Update notice.md

notice.md

@@ -5,4 +5,8 @@ What is problematic in the USA, may not be relevant in the Netherlands---each cu
 Furthermore, defining good ways to measure it is also difficult.
 For example, [Blodgett et al. (2021)](https://aclanthology.org/2021.acl-long.81/) find that typos, nonsensical examples, and other mistakes threaten the validity of CrowS-Pairs, the dataset we show above.
 
-<img title="Results for French and English language models" alt="Bias evaluation on the enriched CrowS-pairs corpus, after collection of new sentences in French, translation to create a bilingual corpus, revision and filtering. A score of 50 indicates an absence of bias. Higher scores indicate stronger preference for biased sentences. In header, "BT" used for "BERT" due to space constraints. https://aclanthology.org/2022.acl-long.583.pdf" src="/aggregated_results_crows-pairs.PNG">
+# Results for French and English language models
+[From the paper proposing this version of CrowS-Pairs](https://aclanthology.org/2022.acl-long.583.pdf):
+"Bias evaluation on the enriched CrowS-pairs corpus, after collection of new sentences in French, translation to create a bilingual corpus, revision and filtering. A score of 50 indicates an absence of bias. Higher scores indicate stronger preference for biased sentences. In header, "BT" used for "BERT" due to space constraints."
+
+![](aggregated_results_crows-pairs.PNG)