Datasets:

LawInformedAI

/

overruling

like 0

Follow

LawInformedAI 25

the following is a partial listing of the cases which are overruled insofar as they hold an expert witness cannot testify as to bodily position at the time of a homicide:

we approve the decision of the court below and disapprove mayberry v. state, 561 so.2d 1201 (fla. 2d dca 1990), to the extent it conflicts herewith.

we overrule taylor v. knox county board of education, 292 ky. 767, 167 s.w.2d 700 (1942), and board of education of rockcastle county v. kirby, 926 s.w.2d 455 (ky. 1996), to the extent that they hold that krs 161.310 provides a waiver of a board of education's governmental immunity.

more recently, in williams, the reviewing court also held that no conflict exists between section 115-4.1(g) and supreme court rule 606(b).

however, the extent and effect of that autonomy remains in dispute, particularly in light of the other ways in which dha was in control of simpkins' work and employment.

see n.c. gen. stat. 7b-201(a) (2017); see also n.c. gen. stat. 7b-1000(b) (""in any case where the court finds the juvenile to be . . . dependent, the jurisdiction of the court to modify any order or disposition made in the case shall continue during the minority of the juvenile, until terminated by order of the court, or until the juvenile is otherwise emancipated.""). respondent-father was and is free to file a motion in the cause to modify the conditions of his visitation with diana.

therefore, to the extent that our decision in maise conflicts with our holding in the case before us, maise is overruled.

the contrary holding in konstantinidis v. the s.s. tarsus, 196 f. supp. 433 (e.d.n.y. 1961), is disapproved, as are similar intimations in miravalles compania naviera, s.s. v. nissho co., 207 f. supp. 716 (e.d.n.y. 1962) and ships freights inc. v. farr, whitlock co.

accordingly, flowal, ramirez, strayhorn and all other cases before this circuit in which we have held that apprendi applies to mandatory minimum sentences, are overruled to the extent they conflict with harris and this opinion.

we now adopt the rule tentatively ascribed to us by the prestin court, and disapprove the holdings in richard v. degen brody, inc., supra, 181 cal.app.2d 289 and hamilton v. dixon.

47 although defendant likens the testimony at his trial to that of people v. sample, 326 ill. app. 3d 914 (2001), we disagree.

however, we acknowledge that during his testimony, james denied sending the text messages.

this rule is a by product of the hands-on approach to reviewing jewell cases we eschew today and does not survive our opinion.

we disapprove of people v. aris, supra, 215 cal.app.3d 1178, and people v. day, supra, 2 cal.app.4th 405, to the extent they are inconsistent with this conclusion.

we therefore overrule mcgore; and we hold, like every other circuit to have reached the issue, that under rule 15(a) a district court can allow a plaintiff to amend his complaint even when the complaint is subject to dismissal under the plra.

filed, which appears to hold to the contrary, is hereby overruled.

however, standing, a component of a court's subject-matter jurisdiction, cannot be conceded or waived.

we disapprove that decision to the extent it implies that parties to all dissolution proceedings involving minor children have an absolute privacy right to seal the file.

in state v. berber, 48 wash. app. 583, 584-85 (wash.

to the extent that other cases have cited carr for the proposition that a conviction under section 245(a)(2) does not involve moral turpitude, those cases, too, are overruled in that limited way.

finally, howell asserts allowing evidence of extraneous offenses violated texas rules of evidence 401, 402, 403, and 404(b).

it apply describes our action in these appeals as we overrule our prior holding in in re natta, 388 f.2d 215 (3d cir. 1968), which erroneously gave a broad interpretation to 35 u.s.c. 24 (1952).

accordingly, in brown, the court expressly limited the scope of estrada: ""estrada is today properly understood, not as weakening or modifying the default rule of prospective operation codified in section 3, but rather as informing the rule's application in a specific context by articulating the reasonable presumption that a legislative act mitigating the punishment for a particular criminal offense is intended to apply to all nonfinal judgments.""

the intermediate court fell into error by following previous precedents of its own court, colbert v. mike-baker brick company, 326 so.2d 900 (la.app. 3d cir. 1976) and becker v. choate, 204 so.2d 680 (la.app. 3d cir. 1967), which had erroneously overlooked the legislative overruling of the decisions upon which they were based.

the court also offered no explanation for imposing the particular sentence it chose.

id. at 135 (16).

also overruled are any cases purporting to follow burrage.

we, therefore, asked our colleagues to consider the appeal in banc on the briefs of the parties, they so voted, and this opinion represents the views of the full court.

to the extent that di suvero and gould are inconsistent with this rule, they are hereby disapproved.

we recede from columbia casualty co. v. zimmerman, 62 so.2d 338 (fla. 1952), and the cases which relied upon it to the extent that the columbia casualty decision is in conflict with our answer to the certified question.

today's adjudication does not require that the holding of porter be overruled, only its rationale.

therefore, assuming without deciding whether the expert's testimony concerning the tagging incident was inadmissible hearsay, there was sufficient evidence to show that gmc is a group that engages in criminal gang activity.

