jskim commited on
Commit
f582acb
1 Parent(s): 961f39c

adding figure

Browse files
Files changed (3) hide show
  1. .gitattributes +1 -0
  2. app.py +2 -0
  3. tool.gif +3 -0
.gitattributes CHANGED
@@ -32,3 +32,4 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
32
  *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
33
  *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
34
  *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 
 
32
  *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
33
  *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
34
  *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
35
+ *.gif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
app.py CHANGED
@@ -248,6 +248,8 @@ with gr.Blocks(css='style.css') as demo:
248
  #### Who is it for?
249
  It is for meta-reviewers, area chairs, program chairs, or anyone who oversees the submission-reviewer matching process in peer review for acadmeic conferences, journals, and grants.
250
 
 
 
251
  #### How does it help?
252
  A typical meta-reviewer workflow lacks supportive information on **what makes the pre-selected candidate reviewers a good fit** for the submission. Only affinity scores between the reviewer and the paper are shown, without additional detail.
253
 
 
248
  #### Who is it for?
249
  It is for meta-reviewers, area chairs, program chairs, or anyone who oversees the submission-reviewer matching process in peer review for acadmeic conferences, journals, and grants.
250
 
251
+ <center><img src="file/tool.gif" width="50%" alt="general workflow"></center>
252
+
253
  #### How does it help?
254
  A typical meta-reviewer workflow lacks supportive information on **what makes the pre-selected candidate reviewers a good fit** for the submission. Only affinity scores between the reviewer and the paper are shown, without additional detail.
255
 
tool.gif ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 36bb5b0bafc462cfaf8ee6cb680e0b15fb1d0f0c73fc32c89ae907964c1ef135
  • Pointer size: 132 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 6.46 MB