wanyu/IteraTeR_v2 huggingface dataset:
Original:   More and more data are becoming publicly available over the Internet.
Revised: Data re-identification or de-anonymization is the practice of matching anonymous data (also known as de-identified data) with publicly available information, or auxiliary data, in order to discover the individual to which the data belong. This is a concern because companies with privacy policies, health care providers, and financial institutions may release the data they collect after the data has gone through the de-identification process. More and more data are becoming publicly available over the Internet.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49: 105-121. doi: 10.1002/jaba.265,  functional analysis and treatment using caregiversKurtz, P.F.,Fodstad, J.C., Huete, J.M., and Hagopian, L.P. (2013), "Caregiver- And Staff-Conducted Functional Analysis Outcomes: A Summary Of 52 Cases".
Revised:  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49: 105-121. doi: 10.1002/jaba.265, and functional analysis and treatment using caregiversKurtz, P.F.,Fodstad, J.C., Huete, J.M., and Hagopian, L.P. (2013), "Caregiver- And Staff-Conducted Functional Analysis Outcomes: A Summary Of 52 Cases".
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Consecutive controlled case-series studies examining behavior analytic interventions of late have examined functional communication trainingRooker , G.W., Jessel, J., Kurtz, P.F. and Hagopian, L.P. (2013), "Functional Communication Training With And Without Alternative Reinforcement And Punishment: An Analysis Of 58 Applications".
Revised:  Consecutive controlled case-series studies examining behavior analytic interventions of late have examined functional communication training.Rooker , G.W., Jessel, J., Kurtz, P.F. and Hagopian, L.P. (2013), "Functional Communication Training With And Without Alternative Reinforcement And Punishment: An Analysis Of 58 Applications".
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Journal of Applied Behavior Anlaysis, 46: 738-749. doi: 10.1002/jaba.87 . External links Scientific Support for Applied Behavior Analysis Applied Behavior Analysis: The Scientific Approach to Autism Therapy, Part  
Revised:  Journal of Applied Behavior Anlaysis, 46: 738-749. doi: 10.1002/jaba.87 External links Scientific Support for Applied Behavior Analysis Applied Behavior Analysis: The Scientific Approach to Autism Therapy, Part 
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46: 708-722. doi: 10.1002/jaba.
Revised:  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46: 708–722. doi: 10.1002/jaba.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49: 105-121. doi: 10.1002/jaba.
Revised:  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49: 105–121. doi: 10.1002/jaba.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Journal of Applied Behavior Anlaysis, 46: 738-749. doi: 10.1002/jaba.87 See also Single-subject Research Applied Behavior Analysis
Revised:  Journal of Applied Behavior Anlaysis, 46: 738–749. doi: 10.1002/jaba.87 See also Single-subject Research Applied Behavior Analysis
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Journal of Applied Behavior Anlaysis, 46: 738-749. doi: 10.1002/jaba.87 See also Single-subject Research Applied Behavior Analysis
Revised:  Journal of Applied Behavior Anlaysis, 46: 738-749. doi: 10.1002/jaba.87 See also Single-subject research Applied behavior analysis
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The Jewish Telegraphic Agency located one relatively observant Jewish individual living on Samoa, who said at the time that he would follow the lead of local Seventh-Day Adventist churches and light Shabbat candles on Saturday night.
Revised:  The Jewish Telegraphic Agency located a single relatively observant Jewish individual living on Samoa, who said at the time that he would follow the lead of local Seventh-Day Adventist churches and light Shabbat candles on Saturday night.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The Jewish calendar defines days as running from sundown to sundown rather than midnight to midnight.
Revised:  The Jewish calendar defines days as running from sunset to sunset rather than midnight to midnight.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Oxford: Oxford University Press . Referenc
Revised:  Oxford: Oxford University Press Referenc
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Oxford: Oxford University Press . Referenc
Revised:  Oxford: Oxford University Press . 
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Influenced by the theory of g-factor, Vernonput his own theory about the structure of intelligence . (Vernon, 1964 ) The structure of human abilitiesVernon ,  P. E.(1964).
Revised: Influenced by the theory of g-factor, Vernonput his own theory about the structure of intelligence . (Vernon, 1964 , P. E.(1964).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  London: Methuen (Vernon,1965) He put emphasize on g factor in all the mental abilities.
