Datasets:

ErfanMoosaviMonazzah

/

esnli-seq2seq

like 0

premise: A blond woman with two children is checking out at a Walmart register. hypothesis: Food makes people hungry.

contradiction: Either the woman is being checked out at a Walmart register or food makes people hungry.

premise: A blond woman with two children is checking out at a Walmart register. hypothesis: A mother is with her two children at walmart.

entailment: A blond women is a mother and checking out a walmart register means she is at walmart.

premise: A woman sitting in a laundromat looking at the camera. hypothesis: A monkey is eating a banana.

contradiction: A woman is human a monkey is an animal.

premise: A woman sitting in a laundromat looking at the camera. hypothesis: A woman is modeling appliances for the camera.

neutral: Modeling appliances cannot be inferred just from knowing a woman is in a laundromat and looking at a camera.

premise: A woman sitting in a laundromat looking at the camera. hypothesis: There is a woman in a room.

entailment: A woman sitting in a laundromat is same as sitting in a room.

premise: A young boy paddles across the water in a makeshift boat. hypothesis: A boy is boating in a pond.

neutral: Paddling across the water in a makeshift boat does not imply one is boating in a pond.

premise: A young boy paddles across the water in a makeshift boat. hypothesis: A boy is in a boat.

entailment: To paddle across the water, one must be in a boat.

premise: A young boy paddles across the water in a makeshift boat. hypothesis: A boy is swimming.

contradiction: the boy can not be swimming while paddling a makeshift boat.

premise: A baseball player is about to throw a baseball. hypothesis: A baseball playing is throwing a ball.

neutral: About to throw does not necessarily imply throwing a ball.

premise: A baseball player is about to throw a baseball. hypothesis: A baseball player is swinging to hit the ball.

entailment: "baseball player is swinging to hit the ball" that "baseball player is about to throw".

premise: A baseball player is about to throw a baseball. hypothesis: A baseball is broken.

contradiction: You can not throw a broken baseball.

premise: A dog zips along the beach. hypothesis: A dog is chasing a ball on the beach.

neutral: You cannot infer that a dog is chasing a ball just from "a dog zips".

premise: A dog zips along the beach. hypothesis: A dog is sleeping in the living room.

contradiction: A sleeping dog does not zips.

premise: A dog zips along the beach. hypothesis: A dog is outside.

entailment: A dog zips along the beach simply means it is outside.

premise: A white dog runs along a rocky shoreline. hypothesis: A dog is running up the stairs at home.

contradiction: the dog can not be running up stairs at home and along a rocky shoreline.

premise: A white dog runs along a rocky shoreline. hypothesis: A dog is running with his owner outside.

neutral: A dog running along a shoreline does not necessarily mean he is running with his owner.

premise: A white dog runs along a rocky shoreline. hypothesis: A dog is running outside.

entailment: Shoreline is outside.

premise: A fuzzy white lap dog runs along a rocky beach. hypothesis: A dog runs across the beach.

entailment: A fuzzy white lap dog runs along a rocky beach is same as dog running in a beach.

premise: A fuzzy white lap dog runs along a rocky beach. hypothesis: A dog chases birds on the beach.

neutral: A dog could be running along the beach for many reasons besides chasing birds.

premise: A fuzzy white lap dog runs along a rocky beach. hypothesis: A dog snuggle down under blankets on the couch.

contradiction: One dog is doing an action of snuggle while the other runs these are opposite.

premise: A small white dog running on a pebble covered beach. hypothesis: A dog on the beach.

entailment: A small white dog running on a pebble covered beach. is just as dog running in the beach.

premise: A small white dog running on a pebble covered beach. hypothesis: A seagull on the dock.

contradiction: A dog and a seagull are different animals.

premise: A small white dog running on a pebble covered beach. hypothesis: A dog runs after his boy and the frisbee.

neutral: A dog could be running on a beach for many reasons. Running after a boy and frisbee add a lot more context and can't be inferred just from knowing that the dog is running. "Running after" is more specific than "running".

premise: A baseball player is putting all his might in to throwing a ball. hypothesis: Player is giving the ball away.

