Datasets:

ErfanMoosaviMonazzah

/

esnli-seq2seq

like 0

premise: A construction worker in a gray shirt and jeans crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials. hypothesis: A working man inspects contents of a bucket.

entailment: It's the duty of the construction worker to inspect the content in a bucket.

premise: A man who appears to be a construction worker smiling at someone. hypothesis: A man frowning at the ground.

contradiction: The man is smiling at someone, not frowning at the ground.

premise: A man who appears to be a construction worker smiling at someone. hypothesis: A man smiling.

entailment: A construction worker is a man.

premise: A man who appears to be a construction worker smiling at someone. hypothesis: A man smiling at his co-worker.

neutral: worker doesn't always mean co-worker.

premise: Dark-haired construction worker in a building. hypothesis: A construction worker is fixing the plumbing in a building.

neutral: worker doesn't always mean fixing the plumbing.

premise: Dark-haired construction worker in a building. hypothesis: A construction worker is in a building.

entailment: A construction worker doesn't have to be dark-haired.

premise: Dark-haired construction worker in a building. hypothesis: A woman is in the woods camping alone.

contradiction: The worker is in a building, not in the woods.

premise: A smiling construction worker kneeling down. hypothesis: The construction worker is kneeling down to tie their shoes.

neutral: kneeling doesn't always mean to tie their shoes.

premise: A smiling construction worker kneeling down. hypothesis: A smiling lawyer is jumping for joy.

contradiction: The construction worker isn't a lawyer. The worker is kneeling down, not jumping for joy.

premise: A smiling construction worker kneeling down. hypothesis: A person is kneeling down.

entailment: A construction worker is a person.

premise: A white greyhound wearing a yellow and black jacket is running on a track. hypothesis: the dog is peeing and stopped.

contradiction: The dog is running on a track, not stopped. The dog can't be peeing when running.

premise: A white greyhound wearing a yellow and black jacket is running on a track. hypothesis: the dog is very fast.

neutral: running doesn't always mean fast.

premise: A white greyhound wearing a yellow and black jacket is running on a track. hypothesis: the dog is running.

entailment: A greyhound is a dog.

premise: Sales man, standing at the counter in a blue and white long-sleeve sweater. hypothesis: The man is sitting in a chair.

contradiction: The man cannot be sitting and standing at the same time.

premise: Sales man, standing at the counter in a blue and white long-sleeve sweater. hypothesis: A man is wearing a sweater.

entailment: "Sales man, standing at the counter in a blue and white long-sleeve sweater." is a rephrasing with more detail of "A man wearing a sweater.".

premise: Sales man, standing at the counter in a blue and white long-sleeve sweater. hypothesis: The sales man is standing at the counter.

neutral: Sales man, standing at the counter is same as The sales man is standing at the counter.

premise: An elderly man selling magazines. hypothesis: An old lady sell magazines.

contradiction: Lady is opposite of man.

premise: An elderly man selling magazines. hypothesis: An old man sell magazines.

entailment: Elderly means old, trying to sell magazines.

premise: An elderly man selling magazines. hypothesis: The salesman sell magazines.

entailment: An elderly man selling means he's a salesman.

premise: A man with a large feather in his hat rides a horse. hypothesis: The man is riding a horse.

entailment: A horse is normally ridden by a man.

premise: A man with a large feather in his hat rides a horse. hypothesis: The man is in a horse ring.

neutral: horse doesn't always mean ring.

premise: A man with a large feather in his hat rides a horse. hypothesis: The man is in a kitchen.

contradiction: The man rides a horse so can't be in a kitchen.

premise: a magazine stand with many multicolored magazines. hypothesis: a magazine stand with many people magazines.

contradiction: Multicolored magazines aren't people magazines.

premise: a magazine stand with many multicolored magazines. hypothesis: the stand has many magazines.

entailment: Many multicolored magazines means they are many magazines.

premise: a magazine stand with many multicolored magazines. hypothesis: the stand is over full.

neutral: stand doesn't always mean full.

premise: An elderly man sells magazines in a stand. hypothesis: the man was giving directions at the stand.

neutral: sells doesn't always mean giving directions.

premise: An elderly man sells magazines in a stand. hypothesis: the man has magazines.

entailment: An elderly man is a man.

premise: An elderly man sells magazines in a stand. hypothesis: the woman sells books at her store.