Revised:  London: Methuen It was influenced by the theory of g factor. He put emphasize on g factor in all the mental abilities.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  London: Methuen (Vernon,1965) He put emphasize on g factor in all the mental abilities.
Revised:  London: Methuen (Vernon,1965) Vernon puts emphasis on the g factor in all the mental abilities.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  He extracted  g factor from  ability test, then found that those remaining content could be divided into two separate parts.
Revised:  He extracted the g factor from ability test, then found that those remaining content could be divided into two separate parts.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  He extracted  g factor from  ability test, then found that those remaining content could be divided into two separate parts.
Revised:  He extracted g factor from an ability test, then found that those remaining content could be divided into two separate parts.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  He extracted  g factor from  ability test, then found that those remaining content could be divided into two separate parts.
Revised:  He extracted g factor from ability test, then found that could be divided into two separate parts.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: Vernon's verbal-perceptual model is a theory about the structure of intelligence proposed by Philip Ewart Vernon in 1964 (Vernon, 1964, 1965).
Revised: Vernon's verbal-perceptual model is a theory about the structure of intelligence proposed by Philip E. Vernon in 1964 (Vernon, 1964, 1965).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Remodeling old models of intelligenceHorn , J. L. (1985).
Revised:  Horn , J. L. (1985).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  " Remodeling old models of intelligence '' . In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence: Theories, measurements, and applications (pp. 267–300).
Revised:  Remodeling old models of intelligence '' . In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence: Theories, measurements, and applications (pp. 267–300).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  " Remodeling old models of intelligence '' . In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence: Theories, measurements, and applications (pp. 267–300).
Revised:  " Remodeling old models of intelligence . In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence: Theories, measurements, and applications (pp. 267–300).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  What’s more, Vernon considered that there might be a third special factor named mathematical skill, but it can be included in perceptual-mechanical (k:m) factor.
Revised:  Vernon considered that there might be a third special factor named mathematical skill, but it can be included in perceptual-mechanical (k:m) factor.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The difference between Vernon’s verbal-perceptual model theory and Horn and Cattell ’ s Gf-Gc theory Vernon ’ s model about intelligence looks similar to the fluid-crystallized (Gf-Gc) intelligence theory because they both agree with g factor and have two more different dimensions on intelligence structure.
Revised:  Difference from and Horn and Cattell ’ s Gf-Gc theory Vernon ’ s model about intelligence looks similar to the fluid-crystallized (Gf-Gc) intelligence theory because they both agree with g factor and have two more different dimensions on intelligence structure.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The difference between Vernon’s verbal-perceptual model theory and Horn and Cattell ’ s Gf-Gc theory Vernon ’ s model about intelligence looks similar to the fluid-crystallized (Gf-Gc) intelligence theory because they both agree with g factor and have two more different dimensions on intelligence structure.
Revised:  The difference between Vernon’s verbal-perceptual model theory and Horn and Cattell ' s Gf-Gc theory Vernon ’ s model about intelligence looks similar to the fluid-crystallized (Gf-Gc) intelligence theory because they both agree with g factor and have two more different dimensions on intelligence structure.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The difference between Vernon’s verbal-perceptual model theory and Horn and Cattell ’ s Gf-Gc theory Vernon ’ s model about intelligence looks similar to the fluid-crystallized (Gf-Gc) intelligence theory because they both agree with g factor and have two more different dimensions on intelligence structure.
Revised:  The difference between Vernon’s verbal-perceptual model theory and Horn and Cattell ’ s Gf-Gc theory Vernon ' s model about intelligence looks similar to the fluid-crystallized (Gf-Gc) intelligence theory because they both agree with g factor and have two more different dimensions on intelligence structure.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  New York: Wiley “ One reason why the Horn-Cattell model has more broad group factors than Vernon ’ s is simply that they analysed a very much larger and more carefully chosen battery of tests.
Revised:  New York: Wiley " One reason why the Horn-Cattell model has more broad group factors than Vernon ’ s is simply that they analysed a very much larger and more carefully chosen battery of tests.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  New York: Wiley “ One reason why the Horn-Cattell model has more broad group factors than Vernon ’ s is simply that they analysed a very much larger and more carefully chosen battery of tests.
