articulated in a narrative blueprint resembles that chose Wenders in "Paris, Texas". The protagonist is self-destroyed in a never-ending ceremony until that at the end you can talk and put back together with a speech the shreds of his life which has been showing in front of the screen.Why to Fineman you are consent to be everything. Why nobody lets only. The landlady, the friend, the administrator of the vast fortune that claimed as a victim of the 11-S, the therapist. all hold his extravagance and chase him for that. For what? Can so relate in front of the camera the suffering that was for him the loss of his family as if it were a television show?The loudspeaker of a confession is not enough for a pain so excessive proportions. It is necessary to go further. We need police to stop it and hold a trial against him and gets questioned his mental health. We need that attacked by parents of the wife and Fineman will become a victim of your silent pain (silent?). The collective catharsis, the bath of tears you both want to flood his bereaved victim is necessary for the public.But the issue should really think about is the price of pain as is a daughter who died in a September 11 plane? as is the brother died in the Gulf war? how much is worth a firefighter trapped in the twin towers? and a victim of Katrina?Actor and director worked already together in "Aggressive Executive". There worked the lesson of the rage that we all carry within, the lesson of not save anything. But already us her learnt well. Not a review was needed to show her, too, to the healthy dentist who interprets Cheadle.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1673

Silvia Giner

El síndrome de Svensson

muchocine

The balance sheet while it is good, I have to say that the film needless you footage. As it is a constant running gag, facing the viewer would have been most grateful remove 20 minutes...

Kepa Sojo arrives and brings a fresh comedy, fun with Absurd-Pop atmosphere and using a lenjuaje of the most delusional to tell us a story that could be very simple but is complicated and the characters end up interlacing with each other in a way peculiar muyyyy.As I admit and I assume geek, I have to admit that my movie I loved it and I have not stopped of laugh from the beginning until the end, although is that the majority will terrify. The gags are great and well the soundtrack going you can download it from the website http://www.elsindrome.com/index2.html and you will see that it is very funny.Svensson syndrome is a film unassuming, focused from a humility that is what makes this story end conquistandote with these characters that we can find "but not you you believe it" in the deep and panderetil Spain in which we live.The actors are all great, but honestly to my the Dick me sobran in the script. We also return to the same (they are higher for the role), but we are going which I have left is Enma poor has a very neglected skin (I recommend to buy a regenerating cream for the skin, is heche oil baby always after showering, drink much carrot juice and moderately sunbathe). Ay! Say that my favorite character was the singer of the group the balls, I think Orlando Bloom...The balance sheet while it is good, I have to say that the film needless you footage. As it is a constant running gag, facing the viewer would have been most grateful remove 20 minutes. This is something that said much in the premiere. It is not much less a film to win the Oscar but how nor the pretends you are going to give ** stars out of 5 which is very good and you are going to laugh much with her.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/526

Matías Cobo

La joven del agua

muchocine

This particular director is on track to become works of cult film, judging by the excitement generated by each new release.

The director of Indian origin that the story of the young woman of the water began to develop in parallel to the forest has. At night, Shyamalan told him his daughter the story of this nymph emerging from a swimming pool and as he progressed in his account, was incorporating various mythological elements to adorn this story whose final, like everyone, has moral. And in contrast to the forest, where the message is more pessimistic about the man and his life in society, the moral of the girl of water makes a sediment of hope, of faith in the possibilities of the man to reverse its current bleak situation. If the characters of the forest, reject a world perceived as hostile, the protagonist of this film, the character of a prodigious Paul Giamatti decides the opposite path, despite having suffered like those, the cruelty of this world. To him, as other characters of this story dressed in contemporary clothes, he challenges the need to continue believing in something. They want to, they need to know their mission in this world. The mysterious nymph, which puts face one Ethereal Bryce Dallas Howard, placed them before questions that will change them during the search for the answers.With an aesthetic and more personal choice of plans, Shyamalan shows each new film a recognizable label of author, both by the choice of their topics and for the manner in which it decides to develop them. Use the fantasy genre to tackle current issues and, therefore, their characters are not extraordinary neither possess superhuman qualities. Do many may not like this style as as a kind of cat for a ride, to sell horror film in the? trailers? and offer a story well away from the conventions of the genre in the movies. But you have no doubt that this particular director is poised to make his films in works of worship, judging by the excitement generated by each new release filmed by him.And as usually it happens to other directores-autores, or one entered the game for Shyamalan film proposals or stays outside and frustrated. To me I hooked this film out at the tail. Everything about her is in place: the work of the actors, the magnificent soundtrack by James Newton Howard and the narrative pace of the story. Only blur perhaps comes from the decision of Shyamalan's autoreservarse a role of so much importance in the history. It is that, in imitation of Hitchcock, make a minimum appearance during the story, but here it has gone hand in hand. He is not an actor, and it shows too much when it shares some emotional scenes with those who are. And finally, the comic wink of this tape, on account of a literary critic and cinema, has a lot of reckoning staff, given the little appreciation which is received the work of Shyamalan in your country. Indeed, weary of both drubbing, the director has dropped the idea of not work over there and come to shoot Europe. Here, like other artists of their species, sure gets it superbly.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1634

Luis Zueco

La vida de los otros

muchocine

The lives of others is a film of these which is keen to be able tell is someone that he go to see her.

We live in the 21st century, we are a generation that has had all, freedom, good education, possibilities to do whatever you would like to listen to the music that gave us the win, read any book to say what we think? You have been able to always choose, this is what our fathers fought, and that seems to us as normal. Not you usually miss something if you do not lose or if you have not had never. By all these privileges that we had and we have, it is a great joy to someone, or German, Chinese Spanish, get back the fear, resignation, resentment, frustration, hatred, rebellion, pain, struggle and who was supposed to live in some parts of Europe for 30 years.The lives of others is a film of these which is keen to be able tell is someone that he go to see her. The main actor this simply spectacular, but very careful with the writer, with a presence and that gives her character that mixture of penalty, poetry, rebelliousness, indignation, need to survive without which the film would be impossible. The side are also at a high level, both the journalist, the Prime Minister and the Lieutenant Colonel. The actress makes a very complicated role that you fall in love and you hate in equal parts, but that is without doubt a great performance, overshadowed in part by the two male protagonists.The captain of the Stasi is no doubt a smart guy, convinced the Communist ideal, but at the same time caught in the dynamics of the game prevents him to see in what has become his country. Live the life of another person makes him see reality from another point of view, something so healthy and that makes so few people today (committed to see things from a unique point of view, with the danger that this, that is the wrong). See things from other eyes makes you wake up from his dream and takes you to sacrifice everything, rather it was nothing by a text, that surely could help to send some wall was not far away.Apart from a beautiful soundtrack, an atmosphere that makes you feel that you are in the GDR in the 1980s. With scenes excellent in cases of interrogation and the placement of the entire system of tapping.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3119

Jesus Lens

Un Corazón Invencible

muchocine

A film, in short, absolutely spectacular, without pyrotechnical fanfare, showing the world as it is today: absolutely confusing, complicated, chaotic and inaprensible to reality.

The last and superb film by Michael Winterbottom, the only thing I don't like is the title. And not because it does not have its logic, which well reflects the content of the story, but because it fails to convey all the grandeur of an exemplary film and, for who subscribes to this, shows the immediate future that should pass the film. If "Road to Guantanamo" was already a piece of masterpiece which demonstrates that the commercial cinema need not be incompatible with the quality and a committed speech and cutting current, "A Mighty Heart" abounds in this path, using an actress of the candelabra to tell a story, exciting, modern and counterflow, absolutely Manichean and being presented with a wealth of nuances that make it a masterpiece that still will get long, model and reference of future filmmakers who consider that a camera can be a weapon through which tell the truth of things.Let us in history. The Middle East is a powder keg after 11-S. EE.UU. He invaded the Afghanistan of the Taliban and the entire area became more unstable yet, with Pakistan as a complex scenario in which command officers, journalists and analysts from around the world, not in vain, Pakistan is halfway between the most explosive Middle East and the far East more unknown, with the India as uneasy neighbor.And that scenario in Karachi, one of the largest cities and chaotic in the world, two journalists, Daniel Pearl and his pregnant wife before returning to Europe, are finalizing an interview with different people, as a famous Sheikh who is credited with much of the violence jihadist in the area. Daniel leaves his home in taxi in the morning. And it does not return.A from there, doing a rigorous follow-up of research police, journalistic and diplomatic which gets underway to recover Daniel Pearl, Winterbottom shoots a model thriller drinking sources more diverse, since "All the President's men the" and other classics of 1970s to the series "24", but all of this with the greatest respect and the realisms, without gruesomeness, without feeding any morbid.The film, which had the theoretical ballast viewers most was aware of the tragedy of Pearl and that, therefore, the surprise effect of knowing what happens at the end of the story was disabled from the beginning; It is absolutely fascinating, maintains interest in all times, suffering with anxiety and, at times, until recently reborn hope, of course, it is as false as impossible."Untamed heart" I like (almost) everything. Performances, spídico style of filming of Winterbottom, with those close-ups, fractioned talks, that camera in hand, those enhanced shots of meetings in various bands and, later, the street images. A few foreign which are capable of transmitting the chaos, the noise, the mess and complex Karachi. Also mounted as short as short and accurate levels, all sequences of foreign, with buses, jams, agglomerations, fumes, the music, the faces. a shooting cuasidocumental that integrates seamlessly into the development of the story and contributes greatly to contextualize it in the best possible way.Special chapter for the raids and the police investigation developed by police in Pakistan. A model exercise in globalized noir in which Google, IP, mobile, those connections telephone and cyber have the leading role.A film, in short, absolutely spectacular, without pyrotechnical fanfare, showing the world as it is today: absolutely confusing, complicated, chaotic and inaprensible to reality. Why, who and with what objective kidnaps Pearl? After seeing the movie, someone is he clear? Because this is the scenario in which we operate. And Winterbottom has counted it, once again, in a masterful way. Chapeau.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/856

Tito Chinchan

La Batalla Tanuki de la Era Heisei Pom Poko

muchocine

The pelí is horny, but not is if it was the intention of the author. I think that West does not understand too well.

Takes, takes and takes, Tito Chinchan has achieved and I brought a film that you had not seen (nor you will see) in life. Nothing more and nothing less than the battle Tanuki of the Era Heisei Pom Poko, that I as believe it or not, there is truth. It is director Isao Takahata and I will tell you that it will. Before that, know that in Spain it is not published and that if the conseguis see, will be with subtitles. It is still funny.The film is about raccoons living in a forest. One day discover (arrive an excavators and expel them from the House where they lived) that humans have plans against their territories. So far almost normal. Suddenly, the raccoons fight by not be reason and it is that they aren't raccoons of truth, but rather Tanuki, so they become things to fight. Suddenly comes out one of them which I think is a female (looks like a drag queen) and tells them that they have to fight against humans. So all join forces and learn to tranformarse in human and things as well.I think that film is the most original I've seen ever, that first and foremost. It is funny but the argument makes very difficult to follow. Not is if it is because you have to go reading it or what, but it took me. It should be a criticism of human or something as well, but not so ended up catch. Then the Tanuki have many problems to not be what came, but divert the attention of his problemón with humans. I can not finish the criticism without comment a scene. During the beginning, called the antención testes have raccoons, perfectly drawn but without pilila. Well, since he is the master talking with his students about a great red carpet (fit about 25 raccoons average bears) well, it says "the transformation is an art, by ejeplo, do you see the carpet on which you are?" "They are my testicles" so it picks up and all raccoons fall to the ground. I also I cáí ass.In short, that the pelí is horny, but not is if it was the intention of the author. I think that West does not understand too well (I learned nothing, come on).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3159

Yojimbo

¿Y tú Quién Eres?

muchocine

It is a new genre in which a script, a director and actors intend to make a film that aware to the viewer but ignoring carry out everything that a film would need.