our decision in hudson v. blanchard, supra, more narrowly interpreting the waiver clause of subsection 6, 12 o.s. 1961 385[ 12-385], is overruled.

thus, to the degree that olivieri suggests that the present version of the pfa act imposes a common residency requirement, it is expressly overruled.

to the extent that this court's opinion in doseck held otherwise, it is hereby overruled.

so, to the extent that wilkinson holds otherwise, it is overruled.

see luton, 272 or app at 490-91.

in light of both our holding today and previous rulings in johnson, dueser, and gronroos, we now explicitly overrule dupree.

to the extent that hetzel and its progeny impose different or additional requirements in the settling of instructions in a civil case under fed.r.civ.p. 51, they also are hereby overruled.

paul points out that the vocational expert concluded that lauren was very professional and bright and is capable of earning a salary of up to $40,000.

state v. andrus, 250 la. 765, 199 so.2d 867 (1967), and state v. green, 244 la. 80, 150 so.2d 571 (1963) are specifically overruled.

given the legislature's intent to permit such a lawsuit, taswell was not required to exhaust judicial remedies and challenge the administrative decision by filing a petition for a writ of mandamus.

to the extent that any of these cases may be read for the proposition that the issue of a trial court's compliance with ocga 19615 is never subject to waiver, they are hereby disapproved.

the circumstances here are similar.

accordingly, we approve the decision under review and disapprove thomas and johnson to the extent of conflict with this opinion.

to sustain the position of appellant under the doctrine of the koch case would, in effect, license elderly men under the guise of kindness and charity to take indecent liberties with young girls.

prominent among the chavez and garmon rulings which are disapproved and overruled is the holding that it is unlawful for an employer to make a contract with a labor "organizer" who represents none of the affected employes whereby the employer agrees that he will compel his workmen, on pain of discharge, to join the organizer's union and to "consent" that the employer shall deduct "dues" from the employes' pay checks for remittance to their "organizer" their unchosen and unwanted "representative."

lohmeier.

to the extent reasoning in in re rachael c., supra, 235 cal.app.3d 1445, implies the contrary, it is disapproved.

that part of duncan which holds there cannot be two convictions where the death of one person is a "material element" in two capital charges is incorrect and due to be overruled on that narrow point.

to the extent that the decision in succession of suggs, supra, is contrary to the view expressed herein, it is expressly overruled.

see generally lancaster cty. bar ass'n v. s.c. comm'n on indigent def., 380 s.c. 219, 222, 670 s.e.2d 371, 373 (2008) (stating the appellate court will reject a construction of a statute that leads to an absurd result not intended by the legislature).

villa, supra, 156 cal.app.3d 1076, hinkle, supra, 175 cal.app.3d 587, and postural therapeutics v. workers' comp. appeals bd., supra, 179 cal.app.3d 551, are disapproved to the extent that they are inconsistent with this holding.

the first prong requires the defendant to show by a preponderance of the evidence that defense counsel was not reasonably competent, while the second prong requires him to show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for defense counsel's unprofessional errors, the outcome of the proceedings would have been different.

in people v. correa (2012) 54 cal.4th 331, 142 cal.rptr.3d 546, 278 p.3d 809, also decided today, we are disapproving language in one of our cases to bring our section 654 jurisprudence closer to the statutory language.

this was the legislative intent and in so far as arnold, supra, holds to the contrary it is specifically overruled.

if some evidence supports a court's decision to impose sanctions, we will not hold that it abused its discretion.

baroid div. of nl indus., inc., 660 f.2d at 446; accord dep't of labor v. occupational safety & health review comm'n, 938 f.2d 1116, 1117-18 (10th cir. 1991).

although we consider that the issue whether vrns are negotiable instruments is not controlled by either dillard or lexington in the interest of clarity we disapprove of the holdings in dillard and lexington to the extent they may be construed to conflict with our holding today.

we reject gaskill's facial constitutional challenges based on due process and ex post facto grounds on the same basis we rejected these challenges in state v. harris, 284 neb. 214, 817 n.w.2d 258 (2012), generally for the reasons that his due process challenge is not before us and the statutes at issue were either prospective or not punitive and thus not violative of ex post facto principles.

we accordingly overrule our holding in the gilmartin case and hold that while the time spent as a cadet in the military academy may not be counted in computing length of service, such service is service in the military forces of the united states.

to the extent that they hold or contain statements to the contrary, we disapprove of such cases as maytag v. united states, 153 ct. cl. 622, 289 f.2d 647; mays v. commissioner, 272 f.2d 788 (c.a. 6th cir.); commissioner v. stokes' estate, 200 f.2d 637 (c.a. 3d cir.); foss v. commissioner, 75 f.2d 326 (c.a. 1st cir.); washburn v. commissioner, 51 f.2d 949 (c.a. 8th cir.); sage v. commissioner, 15 t.c. 299; campbell v. commissioner, 11 t.c. 510; and cluett v. commissioner

prystash v. state, 3 s.w.3d 522, 531 (tex. crim. app. 1999) (applying invited-error doctrine to jury instructions in capital murder case and stating that ""[t]he doctrine of invited error is properly thought of, not as a species of waiver, but as estoppel""); see also 5 c.j.s., appeal & error 872 (""an appellant or plaintiff in error is estopped, or will not be permitted, to take advantage of errors for the commission of which he or she is responsible . . . or . . . has invited or induced the trial court to commit.""). others suggest it is grounded in waiver or ""the common sense view that where a party invites the trial court to commit error, he cannot later cry foul on appeal."" united states v. brannan, 562 f.3d 1300, 1306 (11th cir. 2009).