contradiction: The man isn't a woman.

premise: An old man wearing a blue jean jacket is sitting at the counter of a magazine stand. hypothesis: An old man is wearing a jacket reading magazines.

neutral: Sitting does not imply reading.

premise: An old man wearing a blue jean jacket is sitting at the counter of a magazine stand. hypothesis: An old man is planning to sleep.

contradiction: Sitting and planning are not same.

premise: An old man wearing a blue jean jacket is sitting at the counter of a magazine stand. hypothesis: An old man is wearing a jacket and sitting down.

entailment: Wearing a jacket and sitting down is the same as wearing a blue jean jacket and sitting at a counter.

premise: An older man sells magazines at a magazine stand in Asia. hypothesis: A man sells magazines at a magazine stand in Asia.

entailment: in a both sentence a man sells magazine.

premise: An older man sells magazines at a magazine stand in Asia. hypothesis: An older man sells magazines at a magazine stand in China.

neutral: Not all of Asia is China.

premise: An older man sells magazines at a magazine stand in Asia. hypothesis: An older woman sells magazines at a magazine stand in Asia.

contradiction: The man isn't a woman.

premise: Man in black with a feathered hat sits atop a horse. hypothesis: A man wearing a feathered hat sits at a table as a horse passes by.

contradiction: The man sits atop a horse so can't be sitting at a table.

premise: Man in black with a feathered hat sits atop a horse. hypothesis: The man is standing next to the horse.

contradiction: The man sits atop a horse, not stands next to the horse.

premise: Man in black with a feathered hat sits atop a horse. hypothesis: A cowboy rides his horse out to work.

neutral: Not all men on a horse is a cowboy.

premise: Man in black with a feathered hat sits atop a horse. hypothesis: A man rides a horse.

entailment: in a both sentence man in black house.

premise: Man in black with a feathered hat sits atop a horse. hypothesis: A woman wearing white watches a horse competition.

contradiction: The man isn't a woman. The man wears black, not white. The man sits atop a horse so may be in the competition instead of watching the competition.

premise: Man in black with a feathered hat sits atop a horse. hypothesis: The man has been riding his horse all day.

neutral: Just because the man is on his horse does not mean he has been riding his horse all day.

premise: Man in black with a feathered hat sits atop a horse. hypothesis: A man is sitting on a horse.

entailment: in a both sentence man in horse.

premise: Man in black with a feathered hat sits atop a horse. hypothesis: A man poses on a horse before a horse show wearing a black feathered hat.

neutral: Just because he is sitting on his horse does not mean he poses on it.

premise: Man in black with a feathered hat sits atop a horse. hypothesis: A man ride his horse in a competition.

neutral: Just because he sits on his horse does not mean he is going in a competition.

premise: Man in black with a feathered hat sits atop a horse. hypothesis: The man is outdoors.

entailment: If someone sits atop a horse he is most likely outdoors.

premise: Man in black with a feathered hat sits atop a horse. hypothesis: A man wears a feathered hat while he's sitting on a horse.

entailment: in a both sentence man in sitting on a horse.

premise: Man in black with a feathered hat sits atop a horse. hypothesis: A man drives his truck in the city.

contradiction: The man sits atop and rides a horse so isn't driving a truck.

premise: Man in black with a feathered hat sits atop a horse. hypothesis: A man rides a horse wearing a hat with a feather in it.

entailment: in a both sentence man wearing a hat.

premise: Man in black with a feathered hat sits atop a horse. hypothesis: The man is holding on to the horse's reins.

neutral: Just because they man is on his horse does not mean he is holding on to the horse's reins.

premise: Man in black with a feathered hat sits atop a horse. hypothesis: The man is wearing all white clothing.

contradiction: The man in black isn't wearing any white clothing.

premise: Men and women at reception at a business conference. hypothesis: The business conference has men and women in attendance.

entailment: in a both sentence the business at reception.

premise: Men and women at reception at a business conference. hypothesis: The men and women are conversating at the reception.

neutral: Just because they are at a business conference does not mean they are conversating.

premise: Men and women at reception at a business conference. hypothesis: There is men and women at a circus event.

contradiction: The business conference is a very different event to a circus.

premise: A happy young couple having a glass of whine and talking. hypothesis: Two people are talking while drinking wine.

entailment: Two is a couple, and having a glass is for the purpose of drinking.

