Caching examples.

gradio_cached_examples/16/log.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Answer,flag,username,timestamp
+"During the meeting of June 2023, participants agreed that economic activity had continued to expand at a modest pace, with robust job gains and a low unemployment rate. However, they also noted that inflation remained elevated and tighter credit conditions for households and businesses could weigh on economic activity, hiring, and inflation. Despite these uncertainties, most participants judged it appropriate to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 5 to 5 ¼ percent at this meeting. They believed that leaving the target range unchanged would allow them more time to assess the economy's progress towards the committee's goals of maximum employment and price stability. Some participants favored raising the target range by 25 basis points, citing a tight labor market and stronger-than-anticipated economic momentum, but all participants agreed that maintaining a restrictive stance for monetary policy was necessary to achieve the committee's objectives.
+
+In terms of the policy outlook, participants continued to anticipate that maintaining a restrictive stance for monetary policy would be appropriate, given the persistently high inflation and tight labor market. They emphasized the importance of reducing the Federal Reserve's securities holdings as planned and monitoring the implications of incoming information for the economic outlook. The committee remained committed to returning inflation to its 2 percent objective and would be prepared to adjust the stance of monetary policy if risks emerged that could impede the attainment of their goals. Overall, the participants acknowledged the uncertainties surrounding the economic outlook and the need for data-dependent decision-making in determining the appropriate stance of monetary policy.",,,2023-07-06 17:54:40.738042
+"The voting members present in the meeting on March 2023 were:
+
+- Jerome H. Powell (Chair)
+- John C. Williams (Vice Chair)
+- Michael S. Barr
+- Michelle W. Bowman
+- Lisa D. Cook
+- Austan D. Goolsbee
+- Patrick Harker
+- Philip N. Jefferson
+- Neel Kashkari
+- Lorie K. Logan
+- Christopher J. Waller",,,2023-07-06 17:54:44.921219
+"The staff's economic outlook presented in the April 2009 meeting indicated that labor market conditions were expected to continue deteriorating over the remainder of the year. They anticipated that the unemployment rate during the fourth quarter of 2009 would be higher than the actual unemployment rate in March. Additionally, industrial production was expected to continue falling rapidly.",,,2023-07-06 17:54:49.057157
+"The pandemic of Covid-19 was highly important in the discussions during 2020 for the effects of monetary policy. Participants noted that the virus and the measures taken to protect public health had induced sharp declines in economic activity and a surge in job losses. They agreed that the effects of the pandemic would weigh heavily on economic activity, employment, and inflation in the near term and pose considerable risks to the economic outlook over the medium term. The ongoing public health crisis was expected to continue to weigh on economic activity, employment, and inflation. Participants also observed that the positive vaccine news received over the intermeeting period was viewed as favorable for the medium-term economic outlook.",,,2023-07-06 17:54:55.506101
+"The oil crisis had a significant impact on the economic outlook during 1973. The projections made a month earlier, before the oil shortage was taken into account, suggested a low rate of growth in real GNP and a rising rate of unemployment in 1974. This prospect was considered minimally satisfactory due to the strength of inflationary pressures. However, if the oil embargo were to end, it was expected to have an immediate effect in improving expectations. People would realize that the energy problem had been developing before the embargo and that oil would remain in short supply. Consequently, economic activity was not expected to reach the higher levels projected before the oil crisis. The higher price of oil, which was much higher than previously contemplated, contributed to an increase in the rate of inflation. Overall, the oil crisis was expected to exert a negative influence on real economic activity and release forces quickening the pace of inflation. However, the exact magnitudes of these tendencies and their implications for monetary policy were uncertain.",,,2023-07-06 17:55:03.493242

public_app.py

@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
                                   'of April 2009 with respect to labour market developments and industrial production?'],
                                  ['How important was the pandemic of Covid-19 in the discussions during 2020 for the effects of monetary policy?'],
                                  ['What was the impact of the oil crisis for the economic outlook during 1973?']],
-                       cache_examples=False
+                       cache_examples=True
                        )
     app.queue()
     app.launch()