text
stringlengths 2
299k
| is_spam
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|
[SAtalk] Razor problem
I just picked up Razor SDK 2.03 and 2.14 agents from the the razor site.
I am using SuSe 7.3 - intalled SDK with no problems. All tests passed.
When I try to make the 2.14 agents I get all kinds of errors. In
particuliar it says the net::dns is missing. But it seems to be there. The
SDK test passes it.
Any help would be appreciated.
Doug
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
| 0 |
Re: GA Development (was Re: [SAdev] [Bug 1030] NO_INVENTORY
On Sep 25, 7:35pm, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Allen Smith <easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu> writes:
>
> > Well, I have been doing a bit of fiddling with the GA. I don't have
> > a _large_ corpus practically available to me (or processable within
> > reasonable processor time - I can justify the GA fiddling part as
> > being part of my research, but not the mail processing...), so in
> > order to test out my changes someone needs to send me a copy of the
> > "tmp/scores.h" and "tmp/tests.h" that get generated prior to the GA
> > going into action.
>
> Why not start with mass-check corpus results? It's much easier to get
> those
Ah. As in getting a directory listing of the corpus server and doing some
downloads? OK, done.
> and you can create your own tmp/scores.h and tmp/tests.h.
Good point. Will report back on my results.
-Allen
--
Allen Smith http://cesario.rutgers.edu/easmith/
September 11, 2001 A Day That Shall Live In Infamy II
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
| 0 |
Returned mail: [SACVS] CVS: spamassassin/masses craig-evolve.c.ALTIVEC,NONE,1.1
Unable to find user: <matt_relay@sbcglobal.net>
Please make sure the address is correct and resend your mail.
| 0 |
Re: [SAtalk] URL blacklist
SpamTalk said:
> Probably better than the "spam phrases" approach would be the database
> approach as currently used for white/black listing.
> Any way to tie that to an XML retrieval from a list of central repositories?
> Does mySQL do replication? A properly done XML would let us eyeball the list
> as well as use it to keep the database up to date.
> Another idea: could we synthesize an RBL so that
> http://www.spammer.com/spam/web/bug/ becomes spam.web.bug.x.www.spammer.com
> for a reverse lookup? It is going to get tricky, how to specify a randomized
> intermediate directory?
A good plan, needs an implementation though:
http://bl.reynolds.net.au/ksi/email/
hmm. seems down to me. Basically it's a plan to store hash sums of
URLs/phone numbers found in spam in a DNSBL, for apps like SpamAssassin to
look up. A little like spamcop's "spamvertized URL" list...
--j.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: DEDICATED SERVERS only $89!
Linux or FreeBSD, FREE setup, FAST network. Get your own server
today at http://www.ServePath.com/indexfm.htm
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
| 0 |
Re: [SAtalk] telesp.net.br?
--qcHopEYAB45HaUaB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:33:48PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> I seem to be getting a *lot* of spam relayed via these guys recently.
> Can others confirm this?
>=20
> if it's the case, I'll come up with a forged-hostname test for it.
I do get some from them, typically some dsl.telesp.net.br host:
% grep -c telesp.net.br *| sort -rn
spammers-2002-09:59
spammers-2002-08:64
spammers-2002-07:23
spammers-2002-06:13
spammers-2002-05:4
spammers-2002-04:2
Definitely increasing per month. Percentage-wise: 2002-09 has 1212
spams in it, so 59/1212 is about 4.8%. Last month was 3.6%.
--=20
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I don't believe I've ever cuddled my elses.
-- Larry Wall in <199806221550.IAA07171@wall.org>
--qcHopEYAB45HaUaB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9jfH7AuOQUeWAs2MRAkcuAKDZpe2Imevx9OkqkCh1rKh2IXvv6ACfZ/kn
aBRBTJx/PNPOZg5GNPk5b/s=
=mUje
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--qcHopEYAB45HaUaB--
| 0 |
Re: [SAdev] phew!
jm@jmason.org (Justin Mason) writes:
> Yes -- 50% of the entire set for training and 50% for evaluation.
Once you've settled on the final method for any one release, why not
use 100% of the data for a final run?
Dan
| 0 |
Re: [SAdev] Re: [Razor-users] Mutating spam
Justin Mason wrote:
>> Interestingly, some of these seem (apparently) to be encrypted versions of
>> the recipient email address. To see this, ROT13 yr address and grep your
>> spam archive. There'll be at least 1 hit.
Theo Van Dinter <felicity@kluge.net> writes:
> Hmmm. I'm surprised at these results, especially since I should be
> seeing some false positives... Not a lot of matches though. :(
Still worthwhile -- 1.257% is not that bad. :-)
My results:
OVERALL% SPAM% NONSPAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
11774 4079 7695 0.35 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
100.000 34.644 65.356 0.35 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %)
0.195 0.564 0.000 1.00 0.75 1.00 T_ROT13_EMAIL_3
0.161 0.466 0.000 1.00 0.73 1.00 T_ROT13_EMAIL_2
0.161 0.466 0.000 1.00 0.73 1.00 T_ROT13_EMAIL
The interesting thing is that these hits all seem to be rot13 versions
of the To: address. If we ever start getting FPs (or if anyone is
worried), we could make it an eval test for rot13 of the To: address
(turning non-word characters into "." characters in the regular
expression).
At the same time, it might be worth testing for username in HTML
comments. I found some <!--quinlan--> types in HTML comments, but I
haven't seen enough hits so far to bother (however, I did add a really
good test for email addresses in comments).
Dan
| 0 |
[SACVS] CVS: spamassassin/lib/Mail SpamAssassin.pm,1.115.2.11,1.115.2.12
Update of /cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin/lib/Mail
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv4019/lib/Mail
Modified Files:
Tag: b2_4_0
SpamAssassin.pm
Log Message:
fixed bug 1033: -R and -W were not respecting auto_whitelist_path
Index: SpamAssassin.pm
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm,v
retrieving revision 1.115.2.11
retrieving revision 1.115.2.12
diff -b -w -u -d -r1.115.2.11 -r1.115.2.12
--- SpamAssassin.pm 24 Sep 2002 18:51:37 -0000 1.115.2.11
+++ SpamAssassin.pm 2 Oct 2002 13:19:28 -0000 1.115.2.12
@@ -696,7 +696,13 @@
}
###########################################################################
-# non-public methods.
+
+=item $f->init ($use_user_prefs)
+
+Read and parse the current configuration. C<$use_user_prefs> can
+be C<0> (do not read user preferences) or C<1> (do).
+
+=cut
sub init {
my ($self, $use_user_pref) = @_;
@@ -767,6 +773,9 @@
# TODO -- open DNS cache etc. if necessary
}
+
+###########################################################################
+# non-public methods.
sub read_cf {
my ($self, $path, $desc) = @_;
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-commits mailing list
Spamassassin-commits@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-commits
| 0 |
[SACVS] CVS: spamassassin spamassassin.raw,1.68.2.12,1.68.2.13
Update of /cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv4019
Modified Files:
Tag: b2_4_0
spamassassin.raw
Log Message:
fixed bug 1033: -R and -W were not respecting auto_whitelist_path
Index: spamassassin.raw
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin/spamassassin.raw,v
retrieving revision 1.68.2.12
retrieving revision 1.68.2.13
diff -b -w -u -d -r1.68.2.12 -r1.68.2.13
--- spamassassin.raw 24 Sep 2002 18:51:37 -0000 1.68.2.12
+++ spamassassin.raw 2 Oct 2002 13:19:28 -0000 1.68.2.13
@@ -216,6 +216,9 @@
if ($@) { warn $@; }
if ($doing_whitelist_operation) {
+ # read the config!
+ $spamtest->init (1);
+
if ($opt{'add-to-whitelist'}) {
$spamtest->add_all_addresses_to_whitelist ($mail);
} elsif ($opt{'remove-from-whitelist'}) {
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-commits mailing list
Spamassassin-commits@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-commits
| 0 |
[SACVS] CVS: spamassassin/t db_based_whitelist.t,1.6.4.1,1.6.4.2
Update of /cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin/t
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv4019/t
Modified Files:
Tag: b2_4_0
db_based_whitelist.t db_based_whitelist_ips.t
Log Message:
fixed bug 1033: -R and -W were not respecting auto_whitelist_path
Index: db_based_whitelist.t
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin/t/db_based_whitelist.t,v
retrieving revision 1.6.4.1
retrieving revision 1.6.4.2
diff -b -w -u -d -r1.6.4.1 -r1.6.4.2
--- db_based_whitelist.t 24 Sep 2002 18:51:38 -0000 1.6.4.1
+++ db_based_whitelist.t 2 Oct 2002 13:19:28 -0000 1.6.4.2
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
use lib '.'; use lib 't';
use SATest; sa_t_init("db_based_whitelist");
-use Test; BEGIN { plan tests => 3 };
+use Test; BEGIN { plan tests => 8 };
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -16,17 +16,17 @@
%patterns = %is_nonspam_patterns;
$scr_test_args = "-M Mail::SpamAssassin::DBBasedAddrList";
-sarun ("--remove-addr-from-whitelist whitelist_test\@whitelist.spamassassin.taint.org", \&patterns_run_cb);
+ok (sarun ("--remove-addr-from-whitelist whitelist_test\@whitelist.spamassassin.taint.org", \&patterns_run_cb));
# 3 times, to get into the whitelist:
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb);
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb);
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb);
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
# Now check
ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
ok_all_patterns();
%patterns = %is_spam_patterns;
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/spam/004", \&patterns_run_cb);
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/spam/004", \&patterns_run_cb));
ok_all_patterns();
Index: db_based_whitelist_ips.t
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin/t/db_based_whitelist_ips.t,v
retrieving revision 1.1.2.1
retrieving revision 1.1.2.2
diff -b -w -u -d -r1.1.2.1 -r1.1.2.2
--- db_based_whitelist_ips.t 24 Sep 2002 18:51:38 -0000 1.1.2.1
+++ db_based_whitelist_ips.t 2 Oct 2002 13:19:29 -0000 1.1.2.2
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
use lib '.'; use lib 't';
use SATest; sa_t_init("db_based_whitelist_ips");
-use Test; BEGIN { plan tests => 3 };
+use Test; BEGIN { plan tests => 8 };
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -15,18 +15,18 @@
%patterns = %is_nonspam_patterns;
-sarun ("--remove-addr-from-whitelist whitelist_test\@whitelist.spamassassin.taint.org", \&patterns_run_cb);
+ok (sarun ("--remove-addr-from-whitelist whitelist_test\@whitelist.spamassassin.taint.org", \&patterns_run_cb));
# 3 times, to get into the whitelist:
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb);
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb);
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb);
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
# Now check
ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
ok_all_patterns();
%patterns = %is_spam_patterns;
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/spam/007", \&patterns_run_cb);
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/spam/007", \&patterns_run_cb));
ok_all_patterns();
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-commits mailing list
Spamassassin-commits@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-commits
| 0 |
[SACVS] CVS: spamassassin spamassassin.raw,1.76,1.77
Update of /cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv4429
Modified Files:
spamassassin.raw
Log Message:
fixed bug 1033: -R and -W were not respecting auto_whitelist_path
Index: spamassassin.raw
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin/spamassassin.raw,v
retrieving revision 1.76
retrieving revision 1.77
diff -b -w -u -d -r1.76 -r1.77
--- spamassassin.raw 26 Sep 2002 17:14:59 -0000 1.76
+++ spamassassin.raw 2 Oct 2002 13:20:32 -0000 1.77
@@ -218,6 +218,9 @@
if ($@) { warn $@; }
if ($doing_whitelist_operation) {
+ # read the config!
