input_seq2seq
stringlengths
40
578
output_seq2seq
stringlengths
10
929
premise: A man riding a horse at a rodeo. hypothesis: A man rides his favorite horse.
neutral: A man can ride a horse that is not his favorite.
premise: A man riding a horse at a rodeo. hypothesis: A man rides a bull.
contradiction: You can either ride a horse or a bull.
premise: A group of people are gathered on the beach, one man is carrying a surfboard out of the water. hypothesis: A group of people are watching a man surf.
neutral: the man was not necessarily walking from the water after a surf session.
premise: A group of people are gathered on the beach, one man is carrying a surfboard out of the water. hypothesis: A group of people are at the beach.
entailment: group of people are gathered on the beach simply means group of people are at the beach.
premise: A group of people are gathered on the beach, one man is carrying a surfboard out of the water. hypothesis: A group of people are gathered at an amusement park.
contradiction: An amusement park isn't a beach.
premise: A group of people walking on the surf, two of which are men holding their surfboards, one is blue and one is white. hypothesis: The people are finding a good wave to surf on.
neutral: the people are not necessarily looking for a good wave.
premise: A group of people walking on the surf, two of which are men holding their surfboards, one is blue and one is white. hypothesis: The people are surfing out in the ocean.
contradiction: It is stated that the people are walking on the surf, not surfing out in the ocean.
premise: A group of people walking on the surf, two of which are men holding their surfboards, one is blue and one is white. hypothesis: There are people with surfboards in the water.
entailment: people walking on the surf is same as people with surfboards.
premise: A man in football gear is running with the football with an opposing team member not far behind him going in for a tackle. hypothesis: A group of people are playing football.
entailment: man in football gear is running with the football with an opposing team member is just as group of people are playing football.
premise: A man in football gear is running with the football with an opposing team member not far behind him going in for a tackle. hypothesis: The football player is holding a ham because they lost the football.
contradiction: The football player can be running with either the football or the ham.
premise: A man in football gear is running with the football with an opposing team member not far behind him going in for a tackle. hypothesis: The player with the ball is running towards the end zone so he can score a touchdown.
neutral: the player is not necessarily running towards the end zone.
premise: A young man in a purple American football uniform is attempting to allude the tackle of another young man in a white uniform. hypothesis: The people are competing in a football championship game.
neutral: Attempting to allude does not imply competing in a championship game.
premise: A young man in a purple American football uniform is attempting to allude the tackle of another young man in a white uniform. hypothesis: The people are playing football.
entailment: The American uniform the men were wearing indicated playing football.
premise: A young man in a purple American football uniform is attempting to allude the tackle of another young man in a white uniform. hypothesis: The people are playing tennis.
contradiction: Tennis is different than football.
premise: A football player in a blue, black, and gold uniform evading a player from an opposing team. hypothesis: A football player in a blue, black, and gold uniform not evading a player.
contradiction: The football player can either be evading a player from the opposing team, or not evading a player.
premise: A football player in a blue, black, and gold uniform evading a player from an opposing team. hypothesis: A football player in a blue, black, and gold uniform evading a player.
entailment: football player in a blue, black, and gold uniform evading a player is same as football player in a blue, black, and gold uniform evading a player.
premise: A football player in a blue, black, and gold uniform evading a player from an opposing team. hypothesis: A football player in a blue, black, and gold uniform joyously evading a player.
neutral: the is not necessarily feeling joyously.
premise: Surfers and bathers on the beach. hypothesis: The bathers are soaking up the sunlight.
neutral: beach doesn't imply sunlight.
premise: Surfers and bathers on the beach. hypothesis: Surfers and bathers are near the water.
entailment: If you are on the beach you are near the water.
premise: Surfers and bathers on the beach. hypothesis: There are no surfers on the beach.
contradiction: There can either be surfers on the beach or no surfers on the beach, they can not happen simultaneously.
premise: Young guys are having fun. hypothesis: Young guys are old and grey.
contradiction: Old and grey is different than having fun.
premise: Young guys are having fun. hypothesis: Young guys are enjoying themselves.
entailment: Enjoying something is usually fun.
premise: Young guys are having fun. hypothesis: Some of the young guys are laughing.
neutral: Having fun does not imply laughing necessarily.
premise: three people hiking up a dirt road in the middle of the woods. hypothesis: People are walking through the woods.
entailment: Hiking involves walking and when someone says through they usually mean near the middle.
premise: three people hiking up a dirt road in the middle of the woods. hypothesis: Some people are hiking up a mountain.
neutral: THE PEOPLE CAN EITHER BE HIKING UP A MOUNTAIN OR A DIRT ROAD.
premise: three people hiking up a dirt road in the middle of the woods. hypothesis: The men are sitting at the bar.
