input_seq2seq
stringlengths
40
578
output_seq2seq
stringlengths
10
929
premise: A man is using his computer while seated at a desk. hypothesis: A man sits at a desk.
entailment: He can use a computer while he sits at a desk.
premise: A camera crew is filming two women in formal dresses sitting on a blanket in the middle of a park. hypothesis: Someone is filming.
entailment: Women on a picnic at a park that have someone filming.
premise: A camera crew is filming two women in formal dresses sitting on a blanket in the middle of a park. hypothesis: Everyone wearing formal clothes is inside.
contradiction: Park is not inside.
premise: A camera crew is filming two women in formal dresses sitting on a blanket in the middle of a park. hypothesis: Someone is operating a microphone.
neutral: Camera crew filming does not imply someone is operating a microphone.
premise: man sitting down playing a game of chess alone. hypothesis: A guy playing a board game by himself.
entailment: Chess is a board game and one who playing by himself is another way to say he is playing alone.
premise: man sitting down playing a game of chess alone. hypothesis: The man taking a snooze.
contradiction: Taking a snooze is different than sitting down.
premise: man sitting down playing a game of chess alone. hypothesis: A human sitting down playing one game of chess alone.
neutral: You can not infer it's a human.
premise: Young woman running as two guys in the back try to catch up to her. hypothesis: group of people running.
entailment: If the woman is running and the men are trying to catch up, it is implied they are also running so all the people in the group are running.
premise: Young woman running as two guys in the back try to catch up to her. hypothesis: women runs for her life.
neutral: You can not infer she runs.
premise: Young woman running as two guys in the back try to catch up to her. hypothesis: women has coffee with two guys.
contradiction: Having coffee and running are two different things.
premise: A man in a blue shirt sits outside alone with a chessboard laid out in front of him. hypothesis: A man in a blue shirt sitting outside behind a large wooden chessboard.
neutral: All chessboard are not wooden.
premise: A man in a blue shirt sits outside alone with a chessboard laid out in front of him. hypothesis: Someone sitting outside behind a chessboard.
entailment: A man is ready to play chess at a chessboard.
premise: A man in a blue shirt sits outside alone with a chessboard laid out in front of him. hypothesis: Two elderly men playing Scrabble.
contradiction: Scrabble is different than chessboard.
premise: A man dressed in blue shirt and shorts sits at a table while playing black in chess. hypothesis: Two men are playing chess.
neutral: A man playing chess does not imply two men are involved in playing.
premise: A man dressed in blue shirt and shorts sits at a table while playing black in chess. hypothesis: The man is jogging.
contradiction: Sits is different than jogging.
premise: A man dressed in blue shirt and shorts sits at a table while playing black in chess. hypothesis: A man is playing a game.
entailment: There is a man at the table playing a game of chess.
premise: A young man in a blue blazer and shorts sits alone in front of table with a chess game set up. hypothesis: A man sits in front of a set up chess game.
entailment: If the chess game is set up on the table the man is in front of, then he is in front of a set up chess game.
premise: A young man in a blue blazer and shorts sits alone in front of table with a chess game set up. hypothesis: A man is waiting for his chess opponent to arrive.
neutral: You can not infer he is waiting on an opponent.
premise: A young man in a blue blazer and shorts sits alone in front of table with a chess game set up. hypothesis: A grandma plays a game of connect four at the rotary club meeting.
contradiction: Connect four is different than chess. Young man is different gender than grandma.
premise: A young Asian man sits behind a set chessboard waiting for the other player to arrive. hypothesis: A young man is sitting.
entailment: If he sits behind a chessboard, it is known that he is sitting.
premise: A young Asian man sits behind a set chessboard waiting for the other player to arrive. hypothesis: A young man is on Mars.
contradiction: Mars and chessboard are two different things.
premise: A young Asian man sits behind a set chessboard waiting for the other player to arrive. hypothesis: A young man is indoors.
neutral: You can not infer he is indoors.
premise: Two young men drink beer, leaning on a graffitied wall. hypothesis: The men are drinking.
entailment: If they drink beer, we know they are drinking.
premise: Two young men drink beer, leaning on a graffitied wall. hypothesis: The men are being sprayed with cans of paint while they are passes out drunk in the alley.
contradiction: Sprayed and drink are two different things.
premise: Two young men drink beer, leaning on a graffitied wall. hypothesis: The men are standing in urine.
neutral: You can not infer they are in urine.
premise: A man being airlifted to safety after being in danger. hypothesis: The helicopter is moving people in danger.
neutral: Only one person can be in danger it doesn't have to be multiple people.
premise: A man being airlifted to safety after being in danger. hypothesis: A man is being moved.
