Datasets:

ErfanMoosaviMonazzah

/

esnli-seq2seq

like 0

premise: A doctor in blue scrubs is performing an operation assisted by two men and a woman. hypothesis: a old man was talking.

entailment: The doctor could be an old man and he has to talk to be assisted by the two men and the woman.

premise: A doctor in blue scrubs is performing an operation assisted by two men and a woman. hypothesis: the boys were angry.

contradiction: If they are boys, they cannot be a doctor.

premise: A doctor in blue scrubs is performing an operation assisted by two men and a woman. hypothesis: the child was happy.

neutral: A doctor and his assistants can operate without a child being present or happy.

premise: A woman with a black jacket walks past an outdoor movie poster. hypothesis: A female is leaving a movie theatre.

neutral: walking past an outdoor movie poster does not necessarily imply she is leaving a movie theatre.

premise: A woman with a black jacket walks past an outdoor movie poster. hypothesis: A woman walking outside.

entailment: A woman walking outside explains how the woman could be walking past an outdoor movie poster.

premise: A woman with a black jacket walks past an outdoor movie poster. hypothesis: A woman is cleaning up.

contradiction: The woman cannot walk past and also be cleaning up.

premise: A man in an elf hat holding a white umbrella is standing on the sidewalk with two other men. hypothesis: A man stands.

entailment: A man stands is a more general way of explaining a man is standing on the sidewalk.

premise: A man in an elf hat holding a white umbrella is standing on the sidewalk with two other men. hypothesis: My love's like a red, red wig.

contradiction: A hat and a wig are two separate items.

premise: A man in an elf hat holding a white umbrella is standing on the sidewalk with two other men. hypothesis: Others are nearby.

neutral: others may refer to other men or women.

premise: Indian lady and a guy in a blue suit dancing in the sunlight. hypothesis: A woman eats a pickle.

contradiction: If a woman is dancing, then she is not eating.

premise: Indian lady and a guy in a blue suit dancing in the sunlight. hypothesis: Two people dancing outdoors.

entailment: Two people dancing outdoors is a general way of saying an indian lady and a guy dancing in the sunlight.

premise: Indian lady and a guy in a blue suit dancing in the sunlight. hypothesis: Two people dancing while a band performs.

neutral: Two people dancing in the sunlight does not imply a band performs.

premise: Two older men are talking. hypothesis: Two people are having a conversation.

entailment: Two people having a conversation is one way of explaining two older men are talking.

premise: Two older men are talking. hypothesis: Men are exchanging ideas.

neutral: two men are talking does not mean they are exchanging ideas they could be discussing about sports.

premise: Two older men are talking. hypothesis: A crowd is talking over each other.

contradiction: A crowd is more than two men.

premise: A mountain biker jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area. hypothesis: They are going fast.

neutral: jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area does not imply going fast.

premise: A mountain biker jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area. hypothesis: A biker is doing jumps by trees.

entailment: A bikder doing jumps by trees is the same as saying a biker is jumping a slope in a forest area.

premise: A mountain biker jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area. hypothesis: They aren't on bikes.

contradiction: If they the bikers are jumping a slope outdoors, then they would have to be on bikes.

premise: A mountain biker jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area. hypothesis: A person is trying to learn new tricks on their bike.

neutral: jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area does not mean the person is trying to learn new tricks on their bike.

premise: A mountain biker jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area. hypothesis: The biker is jumping into a hole.

entailment: A moutain biker jumping and a biker jumping is the same action.

premise: A mountain biker jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area. hypothesis: A person rides a bike outdoors.

entailment: A person rides a bike outdoors is one general way of saying a biker is jumping a slope outdoors.

premise: A mountain biker jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area. hypothesis: The biker can be a man or a woman.

neutral: there is no indication that the biker is a mountain biker.

premise: A mountain biker jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area. hypothesis: There's a biker.

entailment: A biker is one way of saying a mountain biker.

premise: A mountain biker jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area. hypothesis: A biker is doing jumps in a wooded area.

neutral: A biker is doing jumps in a wooded area may not necessarily be in a forest.

premise: A mountain biker jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area. hypothesis: The biker is using a small bike to jump a hole.