+ $spamtest->init (1);
+
if ($opt{'add-to-whitelist'}) {
$spamtest->add_all_addresses_to_whitelist ($mail);
} elsif ($opt{'remove-from-whitelist'}) {
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-commits mailing list
Spamassassin-commits@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-commits
| 0 |
[SACVS] CVS: spamassassin/rules 50_scores.cf,1.226,1.227
Update of /cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin/rules
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv4429/rules
Modified Files:
50_scores.cf 60_whitelist.cf
Log Message:
fixed bug 1033: -R and -W were not respecting auto_whitelist_path
Index: 50_scores.cf
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin/rules/50_scores.cf,v
retrieving revision 1.226
retrieving revision 1.227
diff -b -w -u -d -r1.226 -r1.227
--- 50_scores.cf 1 Oct 2002 09:53:43 -0000 1.226
+++ 50_scores.cf 2 Oct 2002 13:20:32 -0000 1.227
@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@
score PORN_GALLERIES 1.000
score RATWARE_LC_OUTLOOK 1.000
score SHORT_RECEIVED_LINE 4.300
-score SAFEGUARD_NOTICE -3.300
+score SAFEGUARD_NOTICE 3.300
score MAILMAN_CONFIRM -1.000
score SIGNIFICANT 1.000
score RATWARE_DIFFOND 2.200
Index: 60_whitelist.cf
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin/rules/60_whitelist.cf,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -b -w -u -d -r1.31 -r1.32
--- 60_whitelist.cf 11 Sep 2002 21:31:35 -0000 1.31
+++ 60_whitelist.cf 2 Oct 2002 13:20:33 -0000 1.32
@@ -65,3 +65,4 @@
# Friends re-united (popular UK old-school-network)
whitelist_from_rcvd *@friendsreunited.co.uk friendsreunited.co.uk
+
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-commits mailing list
Spamassassin-commits@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-commits
| 0 |
[SACVS] CVS: spamassassin/t db_based_whitelist.t,1.7,1.8
Update of /cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin/t
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv4429/t
Modified Files:
db_based_whitelist.t db_based_whitelist_ips.t
Log Message:
fixed bug 1033: -R and -W were not respecting auto_whitelist_path
Index: db_based_whitelist.t
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin/t/db_based_whitelist.t,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -b -w -u -d -r1.7 -r1.8
--- db_based_whitelist.t 26 Sep 2002 17:15:04 -0000 1.7
+++ db_based_whitelist.t 2 Oct 2002 13:20:33 -0000 1.8
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
use lib '.'; use lib 't';
use SATest; sa_t_init("db_based_whitelist");
-use Test; BEGIN { plan tests => 3 };
+use Test; BEGIN { plan tests => 8 };
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -16,17 +16,17 @@
%patterns = %is_nonspam_patterns;
$scr_test_args = "-M Mail::SpamAssassin::DBBasedAddrList";
-sarun ("--remove-addr-from-whitelist whitelist_test\@whitelist.spamassassin.taint.org", \&patterns_run_cb);
+ok (sarun ("--remove-addr-from-whitelist whitelist_test\@whitelist.spamassassin.taint.org", \&patterns_run_cb));
# 3 times, to get into the whitelist:
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb);
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb);
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb);
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
# Now check
ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
ok_all_patterns();
%patterns = %is_spam_patterns;
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/spam/004", \&patterns_run_cb);
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/spam/004", \&patterns_run_cb));
ok_all_patterns();
Index: db_based_whitelist_ips.t
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin/t/db_based_whitelist_ips.t,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -b -w -u -d -r1.2 -r1.3
--- db_based_whitelist_ips.t 26 Sep 2002 17:15:04 -0000 1.2
+++ db_based_whitelist_ips.t 2 Oct 2002 13:20:33 -0000 1.3
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
use lib '.'; use lib 't';
use SATest; sa_t_init("db_based_whitelist_ips");
-use Test; BEGIN { plan tests => 3 };
+use Test; BEGIN { plan tests => 8 };
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -15,18 +15,18 @@
%patterns = %is_nonspam_patterns;
-sarun ("--remove-addr-from-whitelist whitelist_test\@whitelist.spamassassin.taint.org", \&patterns_run_cb);
+ok (sarun ("--remove-addr-from-whitelist whitelist_test\@whitelist.spamassassin.taint.org", \&patterns_run_cb));
# 3 times, to get into the whitelist:
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb);
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb);
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb);
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
# Now check
ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
ok_all_patterns();
%patterns = %is_spam_patterns;
-sarun ("-L -a -t < data/spam/007", \&patterns_run_cb);
+ok (sarun ("-L -a -t < data/spam/007", \&patterns_run_cb));
ok_all_patterns();
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-commits mailing list
Spamassassin-commits@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-commits
| 0 |
Re: [SAtalk] 2.42: est release?
Malte S. Stretz said:
> 1046 is fixed. But what about
> 1011 (add a notice about IRIX and -m to the docs),
> 1031 (cygwin's EXE_EXT),
> 1043 (a cosmetic but rather disturbing one ;-),
all now fixed!
> 1004 (TO_MALFORMED borken),
WONTFIX ;)
> 1006 (packaging related)?
eh, will leave this for 2.50. ;)
OK, if there's nothing moderately serious shown up tonight, I'll release
it tomorrow AM (GMT).
--j.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
| 0 |
Re: [SAdev] Re: Web subscription for spamassassin package
> eh? any reason why? wasn't causing any trouble for me, and
> seems like a good idea.
Because every time someone submitted a bug, they'd get a response
saying "Message is held for moderator because of implicit message
destination" or something like that. It annoyed users, it annoyed me,
and Justin, you never actually got around to accepting the messages :-)
--
Duncan Findlay
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
[SAdev] [Bug 1049] Pathname for "triplets.txt" is incorrect.
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1049
felicity@kluge.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From felicity@kluge.net 2002-10-03 13:26 -------
Hmmm, my last message doesn't seem to have made it into bugzilla yet.
I've committed a patch to fix this problem in both HEAD and b2_4_0. The last
message explains what the problem was and what the patch does to fix it.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
[SAdev] [Bug 1006] Spamassassin's build process makes packaging
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1006
jm@jmason.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org 2002-10-03 13:29 -------
1. Use of $Config is gradually being removed, thankfully. I don't want
to see any of that stuff in there if it acn be avoided, as different
perl versions jsut vary so much in that stuff.
2. perl has no concept of where the rules could be -- unless they're in
the perl libdir (/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.x.x/foo). Perl does not
know about the existence of /usr/share or /etc. Used to use /usr/lib/perl5
for storing rules, and it was actually *much worse* than it is now. So
we need an out-of-band way to tell SA where to find this stuff. that's
the problem!
3. try "perl Makefile.PL < /dev/null" to allow bots to build it.
I think I might be missing some details of what you're peeved about,
though... could you elaborate specifically?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
[SAdev] [Bug 1046] Errors from 'perl Makefile.PL'
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1046
------- Additional Comments From spamassassin-contrib@msquadrat.de 2002-10-03 13:57 -------
> I've thought about this and PM_FILTER needs to die. I've now tried
> multiple ways to make it just transparently work on 5.00503 and failed.
> If anyone has any bright ideas please jump in.
>
> You see anyone upgrading from the CPAN shell will get a failure on the line:
>
> use ExtUtils::MakeMaker 5.45;
Quite some modules from CPAN do have a line like this nowadays (I think or
read so somewhere, respectively). And the Perl error message is very clear:
"ExtUtils::MakeMaker version 5.45 required--this is only version 5.4302 at
Makefile.PL line 2."
> Because it never gets chance to reach a "WriteMakefile" line with a
> PREREQ_PM => { ExtUtils::MakeMaker => 5.45 } option. So the CPAN shell
> can't automatically upgrade this module. I cannot think of any way
> around this.
I could think of a solution: We could remove the "use" line and add the
version to PREREQ_PM. After WriteMakefile() we could add the lines
require ExtUtils::MakeMaker;
ExtUtils::MakeMaker->VERSION(5.45);
to do per hand what 'use ExtUtils::MakeMaker 5.45' does automagically; `perl
Makefile.PL` will die with a "Uncaught exception from user code:
ExtUtils::MakeMaker version 5.45 required--this is only version 5.4302 at
Makefile.PL line 103." there but we've got a Makefile. But I don't know if
CPAN will run the make anyway...
> To add insult to injury, the PM_FILTER part gets run during pm_to_blib,
> which would be fine, except ExtUtils::MakeMaker doesn't let you write a
> MY::pm_to_blib - it's non-overridable! So even though we could
> potentially copy the 5.45 ExtUtils::Install::pm_to_blib code somewhere
> into the spamassassin codebase (I tried that first), we can't cause the
> Makefile to call our code :-(
We could call the preprocessor on install time. That's not a very clean
approach but could work.
We can also overwrite pm_to_blib in the Makefile directly per postamble. We
already have a useless line "pm_to_blib: spamassassin doc/.made" there. Adding
some commands in this section gives some make warnings ("Makefile:933:
warning: overriding commands for target `pm_to_blib' Makefile:877: warning:
ignoring old commands for target `pm_to_blib'") but does work. Not a very good
solution either.
> So I'm *strongly* against the current use of ExtUtils::MakeMaker 5.45
> usage (if this were an Apache project this would be my veto vote), and
> really hope we can find another way.
The "use MakeMaker::..." error message is IMHO quite clear, so I think it's ok
to require the user to do a manual update of ExtUtils::MakeMaker before the SA
installation. But that's just my opinion ;-)
I'll ask on makemaker@perl.org for the best solution. They should know.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
[SAdev] [Bug 1006] Spamassassin's build process makes packaging
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1006
------- Additional Comments From spamassassin-contrib@msquadrat.de 2002-10-03 13:57 -------
A solution could be the preprocessor in combination with PM_FILTER -- if we
get the ExtUtils::MakeMaker versioning stuff right (see bug 1046).
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
[SAdev] [Bug 960] COMMENT low-performing rule pruned
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=960
spamassassin-contrib@msquadrat.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From spamassassin-contrib@msquadrat.de 2002-10-03 14:16 -------
I think it's ok to close this one? Comment is a valid, albeit seldom used RFC
2822 header...
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
[SAdev] [Bug 739] rules broken: RATWARE_*
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=739
spamassassin-contrib@msquadrat.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From spamassassin-contrib@msquadrat.de 2002-10-03 14:17 -------
Relieving Dan ;-)
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
[SAdev] [Bug 779] rule broken: CORRUPT_MSGID
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=779
spamassassin-contrib@msquadrat.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From spamassassin-contrib@msquadrat.de 2002-10-03 14:21 -------
I think INVALID_MSGID does what this rule was supposed to do
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
[SAdev] [Bug 1052] New: bondedsender.com is a scam
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1052
Summary: bondedsender.com is a scam
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.bondedsender.com/
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: spamassassin-devel@example.sourceforge.net
ReportedBy: friedman+spamassassin@splode.com
The default score for bondedsender-certified domains is -10, but I do not
believe they should be trusted and encourage you to change the default.
* I have been spammed by their customers.
* There is no documentation on their website about how I can complain about
this and have their customers financially penalized for sending me unsolicited
mail.
* What proof do any of us have that they really even do anything about it?
Their contract is with their customers, not with us.
This is a scam! Don't trust them!
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
[SAdev] [Bug 1052] bondedsender.com is a scam
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1052
------- Additional Comments From rOD-spamassassin@arsecandle.org 2002-10-03 18:51 -------
Ignoring the conspiracy theories, can you supply examples of spam which was
scored with RCVD_IN_BONDEDSENDER? The only mail I have received which scored
this were from Amazon.com.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
[SAdev] [Bug 1053] New: IMG tag based rules
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1053
Summary: IMG tag based rules
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: Eval Tests
AssignedTo: spamassassin-devel@example.sourceforge.net
ReportedBy: matt@nightrealms.com
Inspired by complaints about all-image or mostly-image spam that's
getting by SA, I've cooked up three sets of rules that analyze the use
of IMG tags in HTML: one that looks at the total area of all of the
images in the message (T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA*), one that looks at the
total number of images in the message (T_HTML_NUM_IMGS*), and one that
looks at the longest total run of consecutive images
(T_HTML_CONSEC_IMG*).
===============
The total area of all images is rather easy to compute: inside of
HTML::html_tests(), if an IMG tag has both the width and height
properties, then multiply them together and add the result to the
running total.
OVERALL% SPAM% NONSPAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
15113 4797 10316 0.32 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
100.000 31.741 68.259 0.32 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %)
0.635 2.001 0.000 1.00 0.81 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA14
0.417 1.313 0.000 1.00 0.78 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA15
0.331 1.042 0.000 1.00 0.76 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA07
0.245 0.771 0.000 1.00 0.74 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA10
0.238 0.750 0.000 1.00 0.74 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA02
0.225 0.709 0.000 1.00 0.74 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA16
0.126 0.396 0.000 1.00 0.70 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA18
0.119 0.375 0.000 1.00 0.70 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA19
0.119 0.375 0.000 1.00 0.70 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA17
1.125 3.523 0.010 1.00 0.68 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA12
0.741 2.314 0.010 1.00 0.65 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA13
1.542 4.732 0.058 0.99 0.58 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA11
0.139 0.417 0.010 0.98 0.54 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA08
0.483 1.397 0.058 0.96 0.50 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA03
0.192 0.500 0.048 0.91 0.44 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA06
0.820 1.834 0.349 0.84 0.39 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA04
0.946 2.022 0.446 0.82 0.38 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA01
0.569 0.896 0.417 0.68 0.32 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA05
6.498 0.500 9.287 0.05 0.02 0.01 T_HTML_IMAGE_AREA09
Spam % of all rules with S/0 > 0.90: 20.615%
=============================
The total number of IMG tags is really easy to do.
0.648 2.043 0.000 1.00 0.81 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS08
0.609 1.918 0.000 1.00 0.80 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS09
0.490 1.543 0.000 1.00 0.79 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS10
0.119 0.375 0.000 1.00 0.70 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS14
0.986 3.064 0.019 0.99 0.63 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS06
2.303 7.150 0.048 0.99 0.62 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS11
0.033 0.104 0.000 1.00 0.61 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS17
0.787 2.439 0.019 0.99 0.61 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS12
0.344 1.063 0.010 0.99 0.60 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS13
0.020 0.063 0.000 1.00 0.58 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS20
0.020 0.063 0.000 1.00 0.58 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS16
0.860 2.627 0.039 0.99 0.57 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS05
0.754 2.293 0.039 0.98 0.56 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS07
0.013 0.042 0.000 1.00 0.55 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS18
0.887 2.627 0.078 0.97 0.52 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS04
1.356 3.711 0.262 0.93 0.47 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS03
0.046 0.125 0.010 0.93 0.46 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS15
6.061 10.256 4.110 0.71 0.34 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS01
0.040 0.063 0.029 0.68 0.32 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS19
6.233 4.753 6.921 0.41 0.22 0.01 T_HTML_NUM_IMGS02
Spam % of all rules with S/O > 0.90: 31.25%
=========================
I figured that spam that is made up of only images is going to only
have IMG tags interspersed with table, paragraph and linebreak tags,
and some whitespace, so there would be a lot of IMG tags with no plain
text (non-whitespace) between them. So I defined consecutive IMG tags
to be ones with no text between them, and looked at the longest run of
consecutive IMGs within a message.
