sophia_ai_robot_prophet / resources /greece /ANewSystemOrAnalysisOfAncientMythology-Vol2_djvu.txt
cryptocalypse's picture
sophia
8332c01
raw
history blame contribute delete
No virus
243 kB
I
p
F
(
I-
J
h
I
"l
H
L
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
b
J
T
ft
i
i-
r
(
r j
Vll
h
I
V
H
*
ai"-
b
h
1
i.
S
>
1
|h
b
?
1
1
h
k
1
I
i
F
I
I
L
I 1
I
l
b
"i
f
i*
4
t
h
hi
i
i
:■
ERRATA
*
r . i
I
>
i
"i
H,
H
*
I
>
«■
I
t
h
J
I
s
I
■l
J
J
E R R A T A
Page Line
S for ruffgpnjTH?, read Ko£spF»Tif£
30 20 for wVxI read conXinr&ro
19 J 3 oiJfcdt/is
2i 5 for fitTrsSgp/iyfljf, rwi aTsflup/afli/
30 17 /cr Phylera, mrdfPhilyra
5 for Appulia, read Apulia
34 11 for Schymnus* read Seymnus.
34 11 for Abderas, read Abderus.
\g for repofitary, read repofitory
1 for immediaily, read immediately.
45 22 for hsxiyj'rwiSi read sAHS^/TWFSf
51 14 for dxo%oi<rt, read tiKoyoxvi*
51 15 for Cercynians, read Cercyonians
54 14 for him* read her
5; 18 for fynonimous, read fynonymous.
61 20 for Hecat'opolos, read Hecatompulos
65 14 after and, infert in.
67 11 for Sogdiania, read Sogdiana.
97 note 30, for headfman, read headman.
101 21 for Strabrobrates, read Strabrobates,
13 13 for Hermadorns, read Hermodorus.
158 18 for ay 0 [jl cto-fl$ v > read oFojxewflgV
6 after and, infert it.
166 23 after cities, infert were.
2 for [jLa.!}}i[Aci,TntQ 4 , read (jLetQtfJtctTi&ot
184 19 for \j,vt av0[Aster > read [M^royoyLc ttfets
188 15 for Eiblus, read Byblus, pajjtm
253 13 for p’, read p
260 11 for infimulate, read infinuate.
298 II for JV 5 p £OIF t U £ Teti, read cT/Sf/WSUS 7 ctt
301 14 for rea d fxfiw
3 f Br lynonimous, read fynonymous
336 note 71, for cf'sJtcc^uiWOf, read /sxet //w?
370 note 28, for jtAUTpHF, read KtihVTr p«F.
400 2 for Nymphtenm, read Nymphrca, line 13, the fame
404 3 for iMTiacty read /zur/jut*
433 19 for %wox,r$v%ffiv 9 read ^woKTOVistriv
2 for Tolchus, read Jolcus
6
. j
34
40
43
y
159
18
j
r 1
L .
■ 333
k_i
I
i
\
477
b .
Yol. II
LK
\
1 1
I
\
I
A
h
h
*
I
p
r
I.
f
j
i
r
j
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
3
Torone likewife was a
if-t 1
<PAsypot, Phlegra, both
about it was in like manner called
I
in
l
There feems to have been a nre tower in this
for accord in cr to the ancient ac
troduced
region named Proteus
O
o
counts, Proteus is mentioned as having reuded in. thefe parts,
He is accord
and is faid to have been married to Torone
J
"A
ID
i,
srat
K oil
v
i
implies a bad cha
rafter, which arofe from the cruel rites praftifed in thefe
r
1
places
whom fortune brought in their way. Torone flood
b
Pallene, which was ftiled 5 Vriyspwv TPQtpog,
the nurfe
4
r i
neai
or grant brood\ Under this charafter both
L
0
4
the fons of Ghus, and the Anakim of Canaan are included
'cophron takes off fro in, Proteus the imputation of being
I
P
■i
Herod* L. 7; c, 123
H 'Kepgot’WG'QS) ^ bp t cp I Ktncti
Koccrcr avS'pBta 3 3>A By pence St ttpip BkxAblto
■£ 0 voq cc<re£t$
r
r n
■1
?i Ttgiv fj.sp rjor:^cacty pup JV
go x .guv cturnv ot uwuQfj&pot VtyccPTes
cwofJLov, StxabOv Epitome. L, 7>p.5ia>
T
XQLi
r
Lycophron, V. 1S5
1
Stephan us places Toroh
in Thrace, and fuppofes it to have been named
from Torone, who was not the wife, but daughter of Proteus. Atto 1
tjjs npGorecos. Some made her the daughter of* Pofeidon and Phosnice. See
Steph. <&A tyocuct. There were more towers than one of this name
ri«AAj?r;cu/£7T/jA()£ Tr f yBycop rpo<pov. Lycoph* V. 127
■4
r
GLGOVm
r
r
*
B 2
acce
P
* ^
h
T
*
t
h
.■-H
I
1
h
i
h
>
I
I
J.
I.
p
h
4
I
n
p
i
*
i"
I
4
I
I
I
1
J
I
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
40
0 UX 2 T S
MlWy
01
sTCLim
\ \
Mi
i
a? aura-
*
Some fuppofe Scylla to have been a dangerous rock; and
J.
H
that it was abominated on account of the frequent {hip
wrecks. There was a rock of that name, but attended
faxum efie, et quidem
non
was
l
which prevailed within, that made it fo detected. This
toms
temple was a Petra
hence Scylla
by Homer ftiled
is
was
■ I
pofed to have been {unrounded, were Cahen, or priefts
As there was a Men-tor in Crete, fo there was a
place of
1
the fame name
only revened,
Sicily, called Tor
in
men
1
- 1
I
and Tauromenium. There isreafon to think, that the fame
flood
the river
From hence
1
which the Greeks rendered Onoballus
of the Cyclopian build
was
with fomething of truth
i.J
ings
us
L.j
E
i
i_ d
we receive it la
him, that when Ulyffes entered the dangerous pais of
had fix of his comrades feized by Scylla
lum
1
V
1
J
Homer. -Odyu. M. V. 222
Epift.79
J
Ajiaff/Aa-is <f>oox.m>ci ‘h.o.i 'Ekztw rnv Xr-oAAxv Asysi. Xthuikopos S g, ev r?
SkuAAj), Axu.icti t m Xx'-iAAotv f /I0 i QuyaTSPa
V. 828.
t
Apollonius. Schol. L» 4
tivai
i
VOL. If
and
r 1
*
■=1
I
I
I
b
I
<
L
\
i
I
d
r
J
d
J
I
i
i
i
j
■i
h
J
S
I
4
I
I
H
I
I
L
I
b
1
H
I
P
4
I
I
I
\
i"
I
4
I
I
p
I
I
f
>
p
*
I
I
t
i
i
h
1
I
I
I
a".
L
a
H
h
a
h
i"
i
h
i
«■
T
K-
I
I
I
"i
"i
i
L
I
H
1
h
1
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
2 name
4
j* •
to wn
I
i_,
I
[
on ac
11
more
Iwl
ulv
>
4 r
are
*
n
covered with the bones of men
i ■ *
L -
ait i
as
nee
r
r n
53
t .
ue
accom
mns in
1
c
en
Nl
# 4
as we
f
have mentioned, that the
s of the
and
rj
Canaanites and Cretans were
c
i *
54
m
Ci
lTj
>
as were
$
r
s
But nothing can mew more
r
cru
P
i
r
re
s as
win**
ning, that nobody could withftand their fweetnefs
All
foothed with it; though their life
were
was
*
co
mane
Virgil. iEneid. L. 5. v. 873
M . See Nonnus. L. 19. p. a20v
5*
J
I
T
, 'J*
I
h
*
HV.
+
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
20
lJ
h
t
*
i
4
*
C
1
■I
VI
h
l
c
H
erous coaft
P
h
+
i
h i
S
I
entice 1
rcrs into
ft
r>
4
Nor
were maintained for a
twofold purpofe* both on account of their voices and their
They were accordingly very liberal of their fa
k
«
i
vours, and by- thefc means enticed fc
s
Lilt.
£
entertainment
f
a was a
L
I
%
t
r
s*
we have a fhort, but a mo ft perfect,
a
v
p.
J
rader
i-
4
to
5J/cyAA«, yyj/jj jutrcwatfQ t, oy
maienca
'n
KaxcLwm cui
Latine vertatur malefica non video. Si Grammaticis obtem
erat enim revera
c
_ J
n
e
r
I
c
L
im
der which charader
we are here to underftand the chief
ace, was no
}
a
i
i
L
I
0 ,
I
I
I
T
*
p
I
h
I
\
I
I
L
I
t
I
P
F
p
J
f 1
\
L
I
t
L
P
I
I
I
1
E-
\
\
I
I
I
i"
i"
I
I
J
I
i
p"
j
i
i
H
%
L
i
I
1
i
4
I
I
i
.J
r
"i
Fj
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
%
■ r '
J
K
as a
71
the river
eminence of this name, and calls it
! 7
. I
• j
J
1
7 *
/
h
I
r
s
Theoc. Idyll. 17. V. 47
Ariftoph. Bargct.%'. Y; 474, So Cocytus is by Claudian defcribed as the
river of tea rs,
71
VZ
K
prefib lacrymarum forte refedit
Rapt. Proferp, L. 1. v. 87*
I-
■ %■
■ /
W • * J
Cocytos.
t
a
,1
I
I
I
1
i"
t
J
j
I
I
I
h
h
h
h
*
I
n
\
£
/
I
I-
I
4
S
5
t
4
+
I
\
I
h
f
I
f
•l
r
ft"
I
h
I
t
I
H
L
i
k
L
4 *
I
I
man.
1
y
"I
H
\
1
J
The Analysis o? Ancient Mythology
-71
obfolet
nd mifapplied. Homer makes mention of the
CL
of Apollo, which the God was fuppofed to have bred
mares
in Piena
IQ
cipyvpOTQ%o$ AttoXX'jjv
Txc sv
J
And he has accordingly put them in harnefs, and given them
to the hero Eumelus. Callimachus takes notice of the
fame mares in
r i
j
■*7
E £ST sum
ivieoic
H
e a
V7T
TO 10
A
*
* J
Thefe Hippai, mifconftrued
mares, were
Thrace,' and in many different regions
They chanted
mns in
the worfhip growing obfolete, the very terms were at laft
miftaken
How far this worfhip
once
a
the Sun, and often compounded
or
Hippa On, and contracted Hippon: of which name places
occur in Africa near Carthage
|8
mi ot
from the animal ‘l7rre£, but
eion •
not
cc7ro Inwjff rs Acuio&j from '
16 Iliad. B. V. 7 66
Boreas was fupp ofed to have been enamoured
Tecav v.mi B opens wetaemo €oerxofxlm&n’j
htt-ttw £ utretjj.evos Trapth-i^ttro 5t net t h
ru S uvroy.ucnrctuiicti eriKov S'VQxetiSgxtt TrwAaj, Odyfi, T, V. 224I
sy H. to Apollo. V, 47
* Strabo. L. 17. p. u8S.
>9 Hefych. 'l7T7r£iw
He alfo mentions the mares of Erefidthon, with which
r
T
.1
J
p i
i_ j
VoL* II
I i
i
a.
he Analysis of Ancient Mythology
That is from a
m
lU
A
k. .
JL
5
Hippa the daughter of Dc
s
mans
who founded there a
title of the Sun. it
the mafculine sender I
moffc curious, and remarkable
ruins
o- it to an horfe. It flood near mount T
Goddefs, whom {he ferved. As it was a
was foroetimes ex
in
a
c
it
t
(
t
o
o
The
in Laconia, and was called the monument of
author tells us
* i
r i
to fome ancient rule ami m
fays he, as I imagine , according
s were fuppofe
If then thefe exterior hones related to the
f*
thod
* < ' i
to
t
mu
/
<-
X
1 .
{even
nets
erratic bodies in oui
fphere, the
N
*0
£*4
1
Ml
it is the
ave
tW'l
C
r
mon ancient reprefentation upon
record, and eonlequently
M
L
It is from hence, I think, manifeft
1
5
and Hippos, related to the luminary Gfii
is
1
■r
r!
*
who was the lame
L
I )
as Dionufus
1 under thi
id of
w or i n
hence we i
ft
a
ion in various regions
V, L
Montes in
in Li
SO
If d'e
qiqwi
n
e<riv
fWTtty 01 Jit jJrvu.KJ A
ojv 1 iXay» i ojp
THTt? OU 7T0?IV+
4
xccra
T2p7rov QtfAoct rov a^cctov^ cm cccrBpm
4 ■■
. qctmv etythtw*. Paufan. L. 3. p. 262
They included the moon
r
«. 1
among trie primary planets j not being acquainted
a
1
b
I
*
"l
I
■:
k
i
i
L
i
1
n
d
i
I
r
p
n
I
i
i
i
;■
i"
j
>
i
N
"ii
i
i
n
i
"i
/
H
■l
L
I
"i
X 1
I
TE S
I
i
t
i
/
H
h
4
4
I
4
I
I
"I
j"
I
i
r
r
4
*
h
1
h
1
Ancient Mythology
The Analysis -of
t
AO
4 L
C f
the Prutaneion in Elis 13 : Eft 02
rsfpa.g mi aur%
H
•at
t'j
t
veirmiMW,. mi ■ ev owrr\g 7rvg am km rav re nfAsgav,
mi
N
Attica at nrft was divided
ev Karri vuzn werwreos mterca
.1
LJ
hamlets: each of which had
Prutaneion, and Archon. Tliefc Archons were
14 Prutaneia ; and were denominated from then
as Orchon, and like Chon-Or
and fire : from which title the
into
"I *
n 11
t
its own
office. Archon is the fame
1
E
name
a
were called Urchani
l
1
a
>
1
I If
I
f
etymology, and have derived the
Pur. Suidas
name 1
f*
101/
u*
M
The Scho
AAA 01
fc
"\
to
*7
<pounv, on to
f
I
Others tell us, that
melon, from
1
/
<w 7^
0
i
r
'u e
revot
fi
0
J
f
i
W-l
r
ZM *
^4*
<
had the fame name
13
r
Tw Zv
r 1
h j
»»
.0. 5. p. 415
vravsix re e%8crct xat
To S'e ?\u%vtov ev Hpur a. ve im . Theocrit. Idyl
Suidas.
>4
Thucyd. L. 2. p. 107
QVTCtS
1$
21
its
L. 2. p. 107. Others gave another reafon. Vl^rmm .
$KSl SXCcQtfPTO 01 n gUTCCVBify 01 T Ct)V 0 AoJV TgCtyfiCCTOOV $lOiXr\T(%L Ibid
i 8 Julius Pollux. L. i* c. i- p. 7.
17
(Ka?,eno. ereifn
I
<
4
H
I
J
H I
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
lie jbatmes I'unte ; and were oriirina
I - -
but were at lad ranked among
fs, and lawgiver, was forne
the lift of tlicie daemons. This is mam
were
1
O
hellifli
W 1
L
tormentors
times enrolled in
r *
i
left from a pan age
X -v I w
n n
Jr
c
in t
as
i
c
^'1
c
9
the fhrinc oi a Fury
p ' 1
U.-J
17.
-
eim
the Scholiaft
>
C
The like is mentioned by
W
$
W
name
H
mv oi
H
'mi mm
1
F 1 "
"1
of a Pru tan cion
a feat
eis
a .
/f
ji
in
1
V
f
fill account
s, ew
on
i
j
i
v
w/r, w/r
L. S. p. 649. Mount Caucafus was denominated
Ihepherd Caucafus. The women, who officiated
daughters of Caucafus, and represented as
«ITes of fi e
, * '
Cancafi filiae Fimas. SecEpiphanius Anchorat. P
Lycophron. Scholia. V. 1225. Kat ICaAAijwer
Ibid
^ . l
Neptune is Paid to have lain with Ceres, when
lodorasi. L. 3. p. 15
Areion
2.2
as 1$ fuppoletl, from
in the temple, were itiled the
Furies: by which was meant prictl
*1
90
L _
43
ll
Y?i lioirvuv 54^
J
A a T 5 )r
I
■>
in die form of a Fury
She is faid from thence to have conceived the hoifc
Apol
>
n
/
Ly cophron
Belops
llndes to her cruel rites, when he
is fpcaking of Tantalu
and
F
L"
Ou rarTov, ev ya.[j,(pcuc-tv’l
I
rm /a 7T0T6
\ trctox.ct [x 1 cfuhAovi
6T0 4 uCfcW5r T«lpM. y. 152
tj
e
j
r
n
b
(■
L
F
4
r
I
i
r
i
Y
i
f
i 1
i
1
"i
I
h
I
I
I
L
I ■
I
J
t
I
I
"i
I
I
I
h
1
■i
•i
I
I
T
■"
I
n
i
i
4
>
I
The Analysis op Ancient Mythology 1 #.
6
1
i
A
4
li
I
i
J
n
r
A
I
: jeres
I
o
i
ora
i
i
which were defignetf
O
h
I
areas
for Gum n ah a
I
d were
I
>
c
I
I
I
I
UC 1 US
one
i
4
I
,1
J
I
I
art. It flood before
T
cyon was
*.
I
I
J
the tomb of Alope,
I J,
I
the time of this writer, who takes notice of
J
I
cyan even m
many others
tomb
I
if it were
P
J
a
J
J
4
l
L J
I
rrK •
I
But it was a
l. or
j
t
4
J
I
ace called Cer-Cuon
,o y who was
*
Before this altar was
I
L
S
*
r h-
s
where the Ccrcyonkm
P
4
H
J
i
i
e to' contend with them, I have taken
4
i
i
i
r
J
I
j
1
notice of a Pharos at 34) Torone, which Proteus is faid to have
I
E
that he mi
I
J
h. >
K
to
4
f
I
«i
r
4
1
I
!■
ions. He fled, it feems, to Egypt, Tskvm aAvfiag rag £>
voKTOvag* TctAecg
fo fkilled
a
"|
w
J
I
we re
that they' flew all ftrangci
%
I
k
-I
I
I
I
in the Palasfmc art
K
I-
/
i
p
l
p
i
Ovid. Ibis. V. 411
Anacbarfis. Vel
AtoAAuvos Auxi 3
I
33 K at 0
a
I
•I
1
l "?
1
i
3 C
ex
p. 380, Tl/firavijV v(p tifteov cnua.( £Tat } xcu
I,
h
V
V v
Ln
J
H
■1
I
T 07 T 05 out on TuAcitq-ga. x.a.i ss g/^s gjcaAeiro, oKiyov tou 7 tiis
jns.ctTe%cot>. Paufan. L. j. p. 94
I
That very ancient temple of Pan on Mount Lycteum
naftiim in a grove- I
* ^
•1
1
i
Arcadia had a Gym
*
n
L
ev tm A ukcu'jj Tlai'cs
l
I
sea/ OTr/ #trrrj a act
s, xai too avTij raftop. Paufan. L, 8, p. 678
78
I
* j
H
S'ptO I
%a.t I T to S' 0 ojj. 0 s
H I have mentioned, that Torone was a temple of the Sun, and nlfo
by which was meant
y
I
<
tlj* ^ f <** § & v
* S
This is not rnereiv
-f, I
i 1
a place of fire, and a lighthoufe
theory ; for the very tower may be feen upon
Pharos with a blaze of fire at the top. See Vol
1
coins, where it is represented as a
PLATE VI. Page 408
h
h
I
1
w ho m
i
V
I
■■
I
I
J
I
I
I
1
"I
t
I
I
J.
■s
I
r
k
«■
1
"i
1
P
h
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
47
the Grecians is
notaurus, was a tempie in Crete: but bj
fpoken of as 'a per ion. Under this character Taurus is repr
pi
fa id
ented as a 35 renowned wrenler, and many perfons are
to have been fent from Athens to be vidtims to his prowefs
tidU,og ctv[ jl.£ gog } a man of a cruel
4
1
■J
3 6
and four difpofition. After he had done much mifchief,
Thefeus at length Tavgov MTS7raKai<re, foiled him in his
He is fuppofed to have done the
own art. and new him
risPKvm rovg
a
0
3*
eoog. For it is Jaid of
vavrcts eg KCLAYlV
M
/
ew
on
In all theie inftances the
in it: of which mif-
him in wre
oeieus
is
1
.1
unge
in.
nerous
need of courtefy, was treated as a
I
rites
a facrifice to the Gods
were evaded under the undue fandtion of
In the hi dory of Bufiris we have
an account of this cuftom prevailing in Egypt
39
35 Plutarch. Thefeus. P. 6
6 Chron. Logos. P.33. He.was alfo named Afterus, Afbcrion, and Afte
Lycoph. V. 1299. Schol. and Etymolog. Mag. Minoi's. Afterius was re
rd Arcana. Paufan. L. 7. p. 524. Ar
Asv 0 A^eorjiv (o Mlrco.) Paufan
rms
prcfented as the fon of Anac. A : -egty
o' peiu
t
Qtl<rS(Oi U 7 r£f 6 t
TCUS 0L7T jUCt VOVT(Li VI TO
2. p. 183
37 Paufan
p. 94
s Diodorus explains farther the character of this perfonage, tw 7 raAcuovTcc
J
TOG 7T OLot0V(Tl * *tOLl TOU
b
39 Diodorus Sic
VOL
4. p. 225, and 23
5
G 4.
p
I
h
r"
4
I
L
I
h
"i
H
I
s
I
I
1
I
.1
•s
I
J
"H
P.-I
H
Y
■,
"i
K
H
W
t
<
S
0
i
j-
I
I
r
i
i
i
/
I
k
■!
I
r*
+ -. u
p^i
"i
1
j
h
r
i
V
4
i
L
4
"i
I
H
I
J
I
h
\
H
I
I
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
59
He vifited many places upon th
reorefented as at the head of an army
his travels were attended with inilitar.
m i
at the fame time deferibed with the Mufe*
n his retinue
Campania
though
ocean
a n a
and
C3
So
i- I
1
Li
1 fl
AS
O
l
yet ne l
and Sciences
His march likewife was conduced with
o Derations
v
y
i
15
fongs, and dances, and the found of every inftrument
c
Oi
mufic
He built cities in various parts; particularly
He
a
catompulos, which he denominated Theba,
after the name
of his mother. In every region, whither he came, he is faid
6
to have initruded the people
L —I
m
and other ufeful arts
vine
♦ *
and where that was not adapted to the foil, he taught the
natives the ufe of ferment, and {hewed them the way to
make 7 wine of barley,, little inferior to the juice of the
He was effeemed a great blemng to the Egyptians
grape
both as a
He hrft built temples
Lawgiver, and a Kin
cr
&
man
as return
reat triumph, where after his death
in {?
or high altar*.
he was enmrined as a Deity
to
in all which he in aftertimes
The
was £hewn in many places
fuppofed to have been buried
people of Mem
was-
5 Diodorus. L. i.,p. 14. This city is alio faid to have been built by Her¬
cules.. Diodorus. L. 4. p. 225
Primus aratra manu folerti fecit Ofiris
El. ; 8. v. 29
Et teneram ferro bllicitavit humum. Tibull. L
1 Zt»0O
. J
Diodorus
r
r - p- 37
'XiytnvTim SuSus a-^rop 3 €13 xsti onpiwf'us cnra.A/\~i
vojx U' Qe/jji'oi 1 avToi ?. Plut. If. et Oiir. p. 356,
£ 1C T COP
B&an?\.€vovTa (Pb Ocriotv
* i Lid
* 1
J
n
-
tv* ~i
&
ts S'etEciv t a * 5 ecu
%C6PuT0U$
9 Eufebius. Pr. Ev. L. j. p.44,45
1 2-
. VOL.II..
3 IS
i
!
Ancient Mythology
DO
The Analysis of
r
■"n
phis (hewed one of them ; whereon was
taining a
a /acred
ai\ con
i
detail of his life, and great a&ions, to the following
i
TO
0
arms over the
7
4
j-
/
H 1
f
S
J
the regions of
r?
a e
A
0
t
6
re
ato
v
*
ocean
the Pennine and
mote countries
nor
the eldeft fon of Cronus ; fprung from
am
&
race o
re
tam o
not been ; and to whofe
*
m
/
of ancient hiftory : and it
This is a very cu nous piece
will be'found to be in great meafure true, if taken with this
allowance, that what is
Oliris was a title con
means the
rree confounded
c.
one perton, was
“l
l. d
ferred upon more perfons than
one
I
&
in
are alluded to, who carried
a
were one branch
the eld
tions here mentioned. They
on the exped
t
i
fpoken of as
who is here
L _
II J
eft fon of Cronus
■ l a. i' l* /.>
pi T
K/
I will not determine. By 11 Cro
as is alfo re
Diodorus Sic. L. i. p. 24
I
Both the Patriarch, and his fon Ham, had the name of Cronus
■ 6 n'lrnuxuv J'g
10
h j
XI
as may
be learned from Sanchoniathon.
wsicf'es, Kgoves b/jiuvuju.os tc>j TactTpt, jctA
Paraia is the fame as Pur-aia, the land of Ur; from whence the Gentile
ers deduce all their mythology
lixpcau Kfijiw t vert
a'sa ei
a
Eufeb. Prsep. L, 1. c. 10. p, 37
writ
1 L
I
%
M
l
■|
1
1
h
■i
■i
i
i
p
I
H
J
I " 1
I
I
H
I
i
V
"I
4
h
I
i"
I
I
r
L
i
/
I
I
dr
I
+
H
I
I
■!
f
I
■T
i
f
V
<
1
4
L
4
4
I
h
I
4
i
I
4 s
h
I
Y
i
I
i
-H
I
I
H
i
I
I
I
I"
h
a".
P
4
p
I
H
"I
1
"l
V
l
i
H.
\
.-I
n
i
>
i
*
of Ancient Mythology
The Analysis
■j 2
encounters a
H
In hi
at the mount
From thence lie goes to
t uampania, about Cum a
.'Not far from hence was an adult and
3
race
way
tain Paktinus
j
A-
<*
the celebrated Fhlcgra
m which wai
i
3
where the giants warred againft heaven
Hercules is laid to have 40 addled
Here was an
mcient
t r
e
}
thofe days darned violently, though it did not for many
in
During his rclidence here he vilited the
hot fountains near Mi/enus and Dicaiarchca : and made a
ia Herculanea, and Ag
I
{
>
D
he crofted the fea to Sicily; which fea
lum
e
A,
fome warm
an
Here he boxed with Eryx; de
feated the Sicani; and
What is
many other exploits
m
^ 1 ty r't
*
t
c
c
t
is faid to have made them travel over the
over
the Alpes, into
and
X^ucra fM)\a—7rpoGa.Ta. Schol. in Apollon. Argonaut. L. 4. v. 1396
h
t
Aypona iv y 'AtGuxm
Tov'EpctxKect, trufifMtpfivrav ccvr<p rav 9*ewj<, xgarvacu t>i y.ui tbs
7 rhti<rw 'aveKovra rw X^av i>%vfitguvai, Diodorus Skul, L, 4. p, 229
5. p. 376. and L. 6. p. 430
*0
Strabo
1
i
a tram
o
r
r
1
y
f
I.
,1
1
I
t
f
4
Ancient Mythology
The Analysis of
-i
74
i
\
is mid to
in 47 Latium. The
lome writers
b
i
Ill
i
c
J.
but
i
E
r
■i
j
was
Z
i
r
Ci 4
j
in their 4 *city, juft
1
v
ians {hewed the Taphos of Ohris at
Hence it was ima
cules was buried at Gades
h
as
that Hei
of this 43 hero.: and Strabo feems to
a
c
c
have been a s ° fable. In fhort the whole
I
i
t
i,
account
1
J
JS very
I
2 matters
to
more
yet the whole is ftill incredi
perfons than one of this name,
i
ble, and can never be fo a
)
(
in order to
(
1
/
c
i
(
their faulty m
fr ex tract
)
m
+
from Cicero. 51 Quanquam
co
lamus, feire velim: plures enim nobis tradunt
ferutantnr et reconditas literas
* *
ove natu m
ove
nam
es m t
Graecorum
is Her
1
.
4
J
4
4 ® Strabo. L. 3. p, 237
He was fuppofed to have been the founder of Tar
teflus, where he was worlhiped under the name of Archaleus. Etymolog, Ma
nr
D
F a.J'apcc
Syncellus. P. 171
Pomponius Mela. L. 3, c. 6
12.' C, 512
• 41
4 «
F 1
+
4 ’ Athenseus
r
L.
I
{' Nat. Deorum
3. c. 16
I
k
r
4
J
1
L
4
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
75
mus
Alter traditur Nilo natus, ^Egyptius
quem aiunt Pnrygias
Tertius eft ex Idteis Dadyli
cui m
Latonte
lDiine
s
c
ferias afferunt. Quartus Jovis eft
et Afteriae
fororis, quem. Tyrii maxime colunt
India
cujus Carthaginem
qui Belus dicitui
ter tius
hlium ferunt
in
Alcumena quem Jupiter genuit; fed
Sextus hie, ex
Jupiter: quoniam, ut docebo, plures Joves accepimus
Hercules was a title given
o
tiles, who have been multiplied into almoft as many per
fonages, as there were countries, where he was worfhiped
n
l' J
What has been attributed to this god hngly , 1 was the
work of Herculeans
a people, who went
under this title
r
L .J
I
fame as the Ofirians, Perehans, and Cuthites, They built
Tarteflus in Boetica, and occupied great part of Iberia
They likewife founded 33 Corunna in Cantabria, and S4 Aleua
in Gaul: of which there are traditions to this day. Some
others among the 56 Alps
of them fettled near 35 Arelate
r
T hey were alfo
alfo at Cuma, and Heraclea in Campania
■ 1
to be found at Tyre, and m
r
h. J
even in the re
Arrian fpeaks of this Indian Hercules together with the. others mentioned
by Cicero. Ei S'e tm m^a. Taxrrc /, 3 aAA&s a.v arcs 'HaajtAej/J ew, o ©r:Scuo\
ttcti xccTot ctvca a Tropp'jj h’J'&v ym
Hift. Ind. P. 319. Varro mentions forty of this
s*
c
Tvpigs btos 3 n o Aiyvirnos 5 tis
[Aevnv /J.syoLS GcccriAzus
who were all reputed Deities
See Ludovicus Normius, in Hifpan. P* 196. 170
See Audigier Origines des Francois, Part. 1. p. 225. 230
Mela. L. 2. c. /;. 1 . 30
7 \ 0
name
ys
1.
yy
r r
Eft locus Herculeis aris facer
* 6 Petronius. P. t 79
1
ft
11101
I
I
I
I.
j
i"
C
4
f
I
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology,
by which is meant the father
of thefe was 6 3 Archemagoras
or chief of the Magi
- J
_ 4
are faid to have been: 6 * Sardus
on
t
Gelonus, Olynthus, Scythus, Galathus
Sardon; Cyrnus
us. Iberus, Celtus, Poimen
As thefe are all mam
r.i
feftly the names of nations,
may perceive by the pur
we
r j
port of this hiftory, that the Sardinians, Comcans, Iberi
Celt®, Galat®, Scythas, &c. 6cc. together with thofe
ans
ftiled Shepherds, were Herculeans; all defcended from that
F
of the Magi;
&
i
4
4
r
It is laid of the former, that he was born at
66
Nufa in Ara—
See Lilius Gyraldus Syntag. io. p. 592. Pauunias.express the name'
L. 8, p, 624
Lilius Gy raid* P. 595
** In the following extra&s we may fee the character of this Deity among’;
different nations. 'Hp&xAecc cptivcc es Iv$u$ atpixea-vut A oyos xccmto ecu
Iv^oicnvTyym'ea A syeavcci
paipeaQat} IvS'ixb sOras
AAActTts upfaKit J5 A(>u7TTwi<n'HgaxAe>?s* cTg clutch Ae^acri ersec
$7TTcocia% i i?\.ict Kcct jjjopicL # A fjuoLcrty Qcc&iAzuvccvtcc* Herod* Li. 2
AAA* terfj^v AiyvTrTtm*) ocrov t ivccctyuartv H^&xAeau 3t«c
Ariftid. Orat. V
'Q 0&9
■ n
b
04
-l'l
rlgccxfacc [jcctht^oL 7rgo$ J&v p cctryv&y y£
T&TOV TOP
Toiaiv
Arrian. Hift. lnd. P. 321
43
n
He had at 1 Tyre a Temple
as old as the
ystu Herod
G'wr.
i* P- 59
Ecpcwai' yao <xiu.ee Topw onuC,oy.evri v.a.1 to
city
.■P
2 . c. 44
E~< yug e? Tug? Isoov 'Hpax-Pisas ir<x A«i qtoltov
h th Agysia HnoaxAeas. x. A. Arrian. Expedit.-Alex; E. 88
Diodorus Sic. L. 3. p* 195. 1 96, and p. 200
at'0par7r/y^ tfrctowf
&.U'
pt, ■
4
TCCl
r
bia
J
I
I
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
he Indus infilled, that lie was a
bia: but
native
mount Meru, was the true
however, fome among them,
of their 61 country j and that the city Nufa,
near
*•»«*:*
j
who allowed, that lie came
was in
*44
the moft ancient times. He taught the nations
came
A
A
to build and to
. l
I
2 various
j
I
I
?
in
c
towns and cities, which lie built in the moft com mo
in
After they were thus eftablimed, he gave
dious lituations
them laws, and infir u died them in the
Gods. He alio taught them to plant the Vine, and to ex
worfhip of the
'I.
