wanyu/IteraTeR_v2 huggingface dataset:
Original: Yesterday , at about 1 PM (Djibouti time) off the coast of Djibouti, 69 died and at least 20 more were reported missingwhen a ship bound for the religious festival Djamaad, in Tadjoura, sunk.
Revised: A ship sank off the coast of DjiboutiYesterday , at about 1 PM (Djibouti time) off the coast of Djibouti, 69 died and at least 20 more were reported missingwhen a ship bound for the religious festival Djamaad, in Tadjoura, sunk.
Edit intent: style
Original: Yesterday , at about 1 PM (Djibouti time) off the coast of Djibouti, 69 died and at least 20 more were reported missingwhen a ship bound for the religious festival Djamaad, in Tadjoura, sunk.
Revised: Yesterday , at about 1 PM (Djibouti time) off the coast of Djibouti, 69 people. At least 20 more were reported missingwhen a ship bound for the religious festival Djamaad, in Tadjoura, sunk.
Edit intent: coherence
Original: Yesterday , at about 1 PM (Djibouti time) off the coast of Djibouti, 69 died and at least 20 more were reported missingwhen a ship bound for the religious festival Djamaad, in Tadjoura, sunk.
Revised: Yesterday , at about 1 PM (Djibouti time) off the coast of Djibouti, 69 died and at least 20 more are reported missing. Reports say that
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  36 more people are currently under medical care, and seven are in  serious condition.
Revised:  36 more people are currently recieving medical care, and seven are in serious condition.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The boat was originally built to only hold about 80 people, but was reported to have at least 200 people on board as well as construction materials  .
Revised:  The boat was originally built to only hold about 80 people, but was reported to have at least 200 people on board as well as construction materials at the time of the sinking .
Edit intent: clarity
Original: A ship sank off the coast of DjiboutiYesterday , at about 1 PM (Djibouti time) yesterday kiling 69 people.
Revised: A ship sank off the coast of Djibouti Yesterday , at about 1 PM (Djibouti time) yesterday kiling 69 people.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: A ship sank off the coast of Djibouti yesterday, at about 1 p.m. Eastern African Time (1000 UTC) killing 69 people.
Revised: A ship sank off the coast of Djibouti yesterday, about 1 p.m. Eastern African Time (1000 UTC) killing 69 people.
Edit intent: style
Original:  Reports say that 36 people are currently receiving medical care  and seven are in serious condition.
Revised:  Reports say that 36 people are currently receiving medical care , and seven are in serious condition.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The boat, built to hold roughly 80 people,  was reported to have been carrying at least 200 people as well as construction materials at the time it sank.
Revised:  Built to hold roughly 80 people, was reported to have been carrying at least 200 people as well as construction materials at the time it sank.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The boat, built to hold roughly 80 people,  was reported to have been carrying at least 200 people as well as construction materials at the time it sank.
Revised:  The boat, built to hold roughly 80 people, it was reported to have been carrying at least 200 people as well as construction materials at the time it sank.
Edit intent: coherence
Original: A ship sank off the coast of Djibouti yesterday , about 1 p.m. Eastern African Time (1000 UTC)  killing 69 people.
Revised: A ship sank off the coast of Djibouti yesterday about 1 p.m. Eastern African Time (1000 UTC) killing 69 people.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: A ship sank off the coast of Djibouti yesterday , about 1 p.m. Eastern African Time (1000 UTC)  killing 69 people.
Revised: A ship sank off the coast of Djibouti yesterday , about 1 p.m. Eastern African Time (1000 UTC) , killing 69 people.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: The ship was bound for the religious festival of Djamaad, in  Tadjoura.
Revised: The ship was bound for the religious festival of Djamaad, in the town of Tadjoura.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: It was sent from the Church's and RTC's (the company that actually owns all Scientology's trademarks) law firm "Moxon and Kobrin" and essentially said I must immediately cease and desist using the domain as it infringed on their trademark "Scientology" and was causing confusion as (they claim) my site was being mistaken for theirs, citing breach of the Langham Act.