entailment: Being airlifted involves being moved so the man was moved.
premise: A man being airlifted to safety after being in danger. hypothesis: The helicopter is putting people in a dangerous area.
contradiction: Putting people in a dangerous area is not airlifting them to safety.
premise: People in a meeting setting paying attention to a speaker in an orange shirt. hypothesis: The people are listening to music on their CD players.
contradiction: Paying attention to a speaker is different from listening to music.
premise: People in a meeting setting paying attention to a speaker in an orange shirt. hypothesis: The people are listening to a speaker.
entailment: If people are paying attention to a speaker, it is implied they are listening to a speaker.
premise: People in a meeting setting paying attention to a speaker in an orange shirt. hypothesis: The speaker is the people's boss.
neutral: You can not infer it's their boss.
premise: A meeting of young people sitting at a conference table. hypothesis: young people are at a party having fun.
contradiction: The location is either a party or conference table.
premise: A meeting of young people sitting at a conference table. hypothesis: young people are learning about politics.
neutral: The young people must not be learning about politics.
premise: A meeting of young people sitting at a conference table. hypothesis: young people are gathered around a table.
entailment: the people gathered around the conference table are young.
premise: A woman in a red shirt is speaking at a table in a room where three other people are listening to her. hypothesis: the woman is going to the park.
neutral: A woman speaking does not imply she is going to the park.
premise: A woman in a red shirt is speaking at a table in a room where three other people are listening to her. hypothesis: the woman is swimming in the lake.
contradiction: Swimming is different than speaking.
premise: A woman in a red shirt is speaking at a table in a room where three other people are listening to her. hypothesis: the woman is wearing a red shirt.
entailment: There is a woman who is talking in a room has on a red shirt.
premise: A woman talks to two other women and a man with notepads in an office building with large windows. hypothesis: A woman talks to others indoors.
entailment: A woman talks to people in a another indoor office building.
premise: A woman talks to two other women and a man with notepads in an office building with large windows. hypothesis: a woman in an office building talks to a group of three taking notes on a notepad.
neutral: A woman with two other women and a man does not make a group of three and just because they are having notepads does not imply they are taking notes.
premise: A woman talks to two other women and a man with notepads in an office building with large windows. hypothesis: a man talks to ducks in a pond.
contradiction: Woman is different than man.
premise: A woman talks to two other women and a man with notepads in an office building with large windows. hypothesis: the woman is white.
neutral: All woman are not white.
premise: A woman talks to two other women and a man with notepads in an office building with large windows. hypothesis: a woman in an office building talks to two other women and a man with notepads.
entailment: A woman talks to two other people with notepads in a different office building.
premise: A woman talks to two other women and a man with notepads in an office building with large windows. hypothesis: A woman talks to dogs inside an office building.
contradiction: Women and dogs are different.
premise: A woman talks to two other women and a man with notepads in an office building with large windows. hypothesis: the woman is asleep at home.
contradiction: Talks is different than asleep.
premise: A woman talks to two other women and a man with notepads in an office building with large windows. hypothesis: The people are outside of the building looking inside.
contradiction: Talks is different than looking inside.
premise: A woman talks to two other women and a man with notepads in an office building with large windows. hypothesis: a woman is talking.
entailment: Two people are talking to woman with notepads in a office building.
premise: A woman talks to two other women and a man with notepads in an office building with large windows. hypothesis: A woman talks to others indoors about lunch.
neutral: People taking in an office building with large windows does not imply they are indoors and they need not talk about lunch.
premise: A woman talks to two other women and a man with notepads in an office building with large windows. hypothesis: Four people stand near a wall speaking to each other.
entailment: People talks with each other with notepads in a large windowed office.
premise: A woman talks to two other women and a man with notepads in an office building with large windows. hypothesis: A woman talks to three other women.
contradiction: Two is different than three.
premise: A woman talks to two other women and a man with notepads in an office building with large windows. hypothesis: A woman happily talks to two other women.
neutral: All talks are not necessarily done happily.
premise: A woman talks to two other women and a man with notepads in an office building with large windows. hypothesis: The group are discussing a project.
neutral: All group talks need not be a discussion on a project.
premise: A woman talks to two other women and a man with notepads in an office building with large windows. hypothesis: A woman talks to two other women.
entailment: There are women talking on notepads in an office building.
premise: A classroom of students discussing lecture. hypothesis: The students are running in P.E. class.
contradiction: Discussing lecture is different than running.
premise: A classroom of students discussing lecture. hypothesis: A classroom is discussing the topics of the day.
entailment: The topics of the day in a classroom setting are included in the lecture.