contradiction: The people can either be hiking up a dirt road, or sitting at the bar, not both.
premise: One teenager gives a performance, while another, holding a bike, looks on. hypothesis: The teenager is a musician.
neutral: just because a teenager gives a performance doesn't mean the teenager is a musician.
premise: One teenager gives a performance, while another, holding a bike, looks on. hypothesis: A teenager is giving a performance.
entailment: A means one, and is giving is another way of saying gives.
premise: One teenager gives a performance, while another, holding a bike, looks on. hypothesis: The teenager is dead.
contradiction: The teenager can be giving a performance or looking on, and can not be dead if he or she is doing these activities.
premise: A man striking a pose as one man with a bike, and another man in the background watch. hypothesis: The man is wearing pants.
neutral: Not all men wear pants.
premise: A man striking a pose as one man with a bike, and another man in the background watch. hypothesis: The men are all riding horses.
contradiction: Striking a pose is different than riding horses.
premise: A man striking a pose as one man with a bike, and another man in the background watch. hypothesis: A man is taking a picture of a man and a bike.
neutral: Sentence 1 is missing taking a picture.
premise: A man striking a pose as one man with a bike, and another man in the background watch. hypothesis: A man flexes his arms for his pose while another man watches.
neutral: Sentence 1 is missing flexes his arms.
premise: A man striking a pose as one man with a bike, and another man in the background watch. hypothesis: A man strikes a pose on his red bike while a man is watching.
neutral: One can not assume the man striking a pose with a bike owns the bike, that the bike is red, or that he is on his red bike.
premise: A man striking a pose as one man with a bike, and another man in the background watch. hypothesis: A man strikes a pose on a bike while a man watches.
entailment: Guy already with a bike posing, so guy in background is just watching.
premise: A man striking a pose as one man with a bike, and another man in the background watch. hypothesis: A woman is posing with a car.
contradiction: A person can be either a man or woman, not both.
premise: A man striking a pose as one man with a bike, and another man in the background watch. hypothesis: The man is swimming in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.
contradiction: The men are striking poses, and watching from the background and can not be swimming in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean while doing either of these things.
premise: A man striking a pose as one man with a bike, and another man in the background watch. hypothesis: There are people near a bike.
entailment: If someone is with a bike, they are near the bike. More than one man is usually called people.
premise: A man striking a pose as one man with a bike, and another man in the background watch. hypothesis: The man is near the bike.
entailment: The man usually refers to one man, and if a man is with a bike, he is near a bike.
premise: A man striking a pose as one man with a bike, and another man in the background watch. hypothesis: A man sits on the couch eating spaghetti.
contradiction: The men can not be simultaneously striking poses, watching in the background, as well as sitting on the couch eating spaghetti.
premise: A man striking a pose as one man with a bike, and another man in the background watch. hypothesis: Three men are near each other.
entailment: There are three men as one strikes a pose, one is with a bike and the other is in the background who decides to watch. All of these men are doing these activities in the same place meaning they are near each other.
premise: A man striking a pose as one man with a bike, and another man in the background watch. hypothesis: The man is getting his picture.
neutral: Sentence 1 is missing getting his picture.
premise: A man striking a pose as one man with a bike, and another man in the background watch. hypothesis: A man is watching another man pose with a bike.
entailment: One man decides to watch in the background as another is striking a pose is the same thing as saying that he is watching another man pose with a bike.
premise: A man striking a pose as one man with a bike, and another man in the background watch. hypothesis: A man is sleeping on the sidewalk while a man walks by.
contradiction: The man can not be striking a pose, or watching from the background if he is sleeping on the sidewalk.
premise: Two boys in all black standing next to both a bike and a tree. hypothesis: The class was sitting in school bored.
contradiction: Two boys does not make an entire class. They cannot be sitting in school bored and standing next to a bike and tree simultaneously.
premise: Two boys in all black standing next to both a bike and a tree. hypothesis: Next to the tree were a bike and two boys.
entailment: boys standing next to both a bike and a tree is the same as the tree being next to the bike and the boys.
premise: Two boys in all black standing next to both a bike and a tree. hypothesis: The boys were planning to climb the tree.
neutral: two boys standing next to tree does not imply they are planning to climb it.
premise: Five black dogs running across the grass. hypothesis: A group of dogs inside a store.
contradiction: The dogs could not be on the grass while they are inside a store.
premise: Five black dogs running across the grass. hypothesis: Dogs running outside in public.
entailment: Dogs usually run on grass which is outside.
premise: Five black dogs running across the grass. hypothesis: A couple of dogs playing at a park.
neutral: Running across the grass does not imply playing at a park.
premise: A small crowd gathered at a local seaman monument holding umbrellas. hypothesis: A crowd braves the rain at a funeral near a monument.
neutral: The crowd holding umbrellas does not mean they braves the rain.