A decent director, a real and painful subject for many people and a few talented actors were the perfect formula to make the film a small oasis. However "are you who you are?" becomes another example of "movie-story" on which I intend to warn for those who feel the impulse to spend money on going to see it.Peli-report is a new genre in which a script, a director and actors intend to make a film that aware to the viewer but ignoring carrying out all that a film would need, i.e., a script with a well crafted story, minimally real dialogue, sober a direction and fulfillment that you not stale, and actors leading with his talent and on their shoulders a story.Mercero does not want to leave room for misunderstandings and trusts Cristina Brondo to represent the protagonist of the movie-story from the beginning. She is an outstanding student who prepares their oppositions to notary. Summer arrives and his family decides to go on vacation and leave the grandfather, already major and with his ailments of Alzheimer's disease in a serviced residence. First encounter. What is wrong in a nursing home? Then a stronghold in which tiran elders who bother to holiday (the only vision offered by the film) that can be either a place in which they are better treated at home (neither of CONAE, clear).The film, like Mar Adentro, imposes a sensitivity and an overwhelming logic. The rest is of ogres. But explains, with film logic, that a methodical student, in that summer, decides to change his life to devote himself to caring for elders with Alzheimer's disease? How can we explain that each phrase of the character is a tirade of a brochure? And more questions, which do not have to do with the loss of my memory, much less. Do and these planes of the prota driving (a convertible Audi of course) and recalling, which film of terror, phrases of the sick? And that a carer and that doctor who are 24 hours always serving the elderly? Is it that there is no shift? And the hipermegasuperchachi residence of the death that loses ill Alzheimer's as soon as they open the door? And these jokes that do not have any grace? And the relationship between doctor and patient granddaughter Sung? And that non-existent friendship between Alexandre and López Vázquez who inexplicably ends in tears? And these grips brothers of the protagonist who speak as if they had Down's syndrome?And the final: after that final phrase (title) of the character of Alexandre are will thinking the protagonist that is disheartening to take Grampa, that unrecognized, to a residence?Finally, a cluster of cinematographic absurdities that make to convince the viewer that has seen an interview La 2 fiction rather than a film dealing with Alzheimer's. All outstanding and tasteful is the beautiful head of animation in the initial credit titles.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4216

Francisco Bellón

Hacia rutas salvajes

muchocine

Towards wild routes is a film with many philosophical and moral aspirations that sinks by pedantry and inconsistencies of the discourse of Penn Sen.

After nominations have been made public to the awards Oscar, as well as making pools about what and who are the Favorites, must also think of the defeated. Perhaps the clearer is this wild routes towards, Sean Penn, who many gave as a clear candidate for the most important Oscar Awards.Sean Penn, it must be said that it is one of the finest actors of the current scene, but that his forays into the address have not been very fortunate. Towards wild routes is another movie to add to that list of busts, and Penn used the adventure of Christopher McCandless to perform an ode to freedom of the human being, anarchy, and cruel and heartless that can reach the society. And do it without losing any time a true filosófico-religioso halo, also of trying to justify acts of the character, so is more pedantic and pretentious. Penn focuses more on relationships that McCandless is setting in their adventure and there are times where the leaves aside the own adventure in itself, and rarely is transmitted to the viewer that struggle of mankind against the wild nature. If the story itself is not very much, the pace and the way in which it is told (who are you think go alternating fragments of the final scene with the rest of the story?) make even less attractive. Penn also happens with the excessive footage, and is two and a half hours duration rather than excessive for a story that could have resolved in little more than ninety minutes. All the actors are correct, although the nomination to the Oscar of Hal Holbrook resembles more a recognition throughout his career than to his portrayal in the film.Towards wild routes is a film with many philosophical and moral aspirations that sinks by pedantry and inconsistencies of the discourse of Penn Sen. Little you can save from a similar film, the most notable being the fantastic Director of photography Eric Gautier.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4009

Oscar Martínez

Irina Palm

muchocine

The strength of Irina Palm lies both in the self-development of its protagonist in the delicious romance that it maintains, always present but never dominant.

Nominated the bear gold at the last Berlinale, Irina Palm is the second film directed by Sam Garbarski German starring Marianne Faithfull, Miki Manojlovic, Kevin Bishop, Siobhan Hewlett, Dorka Gryllus, Jenny Agutter, Corey Burke, Meg Wynn Owen, Susan Hitch and Flip Webster. co-production between, great Brtenaña, Luxembourg, Belgium, Germany and France, Irina Palm tells the story of Maggie, a widow of fifty years to find money for the treatment of his grandsonas well as encourage her son Tom and his wife Sarah. To see an ad that reads "Se necesita stewardess", Maggie enters. When he discovers what kind of companion is, she is shocked, but he accepts the job. Maggie is shy and it would frankly wrong in the Empire of sex if it were not for Luisa, a companion who teaches him the tricks of the trade to make very requested Irina Palm. But the double life of Maggie does not pass unnoticed to its neighbours and must face the double provincial standards and ask serious questions.Irina Palm is one of those films that you would know how catalog, if it is it necessary to do so: it could be defined as a light drama, either as a tragicomedy, or in any event as a black comedy, but the truth is that if we are to judge it in one of these encasillados, the Sam Garbarski film loses many integers. It is Irina Palm works and is therefore a pleasant experience, if not we try to cover it in any category. Some have not hesitated to find the similarities with Full Monty, but latter is much more focused towards the comedy film genre that here we try, it combines the drama of manners, so to speak, with comedy and romance.With a burst of tear desktop telefilm drama, Irina Palm takes not too to show us their true strengths with a couple of subtle comedy gags and quite black, who barely effortlessly manage to make us forget our most dismal omens. Since then, slowly but surely, Irina Palm develops its sordid plot with a predominant tone of black comedy or, rather, self-assurance, desdramatizando in the same way that makes his protagonist, finding the comic side of situations as weird as the elbow of pajillera, home decoration of the room, or the sincere admiration of clients of the local, health benefit, which glorified the figure of Maggie icon of prostitution, as if of a footballer or a pop singer were.On the other hand, and to alleviate the shortage of unexpected twists or complex plots, Irina Palm focuses its development on a subtle portrait of the characters, both in the reactions of her female protagonist as, above all, to its environment, in addition to the great shift that takes the professional relationship between Maggie and Miki, a character who just only need serve his impassive physiognomy to embroider his role. Finally, and as you would expect, the situation takes the classic and expected 'twist' of turn, predictable though why not disappointing, taking us to the expected outcome of the film.In this way, we could say that Irina Palm part of an original although sordid premise, and from that point of origin its director develops an absolutely obvious plot but no less meritorious. And is that the strength of Irina Palm lies both in the personal development of its protagonist and, for a server, delicious romance that it maintains, always present but never dominant.Come on, that I liked.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3060

José A. Peig

La extraña que hay en tí

muchocine

Film, ultimately, brilliant, great interpretation of Jodie Foster, fluent and well-structured narrative and a marvelous staging.

A broadcaster of radio express using the word the reality of social change by putting your eyes lyrical in the city that loves, agonizes over the change inevitable, its vital structure and how people's lives evolve or involucionan, the nostalgia of a memory, it was before and now blurs in a mind foggy as the distorted images that occur on a par with the creditsan urban landscape seen as a mirage of the reality that seems to suggest that the world is going to give a qualitative leap towards insecurity, fear, let flow the violent instincts and, therefore, doubt the principles of law and reason.Erica Bain (Jodie Foster) normally lives a simple life until the violence imposed by the change of perspective and a new understanding of itself. Life is not simple and the fabric of ideological principles that subject and sustain the belief system collapses. The pulse not trembles when you've lived violence de facto. From another place, Sean Mercer police represents the principle of reason and subordination to the dogma of the law, but from the prism of who sees violence as a set of forensic data subsequent to the Act of violence. She is witness to the reality of injustice and he takes refuge in the belief and the formalisms. A policeman kills, but can not grasp the bitterness caused by the set of visceral and psychological phenomena in an act perpetrated from a wild executioner to an innocent victim.Thus, the structure of the narrative part two characters who gradually walk towards a reversal of values that, until then, they had believed, describes the friendship that emerges between the two with dialogues that expose counterpoints on crime, law and the subtle line between the duty of the need, Justice legislative of self-righteousness. The complicity that arises between the two characters as one is aware of the role played by the other, and the dilemma that faces the police is particularly successful.But clear, we not only live in post 11-S society, but in society the image recorded on devices within the reach of anyone. Before the revenge, images of injustice, which hitherto only had meaning in the memory of Erica, moving to the mobile phone are, and that is the crux of the issue. are we to a speech that justifies the crime regardless of the law somehow?. At all. Erica is a dam soul of fear, in its infancy violence is not a revenge as a visceral reaction to potential aggressors. Then, when you feel the support of some citizens who support the figure of a vigilante, mata on behalf of Justice and, therefore, their actions are the result of revenge, abstraction that goes beyond the visceral reaction. The film, therefore narrates and displays the grounds while a psychological process, process which, set against the figure of the police, tells us brings to the table the eternal debate of always, nothing original, and since then have become best movies on the subject, much bolder and more raw than this. However, the truth is that it is an exhibition that encourages reflection on the basis of a history of changes and psychological processes, perhaps too simple reasons, but without proclamations or unilateral formulas based on what the global discourse refers. See what. A group of thugs records the fact of crime, an act that will turn against them when Erica, in an act of conscious of self-justification against the friend, farewell and send the recording to the mobile are in the camera of a mobile phone. This includes images of reality - a reality that goes beyond codes of ethics and forensic data-, then happens when a change in his conscience. The phrase, devastating, - "I've seen what you did" - reveals the hypocrisy which maintained the principles are ideological agent. It is the importance of the real image with the concept and prejudice ex post. In this modern era of use and abuse of all kinds of devices that allow registering reality, many acts which, in the past, could reduce dismissed trials of the real event, today can be experienced de facto. With the modification of conscience that this implies. This is the new substrate - adapting to changing times - used by filmmaker Neil Jordan to return to the question. However, deal with Jordan not exploits to the maximum the possibilities of a complex issue, and the treatment given to the last scene remains somewhat childish by predictable of the Act, while it is coherent by the above arguments. Film, ultimately, brilliant, great interpretation of Jodie Foster, fluent and well-structured narrative and a marvelous staging.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1936

Dragon negro

Premonition (Siete días)

muchocine

Film full of inconsistencies and temporary failures to sing a lot, see it without giving many laps which tells you can entertain you, but find their faults you entertain even more.

