andreped commited on
Commit
43f5a67
2 Parent(s): 35a3683 005dbe0

Merge pull request #34 from andreped/andreped-patch-1

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +27 -4
README.md CHANGED
@@ -117,8 +117,18 @@ https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282110
117
  * Lee et al., Robust End-to-End Focal Liver Lesion Detection Using Unregistered Multiphase Computed Tomography Images, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1109/TETCI.2021.3132382
118
  * Survarachakan et al., Effects of Enhancement on Deep Learning Based Hepatic Vessel Segmentation, Electronics, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10101165
119
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
120
  ## Acknowledgements
121
- If you found this tool helpful in your research, please, consider citing it:
122
  <pre>
123
  @software{andre_pedersen_2023_7574587,
124
  author = {André Pedersen and Javier Pérez de Frutos},
@@ -132,6 +142,19 @@ If you found this tool helpful in your research, please, consider citing it:
132
  }
133
  </pre>
134
 
135
- Information on how to cite can be found [here](https://zenodo.org/badge/latestdoi/238680374).
136
-
137
- The model was trained on the LITS dataset. The dataset is openly accessible and can be downloaded from [here](https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/17094).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
117
  * Lee et al., Robust End-to-End Focal Liver Lesion Detection Using Unregistered Multiphase Computed Tomography Images, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1109/TETCI.2021.3132382
118
  * Survarachakan et al., Effects of Enhancement on Deep Learning Based Hepatic Vessel Segmentation, Electronics, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10101165
119
 
120
+ ## Segmentation performance metrics
121
+ The segmentation models were evaluated on an internal dataset against manual annotations. See Table E in S4 Appendix in the Supporting Information of [this paper](https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282110) for more information. The table presented there can also be seen below:
122
+
123
+ | Class | DSC | HD95 |
124
+ |--------|-------------------|------------------|
125
+ | Parenchyma | 0.946±0.046 | 10.122±11.032 |
126
+ | Vessels | 0.355±0.090 | 24.872±5.161 |
127
+
128
+ The parenchyma segmentation model was trained on the LITS dataset, whereas the vessel model was trained on a local dataset. The LITS dataset is openly accessible and can be downloaded from [here](https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/17094).
129
+
130
  ## Acknowledgements
131
+ If you found this tool helpful in your research, please, consider citing it (see [here](https://zenodo.org/badge/latestdoi/238680374) for more information on how to cite):
132
  <pre>
133
  @software{andre_pedersen_2023_7574587,
134
  author = {André Pedersen and Javier Pérez de Frutos},
 
142
  }
143
  </pre>
144
 
145
+ In addition, the segmentation performance of the tool was presented in [this paper](https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282110), thus, cite this tool as well if that is of relevance for you study:
146
+ <pre>
147
+ @article{perezdefrutos2022ddmr,
148
+ title = {Learning deep abdominal CT registration through adaptive loss weighting and synthetic data generation},
149
+ author = {Pérez de Frutos, Javier AND Pedersen, André AND Pelanis, Egidijus AND Bouget, David AND Survarachakan, Shanmugapriya AND Langø, Thomas AND Elle, Ole-Jakob AND Lindseth, Frank},
150
+ journal = {PLOS ONE},
151
+ publisher = {Public Library of Science},
152
+ year = {2023},
153
+ month = {02},
154
+ volume = {18},
155
+ doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0282110},
156
+ url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282110},
157
+ pages = {1-14},
158
+ number = {2}
159
+ }
160
+ </pre>