neutral: A hole and slope are not the same thing.

premise: A mountain biker jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area. hypothesis: They are avoiding trees.

entailment: They are avoiding trees could be one way of saying a mountain biker is avoiding trees by jumping a slope outdoors.

premise: A mountain biker jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area. hypothesis: The mountain biker is going on a desert trail.

contradiction: A forest and a desert are two different locations.

premise: A mountain biker jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area. hypothesis: The biker is trying to jump over a volcano.

contradiction: You would not find a volcano in a forest area.

premise: A mountain biker jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area. hypothesis: He's indoors.

contradiction: The biker cannot be outdoors and indoors simultaneously.

premise: A mountain biker jumping a slope outdoors in a forest area. hypothesis: A person is riding in a bobsled.

contradiction: A biker would be riding a bike, not a bobsled.

premise: Two older men in winter coats talking outside of a shop with a grassy lawn covered in a light coat of snow in front of it. hypothesis: The old men are discussing the weather.

neutral: There are many things the men may be talking about not necessarily discussing the weather.

premise: Two older men in winter coats talking outside of a shop with a grassy lawn covered in a light coat of snow in front of it. hypothesis: Two old men in winter coats talk outside.

entailment: if two older men in winter coats are talking outside then the two old men in winter coats are talking outside.

premise: Two older men in winter coats talking outside of a shop with a grassy lawn covered in a light coat of snow in front of it. hypothesis: The old men are wearing raincoats.

contradiction: Winter coats are different than raincoats.

premise: Two elderly men having a conversation, snow covered grass in the background. hypothesis: The men are drinking coffee and having some cookies.

contradiction: Snow covered grass would be outside, men would drink coffee and have cookies inside.

premise: Two elderly men having a conversation, snow covered grass in the background. hypothesis: The men are sleeping.

contradiction: If the men are having a conversation, then they would not be sleeping.

premise: Two elderly men having a conversation, snow covered grass in the background. hypothesis: There are two men outside in this picture.

entailment: The grass in the background implies the men are outside.

premise: Two men are standing outside and snow is on the ground. hypothesis: Two men preparing for a snowball fight.

neutral: They can't be preparing for a snowball fight if they are just standing.

premise: Two men are standing outside and snow is on the ground. hypothesis: People are near snow.

entailment: Two men can be rephrased to people. It is implied that since they are standing outside and snow is on the ground they must be near the snow.

premise: Two men are standing outside and snow is on the ground. hypothesis: Men making snow angels.

contradiction: The men are standing or making snow angels.

premise: Two older men in coats are standing outside. hypothesis: These men never wore coats.

contradiction: The men are either in coats or never wore the coats.

premise: Two older men in coats are standing outside. hypothesis: They are outside wearing coats.

entailment: men in coats are outside.

premise: Two older men in coats are standing outside. hypothesis: It is cold, but they went outside anyway.

neutral: Just because Two older men in coats are standing outside doesn't mean it is cold.

premise: A gentleman in a purple scarf and hat is looking at money while holding an accordion. hypothesis: A woman is brushing her hair in her bedroom.

contradiction: There can either be a gentleman or a woman.

premise: A gentleman in a purple scarf and hat is looking at money while holding an accordion. hypothesis: A man is holding an accordian.

entailment: A gentleman is a type of man.

premise: A gentleman in a purple scarf and hat is looking at money while holding an accordion. hypothesis: A man is looking at a hundreds of dollars.

neutral: It doesn't say how much money there is; it may not be hundreds of dollars.

premise: BMX biker jumps over a ravine. hypothesis: ravine jumping is never easy.

neutral: The ravine might be small; we can't say it is never easy.

premise: BMX biker jumps over a ravine. hypothesis: there is a bmx biker who is perfect in ravine jumping.

entailment: "Ravine jumping" is a rephrasing of "jumps over a ravine.".

premise: BMX biker jumps over a ravine. hypothesis: anybody can do ravine jumping.

contradiction: There can either be a BMX biker or anybody can do a jump over a ravine.

premise: A white bike is tied to a street sign. hypothesis: the bike is tied to a stop sign.

