SIMPDashboard / model_data /model_a_data.json
evijit's picture
evijit HF staff
New design
a8af1a7 verified
raw
history blame
8.58 kB
{
"metadata": {
"Name": "Model A",
"Provider": "TechCorp",
"Version": "2.1",
"Release Date": "2023-09-15",
"Type": "Large Language Model",
"Modalities": ["Text-to-Text"]
},
"scores": {
"Bias, Stereotypes, and Representational Harms Evaluation": {
"Comprehensive Evaluation Methodology": {
"status": "Yes",
"source": "Both",
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Evaluations at various stages (data collection, preprocessing, model architecture, training, deployment)",
"Both intrinsic (e.g., embedding analysis) and extrinsic (e.g., downstream task performance) evaluation methods"
]
},
"Inclusive Protected Class Consideration": {
"status": "No",
"source": null,
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Evaluation of non-standard protected classes (e.g., socioeconomic status, education level, regional differences)",
"Consideration of intersectionality and how identity aspects interact",
"Assessment of potential harms to non-typical groups (e.g., by profession or hobbies)"
]
},
"Cultural and Linguistic Diversity": {
"status": "Yes",
"source": "3P",
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Tests of model performance and biases across languages and cultures",
"Consideration of how protected categories may shift in meaning across regions"
]
},
"Stereotype and Harmful Association Detection": {
"status": "Yes",
"source": "1P",
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Detection of stereotypical word associations in text models",
"Sentiment analysis and toxicity measurements, especially regarding specific groups"
]
},
"Performance Disparities Assessment": {
"status": "No",
"source": null,
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Detailed breakdowns of performance metrics (accuracy, precision, recall) for various subgroups",
"Performance analysis for disadvantaged subgroups",
"Intersectionality considerations in performance analysis"
]
}
},
"Cultural Values and Sensitive Content Evaluation": {
"Hate Speech and Toxicity Evaluation": {
"status": "Yes",
"source": "Both",
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Assessments of harmful text generation",
"Evaluations of toxicity, hurtfulness, or offensiveness"
]
},
"Cultural Value Representation": {
"status": "No",
"source": null,
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Use of pre-existing scholarship (e.g., World Values Survey, Geert Hofstede's work)",
"Inductive and participatory evaluations grounded in specific cultural contexts",
"Assessments of ethical scenarios and political value representation"
]
},
"Diverse Cultural Context": {
"status": "Yes",
"source": "3P",
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Assessments that don't equate nationality with cultural context",
"Representation of differing cultural values within countries"
]
}
},
"Disparate Performance": {
"Subpopulation Performance Analysis": {
"status": "Yes",
"source": "1P",
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Non-aggregated (disaggregated) evaluation results with in-depth breakdowns across subpopulations",
"Metrics such as subgroup accuracy, calibration, AUC, recall, precision, min-max ratios"
]
},
"Cross-lingual and Dialect Evaluation": {
"status": "No",
"source": null,
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Cross-lingual prompting on standard benchmarks",
"Examination of performance across dialects",
"Analysis of hallucination disparity across languages"
]
},
"Image Generation Quality Assessment": {
"status": "N/A",
"source": null,
"applicable_evaluations": []
}
},
"Environmental Costs and Carbon Emissions Evaluation": {
"Energy Consumption Measurement": {
"status": "Yes",
"source": "1P",
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Measurement of energy used in training, testing, and deploying the system",
"Evaluation of compute power consumption"
]
},
"Carbon Footprint Quantification": {
"status": "No",
"source": null,
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Use of tools like CodeCarbon or Carbontracker",
"Measurement of carbon emissions for training and inference",
"Conversion of energy consumption to carbon emissions"
]
},
"Hardware Resource Evaluation": {
"status": "Yes",
"source": "1P",
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Assessment of CPU, GPU, and TPU usage",
"Measurement of FLOPS (Floating Point Operations)"
]
}
},
"Privacy and Data Protection Evaluation": {
"Data Minimization and Consent Practices": {
"status": "Yes",
"source": "Both",
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Implementation of data minimization practices",
"Use of opt-in data collection methods",
"Assessment of active consent for collecting, processing, and sharing data"
]
},
"Memorization and Data Leakage Evaluation": {
"status": "Yes",
"source": "1P",
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Examination of the maximum amount of discoverable information given training data",
"Evaluation of extractable information without training data access"
]
},
"Personal Information Revelation Assessment": {
"status": "No",
"source": null,
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Direct prompting tests to reveal Personally Identifiable Information (PII)",
"Use of tools like ProPILE to audit PII revelation likelihood",
"Evaluation of the system's ability to infer personal attributes"
]
}
},
"Financial Costs Evaluation": {
"Comprehensive Cost Evaluation": {
"status": "Yes",
"source": "1P",
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Estimation of infrastructure and hardware costs",
"Calculation of labor hours from researchers, developers, and crowd workers",
"Tracking of compute costs using low-cost or standard pricing per instance-hour"
]
},
"Storage and Training Cost Analysis": {
"status": "Yes",
"source": "1P",
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Assessment of storage costs for both datasets and resulting models",
"Consideration of in-house vs. cloud storage options",
"Evaluation of training costs based on in-house GPUs or per-hour-priced instances"
]
},
"Hosting and Inference Cost Evaluation": {
"status": "No",
"source": null,
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Evaluation of low-latency serving costs",
"Assessment of inference costs based on token usage",
"Consideration of factors such as initial prompt length and requested token response length"
]
}
},
"Data and Content Moderation Labor Evaluation": {
"Crowdwork Standards Compliance": {
"status": "No",
"source": null,
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Assessment of compliance with Criteria for Fairer Microwork",
"Evaluation against Partnership on AI's Responsible Sourcing of Data Enrichment Services guidelines",
"Comparison with Oxford Internet Institute's Fairwork Principles"
]
},
"Crowdworker Demographics and Compensation": {
"status": "Yes",
"source": "3P",
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Documentation of crowd workers' demographics",
"Transparency in reporting instructions given to crowdworkers",
"Assessment of how crowdworkers were evaluated and compensated"
]
},
"Psychological Support and Content Exposure": {
"status": "No",
"source": null,
"applicable_evaluations": [
"Documentation of immediate trauma support availability",
"Assessment of long-term professional psychological support provision",
"Evaluation of practices for controlling exposure to traumatic material"
]
}
}
}
}