wanyu/IteraTeR_v2 huggingface dataset:
Original:  In its direction  the Supreme Court pointed out that in its landmark ruling in Boumediene v. Bush it ruled that overseas captives were entitled to Constitutional protection.
Revised:  In its direction , the Supreme Court pointed out that in its landmark ruling in Boumediene v. Bush it ruled that overseas captives were entitled to Constitutional protection.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Following its ruling on 12 June 2008 all the current Guantanamo captives were entitled to re-initiate their habeas corpus petitions, which had been stayed following the United States Congress passing the Military Commissions Act.
Revised:  Following its ruling on June 12, 2008 all the current Guantanamo captives were entitled to re-initiate their habeas corpus petitions, which had been stayed following the United States Congress passing the Military Commissions Act.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  All four men reported that they were bound, naked, in painful "stress positions", and bombarded with loud music, which they described as a form of religious persecution.
Revised:  The men reported that they were bound, naked, in painful "stress positions", and bombarded with loud music, which they described as a form of religious persecution.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  But this is the first instance of former captives whose cases had already been turned down being given renewed access.
Revised:  This is the first instance of former captives whose cases had already been turned down being given renewed access.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  All four men claimed they were captured by bounty hunters who falsely claimed the four men were Mujahideen.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  New Zealand is currently facing the expulsion of its acting high commissioner over travel sanctions imposed on members of the military regime and their families.
Revised:  New Zealand is currently facing the expulsion of its acting high commissioner over travel sanctions imposed on members of the military regime and their families.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The expulsion could result in a round of diplomatic tit-for-tat and the expulsion of Fijian diplomats from New Zealand .
Revised:  The expulsion could result in a round of diplomatic tit-for-tat and the expulsion of Fijian diplomats from the country .
Edit intent: clarity
Original: President Mugabe declared that the cholera outbreak has been contained The United Nations has reported that a total of 978 people have been killed by a cholera epidemic in the African country of Zimbabwe, an increase of 25\% from just three days ago.
Revised: President Mugabe declared that the cholera outbreak has been contained The United Nations has reported that a total of 978 people have been killed by a cholera epidemic in the African nation of Zimbabwe, an increase of 25\% from just three days ago.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  "Now that there is no cholera, there is no cause for war , " said he . Other Zimbabwean high-ranking officials have also blamed the United Kingdom for spreading cholera on purpose.
Revised:  "Now that there is no cholera, there is no cause for war " said he . Other Zimbabwean high-ranking officials have also blamed the United Kingdom for spreading cholera on purpose.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  "Now that there is no cholera, there is no cause for war , " said he . Other Zimbabwean high-ranking officials have also blamed the United Kingdom for spreading cholera on purpose.
Revised:  "Now that there is no cholera, there is no cause for war , " he stated . Other Zimbabwean high-ranking officials have also blamed the United Kingdom for spreading cholera on purpose.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In the case, the Court applied the pertinent laws in question, Federal laws 15 U.S.C. § 1334(b), the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act or Maine Unfair TradePractices Act (MUTPA) and Me. Rev. Stat.
Revised:  In the case, the Court applied the pertinent laws in question, Title 15 U.S.C. § 1334(b), the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act or Maine Unfair TradePractices Act (MUTPA) and Me. Rev. Stat.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In the case, the Court applied the pertinent laws in question, Federal laws 15 U.S.C. § 1334(b), the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act or Maine Unfair TradePractices Act (MUTPA) and Me. Rev. Stat.
Revised:  In the case, the Court applied the pertinent laws in question, Federal laws 15 U.S.C. § 1334(b), the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act and Me. Rev. Stat.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Ann., Tit. 5, § 207 (Supp. 2008),  Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act  .
Revised:  Ann., Tit. 5, § 207 (Supp. 2008), " Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  It held that these laws " do not preempt the application of state law prohibiting deceptive practices in advertising to the advertisement of tar and nicotine rates in cigarettes ." The landmark decision, allows the lawsuit to proceed on the merits upon remand to the trial court below
Revised:  It held that " do not preempt the application of state law prohibiting deceptive practices in advertising to the advertisement of tar and nicotine rates in cigarettes ." The landmark decision, allows the lawsuit to proceed on the merits upon remand to the trial court below
Edit intent: clarity
Original: Respondents Stephanie Good and 2 others are Maine residents and for over 15 years smoked Marlboro Lights and Cambridge Lights cigarettes, which are manufactured by by petitioners Altria Group and Philip Morris USA.