2 *
6S
travels
e
J
region in the Eaft. Nor was
t
it in
conqueror
on.
A
A
a
but over all the habitable 69 world
The account
< t
4
Aiovvau aTroyovi&Oi'vS'pa.x.et,', Scrabo. L. 15. p. ipog. , The Tyrians kid
61
the fame claim to him
n
Achill. Ta
tins. L. a. p. 67. So did likewife the Cretans, and the people of Naxos. Sonic
of the Libyans maintained, that he
*4
was educated in the grotto of die Nymphs
upon the-river Triton. Diodor. Sic. L. 3. p. 202
nufus the bcnefa&or, fee Arrian. Hift. Ind. P. 321
Of his coming tQ. India from the weft. Philoftratus. L
Do
1
20
n
0
V
p. 64. KtkAo7
* *
u
awoy Acravpiov
* b
Of his trayels, fee Strabo. L. 15. p. 1008
e 9 Tot 1 <N ovv At owe % 7 rzX§QVTCL //era ^gctT 07 resf 0
i~cti rw fyuvuav t# ccw.7reA«# Diodor. Sic. L
65
7 racmv thv omBMnn'* i i JV
3. p. .197
CCS lidl *TBrU q~PQLTiV
acLVTQ s ts ’ Arrian. Hift. Indie. P, 318
r
given
o
i
•l
I 1
I
The Analysis op Ancient Mythology
80
C
the fame as Ofiris
74 recorded
and many of the later m
He was
-was
>
acknowledged this
■J
TOV ft CLP CLVTQIC
V ovo
\
ft CLP EAXl)(r/ AlOVVTOV ' THTOV
awriv smi top
KCLl
IV
? c
THTOV ftCLg SCLVTOtg CL
Diodorus, maintain that their God
T 8 C
TOV
75
s
trts is no
'farther mention , that
over
earth—In like manner the Indi affure
that it is the fame
us
Dionufus according to the Grecian mythology
is re
twice born; and is faid to have had
as
r
an
77 Ark, and woi
?
It was a common fubjedt for E'legy. Plutarch. Ifis et Ofir
rjonuro/^eQa cTe mr apytfiv cctq Awucre, J'ic xett tccKmop enut tr <pi S' p n,
fxeyi^oM suspyscriais xctTccrmicrVcu tw ymi rmv a vfrm7rcoi'- Diodorus Sicul
!L. 4. p. 210
14
7 WTO)
/
xca
n i
ov rat re TPone Aiovuvou
)
trrpa.%m. Diodorus Sic. JL. 3. p, 201
7 * L. 4. p. 210
c. 42. c. 145
as -the Egyptians did of
Ofiris. DcAicw ts otmerat ( Amvcrov ) xca uof/,es freaftca ryct ToAecnv* civu re 6 '0
•is
The Indians gave the fame account of Dionufus
41
%ai
t
aurov (rireo(jt.tx,Tct,
Atovucrav T^Tor '—xai frees cnQeiv cn eMa&e Ato•
/
P
I
boas re V 7 p
lEVtCLl
-j
vu<ros~~K tA. Arnan. Hift, Indie. P. 321
Paufan. L. 3. p. 272
17
As lus rites came originally from Chaldea, and
13. p. 932. EA 0 g,^«x«/) A mitre , imTSTIOPE
Strabo. L
.Orphic. Hymn. 44. V
J
ra.vpojj.erpi'ne
i_ j
ft
J.
■1
r
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
Cronus in
univerfal 80 benefa&oi
r
82
ever they came
men
as an
s in
like account is given of
>
&
81
in an
n
!l
more
ties
b
was
c
1
c
L
c
and Themis. Strabo mentions from the hirtorian Ephorus,
82
deities
11
1
c
*
1
going over the world
*3
and
came, to be more
improve themfelvcs by cult*
r to
ing
4
r i
_j
vation
r 1
.'J
mentioned as proceeding
m a
Tov y.sv ovy Kpovov opt x tt pe aCur ctr a p CaciAsx yereaOat
top n/Atgop {j,gt a^ncrxi , x,ca $ix thto xnro
yxhns TvyvpTa ?roMas STeAfrsip rw otxHy.srvis tpiths' eianyucracrQxi £s
re S'pxaioavpw xcti rw xyrhoTinx ruts Diodorus Sicul. L
Ougxvov *-tbs av&gH7r'd$ <t7topcz£t)v otxapTxg. ervruyayen
XXI TtK jXSV XVOfJUXS XXI S’V'jKoi'BS filB TTXWXt - XXTXXTUTXCrdxi <fg
fim s Ttiv 7 tAsi^»v. Diodorus Sicul. L. 3. p. 189
AtoAA&i px fj&TX ©gfueToj, ootpeAncrai /2aA c/a$pov
hit&v Stirup
t% K«tSr
J f
Kca ts* Kcta fa'JTGv
t
f
rv
Ctv
£
\
ft
u$
if
r
J
4
TafiTi TnP
S' P* 3 3 4
P
r..
1
b
TroXzM 7r£/>/p<?Awj
ctUTov rm omv
6 %
*
TO ySPOS U/ACOP SITtSC T HP Wxg
*
m n^ornrcc T^BKcthuro* Strabo, L, p, 646
A iro^Km^ vw ytw emot
*TtoP ccMfj&gcw Kcc.P7rcoy Kcct GttoV t Ibid
0T<
OV
t*
niASpBp ths ap.ymrr&s xtp
rx
re
r
1
\
p
Y
1
i
>
-■i
i"
I
I
I
L
i.
r
t
I
I
1
I
T
v
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
1
to Egypt, after an abfence of 4 nine years; which is one year
lefs, than was attributed to the expeditions of Hercules.
very plain and pre
is
r
in a sreo
graphical feries from one conqueft to another: fo that the
ftory is rendered in fome degree plaufible
But we may
learn from Diodorus himfelf, that little credit is to be paid
after all the pains he may have taken to
to this narration
owns, that not
win upon our
and
the bards of the fame country, varied in the accounts, which
to
was
moft credible, and what appeared molt confonant to the
me
morials in Egypt, which time had fpared
7
<rv [Mpwv&vrct dis/wgfv. But, as thefe memorials con lifted chiefly
I do not fee how it was poftible for Dio
in hieroglyphics
dor us to unuerftand, what the bards and priefts could - not
a
L
T
ticable, fhould have been the work oi a native Egyptian,
and not of a perfon either from Greece,
or
■is iTO a airoLiav iw<r cat o i r\v Acrixv ev ei'ixurms sweat. Syncel
6
f r *
Ip
1 V
lus
69
¥h
.t
Some make him advance farther, and conquer all Europe
A ertav 'ii Jtcap, k<u THN ETPflflHN, 5tc« TiW txv t y.ui tav Mi >triur
Chron. Pafch. P. 47. Herodotus thinks that he did not proceed farther than.;
T h race
r
r
Guctcos ut ?rat
Txll
it -v,. 1
1
2, C. J 03 .
Diodorus Sicul. L. x. p. 49
jLi
7
I-
writer
i
H
I
4
P
I*
I
J
f
i
J
i
r
/
J
r
r
h
h
I
J
r
"i
h
J-
(
I
I
I-
u
I
f
h
f
h
I
Ancient Mythology
Tile Analysis of
9 °
name of
but the
■Ti 1 !
A
13 Sethofis, Sefoofis, Sefonchous
names are accom
#4
* *
A
cu
111
T
e
vv
+
c
D
kings, who reigned alter
s or
r
rin'
nt
t
A
uc
$
\
r
; <rz /;d
The ,s
r •
e orris
lJ
after
giving at the
fame time an account of his conquefts. He adds that he
us called Sefoftais
ini
\r
r
c
c
i
r n
%
I
t
a curious
y
i +4
V
111
twe
%
l
which Sefonchous maintains the fame rank, and was
>6
«/*
reipn o
4
;
s
mem tons
or ms m
7
a
i
6
volved to Sefonchofcs ; fo that from the
4
time or os/one /jo Us to
Pri
Nilus were two thoufand years
Gedrenus 17 calls him Se
foftris; and mentions him after Ofiris
nd Orus, and
n
U
Sethofis of Jofephus contra Apion
14 Eufeb. Chron. P
L. x* p, 447
7 ,1, 43 . ©&X>;$* jj£Tcc J& thtup
'S'GaoyxfiMFfy A iyv7rr& 7r<xcrn$ £ & cr t\€u$ jQa
Traced;, fxw Aatav Qpfxyarcts ttccctuv
V
c(rfarr$i
Vupiy
* *
3*
ltri4cs xsti Ocriptfot
w
4 a mcc Trfr et^ct, *TM
in Apollon, Ar
cctQ) o/j/m
avrov xuJiei, Schol
I- 4
!■
gonaut. L. 4. v. 272
1
I &
AiKcttagxos ev irpmcp^ jjj-rct tw ItriS'K-xau Ocr/c/jPos Cl
C f\ ”
Xi<Tcy<xp.'aiv MyiT core ytvSoVcu caro
W ^ I T
inn JV^Aia. Schol. in Apollon. Argonaut, ibid
Gedrenus. V
DOV
oveveu
7 m NtiAfi
T
*
TMS
4
/
r J
17
p. 20. Ofiris, Orus, Thoules, Sefoftris
C
/
The Analysis op Ancient Mythology
r.-
. m j
-1
Thoules; which laft was by the above writer omitted
r urov 'Zevwzetg. The author
of the Chronicon Pafchale makes Orus to have been fuc
he calls Thoulis: and next to him. introduces Sefoftris
relates all his great conquefts ; and gives us this farther in
formation, that this prince was the firft of the line of Ham
who reigned in Egypt
in other words, he was the firft king
zS
r-.?
Ariftotle fpeaks of Sefoftris; but does not determine the
on
F
1
i
was long before the age of * 0 Minos
in Crete
Rhodius, who is thought to have been a native of Egypt
fpeaks of the great actions of this prince; but men
tions no name: not
only fays that it
0
who was fuppofed to have reigned
r 1
*
F.
■ 1
J
i m agine
k.
as he was reprefented under, lb
He however attributes to him every thing which is
many
laid of u Sefoftris; particularly the fettling a Colony at Col
chis
LI
iB
Succeeded by Chron, Pafch. P. 48
Joannes Antiochenus has borrowed the fame hiftory, and calls this king
.Softris. Efixo'tAevorev Kiyuirnaw ttqwtqs eit tijs cp-jAijs tb Sw™:, P. 28
Pie adds, that Softris, or Sefoftris) lived in the time of Hermes,
fteytcros AtyuTmoz* I”Ie was fucceeded by Pharaoh^ the firft of the
name. Ibid. Plerodotus calls him Pheron, and Pherona. L. 2, c. in
floAy 'uTrZgrzivei t 01c ^ovots twv Mwto $x(rt/\ 9 sccv n Politic. L
*9
c
0 TO Is
?
r ^
L _i
20
(1
h
1
7. c. 10
r
L I
Apollon. Argonaut. L. 4. V. 272. Bvaev n nvetcpctn
yu tt& 7 rams fietirtAsvs
it
y
&oy%ai(n$) Ai
$Q 7 ro;* 7 ns <f e ev qlvtqv k xcch$u Schol
_ f ■
■ _
-fc.
Oi
ibid
N 2
Um
'■
1
h
i
I
I
"l
I
*
I
I-
l"
I
■l
■J
4
i
I
i
L
J
I
f
I
I
I
I
H
1
/
I-
P
-J
\
V
I
J
I
*
■A
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
obeli/ks attributed to t
%
were
r.i
L
to be fo determinate about an
I 1
How came they
L. i
Ur
n
i
of that country
wort
%
% /■>
in
e
*
v
lofs? the whole
ftances were fo utterly at
ii
I {hall not therefore
%
was mattei
more of Sefoftris
come to
y
I muft again fpeak of him, when I
as
s
H 1
we
ri
t
1
a
attributed to different perfons
contain accounts
are
m
c
as travertins: immenfe
thefe ancient heroes are reprefented
t>
regions, and carrying their arms to
known world
the great Tartarian ocean to the caff, and
&
and to
O
have carried on thele con
and. tliojfe,' whofe xra may poffibly differ, have this m
vifit the fame coun
rout; and are
nearly the fame time
common with the others
tries
1
t
j c
c
-J
f
and are
o
vC
<
attendants i
rvrt
are in
sn
*s
7 -
V
as wel 1
natives in
V H
as their religious
rites
in
k
occurrences
ave
A
It is not to
or in any age
much lefs that he
as :
are
■i
1
l_r.
thofe early ages,
m
■1
co.uld go over fuch a
f
1
1
J
I
1
H
4
I
"l
>
L
I
H
L
4
J
1
I
I
I
\
I
h
I
1
fa"
I
I
T
I
r
J
r
4
i
■"
j
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
ioi
F
L J
mound of earth, no lefs than a mile and a quarter high, and
after which fhe built Ba
proportionally wide at bottom
Media ; and wherever fhe came left memorials of her power
j
particularly in Chaonia and Ecbatana
In fhort fhe levelled
hills, and raifed 4 mounds of an immenfe height, which
tained her name for ages. After this file invaded Egypt,
re
1
with the greater part of Libya
na
r
and having accomplimed her wifh, and there being
no
an army of three millions of foot, five hundred thoufand
horfe, and one hundred thoufand chariots
and
c
r
or rivers
two thoufand fhips to be fo conftrudled, as to Be
taken to
om Phen-ieia
With thefe fhe entered into a naval en
ates king of India; and- at the firffc
this fhe built-
I-
1 n
were
i
n
*1
"i
rus
. _ M
L
i
1
£1
L
I
or
o
\
A UTYj uev M7r€J'€(ZMTQ ^COUCiTCt TO T^tOV eovr cc ct^iQSrBtiTct, Herod. L
4
A i
I
c. 184
Such ^mjJLCL'Tci were
called T Ctfpol
Four fuch were in Troas. TLiaty^v w A o$oi tsttup^ 9 Q\vjul*z&loi xcth bjawci
Strabo, L 10. p. 720. There were fuch alfo of the'Amaaons in Mauritan!3i
■i
raifed' by the Amonians in aU.places where they fettled
K
I
I
I.
L J
4
A
1
1
h
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology,.
103
+
7
■ ■ f ■
Nineve: at other times file is
centuries of 8 Herodotus
She invades the Babylonians be
1
l
. . I
Hence
is introduced as coeval with Nineve: though, if
the lead: credit may be given to 10 Herodotus, it was built
L.
c
•1
I
i
re it
many ages
"1
felf is by Ctefias placed upon the ” Euphrates
tho u erh
I
every other writer agrees, that it lay far to the eaft, and was
This fhews, how little credit is
1
1PT1S
r
"1
"i
4
7
Cononis narrationes apud Phot, P, 427
Hcrodot. L
r
184. five ages (yeveca) before Nitocris the mother of
x. c
d
Labynitus, whom Cyrus conquered
It may be worth while to obferve the different opinions of authors about the
time, when Semiramis is fuppofed to have lived
\
1
I “
T
Years.
*
I
1
According to Syncellus fhe lived before, Chriffc
Petavins makes the term
Helvicus
Euiebius
Mr, Jackfon
Abp. Ufher
Philo Biblius from Sanchoniathon (apud.Eufeb, Praep. Evang. L. ,1
p. 31.) about
Herodotus about
a
77
i
060
o
r
4
L
r.
¥
1
2248
1
1
L:
: j
rJ
IQ84
1
P
I
I
. I
I
I
I
J
1964
h
K
J
1
I
P
1
I
I
I
l
X
I
r
L
I
!■
J
.1
i
\
s
h
1
1200
h
T
713
What credit can be given to the hiftory of a perfon, the time of whofe life
cannot be afcertained within 1535 years ? forfo great is the difference of the ex
tremes in the numbers above given
r ■
r ■
r™
j
1
T
*1.
1
See Dionyf. Perieg. Schol. in V. iood
9 Diodorus Sicul. L. 1. p. 90
Herodotus. L. 1. c. c,8
J
I
d
I
S
1 •
10
1
I
I
I
Diodorus Sicul. L, 1
5 I
P- 92 -:
I
l|
t<©
P
H
n
l
K
h
L
1
p■"
J
I
E
1
j
i"
\
1
p
K
I
I
I
}
1
J
H
I
I
•j
4
I
I
I
I
L
i
j
i
i
r
1
i*
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
107
were many ages after the foundation of the two kingdoms
and were carried on
Aflur Adon, Salmanaffur, Sennacherib, and other of his
fucceffors. Nineve was at laft ruined, and the kingdom of:
9 O
ria was
They began under Pul of Nineve
by
3
united with that of 11 Babylonia
This is pro
the fuppofed marriage of Semiramis and
to 111
Then it was
c
Jt
Ninus
that the Samarim performed the
great works attributed to them
For excluhve of what was
There are
fays 31 Strabo, ahnojl over
h, vaji 13 mounds of earthy and
ears
wallsy and ramparts y attributed to
Semiramis; and in thefe
of communkatiorty and tanks for
are
There are alfo vaft canals
water
atrea es o
one
r-
L"_J
and lakes to receive them
to
e o
rivers
■j
They built the famous terraces at 44 Babylon
and thofe
I
I
into their hands
emafculating their Haves, that their numerous wives, and
an invention
This is the reafon that we find thefe kingdoms fo often confounded, and
the Babylonians continually fpoken of as Aflyrians, and fometimes as Perfians.
m k ri to AiS. Steph. Byz.
Strabo. L. 16. p. 1071
Thefe mounds were high altars, upon which they facrificed to the Sun
By Ctefias they are fuppofed to have been the tombs of her lovers, whom flic
buried alive. Syncellus. P. 6 4
They built Babylon itfelfj which by Eupolemus was faid to have been
the work of Belus, and the Giants. Eufeb. Prsp. L. 9. c. 17. p. 418. Quint
Curt. L. 5. c. 1. Abydcnus apud Eufeb. Prsep. L. 9. c. 15. Syncellus
£1
L j
Lj
*4
44
■l
I
r
i
i
i
r
h
I
i
■■S
J
I
*
I
y
i
f
/
h
I
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
i i
II
L. l .
Medes: and delcribes them both as great in fcience. There
was a Zoroafter Proconnelius, in the time of Xerxes, fpo
Arnobius mentions Zoroaftres Bactria
nus: and Zoroaftres Zoftriani nepos Armenius. Clemens
Alexandrinus takes notice of Zoroafter 31 Medus, who is pro-
Zoroaftres
bably the fame as the Perfo-Medes of Suidas
Armenius is likewile mentioned by him, but is filled the fon
It is faid of him that
of 32 Armenius
J
lie had a renewal of life: and that during the term that he
was in a ftate of death, he learned many things of the Gods
rZ
imagine did not
but to the head of all the
another ftiled a Perfian, whom Pythagoras is faid to
Juftin takes notice of the Ba&rian 34 Zoro-
He is alfo
was
have 33 vifited
after, whom he places in the time of Ninus
mt
SVSTIV
The natives of India have a notion of
8
as of the lame date
Zoroafter, who was of Chinefe original, as we are in
This learned man
.1
r? .
t
fuppofes all thefe
a 9 L. 30. c, 1. p. 523
30 Arnobius. L
1
31 Clemens
r. pv 3 i
P- 399
Clemens. L. 5. p.711. Tafe aruyej'Pupsv 0 Agftewa
IJu/u.ipuAci- JtA. Ei< aJ'/i ytvofJLtvos eS'ctw wctpct ©sw)
Clemens. L. 1. p. 3 57. Apuleius Florid. C. 15. p. 795, mentions a
Zoroafter after the reign of Cambyfes
Juftin. L. 1. c. 1
Syncellus. P. 167
P. 315. It is alfo taken notice of by Huetius. Sinam recenttores Perfe
J*
I
f
0 ywos
54
W
!
_ d
per
Ancient Mythology
fas Analysis of
t
112
c
h!-
¥
perfonages
c
to have been one, and
the Hadrian, the Pamphylian, &c
This is very
the lame
arc
%
as
G
He moreover adds, that hov
T t
aren
r*
V
I 1
..J
*
4
ever
3ie
1
c
about the time, when he 37 lived
/ n
are unanimous
need only
we
to can: our
IU
c
£
There arc
not be all of the fame sera
*
m
L
hut we may perceive, that there was
one
* t*
I
more
has been confounded with that of others, who came after
i"
him. This is a circumflancc, which has
many
l
*/i
Xf*
s*
V
* * I*
k
C
t
may have expreffed thcmiclv.
39 t.
m
erint, ille (Zoroaftcr) fuit tantum
6
unus
)
ures unquam ex tat ere, It is
is: nec eius nomine
to be obferved. that
r
%
At*
4
He lived, it feems
in the rcisrn of
was one
a
Sed haud mirum eft, fi Europaei hoc modo diflentiant de hominc pere
A t dc
ejus tempore concordant omnes, unum tantum conftitucntes Zoroaftrem, eumque
in eodem.feculo ponentes. P, 315.
Plures autem fucre Zoroaftrcs ut fads .conftat. Gronovias in Marcellinum
L. 23, p. 288. Arnobius and Clemens mention more than one, Stanley reckons
up fix. See Chaldaic Philofophy
49 P. ar2
S’
&rino, cum illius populares orientates edam de ejtis profapia dubicenr
1
1 -
A
the
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
IT'?
r.i
the battle of Marathon
and Plato. We have
the birth of Eudoxus, Xenophon
authority to fuppofe 3 * this Zerdufht to have
therefore no
been the famous Zoroafter. He was apparently the renewer
of the Sabian rites: and we may be allured, that he could
ancients, who was re
not
ferred to the nr ft acres
Hyde aflerts, that all writers
agree
F 1
iD
4D
about the time, when Zoroafter made his appearance: and
we have feen above, in the reign of Da
he places him
as
But Xanthus Lydius made him above 31 fix hundred
nus
r 1
And s * Suidas from feme anonymous author
Her-
years prior
r j
thoufand years before that
who pro
33
sera
us
M
L. _l
fefledly wrote of his doctrines, fuppofed him to have been
of the fame 34 antiquity
Plutarch alfo “ concurs
lows him five thoufand years before that war
and al
Eudoxus
35
Wi
5
who was a confummate philofopher, and a great traveller
fuppofed him to have flourimed • fix thoufand years before
Zoroafter may have been called Zerdufht, and Zertooft: blit he was not
Zerdufln the fon of Guftafp, who is fuppofed to have lived during the Perfum
Monarchy. Said Ebn. Batrick ftiles him Zorodafht, but places him in th
time of Nahor, the father of Terah, before the days of Abraham. Vol. x
p. 63.
SO
r
Diogenes Laert. Procem. P. 3
npo tcov Tpwtxtov in at tp Zwfwty'ows
35 Leartius Procem. P. 3,
3l
Pliny. L. 30. c. x
3+
r
}t 'L'j)ooa~ on 6 May of } ov TrerTetJCNr^Aicis tT«nv toov ioumwv ysyovcyat ttpsct*
Cvreoov h^oo-iijiv. Ifis et Ofir P. 369.
the
Vol. II.
i
i
i"
L
1
J
I
"l
t
I
I
I
4
h
K
I
Ancient Mythology
The Analysis of
i 16
writers. He was
P
given
efteemed the fir ft obferver of the heavens; and it
is
i
re m
j
and from them it was derived to the 44
and
ur
ii e s
to the Greeks. Zoroafler was
as
W
all thole, who are
45
t
31
*
t
%
ior to the Magi, and Ma
a*
1 I
WGJ
r
)
p'la
F
2V were may
h*
(
'■#
*■ i
t
CL
4&
as!
Z6<s Magi) according to
71
l*
/
O
2
and with the
even to
ttr vmin?i
>
cS
ns, we are well
ftiles him the fon. of 47 Oromazes, who was
Plato
I.
/>
YT
«
t
ft r
of the Perfians: and it is faid of him that he lau
tr
the day, on which he was
imagine, that
fomethin? fortunate was
to be t)ortended; feme
ifcr
O
indication, that the child would prove a
world
to the
rr
1
7
o
care of 49 Azonaces
was a name of
t
V
I
44
101 eipeunov ha Zajcaf-vw, -0
Anon, apud Suidam. A
O
XV/
Ul
fi
'I
' Ai^UTTlor 5C0i( HAAhV^ g'J'g&XVTQ
TO, 1
s
4*
7 -:
L -I
46 Diog. Laertius Proccm, P. 6
TwMayem'Tm’ZvgoarijH tv Slgoi/.zfy, Plato in Alcibiade. t
Agathias calls him the lbn of Oromafdes, L
41
1. n. 122
Jt t
2. p. 62
40
Pliny. L. 7* c> Rifiteodem, qnonatus eft, die. See Lord’s account of
the modern Perfees
in India. C. 3. It is by them faid, that he laughed
loon
> ft
1^
as he came into the world
49
r
L d
}
the
4 •
j* T
"l
The Analyst
of Ancient Mythology. 117
He was in
3
He jfirffc
facrificed to the Gods, and taught men to do the 51 fame
He like wife inftrucited them in fcience, for which he
came in
was
greatly 5i famed: and was the fir ft, who gave them
laws
The Babylonians feem to have referred to him every thin
<T
which by the Egyptians was attributed to Thoth and Her
He had the title of 53 Zarades, which fignifies the
mes
Lord of lierht. and is
equivalent to Orus, Oromanes, and
Ofiris. It was
fometimes exprefl'ed
Zar-Atis, and fup
54 -
g to a
Chorenenfis ftiles him
the father of the Gods
I
O
Zarovanus, and fpeaks of him
5 s
as
Plutarch would infinuate, that he
was
nicheans, concerning two prevailing principles, the one good,
and the other evil 56 : the former of thefe was named Oro
mazes, the latter Areimanius. But thefe notions were of late
dat
in
1
Dio. Chryfoftom. Oratio Boryfthcnica. 38. Fol. 448. Eufeb. I 5 rEep
p. 42. See alio Agathias above
©usit' iwKTaict i tat S'ccgi^vpict' Plutarch. Hi et Ofir
Primus dicitur artes maeicas invenifle, et mundi principia, fiderumqne
tnctus diligentiffime fpe&affe. Judin. L. 1. c. 1
ZctpccS'Hi,' S'ittv yoLp S7T canct) (cttco rjuia • Agath. L. 2. p. 62
Z < zotiTi r ) Apre / jus , 0 epcrctt . Hefych
Zar-Ades fignifies the Lord of light: Zar-Atis and Atifh, the Lord of fire
L. t. c. 5. p. 1 6. Of the title Zar-Ovanus, I fhall treat hereaftei
sS Plutarch. If. et Ofiris. P. 369
See Agathias. L. 2. p. 62
JO
F
.1 -
L. t
_ J
309
SI
r i
b 1
sn
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
8
r ^
to s * Zoroafter. If we mi
in
r
were t:
# #
name
' v
c
7
£
*
US
com
were genuine,
c
s? Zo
■=L*
J
But this was by no means
was m
60
true.
*r
C
for I apply to the original perfon of the name, what
was
is
4
i
%
9 A
he was inftru&ed by the Ct Gods
Some
rc
t
an inter
with fire, he was
to
l-K
was in
r
called ® 3 Adarbain; wherein
was
jk
ratheion in Afia. This region
was in Armenia
l
in
upon one
t .
Plutarch lays, that Zoroafter lived five thoufand years before the Trojan
war. Plutarch above
P I
Qvtos (g © fiof ) fi
c
J9
o TrAwraiU a
ctM
■r
A
ayaum ay whyr a,r
E<n xcct (wofAiaSi xat Sixcucawx?
xxi iegcv (puatxu iaqvos euperiti
ttcio' t xt owncyoi 7rccvro$ xaAu, al'upQ'J'ox'in'
<p P Of i/Ml v
WJTG$ iJ'otX.TCS
/ 4*
^ -
i ^
(ppov i fJLwr ctr os
quant w, kkj TeAe<os, «ai croaof
I
Eufcb. P. E. L. i
p. 42
l I
r'
Clemens. L. 5. p. 711
6 *
r -
. j
C\
tp aeffl ywo/uMYOS tfayu waget ©
IbiA
Dion. Chryfoftom. Oratio Boryfthenica* P, 44S
Hyde, P, a it
mw
4
l
r
I
I
p
I
I
I
i. i
I
J
L
I
i
"i
I
I
h
J
P
I
4
h
i
4
4
J
I
I
n
i
J
4
h
I
I
I
Im
H
*
t
f
I
4
S
I
I
I
F
i
i
i
■i
1
I
i r
j
j.
i
r
1
<
' h
I
! J ■.
I
*
■.
I
I
?
I
I
I I
F
t
i
i
i
i
r
i
■!
J
S
' L
:'!
r 1
s
I
I
F
F
J
ff
!■
I
I
j
l
f
)
Y
i
r
■ 1
f
t
i
J
■i
i .
s
J
I
I
I
I
r
i r
t ■
.l
■■ i
i
11
i
t
s
I - : '
[
l
s
1
3
\
. y r
4
I
r
i
l
n
*
i"
i
i
i
r
■j
h
J
p
I
I
I
'i
I
1
<
s
1
%
i
t
i
j
r .
