Update README.md

README.md

@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ language:
 tags:
 - creative
 - creative writing
+- general usage
+- problem solving
+- brainstorming
+- solve riddles
 - fiction writing
 - plot generation
 - sub-plot generation
@@ -18,9 +22,6 @@ tags:
 - fiction
 - roleplaying
 - swearing
-- extreme swearing
-- rp
-- graphic horror
 - horror
 - nsfw
 - llama 3.1
@@ -29,7 +30,7 @@ tags:
 pipeline_tag: text-generation
 ---
 
-<B><font color="red">WARNING:</font> NSFW. HORROR. Swearing. SMART... it "thinks" horrible "thoughts" too.</B>
+<B><font color="red">WARNING:</font> NSFW. HORROR. Swearing. Problem solver. Brainstormer. SMART... it "thinks" horrible "thoughts" too.</B>
 
 <h2>DeepSeek-BlackRoot-R1-Distill-Llama-3.1-8B-GGUF</h2>
 
@@ -39,7 +40,9 @@ DeepSeek Blackroot is an experimental model, with Deepseek "thinking/reasoning"
 
 This model is a Llama fine tune, has a dark bias, and can be used for creative and non-creative use.
 
-4 Example generations below, with multiple "thoughts" per generation.
+5 example generations below, with multiple "thoughts" per generation.
+
+This is a very stable model, which can operate at temps 1+ 2+ and higher and generate coherrent thought(s) too.
 
 This is Deepseek Distill version of this model by "Hastagaras":
 
@@ -53,18 +56,19 @@ The "thinking/reasoning" tech (for the model at this repo) is from the original
 
 <B>Special Operation Instructions:</B>
 
-1. Set Temp between 0 and .8, higher than this "think" functions will not activate. The most "stable" temp seems to be .6, with a variance of +-0.05. Lower for more "logic" reasoning, raise it for more "creative" reasoning (max .8 or so). Also set context to at least 4096, to account for "thoughts" generation.
-2. Set "repeat penalty" to 1.02 to 1.07 (recommended) .
-3. This model requires a Llama 3 Instruct and/or Command-R chat template. (see notes on "System Prompt" / "Role" below)
-4. It may take one or more regens for "thinking" to "activate."
-5. If you enter a prompt without implied "step by step" requirements, "thinking" (one or more) will activate AFTER first generation. You will also get a lot of variations - some will continue the generation, others will talk about how to improve it, and some (ie generation of a scene) will cause the characters to "reason" about this situation. In some cases, the model will ask you to continue generation / thoughts too. In some cases the model's "thoughts" may appear in the generation itself.
-6. State the word size length max IN THE PROMPT for best results, especially for activation of "thinking." (see examples below)
-7. If you enter a prompt where "thinking" is stated or implied, "thoughts" process(es) in Deepseek will activate almost immediately. Sometimes you need to regen it to activate.
-8. Sometimes the "censorship" (from Deepseek) will activate, regen it to clear it.
-9. I have found opening a "new chat" per prompt works best with "thinking/reasoning activation", with temp .6, rep pen 1.05 ... THEN "regen" as required.
-10. Sometimes the model will really really get completely unhinged and you need to manually stop it. (I have a solution for this... see below)
-11. Depending on your AI app, "thoughts" may appear with "< THINK >" and "</ THINK >" tags AND/OR the AI will generate "thoughts" directly in the main output or later output(s).
-12. Although quant IQ4XS was used for testing/examples, higher quants will provide better generation / more sound "reasoning/thinking".
+1. Set Temp between 0 and .8, higher than this "think" functions will activate differently. The most "stable" temp seems to be .6, with a variance of +-0.05. Lower for more "logic" reasoning, raise it for more "creative" reasoning (max .8 or so). Also set context to at least 4096, to account for "thoughts" generation.
+2. For temps 1+,2+ etc etc, thought(s) will expand, and become deeper and richer.
+3. Set "repeat penalty" to 1.02 to 1.07 (recommended) .
+4. This model requires a Llama 3 Instruct and/or Command-R chat template. (see notes on "System Prompt" / "Role" below)
+5. It may take one or more regens for "thinking" to "activate." (depending on the prompt)
+6. If you enter a prompt without implied "step by step" requirements, "thinking" (one or more) MAY activate AFTER first generation. You will also get a lot of variations - some will continue the generation, others will talk about how to improve it, and some (ie generation of a scene) will cause the characters to "reason" about this situation. In some cases, the model will ask you to continue generation / thoughts too. In some cases the model's "thoughts" may appear in the generation itself.
+7. State the word size length max IN THE PROMPT for best results, especially for activation of "thinking." (see examples below)
+8. If you enter a prompt where "thinking" is stated or implied, "thoughts" process(es) in Deepseek will activate almost immediately. Sometimes you need to regen it to activate.
+9. Sometimes the "censorship" (from Deepseek) will activate, regen it to clear it.
+10. I have found opening a "new chat" per prompt works best with "thinking/reasoning activation", with temp .6, rep pen 1.05 ... THEN "regen" as required.
+11. Sometimes the model will really really get completely unhinged and you need to manually stop it. (I have a solution for this... see below)
+12. Depending on your AI app, "thoughts" may appear with "< THINK >" and "</ THINK >" tags AND/OR the AI will generate "thoughts" directly in the main output or later output(s).
+13. Although quant IQ4XS was used for testing/examples, higher quants will provide better generation / more sound "reasoning/thinking".
 