Revised:  New York: Wiley “ One reason why the Horn-Cattell model has more broad group factors than Vernon ' s is simply that they analysed a very much larger and more carefully chosen battery of tests.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  This probably explains why the Vernon model does not contain any group factors corresponding to Cattell ’ s Gr (and why it had to be added by Johnson and Bouchard, 2005, when they tried to fit the Vernon model to a much larger data set). ” IQ and human intelligenceMackintosh, N.(1998).
Revised:  This probably explains why the Vernon model does not contain any group factors corresponding to Cattell ' s Gr (and why it had to be added by Johnson and Bouchard, 2005, when they tried to fit the Vernon model to a much larger data set). ” IQ and human intelligenceMackintosh, N.(1998).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  This probably explains why the Vernon model does not contain any group factors corresponding to Cattell ’ s Gr (and why it had to be added by Johnson and Bouchard, 2005, when they tried to fit the Vernon model to a much larger data set). ” IQ and human intelligenceMackintosh, N.(1998).
Revised:  This probably explains why the Vernon model does not contain any group factors corresponding to Cattell ’ s Gr (and why it had to be added by Johnson and Bouchard, 2005, when they tried to fit the Vernon model to a much larger data set). " IQ and human intelligenceMackintosh, N.(1998).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Stevens' date of birth was unclear due to lack of records, with the year 1752 being published by Kristian Caroe -without sources- in his 1905 book "Den danske lægestand, 1479-1900" until Historian Michael E. Newton published contemporary records establishing Stevens birthplace and date.
Revised:  Stevens' date of birth was unclear due to lack of records, with the year 1752 being published by Kristian Caroe , without sources, in his 1905 book "Den danske lægestand, 1479-1900" until Historian Michael E. Newton published contemporary records establishing Stevens birthplace and date.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Henry Cabot Lodge, Alexander Hamilton, 1882, appendix Rachel Faucette had been living on St. Kitts and Nevis for years at the time when Alexander was conceived, while Thomas Stevens lived on Antigua and St. Croix and James Hamilton Sr never disacknowledged his paternity, signing his letters to Alexander even in later years ”your very affectionate Father”.
Revised: Henry Cabot Lodge, Alexander Hamilton, 1882, appendix Rachel Faucette had been living on St. Kitts and Nevis for years at the time when Alexander was conceived, while Thomas Stevens lived on Antigua and St. Croix and James Hamilton Sr never disavowed his paternity, signing his letters to Alexander even in later years ”your very affectionate Father”.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Stevens' date of birth was unclear due to lack of records, with the year 1752 being published by Kristian Caroe, without sources, in his 1905 book " Den danske lægestand, 1479-1900 " until Historian Michael E. Newton published contemporary records establishing Stevens birthplace and date.
Revised:  Stevens' date of birth was unclear due to lack of records, with the year 1752 being published by Kristian Caroe, without sources, in his 1905 book Den danske lægestand, 1479-1900 " until Historian Michael E. Newton published contemporary records establishing Stevens birthplace and date.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Stevens' date of birth was unclear due to lack of records, with the year 1752 being published by Kristian Caroe, without sources, in his 1905 book " Den danske lægestand, 1479-1900 " until Historian Michael E. Newton published contemporary records establishing Stevens birthplace and date.
Revised:  Stevens' date of birth was unclear due to lack of records, with the year 1752 being published by Kristian Caroe, without sources, in his 1905 book " Den danske lægestand, 1479-1900 until historian Michael E. Newton published contemporary records establishing Stevens birthplace and date.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: In 2005 , Johnson and Bouchard further developed a new model by analyzed Gf-Gc theory, Carroll’s Three-stratum theory and Vernon’s verbal-perceptual model (Johnson & Bouchard, 2005).
Revised: In 2005 by Johnson and Bouchard further developed a new model by analyzed Gf-Gc theory, Carroll’s Three-stratum theory and Vernon’s verbal-perceptual model (Johnson & Bouchard, 2005).
Edit intent: fluency
Original: In 2005 , Johnson and Bouchard further developed a new model by analyzed Gf-Gc theory, Carroll’s Three-stratum theory and Vernon’s verbal-perceptual model (Johnson & Bouchard, 2005).