•:
1
J
'J 11>
P
1
s
)
1
f
I
i
r
M
rJ
h-
I
I
I
OR PHE US
I
"|
"l
b
K
k
i
J
n
\
*
I
h
■■
Y
i<
i
"m
h
4
L
r
J
h
•i 1.1
J
r
i
1
d
V
i
4
4
I
H
I
I
4
L
*
H
i
t
L
-I
I
H
j"
4
I
i
i
J-
•l
I
I
I
4
*
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
chara&er of one
32
pl
A
4
31 natives
i
were
wor
revered for their fuperior knowledge
c
J
I #4
A
i
X
; I
%
\
£
fome emblematical fculptures
fathers* which were
-4
*
01
rhrace, and particularly upon
r
111
mount
moun
er
feems to have been a college, and to have confided of
tain
were much addicted to
r
a
j
m %
o
L
and were in great mca
in cl Canaan
■>
as we
e 1
%
uy
^ *
-s #
m en
upon
m en
tioned of Ariftasus, when he made a vilit to Dionufus
mount H acinus
and was never after 35 feen
?h
r
A
4
According to the mod;
com
4
mon accounts
leus, it was ow
£
es, and manner of life
woman
He was a foil
tary, and refufed all commerce with
the Mtenades, and other women of Thrace,
and tore him to pieces
were
V
A
thrown into the Hebrusi down which
were
Maximus Tyrius. C. 37. p, 441
33 Scholia
V. 968
upon the Hecuba of Euripides* V. 1267. See alia the Alceftw
*
Plato de Repub. L, 10. p, 620
33 Diodorus. L
*4
p. 282. The biftory of Ariflaeus is nearly a parody of the
liiftories of Orpheus, and Cadmus
4
bj
J
1
1
f
I
m i
h
I
I
t
account
Jl
1.1
I
I
i.
1
I
I
I
p
I
n
r
b
H
i
i
4
I
I
l"
t
I
J
I
A"
P
l"
L
H
*
I
r
I
I
r"
I
i
i
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
*39
n
i"
Li
4
Greeks were termed the Dionuuaca. They ieem to have
been much the fame as the Cabyritic myiteries, which he
F "i
IS
I
faid to have eftablifhed m
Samothracia. He fought with'
a
mighty dragon, y whole teeth he afterwards fowed, and
pro
duced an
*
been indebted for the firJd introduction of 1 letters: which are
h
in
I
£
1
number flxteen. He married Harmonia, the daughter of
•i
Mars and Venus: and his nuptials were
efence of all the Gods, and Goddefles; each of whom con
P
■ l
i r
■i
■■
n
i
s
A
h.
was
■i
- y
|*M
l"
I
4
*- ■
j
in
!r
life, he is faid to have retired with his wife Harmonia to the
were
jJ
I-
h
I
h
of Labdacus, the father of Laius. This laft was the hulband
I
us
r
>
P
I
h
I.
I
t
I
Bochart with wonderful ingenuity, and equal learning,
i 1
r ■■
i
is re
i
%
rJ
fuppofes Cadmus to have been a fugitive
r i
j
Canaanite, who fled from the face of Jofliua
and that he
4
T
i" "
was
)
K ccf'fr# ec7riitofrBvoi"—'wcnyctyov chtTafreaA/et 6*
Eaxcu h) %cu ypctfx,freerct) mra rrpiv HerocL L. 5
; 'Oi ££ ovrdi ot ervv
c
r
C. 5 ■
Literas
Xi. i. c; £ 6.
A *
* * 1 * ^ ^ L*
-in Greciam intulifle e Phcenice Cadmum, ledecim numero. Pliny
h
li
1
i
t
r 1
"1
1 ..
I
z
m
L
h
I
"I
r
h
"S
p
l"
I
n
\
J
I
I
I
/
H
J
I
I
"i
I
*
r
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
F 1
3
4
Tsc TV7WS SIVOU 7K$ £7Tl
Ld
Herodotus indeed, to prove
tens reigned in that country
us
that he faw fpecimens of their writing at Thebes in the
as an-
temple of Apollo 5 Ifmenius: that there was a tripod
the reign of Laius, the fon of Labdacus; with
51
cient as
n
which imported, that it had been there dedi
ion
with the name
cient
on
r:
10ns
L
of Amphitryon : but how could he be fure that it was the
writing of that perfon, and of thofe times ? We know what
is in en
I.
cl
how often infcriptions
d
it
are
credible, that the characters of Amphitryon mould
i
to
m
could not be underftood ? and which of the two
this cafe to believe. I
or Plutarch r I
: not
an
w
tablet: nor do I believe, that there was a tripod with cha
only argue from the
rafters as ancient as Amphitryon
* 1
k. j
principles of the Greeks,
Plutarch above
r n
O / A.ev rav rgmofoov
A n pvco v fjucufewWv ccttq TtfAsboctcyp
1
T«i/r« ftAixmv a.y sw 5c«t# A«ioy Tor AaCAjcjca. Herod
5 : C. 59
L J
(
"J.
I
1
J
I
i
il
I
J
"l
n
d
Analysis of Ancient Mythology
i h
43
was borrowed, makes Cadmus an
r ■ p
IS
ue
L.
been of Babyloniui extraction
father Age nor, from.
p 1
V
r i
whom he is fuppofed to have been inflruCted in the fciences
M
IS
io
c
J
axis
Mil
V
n
r:
I i
J
We learn the fame from the Scholiaft upon Lycophron
Kcti o
ti ■. j. M
ii
V7C
r .
t
now w ooev o
c
M BV
u
was Cadmus , who came into Greece
o
m
r
j
in which Cad
• * I
mus is reprefen ted as fo knowing: and here it was, that he was
and the other characters, which are attri
mcs
tau
J
\
buted tohim. For he is
6 ozrwr
Thefe arts he carried
CL
010
Cadraum Pherecydes. L. iv. Hiftoriarum ex Agenore et Argiope, Nili
fiuvii filia natucn effe tradidit. Natalis Comes. L. 8. c. 23. p. 481. There are
of this perfonage. AtSws . ?:• E tto.km Tlocreii'wos
Aywms th s BwAa KaJ'p.cs. Scholia Euripid
9
various genealogies
BnAa*;, Ay<\vMQ
A^ KM
Phoeniff. Y. 5
QifiKuHi <fs ev cf 1 sroc (pw/p. Aywap <Ps 0 noaeif'uvos ya.y.u Aau. m ryv Bn A 3
km Icrcaa, w AtyuTTM, km MsAix, w icrffi Ax
TTOTXfJ.B' TS i'S yiVSTXl
KM
5
f.
b
X
T &)V a i yiVOVTCU
eirenot eviayei Aynwo A^ytoirnv rnv NsiAa ra
H
KaJpo;. Apollon. Scholia. L. 3
Dionullac. L. 4. p. 126.
V. 1206. The P.oet calls the Thebans of Bceotia, Clyvyts ft acres Am
1
VOLOS
v. 1.185
IO
1 1
Nonnus. L. 4. p. 1 26
23
hr ft
Ar
I
h
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
144
ria
T
is
r
]
to Greece : for before he
X
came to Hellas, he is faid to have
t
13
KOU
)
TW
CITtO ’
r
V ffCLV
rom
1
s
)
i
h
Li
m
L J
was not
(
)
t
a Phenician, My next e
I
as
5
L
l^l
I
fueh perfon exifted
vour will be to prove that
If we
no
.. A
P
oonnder
*
we
i
t
1
find, that it was impofuble for one
L
n to
¥ Z 1 *
4
what he is fuppofed to
r
compleated. The
more, than that he
4
f
P
*P*
f rn
*
r* t* t>
countries afford us a more extenfwc account
amon
Diodorus
,+ doubts
rP
■P
I
ft r
are to
Strabo, and Paufaunas
%
1
1
>
j
1
1
4
i
infer, that no
the charac- ■
.we
# *
p
t
j
i
as
4
I
k
I
L
-.1
He is faid to
■ 1
** Eufeb. Chron. P. 27. and Syncellus. I*
M See Paufan. L
xcu Ka-f//.o«
«tA. Eufeb. Chron- P. 27
4
*■ *
“1
to 15
L
j
152
9- P- 734
ctTo ©« 6 W
.4
*4
T'jlV A I") UTTICOV e&A
rsnrts stf rm
L ..
I
I
■l
2
H
0
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
*45
and afterwards to
16
Lindus, where he appointed
order of priefts. He did
an
L
- *
the fame
at Thera, and afterwards was at lS Thafus
and
17
r J
his travels partook of the Cabiritic myfleries
m
in 15 Samothracia
vihted
20
: 1
Lj
He was at Lelbos
which he named
where fome of his pofterity
Iffa
21
1
were
I
to
L.J
*
Sporades; which ifland was denominated Membliaros from
one of his **• followers. Mention is made of his being upon
4
the 13 Hellefpont, and in Thrace
he relided. and
1 . J
• found out a mine of * 4 gold, having before found
one
_ 1
is faid to have
*5
in
1
n
wealth
opog. We hear of him afterwards in
£6
8
mi ro
H
there
*7
k
1
J
X6
Diodorus Sic, L. 5. p. 329
YictSjuc$~— 7 rgocr£Gr%e tjjf (Bvpuv, Herod
Canon apud Phorium, P, 443. and Scholia DionyfiL V, 517. E t%e
01 T/\€UCrctPT€$ XCCTCC
r 1
i
17
C * X ^|>
. J
ccprcov $QmxQov iS'pvm
tegQV Hgctxfe'ds V) QcUTQSy VTO T QdV
V
t }]S Eup&iths tw ©a aw £x.Ticrccv
19 Diodorus Sic. L
)
y
p- 323
86 . Priene in Ionia called Cadraia. Strabo
r ■
r
r
l_ I
Nonnus. L. a. p
j
4
I 'J
I
P- 943
J
•h-
Lycophron. V. 219
Steph. Byzant
*3 Nonnus. P. 86
1
. j
F. 1
*+ Auri metalla et conflaturam Cadmus Phoenix (invenit) ad Pangaeum
Plin
mon
56. KctS'fj.aSy xa.1 Tf'Agfpacro'a tv ©pax»} xaTwxtyray. - Apdl
i
7. c
tem
1
lodorus
*s Plin
16 Strabo. L» 14. p. 998
Strabo. L. 10. p, 685.
3 - P- * 3 °
Jf
xa. Hygin. F. 274
34 -c
J
«:
a 7
t
U
II
■%
are
r 1
7
’J
L ' J
J
\
l
t
I
I
I
I
H
1
a
n
The Analysis op Ancient Mytholog
=147
the chief of his advert
I
He married Harmonia at the lake
H Tritonis; and is faid to have founded m
world no lefs than an hundred cities :
J »
according to the Egyptian accounts,
tr
ures were in
iiDva
?o
3 5
Some of thefe cities feem to have been rituated far weft in
I
L'J
1
3 (
30
K m
8
of old called 37 Cadmeia: fo that he may
was
\
1
be ranked among the founders of that city
m
r
L_
SKCiKS f to is Kouvq wokis.
$
mi
Slot
*
is mentioned by Moles Ghorenenfts to have fettled in
Armenia, where there was a regio Cadmeia not far from
38
p. 1
and to have come from 19 Babylonia
race
Jr
k
J
fo in this region
e in
A
igirowwi KtfJivy
ccA>jtj) 5* Nonnus, L* 13* p. 372
p- 323-
3+
A p/jiovrp
Diodorus fays that he married her in Samothracia. L. 5
■d
■a
3 s Nonnus. L. 13. p. 372
6 Nonnus. L. 13. p. 370
37 Stephanus Byzanc. The Carthaginians are by Si Jins Italicus ftiied Cadmev
A
ans.
Sacri cum perfida pa&i
I
Gens Cadmea fuper regno ceitamina movit. L. 1. v, 5
1 "
3 » L. 1. c. 9,10. p. 26. L. 2. c. 4. p. 87.
s Mofes Choren. L. 1. c. 9. p. 2 6. There was a city Cadmea in Cilicia
K«^//£(a gKT/ffSw scat £v KiAnuct. Eufebii Chron. P. 30, 1 . 22
F^
Cadmeia
U 2
*
i.
1
I
I
h
ft
t*
"i
I
4
*
r
F
■•y
Ancient Mythology
The Analysis op
150
rent caff
obliged to retire
felves over various
the fons of Ghus
rr n 1 r
1 hole
I
. J
were
*
c
*
i
>rcai
J
%
111 con
& *
earth
were in after times
or title
>
%
was attri
And as eo
world
to
%
\ (T
lonies
widely diftant; their ideal chieftain, whether Cadmus, or
Bacchus, 01
went to
<!■-*
h
\
Hercules, was fuppofed to have traverfed the
A
i tf/%
ages were
1
c
O
■Hi
t
\
a
I
a
*
+
L. J
1
of
7
* .
c
*
rr1
the ancients
d >
m
*
r
t
w-rvt
O
v-
of titles, out of reverence to their
Wherever they
rnr
es to them, and cities, under various
came t
denominations; all which were taken from fome
attribute. Thefe titles and attributes
*
1 rnr«
KT
A '
tjl
manifold, and
41
multitude of Deities, whole
to a
never could be fettled, nor
* *
Cadmus was one of thefe. He was the fame
n
icra
c
confident
1
*
L
Li
as Hermes of
Egypt, called alfo Thoth, Athoth, and Cunathoth: and
T *
Mr*-.
Acs yoi tc tw&nw
Kat wohvcowuiw. Callicrw H. in Dianam. v* 6
A'/TTrct » <pvh a&i
climw
Homer, IL in A noil* V« 8 z
05 fcC'D
4
rio^Uj }J£V aVUMTTQlCn
% b% ocvmvysA
Qboc kwA nyxt Kums, Eurip* Hippolytus* Y
I
3
ISIDI. MYRlONYM-flE. Gruter. lxxxiii
n. 11
A
i"
4
I
i
r
1
L
*
4
I
1
I
>
P.
a"
i
"l
"l
I
t
j
"i
i
i
t
i
i\
J
J
I
1
4
i
t
i
i
"i
rf-
ih
I
A
I
M
I
1
\
J
I
I
P
I
\
J
I
"i
4
I
I
I
r
H
*
I
I
s
4
A
i
"i
I
L-
Ancient Mythology
The Analysis or
l
the lontans cxpreflcd it Academus, to have Academia formed
Hu
that, when the Cadmians
from it.
came to
us
1
Attica, they introduced a new
cm ol 7+ Archi
■at
f
tecture
which the natives had been ufed
m a
t
v
And he deferibes
to
at feme diftance from thofe of the
the fi fruition of the place called Aca
from
This was
demia, which flood
7S Athens
all accounts
at the diftance of a few furlongs
and fcience; and by
*
%
e
V
i 1
called here
Mori®.
irmgs, and baths for the convenience
There were
of thoic, who here took their exercife, The tradition among
or Academus
V
the Athenians was
founded it in ancient times
name. Laertius ftiies him the hero Ecademus
from whom it received its
?ft
A7ro rim
L.
MO
r
* *
>\
X
a twos Hpms o vo
Am
writer
ious. the comic
Hr eWMoif
v
- Jf
s of him as a Deit\
7
t*
¥
c
-t.
i.
Koa <r(pi *lgct tv AB wyori iJ'fluf/JvcCf
tajj* ou-Jgi* jj.h'nx *r oi<n ?Mrrztoi Awi
vcaoitn 7 a>\cc ns rm <x>kw xut «f>/ xat Ay? % tint J\nyj}TP0i
Lgov m xm o^yut, Herod* L* 5* c« St
*** Paufanias. L;
r
P- 7 1
76
Diog. Laertius. L. 3. § 6. Hornius lays. Academia a Cadmo nomen ac
3. but Ecademus, and Cadmus, were undoubt
cepit, non ab Ecaderno. L. 7
cdly the fame perfon. Harpocration thinks that it took its name from die per
fon, who firft confecrated
c
Atto th Ka.^ieooi'rxv
Tvi A xxfxfjM
XTICTXVT55 TO
It
Jl
H f*&V Axct^npJCC CC 7 TO *H 0 (OQ$ TiVOS Ax&i nfSJ.i
upon Demofthem, contra Timocratem.
Eupolis Comicus
Ulpian
TuXr
\ tm
11
Vita Platon is.
tv A^poTtuToa apiul LaiVtuim in
r ’
L. §* c. 7
*
S'fivuoicriv
h l
1
r
\
The Analysis
Ancient Mythology
59
I
i
* '
©SB
<riv
trees
v
M
L7T.
precin&s, were looked upon
7 »
oi/roog tspctt
as
and the place itfelf in ancient times was of fo great fandtity.
79
7fgoTepoy sv Akcx.
^ k 1 ,-
lot,
f
The Ceramicus at Athens had the fame name
and .was
A
FA
undoubtedly given from the fame peribnage
n
L!i
zctXeircu as srooc 0
no
r
a" .
tion was, that it was denominated from the hero 80 Ceramus.
the {on of Dionufus. This arofe from the common mif
l
J
j
was
it was lacred, and whole name it bore
the fup
L
was
1
L
pofed hero; and Ceramus was Cer-Kam, the tower
tem
pie of Ham, which gave name to the inclofure. This abufe
of terms is no where more
1
in an 1
ion
mentioned by Gruter; where there is a mixed title of the
i
wor
J
Sr
amae
c
• I
MARTI
MPL U M
I
MMUNi
T U M
T
■>
?
L J
1
f
In like manner near mount JLaphyf
title of the chief God..
n
7 reps ocvtop cfe wctclv ca ovrcos teoctt EActfctf
OOI
Hp yctp yvfxvccotov cciro A oc. cF ft b
TJiS ©ga ? x.ct?iovvTcit 1VTcgictt. Sc hoi. upon Ariffcoph* Ns^sAcu. V
.ffilian. Tar.- Hift. L. 3. c. 35
II
L J
_ J
L J
A
To cT g yuptoy o Kioafj.i'/tos to jxtv ouo^cc s clttq Hpcoos Kspccj^ou' £s.iovv<tqv ts
Apia.J'vvs- Panfan. L
®* Gruter.. Infcrip. P.. 57. n. 13
p. 8
simt 5 tea
* -
1
. j
Hum.
1
k
t
1
■'i
J
4
I
1
1
v-
I
h
I
4
I
I
I.
|l
>.-h
"i
r
4
4
r
4
.1
.■
I
1
•m
I
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
\
L r J
J*
Thus we find that Alpha was both an oracle, and an ora
I
The Grecians took it in the latter accepta
cular animal
tion
dience to an oracle, they gave out, that Cadmus followed a
What is alluded to in the animal, which was
1
I
cow
I
I
I
r
i
r ■
of it by Paula nias
Em
I
TJK bQQ£
J
tion
M
r
i
L ‘J
There was a white mark on each fide of the
cow
ure
>
J
moon
I
I
o
I
J
. j
c
r n
> t
. i
L
This is an exadfc defcription of the
TTSPl^OJCOV, tjVTS MtlVW
4
Apis, and other facred kine in Egypt
■!-
r ^
n
p
a
lates to an oracle e
that
P
r
rSl
ns
Ti
i
\
i*\i|
w
I
f
I
h
I
l"
This the Grecians have r
had be
1
r:
r
as
w
r-
ti
I >
hr:
b
T
J
k j
M
ft
cow
f
a
i
i
ble to be taken in either of thefe acceptations
Nonnus
J
P
±
Cadmus as
4
from
and defcribes him
I I
l*
to
ft
, 4
to the common notion as going in quell of a bull, and as be
Yet
ace of relidence by a
4
I
oo
in
cow
r
p
j
Paufan. L. 9. p. 733
I
£
I
F
i"
£
U
■■
$7
I
1 ■
* s Herodot. L. 3. c. 2t>
t
Atyvit t t a Zi/oru/ra
i
Em fommjpcS Qcr^fsPos fajrwi'- L. 4 * p* 126
riocyc 1 ^roA/crcroy £Treeru/xc 7recrBtjct
Tiuviicru Sacuy&vQP lev ttoS'cl £ys. Nonnus
p
r"
1
5*
P
*
4
4
4« p. J 3°
r
1
4
s
he
PH
P
I
I
I
I
1
I
4
"i
r.
1
4.
\
■i
h
i"
4
4
r
i
i
F
l
i
h
"i
i
- .1
n
f
«■
\
i
i
I
"i
t
s
I
l
I
I
I
1
i
j
n
i
i
4
■i
4
>
v
4
I
I
h
>
"I
K
I
s
d
4
i
i
h
H
h
I
>
d
H
r
H
J+
1 .
1
I
H
h
I
V
I
I*
I
l
I
I
I
I
ll
*
1
I
1
{
r
i
J- i
Fhe Analysis of Ancient Mythology
t
M
gons
fhield with a ferpent for a device, to hgnify that he was
a
Theban. The Spartans were of the fame
14.
or
an
and there is faid to have been the fame device upon
1
race
the fhield of
r n
1
j
The
Menelaus, and of 16 Agamemnon
15
J
1
>4
which was there inftituted by the Cadmians
Colchis, Apollo in Phocis, Hercules at Lerna, engaged with
hiftories of the fame purport; but
ferpents, all which are
amifs to take notice of fome of
to which Cadmus is faid to have
It will not, I think
thofe countries weflward
betaken himfelf. From Bceotia he is
and it is certain, that the Cad
aces upon that coafl:
to
ria
Thef
mians fettled in many
protia was a province of the Athamanes, who were deno
I
I
L J
4
&
4
L
Suidas. Epaminondas
Paufanias. L. 10. p. 862
14
r 1
L j
IS
f
h
I
r
16 Both Menelaus and Agamemnon were ancient titles of the chief Deity.
The latter is fuppofed to have been the fame as Zeus, iEther* and Ccelus
He feems to have been worshiped under the fymbol of a ferpent with three heads
Hence Homer has given to his hero of this name a ferpent for a device both
4
upon his breaftplate, and upon his baldrick
L J
Ttfs cf’ £§ agyvosog t£A cljmv cturccg
tir cut )tw
*
a ycracv
avwcvos Iliad. A. V* 38
Kvccveos zXbXiktq S'PCtXOOV' £A CO o£
TfgiS a.fJL(picf BQZUi
I
z
minated
VOL. II
K
I
I
4
I
I
I
•*1
"i
i
h
n
s
J
.J
i
i
i
"i
F
I
k
I
4
Analysis of Ancient Mythology
F ^
V
ft
I ■
L. _■
■f.
have r elided
was in
r *
IS
r i
j 1 -
k
i
not only in Liguria, but
in
i
L .
i
J
1
4 m
nea
.
'J
memorials
h
naan
I
I
of their original; efpeci
l
n
%
i
\
Some of them had carried on a great
torim of Paleitina
I
river
Folia Philiftina; and Fofiiones Phi-
from them was called 30
Mime
I
I
r m
r i
i_ j
n
is laid of Cadmus, that
1 1
%1
I
I
J
"l
a
l
F
i i
IS
I
r
l i
I
a town in
4
I
|>
L
n
i
i
IS
Y
L
l:
i
I
L_
I
I
J
et
J
I
h
i
L
rj
i
fylvis Athamas, et nomine prifco
■■
ri
Enchelise, vern teftantes funera Cadmi
■l
rj
1
1
Alfo a city Conope, by Stepnanus placed in Acarnania
*9 Antoninus Liberalis. C. 12. p. 70. A city Conopium was alfo to be found
upon the Palus Masotis. Steph. Byzant
Plin. L. 3. c. 16. The Cadmians of Liguria came laftfrom Attica and
JBceotia j hence we find a
I
I
1
4
30
river Eridanus in thefe parts, as well as in the former
country, Florct/Aoi eTg Auflj'a/o/s pgy aiv TB*A iGtros xcct H ptS'otvtf tw KgA*n>t$>
XCCTCL
I
ttUT« ouoixa e%(av. x. A* Paufan
»* Vol
P- 45
f
I 1
■ 1
. j
Y
I*-
P* 37b
I
3 * Lucan;
3. v. 187. The fame is mentioned by the poet Dionyfius
Kan oh S' otv 7 rigi v.qKttov iS'ois 7 repi KvSea. Tu/xfiov.,
TvuSoi
C *
A gfAQVWfi KacTftoio Tg (pwfjus epi(T7reiy
j"
Otpitov <rz?htoy Q-sros >$\ct|;ccyTQ, ^,390
OV
\
V
The
I
l!-
4
-t
j
*
*
(■
4
L
I
4
h
1
I
I
I
I
I
p
h
I
\
J
h
I
I
V
■I
y
h
f
C
«■
h
|*M
J
■l
1
.1
I
I
fc
i.
4
*
I
■■
"l
1
r
4
"l
1
r
"i
n
r
L
■/
H
f
*
I v
I
I
"l
i
i
i
"1
l"
p"
a
a
£
h
h
"i
4
I
J
r
j
K
1
4
1
h
I
n
i
I
i
A
I
4
h
*
L
J
i"
I
I
<
h
h
l
L
"w
4
F
e
i
h
l
I
"i
p
p"-
I
► ■"
|L .
1 t
1
L
(
J
f
(
I
1
*
"i
I
■s
h
p
■i
i"
<
l
p
%
h
•V
S
I
4
I
4
k
h
I
I
K
±
■%
1
I
I
■i
I
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
fcript: for that was written in imitation of the former, and
called 9S Poimandras.
Thus have I endeavoured to ftate the progrefs of th
and
r-
to defcribe the rout which they took
in
O
I have (hewn, that under the title of Phenicians and Cad
Canaan, and in the region
they firft fettled
in
.mians
vna
/
H
Antioch
9
Amoysm rqg Xvgicts 7 To 7 \lv skthtclv, Cafus
m
A
now
Chus: and Eelus is a Babylonifh title of
as well
of his immediate defcendants, who are here alluded to
as
thence to Armenia: and that there were colonies here of
Amonians
■¥
from, the hiftory of Cadmus: but more efpecially from
the fimilitude of language, perfon, and manners, which
*
fubfifted among thefe 97 nations. Zonaras is very explicit
mentions the incroachments of the
upon this head
fons of Ham in thefe parts, and fhews the extent of the tref
1
r
' Hermes Trifmegittus, five TlaffActvtyw
Syncellus. P. 326. Eufebius. Chron. P« 24
By which are meant the Syrians, Arabians and Armenians. T ofi
A msvtcou g9 uo$ 9 xcu to
e t*/)v cf iaAfiXTors lieu tbs £ib$
Tw
06
Jn.
07
cti
tcou ApxG&w 7 tqAAvv ofiocpuAicti* e/xty-xt
nrcov
%CLl TBs Tfc>y gCtWTVgGLS M.tA
Zll'CLl
i
Vil X.CCTCC
Strabo
i. p. 70
.7
p
L'.j
k ;
B b 2
J
V
r
i
I
h
I
+
T
X
1
4
S
1
i
■l
I
Jm
I
l"
4
n
p
r
The Analysis ok Ancient Mythology
I
Perfis, and Gedrofia, under the name of Orita^. They are
to be found in Bcetica upon the Atlantic under the fame
name
t
IV
.■
h
4 -
h
I
I
Di uvio
ranean
f
c
P
Thefe are the migrations, of which the ancient hiftorian
5 Iftrus wrote in a curious treatife, long fince loft; which
We meet with
he infcribed irsn toov Aiywmw amutias
4
a fummary account of them in Diodorus Siculus, who men
tions, that after the death of Ifis and Ofiris the Egyptians
over the face of
*1
I
Owe ovv Alyvwrioi <pct<n xou uerct ravra ami
the earth
Mac 7 rXsi?a$
usvqv
6
r
i
l
TW OIKS
migrations there were two remarkable above
koltcc wa<rav
h
I
J
T:
1
■!
>■
L
r
the
of the Tons of -Ghus, concerning whom I
h
J
w n
k. -I
r
J
.1
■■
the other of the Ifraelites, which was
The author above takes
notice of both thefe occurrences in a moft valuable extract
C
wherein he Hoes not fufEciently dif
4
I
I
* I *
I
nor the
4
I
I
L
; times
I
n
h
P
In Bcetica they were called Oritani. Strabo. L. 8
There were Orita? in Epirus. Dicaearchus flatus Graeciae. Meret
Ogeircu, P. 4. v. 45
Oritaein Perfis. Arrian
Maris Erythr
4
p. 204.
1
P
t&tqv smv
h
t
"l
J
L
"1
I
4. c. 26. alfo in'Gedrofia
See Au< 5 tor Periph
i
"i
*
1
•x
f
j
j
_1
1
1
*
Hgos nrov £wtv tsj IrcT# 'TroroLfJt# O pitch
IvS'tKOV* Steph. Byzant. There
fephus. Ant
Schol. 'Dionyf. V. 1095. flpirca earn
E
l
■i
were Oritae in Perfis, hard by the Cutha'of Jo
■ 1
9* c. 4. and c, 15
Clemens* Alexand. Strom
A
!>
b
b
B
4
I
382
t
L
1
l
p ■
I
k
L j
ri
1
h
4
4
Diodorus Siculus
k J
p.. SLA,
n
■ i
L..
I
4
1
■1
I
curious
f
I
h
J
4
P
I
r
j
L
X
1
X
/
I
I
X
**
Analysis of Ancient Mytholo gy
t i
i
* j
TM
oi eft\<p clv e$r cctoi
wff ftiveg fourty* sig
> t
KQLl
(TVfgOLCpSVTeS
mi r ivocg sTsgsg toths, eyovreg
3
Tl)V
UP
ftyeiAovag' cav
VS fCLTOl
■ *1
Oh ftoAvg Xscag etsfts<rev eig tqv
vvv
r
i
Upon thiSi as fome. writers tell
the mojl
\ n
US
eminent
were m
elves to
ODlt
or
o
o e
or toem
the mojl
were
were
a large> But
enae tnete
lefs noble , body of people , who retired into the province called
now
r *
we
as we can carry it, ana of the rites and religion introduced into
?
Zonaras.:
ere
s
(
dea to Egypt ; and from thence were derived to the Greeks. The
•J
feme is
of the .Cadmians, and other Cuthites, in thefe parts, is ut-
i •
us
r-H
terly unknown. With them commences the hiftory of the
*h
It is true, there are accounts concerning
4
f
. — i
Ex Diodori. L. xl. apud Photium. P. 1152
9 "A fimilar account is given by the fame author. L. 1, p. 24*..
Zonaras. V. 1. p. 22. Alfo Syncellus. P. 102
* 1,
He is very full upon this head. • Contra Apion. L
*
ft"
j
]
>*
p. 443. and 444. .
theus
■ I
3 * V
•I
1
J
h
I
I
4
•1
L
h
1
<
i
r
l"
n
4
h
"i
?
r
I
H
I
J
h
h
4
>
I 1
Y*
4»P«r
i
i
h
I
I
P
I
4
>
4
b
I
r
h
h
I
I
=;
J
\
-I
(
i
h
r
i
i
I-
■.
«■
"i
i
w
i
j
h
f
i
h
I
I
-J
I
r
1
1
r
"i
i
i
i
S
i
i"
n
•j
k
4
H
I
I
i
I
.J
1
"i
I
J.