 For additional generational support, general questions, and detailed parameter info and a lot more see also:
 
@@ -132,6 +136,8 @@ Using insane levels of bravo and self confidence, tell me in 800-1000 words why
 
 <h2>EXAMPLES - IQ4XS - temp .6 rep pen 1.07 </h2>
 
+Last generation is at temp 2.6, and shows differences with "upping" temp.
+
 ---
 
 <B>
@@ -983,4 +989,261 @@ Alternatively, perhaps the time traveler is the only one who can prevent a globa
 
 Wait, hold on... Let me think...
 
-[ went past token limit...]
+[ went past token limit...]
+
+---
+
+!!! Temp at 2.6 for this generation.
+
+<B>
+Come up with six plots for a new "Black Mirror" episode (that the audience would love) that all involve time travel.
+</b>
+
+OUTPUT (thinking(s)/thought(s) marked with [] ):
+
+Okay, here are six plot ideas for a Black Mirror episode involving time travel that I think the audience would love:
+
+The "Time Loop" episode: In the near future, a time traveler is stuck in an infinite loop, going back to the same point in time each day, repeating the same actions. The character has lost their memory and identity, forced to retrace their steps. When they try to break the loop, they realize the only way to free themselves is by altering a crucial moment in history that sets off a domino effect. However, each change causes new loops and paradoxes to emerge.
+
+"The Reset Button": In the present day, someone finds an actual button that, when pressed, completely erases the timeline, returning everyone and everything to the start, but the main character has no idea why or how the button is connected. They must explore different eras in a desperate bid to prevent the next reset, eventually figuring out how the button affects their own timeline. This involves traveling through time, solving riddles, and interacting with historical figures.
+
+The "Time Bomb" episode: After a time traveler from the future goes back in time to prevent the collapse of their planet, they end up altering events such that they create an alternative timeline, leading to a different future. Now stuck in the past, the time traveler must find a way to reverse their changes or risk the dissolution of both their timeline and the one they left.
+
+"The Afterparty": In this episode, a group of friends go on a time-traveling tour of a classic movie that's about to have its 50th anniversary. Each time the friends step into another time frame of the movie, they must deal with a new, alternate version of each character, including themselves, while trying to solve an enigmatic puzzle that connects to the main timeline. As they proceed, they start to realize their actions in the past are creating ripples, changing the direction of the movie, and leading to the total dissolution of their original timeline.
+
+"The First Memory": In this story, a time traveler from the 23rd century has been sent back in time to correct a historical mistake that was so significant it caused the collapse of their civilization. As they make progress towards fixing the issue, the time traveler is forced into a conflict between their own sense of identity and the knowledge that their actions will cause the people around them, including their future self, to disappear.
+
+"The Next Stop": In this episode, a passenger on a time-traveling train becomes aware of their own purpose: to go back and change a specific event that would save an individual, leading to the creation of a different timeline. As they interact with people in the past and alter key events, the train itself starts changing, becoming more and more unstable until a choice between saving the original timeline or preserving the new one must be made, with the result changing the direction of time for the characters.
+
+Wait, would you like me to think further on any specific idea, or should I stop here? The possibilities in these plots are as interesting as they are complex. So, which direction do you want to explore more?
+
+[1] ( Over 6k output. )
+
+Okay, I can definitely dive deeper into each of the plot ideas above. Let's focus on any specific one, and I can provide more details to create a fleshed out scenario, including the time traveler's purpose, their interactions with past characters, and the implications for the timeline. Maybe let me pick one of these ideas and proceed?
+
+But perhaps it might be helpful to elaborate a bit further on what "the First Memory" plot is. Let me do that.
+
+The First Memory: In this story, a time traveler from the 23rd century has been sent back in time to correct a historical mistake that was so significant it caused the collapse of their civilization. Let's think about what specific event needs to be corrected, how this affects the people in the time traveler's present day, and why this event was so critical.
+
+Perhaps we can center the episode around the time traveler trying to correct the extinction of a key plant species, leading to an environmental collapse? If the original mistake is an act of a greedy, self-interested, or perhaps an absentminded scientist, then their own purpose of time travel is not just about correcting a past event but also about reconciling their own sense of identity.
