input_seq2seq
stringlengths 40
578
| output_seq2seq
stringlengths 10
929
|
|---|---|
premise: Small laughing child with blond-hair sitting at a table holding a green sippy cup. hypothesis: The child is happy. | entailment: Laughing is an expression of being happy. |
premise: Small laughing child with blond-hair sitting at a table holding a green sippy cup. hypothesis: A child is drinking apple juice. | neutral: A child holding a green sippy cup doesn't suggest the child is taking apple juice. |
premise: Small laughing child with blond-hair sitting at a table holding a green sippy cup. hypothesis: A child is throwing a tantrum. | contradiction: The small child can't be laughing and throwing a tantrum at the same time. |
premise: A little boy drinks milk and gets milk all over his face and table. hypothesis: the kid has milk on his face on a school day. | neutral: It may not be a school day. |
premise: A little boy drinks milk and gets milk all over his face and table. hypothesis: the dog eats mice. | contradiction: The subject cannot be both a dog and a little boy. |
premise: A little boy drinks milk and gets milk all over his face and table. hypothesis: the kid has milk on his face. | entailment: A boy is a kid and he has milk on his face because he gets milk all over his face. |
premise: Two pre-teen girls listening to music on an MP3 player with headphones. hypothesis: The music is loud. | neutral: The music on the MP3 player doesn't have to be loud. |
premise: Two pre-teen girls listening to music on an MP3 player with headphones. hypothesis: Thre are girls. | entailment: The girls are listening to music, therefore, thre are girls. |
premise: Two pre-teen girls listening to music on an MP3 player with headphones. hypothesis: The player is a cd player. | contradiction: The music player cannot be both a cd player and MP3 player. |
premise: A man is running behind a dogsled being pulled by four dogs. hypothesis: A man is being pulled by himself. | contradiction: The man can't be being pulled by four dogs if he is being pulled by himself. |
premise: A man is running behind a dogsled being pulled by four dogs. hypothesis: A man is running behind a sled. | entailment: The sled that he is running behind is a dogsled. |
premise: A man is running behind a dogsled being pulled by four dogs. hypothesis: A man is racing with the dogs. | neutral: A man behind a dogssheld pulled by dogs shouldn't be racing. |
premise: Toddler with milk around his mouth. hypothesis: A child has milk on their face. | entailment: A toddler is a child and they have to have milk on their face in order to have milk around his mouth. |
premise: Toddler with milk around his mouth. hypothesis: A child was making a mess with milk. | entailment: A toddler is a child and he must be making a mess with milk in order to have it around his mouth. |
premise: Toddler with milk around his mouth. hypothesis: A toddler with juice around his mouth. | contradiction: The toddler cannot simultaneously have milk and juice around his mouth. |
premise: Toddler with milk around his mouth. hypothesis: Toddler eating milk. | contradiction: The toddler cannot be eating milk if it is around his mouth. |
premise: Toddler with milk around his mouth. hypothesis: A child threw up milk on himself. | neutral: It may not be that the child threw up, but rather was messy. |
premise: Toddler with milk around his mouth. hypothesis: A child. | entailment: A child is a toddler. |
premise: Toddler with milk around his mouth. hypothesis: Toddler wearing mik. | entailment: Toddler must be wearing mik in order to have milk around his mouth. |
premise: Toddler with milk around his mouth. hypothesis: A man spills beer on his shirt. | contradiction: The subject cannot be both a toddler and a man. The subject cannot spill both milk and beer simultaneously. |
premise: Toddler with milk around his mouth. hypothesis: The toddler has milk around the corners of his mouth. | entailment: If he has milk around his mouth then he has milk around the corners of his mouth. |
premise: Toddler with milk around his mouth. hypothesis: The toddler has icecream around his mouth. | contradiction: The toddler cannot simultaneously have milk and icecream around his mouth. |
premise: Toddler with milk around his mouth. hypothesis: The child was well groomed. | contradiction: The child cannot be oth well groomed and have milk around his mouth. |
premise: Toddler with milk around his mouth. hypothesis: Toddler drinking milk. | neutral: Rather than drinking milk, it may've spilled it. |
premise: Toddler with milk around his mouth. hypothesis: A toddler just drank his first glass of milk. | neutral: No glass is indicated, and it may not be the first one it has ever had. |
premise: Toddler with milk around his mouth. hypothesis: The child was still unable to drink milk properly. | neutral: Rather than being unable to drink milk properly, there could have been an issue with the milk container. |
premise: Toddler with milk around his mouth. hypothesis: The toddler with milk around his mouth is making a mess. | neutral: The toddler is not shown to be making a general mess, just having reasonable issues with drinking. |
