Datasets:

ErfanMoosaviMonazzah

/

esnli-seq2seq

like 0

premise: a woman in a yellow shirt and green shorts is climbing an artificial red wall whilst wearing a safety harness. hypothesis: a woman in rock climbing attire scales a wall wearing a safety belt.

neutral: The fact that a woman in a yellow shirt and green shorts is climbing an artificial red wall whilst wearing a safety harness does not imply that she is in rock climbing attire scales a wall wearing a safety belt.

premise: a woman in a yellow shirt and green shorts is climbing an artificial red wall whilst wearing a safety harness. hypothesis: The woman is climbing.

entailment: in a both sentence wearing and climbing is different.

premise: a woman in a yellow shirt and green shorts is climbing an artificial red wall whilst wearing a safety harness. hypothesis: a woman is climbing a wall using a safety harness.

entailment: in a both sentence a woman using a safety harness.

premise: a woman in a yellow shirt and green shorts is climbing an artificial red wall whilst wearing a safety harness. hypothesis: A man attempts to climb a wall without a safety harness.

contradiction: A woman wearing a safety harness is not a man without a safety harness.

premise: a woman in a yellow shirt and green shorts is climbing an artificial red wall whilst wearing a safety harness. hypothesis: The woman is at a gymnasium.

neutral: The woman climbing a rock wall does not mean that she is at a gymnasium.

premise: a woman in a yellow shirt and green shorts is climbing an artificial red wall whilst wearing a safety harness. hypothesis: A woman in a safety harness is Spiderwoman the superhero.

contradiction: If the woman was Spiderwoman, she would not be wearing yellow and green.

premise: a woman in a yellow shirt and green shorts is climbing an artificial red wall whilst wearing a safety harness. hypothesis: The woman is sleeping.

contradiction: A woman cannot be climbing and sleeping at the same time.

premise: a woman in a yellow shirt and green shorts is climbing an artificial red wall whilst wearing a safety harness. hypothesis: A woman is rock climbing.

entailment: Both subjects are climbing.

premise: a woman in a yellow shirt and green shorts is climbing an artificial red wall whilst wearing a safety harness. hypothesis: The woman is using safety equipment.

entailment: A woman could be in a yellow shirt and green shorts. A safety harness could be safety equipment.

premise: a woman in a yellow shirt and green shorts is climbing an artificial red wall whilst wearing a safety harness. hypothesis: The woman is lifting weights.

contradiction: One cannot be climbing a wall while lifting weights.

premise: a woman in a yellow shirt and green shorts is climbing an artificial red wall whilst wearing a safety harness. hypothesis: The woman is indoors.

neutral: Not all an artificial wall is indoors.

premise: a woman in a yellow shirt and green shorts is climbing an artificial red wall whilst wearing a safety harness. hypothesis: A woman is climbing a fake red wall for firefighter exams.

neutral: A woman climbing an artificial red wall whilst wearing a safety harness is not necessarily for firefighter exams.

premise: Two people on a rock looking at each other. hypothesis: A couple stare at each other.

neutral: Not all two people is a couple.

premise: Two people on a rock looking at each other. hypothesis: Two people look at each other.

entailment: They are shown to be looking at each other.

premise: Two people on a rock looking at each other. hypothesis: Two people are at a movie theater.

contradiction: A rock and movie theater are not the same place.

premise: A busy operating room with high tech equipment to assist the doctors. hypothesis: A judge and an accused are staring at each other.

contradiction: Doctors means different to a judge.

premise: A busy operating room with high tech equipment to assist the doctors. hypothesis: Equipment are lying in operating room.

entailment: A busy operating room is a type of operating room, and high tech equipment is a type of equipment.

premise: A busy operating room with high tech equipment to assist the doctors. hypothesis: An operation is being performed in the operating room.

neutral: Describing an operating room is not the same thing as stating that an operation is taking place.

premise: The girl is climbing a rock wall. hypothesis: A girl climbs away from danger up a rock wall.

neutral: Just because a girl climbs a rock wall does not mean that she is climbing away from danger.

premise: The girl is climbing a rock wall. hypothesis: A girl is rock climbing.

entailment: A girl climbing a rock wall must be rock climbing.

premise: The girl is climbing a rock wall. hypothesis: A woman sits on the couch and watches TV.

contradiction: Can either be a girl climbing or a woman sitting.

premise: A woman in an apron carries a styrofoam box of upside down ice cream cones. hypothesis: A female surrounded by kids is walking with a heavy object.

