input_seq2seq
stringlengths
40
578
output_seq2seq
stringlengths
10
929
premise: A guy performing a bicycle jump trick for an audience. hypothesis: a guy is performing a bike trick.
entailment: Bike trick is a restatement of bicycle jump trick.
premise: A gray-haired woman in a blue dress coat with snowflakes on it balances something on her head. hypothesis: The woman is wearing a coat.
entailment: A blue dress coat is a more specific type of coat.
premise: A gray-haired woman in a blue dress coat with snowflakes on it balances something on her head. hypothesis: The woman loves her blonde hair.
contradiction: Gray hair and blonde hair are different hair colors.
premise: A gray-haired woman in a blue dress coat with snowflakes on it balances something on her head. hypothesis: The woman is guarding herself from the snow.
neutral: Balancing something on the head may be for many reasons, not only for guarding herself from the snow.
premise: Two children play outside in a field. hypothesis: A brother and sister chase each other in a field.
neutral: Sentence 1: Two children play outside in a field. Sentence 2: A brother and sister chase each other in a field.
premise: Two children play outside in a field. hypothesis: Kids are playing outdoors.
entailment: Children are kids. A field is outdoors.
premise: Two children play outside in a field. hypothesis: Two children are reading at their desks.
contradiction: The children cannot be playing outside and reading at their desks simultaneously.
premise: One man sits inside and plays the banjo, there are trees behind him outside. hypothesis: A man runs outside.
contradiction: The man can't be sitting inside and playing outside at the same time.
premise: One man sits inside and plays the banjo, there are trees behind him outside. hypothesis: A male sitting indoors.
entailment: A man is a male. Sitting indoors is a restatement of sits inside.
premise: One man sits inside and plays the banjo, there are trees behind him outside. hypothesis: A male plays a banjo while sitting on a sofa.
neutral: Sentence 1: One man sits inside and plays the banjo, there are trees behind him outside. Sentence 2: A male plays a banjo while sitting on a sofa.
premise: Two children, in colorful outfits, playing in a field with a big rock in the middle. hypothesis: Don't play with rocks.
contradiction: It is not possible to play in the filed and not play simultaneously.
premise: Two children, in colorful outfits, playing in a field with a big rock in the middle. hypothesis: Two kids are playing with a big rock in the field.
entailment: Children are kids. Playing with a big rock in the field is a restatement of playing in a field with a big rock.
premise: Two children, in colorful outfits, playing in a field with a big rock in the middle. hypothesis: Two kids are playing with a big rock in the field with family.
neutral: The first sentence does not say that they are playing with the big rock, simply that they are in a field with a rock. The first sentence does not mention anything about family.
premise: Two young girls are playing outside in a non-urban environment. hypothesis: Some girls are running through an open field.
neutral: The first sentence does not say that they are running - simply that they are playing. A non-urban environment does not necessarily imply an open field.
premise: Two young girls are playing outside in a non-urban environment. hypothesis: Two girls are playing outside.
entailment: Girls are young, and they are in a non-urban environment so they are outside.
premise: Two young girls are playing outside in a non-urban environment. hypothesis: Some girls are running on the sidewalk, next to some parked cars.
contradiction: The girls cannot be playing in a non-urban environment while running on a sidewalk at the same time.
premise: Two children in hats play in an open, rocky field. hypothesis: The children are at home eating lunch.
contradiction: The children cannot play in a field and be eating lunch at home simultaneously.
premise: Two children in hats play in an open, rocky field. hypothesis: The children are playing in a rocky field.
entailment: Two children in hats, and they can only play in rocky field in an open area.
premise: Two children in hats play in an open, rocky field. hypothesis: The children are playing catch.
neutral: The first sentence does not specify what, exactly, they are playing. It may not be catch.
premise: A woman wearing a green and pink dress is dancing with someone wearing a blue top with white pants. hypothesis: The dancing woman is on the grass.
neutral: The first sentence does not mention grass, nor anything else about the surface upon which the woman is dancing.
premise: A woman wearing a green and pink dress is dancing with someone wearing a blue top with white pants. hypothesis: The woman in green and pink is dancing.
entailment: "The woman in green and pink is dancing" shows that " she is is dancing with someone wearing a blue top with white pants".
premise: A woman wearing a green and pink dress is dancing with someone wearing a blue top with white pants. hypothesis: The dancing woman is alone in her bedroom.
contradiction: one woman is alone, the other is with someone dancing.
premise: Man in gold pants looking at the camera. hypothesis: Man looking at the camera.
entailment: The man is looking at the camera.
premise: Man in gold pants looking at the camera. hypothesis: Man looking at something.
neutral: Because the man is looking at the camera does not mean he is looking at something.
