20230808-AI coding-1st round/1027 – Li 2017.txt

PMID: 28430606 PMCID: PMC5464800 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15405
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Male and female Wistar rats, three months of age, weighing 200 ± 20 g, were purchased from the Animal Experimental Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Harbin Medical University (Harbin, China). Prior to the experiment, rats were quarantined for two weeks at the Northeast Agricultural University (Harbin, China). All experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines outlined by the Ethical Committee for Animal Experiments (Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China).

Mating and drug administration
Thirty-six Wistar rats were divided into 12 cages (one male and two females per cage) with an iron mesh at the bottom. On the next morning the vaginal suppository was investigated through the iron mesh. When sperm was detected, female rats were annotated as pregnant at day 0 (P0). The female rats were anesthetized via intravenous ketamine injection (200 mg/Kg) for 3 h on P14 [55]. The total volume of ketamine stayed below 2 mL/100 mg. Ketamine-treated offspring were recorded as K group, while individuals within the control group were recorded as C group. The first day after birth was recorded as B0. During B25-B30, Morris water maze task, contextual and cued fear conditioning, and olfactory tasks were used to test learning and memory capacity (n = 120, 5/dam, Figure ​Figure11).
Sample collections
Rat pups were sacrificed at B30 via cervical dislocation, and were recovered to collect brain tissue for Nissl staining (n = 24, 1/dam), Golgi staining (n = 24, 1/dam), and western blotting (n = 72, 3/dam). A subset of their hippocampuses were quickly dispensed on ice, put into a freezing tube, and frozen in liquid nitrogen, while other tissues were preserved in 10% formalin.

Nissl's staining
Coronal brain sections were cut in a vibratome (Leica VT1200S, Germany) after the brains were postfixed in the same fixative. To ensure matching of hippocampal sections between groups, we used anatomical landmarks provided by the brain atlas. The selected brain sections were stained with 0.5% cresyl violet and we selected three 104 μm2 areas for examination with a light microscope (Leica DFC420, Germany) to count neuron numbers in the CA1 and CA3 regions of the hippocampus.

Golgi staining
Golgi-Cox staining was utilized to obtain hippocampal dendritic spine density via the FD Rapid GolgiStainTM Kit (FD Neuro Technologies Inc), following the manufacturer's instructions. Coronal tissue sections of 150 μm thickness were cut at room temperature, using a vibratome (Leica VT1200S, Germany) and then, they were put on gelatin coated slides. Subsequently, slides were dehydrated with a gradient of 50%, 75%, 95%, to 100% ethanol and cleared in xylene, then the specimens were prepared with slide coverslips and sealed with Permount. The slides were then examined in detail with a light microscope (Leica DFC420, Germany). We analyzed the stained spine, using techniques similar to those described in previous study [56]. Five pyramidal neurons were analyzed that were well-impregnated and clearly distinguishable from others in each hippocampus (20 × objective lens). Five segments of 10 μm of apical and basal dendrites respectively, were randomly selected from each pyramidal neuron for inspection (via 200 × oil immersion lens) to quantify the density of spines. Spinal density of secondary apical and basal dendrites was analyzed at proximal segments emerging at more than 50 μm distance from the soma of the hippocampal CA1 neurons. All of these spines were required to exhibit a clearly distinguishable base or origin and were isolated from neighboring dendrites. Spine density was calculated per 10 μm of dendritic length. The open-source ImageJ 1.48 r Java image-viewing software and Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 were used to calibrate the scale and enlarge the segments of the spines. An investigator blinded to the experimental condition completed all analyses.

Morris water maze test
Place navigation trials
To test hippocampal-dependent spatial cognition, rats were trained in the standard morris water maze with a hidden platform [57]. A white escape platform (12 cm diameter) was submerged in a circular pool (160 cm diameter, at a 50 cm depth), filled with warm (23–25°C) opaque water. At B25-29, each rat pup underwent four trial sessions per day (60–70 min inter-trial interval) for five consecutive days. Each trial consisted of releasing the rat into the water, facing the outer edge of the pool at one of the quadrants (in random sequence) and permitting the animal to escape to the platform. They received four trials per day of training in search for the submerged and unmarked platform, with trial durations of 60 s on the platform at the end of trials. All trials were videotaped, and the swimming paths of rats were recorded with the ANY-maze video tracking system (Stoelting Co., IL, USA), which enabled us to measure the time taken (latency) to find the platform (s), as well as other behavioral information obtained during this spatial reference memory test. The animals were dried and placed beneath a heating lamp after completion of each test.

Spatial probe test
A probe trial was performed 1 d after the last trial at B30 where the platform was removed from the pool to assess memory retention for the location of the platform. During the 60 s test trial, we recorded and analyzed the swimming speed (cm/s), the swimming path tracks, and the number of entries into the platform quadrant zone.