premise: A classroom of students discussing lecture. hypothesis: The students are discussing the lecture in history class.
neutral: You can not infer they are in history class.
premise: A man holds a clipboard and a pen as a woman looks at them. hypothesis: The man is working.
neutral: You can not infer he is working.
premise: A man holds a clipboard and a pen as a woman looks at them. hypothesis: The woman is asleep.
contradiction: A man and woman are different genders.
premise: A man holds a clipboard and a pen as a woman looks at them. hypothesis: A woman is looking at a man's possessions.
entailment: It is implied if the man holds a clipboard and pen they are his possessions and if a woman looks at them we know she is looking.
premise: A man with a bright green shirt is talking to a woman in a pink shirt. hypothesis: A couple are eating dinner.
contradiction: A couple means more than a man.
premise: A man with a bright green shirt is talking to a woman in a pink shirt. hypothesis: A couple is standing outside.
neutral: A man and woman talking to each other does not make them a couple.
premise: A man with a bright green shirt is talking to a woman in a pink shirt. hypothesis: A couple is talking.
entailment: The man and woman are a couple.
premise: A man in a green shirt holds out a clipboard for a woman in pink's attention. hypothesis: A man wants a woman to look at his clipboard.
entailment: That a man holds out a clipboard implies he wants someone to look at it.
premise: A man in a green shirt holds out a clipboard for a woman in pink's attention. hypothesis: a man is trying to get a woman to sign something.
neutral: The man may just want to women to read something on the clipboard and not to sign something.
premise: A man in a green shirt holds out a clipboard for a woman in pink's attention. hypothesis: A man takes off his shirt to get a womans attention.
contradiction: Holds out a clipboard is different than takes off his shirt.
premise: A man in a bright green shirt shows a woman in a bright pink shirt something on a clipboard. hypothesis: A man is wearing a gold shirt.
contradiction: A man was in a bright green shirt. And the is a man and a woman.
premise: A man in a bright green shirt shows a woman in a bright pink shirt something on a clipboard. hypothesis: A man shows his boss something on a clipboard.
neutral: The women may not be his boss.
premise: A man in a bright green shirt shows a woman in a bright pink shirt something on a clipboard. hypothesis: A man shows a woman something.
entailment: Something on a clipboard is something.
premise: A man in a bright green shirt shows a woman in a bright pink shirt something on a clipboard. hypothesis: The man has something to tell the woman.
entailment: That a man shows a woman something implies he has something to tell the woman.
premise: A man in a bright green shirt shows a woman in a bright pink shirt something on a clipboard. hypothesis: Two people are looking at a clipboard.
entailment: That a man shows something on a clipboard to someone implies that both are looking at the clipboard. A man and a woman are two people.
premise: A man in a bright green shirt shows a woman in a bright pink shirt something on a clipboard. hypothesis: The woman is wearing blue.
contradiction: The woman is wearing a bright pink shirt.
premise: A man in a bright green shirt shows a woman in a bright pink shirt something on a clipboard. hypothesis: A man is teaching a woman a concept.
neutral: The man may just be looking for a signature and not teaching.
premise: A man in a bright green shirt shows a woman in a bright pink shirt something on a clipboard. hypothesis: There is a man and a woman.
entailment: That a man shows a woman something implies that there is both a man and a woman.
premise: A man in a bright green shirt shows a woman in a bright pink shirt something on a clipboard. hypothesis: Two people are looking at notes on an electronic tablet.
contradiction: The man and woman are looking at something on a clipboard.
premise: A man in a bright green shirt shows a woman in a bright pink shirt something on a clipboard. hypothesis: The man is drinking a cup of coffee.
contradiction: The man is showing the woman something on the clipboard not drinking coffee.
premise: A man in a bright green shirt shows a woman in a bright pink shirt something on a clipboard. hypothesis: A man is wearing a bright green shirt.
entailment: "Man is wearing a shirt" is a rephrasing of "man in a shirt".
premise: A man in a bright green shirt shows a woman in a bright pink shirt something on a clipboard. hypothesis: The man and the woman are employees at the same business.
neutral: The man and the women may be strangers and not employees at the same business.
premise: A man in a bright green shirt shows a woman in a bright pink shirt something on a clipboard. hypothesis: A man in a green shirt shows a woman his paychecks on a clipboard.
neutral: The man may be showing a petition and not his paychecks on the clipboard.
premise: A man in a bright green shirt shows a woman in a bright pink shirt something on a clipboard. hypothesis: The woman shows the man a clipboard.
contradiction: The man shows the woman something on the clipboard not the woman.
premise: A man in a bright green shirt shows a woman in a bright pink shirt something on a clipboard. hypothesis: The clipboard has writting on it.
