input_seq2seq
stringlengths
40
578
output_seq2seq
stringlengths
10
929
premise: A young red-haired girl wants to see what comes after the clowns in the parade. hypothesis: A girl is watching a parade.
entailment: If a girl wants to see what comes next, it follows that she is watching.
premise: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps. hypothesis: Two adults holding musical instruments.
entailment: Adults are men and a guitar and accordion are musical instruments.
premise: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps. hypothesis: Two men are playing music outside.
entailment: The men are playing guitar and an accordion so they are playing music.
premise: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps. hypothesis: A band playing music for some pedestrians.
neutral: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps does not indicate that a band playing music for some pedestrians.
premise: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps. hypothesis: Two men are holding an outside concert.
neutral: Just because two men are playing instruments, doesn't mean they're holding a concert.
premise: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps. hypothesis: Men are playing musical instruments.
entailment: A guitar and an accordion are musical instruments.
premise: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps. hypothesis: The men are playing songs together.
neutral: Just because two men are playing instruments doesn't mean they're playing a song.
premise: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps. hypothesis: seven men play football.
contradiction: There can either be two men or seven men.
premise: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps. hypothesis: Two men are standing on a hilltop.
contradiction: Two men cannot be standing while sitting.
premise: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps. hypothesis: Two men are playing volleyball in the park.
contradiction: Two men cannot be playing volleyball and instruments at the same time.
premise: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps. hypothesis: The men are dressed in overalls and digging a hole to China.
contradiction: Two men cannot be digging a hole to china while they are playing instruments.
premise: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps. hypothesis: two street performers wait for a crown.
neutral: Just because two men are playing instruments doesn't imply they're street performers.
premise: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps. hypothesis: Two men have escaped from a psychiatric hospital and are playing a song together.
neutral: Just because two men sit on steps, doesn't mean they were in a mental hospital.
premise: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps. hypothesis: The friends are baking some pastries.
contradiction: Two men cannot be baking some pastries while they are playing instruments.
premise: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps. hypothesis: two men sit on steps.
entailment: The men are sitting on steps.
premise: Two men, one playing a purple guitar and the other playing an accordion, sitting on stone steps. hypothesis: The men are playing instruments.
entailment: A guitar and accordion are instruments.
premise: Tourists pose for camera at night. hypothesis: travellers pose for camera.
entailment: Tourists are travellers.
premise: Tourists pose for camera at night. hypothesis: photo pose by tourist.
neutral: Just because tourists are posing, doesn't mean by tourist.
premise: Tourists pose for camera at night. hypothesis: man at work.
contradiction: There can either be tourists or a single man.
premise: A man and woman standing next to each other in the snow by a lake. hypothesis: A couple is enjoying the snow.
neutral: Just because a man and women are together, doesn't imply theyre a couple.
premise: A man and woman standing next to each other in the snow by a lake. hypothesis: A couple is sitting in the snow.
contradiction: People cannot be standing and sitting simultaneously.
premise: A man and woman standing next to each other in the snow by a lake. hypothesis: People are standing outside.
entailment: A man and a woman are people and they are by a lake so they must be outside.
premise: Water splashes down as the awning is washed. hypothesis: The owning is dry.
contradiction: awning and owing are different actions.
premise: Water splashes down as the awning is washed. hypothesis: An awning is being cleaned.
entailment: The awning is washed which means that it is being cleaned.
premise: Water splashes down as the awning is washed. hypothesis: Someone is spring cleaning.
neutral: Just because someone is washing an awning, doesn't mean it's spring cleaning.
premise: Some hospital employees reading books in a hallway. hypothesis: A woman is washing dishes.
contradiction: Reading and washing are not same both are different.
premise: Some hospital employees reading books in a hallway. hypothesis: Employees are in the hallway.
entailment: The employees here are working in a hospital.
premise: Some hospital employees reading books in a hallway. hypothesis: Employees are reading training manuals.
neutral: Not all books are training manuals.