Revised: It was sent from the Church's and RTC's (the company that actually owns all Scientology's trademarks) law firm "Moxon and Kobrin" and essentially said I must immediately cease and desist using the domain as it infringed on their trademark "Scientology" and was causing confusion as (they claim) my site was being mistaken for theirs, citing breach of the Lanham Act.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The release suggested that YouTube had taken this action under external pressure from Cruise or Viacomm .
Revised:  The release suggested that YouTube had taken this action under external pressure from Cruise or Viacom .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Responding to a query by Wikinews reporters, YouTube said "We have not received a DMCA notification letter from Viacomm ." The Church of Scientology was offered the opportunity to respond to the claims made by Stollery during the interview.
Revised:  Responding to a query by Wikinews reporters, YouTube stated "We have not received a DMCA notification letter from Viacomm ." The Church of Scientology was offered the opportunity to respond to the claims made by Stollery during the interview.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Responding to a query by Wikinews reporters, YouTube said "We have not received a DMCA notification letter from Viacomm ." The Church of Scientology was offered the opportunity to respond to the claims made by Stollery during the interview.
Revised:  Responding to a query by Wikinews reporters, YouTube said "We have not received a DMCA notification letter from Viacom ." The Church of Scientology was offered the opportunity to respond to the claims made by Stollery during the interview.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  I read pro-Scientology material like Dianetics (as best as one can) and Clear Body  Clear Mind, and all of the church OT material  as well as many critic's books such as L Ron Hubbard Messiah or a Madman, A piece of Blue Sky, Bare-Faced Messiah, and of course all the critical websites I could find to really see inside the cult without going INSIDE the cult.
Revised:  I read pro-Scientology material like Dianetics (as best as one can) and Clear Body , Clear Mind, and all of the church OT material as well as many critic's books such as L Ron Hubbard Messiah or a Madman, A piece of Blue Sky, Bare-Faced Messiah, and of course all the critical websites I could find to really see inside the cult without going INSIDE the cult.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  I read pro-Scientology material like Dianetics (as best as one can) and Clear Body  Clear Mind, and all of the church OT material  as well as many critic's books such as L Ron Hubbard Messiah or a Madman, A piece of Blue Sky, Bare-Faced Messiah, and of course all the critical websites I could find to really see inside the cult without going INSIDE the cult.
Revised:  I read pro-Scientology material like Dianetics (as best as one can) and Clear Body Clear Mind, and all of the church OT material , as well as many critic's books such as L Ron Hubbard Messiah or a Madman, A piece of Blue Sky, Bare-Faced Messiah, and of course all the critical websites I could find to really see inside the cult without going INSIDE the cult.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  I read pro-Scientology material like Dianetics (as best as one can) and Clear Body  Clear Mind, and all of the church OT material  as well as many critic's books such as L Ron Hubbard Messiah or a Madman, A piece of Blue Sky, Bare-Faced Messiah, and of course all the critical websites I could find to really see inside the cult without going INSIDE the cult.
Revised:  I read pro-Scientology material like Dianetics (as best as one can) and Clear Body Clear Mind, and all of the church OT material as well as many critic's books such as L . Ron Hubbard, Messiah or Madman, A piece of Blue Sky, Bare-Faced Messiah, and of course all the critical websites I could find to really see inside the cult without going INSIDE the cult.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  I read pro-Scientology material like Dianetics (as best as one can) and Clear Body  Clear Mind, and all of the church OT material  as well as many critic's books such as L Ron Hubbard Messiah or a Madman, A piece of Blue Sky, Bare-Faced Messiah, and of course all the critical websites I could find to really see inside the cult without going INSIDE the cult.