neutral: The clipboard may have just a picture on it and no writting.
premise: A man on a street in a bright t-shirt holds some sort of tablet towards a woman in a pink t-shirt and shades. hypothesis: A man is showing a woman a funny video on his tablet.
neutral: The man may be showing a document and not a funny video on the tablet.
premise: A man on a street in a bright t-shirt holds some sort of tablet towards a woman in a pink t-shirt and shades. hypothesis: The tablet is turned on.
neutral: The tablet may be off and not on.
premise: A man on a street in a bright t-shirt holds some sort of tablet towards a woman in a pink t-shirt and shades. hypothesis: The man is on another street than the woman.
contradiction: A man holds some sort of tablet towards the woman so the had to me on the same street.
premise: A man on a street in a bright t-shirt holds some sort of tablet towards a woman in a pink t-shirt and shades. hypothesis: The man and woman are outdoors.
entailment: People being on a street implies that they are outdoors.
premise: A man on a street in a bright t-shirt holds some sort of tablet towards a woman in a pink t-shirt and shades. hypothesis: A man and a woman are outside.
entailment: That people are on a street implies that they are outside.
premise: A man on a street in a bright t-shirt holds some sort of tablet towards a woman in a pink t-shirt and shades. hypothesis: A man and a woman are eating in a resteraunt.
contradiction: The man was holding a tablet towards the woman so and not eating a restaurant.
premise: A man on a street in a bright t-shirt holds some sort of tablet towards a woman in a pink t-shirt and shades. hypothesis: A man is stealing a woman's tablet.
contradiction: A man did not steal a woman's tablet he holds out some sort of tablet towards the woman.
premise: A man on a street in a bright t-shirt holds some sort of tablet towards a woman in a pink t-shirt and shades. hypothesis: A woman shows a cell phone to a person standing nearby.
contradiction: A man holds a tablet towards a woman. The woman didn't show a person a cell phone.
premise: A man on a street in a bright t-shirt holds some sort of tablet towards a woman in a pink t-shirt and shades. hypothesis: A couple are using a tablet to watch a video on the street.
neutral: The man and the woman may be strangers and not a couple. The may be reading a document and not using the tablet to watch a video.
premise: A man on a street in a bright t-shirt holds some sort of tablet towards a woman in a pink t-shirt and shades. hypothesis: A woman is shown a tablet by a man standing on the street.
entailment: If there is a man on a street then it's implied the man is standing on the street.
premise: A man on a street in a bright t-shirt holds some sort of tablet towards a woman in a pink t-shirt and shades. hypothesis: A man having cell phone in his hand.
neutral: The tablet may not be a cell phone.
premise: A man on a street in a bright t-shirt holds some sort of tablet towards a woman in a pink t-shirt and shades. hypothesis: A man shows directions to a museum on a tablet to a woman nearby.
neutral: We don't know if he's giving directions or not.
premise: A man on a street in a bright t-shirt holds some sort of tablet towards a woman in a pink t-shirt and shades. hypothesis: There are some people in a street.
entailment: If a man and woman are on a street then there are some people on a street.
premise: A man on a street in a bright t-shirt holds some sort of tablet towards a woman in a pink t-shirt and shades. hypothesis: The man handover the cell phone to the woman.
contradiction: A man holds out some sort of tablet towards the woman, he doesn't handover a cell phone.
premise: A man on a street in a bright t-shirt holds some sort of tablet towards a woman in a pink t-shirt and shades. hypothesis: A man is showing a woman something.
entailment: When he holds the tablet towards the woman he is showing her something.
premise: A child with a yellow cup and milk all over his face. hypothesis: The child spilled his milk.
neutral: We don't know if the milk was spilled or poured on purpose.
premise: A child with a yellow cup and milk all over his face. hypothesis: The child has a clean face.
contradiction: The child cannot have both a clean face and milk all over his face.
premise: A child with a yellow cup and milk all over his face. hypothesis: The child had milk all over his face.
entailment: Child had milk all over his face it's another way of saying child with milk all over his face.
premise: Two barefoot men are playing on a green lawn outside a building with other people in the background. hypothesis: Two men are barefoot on the lawn.
entailment: The men must be barefoot on the lawn interested to be barefoot men playing on a lawn.
premise: Two barefoot men are playing on a green lawn outside a building with other people in the background. hypothesis: Two men in sandles are on the beach.
contradiction: The two men cannot be simultaneously barefoot and wearing sandles.
premise: Two barefoot men are playing on a green lawn outside a building with other people in the background. hypothesis: Two men are playing barefoot lawn darts.
neutral: They are not shown to be playing lawn darts.