AmelieSchreiber commited on
Commit
060e98e
1 Parent(s): 1121e0e

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +1 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ comprehensive. Using the notebook linked above should help further evaluate the
55
 
56
  This model is a finetuned version of the 35M parameter `esm2_t12_35M_UR50D` ([see here](https://huggingface.co/facebook/esm2_t12_35M_UR50D)
57
  and [here](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/model_doc/esm) for more details). The model was finetuned with LoRA for
58
- the binay token classification task of predicting binding sites (and active sites) of protein sequences based on sequence alone.
59
  The model may need more training, however it still achieves better performance on the test set in terms of loss, accuracy,
60
  precision, recall, F1 score, ROC_AUC, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) compared to the models trained on the smaller
61
  dataset [found here](https://huggingface.co/datasets/AmelieSchreiber/binding_sites_random_split_by_family) of ~209K protein sequences. Note,
 
55
 
56
  This model is a finetuned version of the 35M parameter `esm2_t12_35M_UR50D` ([see here](https://huggingface.co/facebook/esm2_t12_35M_UR50D)
57
  and [here](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/model_doc/esm) for more details). The model was finetuned with LoRA for
58
+ the binary token classification task of predicting binding sites (and active sites) of protein sequences based on sequence alone.
59
  The model may need more training, however it still achieves better performance on the test set in terms of loss, accuracy,
60
  precision, recall, F1 score, ROC_AUC, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) compared to the models trained on the smaller
61
  dataset [found here](https://huggingface.co/datasets/AmelieSchreiber/binding_sites_random_split_by_family) of ~209K protein sequences. Note,