Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
Create TECHNICAL_NOTES.md
Browse files- TECHNICAL_NOTES.md +52 -0
TECHNICAL_NOTES.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# RFT-Ω Harmonic Validation Interface
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
Public endpoints for verifying **Rendered Frame Theory (RFT)** harmonic-stability metrics *(QΩ and ζ_sync)* under synthetic noise.
|
| 4 |
+
This Space provides an open, reproducible test harness for anticipatory-stability and drift-recovery mechanisms within the **RFT-Ω Kernel**.
|
| 5 |
+
|
| 6 |
+
---
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
### 🛰️ Live Endpoints
|
| 9 |
+
- **UI:** [https://rft-omega-api.hf.space](https://rft-omega-api.hf.space)
|
| 10 |
+
- **Heartbeat:** [https://rft-omega-api.hf.space/api/ping](https://rft-omega-api.hf.space/api/ping)
|
| 11 |
+
- **Metrics:** [https://rft-omega-api.hf.space/api/metrics](https://rft-omega-api.hf.space/api/metrics)
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
---
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
### 🧩 Expected Output
|
| 16 |
+
Each JSON call returns harmonic-coherence values that fluctuate slightly to simulate stochastic environmental drift.
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
**Example responses**
|
| 19 |
+
```json
|
| 20 |
+
/api/ping →
|
| 21 |
+
{"ok": true, "message": "RFT-Ω API online and stable"}
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
/api/metrics →
|
| 24 |
+
{
|
| 25 |
+
"QΩ": 0.845,
|
| 26 |
+
"ζ_sync": 0.793,
|
| 27 |
+
"status": "nominal"
|
| 28 |
+
}
|
| 29 |
+
```
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
**Typical ranges**
|
| 32 |
+
| Metric | Range | Meaning |
|
| 33 |
+
|---------|--------|----------|
|
| 34 |
+
| **QΩ** | 0.82 – 0.89 | Harmonic-stability factor |
|
| 35 |
+
| **ζ_sync** | 0.75 – 0.88 | Synchronisation coherence |
|
| 36 |
+
| **status** | `"nominal"` | System in equilibrium |
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
Repeated requests should show < 0.05 variance, demonstrating **stable harmonic response** under noise.
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
---
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
### 🧠 Validation Purpose
|
| 43 |
+
External research or engineering teams (e.g., xAI, Starship Systems, RobustBench, GLUE) can use these endpoints to :
|
| 44 |
+
- benchmark RFT harmonic stability under controlled perturbations
|
| 45 |
+
- examine QΩ / ζ_sync variance as a predictive-drift signal
|
| 46 |
+
- reproduce RFT’s low-variance behaviour in noisy inference environments
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
---
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
### ⚖️ Rights & Contact
|
| 51 |
+
All Rights Reserved under **RFT-IPURL v1.0** and the **Berne Convention (UK Copyright Law)**.
|
| 52 |
+
**Author / Contact:** Liam Grinstead — liamgrinstead2@gmail.com
|