input_seq2seq
stringlengths
40
578
output_seq2seq
stringlengths
10
929
premise: A woman in costume is marching with a large drum. hypothesis: She plays in a band.
entailment: If a woman wears a costume an marches with a large drum, she plays in a band.
premise: A man carrying a load of fresh direct boxes on car with wheels in the city streets, as a woman walks towards him. hypothesis: Someone is toting packages in an urban setting.
entailment: Toting means carrying. Boxes are packages. Someone in the city streets is in an urban setting.
premise: A man carrying a load of fresh direct boxes on car with wheels in the city streets, as a woman walks towards him. hypothesis: A young lad delivers groceries by bicycle in the city.
contradiction: Carrying a load on a car is not the same as delivering them by bicycle.
premise: A man carrying a load of fresh direct boxes on car with wheels in the city streets, as a woman walks towards him. hypothesis: A man delivers groceries to shut-in seniors in the city.
neutral: fresh direct boxes are not only groceries. Just because a man is carrying boxes does not mean he is delivering them to shut-in seniors.
premise: a motorcyclist does a nose wheelie. hypothesis: A man doing a wheelie.
entailment: A motorcyclist is a man, a nose wheelie is a wheelie.
premise: a motorcyclist does a nose wheelie. hypothesis: A man standing beside a crashed motorcycle.
contradiction: A man cannot be doing a nose wheelie and standing beside a motorcycle at the same time.
premise: a motorcyclist does a nose wheelie. hypothesis: A motorcyclist doing a wheelie.
entailment: A nose wheelie is a type of wheelie.
premise: A man sitting on a scooter on the curb. hypothesis: A man is waiting for someone to fix his scooter.
neutral: He may just be sitting. It is unlikely he is waiting for someone to fix his scooter.
premise: A man sitting on a scooter on the curb. hypothesis: A man is outside, near the street.
entailment: One must have a street to have a curb. It is implied that since he is on the curb, he is outside.
premise: A man sitting on a scooter on the curb. hypothesis: A man is relaxing at the bar.
contradiction: A man can't be sitting on a curb and relaxing at a bar at the same time.
premise: A man stopping on the sidewalk with his bike to have a smoke. hypothesis: The man is playing basketball.
contradiction: A man cannot be playing basketball and having a smoke at the same time.
premise: A man stopping on the sidewalk with his bike to have a smoke. hypothesis: The man is standing.
entailment: A man on the sidewalk with his bike is standing.
premise: A man stopping on the sidewalk with his bike to have a smoke. hypothesis: The man is lighting a cigarette.
neutral: A man stopping to have a smoke is not necessarily lighting a cigarette; it could already be lit, or he could be smoking something else.
premise: A man is sitting on a motorcycle on the sidewalk. hypothesis: A man is sitting on a motorcycle.
entailment: A man sitting on a motorcycle on the sidewalk is still on a motorcycle.
premise: A man is sitting on a motorcycle on the sidewalk. hypothesis: A man is sitting on a motorcycle and drives away.
neutral: A man sitting on a motorcycle on the sidewalk is not necessarily driving away.
premise: A man is sitting on a motorcycle on the sidewalk. hypothesis: A man in black is playing with his cat on Sunday.
contradiction: A man cannot be sitting on a motorcycle and playing with his cat simultaneously.
premise: Man smokes while sitting on a parked scooter. hypothesis: A man smokes a cigarette while sitting on his scooter.
neutral: A man can smoke something besides a cigarette.
premise: Man smokes while sitting on a parked scooter. hypothesis: The man drinks a beer while sitting in his car.
contradiction: A man cannot be sitting on a car and scooter at the same time. A man cannot be smoking and drinking a beer simultaneously.
premise: Man smokes while sitting on a parked scooter. hypothesis: The man is smoking something while sitting on the scooter.
entailment: If a man is smoking and sitting on scooter, it must be parked.
premise: Man on the sidewalk sitting on a motorcycle. hypothesis: A man on the motorcycle.
neutral: None - all of the information can be inferred.
premise: Man on the sidewalk sitting on a motorcycle. hypothesis: Man sitting on a motorcycle on the sidewalk.
entailment: A man on the sidewalk sitting on a motorcycle is equivalent to a man sitting on a motorcycle on the sidewalk.
premise: Man on the sidewalk sitting on a motorcycle. hypothesis: A man driving his car.
contradiction: A man cannot be sitting on a motorcycle and driving his car simultaneously.
premise: A couple, wearing black, burgundy, and white, dance. hypothesis: The woman danced alone.