Revised:  I read pro-Scientology material like Dianetics (as best as one can) and Clear Body Clear Mind, and all of the church OT material as well as many critic's books such as L Ron Hubbard Messiah or a Madman, A Piece of Blue Sky, Bare-Faced Messiah, and of course all the critical websites I could find to really see inside the cult without going INSIDE the cult.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  I read pro-Scientology material like Dianetics (as best as one can) and Clear Body  Clear Mind, and all of the church OT material  as well as many critic's books such as L Ron Hubbard Messiah or a Madman, A piece of Blue Sky, Bare-Faced Messiah, and of course all the critical websites I could find to really see inside the cult without going INSIDE the cult.
Revised:  I read pro-Scientology material like Dianetics (as best as one can) and Clear Body Clear Mind, and all of the church OT material as well as many critic's books such as L Ron Hubbard Messiah or a Madman, A piece of Blue Sky, Bare-Faced Messiah, and of course all the critical websites I could find to really see inside the cult without going inside the cult.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Scientology owns a front group spefically to oppose psych meds and psychiatrists called CCHR (Citizens Commission on Human Rights), staunchly opposing ALL medication of that genre.
Revised:  Scientology owns a front group specifically to oppose psych meds and psychiatrists called CCHR (Citizens Commission on Human Rights), staunchly opposing ALL medication of that genre.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Cruise's numerous statements that no one should be using any psychatric medication was not only ignorant but darn right dangerous.
Revised:  Cruise's numerous statements that no one should be using any psychiatric medication was not only ignorant but darn right dangerous.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Cruise stated that the opposed Brooke Shield's use of medication for post partum depression, and that she was ignorant about the history of psychiatry - well he is most certainly ignorant of the circumstances of every medicated individual in the world, and as such his comments that people should get of the meds and take vitamins and exercise was absolutely outrageous.
Revised:  Cruise stated that the opposed Brooke Shield's use of medication for post-partum depression, and that she was ignorant about the history of psychiatry - well he is most certainly ignorant of the circumstances of every medicated individual in the world, and as such his comments that people should get of the meds and take vitamins and exercise was absolutely outrageous.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Cruise stated that the opposed Brooke Shield's use of medication for post partum depression, and that she was ignorant about the history of psychiatry - well he is most certainly ignorant of the circumstances of every medicated individual in the world, and as such his comments that people should get of the meds and take vitamins and exercise was absolutely outrageous.
Revised:  Cruise stated that the opposed Brooke Shield's use of medication for post partum depression, and that she was ignorant about the history of psychiatry - well he is most certainly ignorant of the circumstances of every medicated individual in the world, and as such his comments that people should get off the meds and take vitamins and exercise was absolutely outrageous.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  No one can possibly argue that it isn't irresponsible for Tom Cruise to effectively tell every child and adult on prescribed medication for a "chemical imbalance" (a mental illness like depression, bi-polar, schizophrenia, add / adhd etc.) to suddenly stop their meds and start “exercising and taking vitamins.”
Revised:  no one can possibly argue that it isn't irresponsible for Tom Cruise to effectively tell every child and adult on prescribed medication for a "chemical imbalance" (a mental illness like depression, bi-polar, schizophrenia, add / adhd etc.) to suddenly stop their meds and start “exercising and taking vitamins.”
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  No one can possibly argue that it isn't irresponsible for Tom Cruise to effectively tell every child and adult on prescribed medication for a "chemical imbalance" (a mental illness like depression, bi-polar, schizophrenia, add / adhd etc.) to suddenly stop their meds and start “exercising and taking vitamins.”
Revised:  No one can possibly argue that it isn't irresponsible for Tom Cruise to effectively tell every child and adult on prescribed medication for a "chemical imbalance" (a mental illness like depression, bi-polar, schizophrenia, ADD / adhd etc.) to suddenly stop their meds and start “exercising and taking vitamins.”
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  No one can possibly argue that it isn't irresponsible for Tom Cruise to effectively tell every child and adult on prescribed medication for a "chemical imbalance" (a mental illness like depression, bi-polar, schizophrenia, add / adhd etc.) to suddenly stop their meds and start “exercising and taking vitamins.”