neutral: Not all women are surrounded by kids.

premise: A woman in an apron carries a styrofoam box of upside down ice cream cones. hypothesis: A female is carrying a box.

entailment: She is described as carrying a box.

premise: A woman in an apron carries a styrofoam box of upside down ice cream cones. hypothesis: A contractor is eating a sandwich.

contradiction: woman and contractor,and icecream and sandwich.

premise: Crowd standing outside a metro area. hypothesis: A group of people out in the metropolis.

entailment: A crowd is made up of people.

premise: Crowd standing outside a metro area. hypothesis: The crowd is sitting in a field.

contradiction: Standing is not the same as sitting.

premise: Crowd standing outside a metro area. hypothesis: There is a large city.

neutral: Not all metro areas are a large city.

premise: Crowd standing outside a metro area. hypothesis: A group of people stand outside.

neutral: All inferred, crowd is a group of people, standing outside is stand outside.

premise: Crowd standing outside a metro area. hypothesis: Pedestrians wait at a taxi stand.

contradiction: A TAXI STAND IS NOT A METRO AREA.

premise: Crowd standing outside a metro area. hypothesis: A group of people have gathered.

entailment: A crowd is a group of people.

premise: Crowd standing outside a metro area. hypothesis: A group of people are assembled outside.

entailment: A crowd standing indicates they are assembled.

premise: Crowd standing outside a metro area. hypothesis: A crowd waits for the city bus.

entailment: Standing can indicate waiting.

premise: Crowd standing outside a metro area. hypothesis: The group gathered outside to celebrate the strike of midnight on New Years Eve!.

neutral: Not all crowds celebrate New Years Eve.

premise: Crowd standing outside a metro area. hypothesis: The group are standing in a corn field in the country.

contradiction: The group cannot be outside a metro area and in a corn field at the same time.

premise: Crowd standing outside a metro area. hypothesis: Group of people walk down Main Street.

contradiction: One cannot be standing and walking down the street simultaneously.

premise: Crowd standing outside a metro area. hypothesis: There is a crowd standing outside.

entailment: The crowd is described as standing.

premise: Crowd standing outside a metro area. hypothesis: People standing waiting for the bus.

neutral: Not all people are waiting for the bus.

premise: Crowd standing outside a metro area. hypothesis: A group of people are waiting for the station to open.

neutral: Not all crowds are waiting for the station to open.

premise: Crowd standing outside a metro area. hypothesis: Metrosexuals sitting on the porch.

contradiction: People can't be sitting and standing at the same time.

premise: young boy in orange sweatshirt on a log. hypothesis: A young boy in an orange sweatshirt sitting on a log by a river.

neutral: Not all boys are by a river.

premise: young boy in orange sweatshirt on a log. hypothesis: A young boy in an orange sweatshirt on a log outside.

entailment: A log is often outside.

premise: young boy in orange sweatshirt on a log. hypothesis: A young boy in a blue sweatshirt sleeping on a deck.

contradiction: The sweatshirt cannot be orange if it is blue.

premise: Boy in a black shirt standing in front of an advertisement. hypothesis: The boy was wearing a black shirt.

entailment: He is described as wearing a black shirt.

premise: Boy in a black shirt standing in front of an advertisement. hypothesis: The boy was at school.

contradiction: The boy cannot be in front of an advertisement if he is at school.

premise: Boy in a black shirt standing in front of an advertisement. hypothesis: The boy was in the advertisement and posing next to it.

neutral: Not all boys are posing next to it.

premise: A graffiti artist paints over a poster on a brick wall. hypothesis: A graffiti artist paints a poster.

entailment: A graffiti artist paints over a poster is a rephrasing of graffiti artist paints a poster.

premise: A graffiti artist paints over a poster on a brick wall. hypothesis: A man is taking his dog on a walk.

contradiction: A man cannot paints over a poster while taking his dog on a walk.

premise: A graffiti artist paints over a poster on a brick wall. hypothesis: An artist is painting.

entailment: We can see he paints something.

premise: A graffiti artist paints over a poster on a brick wall. hypothesis: A graffiti artist paints a poster to try and win a contest.

neutral: An artist can be motivated by a multitude of other things besides trying to win a contest.

premise: A graffiti artist paints over a poster on a brick wall. hypothesis: A graffiti artist rips a poster at an art contest.

contradiction: The artist cannot both rip and paint over the poster.