Revised: In 2005 , Johnson and Bouchard . They developed the model by analyzing Gf-Gc theory, Carroll’s Three-stratum theory and Vernon’s verbal-perceptual model (Johnson & Bouchard, 2005).
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The new model is called g-VPR model . g-VPR model is a four stratum model .
Revised:  The g-VPR model . g-VPR model is a four stratum model .
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The new model is called g-VPR model . g-VPR model is a four stratum model .
Revised:  The new model is called g-VPR model g-VPR model is a four stratum model .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The new model is called g-VPR model . g-VPR model is a four stratum model .
Revised:  The new model is called g-VPR model . is a four stratum model .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The new model is called g-VPR model . g-VPR model is a four stratum model .
Revised:  The new model is called g-VPR model . g-VPR model is a four stratum model :
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  First stratum: primary traits Second stratum: broader than stratum I but still narrow abbilities Third stratum: verbal , perceptual and rotation factors  Fourth stratum: g factor  Johnson and Bouchard made comparison between Gf-Gc, three-stratum and verbal-spatial model.
Revised:  First stratum: Primary traits. Second stratum: broader than stratum I but still narrow abbilities Third stratum: verbal , perceptual and rotation factors Fourth stratum: g factor Johnson and Bouchard made comparison between Gf-Gc, three-stratum and verbal-spatial model.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  First stratum: primary traits Second stratum: broader than stratum I but still narrow abbilities Third stratum: verbal , perceptual and rotation factors  Fourth stratum: g factor  Johnson and Bouchard made comparison between Gf-Gc, three-stratum and verbal-spatial model.
Revised:  First stratum: primary traits Second stratum: Broader than stratum I but still narrow abbilities Third stratum: verbal , perceptual and rotation factors Fourth stratum: g factor Johnson and Bouchard made comparison between Gf-Gc, three-stratum and verbal-spatial model.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  First stratum: primary traits Second stratum: broader than stratum I but still narrow abbilities Third stratum: verbal , perceptual and rotation factors  Fourth stratum: g factor  Johnson and Bouchard made comparison between Gf-Gc, three-stratum and verbal-spatial model.
Revised:  First stratum: primary traits Second stratum: broader than stratum I but still narrow abilities. Third stratum: verbal , perceptual and rotation factors Fourth stratum: g factor Johnson and Bouchard made comparison between Gf-Gc, three-stratum and verbal-spatial model.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  First stratum: primary traits Second stratum: broader than stratum I but still narrow abbilities Third stratum: verbal , perceptual and rotation factors  Fourth stratum: g factor  Johnson and Bouchard made comparison between Gf-Gc, three-stratum and verbal-spatial model.
Revised:  First stratum: primary traits Second stratum: broader than stratum I but still narrow abbilities Third stratum: Verbal , perceptual and rotation factors Fourth stratum: g factor Johnson and Bouchard made comparison between Gf-Gc, three-stratum and verbal-spatial model.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  First stratum: primary traits Second stratum: broader than stratum I but still narrow abbilities Third stratum: verbal , perceptual and rotation factors  Fourth stratum: g factor  Johnson and Bouchard made comparison between Gf-Gc, three-stratum and verbal-spatial model.
Revised:  First stratum: primary traits Second stratum: broader than stratum I but still narrow abbilities Third stratum: verbal , perceptual and rotation factors . Fourth stratum: g factor Johnson and Bouchard made comparison between Gf-Gc, three-stratum and verbal-spatial model.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  First stratum: primary traits Second stratum: broader than stratum I but still narrow abbilities Third stratum: verbal , perceptual and rotation factors  Fourth stratum: g factor  Johnson and Bouchard made comparison between Gf-Gc, three-stratum and verbal-spatial model.
Revised:  First stratum: primary traits Second stratum: broader than stratum I but still narrow abbilities Third stratum: verbal , perceptual and rotation factors Fourth stratum: g factor . Johnson and Bouchard made comparison between Gf-Gc, three-stratum and verbal-spatial model.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Then  based on the verbal-spatial model, Johnson and Bouchard “began by adding a memory factor (labeled content memory to distinguish it from the memory factor in the fluid-crystallized model)”.
