Datasets:

ErfanMoosaviMonazzah

/

esnli-seq2seq

like 0

premise: Kids play soccer outside. hypothesis: Children are engaging in outdoor sports.

entailment: Kids are playing soccer outdoor.

premise: Kids play soccer outside. hypothesis: Kids sit at home and wonder if they'll ever get to enjoy outdoor sports.

contradiction: kids play cannot mean kids sit at the same time.

premise: A group of guys playing soccer in a park with onlookers in pavilions behind them. hypothesis: A group of guys are playing football in a bowling alley.

contradiction: guys in a park cannot mean guys in a bowling alley at the same time.

premise: A group of guys playing soccer in a park with onlookers in pavilions behind them. hypothesis: Men are playing soccer in a park.

entailment: Men are playing soccer in a park with onlookers.

premise: A group of guys playing soccer in a park with onlookers in pavilions behind them. hypothesis: The group of men playing soccer are professionals.

neutral: Not all guys playing soccer in a park with onlookers are professionals.

premise: People are playing soccer on the grass. hypothesis: The people are playing basketball in doors.

contradiction: people playing soccer cannot mean people playing basketball at the same time.

premise: People are playing soccer on the grass. hypothesis: The people are playing a sport.

entailment: playing a sport like soccer on the grass feels good.

premise: People are playing soccer on the grass. hypothesis: The people are competing for a trophy.

neutral: Not all people playing soccer on the grass are competing for a trophy.

premise: There are several young men kicking a ball around, with a pavilion behind them with people standing under them. hypothesis: Several men are sleeping on a bed.

contradiction: men kicking cannot mean men sleeping at the same time.

premise: There are several young men kicking a ball around, with a pavilion behind them with people standing under them. hypothesis: There are several young men kicking a ball around.

entailment: several people are kicking a ball around.

premise: There are several young men kicking a ball around, with a pavilion behind them with people standing under them. hypothesis: There are several young men kicking a ball around and laughing.

neutral: Men don't have to be laughing while kicking a ball.

premise: Seven people playing soccer on a field, man in the blue shirt is about to kick the ball. hypothesis: They are outside.

entailment: Outside a group of people are playing soccer.

premise: Seven people playing soccer on a field, man in the blue shirt is about to kick the ball. hypothesis: THey are playing basketball.

contradiction: Soccer isn't basketball.

premise: Seven people playing soccer on a field, man in the blue shirt is about to kick the ball. hypothesis: THey are playing in a match.

neutral: Not all people playing soccer on a field are playing in a match.

premise: two people are sitting on a rock looking at the horizon. hypothesis: There are two people sitting outdoors.

entailment: Two ladies are sitting on a rock outdoors.

premise: two people are sitting on a rock looking at the horizon. hypothesis: There is a couple holding hands while watching the horizon.

neutral: Not all people are couple holding hands.

premise: two people are sitting on a rock looking at the horizon. hypothesis: There is a man watching his last sunrise alone while sitting on a rock.

contradiction: People aren't a man.

premise: A woman laughing at a man. hypothesis: A woman crying.

contradiction: She can't be crying and laughing.

premise: A woman laughing at a man. hypothesis: A woman laughing.

entailment: A woman laughing at a man funny moments.

premise: A woman laughing at a man. hypothesis: A woman laughing at a mans joke.

neutral: Not all woman laughing at a man is due to joke.

premise: The man in the black shirt made the lady laugh. hypothesis: The man made a lady laugh.

entailment: If the man made the lady laugh he can make a lady laugh.

premise: The man in the black shirt made the lady laugh. hypothesis: The girl didn't like the joke.

contradiction: Girl isn't a man.

premise: The man in the black shirt made the lady laugh. hypothesis: The man told a funny joke.

neutral: Not all man in the black shirt made the lady laugh is because the man told a funny joke.

premise: A girl in a black t-shirt laughs at a man in a black t-shirt who is telling a story. hypothesis: He tells a story about his childhood.

neutral: Not all stories are about childhood.

premise: A girl in a black t-shirt laughs at a man in a black t-shirt who is telling a story. hypothesis: He eats a pizza.

contradiction: Telling isn't eating.

premise: A girl in a black t-shirt laughs at a man in a black t-shirt who is telling a story. hypothesis: The man tells a funny story.

entailment: If the girl laughs at the man telling a story you can assume it is a funny story.