Contextual and cued fear conditioning
Conditioning training on day one consisted of placing the rat pups in the chamber and exposing the animals to a mild footshock paired with an auditory cue. The rat pup was brought from the home cage to the testing room and placed into the conditioning chamber. It had 3 min to explore the novel environment. The auditory cue (a 90 dB tone) was sounded for approximately 30 sec. A stimulus light within the wall of the chamber may also be illuminated. During the last seconds of the auditory signal, an unconditioned aversive stimulus, a mild footshock in the range of 0.25 to 0.5 mA, was administered through the grid floor for 2 sec. The number of seconds spent freezing in the test chamber on the training day was considered the control measure of unconditioned fear. The rat pup was left in the conditioning chamber for 1 min after the last pairing, during which the association between the aversive stimulus and the properties of the conditioning chamber was further established. The rat pup was then returned to its home cage.

Testing on day 2 began approximately 24 hours after the conditioning session. The rat pup was returned to the same conditioning chamber and scored for bouts of freezing behavior. No footshock was administered on day two. The number of seconds spent freezing in the identical test chamber on day two was considered the measure of contextually conditioned fear, i.e., freezing within identical context. Freezing was defined as a lack of movement other than respiration. Presence or absence of freezing behavior was generally recorded by an investigator, who was blinded to the experimental condition, taking a note every 10 sec for 5 min, for a maximum total score of 30 freezing bouts. The rat pup was then returned to its home cage.

The second phase of testing began an hour later. A further testing chamber with very different properties provided the altered context. Changing the sensory cues as much as possible was essential so that the rat pup perceives the novel context as unrelated to the conditioning chamber. Such as triangle-shaped test chamber with different lighting was used and lemon juice was painted on the walls, while a different investigator wore gloves and a lab coat of different texture than on the training day. Freezing behavior was scored for 3 min. Contextual discrimination of fear conditioning was quantified by comparing the number of freezing bouts in the same contextual environment to the number of freezing bouts in the novel contextual environment.

At the end of the first 3 min, the tone that was presented on training day one (was well as the light stimulus cue if used on day one) was presented in the novel context environment. Freezing behavior was scored for the next 3 min in the presence of the sound (and light) cues. Cued conditioning was calculated via comparison of the number of freezing bouts in the novel context environment in the presence of the cue with the number of freezing bouts in the novel context environment in the absence of the cue (Figure ​(Figure5a5a).

Olfactory task
This task was designed to investigate the olfactory learning and memory abilities [58]. For this experiment, two holes (3 cm diameter and 4.5 cm deep) were used. A polypropylene swab, embedded in a fine plastic mesh and containing 20 μL of diluted odors (1:10) was placed at the bottom of each hole and covered with wood shavings. The acquisition test (one session) consisted of one odor (either limonene or carvone, Sigma-Aldrich) being presented in both holes for a 5 min period. In a preliminary experiment, with simultaneous presentation of the same pair of odors (one odor in each hole) in a one-trial test, rat pups spent the same amount of time exploring either hole, indicating no preference for one of the two odors. The recall test consisted of a 3 min session in which one hole was odorized with the previously presented odor, while the other hole was odorized with a new odor (Figure ​(Figure6a).6a). The delay between acquisition and recall tests was 60 min. During the recall test, the cumulated exploration time of each hole was converted as the percentage of the total exploration time of both holes. Rat pups were considered to have remembered the familiar odor when they spent less time exploring the hole containing it, in relation to the time spent exploring the hole containing the new odor. Equal exploration times for both holes during the recall test were considered to indicate that rat pup did not remember the familiar odor. Both odors were used alternatively during acquisition or recall and presented randomly in each of the two holes to avoid place preference bias (Figure ​(Figure6a6a).

Cell culture and drug treatment
PC12 cells were obtained from the Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China. The cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco), supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL; 100 μg/mL) at 37°C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. The cells were seeded in 6-well plates with 2-9 × 105 cells/well or 96-well plates with 2-9 × 104 cells/well, and the culture medium was changed daily. Cells were pretreated for 3 h with Protein Kinase A (PKA) inhibitor (H89, 10 μM, H group), Extracellular Regulated Protein Kinases (ERK) inhibitor (SCH772984, 10 μM, S group), PKA inhibitor + ERK inhibitor (S+H group), DMSO (solvent of inhibitors, D group), and ketamine (K group).

Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay
Cell viability was detected via the CCK8 assay (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China). Following the indicated treatments, CCK8 solution (10 μl) was added to each well (96-well plates). Then, the cells were cultured at 37°C for one further hour. The optical density of each well was measured at 450 nm with a Bio-Tek microplate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Winooski, VT).

WB
150 μg of protein were separated via 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (HybondTM-C Extra, GE Healthcare) via electroblotting. After washing, membranes were blocked with 3% (w/v) BSA (biotopped) for 4 h at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C in BSA with antibodies that are specific for Ca2+/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase II (CaMKII), p-CaMKII, CaMKIV, p-CaMKIV, ERK, p-ERK, PKA, CREB, p-CREB (1.5:1000, EnoGene), p-PKA, and Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF, 1:1000, abcam). Membranes were washed thrice with PBS containing 0.1% Tween and then incubated for 1 h at room temperature either with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Goat anti-Rabbit IgG Antibody HRP (ABIN) or a goat anti-Mouse IgG Antibody HRP (Sigma)) in BSA.

Data analysis
All data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., USA) via one-way ANOVA, followed by Turkey's Post Hoc test or unpaired two-tailed Student t-test. Values were considered to be statistically significant for P < 0.05. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation unless otherwise noted.