This one seems to do pretty good, because in my non-spam corpus
there's only a handful of messages with IMG runs larger than two.
0.450 1.418 0.000 1.00 0.78 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS06
0.232 0.730 0.000 1.00 0.74 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS08
0.205 0.646 0.000 1.00 0.73 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS11
1.813 5.691 0.010 1.00 0.71 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS02
1.019 3.189 0.010 1.00 0.67 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS03
0.768 2.397 0.010 1.00 0.66 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS05
0.053 0.167 0.000 1.00 0.64 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS12
1.006 3.127 0.019 0.99 0.63 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS04
0.483 1.501 0.010 0.99 0.62 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS07
0.020 0.063 0.000 1.00 0.58 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS13
0.020 0.063 0.000 1.00 0.58 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS15
1.032 3.148 0.048 0.98 0.57 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS10
0.199 0.605 0.010 0.98 0.57 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS09
0.013 0.042 0.000 1.00 0.55 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS17
0.013 0.042 0.000 1.00 0.55 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS19
0.007 0.021 0.000 1.00 0.51 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS14
7.080 7.484 6.892 0.52 0.26 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS01
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS16
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.01 T_HTML_CONSEC_IMGS18
Spam % of all rules with S/O > 0.90: 22.85%
==========================
Next I'm going to see if there's any meta rules I can make that will
reduce the FP rate for low S/O rules.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
[SAdev] [Bug 1053] IMG tag based rules
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1053
------- Additional Comments From mgm@starlingtech.com 2002-10-03 21:46 -------
Looks great! One note: most "image-only" spam actually has some text (a few
words at the top, a disclaimer at the end) so keep that in mind. The typical
image spam that slips through SA seems to have a bit of text, one huge image,
then a bit more.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
[SAdev] [Bug 1054] New: Split up FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1054
Summary: Split up FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: spamassassin-devel@example.sourceforge.net
ReportedBy: matt@nightrealms.com
The current FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS triggers on any from where the user name ends
in two or more digits. I think this should be split up into different
numbers of trailing digits, so that rules with different S/O ratios can
get different scores. So I've made test rules that look from From
names that end with two, three, four, or five digitis, and one for six or
more digitis; I also put in a test rule that looks for Froms that end in a
single digit, just the sake of completeness.
Here is what I got:
OVERALL% SPAM% NONSPAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
15113 4797 10316 0.32 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
100.000 31.741 68.259 0.32 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %)
1.244 3.877 0.019 1.00 0.64 0.01 T_FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS6
0.576 1.459 0.165 0.90 0.43 0.01 T_FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS5
4.982 10.694 2.326 0.82 0.38 0.01 T_FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS4
3.434 6.337 2.084 0.75 0.35 0.01 T_FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS3
8.979 12.383 7.396 0.63 0.30 0.01 T_FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS2
8.847 6.817 9.791 0.41 0.22 0.01 T_FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS1
I should note that I get rather bad S/O's for FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, probably
because so much of my corpus is made up of Yahoo! Groups traffic, which
seems to have a lot of users that like sticking numbers at the ends of their
names. Here is the normal stats for FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS:
7.024 28.480 2.834 0.91 0.50 0.88 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS
and my stats:
19.228 34.793 11.991 0.74 0.35 0.88 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
Re: [SAdev] nightly mass-check and hit-frequencies
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
DQ> jm@jmason.org (Justin Mason) writes:
DQ>
DQ> > But I think rsync is key; it's very efficient bandwidth-wise, and it
DQ> > allows you to select which ones you want just as well as wget would.
DQ> > (Bandwidth is a much bigger issue for me and some other of the europeans
DQ> > involved, than it would be for you guys ;) IMO it's by far the most
DQ> > efficient and scriptable way to do this stuff, these days.
DQ>
DQ> It must be horrible being a dial-up user in 2002. If we can *automate*
DQ> rsync submission with good *authentication*, it would be fine with me.
DQ> The current rsync method is not sufficiently authenticated, though.
I'll take a look at it. I'm sure there's got to be some reasonly easy way to
have rsync carry itself over ssh and secure access using ssh keys.
DQ> > I suggest we use the hughes-family.org server for rsyncing, as we do for
DQ> > the corpus_submit stuff -- in a separate subdirectory, though! -- then
DQ> > I'll take a look at getting a nightly hit-frequencies-collation system
DQ> > going.
Ok, I'll take a look at it.
C
| 0 |
Re: [SAtalk] razor2 auth?
Randy Bush said:
> >> freebsd -stable
> >> spamassassin 2.41
> >> spamasassin -r
> >> results in
> >> razor2 report failed: No such file or directory Razor2 reporting requires
> authentication at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Repo
> rter.pm line 77.
> >> used to work until upgrade
> >
> > using spamd? try the -H switch.
>
> no, pipinng the message to "spamassassin -r" from within my mail
> user agent, VM under Emacs.
oops, sorry -- didn't notice the "report" bit. Yes, you need to register
for Razor2 -- "razor-register" or "razor-admin -register" if I recall
correctly.
--j.
| 0 |
[SAtalk] emacs rmail How to sort subject lines and headers.
In emacs rmail what varieties of different techniques are there for
sorting your favorite correspondents from the mix?... leaving the hundreds
of spam commercials. A filter for the campus computer system puts subject
lines and headers on many of the hundreds of spam commercials
with http://spamassassin.org
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
| 0 |
Re: [SAtalk] Re: AWL bug in 2.42?
Kenneth Nerhood said:
> I too am seeing very weird things with 2.42 and AWL. I installed a
> fresh system, and then ran a bunch of test spam through it (all from the
> same user). All messages should have scored over 15. The AWL kept
> adjusting them down so that after about 10 message I had a negative
> score. I'm using spamc/d.
That's exactly what is intended; the idea is that legit senders who
habitually score just > 5, will eventually get out of "AWL hell" after
6-10 messages.
Note that running a single spam through "spamassassin -a -t" *will*
eventually whitelist the spammer. but that's why the man page tells you
not to do it ;)
--j.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
| 0 |
[SAdev] Party in San Francisco tonight
I don't know how make of you are in the Bay Area but EFF is having a benifit
party ast the DNA Lounge in San Francisco tonight. Wil Weaton (Wesley Crussher
from star Trek TNG) will fight Barney the Dinasour.
Come on by if you're not doing anything.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
Re: [SAdev] 2.40 RELEASE PROCESS: mass-check status, folks?
On Thursday, August 22, 2002, at 10:24 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
> I plan to
>
> 1. figure out the freqs tonight, suggest what tests to drop
> 2. wait for comments
> 3. drop tests that nobody cares about tomorrow
> 4. sed out the dropped tests from the mass-check logs
This step is unneccesary -- unless you've changed the scripts
much, any test in the logs which aren't in the rules files will
just be ignored I think. You do seem to have changed the
logs-to-c script and removed the bit where you could specify
immutable tests at the top -- I took a brief glance through the
code and couldn't fully make out how it had changed. I think we
want to be able to specify immutable test scores though in there
somewhere -- or is that now handled by the tflags stuff? For
the last couple releases, any test which occurred infrequently
(by thumb-in-the-wind subjective criteria) I set to have
immutable scores, as well as a handful of other rules.
> 5. kick off the GA
>
> BTW I'll be away this weekend at Linuxbierwanderung, so Craig,
> you might
> have to run the GA. ;)
Shouldn't be a problem. Assuming I can get the darned thing to
compile :)
C
| 0 |
[SAdev] [Bug 1075] RPM build puts wrong path in the *.cf files
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1075
spamassassin-contrib@msquadrat.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |spamassassin-
| |devel@lists.sourceforge.net
AssignedTo|spamassassin- |spamassassin-
|devel@lists.sourceforge.net |contrib@msquadrat.de
------- Additional Comments From spamassassin-contrib@msquadrat.de 2002-10-08 04:16 -------
I'm gonna fix this one. I think the best solution will be to copy the modified
rules to blib and install them from there. Then the rules files will be
changed on build time and not install time, too.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
Re: [SAtalk] Setting up a spam eating address
"Steve Thomas" said:
> I created a user (honeypot) and set up an alias to it. Then I added a
> 'hidden' (font color same as background color) link to that address at the
> bottom of my html pages. The .procmailrc file for that user is: .....
> which will submit the msg to razor then save it locally. I set this up about
> a month ago, and haven't received anything other than some viruses (Sircam)
> on it yet. The viruses are rejected at the MTA level, so they're not being
> saved/reported to razor.
FWIW, I would now recommend doing this (using a user with a procmailrc)
instead of a system alias; more secure, and easier to filter out crud
like bounces, virii etc. that render a corpus dirty.
--j.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in!
http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
| 0 |
Re: [SAtalk] False Positive of the Week
Bob Sully said:
> Spamassassin (2.30) has been tossing my daily LogWatch (3.3) reports into
> the spam bucket. A recent one generated the folowing hits: ....
fixed in CVS I think, or at least my logwatches get through fine. If it
is not fixed in CVS, then report it, using the correct bug-reporting
procedure:
1. open a Bugzilla bug. http://bugzilla.SpamAssassin.org/
2. attach a sample mail message *as an attachment* with all
headers intact
--j.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in!
http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
| 0 |
[SAdev] [Bug 839] mailbox corruption not fixed with procmail 3.22
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=839
------- Additional Comments From alan@rdrop.com 2002-09-05 22:22 -------
I haven't tried 2.41 yet because it requires File::Spec, which barfs when
spamassassin tries to use it. I haven't filed a bug yet because I suspect it's
because I'm still running 5.005 perl because of reported compatibility issues
with 5.6 and later, but I probably will because I think there's too much legacy
perl code to put up with major compatibility problems, and spamassassin didn't,
at least in the quickest of looks, say it needed a newer one. The perl @ stuff
was bad enough... but this is all a separate soapbox...
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
Failed mail: Banned or potentially offensive material
This is a MIME-encapsulated message
--==_15304473447567@buffy.jpci.net==_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Your message was not delivered to
daz@jpci.net
This mail message contains banned or potentially offensive text.
--==_15304473447567@buffy.jpci.net==_
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Reporting-MTA: dns;buffy.jpci.net
Final-Recipient: rfc822;daz@jpci.net
Action: failure
--==_15304473447567@buffy.jpci.net==_
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13] helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net)
by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
id 17ywHF-0003wQ-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 08:28:05 -0700
Received: from dsl092-072-213.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.72.213] helo=blazing.arsecandle.org)
by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
id 17ywGP-000544-00
for <Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 08:27:14 -0700
Received: (qmail 31751 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2002 15:26:25 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO RAGING) (rod@127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 8 Oct 2002 15:26:25 -0000
Message-ID: <042a01c26edf$16332c50$b554a8c0@RAGING>
From: "rODbegbie" <rOD@arsecandle.org>
To: "Odhiambo Washington" <wash@wananchi.com>,
"spamassassin" <Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <20021008130510.GA23757@ns2.wananchi.com>
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamd error messages
Organization: Arsecandle Industries, Inc.
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report>.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
micalg=SHA1;
protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature";
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0426_01C26EBD.8DF911E0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-BeenThere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchives/forum.php?forum=spamassassin-talk>
X-Original-Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:26:32 -0400
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:26:32 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0426_01C26EBD.8DF911E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> After being bitten by bugs in 2.41, I've downgraded to 2.31 but now spamd
> spews errors like I've never seen before:
Delete the contents of /usr/local/share/spamassassin and reinstall. There
are some files that were new to v2.4x, so they won't be overwritten when you
downgrade.
rOD.
--
"Fast! Fast! Faster! Bring the beef, you bastard,"
cries Paula Abdul, "and don't forget the pasta!"
Doing the blogging thang again at http://www.groovymother.com/ <<
------=_NextPart_000_0426_01C26EBD.8DF911E0
Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature;
name="smime.p7s"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="smime.p7s"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------=_NextPart_000_0426_01C26EBD.8DF911E0--
--==_15304473447567@buffy.jpci.net==_--
| 0 |
Re: [SAdev] Interesting approach to Spam handling..
David H�hn wrote:
> Hello, have you seen and discussed this article and his approach?
>
> Thank you
>
> http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html
Yes. See the perl module Mail::SpamTest::Bayesian on CPAN, and the
thread on sa-talk.
Matt.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel
| 0 |
Re: [SAtalk] Re: fully-public corpus of mail available
Craig Hughes said:
> > - All headers are reproduced in full. Some address obfuscation has
> > taken place; hostnames in some cases have been replaced with
> > "spamassassin.taint.org", which should have a valid MX record (if I recall
> > correctly). In > most cases though, the headers appear as they were
> > received.
>
> Nope:
>
> [craig@balam craig]$ dig spamassassin.taint.org mx
I knew there was something about spamassassin.taint.org ;)
Ah well, that's probably just as good anyway...
--j.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
| 0 |
Re: [SAdev] fully-public corpus of mail available
> (Please feel free to forward this message to other possibly-interested
> parties.)
Some caveats (in decending order of concern):
1. These messages could end up being falsely (or incorrectly) reported
to Razor, DCC, Pyzor, etc. Certain RBLs too. I don't think the
results for these distributed tests can be trusted in any way,
shape, or form when running over a public corpus.
2. These messages could also be submitted (more than once) to projects
like SpamAssassin that rely on filtering results submission for GA
tuning and development.
3. Spammers could adopt elements of the good messages to throw off
filters. And, of course, there's always progression in technology
(by both spammers and non-spammers).
The second problem could be alleviated somewhat by adding a Nilsimsa
signature (or similar) to the mass-check file (the results format used
by SpamAssassin) and giving the message files unique names (MD5 or
SHA-1 of each file).