accordingly, we grant guzman's petition for review, reverse the board's order, and remand guzman's case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

although we are reluctant to do so, we must overrule gibson to the extent that it applies structural error review to an instructional error that affects only an element of the offense, a permissible evidentiary inference, or a potential theory of conviction, as opposed to an instructional error that affects the overarching reasonable doubt standard of proof.

aetna therefore is overruled as the law of this circuit.

for reasons elaborated in jones, 795 s.w.2d 199, we reject the premises upon which this reasoning is based and, to the extent it suggests that a judgment may not be corrected nunc pro tunc when its recitations are factually erroneous, we overrule bryan.

this rule has received the strictest scrutiny and withstood repeated attacks; but the time has come, and we now abolish the cobb standard for appellate review of orders granting new trials on the sole ground that the verdict is against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence, and we overrule that line of cases following the cobb standard.

at the present time, we feel that we should follow the hamilton case and consider the lunkin case overruled.

to the extent that vaughan v. harvard indus., inc., 926 f. supp. 1340, 1348 (w.d. tenn. 1996) followed the myers rule and held that the ada does not require re-assignment when a disabled employee cannot be reasonably accommodated in his current position, it is overruled.

but samia did not produce any of those third parties as witnesses, and the jury was not required to credit samia's second-hand and uncorroborated account.

4. people's return

the court then denied both of mr. denzmore's motions.

today we overrule these cases and hold, consistent with rule 32(e), that the "fair and just" standard applies to any motion for plea withdrawal that is made prior to the defendant's sentencing.

see tex. r. app. p. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

further, in adler v dormio, 309 mich app 702, 708; 872 nw2d 721 (2015), this court set forth the legal principles that govern the trial court's decision concerning whether relief from judgment is appropriate pursuant to mcr 2.612(c)(1)(f):

although the district court recognized the "general rule" that " rooker-feldman may not be invoked against a federal-court plaintiff who was not actually a party to the prior state-court judgment," 379 f. supp. 2d, at 1123, it nevertheless followed tenth circuit precedent in allowing application of rooker-feldman against parties who were in privity with a party to the earlier state-court action.

insofar as the following opinions are inconsistent with this opinion, they are expressly overruled.

accordingly, the former wife claimed that the former husband's alimony obligation had remained ""fully due since october, 2011"" through the date of the former wife's motion, yet the former husband failed to honor that obligation.

accordingly, we disapprove huang to the extent it is inconsistent with the views set out in this opinion.

for the reasons detailed here and to the extent auxier is inconsistent with this opinion, we overrule it.

insofar as the following opinions are inconsistent with this opinion, they are expressly overruled:

see commonwealth v. dennis, 164 a.3d 503, 512 (pa. super. 2017).

##bauguess v. paine is not ovveruled (same line of cases).

in so holding, we recede from our decision in koch v. kimball

the district court granted the stipulated motion to dismiss, id., at 39a, and respondents appealed.

appellant must show that the trial court would have erred in overruling the objection to show ineffective assistance for a failure to object.

to the extent that cases such as in re chabot, supra, 100 b.r. 18, take an approach in contradiction to that expressed here, they are disapproved by the panel.

the royal & sun opinion articulated those factors as follows:

having reviewed the issue en banc, we overrule mckenzie and reverse the award of a contingency enhancement to ms. king.

see allred v. exceptional landscapes, inc., 227 n.c. app. 229, 232, 743 s.e.2d 48, 51 (2013) (""unchallenged findings of fact are presumed to be supported by competent evidence and are binding on appeal."" (citation omitted)).

we overrule seales and its progeny to the extent that they allow admission of testimonial statements when found to be reliable under the "indicia of reliability" test in the absence of cross-examination.

that prompt assertion of rights hurt no one.

further, the prosecutor's closing arguments consistently tied the current incident to defendant's purported state of mind in 1991.

first, unlike here, the applicant in ex parte wolf submitted evidence supporting his position that his plea counsel's actions and advice fell below the prevailing professional norms for representation of a defendant like him.

furthermore, the trial court indicated in its order that it had ""consider[ed] . . . [appellant's] special appearance, the pleadings, the affidavits, and arguments of counsel.""

we overrule valley to the extent it is inconsistent with this opinion.

to the extent that jennings is inconsistent with our holding herein, it is hereby disapproved.

the case of gehman v. superior court (1979) 96 cal.app.3d 257 [ 158 cal.rptr. 62] is disapproved to the extent that it is inconsistent with this conclusion.

therefore, the trial court's plea for rectification is vindicated; strother is expressly overruled; the judgment is reversed; and the cause is remanded.