Revised: Respondents Stephanie Good and 2 others are Maine residents and for over 15 years smoked Marlboro Lights and Cambridge Lights cigarettes, which are manufactured by petitioners Altria Group and Philip Morris USA.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  “No requirement or prohibition 'based on smoking and health' shall be imposed under state law with respect to the advertising or promotion,” the law provides, and only if the law’s labeling requirements on cigarettes are obeyed.
Revised:  “No requirement or prohibition 'based on smoking and health' shall be imposed under state law with respect to the advertising or promotion,” the law provides, and only if the labeling requirements on cigarettes are obeyed.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In the case, the Court applied the pertinent Federal laws, in question, Title 15 U.S.C. § 1334(b), the  Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act  and Me. Rev. Stat.
Revised:  In the case, the Court applied the pertinent Federal laws, in question, Title 15 U.S.C. § 1334(b), the " Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act and Me. Rev. Stat.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In the case, the Court applied the pertinent Federal laws, in question, Title 15 U.S.C. § 1334(b), the  Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act  and Me. Rev. Stat.
Revised:  In the case, the Court applied the pertinent Federal laws, in question, Title 15 U.S.C. § 1334(b), the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act " and Me. Rev. Stat.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Ann., Tit. 5, § 207 (Supp. 2008),  "Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act" (MUTPA).
Revised:  Ann., Tit. 5, § 207 (Supp. 2008), the "Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act" (MUTPA).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The landmark decision , allows the lawsuit to proceed on the merits upon remand to the trial court below.
Revised:  The landmark decision allows the lawsuit to proceed on the merits upon remand to the trial court below.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In November, however, the FTC officially dropped its endorsement of the Cambridge Filter Method, saying the test method is flawed because "the machine doesn't take into account the way smokers adjust their behavior."
Revised:  In November, the FTC officially dropped its endorsement of the Cambridge Filter Method, saying the test method is flawed because "the machine doesn't take into account the way smokers adjust their behavior."
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  In November, however, the FTC officially dropped its endorsement of the Cambridge Filter Method, saying the test method is flawed because "the machine doesn't take into account the way smokers adjust their behavior."
Revised:  In November, however, the FTC officially dropped its endorsement of the Cambridge Filter Method, saying it is flawed because "the machine doesn't take into account the way smokers adjust their behavior."
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In June, the Supreme Court in an 8-1 ruling held that  a case filed in a state court alleging a defective catheter was pre-empted by a federal statue providing regulation of medical devices to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Revised:  In June, the Supreme Court in an 8-1 ruling held that " a case filed in a state court alleging a defective catheter was pre-empted by a federal statue providing regulation of medical devices to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:   In a fractured decision , the Court also held in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.  (1992), that the phrase “ based on smoking and health ” in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the “general duty not to make fraudulent statements.
Revised:  " In a fractured decision , the Court also held in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. (1992), that the phrase “ based on smoking and health ” in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the “general duty not to make fraudulent statements.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:   In a fractured decision , the Court also held in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.  (1992), that the phrase “ based on smoking and health ” in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the “general duty not to make fraudulent statements.
Revised:  In a fractured decision of ' Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. (1992), that the phrase “ based on smoking and health ” in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the “general duty not to make fraudulent statements.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:   In a fractured decision , the Court also held in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.  (1992), that the phrase “ based on smoking and health ” in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the “general duty not to make fraudulent statements.
Revised:  In a fractured decision , the Court also held in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. ' (1992), that the phrase “ based on smoking and health ” in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the “general duty not to make fraudulent statements.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:   In a fractured decision , the Court also held in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.  (1992), that the phrase “ based on smoking and health ” in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the “general duty not to make fraudulent statements.
Revised:  In a fractured decision , the Court also held in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. (1992), the Court also held that "the phrase ' based on smoking and health ” in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the “general duty not to make fraudulent statements.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:   In a fractured decision , the Court also held in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.  (1992), that the phrase “ based on smoking and health ” in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the “general duty not to make fraudulent statements.
Revised:  In a fractured decision , the Court also held in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. (1992), that the phrase “ based on smoking and health ' in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the “general duty not to make fraudulent statements.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:   In a fractured decision , the Court also held in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.  (1992), that the phrase “ based on smoking and health ” in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the “general duty not to make fraudulent statements.
Revised:  In a fractured decision , the Court also held in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. (1992), that the phrase “ based on smoking and health ” in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the 'general duty' not to make fraudulent statements.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  ” Justice Clarence Thomas opined that  some kinds of fraud claims against cigarette makers may go forward, just not those concerning “ smoking and health.
