Spaces:
Running
Running
Update readme.md
Browse files
readme.md
CHANGED
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ With a few tricks, we have been able to fine-tune a competitive Italian CLIP mod
|
|
5 |
In building this project we kept in mind the following things:
|
6 |
|
7 |
+ **Novel Contributions**: We created a dataset of ~1.4 million Italian image-text pairs and to our knowledge trained the best Italian CLIP model currently in existence;
|
8 |
-
+ **Scientific Validity**: Claim are easy, facts are hard. That's why validation is important to assess the real impact of a model.
|
9 |
+ **Broader Outlook**: we always considered which are the possible usages for this model.
|
10 |
|
11 |
We put our **hearts** and **souls** into the project during this week! Not only did we work on a cool project, but we were
|
@@ -80,10 +80,10 @@ We selected two different tasks:
|
|
80 |
|
81 |
| Accuracy | CLIP-Italian | mCLIP |
|
82 |
| --------------- | ------------ |-------|
|
83 |
-
| Accuracy@1 |
|
84 |
-
| Accuracy@5 |
|
85 |
-
| Accuracy@10 |
|
86 |
-
| Accuracy@100 | 81.08
|
87 |
|
88 |
## Qualitative Evaluation
|
89 |
|
|
|
5 |
In building this project we kept in mind the following things:
|
6 |
|
7 |
+ **Novel Contributions**: We created a dataset of ~1.4 million Italian image-text pairs and to our knowledge trained the best Italian CLIP model currently in existence;
|
8 |
+
+ **Scientific Validity**: Claim are easy, facts are hard. That's why validation is important to assess the real impact of a model. We thoroughly evaluated our models and made the validation reproducible for everybody.
|
9 |
+ **Broader Outlook**: we always considered which are the possible usages for this model.
|
10 |
|
11 |
We put our **hearts** and **souls** into the project during this week! Not only did we work on a cool project, but we were
|
|
|
80 |
|
81 |
| Accuracy | CLIP-Italian | mCLIP |
|
82 |
| --------------- | ------------ |-------|
|
83 |
+
| Accuracy@1 | **22.11** | 20.15 |
|
84 |
+
| Accuracy@5 | **43.69** | 36.57 |
|
85 |
+
| Accuracy@10 | **52.55** | 42.91 |
|
86 |
+
| Accuracy@100 | **81.08** | 67.11 |
|
87 |
|
88 |
## Qualitative Evaluation
|
89 |
|