premise: A man dressed in warm clothing sleds behind four dogs in the snow. hypothesis: The man is swimming with his dogs. | contradiction: The man cannot be both swimming with his dogs and dressed in warm clothing sledding behind his four dogs. |
premise: A man dressed in warm clothing sleds behind four dogs in the snow. hypothesis: The man is outside sledding. | entailment: A man is in the snow so he must be outside. |
premise: A man dressed in warm clothing sleds behind four dogs in the snow. hypothesis: The man is sledding in Alaska. | neutral: Just because a man sleds behind four dogs in the snow doesn't mean that the man is in Alaska. |
premise: A cowboy Roping a calf in a rodeo. hypothesis: A cowboy with a brown hat is roping a calf in a rodeo. | neutral: Not all cowboys wear brown hats. |
premise: A cowboy Roping a calf in a rodeo. hypothesis: A man is working in an office on a laptop. | contradiction: There wouldn't be a rodeo or a calf in an office. |
premise: A cowboy Roping a calf in a rodeo. hypothesis: A person is performing. | entailment: Cowboy performing in a rodeo. |
premise: Men fish on a concrete slab. hypothesis: Men are sleeping in tents. | contradiction: The men would not be sleeping in tents while they simultaneously fish on a concrete slab. |
premise: Men fish on a concrete slab. hypothesis: Men are near the water. | entailment: One must be near the water to fish. |
premise: Men fish on a concrete slab. hypothesis: Men are fishing for trout. | neutral: Men fish on a concrete slab doesn't infer that they are fishing for trout. |
premise: A man wearing a blue shirt screaming or yelling with his arms raised up in the air. hypothesis: A man is angry. | neutral: Just because a man is screaming or yelling with his arms raised in the air doesn't mean he's angry. |
premise: A man wearing a blue shirt screaming or yelling with his arms raised up in the air. hypothesis: A man makes a ruckus. | entailment: makes a ruckus is another way of describing someone screaming or yelling. |
premise: A man wearing a blue shirt screaming or yelling with his arms raised up in the air. hypothesis: A man is relaxed. | contradiction: The man would not typically be relaxed if he was screaming or yelling. |
premise: Four people near a body of water, one sitting and three standing, while two people walk on a nearby sidewalk. hypothesis: one person swims in water. | contradiction: The four doesn't include the one swimming. |
premise: Four people near a body of water, one sitting and three standing, while two people walk on a nearby sidewalk. hypothesis: Four people sitting near the pond. | contradiction: Three people can't be standing at the same time as four people are sitting. |
premise: Four people near a body of water, one sitting and three standing, while two people walk on a nearby sidewalk. hypothesis: There is chalk art on the sidewalk. | neutral: Not all sidewalks have chalk art on them. |
premise: Four people near a body of water, one sitting and three standing, while two people walk on a nearby sidewalk. hypothesis: one person sits while three stand near a body of water. | entailment: Both scenario has four people with one person sitting and three standing. |
premise: Four people near a body of water, one sitting and three standing, while two people walk on a nearby sidewalk. hypothesis: People are standing on stairs. | contradiction: The entire group of people is standing on stairs as opposed to the group that has one person sitting, three standing while two other people walk. |
premise: Four people near a body of water, one sitting and three standing, while two people walk on a nearby sidewalk. hypothesis: A group of people are inside a building. | contradiction: It is implied by the people being on a sidewalk or near a body of water that they are not simultaneously inside a building. |
premise: Four people near a body of water, one sitting and three standing, while two people walk on a nearby sidewalk. hypothesis: The sidewalk is desolate and empty. | contradiction: The sidewalk cannot be desolate and empty if two people are on the sidewalk. |
premise: Four people near a body of water, one sitting and three standing, while two people walk on a nearby sidewalk. hypothesis: Four people congregate at the pond. | neutral: People congregating near a body of water doesn't have to be at the pond. |
premise: Four people near a body of water, one sitting and three standing, while two people walk on a nearby sidewalk. hypothesis: People are going swimming. | neutral: Just because people are near water doesn't mean they are going swimming. |
premise: Four people near a body of water, one sitting and three standing, while two people walk on a nearby sidewalk. hypothesis: There are people on a sidewalk. | entailment: Two people are on the sidewalk, walking. |
premise: Four people near a body of water, one sitting and three standing, while two people walk on a nearby sidewalk. hypothesis: Everyone is wearing a dress. | neutral: People near water and walking nearby does not infer that all are wearing a dress. |
premise: Four people near a body of water, one sitting and three standing, while two people walk on a nearby sidewalk. hypothesis: People are near water. | entailment: People indicates more than one. |