Revised:  " Justice Clarence Thomas opined that some kinds of fraud claims against cigarette makers may go forward, just not those concerning “ smoking and health.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  ” Justice Clarence Thomas opined that  some kinds of fraud claims against cigarette makers may go forward, just not those concerning “ smoking and health.
Revised:  ” Justice Clarence Thomas opined that " some kinds of fraud claims against cigarette makers may go forward, just not those concerning “ smoking and health.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  ” Justice Clarence Thomas opined that  some kinds of fraud claims against cigarette makers may go forward, just not those concerning “ smoking and health.
Revised:  ” Justice Clarence Thomas opined that some kinds of fraud claims against cigarette makers may go forward, just not those concerning smoking and health.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  ” “ Thus, if cigarette manufacturers were to falsely advertise their products as ‘American-made’ or ‘the official cigarette of Major League Baseball,’ state-law claims arising from that wrongful behavior would not be pre-empted.
Revised:  " " Thus, if cigarette manufacturers were to falsely advertise their products as ‘American-made’ or ‘the official cigarette of Major League Baseball,’ state-law claims arising from that wrongful behavior would not be pre-empted.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Altria's associate general counsel, Murray Garnick, in a statement, said " We continue to view these cases as manageable, and the company will assert many of the strong defenses used successfully in the past to defend against this very type of case.
Revised:  Altria's associate general counsel, Murray Garnick, in a statement, said " we continue to view these cases as manageable, and the company will assert many of the strong defenses used successfully in the past to defend against this very type of case.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: In June, the Supreme Court in an 8-1 rulingheld that "a case filed in a state court alleging a defective catheter was pre-empted by a federal statue providing regulation of medical devices to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration."
Revised: The Supreme Court in an 8-1 rulingheld that "a case filed in a state court alleging a defective catheter was pre-empted by a federal statue providing regulation of medical devices to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration."
Edit intent: coherence
Original: In June, the Supreme Court in an 8-1 rulingheld that "a case filed in a state court alleging a defective catheter was pre-empted by a federal statue providing regulation of medical devices to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration."
Revised: In June, the Supreme Court in a June ruling, said 8 to 1 that "a case filed in a state court alleging a defective catheter was pre-empted by a federal statue providing regulation of medical devices to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration."
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  In a fractured decision of 'Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.' (1992), the Court also held that "the phrase 'based on smoking and health' in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the 'general duty' not to make fraudulent statements." Justice Clarence Thomas opined that "some kinds of fraud claims against cigarette makers may go forward, just not those concerning smoking and health.
Revised:  The court also ruled in 1992 in 'Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.' (1992), the Court also held that "the phrase 'based on smoking and health' in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the 'general duty' not to make fraudulent statements." Justice Clarence Thomas opined that "some kinds of fraud claims against cigarette makers may go forward, just not those concerning smoking and health.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In a fractured decision of 'Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.' (1992), the Court also held that "the phrase 'based on smoking and health' in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the 'general duty' not to make fraudulent statements." Justice Clarence Thomas opined that "some kinds of fraud claims against cigarette makers may go forward, just not those concerning smoking and health.
Revised:  In a fractured decision of 'Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.' that "the phrase 'based on smoking and health' in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the 'general duty' not to make fraudulent statements." Justice Clarence Thomas opined that "some kinds of fraud claims against cigarette makers may go forward, just not those concerning smoking and health.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In a fractured decision of 'Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.' (1992), the Court also held that "the phrase 'based on smoking and health' in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the 'general duty' not to make fraudulent statements." Justice Clarence Thomas opined that "some kinds of fraud claims against cigarette makers may go forward, just not those concerning smoking and health.
Revised:  In a fractured decision of 'Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.' (1992), the Court also held that "the phrase 'based on smoking and health' in the Labeling Act did not apply to pre-empt suits under state laws based on the 'general duty' not to make fraudulent statements." Justice Clarence Thomas said that "some kinds of fraud claims against cigarette makers may go forward, just not those concerning smoking and health.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  " " Thus, if cigarette manufacturers were to falsely advertise their products as ‘American-made’ or ‘the official cigarette of Major League Baseball,’ state-law claims arising from that wrongful behavior would not be pre-empted.
Revised:  Thus, if cigarette manufacturers were to falsely advertise their products as ‘American-made’ or ‘the official cigarette of Major League Baseball,’ state-law claims arising from that wrongful behavior would not be pre-empted.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Forbidding lawsuits based on health claims, would not mean consumers lack protection, as tobacco marketing is subject to regulatory oversight , " he further explained.