premise: A happy young couple having a glass of whine and talking. hypothesis: A man is sitting alone in a bar.

contradiction: A young couple is not a man who is alone.

premise: A happy young couple having a glass of whine and talking. hypothesis: A couple is toasting a celebration.

neutral: Just because they are drinking wine doesn't mean they are toasting a celebration. People drink wine for all sorts of reasons.

premise: A man and a woman are talking to a man in a room filled with people. hypothesis: The people are at a party.

neutral: Just because the room is filled with people does not mean they are at a party.

premise: A man and a woman are talking to a man in a room filled with people. hypothesis: Some people are talking.

entailment: in a both sentence people are talking to a man.

premise: A man and a woman are talking to a man in a room filled with people. hypothesis: The man and woman are driving home.

contradiction: One cant be in a room and driving home simultaneously.

premise: A woman with a tote bag exchanges conversation with people at a trade show. hypothesis: A woman is at a trade show.

entailment: There is a woman at a trade show.

premise: A woman with a tote bag exchanges conversation with people at a trade show. hypothesis: A woman with a tote bag exchanges conversation about her day with people at a trade show.

neutral: Not all conversation is about someone's day.

premise: A woman with a tote bag exchanges conversation with people at a trade show. hypothesis: A man with a tote bag exchanges conversation with people at a trade show.

contradiction: Woman and man are different.

premise: A couple attending an indoor business event are speaking with a representative in a nice suit. hypothesis: The couple are talking with the representative to understand their job better.

neutral: Just because they are talking with a representative does not mean they want to understand their job better.

premise: A couple attending an indoor business event are speaking with a representative in a nice suit. hypothesis: A couple throw rice at a wedding.

contradiction: One cant be attending a business event and at a wedding simultaneously.

premise: A couple attending an indoor business event are speaking with a representative in a nice suit. hypothesis: A couple negotiates a deal with a representative at an event.

neutral: Just because they are speaking to a representative does not mean they negotiates with him.

premise: A couple attending an indoor business event are speaking with a representative in a nice suit. hypothesis: The couple are trying to buy something.

neutral: Not all couple speaking to a representative are trying to buy something.

premise: A couple attending an indoor business event are speaking with a representative in a nice suit. hypothesis: A couple beats up a representative from a large corporation.

contradiction: One can not be speaking with and beats up someone simultaneously.

premise: A couple attending an indoor business event are speaking with a representative in a nice suit. hypothesis: The couple are in a business center.

entailment: in a both sentence the couple are indoor.

premise: A couple attending an indoor business event are speaking with a representative in a nice suit. hypothesis: A couple speak with a representative.

entailment: in a both sentence a couple attending an business event.

premise: A couple attending an indoor business event are speaking with a representative in a nice suit. hypothesis: Children are playing at daycare.

contradiction: Children would not be attending a business event.

premise: A couple attending an indoor business event are speaking with a representative in a nice suit. hypothesis: The couple are circus performers.

contradiction: Circus performers wouldnt go to a business event.

premise: A couple attending an indoor business event are speaking with a representative in a nice suit. hypothesis: A couple speak with a representative from a large corporation.

neutral: Not all representative are from a large corporation.

premise: A couple attending an indoor business event are speaking with a representative in a nice suit. hypothesis: A representative is working at an indoor business event.

entailment: A REPRESENTATIVE WORKING AT AN INDOOR BUSINESS EVENT IS SPEAKING TO A COUPLE ATTENDING IT.

premise: A couple attending an indoor business event are speaking with a representative in a nice suit. hypothesis: A couple is asking questions to increase their business revenue.

neutral: Howto increase business revenue is not the only question to ask a representative.

premise: A couple attending an indoor business event are speaking with a representative in a nice suit. hypothesis: The couple are together.

entailment: THE COUPLE SPEAKING WITH THE REPRESENTATIVE ARE TOGETHER.

premise: A couple attending an indoor business event are speaking with a representative in a nice suit. hypothesis: A couple talks with a representative at an event.

entailment: A COUPLE IS TALKING WITH A REPRESENTATIVE AT AN EVENT THEY ARE ATTENDING.

premise: A couple attending an indoor business event are speaking with a representative in a nice suit. hypothesis: The man is wearing a spacesuit and standing next to a time-machine.

contradiction: A spacesuit is not a nice suit for business.