H
4
I
I
"i
I
I
I
4
J
j*
i"
k
I
L
%■
I
I
I
I
4
n
t
i
i
i
j
\
4
?
i"
J
I
I
J
iri
h
I
1
I
»
J
I
h
i
*
■S
i
h
V
d
n
=i
I
L
A
h
i
i
h
h
i
H
J
I
I
"L
I
i
I
I
3
"i.
i
p
I
I
\
\
V.
f
I
I
I
J"
J
I
I
I
I
t
r
H
4
I
h
s
I
h
J-
h
1
■l ■■
h
i
The Analysis op Ancient Mythology
in the firfl:
200
+
ages
r
I
hiftorians and mythologifts of different
and
cou ntries
be particularly found in the facred rites
traces of it are to
of Egypt, and of Greece
r
t
i
in the more an
i.
■i
H
cient writers, that the great Patriarch was
I
I
as a
i
* t
i
liarly favoured by heaven; and honoured him with many
each of which had a reference to fome particulai
titles
I
I
Atlas, Theuth, Zuth, Xuthus, Inachus, Ohris
When
I
L
r ^
i j
"i
4
i
4
the title of Helius among others was conferred upon him
w 1
h-
"i
. 1 "
They called him alfoMijv, and May, which is the Moon
4
i_ j
b
j
the fecret meaning of which name I fhall hereafter fhew
When colonies went abroad
b
4
r
many took to themfelves the
r r.
denominated Achaemenidae, Auritae, Heliadae, from the Sun.
are to be found in Arabia, and
The natives at Orchomeno
set ; as were alfo fome of the inhabitants of
was. the ancient name of the Arcadians
People of the former name
other parts of the world
m
I
I
were
b
A
inter
was
%
4
I
"i
I
I
and Dios
was
r ^
■d
Kat Api^cov o Xiosgy Tctis vecrecri xca Atovvcios
X a Ax/cT eu s ev ttpcoto) xt icr£®$
eSrm S'e A gxaS'tccs 'Xehwrcts wou, Schol. in Apollon
0
i"
ru avra <pouj\ xccl
1
R-hod
4. y, 264
i_ j
the
>
t
L
4
L
1
x
i"
V
4
J
I
r
1
The Analysis
Ancient Mythology
\Z
201
the vine, and the inventer of 9 fermented liquors: whence he
was denominated Zeuth } which fignifies ferment; rendered
was alfo
Dionufbs, inter
10
Bac
r
chus was Ch
be in general efteemed Ham, fo much reverenced by the
Li
may
1
w
niformly adapted : nor were the ancients confident
their
in
thefe ancient hiftories, than that fatal turn in the Greeks
wi th which
l
1
and
r 1
i_*
was
preferved : they called him Noas, Naiis, and fometimes
ri
vers were denominated from him. Anaxagoras of Clazomeme
had been in Egypt; and bad there obtained fome know
of
Noas or Nous; and both he and his difciples
* JL
lennble
that it was a foreign appellation
fa :■ 1
Tov Ocrtpiv ^toiucrcv. Diod. Sic
A xat ajirmyptoo jjlb vnv b^outocs u itpos (pVTBtccv cc/m.7re?i&
'TPtOOf/.£Pm , i fJLCt&SW TO XciTGLaY-tVcd^QfJLtVCV tXr T0V XglSrav 7T$PGt%U hUTTQfJ&VQV
7 r€pi 'tqv oivov eucocTjcts. Djod. Sic
xexhurcu xn to eviw &evxahuoi* TheopbiL ad Autolyc. L. 2. p. 370
1. p. 11
L_l
I
3. p. 207
1 n
Pi^cu^os t/£ Aiyuirrm By rots %fovois Ncc£
0$ Nojs %ca &iovv<ro$} xcti Qcig# kccMitccl Tzetzes Chil
VOL
10, Hift. 335
r l
ined
n
L
>
s
i
r 1
r.
I
I
I
r
i
.■
i
H
1
"I
J
J
"i
fl
1
*
h
I
r
J
i
r.
1
"I
A
1
h
r
i
l
I
i
1
n
i
Y
I
h
r
i
"H
I
n
K
"i
"i
r
L
h
I
■r
i
i
+
\
I
H
J
I
h
r
1
l'
I
I
1
I
It
J
H
r
v
P
I
■V
"l
r
i
>>
The Analysis of Ancient Mythologv
209
Lj
His name lias been rendered very 11 alii
of the Patriarch
e
itfelf, by having been lengthened with terminations
and
otherwife fafhioned according to the idiom of different na
"■"da
tions
are
M
and particular, that we cannot mils of the truth
He feems in the Eaft to have been called Noas. Noafis
J
name was com
pounded Dionufus. The Amonians, wherever they
came
hence places called Nufa will
founded cities to his honoui
often occur. Hefychius fays, that there were both cities and
mountains ftiled Nufean in many parts of the 28 world: and
he i n ft an ces in Arabia, Ethiopia, Egypt, Babylonia, Eruthrea
y
Thracia, Theftaly, Cilicia,’India, Libya, Lydia, Macedonia,
the ifland Naxos; alfo a Nufa near mount Pangaeus; and a
Syria, the fame, which was called af~
There was alfo a place called Nufa
upon mount Caucafus; and upon Helicon: alfo in the
ifland Eubcea ; where was a notion, that grapes would
in one day. Of the Nuia
India Philoftratus takes notice; and fays, that from
place of this name in
o
s
29
bloffom, and come to perfe&ion
■ 1
in
y
30
■, 1
But this, if the
\
ST CLl
VVTIQS CC 7 T 0 2 V
H xctSr eva tottqv' zq-i yetp A AtSriOTricc?
(BerrctAiot? x KiAnaa?] Atj 3 iw$y
Hefych
/Ssrrw ?r
Nucra, xcct ego
A tyvTTT&i BctfivAooi’QSy HgvSrpa?} Q^cckm
AuS icct-) Malted evicts Ncc^y 3 ttSoi to llctyycaov^ tottqs
ErQiX. cTict 'uias rifj.epct? mv cl/j.ttsAov (pcuriv avvvn
VC'lCiy
S>
Served
T 0 V
7 rear
* V ft *
7
Steph. Byzant
Vit. Apollon. Tyan. L
VOL. II
P* &6
M
n
[*
t ^1
au th or
E e
A" 1 '
I
s
I
H
h
V
H
"i
I
I
«■
I
I
h
h
h
h
I
1
J
4
j
•j
f
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology."
deans likewife mentioned him by the name of Xifouthros
Nws S<cr
2.1 %
r.
41
/
of
name occurring in
acco m
of Syria laid the lame claim to him
c
c
The natives
F
through which the waters after the deluge were faid to
likewife reported to. have built
retreated;
hav
4 .%
was
fame nature: and a like tradition; that the 43 waters of the
E
lefs the notions may be of the waters havin
retreated
or
o
yet they fhew what
im
were retained by the Amonians, who m
of this event
As dil-
came
ferent nations fucceeded one another in thefe parts, and time
a mixture
and modelled it-according to their
vai
notions and tradition
and the event for a
44
R S
was
in
41 Cedren. P.ti;
Lucian, de Dea Syria
4S c O gov es 7m%vv to sdctfyos
tin ZltuKaAieovos (rv/j.Catcrct.r^vwor.'jW'at tccut'o
44 How various thefe accounts-were
from Lucian
r .*88
\
r
p. 883
4 *
" 1
P
XCU ' AS>B crt 5 /jr_£. T5 )V £ 7T0JJX zlCC V T))V
to 6 £0*0. Paufan. L. i. p. 43.
even in the fame place, we may learn
a cidt xa&Tct
A>;o'£ cL f s>?\Gytov t zS^ DcJDea Syria*
c
D o/Aoi A oyot eAsyovro t«>' ci p.iv inoi,
aAAo: Bxpfiaaah
r i
* A
f
01 /X&r TQLQi.
c.
•D
-4
the
i 4 *
ti
I
I
lJ
b
1
I
I
I
J
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
fays, that this great occurrence
214
the hiftories of nations
I
4
in
was
He mentions Berofus of Chaldea, Hiero
I
I
nymus of Egypt, who wrote concerning
Phenicia; alfo Mnafeas, Abydenus, Melon, and Nicolaus
Damafcenus, as writers, by whom it was recorded: and
I
•l
dds, that it was taken notice of by many others
<X
*
4
we mail find the traces
"i.
I"
As we
of this event more vivid and determinate than thole of
L
and more conformable to the accounts of Mofes
r
Greece
r
J
4
dt to this
pur
:1 J
V
L
I
45
enus
j
1
■t
I
king, whom he names Seifithrus; and fays,. that the
that
as
I
I*
us Cent out birds
4
&
n
H
J
I
"i
but that the
I
I
birds j not finding any refiing place-) returned to him again
‘This was repeated three times j when the birds were found to
t
A
*
i
l
return w
ee
Wit a
d
f
4
b
b
4
Kgovot 7rgQ(nifjLcam fjuev eotevca ttA??
TrtfJLTrry e?rt J s excc' xeAeuei 7 rccv^ on
€V HtTTTupQ1 <?IV GL7T01
uevi&t ctraTrAge-. xcu
Q/L&pwv d\scriB
ygaiAfjLocrMv y\v e%pfjL$vov $v 'HA;b wotei ry
Xe tcr&p0s tccvtcc g^r/rsAe# tt 0/>;a cc $ 5 syoscos syr Ap
7tuoccvTiKcc [aw kclt ctAct fiftav £ r cl m &$s* Tpmi cTs Ti/mega*
eyrenct m exoiraa'^ jAerysi rcov opviSrwp irtimv '7rotsu/ABVQ$ i en<B yw i^oieu r& v^cc
’TQSexfupctV. A L ^63 cPg 2£Q[ASV& Ttpects 7T&Actytt$ U%'CtV6Q$) CL7rQ0%€rCU OKU XCVTQg
07Ttar0) xofAtCpwcu
4*
o
TO 5
fl.
K
I
Oil
I
t
I
fOj 0 *<?PTG'l 5 TTGLpet T Op JjZiG'lSrgQV
T J10*i
xcu 1r uvr^crw ersput* Cl$
I
L .
I
rgtrytnv BPTV%fi€V) a7rtxcLTQ ycto <Pv) irn Ae xcltoutt hzo 1 rago-u^ G toi [aiv
ctv$rpte 7 roov <x(pctvi? 8 cni
I
qctgp.etna to tanv &7rt%a>pom Tctpitp^ro. Abyden. apud Eufeb. Prasp. Evang
See alfo Cyril, contra Julian
r
L .
I
9
12
p. 8
m
I
4
r ~
1
r ^
j
1
the
L
1
1
L
I
v
b
i
I
1*
I
I
4
I
If*
-Ti
*
1
J
1
r
¥
i"
1
i<
1
Nn
¥
4
1
4
h
I
I
1
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
5
wMi
1
U j
never more feen of men
the earth. Abydenus concludes with a particular, in which
all the eaftern writers are unanimous; that the place
4
fcent from the ark was in Armenia: and lpeaks of its
Plutarch mentions
re
time
mams
a
the Noachic 46 dove, and its being fent out of the ark
J
curious account to the prefent purpofe is by 47 Eufebius given
from Melon, who wrote
J
takes notice among other things of the per ion, who furvived
e
cai
Armenia: but he has mixed much extraneous matter in his
narration
and fuppofes, that they came to the mountainous
ria
1
L_
and the
e
native of Samofata, a city of Com
in Lucian
magene upon the Euphrates: a part of the world where
was a
d"
1
L J
e were
ferved in the rites and worihip of the country. His know
was obtained from the Ahatic nations
ledge therefore
3
r
Aj cow (put 71 7t s o$pccv frt Xagvcotzs a&fg.u&jw
uev irciKiv <fuouerin\ eutfwts ccttott a<r. Plu
46
Oi fu&v [MJ^roAoyoi tcw
cTijA &f/.ct
tarch. de folert.. Animal. V
i
«- ■
p. 968
47 r O cTg TW <TU<rxevi]v r*w nccra yfcL^ccS MwA«r 5 Kara rov xctraxAvcr-
A o//.evicts fltTreAS'Sir tov 'iTSgtfaify&gVTcL a. v & gee 7 r 0 v fjjBTct
fhcCl'UCTGtVTtt T‘f\V
o
r
1
\
fJ*QV (pWW
USOJV* 2 X
f
c
Tcov wttov B^shauvouByoy viro tcov eyp^coptc^v^
bAStbip nir opeww t?/? vo-clv bm/aj
fJLZTX.
Eufeb. Prasp. Evang
1 /
v %copglv
is
L. 9
C* IQ. P* 420
■j
amoncr
a
'h
I
X
I
4
I
b
I
I"-.
j"
«■
■■
I
I
J"
L>
"i
i
j
r
n
i"
i
\
r
r
s
1
i
H
h
4
1
>
i'i
i
C
I
r
f
>
i
%
i
■■
+
\
H M-
1
I
I
-I
4
p
+
L
1
\
i
•t ^
"l
I
I-
I
"l
F
h
L
I
i
s
i
4
L
n
I
h
4
i
i
i
i
h
I
>
>
I
I
h
I
>
I
*
T.
I
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
221
■“ 1
It is (aid of Sefoftris, that he conftru&ed
was two hundred
cedar
6l
which
was
rj
ei
m
n
it was. when, finifhed. dedicated
Ofiris at Thebes
b
A
It is not credible, that there fhould have been a fhip of this
iize, efpecially in an inland diftri£t, the moft remote of any
mrine
The
r \
former was framed upon this large fcale : and it was the
cronautic ex
ion i
the dimensions of a
was
by which mu ft be meant
were
And I have moreover
on
07 ,
Trireme
" 1
ft
Triremes at the time alluded to
{hewn, that all thefe dragons,. as they have been reprefented
Dracontia
were in
..i
tj
among other rites, the worfhip of the ferpent
was infti
tuted. There is therefore realbn to think, that this temple
as well as that of SefoJflris, was fafhioned
J
{hip : and as to th
perficial contents after the model of
a
latter, it was probably intended in its outlines to be th
ex
commemoration of which
act re
it was
m
Diodor. SicuL L, i. p» 52.
K$iro yccg A /IgaKOV to* £
Hi%ero frccfipQTctrctv yevucoy^
Os TTCt^et {ACCK&1 rs 'TTZVr
vtqpov vmv xgcLTU, Pi fid. Pyth, Od» 4* P
Os xai t co xcci t&> f mxu a wpeer os
jSAi^ff e7r?uw# v&vv 7rivrmovTonoy
61
n
261
VTITKQVTQPGV VOVy
k._ 1
7 rs
Schol. ibid
)K *>5 SVIOiy
Theba
L J
3
3
f
i
I
I
I
h
I
V
c
j
*
\
i
h
i!
-M
«fc
L
i
I
i
*A
I
C
"i
I
I
■■
I
I
I
*
1
L
I
I
I
I
K
I
n
i
H
4
L
i"
i
I
r
J
h
I.
I
H
r
h
4
I
h
i"
"i
1
"l
4
h
1
r
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
227
A
that all thefe emblematical re
I think it is pretty plain
have given fo many inAance
s 3 re
and the confervation of one
1
r
I have before taken notice, that this hif-
family in the arl
r ^
J
tory was pretty recent, when thefe works were executed in
and when thefe rites were firft eftablifhed : and there
S7P
is reafon to think, that in early times moil ihrines among
the Mizraim were formed under the refemblatice of a {hip,
7
memory of this great event. Nay, farther
both fhips
in
from hence • being Ailed
and temples received their names
and Nows, and Mariners Naur on, Nautae, in reference to the
Patriarch, who was varioufly * Ailed Noas, Naus, and
Noah
myfteries have fome
However the Greeks may m tiieir
yet in their reference
times introduced a Ahd as a fymbol
. 1
Aagwi;, Larnax,
ark, which they call,
77
an
KibctiTog, and the like. And though they were apt to men
tion the fame perlon under various titles; and by thefe
different people feem to be made principals in the
m ean s
fame hiAory : yet they were fo far uniform in their
accounts
of this particular event, that they made each of them to be
Thus it is faid of Deucalion, Perfeus
in a
Tara* tv AAPNA.KI Jtacea-tuiriitt. See
Theophil. ad Autolic. L. 3
Plato of Deucalion and his wife
11
Xctovag ctVT 07 roPQ$
alfo Nonnus. L, 6. p. 200
2V Kl&MT
1
p . 391
1)
-r
Acre* S 9 ms 7 tok rov Ai7toXqv haora
Theocrit. Idyll. ■}. V. 78
Zftior ecu' to.
f
machine
cr
o
l.
I.H
I
n
i
i
I
I
i
V
i
i
4
4
Analysis of Ancient Mythology
229
name of Thebaj not in Egypt only and Bceotia, but in Ci
licia, Ionia, Attica, Pthiotis, Cataonia, Syria, and Italy
It
was fometimes expreffed Thiba
a town of which name was
I_I
8 *
is called Thibis
in Pontus
by 8j Pliny. He mentions a notion, which prevailed, that the
people oi this place could not Jink in water \ eofdem non
may. fee in this a remote alluhon to the
. J
merei : we
name
J
There was another term, belides Theba, under which the
was
r 1
tus
*1
original: as both - an * 4 haven
a
m
city of great antiquity in
in the fame manner. The fathers of the Greek church
gia, were denominated .
j
when they treat of the ark, interpret it in this manner
is alfo the term made ufe of by the 86 Seventy
!■ 1
Steph, Byzantiri
. Itwasfaid to have been built by the Amazons, From the Amazons being
Thcbeans, we may judge of their race, and true hiftory
. Plin. L. 7
Katroi tbs ye ttspi FIovtcv oixBVTctS TrctAca Onfats 7rgoffctyQP€vof/.et f 8$
t, A. Plut. Symgos. L, 5* c« 7.
H One of the havens at Alexandria, Strab. L. 17. p, 1145
s 5‘ Upas A.iroLjjjcta* Strab, L* iz> p, 854
KtScoros* Aag>ra§ ^v?uv>u Hefych
^ ricifitrov bv <navr(f Ktj2a)TQV ex |;uA&>j' Tfr paywtyt
K iGootqp* Genef C. 6. v. 14. Edit. Aid.
7 Hebr. C, 11, v. 7
r
c. 2
r i
L J
, vaqmete: ■Trmm^n xetret
Tnv
Pet
a. v. 20. .
i
which
A,
v 1
t
1
H
I
op Ancient Mythology
I
The Analysis
230
n
i_ j
A
\
w
-h
I
river
e
I
upon
from its name
deed, all over
feem to have been
alfo called Apamea
name
In
I
I
4
1.
v
r j
k
t
1
memori
J
e
I
I
K
f
L
4
I
I
r
was
A
"i
A
38
which
4
it in
A
4
1
1
I
1
1
1
faid to have been conferred upon
J
arnea is
I
1
latter times. It was
t
m
mem or y
it is connected
we fhall £nd that the people had
concern
1
l
L
•k
/
of the ark, and of the hiftory, with which
b
proof of this,
And in
more
I
the flood, and the prefervation of mankind through
I
I
Noah, than are to be met with elfewhere. The learned
Falconerius has a curious diflertation upon a coin of Phi
1
"i
89
■j-w
I
I
41
"I
I
I
I
h
Strab,. L. 12. p. 864, It. was undoubtedly the fame as Cetense, of which
I.have treated before; and which I have fliewn to haye been named from its
Cekenas Iihould imagine was the name of the city ; and Cibotus
which diftindtion was not attended to in former
novsque urbi Apa
c. 13. Ter
' 1
tius Apatneam vadit, ante appellatam Ceksnas, deinde Ciboton. Plin. L. 5.
fituatiqn
was properly the temple
times. Migratum inde haud procul veteribus Cetenis
J
niese nomen inditum ab Apamea forore Seleuci Regis. Liv* L. 38
■ T
1
h
j
p
C. 20
I
4
8> Odtav. Falconerii Diflertatio de nummo Apameenfi. Deucalionei diluviity
pum exhibente ; ad Petr, Seguinum S. Germani Antifliodor. Paris. Decanum
Ex Libra, cui atulus, Sele&a Numifmata And qua ex Mul'eo Petr. Seguini
Paris. 1684: He mentions another coin fimilar to the above, and ftruck by
the fame people, who are-ftiled Magnetes Apameenfes. On one fide is the
head of Severus crowned with laurel: on the other, the ark with the fame pet
fons in it, and the like circumftances deferibed: above, Bill AFQNO&ETflN
I
I
I
APTE MArHHTjQN AriAMEnfr. .
J 1
The two laft fyllables of MAFNHTflN
I
arc upon the blank fpacc of the
There
ark.
L
"i
"1
■V 1 !
J
I
l
I
1
I
J
I
i
1
*
p"
1
4
r
"i
1
j
i
"i
1
h
I
! I h
I •
I
S
s
I
I
I
%
I
I
■l
I
.■ ■
I
I
I
I
■ C
1
I
ii
i
l
l
i
. i
1
I
I
I
I
I
J
\
I
s
J
' I
I
I
•I
i
I
I
s
I
1
a
f
s
s
I
I
I
I
1 j
I
I
I
s
I
s
I
I
I
r r i
i
J
I
i
i ■ ■
f
r
w
J
I
l’ ■
I
r ■
i
I
111';
j
■ hi .
d
I
i
Ml
i
P
M
i [
s
I
I
5
i
i
i
I
*
* !
>i
HI
i
i ■
>
i
■i
4
■: I I
J
P
Y
i
: i
- \
i
fif
i
I
£
f £
aw
'J
Ji
title} U'
unauca
I
4
-
-p
F /
S
i
1
Mi
» P
j •
i
L .1
W V
C:
M
i
M!
i
f . L ■ ■ •£■ 1 i- i
5
I r. •-
.■
s
■V ■ is ■
• /
.V
■ ■
■ ■ K
hi .
s
■j
■ .■
■.
s
.■
■j ■
s
ss
I ■.
■ .V. \ .■
.■ ■
I
r
i - 1
■ j
■j
■■I
■ *.
I
■ j ■■■
■ ■.j. Is- _ ■■
|fJ
,i
V
s
1
A
l
■ k 1
ir 1 - 1 ■
r.-i
P
I /
h
i
r
n
i
■ ■pa* m m U
_ J LWI. X
L
M II4IB
■ " ■
_ S ■
■■■ ■"
I iH
ii i i ■■ i
V
p
I
I.
W
1
1
cun
4
V
I
L
I
%
f
i-
s
Y
! 5
l i-'!
r . I
I •
I
I
I
I
> ■
: ? :
Mi
i
!
\
E
s
I
. L
> t
■■
1 f
s
s
I
i 1
I
<
i
a"
I
V
I
i J
i
I
a"
I
i,
>. ft
^ i-
ft
I 1 -.
r
i
4
I
!
a"
*
I
1,
s
*
:• i
- r-
s
I
• L
I
r
"i
i ■
i
\
i
k:
I
J-
T
S
T
"I
■i
i ■
h
H
a
■j
*
■;
r
■.
i.
s
d* I
J
J
/
u
i-
4
• i-
• I*!
J ■
s
m
I
A
5
#
I
! >
J
i
I
|U Vl.
: ■;
i
0
y
.■
iifc
t
4
I
I.
*
i.
i
i
i
.4
1
i
:: &
s
: ■J.
1*
I
■it
I!
J
J
s
i
J
I •
I
\
V
t
f
1
.(
I
E
i
\
»
i
F
"i
.b
I
i
i
i
I
*1
f
a •'
■ I
. I
I •
I
s ■
7 J
J
it
i ■
i.. •
p. ■■ i i ■
-1
1 . s' ■ . I T
• ■. .
I ■
. I ■ ■.
■■■a-i I -:
: ■. r-^■ i .
I
I
fh ■ p
H
i n i. - l- ■
■ p i
t/iK
■L
t
L 1
I
I
I
J
i
h
F
r
i
*i
I
Kh.
J
*
>
L
Ancient Mythology
Tub Analysis of
a
r 1
254
Lj
« 1 *
>
nient may be, which
is
not
i
J
+
o
*
L>
F
K
> P
L
F
A
I
k*
1
r
■i
1
j
r
mine
called 1 1 canoe, Jannus
is
of the
way
r
1
1
as an
L
■'j
1
1 1
■1
J
Mr
jn
■ n i
& v &
d .■
L* J *
} I - S'
; ■>
I
q"
I
I
P
^ C. til
« *
b
f
1
I
ir.
I
I
1-
4
k
j
Vi
d
f
1
!■
L
r i
1
1
*
A
P
;i
1
1
h
I
I
f
J
f
)
4
r "
r
11
1
>
d
’V
V
0 :
j
1
■:
h
t
11 1 ,
1 *
V.
L
I
4
4
h
4
1
!■
L
i'll
J
A
t
i>-
I
I
H
"1
I
I
L
*■
I
F
•N
r
I
i.
■"I
with which he
J •
J
"1 r
L
V
I
"l
was r
=L
r >
I
"d
I
J.
r
-4
1
L
T
LJ
1
1
■r
1
anus Bifrons. One of thefe faces was that
b
"i
h
I
h
"if
man
Vi
countenance of a young
A ^
many emblems
■j* 1
There was
J
r
L _i
I
I
J
4
K
4
About
* I?
h
1
1
■1
» >
I
T
kf
I >
•1
his different depart
■1
J
de
him
I
.4
7
I
4
o
i,
I
J
ri
k
I
ri
r
j
hand, with
I
1
m one
rjy
51
51
I
h
L
r i
J
r.j
1
1
to a rock : from whence ifftied
h
v-
b
L
V
d-
j-
1
r
J
*
1
J fc
I
g
L
r
i
key. T he
non
water
ion given of him by -Albricus feems
p ^
P
>
4
\
*1
I
■■
I
r
1
to have
r
r 1
I
*
L
I
?
J
h
%
p ^
4
I
J
throno fulgenti radiis
1
anus
circumquaque,
altera
in
4
F
r n
1 j
I
I
t
f
A
I
I
h
d
quarum una ante
erat tern
1
H
* *
1
J
H
i
H.
I
*
I
’i
LI
r 1
p-
ij
4
F
I
4
1
d
1
1
4
1
I
4
O I ctvvos bp rot$ 7 r&Aouois 7rctvv
" 4
TroJViTiXOS xai xo/wyix^. gx to
L
J'/a/rw. In Numa. Vol
I
etre Acapowt etrs GcunTuuSy yevofisva
ngitoS'm Keci aypie Asysrcti jj,STa&ahuv 'rw
\
r Jl
1
y
i
J,
I
p .,72
p ^
1
J
Jctpvos—S'ic&cis Big 1 raA/av- x<xi cru^oiXJ7ff*« to/$
+
F
xcci
\
I
•^/AaiTrav Kat d'lanctv. — ■ tous 7r$(>i tyiv Irothictp ctvros ctypiois
•ftivus eve cm/ sts en^ov Cm <r %ti fea, tts t a eei Kat yscogye/v xat 'iroAiTeveaOctij fJiereCu^e
xca fjLSTiKotffx>;crs, Plutarch. Qnasft. Rom. vol...2
KOU CCVOfJLOlS %PU
r ?
1
i
269
ri
I
Lj
\
"l
1
r
Ip» Q 2 l
L. *
L 1
h
L
I
I
I
b-
I
c
■■J
1
<
P
4
J
>
I
1"
I
Li
J*" * *1
' 4 *
I
1
h
I- +
I
■Ancient
3
i
±.
f
F
r
The Analysis 1 of
n
Ip"
I
"l
3
r
i
-i
r
>
i
b
c
I
I
* lifr
I
I
i
I
eaii
i fl
b ■
i
■.
r
J
J
L
I
r
+
i
and he is faid to
on the Sicilian coins of
*
a twofold countenance
crown
h
I
f '
b *
i
h
r
i-
i -
h
I-
1
'5
I
I
i
I
a
com
figure often occurs
r 1
L A
J
4 »
f
IlIS
j
V
a
j
7
I
I
i
I
and on
feems to b
r
b
l"
a
is a
i
i-
L
u
h.
r
l
i 1
Fie was
H
i
i
I
1
I
as a
I
man
i
i
l
i -
'1 ■
r
and a-pro
h
I
I
I
«■
being in a manner
is addreffed by Ovid
ie bifrons, anni tacite labentis origo
the fir ft month of the
was fliled Matutinus
Under this defcription he
I
I
year
"d
P
I.
I
ane.
t
r
I
From
I
b
H
I
"i
year
as if
■I
i
1
b
>
i
t
I
Imsapiog awo rs tews
9
"i
1
L J
Iv
to him were
I
I
I
I
c
p 4
■s
L J
H.
I
There was a tr
« , *
lo
*
j.
i
J
l
*■
h
i
>
r
A
and one of the
i"
J-
K
I
H
as a
I
mns of the Salii he was
ven
h
i
1
■i
t
j
tj
b
I
1
§ *
i
i
A
01
•ei
"l
I
I
I
fliled the ” god of gods
r
4
f
]
eus fliles
4
I
i
i
i
in
is
h
i
roe KOU OL
M
4
"l
3
i
1
i
■p
+
AIQHOS KPONE. DArrENETOP
-Til r
I
b
re
.i
ct. /cot*
p
Fern*, <pvr)s 3 acuwcn, 'Peas ttocti
1
i "
3
i
1
h
F
I
P
I
I
*
i"
*
L-
T L
UgOOTOV Off Jy££U
6 9 2
Parut. Sicilia
I
Faft. L. i. v. 65
* Plutarch, in Numa
Athenaeus. L, 15
1 cat irjygd'iaf, x.ctt 7rAcia
ta__J
4
n
■ 4
4
?
r
r
1
1
h
1
1
4
p. 72 .
1
I
£
Hence he was fliled Tempi
i a
I
ornm pofitor
4
1
j
Sat- L
59
(
1
r.
1
tz
Hymn. 13
* 3 Naturte obftetrix: fo correfted by the Authoi
i
P
\
I
\
1
h.
We
r
5
1
1
L
4
J
I -
V
f
r
L
i
*
■:
i
i
i
4
j-
I
J
I
p
I
J
4
I
a
s
r
r
/
I
h
I
■n
i
t
■"
h
J
J.
r
i
X:
I - -
I
s
-L
K
K
h
I
I
I
I
J
T
I
I
I
f '
L
I
I
I
■■
V
A
H
4
*
TCt YiV 0U8
I
£
%
r
j
>■
3
J
A. n axa
primus o
vi ac
k- J
* i
t
iT
er
L
i
#
ro
e
c
J
1
r*
erne
L_.
e
4
e
4
ft
*
4
u v
D
3
c
4
#
I
O
A
as avG?