premise: A man and a woman in wedding clothes look out toward the water. hypothesis: The man and woman are wearing wedding rings.
neutral: Just because a pair are wearing wedding clothes, doesn't mean they're wearing wedding rings.
premise: A man and a woman in wedding clothes look out toward the water. hypothesis: The man is alone crying in the kitchen.
contradiction: wedding and crying are different actions.
premise: A man and a woman in wedding clothes look out toward the water. hypothesis: The man and woman have their eyes looking toward the water.
entailment: The people look out toward the water so their eyes must be looking toward the water.
premise: a doctor and nurses in a hospital standing behind a cart. hypothesis: A doctor and some nurse standing in a hospital.
entailment: The doctor and nurses are in the hospital.
premise: a doctor and nurses in a hospital standing behind a cart. hypothesis: The doctor works at this hospital.
neutral: Just because a doctor is at a hospital, doesn't imply he works there.
premise: a doctor and nurses in a hospital standing behind a cart. hypothesis: The doctor is pushing the cart.
contradiction: standing and pushing are different actions.
premise: A woman holds a yellow stick and pokes the tarp over a floral display during a rainstorm, releasing large quantities of water to the ground. hypothesis: the woman is actually climbing a mountain.
contradiction: releasing and climbing are different actions.
premise: A woman holds a yellow stick and pokes the tarp over a floral display during a rainstorm, releasing large quantities of water to the ground. hypothesis: the woman hates the rain.
neutral: Just because a person protects themselves from the rain, doesn't imply they hates it.
premise: A woman holds a yellow stick and pokes the tarp over a floral display during a rainstorm, releasing large quantities of water to the ground. hypothesis: the woman is standing in the rain.
entailment: The woman pokes the tarp while standing in a rainstorm.
premise: An individual pushing rain off the tops of the canopy. hypothesis: A person is folding up a fabric canopy.
contradiction: pushing and folding are different actions.
premise: An individual pushing rain off the tops of the canopy. hypothesis: A person is pushing rain off of a canopy.
entailment: The individual pushing rain off the canopy is a person.
premise: An individual pushing rain off the tops of the canopy. hypothesis: A worker is pushing rain off the top of a canopy.
neutral: There is no suggestion that the individual is a worker.
premise: A woman in a long white bridal gown and a man in a black suit are standing at a rail looking at the ocean. hypothesis: A couple in wedding outfits are looking at the ocean.
entailment: The woman in a bridal gown and the man in a black suit are a couple in wedding outfits looking at the ocean.
premise: A woman in a long white bridal gown and a man in a black suit are standing at a rail looking at the ocean. hypothesis: Two kids are looking at the ocean.
contradiction: woman and kids have different ages.
premise: A woman in a long white bridal gown and a man in a black suit are standing at a rail looking at the ocean. hypothesis: People dressed for a wedding are standing at a rail.
neutral: Just because a women wears and bridal gown and a man wears a black suit does not mean they are dressed for a wedding.
premise: Two dogs are fighting and playing with each other while running through some grass. hypothesis: Two dogs play in the grass.
entailment: The dogs are in the grass and are playing with each other, so they are playing in the grass.
premise: Two dogs are fighting and playing with each other while running through some grass. hypothesis: Two dogs play in the flower filled grass.
neutral: Not all grass is flower filled.
premise: Two dogs are fighting and playing with each other while running through some grass. hypothesis: Two dogs play on the couch.
contradiction: fighting and play are different.
premise: Two brown dogs with blue collars are running in the grass. hypothesis: The dogs are sitting by the pond.
contradiction: not all the dogs are brown.
premise: Two brown dogs with blue collars are running in the grass. hypothesis: Some dogs are running after a ball in the park.
neutral: Just because dogs are running does not mean they in a park or running after a ball.
premise: Two brown dogs with blue collars are running in the grass. hypothesis: There are dogs outdoors.
entailment: The dogs are running in the grass outdoors.
premise: four young adults in a busy city area. hypothesis: These four friends are shopping.