neutral: "Giving the ball away" suggest that the player is throwing it to another player, which can't be inferred from just knowing that the player is throwing the ball.

premise: A baseball player is putting all his might in to throwing a ball. hypothesis: Pitcher is winding up a throw.

entailment: If someone is going to throw they are throwing.

premise: A baseball player is putting all his might in to throwing a ball. hypothesis: The player tossed the football.

contradiction: Baseball and football are different games.

premise: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering. hypothesis: The cheerleaders are wearing blue.

neutral: cheering doesn't always mean wearing blue.

premise: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering. hypothesis: An empty field.

contradiction: There cannot be an empty field while there are cheerleaders on it.

premise: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering. hypothesis: Some people are cheering on a field.

entailment: Cheerleaders are people.

premise: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering. hypothesis: Cheerleaders are waiting for the game to begin.

neutral: Cheerleaders can cheer on a field at any point in a game, not only while they are waiting for the game to begin.

premise: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering. hypothesis: The football player killed the cheerleader with his bullet pass.

contradiction: the cheerleader can not be being killed while cheering on the field.

premise: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering. hypothesis: The Dallas Cowboys' cheerleaders are trying to pump-up the crowd.

neutral: It is impossible to infer that the cheerleaders are specifically Dallas Cowboys' cheerleaders without this extra information added, since there are many different sports teams that have cheerleaders. Cheerleaders could be cheering at a practice, not specifically at a game, so "pump-up the crowd" gives more context, such as there being a large crowd and the setting being a game, that is not otherwise included.

premise: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering. hypothesis: There are people outdoors.

entailment: Cheerleaders are people, fields are outdoors.

premise: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering. hypothesis: Cheerleaders cheer on a field for an activity.

entailment: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering it is the same as cheer on a field for an activity.

premise: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering. hypothesis: People cheering.

entailment: Here people are Cheerleaders cheering in the field.

premise: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering. hypothesis: People sit on the snow-covered bench.

contradiction: Cheering is active sit is not.

premise: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering. hypothesis: Cheerleaders cheering.

entailment: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering is same as Cheerleaders cheering.

premise: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering. hypothesis: Some football players are practicing a running play.

contradiction: Cheering and running are two different things.

premise: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering. hypothesis: The cheerleaders cheer for the start of the big game.

neutral: Cheerleaders could be on the field cheering at any time during the game, it can't be inferred from sentence 1 that it is at the start of the game. Cheerleaders cheer at all games, so there is no way to infer from sentence 1 that they are cheering at the big game.

premise: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering. hypothesis: Cheerleaders cheer for the football team.

neutral: Many different sports teams have cheerleaders, so it can't be inferred from sentence 1 that they are cheering for a football team.

premise: Cheerleaders are on the field cheering. hypothesis: An old man wearing a diaper.

contradiction: Cheerleaders and a man are different descriptions of people.

premise: A woman holding a boombox. hypothesis: A man holding a boombox.

contradiction: The person holding a boombox cannot be both a man and a woman.

premise: A woman holding a boombox. hypothesis: A sad woman holding a boombox.

neutral: Sad is a specific emotion, people are not always sad.

premise: A woman holding a boombox. hypothesis: A person holding a boombox.

entailment: Woman is person.

premise: A woman in a blue shirt and green hat looks up at the camera. hypothesis: A woman wearing a blue shirt and green hat looks at the camera.

entailment: Being in clothing is the same as wearing clothing.

premise: A woman in a blue shirt and green hat looks up at the camera. hypothesis: A woman wearing a blue shirt and green hat smiles at the camera.

neutral: Just because a woman looks up at a camera doesn't imply that she smiles.

premise: A woman in a blue shirt and green hat looks up at the camera. hypothesis: A woman wearing a blue shirt and green hat is on her cellphone.

contradiction: the woman is looking up at the camera. she may not be on her cellphone.

premise: Cheerleaders are doing a cheer at a football field. hypothesis: The cheerleaders are wearing black and red uniforms.

neutral: Not all cheerleaders doing a cheer at a football field wear black and red uniforms.