*
i
■ ■ IS
i
4
I
ei
■■l
) xcu
V
V
f
#
4
7
r .- 1
or
a
a
1 “ I
o
iipQfj
4
i
*
h
I
h
i
•m
r
i
I -
l
i
i
I
I
I
1
r
I
"l
\
I
OF
and which never returned, was held in a different
3
and was for
omen
a
n
l j
among
was
O
Ion,andlonah
C
4
It was efteemed an in
terpreter of the will of the Gods to man; and on that ac
count in the fir ft ages
r ^
p "
■" "i
7 **>
i s-U
as a
e
t*
c
a
mariners it was
who in
to
I
at
1C1
to let a dove oi
ous
or
from
order to judge from its movements of
s. in
J
L_ .
was at
the head of Taurus: and they are in
was at
r
1
confequence of
. j
M
or
have fet
appearance
>i
4
out upon their expedition
avTSAAom
s
i
A
Tots 6 s
Afiyov&VTcu 7rXev<reoo& It was thought
OCV 01
as we
in g
a
m
time of
from 5 Ovid
zer to
' J
l
v
The raven however did not mtircly lole its credit. It was efteemed an augu
ral bird; and is
tus led to Cyrene
I< at Afeuriv eatovTi
Onus' etf'os Tt-vcregas ciyPiets Hefych
The Peleiades* fomedmes expreffed Pleiades, are faid to have been’ the
r
faid to have preceded, and directed the colony, which Bat
riyticrctTQ
Callim. Hymn, in Apoll. v. 66
1
I
I
n
*• *
■ i
daughters of Atlas
According to Pherecydes Syrus, they were daughters of Lycurgus, and
nurfes ofDionufu
Theocrid Idyll. 13. v. 25
1 Fafti. L. r.. v. 65
Sri
and Scholia ibid
4
1 1
L J
O'
I I
L j
dove
1
t.*
The Analysis
Ancient Mythology
O
"J
to
ores out
was
obfolete term, he makes Theba, a woman
who gave her
o
ic doves for a prefent. One of thefe, it is faid
two
a
i
r" i
L.
duas Columbas, humanam vocem edentes
quarum altera
r n
H
o
cles mentions thefe facred doves, and the vocal grove,
accou nt
is
came
f
n
1 1
that they came from
and intimates
L j
were
F i
Egypt to Phenicia, and from thence
at leaft
through the hands of Phenicians
firft prefents his
H
from the people of the place
*5
jpeons
cues
Egypt: and that
one
m
rom
H
a beech tree . an
its
?
how necejjary it
with an human voice
was
wm
Sophocles. Trachin. v. 174. See Scholia
TWs AwJWaiwv (pacrf 4* Trpofxoam&i Svo ffcAftad'a* joteA
>
an f a? ex
AtyvTTrfav cc l y<t7r , T9fJ.ivoh^ tw fxtv ccutezov & AtfiWfV
(pnyou uvt^a^cc^oci (poovri <zvSocg)TW‘fo out £tn
1 o
TuP
TOriV
airixt&cu’ ICofMvnv Si piv sm
uMVTtfiw ecu to i ri\io 5 yi. vSuxi . Herod
VOL
2. C. 55
there
r n
j
. j
4
J
iV
I
I
-I
I
J
<
■l
l<
•"l
l"
I
i.
I
f
L
d
\
I
I
1
I
p
r
i
i
i
L
I
I
■" i-
v
I
Y
f
I
4
4
h
I
*
■i
■"i
%
I
I
I
F
"l
I
I
I
I
■j
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
r
OI
writers, related to fim; though they did
not icnov/
in what the reference confided
was
Atareatis, (bmetim.es contracted Dercctis and Dercetus: and
O ^
worfhined under the fame mixed figure. Atareatis, (filed
a
o
Dercetus, is a compound of Atar or Athar, the fame as On
and Ofiris
and of Gatus or Catus, rend
3? the
*L
ICi c
Cl
lonians, a full. Dagon, Sidon, Dercetus
fame 45
were all names of the
r.
1C
ion
{
*
i
V.
*
to
c
3
He lived both before and after the (food
was
and was re
Am vffomm rr\g rs i
at Babylon with two head
C *
3
K, 7. A
r
5
c
7
IQ
Paleftine: as we learn from Helladius Befantinous. 46
7T0V <5fi OVTCL TOt 7TCM7CI
00
Sfta
ctv
1
The meaning of which is this: that though Oanes was in
an animal of
L ' 1
was
;
a man
re
o
1
the fea : and on that account they reprefented him with the
1
All tliefe characters were taken original
icrog
r
A
r
oma
ics in
• i
wnen
and through whom arts and fci
renewed in the world. As
ter of hi
ic knowledge; he was
eica
to one par
the earth was
ences
1
were fuppofed to have been
he was a mefienger of the Deity, and
a
will
O
O'
O
The iiun e writer fuys
Sanchoniathon apud Eufeb. P. E. L. 1 . c. 10
Cl.TO
4!
/g 7-8 'irona yu'erai £ifc»r. Ibid. P. 3 S. X‘ Juv tt trxa Suyavig
46 Apud Photium. C. 279, p. 1594
r
m
VoL. II
3
J
I
4
1-
J
I
Ancient Mythology
Tiis Analysis of
y
102
1
t
confequcnce of tliefe
l
i 1
F
\
*
I
J
4
in
1
1
as
t
■ i
e
c
i
i
iic anions:
From them it was
i favourite
dees
traces of it are
r
cr
.i
i
j
derived to other nations
and
i
\
i
em
I
onians, it teems to
nfigne: and to
In' r
to
■"
r
^ ,
i
Iiave been
I
4
I
T
I
h
I
have been depicted
I
on
t-
i"
I
I
went to war
J
L
-I
r
L .J
H
■# »
Hence.
x
J
I
H
H
I
P" 1
47
4
o
I
mentions- the latter by the
*
f
onians
4
I
rendered in the Vul-
namc of run, Jonah
e is
CL-LXC
I
i
(
i.
\
>
terra eorum in
m
The like occurs in the account given of the
who went up to
near
7
a
acie tree
e/o
e
l"
I
Columb a
I
I
I
i
f
ians
y
I
J
1
irates. It was
thefe words
1
I
on
upon
3 •
I
I
I
put into their mouths : +s Arife and let
are
go again to our own people and to the land, of out
us
na
P
4
4
~rom
m
is
3 /
I
t
rom
re non o
4
4-
"i
1
* *
\
It is accordingly rendered
1
*
in
I
I
I
I 1
I
I
I
The like
I
a raae
occurs in
er
h
4
I
I
I*
49
f *■
I
H
I
I
I
"I
4
I
r •
nations m
a
every one to.
every one to his own land.
H
1
4
4
L
j
¥
i
i
^ eopie
\ Jeremiah. C. 25
49 C* 46* y. 16
an nee
1 .
I
1
b
47
h
v. 38..
I
jl
P
-"l
H
I
4
L
4
■I
a very particular man
in
"I
k
h
ner
7Tcc a~coTry ixctpsa t oas ISAA'/ivoun
a. To
as alfo C, 4 6. v. i 6*
r
r 1
tj
h
h
In
I
H
k
1
1
I
4
I
n
I
r
j*
i
r
9
The Analysis of Ancient Mytholo
n y
ait
o
I
tlie Iris, as
:r. All, who went
Dove; which was
c
two
under that ftandard. oi
in
o
blem, were (tiled Semarim, and Samorim. It was a title con
device lor their national infinme
7
c
b
_ j
{tiled the sate of 63 Semi
One of the gates of Babylon
was
O
cr
ramis
7
c
b
Ramis, or the Dove, engraved by way of diftindion over it
lJ
odorus, was
We find then, that the title Samarim, or Semiramis, did
not relate to one perfon, but to many : and it
inces
c
/
y
t
c
to
tied about Cochin, and Madura, in India ; and the great
kino's of Calicut were {tiled the Samarim even in later tiim
Q
CD
when thofe countries were vifited by the 65 Portuguefe and
Enfflifh
The wormip of the Dove prevailed
66
in
Tia
about Erne fa and Hierapolis, as I have (hewn
and there
Samarim in thele 67 parts
As Semiramis was nothing elfe but a divine emblem, ua
were
we need not wonder
and the circumfcances of
xe Grecian writers
accord
y
at the etymology ot her name,
are trail fmitted
\
as
r
fi.d
68
i
Herodotus. L. 3. c. 155
44 Diodorus Sic
%
X
J, Ut V u *
2. p. roo
65 See Alzarez Cabral; and the voyage of Vafquez de Gama
66 Purchas, Vol. I. paflim.
67 Bochaut. Geog. Sacra. P. 317
Hefychius. Diodorus fays of the perfon, who was fuppofed to have named
68
her, ovouci muevov
L. 2. p. Q3
xiro rwp weaicftmv
* 1
R r 2
VOL
wg
1
J
p
t
n
i
J
I
i
r
Analysis of Ancient Mythology
S lt
As Semiram is was Serna-Ram is
mo
o
cr
M
6
was Sema-El, and
1
lJ
of the like purport
Her nicer Ino was no other than Iona
the fame as Venus, and reputed a goddefs of the
fea, and
11
The poets reprefented Ino as the
/
)
l
h
J.
1
r
marina..
Henn-Ione, and n
miles a dove: and Ino and Hermione are different names
1
J
s
but Hermione is a com
/
i
r
Semele related to the fame
I
i
TA
as well as
made a
Dionufus
e.
r
ii
fabled that Dionufus was born in fire,; and that Semele was
eonfumed in the fame element. It is moreover faid of her
_ but recalled to
This circumftance is alluded to in the
that ine was confined
in
V
light by Dionufus
to Semele,, where fhe is mentioned,
mn
-i,
So
T
i,
, *
r
E?
oro imp xta
r
Deluge ; and to the flate of death
m
.1
a
was
j
F
y
i'^
\
p
h
J
J
77 S g Sreojv etveti tojv vu.Xcicrcn
Similar to Hermon
bius, Hermeracles, Hermochemia. It was
tural, Chermion, Chermione, and Charmione
79 Bochart. Hierozoi'con, L. i, c. x
J
Hymn. 43,
Pauiiin. L. 9. p; 719..
Herm’onax, HermonaflTa, Hermodorus, Hermotu
fometimes cxpreffed with the gut
W V
*78
I
J
S
I
So
J -
1
it:
1
*****
&
*
PI
I
■ I
G
a
k
>
i"
i
*
i
i
■j
t
i
r
j
k
I
V
I
4
I
•h
r
r
L
1
.M.
I
• s
1
r
i
■i
i"
I
h
A
\
t
%
*
Trf
/
1
/_
3f
j
4
it
*
ana men
r
L
U
l
%
I
i.
I
1
i
«!
i
r J
r
h.
L
I
mac rove me realms oe
various mDe
S
i
P
'd
K
f
I
ri
Li_ J
n
i
A
I
*
4Vi
4
^ i
r
J
i
l i
L J
i
air
4
I
■j
J
we owe
r
p
h
4
A
>_
>1
Id a
J-
I
i 1 -
s
r 1
i_I
"i
*
4
s
r,
!
waves
i
i
4
h
I
L j
I
y
•i
I
I
I
*
7 Diva non miti generata ponto. Senec. Hippol. Aft. i
^ 4
Venus, orta mari, mare prseftat eunti. Ovid. Epift, 15
Sic te Diva potens Cypri
I
Sic fratres Helenas, luoida fidera
Ventorumque regat Pater, &c. Horat. Lib
I
Tlo?Tta, JLtitov'tiu, Aipjvia., Ylshayui, Avct^uofjt,
Mater .DWiim, Genetillis
L
v. 273
r
I
V. 213
r
L J
I
n
1
Hj
i"
r 1
U
Hence filled
1. Od
3
alfo Ouoavia, Genetrix,
i'll
I
I
*
I
i" r>
4
1
A > vet <r a n$, 0 t i Kutpi 5
I
I
d
CtTTO
Kfcw xparee 1 ttovtoio - v Mufaeus. V. 249
I
I
HU
I
p
t
I
I
I
r
i*
c
L J
>
w
1
r
1
I
p
Analysis of Ancient Mythology
327
M
L s 'j
This renewal of life
was
a
51
c
r.
in their
ics defcribed him as
o
water-lilly, and
or
called Orus
He was the fuppofed fon of His: but it has
r 1
the Ark 35 that receptacle , which was ftiled the mother of
mankind, Orus is
as u
on
Hence it is faid of His, that fhe had
at bottom is the fame
making people immortal: and that, when fhe
3 °
waters
1 m mor
r:
L I
The fame mythology, and the fame hieroglyphics were
China and Japan; where they are to be
as far as
The Indians have a perfon
at
reverence, and efteem a Deity; and whom they call
3
This is the fame name as Boutus of
Buto, and Budo
and Bceotus of Greece. The ac
on: for it is
but made
count given of him is fimilar to that of
r
faid. that he did not come to life the ufual way
>
the fide of his mother: which
himfelf
e
a
mani. fedse fuas
37
as a virgin
35f Twi' l<riPV7roS y Q%yv* I (is et Ofiris. P. 374
CCUTtfP XCU TO ct$XVa<riCL$<pGC,OfJ.rtyLOVi£l ov rov VI QV Clgw
NEKPON IvpS
avaq-iurcu J'oucrav rnv ^vftyiv cc?k<c zcct T-ns
dor. Sic. L. i. p. 22
Rccramnus de Nativitate Chrifti. C
1*
1)7TO TCOP
KA0’ TAAT02, fri
fAGTah&SftP 1 DiO
TirctVW £Tl£uheuhvTCt« KCU
sUTOC
3
au c&vcccnccs 7fciJjcrai
an dor em
[
4
I
TftE Analysis of Ancient Mythology
333
mended , Ac fuch times there Teems to have been
an invoi
n
LrCI.
tion made by the people to the Dove, Ionali; which
was
'AffOL
The prin
their view
61
Iw
. j
rites m
CT
Cl
a time to darknefs; who was at laft found
co
6 i
Oc rigtg —8 kclt era; ymnai rs
; ■ i
63 <
mations at
b
L
J
notice
1 ^
was re
whole extremities
as is exhibited
which in confequence of it was made
ure
were alike. It was a kind of crefcent. fuch
new moon
fa
moon
Meen. Hence
r *
its
O
likewile it is, that the moon
was
a
o
the mother of all
r
the Moon and the Ark were lynonymou
terms
0
r
informed by Plutarch
Analogous to the abov
we are
that the chief concern
of the Egyptians was fhewn at the
1 ~
L J
ins
0
1 a
/
Demofthen. <p£<p. P. 568.
There was an infcription of this purport at Argos: which infeription
61
was
engraved in the temple of Io, the fame as Ionah, Chron. Pafch. P. 41. Icoyaq
i Xehm. Euftath. in Dionyf. V. 95
Theophilus ad Autol. L. f. p, 343
63 Athens gor, Legatio. P. m
6 z
Lj
■ r
t JT i
*
. W°S,
I
I
I
1
p
b
■■
r
lrt
rt
I
1
1
T
t
*
i
i
3
p
*
r
*
4
I
4
#
4
»
4
ff
If
»
#
*
t
4
#
: J
t
j
i ■
i.
1 -
;
f
'|L
I
}
n
w
4
11
i
»
\
F
4
J i
4
4
I
t
4
%
*
l
p
*
J
i-
r
1
*
J
i
■;
f
\
4
<
■It
X
"J I
' I
V .
*h‘i /l* t/t
\
+
■*
"I
J
"l
L
I
*
I
I
I
I
I
4
1
pi
-"l
T-
I-
The Analysis
Ancient Mythology
337
L M
the time of
VMT 0? CtV 5
ntgots grow
cline , darknefs now encreaiing
TO TKOTOS
N
J
J
was m
d
c e
when the fun pa ffes
Swiv
miftake not. was
o
J
This* if
20
2
2
" 1
month, and day of the month, on which Noah entered the
J
came
Noah's life-i in the second mon
THE SEVENTEENTH DAY
of the month, the fame day were a
o
think
this hif
memorial of the Patriarch and De-
no doubt, but
JirR
r 1
r n
j
L
As this
W
J
traditions, when the Sun was in Scorpio
r
is
t
1
fj
Pint. Ids et Ofiris
73 'H Se Ta (pojrcs fA.etpex.i»STcciy itai •kdoltsitx.i awatfAi
P. 366
3 I
* 1
j&to fxvpos Adup a’pctvio-vyvcu rov Qcrwtv hey&vt. Pint. Ifis et Ofiris. P, 366
1 07rt S'Zttoc, rw O a-tpi^os yeve&vcu A tyvyr'not fwQohoy&tri
Ibid
v
* 4
r 1
p.367. The-Egyptians varied in their rites, as we learn from feveral paflages
in Herodotus. They differed alfo in particular places about the commence¬
ment of the year. Hence we find the fame hiltor.y of Ofiris commemorated
both in autumn, and in fpring
75 Genefis
L .
7. V. IX-
1_ J
H A L
C A
C U
A
T
fur mi fed', that they
*
of perfons ; but ancient terms
were not the names
VI
P
L j
VOL
were
x
*
J-P
J
1 ,
3 *
hi
J
LP ¥
it;
T'
"111
n -■
■H
*
- r>
- T
I
;■ ■
i.
A 1
J
i
I
h k
ft
i
A
\
a
i
a
H|
h
%
I
i"
I
I
J
l
J
I
1
i
at
J
I
I
"i
o
I
1
I
I-
M
I
f
I
IS
g<
1
■}
I
I
le
n
i
i
j
4
I
11
I
i
I
It*
I
6
r M
}
J
1 "
■i
A
I
wK
o
a
f
a
m
t
K
j
Id
a
/
a
a
se
a
0
/
f
£
■l
I
>
m
>5
*
a
a
b#-
%
*
.j
t
j
h.
It
£
f
i 1
sa
f
r
ri
I
P. ’I
W
4
-!
k._i
I
I-
•?
h
I
+
4
■■
I
I
I
I
I
I
oe
I
0
J
i
r
T
J
I
0
JfOTO
I
'
n
i
XJ
■\
■J
■L
L
t
I
I
H
j
H
i
J
n
-I
ta. ri
"l
n
p n
r
r ^
L._ J
r
j
4
I
4
I
h
-i
The egg is alfo {tiled Hop Xequpioi
T Trwifj.iov ctvefjiovi vstov. Hefycliius
yind God made a wind to ^afs over the earthy and the waters ajpwaged. Gefief. C« 8
'V. i. Damafcius ftiles the
14
I
egg TO TtVSfAeVQPi KCtl TO KUOV COOV
r
h .
\
4
I
i
3
r i
L J
J
35.Orphic. Hymn. 5 . In all thefe fytnbols the term At(puws continually
occurs
dVffltWj; Clam$ <y«pw$
m Berofus. All theie relate to one perfon, and-the fame hiftory
I
"l
r.i
L
j
I
4
0
t
1-
Analysis
Ancient Mythology
n
r
I
them at Afcalon
rites
0
1
r l
>
l
.. J
which was ftiled
in
. J
the ancient and true name of this city to have been Beroe
■ i
*
J
But
rf
s
great miftake : for the ancient name was Barit or
this is
nt
h
mans were.
a
the fame as Barit, he manifeftly alludes
r —
luge, and to the covenant afterwards made with
as coeval with the world
man. He
i
i
5 ?
I
and time itfelf according to the
4 Grecians commenced from*.
r
5
I
%aA£ 8 <n .
4
b
He {peaks of her as a nymph,.who had the whole
ocean;
for her pofleuion
'7
I
h
i
i
I
i
were derived
p ^
u J
r ^
l:
nzff a. ircto 'EAAwgt Betu ]&£m 7rfa.&ts
They ftiled it the sera or Inachus
Iva%p Eufeb. Chron. P. 24* 1 . 55
Danes appeared ev to) ttputq euiccurq). Alexand,'Polyhift. apud Eufeb/Chron
time commenced from his appearance
T})? 'EAAwxws Icfogicu etp%w AHO INAXOT APfEIOT: the meaning
of which is from Noah the Arkite. Ocell. Lncanus. L. 1. c. 3.
Nonni Dionyf. L. 41. p. 1074. v; 3.
4
F
OLIVO TOW
1
n
a-
i_ j
1
\
\
P, 6 . for
1
I
"l
Lib no a..
H
I
J
I
Analysis of Ancient Mythology
r
OI
r n
o
mt *
I nis
was fometimes attributed to Leda, and fometimes
to
OYlfLOg A-TTlKUy
i]T;C 6 TSKSP Q . 0 V
IJ
; j
. J
r l
ferpent was defcribed round it; either as an emblem
of that Providence, by which mankind
flgnify a renewal of life from a Aate of death
which circumftance was
annu
times
preferved
was
or
elfe
denoted by
a
animal, by
fkin, was
its
I/J _
new its life, and to become politis
novus ex turns
and frem aftei
was
light whatever was within contained
Nonnus
has fomethinsr hmilar to this
The ark, fraught with tl
e
r n
j
whole of animal life, and tolled about by
unruly flood
an
is defcribed under the character
Beroe in labour
to
r
L .
r ^
Schol. in Callimach. Hymn, ad Dianam. ¥*232. Ram Notts is £ fieyoLs
.Noos or Noas, from whom the diftrift was named. The reft of the fable is
eafily decyphered. To T vv£clp$iqv (&)or) ot 7 towtou A ey&cnv &gctvo7re t£s ca t ct<p r Jvat
P- 6 37 -
ricMTQyovQv itaXto) fAsyotV} ut&2go , 7r?iuyTO^
£loyepr f
yevzcriv M ctxccpodv^ Srpnrcov t
lx
Plut. Sympos
2
L J
_ J
ft
1
Orphic. Hymn. 5
ccv^r pcuTTo)V
were called Barides by Vitruvius
like buildings in the Grecian Hippodromes
I ■
Qtpiv Qcoypa<pU{Ti~~~xa& J 6
Kocr/JLOV $BXofAZvQt (c; AsyvTTTtoi) ypcc 4
12 .
a
c. 2. p. 4.. The chief Arkite
yypas ccfpscs cctto^vbtou* Horapollo
ev:c&urop to
perfonage was, from the Ark, denominated A gKcaosy Areas, Argas, Argus
and he was for the reafons given defcribed as a ferpent. Hence we read of
1 Hefychius, which is remarkable
Apyccf^ Ops, in
E te
VOL
r i
L
1 .,
i
I
L
i
J.
i
b
r
(
i
I
Ancient
Analysis
J
Philoftratus mentions, that, when
F
t d
bees
i
fent their firft'colony to Ionia, the mufes led the way in the
Form of bees
fide of the Danube was
occupied by 7 bees. When the
inclofed in an Ark
bees were
fhepherd Comatas
was
i
fuppofed to have fed him. Jove alfo upon mount Ida was
When
faid to have been nourifhed by 9 bees
e
i ■_
fecond time eredled, it was built by bees
was a
at
J
wno com
from the
Such are the
■i
were
ro
ecian accounts
S.
i
r
£
but the Meliffae, thus interpreted
{
ftiled Seira, Theba, Selene, and Dama
When Pindar mentions
11
the Scholiaft tells us, that the
fes of Damater; and that, accord
ing to fome writers, all the female attendants of that God
I
dels were fo called. And he farther adds, that thefe were th
F
a
voice oj toe l
Meliffae were
T
1
of the earth; and
ons
ankind agriculture ; by which
ey weaned them
th
A"
■ w
I
1 %
to
rom
?
i
j
r
■ d
I
this
L-
n
M
"I
crat nysvro t 3 vccvtikh sv sifei pe A t cr cr <uv . Icon
t a Trip civ nr a 11 ; -ny. L. 5
2. p. 793
c. 10
7
A ey 3 cri$ Me A urtxai KccrBypcri
Theocrit* Idylh 7. v. Si
* Callimach. Hymn, in Jov. V. 50
PsUIlLD, L. IO. P« 8iO. T & G V 07T0 jbCfA'^ £7" (T Goi] 'TO V POLOV
Pyth*.Ode 4 - p* '^39* MeAto-cras wjg l&'$ TctS T?J5
Scholiaft upon Theocritus in like
r
I
1
ID
&v/jmTPG$ 'IxtA. The
(or, as fome read
manner fays
nrct$ £Ta:ttoL$
xeti Ajj pa MeAia-trccs Atyia-bxt. Idyll. 15. v. 94
"M
iBpBl a.r) GLUTtyS (IzBp&tQcVte)
r"
AAAjiA oipccytcLv* Ibid
By
s
"l
h
.1
I
4
I .
0
at
J
*
■ - i
p
I
r
I-
r
n
I
i
■i
i
r 1
I
*
a
I
*
F
J
.■ I
J
e
a
I
0
I
l
l
L
f
l:
i
i
A
■*
h
a
L
I
n
i
F
1
e
a
l
h
*
0
I
n
u
i
j
wo
I
I
I
I
I
r
A
>
This
name there was
la
I
i
i
I:
o
*
I
J
whole myfteries
the wormip of
n
k. ^
were
t . '
K
rites of fire. The city was fituated
accom
called Taurus: and its
branch
vaft
r
upon
■A
IS
n
b_. j
j
Ti?s S'£ P ota* a A oyo$
Toct JV *tw Hcei Pcu&j' ccyTy
Achilles Tatius. L. 3. p. 167
18; There were many places in Syria and, Canaan
Mention is made
1
t!
. a
c
r 1
°9 2 Kings
which feem to have been denominated from this hieroglyphic
the tribe of Simeon : We alfo read of En
1
5 - v
111
. . _i
Rimmon, Gath-Rimmon, and the mourning of Hadad-Rimmon in the valley
of Megiddo. See Jofh
v. 45. Zachariah. C
30 Texeira’s Travels
Nehemiah. C. u. v. 20. Jolh. C. ig
9. v. 7
I
2. V
1
r
1 :
p
h
IX
I
1
. j
31 poicitf Hefych
1
L
Surcrunt
7
J 1
I
H
I
I
n d
"i
"i
L
i
i"
i.
j
i
i
1
i
"i
"i
k
£
h
I
J
J.
I
I
!■
i
T
I
i"
-I
\
h
I
I f
t-.
s
p
i.
"I
4
h
L
i<
"i
i
"i
j
■+
4
1
*
J.
1 -
I
I
H
i
li
"i
j
i
4
1
J
I
h
r
i
h
"i
h
*
4
I
■■
I.
I
I
r
■j
S
L
J
I
A
1
I-
I
-i
Y
i
i-
i
*
i
I
i
I
\
p
i
K
n
i
b
I
I
H
I
H
I
I
4
1
■■
i"
>1
H
H 1
J
I
4
tntil Y
p
■l
id
■ ■"
I'
r
Y
m
■TJ
A
LTJ
6 o
L J
ferv
Thalaffio
not know the
L J
r
L"
r i
I
L!
LTj
J
may be feen bv their various
as
name
Thalaflius was the God of t-he-fau the
6lI
S I
fame as Pofeidon : the £
aifo as Belus
This is-
fsl
r
won
si
!l
t
. I
donians. ®ocAcc<r<ria$ Zsv$ bv Zioom rifActrou
lath
efych. Tha
Beroius was among the ancient
of the fea. From hence
62
r
i
ccor
deans the n
and Thalafla of the Greeks; and the God Thalaflius of the-
51
Thalatta
J J
r
t is remarkable that at the celebration
Romans
II
t
tials among the Greeks, after- they had facrihced to the
youth was introduced
Gods, and appeafed the Daemons
a
K
with a cheft of flowers: who re
v
r $
h
Etpvyov tt&KOV) SVgOV CtfJLBlVQV
ries
n
a more
r
nate lot
r
not well be called’
prema-’
The expreflion would befides.
• an: evil
r i
L I
Epithalamium Julias. V. 132
61 Plutarch in Romulo. Livius.. L. i. cv .9
Varro deduces it from Talaron, lignum lanificii. See Poropeius Feftus, That
the Romans were ignorant of the purport is plain from the queftion of'Plutarch
in another place. Zlicc itio. ttoAuSpuAAwtos o.J'st a.i To. Act <710$
Quteft. Roman®. P. 271. It was more commonly rendered Thalaflius, and 5
Thalaffio.
«x Eufeb. Chron, P..6. To /tsOrofunweeBat.'
S'Ct&CtGQ'CC
a
t
tv TOJS ycLUQt$
1*
1 j
r,
L d
tUIti*
I
J
i
r
i
J
L
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
394 -
r-
mentioned, that - Ohris was the fame as Or us
it has been
was upon
this account called the elder Orus
69
T
I
\ - V,
I
*0
O
l
v: V k c ■- 1 ■* •
f
v.
V
* 'i
1
1
1 £."•
:\
necn
* l*
i.
m a different ft ate. Plutarch tells us, that
as the head, or
to
J
I
lans
as
ion
1
i
and Onris
in which Orus was 71 preferved
ft
fit]
and often reprefented as the Sun it
were ftiled Heliad 02
Hence many have been milled; and have referred
felf
4
what has been faid of thefe perfonages,
But the Egyptians in this title did not allude to the Sun
but to a
I '
as ap
I
. J
ICS
F
J
Ihip, which is fupported by a crocodile
■i
ltanding upon a crocodile, and at the fame time
{bribed. as
I I
furrounded with other lymbolical reprefentations
as-
in
in
V
X 1
■r>.
J
I
T 4
the midft of waters; they accord;
i +
7
■P
i
\
±
h(
69 Top A
Ifis et Ofiris, P. 355
7 ° Top fiev Q<rigiv
TfA etrfAGZ' Ibid. P, 374.
71 lorn
Plut. -
Iv KrrvoKKma
ov itctt
5
y
1
JVI envy co$ UTro^Q^nuy Toy J's £Ioq ?3 ct7ro*-
>
4
vSkt txoy -arpcffjjs yevec ,Jtaoo t i0»v»
I inr, oncor Ilpy xoor/uuoy
7 * HAic^cT’g <7 iy&cr t ^totS <^1
tf&As Milters* Eufeb* Prssp. Ev\ 31,
xca Ibid
l
374 . 'Kcopap ytvfcr£co$} xui Ibid
SpCOTTti e7Ti£y£pKOT0$ TErAoifc B7H. KgOXQ
37 2
V
*
L J
I
ccv
\
r
3 ‘ P- II5
t
H
f
p
*
s>
• "-"n -
(4 r y -if
' -
k J T
I •
I
■F "
"h d-
h..J •«!*
ri
J- ^V
+
■ s
F
fa
■"■■ •
i'll
I -■
V-.Lrt ?;
iV i i. 1- ■ r
■ i
k
\-W
-■ • ■
p
* ■ ■.
L ,i
s
•s
. •■
■ fa i
• h
I
»>: .v
K'i ■
■ \r
. ■■• * J .
l-T
a
i
i p
fa
i
■if’ f iV\.
i frS |
'■' ’■'h
b 'T
' % A ■■ ^
■ \ ¥ ' ■ ■' ^ ■
M 1 1 -J
>
I •
• r
■ b*
1
■>.T
< v
. ■
j*
1
■i
r ■
i'-
i
1
i. 1 ■ ■ ■
1 yJ'
■1
. . k-
■.J»
4
I *■ .
v _fcJn. .■
i -
'll
a"
1
X F —' • rJ
‘ b
1 \ t ?• ;
l
, ■■■ i-ii
p ■
( h ■ >
" T ^ "L -
1 H - >" ■
" b
• 4
1
J-
fa 1
■ V- v. ■
c
b -F ■' J
■■"1 .
. V 1 ^ J
' ta'.'
% ■ ■; "
r-
-V 7
: n-.
fa--
•: •
J
v 1
L
. 4
'* J 1 -
1 p
s
4
1
• : "h
l' ' '
k
4 ‘
V -fa "> •
P
h 1 | • 1
;r. r j
ii
.- u'-rS- ^ _
;.r. ^ ' ■ : v- '
■ F’ ■ i* 1 ^
Vvr-i:r L
|_ a_ a ■ a ■ _
+ ’ "
A>t
■i -
Fp
i" * V
■" \!
