pinnbench / MANIFEST.md
EvalData's picture
Initial benchmark release: 1,539 logged runs + Croissant metadata + claim manifest
bd14b51 verified

Claim-to-Artifact Manifest

All paths below are repo-root-relative.

  • Long-form technical report: docs/paper_combined/main.tex
  • NeurIPS 9-page main-track submission: docs/paper_neurips/main.tex (when present; see docs/paper_neurips/ for the packaged submission)

Numeric headline audit: docs/paper_combined/CLAIM_INVENTORY.md.

Section 5: Does Hybridization Help?

Claim Artifact (repo-root-relative) Regeneration
Hybrid vs PINN-only (Heat1D d=-8.3, Wave2D d=-3.6) experiments/results/rq3_10seed/results.json, experiments/results/rq4_10seed/results.json experiments/scripts/rq3_model_comparison.py, experiments/scripts/rq4_wave2d_model_comparison.py
KdV hybrid (d=-0.38), AllenCahn (d=-3.12) experiments/results/rq1e_kdv_10seed/results.json, experiments/results/rq1f_allencahn_10seed/results.json experiments/scripts/rq1e_kdv_hybrid.py, experiments/scripts/rq1f_allencahn_hybrid.py
PINO comparison (2 PDEs) experiments/results/rq_pino_heat1d_10seed/results.json, experiments/results/rq_pino_advdiff/results.json experiments/scripts/rq_pino_comparison.py, experiments/scripts/rq_pino_advdiff.py
OOD evaluation (coefficient, domain, IC/domain shifts) experiments/results/rq6_ood/results.json, experiments/results/rq6_ood_heat1d/results.json, experiments/results/rq6_ood_advdiff/results.json, experiments/results/rq6b_ood_domain/results.json, experiments/results/rq6c_ood_ic_shift/results.json experiments/scripts/rq6_ood_*.py
HyPINO official native-suite smoke (context only; not same-PDE head-to-head) experiments/results/paper_combined/hypino_official_eval/results.txt experiments/scripts/paper_combined/evaluate_hypino_official.py
HyPINO zero-shot Heat1D adapter smoke (compatibility only; not same-budget baseline) experiments/results/paper_combined/hypino_heat1d_adapter/results.json experiments/scripts/paper_combined/evaluate_hypino_heat1d_adapter.py
HyPINO target-PINN adaptation probe (Heat1D + AdvDiff1D, 500 Adam steps, 3 seeds) experiments/results/paper_combined/hypino_adaptation_2pde/results.json experiments/scripts/paper_combined/finetune_hypino_heat1d.py, experiments/scripts/paper_combined/finetune_hypino_advdiff1d.py, experiments/scripts/paper_combined/aggregate_external_probes.py
PINNacle executable subset smoke (Burgers1D/Wave1D/Poisson1D/Helmholtz2D/Heat2D-Multiscale, 200 iterations each) experiments/results/paper_combined/pinnacle_subset_5task/results.json experiments/scripts/paper_combined/run_pinnacle_subset.py, experiments/scripts/paper_combined/aggregate_external_probes.py
No-dominance (13 PDEs) experiments/results/paper_combined/routing_evaluation/results.json experiments/scripts/paper_a_routing/run_policy_suite.py

Section 6: Does Causal Loss Help?

Claim Artifact (repo-root-relative) Regeneration
2x2 stage ablation (9 PDEs, 360 runs) experiments/results/paper_combined/stage_ablation/*.json experiments/scripts/paper_c_causal/stage_ablation.py
Statistical tests (BH-FDR, 27 tests) experiments/results/paper_combined/statistical_tests.json experiments/scripts/statistical_analysis.py
Gradient flow (cos~1.0, 4 PDEs) experiments/results/paper_c/gradient_flow_*/gradient_flow_results.json experiments/scripts/paper_c_causal/gradient_flow_analysis.py
Temporal error (ratio 0.98-672x) experiments/results/paper_c/temporal_error_analysis/results.json experiments/scripts/paper_c_causal/temporal_error_analysis.py
Causal weight collapse experiments/results/paper_combined/adaptive_epsilon/results.json experiments/scripts/paper_combined/test_adaptive_epsilon.py
Wang-style single-stage causal comparison (4 PDEs) experiments/results/paper_combined/wang_comparison/*_results.json experiments/scripts/paper_c_causal/wang_comparison.py
Adaptive epsilon mitigation experiments/results/paper_combined/adaptive_epsilon/results.json experiments/scripts/paper_combined/test_adaptive_epsilon.py

Section 7: Physics Weight Tradeoff

Claim Artifact (repo-root-relative) Regeneration
Wave2D lambda sweep (5 values) experiments/results/rq5_wave2d_lambda_sweep/results.json experiments/scripts/rq5_wave2d_lambda_sweep.py
Burgers1D lambda sweep experiments/results/rq2b/results.json experiments/scripts/rq2b_burgers_lambda_sweep.py

