Datasets:

LawInformedAI

/

overruling

like 0

marley's testimony that gurino called himself the ""suncruz kid"" was admissible as a statement against penal interest.

petitioner argues that the tribunal erred by affirming the department's denial of a pre for the property for the 2010 through 2013 tax years.

mcdonald is erroneous.

the cases were all decided prior to the cases cited above in the text.

although white testified that gladys herself called him to discuss the preparation of her 2008 will, clara disputed whether her mother could have looked up the number in the phone book. according to clara, gladys's eyesight had become so poor that gladys had difficulty reading or even seeing a glass of water in front of her. clara further testified that gladys needed help dialing phone numbers and would ask clara to dial the numbers for her. 33.

again, a couple of times, gdowski seemed to loosely reference a two-year opportunity given to russell at the lapeer store with assurance pay.

we hold that esco mistakenly applied ross in the context of a dismissal of an election-contest petition, and we overrule esco to the extent that it provides that the dismissal of election-contest actions for failure to satisfy jurisdictional ( i.e., nonmerits) prerequisites can be with prejudice.

accordingly, to the extent of any conflict nemecek v. state, 621 s.w.2d 404 (tex.cr.app. 1980) is overruled.

for that reason, we disapprove people v. graham, supra, 83 cal.app.3d 736, to the extent it so requires.

in the instant case, defendant filed a motion requesting, inter alia, primary custody of lauren and modification of the existing visitation terms and provisions, due to issues that had arisen following entry of the first modification order. after a hearing, the trial court concluded, in relevant part:

the statute concerns the admission of ""evidence of a statement made by a witness,"" so that ""the witness"" in the statute who ""narrates, describes, or explains an event or condition of which the witness had personal knowledge"" is the person who gave the prior inconsistent statement that a party seeks to admit.

id. at 354, 775 s.e.2d at 331.

appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the supreme court, suffolk county (william j. condon, j.), rendered march 24, 2015, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

to the extent it is inconsistent with this conclusion, tabucchi, supra, 64 cal.app.3d 133, is disapproved.

the decisions in hunt, fuller, and lary are overruled to the extent that they conflict with the modified vehicle-damage rule set forth in this opinion.

at a december 14, 2015 hearing on the parties' motions and exceptions, the trial court maintained the exception of res judicata as to all claims for rescission, avoidance, or nullity of the option agreement, with the caveat that it denied the exception as it related to any claims of termination, reformation, or any other claims not dismissed by the trial court or this court.

federal rule 33(d) is normally discussed in the context of a party's invocation of the rule in response to an interrogatory and a subsequent challenge to the sufficiency of that response by the requesting party through a motion to compel discovery.

tex. civ. prac. & rem. code ann. 18.001(e)(1).

we hold that the denial of appellants' motion for summary judgment is not appealable under section 1292(a)(1), and as our result here is inconsistent with the result reached in the above cases we are reversing the rule set forth therein which until now has settled the matter in this circuit in favor of appealability, peter pan fabrics, inc. v. dixon textile corp.

defendant's class x conviction of armed violence is governed by sections 33a-2 and 33a-3 of the criminal code of 2012 (720 ilcs 5/33a-2(a), 33a-3(a) (west 2014)).

so to be clear, to the extent tuck held that the judiciary possesses some power to interfere in the legislature's internal procedure, we overrule it today.

insofar as that language conflicts with the decision in the instant case it must be overruled.

further, for the sake of clarity and consistency, we overrule earthgrains v. cranz

nonetheless, the record is clear that, immediately upon confronting a.c., bernard no longer had consent to remain in the house.

three circuits two sitting en banc have disagreed with farrakhan i and concluded that felon disenfranchisement laws are categorically exempt from challenges brought under section 2 of the vra.

accordingly, we disapprove of thomas to the extent it is inconsistent with watson.

inasmuch as the maximum term of the defendant's sentence expired during the pendency of this appeal, any issues which relate to the length of his sentence are academic (see people v velez, 116 ad3d 1077, 1077; people v gonzalez, 113 ad3d 792, 793; people v conklin, 46 ad3d 698, 698; people v ackridge, 31 ad3d 654, 655). under these circumstances, we need not reach the defendant's remaining contention that his appeal waiver was invalid (see people v bernard, 155 ad3d 1059, 1059; people v thomas, 139 ad3d 986, 986).

our supreme court held the trial court's order did not violate separation of powers principles despite the fact that a legislative committee deleted a line-item appropriation for this particular fee award.

""if a statute is susceptible of more than one meaning, one of which is constitutional and the other not, we interpret the statute as being consistent with the constitution.""