F .
a. J h\ li ■*
A "l
■mV-
^ ? 4
"'■P' IW ■
i&
:l
^ ■
{
L .
I ,fc
■ i 1
r ’H F
I
f :1 ► ■
■ |
H
b
1 y- -
- 1 .
s
■s _a
v:
. +
r ^. 1 ■
■■ -. j .
I a 1 4 S 1
>J 1 I "
-■ h 1 ■■
J
1. ru
ir . ■ b*‘ J. i 1 --- ■
b- s «-T- ■. ■ '■
■.+■ ■■
' v.
I '■
^ J ■ - "n
■ .: ■>
s
■ ■•■hi-
.■■.!
I. ■
v k
■b ■
I •
L I
a.
u !■,' .F
I-
■ + “1
j:
k"
* •
■ J
f:
H - -
>■
x-r?
j :;;r =
-■1 b
a _ I
la"
la’ a"
I
■ .
'I
H ■
V." J
J
r'i
L
■ |
L '
L 1
•>
*
p-"
H
>
- ■ j 1
^ r ■■ ■ ^■
• >1 ^ ■ jK •;
v J ■ • h
. h p
■ ■ V'r.
'. V. 4 >.'
/'■" l - ' o ,J -
• -L
b™ ■ r
■: 4 -
P. s
s ■
F
?
1
r l
-■ij -:
■■■ J- 11 -
1
1
b «■
■*
1
>F.
riv
■ i *•
' '
. ■ ■ H
I ■■
■■■'ll
Ii
r >t r
■ 1 ^ ■ 1
.■■l
¥
' r . - -
V;
♦ 'pH
■a"
s ■
P
I
I I
w-
‘ 1 %
i
1
j. ' ■ l.
:■■ ■
--f r
L
a" "
I.
s
. K-
■ ^y v
^ + _l-r_ \ ■ "
.-A
a"
ri
■ * 1
• 4-.*
1
■■ 1
• I
s ■
ri'
;■ J_'
1
1
: f •
•>
- . O 1 " ta"
’F .J" • " T
s
a V’ "
1 a.
I
1;,
.[■ -i-:j
h
:V“
^ ” -b'.
!J
i-.- \ d
d Pj
s
h
M-
• s k b" ■ 1 "fc ",
'b-
I
'.■■■ '
M -
■’i it
■. > ■■ ■■
■ 1 r •
h- 1 h
V
■. ■ ■>
"I-
1 al -
F "
: • I
j*
1 s
1 I • * I fc
Vi -,-■#■■■
: ■-- FV-
H
-r
^r.
1 ■
%
j
1
1
1 • j
r -M .►"f
<a " V
/■’MV
I •"
s
t s
^fc p
* r*
p ■■ •■
. * i ■■*
a"
4
-r^v' 4 -
1
- g;:V ■ >
A _ k_ a PI
•.: >«.-
I
r
p ■
j
p - ■
4
■a
H .
F
-fc r -
p
I
■ 1
1
1
a F
1 "
F a a
I
1 '.H,
I
I
• 4
■ • 1
'' S ;
' ' V ..r L ■
Lll
!■
■■1 v r
■-J
-hi
i J . J 1
1 H ■ 1
"P
■ V
"F ■ " a
-vV
p
s
s
H
ivj 1
1
1
r s ■
5 T-
I
I
I ' 1 F a 1 P
4
1
r-.
F '
- J,';:
4 •
p r
1
l = 1
:■ ^ -U
’ <-y.^
■ t ti t ■ i 0
■ \ fc. 1 _ ■ ■ 1 1
it- p-
H.p i.
J
" 1 \1
■■>.
- V. j..:
h
" h
K-"
"" - 1 -. "• ^
1
I
1
■ih\
I
M
I
k a "| .<
:Lv
■ I
a a a a I el
J
^: ■
■ 1
1 ,'a
V Fl.il
■■ ■
1 r 1
V
\.-b ,
IP> F
M
J ' 1 '
■■r i --: i '. 11
. ri "
s
I >
V
1
•j
fa -
k >
1
* f V* V
I
,' j . 7 ■■ 1 ^ ■ > ■■
" I'*
" --I '
S a
■ v i.' : '
> " ■
5 - T
I h
1 .
■ v
*\
I
I ■"
P
" "l '
h .F
f
4
1
."F
P . ■
a a «k
■^'. 1 ^ -1 ><<
I ■' J \ <
a P P
- rtf*
s
1
• J
■ ? : -u
r
’■/r*
■!■■_ ■ ?■ ■
s
H ■ “ h
■ I
T b
_ .■
■b
ri I" ^
■nr 1
r
■" ■ j
■■f .i-
1
p. .■■ J
1 >1
-■>■5 1 -
1 ■ r J
I
_ *|
.
4 fc.
■ >.
■i
1
■n!
II
P I
S
■i r
1 1 _■
1 ■ ' k.
’ _■ I '
‘.i> J ■
- r r-f
t:
1
■ J-.-*--
■ 1 F d 1
i " S." L |
: '-V- r'" r
fc^.^ ‘,V
h •
n:
S--
V | . V
" f ;
1
I
a al
o.
I
a I 1
fa "■
J
-
j \ j;- -■ -
_ . 1 1 a . 1 S
■ v i - ■ ■
- . J
I I 1
:■■ t .
p
s
■■ V
■ "l a ■
- # J
: j-. 1 -.
h
J 1 .
"p"
- L-
F
1 ™.
fc .l
/ • "
- J. *H
• 1
1
■■I-
h 1 : F s
a-'."-!
I I
I
I -
I
•L
"a
I "
h •
1 a
I
a >
* I > "a
. J a
Ti •
j
1
■a
L s
j* ■
> J
L
H
• h
I 1
V
-V
. ■ "! ! -
r \
fa •
s j
PhL -^ '■■
r f
. -*- j -
I h" "
■ -I ^ H. . -
I
' .
■ 1 r
I "
t
r ■
1
h
J
* •>
L a "■
a 1 ■ "
F
■ J Vi:
I
P
s
1 1 L ’
■r -■>■■ j -
1 b h ■ ’.i ■
■. -
■ V
_ I
• V
F
- p i.
■ p
h- 'r ,
;i :.-rv
l h
a/J
e"a "
"1
s ■
•H " •
H
v
I "
^ ’
a " "l 'a"
■" ■. "-pS . • .1
f I a "a .
F .
at
I
>■:
■ '•
p ■
1
fa
-1 1
- 3 '
r
<■ ^
.■. ■
■ ■ *■ ■ V
aP ■-
i*
. >.
' P
-■ h
. r
: s
■ j v
11
m 4 •
C
IT- ■ 'a
■■
; ."ul-
i L*
- p"-
• F
""■a fc • J
P .
P fa . 1 J
a T
I
vv
■I "_J I
I
F
■ " I
ri
I
I ".d
1 >.
>■ j >
1:
’ L ■ ’
*
I
a I
h 1 ;:
L'-t: - -
■_Pa
"i ■■■ ■!
t-r ->■,■■
a J ■ b* :
k "
r 1 . , k jd -
S "a ^ F I
"" ^ - : "
I J- .
a 4
"a
S
Is
■> .
p 1
■'(■■■
*.
- J.
p ■
■H.
I. '
. I. "" ^
P 1 "
: ■
a - ad
^ I |C .
s ■■
ri ^
1
r i •
J
■ 1
.1 "
• 1
1
■ •r m
a I
■.i' 4
■ ■* ■;.r
l
. j )
l ■ ■
• fa V
1
1
1
r'^
, h \s:
p
p
F
I
! ^ •"
v ■
P F a
■ 1 __ b_ -J <■ F
b. ! t 1
S
s
hSa
I -T S
S
r p ■ ""
1
i-
r- •.* ■
v
. X
■n
■■■ I
b - i r -.'
S. P .
fa
■ P
I
o- ■
• I
1 ■
• I
*' ■ p
I
I
- ip. K r
I "
I
• >. "
fa .J . "1
■ 1 F
p
a "■ ■ -
■ s
_V J
p
F s
>* •
p
r 1
• r ■
j _
- 1 , h
■)
1
11 4
j 1
* 5 ■ ■ n
J
H"
■ 1
L
1
1
^ :-.>r
1
p
.-T'
• ■ S
P
J "S 1
l
.■ ■>-
■ f -
L ■.
“ ^ >V
J 4 J
I
!h
-■p J. r - - ■
s
h!
F -
■ - PS
•""J J S i
S a -
"I" J. J
p. pH " ■
■ * pp
a S J
p ,B| 1 1
fc LIJ- ■
■ h '" h
I
■ ->i. ..
H P A 'I . •■
■1 ■■
1
r ■
1 b
j p •
F a
: ^b.s-
h '
f..
a . I
.1 ■!■.,,
I
I
I
"r
• •
s
•F
•: < i
■a >
^■v- f
a | ■■ ■ >
fa -
V-
t r V
y
r-
^ ■
s
a fa
a P
■rf’j >
p
■ \ - ■
p-
f,
1 s
I "
v-.l
■s
■ ■ I
';'
r v r_ •
L-
-V
I
I
s
■-1
• ■.
s
. r-
j- - j
s ■
■r
: L
\ ' ■■■
- ■ p ■
h p ■-■
■ i
a l 'jr 1
.ff-
s
I .
• b
• \
■ 7 f^'
r i-V
■ i •
■ fi
r T'
• Fa m
I
:v*
l
T \ A
■ I
-.J
. f > 1 1
,. ?. ■■ =-
F
•F
L
I
-4
I .
I
I
a I
f: -
F'L ■
■ ■- 1
+ •
- :=• (■ •
a _ S a a a
I ■ . I
F'a-
pP.^"
a . P. S •
""la. P
P
\ a
■_a - S fa '
•h ■
1 _:l - ■. -
.■’.O
p
■- 1 .
f ■■■
s
fa f .
I
I
■' c fc > ■,
1
I
■ I
- - k t." !
■ A-'.- -
p I
i y ? ■• V-
- k>
.1
fc V
I. 1 a|P . J ^
■ P. 1 A ^
4
. ■ fa- >
■ Vi
fa
S>
h ; i -i K -
F"_-a
"a F a
aP. "
. ■ .f S'-
■■ >.:
Sa
A
V
• P
1 s
. . E
1
■F
H H
—- S |- * j >"P
1
|P
■ 1
1 r
k r J
• . 4 I'
;
J .r,
a fa
> I I
h "
I
fa " '
i 's
I
.1
a s • 4
p 1
" F 1 ' "
1 J
a I " • "
I
K
a P J
r.
r
p ■
J
s ■>
I
1
FI I
■ fai
■a
1 ■ |
I "■
s
s
■ K
■ h ..'
1
F-
1
L
. S
I 1 1
. •> \ >.
P
P
J.
I • fc P
a 1 "
L
- - l E ' -
a I ^ "fc
" • >
F
s
1 -
H .
■ h
if
.V
L ■■■
n -
• P
.*
n
F
1
1 ^ • s
p r - I
1
1
■ I k"
■ ■ 1 ■
• a J
i, - r
1
. v
_ 1 -
- F
a I
I J r ■
1
■:- r 4 (
■ c
■ f ■
1 b ’
■1 .
:1 ili 1 1
1 .X
F
; -.-kT-
• - b
L ’
1
'nr 4 ^
■a
t: •
4
p
L
■ . 1 . - ^
■ K
- ■ s ■■
■ s
H-
■ ■'
+ 1 ■...
-"7
■•,1
I
I
" F
1 1
h s
L"
V- V
1 p ■
p
■ - w
P ■ P
I'.i"
h
p ■
1 ■
1
. 1
t ■■_:
■ "1 .
■■ r ^ ^ ^
• 1
■ - H
I
I
t
T>i k
L
)
tj*
• ■ I
I
b
I 1
Y
>
1
v
■:-v -
P
fa
s
^ * ..
L.l
-_1 ^ S
I-- ■ /
P
.L
A * 1
F
F
"-4
I ■ :
H
1
• fa
4" •
a P
.Y o j ■
1 ■ \ +
A'.VVr-'
"l-
F a d
1- > -
s fa
■ T
* V#
■ r
-■-tv V'v'
^ ^ I '.I P 1 "
l"
J .
F
I
LA-
s
X
1
a \
fa
S"
.a ? :i
s
1 1 .f
K*
H?
I
v
-V •' ^ '
?
S
a | " P F
■ -.'rv :
I
■.' h - p
V
s ■■
\
4
1 *
* vv- -■
,1 a I 1 r
; >> !:■
1 1
^a
r J->
s >
I
•iV
11
r s
Jb- 'fc ■■ 4
S P
1 4
p .fa ’ *
s
fa
Si C r’«
/F ’
s
^ '
5 i^
■ V. Yt ;»- ■ :v> J i- . 7 ;
■i a ^ -l n ■ . _ -L \ s "j s . " s r b^ B . s
v > j.
s
fa
1 J
f j
7_-V- l 1
4 1
*
•■■t ■
- x
. i-
' 1 ^1
r r: ■
fa
V.
H I a I
F
1
1 1
1 ■ ■
s"-
■ s
1
y
1
1
1
.v *1
•m
= i
faV
.'fvA
'll. 1 ' .
a I r I
fa "
a >
4
I
M - a
-s-
J,
h.
4
J
L.
b
K
n* ■ a
I
fap. ■.
I
1-1 •
J -
h 1
s
■V^a .V-
h
L ri.
4
d "
>
\
I
N-
V
fa
1 '
:vl 1 Al
>■.
■■ v s :
I
I
vri.
■■^b
■1 ■
fc-Jib,-.
I
• 1
r d
p •
;7 4 ■ 'Vi
L >4 -
p p
- ^b^.'l
fa-
■a
iV« T.>.
fa
Y
i ,-7 .A
■-: ^ -i ^
r■>’
F
•X
1 ^
L 1
: ■■■ i ; 7
faj s"
^ '
F I
fa
J.1 -
.r^
p" .
+ -J •
p
-I
-
"■■’bV -5
1 * a P a_ —
I
P
I
1 L>
P «
• .4
1
V / ; ■
xS*
. >:
j
r
■a
Claw** f"
■ 1
tP
b
1
1
1
fa
.s
The Analysis
of Ancient Mythology
r
95
n
tory, made ufe or types, which had Tome analogy
and re
Some of thele could fcarc
r
CiY
I 1
. A
J
Such
man in an arl
*
dead; and who afterwards
was their carrying about the image of a
who appeared to be
73
BP
fuppofed to return from a {late of darknefs
lif
4"
was
to
v. I
But fuch deferiptions related rather to their
ceremonies
The flmilitude, of which I aui ? now
is to
O'
i
tJ
obferved in their hieroglyphics and fculptures
Thefe will
am
- 1 l-**
O
A
Hence the crocodile, and Hippo
potamus, were emblems of the Ark
inundation of the Nile they rofe with the waters, and
were fuperior to the flood
The Lotus, that peculiar
7 S
account
was
■J
and we accordingly And a frog upon the Lotus introduced
as a facred emblem in the 76 Bembine table
We are more-
over told by Iamblichus, that the figure of a wan upon
this plant in the midil of mud, was an emblem of 77 Helius
• r
ima
and that the fymbols of Selene had the like reference to the
Moon
re
I
Ifis et Ofiris. F. 357
Efi/WcOF ca f Up607T8 TS$l’mtQTO$ €P Ki€ot)TtCp irBPt^P
*Tov Qatpw uSb ' 7 rctpcty$voiuL$VGVr Ibid. P. 358
73
ILZVQV, •
74
r. p. 79.
The Egyptian Priefts ufed to crown themfelves with the Lotus. Heliodo
tt
If
L
ri
o. p. 4 5 7
Figure GG. Edit. Amfterdam.
151 . &g}i> S 7 ri Acdru>
J
r
■■ i
76
1 Sedt. 7
L 1
Afc
* -N
r
'i E
4*/
fmemcnC
Hr
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
The image of the moon, which in
397
fc..j
r
and referred the hiliory, with which it was attended, to the
term
Helms
borrowed. Hence in their
was
human imagination conceited
Some of the fathers
ever
no
tice, that the Egyptians defcribed Heiius
m a
c
a crocodile: which, he thinks, was
Eufebius fay
air
s
that the padage of the Sun was
water, which was denoted by the crocodile
Si
I am per
too good aftrono
fuaded, that the ancient
were
or
and naturalifts, to have entertained any fuch notions
mer s,.
By Heiius they meant a perfon fo denominated : and the
Moon, to
78
8
was
U
k
I
the reputed mother of the world, as Plutarch confefles
which character cannot be made in any degree to correfpond
with the planet. Selene was the fame as Ills, T ami
the
fame alfo as Rhea, Vefta, Cubele, and Da-Mater
The crocodile was greatly reverenced by the u Egyptians
r 1
k
account of their
and, according^to Diodorus, it was upon
hyp# TW 'TYQpttCtV 7TQVG5 ycVVQ Toy
HAioi, Pr£p. Evan
8 ° Oti
HA/os JV ctioepos yXuxSfB xxi
c c
0
Zpovov. L. 5. p. 670.
t c
t*
Xvf+CCWZt %0Q%o£?iXo$ TTOTtJXGV OrCtig
L. 3. p* 115. A?? A oi <^e to {/.w irAotov tyw zv vygw
Plutarch, Ifis et Ohris. P* 381, Strabo* L
BV w (pBpBTCU 0
xwncrtr*
Si
Ibid
82
p. 1165.
>1
/
kin «•
O
I
1
t
p
ll
I
I
I
1
I
I
«■
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
fa"
I
I
4
"l
1
PL ATM ZUt
1
f
t.
4
"i
h
I
I
J
.1
I
+
I
I
I
I
p
b
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
J
F i
*\
I
1
_ J
or
aces was an
non in
I
That the Apis, and Mneuis were both
J
=1
and who
r i
is 7 certain
r.
J
an ancient
age was
r
L J
r
j
may be known from the account
I
I
L
I
*
F
l
the name
but
P
U
i
[
I
i
L J
I
was
r
*
%
k — J
limited to Italy; that of Inachus and Phoroneus
os
F 1
i
of Deucalion to Theffaly. Mneues, or
as the ancient
f
■'j i
3 :
-■
i
compound of Men-Neuas
it. Mneuas. is a
nans
and relates
Minos, Min-noas
- I
alfo who was re
Taur. or Mino-taurus
I
•i
who in Crete was ftiled
the
under the emblem of the Men
Diodorus
\
\
W
S
j
i +
rj
iver
Gods and Heroes, when a
I
6
was made in the manner
as a man of a moft
rj
I
meu.
exalted foul, and a
I
I.
H
h
I
I
I
K
h
4
I
and he
Thefe laws were unwritten
I 1
I
j
H
I
which
l-
I
n
i
i
i
i
i
=1
F.
Hv TOLUT?) G’ShttCTlV 'A^pOe^tTVl'} Oo
Tnv l<rtv A.iyvTTTtoL
XO, C, 2*7
K Wf/.fi AtyuTrrict yLovo'cu to ovoucl
ctviav
l.
/
J
I
auTW xa Ayrrss. nfAwcri cPg xat 0^A Bictv- byj
QbxBpw
Xolt CLVTW
0 -
L .
"l
I
xa-t ir^ciTThiGi) kxi ypcupaai. JElian de Animal
Atovucros. See Lycophron. V. 209. and Scholia
I
Msrcc 71 IV TnxAuiCCV
£
L
n
C
Jl
{
7
AtyUTTTQV ClB XUTCL^CtCriVy TW UV1QXoyBUBVW y€
•Tfcs %<CT
yQV£Vcct* 7Tt TB TW ©g«P X<Zl
cracructi
7 reiorcu (pccrri 7rgooTov aypocTTo/s yQfxoi$%gn
Toy MidgtWj ctvfipa xcu' Ty fx£yay$ xcu
CLO Ttt T QV
I r *
canes ecro/xspb's, Diod. L. i* p„ 84
‘ztAjjOjj Ciouv (lege Bwr)
rot
/
TW (zi&J TtQlVOTOrTGV
RpfrW oeJ^aoxe
rcov fjj%uQv£voixero)v
usyaKon* ayoSco)
I
I
r
rau Taras, as
1
V
"rf
I
J
I
I
I
{
I
■■
I
I
r
1
1
I
I
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
420
il
^ J
whence came the term Appa, Appas
term for a fathei
■1
K
and Apia among
to
P
the Romans. Homer
-p
Patna among
L J
when N eft or was fent
ancient words: and he tells us
to
■p
fight againft the Centaurs of
from
that he, went
4
to
V
'1
This may
1* r.
warn
mr;
either that he went far away
elfe to a great diftance from the region
was fo called from Apis of
I differ from 13 Strabo, Eu
or
L J
.. d
n
1
ftathius. and all the Scholiaft
►J
/
w j
meant fomething 'at a diftance. Hence
was
A
which is
A
terra
a
1
»
fcarcely fenfe. Paufanias who
an
1
was as
a fibres us
was
►j
that of old the
ftiled
Strabo was a geographer,
as
and
14.
ia
v
l
I
I
We may there
I
that it was fo denominated from Apis
JL
fore be affured, that the term, was foinetimes ufed for
But it likewijfc fignined patria
from Apis
a proper name
j
t
whence came the Greek term xs Khtcclg
a
X <
I
L .
r
as,
as was ex
Amon, Ammon : Adoo
wmca jigm
jure as Atis was rendered Attis
Addon
as
3
I
I
=:
3
1
i
I
Iliad. A. V. 270. T. V. 49. OdvfT. H. V
1 %
2 '
H
They render by 7rcpp&
Ejc ym fJL&xs&v a7r£%B<ni
Horn. Iliad. L. A. V. 2. Anw J's ‘Trofj.oj Strabo. L. 8. p. 570
' 4 Tyv evrcs IcrUijrj-J pfUKccv Asriocv
L. 2. p. 123. Apis is fuppofed to have come from' beyond Naupa&us; Awn
N ctuTontTicts. wSSich. Supplices. But by the coming of Apis is to
Schol. in
■J 3
I
*7
I
(AthcTos) xctXeiauat, Paul
exstvd
ex sr eg us
be underftood the intraduilion of particular rites
which were originally from
Egypt
. j
; HeJychius
35
Acs
i
L
1 -
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
A2 2
Noah : and to him thefe animals were iacred
Tsg T.a vg&g rsg kgsg, tov rs om
that
\
as
ms us
1
o
Keu tov M veviv, O
Amy
r
I
-p
f
MneuiSi were
upon as
manner
were
and to be
to
wis
s .
■ J
J
living oracles, and real Deities
H
*3
in a
r ^
1 . 1
f
e
'•« H
Diodorus fpeaks of the honour,
F ’
L_J
in
they were held, as being equal to that paid to the as Gods
l J
that they were reverenced as
J
us
I
z 6
Deities, and this umvei
The Mneuis was wo
hence
facred
*
L J
P
r
at
is was at
that the former was
v
as ■
11 s
si
r “>
j
■l.
the Sun. They
were
who among other ^titles had that of
i
k;
I
dedicated to
Helius: but
1
of the Deus Lunus
minated
1
C
j
1
more to
1
1
did not refer
: and to the
I
O'
t
■ii
o
to
in
I
3 66
Ifis et Ofii'is
21
r
r
h<ti* Ibid.
ew tyi$ Qfftoi^os
BDCOt f CC V .
ifc
Att^. Ibid. P* $61
*3 Eu/zopf'OF e«cor« foj
TOV
J
Top cTa A r ser/y blxovcl fxtv Oaipt^os e/u.'j'U^op
Ibid, P. 268
21V0LI
i
*4 O Eas Attrn
eq-'iu ocjjoi ■Oaios: Ibid
0
I
1
Tehevryicrccvros QtriPitf'os tstov^bj ) *?? 4*^*7
fidrehei-jLiewi xc&ivw* %A. Diodoi
5 Toys cTg Toombs tbs ie£es 5 tov t£ Kyrtv^
TQl$®eo& Jj. : ‘I. p. 79 . Aw< 5 5 9^05 Amm-Tt&H
CCUTS XOU diet T&UTCt
I. p. 76
I
h
Mnviv 7 ty.cco'Bai Tdccpccn^Xwico$
Stud as.
Xctl TOP
r
I
P
Tom Se Taygas tbs ze^as
crebecrUctz ■
ttaQst'ETSrP 0gy$
P* 19. Apis, populorum omnium numcn. Mela
c. 9. ©eos BMpyerctTQs 0 A-etis* ^Elian de Animal. L
♦Zt rctcnv AiT/UTTTZOZS. L, I
ll
1. c. 10
r
n
machine
I<
p
I
1
s
■ I
i
-!
i r
i
i
i
■>!
l
S
I
>-5
m
j;
"i
r
§
*■
i ■
a"
a"
I
X
I
r",
iv
i >
• I
I
I
I : l
n
i •
v
■V
*
'1
i
■:
?■,
l 1
J
J
I
|H
■J
j
0
■%i
i
S :
V
■■'J
■l
■y
4
I" -
J
"iT
•Lh
r,
I
.1 •
f'J
■ J
-■ —
J'
r
h
s
■:r
J-
J
.Vh
:5t
I
I*
I.
I 1
• I
:■
i
S r J
J
J
i
i
• -j
l
f
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
3
e
■ 1
I.
which
in
I
r
A
was
lans
to the new moon
vourite emblem
which I have fhewn to have been a fa
And there is reafon
think, that they
N
made me of fome art to imprefs the hg
of a
as it is cer
cent upon the fides of thefe iacred animals
tain, that white marks of this form were
c
The Mneuis was ui
upon them
chofen of a
black colour, that thefe impremons
i.
»7
mi
more
The like is faid of the Apis, who is
appear
defcribed as a Deity
zs
Bos m JEgypto etiam: numinis vice
.J
ne ei in dextro latere candi
colitui
cans macula, coi
account is given
diveriis
o
notarum nguris exprefli
maximeqne
lateri dextro infignis
11
n
c
r
omnium corniculantis lunas fpecie
Thefe animals are
r ■
a -
faid to have had this regard paid to
10
being emblems of hujbandry ,
them, as
ins
..1
l
r
l . I
as
4
r
0
Of
m?s
u
e
L
/
I
I
4
j
&
i ■.
i
.1
to t
mt
a
i
V 6 *
i
fjLeyt<j*Q$2 a(poSpct /jlgAus* Athv
c&Amv. Porphyrins apud Eufcb, Pri£p* Evan. L. 3
L, 8. c\ 46. p« 472
fAeActVU' xai aUTQV UTT^P T GOP'
c. 13. p. 1 17
p
Q 060 V
%
r ^
■ j
L. 22. p. 257,
Apuz aict yecopytetz ypZictV}
A J"
xett Sta to to)V eupourcov xap
3 °
I P
b
1
yzatxis 7rapu'S'0<r 1 [ao y yeyoyevea t qis [Asrayive^soon
Try5 tj }v So^au n ecu 7
■>
£/$ c^irctvTa tqv ctt&yct
j
r.*
J
Diodor. 'L. i. p. 79
.1
h
r
But
+
p
r
4
I
I
ri
I
ri
i
i
i
\
i
V.
11 j h
>
.ri if*" •
h
■ / v
i
■■ 11 '
■ #
■ j - ■ ■
*/ ■ -■
v>_.*
V- '."V. * f *
F.-'
V * r b . ■ F ■ . 4 * ►
- I " -P
"V *
• I i
\s) ■!*'&■■■
■ ■■
" V
^ r
-■V/« - J
: ^ ..
. Tl' # ■ ..
■ i
A L
I
■ ■ f :*
1
h ■_ i
i
Wj " '
>
, i
f ■■
■ I T -
i*4
„ A ‘
di
S,
' p
i
..^-r; f
:i» 11 ■;■:..*-t':;v>r. * ^ ■ ..; * ■
I'
i.
i
■ * *
#■
Hr
JjO/'Jf-
4
h
. . P
4 "
V
\
I ■
-,.■>■
i I j'i
| '
. 1 ■ i
U %
I-*
" 4 *
1 -I i
-I V ",
• h ■
i -
■ < \ *■
■> ■ ■ X
k - J*
I
t
p--_ ■
H "
*: * w
„ V
1 Hk_ _. b . liT
4| .
h<
: ^ *'
■ ■ - -j f
t.
i
■ b.
h
I
I
I
-4
H
i
. P ¥
p
k
■r
P.
i
I
■«■,
r
M/
* i
i
i
.1
N
■ _-'.t
I .
i ■ i J
Vi-'
£ I
I
> 1
*
* r"'
I ■
■ i-
* J '/
H
r
'Vi
V
*•
..*■
I _ h
*■
t.
■*.
t:
- J -K-
'■* J ^
=
i
"« i 4
■v*
'VS
*v: ■
o
■ i #*-r
■. •>#-•
-> >■
A .►
i
I
‘J H
V'c
■\ J 7
p
i
i *■■
- - n.
i
■ ■"
m:
d
1 K
r±*
■ s H
•r
- ; rjr r *
■ r
'_ P
f r
■ h h ■
. * -
p 1
r.
■ i
• i
i
I
+%' ■t.-
- i
/v ;
. I
H 1
, \
*■
J
r ra
■SrV-
v> ■
h I
I
1
I
I
t'
d
'' ' "f- U
r l ■. ,
v 1 *-
i .
V J
Li
^ ■ * ■
f
■ - i
■■ r
t :" J
• I-
P
V 1 '
*
P
I
' ' I
'*v
I
N 1
4 ■
P
4
H
" 4 "
i#
■ sfflf
>
tr -!►.*: *-
I
/v. / p,
' F , *■ I
I
I I*
H'l ■!■
J J
h
I •
• 1 ■■ ^
H ,
4
L 1
h
■ /
T i ^ ■
"■_■ ■' r
4 J
"■ • t
I
I ■
Jl •
l - V - L --
b * T ■! _■
ft' .i- ■
■■ji.; ■
t* J-. -
1 :*/ r
f/ JP - p
.' /.V-
■ t
• ■ 4
• - P J <
I
^7.
4
", ",
■V ^
*
■:vl
I
I
. \
I
f .:
I F
.-A
. . • r ll
I
ry. ;
4 ■
V . t
■ ■ 7 ! i ■ j /
I
■. ■! '.
* ■
.*/. : ■' Vi ■ ■■'
- H ” 1 '
■i
L ■
J' '
h ' h
I
I
4 -
- ' H Pl p .
1 I
I
I
I "
: , L V/
1 ■ ■ I
f ■
I
> h
4 i
Hflim:
\ s
r
. t i h
i i
* 4
u iti
. .■ I n t 1 ifr f
li||| !Hl ft.- I,,
i ■
MP
M ■ M ■
H Ll
■ "I I 11 J-l
■. \
I >
I
r. ■
i
P
" ' // * -
I ’?i» # ■* i r
1
■ *,
t
r ■
1 4 .
I
■ I
j
S •
I
pt‘
P ' L
Ih
■i
J
■ ' 1# #, f r' W
4
1
^ r; * ■
r ^ r y " p ^
j Ti > r ^ ►
*! . * *'* \
\
? * f
■if > ■
4 •
::■»
I
. ^
.. ^
^: :
i- .
h
S
■'_+ ■ .
■ .
1
r ■
i
H
i.
J '
, .*y ■
4
2 *
fc.
I
4 .