contradiction: A woman cannot dance alone and dance as part of a couple at the same time.
premise: A couple, wearing black, burgundy, and white, dance. hypothesis: The couple danced.
entailment: It is in their nature for a couple to dance.
premise: A couple, wearing black, burgundy, and white, dance. hypothesis: The couple danced in the competition.
neutral: Just because a couple is dancing does not mean that it is in a competition.
premise: People in orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe at the bottom await the beginning of a race. hypothesis: People are running for a charity.
neutral: Not all races are for charity.
premise: People in orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe at the bottom await the beginning of a race. hypothesis: the runners waited to start the olympic race.
neutral: Not all races are olympic, and not all people in that clothing are runners.
premise: People in orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe at the bottom await the beginning of a race. hypothesis: People wearing pink and purple get ready for a race.
contradiction: People are either wearing pink and purple, or they are wearing orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe.
premise: People in orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe at the bottom await the beginning of a race. hypothesis: People wearing their bright team uniforms await the pistol that signifies the start of their race.
neutral: Not all races start with the pistol.
premise: People in orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe at the bottom await the beginning of a race. hypothesis: People are having a cook off.
contradiction: People would not have a cook off during a race.
premise: People in orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe at the bottom await the beginning of a race. hypothesis: People in orange vests await the beginning of a race to win first prize.
neutral: Not everyone in a race necessarily wants to win first prize.
premise: People in orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe at the bottom await the beginning of a race. hypothesis: People wait for a race to begin.
entailment: People have to wait before a race begins.
premise: People in orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe at the bottom await the beginning of a race. hypothesis: The people waiting are part of the race.
neutral: Not everyone awaiting a race is part of the race.
premise: People in orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe at the bottom await the beginning of a race. hypothesis: the athlete backflips off of a mountain.
contradiction: There would be either people or A athlete.
premise: People in orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe at the bottom await the beginning of a race. hypothesis: People in orange vests are racing in a race that has started.
contradiction: Cannot be wiating to race and racing at the same time.
premise: People in orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe at the bottom await the beginning of a race. hypothesis: People in orange vests await the beginning of a race.
entailment: People wear orange vests before the beginning of a race.
premise: People in orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe at the bottom await the beginning of a race. hypothesis: People are wearing colorful clothes.
entailment: People wear colorful clothes before the beginning of a race.
premise: People in orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe at the bottom await the beginning of a race. hypothesis: People are racing backwards through Hell.
contradiction: People cannot await a race and be racing at the same time.
premise: People in orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe at the bottom await the beginning of a race. hypothesis: People are waiting for a race.
entailment: await the beginning of a race is a rephrasing of waiting for a race.
premise: People in orange vests and blue pants with a yellow stripe at the bottom await the beginning of a race. hypothesis: the runners waited to start the race.
entailment: runners have to wait before the beginning of a race.
premise: A young man and young lady dancing on a carpeted floor with a picture from the movie Toy Story on a big screen in the background. hypothesis: They movie is very loud in the background.
neutral: Not every movie is very loud.
premise: A young man and young lady dancing on a carpeted floor with a picture from the movie Toy Story on a big screen in the background. hypothesis: The people dance on the sidewalk.
contradiction: There wouldn't be a carpeted floor where there'd be a sidewalk.
premise: A young man and young lady dancing on a carpeted floor with a picture from the movie Toy Story on a big screen in the background. hypothesis: The two people are dancing.
entailment: the man and the lady are two people and they are dancing.
premise: The skier is wearing a yellow jumpsuit and sliding across a yellow rail. hypothesis: The skier is in a competition.
neutral: Not every skier is in a competition.
premise: The skier is wearing a yellow jumpsuit and sliding across a yellow rail. hypothesis: The skier is wearing a jumpsuit.
entailment: Both subjects are wearing.
premise: The skier is wearing a yellow jumpsuit and sliding across a yellow rail. hypothesis: The skateboard is wearing a blue jumpsuit.
contradiction: If you are a skiier you are skiing, if you are a skateboard you are a skateboard.
premise: A track event held by J.P. Morgan Chase with security. hypothesis: J.P. Morgan Chase held a track event.
entailment: 'J.P. Morgan Chase held a track event' is a rephrasing of 'A track event held by J.P. Morgan Chase'.
premise: A track event held by J.P. Morgan Chase with security. hypothesis: The track event has no security.
contradiction: The event cannot simultaneously have security and have no security.
premise: A track event held by J.P. Morgan Chase with security. hypothesis: Security guards are searching for weapons at a track event.