neutral: A street sign could be any number of different signs, only one being a stop sign.

premise: A white bike is tied to a street sign. hypothesis: the car is parked at the sign.

contradiction: It is either a white bike or a car.

premise: A white bike is tied to a street sign. hypothesis: the bike is tied to a sign.

entailment: tied to a sign implies that tied to a street sign.

premise: A white bike is leaning against a post. hypothesis: A bike is on the ground about to be reparied.

contradiction: The bike cannot be both leaning against a post and on the ground at once.

premise: A white bike is leaning against a post. hypothesis: A bike with a flat tire is not being ridden.

neutral: It is not obvious from leaning against a post that the bike has a flat tire.

premise: A white bike is leaning against a post. hypothesis: A bike it outside.

entailment: The post is outside therefore the bike is outside.

premise: The boy locked the cycle and went away. hypothesis: A boy riding a bike.

contradiction: The bike is either locked up or he is riding it.

premise: The boy locked the cycle and went away. hypothesis: A boy walking away.

entailment: If a boy is walking away he went away.

premise: The boy locked the cycle and went away. hypothesis: A bicycle chained up with a boy walking away.

neutral: The fact that the boy locked the cycle and went away does not imply that a bicycle chained up with a boy walking away.

premise: A crowded city during daytime. hypothesis: A city filled with people in the middle of the daytime.

entailment: "A city filled with people," is a rephrasing of "a crowded city.".

premise: A crowded city during daytime. hypothesis: A abandoned city at the edge of the world.

contradiction: A crowded city cannot be abandoned.

premise: A crowded city during daytime. hypothesis: A crowded city filled with many cars on a warm summer day.

neutral: you don't know what the city is filled with, so it may not be many cars. Also, we know it's daytime, but not that it is warm or sunny.

premise: People walking around in a big city. hypothesis: People are walking to the park.

neutral: city is not the same as park.

premise: People walking around in a big city. hypothesis: People are outside.

entailment: If people are walking around a big city, they are outside.

premise: People walking around in a big city. hypothesis: The people are asleep.

contradiction: Cannot be walking around and asleep at the same time.

premise: A busy city that looks like New York City. hypothesis: The city has a lot of people in it.

entailment: A city that is busy has a lot of people in it.

premise: A busy city that looks like New York City. hypothesis: The city is very large.

neutral: Many cities are very large and not just New York City.

premise: A busy city that looks like New York City. hypothesis: The city looks like Lawrence, Kansas.

contradiction: The city either looks like NYC or Lawrence, KS. It cannot resemble two such different cities.

premise: A view of buildings and people walking across the streets in Times Square, New York City. hypothesis: There is a city.

entailment: Time Square is a city in New York.

premise: A view of buildings and people walking across the streets in Times Square, New York City. hypothesis: The field of poppies is perfectly still.

contradiction: It is either a view of buildings and people or a field of poppies.

premise: A view of buildings and people walking across the streets in Times Square, New York City. hypothesis: Times Square in New York City is full of people and bustling with noise and activity.

neutral: The fact that people are walking across the street doesn't imply that there are full of people and they are bustling with noise and activity.

premise: A woman is making a clay pot. hypothesis: A man is painting a painting.

contradiction: Either a man or a woman. Cannot be painting and making a clay pot simultaneously.

premise: A woman is making a clay pot. hypothesis: A woman is making a flower pot.

neutral: Sentence 1 is missing flower pot.

premise: A woman is making a clay pot. hypothesis: An artist is sculpting with clay.

entailment: A woman who is an artist is making or sculpting clay.

premise: A barber waiting for customers. hypothesis: A barber is inside his shop standing in the front.

neutral: he does not have to wait inside his shop.

premise: A barber waiting for customers. hypothesis: A barber is at work.

entailment: A barber who has customers is at work.

premise: A barber waiting for customers. hypothesis: The barber is closing the shop at the end of the day.

contradiction: He is either waiting or closing the store.

premise: A man sitting in a barber shop. hypothesis: There is an individual waiting indoors.

entailment: A man is an individual at a indoors barber shop.

premise: A man sitting in a barber shop. hypothesis: A man is waiting to get his haircut.