premise: A woman with a long ponytail and a man with short hair enjoy a laugh while eating dessert. hypothesis: A woman and a man are eating dessert.

entailment: You can assume a woman and man who laugh while eating dessert are also eating dessert.

premise: A woman with a long ponytail and a man with short hair enjoy a laugh while eating dessert. hypothesis: A young couple are walking their dog in the park.

contradiction: Woman isn't a couple.

premise: A woman with a long ponytail and a man with short hair enjoy a laugh while eating dessert. hypothesis: A young couple enjoy a laugh over dessert.

neutral: Not every woman and man are a couple.

premise: A man with a pen and paper checking stock. hypothesis: A person is checking stock.

entailment: A man is a person.

premise: A man with a pen and paper checking stock. hypothesis: The warehouse supervisor is checking the work of his employee.

neutral: Not all warehouse supervisor are men, stock and employee are not the same thing.

premise: A man with a pen and paper checking stock. hypothesis: A man is driving his car in the rain.

contradiction: Checking stock isn't driving.

premise: Young man jumping in the water over waves at beach. hypothesis: Boy drowns.

contradiction: One cannot drown while jumping in the air.

premise: Young man jumping in the water over waves at beach. hypothesis: Young man jumps in water to avoid parents.

neutral: That a young man jumping in the water over waves at beach does not imply he does it to avoid parents.

premise: Young man jumping in the water over waves at beach. hypothesis: There is a boy outside.

entailment: Answer : Boy is referred to the young boy beach tells he is outside.

premise: A little girl is holding a colorful end war Ron Paul sign, some adults are also standing near her in the picture. hypothesis: Adults stand near a child holding a political sign.

entailment: A little girl is a child.

premise: A little girl is holding a colorful end war Ron Paul sign, some adults are also standing near her in the picture. hypothesis: The little girl is holding a sign.

entailment: It doesn't matter what type of sign the little girl is holding. It is a sign no matter the topic.

premise: A little girl is holding a colorful end war Ron Paul sign, some adults are also standing near her in the picture. hypothesis: Everyone is playing poker in a smoke-filled room.

contradiction: Holding a sign isn't playing poker.

premise: A little girl is holding a colorful end war Ron Paul sign, some adults are also standing near her in the picture. hypothesis: A girl protests with a group of adults.

neutral: Not all signs are for protests.

premise: A little girl is holding a colorful end war Ron Paul sign, some adults are also standing near her in the picture. hypothesis: A girl holds a sign near adults.

entailment: If adults are standing near the girl it means the same as being nearing adults.

premise: A little girl is holding a colorful end war Ron Paul sign, some adults are also standing near her in the picture. hypothesis: A person holding a sign.

entailment: A little girl is a person.

premise: A little girl is holding a colorful end war Ron Paul sign, some adults are also standing near her in the picture. hypothesis: The girl is being forced to hold a Ron Paul sign because of her psychotic libertarian parents.

neutral: Not all children are forced to hold signs, not all adults next to children are parents.

premise: A little girl is holding a colorful end war Ron Paul sign, some adults are also standing near her in the picture. hypothesis: The girl is near adults.

entailment: A little girl is the same as a girl and if adults are standing near the little girl it means the girl is near the adults.

premise: A little girl is holding a colorful end war Ron Paul sign, some adults are also standing near her in the picture. hypothesis: The little girl is riding a dolphin with her hands in the air.

contradiction: Holding isn't riding.

premise: A little girl is holding a colorful end war Ron Paul sign, some adults are also standing near her in the picture. hypothesis: A group of girls play together.

contradiction: Holding isn't playing.

premise: A little girl is holding a colorful end war Ron Paul sign, some adults are also standing near her in the picture. hypothesis: Some people are at a political rally.

neutral: Hold and end war sign does not mean they are at a political rally.

premise: A little girl is holding a colorful end war Ron Paul sign, some adults are also standing near her in the picture. hypothesis: Some tall people.

neutral: Not all people are tall.

premise: A little girl is holding a colorful end war Ron Paul sign, some adults are also standing near her in the picture. hypothesis: Nobody has a sign.

contradiction: girl cannot be nobody at the same time.

premise: A little girl is holding a colorful end war Ron Paul sign, some adults are also standing near her in the picture. hypothesis: A little girl holds a stuffed toy in both hands, while her mother holds a Ron Paul sign.

contradiction: girl holding sign cannot mean girl who holds a toy at the same time.