The third problem doesn't really worry me.
These problems (and perhaps others I have not identified) are unique
to spam filtering. Compression corpuses and other performance-related
corpuses have their own set of problems, of course.
In other words, I don't think there's any replacement for having
multiple independent corpuses. Finding better ways to distribute
testing and collate results seems like a more viable long-term solution
(and I'm glad we're working on exactly that for SpamAssassin). If
you're going to seriously work on filter development, building a corpus
of 10000-50000 messages (half spam/half non-spam) is not really that
much work. If you don't get enough spam, creating multi-technique
spamtraps (web, usenet, replying to spam) is pretty easy. And who
doesn't get thousands of non-spam every week? ;-)
Dan
| 0 |
Re: [SAdev] fully-public corpus of mail available
(trimmed cc list)
Daniel Quinlan said:
> 1. These messages could end up being falsely (or incorrectly) reported
> to Razor, DCC, Pyzor, etc. Certain RBLs too. I don't think the
> results for these distributed tests can be trusted in any way,
> shape, or form when running over a public corpus.
I'll note that in the README.
> 2. These messages could also be submitted (more than once) to projects
> like SpamAssassin that rely on filtering results submission for GA
> tuning and development.
> The second problem could be alleviated somewhat by adding a Nilsimsa
> signature (or similar) to the mass-check file (the results format used
> by SpamAssassin) and giving the message files unique names (MD5 or
> SHA-1 of each file).
OK; maybe rewriting the message-ids will help here, that should allow
us to pick them out. I'll do that.
> 3. Spammers could adopt elements of the good messages to throw off
> filters. And, of course, there's always progression in technology
> (by both spammers and non-spammers).
> The third problem doesn't really worry me.
nah, me neither.
> These problems (and perhaps others I have not identified) are unique
> to spam filtering. Compression corpuses and other performance-related
> corpuses have their own set of problems, of course.
>
> In other words, I don't think there's any replacement for having
> multiple independent corpuses. Finding better ways to distribute
> testing and collate results seems like a more viable long-term solution
> (and I'm glad we're working on exactly that for SpamAssassin). If
> you're going to seriously work on filter development, building a corpus
> of 10000-50000 messages (half spam/half non-spam) is not really that
> much work. If you don't get enough spam, creating multi-technique
> spamtraps (web, usenet, replying to spam) is pretty easy. And who
> doesn't get thousands of non-spam every week? ;-)
Yep. The primary reason I released this, was to provide a good, big
corpus for academic testing of filter systems; it allows results to
be compared between filters using a known corpus.
For SpamAssassin development, everyone has to maintain their own corpus.
--j.
| 0 |
RE: [Razor-users] Razor with sendmail
----- Original Message -----
From: <razor-users-request@example.sourceforge.net>
To: <razor-users@example.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:05 PM
Subject: Razor-users digest, Vol 1 #346 - 8 msgs
> Subject: RE: [Razor-users] Razor with sendmail
> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 15:03:05 -0400
> From: "Rose, Bobby" <brose@med.wayne.edu>
> To: "Julian Bond" <julian_bond@voidstar.com>,
> <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>
> If you didn't add it when compile would be one way. Another would be to
> grep your sendmail.cf for the word Milter.
>
>
>
> "Bort, Paul" <pbort@tmwsystems.com> wrote:
> >If your sendmail has been compiled with Milter support, you can add=20
> >SMRazor easily. We've been using it for a while without problems.=20
> >Others on the list have mentioned it as well.
> >
> >http://www.sapros.com/smrazor/
>
> Is there an easy way to tell if Milter is compiled in?
>
To see all the options compiled into (and version of) sendmail, try the
following line:
echo \$Z | /path/to/sendmail -bt -d0
Sven
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
RE: [Razor-users] Razor with sendmail
On Aug 23 Bort, Paul wrote:
>If your sendmail has been compiled with Milter support, you can add SMRazor
>easily. We've been using it for a while without problems. Others on the list
>have mentioned it as well.
>
>http://www.sapros.com/smrazor/
Does this fork+exec a perl interpreter for every incoming mail? If so, I
reckon your mailer is vulerable to a DoS attack without too much effort...
The real question is: is there a way to run razor without this overhead?
Even some sort of razord you could talk to over a unix socket would do.
Until I can find one, I cannot spare the resources to run razor at all :(
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Where can i find a positif mail(spam) for test
Bonjour,
I'm writting a Python script, in order to use Razor with Qmail.
The script is finish, but i want to test the result with positive
mail (spam). Somebody knows, whrere can i find one.
PS : Escuse my pooooooor English ;-))
--
Toorop
Lorsque que vous avez �limin� l'impossible, ce qui reste,
m�me si c'est improbable, doit �tre la v�rit�.
www.spoonsdesign.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Exit.status =13 ?
Bonjour,
Always for my script, if i run it manually in console all is ok
whether is the user.
But if i try to implement it in my general script filter running
whith qmailq UID (503) :
I've got 13 has exit status, and in my mail log :
"Can't call method "log" on unblessed reference at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Razor2/Client/Agent.pm line 211."
My log file is in /home/user/.razor/razor-agent.log
and have write permission for qmailq user.
Any idea ??
--
Toorop
Lorsque que vous avez �limin� l'impossible, ce qui reste,
m�me si c'est improbable, doit �tre la v�rit�.
www.spoonsdesign.com
---------------------------------
Mail scann� par Protecmail filter
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Reducing impact from tons of email
I'm not sure if this is really a razor problem/issue or a sendmail
problem. Here's the scenario... My mail server is a 150mhz PC funning
FreeBSD 4.4. Ordinarily, the machine is quite idle; it supports my
wife's web site with Apache server running on it and a few other
services (jabber, etc). Between the various members of our family, we
get a fair amount of email coming in (mailing lists, etc). On
occasion, our DSL-based ISP dies for a number of hours. When we get a
reconnection to the Internet, I get a huge flow of emails coming in
which are then filtered via razor. As a result, I will sometimes see
over 20+ sendmail processes running at the same time after such an
occasion. The machine is then REALLY slow.
I noticed that my /etc/procmailrc file had had no arguments associated
with the call to razor-check. There was something in the log, though,
to make me suspicious that it was possibly not seeing all my razor
files. So I have just added "-home /etc/razor" as an argument. I
haven't had any down time since then so I cannot comment on whether
this change has sped up my razor processing a noticable amount. (This
paragraph may be an aside to my real problem, the first paragraph
above; but I thought I should be complete in my description.)
At any rate, has anyone else suffered from a backlog of email
processing creating lots and lots of sendmail processes? Is there,
perhaps, a way to limit the number of sendmail processes?
Any ideas would be welcome.
Thanks,
Joe
---
Joe Berry
joe@topshot.com
AIM "joe topshot"
Yahoo Msgr "joetopshot"
jabber "joetopshot@topshot.com"
Baltimore, MD
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
RE: [Razor-users] Reducing impact from tons of email
See your /etc/sendmail.cf file, there are a number of methods for limiting
the number of concurrent sendmail processes, either by load average (I'm
sure), or concurrency (I think)... I use sendmail anymore (I use qmail) but
I'm sure that if you look in the config file, you will see what you need...
Regards,
Adam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net
> [mailto:razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Joe Berry
> Sent: Sunday, 25 August 2002 1:44 PM
> To: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Razor-users] Reducing impact from tons of email
>
>
> I'm not sure if this is really a razor problem/issue or a sendmail
> problem. Here's the scenario... My mail server is a 150mhz PC funning
> FreeBSD 4.4. Ordinarily, the machine is quite idle; it supports my
> wife's web site with Apache server running on it and a few other
> services (jabber, etc). Between the various members of our family, we
> get a fair amount of email coming in (mailing lists, etc). On
> occasion, our DSL-based ISP dies for a number of hours. When we get a
> reconnection to the Internet, I get a huge flow of emails coming in
> which are then filtered via razor. As a result, I will sometimes see
> over 20+ sendmail processes running at the same time after such an
> occasion. The machine is then REALLY slow.
>
> I noticed that my /etc/procmailrc file had had no arguments associated
> with the call to razor-check. There was something in the log, though,
> to make me suspicious that it was possibly not seeing all my razor
> files. So I have just added "-home /etc/razor" as an argument. I
> haven't had any down time since then so I cannot comment on whether
> this change has sped up my razor processing a noticable amount. (This
> paragraph may be an aside to my real problem, the first paragraph
> above; but I thought I should be complete in my description.)
>
> At any rate, has anyone else suffered from a backlog of email
> processing creating lots and lots of sendmail processes? Is there,
> perhaps, a way to limit the number of sendmail processes?
>
> Any ideas would be welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
> ---
> Joe Berry
> joe@topshot.com
> AIM "joe topshot"
> Yahoo Msgr "joetopshot"
> jabber "joetopshot@topshot.com"
> Baltimore, MD
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
> _______________________________________________
> Razor-users mailing list
> Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re[2]: [Razor-users] Reducing impact from tons of email
On Aug 25 Joe Berry wrote:
>Very good advice given above.
Yes :)
>One more problem solved.
No. One more problem in some software worked around by using tricks in
another piece of software. The solution is the aggregator.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Preproc erasing message
The following razor debugging sequence show my mail going from 9295 bytes to
0 bytes after the preproc runs, which gives me an exit code that is not 0.
I included the message below.
Fox
Razor-Log: No /etc/razor/razor-agent.conf found, skipping.
Razor-Log: No razor-agent.conf found, using defaults.
Aug 26 10:28:09.225237 check[3469]: [ 1] [bootup] Logging initiated
LogDebugLevel=9 to stdout
Aug 26 10:28:09.225890 check[3469]: [ 5] computed razorhome=/etc/razor,
conf=, ident=/etc/razor/identity
Aug 26 10:28:09.226006 check[3469]: [ 2] Razor-Agents v2.14 starting
razor-check -d -home=/etc/razor
Aug 26 10:28:09.229704 check[3469]: [ 9] uname -a: Linux qmail.mckee.com
2.4.8-34.1mdk #1 Mon Nov 19 12:40:39 MST 2001 i686 unknown
Aug 26 10:28:09.230155 check[3469]: [ 8] reading straight RFC822 mail from
Aug 26 10:28:09.231524 check[3469]: [ 6] read 1 mail
Aug 26 10:28:09.231923 check[3469]: [ 8] Client supported_engines: 1 2 3 4
Aug 26 10:28:09.233017 check[3469]: [ 8] prep_mail done: mail 1 headers=631,
mime0=9295
Aug 26 10:28:09.233434 check[3469]: [ 6] skipping whitelist file (empty?):
/etc/razor/razor-whitelist
Aug 26 10:28:09.233995 check[3469]: [ 5] read_file: 1 items read from
/etc/razor/servers.discovery.lst
Aug 26 10:28:09.234369 check[3469]: [ 5] read_file: 1 items read from
/etc/razor/servers.nomination.lst
Aug 26 10:28:09.234697 check[3469]: [ 5] read_file: 3 items read from
/etc/razor/servers.catalogue.lst
Aug 26 10:28:09.235184 check[3469]: [ 9] Assigning defaults to
honor.cloudmark.com
Aug 26 10:28:09.235415 check[3469]: [ 9] Assigning defaults to
truth.cloudmark.com
Aug 26 10:28:09.235624 check[3469]: [ 9] Assigning defaults to
fire.cloudmark.com
Aug 26 10:28:09.235830 check[3469]: [ 9] Assigning defaults to
apt.cloudmark.com
Aug 26 10:28:09.236715 check[3469]: [ 5] read_file: 11 items read from
/etc/razor/server.truth.cloudmark.com.conf
Aug 26 10:28:09.237368 check[3469]: [ 5] read_file: 11 items read from
/etc/razor/server.fire.cloudmark.com.conf
Aug 26 10:28:09.237825 check[3469]: [ 5] 149643 seconds before closest
server discovery
Aug 26 10:28:09.238135 check[3469]: [ 6] truth.cloudmark.com is a Catalogue
Server srl 51; computed min_cf=1, Server se: 0B
Aug 26 10:28:09.238414 check[3469]: [ 8] Computed supported_engines: 1 2 4
Aug 26 10:28:09.238656 check[3469]: [ 8] Using next closest server
truth.cloudmark.com:2703, cached info srl 51
Aug 26 10:28:09.238871 check[3469]: [ 8] mail 1 Subject: New Freeware
Download
Aug 26 10:28:09.290618 check[3469]: [ 6] preproc: mail 1.0 went from 9295
bytes to 0, erasing
Aug 26 10:28:09.291100 check[3469]: [ 5] Connecting to truth.cloudmark.com
...
Aug 26 10:28:09.505431 check[3469]: [ 8] Connection established
Aug 26 10:28:09.505662 check[3469]: [ 4] truth.cloudmark.com >> 29 server
greeting: sn=C&srl=51&ep4=7542-10&a=l
Aug 26 10:28:09.506086 check[3469]: [ 6] truth.cloudmark.com is a Catalogue
Server srl 51; computed min_cf=1, Server se: 0B
Aug 26 10:28:09.506342 check[3469]: [ 8] Computed supported_engines: 1 2 4
Aug 26 10:28:09.506604 check[3469]: [ 8] mail 1.0 skipped in check
Aug 26 10:28:09.506686 check[3469]: [ 5] No queries, no spam
Aug 26 10:28:09.506787 check[3469]: [ 5] disconnecting from server
truth.cloudmark.com
Aug 26 10:28:09.507071 check[3469]: [ 4] truth.cloudmark.com << 5
Aug 26 10:28:09.507155 check[3469]: [ 6] a=q
Aug 26 10:28:09.507959 check[3469]: [ 8] razor-check finished successfully.