Section 8: Policy Selection from Early Dynamics

Claim Artifact (repo-root-relative) Regeneration
Routing evaluation (13 PDEs, 450 runs) experiments/results/paper_combined/routing_evaluation/results.json experiments/scripts/paper_a_routing/evaluate_routing_full.py
Scaling analysis (5→9→13 PDEs) experiments/results/paper_combined/routing_evaluation/scaling_ablation.json experiments/scripts/paper_a_routing/scaling_and_ablation.py
Feature ablation (nested CV) experiments/results/paper_combined/routing_evaluation/scaling_ablation.json Same script (Part 2)
Diagnostic bound (33/52 = 63.5% overall; 33/39 = 84.6% for k ∈ {10,50,100}; universal failure at k=20; fails on Burgers1D and Burgers1D-lownu at every defined k) experiments/results/paper_combined/routing_evaluation/regret_bound_validation.json experiments/scripts/paper_combined/validate_regret_bound.py
Meta-router (GBR+PDE and RF+PDE-top5: 84.6%, 11/13 held-out PDEs; full RF+PDE: 61.5%) experiments/results/paper_combined/meta_router/results.json experiments/scripts/paper_combined/evaluate_meta_router.py
Held-out generalization (3 PDEs) experiments/results/paper_combined/routing_evaluation/holdout.json experiments/scripts/paper_a_routing/holdout_validation.py
Family-macro accuracy (LOPO aggregated by 8 families): physics-final 81.2% / GBR 68.8% / RF 54.2% / Ridge 45.8% experiments/results/paper_combined/routing_evaluation/results.json experiments/scripts/paper_a_routing/family_holdout_analysis.py
Bandit comparison (SH, LinUCB) experiments/results/paper_a/bandit_evaluation/results.json experiments/scripts/paper_a_routing/evaluate_bandits.py
Accuracy-regret dissociation (77x) experiments/results/paper_combined/routing_evaluation/results.json + experiments/results/rq_early_predictor_l2/results.json experiments/scripts/paper_a_routing/evaluate_routing_full.py

Figures

All figure sources live under docs/paper_combined/figures/ (repo-root-relative).

Figure Regeneration
fig_no_dominance.pdf experiments/scripts/paper_a_routing/generate_figures.py
fig_routing_accuracy.pdf Same
fig_feature_importance.pdf Same
fig_budget_savings.pdf Same
fig_scaling.pdf experiments/scripts/paper_a_routing/scaling_and_ablation.py
fig_feature_ablation.pdf Same
fig_dissociation.pdf experiments/scripts/paper_a_routing/generate_dissociation_fig.py
fig_ntk_proxy.pdf experiments/scripts/paper_a_routing/ntk_proxy_analysis.py
fig_regret_bound.pdf experiments/scripts/paper_combined/validate_regret_bound.py
fig_stage_ablation_heatmap.pdf experiments/scripts/paper_c_causal/generate_figures.py
fig_pretrain_effect.pdf Same
fig_interaction_plot.pdf Same
fig_runtime_tradeoff.pdf Same
fig_gradient_alignment.pdf experiments/scripts/paper_c_causal/gradient_flow_analysis.py
fig_gradient_combined.pdf experiments/scripts/paper_c_causal/generate_combined_gradient_fig.py
fig_causal_weights.pdf experiments/scripts/paper_c_causal/causal_weight_evolution.py
fig_temporal_error.pdf experiments/scripts/paper_c_causal/temporal_error_analysis.py
fig_epsilon_trajectories.pdf experiments/scripts/paper_combined/test_adaptive_epsilon.py
fig_weight_collapse.pdf Same

Table generation provenance (hand-curated vs auto-generated)

The paper_combined manuscript contains roughly twenty tables. Their provenance with respect to the released JSON artifacts is as follows.

  • Auto-generated (from JSON via experiments/scripts/generate_paper_tables.py or experiments/scripts/statistical_analysis.py): tab:stats-core statistics rows, tab:causal-ablation per-PDE effect rows, and the raw fragments in experiments/analysis/paper_tables.tex and experiments/analysis/statistical_tests.md.
  • Hand-curated from JSON numeric values (values copy-pasted from the corresponding results.json; verified in CLAIM_INVENTORY.md and by scripts/verify_claims.py): tab:routing, tab:meta_router, tab:feature-importance, tab:scaling, tab:bestpolicy, tab:lopo-family, tab:adaptive-epsilon, OOD taxonomy table, Wang single-stage comparison table, HyPINO adaptation table, and the PINNacle subset table.

Hand-curated tables intentionally remain hand-curated for this submission: the values match the inventory, each row cites a specific artifact path, and a combined-paper-wide table generator is deferred (out of scope for the reject-risk reduction pass). Any future numeric change must be reflected simultaneously in the JSON artifact, the paper table, and CLAIM_INVENTORY.md.

Notes on scope (per REVISION.md)

  • All experiments are in the synthetic exact-solution regime; Stage 1 supervised data comes from analytical solutions. No claim is made about noisy, sparse, or real-measurement regimes.
  • External baselines (HyPINO, PINNacle, Wang-style causal, adaptive weighting) are contextual positioning except for the internal PINO comparison (Heat1D + AdvDiff1D) and the Wang-style 4-PDE probe, which are direct same-pipeline probes but not broad head-to-head reproductions.
  • The routing suite is 13 PDE configurations across 8 families; results are conditioned on that composition.
  • pinn_only denotes the PINN backbone under the same supervised-data access as the hybrid, not a standard data-free PINN. It isolates architecture, not data regime.