• i
4
ri
r
r i . ■ k
? >T
>
■ *■%'
. j?-.
i
1 ' ,
C*>.‘
■P
P
V
4
p
! ' l
- V ■
- ± > r +
t %^: r
p >h
l
H
. .v
1
h f P
1
t
4
4
-. tv,
I
p
’J#'.'
v ' r > r / . ■
J
I
| | i P 1 ;
* rif ■ J ‘
i ■ , #- 1
r ,
4
f 1 -V
• I
r
I* [ f
f ^ . • •
p i • k
J
' V h
• L. 1
i
i
i
■ ,r-
L
Pl
■'H
4
■ x . *■.' . -
I l’ *
f.' ■ ' i!l ■ v
h ■ ’
h
!■■ ■
*
■P 1 a"
' i
+ ■
r * 4
■ ,'h V ■:■
. r
. L
i
■ 4
l * ■
f
■ * ■ d
j 1
i
'a Pi
4
I
- ■
h - ^ *
.4 ■
1
^ ■■ i h L- r ■
t • *' * J __
*1
*' ■ "
7 P ■
h' ■■ '■
. J ■
k ■
■Vf.
.1
J k .
■ T I
■ * V ,**
- >vv;
i
P IT
' k‘
H
t
I I
P 1
*
I
4
: l
*■ ■
i<4
»
h
4 _,■ " '
r - rv j
4 1
\
h
= ‘i ■ ;
i
. h
I
4
:
H
■P"
P
I
A-Vv* :
H -I
% -
j f »
^ i:
V/. rt ■*
I
r ■ ► ■ * ■■ ■
1 r' ^'s-
>.f- \
i: * ■
di*
- - ■ ■■ v ■
* \ ^ .-■ ■-
*. ■ * * * ■ f \ ■
■ ■ p I ’ ■ J ■
.■« ■■
I - L 1
■ I 4
T
i
h
>1
i
J * ' 4 h
■ • i
V * ,
,■
P h- -a.
h
h I ft .•
4
"t
I
I .
P
I
H
t
I.
I
h
I
■.■ h / .'i, i .’'
wr*v.v-v'-'
"'j-* 1 . "
n_"»
4
k
m *
• ■ P
■ \ a -
-\ J /
J
P ■
+ .-1 .
■.
■> k h
■ -4
V ■*■
h
I
■ % , ■
1
ifev '
** ‘VV " w: iV-J.' -
' 4 * i’V^' J1 + 1
" m ■ ■ ly
- *
h i
• T
+"
J.
4-
• 4
4
V
M* ’ fi ■
'I
I
► N- ■
k
P '
_, ■. * F
’ 4 .
fc + ■
-^’X * *
4
4 -
*
i *
4
L. l
t
S
i
N- 4.
J*
I I
I .
J 1 ,
* ■
-1- .
. F-F- J
Pft'
4 I
, ’t %
I
J
' "4
. +
4 "
. 4
I
I •
:
■ *
■r
i F ■ ■
1
h
f
; "■
h
**
■ 1, i-'
p
. J m
t
.P
_ p
I ■
1 » 4- ' ' '
jl PB*'_
i /
P-
• (■ H
• > ^
j i 1
h
■ i
'■ i
/
f
H
4 -k
k ^
T • 4| J
4 ^ ,, p , C‘V-> 4 v ■ - *"* ■ -
ri
-■ i
4 '
I h -
4
. h
■ h *
i
4
^ 1
. »
P
ft -
P "
T I
'* b :v
i. ■
■ >■
v;
• i ■
u
I
p r ■ 1
■ 4 - | -
■ *
r< ■
M
4 n
i
I
■ Pb k
p i ■
P 1 ■
J
4 * -
« *
I
■ J4 *
■ 4
If*
• I
I
\* 4
■ * p ■
ll '
4 1 ' 1
4 7
+
■. ^ ■ p
r •
fi
n' ■
ri
:h
r
-d *
:.- - 1 ,v
4
ri
4*
j i
i ■
* P "
^ .
H
• I I -
/vyi'^ V i . '
■'''Vvv^*v* , - I -V*yy- -.v
** >u ;-vj.■-■ t-, ;->pv_- r ;.- ^
■ «P .«P
* ' ^Vr *1 ^S^***" -
v.-vZ/Aj;'*''
■ , h i v' l *Vit ■ ■
11* r *.
■ ■*■ 1
. J
. p. 1
* X 4 1 "
i.
u H
r ''y i .
"i
iw m
k X
*
P
^ H" -
4
I
#
I
*s
k
f
4
* J" V ^
■■ J .-■■ ^ ’
t
■ I
J '
■ t
+ ■
t
■ x
1
I
f
*1'*
*1 1
I f 1
k
P
P
,-fc*
P ■ '
4
1
rip '
■ j
h
k
j ;
h
\
■■ %
¥
>>
4
■p
-ii
I
I ■
■ i ■ •
*
- - f
n
J
I
P"
)
1
■ J"
^.4 ■
• v .t P ‘V-y
4
*c
.* r " +
■ I J
. ^ I
IV
/
1-
-• ri
1 'll
¥
P
■ b .
h
i %.
v _ ■■ .
- -1
7 ■- m v . ■
■ J - V-
4
» 1 I -
ri "
r
P
N
4
if
rfij
I
■ -P
'. d
ri-
P
ri i
_ ' pf
f p -I f
■ .■■■
4
• p
■-.14 #
._ ’i'.
4
r’"
4
J
_ r -.
I
t
L
1: tV*
* f C r l .,V'
J - ’
p
P
» I _ • .
■%'.f
ri
* . -
■ i + i ■ »■
p n
*
,.. /
t
41
LViV.k
* \
I
^ >
A
- A
- : r .
■ k ■
p j-*
i
V.!pri
■ . j> ’> + ;l j Wf v’ ! * * ■
j V 11 7; j 1 4 h j k + fr i ^
.%' s ^'
-1 |h P 4 *
llVt 1
■ v .-m fjjiV...
.ifit*?' ” V
ri, ■ • r l i 1
r -
n
■■
^ -i pki-*.'
> i.
■ **
* *_■ ■
#
■ p
■^vNv
? ■ t * ci/
- ■ jtV-'
- / m
L . P P
I .V
I
a* '
x .
i ■
■ k
l-
i
- 1 i
> r
^ b
I
^a
k h
1 -
i ■
k •
H 1
4-
• f v
1 k
. i ' L
*V-
I- ■.
c
iV
1 I . r ri 4J.
i t
4
P
P
v •
4'
1 1 ■.
i h.
4 F
I ■
■ I
■ fj *
A* f.‘\>
K
I
• h
I
4 i
■_**-■ H
J ■ ' f . f J
f f /l p
ri ■
A
N 4 '
■ H
. * > -
I
h k 4
1 P
\
I ■
> k
*::■
" N
r
1 u«.
I
ri.
ri
\
" I
I
■i
r ri
H r
■■ ri
• "►I 1 '
* >d . 1 ■
I . I
’« t " p
I
■ ■•
I
* i
"" 'J*
h
>‘A\-
! h
4 .
• l
I ^
if i
'i
♦Vi
1 -p
■ I H
■ ’ r
.L
\
ri
li
■ I L j
t
' *
Cx
f
ri "
i
I
• I .
p I
■ j
< I
I
h
>k .
ti
1-ri
p
i
i
■ *j
• * "rj
;*v j >-
< , wSHvt
#
i i C' >:
h
1
• . 4
- V i
r i ri
l VW'' >
...
ia u
1 ► - 4
P r
4 .
■i :
i
*w
4 •
*4
i
■ s
r ri
;*ix
\
P
J
I mb
_ • fc.
v'.Vl'-
■ a
■ViV
ll
J
*
hi
a
I
. *-«,->■ ■ v
^■ + 1 r
b l<
V 1
Vv"
^ , >4
t
h
■ :■
i
I
I
k I
ri
I
' r|d A^
&
f " r
1 ■ *
TV-"- p
l-v
•- ^.,y 'm ■
^ .
ll
H
i
1 i*
tl
p
fcVi^VjKr-
o: r
r i. -f - .
fc k» * s
f p-
4
ri
J Pi ll i 1 l \ . ■ F 1 ■> h ■ 1 I « r j ■ 1 1
/■!!%: vV. ■ V^- 1 / /j / •'
- V ’* "p - a V J V F ^v'^
*WJj rP - -V
'■jVAl'V
■ ; iv^: H trV
d' I ■ I l“ J". I . n V.'# d ■ \
y
H
41
r
f
i
^ i*
*p
L
* - L,
’ V L ' ■
+
IJ
li
b
r-# T , A
-/■■ . p -
k
ri
i
k
s
j p
4 1
ri'p- »
P
■.,7-;,V.' *J
• ri
«
p
M ■ '
7
,hT
P
I
ri
- r*;>
r^ H
ri i
. 1 *
p
H
J
i
■ a I |p
+i T
ri
i
i-
* ■ 1.
■■■v
■ ***
li
I ■"
■ p
f +> / ( .V r -
«_■ j . •. » - 1
1
'4*
* P
4*
1 1 1 s* *
r ■*»* j
P f .1
k
/Vi
V ' H P
I
1
ft '■»
p ■
• A
i| h
.ri*
C. i P.| .F-iV
* ■ I^J*"
pp*:
■ri
. j*
4
P
v; ?j\
VvM '
IB 4 J .
V*
I
tp *
i
ri
^ P
- ri*- j -
* 4 r
‘ ' * - * J
i ■
4- I
f .
l 1
p *r.
J
11
M -Ft Ik * * ^ ■■
H *
• ^ • - *
■ I "
TP™
•ubb.b a aa mym .- J- ' -■ - .iliiip
^■Mppppiif **m p**4 t « hi it** m ■ pi ■ tpii m > if m nm hhh%hM
I •
^tP^,
■y^- j
y
4
t
/■
I
Jr-
-. a
i
i> b
L
i"
r ■
i: ■
?
ri'
■i
. s.^hpTd'd i
^AmiltflllriUftilllHIfHMmMliniVIMtllliVIIIIIIMHMIWIIIIIMIffVIMIIftHtmi ft|h4<na<t»in«Miri
^ **4 *4|4 fi# t ^1* P M * *
VtP
PHfM
i
I 1 ■ .
..kb
P i . • • I - . |
r 4 P
. P
.1 -
I
P ■
i* r
I •
■■/ •
I 1
v ■ ■
• i a i • .
s ■
I p a I
• ■■ ' ■
I I
I ■ m*m B ■ ■
a l •
1
1
■i
I
4
■|
L
h
>>
ifttidire tfc\
t
I
I
L
i 1
I
"i
b
i<
s
I
ri
I
h
ri
I
>
"i
4
H
b
h
%
h
I
4
-T
"i
i
l
*
I
"i
p
p
"i
1
i
L
4
4- 1
>
i"
I
f
\
I
J
L
H
"i
P
+
/
P
I
J
K
I
1
h
>
f
i
\
i
d
i
Hi
I
J 1
4
ri
1
4
I I
I
I
L
d-
4
i
i
E
h
I
i"
I
J
I
f-
I
I
I
t
I
"i
b
i
L
L
4
d I
\
hP
h
I
(
b
h
4
P
p
4
f
J
i"
r
"i
i 1
p
p
i
E
y
i
%
4-
d
|l
T
i.
I
4
1
I
"i
i"
P
\
I
I
I
I
d
d"
P
■4
I
a
p
"i
i*
J
\
P
b
T
i
4
j
"i
L
i
i
-L
r
j
p
i
i
i
4
p
i
■i
h
4
4
I
P
4
1
i
J
"I
p
i
L
I
I
1
d-
1
1
p
p
f
I
"i
I
•*
j"
i
P
K
4
t
"i
4
h
I
I
d
J
4
J-
I
I
I
4"
4
J
I
"i
\
h
•i
s
i
H
I
1
J
-I
b
I
I
>
I
r
i
4
«!
4
ij
"i
-4
i
4 . J
j
i
l
x
i
4
4
n
i
■ r
4
\
r
i"
4
I
4
d
d
Vm
V
l|
I
4
I
I
4
h
J.
*
I
i"
"I
H"
1
K
4
b
ri
<
>
a
%
I
P
P
h
p
I
p
I
i"
I
\
p
I
1.
U
b
I
r
4
P
h
I
I
I 1
A
■j
4
L
mi
J
■P
b
J
L
P
4%
P
H.
I
i"
P
I
I
t
4
>
I
"i
l
ri
I
4
4
*1
t
i
+
I
1
I
A
L
t
4
h
4
V
I
"s
"I
V
J
4
"i
I*
b
I
\
I
>
I
P
H
P
r
$
i
t
i
b
b
h
p-
i,
>■
"i
j
h
i
h
A
I.
1
I
•i
b
P
4
I
P
h
■■
ri
4
l"
■"l
L
t
I
I
f
\
M
r
•i
i
4
ri
<
I
s
I
V
4
4
t
"l
J
"i
J
f
j i
i
l
u
*
4
P
p
Y
P
P
P
I
-J
i"
+
1
P
I
r
i
l
h
i
l
4
J
h
P|
L
H
>
I
P
P
1
I
V
"i
"i
p
"i
F"
"l
I
"i
J.
f
J
I
t
u
>
. I •
I
I
I ■
A
*
t
i i
t
i
=i
d
i
>:
i •
a"
I
I 1
J
I
L.
.i
i
s
H
• ' 1
: i
i
i
i
1 :;
it
r
I ■.
I
I
L
! \
■ i
i
" :■
i
i
• I
\(V
i
I
: h
■ *
!t!
■ 2
. J
"i
L
h
!
I
I. |
C :
«■
t ■
i ■
i;
i,
i
i
s
s
M ^
:\
i - ■ + '
t ^ W i
* >
I
t 1 \\ MM
1^. ■
h
I
i
\
■ i
t
■ "i
i. :
■J
t -
J .
L *
i
t
4
l
I
l
r
h
: h
9
■i
s
P
4
I
I ’
i-
I
4
i
s
I
= ■. J.
*
I
I
I
J
J
r
I
1
b
r
i
r
J
L
J
i
*
I
£
r
Oft
G
7.
r
X
55
I
I
r
eafi
rtf
it
o
I
n
d
1
i
P 3
i
F
f<
I
r
■s
e<
1
I
s
l
e
l
i
I
*
a
L
■■
1
F
I
I
r
fi
e
n,
L'
e
I
r
i
n
i
\
*
i
i
i
m
I
y-
¥
A
i
i
a
■■
a
s
I
I
4
i
j
i
pH
i
r i
4
a
r
J
L
*
I
I
*9 They were ftiled Bao-iA^o; XxoGa;, Royal Souths: Herodotus
57. So in Egypt they had been called Royal Shepherds: IW/Aejs Uoiy.ms
7 ° Herod, ibid
7 ’ Ibid
' l"
4
r ~t
I
I
I. I
I
I*
A-
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
7*
«• i
1
1
r
L*
Vi
r'
Called by Euripides Aprs pup &ievp ctmo-crocv* Hippol
She was confe
quently the &me as Hera or Juno. Hence probably her name.is a compound of
_ ^ r r 1
Temis, the fame as Themis, the Goddefs of Juftice. 1 have fometimes
thought that it was from Ar-temis, the city of Themis
5
I
£*]
r
1 1
n
L I
L_l
■l
I I
F
L
I
73 Eerer» xa/ fa/j&yecra'tr evr«rxc»xo5» Callimachus
temis Ai/nma 5 and A//xj/«r(s• Paufanias
74■ P, xxxix, n. 8
Hanc tibi marmoreo casfam de monte, Diana
^ J
I
Regina undarum, Nympha, decus riemorutn
to Diana. V. 39. Hence Ar.
4. p. 287
r
r n
1
j
8
3. p. 271
r 1
■ 1
r'
L J
L .
L J
r
1
n
.S
I
b
1
IE
n
F
I
Y
I
i.
I.
Ancient Mythology
The Analisbm of
r "
j
I
A rkite
of 9 Haran
infer, that it was the
i
tr
I
1
i
we may
and
k d
b
1^
rj
1
E
L a'ban a
10
Of
I
I
l
I
. A
that thofe places, which were called Albani
4
imagine
had this name from Al Laban, the Moon, the objed:
I
of worlhip in thofe parts. This Al Laban was contra&ed
Alban and rendered with a termination Albanus
r
i
make no doubt, but that the Arkite idolatry prevailed
Strabo mentions
ii
U
w
r 1
'A
lJ
1
r
God. Lunus
o
4
I
I
Albanus in Latium a faered mip was reverenced; which
Juno, or Ionah. From
(
4
Dion Camus calls the mip
li
hence we may infer, that it was a
r
h
4
called Baris
I
L
uno were
and Venus was ftiled 13 Lubentia* and Lubentina
I
I
1
._j
I
which
b
r
i
"K
I
L
i
i"
i"
i
The place was called both Haran and Charan: by the Greeks Carrhae,
and the people Carrheni. It ftill preferves the name of Haran and Heren: See
Pocock’s Trav. VoL i
p. 161. It is the of Chrufococcas
the Haren
of Ulug Beig
Ahcactf*.
J
x cLTqx. j;cr tv f v Xa ioct t >. A<5t. Apoft
See Plate reprefenting the Deus Lunus Carrhenorum
I , 1 L. 12 . P.835
From Labanaj and Lavana, came Luna. It is remarkable that the Portus
Argous in Hetruria was hard by Portus Lunus. Strabo. L. 5. p. 333 - 339 -
342 . and the people of thefe parts are by Silius Italicus called Mseonians.
L. 8. v. 484
L. 39. p. 62
Auguftin. de Civitate Dei. L
8. v. 4
I
s
I
r’
L d
L_J
JO
/
L
1
I
r
h
I
1
4
d
>
I
4
I
Hpaff
nv 5
h
*5
5* P* 53
1
Lubentia
J
J
J
L
1
I
b
4
■ f ■■■
1,
. I
T;
l .
■■ i ■
i ■
j
K
■i
£
I
I ■ /
■. v i’'.
S
1
> M
m\
i
fc W
*
n;>;
I!
*
m
h.
I
I
11
?
}
i
4
I
r
J
t
*
{:
, i
ill
<iu
j
t
i
i 1
>
p
1
r
p
: i
.■ * - 1
i
r
: V-
K
i
i
i,
ii >
M
4
f y
*
i
i
t Si
tliil
fc •
. 4
'i: - l
- * ■: r !
f
.
•(
*
^ 1
I
p
!
J
4 ;
■ I ■ 1 j
■ I r
r.’t
I
iIHi
r
■ i
i ii
4
I’
I
f
4
1 v:
ii
: -r I
f i fc
h
h
I
I- I
h
■.
■.
^ i
■ J
I
d
I
j
V
i
n
■! ■ ;
r
Hit*
ta
I
1
J
1
I-
Iff!
i
1
Ii
}*'t ;
■r T 1 F '
\ t . i .>
■r M b P ,
j :
V
J
I
I
r I
r
1
; I 0 ‘
N ■ r
■ y J '
: M
t ■
■1:1
■.
. ? >
1
4
?
f
I
I
V
* 1 Si
i
ij
1
1.
:#
1 .
J
U'
3
I
l
l
l
1
11
; l> J
■■
b
• 1
h t
■ *
*
i
'•L
J
■ I J
II
■j:
t r
r
j
*
i
.Hi
1
h
P
;
t i i
i n
r l ■
1
* 1 ;
1 ■
i-
■.
I
it,
i
1
ii
i
r. i
1
t
1
y j
in
1
4.
L
■ •.
I
c
II jl
■1
1
T.
i a
f
*
1
1
*
■' *
l ;
4-
11
.1
i
'k
:■
'i
1
4
t
J
.4.
/ v ■•v*
I
I
I
A
i
p
i"
b
|i
I
*
K
+
4
i
I
J
J
1
I
r
b
I
r
4
*
I
4
I
P
I
4-
I
J
[
t
I
1
I
I
i"
r
i
r
4
4
4
I
I
"i
t
h
F
"i
i
j
I
i
I
I
I
i
P
J-
I
4
b
4.
K
I
>
Pi
I
I
-i.
I
I
"4 4
i
p
J
4 -
i
ir
4
1
1
4
i"
4
2
f
I
1
J
b
4
I
P
r
"i
i
+
A
b
>
Y
■P"
I
I
l|
I
I
P
h
i
L
4
i
i
i
I
L
4
4
I
"I
1
h
i*
I
4
J
J
I
I
I
r
i
4
I
I
I
h
i
I.
i
i
i
K
b
P
I
i
P
4
I
1
f
b
I
I
S
P
I
r
b
I
1
I
r.
I
I
P
I
P
4
I
h
1
b
1
i
i
I
i
i
i
ii
i
i
i
p
4
i
i
4
j
i*
i
I
i
r
L
I
4
I
i"
i"
4
I
I
I
1
?
t
■.
f
I
I
s
I
I
r
r
s
4 T-
1
P
I
1
I
d
I
r
i
j
I
c
r
i
i
i
I
/
I
>
i
r
i
4
I
I
i
i.
i
L
I
■i
1
i
N
i
I
i
f
i
i 1
t
*
I
i
J
i
■r
P
H
b
J
=1
J
H
1
I
P-
h
I
I
>
L
i 1
I
f
/
i
I
i -
I
4
f
A
1
f
?
1
h"
r
4
I
l|
f
P
h
4
f
t
I
I
4
H
I
I
P
iLXl'K Will
H
4
i
j
i
i
i
it
i
■j
I
I
I
L
4
I 1
Analysis
Ancient Mythology
E
/
j
r.
\
to
were
.J
j
daemons, and in number three: and they are fometimes
as
as
chief Deity of Egypt, and the reputed father of the Gods
r_n
i
tes, which flood in Heliopolis, he
ccordin cr to
was
mapion ftiled * Hpowsro? o
TWJ) ®$M
from whom this obelifk was named, is
I*
u
■*.
j
mafes. or Ram-Ahs
Rameftes is of the fame purport
1
L _l
rj
a
I
Aftes. 9 Aftus, a
all variations of the fame term, and
fj
A
equally relate to fire
came
m
or
r-”
I
hence alfo the
Hiftia. Heftia, and Vefta of other countries. The Cabiri
f '
L . J
i
many times reprefented as Heliadse
are
i
t
r j
the Sun. ftiled Cam-Il: alfo the defcendants of Proteus
rj
i
io
Potes: and Caf
r 1
Varro they were
11
fius Hermina defcribed them as
32
3
Gods .. One of the moft ancient temples of thefe Deit
L
was
Aiyovrcu S's givai 'H (pcticpw Trcu^zS' Hcfych
Nonnus. L. 24. p. 626
K cu TSxewv H (pathos mv aAsyiQe KoGaocoy
12 6
s Marcellinus
17. c. 4. p
See volume the firft. p. 59. and 62
AxaatXaos cTe 0 Apyetoi ex Ket&tgM
r 1
. j
?
r. l
h
Utpca^a Ha.pt.1X0v Xeyst, Tad's rgeis
KctSeiPtts ms flgareas xat
KCU
Kct€eiou 5 } z A. ere
m
10. p. 724
Hi, quos Augurum libri feriptos habent fic, Divi Potes, funt pro illis 3
Samothrace 0eoi £vv&rot* Varro de Ling* Lat.
T Kou
p I
I ■
I ■
L j
4 . p. 17
qui m
Macrob. Sat. L. 3. c. 4. p. 376
S*
r
at
b-
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
ixpon Mount Cad us in the fame region. They are faid to
float, or
SI
are reprefented as hufbandmen, and at the fame time
of the fea
a*
men
To them the city Biblus is faid to have been
t
Dione, the Dove. They alfo built Berytus, the city
2 3
as
city to have confecrated 2+
clvcl
re
mains of the former world
Thefe rites confided m me
L ...
morials of the Ark Berith, and of the perfons therein pre
ferved; who were the original Cabiri
Baalim. By San
or
. ^
number; the
are defcribed as ei
choniathon tl
in
the God of health, and re
is likewife mentioned by Damafcius
2 5
1US
was
ftorer of life
r 1
as a
Gods was 26 enamoured : one
w
darknefs, but out of that gloom difplayed
a
He too
27
I
l
the Cabiri
the hi dory of the nrd
In the cities of Syria
ages was
o
Ibid
np( 070 l ttAciov svpci
Ka£/^ci-S aypoTais
*3 BaccAnfu rn xca
a 4 - 'Oi xxi 110NT0T AKH'ANA m rw Bvdutqv cxpteoooxv. Ibid. p. 39
*s Ibid
a i
Ibid, p* 38
t & 5 xat
Aim w. Ibid
22
■ 1
. _i
5
*6 'Q ev Bvcvry AaxXmrios ex e<riv EAV^, aJe Ao-oTT-nos", a A Act tis eri%pyciK
72701 $ 0 E<r
Oyf'QQS eytvsru syrt
yag eyevovro tccio h x.A
(pot Vi
m
ggwjxsros ytyovz—*
AcncAiiTTiov tp fMivGu# gt t v
jmouvo:
Apud Photium. p* 1073
7 El> 0 -XOTW
OV
1
L j
At &> Avy 1 w toKv (ptos avu-fas. Ibid
VOL. II
■l
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
"I
In Berytus Saturn was reve
k J
P
I
lies
in
I
J
r
■■
renced, who was no other than Sadyc, the
man
two of
which were in their natural portion forward.: the two
upon the hinder
reprefented with a8 four eyes
I s 1
was
L.
e
i
other were
I
in a
¥
d
i
countries were firfl: compofed by
I
a
have mentioned, that nothing
2 9 Thabion
was more
than for the priefts to be called the fons of the
common
4
Thaba was the Ark. the Theba.
Deity, whom
r_j
1
was no other than..
1
K
of the lonians
E
h
I- I
"i
k.
i
C
f
P 1
I
h
L
I
r
the prieft of Theba-Ion, the Arkite
Dove,
He is faid to have been the
L
30
in
f
r
officiated in Phenicia
There were many cities,, and thofe in parts very remote
where the Cabiritic rites were for a long time maintained
* K
Some of thefe cities were named Cibura, Cabura, and Ca
all of them
moil ancient Hierophant, that ever
t
L ■
1
If
1
L
L
I
|"|
■"I
H
may be feen a reference to the.
In Pontus was a city Cabira, the
beira; and in
fame ancient hiftory
|_ A
royal feat of Mithridates ; where was one of the aioft mag
The nature of the wormip
to whom it was facred': for
^ H
|
n
1
i
J
A pkcci(s3j to the--Deus Lu-
1
I
e was
i
I
A
J
mis Arltithi
was, the city
Ci
near Caroura
j
►J
I
*8 Eufeb. P; E. p. 39.
*9 'Teona, Tavra 0 QctCtuvo? nan vr photos tup an at upo; yeyovoTUP ( lhiv:xui>
'lepGtpxvrns, aAAK^opjjtras—*— -ttCLIPS'&>%&• Ibid
3 ° p\ Ion,, Golumba
l"
1
4
I
I
- C
Strabo
ert. cTe kcli tbto .t))$ 'XzXyiv))
z*
1
TO isaov
I
-1
I
L. 12. p. 83A
I
bura.
J
I
OF
bura: and it is well known, that all this
region was
r*
to
temple of the 3a God Lunus, the fame as Kpmios
was a
Near Side in Cilicia was
r . n
nd we
name
a
that the fame worfhip
The Cabiritic rites were
t
Imbros. and Lemnos
likewife kept up
L j
in
23
in Samothracia
the city
in
Theba
in Boeotia
Damater. the fame as Theba and
r -■
Ins. had the title of n Cabiria
and it was an opinion,
that thefe myfleries were firft eftablimed by
her: by
35
which was meant, that they were derived from the Ark,
Hence the Cabiri had
reputed mother of all beings
An in nance of this
often joint worfhip with Damater
Was obfervable at Anthedon in Boeotia, where flood 36 Ka
1
2
the fame as the Ca
and the prove 0
Ci -j
barni of the Parians, who were
wei
+ -
$
\
L:
. I
37
that the chief province of the Cabiri related
to the
vablc
Their influence was
nd
fea
- #
ini
r
cr
11
U
o
manners for fuccefs in their voyages
nlored
*•> vr
5 '
£
Ibid. p. 869
J tjt,£ ocp ^ K a^sipoi ). Strsbo* I!** 10. p*
Euftath. in Dionyf. V. 524
&Acrc£. Pauflin. L. 9. p* 75®
ip v TgAmh
T* A
Kaotip Asyottzvov
OUV ?V Aj IfJLVU y.Ctt
<
\u%)) fjLZv zq-t iztcc
hVQZ
V i*
*n
V-
I*
*
3 Iv
A
I
•It
*r
rv
j
a/A'
u.
j.
rr.i
i
E
fa
34
tp i a
pci yevv rots Kat ft cal
Ibid. P. 753-. The region was
Hefych
J
i
is S'&pov tq
called Cabeiraia
P- 759
3S
It
c
*
1
I
Q O 2
n
Ancient
Analysis
rJ
M
lJ
38
1
of the fame ordei
were
ft
ft
J
►j
ftiled 39 Aveueroretefcu, as being of a royal
or
were the fame as
ries were
1
m
ftiled
Cabiri; and that
In thefe the Rhoia
the
biritic
p
40
m
1
— -pi
was m
oduced : and they were often celebrated in woods, and
was attended with fhouts
frantic manoeuvre. Nonnus has*
upon mountains
i
and icreams, and every
fome allufton to thefe rites, when at the marriage of Har
of the Cabiri. .
41
CO
r.
were
to imagi
a
1
nation: yet no
was
not partake in thefe myfteries
■ I
L j
TsAeras ©sow
6
?
r n
L
a
Ai/a
TS TlVQKTVOdV
s® Apollon. Rhod. y. 918
Clemens Alexand. Cohort, p. 16
Ibid
4*
T 7
Vba^T«S
J
41 L. 3. p. 88
I “I
L .
I
4 l Euripides. Hauyai. V. 73. quoted by Strabo. L
10. p. 720 ;
K i (rtf m
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
!
: i
n
%
A
L ■ "
A iovv<rov vspcttfev
s
i
n
a
ov
4 i
1
1
I
1
k' <
L
i
>
) c
}
1
fi
i
E? (XbvLVOvg
j
L H
i.
9 C
■:
L r j
to be found in Pindar
I
e is
* 1
#■
44
M
l JCV
r
j
5
c
(Ti Tfsvmi 6
svct re
a
V7iQ
fj
r.
i
m
from the Ark: when the whole of
memorial of the exit
r
\
Bans
was the fame
Kr, which
the original has viroi’.rr^uvrca to
The fecond line in
'mav'Ton £ v
43 Ibid. p. 72 1
I. have altered to •yTrof/.caL&vrci
Pindarns apud Strabonem, L
n
r
\
' 1
10.0.719
44
as
1
H
i"
I
i
l
?
I-
1
i.
L.
*
\
h
I
>
I
+
4
I
i
*
I
h
I.