Sandra Bullock stars in this film with supernatural overtones where a wonderful life in principle with her husband and their two daughters troncará after receiving the news of the death of her husband in an accident of traffic, the next day wakes up and is that her husband is alive, thinking that all been a bad dream. But the next day he wakes up and her husband returns to be dead, with resulting everything more real than she thought.From the outset, a paranormal thriller starring Sandra Bullock already claims some aversion to the couple that warns that we are facing a very conventional and shot product in the face of the showcasing of the star. What happens is that the star looks rather little as it happens with the same face of disgusted during all the footage and also the character that plays just becoming more pathetic than anything else. And is that when one already it makes time given has that what happens is that the protagonist is living the days in a disorderly way, she seems to discover it and also tells it you out loud until doing a sketch so that we understand well and we do not lose, as if we were stupid.After all this the grace of the film is to see if the Bullock will be able to save her husband from imminent death or whether it will fail to do so, but the writers discuss the great failure of portraying her husband as a cocoon, which makes you lose all complicity and emotion by what happens or notrather, what you want is that they kill and already step that takes the woman with him. But this is not the only bug that commit the writers already that the film full of inconsistencies and temporary failures to sing a lot, and is that if you get to play with the time at least keep some consistency, not a puzzle pieces that then do not fit.The film deserves a mention to the scene more jam as seen by a server recently and is how to convert a task daily, as normal as going to collect the clothes lying in a sequence of tension in crescendo stuck with shoehorn to justify another scene. But the jackpot goes to this ridiculous way, touching the joke of how the Bullock tries to save her husband, seriously I was starting me the box and hallucinating, it can become more foolish?As telefilm for the desktop on Sunday has true pass, see it without giving many laps which tells you can entertain you, but find their faults you entertain even more.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1751

Iñaki Bilbao

Days of glory

muchocine

A very entertaining, with a very successful film mixed purely war film, with clear and marked notes socio-political - religious

Good French film that tells a true story, perhaps not as recounted the facts, but yes in its essence. I refer to the fact that the names and characters were not perhaps the true (do not know), but which are based on real human beings who lived through the events that we show in this hard war film with clear complaint socio-political. Perhaps tired of the various French Governments deferred financial aid the Muslims veterans who fought for France in World War II, Rachid Bouchareb and producer and co-star of the film, Jamel Debbouze, undertook the work of throwing light on this humiliating and shameful issue.The result is a film very entertaining, with a very successful mixed purely war film, with clear and marked notes socio-political - religious. Well directed, Bouchareb achieved a unified male performance, as evidenced by that at the last Festival of Cannes film, this choral interpretation of the four actors of North African origin to achieve this award.On the technical side, the work is commendable, with a worthy direction of photography, good editing of sound, and a few successful dialogues, credible at all times. Because the script which underpin the tape is brilliant, getting that the film may be of interest at all times.With regard to the action scenes, it must be said have claw and lot of dramatic intensity, although the final fight in the Alsatian people reminded me more of the account which takes place in "Saving private Ryan". Something that is reinforced in the may surplus but no less enlightening epilogue. Surplus because everything was already explained absolutely before, but enlightening because I know how many veterans of former French African colonies who fought for France lived after the war. Hell, abandonment, poverty, the I ninguneo social, he continued, not ended with the completion of the contest.The last minute proves with sadness and shame

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/641

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Las partículas elementales

muchocine

It is perhaps the film's love of the year, but there is no hugs sudados, nor looks lost in the foliage of the passionate rapport: there are emotions, resignations, risks, deliveries, vices and concessions.

The novel by Michel Houellebecq was intelligence, audacity and pessimism, greased everything so that the narrative machinery flow and bad milk and the eschatology of the author rezume by each phrase in the film of Oskar Roehler, rookie with pretensions of already quoted author, cut to frivolous reflection on the disappointment of the bourgeois man in the Europe of the welfare State, although not without its attachment of cynicism, his particular evidence of inconsistency of European society today.He is two diametrically opposed half-brothers. One, cultured and refined, triumphant nato, dump in his work (a molecular biologist). The other is eaten by various venereal fever Muttley. Both in an already talludita age, discover the love and the film is humming how love is changing them. Or in fact does not change them anything. Chance, fate, in the magnificent Houellebecq novel exerted a notable role, comes here to destroy this apparent life of galanteos when the lovers of both fall ill and must consider if return to previous life or (definitely) assume some responsibility and face the disease with fortitude and poise.There is a settling of accounts director explicit very subtly. The novel (again she insistently because this is a literary film based on a literary boom) did more blood. There was no sweetness. Here the character are delivered with much tact: guess them carnal, nearby. The feelings that move them are those that drive us all and neglect suffered in childhood is the abandonment which, on occasion, we all feel when the total weaning and enter hocicados, driven by an absolute fever, in the society for work, find an apartment, fix a hipóteca, having children, in short, that Vertigo only having already settlement in retirement or in the Tomb. And some would say not there.Elementary particles is a film of the disenchantment of sadness, but this ballast is left to be seduced by some hope. The author is distancing itself from the cruelty of Houellebecq: is your plot of madness, of humor also of verismo. The thickness of the book was lightened because this is film and is a very difficult task to make images the avalanche of ideas and concepts (politically incorrect almost all) than the novelist German reflected in his novels.It is perhaps the film's love of the year, but there is no hugs sudados, nor looks lost in the foliage of the passionate rapport: there are emotions, resignations, risks, deliveries, vices and concessions.Those who have enjoyed the book (like me), always see a film false, it is hence in excess of its argument approaches, but entertaining, clear, very well trabada and, by course, Rocky, acidic. Moritz Bleibtreu also makes a work unique, hypnotic. Only see him deserves to enter the game of its plot.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2195

Ramón Balcells

Oceans 13

muchocine

Thanks to the original implementation Sodebergh scene and a cast that happens it in big, Ocean? s Thirteen is a form of entertainment that can be seen.

Six years ago the irregular director Steven Sodebergh directed a film entitled Ocean? s Eleven, a magnificent top quality entertainment with a superb cast, led by the trio Pitt Clooney, Damon. Three years later, to see the hit which marked the first part, it was proposed to direct the sequel, that to me, I do not personally dislike, but not told me anything new. Do and indeed, following the second success, Sodebergh did not hesitate reunited again with the entire team, which seems that it becomes it Pearl, and carry out the third part: Ocean? s Thirteen may say that this film is totally unnecessary. What is more, I believe that with the first part of--for now - trilogy, already had enough. Already in Ocean? s Twelve the screenplay began to fall into the temptation of simplicity, but is that the plot is as simple as useless in the third installment. Do yet and so, thanks to the original commissioning Sodebergh scene and a cast that passes big, Ocean? s Thirteen can be seen, moreover, is a form of entertainment that is worth seeing, if only for the afternoon. The good thing about the movie is that you despite having an flojísimo argument with really stupid and incomprehensible actions, does not fall into the worst trap that a film like this can fall: boredom. Although Sodebergh would have achieved the high level of the first if it would have benefited from a solid base, and if he had quit so many useless and ido dialogues more grain. I must admit that, despite not being anything boring, the film comes to tire at some point for being so liosa and at the same time so simple. Let me explain: may seem, as exactly in the second part, which is very complicated to understand, because the smartass of Sodebergh skips many explanations (in some cases) and makes the viewer understand what is happening is extremely complex. But do not fool, this formula (with economic intentions, of course) that the director uses, is nothing more than a hoax. Yes, we can believe that all robatorios are amazing and very complicated, but in reality it isn't more than a simple and pure entertainment, and no searching, no way, logic, more than anything because in reality there. If you'll see Ocean? s Thirteen, not going to think, going to entertain you. And if you do not learn anything, because it is - a little - poorly explained, and not because you're stupid. I recognize that there are moments at which did not understand anything of what was happening, but I think this is what you want to Sodebergh.Como telling, sharing what has happened in large shooting this film. And it already shows! Almost all the scenes are of humor, and that is where it shows that inevitable spark have the actors and their absurd, but at the same time very effective dialogues. Get me the impression that this movie is a joke, but I don't know how, but has got me hooked. And just as the first part had a care script and some very nicely drawn characters, here these two aspects are lost altogether, and even so (I do not tire of saying it), it's incredibly enjoyable to see. There is chemistry between the actors, and there are several really funny sequences, and others, of course, pathetic (the change of the jewels and Vincent Cassell on the roof?) Who has seen already I mean). Do Yes, Ocean? s Thirteen is unnecessary, simple, less luxurious (by mcuho casinos that appear) than the second (do already do not say nothing in comparison with the first, because I could spend paragraphs comparing them and, indeed, Ocean? s Eleven won in all).And it is that along with your entertainment and the chemistry between the actors, there is another remarkable point and that it will fully part, and is the incorporation of two large and veteran actors Al Pacino and Ellen Barkin (who coincidentally worked together in interesting melody of seduction). They triumfan even more than Danny eco? sorry, George Clooney and his gang. They are the villains more fun and unique of the three films, even more than the funny and sometimes excellent actor Andy Garcia (careful to phrase that loose on the shadow that makes Pacino hotel to your pool). Between the latter and Barkin there chemistry, despite barely having the simple relationship of jefe-secretaria. But I think that she highlights more alone than together (great scene of her with Matt Damon). Although obviously not despreciaría the performance of the gang, to which they were joined by the always present there and already mentioned Garcia. Not to mention the entire team because they are many, but I am missing the presence of Julia Roberts (who appeared in the previous two) and Catherine Zeta Jones (that it only came out in the second and his role was very interesting, despite the fact that she is a bad actress), which provided that female air stood out above all the male gang. But it is also true that Barkin does equal or rather than the other two.In short, an entrenida film and nothing else, with a cast of luxury and, unfortunately, a style less care and simpler than the of two previous deliveries. Recommended for a Friday evening, in which you have no desire to think and Yes fun. That Yes, one-quarter would already be too. What's more: this third installment has already seemed completely unnecessary.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3021

Antoni Messa

Disturbia

muchocine

The formula is served. Now it is question of enjoy it. Well worth, even if only by his almost total claims lack and the beautiful face of Sarah Roemer, the girl in the House opposite.

Disturbia, purely and simply, it is a new twist on the history espoused by Hitchcock in the window indiscreet. A product to use, simple and predictable, although effective. Clearly aimed at the teenage audience, it is a nice way of approaching the classic of the orondo British filmmaker and, to my taste, much more correctly than the pretentious, overloaded and bizarre double body, review of the same title (and Vertigo) made a Brian De Palma in hallucinatory State.Its director D. j. Caruso (a type with a not very good film history), bet by approaching the subject from the coordinates of the serie B, as did John Badham, in 1987 and counting with a similar premise, from his entertaining illegal procedure. And it is, ultimately, Disturbia, at the time that pays homage to Hitchcock masterpiece, turns to a visualization and narrative very own of thrillers youth that were made in the 1980s; something similar to what recently has condemned Michael Bay with his Transformers (unexpectedly) visible, also starring Shia LaBeouf and, apart from the film we are discussing now, recently he could be seen in the splendid memories of Queens and already form part of the cast in the highly anticipated new installment of Indiana Jones.Buena part of the effectiveness of Disturbia is due to the brilliant interpretation of this actor; a young promise rising for the time being, whereas, a pleasure to see him on screen. On this occasion he gives life to Kale Brecht, son of a renowned writer died in a terrible car accident, an unbearable feeling of guilt, it will become a teenage problematic to Kale. He was the driver of the car at the time of the fatal and inevitable mishap.A sentence uttered at the wrong time by his master of Spanish (Italian version dubbed in Spanish) and an unexpected and violent reaction from the boy, will lead him to a three-month house arrest; time that will invest in a State of total restlessness in hanging and spy, after the Windows of his home and to the astonishment of his mother, the comings and goings of members of your neighborhood, a quiet residential area of Pasadena, California. While a plaster leg was the impediment which restricted the movements of a voyeur James Stewart, an artifact police ring-shaped, equipped with a sensor and placed in the right foot, will be the delimiter of the possible displacement of Kale. Soon, as well as discover the presence of vecinita tempting and newly arrival to the neighborhood, you will begin to have strong suspicions of having a wanted serial killer hosted in your own neighborhood.D. j. Caruso tape works on two levels, and both one and the other, makes it correctly. On the one hand, through the nice touch of comedy awarded the character of Kale Brecht and relations with his new neighbor and a schoolmate East - paragraph that highlights, no doubt, by its agile dialogues and, first and foremost, by comic of the splendid skills LaBeouf-and, on the other hand, entering fully into the thriller; treatment, this one, in which their predictability makes too noticeable. Despite this, their development, it shows a good mastery of suspense and intrigue, without diminishing nothing disturbing touch that always know give their perfidious and evil characters, David Morse, a secondary luxury that well deserves a leading role as soon as possible.Make the following mathematical operation and get the film Disturbia as a final result. Window indiscreet more body double. Whilst remaining double physical body giving title to the work of De Palma, add few drops of the very teenager Club of the five. The formula is served. Now it is question of enjoy it. Well worth, even if only by his almost total claims lack and the beautiful face of Sarah Roemer, the girl in the House opposite.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1947

Jesus Lens

Spiderman 3

muchocine

One is going to see the most expensive movie in the history of the cinema and he dislikes to meet with a surfeit of French Existentialism poorly digested and passed through the Blender of the Disney style. I do not know whether to Raimi & Co. It has risen them arácnida fever at the head, but these ravings of Kierkegaard for children are pretentious, stupid and nonsense.