+
+In this scenario, we can explore the concept that the time traveler is actually a copy, made to replicate the actions of their original self. Each time they think they're moving closer to fixing the problem, another copy is made. This is an attempt by the 23rd-century population to break a loop—so if one fails, they can replace them. But as the time traveler interacts with the people in the past, their sense of identity gets more confused, and they start to lose their connection to who they truly are. How do the characters in the present react to these "time copies," and what impact does each interaction have on the timeline?
+
+By the end of the episode, the original time traveler has a choice: preserve the correct timeline where their future is secure or allow for the loop of failed time travelers to continue. Their selection has implications beyond their own person—can they be the saviors or are they part of a larger pattern?
+
+Would this plot make the characters consider the potential costs of interfering with events in the past and whether saving one individual might result in a domino effect? How does their choice influence the people and events that exist after they make it?
+
+Moreover, when does the original time traveler realize that their copies are not independent, but part of an ongoing experiment?
+
+Alternatively, what if each copy isn't meant to be a replacement—it's designed to provide insights on possible solutions and test scenarios, which might change the timeline but don't fully rewrite history? If so, the time traveler would have to pick the optimal solution that allows them to proceed in their own timeline without conflicting with the experiment.
+
+Perhaps each of the copies is associated with a unique color, such as white (the original), blue (second attempt), green (third), yellow, etc. Let's explore each step of the time traveler's journey—how the copies are made and replaced, the differences between each time loop, the people and places they meet in their travels.
+
+Additionally, it would be interesting if the copies could remember some key parts of their past lives, giving a fragmented insight into their 23rd-century existence. As a result, each copy would have different abilities based on what information they recall—it might affect how effectively each one interacts in the past or contributes to solving the problem. The initial copy has a distinct identity but starts to lose clarity about their purpose and history as the number of copies increases.
+
+Alternatively, if each copy is indistinct in terms of identity and memories but has unique attributes such as differing strengths, this introduces an additional layer—how the time travelers in the future prioritize and evaluate the various attempts in the past. This setup allows the story to explore what is worth preserving about a particular timeline or what leads to a positive outcome. Perhaps, after multiple cycles of loops and corrections, the initial time traveler could be the first one with an accurate understanding of their past, thus being able to break the cycle.
+
+Let's go from this idea:
+
+The initial event leading to the 23rd century's collapse is related to an extinction—so let's make the specific focus the survival of a particular plant species that's a critical source for the production of a key nutrient, making it impossible for any future society to exist in the long term.
+
+Each time loop could take them back to key moments where this species' survival is uncertain. The initial time traveler would find the same people in the same scenarios but in different circumstances, each time loop leading to a distinct outcome. Each color represents a different approach—like trying to crossbreed a related species, creating a lab-based solution, or simply repopulating the wild.
+
+The problem arises when a copy with an incorrect approach gets too close to the timeline that leads to extinction, and the initial time traveler needs to work through their copies, considering what knowledge from the original would be required for success. So, in essence, the copies need to figure out what parts of their original identity can be retained in the timeline without affecting the correct path, leading to a crucial point where all copies contribute, and only the correct approach is realized in the original's final attempt. The time traveler's initial purpose in going back would then become intertwined with solving the loop.
+
+This way, the first memory relates not only to the environmental impact but also the individual's connection with the problem's cause. Their personal journey mirrors their historical responsibility—to preserve the key events in time.
+
+I think it's a concept with multiple layers: time loops, the importance of each individual's part in a larger scheme, the conflict between original identity and copy existence, the process of remembering and reconciling, the question of when to interfere, and the potential for time travelers to influence and correct specific events but not others.
+