Revised:  No one can possibly argue that it isn't irresponsible for Tom Cruise to effectively tell every child and adult on prescribed medication for a "chemical imbalance" (a mental illness like depression, bi-polar, schizophrenia, add / ADHD, etc.) to suddenly stop their meds and start “exercising and taking vitamins.”
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Think about how many people his statements could have (and from the over 1000 posts on my website HAS HAD ) on those who are unwell?
Revised:  Think about how many people his statements could have (and from the over 1000 posts on my website has had ) on those who are unwell?
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  It was irresponsible, ignorant  and dangerous and if my site pokes a little fun at him for doing that and possibly makes those people think twice before following his advice  then I'm happy.
Revised:  It was irresponsible, ignorant and if my site pokes a little fun at him for doing that and possibly makes those people think twice before following his advice then I'm happy.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  It was irresponsible, ignorant  and dangerous and if my site pokes a little fun at him for doing that and possibly makes those people think twice before following his advice  then I'm happy.
Revised:  It was irresponsible, ignorant and dangerous and if my site pokes a little fun at him for doing that and possibly makes those people think twice before following his advice , then I'm happy.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  followed by his completely out of character argument with Matt Lauer about medication and Scientology (calling him glib, stating he was an expert in medicine as if he PhD [  , and then repeating himself over and over again), followed by his appearance on  60 minutes where he threatens to walk out when, then lying to a reporter at a press conference about alien's having any involvement in the tenets of Scientology... well, they soon work it out themselves!
Revised:  followed by his completely out of character argument with Matt Lauer about medication and Scientology (calling him glib, stating he was an expert in medicine as if he [ , and then repeating himself over and over again), followed by his appearance on 60 minutes where he threatens to walk out when, then lying to a reporter at a press conference about alien's having any involvement in the tenets of Scientology... well, they soon work it out themselves!
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  followed by his completely out of character argument with Matt Lauer about medication and Scientology (calling him glib, stating he was an expert in medicine as if he PhD [  , and then repeating himself over and over again), followed by his appearance on  60 minutes where he threatens to walk out when, then lying to a reporter at a press conference about alien's having any involvement in the tenets of Scientology... well, they soon work it out themselves!
Revised:  followed by his completely out of character argument with Matt Lauer about medication and Scientology (calling him glib, stating he was an expert in medicine as if he PhD [had a , and then repeating himself over and over again), followed by his appearance on 60 minutes where he threatens to walk out when, then lying to a reporter at a press conference about alien's having any involvement in the tenets of Scientology... well, they soon work it out themselves!
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  followed by his completely out of character argument with Matt Lauer about medication and Scientology (calling him glib, stating he was an expert in medicine as if he PhD [  , and then repeating himself over and over again), followed by his appearance on  60 minutes where he threatens to walk out when, then lying to a reporter at a press conference about alien's having any involvement in the tenets of Scientology... well, they soon work it out themselves!
Revised:  followed by his completely out of character argument with Matt Lauer about medication and Scientology (calling him glib, stating he was an expert in medicine as if he PhD [ , and then repeating himself over and over again), followed by his appearance on " 60 minutes where he threatens to walk out when, then lying to a reporter at a press conference about alien's having any involvement in the tenets of Scientology... well, they soon work it out themselves!
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  followed by his completely out of character argument with Matt Lauer about medication and Scientology (calling him glib, stating he was an expert in medicine as if he PhD [  , and then repeating himself over and over again), followed by his appearance on  60 minutes where he threatens to walk out when, then lying to a reporter at a press conference about alien's having any involvement in the tenets of Scientology... well, they soon work it out themselves!
Revised:  followed by his completely out of character argument with Matt Lauer about medication and Scientology (calling him glib, stating he was an expert in medicine as if he PhD [ , and then repeating himself over and over again), followed by his appearance on 60 Minutes" where he threatens to walk out when, then lying to a reporter at a press conference about alien's having any involvement in the tenets of Scientology... well, they soon work it out themselves!
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Wikinews: Why attack Scientology rather than other cult-like religions?