premise: A small crowd gathered at a local seaman monument holding umbrellas. hypothesis: A single person at the local seafood restaurant orders crabs.
contradiction: A small crowd refers to a group of people not a single person. People are not usually holding umbrellas inside a restaurant. They cannot be at a seaman monument and a seafood restaurant at the same time.
premise: A small crowd gathered at a local seaman monument holding umbrellas. hypothesis: A crowd holds umbrellas near a monument.
entailment: Holding is a different way of saying holds. When people are at a monument they are usually near it.
premise: A bunch of Africans are playing soccer on a sandy beach. hypothesis: 22 people are playing soccer together.
neutral: 22 can be more than a bunch.
premise: A bunch of Africans are playing soccer on a sandy beach. hypothesis: People are playing soccer.
entailment: A bunch of Africans are people.
premise: A bunch of Africans are playing soccer on a sandy beach. hypothesis: There is no soccer ball.
contradiction: They could not be playing soccer if there is no soccer ball.
premise: Injured solders covered in bandages sit in wheelchairs that are pushed by their fellow warriors. hypothesis: Injured solders covered in bandages joyously sit.
neutral: Sit does not imply joyously sit.
premise: Injured solders covered in bandages sit in wheelchairs that are pushed by their fellow warriors. hypothesis: Injured solders covered in bandages sit.
entailment: If in wheelchairs, the injured soldiers would be sitting.
premise: Injured solders covered in bandages sit in wheelchairs that are pushed by their fellow warriors. hypothesis: Injured solders covered in bandages don't sit.
contradiction: Sit is opposite of don't sit.
premise: A man kicks up dust on as he rides a four-wheeler, with a crystal blue sky in the background. hypothesis: A man is riding a four-wheeler.
entailment: someone who rides a four-wheeler is riding a four-wheeler.
premise: A man kicks up dust on as he rides a four-wheeler, with a crystal blue sky in the background. hypothesis: The man is on his way home from the ATV park.
neutral: four-wheeler, doesn't always mean ATV park.
premise: A man kicks up dust on as he rides a four-wheeler, with a crystal blue sky in the background. hypothesis: The man is riding a horse down the road.
contradiction: The man is either riding a horse or a four-wheeler, but cannot be on both simultaneously. A four-wheeler is not legal to drive down the road.
premise: A man kicks up dust on as he rides a four-wheeler, with a crystal blue sky in the background. hypothesis: A man is about to fall off the four-wheeler.
neutral: rides doesn't always mean fall off.
premise: A man kicks up dust on as he rides a four-wheeler, with a crystal blue sky in the background. hypothesis: A four-wheeler is riding the man.
contradiction: A four-wheeler is an automotive and cannot ride a man, therefor the man would have to be riding the four-wheeler.
premise: A man kicks up dust on as he rides a four-wheeler, with a crystal blue sky in the background. hypothesis: A racer is going towards the finish.
neutral: man doesn't always mean racer.
premise: A man kicks up dust on as he rides a four-wheeler, with a crystal blue sky in the background. hypothesis: It rained the previous day.
neutral: dust doesn't always mean rained.
premise: A man kicks up dust on as he rides a four-wheeler, with a crystal blue sky in the background. hypothesis: A man is riding a four-wheeler.
entailment: man rides a four-wheeler is same as man is riding a four-wheeler.
premise: A man kicks up dust on as he rides a four-wheeler, with a crystal blue sky in the background. hypothesis: A vehicle travels outdoors.
entailment: A four-wheeler is a vehicle with four wheels. If it kicks up dust with the sky in the background, then it travels outdoors.
premise: A man kicks up dust on as he rides a four-wheeler, with a crystal blue sky in the background. hypothesis: The sky is clear and not raining.
entailment: A crystal blue sky means the sky is clear and it is not raining.
premise: A man kicks up dust on as he rides a four-wheeler, with a crystal blue sky in the background. hypothesis: There is a man riding an ATV.
entailment: An ATV is a four-wheeler drive.
premise: A man kicks up dust on as he rides a four-wheeler, with a crystal blue sky in the background. hypothesis: A man is doing tricks on his four-wheeler.
neutral: kicks up dust doesn't always mean tricks.
premise: A man kicks up dust on as he rides a four-wheeler, with a crystal blue sky in the background. hypothesis: The man is kicking a football.
contradiction: The man cannot be kicking a football and kicking up dust simultaneously. The man cannot kick a football and ride a four-wheeler simultaneously.
premise: A man kicks up dust on as he rides a four-wheeler, with a crystal blue sky in the background. hypothesis: A four-wheeler stands unmoving in a garage.
contradiction: The four-wheeler cannot be standing unmoving in a garage if the man is riding it.
