Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -45,19 +45,19 @@ It achieves the following results on the evaluation set:
|
|
45 |
- Task: Sentiment Classification (Positive/Negative)
|
46 |
|
47 |
## Training Procedure
|
48 |
-
|
49 |
|
50 |
-
|
51 |
|
52 |
-
|
53 |
|
54 |
-
|
55 |
|
56 |
-
|
57 |
|
58 |
-
|
59 |
|
60 |
-
|
61 |
|
62 |
### Training hyperparameters
|
63 |
|
|
|
45 |
- Task: Sentiment Classification (Positive/Negative)
|
46 |
|
47 |
## Training Procedure
|
48 |
+
The model was fine-tuned using the transformers library and the Trainer class from Hugging Face. The training process involved the following steps:
|
49 |
|
50 |
+
1. Tokenization: The input Urdu text was tokenized using the RobertaTokenizerFast from the "urduhack/roberta-urdu-small" pre-trained model. The texts were padded and truncated to a maximum length of 256 tokens.
|
51 |
|
52 |
+
2. Model Architecture: The "urduhack/roberta-urdu-small" pre-trained model was loaded as the base model for sequence classification using the RobertaForSequenceClassification class.
|
53 |
|
54 |
+
3. Training Arguments: The training arguments were set, including the number of training epochs, batch size, learning rate, evaluation strategy, logging strategy, and more.
|
55 |
|
56 |
+
4. Training: The model was trained on the training dataset using the Trainer class. The training process was performed with gradient-based optimization techniques to minimize the cross-entropy loss between predicted and actual sentiment labels.
|
57 |
|
58 |
+
5. Evaluation: After each epoch, the model was evaluated on the validation dataset to monitor its performance. The evaluation results, including training loss and validation loss, were logged for analysis.
|
59 |
|
60 |
+
6. Fine-Tuning: The model parameters were fine-tuned during the training process to optimize its performance on the IMDb Urdu movie reviews sentiment analysis task.
|
61 |
|
62 |
### Training hyperparameters
|
63 |
|