What boredom: Spiderman 3 a dramatic thing. Children yawned between plúmbeas scenes of conversations of adults and elders desesperaban before the childishness of the characters. From time to time came the action, but it was like awakening to the TV and see some goal with sopor loose, light years from the emotions. So disappointing has been "Spiderman 3".I have already said on other occasions that I love the direct, forceful and passionate style of Inigo Domínguez, correspondent in Italy Ideal. Actually, wanted to Inigo: bread, bread and Spiderman, boredom. In a few petados theaters as ever, with LF tails that sold out the taquillaje to see Spider-man, at the end of the film, the most widespread comment was: "Vin compae longest movie". And immediately, talks trufaran a damn Word when speaking of a film, especially when it involves pure entertainment: boredom.Because who cares about the metafísico-sentimentales sorrows of Spider-man? One thing is the Lair by the dark side of Batman, his fears and fears; and quite another this babbling arácnida telenovela: you want-no te quiero; I envy you - I admire; you understand-you-no step are when you need; I love - I hate you. By God! That already have to Diego de la Vega and india for clamoring Yumalai.El case is that "Spiderman 3" lasts two hours and media that seem to five, makes you remove you in the armchair, looking at the clock continuously, consult the phone looking for an SMS that you lift it out of the tedium and of having flight attendants in the room, wanting to give ask a pillow and some earplugs and take a NAP until leaving the titles of credit.Okay, okay. I'm going through. I have exaggerated somewhat. Nor is it you feel irrepressible desire to open up veins or something. It must be recognized that the special effects are milk, which Spider-man flies beautifully, black suit mola mazo and, above all, the Sandman is amazing. Vale.Pero one is going to see the most expensive movie in the history of the cinema and he dislikes to meet with a surfeit of French Existentialism poorly digested and passed through the Blender of the Disney style. I do not know whether to Raimi & Co. It has risen them arácnida fever at the head, but these ravings of Kierkegaard for children are pretentious, stupid and nonsense.With good, complex and stimulating was the last "Batman", often blunder have led us to this "Spiderman" complacent, ombligista and jamaipanese. To see if the action film directors/producers learn to make films with message, committed and such and such is not necessary to bore up to the sheep, with endless discursitos loaded with morals. So now I have the Bucay and Coelho's turn.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4076

Carlos Giacomelli Puig

88 Minutos

muchocine

Correct thriller to overal that keeps the viewer's attention mainly due to the relative difficulty of finding out who is really behind the whole shebang against the protagonist. It premièred in cinemas not be Pacino?

Dr. Jack Gramm (to Al Pacino) is a University professor who also works as a forensic psychiatrist for the FBI. Few hours before that carried out the execution of a prisoner imprisoned because of their work, Gramm receives a call threatening him are only eighty-eight minutes of life. So, in little more than an hour and twenty should find out who wants him dead, and try and save his life.They are not few those who argue that in recent years, to find good American cinema in stores must go to the section "television series", where products of highest level such as "Lost", "Alias", or "24" are. Precisely the starring Kiefer Sutherland is the more footprint has left on screen (large or small), because its innovative montage and his revolutionary scripts begin to be emulated with increasingly more often.And "88 minutes" is a clear example of this.In fact, many are similar (almost plagiarism) between the film, incidentally directed by Jon Avnet, and the legendary series. Obviously, the first of them is the choice of telling the story in real time (or almost) with some element which constantly reminds us of the intervening minutes. That television screenshots were black with a thunderous digital counting clock seconds, on this occasion are calls Recalling life which fits with the protagonist. This resource serves to influence certain feeling of strain during the footage, and indeed it does, but much less so in the same way that happened in "24" (and is perhaps one thing keep that frenetic pace during the forty minutes of length of a chapter, and another do it into a feature film).More blatant is still the character of Pacino, Jack Bauer into something else in years, but with the same characteristics, since their interrelation with the rest of characters (Dr. Gramm is passed almost the entire film glued to the phone, just one), the way of solving their problems, the mistrust which sometimes generates his character, and even your tone of voice.In fact, this is not negative, that without elements such the film would be lost without remission, becoming a forgettable as bland as a little stimulant thriller. Because there is nothing to highlight it.The script is quite conservative and is dedicated to moving by the most hackneyed clichés of the genre. It is a correct history to find out who is the bad guy, but nothing more. Appreciated the large amount of dialogue containing the film (that even though they cause more than one slump of pace, her apart from the rest of products nowadays), especially the last which Pacino maintains with one of his students, in which leaves an open very difficult to answer question, but apart from this there is absolutely nothing more remarkable.Nor can praise is too actions, because all seem apathetic and desganados, carrying out monotonous work except for some time Pacino (phone talk--as non-with the sentenced to death). Negatively highlights the presence of Leelee Sobieski, whose character does not change its facial expression, either in class or being attacked.But in reality, the real problem with "88 minutes" lies in the direction. A director with something more than mordant (Michael Mann, for example) it would have perhaps been able to build a far more stimulating work, but Jon Avnet signs a film completely impersonal, without a single plane that can remember five minutes of finishing the viewing, a dangerous scent of this tv-movie from the first minute. A real waste.In short, "88 minutes" is a correct thriller to overal that keeps the viewer's attention mainly due to the relative difficulty of finding out who is really behind the whole shebang against the protagonist. However, the approach of certain questions cannot be avoided. There would be this film does not exist "24"? This genus of small to big screen translation needed? And the most important is premièred in cinemas not have the presence of Al Pacino?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1626

Jeremy Fox

Bobby

muchocine

A great movie that could have been round but will be gaining in recognition with the passage of the years.

Total and unjustly forgotten at the Oscars this year, "Bobby" isn't much less first movie Emilio Estevez as director, but the truth is that nothing in his previous filmography did portend something similar.On the tape, follow developments of 22 fictional characters at the Ambassador Hotel, the eve of the day that Senator Robert f. Kennedy was assassinated. Obviously, are facing a coral Ribbon that, naturally, the interpretations are basic. If the director could not rely on its cast, the whole cojearía significantly.In this case, fortunately, we are witnessing throughout an interpretative recital of the distribution as a whole. Distribution, I forgot to say it truly spectacular and integrated, among others by Harry Belafonte, Joy Bryant, Nick Cannon, Emilio Estevez, Laurence Fishburne, Heather Graham, Anthony Hopkins, Helen Hunt, Ashton Kutcher, Lindsay Lohan, William H. Macy, Demi Moore, Martin Sheen, Christian Slater, Sharon Stone, Elijah Wood and the own directorOsado is dare to stand out to someone from all of them but I would be me with a wonderful time starring Demi Moore and Sharon Stone in a hairdressing salon. A real delight intepretativa to enjoy over and over again and in which both show what are capable as actresses.Of course, that the other two legs of all choral films (and non-choral, to tell the truth) must be the script and direction. I have no objections of importance to any of the two aspects. The script of the own Emilio Estevez is full of nuances and get fully justify the intervention of all the characters while, for its part, the strong leadership gives the pulse needed to keep us hooked and jump from history in history unless we have the sensation of watching parts of a puzzle. There is no major achievement in the choral film: create an entire uniform from so many different stories.I imagine that in certain sectors ideological Americans not have welcomed the tape and could certainly be accused of overly idealistic. If one ignores the film, Bobby Kennedy would have been the President which, among other things, stop the Viet Nam Guerra and to eliminate social inequalities existing in its country. Ultimately, it was the panacea. It is not that I think that the thing not had gone better with him as President, hardly could have been worse, but this frenzied optimism, in what he had done, it is distilled over the tape I was too innocent.But leaving aside a peccadillo of youth as the innocence, we have a great film that could have been round for more scenes of force, such as the one mentioned above, but will be gaining in recognition with the passage of the years. Moonfleet.es rating: 8.5 out of 10

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/506

Silvia Giner

El código Da Vinci

muchocine

The film is very well directed, is very faithful to the book which I thank, barely there are at least a couple of differences that I warned...

For anyone who reads the book, see the movie can be tedious. In addition to knowing what is going to happen is a film of these that my friend Katie called "Insultantes for the Viewer" that explains each scene to a level of detail that one just wondering if the director of the film will think that your audience is lerdo. Well this is not true as and as I see it because what was involved here was sending a message to the may number of people as possible (if still someone was after the amount of books that sold Dan Brown), and all do not have the same sharpness or simply there are many people going to the movies of brevas figs and find it difficult to continue an argument represented as it is done now (I think there is in fact) (several studies "applied to films" on the subject of the perception of 1 same thing in different people, the result is always different). so I gather that the director/producer thought that it was best to adapt the message to language more possible "didactic" (by call it somehow).Moreover, recommend that they see the film in original version if you do not want to die from an attack of deafness with the "grrr ggggññ" of the folding of Audry Tatou (terrible dubbing due to the forced French accent, not by the folding).But. the film is very well directed, is very faithful to the book which I thank, barely there are at least a couple of differences that I warned one of them is that replaced the visit of Robert to the library by an "original" doubt with the new technologies in a bus, thanks to which discovered another new track.What I liked: 1 - the end with this endless and repetitive hanks kneeling before the Roslyn ancestral assuming that it had become the new guardian of the secret and therefore in the new Grand Master of the Priory of Sion. 2 - the flight in the smart.3 - Silas, who in the book is a being bland, in the movie occurs under the spectacular port of Paul Bettany, which to my taste is too handsome and impressive for the role, too much charisma uff this man in every movie is better (for those not ye, Bettany played the poseso doctor traveling on the ship's Master & Legeais and some say that it is a nod to Darwin). Supposedly in the book this character is not, but anyway, I like the bet made by the director, greatly improves the character and thereby to history in general. Positive balance in general.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1457

Kiko de España

Inland empire

muchocine

I can still hear the laughter of David Lynch behind the screen. I do that I know. I like it. I hate it. Put your note when you see. But go to see her.

I can still hear the laughter of David Lynch behind the screen. Very bastard managed to have me three hours sitting in the Chair watching. something.I would like to start warning of all the movies of Lynch, unless A true story, afraid me. This is the synopsis official, attention: the history of a mystery. The history of a mystery in a world within other worlds that are revealed about a woman. A woman in love and in trouble. Já Já JáInland Empire is an autohomenaje that provides the nutty Lynch (official, is crazy) and his time, bridging the gap were Kevin Smith in Jay and silent Bob Bob or Carpenter in ghosts of Mars. And if you don't believe me look at the end credits. Inland Empire is a story of actresses, whores and a family of rabbits who lives between canned laughter. And terror, because Inland Empire is a horror movie.Expressionist ratos, videoclipera, always different moments (and digital), you need the absolute surrender of the Viewer from the first moment to not check out by legs at the half-hour. It could also be the incomplete pilot of a new mystery series cancelled before finishing the filming.Or could also be a revision lynchiana of the "mythical" La fin absolue du monde, not you fuck.I do that I know. I like it. I hate it. Put your note when you see. But go to see her.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3088

Bruji

La extraña que hay en tí

muchocine

Do do dangerous argument, by his manipulator development, only ending convincing to those who did not understand that? in an eye for an eye, the world would be blind?. We are facing a new kind of cinema, which, frankly, terrifies.