>>From bounce-html-sales1-21787251@lyris.execsoft.com Mon Aug 26 14:28:10 2002
Return-Path: <bounce-html-sales1-21787251@lyris.execsoft.com>
Delivered-To: log@qmail.mckee.com
Received: (qmail 3472 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2002 14:28:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO port-216-3073879-ds200.devices.datareturn.net)
(216.46.231.87)
by 10.97.5.1 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2002 14:28:05 -0000
X-Mailer: Lyris Web Interface
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 09:45:48 -0700
Subject: New Freeware Download
- Jammed: eric_koester@ccmail.mckee.com
To: <trollbox@dustpuppy.mckee.com>
From: "Diskeeper Product Manager, Executive Software"
<executive@executive.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:leave-html-sales1-21787251A@lyris.execsoft.com>
Reply-To: executive@executive.com
Message-Id:
<LYRIS-21787251-20123-2002.08.24-09.47.15--eric_koester#ccmail.mckee.com@lyr
is.execsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Spam-File:
Envelope-Recipient: eric_koester@ccmail.mckee.com
<!------------------------------------------------------------
Is Maximum System Performance and Reliablilty Important to you?
Find out what you are missing!
New Diskeeper Lite for Windows.
IT'S FREE!
* Includes the same advanced defragmentation technology used in
Diskeeper 7.0.
* Is much faster than the previous Diskeeper Lite and all
built-in defragmenters.
* Now runs on Windows NT�/98/2000/XP.
Millions of downloads attest to the popularity of Diskeeper Lite,
but it only ran on Windows NT 4.0. Now it's been updated for all
Windows operating systems from Windows 98 onward.
New Diskeeper Lite is still manual-only and cannot be scheduled
or run across a network, but it is far superior to any built-in
defragmenter and much faster. And it will show you why full-version
Diskeeper is the most recommended automatic defragmenter ever
built.
Find out what you are really missing. Free!
http://www.execsoft.com/downloads/survey.asp?PId=15&ad=dkldl3
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: We periodically send new product information electronically or
survey those individuals who voluntarily give us their e-mail address.
We hope you enjoy receiving this timely information. However, if you
would like to remove yourself from this list, please do not reply to
this e-mail to be removed.
To unsubscribe, send your e-mail address in the body of a message
along with your name, on a separate line, to unsubscribe@executive.com.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
� 2002 Executive Software International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
DISKEEPER, Executive Software and the Executive Software logo are either
registered trademarks or trademarks of Executive Software International,
Inc. in the United States and/or other countries. Windows and Windows NT
are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States
and/or other countries. All other trademarks and brand names are the
property of the respective owners.
------------------------------------------------------------->
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<title>New Freeware Download</title>
</head>
<body>
<p align="center">
<img border="0" src="http://www2.execsoft.com/max-perf_speedo.jpg"
width="537" height="121"><img border="0"
src="http://www2.execsoft.com/n-dkl_082302.jpg" width="470"
height="106"></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"
style="border-collapse: collapse" bordercolor="#111111" width="100%"
id="AutoNumber2">
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<p align="center"><b><font face="Verdana" color="#ff0000"
size="5">IT'S
FREE!</font></b></td>
</tr>
</table>
<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse:
collapse" bordercolor="#111111" width="100%" id="AutoNumber1">
<tr>
<td width="15" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="15" valign="top">
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="2">
<span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">
<img src="http://www2.execsoft.com/chk-mark.gif" border="0" width="15"
height="14"></span></font></td>
<td width="100%" valign="top"><font face="Verdana">Includes the same
advanced defragmentation technology
used in Diskeeper 7.0.</font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="15" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="15" valign="top"><font face="Times New Roman" size="2">
<span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">
<img src="http://www2.execsoft.com/chk-mark.gif" border="0" width="15"
height="14"></span></font></td>
<td width="100%" valign="top"><font face="Verdana">Much faster than the
previous
Diskeeper Lite and all built-in defragmenters.</font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="15" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="15" valign="top"><font face="Times New Roman" size="2">
<span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">
<img src="http://www2.execsoft.com/chk-mark.gif" border="0" width="15"
height="14"></span></font></td>
<td width="100%" valign="top"><font face="Verdana">Now runs on Windows
NT<sup>�</sup>/98/2000/XP.</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><font face="Verdana">Millions of downloads attest to the popularity of
Diskeeper Lite, but it only ran on Windows NT 4.0. Now it's been updated
for all
Windows operating systems from Windows 98 onward.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">New Diskeeper Lite is still manual-only and cannot
be
scheduled or run across a network, but it is far superior to any built-in
defragmenter and much faster. And it will show you why full-version
Diskeeper is
the most recommended automatic defragmenter ever built. </font></p>
<p><b><font face="Verdana">Find out what you are <i>really</i> missing.
Free!</font></b></p>
<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center" align="center">
<span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">
<font face="Arial" size="2">
<a href="http://www.execsoft.com/downloads/survey.asp?PId=15&ad=dkldl3">
<img src="http://www2.execsoft.com/dlnowbut.gif" border="0" width="195"
height="25" alt="Download Diskeeper Lite"></a></font></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"
style="border-collapse: collapse" bordercolor="#111111" width="100%"
id="AutoNumber4">
<tr>
<td width="100%"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><font
size="2">
Full version Diskeeper
available for purchase from:</font></span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div align="center">
<center>
<table border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"
style="border-collapse: collapse" bordercolor="#111111" width="620"
id="AutoNumber3">
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<p align="center">
<span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">
<map name="FPMap0">
<area
href="http://www.buy.com/retail/searchresults.asp?orderby=4&querytype=&qutyp
e=0&qu=diskeeper&pagereq=1&alpha=&alpha2=&deptid=0&mfgpartno=&mfgid=0&search
id=0&loc=105&search_store=2" shape="rect" coords="491, 25, 576, 49">
<area
href="http://www2.warehouse.com/search/pppsmainsearch.asp?home=micro&qu=disk
eeper&imenu=&so=X&Search.x=6&Search.y=12" shape="rect" coords="191, 69, 328,
101">
<area
href="http://www.pcconnection.com/scripts/searchresults.asp?BasicSrchText=di
skeeper&SR=1&ER=10&TR=0&ST=BS&PP=0&sortval=Price&plattype=A&Search.x=40&Sear
ch.y=12" shape="rect" coords="3, 8, 165, 52">
<area
href="http://www.softchoice.com/software/prod_description.asp?5445x$qJpibFSc
VSPL34dNX1NpKIC7k0y8w2JTWf0TJAZv16neAteuE$2jAUDdqSkqd22U8RG_ODIY1ZVd0ZK2FJBL
pFHM1p8InrYf$$dQNb9amrhiAmTmLZzs6Jg4VvRqWW09_ng7ABuhLAPrzhNCfBQIlCQ25pKQimn$
HCmHgoBko9i4bo43b9ggk2ngYvPiimlN6" shape="rect" coords="196, 5, 334, 52">
<area
href="http://www.softwareshelf.com/products/execsoftprod.asp?p=5"
shape="rect" coords="1, 70, 167, 101">
<area
href="http://www.staples.com/Catalog/Browse/sku.asp?PageType=1&Sku=490710&bc
Flag=True&bcCatId=0&bcCatName=Software,+Books+&+Training&bcDeptId=1443&bcDep
tName=Utilities&bcClassId=140505&bcClassName=System+Maintenance"
shape="rect" coords="362, 4, 459, 50">
<area href="http://shop2.outpost.com/product/3196730"
shape="rect" coords="357, 70, 437, 122">
<area href="http://www.asap.com/execsoftware/2001Q11.htm"
shape="rect" coords="484, 72, 613, 117">
</map>
<img border="0"
src="http://www2.execsoft.com/logos_resell_082302.gif" usemap="#FPMap0"
width="620" height="124"></span></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center>
</div>
<hr noshade color="#E4E4E4">
<FONT SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana"><B>
<FONT COLOR="#FF0000">NOTICE:</FONT></B> We periodically send new product
information electronically or
survey those individuals who voluntarily give us their e-mail address. We
hope you enjoy receiving this timely information. However, if you would
like to remove yourself from this list, please do not reply to this e-mail
to be removed.</FONT></span><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><font
size="1">
</font></span>
<span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">
<P><FONT SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana">You have received this message from
esi-vp-marketing at the e-mail
address: eric_koester@ccmail.mckee.com
<BR> To unsubscribe, send the above e-mail address in the body of a message
along with your name, on a separate line, to
<A HREF="mailto:unsubscribe@executive.com?subject=Unsubscribe%20
eric_koester@ccmail.mckee.com" > unsubscribe@executive.com</A>.</FONT></P>
<hr noshade color="#E4E4E4">
<p><font size="1" face="Verdana">� 2002 Executive Software International,
Inc.
All Rights Reserved. DISKEEPER, Executive Software and the Executive
Software
logo are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Executive Software
International, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries. Windows
and
Windows NT are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the
United
States and/or other countries. All other trademarks and brand names are
the
property of the respective owners.<br>
</font></p>
</body>
</html>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Collision of hashes?
The following was personal correspondence between two people. I can't
fathom how Razor thinks it is spam:
>
> We are struggling with the decisions related to wether or not to
> go ahead with our plans to purchase an OCR and forms
> scanning solution.
>
> An outside consultant mentioned that he had heard that not to
> long ago you folks were considering implementing OCR
> technology to reduce data entry costs and improve efficiency.
> If you could let us know if you did move foreward with any
> plans in that direction it would be of great help to us. May I ask
> what initialy prompted you to consider OCR? Did you decide it
> could help your compamy? What software did you go with?
> Would you recomend we take a look at it?
> At present we are still planning to continue our research until
> we decide which OCR system best suits our needs, then
> implement it quickly.
>
> If you are just starting to consider this
> technology feel free to stay in touch. We will let you know what
> we decide on and if it works for us.
>
> If you cannot advise on this please forward this E-mail to the
> proper individual in your company who might be able to help with
> this.
> Thanks,
> Jay
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] razor plugins for mozilla?
Hello,
did any of you hear about a a razor plugin for mozilla?
a plugin that would add a "report as spam" button somewhere for the user
to report a mail as spam on a server?
Arnaud
--
Arnaud Ab�lard
Administrateur r�seaux et syst�mes
Irin / Facult� de Sciences
Universit� de Nantes
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] razor plugins for mozilla?
No, please post a link!
Fox
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arnaud Abelard" <arnaud.abelard@sciences.univ-nantes.fr>
To: <razor-users@example.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 2:39 AM
Subject: [Razor-users] razor plugins for mozilla?
> Hello,
>
> did any of you hear about a a razor plugin for mozilla?
> a plugin that would add a "report as spam" button somewhere for the user
> to report a mail as spam on a server?
>
> Arnaud
> --
> Arnaud Ab�lard
> Administrateur r�seaux et syst�mes
> Irin / Facult� de Sciences
> Universit� de Nantes
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
> _______________________________________________
> Razor-users mailing list
> Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] razor plugins for mozilla?
--aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Revoking self-submitted content (unblocking something you accidentally
blocked) results in permanent deletion of said content from the
network.
Fortunately, Razor2/SpamNet isa network of content people DON'T want
[in their inbox, let alone IP rights]. Block away!
--jordan
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:24:33PM -0700, Craig R.Hughes wrote:
# "Free" is a relative concept if you actually read the EULA. No
# commercial use, and anything you submit to razor becomes entirely
# their intellectual property. Better not accidentally hit "This is
# spam" on anything you want to retain IP rights to.
--aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9dSc/pwQdAVEbU7oRAlZcAJ0dsOi7U1Mf/2LjCE87mRSBhe1gpQCeJ7yf
P310bOJSkBt79KRJMo+oTgQ=
=+IYG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1--
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] Razor v2 effectiveness stats - HTML table - Take 2
Oh, I was serious. I'm awful with perl/etc. I just think the HTML graph that
was created was pretty neat and I wish I could do something like that. :-)
> I can't tell if you are serious or joking. I have a custom perl based
spam
> blocking framework that uses plug-ins to block spam. I test each message
> with every plug-in and keep the stats in a mysql database, which are what
> you see below.
>
> Fox
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jonathan Nichols" <jnichols@pbp.net>
> To: <razor-users@example.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 2:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Razor v2 effectiveness stats - HTML table -
Take
> 2
>
>
> > How do you make up graphs like that, anyway? :-)
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Daniel Higgins" <dhiggins@netc.net>
> > To: "Fox" <lds0062@cdc.net>; <razor-users@example.sourceforge.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:57 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Razor v2 effectiveness stats - HTML table -
> Take
> > 2
> >
> >
> > that's pretty impressive, have you seen any false positives yet? myself
> i'm
> > still at the stage of creating the corpuses. i'll report back after i
get
> > some testing of my own :P
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Fox
> > To: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 12:54 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Razor v2 effectiveness stats - HTML table -
> > Take 2
> >
> >
> > Sorry about the html, for those of you still using elm or other
non-GUI
> > clients. I don't have time to post it as text.
> >
> > The "Spam Count" is the total of all spam detected by the various
> filters.
> >
> > Jammed is a custom phrase ranking system.
> > Razored is Razor v2.
> > Bayesian filter is based off of Paul Graham's work (statistical
> > probability), using a corpus of 4000 non-spam and 2000 spam messages.