premise: Man in gold pants looking at the camera. hypothesis: Man is walking away to the hall.
contradiction: The man cannot simultaneously be walking away and looking at the camera.
premise: A man in a gold skirt sits in front of the computer. hypothesis: A man in a gold skirt sitting at his computer watching the computer screen.
entailment: A man sits in front of the computer implies that he is watching the computer screen.
premise: A man in a gold skirt sits in front of the computer. hypothesis: A man in a golf skirt sitting at his computer typing to his friends online.
neutral: A gold skirt is not necessarily a golf skirt. The first sentence does not specify what the man is doing on the computer. He may not be typing to his friends online.
premise: A man in a gold skirt sits in front of the computer. hypothesis: A man in blue pants sitting and watching the television.
contradiction: blue and gold are not the same colors.
premise: Man wearing black t-shirt sitting at a computer desk. hypothesis: the man is working on the computer.
entailment: the man is working on the computer implies that he is sitting at a computer desk.
premise: Man wearing black t-shirt sitting at a computer desk. hypothesis: the man called off work and was at the zoo all day.
contradiction: one man is at the zoo, the other is at a desk.
premise: Man wearing black t-shirt sitting at a computer desk. hypothesis: the man is doing a project for work.
neutral: We do not know what the man is doing at the computer desk - it may not be a project for work.
premise: A bearded man in a black t-shirt sits in front of a desk holding a computer. hypothesis: A man is standing in the rain.
contradiction: The man can't be in the rain if he's sitting in front of a desk.
premise: A bearded man in a black t-shirt sits in front of a desk holding a computer. hypothesis: A man waiting with his computer.
entailment: a man with beard sits and waiting with a computer.
premise: A bearded man in a black t-shirt sits in front of a desk holding a computer. hypothesis: A man buying a new laptop.
neutral: Sitting in front of a desk holding a computer doesn't imply that he is buying it. A computer may not be a laptop.
premise: A man in a gold foils skirt, sitting at a computer desk, looks at the camera with his hands raised to his face. hypothesis: a man is looking at his webcam.
entailment: "A man looks at the camera" is a synonym of " a man is looking at his webcam".
premise: A man in a gold foils skirt, sitting at a computer desk, looks at the camera with his hands raised to his face. hypothesis: he is covering up his face.
neutral: His hands are merely raised to his face - we do not know that he he is covering up his face.
premise: A man in a gold foils skirt, sitting at a computer desk, looks at the camera with his hands raised to his face. hypothesis: a man is sticking his tongue out.
contradiction: one man is making faces, the other is taking a picture of himself it seems with a camera.
premise: A young girl sitting at a table with a bowl on her head. hypothesis: A young girl has a bowl on her head.
entailment: "A young girl sitting at a table with a bowl on her head" is a form of "A young girl has a bowl on her head".
premise: A young girl sitting at a table with a bowl on her head. hypothesis: A toddler dumped her bowl of spaghetti on her head.
neutral: A "young girl" may not be a toddler. We only know from the first sentence that she has a bowl on her head, not that the bowl contained spaghetti, or that its contents were dumped.
premise: A young girl sitting at a table with a bowl on her head. hypothesis: A man is eating cereal in his car.
contradiction: a man is not a young girl.
premise: A man dances with a fire baton at night. hypothesis: the crowd cheers as he peforms.
neutral: Dances with a fire baton does not imply that a crowd cheers.
premise: A man dances with a fire baton at night. hypothesis: the woman does a hula dance.
contradiction: Man and woman are of different gender.
premise: A man dances with a fire baton at night. hypothesis: the man is dancing.
entailment: If the man dances with a fire baton it is the same as dancing.
premise: A doctor checks the stomach of a toddler. hypothesis: The toddler is getting a checkup.
entailment: The doctor checks a stomach which implies that the toddler is getting a checkup.
premise: A doctor checks the stomach of a toddler. hypothesis: The doctor is looking inside the toddler's mouth.
contradiction: a toddler's mouth is not the same as their stomach.
premise: A doctor checks the stomach of a toddler. hypothesis: The toddle might be sick.
neutral: Toddler is misspelled as toddle. This may be a routine check-up, and we do not know that the toddler may be sick.
premise: Young blond woman putting her foot into a water fountain. hypothesis: A young woman wearing an evening gown, and holding her shoes in her hands, is dipping one foot into Buckingham Fountain in Chicago.
neutral: The first sentence does not mention that she is wearing a gown, that she is holding shoes in her hands, or that this is the Buckingham Fountain.
premise: Young blond woman putting her foot into a water fountain. hypothesis: A young blond woman is sitting down on a beach chair.
contradiction: one woman is at the beach chair, the other is at a water fountain.