premise: A skier coming over a snowy hill while people look on. hypothesis: The skier is pushing a snowmobile.

contradiction: A skier does not use a snowmobile.

premise: A skier coming over a snowy hill while people look on. hypothesis: The skier has a number outside his clothing in his or her chest area.

neutral: Not all skier has a number outside their clothing.

premise: A skier coming over a snowy hill while people look on. hypothesis: At least some of the people are wearing coats.

entailment: SOME PEOPLE WEARING COATS ARE LOOKING AT A SKIER COMING OVER A SNOWY HILL.

premise: Three surfers walking on the beach. hypothesis: The surfers are wearing jeans and sitting around a table.

contradiction: One cant be walking on the beach and sitting around a table simultaneously.

premise: Three surfers walking on the beach. hypothesis: The surfers are outside.

entailment: THREE SURFERS ARE OUTSIDE WALKING ON THE BEACH.

premise: Three surfers walking on the beach. hypothesis: The weather is nice outside.

neutral: Surfers does not walk in the beach only when the weather is nice outside.

premise: Three surfers walking down a beach. hypothesis: There are three surfers who are friends.

neutral: It cannot be assumed that the group of surfers are friends.

premise: Three surfers walking down a beach. hypothesis: There are three surfers.

entailment: The surfers are - they exist - because they are walking.

premise: Three surfers walking down a beach. hypothesis: There are four skateboarders.

contradiction: There can be either surfers or skateboarders.

premise: Three surfers are walking on the beach. hypothesis: Three surfers are on the beach.

entailment: THREE SURFERS ARE ON THE BEACH WALKING.

premise: Three surfers are walking on the beach. hypothesis: Three surfers are in the car.

contradiction: One cant be walking on the beach and in the car simultaneously.

premise: Three surfers are walking on the beach. hypothesis: They are about to go into the water.

neutral: Not all surfers walking on the beach are about to go into the water.

premise: Three surfers walking down a beach with several large rocks in the sand. hypothesis: There are three surfers.

entailment: THREE SURFERS ARE WALKING DOWN A BEACH WITH SEVERAL LARGE ROCKS.

premise: Three surfers walking down a beach with several large rocks in the sand. hypothesis: There are five surfers.

contradiction: Five is more than three.

premise: Three surfers walking down a beach with several large rocks in the sand. hypothesis: The surfers have surfboards.

neutral: Not all surfers walking down a beach has surfboards.

premise: Three shortboarders are walking down the beach toward an outcropping of black boulders. hypothesis: Three shortboarders are riding bikes on the beach.

contradiction: Either the shortboarders are walking or they are riding bikes. They cannot physically do both.

premise: Three shortboarders are walking down the beach toward an outcropping of black boulders. hypothesis: Three shortboarders are getting ready to enter the water.

neutral: Not all shortboarders walking down the beach are getting ready to enter the water.

premise: Three shortboarders are walking down the beach toward an outcropping of black boulders. hypothesis: Three people are walking on the sand towards black rocks.

entailment: THREE SHORTBOARDERS ARE WALKING TOWARDS BLACK ROCKS DOWN THE BEACH.

premise: Young riders on an amusement park ride. hypothesis: Young Children doing their homework.

contradiction: Either the children are on a park ride or they are doing their homework, which they wouldn't do at an amusement park.

premise: Young riders on an amusement park ride. hypothesis: Young Riders riding an amusement park ride.

entailment: YOUNG RIDERS ARE RIDING ON A RIDE IN AN AMUSEMENT PARK.

premise: Young riders on an amusement park ride. hypothesis: Young Riders riding an amusement park ride with parents.

neutral: Not all young riders riding an amusement park rides with their parents.

premise: A girl is playing with toys inside of a tub of water. hypothesis: A girl is lost at sea.

contradiction: Either the girl is laying inside a tub of water, or is completely lost at sea. She cannot be in both places at once.

premise: A girl is playing with toys inside of a tub of water. hypothesis: A girl is in water playing with toys.

entailment: A tub of water is still water.

premise: An older gentleman in a plaid shirt and glasses is smiling at the camera. hypothesis: THe older gentleman is wearing a solid shirt and contacts.

contradiction: Either the gentleman is wearing a plaid shirt and glasses or a solid shirt and contacts. He cannot wear all of those simultaneously without issue.