> >
> > Spam Statistics
> > Date Spam Count Jammed Razored Blacklisted Trollbox Bayesian
> > 2002-08-27 370 145 (39.19%) 181 (48.92%) 79 (21.35%)
120
> > (32.43%) 275 (74.32%)
> > 2002-08-28 397 106 (26.70%) 126 (31.74%) 163 (41.06%)
136
> > (34.26%) 320 (80.60%)
> > 2002-08-29 346 154 (44.51%) 146 (42.20%) 78 (22.54%)
101
> > (29.19%) 261 (75.43%)
> > 2002-08-30 366 163 (44.54%) 166 (45.36%) 65 (17.76%)
138
> > (37.70%) 272 (74.32%)
> > 2002-08-31 282 211 (74.82%) 133 (47.16%) 27 ( 9.57%)
132
> > (46.81%) 256 (90.78%)
> > 2002-09-01 220 127 (57.73%) 125 (56.82%) 22 (10.00%) 91
> > (41.36%) 157 (71.36%)
> > 2002-09-02 166 86 (51.81%) 77 (46.39%) 22 (13.25%) 64
> > (38.55%) 123 (74.10%)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> > cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
> > https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
> > _______________________________________________
> > Razor-users mailing list
> > Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
> _______________________________________________
> Razor-users mailing list
> Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Windows port / bug reports?
Hi,
Newbie (to the list) question; I've been working on porting the code to
run under Perl on Windows. The changes are fairly minor and can be made
to interoperate with the current code. How would one best go about
getting those changes merged in (better question, would there be
interest in such a version and getting those changes merged in)?
Bill
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] Problem with Razor 2.14 and Spamassassin 2.41
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050101050502080302080407
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I found a nice little Perl script for this purpose called rotate, which
makes the process of rotating log files very simple. If there's an
official source for this script, I couldn't find it. (My hosting
provider, pair.com, has it installed, and that's where I found it.)
However, redistribution appears to be allowed, so I've attached it.
Good luck...
L
David Rees wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:53:16PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
>
>>On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:16:57PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
>>
>>
>>>You might be better asking this on the spamassassin-talk list. The folks
>>>there will almost definitely have an answer for this.
>>>
>>>
>>I posted a fairly lengthy complete answer to this problem and how to
>>get around it in SA 2.41 on the spamassassin-talk list. :)
>>
>>
>
>Thanks for the post there, it answered all my questions about
>spamassassin/razor interaction.
>
>Now for a razor question:
>
>I'm worried about having a server full of razor-agent.log files which keep
>on growing. Is it possible to configure razor log via SYSLOG to make it
>easy to rotate logs? Searching through the man pages didn't turn anything
>up... Otherwise I'll have to write a script to go through each user's home
>directory looking for razor-agent.log files to rotate periodically.
>
>Thanks,
>Dave
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
>cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
>https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
>_______________________________________________
>Razor-users mailing list
>Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
>
>
--------------050101050502080302080407
Content-Type: application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.1;
name="rotate"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="rotate"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--------------050101050502080302080407--
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] Problem with Razor 2.14 and Spamassassin 2.41
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 10:12:59PM -0400, Leland Woodbury wrote:
> I found a nice little Perl script for this purpose called rotate, which
> makes the process of rotating log files very simple. If there's an
> official source for this script, I couldn't find it. (My hosting
> provider, pair.com, has it installed, and that's where I found it.)
> However, redistribution appears to be allowed, so I've attached it.
Thanks for the script. It also appears that the standard logrotate tools
included with many systems (or at least RedHat systems) will support
wildcards when rotating files so something like
/home/*/.razor/razor-agent.log can be specified...
-Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] Problem with Razor 2.14 and Spamassassin 2.41
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:53:16PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:16:57PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> > You might be better asking this on the spamassassin-talk list. The folks
> > there will almost definitely have an answer for this.
>
> I posted a fairly lengthy complete answer to this problem and how to
> get around it in SA 2.41 on the spamassassin-talk list. :)
Thanks for the post there, it answered all my questions about
spamassassin/razor interaction.
Now for a razor question:
I'm worried about having a server full of razor-agent.log files which keep
on growing. Is it possible to configure razor log via SYSLOG to make it
easy to rotate logs? Searching through the man pages didn't turn anything
up... Otherwise I'll have to write a script to go through each user's home
directory looking for razor-agent.log files to rotate periodically.
Thanks,
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] Problem with Razor 2.14 and Spamassassin 2.41
And you were exactly the person I figured would do so. <G>
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:16:57PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> > You might be better asking this on the spamassassin-talk list. The folks
> > there will almost definitely have an answer for this.
>
> I posted a fairly lengthy complete answer to this problem and how to
> get around it in SA 2.41 on the spamassassin-talk list. :)
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] removing Razor1
--iJXiJc/TAIT2rh2r
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:11:32PM -0500, Josh Hildebrand wrote:
> If that's the case, can someone please point me to something that explains
> how to remove Razor1 from my system? I don't see a point in envoking it.
> Especially when it appears to error out on me.
>=20
> Problem while trying to load Razor1: Permission denied at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 288.
> debug: leaving helper-app run mode
rm -rf /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Razor
(you'll want to check that path first of course...)
--=20
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"It's a chicken finger device." - Theo, looking at entree
--iJXiJc/TAIT2rh2r
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9d/wdAuOQUeWAs2MRAsXtAJ9ZJezMTsUuIw/Q3MMkZ6/QAyuYGgCgtc3/
iUYXa6+6icdddeWovza09lk=
=46WZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--iJXiJc/TAIT2rh2r--
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] Problem with Razor 2.14 and Spamassassin 2.41
Shouldn't there be a w, somewhere in tehre? Simply setting group and
owner to read and execute won't alleviate a write problem.
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Michael Duff wrote:
> This is due to insufficient write privileges to the "razor-agent.log"
> file. A quick work-around is to do a "chmod go+rx" on that file (of
> course, it's better to restrict the access as much as possible).
>
> In Agent.pm, when the Razor2::Logger object is created, if it doesn't
> have write permission to the log file it does not succeed. Then, later
> in the code when the log object is used, it fails with the "unblessed"
> error.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Michael Duff
>
> David Rees wrote:
>
> >This is my first time running Razor, heard a lot of good things about it so
> >I thought I'd give it a shot. I also run SpamAssassin so I'd like to
> >integrate the two.
> >
> >I'm not sure if this problem is with SpamAssassin or Razor, so I though I'd
> >shoot the message here first
> >
> >With a freshly installed SpamAssassin 2.41 and Razor 2.14 I'm seeing these
> >messages spit out from spamd:
> >
> >razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Can't call method "log" on
> >unblessed reference at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Razor2/Client/Agent.pm
> >line 211, <STDIN> line 75.
> >
> >Any ideas? razor seems to run correctly over the command line.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >-Dave
> >
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> >cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
> >https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
> >_______________________________________________
> >Razor-users mailing list
> >Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
> _______________________________________________
> Razor-users mailing list
> Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] Problem with Razor 2.14 and Spamassassin 2.41
--Enx9fNJ0XV5HaWRu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:16:57PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> You might be better asking this on the spamassassin-talk list. The folks=
=20
> there will almost definitely have an answer for this.
I posted a fairly lengthy complete answer to this problem and how to
get around it in SA 2.41 on the spamassassin-talk list. :)
--=20
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Good judgment comes from bad experience, and a lot of that comes from
bad judgment." - Zen Musings
--Enx9fNJ0XV5HaWRu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9d/x7AuOQUeWAs2MRAtAFAKDAv2ned2UEMjxqPm2PknM7USMCdgCggFr+
ONI0BQ6UcqCITZKsDjr5hRc=
=Wyzr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Enx9fNJ0XV5HaWRu--
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
RE: [Razor-users] spamassassin+razor2
Theo,
Thank you very much, it solves the problem!!!!
Eugene
-----Original Message-----
From: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net
[mailto:razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Theo Van
Dinter
Sent: September 5, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Eugene Chiu
Cc: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] spamassassin+razor2
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:27:08PM -0400, Eugene Chiu wrote:
> razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor Insecure dependency in open
while runn
> ing setuid at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Razor2/Client/Config.pm
line
> 410, <GEN23> line 1.
> >From info@znion.com Thu Sep 5 11:55:15 2002
> Subject: *****SPAM***** Computer Maintenance
> Folder: /home/eugene/caughtspam
8343
It looks like you're running via procmail -- what are the permissions
on procmail? "Insecure dependency" screams "I'm in taint mode!", which
is a typical problem when procmail is setuid/setgid (the permissions
should be 755).
If this is in fact the problem, an easy solution is to put "DROPPRIVS=yes"
in the procmailrc. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"The bus had no heat, blew over in the wind and used the driver's legs
as its first line of defense in an accident." - Unknown about the VW Bus
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] Problem with Razor 2.14 and Spamassassin 2.41
This is due to insufficient write privileges to the "razor-agent.log"
file. A quick work-around is to do a "chmod go+rx" on that file (of
course, it's better to restrict the access as much as possible).
In Agent.pm, when the Razor2::Logger object is created, if it doesn't
have write permission to the log file it does not succeed. Then, later
in the code when the log object is used, it fails with the "unblessed"
error.
Hope this helps,
Michael Duff
David Rees wrote:
>This is my first time running Razor, heard a lot of good things about it so
>I thought I'd give it a shot. I also run SpamAssassin so I'd like to
>integrate the two.
>
>I'm not sure if this problem is with SpamAssassin or Razor, so I though I'd
>shoot the message here first
>
>With a freshly installed SpamAssassin 2.41 and Razor 2.14 I'm seeing these
>messages spit out from spamd:
>
>razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Can't call method "log" on
>unblessed reference at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Razor2/Client/Agent.pm
>line 211, <STDIN> line 75.
>
>Any ideas? razor seems to run correctly over the command line.
>
>Thanks,
>-Dave
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
>cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
>https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
>_______________________________________________
>Razor-users mailing list
>Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] spamassassin+razor2
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C254F9.146CF4F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
I am wondering if anybody has successfully install a site-wide =
spamassassin+razor2 installation. I am having so much trouble and the =
following is the extract of my procmail.log.
razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor Insecure dependency in open =
while runn
ing setuid at =
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Razor2/Client/Config.pm line
410, <GEN23> line 1.
>>From info@znion.com Thu Sep 5 11:55:15 2002
Subject: *****SPAM***** Computer Maintenance
Folder: /home/eugene/caughtspam =
8343
In razor-agent.log, I simply get the bootup message and that's it...
Sep 05 11:55:15.668648 check[8478]: [ 1] [bootup] Logging initiated =
LogDebugLeve
l=3D14 to file:/var/log/razor-agent.log
Please help. Thanks.
Eugene
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C254F9.146CF4F0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4807.2300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi all,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I am wondering if anybody has =
successfully install=20
a site-wide spamassassin+razor2 installation. I am having so much =
trouble and=20
the following is the extract of my procmail.log.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>razor2 check skipped: Bad file =
descriptor Insecure=20
dependency in open while runn<BR>ing setuid at=20
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Razor2/Client/Config.pm =
line<BR>410,=20
<GEN23> line 1.<BR>From <A=20
href=3D"mailto:info@znion.com">info@znion.com</A> Thu Sep 5 =
11:55:15=20
2002<BR> Subject: *****SPAM***** Computer Maintenance<BR> =
Folder:=20
/home/eugene/caughtspam &n=
bsp; &nb=
sp; &nbs=
p; =20
8343</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>In razor-agent.log, I simply get the =
bootup message=20
and that's it...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Sep 05 11:55:15.668648 check[8478]: [ =
1] [bootup]=20
Logging initiated LogDebugLeve<BR>l=3D14 to=20
file:/var/log/razor-agent.log</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Please help. Thanks.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Eugene</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C254F9.146CF4F0--
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] spamassassin+razor2
--4Ycl1UgPPPgGZoSL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:27:08PM -0400, Eugene Chiu wrote:
> razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor Insecure dependency in open whi=
le runn
> ing setuid at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Razor2/Client/Config.p=
m line
> 410, <GEN23> line 1.
> >From info@znion.com Thu Sep 5 11:55:15 2002
> Subject: *****SPAM***** Computer Maintenance
> Folder: /home/eugene/caughtspam =
8343
It looks like you're running via procmail -- what are the permissions
on procmail? "Insecure dependency" screams "I'm in taint mode!", which
is a typical problem when procmail is setuid/setgid (the permissions
should be 755).
If this is in fact the problem, an easy solution is to put "DROPPRIVS=3Dyes"
in the procmailrc. :)
--=20
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"The bus had no heat, blew over in the wind and used the driver's legs
as its first line of defense in an accident." - Unknown about the VW Bus
--4Ycl1UgPPPgGZoSL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9d8C5AuOQUeWAs2MRAhaSAJ9AxnypfiK/+5I6gxO8sTauLOJ3wgCg0N5b
HPwI8USX9YeAQF6GE4bzmgc=
=6aCu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--4Ycl1UgPPPgGZoSL--
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] removing Razor1
Forgive me for being a partially stupid end-user of this fantastic
spam fighting software.
I was looking at my spamd debug output today, and noticed that it ran
through Razor2 stuff, and then it ran through dccproc, and then it tried to
go through old Razor1 stuff. I'm assuming (and please correct me if I'm
wrong) that Razor1 is out dated and was to be replaced entirely by Razor2.
If that's the case, can someone please point me to something that explains
how to remove Razor1 from my system? I don't see a point in envoking it.
