Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ For example, the following figure demonstrates the advantages of using **LWM-bas
|
|
| 45 |
</p>
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
<p align="center">
|
| 48 |
-
<strong>Figure:</strong> This figure shows the F1-score comparison of models trained with wireless channels and their LWM embeddings for LoS/NLoS classification. CLS embeddings are 32× smaller than raw channels, while channel embeddings are 4× larger. Three embedding types are considered: (i) pre-trained LWM embeddings, (ii) embeddings of imperfect raw channels, and (iii)
|
| 49 |
</p>
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
---
|
|
|
|
| 45 |
</p>
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
<p align="center">
|
| 48 |
+
<sub><strong>Figure:</strong> This figure shows the F1-score comparison of models trained with wireless channels and their LWM embeddings for LoS/NLoS classification. CLS embeddings are 32× smaller than raw channels, while channel embeddings are 4× larger. Three embedding types are considered: (i) pre-trained LWM embeddings, (ii) embeddings of imperfect raw channels, and (iii) task-specific embeddings from a fine-tuned LWM.</sub>
|
| 49 |
</p>
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
---
|