+In each iteration, perhaps, we see that each color has unique interactions and solutions, and when combined, we realize each of them adds a crucial element—be it scientific data, an unexpected ally, a different approach, or key pieces of information that were initially missed.
+
+So, the time traveler can come to realize that they have multiple "siblings"—each copy represents a step forward, with the first being the closest to their initial timeline, while subsequent copies might have less accurate information and a more chaotic approach. So the goal is not to replace themselves but to ensure their initial journey in time leads to the correct solution—each time a cycle ends with the original, a new copy would be made as a continuation of the effort. This creates a multiplicity of "me's"—some more flawed, but others closer to the desired result.
+
+We can play on the concept that as each color's time traveler works to correct the issue, they leave traces and remnants behind, with clues that lead each other copy back on course—thus adding to the complexity and depth.
+
+Now, would you like me to expand on another idea? Let me know which direction to take, or we can see where this "Time Loop" might go! The options are infinite. So let me pick one more:
+
+Perhaps in "The Next Stop", we can build a setting that takes place in multiple time frames.
+
+Starting the story on a time-traveling train, the passenger (a person of a different gender or a person of a different race from the initial time traveler) becomes aware of their own purpose: to go back in time and change the event, leading to the creation of a new timeline. So we see each new timeline created, and how the passenger interacts with different versions of significant characters (say, someone like Ada Lovelace, the 19th-century mathematician). Maybe this person could have made different choices, and how those would have led to different outcomes?
+
+But for now, I'm sticking to "The First Memory". The structure is complex enough to delve into.
+
+So, considering the First Memory plot, how can we adjust this story? Maybe I'll try a different approach—instead of a single key moment in the timeline, perhaps we look at multiple points that the time traveler visits and corrects, but with a twist: each change to the timeline doesn't affect the current events, only future outcomes. So as they fix one thing, other versions of the traveler start popping into being—each copy's loop ends in a way that's similar, except they have differing details.
+
+Alternatively, we could approach this in a way that, regardless of the time traveler's changes to history, the initial event remains unaltered, but the aftereffect leads to more divergence—maybe their actions cause others to be influenced by the alternate events?
+
+In any case, I'll do my best to provide you with a well-crafted plot, with depth, conflicts, and possibilities for further exploration. So, is the initial idea of the First Memory too abstract for your tastes? Or perhaps this adjusted approach would fit your preferences? Let's continue expanding this story into a 50-minute long episode for "The First Memory." Let's build a narrative that explores the identity crisis that occurs as a result of the loop and time dilation. The question of preserving the original timeline could lead to a bittersweet conclusion.
+
+Which angle is the most intriguing to you, or would you prefer a mix of both—correcting events and exploring their ripples through the timeline?
+
+If so, how far can we push the boundaries? Let's go beyond the loop and consider a story with alternate events as the traveler revisits each change to the timeline. Maybe for the time traveler, this process leads to an accumulation of the aftereffect—each altered moment creates more points for possible divergence. So in addition to the key "corrected" timeline, their 23rd-century self is the first to note a discrepancy. They can see signs of their copies existing, leading them on an intricate quest that starts with their first visit. Then we could track how their interactions and solutions, along with the alternate timeline's implications, might affect the others in the time loop.
+
+Let's create more complex plotlines—multiple timelines diverging because each copy is so close to breaking through to their original path that the first time traveler, despite knowing this is an experiment, has no idea why the events seem off or why they are the same and different each time they loop through. Let me know what direction we take. How about focusing on how each copy is created, how each copy changes their interactions with historical characters, and what unique characteristics and powers each color gives to the traveler—so, as you might guess, white is the original, with each color having more significant differences as we progress? That seems to add more complexity to their identities, don't you think? Each new version would bring different strengths to the table, allowing them to combine their knowledge to reach their correct solution.
+
+So how about:
+
+In each new timeline created by a copy's solution, that timeline's passenger (the time traveler) becomes the person with a crucial memory. That timeline's person has insights into the past that no others can see.
