wanyu/IteraTeR_v2 huggingface dataset:
Original: The Supreme Court of India has said that the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) will remain a minority institution and that its character will not change, but refused to stay, till the pendency of the matter, the Allahabad High Court’s verdict striking down the 50\% quota for students belonging to the minority community.
Revised: The Supreme Court of India has said that the (AMU) will remain a minority institution and that its character will not change, but refused to stay, till the pendency of the matter, the Allahabad High Court’s verdict striking down the 50\% quota for students belonging to the minority community.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: The Supreme Court of India has said that the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) will remain a minority institution and that its character will not change, but refused to stay, till the pendency of the matter, the Allahabad High Court’s verdict striking down the 50\% quota for students belonging to the minority community.
Revised: The Supreme Court of India has said that the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) will remain a minority institution and that its character will not change, but refused to stay, till the pendency of the matter, the High Court’s verdict striking down the 50\% quota for students belonging to the minority community.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Justice K.G Balakrishnan headed the bench.
Revised:  Justice headed the bench.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The Aligarh Muslim University hailed the SC ’ s interim order on the institution ’ s minority character as a ‘major victory’ and said the issue of granting 50\% reservation to Muslims would be held in abeyance till a final verdict.
Revised:  The Aligarh Muslim University hailed the SC ' s interim order on the institution ’ s minority character as a ‘major victory’ and said the issue of granting 50\% reservation to Muslims would be held in abeyance till a final verdict.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The Aligarh Muslim University hailed the SC ’ s interim order on the institution ’ s minority character as a ‘major victory’ and said the issue of granting 50\% reservation to Muslims would be held in abeyance till a final verdict.
Revised:  The Aligarh Muslim University hailed the SC ’ s interim order on the institution ' s minority character as a ‘major victory’ and said the issue of granting 50\% reservation to Muslims would be held in abeyance till a final verdict.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The Aligarh Muslim University hailed the SC ’ s interim order on the institution ’ s minority character as a ‘major victory’ and said the issue of granting 50\% reservation to Muslims would be held in abeyance till a final verdict.
Revised:  The Aligarh Muslim University hailed the SC ’ s interim order on the institution ’ s minority character as a "major victory" and said the issue of granting 50\% reservation to Muslims would be held in abeyance till a final verdict.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The appeal to Supreme Court challenging the High Court verdict that AMU was not a minority institution entitled to protection under Article 30 (1) of the Constitution .
Revised:  The appeal to Supreme Court challenging the High Court verdict that AMU was not a minority institution entitled to protection under Article 30 (1) of the .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The Allahabad High Court on January 5 had struck down the provision of the Aligarh Muslim University Amendment Act, 1981, by which the status of a minority institution was accorded to AMU. It had also quashed the 50 per cent quotas for Muslim students.
Revised:  The Allahabad High Court on January 5 had struck down the provision of the Aligarh Muslim University Amendment Act, 1981, by which the status of a minority institution was accorded to AMU. It had also quashed the 50 per cent quotas for students.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The division bench referred to the SC judgement in the Ajeez Basha case of 1968, which had already taken the view that AMU was not a minority institution and any enactment of a law by Parliament could not overrule the judgement.
Revised:  The division bench referred to the SC judgement in the Ajeez Basha case of 1968, which had already taken the view that AMU was not a minority institution and any enactment of a law by could not overrule the judgement.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In 1875 Sir Syed Ahemd Khan , a modern liberal Muslim, established the Anglo Oriental College in Aligarh .
Revised:  In 1875 Sir , a modern liberal Muslim, established the Anglo Oriental College in Aligarh .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In 1875 Sir Syed Ahemd Khan , a modern liberal Muslim, established the Anglo Oriental College in Aligarh .
Revised:  In 1875 Sir Syed Ahemd Khan , a modern liberal Muslim, established the Anglo Oriental College in .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The decision was overruled by the Indira Gandhi government in 1981 by bringing about an amendment in the Act.
Revised:  The decision was overruled by the government in 1981 by bringing about an amendment in the Act.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In 2006 the  Allahabad High Court on January 5 had struck down the provision of the Aligarh Muslim University Amendment Act, 1981 . In 2006 the Supreme Court of India has said that the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) will remain a minority institution .
Revised:  In 2006 the | Allahabad High Court on January 5 had struck down the provision of the Aligarh Muslim University Amendment Act, 1981 . In 2006 the Supreme Court of India has said that the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) will remain a minority institution .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In 2006 the  Allahabad High Court on January 5 had struck down the provision of the Aligarh Muslim University Amendment Act, 1981 . In 2006 the Supreme Court of India has said that the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) will remain a minority institution .
