update custom message

constants.py

@@ -120,19 +120,19 @@ Custom splits and potential data leakage during training can indeed lead to misl
 
 To address these concerns and ensure the reliability of metrics on the leaderboard:
 
-#### 1. Transparency in Training Data
+##### 1. Transparency in Training Data
 Model submissions should come with **detailed information about the training data** used, including whether they have seen the specific test sets used for evaluation. This **transparency enables the community to assess the validity of the results**.
 
-#### 2. Standardized Evaluation
+##### 2. Standardized Evaluation
 Promote the use of **standardized evaluation datasets and testing procedures across models**. This helps prevent data leakage and **ensures fair comparisons**.
 
-#### 3. Verification and Validation
+##### 3. Verification and Validation
 Implement verification processes to **check the integrity of submitted models**. This could include cross-validation checks to **identify any potential issues with custom splits or data leakage**.
 
-#### 4. Community Engagement
+##### 4. Community Engagement
 Encourage **active participation and feedback from the ASR community**. Regular discussions and collaborations can help **identify and address issues related to data integrity and model evaluations**.
 
-#### 5. Documentation
+##### 5. Documentation
 Models added to the leaderboard should **provide comprehensive documentation**, including information on **dataset usage, preprocessing steps, and any custom splits employed** during training.
 
 By focusing on these aspects, we can enhance trust in the metrics and evaluations within the ASR community and ensure that the models added to the leaderboard are reliable and accurately represent their performance. It's essential for the community to work together to maintain transparency and data integrity.