update

prompts.json

@@ -37,9 +37,10 @@
             "### Motivation Profile ###",
             "{{MOTIVATION_PROFILE}}",
             "### Questions ###",
+
             "1. Write an overall short summary with the title: \"Profile summary (You)\" of the profile consider different traits and scores of that individual. When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you' instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores.",
-            "2. Analyze key strengths, weaknesses(area for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (High),.....,etc., do not output scores) with the title:  \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" for main profile and \"RISKS\" for red flag, considering the relationship between trait scores i.e. what the combination of scores tells us. in {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s professional role in the leadership context, considering relationship between trait scores i.e. what do the combination of scores tell us; If no Red Flags have HIGH, remove the Risks section, do not care about the risk if the socre is AVERAGE or LOW. When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"you\" instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores.",
-            "3. Analyze the motivation profile (In Bullet Points with headers (High Motivation, Average Motivation, Low Motivation), each header should have the trait analysis Reward, Connection,.....) with the title: \"Motivation (You)\". When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you' instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores.",
+            "2. Analyze only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile. Identify key strengths, weaknesses(area for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (High),.....,etc., do not output scores) with the title:  \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" for main profile and \"RISKS\" for red flag, considering the relationship between trait scores i.e. what the combination of scores tells us. in {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s professional role in the leadership context, considering relationship between trait scores i.e. what do the combination of scores tell us; If no Red Flags have HIGH, remove the Risks section, do not care about the risk if the socre is AVERAGE or LOW. When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"you\" instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores. Do not include any Motivation Profiles in this section.",
+            "3. Analyze only the Motivation profile (In Bullet Points with headers (High Motivation, Average Motivation, Low Motivation), each header should have the trait analysis Reward, Connection,.....) with the title: \"Motivation (You)\". When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you' instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores.",
             "Your response for each question should be very indepth and professional and organized under clear headings, with each point supported by specific examples from the {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s profiles and provide the individual at least 5 points for each question. Remember do not write any conclusion and do not disclose the bio, age, occupation, and PII."
         ],
         "ManagersSummary": [
@@ -79,7 +80,7 @@
             "{{MOTIVATION_PROFILE}}",
             "### Questions ###",
             "1. Write an overall short summary with the title: \"Profile summary\" of the profile consider different traits and scores of that individual. When answering this question, use name \"test-taker\" and do not include their real name, gender, tenure (length of service) or role. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores.",
-            "2. Analyze key strengths, weaknesses(area for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (High),.....,etc., do not output scores) with the title:  \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" for main profile and \"RISKS\" for red flag, considering the relationship between trait scores i.e. what the combination of scores tells us. in {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s professional role in the leadership context, considering relationship between trait scores i.e. what do the combination of scores tell us; If no Red Flags have HIGH, remove the Risks section, do not care about the risk if the socre is AVERAGE or LOW. When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"test-taker\" instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores.",
+            "2. Analyze only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile. Identify key strengths, weaknesses(area for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (High),.....,etc., do not output scores) with the title:  \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" for main profile and \"RISKS\" for red flag, considering the relationship between trait scores i.e. what the combination of scores tells us. in {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s professional role in the leadership context, considering relationship between trait scores i.e. what do the combination of scores tell us; If no Red Flags have HIGH, remove the Risks section, do not care about the risk if the socre is AVERAGE or LOW. When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"test-taker\" instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores. Do not include any Motivation Profiles in this section.",
             "3. Analyze the motivation profile (In Bullet Points with headers (High Motivation, Average Motivation, Low Motivation), each header should have the trait analysis Reward, Connection,.....) with the title: \"Motivation\". When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"test-taker\" instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores.",
             "Your response for each question should be very indepth and professional and organized under clear headings, with each point supported by specific examples from the {individual_name}'s profiles and provide the individual at least 5 points for each question. Remember do not write any conclusion."
         ],