premise: Four people near a body of water, one sitting and three standing, while two people walk on a nearby sidewalk. hypothesis: Four people congregate near the water. | entailment: congregate is another way to describe a group of people sitting and standing together. |
premise: Four people near a body of water, one sitting and three standing, while two people walk on a nearby sidewalk. hypothesis: There are people outdoors. | entailment: One must be outdoors if one is near a body of water or a sidewalk. |
premise: Four people near a body of water, one sitting and three standing, while two people walk on a nearby sidewalk. hypothesis: one person rests, sitting down while three others stand near a body of water. | neutral: One person sitting near a body of water doesn't mean that that person is resting. |
premise: Two little girls lie on the carpet next to an O made of wooden blocks. hypothesis: Two girls are taking a nap on the carpet. | neutral: Just because two girls lie on the carpet, it doesn't mean they are taking a nap. |
premise: Two little girls lie on the carpet next to an O made of wooden blocks. hypothesis: Two girls are having a pillow fight. | contradiction: People do not typically lie while they have a pillow fight. |
premise: Two little girls lie on the carpet next to an O made of wooden blocks. hypothesis: Two girls lay next to wooden blocks. | entailment: Girls indicates young or "little" females. |
premise: People are fishing and walking next to the water. hypothesis: People are fishing and walking next to the water. | entailment: "People are fishing and walking next to the water" and "people fishing and walking next to the water" are identical. |
premise: People are fishing and walking next to the water. hypothesis: People are swimming in the water. | contradiction: People do not simultaneously go swimming while fishing or walking. |
premise: People are fishing and walking next to the water. hypothesis: People are enjoying the summer weather fishing. | neutral: Just because people are fishing and walking next to the water doesn't infer that they are enjoying the summer weather. |
premise: Two guys playing football on a campus green. hypothesis: They are eating fried fish on the boat. | contradiction: The people cannot be simultaneously eating on a boat if they are playing football on a campus green. |
premise: Two guys playing football on a campus green. hypothesis: They are practicing before the big game tomorrow. | neutral: Just because two guys are playing football doesn't mean they are practicing. |
premise: Two guys playing football on a campus green. hypothesis: There are some guys in this picture. | entailment: Some can refer to two guys. |
premise: Asian school children sitting on each others shoulders. hypothesis: Schoolchildren together. | entailment: Sitting on each others shoulders implies together. |
premise: Asian school children sitting on each others shoulders. hypothesis: Asian factory workers sitting. | contradiction: There can either be school children or factory workers. |
premise: Asian school children sitting on each others shoulders. hypothesis: Asian schoolchildren are friends. | neutral: Sitting on each other shoulders does not necessarily mean the schoolchildren are friends. |
premise: A man wearing a red sweater is sitting on a car bumper watching another person work. hypothesis: vehicles are slow at speed breaker. | contradiction: He refers to vehicles instead of a man. |
premise: A man wearing a red sweater is sitting on a car bumper watching another person work. hypothesis: there was a speed breaker on the road by which people are taking care. | entailment: "There was a speed breaker on the road by which people are taking care" because a man is "sitting on a car bumper watching another person work". |
premise: A man wearing a red sweater is sitting on a car bumper watching another person work. hypothesis: people make speed fast at speed breaker. | contradiction: He refers to people increasing speed at a speed breaker instead a man watching another person work. |
premise: A young woman frolicking on the lawn in front of the us capitol building. hypothesis: A young woman having a picnic on the lawn in front of the capitol building. | contradiction: Frolicking is different than having a picnic. |
premise: A young woman frolicking on the lawn in front of the us capitol building. hypothesis: A young lady playing in front of the capitol building. | entailment: Playing is a result of frolicking. |
premise: A young woman frolicking on the lawn in front of the us capitol building. hypothesis: A young lady playing chase in front of the capitol building. | neutral: Frolicking doesn't mean playing chase. |
premise: a man wearing a multicolored striped shirt playing the guitar on the street. hypothesis: A man is hitting a child. | contradiction: A man playing the guitar cannot be hitting a child simultaneously. |
premise: a man wearing a multicolored striped shirt playing the guitar on the street. hypothesis: A man in a colorful shirt is playing an instrument. | entailment: Multicolored striped shirt is a rephrasing of colorful shirt. |
premise: a man wearing a multicolored striped shirt playing the guitar on the street. hypothesis: A man is performing for money. | neutral: Not all man play guitar for money and not all man are wearing multicolored striped shirt. |