premise: A graffiti artist paints over a poster on a brick wall. hypothesis: A person is putting up posters on a wall.

contradiction: The person cannot both be putting up and painting over a poster.

premise: A graffiti artist paints over a poster on a brick wall. hypothesis: A singer draws on a window in a brick wall.

contradiction: The person cannot paint over a poster if they are painting over a window.

premise: A graffiti artist paints over a poster on a brick wall. hypothesis: An artist was hired to paint over a poster.

neutral: Not all artists are hired.

premise: A graffiti artist paints over a poster on a brick wall. hypothesis: A graffiti artist is illegally paining over a poster on a building.

neutral: Not all artists are illegally paining.

premise: A graffiti artist paints over a poster on a brick wall. hypothesis: An artist is covering up some bad words on a brick wall.

neutral: Although the artist is painting over a poster they may not be covering up some bad words.

premise: A graffiti artist paints over a poster on a brick wall. hypothesis: A graffiti artist paints over something else.

entailment: A poster on a brick wall is mentioned as something else.

premise: A graffiti artist paints over a poster on a brick wall. hypothesis: A graffiti artist is paining over something on a brick wall.

entailment: THe poster is mentioned as something.

premise: A graffiti artist paints over a poster on a brick wall. hypothesis: A artist is using graffiti.

entailment: A grafitti artist uses grafitti.

premise: A graffiti artist paints over a poster on a brick wall. hypothesis: An artist is making a poster.

contradiction: The artist cannot both make a poster and paint over it.

premise: A graffiti artist paints over a poster on a brick wall. hypothesis: A woman spraypaints over an advertisement.

neutral: While we know they are painting over a poster we do not know it is an advertisement.

premise: A man in a white t-shirt looks toward the camera surrounded by a crowd near a metro station. hypothesis: The man sees the camera.

entailment: Looking towards the camera means he sees the camera.

premise: A man in a white t-shirt looks toward the camera surrounded by a crowd near a metro station. hypothesis: the people are all holding picket signs.

contradiction: The man cannot look toward the camera if he is holding a sign. (?).

premise: A man in a white t-shirt looks toward the camera surrounded by a crowd near a metro station. hypothesis: The man is wearing a suit and tie.

contradiction: The man cannot be wearing both a white t-shirt and a suit and tie.

premise: A man in a white t-shirt looks toward the camera surrounded by a crowd near a metro station. hypothesis: There is a crowd at the station.

entailment: It is clear that the crowd is at the station in both contexts.

premise: A man in a white t-shirt looks toward the camera surrounded by a crowd near a metro station. hypothesis: a group of people have gathered for a purpose.

entailment: If there is a crowd they must have gathered for a purpose.

premise: A man in a white t-shirt looks toward the camera surrounded by a crowd near a metro station. hypothesis: The famous man is surrounded by his fans.

neutral: Not everyone who looks toward a camera is famous. Not every crowd is made up of fans.

premise: A man in a white t-shirt looks toward the camera surrounded by a crowd near a metro station. hypothesis: A crowd at the station is taking pictures of him.

neutral: While we know the man is looking toward a camera we do not know that the crowd is taking pictures of him.

premise: A man in a white t-shirt looks toward the camera surrounded by a crowd near a metro station. hypothesis: A man in a train station looks at the camera.

entailment: If the man is surrounded by a crowd near a metro station, it means he is in a train station.

premise: A man in a white t-shirt looks toward the camera surrounded by a crowd near a metro station. hypothesis: The boy is playing basketball.

contradiction: The man/boy would not likely be playing basketball near a metro station.

premise: A man in a white t-shirt looks toward the camera surrounded by a crowd near a metro station. hypothesis: The man is having coffee at the shop.

contradiction: The man cannot be both near the metro station and in the coffee shop.

premise: A man in a white t-shirt looks toward the camera surrounded by a crowd near a metro station. hypothesis: the man is alone.

neutral: There in no mention of the man being alone.

premise: A man in a white t-shirt looks toward the camera surrounded by a crowd near a metro station. hypothesis: A news crew is at the metro station.

neutral: While the man is near a metro station we do not know if a news crew is at the metro station.

premise: A man in a white t-shirt looks toward the camera surrounded by a crowd near a metro station. hypothesis: A man is curious why the crowd is surrounding a camera.

entailment: A man is naturally curious if there is a crowd near the station.

premise: A man in a white t-shirt looks toward the camera surrounded by a crowd near a metro station. hypothesis: A lady is posing for pictures.