Revised:  Wikinews: 
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Well, " coincidently " the SAME DAY Viacom pulled the South Park episode about Scientology off-air **reportedly** due to Cruise's pressure to drop all promotion of MI3 if they didn't the site hosting all my videos pulled them citing "removed at the request of the owner".
Revised:  Well, " coincidentally " the SAME DAY Viacom pulled the South Park episode about Scientology off-air **reportedly** due to Cruise's pressure to drop all promotion of MI3 if they didn't the site hosting all my videos pulled them citing "removed at the request of the owner".
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Well, " coincidently " the SAME DAY Viacom pulled the South Park episode about Scientology off-air **reportedly** due to Cruise's pressure to drop all promotion of MI3 if they didn't the site hosting all my videos pulled them citing "removed at the request of the owner".
Revised:  Well, " coincidently " the same day Viacom pulled the South Park episode about Scientology off-air **reportedly** due to Cruise's pressure to drop all promotion of MI3 if they didn't the site hosting all my videos pulled them citing "removed at the request of the owner".
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Well, " coincidently " the SAME DAY Viacom pulled the South Park episode about Scientology off-air **reportedly** due to Cruise's pressure to drop all promotion of MI3 if they didn't the site hosting all my videos pulled them citing "removed at the request of the owner".
Revised:  Well, " coincidently " the SAME DAY Viacom pulled the South Park episode about Scientology off-air reportedly due to Cruise's pressure to drop all promotion of MI3 if they didn't the site hosting all my videos pulled them citing "removed at the request of the owner".
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Please explain what happened Well, "coincidently" the SAME DAY Viacom pulled the South Park episode about Scientology off-air **reportedly** due to Cruise's pressure to drop all promotion of MI3 if they didn't the site hosting all my videos pulled them citing "removed at the request of the owner".
Revised:  Please explain what happened 
Edit intent: coherence
Original: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Wikinews: How do you know that Tom Cruise and/or Viacom were responsible for the removal of the videos?
Revised: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% How do you know that Tom Cruise and/or Viacom were responsible for the removal of the videos?
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  I received no notice, warning, or communication of any kind (sort of rude after pulling many  many millions of new viewers to their site!) nor are they even replying to requests as to what happened.
Revised:  I received no notice, warning, or communication of any kind (sort of rude after pulling many , many millions of new viewers to their site!) nor are they even replying to requests as to what happened.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Wikinews: Do you hold licences for the videos being distributed on your website?
Revised:  Wikinews: Do you hold licenses for the videos being distributed on your website?
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  If not  under what grounds are you distributing them?
Revised:  If not , under what grounds are you distributing them?
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Many of the videos were on youtube (the hosting company) already  so I simply linked to those files.
Revised:  Many of the videos were on YouTube (the hosting company) already so I simply linked to those files.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Many of the videos were on youtube (the hosting company) already  so I simply linked to those files.
Revised:  Many of the videos were on youtube (the hosting company) already , so I simply linked to those files.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Others were linked to directly from the copyright holders (like msnbc, access hyollywood , 60 minutes, cnn etc ) so again we didn't actually infringe on the copyright, simply pointed our site at their file.
Revised:  Others were linked to directly from the copyright holders (like MSNBC, Access Hollywood , 60 minutes, cnn etc ) so again we didn't actually infringe on the copyright, simply pointed our site at their file.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Others were linked to directly from the copyright holders (like msnbc, access hyollywood , 60 minutes, cnn etc ) so again we didn't actually infringe on the copyright, simply pointed our site at their file.
Revised:  Others were linked to directly from the copyright holders (like msnbc, access hyollywood , 60 Minutes, CNN, etc. ) so again we didn't actually infringe on the copyright, simply pointed our site at their file.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  No, because as I mentioned ours were removed, and youtube 's policy is to remove the video and inform the user - not state that we requested their removal.
Revised:  No, because as I mentioned ours were removed, and YouTube 's policy is to remove the video and inform the user - not state that we requested their removal.
Edit intent: fluency