The stellar vehicle that guarantees the showcasing of one of the best actresses in recent times and the peculiar style of an irregular and unpredictable director, converge in a dangerous argument that, by its manipulative development, only ends up convincing to those who did not understand that "an eye for an eye, the world would be blind". Pining the universe conciliator who forge the roswelliano Frank Capra, would be wonderful to think that the reasons that lead to Jodie Foster to embark on dangerous argument, prior review, becomes a star vehicle that guarantees its showcasing are purely professional. Even so, can that the ambitious producer again wrong, almost as much as in the review to do the King and I in 1999. In any case, it seems that the four oscars of Katherine Hepburn would continue without tremble, as many believed to observe the meteoric career of the agent of the FBI in the thriller of Jonathan Demme.Persiguiendo, perhaps, the spirit of Taxi Driver and a finish so surprising as infiltrators, the strange in Ti - benevolent translation of "the brave" -nothing has to do with the film by Martin Scorsese. While this is a "violent director", the violence of his filmography is only understood from the point of view of those who reject. So therefore indicated the difference, the theme of the production that we discussed today, nor us closer to the subgenre of the 1980s in which the streets were filled out of thugs against those who fought a Charles Bronson in full possession of his physical faculties. Titles as I am justice or El Justiciero de la Noche, branded of fascist ideology, mere action shows, lacked manipulative elements which incite to develop empathy in the Viewer. It is there where the dangerousness of the argument created by the Taylor, aimed at justifying the unjustifiable.The veteran writers, moreover, forget the wise words by Joseph l. Mankiewicz, according to which. "The difference between real life and the movies is that a script should be sense and life not". When less is unlikely that, in a city that statistically it is among the safest in the world, one person comes to be in danger of death in three consecutive times during a span of fifteen days. From there, the banalities occur between the sway of shaking cameras, games of lights and a brutally tedious pace, to reach a unexpected resolution against the pillars of democracy. Once again, American society continues to divide the world in "good" and "bad", with more brazenness ever, including the evil in the honest.After a "crash course on New York", Neil Jordan, unpredictable director, must feel like a fish in the water to receive the order. Expert on risky arguments in efectistas deception, never had problems to devise a dignified exit to the acts of violence, nor to show, behind a murderer, there is always one person, any of us as indicated on this occasion. So disappointing filmmaker, also counts with the aggravating circumstance of believing a genius, a kind of Stanley Kubrick in the eternal filming of Clockwork Orange. And, although it is always appreciated personality that some managers show after the cameras; the marked technical influence of "angry youth" and the abundance of flat media English realism of Free Cinema, end up dizzy. All this, of course, emphasizing the physical attributes of the Executive producer, now with a few tired blue eyes frightened, now with talking lips on the radio, now with the evocative touch of a hand. While the secure world we knew is transformed and agoraphobia wins the game to the flashbacks, voice-overs and the acrobatics of the Assembly.It is possible that this unfortunate product is only remembered by the shooting of the aggression suffered by the protagonists, improper lack of elegance of Jordan, more given to the filming of absolutely emetics levels. Again, everything suggests the results of box office, that we are facing a new kind of cinema, which, frankly, terrifies.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3192

José A. Peig

En la ciudad

muchocine

The splendid script allows you to dive into the world of feelings with great versatility, real characters as life itself who at all times follow a development tailored to the millimeter.

Cesc Gay (2003) movie immerses us in a collective soul affected by atomization produced because of internal isolation, self-deception, and fear to reveal the intimate needs of relationship and affection in emotional circumstances. It represents the way of life of the middle class in Barcelona with a group of men and women whose sentimental becoming draws parallel to the time lines occurring differences in the reasons that affect the decisions and viewpoints that enrich the pulse of the narration. A film in which the silences and the thought of the hidden heart behind them has his choral vocals inspired by the everyday reality of today's society. The words lie or say really.The society of the middle classes. The story and the concise display of each scenario puts the emphasis on the uses and customs of a specific social stratum, characterized by the extent and dynamics of social relations held in a conventional and accommodative life mode; work (liberal professions, mainly), sofa, bed, cafes, restaurants and parties. Over all the footage we see characters that, apparently, cannot avoid being prisoners of that flow of conventions which leads them to judge lecturing about the intimate life of others, while continuing to hide own deficiencies. Thus, is a human set wrapped by stability and wealth in the material order, but dysfunctional and vacuum in the aspects of spiritual and personal development. The emotional life is the agonizing palpitation calling loudly for an examination of conscience. Film, therefore, markedly sociological, so frequent in the Spanish cinema, whose thesis does not go beyond a budget of common knowledge nowadays.Well, the splendid script lets dive into this world of feelings with great versatility, real characters as life itself who at all times follow a development tailored to the millimetre, according to a pattern defined from the beginning until the end of the narrative.It is effective to structure the progression of the collective drama based on a succession of sequences showing - of a segmented way - the life of each one of the characters, state until the final scene in which all converge around a round table, moment in which palpitation (tears) of a key character, turn on the feeling that, up to this sceneHe remained disguised. The last shared silence expresses and synthesizes altogether which in the previous development was atomized. A bitter end but also hopeful. Tears are a sign they all recognize, regardless of the specific and idiosyncratic reasons.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1173

Plissken

Más extraño que la ficción

muchocine

The good part of ' Stranger than fiction' is that can be seen perfectly, without offending or bore anyone. The bad part is the simplicity of its main plot and excessive calm with which unfolds all around Harold Crick.

Curious this Marc Forster. In just five years has signed four very different movies as ' Monsters ball' (dense racial drama), 'Finding Neverland' (sweetened biopic), 'Stay' (conventional thriller) and his latest release, ' Stranger than fiction' (tragicomedy absurd-romanticona). And three of them their protagonists (Halle Berry, Johnny Depp and Will Ferrell) in latter have sounded strong as candidate to the oscar (Berry took him). Without doubt, a guy with a talent for the direction of actors, eye for the choice of projects and versatility to adapt to any company.With ' Stranger than fiction', Forster explores familiar ground for all of us thanks to Charlie Kaufman: eccentric characters, absurd situations and reflections on life, destiny and envelope the craft of writing, in particular on the relationship between character and creator, demiurge and creature. Does a character escape the control of his literary father, or each and every one of their actions are given by the imprint it awarded? Or seen from the other side, once it has been created to "someone", what right does the writer to decide for him?Harold Crick is a grey, lonely, without goals in life. One day, a voiceover begins to narrate his every day. It is the beginning of a search, the search for the ultimate purpose of the existence of Crick. Yes, the truth is that synopsis is not worth a damn, but it is that really the main plot can be summarized in that, and for revelations already this trailer (if not have seen you do not, shoots two thirds of film). The originality of the script from Zach Helm is that while we are witnessing the absurd miniepopeya of Harold Crick (effective and sober Will Ferrell), also attended the miseries of the creative process with the parallel story of Kay Eiffel (excellent Emma Thompson), blocked writer. Stories complement each other to create a kind of friendly variant of 'The Truman show', which starts with decision relying on the work of Ferrell and it deflated somewhat to spend the surprise effect, after passing by nice roads in excess (for my taste, eye).The good part of ' Stranger than fiction' is that can be seen perfectly, without offending or bore anyone. Good performances (the main add a fun Dustin Hoffman, Maggie Gyllenhaal a sparkling, something a sosaina Queen Latifah and a past of laps (what rare) Tom Hulce), interesting visual aspect (in charge of his man of trust, Roberto Schaefer), and a curious use of music (from The Clash to Vangelis passing by Maxïmo Park) make up an attractive mix.The bad part is the simplicity of its main plot and excessive calm with which unfolds all around Crick, except fun specific moments. It is missing a greater dramatic tension to help bring the history of the manidas four corners of romántico-fantástica comedy. Perhaps more black humor would have been good.'Stranger than fiction', another enjoyable film by Marc Forster, but nothing you're going to remember here at year's end. a 6'5.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/771

José A. Peig

Los fantasmas de Goya

muchocine

In any case, this film is a good example to be able to distinguish the narration of the Fund alive, ambiguous and subtle envelope which should sustain. And it does not.

The arrogance of the human being and the inquisitorial intransigence are placed in the center of all the historical framework that shows compressed and polished for a rapid consumption in this new film by Milos Forman, another of the great filmmakers who us is now unrecognizable.You can give many hypotheses to try to clarify the reason why Goya was chosen as an excuse to shoot a very trite story about the Spanish Inquisition and the consequences of the Napoleonic invasion. In any case, this film is a good example to be able to distinguish the narration of the Fund alive, ambiguous and subtle envelope which should sustain.And it does not.The story itself, could offer more of what has been, and no doubt the story flows with enough sense of rhythm and progression of events, almost without respite to the Viewer, is moving at breakneck speed. Many are things narrated in 100 minutes, but the content is so hieratic, thick, rugged and devoid of life beyond a few characters that parlotean and go from one side to another, ending by deflate it and become another folletín to use, plagadito of platitudes and shamefully exempted from any hint of subtlety dramatic situations. I.e., this film is a product so flat, so inert, so obvious, so mechanical, that one cannot understand how it is possible to be sponsored by a filmmaker as form and, on top, allowing the luxury of starting its pathetic journey with an evocative musical band that accompanies the suggestive images of the paintings of Goya. It is not narrated history is "dense" or too complicated, it is rather the emptiness generated in the treatment of each of the thematic elements, profiles psychological or ineffective structure aimed at articulating the whole: from the individual drama depicted the characters played by Bardem and Natalie Portman to collective drama, and Goya as liaison and neutral perspective between the two. Disjointed and schematic, the narrative flows into a superfluous and shameful "sampling" of a time and facts represented with such simplicity, both in the text and Visual, that better be saving the time and money it costs to a film entry.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2828

Kiko de España

Patinazo a la gloria

muchocine

Heder and Ferrell are ideals as comic couple and Ben Stiller apporta dollars in producer functions as already did in the film Tenacious D.

My annual appointment with Will Ferrell, Plissken and nosoyrosamariacalaf returns to be a success, as it was with the funny Nights.Como Talladega Ferrell fan club directors could not be happier: Blades of glory is his best movie since Anchorman, and that is too much to say.Chazz Michael Micahels (Ferrell) and Jimmy MacElroy (Heder) are expelled from for life of the competition. but by a gap in the regulation are allowed to compete as a couple.From there, a myriad of spectacular choreographies and the Parrot with the "iron Lotus", one of most cojonudos gags of recent times.Glad to see well surrounded found Ferrell surrounded by CRACKS as Will "Arrested" Arnett, in an excesivísimo role as the archrival Stranz Van Waldenberg, Jenna "office" Fischer, Carig T. "Poltergeist" Nelson or Amy "Arrested also" Poehler. Jon Heder "napoleón" course is up to.Heder and Ferrell are ideals as comic couple and Ben Stiller apporta dollars in producer functions as already did in the film Tenacious DEspectacular, fast and hilarious.Another one of those that I can see on dvd before you reach our cinemas, although the subtitles are yellow...

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/835

José A. Peig

El perfume

muchocine

A great work poetic, so much fun as dramatic, so direct in their aesthetic intentions as ambiguous and multifaceted in its ultimate meaning. Film that is part of a hidden reality and dream.