premise: A man wearing a colorful and striped sweater plays music in the street. hypothesis: Two goldfish are riding bikes in a giant pile of mashed potatoes. | contradiction: Striped sweater is different than riding bikes. |
premise: A man wearing a colorful and striped sweater plays music in the street. hypothesis: The man is playing music on an instrument. | entailment: Playing an instrument implies playing music. |
premise: A man wearing a colorful and striped sweater plays music in the street. hypothesis: The man likes to receive attention for his music, which sounds terrible. | neutral: He is a terrible musician. |
premise: A man wearing a multi-color coat is playing the guitar on the street. hypothesis: The man plays guitar. | entailment: Plays music means he is playing the guitar. |
premise: A man wearing a multi-color coat is playing the guitar on the street. hypothesis: the woman is getting her nails done. | contradiction: Woman and man are different. |
premise: A man wearing a multi-color coat is playing the guitar on the street. hypothesis: the man is trying to raise money for drugs. | neutral: The man is on drugs. |
premise: Street performer in colorful shirt performing with small guitar. hypothesis: The street performer is singing a song. | neutral: The performer is singing as well. |
premise: Street performer in colorful shirt performing with small guitar. hypothesis: The street performer is sleeping on a park bench. | contradiction: Sleeping and performing are different. |
premise: Street performer in colorful shirt performing with small guitar. hypothesis: A street performer is trying to earn extra money. | entailment: The performer is trying to earn extra money by performing with the small guitar. |
premise: Two men are painting a building while a third is walking past on his cellphone. hypothesis: A building is being painted. | entailment: A building is being painted is a rephrasing of a building is being painted. |
premise: Two men are painting a building while a third is walking past on his cellphone. hypothesis: No one ever comes to this unpainted and dilapidated building. | contradiction: Two men are different that no one. |
premise: Two men are painting a building while a third is walking past on his cellphone. hypothesis: A supervisor calls in his report on the painting crew. | neutral: The supervisor is the third man. |
premise: Two men are on scaffolding as they paint above a storefront while a man on the sidewalk stands next to them talking on the phone. hypothesis: Two men are painting their new store. | neutral: Two men painting a store, doesn't have to be their new store. |
premise: Two men are on scaffolding as they paint above a storefront while a man on the sidewalk stands next to them talking on the phone. hypothesis: Three men are outside. | entailment: Out of the three men outside, only two are on scaffolding. |
premise: Two men are on scaffolding as they paint above a storefront while a man on the sidewalk stands next to them talking on the phone. hypothesis: No one is on a phone. | contradiction: The man on the sidewalk can't be talking on the phone if no one is on the phone. |
premise: A blue excavator digging a large hold in cement. hypothesis: the boy was listening. | neutral: digging doesn't always mean boy. |
premise: A blue excavator digging a large hold in cement. hypothesis: a child was there. | entailment: A child might be in the area of a blue excavator. |
premise: A blue excavator digging a large hold in cement. hypothesis: not watched at alll. | contradiction: Not watched is different than digging. |
premise: A man with khaki shorts on is holding a little girls hand while she walks in the water of a creek. hypothesis: A man is holding a girls hand and walking through a creek. | entailment: A man walks through the creek. |
premise: A man with khaki shorts on is holding a little girls hand while she walks in the water of a creek. hypothesis: A man with jean shorts on is holding a little girls hand while she flies a kite. | contradiction: The man cannot be wearing khaki and jean shorts, and doing walking in the water and flying a kite at the same time. |
premise: A man with khaki shorts on is holding a little girls hand while she walks in the water of a creek. hypothesis: A man with shorts on is helping a little girl find her way home. | neutral: A girl walking in a creek is not assumed to be trying to find her way home. |
premise: Two women are walking down a dirt path carrying loads on their heads. hypothesis: Two horses running in a field. | contradiction: Horses is different than women. |
premise: Two women are walking down a dirt path carrying loads on their heads. hypothesis: Two people are walking down a path. | entailment: Walking down a path means that they are walking down a dirt path. |
premise: Two women are walking down a dirt path carrying loads on their heads. hypothesis: Two beautiful women wearing white are walking down a dirt path carrying loads of nuts on their heads. | neutral: They are carrying nuts. |
premise: A street vendor in Asia tries to bring in more customers. hypothesis: A vendor trying to attract costumers. | entailment: To attract means to bring in. |