725 f.3d at 1207 (citing to 40 c.f.r. 122.26(d)(2)(i)(f) (regarding municipal storm water discharges)).

accordingly, we overrule sanchez as to its ultimate conclusion.

the majority properly rejects our prior holding in united states v. rosen

the majority overrules the recent decision of ex parte trisler, 605 s.w.2d 619 (tex.cr.app. 1980), and the long line of decisions it represents, without regard to the doctrine of stare decisis.

after full reconsideration of the issues involved, we now reject our earlier position in part vii of fowler and adopt the view taken by the fourth circuit in douglas.

accordingly, i would proceed to address the merits and reverse as a genuine issue of fact exists.

accordingly, we overrule zinsmeyer to the extent it is inconsistent with this opinion.

he then estimates that ""at least 960 brake linings were blown out in marcantoni's garage"" during that period of time. he arrives at that figure by multiplying the number of brake linings per wheel (2) by the number of wheels per tandem dump truck (10) by the number of brake replacements per year (2), which comes to 40 brake linings being blown out per truck per year.

he also complains that siriani did not warn him that he could be personally liable for those fees if they were not paid by the estate.

he further noted that martin and unger modified basf's off-the-shelf liquids with additives, parameters, and plating processes claimed as novel in the '371 application.

a rereading and rethinking of victor in relation to douglas v. california, supra, and our discussion in the instant opinion, convinces us that victor was not correct and should be overruled.

r., 254 s.w.2d 394 (1953) and other cases are in conflict with our holding today, they are overruled."

1976) (internal quotation marks omitted).

we affirm without additional comment the trial court's rulings on the propriety of notice and adjudication regarding graves' status as an hfo.

also, the record supports the court's findings that diaz's actions were not a product of control by salgado or a product of her fear of him.

it seems clear that in this respect the act was meant to and did overrule such cases as ree v. state, 565 so.2d 1329 (fla. 1990) and pierre v. state.

to the extent that don hill holds that a derivative claimant can perfect a lien without timely supplying all of the notices required by section 53.056 of the texas property code, it is overruled.

we disapprove of this language in l.c.

therefore, to the extent that language in lam suggests otherwise, such language should be disapproved.

iv. referencing prior lawsuits.

30 accordingly, until there is more guidance and an effort at uniformity, we will continue to see a steady flow of cases in which this issue is raised, with widely varying results from our court.

see vardaman, 711 so.2d at 732-733.

on appeal, the government argues that: ""[t]he specification contains a detailed description of a best mode embodiment of the invention with every reference to power being expressed in the [i]mperial units of 'horsepower' or 'hp,'"" cross-appellant's br. 55 (footnote omitted); see '032 patent col.

our opinion in in re hart, 923 f.2d 1410 (10th cir. 1991) (per curiam), is accordingly overruled to the extent it conflicts with nobelman.

actually, in his appellate briefing, mr. havens argues that he is entitled to compensatory damages under both title ii and 504.

the majority correctly notes that abandonment of the doctrine and reversal is not yet compelled in this case by the united states supreme court's first amendment jurisprudence.

to the extent that it holds to the contrary, murdoch i is overruled.

see heckman v. williamson cty., 369 s.w.3d 137, 150 (tex. 2012) (plea to jurisdiction must be granted if defendant presents undisputed evidence that negates existence of jurisdiction).

3. closing argument.

he also claims that the district court erred when it rejected his ineffective assistance of counsel claims.

to the extent that adams holds that there can be no recovery for negligent interference with prospective economic advantage, it is disapproved.

we provide the following explanations of this construction's application.

this assignment of error is accordingly overruled.

southern reporter. (madison circuit court, dr-17-3415) per curiam.

insofar as brachbill is read to mean pecuniary inducement alone will suffice without proof of intimidation, it is disapproved.

however, i now agree with the decision of the majority to overrule lewis.

in affirming the defendant's convictions and sentence, the court of appeals generally disapproved trial court consideration of the lsi-r as "contrary to the essential function of the trial court in sentencing.

stowers had a full and fair opportunity to litigate his contempt in those proceedings, all the way through appeal to our court.

we now hold that zauderer in fact does reach beyond problems of deception, sufficiently to encompass the disclosure mandates at issue here.

upon the authority of odom, we hereby recede from our inadvertent comment in singleton.

in addition, ""a mandatory injunction is the proper means of enforcing a restrictive agreement affecting real estate.""

although we are reluctant to abandon settled precedent, a majority of this court is now convinced that our decision in federal kemper was improvident and should be overruled.

after agreeing to have the parties' dispute resolved on a paper record, at oral argument lively argued that cooper ""forgot"" to process the payment or became distracted, and the court should so conclude by drawing inferences in favor of lively as the ""non-moving party.""