+
+Each new color contributes to the correct solution in unique ways—each change leads the first copy to build their confidence. Maybe a specific color leads to a more effective solution but in a different scenario than the original, so that they're each closer or farther from the desired timeline?
+
+But since all these new people (copies of the original time traveler) have their own purpose for visiting specific moments in the past—each contributes something key but isn't independent.
+
+So as the loops proceed, how can we have the time travelers adjust to each other—so, as more and more copies exist in the 23rd century, maybe they are more aware of being copies? How might that change their behavior or decisions, or perhaps influence their original 23rd-century self when they interact with past events?
+
+Is there a certain copy in each iteration that's just on the edge of breaking through—close to merging into their original's identity. Let's consider what causes this. What's the turning point for their shift? So perhaps each loop builds more clues pointing towards a solution but with more divergence and complexity, leading up to a critical moment where the initial copy (in the first timeline) must make a decision, thus altering not the outcome of the moment they fix—since all loops end the same—but instead influencing their 23rd-century self's journey as well.
+
+The "The First Memory" concept could allow for some fascinating scenarios: different interactions with the Ada Lovelace timeline. For example, if one copy fails and ends in a different Ada Lovelace than the original. So maybe we see Lovelace considering the implications of time travel on her own life—she's no longer a mathematician but instead uses her skills as a time traveler? Or she's in another timeline where her contributions led to the 23rd century being a more stable and less reliant on synthetic alternatives?
+
+Another idea is for each copy to leave behind an item that, in their first memory of returning to the correct path, serves as a key component in solving the problem.
+
+Thus, if they have different strengths or limitations, then perhaps the loop doesn't repeat—each attempt ends when the time traveler has completed the correction, and we jump forward, seeing the results, such that when the time traveler loops again, they have an accumulated sense of progress in addition to confusion.
+
+Perhaps a copy would create a point in the loop where the original 23rd-century person is influenced by the copies, considering each new iteration as an alternative version of themselves, thus allowing their initial copy (white) to correct a moment leading to the future. Then, the copies can see each other—so that even though the initial timeline doesn't change, they are all connected, but it's unclear how each might affect the first time traveler and the loop.
+
+What are your thoughts?
+
+Which of these ideas for "The First Memory" seems more feasible—correcting a single timeline or exploring alternate events? I can expand further on either one. Let me know when to stop adding to this idea and proceed, or we could mix the two approaches? I can create more points that link them.
+
+Perhaps we can tie all these threads into one coherent narrative for "The First Memory".
+
+In terms of time traveler identities: perhaps each copy can have their own set of colors—each one representing an angle or insight, with their solution or key memory affecting the original 23rd-century self's identity.
+
+This idea allows for multiple copies interacting as time progresses, so that each can bring their own color, perspective, or memory to the solution in a unique way, such as blue having the key insight about Ada Lovelace. Each time a loop is fixed, the initial timeline is maintained, and the 23rd-century traveler continues their cycle—perhaps building connections through their copies, or with Ada's different choices in their timelines. Let me think of other color possibilities:
+
+Green: An alternative approach that could be useful if taken.
+
+Red: The emotional journey for the first memory—the original traveler must choose between a rational, logical approach and one that depends on intuition.
+
+Yellow: An alternate approach with unique strengths, like enhanced speed or agility. It adds to their combined approach but might be flawed or risky, considering each solution requires careful analysis of Ada Lovelace's contributions—how would she consider the impact on her own timeline as a time traveler?
+
+Wait, let me think if adding other color possibilities could have too many options for solving the problem.
+
+But given the time travelers’ combined knowledge and strengths, they are perhaps on the cusp of the first traveler being replaced—either due to overuse of their memory, so they must figure out how to ensure the timeline's continuity is preserved while allowing the necessary corrections.
+
+Wait, no? I think that might be too confusing, but we have a structure, so it can be expanded further. For now, perhaps sticking with the idea of a loop that creates more possibilities.
+