premise: Cheerleaders are doing a cheer at a football field. hypothesis: The cheerleaders are wearing clothes.

entailment: Cheerleaders are not naked on a football field.

premise: Cheerleaders are doing a cheer at a football field. hypothesis: The cheerleaders are at the basketball arena.

contradiction: the cheerleaders ca not be on a basketball arena and also a football field.

premise: An excited, smiling woman stands at a red railing as she holds a boombox to one side. hypothesis: A human standing.

entailment: in a both sentence exctied and standing is different.

premise: An excited, smiling woman stands at a red railing as she holds a boombox to one side. hypothesis: A tall human stanindg.

neutral: Not all women are tall.

premise: An excited, smiling woman stands at a red railing as she holds a boombox to one side. hypothesis: Nobody is standing.

contradiction: a woman is standing. not nobody.

premise: A lady is kneeling wearing a blue shirt. hypothesis: A lady is close to the floor.

entailment: In order to be close to the floor, the lady must be kneeling.

premise: A lady is kneeling wearing a blue shirt. hypothesis: A lady is kneeling before the priest at church.

neutral: All ladies kneeling are not kneeling before the priest at church.

premise: A lady is kneeling wearing a blue shirt. hypothesis: The woman is doing jumping jacks outside.

contradiction: Jumping jacks are not done while kneeling.

premise: The silhouette of three people in front of a wall. hypothesis: The people are by the wall.

entailment: The silhouette of people is being cast on a wall they are near.

premise: The silhouette of three people in front of a wall. hypothesis: The people are running down the country road.

contradiction: three people can not be standing in front of a wall and also running down a country road.

premise: The silhouette of three people in front of a wall. hypothesis: The wall is painted.

neutral: There is no implication that the wall has any type of decoration or is painted.

premise: Two people wearing blue clothing are making hand gestures next to one another. hypothesis: A man and a woman are standing next to each other and communicating through sign language.

neutral: Just because there are two people doesn't imply the people are a man and a woman. All people making hand gestures are not communicating through sign language.

premise: Two people wearing blue clothing are making hand gestures next to one another. hypothesis: A man is sitting with his hands in his pockets.

contradiction: A person cannot make hand gestures with their hands in their pockets.

premise: Two people wearing blue clothing are making hand gestures next to one another. hypothesis: Two people are next to each other.

entailment: making hand gestures shows that people are next to each other.

premise: A spotted black and white dog splashes in the water. hypothesis: the dog is in the water.

entailment: In order for the dog to splash, it must be in the water.

premise: A spotted black and white dog splashes in the water. hypothesis: the dog is swimming by itself.

neutral: Just because the dog splashes in the water doesn't mean it is swimming by itself.

premise: A spotted black and white dog splashes in the water. hypothesis: the dog is eating out of his favorite bowl in the kitchen.

contradiction: A dog cannot be eating in the kitchen while he simultaneously splashes in the water.

premise: A large group, wearing pink shirts, waves to onlookers. hypothesis: A crowd gesticulates.

entailment: A large group can be called a crowd. Gesticulates is the same as wave.

premise: A large group, wearing pink shirts, waves to onlookers. hypothesis: They are raising money.

neutral: A large group doesn't necessarily mean the people in the group are raising money.

premise: A large group, wearing pink shirts, waves to onlookers. hypothesis: No one is watching them.

contradiction: there are onlookers. not no one.

premise: A baby is playing with a strand of beads. hypothesis: The beads are multi-colored.

neutral: Not all strands of beads are multi-colored.

premise: A baby is playing with a strand of beads. hypothesis: The baby is sleeping.

contradiction: the baby cant be playing with beads while sleeping.

premise: A baby is playing with a strand of beads. hypothesis: The baby is playing.

entailment: The baby is playing with an item.

premise: People are on a stage performing. hypothesis: people are sleeping.

contradiction: People cannot perform on a stage while sleeping.

premise: People are on a stage performing. hypothesis: people are singing onstage.

neutral: All people performing are not singing.

premise: People are on a stage performing. hypothesis: pwople are on stage.