neutral: The man can be sitting in the barber ship without waiting to get a haircut - he could be the barber.

premise: A man sitting in a barber shop. hypothesis: A man is brushing his teeth.

contradiction: He is either sitting or brushing his teeth.

premise: A woman preparing to glaze a bowl. hypothesis: A woman happily preparing to glaze.

neutral: Just because the woman is preparing to glaze a bowl does not not mean that she is doing it happily.

premise: A woman preparing to glaze a bowl. hypothesis: A woman not preparing to glaze.

contradiction: She is either preparing or not preparing to glaze a bowl.

premise: A woman preparing to glaze a bowl. hypothesis: A woman preparing to glaze.

entailment: A woman is preparing to use glaze.

premise: A woman wearing an apron inspects a large pot on a table filled with cups, bowls, pots and baskets of assorted size. hypothesis: A woman wearing gloves is washing dishes.

contradiction: The woman is wearing either an apron or gloves.

premise: A woman wearing an apron inspects a large pot on a table filled with cups, bowls, pots and baskets of assorted size. hypothesis: A woman wearing a red apron inspects a large black pot on a table filled with cups, bowls, pots and baskets of assorted size.

neutral: Aprons do not have to be red. A pot can be any color, not just black.

premise: A woman wearing an apron inspects a large pot on a table filled with cups, bowls, pots and baskets of assorted size. hypothesis: A woman is wearing an apron.

entailment: A woman wearing an apron puts a pot on a table.

premise: A model posing to look as if she's a real female soccer player. hypothesis: A man is modeling for a cooking show.

contradiction: A man cannot be female, nor would he be referred to as she. Modeling for a cooking show would look very different than modeling as a soccer player.

premise: A model posing to look as if she's a real female soccer player. hypothesis: A woman is trying to model for a sports magazine.

neutral: A model trying to look like a soccer player is not necessarily posing for a sports magazine.

premise: A model posing to look as if she's a real female soccer player. hypothesis: A model is doing a shoot.

entailment: The model is doing a photo shoot so she must be posing.

premise: Firemen emerge from a subway station. hypothesis: Firemen walking outside.

entailment: Firemen emerge outside from the station.

premise: Firemen emerge from a subway station. hypothesis: The station is empty.

contradiction: The station can be either empty or with firemen inside.

premise: Firemen emerge from a subway station. hypothesis: The firemen are not working.

neutral: Just because firemen are coming out of the subway does not mean that they are not working.

premise: Exhausted looking firemen are walking. hypothesis: Firemen are walking.

entailment: The firemen walking look exhausted.

premise: Exhausted looking firemen are walking. hypothesis: Exhausted looking firemen are walking back to the fire station to rest.

neutral: Not all exhausted firemen who are walking are going back to the fire station to rest.

premise: Exhausted looking firemen are walking. hypothesis: Determined looking firemen are running into a burning building.

contradiction: One can't be walking and running at the same time.

premise: Three firefighters, the nearest firefighter is holding a helmet in his left hand. hypothesis: Three man are holding axes in their left hands.

contradiction: The nearest firefighter is either holding an axe or holding a helmet.

premise: Three firefighters, the nearest firefighter is holding a helmet in his left hand. hypothesis: The three firefighters are discussing sports.

neutral: Just because a one of the firefighters is holding a helmet does not mean that they are discussing sports.

premise: Three firefighters, the nearest firefighter is holding a helmet in his left hand. hypothesis: The firemen are gathered one is holding his helmet.

entailment: One of the firefighters is holding a helmet in his hand.

premise: A man walking along side a clean up crew. hypothesis: The man directed the clean up crew where to go.

neutral: Not all men who walk beside a clean up crew will direct the clean up crew where to go.

premise: A man walking along side a clean up crew. hypothesis: The woman jogged alongside the crew.

contradiction: If it's a man, it can't be a woman.

premise: A man walking along side a clean up crew. hypothesis: The man walked alongside the crew.

entailment: The crew is a renaming of the clean up crew.

premise: A little boy swims underwater. hypothesis: A boy floats on top of water.

contradiction: One can't be swiming underwater and float on top of it simultaneously.