Spaces:
Runtime error
Runtime error
amandakonet
commited on
Commit
•
3f86dc6
1
Parent(s):
85200e9
model output
Browse files
app.py
CHANGED
@@ -180,14 +180,12 @@ st.markdown("## Try it out!")
|
|
180 |
|
181 |
# select climate claim
|
182 |
option_claim = st.selectbox('Select a climate claim to test', ex_df['claim'].unique())
|
183 |
-
st.write('You selected:', option_claim)
|
184 |
|
185 |
# filter df to selected claim
|
186 |
filtered_df = ex_df[ex_df['claim'] == option_claim]
|
187 |
|
188 |
# select evidence
|
189 |
option_evidence = st.selectbox('Select evidence to test', filtered_df['evidence'].unique())
|
190 |
-
st.write('You selected:', option_evidence)
|
191 |
|
192 |
st.markdown("Now, we can use your selected (claim, evidence) pair in the fine-tuned transformer!")
|
193 |
|
@@ -213,7 +211,7 @@ with torch.no_grad():
|
|
213 |
pred_label = 'refutes'
|
214 |
|
215 |
# write out
|
216 |
-
st.write("**is**",
|
217 |
st.write("**with**", option_evidence)
|
218 |
|
219 |
# clean up true label
|
@@ -224,7 +222,7 @@ with torch.no_grad():
|
|
224 |
true_label = "supports"
|
225 |
else:
|
226 |
true_label == "refutes"
|
227 |
-
|
228 |
st.write("**The correct relationship is**", true_label)
|
229 |
|
230 |
# section 6: analysis
|
@@ -232,7 +230,7 @@ st.markdown("## Critical Analysis")
|
|
232 |
st.markdown("What else could we do?")
|
233 |
st.markdown("* Given more data, the performance of the model can be greatly improved. This is just a proof of concept")
|
234 |
st.markdown("* This is only one small part of the puzzle!")
|
235 |
-
st.markdown("In the complete pipeline (from user input to final output), we could move from just outputting evidence to training a transformer to reply with persuasive evidence. That is, instead of simply saying, \"This claim is supported by this evidence\", the model could transform the evidence into a persuasive argument, thus combatting climate change misinfo in a more platable and convincing way.")
|
236 |
|
237 |
|
238 |
# References + Resource Links
|
|
|
180 |
|
181 |
# select climate claim
|
182 |
option_claim = st.selectbox('Select a climate claim to test', ex_df['claim'].unique())
|
|
|
183 |
|
184 |
# filter df to selected claim
|
185 |
filtered_df = ex_df[ex_df['claim'] == option_claim]
|
186 |
|
187 |
# select evidence
|
188 |
option_evidence = st.selectbox('Select evidence to test', filtered_df['evidence'].unique())
|
|
|
189 |
|
190 |
st.markdown("Now, we can use your selected (claim, evidence) pair in the fine-tuned transformer!")
|
191 |
|
|
|
211 |
pred_label = 'refutes'
|
212 |
|
213 |
# write out
|
214 |
+
st.write("**is**", pred_label)
|
215 |
st.write("**with**", option_evidence)
|
216 |
|
217 |
# clean up true label
|
|
|
222 |
true_label = "supports"
|
223 |
else:
|
224 |
true_label == "refutes"
|
225 |
+
|
226 |
st.write("**The correct relationship is**", true_label)
|
227 |
|
228 |
# section 6: analysis
|
|
|
230 |
st.markdown("What else could we do?")
|
231 |
st.markdown("* Given more data, the performance of the model can be greatly improved. This is just a proof of concept")
|
232 |
st.markdown("* This is only one small part of the puzzle!")
|
233 |
+
st.markdown("* In the complete pipeline (from user input to final output), we could move from just outputting evidence to training a transformer to reply with persuasive evidence. That is, instead of simply saying, \"This claim is supported by this evidence\", the model could transform the evidence into a persuasive argument, thus combatting climate change misinfo in a more platable and convincing way.")
|
234 |
|
235 |
|
236 |
# References + Resource Links
|