Revised:  In 2006 the Allahabad High Court on January 5 had struck down the provision of the Aligarh Muslim University Amendment Act, 1981 . In 2006 the Supreme Court of India has said that the Aligarh Muslim University will remain a minority institution .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Category: Ind
Revised:  Category: India Category:As
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  She strongly implies it was Cleveland who actually authored the proclamation to show contempt for the revolutionary Hawai`i government headed by President Sanford B. Dole.
Revised:  She strongly implies it was Cleveland who actually authored the proclamation to show contempt for the revolutionary Hawaii government headed by President Sanford B. Dole.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  His actions while there seemed to imply a mission to destabilize the revolutionary government and to produce a report that would derail efforts in Congress to accept Hawai`i 's offer of annexation.
Revised:  His actions while there seemed to imply a mission to destabilize the revolutionary government and to produce a report that would derail efforts in Congress to accept Hawaii 's offer of annexation.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  But despite all these things, after the U.S. Senate published the Morgan Report containing lengthy sworn testimony which repudiated the Blount Report, Cleveland changed his mind, gave formal diplomatic recognition to the Republic as the legitimate government of Hawai`i , and engaged in normal diplomatic negotiations with the Dole government on matters such as further implementation of treaties.
Revised:  But despite all these things, after the U.S. Senate published the Morgan Report containing lengthy sworn testimony which repudiated the Blount Report, Cleveland changed his mind, gave formal diplomatic recognition to the Republic as the legitimate government of Hawaii , and engaged in normal diplomatic negotiations with the Dole government on matters such as further implementation of treaties.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The article prints as factual several false and historically inaccurate assertions by Reverend Patterson, a Native Hawaiian } sovereignty activist, who seems to have taken a 112 year old joke seriously.
Revised:  The article prints as factual several false and historically inaccurate assertions by Reverend Patterson, a Native Hawai } sovereignty activist, who seems to have taken a 112 year old joke seriously.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The article prints as factual several false and historically inaccurate assertions by Reverend Patterson, a Native Hawaiian } sovereignty activist, who seems to have taken a 112 year old joke seriously.
Revised:  The article prints as factual several false and historically inaccurate assertions by Reverend Patterson, a Native Hawaiian }ian sovereignty activist, who seems to have taken a 112 year old joke seriously.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawaiian } natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawaiian } monarchy's overthrow."
Revised:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawai } natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawaiian } monarchy's overthrow."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawaiian } natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawaiian } monarchy's overthrow."
Revised:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawaiian }ian natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawaiian } monarchy's overthrow."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawaiian } natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawaiian } monarchy's overthrow."
Revised:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawaiian } natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawai } monarchy's overthrow."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawaiian } natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawaiian } monarchy's overthrow."
Revised:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawaiian } natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawaiian okina} monarchy's overthrow."
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawaiian } natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawaiian } monarchy's overthrow."
Revised:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawaiian } natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawaiian }ian monarchy's overthrow."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The fake proclamation attributed to President Grover Cleveland, was actually printed in the New York Sun February 26, 1894, and has been reported as real on several Hawaiian } sovereignty websites;
Revised:  The fake proclamation attributed to President Grover Cleveland, was actually printed in the New York Sun February 26, 1894, and has been reported as real on several Hawai } sovereignty websites;
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The fake proclamation attributed to President Grover Cleveland, was actually printed in the New York Sun February 26, 1894, and has been reported as real on several Hawaiian } sovereignty websites;
Revised:  The fake proclamation attributed to President Grover Cleveland, was actually printed in the New York Sun February 26, 1894, and has been reported as real on several Hawaiian }ian sovereignty websites;
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  She strongly implies it was Cleveland who actually authored the proclamation to show contempt for the revolutionary Hawaii } government headed by President Sanford B. Dole.
Revised:  She strongly implies it was Cleveland who actually authored the proclamation to show contempt for the revolutionary Hawai } government headed by President Sanford B. Dole.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  She strongly implies it was Cleveland who actually authored the proclamation to show contempt for the revolutionary Hawaii } government headed by President Sanford B. Dole.
Revised:  She strongly implies it was Cleveland who actually authored the proclamation to show contempt for the revolutionary Hawaii }i government headed by President Sanford B. Dole.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The article prints as factual several false and historically inaccurate assertions by Reverend Patterson, a Native Hawai okina ian sovereignty activist, who seems to have taken a 112 year old joke seriously.
Revised:  The article prints as factual several false and historically inaccurate assertions by Reverend Patterson, a Native Hawai ` ian sovereignty activist, who seems to have taken a 112 year old joke seriously.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawai okina ian natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawai okina ian monarchy's overthrow."