The Analysis
of Ancient Mytholog
AO
V
a *
fuch as the Croziers, Phcenicopter, Tou
r
can. &c. were ;or
long time vacant, and unformed: 1
never been taken
ivmp 1
l_
notice of, till our late difcove
fide of the line
made on the other
p"
been reduced
nes wei
From that time they h
VC
r 4
into
names
*
v
\
e. as we have it a
1
lineated
was not. the
work of Greece, it mu ft certainly have been the produce
of
IQ
came horn
l, OP V
■ :>
C
4
h
muft have been from the fame quarter. For it cannot be
in the conftruding of. a fphere t
would borrow from the Ia Helladians, or
xans
from any people
hatever: much lefs would they croud it with afterifms
w
relating-to various events, in
in
VJ
was not known to the
thofe ear
fons of Mizraim
of Fgyptian ori
their Gods, .and
The Zodiac, which
Diodorus lays that the Sphere was the invention of Atlas ; by which 'we are
unde'rftand the Atlantians, L. 3. p. 193.
11 fwT«5 A iyv 7 TT.ias avfouTm' ctT&v'TW e&uomv TOP s viaurov, fuafeza figgeat
£ a cr a fjievui nov otf&w es clvtcjv' n:axn a J's ege vgwv ez rm AXTVflN sfeyov* He-
rodot. L. 2. c. 4 -’
Teco/ jlSt pi as ts av eugeTcct
L. 1. p. 361.
s
I
are
I
emblems of
* v K ^ ±
ginalj and were defign.ed as s
0
* *
M
to
s 2
# y£T' ov clu iv (ot A/^uTTTio^)* Clemens Alcxand. Strom
r 1
k. 1
m.ureece. tJu fxrw ovae <pycm } oxm
11 + -T r r
(fpaAAov to Atovutrov) y aAAo xa t i
l. p. 62, 63
P I
EAAjjiw gAabo^ J? vouto
J
See alfo Diodorus Siculus. L
V
j
Aiyinmot - Trap
VOfiQUQV
of arts from Egypt
Herodot. L. 2. c. 49.
J
I
L
\
r
n
the
I
i
I*
1
I
4
The Analysis -op Ancient Mythology
tions, that iEetes once reigned in that country
takes
Fhrixus in Iberia* as well as in Colchis
In Armenia, too
17
i
and as far off
media, and the neighbouring regions , there
as
are
along the coafl about Sinope, upon the Pontus Euxinus j and
at places
m
Lemnos, the like traces are to be obferved y both of the expedi
Phrixus . There are
retreat
in ve ntres
e
m
and upon the coafl of the Adriatic
Crete, and in Italy,
'They are particularly to be feen about the Ceraunian moun
iZ
tarns m
irus
In all
In ano-
o
in a
2
ther place he again takes notice of the great number of
in the eaft: which were held ■
Diodorus Si
high reverence by the barbarous nations
in
; i
cuius alfo mentions many tokens. of the aa Argonauts about
M nrictSj zxt T 5 t>r Trhvato
rm TOUT'S Trccpx
T0t)V KOLTCC Ttfv A'/JJXI
TJJ? $ptka* TS cTS
xai IraAfatS xvj
Kca r a I cLTQrfiot ttqAAcl^b %ai Agfiewas xai t m
S'eixivTcct* Kai f&w Kca 7 repi Xw&TWi ***
17
yOt)PCt)V CtVT Of 5 TQ7TW
A 1 &P$ KCU TW
TOTTOOV AeyBTUL TTQKXoL TTS
IctarovcS » xoti raw KoAj^w.,
c
%OU TOV BhA7)(T7rOUTOV
tb I Gurovas q^pxreix
rns Kprnn
GV
xat
■5
AJ>b. p. 77
TS
. l
b J
v ArgidV}
Abikput at yctp rtva crnfum J tea 7 rspt ra Kegswiot
opti- Kdi nsriPT tqv
a * s>
TwjWf&S iWOtf T3)5 TObV A
is
rio^giirwyiaTvi jcoAtw 5ta< TaiS wpo rs
ttAclvs cnyjLUca Ibid* p* 39
1
19 Ibid. p. 798
L, 4* P* *59
TW
VC&UTOIV
ao
H
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
ji
r 1
j
Hetruria
in
I
r . i
.j.
H
J
4
h
Which latter had its name
I
o
r n
as a certainty , raa# the like memorials are to
and at Gades in Iberia ,
I
r
i
i
nia
i
0
H
I
I
I
J
4
2 /
coau
I
J
I
E
r .
.J
From thefe evidences Co very numerous, i
d fo-wi
I
b
dely diftant, Strabo concludes
I
T
I
I
He
and of their
k
I
an
J
I
4
t
I
V
A
as of fadts
I
1
l-
univer
5
i
r-
i
i
h
I
I
for I think the evidence, to which, he appeals, makes
mull repeat what upon
f
I I
J.
have more than once faid, that if fuch a
like occahon
I
J
I
1
I
The Grecians have taken
what is attributed to him
L
an ancient
relation: and as
b
themfelves, to which they had no
> 4
1
the real purport of it was totally hid
I
run themfelves into a thou
4
I
*
The Argo
r
fand abfurdities
L
built: and the heroes are faid to have been in number ac
L. J
I-
IS
P
l"
4
4
I
1
J
1
The author, of the
one
r
CO
b
L
J
I
J
p
h
I
■i
r
"i
lictTct tup AwaXiav Apywos, Strabo. L. 5. P* 34 2
S *
Paiftum t o 'Hpas hgov rm A gy evicts
Circaeum Apyss xtetvov ofptov. Lycoph. v, 1274
totle 0 au/xas: ctcrixctncov . p. and Taciti Annales. L. 6. c* 34
T cov cTs yrepi rov Icttrovot crufx^ctvrtov^ %ctt nw Apyoo^ xca : A gyovctvrcts tmv
QfjLoAoy&f*w&p 'srupet ttocciv % t A« Strabo, L
He mentions near
"i
Jacrova iS'cti/mot. L. 6. p. 386- Near
See the Scholia : alfo Arif-
P
A
•"l
I
P- 77
1 1
1
r l
I
\
I
1
■J
4
I
I
J
I
t
H
I-
*
i
L.
h
-J
K
■v
I
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
I
them back by the lame way,
s olau
Nor
into other dif-
For if the
of by the authors
as
they went out: but herein
can this be
were not m
which Strabo builds fo much, and of which mention
is
4
K
have attended his comrades throughout
which is con
i H
i.
tradi&ory to mod accounts of this expedition
more
over tells us, that the Argonauts upon their return landed
4
where Hercules made a demand upon
at Troas
*1
o
d
their city. Here we find the crew of a little bilander
in
I
one
and fifty thoufand men could not effedt in ten years
t
j
31 Hercules lived but one generation before the Trojan
war
and the event of the firft capture was fo recent, thatAn
I
all which is
chifes was fuppofed to have been witnefs to it
i
believe, that fuch a change
can we
I
K
w
3 ° L. 4. p. 259
3 * 'O 1 'EAAjiJ'fiS (ftetciv 'Hpctx Afft i y£v£a^<x.t vice irpoTlgov
L, 1. p. 21. Homei
Iliad. E. v. 642
I
31 Anchifes is made to fay
TOyT paixcdv. Diodor*
omevv
I
t-f
h
I-
h
d
4
I
rmcri
. j
1 .
■i
i*
Satis una fuperque
w
H
1
Vidimus excidia, cc
either
I
VOL. II
3
r
I
1
Si
0
1
I
1
4
I
"1
r
l
4
I
Analysis of Ancient Mythology
n
490
n
1
L-J
"l
I
the polity of
ith
1
or
in
u
1
L
L:
h
I
1
J
I
fuppofed to have returned to Iol
are
P
I
I
I
H
I
I
r \
►j
l
cus : and the whole is
months ; or as feme defcribe it. m
j
34 1
two
o upon
and a delineation of it in
&
I
I
■1
I
■j
i
h
this was.
id to
L
N
I
4
1
J
1
3
L
J
r
heavens
But is it pom
*
l"
*
l"
1
f
h j
1
or
+
1+
c
*
1
j
v
•H
(
indeed at any rate
r
fuch
to h
i_ I
or
r
j
s
I
k
1
•1
are faid to have built tem
r
\
1
4
h
f
I
-s
K
t
I
«!
1
over Vaft continents
founded cities
1
■1
1
Dies
P
I
I
h
t
l
;
F
1
I
and through feas unknown : and all this
open 35 boat
m an
0
mountains, and often carried for
ovei
I
I
I
4
I
"l
p
r i
1 j
l
¥
aS cL
y
Jt
i
in theii
■■
b. _l
k
J
I
>
IKI
3
i
s
I
J
I
:■
1
1
i-
A
1
I
L^j
V.
L
But there is fqarce a circumstance
wr 11 er s
in
h
>
"I
P ■
b 1
4
+
i
given of Hercules. According to
36 Herodotus he was left
1
out.
h
H
4
J
l
H
"I
1
II
I
L
¥
A
I
I
rma. Demaretes and Diodorus
I
J
37
■1
■r
:■
h-
s
1
1
K
I
4
I
4
c
I
4
33
?• P- SB
1 n
1 1
Toy Trai^Ta 'srAoi/v ev S'ucri fxww ccvvo , ccvtb$* Scholia in Lycoph. V. j 7 5
The Argo was filled Apyaov /nca«pos by Diodorus ; .and the Scholiafl: upon
' k '
Orphic Argo
1
I
3 *
I
l"
L
I
Pindar : alfo by Euripides
I
It is alio called Apywov axetrov
I
* ^
I
I
5
naut. V. 1261. and V. 489. Titpvs Iburrwp
I
auareno
Herodotus. L. 7. c. 193
Apollonius Rhodiusi L. I,, v. 1285. Theocrit. Idyll. 13
Apollodorus. L ,r, p. 45. Diodorus, L. 4. p
J-
L J
|
I
f
3 T
f
F ^
I
L J
38
K
1
1
251.
4
made
i"
1 1
I,.
I
■■
i"
1"
i"
I
J
I
P
I
I
!-
4
I
The Analysis op Ancient Mythology
49 7
r.i
s i
L,
s*
IS
J5
4
OTt
f 1
It was
that
the heavens by Minerva
as a memorial
i_
Poets
m
►J
L J
ru ww was
e
r 1
59 Inde lacemtum primum mare, cum
o
X
This
according to Manilius,
was
in
ferted in the fphere
’ J
L J
In Coelum fubdu&a, marl quod prima cucurrit
All the other 61 poets are
□ 0
5 * Theon in Aratum
v. 55 r. The
J)' 7 rit
(
CCTTO m KCtTOLGK&JCttJiZVTQS
The Argo is termed eoyov Auwcam IApollonius, L. i
fame is to be found in Apoilodorus. Karros (A^yo ) Awjras tWy&e/
TWKOVTOpOV VOLUV XCCTtO'XZVCtO'S} TJ?Z ; 7ZTpQ(rctyQfgUV££G'Ctl f
I - w
-A ^ *
Apyo). L. i. p. 42
9 Lucan. Pharfal. L. 3. v. 193
h. .
it
Manilii Auron. L. 1. v. 403.
Prima Deftm magnis canimus freta pervia nautis,
Valerius Flaccus, L. 1. v. 1
60
rn
LJ
Fatidicamque ratem
Hjec fuit ignoti prima carina mans
jEqnor Jafonio pulfatum remig
■I
Martial. L. 7. Epig. 19
n
Ovid, de Ponto. L
pnm urn
I*
3
L
t j
■lit i. v. i.
1
Primseque ratis molitor Jafon. Ovid. Metam. L. 8. v. 302.
Per non tentatas prima cucurrit aquas. Ovid. Trift. L. 3. Eleg. 9. v. 8
Prima rnalas docuit rairantibus asquora vends
Peliaco pinus Venice casfa vias. Ovid. Amorum. L. 2. Eleg. ix
Vellera cum
\
v. 1
l
petiere carina. Metamorph. L, 6. v. 72
A.
II
Per mare non notum pr;ma
Prima fretum fcandens Pagafaso littore pinus
hominem projecit in undas. Lucan. L, 6 . v. 400. See
\
Terrenum ignotas
v. 1
alfo
Hv gin u s
3 s
VOL, II
p _ i
L . I
I
The Analysis
of Ancient Mythology
499
J
*5 ,T
GU 010
r
i
was
o
\
who calls it Canopus, and fays, that it was too
Vitruvius
regionibus
enough to be feen in
Q
Ki
eft ignota. It was alfo fcarce high
it from an eminence near 67 Cnidus. But-there is fcarce a
as 68 Cnidus
Europe of a latitude lo far fouth
ace in
in
1
This alone would prove, that the fphere could not be the
)
work of a Grecian : and that this anerifm could have no
The Bar Canobus, as I have
and
relation to that country
gn, and attended
but both the liar itfelf, and
£
with a vei
the hiftory, to which it related, was in great meafure a fe
Not a word is faid of it in their an
I
cient accounts of the e 9 Arero
to
a. Am t'/}~ A safe's xety.svoi Aa//.ierp:s
v. 13. o £V OLlLCXt) TOO
Orca. Proclus de Sphseri
6 <
1 kpn^ia-tS-
K a vo:C
■l
0110 sm
,a<r w
i
Vitruvius. L. 9, c
M
/
<rc /5 sv Tu> EAAadhjiw y. A iu a t<
67 Strabo. L. 2. p. lho. KatwCos a<f.am pm
Scholia Dionyf. v. 10.
It could fcarcely be feen -at Rhodes, which was nearly the fame latitude as
Gut&s (o Kut'o^o ;) ev P o
Proclus de Sphseri. See Scholia
was the fame as the God Elbrus, or A for us, who
68
(SeupvTOi £<rn
r
r, Trcct'TzA&s cap
m Dionyf* Tr^uiy???. v. 11
Cnidus
)
3 W fJLQAtS
b
“ l
OCXTOs.
69 Canopus, and Canobu
11
vssVAsov TQiro)
I
^5
and was fuppofed to have been the
the pilot of the
1
Paleftine and Syria
He is represented by Hefych
worth iped in
was
ius, as
founder of Carthage
1 xiCefvh'Tin
1
{tiled lacupei. Paufan. L. a
jTW'Afjaf. Artemis
Aforus, and Azorus, was the fame as the Plazor of the
f-
was
Axgo. A Cfi'p
p. 240.- and 274
Scriptures.
0
j
The
3 S2
I
I
s
J 1
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
CO 2
the Doves
Here was
77
* -
r
■j
and the lea port Iolcus, of the fame purport as Argos and
Theba. It was one of the moft ancient cities ofThefFaly,
in
fuppofed to have been laid up
which the Argo
and
acer It was de
was
the name mews the true 1
1
which was one of
I
or float. Iolcus was
■is a variation of Aia-
V
the Grecian names for a
originally exprefled laolcus, which
Olcas, the place of the Ark
Medea
Apollonius makes
in
when Aie fpeaks of being wafted to
ufe of the true name
I
Greece
e
ctvrfj v [is raysm vwsg ttovtolq
i
a mi as 7 \Xou
feminine is the fame as Peeafus: and received
sig
)
I
■i.'
to
its name from a well known emblem, the horfe of Pofei
we are to. underftand an ark
don.; by which
f 1
or
1
. J
70
II btrsi
0 W'OIJJTJJff TOLS VOLVS S 171
mt op
1
u
sysi Aoyop eiri yt\g meg.
TOP
.i
i
i
CWTOP SP
mean, [hips ; and hence it ts
l _
For there is a /.
and a i
was efleemed the horfe of Pofeidon, and often termed
a*name, which relates to
pavg
ts
l.
ms
o
/
/
'em land
>
an
ween
V
t.
i
■i
O
(
Hence it came, that
<9
ea
in
r 1
/
c
t
So
fliip, and fhews the
a
L
77 Avtikcc a n$pw'uTofrvhmos
/l\ugTo, rhihiccSus Si -sra. pc-',)i/ jsi z oi? eon-ms
Apollon. Rhod, L. 3. v. mo. Ilomer alfo ttiles it Eu
Odyfi". A. V. 255
79 Artemidorus. L. 1. c. 58
-®° Qvoux tiv Tto irAoi y Tl)j yaa-os
tact 1 leAacryw
Apollon. L. x. V; 580
^opofi lacAJCOa
ft
n
c fj n
4
b .
1
f
PaiEcphatus
purport
IU
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
S°3
A
r .
whelmed it: and as it
o
of a horfe,. it gave rife to. the fable of the
two chief Deities
contending about horfe
80 *
He 7T0Tg OJ
e? IffTTw-y
fcnray asAA
3
Zsv£. yyi
It was upon., this account that the cities
At-*
the title of ‘hrmai mi
mi womo$ Emriycao
3 *
J
l
t
SP *
y
j.
j
I have mentioned that the Arkite worfliip was
introduced
into Italy by people niled Arcades, and Argsei: and here
Hippium in the region of Daun
81
I ima
was an.
OS:
la
of thefe appellations related to the animal
gine, that none
■■
an horfe j but to an emblem, under which in
y
c
the ark was 8i reverenced. Daunia itfelr is a com
or
Da-Ionia,. and, fignines the land' of the Dov
In Thef
7 <R
faly every place feems to have had a reference to this hiftor
>
. i
Two of the. chief mountains were Pelion, and Glia; one of
Orph. Argonaut. V.' 1275
Ta Ttpt Rawing xat to Avyos to 'linrtov
IT f -
II,. 8. p. 568.. Apyos — Iacroi', 3 Ittotoj', 3 'br?r&07oi>
St There is no fatisfaftory hiftory, that any of thefe places were really famous
for horfes: and though the poet fays Aptum dicet equis Argos 5 yet I have reafon
to think, that the notion arofe from a miftake in terms
Seres was originally differently expreffed ; and.that it fignified. Hippo
■i 1
Eat, or the temple of the Ark. It was
and Non'nus under the char after of Perfeus deferibesfome Perezites, who fettled.
*
in. Daunia, founding a temple under this emblem
IIoAukA V<TQ10 7?Ctc’ ffTTTs
* ^
Tuc<rw:£i 7T7 jfe vzPiacrax
CV Q?\.OV 7T &T 0 (T XT 0
80
L. 5. p.329. See alfo
1 •
Straoo
81
I imagine* that th
r
term i ttttc
fo me times reprefented by a Cetus
p■■
picv TiAifj.ct yaws
QAxccacc A an
Kvircs qAqV) 'Z&$pif,t£Tp
p. 1232, Hence.we,may fee that there.is a correfpondence in
C T\V
I
is
f kpo-evs. Nonni Dionyf. L. 47^
in all thefe hiftoriss
> *
\
1
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
1
5.04.
which
the 83 Oracle
I
was a
near it two iflands, named the iflands
Thefe circumftances contain
of 84 Pyrrha and Deucalion
no
afford wonderful evidence of the. Arkites, and their rites
which were introduced in all thefe places. The Grecians
-1
J
took the hiftory to themfelves; and in confequence of this
ion
t
Argsei fettled, they fuppofed that their
title of Arcades or
I
Arero had been. Hence
not 01
it
/
the moft diftant feas, but over hills, and mountains, and
.j
They fent their heroes to
3 it
no
c
Colchis, merely becaufe fome of their family had fettled
They made them vifit Troas and Phrygia, where
there
(
city Theba, and Lariffa, limilar to thofe
in their
was both
Some Arcades had fettled here ‘ who were
fuppofed to have been led by Dardanus, the brother of
Virgil, 1 know not why, would make him
come
1
a better my
by which we are to underftand an
ftiles him Areas
i 1
and fays, that after a deluge he
came with his ne
Arkite
Corybas from Arcadia • to Samothrace; and from
p hew
8 3 O cro'cty 04* fa x A 71 $ cov
xca Scholia in Iliad. B. v. 93
t/5 oaaa 0
*
He
\
llJ
Apollon* Argon, I
Ghfeatj eiTct cocp'X lluppccj Kca *£uo vycriSioL irKnonoV) ow
CiebKxXitov ?icsA# t«/> Strabo. I
Hi &*)'•} eXas op
TVsp ctvTcop sT? ut
OkQ u&v Ticpox to J
■*S I
v* mo
&
0
i
1
*■8+
*
9, 66
a
&
1
1. p. 48
4 *
thence
L
I
p-
*
L
J of Ancient Mythology
There were fome lonim, who fettled
5 ° 7
J
have been done
afterwards Antiochea
the Greeks, and were fuppofed to have come from Argo
aw
J f
It is alfo faid by another writer.
Cedrenus accordingly ftiles them
95
i •
rom
os
dc
m e
who were by nation Argives,. made them
a vifit, and built
He did the fame in Perils: and in
for them a temple
both regions inftituted Puratheia : and the flame, which he
rj
gave to each of thefe edifices, was
O 1
Thefe temples however
not built by
were
J
Perleus; but eredted to his honour. For I have fhewn, that
Perfeus was a Deity, the fame as Helius, and Ofiris: and
aces by the lonim, who were
in
The accounts therefore, which have been giv
Arkites
n
as true, if in dead of Perfeus we
fubftitute Perefians, and Perezzites; and inftead of natives of
h
read Argoi, and Arkitas,- or as it is foinetimes ren
above^ may be all admitted
Argos we
o
dered , 97 Architas
a great part of Syria. From
and occupied
Paleftine
thence they
(
came
Aeym I ANITAS
b *
P. 22* JLna es to Hihiriav egos ekmv
£ 7C A/fy 7} (7 CC V 7f£i£C£ f JQl$ CCVTOtS 'SfUgOtS lo)VlTCCL £TJ put\ Chron. I aC
9 5
S'J'-g Tb’s alt
■ 1
7
c
Acygiot
chale* p* 42
QiTll’SS
AprOTS LQNiTAI
%iirta {ytctyuijw £x r r J
O cTe auras riepaws ex tigs rots I&ttqAitcus (It Ihould be
jJLCLVtoV
96 O negvtvs
em tiw zvoi&v
loi'QTtoXl'TGLls) IHQV }
GTt £V T ?1
%
r
J
A. Chron. Pafch. p. 40
57 So the title was exprelTed in Syria
was {tiled' Venus Archiris. Macrob. Sat. L
X T
The Goddefs upon mount Libanus
-I. C. 21
r
L 1
cian s
\
1
p -
The Analysis op Ancient Mythology
5°9
l
IS
ai
in the retnotefl region of
built , and named , after the ark , which was the
was
r 1
t
The chief title, by which, the Argonauts
were diftin
emimed, was
•lnyeE
tion has been matter of debate, among mod writers upon
1
O
1
J
a
as. a
in
r ■
r
defcended
i \
h *
:
I
ftctprcis, mu
■i
r
Oi 7rXei?oi, mi mzoi oup di[M,rog sv'yetomto
P
ii
mi OLVTOV
l
H
(t)C
i
d
* *
a «
■J
f
fays, that the Minyas
an ancient race.
were
1
and defcended- from 3 Minyas of Theffaly. This Mmyas
the fon of Callirrhoe, and Pofeidon: though Pau
was
fanias makes him the. fon of 4 Chrufes: and other writers
ftill more in their
5
opinions
vary
r ’
Apollon. L
To J'e TOiv Mivmv yevos agX ai0V
fAii'ua.'S'ai Opy^ojxsvMv, O yot[> Mtyuos tt^wtos nocfiv Ovy^sfMvictiv
Schol. ibid..
tn Lycoph. V. 874*
'M.irvatt Parian* L. P* 7^3
Alfo . Schol. Apollon
V. %2Q
i_d
r |
Mivus t 0 OerTxte, — nXn<no%&m
-
GC 7 TQ
c
xect yznopft oi
Schol. in Pindar; Olymp* Ode 13* p. 124-
Homer. Iliad* B. v. 511
A 'uro Miwy T8 YlotrBtS'covos 'Trctif'Q? x&i KaMjppw* Schol
A to r& A to* of a
/
. j
*>
T/05 yivsTcu XPTXH Mi vuas
See Scholia upon
L. t. v. 220
X.CCI CC7T aUT8
Pindar. Pyth."Ode 4. p
4
2 AO.
* -
Servius in Virg, Eclog. 4 > vv 34
r n
L J
are
I.
I
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
5 1
3
Colchis
a
J
nominated from it, m
m
were
r
L'j
Memei, the fame as the Minyae
in
where the
10
was
emblem of the facred Bull was fo religioufly preferved. All
thefe places will be found to have been thus denominated
from the fame rites and worlhip
se. or Menians, were Arkites: and this denomi
The people, who
were
c
nation they took from the Ark ; and alfo from the Patrf
_i
who was at times called Meen, Menes, and Manes
arch
r i
J
Thofe therefore, who in
will univerfally be found to have a refe
this appellation
rence to
thofe, whofe country
*
molt ancient, Minyse
is men-
were
name of Mmyas
tioned in
XX
Ararat,, where
This people relided at the bottom of Mount
I have mentioned, that they called
the Ark firft refted
the appulfe of the facred ihip
mountain Baris from
tbi
O
and retained many memorials of the Deluge. At no great
diftance
Areas, and
3 X 2
r
the fame region, was a city named
■■
The Minnsei upon the Red Sea
in
were Arabians
Area
n n
Colchorum. &c. Serviusia
8 Minyfe appelhti vel ab agro hujus nominis
Virg. Eclog. 4. v, 34
9 JVJ iVVCt TroXlS ©?TTtxAl«
Arcadia. Strabo, L. 8, p. 519.
Stephanus. Mevat. See Cluver. L. 2
*
Eufeb. Prtep. Evang. L. 9. p. 414
Antoninus, p. 148* p, 2 J 4 * ft is called A
ibid.
H.
_ j
S'i Irtpet $pvyioc{. St£ph. Byzant. Minyse •
c. 7. Sicilia, p. 339. called now
n~
EC'i
4
Jo
Minio
THt> 'Mtvvot.fct *J.iy cl 0 pos E a.pi$
by Hierocles Grammaticus
U1HD
il
• ,
; it a
I a
t.
P- 7 °S
who*
5 l 3
1
L J
the grove and temple of Iona
m all which names we
V
may fee a reference to the fame rites and hiftory
The
molt celebrated city of this
was Orcho
name
rheflaly ; which was fo denominated from the
r
menus m
lunar God, and from the rites fpoken of above
it was alfo called Aim on, and the
Hence
region Almonia; equi
it was alfo dif-
valent to Aimon and Aimonia, by which
M iwct y 7 ro?.i$ ®srrcO\i-oig y t) tigorepw AKum m }
n *
L j
> c
a<p
to
i
In Theffalia autem ** Orchomenus Minyeus antea di&us
•Xi
BImon lignifies literally the town of the God Lunus,
or
M
was exprefled and reverenced under the figure of a lunette
r 1
t j
* #
ci r les
were
on
■1
was
Kv
1
Ei'TauSa <f £ j ecu t a. aAcnj, to tk IflNAl
Si V.CCI TJ7S A pwas axpoTOAis W
ON. Strabo. L. 8. p. 532, 533
Strabo fuppofes
eviiiS-A XafJLBs sxdXcw tcc J 4 ». And Sama certainly had that meaning: but in
fimilar to <rauu and ertifjux, which were de
.1
T8T0
3
Sama-Con, fignum c&lefte, five fignum Dei
that Samos and Samicon were fo named from Sama, high
m
1
rived from it
Steph. Byzant
L. 4. c. 8. Harduin reads Salmon.
Orchomenus is a compound of Or-Chom-Men, three titles, which need
no explanation
20
2* C, 3
763 . quafi Met
a 3
Schol. Apollon, L* i, v
Tov IojA %QV MtlVCtl tfKQVV
Selenitae
VOL
1
yuett
1 1
L .
b
i
*
h
i.
1
HI
G
*
L
9 )
I
Ji
I
1
r\
/
/
i
i
7
i
*
j
a
Wi
I
/
3
v
■i
i_d
i
l"
I
*
et
¥
tf
*
h
¥
i
¥
I
I
i
v.
I
I
'A
'l
i
i
r.
¥
¥
¥
U
i
¥
¥
4
i
A
t
I
I
I
I
4
4
•J
1
1
l:
■j
A
n
I
L
L.
. J
e
i
*
j
i
j
i
¥
#
i
i
i
t
■p
H
“1
I
¥
A
¥
¥
to think
¥
J
t all
I
1
I
r* i
lfi
L
I
•I
c
I
k
I ►
r
r< i
"i
u
I
L
h
l
h
"i
42. c. 3. p. 589. Tacitus. Annal. L. 6 . c. 34-
39 It may be worth while to fee the hiftory, which the mythologies give of
thefe perfonages. Jafus was the Ion of Argus. Apollodorus. L. 1
Jafius, Janigena, tempore Deucalionis, cuj ; us nuptiis interfuit Id
from Berofus
Tourmv
JcccrB Buy ar tip. Paufan. L, 2
* 7)
was reftored to fecond youth
Jura
4
t
a
3
1
r |
. i
d
d
p. 59, 60
Hoffman
r *
1
h.
I
I
A nfj.wpoi epxcQets. See Servius in JEneid
3, v. 108. 170
5 > p. 4-I.2-. Mfort
Jo>
r
L .
145* Iclctb Gcouos* Ibid
I
I
Yncas anrogucracra.
4® Odyff. 5. V. 245
4 1 A*yuix.Qv Aoyoiy
Auftor Reditus
1
1. '
1
J
J
I
1
. J
I
n Lx <rov } v 'Ittiov, v l7nroCoroT, » IlfAao-ytzov. L, &
I_
P ^
L J
4
I
*
L.
K
I
1
I
h
ij
i"
I
I
1
I
4
A
I
I
k
I
>
i
i
I
T
n
1
t
1
The Analysis of Ancient Mythology
he lived, he bad fair
534
have obtained it
n
h
a*
o
As he was folici
tL
i_ j
tons to obtain fome information, he betook himfelf to 37 Do
3-
l
reputed the molt ancient in Greece. But they
was
*
were
them by names and -titles: but thofe
h. J
were
■I
{
i,
in
WOl
c
1
K
with this melancholy confemon, concerning the Gods of
his country, 39 that he did not know how they came firft
how long they had been in it
into the world
nor
nor
were. He believed
L • i
J
o
k
that their nature, and origin, had always been a fecret
and that even the Pelafgi, who rirft introduced them, and
their rites, were
40
d
J
> ■- 1-
h r
c
in our
we
The Gentile hiftories of themfelves could not have
out
r “i
1
tion
j
J
I
Herod. L. 2. c. 50
ot n^A caryoi &ZGiai %7rev%oi*evoij cos eyco ev Ac o^covyi oiSgc
ya p ctxyxcecrctv xoo
37 nVVVCLVOp.'cVOS bTOO ZUMCTKCO $GP
E 8 uOP £s 7 TCCVTCC WOGTZPCV
€7rmVfJLMV ^ OWOfJLOt $7r0l£UV70 GV$$Vt C&UJtCOVj GV
Ibid, c, 53. See page 307. of the fir ft volume of this work
AiyvTrvv cczviKPuem ret cvra
!■-
ctXB&ctS
i.
eTTUvopTo ex
3 s XfiWB ttgXXb A0
GPTG$
6e&>v xnh, Herod, ibid
L .
J-
fxuroc t&jv
39 E rvevJ'e syevera macros tcop ©ecop^ ene S'e ctet wav 7 rccvre^ oxowi Se nrives
00$ ci7rm j Xcryto. Herod, fupra
J
1
1
fid f«, b -K }W‘T'f«,TQ[*.£%Pia> TPCCTiP Ti %cu-
* Ibid
1_ 1 f *
n a
1
1
1
"M
■l
K
.J
I-
P
h
•r