Datasets:

Formats:
json
Languages:
English
ArXiv:
Libraries:
Datasets
pandas
License:
dcores commited on
Commit
060eccc
1 Parent(s): 89916d5

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +1 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ size_categories:
50
  </div>
51
 
52
  ### Updates
53
- - <h4 style="color:red">25 October 2024: Please redownload dataset due to removal of duplicated samples for Action Sequence and Unexpected Action.</h4>
54
 
55
  # TVBench
56
  TVBench is a new benchmark specifically created to evaluate temporal understanding in video QA. We identified three main issues in existing datasets: (i) static information from single frames is often sufficient to solve the tasks (ii) the text of the questions and candidate answers is overly informative, allowing models to answer correctly without relying on any visual input (iii) world knowledge alone can answer many of the questions, making the benchmarks a test of knowledge replication rather than visual reasoning. In addition, we found that open-ended question-answering benchmarks for video understanding suffer from similar issues while the automatic evaluation process with LLMs is unreliable, making it an unsuitable alternative.
 
50
  </div>
51
 
52
  ### Updates
53
+ - <h4 style="color:darkgreen">25 October 2024: Please redownload dataset due to removal of duplicated samples for Action Sequence and Unexpected Action.</h4>
54
 
55
  # TVBench
56
  TVBench is a new benchmark specifically created to evaluate temporal understanding in video QA. We identified three main issues in existing datasets: (i) static information from single frames is often sufficient to solve the tasks (ii) the text of the questions and candidate answers is overly informative, allowing models to answer correctly without relying on any visual input (iii) world knowledge alone can answer many of the questions, making the benchmarks a test of knowledge replication rather than visual reasoning. In addition, we found that open-ended question-answering benchmarks for video understanding suffer from similar issues while the automatic evaluation process with LLMs is unreliable, making it an unsuitable alternative.