contradiction: man cannot be a lady at the same time.

premise: A man in a white t-shirt looks toward the camera surrounded by a crowd near a metro station. hypothesis: A man is with a group of people.

neutral: There is no mention of the man being with a group of people.

premise: A young man is texting while standing in front of a poster. hypothesis: A man texts his wife.

neutral: Not everyone who texts is texting his wife.

premise: A young man is texting while standing in front of a poster. hypothesis: A woman talks on the phone.

contradiction: man cannot be a woman at the same time.

premise: A young man is texting while standing in front of a poster. hypothesis: A man texts.

entailment: It is obvious that the man is texting in both contexts.

premise: A man in a green shirt is standing between two cars holding up 3 fingers. hypothesis: A man is standing between bikes.

contradiction: man standing between cars cannot be standing between bikes at the same time.

premise: A man in a green shirt is standing between two cars holding up 3 fingers. hypothesis: A man is standing between pink sports cars.

neutral: While we know the man is standing between two cars we do not know that they are pink or that they are sports cars.

premise: A man in a green shirt is standing between two cars holding up 3 fingers. hypothesis: A man is standing between cars.

entailment: It is obvious that the man is standing between cars in both contexts.

premise: A dog is jumping in the air to catch an orange Frisbee. hypothesis: A dog is outside playing.

entailment: Jumping to catch an orange Frisbee is outside playing.

premise: A dog is jumping in the air to catch an orange Frisbee. hypothesis: The old man is reading the newspaper.

contradiction: A dog is different to the old man.

premise: A dog is jumping in the air to catch an orange Frisbee. hypothesis: A dog is playing catch with kids.

neutral: Who knows whether kids threw the frisbee.

premise: A man in a green shirt hailing a taxi in a large city. hypothesis: A man wearing green clothing needs to get to the airport.

neutral: Not everyone hailing a taxi need to get to the airport.

premise: A man in a green shirt hailing a taxi in a large city. hypothesis: A man is skinny-dipping alone in a mountain stream.

contradiction: man in city cannot be a man in mountain stream at the same time.

premise: A man in a green shirt hailing a taxi in a large city. hypothesis: A man wearing green clothing wants to go somewhere.

entailment: A man in a green shirt is hailing a taxi to go somewhere.

premise: a man is hailing a cab or giving a peace sign in a city. hypothesis: The man is showing his middle finger in the city.

contradiction: Hailing a cab is different to showing middle finger.

premise: a man is hailing a cab or giving a peace sign in a city. hypothesis: The man wants to promote peace.

neutral: He might want to promote peace, or he might want a cab ride.

premise: a man is hailing a cab or giving a peace sign in a city. hypothesis: The man is throwing up a peace sign.

entailment: Giving a peace sign is a paraphrase of is throwing up a peace sign.

premise: A dog catches a disk in the air. hypothesis: A puppy is playing catch with a Frisbee.

neutral: Not all dog is a puppy.

premise: A dog catches a disk in the air. hypothesis: A dog is eating kibble out of a red bowl.

contradiction: dog in the air cannot be a dog eating at the same time.

premise: A dog catches a disk in the air. hypothesis: An animal is jumping.

entailment: A dog is an animal catches a disk in the air.

premise: A man in a green shirt hailing a cab. hypothesis: A man is in a hurry.

neutral: Not all man in a green shirt hailing a cab is in a hurry.

premise: A man in a green shirt hailing a cab. hypothesis: A man is driving his own car.

contradiction: man hailing a cab cannot be man driving at the same time.

premise: A man in a green shirt hailing a cab. hypothesis: Man is getting a cab.

entailment: A green shirt man got a cab.

premise: A boy and a girl wearing a blue jacket are having their own snowball fight. hypothesis: The children pay in the mud.

contradiction: A snowball fight does not usually happen in the mud.

premise: A boy and a girl wearing a blue jacket are having their own snowball fight. hypothesis: A snowball fight is in progress.

entailment: Having is a present tense form of have, meaning the snowball fight is happening now. If it is happening now, then it is in progress.

premise: A boy and a girl wearing a blue jacket are having their own snowball fight. hypothesis: The siblings enjoy the snow.

neutral: A boy and a girl engaging in the same activity may not be siblings. One may be having a snowball fight and not enjoy the snow.

premise: Kids play soccer outside. hypothesis: Kids are only playing soccer because their parent make them.

neutral: Just because kids play soccer outside does not mean that they are only playing soccer because their parent make them.