Especially when it appears to error out on me.
debug: Razor1 is available
debug: entering helper-app run mode
debug: Razor Agents 1.19, protocol version 2.
debug: 170803 seconds before closest server discovery
debug: Agent terminated
Problem while trying to load Razor1: Permission denied at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 288.
debug: leaving helper-app run mode
Thanks!
--
Josh Hildebrand Email: josh@jedi.net
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] Problem with Razor 2.14 and Spamassassin 2.41
You might be better asking this on the spamassassin-talk list. The folks
there will almost definitely have an answer for this.
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, David Rees wrote:
> This is my first time running Razor, heard a lot of good things about it so
> I thought I'd give it a shot. I also run SpamAssassin so I'd like to
> integrate the two.
>
> I'm not sure if this problem is with SpamAssassin or Razor, so I though I'd
> shoot the message here first
>
> With a freshly installed SpamAssassin 2.41 and Razor 2.14 I'm seeing these
> messages spit out from spamd:
>
> razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Can't call method "log" on
> unblessed reference at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Razor2/Client/Agent.pm
> line 211, <STDIN> line 75.
>
> Any ideas? razor seems to run correctly over the command line.
>
> Thanks,
> -Dave
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
> _______________________________________________
> Razor-users mailing list
> Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] Problem with Razor 2.14 and Spamassassin 2.41
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:16:57PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> You might be better asking this on the spamassassin-talk list. The folks
> there will almost definitely have an answer for this.
Thanks, I just posted a similar message there.
-Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Problem with Razor 2.14 and Spamassassin 2.41
This is my first time running Razor, heard a lot of good things about it so
I thought I'd give it a shot. I also run SpamAssassin so I'd like to
integrate the two.
I'm not sure if this problem is with SpamAssassin or Razor, so I though I'd
shoot the message here first
With a freshly installed SpamAssassin 2.41 and Razor 2.14 I'm seeing these
messages spit out from spamd:
razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Can't call method "log" on
unblessed reference at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Razor2/Client/Agent.pm
line 211, <STDIN> line 75.
Any ideas? razor seems to run correctly over the command line.
Thanks,
-Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] spamassassin+razor2
No as a answer to this FAQ, would the recommended answer be to
a) chmod 755 /usr/bin/procmail
or
b) add DROPPRIVS=yes to /etc/procmailrc
or
c) all of the above
I ask because I just did B, and my procmail is still:
-rwsr-sr-x 1 root mail 67988 Jul 24 15:43 /usr/bin/procmail
But things seem to be working, so far..
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:18:55PM -0400, Eugene Chiu wrote:
>
> Theo,
>
> Thank you very much, it solves the problem!!!!
>
> Eugene
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net
> [mailto:razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Theo Van
> Dinter
> Sent: September 5, 2002 4:38 PM
> To: Eugene Chiu
> Cc: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Razor-users] spamassassin+razor2
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:27:08PM -0400, Eugene Chiu wrote:
> > razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor Insecure dependency in open
> while runn
> > ing setuid at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Razor2/Client/Config.pm
> line
> > 410, <GEN23> line 1.
> > >From info@znion.com Thu Sep 5 11:55:15 2002
> > Subject: *****SPAM***** Computer Maintenance
> > Folder: /home/eugene/caughtspam
> 8343
>
> It looks like you're running via procmail -- what are the permissions
> on procmail? "Insecure dependency" screams "I'm in taint mode!", which
> is a typical problem when procmail is setuid/setgid (the permissions
> should be 755).
>
> If this is in fact the problem, an easy solution is to put "DROPPRIVS=yes"
> in the procmailrc. :)
>
> --
> Randomly Generated Tagline:
> "The bus had no heat, blew over in the wind and used the driver's legs
> as its first line of defense in an accident." - Unknown about the VW Bus
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
> _______________________________________________
> Razor-users mailing list
> Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Josh Hildebrand Email: josh@jedi.net
Digital Sluice Pager: http://www.digitalsluice.com/josh/pager
Phone: 512-255-9797 eFax: 413-691-9191
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] log problem
I just set up razor and spamassassin, but I keep getting this error in my
mail log file
razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Can't call method "log" on
unblessed reference at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Razor2/Client/Agent.pm line 212.
I have looked through the archived list and the only thing I have seen
about this error is a possible permission problem on the log file.
I did what it said in the archives, basically change the permission on the
file but its still no go.
Any other help would be appreciated, maybe I'm missing something.
something I forgot to run or do.
rob
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] log problem
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 05:10:23PM -0400, Rob wrote:
> I just set up razor and spamassassin, but I keep getting this error in my
> mail log file
>
> razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Can't call method "log" on
> unblessed reference at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Razor2/Client/Agent.pm line 212.
>
> I have looked through the archived list and the only thing I have seen
> about this error is a possible permission problem on the log file.
Yeah, the answer isn't here in this list, it's on the spamassassin-users
list. I just asked it late last week.
Hint: Add -H to the spamd startup flags using the latest version of
spamassassin.
-Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] log problem
Or, you could do this. <G>
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, David Rees wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 05:10:23PM -0400, Rob wrote:
> > I just set up razor and spamassassin, but I keep getting this error in my
> > mail log file
> >
> > razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Can't call method "log" on
> > unblessed reference at
> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Razor2/Client/Agent.pm line 212.
> >
> > I have looked through the archived list and the only thing I have seen
> > about this error is a possible permission problem on the log file.
>
> Yeah, the answer isn't here in this list, it's on the spamassassin-users
> list. I just asked it late last week.
>
> Hint: Add -H to the spamd startup flags using the latest version of
> spamassassin.
>
> -Dave
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
> _______________________________________________
> Razor-users mailing list
> Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] log problem
It's a permissions issue on the razor log file. SpamAssassin runs setuid
to the user to whom mail is being delivered.
You'll need to make the razor log file world writable.
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Rob wrote:
> I just set up razor and spamassassin, but I keep getting this error in my
> mail log file
>
> razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Can't call method "log" on
> unblessed reference at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Razor2/Client/Agent.pm line 212.
>
> I have looked through the archived list and the only thing I have seen
> about this error is a possible permission problem on the log file.
> I did what it said in the archives, basically change the permission on the
> file but its still no go.
>
> Any other help would be appreciated, maybe I'm missing something.
> something I forgot to run or do.
>
>
> rob
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
> _______________________________________________
> Razor-users mailing list
> Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Viewing my trust rating?
Hey Folks
I know this question gets asked a lot, but I haven't seen an answer lately.
Any idea when a user will be able to view his own trust rating? What are
the plans for this? Will it be built into the client, web based, emailed
to you nightly? If you could share your brainstorming on the subject, I
would greatly appreciate it.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Bug?
Does anyone else experience this:
http://sf.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=600311&group_id=3978&atid=10
3978
Also, it seems that the bugs tracker on SF isn't used very much ... is there
somewhere else to post bugs?
- Colin
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] How to test razor
I have a spamd/spamc/razor/dcc setup.
My razor logs are full of:
Sep 10 09:48:48.411339 check[10200]: [ 1] [bootup] Logging initiated
LogDebugLevel=3 to file:/home/omega13/.razor/razor-agent.log
Sep 10 09:48:49.391309 check[10200]: [ 3] mail 1 is not known spam.
The problem is that all the entries show "is not known spam" I can't believe
I'm that lucky. So, how do I test to see that my razor installation is
working properly. I've been up to my ears in documentation for the past few
days, so, if the reference is easy, just point me to it. Otherwise a brief
hint on how to, would be appreciated.
--
Robin Lynn Frank
Paradigm-Omega, LLC
==================================
Gandalf fell at Khazadum.
Sheridan fell at Z'ha'dum.
Avoid high places in
locations ending in "dum"
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] no positive razor hits?
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Rose, Bobby wrote:
> Use the sample-spam.txt from Spamassassin and do a "razor-check -d <
> sample-spam.txt"
Interesting. I just upgraded to razor-agents 2.14 yesterday, ran
razor-admin -register. I to am seeing that I'm not getting any positives
from razor. Including the sample-spam.txt's from spamassassin 2.41, 2.31,
and 2.20.
Any suggestions? thanks.
-d output below
maxwell:/var/qmail/alias/gb-users%# razor-check -d <
/usr/local/src/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.20/sample-spam.txt
Razor-Log: Computed razorhome from env: /root/.razor
Razor-Log: Found razorhome: /root/.razor
Razor-Log: No /root/.razor/razor-agent.conf found, skipping.
Razor-Log: No razor-agent.conf found, using defaults.
Sep 12 12:04:13.785852 check[52238]: [ 1] [bootup] Logging initiated
LogDebugLevel=9 to stdout
Sep 12 12:04:13.787113 check[52238]: [ 5] computed razorhome=/root/.razor,
conf=, ident=/root/.razor/identity-ruqVa5jbuS
Sep 12 12:04:13.787442 check[52238]: [ 2] Razor-Agents v2.14 starting
razor-check -d
Sep 12 12:04:13.789903 check[52238]: [ 9] uname -a: FreeBSD
maxwell.gta.com 4.5-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE-p3 #0: Wed May 22
14:52:29 EDT 2002 root@maxwell.gta.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/maxwell
i386
Sep 12 12:04:13.790480 check[52238]: [ 8] reading straight RFC822 mail
from <stdin>
Sep 12 12:04:13.791397 check[52238]: [ 6] read 1 mail
Sep 12 12:04:13.791917 check[52238]: [ 8] Client supported_engines: 1 2 3
4
Sep 12 12:04:13.792948 check[52238]: [ 8] prep_mail done: mail 1
headers=1432, mime0=3139
Sep 12 12:04:13.793639 check[52238]: [ 6] skipping whitelist file
(empty?): /root/.razor/razor-whitelist
Sep 12 12:04:13.794295 check[52238]: [ 5] read_file: 1 items read from
/root/.razor/servers.discovery.lst
Sep 12 12:04:13.794871 check[52238]: [ 5] read_file: 1 items read from
/root/.razor/servers.nomination.lst
Sep 12 12:04:13.795382 check[52238]: [ 5] read_file: 3 items read from
/root/.razor/servers.catalogue.lst
Sep 12 12:04:13.796047 check[52238]: [ 9] Assigning defaults to
honor.cloudmark.com
Sep 12 12:04:13.796456 check[52238]: [ 9] Assigning defaults to
apt.cloudmark.com
Sep 12 12:04:13.796829 check[52238]: [ 9] Assigning defaults to
fire.cloudmark.com
Sep 12 12:04:13.797180 check[52238]: [ 9] Assigning defaults to
truth.cloudmark.com
Sep 12 12:04:13.798322 check[52238]: [ 5] read_file: 11 items read from
/root/.razor/server.apt.cloudmark.com.conf
Sep 12 12:04:13.799188 check[52238]: [ 5] read_file: 11 items read from
/root/.razor/server.honor.cloudmark.com.conf
Sep 12 12:04:13.799866 check[52238]: [ 5] 96778 seconds before closest
server discovery
Sep 12 12:04:13.800342 check[52238]: [ 6] apt.cloudmark.com is a Catalogue
Server srl 51; computed min_cf=1, Server se: 0A
Sep 12 12:04:13.800818 check[52238]: [ 8] Computed supported_engines: 2 4
Sep 12 12:04:13.801167 check[52238]: [ 8] Using next closest server
apt.cloudmark.com:2703, cached info srl 51
Sep 12 12:04:13.801513 check[52238]: [ 8] mail 1 Subject: Home Based
Business for Grownups
Sep 12 12:04:13.805467 check[52238]: [ 6] preproc: mail 1.0 went from 3139
bytes to 3100
Sep 12 12:04:13.805878 check[52238]: [ 6] computing sigs for mail 1.0, len
3100
Sep 12 12:04:13.809475 check[52238]: [ 5] Connecting to apt.cloudmark.com
...
Sep 12 12:04:18.587441 check[52238]: [ 8] Connection established
Sep 12 12:04:18.587929 check[52238]: [ 4] apt.cloudmark.com >> 29 server
greeting: sn=C&srl=51&ep4=7542-10&a=l
Sep 12 12:04:18.588562 check[52238]: [ 6] apt.cloudmark.com is a Catalogue
Server srl 51; computed min_cf=1, Server se: 0A
Sep 12 12:04:18.589041 check[52238]: [ 8] Computed supported_engines: 2 4
Sep 12 12:04:18.589432 check[52238]: [ 8] mail 1.0 e2
sig: PGFfFte87P3Ve-CPTdu3NWgiBikA
Sep 12 12:04:18.589751 check[52238]: [ 8] mail 1.0 e4
sig: k6oGZsa1AvVolyvalWx2AACdWb8A
Sep 12 12:04:18.590103 check[52238]: [ 8] preparing 2 queries
Sep 12 12:04:18.590638 check[52238]: [ 8] sending 1 batches
Sep 12 12:04:18.591087 check[52238]: [ 4] apt.cloudmark.com << 96
Sep 12 12:04:18.591324 check[52238]: [ 6]
-a=c&e=2&s=PGFfFte87P3Ve-CPTdu3NWgiBikA
a=c&e=4&ep4=7542-10&s=k6oGZsa1AvVolyvalWx2AACdWb8A
.
Sep 12 12:04:19.270870 check[52238]: [ 4] apt.cloudmark.com >> 14
Sep 12 12:04:19.271227 check[52238]: [ 6] response to sent.1
-p=0
p=0
.
Sep 12 12:04:19.272130 check[52238]: [ 6] mail 1.0 e=2
sig=PGFfFte87P3Ve-CPTdu3NWgiBikA: sig not found.