premise: Young blond woman putting her foot into a water fountain. hypothesis: A person is dipping her foot into water.
entailment: " woman putting her foot into a water fountain" is a rephrasing of " A person is dipping her foot into water".
premise: A young woman tries to stick her foot in a fountain. hypothesis: The woman is riding a train.
contradiction: you can't put your foot in a fountain while riding a train.
premise: A young woman tries to stick her foot in a fountain. hypothesis: A woman is near a fountain.
entailment: A young woman is still a woman.
premise: A young woman tries to stick her foot in a fountain. hypothesis: The woman has one foot in the air.
entailment: If the woman is trying to stick her foot in the fountain then it's in the air.
premise: A woman in capri jeans crouches on the edge of a fountain with her left foot kicked out to touch the falling water. hypothesis: A woman is walking in park.
contradiction: you can't crouch at the edge of a fountain while walking.
premise: A woman in capri jeans crouches on the edge of a fountain with her left foot kicked out to touch the falling water. hypothesis: A woman is very eager to touch the water.
neutral: the woman is not necessarily eager.
premise: A woman in capri jeans crouches on the edge of a fountain with her left foot kicked out to touch the falling water. hypothesis: A woman is like to touch the water in fountain.
entailment: A woman is kicking her foot to touch the water.
premise: Woman balancing on edge of fountain while sticking her toe in the water. hypothesis: A woman stand on a fountain and dips her toes in.
entailment: The woman is on a foundation so she is putting her toes in water.
premise: Woman balancing on edge of fountain while sticking her toe in the water. hypothesis: A woman sits on the grassy ground.
contradiction: the grassy ground is not the same as the edge of a fountain.
premise: Woman balancing on edge of fountain while sticking her toe in the water. hypothesis: An old woman stands on a fountain and sticks her toes in.
neutral: the woman is not necessarily old.
premise: A couple strolls arm and arm and hand in hand down a city sidewalk. hypothesis: The couple is outdoors.
entailment: In order to be on a city sidewalk the couple must be outdoors.
premise: A couple strolls arm and arm and hand in hand down a city sidewalk. hypothesis: The couple is married.
neutral: Not all couples are married.
premise: A couple strolls arm and arm and hand in hand down a city sidewalk. hypothesis: The couple is having dinner at a restaurant.
contradiction: If the couple strolls, they must not be having dinner at a restaurant.
premise: A man stare at a passing couple while walking down the block. hypothesis: A man stares at a passing couple.
entailment: The man watching the couple must stare to observe the couple.
premise: A man stare at a passing couple while walking down the block. hypothesis: The man is jealous of the couple.
neutral: Staring does not imply being jealous.
premise: A man stare at a passing couple while walking down the block. hypothesis: The woman stares at a couple as they argue down the block.
contradiction: It must be either a man or a woman doing the staring.
premise: a couple are holding hands behind their backs while walking down a street, and the man has his arm around her shoulder. hypothesis: couple walking home.
neutral: just because they are walking does not mean that they are walking home.
premise: a couple are holding hands behind their backs while walking down a street, and the man has his arm around her shoulder. hypothesis: couple walking.
entailment: The couple is walking.
premise: a couple are holding hands behind their backs while walking down a street, and the man has his arm around her shoulder. hypothesis: bear in zoo.
contradiction: If their hands are behind their backs, then the man's arm cannot be around her shoulder.
premise: A man and a woman are holding hands as they walk along a city sidewalk. hypothesis: A married couple are fighting on the sidewalk.
contradiction: A couple who are fighting would not be holding hands as they walk down the street while they are fighting.
premise: A man and a woman are holding hands as they walk along a city sidewalk. hypothesis: A married couple are holding hands as they walk along the city sidewalk.
neutral: the people are not necessarily a couple.
premise: A man and a woman are holding hands as they walk along a city sidewalk. hypothesis: A man and a woman are holding hands.
entailment: A man and woman are holding hands as they walk.
premise: a man in red stands with his child at the beach. hypothesis: A man wearing blue sleeping with his child in his lap inside his home.
contradiction: The man would not be standing if he is sleeping.
premise: a man in red stands with his child at the beach. hypothesis: A man wearing red standing with his child at a beach overlooking the ocean.
neutral: at the beach does not necessarily imply overlooking the ocean.
premise: a man in red stands with his child at the beach. hypothesis: A man wearing red standing with his child as they watch others build sand castles at the beach.
neutral: standing at the beach does not imply that they watch other build sand castles.
premise: New sport is being played to show appreciation to the kids who can not walk. hypothesis: People are playing a sport in honor of crippled people.
entailment: Kids who can not walk are crippled people.
premise: New sport is being played to show appreciation to the kids who can not walk. hypothesis: People are playing football without gear.
