|
{ |
|
"_name_or_path": "law-ai/InLegalBERT", |
|
"architectures": [ |
|
"BertForSequenceClassification" |
|
], |
|
"attention_probs_dropout_prob": 0.1, |
|
"bos_token_id": 0, |
|
"classifier_dropout": null, |
|
"eos_token_ids": 0, |
|
"hidden_act": "gelu", |
|
"hidden_dropout_prob": 0.1, |
|
"hidden_size": 768, |
|
"id2label": { |
|
"0": "Issue", |
|
"1": "Court Discourse", |
|
"2": "Conclusion", |
|
"3": "Precedent Analysis", |
|
"4": "Section Analysis", |
|
"5": "Argument by Petitioner", |
|
"6": "Fact", |
|
"7": "Argument by Respondent", |
|
"8": "Ratio", |
|
"9": "Appellant", |
|
"10": "Respondent", |
|
"11": "Argument by Appellant", |
|
"12": "Petitioner", |
|
"13": "Judge", |
|
"14": "Argument by Defendant" |
|
}, |
|
"initializer_range": 0.02, |
|
"intermediate_size": 3072, |
|
"label2id": { |
|
"Appellant": 9, |
|
"Argument by Appellant": 11, |
|
"Argument by Defendant": 14, |
|
"Argument by Petitioner": 5, |
|
"Argument by Respondent": 7, |
|
"Conclusion": 2, |
|
"Court Discourse": 1, |
|
"Fact": 6, |
|
"Issue": 0, |
|
"Judge": 13, |
|
"Petitioner": 12, |
|
"Precedent Analysis": 3, |
|
"Ratio": 8, |
|
"Respondent": 10, |
|
"Section Analysis": 4 |
|
}, |
|
"layer_norm_eps": 1e-12, |
|
"max_position_embeddings": 512, |
|
"model_type": "bert", |
|
"num_attention_heads": 12, |
|
"num_hidden_layers": 12, |
|
"output_past": true, |
|
"pad_token_id": 0, |
|
"position_embedding_type": "absolute", |
|
"problem_type": "single_label_classification", |
|
"torch_dtype": "float32", |
|
"transformers_version": "4.38.2", |
|
"type_vocab_size": 2, |
|
"use_cache": true, |
|
"vocab_size": 30522 |
|
} |
|
|