Sep 12 12:04:19.272449 check[52238]: [ 6] mail 1.0 e=4
sig=k6oGZsa1AvVolyvalWx2AACdWb8A: sig not found.
Sep 12 12:04:19.272760 check[52238]: [ 7] method 5: mail
1.0: no-contention part, spam=0
Sep 12 12:04:19.273012 check[52238]: [ 7] method 5: mail 1: a
non-contention part not spam, mail not spam
Sep 12 12:04:19.273257 check[52238]: [ 3] mail 1 is not known spam.
Sep 12 12:04:19.273578 check[52238]: [ 5] disconnecting from server
apt.cloudmark.com
Sep 12 12:04:19.273982 check[52238]: [ 4] apt.cloudmark.com << 5
Sep 12 12:04:19.274203 check[52238]: [ 6] a=q
Sep 12 12:04:19.274585 check[52238]: [ 8] razor-check finished
successfully.
---
david raistrick
drais@atlasta.net http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Re: Collision of hashes?
To continue the subject on an otherwise unrelated note, the following
personal correspondence was just flagged as spam:
The following is a slightly modified e-mail message trapped in a server-wide
spam box.
------
NEWSPAPER?????
any time estimate when we can expect you home?
dad
<********@********** To:
<*************@***************>
*********> cc:
Subject: Oh, yeah
09/12/2002 12:43 PM
I have to stay after school today so I can work on the school newspaper
(layout) -- Nords will bring me home later than usual.
------
I don't know how to explain this one.
--Will
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Fun Uses of Razored Mail
I'm taking all my razored mail today and calling any 1-800 numbers I can
find. I say "Hi, I'm calling everyone that spammed me today to raise their
cost of doing business. You have a great day!" I'm told I should do it
from a pay phone, so it costs them 50 cents per call. If more people did
this, we could tie up their phone lines and cost them so much money they
could never make spam work.
Also fun is the simple "Die Spammer Die!"
Fox
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Bug ... still
Haven't heard anything about this, so excuse the repost but:
http://sf.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=600311&
group_id=3978&atid=103978
Or should bugs be reported somewhere other than on the SF bug tracker?
- Colin
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] empty mail is spamm?
Hi,
Is it possible to use razor without filtering empty mails as spamm?
An mail with an attachment is considered spamm. Is this normal?
Or I mysqlf like to send emails to myself where all important is said in
subject and body is empty (for remaining smth).
Thanks,
Raido Kurel
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] empty mail is spamm?
Razor won't filter empty emails. What version of the agents are you using?
cheers,
vipul.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 04:16:31PM +0300, Raido Kurel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to use razor without filtering empty mails as spamm?
> An mail with an attachment is considered spamm. Is this normal?
> Or I mysqlf like to send emails to myself where all important is said in
> subject and body is empty (for remaining smth).
>
> Thanks,
> Raido Kurel
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Razor-users mailing list
> Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist | widely distributed."
http://vipul.net/ | -- William Gibson
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] HTML Table - Razor Stats using -lm 4
"Fox" said:
> Before or after I whitelisted all the legit mailing lists that Razor is
> tagging? I had one false positive in the last four days. Razor tagged some
> guys person-to-person message because he used an ostrich-in-your-face jpeg
> that is probably pretty popular on the net, and -lm 4 means any single
> attachment in a message that is razored, razors the whole message, if I
> understand it correctly.
Razor folks: is -lm documented anywhere? BTW, I notice all my *.conf
files in ~/.razor use "lm = 4" by default anyway.
> No, I am not keeping official tally of false positives. I need to write a
> html interface to do it, and then it would be easy. I imagine you want
> false positive rate per filter. I will work on it tomorrow, and maybe in a
> week I will have some stats for false positives.
Yeah, that'd be cool -- much appreciated! comparing text classifiers
like spam filters, without tracking FPs, is not good. After all, "cat >
/dev/null" gets a 100% hit rate, but without the FP rate figure of, let's
say 90%, you'd never know it was a bad thing to do ;)
--j.
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] early experiences with Razor2 (and SA)
--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Gary Funck <gary@intrepid.com> [2002-09-18 13:57:00 -0700]:
> In my experience, there are spam messages that sneak past Spam Assassin,
> that Razor will pick up. Those are the ones that I'm calling "marginal".
> Basically, I'm hoping that "the collective" of Razor users make a better
> judge of spam than any single program like SA can, and therefore I can
> benefit from their judgement and get more extensive spam filtering. I've
> seen examples of this already, where SA doesn't score the spam high enough
> to bounce it, but Razor does.
I think perhaps you missed the fact that SA scores are adjustable. If
you want SA to tag all messages listed in Razor then you can put this
in your ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file.
score RAZOR_CHECK 10
The default score is 3 and the default threshold needed is 5.
Therefore if you wish to have any razor listed messages tagged by SA
then setting a score for any razor listed messages to anything above 5
would be sufficient.
If you are already using SA then the above would be more efficient.
Otherwise you are running all of the mail through razor twice, once
for SA and once again afterward. If you really want to run Razor
individually then you should set the 'score RAZOR_CHECK 0' so that SA
won't do it and avoid the double network hit.
However, one of the benefits of using SA in combination with Razor has
been the history of false positive reports in the razor database. The
current score of 3 is hefty, but not enough by itself to tag as spam.
But for any real spam is usually enough to push it over the threshold.
Razor2 addresses the false positive problem but is not yet in as wide
of use as Razor1.
Bob
--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9iV7k0pRcO8E2ULYRAjoAAJ97CB6LpbhPHqa8IJx1l4g/LRiVdwCfUZIB
kUAK30zsRWL8PTb1TrEQuy8=
=XVm6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--huq684BweRXVnRxX--
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
RE: [Razor-users] RE: Re: Some startup questions...
> I suggest that you use a normal user to start. Once you are familiar
> enough with razor and understand how it works, try the complex things
> like integration with the MTA and the like.
OK, but do I have to launch that command as "root" or what?
Thank you
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] The -lm 4 blues
Using -lm 4 is yielding an extra 20% a day, but it gets false positives
where it shouldn't.
Such as an email with a Word doc and the signature below. After looking at
the Word doc, directions to the sender's cabin, I am convinced it marked the
body, which contains no next except the "IncrediMail advertisment"
signature, as spam.
So I have to turn off -lm 4. Razor has been getting other strange emails it
shouldn't with -lm 4 on.
See the incredimail ad signature I am talking about below:
Fox
____________________________________________________
IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] Razor: shall I use it with AMaViS or with
Depends on how you want to use it.
The default setup of running it from procmail works just fine, as long as
you remember to go into your postfix/main.cf file, and tell it to use
procmail instead of the internal delivery agent.
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Boniforti Flavio wrote:
> How do I intergrate razor into my postfix setup? Will it have to
> interact with AMaViS or with SpamAssassin?
>
> Thank you
>
> Boniforti Flavio
> Informa Srl
> Via 42 Martiri, 165
> 28924 Verbania (VB)
> Tel +39 0323 586216
> Fax +39 0323 586672
> http://www.co-ver.it/informa
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Razor-users mailing list
> Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] Using razor with maildrop
Here is my recipe for Maildrop:
# Vipul's Razor check
#
log `/usr/bin/razor-check`
log "razor-check = $RETURNCODE"
if ( $RETURNCODE == 0 )
{
xfilter "reformail -a'X-Razor: SPAM'"
log "SPAM caught by Vipul's Razor"
to "$FOLDERS/.SPAM/"
}
I used this with Razor version 1. I'm not sure if it was ever used
with Razor2. I am now using SpamAssassin w/ Razor2. You may wish to
remove the log statements once running.
I use both. SpamAssassin (SA) catches things that Razor does not. There
were enough false positives with Razor that I do not trust it alone.
After whitelisting all the newsletters I receive, SA w/ Razor2 does a
very good job.
HTH,
Jeffrey
Quoting Sunil William Savkar <sunil@inthespace.com>:
> Hi.
>
> I just finished installing and getting running maildrop with my virtual
> users. I was thinking to set up razor with maildrop as my first test of
> its filtering capabilities..
>
> I have seen documentation out there for procmail, but is there similar
> documentation for integrating maildrop with razor?
>
>
>
> Separately, it looks like many people use spamassassin with razor. If I
> am using razor2, is there still an advantage to this?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> Sunil
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] Using razor with maildrop
Jeff--
What is the maildrop recipe you use with spamassassin? I was trying to
set mine up but I am running into a few difficulties.
I think I will try spamassassin first and see how it goes, and then
perhaps fold in razor2... is it easy to fold in?
Sunil
>
> Here is my recipe for Maildrop:
>
> # Vipul's Razor check
> #
> log `/usr/bin/razor-check`
> log "razor-check = $RETURNCODE"
> if ( $RETURNCODE == 0 )
> {
> xfilter "reformail -a'X-Razor: SPAM'"
> log "SPAM caught by Vipul's Razor"
> to "$FOLDERS/.SPAM/"
> }
>
> I used this with Razor version 1. I'm not sure if it was ever used with
> Razor2. I am now using SpamAssassin w/ Razor2. You may wish to remove
> the log statements once running.
>
> I use both. SpamAssassin (SA) catches things that Razor does not.
> There were enough false positives with Razor that I do not trust it
> alone. After whitelisting all the newsletters I receive, SA w/ Razor2
> does a very good job.
>
> HTH,
> Jeffrey
>
>
> Quoting Sunil William Savkar <sunil@inthespace.com>:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I just finished installing and getting running maildrop with my
>> virtual users. I was thinking to set up razor with maildrop as my
>> first test of its filtering capabilities..
>>
>> I have seen documentation out there for procmail, but is there similar
>> documentation for integrating maildrop with razor?
>>
>>
>>
>> Separately, it looks like many people use spamassassin with razor. If
>> I am using razor2, is there still an advantage to this?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sunil
>>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Razor-users mailing list
> Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Forged email address
I received a spam email that had apparently forged the From header with
my own email address. After reviewing the message I forwarded it with
the rest of a batch of spam ti the database with razor-report. Now of,
course, my own email address is listed int he Razor database. How do I
go about getting it removed.
I have seen this ploy (forged From headers) several time since then.
Perhaps the razor-report need to detect this and emit a warning.
dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
Re: [Razor-users] razor unblessed reference
Vipul Ved Prakash said:
> Are there any suggestions for "fixing" this in razor-agents? razor-agents
> could write to syslog by default, but I am not sure if that would be
> desirable default behaviour...
Hi Vipul,
I reckon if the "unwritable log file" error condition could be caught by
Razor and handled gracefully (logging to syslog or /dev/null), it'd be a
great help.
As it stands, if the log file is unwritable, the razor check falls over
entirely as the constructor returns undef (unblessed reference = 'die'
error in perl).
--j.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] "No razor servers available at this time"
I'm getting "no servers available" about half the time in the last few days.
This is with Razor 2. Is there something I need adjust in the installation
here, or are the servers just down/overloaded?
Thanks,
Whit
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] "Can't use and undefined value.." error
I just installed razor 2.152 on a FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE box and having
problems with razor-check. Any time razor-check is run, (with or without
arguments), i get this error:
Can't use an undefined value as a symbol reference at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-freebsd/Razor2/Client/Agent.pm
line 756.
razor-admin runs just fine and the make test before the install was all
ok.
Has anyone seen this before?
Module versions:
Digest-HMAC-1.01
Digest-MD5-2.20
Digest-Nilsimsa-0.06
Digest-SHA1-2.01
MIME-Base64-2.12
Net-DNS-0.23
Test-Simple-0.44
Time-HiRes-01.20
URI-1.19
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Re: Can't use and undefined value.." error
> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:00:12 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Dayv Gastonguay <noghri@nauticom.net>
>
> I just installed razor 2.152 on a FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE box and having
> problems with razor-check. Any time razor-check is run, (with or without
> arguments), i get this error:
>
> Can't use an undefined value as a symbol reference at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-freebsd/Razor2/Client/Agent.pm
> line 756.
>
Try installing the latest Perl (at least 5.6.1) port on Freebsd and make
sure you set the system to use perl from ports (i.e. in the
ports/lang/perl5/files directory run ./use.perl port. Reinstall the relevant
perl modules needed by razor and try again.
Sven
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Fire.cloudmark.com is having issues
I noticed a drop in checks, and did some tests. If I move truth up in
my catalog list, a check comes back postive, but if I move fire up in
the list, then I don't get the positive check back. It's almost like
it's not syncing up with Hubris which is the one my reports are getting
sent to.
-=Bobby
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
RE: [Razor-users] Fire.cloudmark.com is having issues
What does this mean? I set up procmailrc for a spamtrap but I'm getting
an error. I also am reporting to pyzor and dcc and they aren't
registering an error. What's weird is that it works sometimes.
.
Oct 02 23:46:11.470523 report[14051]: [ 4] honor.cloudmark.com >> 20
Oct 02 23:46:11.470805 report[14051]: [ 6] response to sent.3
-res=1
err=230
.
Oct 02 23:46:11.471825 report[14051]: [ 5] mail 1, orig_email, special
case eng 1: Server accept
ed report.
Oct 02 23:46:11.472228 report[14051]: [ 8] mail 1.0, eng 4: err 230 -
server wants mail
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |
[Razor-users] Problem with SDK 2.03?
I recently brought up a new system - SuSe 7.3 and I am running
spamassassin and procmail, which work fine.
I tried bringing up razor (2.14) but I am not able to get the SDK to
install and razor reports missing modules. They appear to be there. I
followed the installation directions. There appears to be an endless list
of errors. Any ideas on what to do or where to start?
Doug
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
| 0 |