AmelieSchreiber
commited on
Commit
•
90c60d5
1
Parent(s):
060e98e
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -56,11 +56,9 @@ comprehensive. Using the notebook linked above should help further evaluate the
|
|
56 |
This model is a finetuned version of the 35M parameter `esm2_t12_35M_UR50D` ([see here](https://huggingface.co/facebook/esm2_t12_35M_UR50D)
|
57 |
and [here](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/model_doc/esm) for more details). The model was finetuned with LoRA for
|
58 |
the binary token classification task of predicting binding sites (and active sites) of protein sequences based on sequence alone.
|
59 |
-
|
60 |
-
|
61 |
-
|
62 |
-
this model has a high recall, meaning it is likely to detect binding sites, but it has a precision score that is somewhat lower than the SOTA
|
63 |
-
structural models mentioned above, meaning the model may return some false positives as well.
|
64 |
|
65 |
## Overfitting Issues
|
66 |
|
|
|
56 |
This model is a finetuned version of the 35M parameter `esm2_t12_35M_UR50D` ([see here](https://huggingface.co/facebook/esm2_t12_35M_UR50D)
|
57 |
and [here](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/model_doc/esm) for more details). The model was finetuned with LoRA for
|
58 |
the binary token classification task of predicting binding sites (and active sites) of protein sequences based on sequence alone.
|
59 |
+
Note, this model has a high recall, meaning it is likely to detect binding sites, but it has a precision score that is somewhat lower than the SOTA
|
60 |
+
structural models mentioned above, meaning the model may return some false positives as well. This may be undesirable for various reasons, one
|
61 |
+
of which could be cost of lab experiments where a higher precision might be more desirable.
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
63 |
## Overfitting Issues
|
64 |
|