premise: A man kicks up dust on as he rides a four-wheeler, with a crystal blue sky in the background. hypothesis: A man is riding a motorcycle on a highway.
contradiction: A four-wheeler is an ATV and a motorcycle is a motorized bike. The man cannot be riding both simultaneously.
premise: The low sun is casting a shadow of the person on the wall behind them. hypothesis: A model poses for the camera.
neutral: Not everyone who casts a shadow is a model posing for a camera.
premise: The low sun is casting a shadow of the person on the wall behind them. hypothesis: A man shops for groceries at Walmart.
contradiction: The first sentence indicates that the character is outside with the sun casting a shadow on a wall, but the second story indicates that they are clearly in a Walmart.
premise: The low sun is casting a shadow of the person on the wall behind them. hypothesis: A human is making a shadow.
entailment: Casting a shadow is a rephrasing of making a shadow, and person is a human.
premise: A man with a blue jacket and glasses is sitting on a stool. hypothesis: A man is sitting in a chair at a dinner table.
contradiction: The man cannot be sitting on a stool and a chair simultaneously. There are not usually stools at a dinner table.
premise: A man with a blue jacket and glasses is sitting on a stool. hypothesis: A man is sitting on a stool.
entailment: There is a man sitting on a stool.
premise: A man with a blue jacket and glasses is sitting on a stool. hypothesis: A man is sitting on a stool while he waits for his friend to show up.
neutral: sitting doesn't always mean waits for his friend.
premise: Older Asian man looks on while sitting in his shop. hypothesis: Asian man outside, jogging.
contradiction: The man would not be outside jogging if he is sitting in his shop.
premise: Older Asian man looks on while sitting in his shop. hypothesis: Asian man with a white beard.
neutral: shop. doesn't always mean white beard.
premise: Older Asian man looks on while sitting in his shop. hypothesis: Asian man sitting in his shop.
entailment: There is an Asian man sitting in his shop.
premise: A man in a blue jackets sits on a stool. hypothesis: The person sits on a tall seat.
entailment: A man is an adult male person. A stool is a tall seat.
premise: A man in a blue jackets sits on a stool. hypothesis: The man wears a bright green jacket.
contradiction: The blue jacket is not green.
premise: A man in a blue jackets sits on a stool. hypothesis: The man is sitting at a bar.
neutral: stool. doesn't always mean bar.
premise: A construction worker in a gray shirt and jeans crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials. hypothesis: The worker is fixing the pothole on the road.
neutral: materials doesn't always mean fixing the pothole.
premise: A construction worker in a gray shirt and jeans crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials. hypothesis: The worker is making the bed.
contradiction: The worker is crouching next to an orange bucket and white bags probably at work, not making the bed.
premise: A construction worker in a gray shirt and jeans crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials. hypothesis: He is pulling something out of the bucket.
neutral: materials doesn't always mean . pulling something.
premise: A construction worker in a gray shirt and jeans crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials. hypothesis: A male construction worker crouches next to bags of materials.
neutral: worker doesn't always mean male.
premise: A construction worker in a gray shirt and jeans crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials. hypothesis: The man is standing.
contradiction: The worker is crouching, not standing up.
premise: A construction worker in a gray shirt and jeans crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials. hypothesis: Construction worker planning next step.
neutral: crouches doesn't always mean planning.
premise: A construction worker in a gray shirt and jeans crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials. hypothesis: Guy takes break to read a book.
contradiction: The worker crouches next to a bucket and white bag which isn't a good spot to take a break and read a book.
premise: A construction worker in a gray shirt and jeans crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials. hypothesis: A construction worker is jumping of a building.
contradiction: The worker crouches next to an orange bucket and white bags so isn't jumping off a building.
premise: A construction worker in a gray shirt and jeans crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials. hypothesis: The man has clothing on.
entailment: A gray shirt and jeans are clothing to put on, sometimes by construction workers.
premise: A construction worker in a gray shirt and jeans crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials. hypothesis: a photographer poses in a mirror.
contradiction: The construction worker isn't a photographer. The worker crouches next to a bucket which isn't posing in a mirror.
premise: A construction worker in a gray shirt and jeans crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials. hypothesis: The person is doing construction work.
entailment: A construction worker who crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials is doing construction work.
premise: A construction worker in a gray shirt and jeans crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials. hypothesis: A person crouches next to a bucket.
entailment: There is a person who crouches next to a orange bucket.
premise: A construction worker in a gray shirt and jeans crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials. hypothesis: a worker crouches near a bucket and bag.
entailment: A bucket doesn't always have to be orange.
premise: A construction worker in a gray shirt and jeans crouches next to a orange bucket and white bags of materials. hypothesis: a worker finds a tool in a heap.
neutral: materials doesn't always mean .a tool.