The perfume is the essence of everything, since there is nothing that is so early as the smell, located in the fragrance that transcends the purely physical beauty and raises her to the altar of poetic and sensual. The perfume upsets because it is a subtle mystery, a carnality so evident that it symbolizes her in his mesmerising Ethereal smoke. There was a boy born of crap every day, which soared above the filthy Plebs who could never rocked with the due motherly aroma. The same social stench becomes reason and weapon to return evil for goodness or kindness despite such evil. If you find your perfume, you find yourself. When the circle closes, you return to the origin, the dirty origin which takes you the final debt. Great story of a Savior resulting in victim of his own humanity.European production directed by German Tom Tykwer, inspired by a known bestseller, we are faced with a purely symbolic film. Their beauty lies - as in a lyric poem or epic - represented history under the fertile look of the metaphorical. It is a unusual fable that gravitates argues in a varied assortment of aesthetic resources that dress with the proper dress of the so-called "poetic function". Once again, substance and form live in harmony with the claims made by their authors.Let us look: the story begins with a birth so terrible that it seems not real; There is no rawness, the way of giving birth it resembles a deposition of feces on top of a garbage dump of rotten fish (located in a physical and social environment of dirt and violence); It is rather a dreamlike nightmare. The creature, always at the Centre of the gaze, survives a first sensory hell, which her heading towards a future of search of the sensual fragrance. Their isolation and social rejection geared their steps toward love that no one can ever give. From that starting point, defined with millimeter precision and an enormous sense of the visual, the central character is defined in his tragedy and their gestures in conflict and need an environment of aromas.Chromatic resources are as important as the development and scenic changes: silver, dark, ochre and Brown in line with the experiential State of the protagonist, and smell always symbolizing their emotional connection with the environment in the first steps of his initiatory journey. The colour scheme is transformed when meets his first love, the first fragrance, the first victim of his need to find identity and meaning to his deprivation. The fragrance turns into obsession, must hold, because it is what lingers after the death of the beloved object. They are the essences, unscented there is life, there is no identity. From this point of the story, predominate more vivid colours, in line with a new State of being. It has found a meaning to his life and travels in search of the essence. Solo on the heights of a monte, discovers its interior when they go away the interference of the obsessive sensory world that enslaves it from abroad. Parable, in any case, the immeasurable interior journey that transcends the external noise. Just find the master fragrance that allows you to control the unconscious and the banality of her fragrant Plebs, hungry of cruelty.Words, just words. Their metaphorical power opens a window of meanings, not because it is so grave as alleged, but yes for being so increadibly playful; under its dramatic and disturbing tone, flutters a laudable sarcastic laugh (see the death of the seller of perfumes portrayed by Dustin Hoffman or the speech of the cardinal against the fearful mob) that often turns into a fierce satire with Kafkianos dyes. In a first leg, we believe to be attending a surreal parable about a social outcast, then we are entering a stage worthy of thriller about a psicokiller. The mixture of genres and textures give the metaphorical game rules. We are before a turbulent allegory that is watching us with very bad milk, but at the time, seems unwilling to take very seriously itself.A toy poetic and rich in flavors, physical and spiritual.All this should add the remarkable setting and historical reenactment, the commissioning scene arrogance, the sober but elegant and precise direction at a time requiring lyrical meaning, and a montage that emphasizes - in a very appropriate way - the obsessive action of his central character around the remaining cast. With regard to the narrative, is appreciated the subtlety that emerges from a crucial omission: never come to know whether the latest victim (which will provide the final drops for the composition of the spellbinding perfume) has been forced or has ceded voluntarily to a necessary sacrifice; the decline in the gesture of violence and subsequent exchange of glances between the beautiful girl and the young collector of fragrances accentuate the ambiguity to open a channel of possible meanings and interpretations, in perfect conjunction with the poetic vein that reinforces the proposed game. However, he sometimes suffers when it comes to combining all the thematic elements and does not have the depth that aims to: may have some confusion in its mixture between the explicit and the implicit metaphorical. What is, ultimately, "The perfume"? Parable of an outcast? Metaphor of a hypocritical society? Ode to an innocent person who is born and dies eaten in a world of wild beasts?. The use of planes slowed at the scene of the massive spell is also questionable, although in this case it seems to be justified by reference to the oneiric. Or, simply, the work than the understanding that now can be a server giving. This has overtones of future masterpiece, applying a more quiet look.Today, regardless of tastes, what cannot be denied is "The perfume" a masterpiece of poetic, so much fun as dramatic, so direct in their aesthetic intentions as ambiguous and multifaceted in its ultimate meaning. Film that is part of a hidden reality and dream.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1048

Ramón Balcells

Superman returns

muchocine

A mediocre blockbuster which for me, has received too many good reviews for what it really is: an adventure without just personality (coming from such director) film seeking entertainment and little else.

I'm not very fan of superheroes, but I have to recognise that both Spider-Man and Superman are those that most attracted me, perhaps because they have more feelings than the others. Today I speak of the second, that small saw in TV series (and something of which one I liked him was how changed in the cabin). In 1978, Richard Donner made to fly for the first time to a man on the big screen with Superman, based on the comic book of Joe Shuster and Jerry Siegel. The result was pretty good, and I think that thanks to part of the originality, the actors: Christopher Reeve, Gene Hackman, Marlon Brando and Glenn Ford. Now, in 2006, we do not have this "repartazo", but yes to Bryan Singer (director of the magnificent usual suspects, although he fails to it or to the bottom of the shoes), which fails the same emotion, the other was a great innovation, but it gives a personal touch, and that note. But Superman Returns, thus is how this new version is called, also has its flaws, and believe that it is essential to discuss them: presents many topics of American films, such as the rescue of Lois and his son on the yacht or many dialogues that seems that you you know of memory. These aspects make much lower the quality of the film, especially because it is less credible. But I must also highlight some virtues that are not typical of this type of production, e.g. the way how account its plan Lex Luthor, several quite innovative camera movements and the spectacular main credit titles. Anyway, as you can see, the film is quite irregular. I alargaré not much, because half of what you could already explain it would (as the argument, for example, which is long, but known).One thing yes I will highlight are the special effects, which as usual in this kind of films, are spectacular, the scene of the rescue of the aircraft, both in the final outcome. Also it has of comenar to the scenes of action are rather limited, although they are brilliantly filmed and long-lasting; the music, which mainly highlights the theme that John Williams composed for the first film; and last but not least, the good, but a little contained performance of Kevin Spacey playing the villain and enemy of Superman, Lex Luthor. Other performances are, the truth very little credible, especially of Brandon Routh as mediocre Superman.Un blockbuster which for me, has received too many good reviews for what it really is: an adventure without just personality (coming from such director) film seeking entertainment and little else.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3585

Ana Belén Pacheco

La Sombra del Reino

muchocine

It has sufficient shrapnel to be a correct and even entertaining thriller of action cinema.

I am highly disappointed by the publicists of the shadow of the Kingdom. Look to one that is very yours decided not to read anything from this film why that takes a considerable delay of release since it was shot because the Americans should consider her the sea of controversial. And how to live in ignorance is bad the only reference were posters of the same show gentlemen (and Mrs) with their submachine guns and face of killing many poor Arabs. And say, cone, one of war, how well, hour and three quarters of war film. And when sales give you wanted to write to the dealership to tell them that at Spain we know to differentiate between the war film and the terrorist. Quote verbatim the synopsis of the production company although I disagree with it: A group of American officers moving to Riyadh to capture the brain from the lethal terrorist attack that cost the lives of several countrymen stationed at Saudi Arabia. The team will have one week to infiltrate and destroy a terrorist cell decided to wage "Jihad" against the Western society.In other words, Americans, I welcome with alegriaaaa. No, nor much less, the Americans are no longer fashion in the East. I have no very clear if they intended to make a film of anti-war dyes, a political pamphlet or send a message but if we are positioned before it as action movie is much more practical and enjoyable as fact that finally offers to part of a couple of philosophical reflections on how bad the war, how bad are terrorists and that both sides believe to have the ultimate of its part truth has sufficient shrapnel for be a correct and even entertaining thriller of action cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/418

Calaf

La joven del agua

muchocine

To relax in the easy chair, open mind, and not raise too many things. Just enjoy the characters and fantasy.

I liked the last of the most famous Hollywood Indian, although I have to say that it is a dangerous movie, of those that does not leave indifferent. Either you like or you will seem ridiculous. It is a fantastic tale you must see wanting to believe.It is not a movie of action, not even fear. It is a tale, strange by where and how it develops, but charming. I understand that may seem a joke, but I will not leave applauded at a rate capable of writing something like this and have the courage to take it to the movies, with the risk involved.So to relax in the easy chair, open mind, and not pose too much. Only to enjoy with the characters and the fantastic (and sometimes absurd) history.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/249

Oscar Cantero

Asterix y los vikingos

muchocine

Great that children enjoy good drawings, and cease to see for a while the esperpénticas series of children exhibitionist and rude coming from Japan

When at beginning of the years sixties appeared "Asterix the Gaul", first comic of this great saga, little could think the parents of the creature (René Goscinny and Albert Uderzo) the adventures of his characters would become a social phenomenon that transcend times, fashions, and ages. Probably not happened by the head these adventures, published in the fledgling magazine Pilote, would end up being carried the screens around the world in cartoons, real image and animation. But the reality is that almost thirty years after the death of the creator, opens the umpteenth adaptation (partial) of one of his comics (Asterix in Normandy). Asterix and the Vikings is another fun animated sitcom in which our protagonists are responsible for making a made man and right of the nephew of the Chief, Gudúrix, which is nothing more than an arrogant boy of low value. The thing is complicated when the mozalbete is kidnapped by the Vikings, it looks where sought an extremely fearful person that teach them to fly, that according to his Mage "fear gives wings". Asterix and Obelix are thrown towards the North in search of his protégé, who while there will be known to the charming Abba with her love. This installment has a greater number of action scenes and length of their nearly eighty minutes wasted good humour, dynamism and fluidity in the dialogues, which gives greater luster to this production franco-danesa. Great movie for children enjoy good drawings always, and cease to see for a while the esperpénticas series of children exhibitionist and rude coming from Japan, and that a national chain has bad taste program on a daily basis, for fear of parents and educators.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/258

Noa

Las colinas tienen ojos

muchocine

An entertaining, with many clichés of the genre well avenidos savagery and an unpleasant outcome

With the heat of the summer, evening parties and other sinful distractions have advanced without want to (avoid) holidays. Although officially I will close temporarily the snack bar next week. Quiet, there will be dinner of farewell and botellón to everyone. Pagais you. That Yes, we stayed in a place surrounded by ethyl zombies, not from each other, and nothing to go to a desert to make grace such as the Carter family. Pleasantly satisfied I am. (I Jane, your Chita). Alexandre Aja is the man of the function. "High voltage" positively surprised me and that I was almost a year looking at the cover of the dvd and returning to put it into its corresponding shelf. Well, sometimes her left behind "The Aviator" that I got closer to the counter. "High voltage" turned out to be a good horror film, with winks and homages to classic titles are essential. The end, many criticize, I do not bother me at all. According to the critical acclaim of the film Hollywood didn't look at Aja, seeing in him the next Carpenter, Craven or Hooper. "The hills have eyes", remake of the 1977 Wes Craven classic is the hope of good horror film.Partly topical and somewhat boring, we know an American family, which included caravan travels through places of the desert inóspitos again Mexico. Someone will convince them to change their route and take a shortcut. In the middle of nowhere will find a human with very bad milk to which will have to deal with a struggle of blood and guts and deformed cannibals.AJA do not skimp on close-ups of pure carnage and a visual dirt infuriating and well done. Obviously it is not suitable for all kinds of audiences, in which not myself, and am part of female gender network (nod without malice). The film is an entertaining, with many clichés of the genre well avenidos savagery and an unpleasant outcome, i.e. well. Despite all the successes of the tape, the plot blunders are also evident although in this type of movies they do not acquire such importance if the result is effective.As a recurring example are the main characters or tasteless figurines, a woodpecker that matter to us. Except for the baby and the dog, doing the best moments of the film, along with the deformed humans and sequences in the radioactive village. There are also things of MacGyver retirao, as some explosion in some caravan or the ability of some to be immortal. Despite everything, I recommend "the hills have eyes" to all lovers of the genre.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/320

Juan Manuel

Cariño, estoy hecho un perro

muchocine

Highly recommended choice for going to the cinema and join the smile of children. Don't worry if this is not the movie you have chosen, leave that their children are that carry you.