Revised:  Forbidding lawsuits based on health claims, would not mean consumers lack protection, as tobacco marketing is subject to regulatory oversight . " he further explained.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Forbidding lawsuits based on health claims, would not mean consumers lack protection, as tobacco marketing is subject to regulatory oversight , " he further explained.
Revised:  Forbidding lawsuits based on health claims, would not mean consumers lack protection, as tobacco marketing is subject to regulatory oversight , " 
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The 5-to-4 judgment will encourage dozens of lawsuits claiming billions of dollars in damages.
Revised:  The 5-to-4 judgment is expected to open the way for dozens of lawsuits claiming billions of dollars in damages.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: Several smokers in recent decades switched to "light " cigarettes, with fervent faith they posed less of a danger to their health.
Revised: Several smokers in recent decades switched to light cigarettes, with fervent faith they posed less of a danger to their health.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Although mechanical tests showed "light" cigarettes emitted less tar when burned, actual smokers inhale about the same amount of tar when they puff on a "light " cigarette, the studies found.
Revised:  Although mechanical tests showed "light" cigarettes emitted less tar when burned, actual smokers inhale about the same amount of tar when they puff on a light cigarette, the studies found.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The cigarette business faces more than 30 class-action lawsuits from smokers and ex-smokers who seek billions of dollars in damages and claim they were deceived by the marketing of "light " and low-tar cigarettes.
Revised:  The cigarette business faces more than 30 class-action lawsuits from smokers and ex-smokers who seek billions of dollars in damages and claim they were deceived by the marketing of light and low-tar cigarettes.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  They sought damages compensation for economic rather than medical harm, claiming they had overpaid for cigarettes based on fraudulent advertisements suggesting that “light ” cigarettes were safer than regular ones.
Revised:  They sought damages compensation for economic rather than medical harm, claiming they had overpaid for cigarettes based on fraudulent advertisements suggesting that light cigarettes were safer than regular ones.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The court also dismissed Philip Morris'  argument that the Federal Trade Commission's mid-1960s endorsement of machine testing of cigarette tar and nicotine levels "should relieve the company of liability for alleged fraud."
Revised:  The court also dismissed Philip Morris' s argument that the Federal Trade Commission's mid-1960s endorsement of machine testing of cigarette tar and nicotine levels "should relieve the company of liability for alleged fraud."
Edit intent: fluency
Original: On Friday, June 10, 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush said that the United States will defend the Republic of China (otherwise known as Taiwan) if it is  attacked by the People's Republic of China (mainland China).
Revised: On Friday, June 10, 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush said that the United States will defend the Republic of China (otherwise known as Taiwan) if it is ever attacked by the People's Republic of China (mainland China).
Edit intent: style
Original:  Mr. Bush's response: "Yes, we would%DIFDELCMD < ]%%% . It's called the Taiwan Relations Act. 
Revised:  Mr. Bush's response: "Yes, we %DIFDELCMD < ]%%% . It's called the Taiwan Relations Act. 
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Mr. Bush's response: "Yes, we would%DIFDELCMD < ]%%% . It's called the Taiwan Relations Act. 
Revised:  Mr. Bush's response: "Yes, we would%DIFDELCMD < ]%%% Relations Act. 
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  It's called the Taiwan Relations Act (search) .
Revised:  It's called the Taiwan Relations Act .
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  He is recovering in hospital   
Revised:  He is recovering in hospital . 
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The BBC has speculated that the incident may have been staged to justify a military crack-down on opposition supporters.
Revised:  BBC News has speculated that the incident may have been staged to justify a military crack-down on opposition supporters.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The head of the Zimbabwe Air Force has been shot in the arm in an apparent assassination attempt.
Revised:  The chief of the Zimbabwe Air Force has been shot in the arm in an apparent assassination attempt.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  BBC News has speculated that the incident may have been staged to justify a military crack-down on opposition supporters .  Shiri , one of Zimbabwe's military chiefs, is a strong ally of President Mugabe.
Revised:  BBC News has speculated that the incident may have been staged to justify a military crack-down on opposition supporters . Shiri is a strong ally of President Mugabe.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Air Marshall Perence Shiri, 53  is recovering in a local hospital.
Revised:  Air Marshall Perence Shiri, 53 , is recovering in a local hospital.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Officials blame the incident on terrorists and political opponents for the attack .
Revised:  Officials blame the incident on terrorists and political opponents .
Edit intent: clarity