entailment: If people are on a stage, they are most likely performing.

premise: A woman is running a marathon in a park. hypothesis: The woman is running in her backyard.

contradiction: A woman cannot run in her backyard and at the park simultaneously.

premise: A woman is running a marathon in a park. hypothesis: The woman is running fast.

neutral: Just because a woman is running in a marathon doesn't imply she is running fast.

premise: A woman is running a marathon in a park. hypothesis: The woman is outdoors.

entailment: To run a marathon, the woman must be outdoors.

premise: A group of people point forwards while performing some kind of act. hypothesis: A group of people point forwards while doing something.

entailment: The group of people is "performing some kind of act", which means they are doing something.

premise: A group of people point forwards while performing some kind of act. hypothesis: A group of people fight using tigers.

contradiction: A group cannot point forward while they fight using tigers.

premise: A group of people point forwards while performing some kind of act. hypothesis: A group of people point somewhere while speaking.

neutral: Just because a group of point doesn't mean they are speaking.

premise: Several people are dancing together in sync. hypothesis: kids are fighting each other.

contradiction: People do not dance together while fighting at the same time.

premise: Several people are dancing together in sync. hypothesis: man and woman dancing together.

neutral: Just because people are dancing doesn't imply the people dancing together are man and woman.

premise: Several people are dancing together in sync. hypothesis: people are dancing.

entailment: Both sentences mention people dancing.

premise: Group of people dancing. hypothesis: people dance together.

entailment: If a group of people is dancing, then they are most likely dancing together.

premise: Group of people dancing. hypothesis: people are dancing with one another during a religious ritual.

neutral: Just because people are dancing does not imply they are dancing with one another during a religious ritual.

premise: Group of people dancing. hypothesis: dogs are mating.

contradiction: It can either be people or dogs, not both.

premise: An adult couple enjoys time in a hot tub. hypothesis: A couple is inside watching TV.

contradiction: A couple cannot be watching TV while in a hot tub simultaneously.

premise: An adult couple enjoys time in a hot tub. hypothesis: A couple is in a hot tub.

entailment: Both sentences mention a couple in a hot tub.

premise: An adult couple enjoys time in a hot tub. hypothesis: A couple is in a hot tub outside.

neutral: All hot tubs are not outside.

premise: An average looking man is playing the guitar. hypothesis: The man knows how to play guitar.

entailment: If someone is playing the guitar, it is implied that they know how to play guitar.

premise: An average looking man is playing the guitar. hypothesis: The man can play the guitar well.

neutral: You can not infer he can play well.

premise: An average looking man is playing the guitar. hypothesis: The man is playing the drums.

contradiction: Drums and guitar are two different instruments.

premise: Two tan and white dogs and one tan dog racing down the beach near the water. hypothesis: three dogs are chasing a ball.

neutral: You can not infer they are chasing the ball.

premise: Two tan and white dogs and one tan dog racing down the beach near the water. hypothesis: three dogs are outside.

entailment: Dogs racing down the beach must be outside, as the beach is outside.

premise: Two tan and white dogs and one tan dog racing down the beach near the water. hypothesis: three dogs are laying in a couch.

contradiction: Three and two are different numbers. Laying and racing are two different things.

premise: A man and woman are walking down the street holding hands. hypothesis: A man and woman are walking down opposite sides of the street.

contradiction: People cannot hold hands while walking down opposite sides of the street.

premise: A man and woman are walking down the street holding hands. hypothesis: A couple of people are holding hands while walking.

entailment: The "couple of people" mentioned in sentence 2, refers to the man and woman in sentence 1.

premise: A man and woman are walking down the street holding hands. hypothesis: A newlywed couple hold hands and skip down the street.

neutral: Just because a man and woman walk together doesn't mean they are a newlywed couple. Holding hands doesn't imply they skip and hold hands.

premise: A man is using his computer while seated at a desk. hypothesis: A man searches the internet sitting down.

neutral: Man using his computer does not imply he searches the internet.

premise: A man is using his computer while seated at a desk. hypothesis: A woman drinks a beer at her desk.

contradiction: It is either a man or woman.