premise: A little girl is holding a colorful end war Ron Paul sign, some adults are also standing near her in the picture. hypothesis: The little girl is at a protest.

neutral: Holding a sign does not mean you are at a protest.

premise: A young female child is holding a homemade sign that says End War, with Ron Paul written on the side. hypothesis: A funny person holding a sign.

neutral: Not everyone is funny.

premise: A young female child is holding a homemade sign that says End War, with Ron Paul written on the side. hypothesis: A person holding a sign.

entailment: A young female child is a person.

premise: A young female child is holding a homemade sign that says End War, with Ron Paul written on the side. hypothesis: Nobody has a sign.

contradiction: child cannot be nobody at the same time.

premise: A young girl in a pink and white sweater is holding a pro Ron Paul sign that reads "END WAR.". hypothesis: The girl is wearing pink.

entailment: A young girl in a pink and white sweater is wearing pink.

premise: A young girl in a pink and white sweater is holding a pro Ron Paul sign that reads "END WAR.". hypothesis: The girl is outside.

neutral: Not all girls are outside.

premise: A young girl in a pink and white sweater is holding a pro Ron Paul sign that reads "END WAR.". hypothesis: The girl is asleep in her bed.

contradiction: girl holding a sign cannot mean girl asleep at the same time.

premise: A little girl holding a big sign that says "END WAR" and she's looking down at it. hypothesis: The sign reads "peace".

contradiction: sign which says end war cannot mean sign reads peace at the same time.

premise: A little girl holding a big sign that says "END WAR" and she's looking down at it. hypothesis: The young female is at a protest.

entailment: A little girl is a young female. A girl holding a big sign that says 'END WAR' is at a protest.

premise: A little girl holding a big sign that says "END WAR" and she's looking down at it. hypothesis: The girl is with her family.

neutral: Just because a girl is little and holding a sign doesn't mean she is with her family.

premise: A boy in a blue and red top is jumping into the ocean. hypothesis: The boy is playing basketball.

contradiction: boy jumping cannot mean a boy playing at the same time.

premise: A boy in a blue and red top is jumping into the ocean. hypothesis: The boy got water in his eyes.

neutral: The boy would not necessarily get water in his eyes by jumping in the ocean.

premise: A boy in a blue and red top is jumping into the ocean. hypothesis: The boy is outside.

entailment: One must be outside before jumping into the ocean.

premise: A blond girl sitting in a yellow chair texting. hypothesis: The blonde girl is walking through the halls talking to her teacher.

contradiction: girl sitting cannot mean a girl walking at the same time.

premise: A blond girl sitting in a yellow chair texting. hypothesis: The girl is texting her best friend.

neutral: The girl may be texting someone other than her best friend.

premise: A blond girl sitting in a yellow chair texting. hypothesis: The girls is sitting down while sending a text.

entailment: Texting is an act of sending a text.

premise: There is a bunch of tourists standing around on the grass and looking at some old ruins. hypothesis: a family on vacation.

neutral: A bunch of tourists don't have to be a family.

premise: There is a bunch of tourists standing around on the grass and looking at some old ruins. hypothesis: humans outside.

entailment: A bunch of tourists are humans, and on the grass implies outside.

premise: There is a bunch of tourists standing around on the grass and looking at some old ruins. hypothesis: a group of dogs playing.

contradiction: Tourists is different to dogs.

premise: A boy in rash guards and swim shoes runs into the water at a beach. hypothesis: A boy is outside.

entailment: A boy who runs into the water at a beach is outside.

premise: A boy in rash guards and swim shoes runs into the water at a beach. hypothesis: A boy is laying on the beach.

contradiction: boy who runs cannot be a boy laying on the beach at the same time.

premise: A boy in rash guards and swim shoes runs into the water at a beach. hypothesis: A boy loves to swim.

neutral: It doesn't mean the boy loves to swim just because he runs in the water.

premise: Five black dogs run in a field. hypothesis: Some huge animals running.

neutral: Five black dogs may not necessarily be huge animals.

premise: Five black dogs run in a field. hypothesis: No animals running.

contradiction: It cannot be that no animals are running if 5 dogs run.

premise: Five black dogs run in a field. hypothesis: Some animals running.

entailment: Dogs are a subset of animals.

premise: A blond in flip-flops and shorts is sitting on a yellow chair outside. hypothesis: A blond in flip-flops and shorts is ice skating.