neutral: Four people are not necessarily friends, and being in a busy city area is not the same thing as shopping.
premise: four young adults in a busy city area. hypothesis: These three are wearing hats.
contradiction: City and hats are not same both are different.
premise: four young adults in a busy city area. hypothesis: These four are outdoors.
entailment: One cannot tell that a place is a busy city area unless they are outdoors.
premise: There are two brown dogs playing in field. hypothesis: The field has animals in it.
entailment: Dogs playing in the field follows that dogs are animals.
premise: There are two brown dogs playing in field. hypothesis: The dogs are playing with an old newspaper.
neutral: The first sentence doesn't mention what that the dogs are playing with an old newspaper.
premise: There are two brown dogs playing in field. hypothesis: The dogs are sitting next to their owners.
contradiction: two dogs are playing the other two are sitting next to their owners.
premise: Four younger guys walking down the sidewalk looking at the camera. hypothesis: some boys are with girls and making pose.
neutral: There is no mention that the guys are with girls and although they are looking at the camera they may not be making poses.
premise: Four younger guys walking down the sidewalk looking at the camera. hypothesis: adults walking and giving poses.
entailment: Four adult men are walking down the sidewalk and giving poses for the camera.
premise: Four younger guys walking down the sidewalk looking at the camera. hypothesis: adults are sitting on the road side and looking each other.
contradiction: adults and younger have different ages.
premise: Four young men walking along a sidewalk. hypothesis: Four men walking.
entailment: The four men walking are young.
premise: Four young men walking along a sidewalk. hypothesis: Four young women running down the street.
contradiction: men and women are different gender.
premise: Four young men walking along a sidewalk. hypothesis: Four black men walking along a sidewalk.
neutral: There is no mention of the young men's ethnicities therefore were do not know they are black.
premise: Four teenagers dressed in black and white shirts and blue jeans walk down a sidewalk. hypothesis: the teenagers are doing homework at their house.
contradiction: The teenagers cannot simultaneously walk and be doing homework.
premise: Four teenagers dressed in black and white shirts and blue jeans walk down a sidewalk. hypothesis: the teenagers are causing trouble.
neutral: Just because they walk down a sidewalk does not mean they are causing trouble.
premise: Four teenagers dressed in black and white shirts and blue jeans walk down a sidewalk. hypothesis: four teenagers are walking down a sidewalk.
entailment: Walking down a side walk is the same thing as walk down a sidewalk.
premise: Several youths in black and white shirts and blue jeans walk down a street. hypothesis: Several youths are wearing clothes.
entailment: Shirts and jeans are clothes.
premise: Several youths in black and white shirts and blue jeans walk down a street. hypothesis: The youths are only wearing swimsuits.
contradiction: Jeans and swimsuits are different.
premise: Several youths in black and white shirts and blue jeans walk down a street. hypothesis: The youths are holding baseball gloves.
neutral: Holding baseball gloves cannot be inferred from how they are otherwise dressed.
premise: Woman climbing an artificial rock wall. hypothesis: A woman is climbing a rock wall inside a climbing gym.
entailment: The woman must climb an artificial rock wall inside a gym.
premise: Woman climbing an artificial rock wall. hypothesis: A woman is participating in exercise.
entailment: The woman is exercising by climbing a rock wall.
premise: Woman climbing an artificial rock wall. hypothesis: There is an outdoor climbing wall with people on it.
neutral: Artificial rock walls do not have to be located outdoors. We are only told the woman is climbing the wall there is no mention of people on it.
premise: Woman climbing an artificial rock wall. hypothesis: A man is playing checkers.
contradiction: woman and man are different gender.
premise: Woman climbing an artificial rock wall. hypothesis: A woman is climbing up into a tree.
contradiction: A woman cannot be climbing a tree and an artificial rock wall at the same time.
premise: Woman climbing an artificial rock wall. hypothesis: A woman is practicing rock climbing for the first time.
neutral: Although the woman is climbing the wall she may not be practicing rock climbing for the first time.