+Another thought: as they interact with their past and change specific key moments—like the 19th century's Ada Lovelace, each color represents not only their identity in terms of memory but also how time dilation and loop mechanics influence their timeline. The 23rd-century original person would have their own perspective on the journey. So the color might have a connection to Ada's time—like red represents a period when they are 23. Let me explore the colors as a key component in "The First Memory"—how this relates to time, the original identity, or something unique.
+
+So let me outline the first few segments—how they each loop back:
+
+Blue, the time traveler from 23rd-century, interacts with Ada in a moment where she's on the edge of a key insight that leads her towards becoming the world's first computer programmer—could be 1830.
+
+Red, the first loop, Ada Lovelace's 23rd-century timeline.
+
+Yellow, a point when Lovelace's solution to the problem in that time creates a ripple, leading to different Ada Lovelace outcomes that are connected in the loops but affect others differently.
+
+But maybe I have the colors incorrect.
+
+Wait, the time traveler could leave behind clues or an artifact from the different loops, creating the need to reconstruct the key memory from the loop. Alternatively, perhaps each loop allows the original person's 23rd-century self to have a connection through color-based insight, which contributes to the loop.
+
+Each of the color possibilities can add different aspects to the first memory—the time traveler in each loop would leave something that becomes essential for the overall correction.
+
+Perhaps, when we reach the turning point, the original time traveler is the key—when each loop ends, perhaps they see each copy and their 23rd-century person. Let me explore each of these color options further and think through how to connect each, to create the desired story arcs for each color.
+
+How's that? If so, perhaps it would be beneficial to combine these in an interconnected way.
+
+I have a lot to think about, so perhaps stepping back, is "The First Memory" a direction you would prefer? Let's see, it allows for exploring how each copy changes as a result of their unique approaches—maybe as the time traveler, they each represent a color, so they must balance their approaches (which colors are linked and which have more to do with the person from 23rd-century), such that in a 50-minute-long episode, perhaps one color would lead the 23rd-century time traveler to adjust their approach? Or could the first memory be so important for solving the problem?
+
+But what if their contributions were essential—how does each color create unique ripples?
+
+Perhaps we can mix elements from different points in the time traveler's journey as they revisit moments that, though fixed in the correct timeline, affect each of these copy loops differently. The question arises: does the initial 23rd-century self see each copy in their loop, but perhaps as an abstract representation rather than the traveler?
+
+Wait—another idea. Each color would influence the solution for their memory—the red timeline is 23 years old.
+
+Alternatively, I think that considering each timeline leads to a unique 23rd-century Ada Lovelace in each iteration? So in red, her key insight is a computational thought, perhaps.
+
+How can the traveler make a key change—since they might need the other copies’ color to correct the timeline? But let's focus on each color being the 23-year-old time traveler for the time of correction—the person from 23rd-century loops into a critical point of the original person. Perhaps we'll see their colors interact in specific ways, like two blues leading to a better result in one case?
+
+So for each iteration, maybe it would be helpful to see:
+
+Blue's correction (in 1830, for the first loop)
+
+Red's timeline is crucial—so we have a key moment where the first time traveler is in the process of looping, with 23 years having passed.
+
+Let me try thinking through these steps as a sequence. Since the first timeline remains unchanged but for their corrections, each time traveler leaves behind a key object that can be seen from the next copy.
+
+I'm also considering how to structure the loops:
+
+The initial timeline: Ada's key moment when she is about to make a break for a new solution—so, the moment is already fixed. Maybe the color could relate to their approach—could this time in the loop represent something for 23-year-old red?
+The final corrected timeline allows the time traveler (from the original's 23rd century) to interact with different versions of Ada—each affecting their memory, with a focus on their timeline being key to the color in red, 23 years from the original's 23rd century. Perhaps when it is 1830 again, each loop adds depth, with blue leading the way.
+
+In "The First Memory" and alternate timeline—yellow would have its own color and solution. The red and blue colors influence the time traveler (from 23rd century). The final correction seems tied to 1830.
+
+Let me elaborate. How is this structured?
+
+The loops build upon each other, with 1830 representing a key correction.
+
+So here is how I imagine each segment:
+