Revised:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawai ` ian natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawai okina ian monarchy's overthrow."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawai okina ian natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawai okina ian monarchy's overthrow."
Revised:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawai okina ian natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawai ` ian monarchy's overthrow."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The fake proclamation attributed to President Grover Cleveland, was actually printed in the New York Sun February 26, 1894, and has been reported as real on several Hawai okina ian sovereignty websites;
Revised:  The fake proclamation attributed to President Grover Cleveland, was actually printed in the New York Sun February 26, 1894, and has been reported as real on several Hawai ` ian sovereignty websites;
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  She strongly implies it was Cleveland who actually authored the proclamation to show contempt for the revolutionary Hawai okina i government headed by President Sanford B. Dole.
Revised:  She strongly implies it was Cleveland who actually authored the proclamation to show contempt for the revolutionary Hawai ` i government headed by President Sanford B. Dole.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  His actions while there seemed to imply a mission to destabilize the revolutionary government and to produce a report that would derail efforts in Congress to accept Hawaii 's offer of annexation.
Revised:  His actions while there seemed to imply a mission to destabilize the revolutionary government and to produce a report that would derail efforts in Congress to accept Hawai`i 's offer of annexation.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  But despite all these things, after the U.S. Senate published the Morgan Report containing lengthy sworn testimony which repudiated the Blount Report, Cleveland changed his mind, gave formal diplomatic recognition to the Republic as the legitimate government of Hawaii , and engaged in normal diplomatic negotiations with the Dole government on matters such as further implementation of treaties.
Revised:  But despite all these things, after the U.S. Senate published the Morgan Report containing lengthy sworn testimony which repudiated the Blount Report, Cleveland changed his mind, gave formal diplomatic recognition to the Republic as the legitimate government of Hawai`i , and engaged in normal diplomatic negotiations with the Dole government on matters such as further implementation of treaties.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  As much as political activists may want to believe Cleveland declared April 30, 1894 as a day of mourning for their cause, the reality is that Cleveland made no such statement, and in fact treated the Republic of Hawaii with dignity and respect after his initial impressions regarding the Hawaiian Revolution were shown to be in error.
Revised:  As much as political activists may want to believe Cleveland declared April 30, 1894 as a day of mourning for their cause, the reality is that Cleveland made no such statement, and in fact treated the Republic of Hawaii with dignity and respect after his initial impressions regarding the Hawai`ian Revolution were shown to be in error.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The article prints as factual several false and historically inaccurate assertions by Reverend Patterson, a Native Hawai`ian sovereignty activist, who seems to have taken a 112 year old joke seriously.
Revised:  The article prints as factual several false and historically inaccurate assertions by Reverend Patterson, a Native Hawaiian sovereignty activist, who seems to have taken a 112 year old joke seriously.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawai`ian natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawai`ian monarchy's overthrow."
Revised:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawaiian natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawai`ian monarchy's overthrow."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawai`ian natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawai`ian monarchy's overthrow."
Revised:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawai`ian natives", is as follows: "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawaiian monarchy's overthrow."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The fake proclamation attributed to President Grover Cleveland, was actually printed in the New York Sun February 26, 1894, and has been reported as real on several Hawai`ian sovereignty websites;
Revised:  The fake proclamation attributed to President Grover Cleveland, was actually printed in the New York Sun February 26, 1894, and has been reported as real on several Hawaiian sovereignty websites;
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  As much as political activists may want to believe Cleveland declared April 30, 1894 as a day of mourning for their cause, the reality is that Cleveland made no such statement, and in fact treated the Republic of Hawaii with dignity and respect after his initial impressions regarding the Hawai`ian Revolution were shown to be in error.
Revised:  As much as political activists may want to believe Cleveland declared April 30, 1894 as a day of mourning for their cause, the reality is that Cleveland made no such statement, and in fact treated the Republic of Hawaii with dignity and respect after his initial impressions regarding the Hawaiian Revolution were shown to be in error.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawaiian natives", is as follows:%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawaiian monarchy's overthrow."
Revised:  %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawaiian monarchy's overthrow."
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawaiian natives", is as follows:%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% "...it was Cleveland as president who set aside April 30, 1894 as a day of prayer and repentance over the U.S. role in the Hawaiian monarchy's overthrow."
Revised:  The direct falsehood reported as fact by Associated Press (not merely attributed to Reverend Patterson), and which Reverend Patterson uses as a basis for his April 30, 2006 "national day of prayer for Hawaiian natives", is as follows:%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% 
Edit intent: coherence