we disagree with the premise of knowles's argument suggesting that the ptab's claim construction conflicts with mems technology.

balow is in direct conflict with at least two recent court of appeals cases, brown v. state, 810 s.w.2d 716, 718 (mo.app. 1991), and rogers v. state, 810 s.w.2d 125 (mo.app. 1991).

the majority claims the court of appeals read the pra statute of limitations (rcw 42.56.550(6) ) too narrowly in tobin v. worden

in that regard, the legislature expressly declared: "it is the intent of this legislation to provide that all objections to the form and substance of the moving and opposing papers shall be first made in the trial court and not on appeal by the parties or by the appellate court and to expressly overrule the rules stated in witchell v. dekorne [(1986)] 179 [cal.app.3d] 965 [ 225 cal.rptr. 176] and zuckerman v. pacific savings bank.

see rosenberg v. north bergen, 61 n.j. 190, 199 (1972) (""the function of [a] statute [of repose] is thus rather to define substantive rights than to alter or modify a remedy""); cronin v. howe, 906 s.w.2d 910, 913 (tenn.

that is true of the present case; and, due to intervening supreme court precedent, we reject our recent characterization in mosser, followed as binding precedent in this court in a number of cases, see qualchoice, inc., 367 f.3d at 642, 647, that a federal court has no subject-matter jurisdiction over an action ostensibly brought under 29 u.s.c. 1132(a)(3) apparently for solely legal relief.

see mciver, 134 n.c.app. at 588, 518 s.e.2d at 526.

accordingly, we similarly disapprove the decisions in vanderbilt inn on the gulf v. pfenninger, __ so.2d __, 2002 wl 459252 (fla. 2d dca february 8, 2002), bomemann v. ure, 778 so.2d 1077 (fla. 4th dca 2001), and silva v. lazar, 766 so.2d 341 (fla. 4th dca 2000), to the extent that they adopt the erroneous due diligence principle of tejada which is disapproved here.

"" gratz v. bollinger, 539 u.s. 244, 270, 123 s.ct. 2411, 156 l.ed.2d 257 (2003) (quoting adarand constructors, inc. v. pe, 515 u.s. 200, 224, 115 s.ct. 2097, 132 l.ed.2d 158 (1995) ); see also miller, supra, at 904, 115 s.ct. 2475 (""this rule obtains with equal force regardless of the race of those burdened or benefited by a particular classification "" (quoting croson, supra, at 494, 109 s.ct. 706 (plurality opinion of o'connor, j.))). ""thus, any person, of whatever race, has the right to demand that any governmental actor subject to the constitution justify any racial classification subjecting that person to unequal treatment under the strictest of judicial scrutiny.

we apply this standard to determine whether excusing a prospective juror in a capital case for cause based on the prospective juror's views on capital punishment violates the defendant's right to an impartial jury under article i, section 16 of the california constitution. [citations.]

and we agree.

id. 2679(d)(5).

because all presumptions are in favor of the constitutionality of a statute, the burden is on the party claiming that the law is unconstitutional to prove it.

but we disavow jose m.'s reasoning with respect to (1) its distinguishing the significance of adoption in private versus state-initiated severance cases, and (2) its assessing the benefits of adoption solely in terms of whether the child's "day-to-day" living arrangement will change.

to the extent that park suggests that the factual predicates for an undertaking duty are to be decided by the court, we disapprove it.

(emphasis supplied); u.s. const. amend.

to the extent that johnson implies that the rule controls over section 510.150

to the extent that these cases are inconsistent with our opinion today, they are disapproved.

it further quoted commissioner norris as saying:

accordingly, we overrule get it kwik, to the extent that that opinion holds that a where a violation of the notice provisions of the bulk transfers act has occurred, the transferee cannot be personally liable to the transferor's creditors under any circumstances.

we conclude remand is necessary given the unique questions involved and the limited facts available to us as an appellate court.

zhong v. u.s. dep't of justice, 480 f.3d at 107, 120.

instead, a plaintiff must ""provide enough detail to show the factual basis for its claim.""

insofar as davis conflicts with this opinion it is overruled.

but having now fully considered these irreconcilable principles, we have concluded that smith must be overruled.

because of supreme court precedent to the contrary, we now disapprove of these cases to the extent they hold, as a general rule, that a trial court need not test lesser sanctions before imposing death penalty sanctions.

we affirm, and in so doing, we recede from sapphire condominium association v. amerivend corp., 691 so.2d 600 (fla. 4th dca 1997), and bridgeport inc. v. rinker materials corp.

however, to the extentfesmire, supra, and cases following it require a trial judge, without exception, once an allegation of abuse has been made, to make a finding on the record as to whether "domestic abuse" has in fact occurred, they are in error and are hereby overruled.