premise: Woman climbing an artificial rock wall. hypothesis: A woman is training to go mountain climbing.
neutral: Although the woman is climbing the wall she may not be training to go mountain climbing.
premise: Woman climbing an artificial rock wall. hypothesis: A woman is bicycling through a field.
contradiction: A woman cannot be climbing a rock wall and bicycling through a field at the same time.
premise: Woman climbing an artificial rock wall. hypothesis: People are ascending a climbing wall using grips for their hands and feet.
entailment: One of the people ascending the rock wall is a woman.
premise: Woman climbing an artificial rock wall. hypothesis: A women is exercising.
entailment: climbing is exercising.
premise: Woman climbing an artificial rock wall. hypothesis: A woman is bungee jumping.
contradiction: A women who is bungee jumping cannot be climbing an artificial wall at the same time.
premise: Woman climbing an artificial rock wall. hypothesis: The woman is enjoying climbing a rock wall inside a gym.
neutral: There is no mention that the woman is enjoying herself on the wall or that the wall is inside a gym.
premise: Woman climbing an artificial rock wall. hypothesis: A woman is practicing on a rock climbing wall.
entailment: in a both sentence woman climbing a wall.
premise: Woman climbing an artificial rock wall. hypothesis: The women is about to fall.
neutral: We are told the woman is climbing the rock wall but there in no mention that she is about to fall.
premise: Woman climbing an artificial rock wall. hypothesis: A group of men are playing on an indoor climbing wall.
contradiction: A woman is not a group of men.
premise: The girl is in a harness, climbing rocks. hypothesis: A girl is learning to rock climb.
neutral: A girl climbing rocks may have already spent time learning to rock climb.
premise: The girl is in a harness, climbing rocks. hypothesis: A boy plays on the rocks.
contradiction: A girl is not a boy.
premise: The girl is in a harness, climbing rocks. hypothesis: A child is rock climbing.
entailment: in a both sentence a child is climbing rock.
premise: A woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing. hypothesis: A woman exercising.
neutral: Rock climbing might be described as exercising, but it isn't always.
premise: A woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing. hypothesis: A lady is exercising indoors.
entailment: A woman is a lady, and indoor rock climbing is a form of exercising.
premise: A woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing. hypothesis: A woman is wearing a harness.
entailment: in a both sentence a woman is wearing.
premise: A woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing. hypothesis: A woman is wearing a helmet.
neutral: Not all woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is wearing a helmet.
premise: A woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing. hypothesis: A woman watches while others rockclimb outside.
contradiction: A woman indoor rock climbing and watches others rock climb outside simultaneously.
premise: A woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing. hypothesis: A professional rockclimber is climbing a wall.
neutral: Not all woman is professional rockclimber .
premise: A woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing. hypothesis: She is doing a good job.
neutral: Not all woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is doing a good job.
premise: A woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing. hypothesis: A woman is climing a fake wall inside.
entailment: in a both sentence woman are inside.
premise: A woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing. hypothesis: a woman climbing a mountain outdoors.
contradiction: A woman cannot be indoor rocking climbing and climbing a mountain outdoors at the same time.
premise: A woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing. hypothesis: A woman climbing.
entailment: indoor rock climbing shows that woman climbing.
premise: A woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing. hypothesis: A woman is playing tennis.
contradiction: A woman playing tennis cannot be indoor rock climbing at the same time.
premise: A woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing. hypothesis: A woman is at the movies.
contradiction: A woman cannot be indoor rock climbing at the movies.
premise: A woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing. hypothesis: A woman is almost at the top of the rock climbing structure.
neutral: Just because a woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing does not mean that she is almost at the top of the rock climbing structure.
premise: A woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing. hypothesis: She is outdoors.
contradiction: A woman who is outdoors cannot be indoor rock climbing.
premise: A woman in blue shorts and a white shirt is indoor rock climbing. hypothesis: A woman is rock climbing.
entailment: in a both sentence a woman in rock climbing.