neutral: We have no idea if they are searching for weapons they could be doing anything.
premise: Two people dancing, wearing dance costumes. hypothesis: The couple are dancing together.
neutral: Not all dancers dance together.
premise: Two people dancing, wearing dance costumes. hypothesis: The people are moving.
entailment: Dancing is moving.
premise: Two people dancing, wearing dance costumes. hypothesis: Two people are eating dinner.
contradiction: People should not be eating and dancing at the same time.
premise: An english farmer with a horse pulled wagon. hypothesis: There is a farmer laying down outdoors.
contradiction: The farmer would not be laying down while with a pulled wagon.
premise: An english farmer with a horse pulled wagon. hypothesis: There is a farmer with a horse wagon.
entailment: Horse pulled horse wagons.
premise: An english farmer with a horse pulled wagon. hypothesis: There is a farmer riding a wagon outdoors.
neutral: Not all wagons are outdoors.
premise: Children's soccer game being played while the sun sets in the background. hypothesis: Old men playing soccer while the sun sets.
contradiction: Old Men wouldn't be playing soccer at a children's soccer Game.
premise: Children's soccer game being played while the sun sets in the background. hypothesis: Children playing soccer while the sun sets.
entailment: Children soccer game implies that children are playing soccer. While the sun sets denotes that this activity is done while the sun is setting.
premise: Children's soccer game being played while the sun sets in the background. hypothesis: Girls playing soccer while the sun sets.
neutral: Not all children are girls.
premise: A soccer game played by a blue team and a red team on a perfectly manicured field at dusk. hypothesis: No one is playing soccer.
contradiction: A soccer game cannot be played by no one.
premise: A soccer game played by a blue team and a red team on a perfectly manicured field at dusk. hypothesis: People are playing soccer for a competition.
neutral: A game played dusk does not mean that the people are playing currently. A perfectly manicured field does not mean that the soccer match must be for a competition.
premise: A soccer game played by a blue team and a red team on a perfectly manicured field at dusk. hypothesis: People are playing soccer.
entailment: the word team denotes that People in the teams are playing a soccer game.
premise: Two soccer teams are competing on a soccer field. hypothesis: Two skilled soccer teams are competing against one another for the championship.
neutral: Not all soccer teams are considered skilled. Two teams competing does not mean that the game must be a championship.
premise: Two soccer teams are competing on a soccer field. hypothesis: There is a soccer game.
entailment: in order for soccer teams to compete it is assumed they are playing a soccer game.
premise: Two soccer teams are competing on a soccer field. hypothesis: Two baseball teams are competing.
contradiction: There is either two soccer teams or two baseball teams.
premise: Soccer teams play on a field as the sun sets behind a line of trees. hypothesis: Soccer teams are competing outdoors.
entailment: One must be outside to be behind a line of trees. One must play to compete.
premise: Soccer teams play on a field as the sun sets behind a line of trees. hypothesis: A football team is playing hockey against a soccer team in an ice rink.
contradiction: A soccer team can't be playing another soccer team while also playing hockey against a football team.
premise: Soccer teams play on a field as the sun sets behind a line of trees. hypothesis: A soccer team is about to win a soccer game.
neutral: The soccer team may not be about to win; many games end in ties.
premise: two men serving preparing food. hypothesis: Two men riding bikes.
contradiction: The two men can either be preparing food or riding bikes.
premise: two men serving preparing food. hypothesis: Two men wearing aprons.
neutral: The two mean can serve and prepare food without wearing aprons.
premise: two men serving preparing food. hypothesis: Two men serving food.
entailment: two men serving prepared food, shows that the food is served by the two men.
premise: A soccer game occurring at sunset. hypothesis: a sports game is being played.
entailment: a soccer game is a sports game and when it is occurring one assumes the game is being played.
premise: A soccer game occurring at sunset. hypothesis: the world cup is being played.
neutral: Soccer games can be played at times other than the World Cup. Also occurring at sunset does not mean that the game is being played currently.
premise: A soccer game occurring at sunset. hypothesis: a basketball game is ocurring at sunrise.
contradiction: Either a soccer game or basketball game can be occurring. Also, the game cannot be at both sunset and sunrise.
premise: White small child wearing a brown and gray striped hoodie plays at park. hypothesis: A small child is playing video games in his bedroom.
contradiction: The small child can't be playing video games while he also plays at the park.
premise: White small child wearing a brown and gray striped hoodie plays at park. hypothesis: A child plays at a park.
entailment: A small child is a type of child.