contradiction: The people are playing football without gear, which is a known sport, so it is inconsistent with the sentence saying that it is a "new sport.".
premise: New sport is being played to show appreciation to the kids who can not walk. hypothesis: People a playing a sport to help fund a crippled people fund.
neutral: show appreciation for kids who cannot walk does not imply that they were there to fund a crippled people fund.
premise: Two men in wheelchairs are reaching in the air for a basketball. hypothesis: Two sad men in wheelchairs are reaching in the air for a basketball.
neutral: Two men in wheelchairs does not imply that the men are sad.
premise: Two men in wheelchairs are reaching in the air for a basketball. hypothesis: Two people in wheelchairs are reaching in the air for a basketball.
entailment: Men are people.
premise: Two men in wheelchairs are reaching in the air for a basketball. hypothesis: Two women in wheelchairs are reaching in the air for a basketball.
contradiction: One sentence says two men are reaching for a basketball, but the second sentence says that two women are reaching for a basketball.
premise: Three wheelchair basketball players wearing team uniforms are attempting to reach the descending basketball with other players in the background. hypothesis: Some wheelchair basketball players playing the basketball match.
neutral: wearing uniform and trying to reach the descending ball does not necessarily imply that they are playing a match.
premise: Three wheelchair basketball players wearing team uniforms are attempting to reach the descending basketball with other players in the background. hypothesis: Three wheelchair basketball players playing basketball in field.
entailment: If there are players in the background then they are in a field.
premise: Three wheelchair basketball players wearing team uniforms are attempting to reach the descending basketball with other players in the background. hypothesis: A peoples are taking coffee together at coffeshop.
contradiction: The locations are inconsistent. In one, the people are reaching for a falling ball, while in the other, they are in a coffeeshop.
premise: Four guys in wheelchairs on a basketball court two are trying to grab a basketball in midair. hypothesis: Four guys are playing cards.
contradiction: In one sentence, the players are trying to grab a basketball, and in the other sentence, they are playing cards.
premise: Four guys in wheelchairs on a basketball court two are trying to grab a basketball in midair. hypothesis: Four guys are playing basketball.
entailment: If the guys are trying to grab a basketball then they are playing.
premise: Four guys in wheelchairs on a basketball court two are trying to grab a basketball in midair. hypothesis: The four players are handicapped.
neutral: in a wheelchair does not mean handicapped.
premise: Three dogs in different shades of brown and white biting and licking each other. hypothesis: the dogs are fighting.
contradiction: Dogs that are fighting do not lick.
premise: Three dogs in different shades of brown and white biting and licking each other. hypothesis: there are three dogs.
entailment: There are three dogs biting and licking each other.
premise: Three dogs in different shades of brown and white biting and licking each other. hypothesis: the dog playing.
neutral: the dog may not necessarily be brown and white.
premise: Two dogs playfully bite a third dog, which has its tongue sticking out. hypothesis: Two puppies bite their mother, while she pants.
neutral: The two dogs that playfully bite a third dog may not be puppies, and the third dog may not be their mother.
premise: Two dogs playfully bite a third dog, which has its tongue sticking out. hypothesis: Two dogs are sleeping while a third eats its food.
contradiction: The third dog cannot eat food while he just has his tongue sticking out.
premise: Two dogs playfully bite a third dog, which has its tongue sticking out. hypothesis: A pair of dogs tease a third with nibbles.
entailment: Two dogs is the same as a pair of dogs and them playfully biting is a form of teasing with nibbles.
premise: Three small puppies bite and play together in the grass. hypothesis: The puppies are sleeping in a basket.
contradiction: Puppies can not play while sleeping.
premise: Three small puppies bite and play together in the grass. hypothesis: They are playing at the dog park.
neutral: dog park is not the only place for puppies to play.
premise: Three small puppies bite and play together in the grass. hypothesis: Three puppies are playing outside.
entailment: Grass is outside.
premise: Two dogs biting another dog in a field. hypothesis: dogs bitting.
neutral: You can not infer what they are bitting.
premise: Two dogs biting another dog in a field. hypothesis: dogs attacking another dog.
entailment: A dog is being attacked by two other dogs.
premise: Two dogs biting another dog in a field. hypothesis: dog sitting in filed.
contradiction: There are two dogs not one dog.
premise: Tourists waiting at a train stop. hypothesis: Tourist walking around an art museum.
contradiction: If they are waiting at a train stop, they cannot be walking around an art museum.
premise: Tourists waiting at a train stop. hypothesis: A group of tourist waiting for a train outside.
neutral: Not all train stops are outside.
premise: Tourists waiting at a train stop. hypothesis: A group of tourist waiting for a train at a train station.
entailment: A group of tourists waiting for a train must also be a at train station to depart.