contradiction: blond is sitting cannot mean blond is ice skating at the same time.

premise: A blond in flip-flops and shorts is sitting on a yellow chair outside. hypothesis: A blond in flip-flops and shorts is sitting on a yellow chair at the beach.

neutral: Just because the blond is outside and wearing flip-flops doesn't mean she is at the beach.

premise: A blond in flip-flops and shorts is sitting on a yellow chair outside. hypothesis: A blond in flip-flops and shorts is sitting outdoors.

entailment: A yellow chair outside is obviously outdoors.

premise: The black dogs are running in a grassy field. hypothesis: The black dogs are sitting.

contradiction: dogs running cannot mean dogs sitting at the same time.

premise: The black dogs are running in a grassy field. hypothesis: The black dogs are in a grass field.

entailment: A grassy field has grass in it.

premise: The black dogs are running in a grassy field. hypothesis: The black dogs are wearing collars.

neutral: Dogs don't always wear collars.

premise: A woman in an apron is carrying a tray of ice cream with cones on top. hypothesis: A man is carrying ice cream sandwiches.

contradiction: A woman is different to a man.

premise: A woman in an apron is carrying a tray of ice cream with cones on top. hypothesis: An ice cream shop employee is carrying ice cream to the kids.

neutral: A woman in an apron doesn't have to be an employee.

premise: A woman in an apron is carrying a tray of ice cream with cones on top. hypothesis: A woman is carrying ice cream cones.

entailment: Carrying ice cream cones is a rephrasing of carrying a tray of ice cream with cones on top.

premise: A pack of black dogs running in grass. hypothesis: The dogs all run and play together.

neutral: Dogs can run together as a pack and not play together.

premise: A pack of black dogs running in grass. hypothesis: The animals run around an indoor enclosure.

contradiction: grass means outdoor.

premise: A pack of black dogs running in grass. hypothesis: The group of animals runs outside.

entailment: A pack of black dogs is a group of animals, and grass implies outside.

premise: Many black dogs run in a grassy area. hypothesis: A group of dogs are playing.

entailment: A group of dogs are many dogs. Dogs running in a grassy area are playing.

premise: Many black dogs run in a grassy area. hypothesis: Lots of dogs sleeping in a garage.

contradiction: They are either running or sleeping. They are either in a garage, or in a grassy area.

premise: Many black dogs run in a grassy area. hypothesis: A pack of wild dogs play in a field.

neutral: All dogs that run are not wild. A grassy area doesn't necessarily imply a field.

premise: A man is walking on the roof of a building under construction. hypothesis: Man walking on a roof during his lunch break.

neutral: A man doesn't walk on a roof only on his lunch break.

premise: A man is walking on the roof of a building under construction. hypothesis: Man walking on a roof.

entailment: Man is a man.

premise: A man is walking on the roof of a building under construction. hypothesis: Man is snorkeling in the great barrier reef.

contradiction: The man is either walking or snorkeling. He is either on the roof of a building, or in the great barrier reef.

premise: A man wearing a black hat standing next to a black pole. hypothesis: A guy in a hat is standing by a pole.

entailment: A guy is usually a young man. A man in a hat is wearing a hat.

premise: A man wearing a black hat standing next to a black pole. hypothesis: A man in a coat sits ontop of a fire hydrant.

contradiction: The man is either sitting or standing.

premise: A man wearing a black hat standing next to a black pole. hypothesis: A man in a black hat is standing next to a street light.

neutral: A black pole is not necessarily a street light.

premise: A man with a light colored shirt is lean against a post, looking at another person that is standing below him. hypothesis: The man is waiting for someone.

neutral: It cannot be inferred that the man is waiting.

premise: A man with a light colored shirt is lean against a post, looking at another person that is standing below him. hypothesis: The man in shirt is leaning casually.

entailment: A man with a light colored shirt is a man in shirt, and lean against a post is leaning casually.

premise: A man with a light colored shirt is lean against a post, looking at another person that is standing below him. hypothesis: The man is walking down the street.

contradiction: The man cannot be walking while lean against a post, looking at another person that is standing below him.

premise: A man unlocks a blue garage door. hypothesis: A man unlocks a door.

entailment: A man unlocks a blue garage door implies a man unlocks a door.

premise: A man unlocks a blue garage door. hypothesis: A woman calls the cops when someone breaks into her house.

contradiction: It is either a man or a woman. They either call the cops, or they unlock a blue garage door.