Revised:  Then , based on the verbal-spatial model, Johnson and Bouchard “began by adding a memory factor (labeled content memory to distinguish it from the memory factor in the fluid-crystallized model)”.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  However, Johnson and Bouchard found  “ Isolation  of the tests involved resulted in identification of an additional third-stratum factor for image rotation, which also eliminated the contradictory cross-loadings.”
Revised:  However, Johnson and Bouchard found that “ Isolation of the tests involved resulted in identification of an additional third-stratum factor for image rotation, which also eliminated the contradictory cross-loadings.”
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  However, Johnson and Bouchard found  “ Isolation  of the tests involved resulted in identification of an additional third-stratum factor for image rotation, which also eliminated the contradictory cross-loadings.”
Revised:  However, Johnson and Bouchard found “ i of the tests involved resulted in identification of an additional third-stratum factor for image rotation, which also eliminated the contradictory cross-loadings.”
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  After Johnson and Bouchard concluded this g-VPR intelligence structure model, they compare the model fit of g-VPR with  Gf-Gc model and  verbal-spatial model.
Revised:  After Johnson and Bouchard concluded this g-VPR intelligence structure model, they compared the model fit of g-VPR with Gf-Gc model and verbal-spatial model.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  After Johnson and Bouchard concluded this g-VPR intelligence structure model, they compare the model fit of g-VPR with  Gf-Gc model and  verbal-spatial model.
Revised:  After Johnson and Bouchard concluded this g-VPR intelligence structure model, they compare the model fit of g-VPR with the Gf-Gc model and verbal-spatial model.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  After Johnson and Bouchard concluded this g-VPR intelligence structure model, they compare the model fit of g-VPR with  Gf-Gc model and  verbal-spatial model.
Revised:  After Johnson and Bouchard concluded this g-VPR intelligence structure model, they compare the model fit of g-VPR with Gf-Gc model and the verbal-spatial model.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Results showed that  g-VPR model fit better than any other models.
Revised:  Results showed that the g-VPR model fit better than any other models.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Results showed that  g-VPR model fit better than any other models.
Revised:  Results showed that g-VPR model fitted better than any other models.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In the article, Johnson and Bouchard (2005) also discussed specifically about  g-VPR model and Gf-Gc theory.
Revised:  In the article, Johnson and Bouchard (2005) also discussed specifically about the g-VPR model and Gf-Gc theory.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  According to Garlick (2002), special neuronal connections will be built under environmental stimuli , then people’s knowledge and skills are developed.
Revised:  According to Garlick (2002), special neuronal connections will be built under environmental stimuli when people’s knowledge and skills are developed.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:   They developed the model by analyzing Gf-Gc theory, Carroll’s Three-stratum theory and Vernon’s verbal-perceptual model (Johnson Bouchard, 2005) .
Revised:  Bouchard, 2005) They developed the model by analyzing Gf-Gc theory, Carroll’s Three-stratum theory and Vernon’s verbal-perceptual model (Johnson Bouchard, 2005) .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:   They developed the model by analyzing Gf-Gc theory, Carroll’s Three-stratum theory and Vernon’s verbal-perceptual model (Johnson Bouchard, 2005) .
Revised:  They developed the model by analyzing Gf-Gc theory, Carroll’s Three-stratum theory and Vernon’s verbal-perceptual model Bouchard, 2005) .
Edit intent: coherence
Original:   They developed the model by analyzing Gf-Gc theory, Carroll’s Three-stratum theory and Vernon’s verbal-perceptual model (Johnson Bouchard, 2005) .
Revised:  They developed the model by analyzing Gf-Gc theory, Carroll’s Three-stratum theory and Vernon’s verbal-perceptual model (Johnson .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Second stratum: Broader than stratum I  but still narrow abilities.
Revised:  Second stratum: Broader than stratum I , but still narrow abilities.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Johnson and Bouchard made comparison between Gf-Gc, three-stratum and verbal-spatial model.
Revised:  Johnson and Bouchard made comparisons between Gf-Gc, three-stratum and verbal-spatial model.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Since 1976 the armed group has called for a federal system rather than an independent Karen State .
Revised:  Since 1976 the armed group has called for a federal system rather than an independent Karen State of kawthoolei
Edit intent: clarity