premise: White small child wearing a brown and gray striped hoodie plays at park. hypothesis: A small boy is playing tag at a park with his friends.
neutral: The child is not shown to be with anyone; he may not be playing tag with friends.
premise: A little boy in brown pants is playing on ropes at a park. hypothesis: There is a little boy in brown pants.
entailment: the little boy in brown pants occurs in both sentences whatever he happens to be doing.
premise: A little boy in brown pants is playing on ropes at a park. hypothesis: There is a little girl in red pants.
contradiction: It must be either a litte girl or a little boy playing on the ropes at the park. The little child cannot be wearing both red pants and brown pants.
premise: A little boy in brown pants is playing on ropes at a park. hypothesis: There is a little boy who likes the color brown.
neutral: The boy wearing brown pants does not mean that he likes the color brown necessarily.
premise: Toddler in striped sweatshirt plays on rope on playground. hypothesis: A child takes a break from school.
neutral: It is not necessarily true that the kids tries to break from school.
premise: Toddler in striped sweatshirt plays on rope on playground. hypothesis: A child is napping.
contradiction: A child cannot be napping while he plays.
premise: Toddler in striped sweatshirt plays on rope on playground. hypothesis: A child plays on a playground.
entailment: Toddler and child are equivalent as part of the activity on the playground.
premise: A woman wearing a pink hat is looking at a pink car with the truck open. hypothesis: The woman is wondering if she left her car open.
neutral: The woman looking at a pink car does not mean that she must be wondering about it. A pink car does not mean that the car must be her car.
premise: A woman wearing a pink hat is looking at a pink car with the truck open. hypothesis: The woman is wearing a grocery bag to her car.
contradiction: The woman cannot be wearing both a pink hat and a grocery bag.
premise: A man in a blue shirt is looking up. hypothesis: A man in a blue shirt is looking up at a dog.
neutral: A man looking up doesn't imply he is looking up at a dog.
premise: A man in a blue shirt is looking up. hypothesis: A man in a red shirt is looking up.
contradiction: the man can't be wearing a red shirt while also wearing a blue shirt.
premise: A man in a blue shirt is looking up. hypothesis: A person looks up.
entailment: A man is a person and is therefore looking up.
premise: Three girls on an amusement ride enjoying themselves. hypothesis: There are three girls.
entailment: The three girls appear in both sentences whatever they happen to be doing.
premise: Three girls on an amusement ride enjoying themselves. hypothesis: The girls are at home.
contradiction: The three girls cannot be both on an amusement ride and be at home at the same time.
premise: Three girls on an amusement ride enjoying themselves. hypothesis: The girls like amusment parks.
neutral: Girls enjoying a particular ride at an amusement park does not mean that they like amusement parks as a whole.
premise: Woman at Walmart check-out having her groceries bagged by an employee. hypothesis: The woman bought unhealthy food.
neutral: Not all food from Walmart is unhealthy food.
premise: Woman at Walmart check-out having her groceries bagged by an employee. hypothesis: The woman is in Target.
contradiction: The woman must be at either Walmart or Target, but not both.
premise: Woman at Walmart check-out having her groceries bagged by an employee. hypothesis: A woman is in Walmart.
entailment: the woman is in Walmart whatever she happens to be doing.
premise: Brown dog treads through water. hypothesis: Brown dog is sleeping next to the water.
contradiction: The brown dog must be either treading through water or sleeping next to the water.
premise: Brown dog treads through water. hypothesis: Brown dog treads through water as he is soaked in water.
entailment: There is a brown dog who treads through water in each sentence whatever else he my be doing or feeling.
premise: Brown dog treads through water. hypothesis: Brown dog treads through water as he swims towards shore.
neutral: A brown dog can tread water at times other than when he swims towards shore.
premise: A woman is waiting with children as she is checked out at Walmart. hypothesis: A woman is standing at the counter at Target.
contradiction: The woman cannot be checked out at Walmart and standing at the counter at Target.
premise: A woman is waiting with children as she is checked out at Walmart. hypothesis: A woman has children with her at the check out counter.
entailment: the woman and the children are at the check out counter.
premise: A woman is waiting with children as she is checked out at Walmart. hypothesis: A woman has three children with her.
neutral: A woman having multiple children does not mean that she definitely has three children.
premise: A blond woman with two children is checking out at a Walmart register. hypothesis: A mother is with her two children at Walmart buying food.
neutral: A woman isn't necessarily a mother. It can't be inferred that food is being bought just because the woman is at a register since Walmart sells many things and other services are offered at the register such as returns, etc.