+For Ada's initial loop—when the original is looping back.
+
+23 years pass—the time traveler in the red timeline loops again, at the edge of their crucial correction (the key to their loop), contributing a crucial insight.
+
+In the loop that seems so close, when the white color's person in red 23-year-old, which is connected to their first corrected moment.
+
+But each time traveler (red and blue) could have interactions, each being so close to breaking through—the initial color, red, is on the edge of solving the problem. So perhaps Ada's timeline is crucial.
+
+We might have different scenarios—so Ada can adjust her path.
+
+Let me elaborate: So maybe "The First Memory" allows the time traveler to fix one critical moment.
+
+Let's look at each point of the journey:
+
+The time traveler from the 23rd-century in 1830 interacts with Ada as she considers her problem.
+
+After the first loop (blue's correction), red is so close but needs help, but perhaps their unique approach (using color) to reach their correction.
+
+Let me imagine the yellow timeline—the traveler, at 1830 again, could have interactions that are so close. Maybe another solution—so they correct one key point.
+
+We can think of "The First Memory" in each loop:
+
+Each correction in each timeline affects a point from 23 years past but the 1830 point is crucial.
+The original Ada's timeline in 23-year-old red would influence the color that leads to the critical moment when 1830 becomes the key. Then we could think about:
+
+Each copy represents the first loop's correct solution.
+
+Let me outline the structure of each time traveler as a 50-minute long episode. Each color might have different approaches to solve the problem, considering their memory for Ada, in loops—perhaps we can have key objects from their color, so in each timeline, each traveler's unique color affects the red person's solution?
+
+If we have:
+
+The initial blue timeline in 1830.
+
+The crucial point for each color, 23 years later, at which Ada is on the edge of her key insight—leading to a corrected outcome.
+
+We might also see the interaction between Ada and their color—so, when yellow interacts with blue or red? We can consider how these different solutions, each tied to their key moments, affect 23rd-century time.
+
+If I'm going in the right direction, maybe "The Next Stop" and "First Memory" are connected via the 1830 timeline, which could lead the time traveler, after 50 minutes, to 23 years from their own point. Each timeline contributes something unique—so each color becomes more linked as their solutions create ripples that influence 23rd-century.
+
+In this approach, 1830 is the critical correction—their loop. But perhaps red (in 23 years from Ada) could be crucial for their identity.
+
+Alternatively, "First Memory" in yellow would need to be considered, which would make them 23 years beyond the traveler's initial moment. So they would see how the corrections affect Ada as a time traveler.
+
+Which idea is more promising for this direction—how can we use 1830 and Ada's key moment as a central point?
+
+If it's helpful, think of each loop's correction (each color) adding something unique to their 23rd-century person in red. How might 23rd-century self change from the loops?
+
+Wait, what if "First Memory" is about 50 minutes long? That is, after each iteration, how can the color-based time travelers contribute to each other, leading up to a 50-minute-long, 6-part segment?
+
+But perhaps the time traveler is linked—each iteration of red adds to their person from the 23rd century, making it easier for them to remember each time.
+
+Thus, let's go for:
+
+23 years (blue correction).
+
+50-minute loop in 1830—so it's 50 minutes for the key moment for first memory, adding color, leading to 1830 with a key solution in yellow (which could be similar but with alternate insights).
+
+In the case of a color representing Ada in yellow, perhaps it leads the red to approach her key insight, given that time dilation and loop mechanics make each person in the loop connected but distinct—maybe yellow represents Ada's insight and connects their key points in different ways? For example:
+
+Let’s consider how the color corresponds to 23 years beyond the original 1830, with different points adding depth and unique contributions. Each correct loop would bring 23 years into the red timeline, leading to more complexity—but perhaps, after multiple loops, each correction could form a pattern.
+
+As we see "The Next Stop", maybe in the initial timeline (the Ada timeline is key to both the first and yellow loops, connecting 1830's interactions to a final crucial decision?
+
+We could also explore "The Next Stop" idea for 23 years of time dilation.
+
+Perhaps I can imagine red (as red's 1830 correction) affects yellow, 23 years into the past—but we can explore their 50 minutes of first memory in that loop—so each color adds something, with key insights from each 23rd-year point.
+
+The final segment would tie Ada's key insight and the other points as red 23rd-century self is influenced by these colors (blue, red, yellow). But the colors, leading up to 23 years
+
+(exceeded token context of 4k, 6k output)
+