Based on a success of real factory 1959 live action Disney comes to our screens a remake of this family comedy. Love'm made a dog, starring Tim Allen, Kristin Davis, Danny Glover and Robert Downey Jr. The film tells the story of a lawyer that absorbed by his work away each time that she wants to and that feels every day abandoned family. This story also is involved a dog of great longevity that accidentally transferred you to the character of Tim Allen, the ability to take his canine form. This is the starting point of a hilarious comedy highly recommended to do with children. The film has all the elements of the family comedy Disney. A father who is no longer in the family wave, and that each day that passes is more and more absent from the small events of the day to day of their family, a mother that is not the way of doing her husband back to the man who fell in love with, and a couple of teenage rebels who arealong with the shift, the trigger for a 180º turn animal have as a result the expected happy ending to which we are accustomed the films of this genre. As it could not be otherwise, a movie Disney self-respecting must have some "bad" they are to rise to the occasion, very evil, nor very edulcorados that if they are to have that Nice and tontorrón touch have the evil Disney characters, therefore a great Robert Downey Jr. assumes the role of the scientist evil itself which is a great actor fluently. The film gives a succession of gags, most of them concerning the film from the first minutes of footage from the film starring Tim Allen, who start out loud, way continued and sustained to an audience that is delivering over its 99 minutes of footage.It is a film designed to stop children imagination with the adventures of a dog friendly, understanding and great parents to find the solution to their difficulties and wool personal during the 99 minute film has us subject to the big screen. Disney characters have a personal approach that make children feel identified with them and which in turn succeed us, adults, connect with a relative ease with children internalized and slept once we went and that during the session he returned to us in contemplation of the smile of the nieces that we filmfor one, or the children of her own to others. A smile that we add almost with neglect because, while these characters are closest to those of the series of "honey, I shrunk the kids", that in the of "Mary Poppins", in addition have a special charm that makes we see the movie with pleasure.Tim Allen as an engine of the great películaEl actor, producer, and writer delivers your best festival of grimaces, gestures and expressions in a sympathetic interpretation direct heiress of best gestural humor of the silent film era. He bears much of the weight of a film that has one of its best moments in the appearances of the great actor. Especially noted are the scenes in court. There is where Allen offers a recital of gestures and expressions with which large and small break out laughing during the viewing of the film. Let us not lose sight a nice Chase in which the actor, literally running on all fours, stars in a persecution of the purest Disney style, with gardens full of people watering their plants, people always through impeding the persecution and a final auction that does not disappoint.In short and as a whole; "I love am made a dog" is a highly recommended choice for going to the cinema and join the smile of children. Don't worry if this is not the movie you have chosen, leave that their children are that carry you. The film will win you and you will see its rictus is relaxed and in a few minutes you are dominated by the smile and laughter enjoying almost equal to the smallest room.Word of one which already went through that.Until the next.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/962

José A. Peig

La joven del agua

muchocine

M. Night Shyamalan gets naked to show us their fantasies and their intellectual cowardice in this new fairy tale, the most straightforward and honest of how many they had filmed to date.

D. Night Shyamalan gets naked to show us their fantasies and their intellectual cowardice in this new fairy tale, the most straightforward and honest of how many they had filmed to date. And this time there is no trap. It is not a dramatic trick to confuse the viewer at the time that history gives the dazzling turn to us into a fabric of metaphors and philosophical, anthropological and sociological reflections, as in the case of "The forest". After the titles of the home, shows us that we are entering the realm of myth and the enchanting, not leaving the Viewer no choice but to the of lull in the armchair as an innocent child willing to believe the fairy tale, emulating one of the scenes in which the brilliant Paul Giamatti strives for transfigurar his nervous and insecure pose in the image of a child's cradle in the presence of the Narrator. And that is the only way to enjoy the film. All part of the myth of the nymph of the waters, creatures from another world that ensure the inspiration of humanity unless it is turned, came the wars, inequalities and struggles between social classes. The world, in short, lost its communication with the magic and enchantment, with innocence. and men knew not to listen to the wisdom that sprang from the depths. It is like the myth of the golden age in which humanity lived in harmony get same and with the elements of nature. The significance was lost, thus. Shyamalan camera introduces us to the real and current world from a dark corner that pounces Mr Cleveland, the protagonist of the story, to end the life of a bug that frightens residents. Cleveland is the Regent of a block of apartments, stuttering, something aseptic and disoriented, lives between his solitude and chores with their tenants, all of them with some "tick" of personality: a boy who wants to be special to increase the muscular mass of only one half of his body, a pedantic and deadpan film critic, an old silent it passes the time watching TV sitting on the coucha group of jipis, a retired writer and an essayist with great pretensions. All have claims to be something special, do not know, but are about to embark on a mission to save humanity. They are the synthesis of a routine world, a micro universe of beings and views that flutter around a blue central point: the swimming pool, the omega point from which will emerge the extraordinary, the fairy with a face of porcelain doll who will come to give meaning to the lives of all of them. Who can doubt that this is a story about how the routine and the disenchantment of everyday life is going shedding with a progressive leap of faith in a tale of old on sea creatures who come to the world to redeem it and restore harmony, this chimera of collective consciousness, believing that first and foremost was idyllic and that if he stopped being what was for a purpose and following the guidelines of a universal plan that us? It will guide everyone toward a new world?. He is God and the faith that Shyamalan tries to dissect pulse of fantasy and micro costumbrista drama, picking up the current state of fear in a troubled world. Not in vain, there are occasions in which shows us the TV on in the homes of the residents of the apartment block - which is almost only scenario of the narration - constantly repetitive broadcast images of the war of Iraq. At another time, one of the protagonists, says plainly something like: "originality is nonexistent in today's world". And clear, Shyamalan rubs hands doing his peliculón, a waste of megalomania very full of pretensions. Nothing new, on the other hand, coming from the author of "Signs" and "The forest". As it is advancing the history, magic is taking shape real and palpable, at least in the mind of Cleveland and the Group of dreamers who walk in search of faith in something of a transcendental sense to their lives. One of them has the real singer voice, a político-sociológico writer of trials of nature which, according to the vision of the fairy of water, has written a book in the hands of a future leader (a preacher for a new was, go) will promote a change of planetary proportions, the return to the golden age. There is a prophet, a group of brothers, a guardian who doblegará evil creatures that threaten the life of the fairy. Cleveland gets seduced by the dream and seeks a correspondence in the real world for all the iconographic elements of what should not be more than a fiction for children from cradle. Need the existence of such correspondence to make possible the salvation of the fairy and for the redemption of humanity begins its first cycle. Everything is an act of faith. Thus it often happens, probably provided that a humans embarks on a dream. And this is, according to my sensitivity, the most heart-rending aspect of the film: beats a deep anxiety to the reality of a world on the eve of the Apocalypse. Rather, beats a wrenching fear at the possibility that everything is a fantasy to escape the harsh reality. There is, accordingly, a desperate to believe in magic, in the gods, beings higher in the designs of the universe planned by "energy" and "forces" that we like to think that we do not understand, but, somehow, and everything it to maintain hope, should exist. Not because it comes from the hand of reason and logic, but simply because we need to believe. It is pathological to search "signals" in the vision of the boxes of cereal on the shelf in the kitchen or a crossword puzzle of a weekly magazine. It may be excessive, but Indian filmmaker shows it us openly and let soften in the wonderful sequence in which Cleveland and yours surround the affirmer girl of water, between skepticism and hope, while Cleveland embraces her in tears of pain. The only hope to your pain is the faith in the resurrection of the girl (to what sounds to me this?). It is the sign that he needs. Definitely, d. Night Shyamalan is crazy by his audacity and desparpajo. A round of applause for his daring creativity, but something squeaking in this platform antropológico-religioso - Mystic (takes longer!) brings between hands. I have to say that "The young of the water", at first glance, I liked less than "Signs" and "The forest". Those two were a good balance between claim to entertain and do think the Viewer. It dominated, perhaps too much, philosophical and other, claims making it less fun than his previous works ("The protected" not speak because I have not yet seen). Yes, I love the multitude of subliminal messages behind during the footage I love that Shyamalan is a mystical filmmaker, but I also prefer the impression of excess verbiage and, perhaps, having missed a little more than lyricism and mystery around the young protagonist, what is said deeper into your profile to be mythological, but without falling into too many hermetismos. More dangerous and controversial of all is the intellectual cowardice of the speech: everything is in the hands of the belief in beings and supernatural things. Shyamalan does not support the reality and wants the world to reach the good through the intervention of the magic, the superstitious thought and other entelequías of the New Age have become part of the culture of masses as a reaction to the chaos and the post-modern loss of values. While in "The forest" we tackle the reality descabezando myths and facing the civilization in the hope placed in the goodness of the human being, everything is in the hands of fanciful hopes. Therefore, notwithstanding, this it is a pure and simple fairy tale, and as such must be assessed it. But at this point we encounter the great flaw of the film; a story about fantasy elements that slip in a world everyday and boring can be counted, but what we cannot do is ignore the dramatic sense that, in such circumstances, provided the line that separates the real from the imaginary and fantastic, normal of exceptional, and signaling, and the effort of the characters to cross that line. Shyamalan does not use this mixture for an emotional inciático trip in which characters can take the decision to believe in wonderful, what is beyond the limit of the real, but that it melts everything, hastily, in a same texture of elements. This stripping emotion and drama to a story that aims to be full of humanity and need to dream. Therefore, the result is both cold and history does not procure the lyrical and emotional intensity that suggests the story. On their behalf I highlight that, as I said at the beginning, there are no trap or dramatic twist that makes Squeak the plot, already from the beginning you know that you you will enter a world of fantasy in order to test the faith of the protagonists of flesh and blood. On the other hand, the film is intended to be tender and sensitive, and indeed succeeds without ever falling into the kitsch. The narrative brilliance of Shyamalan remains in force and demonstrates, despite comic books themselves, are nonsense because only he is them believed be weaving, knows moving in the ground with their own fears and fantasies. "Girl with the water" is the least commercial of his films, and for this reason will be - being already - hard de both by the public and the critics. For something is the most misunderstood filmmaker today.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2085

Rafa Ferrer

TMNT: Las tortugas ninja

muchocine

In the USA it has worked quite well at the box office, being the most-watched tape for 1 week and staying for 3 weeks in the top 10 most-watched tapes.

In 1987, with only 11 years old of age, I faced for the first time to go to the movies out of my neighborhood (Aluche), we had to beg, and almost get on his knees so both a teammate of my then class as me, leave us one rainy Saturday afternoon, attend a cinema in the Centre of Madrid (now-extinct Madrid cinema) (no adult) to see the first ninja turtles film, or saying that you being a tender infante, the tape shocked me, and got those animals green, with whom shared name (well, with one of them), formed along with other tapes a part of my childhood, these great marionestas created by the late Jim Henson.Hoy, 20 years after the first "tortugil" Premiere, we turn to see the facesThis time the TMNT CGI, are made so beautiful with last generation computers, showing both the hairs of the rat Splinter (endearing character ever there), as the skin of turtles in a really surprising way, shame that humans who appear in the film are not so well achieved, since they seem simpler characters in comicthat people real; then pointing the first both negative to this revisitación of a myth of the childhood of many thirtysomethings, among whom I am.Logically, and to 20 years ago, the tape is aimed at children, is why it lacks of violence (and that promised otherwise) and his humor sometimes becomes quite shabby, but there are somewhat confusing moments that will leave the munchkins with poker face. Of course one has to raise in advance with what you see, and without have a fairly broad critical spirit, give a few small drops of confidence to what we see on screen, go, leaving the brain in off, without asking too many questions.On the other hand, the set of voices in V.O. is more diverse, featuring, among others, Sarah Michelle Gellar as April, Chris Evans as Casey Jones, the Eastern actor Zang Ziyi as Splinter, as well as the "mutant" Patrick Stewart, as the villain role and initial tape Narrator; in its Spanish version the usual actors voices will be respected so that we won't have to endure any stupid "question famosillo" putting voice to any animated character.Something that I not come to convince too is abuse of flat air and rooftops, over and over again (repetitive, by Jove!) and that he intends to turn its hue but more comiquera, we should not forget that the turtles were first comic before its passage to celluloid.On the other hand, found it me particularly significant, the introduction/presentation of the main characters (Leonardo, Donatello, Miguelangelo and Raphael.), as well as the clarity of movements in the fight scenes, clearer, for example in "Spiderman 3" where it was impossible to know who did what.Its Score, composed by the already famous musician, Klaus Badelt (author of the fanfare of "Pirates of the Caribbean"), composed a careful selection of cuts heróicos, accompanying the development of the action you see on screen, giving a sound elegant and at the same time perfect in his aplitud way soverbia.In USA it has worked quite well at the box office, being the most-watched tape for 1 week and staying for 3 weeks in the top 10 most-watched tapes, grossing so far, insignificant nothing figure of the green currency (dollar) 53.000.000. do for what almost always animation and child go hand in hand? More than once I had to say without shame that, even at my age, I still like the films of "Drawings".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/762

Daniel Galindo

La matanza de Texas: el origen

muchocine

Suitable only for the very fans of the horror genre, he played with the adrenaline while we already know how this will end the thing.

Here we have the classical family of the profound America which shows United around a group of boys who cut, thus celebrating the festive spirit of a common sentiment.Action us back until the year 1969. Between dreamy images which will result in a kind of discouraging Mirage, the film raises a walk by macabre deductions and nothing clean murders. It reveals as an exercise in synthesis on the origins of one of the most acclaimed and feared film legends.This story marks the approach of which was narrated recently on the occasion of the revision of the classic Texas Chainsaw Massacre. A film whose main purpose is the responses and not be misleading with regard to its principles. It is why what you applaud its director, by not betraying the spirit of a kind of cinema that has many followers, especially adolescents, and is most commonly consumed between ranging one weekend night.As film product is not surprising: the realization is intended to highlight the isolation in a rural landscape with roads semi-deserted and suspicious characters that encourage even more uncertain clashes. The parade of viscera, members separated from their bodies and blood flowing unchecked can be more weary that annoying, following the footsteps of recent as Saw, Hostel, Creep titles. An example of the counterattack? gore? West to East sustitos cinema.And although we never thought that we could say, is missing the always questionable and peculiar sense of humor of a genus whose maximum contribution to society is the allow that many young people arrimen each other, not going to be that it comes from the mask.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/316

Ibán Manzano

Cars

muchocine

Unable to reconcile at one common point the overwhelming visual Bill of their careers, twists and loops with the single, not simplistic, design production of his charismatic characters

In his brief but successful filmography, Pixar has achieved a complex balance between the animated nostalgia and new techniques by computer. That is, first of all, where paradoxically fails based his most ambitious film and adult, Cars. Probably for being unable to reconcile in a common point the overwhelming invoice visual of their careers, twists and loops with the single, not simplistic, design production of his charismatic characters. An obvious error for a film that, in fact, seems ashamed of herself because you cannot find or do not want to find, an only argument that defends speech that so vehemently proposes: the nostalgic look at the street mother of America, already not only remember, but also recover the way of life that involved the mythical route 66Cars is thereforean indulgent film fails to sublimate their initial material which but, on the other hand, pulls catalogue Pixar; IE representative characters, double readings and height gags scattered so desarticulada as excessive plot. Cars, that manages to shine intermittently, is placed on the edge of the cartoon and only happens to resort to his impeccable visual pyrotechnics to disguise their flaws, but unfortunately rather it underscores them.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2381

Oscar Cantero

El juicio de Nuremberg

muchocine

A palpable demonstration that any item, rugged as it is, can be treated with elegance and serenity., and in which Stanley Kramer directed a cast imprensionante and certainly unique.

There are films that are unable to make any impression; others, who impressed when they see; and there is a third small group of films that impact since that reads the cast. And precisely to him belongs the judgement of Nuremberg (winners or losers?). This claim, which might seem exaggerated in principle if not referred to the cast, transforms into logic when names appear as Spencer Tracy, Burt Lancaster, Richard Widmark, Maximilian Schell, Marlene Dietrich, Montgomery Clift and Judy Garland (there is that).The film, which as one can assume tells processes judged the scarce Nazi heads who survived or were arrested after the war, was made in 1961, 16 years after the end of the war, and therefore with a sediment of calm that the pain and anger had not allowed to have before.With some characterizations and some magnificent performances, the film goes beyond the easy criticism to the losers of the war and its atrocities, and delves into the personality and feelings of an ancient German judge who is being judged for his performance during the regime and the war. Interactions with the judge (the unforgettable Spencer Tracy), and this with the character played by Marlene Dietrich, make up a huge quality product and whose extensive footage, arriving in three hours, is passed in a sigh.The delicacy in the account of the facts, treating them firmly but without ruggedness, is no doubt merit Stanley Kramer and Abby Mann, director and screenwriter, respectively.Winners or losers is a film without fanfare technical, not needed by another party, in which the weight of the argument rests on the dialogues, and where once more, have great weight body language and the use of the close-ups and silences.All these virtues made her worthy of several nominations for the Academy, of which two of them fructicaron; one in the person of Maximilian Schell, as best actor for a performance full of force and intensive, and another for best adapted screenplay.A wonder that no one should not see; either for purely cinematic reasons, or by the simple fact of knowing a story that isn't so far away or is as unique as it might seem to the recent generations.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/372

Jose Contreras

United 93

muchocine

The movie doesn't play with the possible outcomes, but full of uneasiness when it tells the amount of incidents that could have aborted the plot.

The Spielberg film represents just the opposite that the Greengrass. Spielberg authored much easier to praise because it leaves its mark on everything it touches. Its vocation is to manipulate. When speaking of Jews makes it clear his political message, and when speaking of dolls who speak or immigrants heróicos you know any excuse is valid to provoke an emotion.There are who admires this type of copyright because it makes a difficult job. This type of Viewer may not appreciate what makes Greengrass. Its work is reduced to strip a few facts of any rhetorical element of everything that can affect us. The style of the film is thoroughly behaviorist, we know nothing of any character except what he said or what he did at the time of the accident. The Viewer is free to sympathize with terrorists or with the flight attendants. Everything you see are made.Nobody is going to go see "United 93" without knowing the end. The movie doesn't play with the possible outcomes, but full of uneasiness when it tells the amount of incidents that could have aborted the plot.Although it seems a neglected film has a profound work. The author has chosen a space of time in which things could have changed. You have chosen a camera on his shoulder that moves as a look. You have chosen voices and characters that don't behave to rise to the occasion because none knows that he is taking part in a historic moment. The heroes do not have time to do great phrases, drivers do not know where are the aircraft although you can see burn the towers with their eyes. The only one who knows too much is the Viewer.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2849

Ramón Besonias

Mr Brooks

muchocine

Much Jekyll and Hyde little. Only transgressing the complacent correction in which sits the genre we had perhaps been able to enjoy one history more than usual. Again will be.

In an attempt to be disturbing, the archetypal actor of honesty American - as it was in its day James Stewart or Gary Cooper - Mr. Costner, is pulled to the mud and strives seem credible representing without great force (with the expressive restraint that characterizes him) the thousandfold emulated the unfolded or more literary murderer, Dr. Jekyll character. And making the dark replica of Mr. Hyde we have the always prodigious William Hurt, which absorbs the attempts of good Costner by seem very bad in every scene. At the end we soon see how nesesariamente this actor works best lover, father or husband as tanning officer of murder.The same head, Bruce A signed script. Evans, a rookie filmmaker, trained as a writer of texts of mediocre movies such as account with me or Starman. However, we can say that Mr. Brooks is his best screenplay to date. This helps a sunset in austere scene (thankless debt of good make the Coens in easy blood or Fargo) and a leisurely pace that work effectively for all genre of killers fan might expect without asking an elm tree pears.However, despite their goodwill, Mr. Brooks was soon opts for standardize dualism disturbing character into resabidos territories of the genre, where the family stays pristine despite the murky basement that sits. The proposal would even have been refreshing if this personal universe of the murderer would have drawn by transverse lines of elusive definition, and not that clear resolution even with that final innocent just saving the set.In fact, at the end of the projection the viewer has that feeling of déjà vu as widespread in these years in products of the thriller genre with intelligent murderer. Only transgressing the complacent correction in which sits the genre we had perhaps been able to enjoy one history more than usual. Again will be.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3874

Heitor Pan

La gran aventura de Pee-Wee

muchocine

The plot was true roll Burton, a flamboyant character, surreal scenes and an adventure very out of the ordinary, but what was obviously a film commissioned for the showcasing of a comedian.

Go disaster (eye am not even speaking of the film, but it would be a good start). I open a special on one of my fetish directors and it is that takes me a month to the first review. There was no possible excuse, so yesterday, with some enthusiasm, we sat down to see the directorial debut of the great Tim Burton, a commissioned film entitled "The Pee-Wee's big adventure", the only Director that I remained to be seen. It wasn't long until we wonder if we would have not wrong film. You might have never thought that 90 minutes of Burton could do endless.It ran in 1984 and Tim Burton, with 26 years, had begun to sound in the film scene after the short films "Vincent" and "Frankenweenie". At the same time, a comedian named Paul Reubens, triumphant on television with a unique comic character named as Pee-Wee Herman and Warner Brothers wanted to launch actor and character to the big screen. "Frankenweenie" reached the hands of Reubens, which didn't offer the address of the Burton.La film plot was true roll Burton, a flamboyant character, surreal scenes and an adventure very out of the ordinary, but what was obviously a film commissioned for the showcasing of the comedian, therefore that Tim Burton could introduce was limited to very few scenes with his particular aesthetic.The plot revolves around the character of Pee-Wee Herman, a neuter type of childish voice, behaviour extravagant and egocentric, always dressed in a gray suit and Red bow tie. A sort of cross between Mr. Bean and Chiquito la Calzada. This character will be involved in an adventure full of flat and stereotyped characters in search of its most precious asset, a tacky very tuned red bicycle.From the first frame to the last, we are flooded by excessive personality of the character, so if after the first five gags, so you've already begun to hate, as I did to me, just wanting to not only that Pee-Wee can't find his bicycle, but that ends up dying with pains at some point in its search. can find something in the universe of Burton in this shed? Then some another stroke. Some surreal detail as a window overlooking a fish tank, some pumpkin of Halloween, a surrealist dream with scenarios that evoke the world of the dead in "Beetlejuice" or a scene from Ghost with a host which becomes for brief moment a character of his personal imagery. Too bad that these details are not sufficient to lift one of the worst movies I have ever seen.The only salvageable part of the movie, apart from these two or three scenes, is the soundtrack, which was the first of a long collaboration between Burton and Danny Elfman, just broken in one of his films to date. Burton was a fan of the group by Elfman, Oingo Boing Band, so he convinced the Studio to risk with music. Elfman and Burton sintonizaron from the first moment and the composer would be linked, from then on, the world of cinema, with his particular style of music.Interestingly, the director does not have my dire vision of the result. According to his words, when referring to the poor reviews that came out after the premiere: "Came out in many lists of the worst films of the year." It's funny, but I see the movie and does not seem so bad. I love it. It may have some weak moments, but it isn't so bad. "It was pretty devastating, I had never spent that." Burton is an undemanding spectator (and the truth is that neither I, nor those who know me consider me too picky) or it is difficult to do with objectivity a work, which seems very normal.It is fortunate that after this offer you the opportunity to direct a film more personal, because but, today, can not be writing in this special.