wanyu/IteraTeR_v2 huggingface dataset:
Original:  “ It is suggested in debates that the energy cost of extracting uranium from new mines would be so high that there is little point in developing a nuclear power industry – that is simply not true. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% " We also found that substantial progress has been made for disposal of waste in deep geological formations.
Revised:  " It is suggested in debates that the energy cost of extracting uranium from new mines would be so high that there is little point in developing a nuclear power industry – that is simply not true. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% " We also found that substantial progress has been made for disposal of waste in deep geological formations.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  “ It is suggested in debates that the energy cost of extracting uranium from new mines would be so high that there is little point in developing a nuclear power industry – that is simply not true. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% " We also found that substantial progress has been made for disposal of waste in deep geological formations.
Revised:  “ It is suggested in debates that the energy cost of extracting uranium from new mines would be so high that there is little point in developing a nuclear power industry – that is simply not true. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% We also found that substantial progress has been made for disposal of waste in deep geological formations.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Associate Professor Sevior said that nuclear technology is developing at a rapid pace, with new power plant designs proposed that will enable more efficient use of uranium, increasing the possible use of uranium fifty-fold and significantly reducing the amount of nuclear waste.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  “ Power plants will become more efficient and will continue to provide significant amounts of energy, without impacting the environment in the same way as coal and other fossil-fuel power stations, ” he said. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% “ Nuclear power plants can also provide hydrogen for cars, something that will be necessary in the future, particularly as the price of oil continues to rise.”
Revised:  " Power plants will become more efficient and will continue to provide significant amounts of energy, without impacting the environment in the same way as coal and other fossil-fuel power stations, ” he said. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% “ Nuclear power plants can also provide hydrogen for cars, something that will be necessary in the future, particularly as the price of oil continues to rise.”
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  “ Power plants will become more efficient and will continue to provide significant amounts of energy, without impacting the environment in the same way as coal and other fossil-fuel power stations, ” he said. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% “ Nuclear power plants can also provide hydrogen for cars, something that will be necessary in the future, particularly as the price of oil continues to rise.”
Revised:  “ Power plants will become more efficient and will continue to provide significant amounts of energy, without impacting the environment in the same way as coal and other fossil-fuel power stations, " he said. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% “ Nuclear power plants can also provide hydrogen for cars, something that will be necessary in the future, particularly as the price of oil continues to rise.”
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  “ Power plants will become more efficient and will continue to provide significant amounts of energy, without impacting the environment in the same way as coal and other fossil-fuel power stations, ” he said. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% “ Nuclear power plants can also provide hydrogen for cars, something that will be necessary in the future, particularly as the price of oil continues to rise.”
Revised:  “ Power plants will become more efficient and will continue to provide significant amounts of energy, without impacting the environment in the same way as coal and other fossil-fuel power stations, ” he said. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% " Nuclear power plants can also provide hydrogen for cars, something that will be necessary in the future, particularly as the price of oil continues to rise.”
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  “Groups that are for and against nuclear power can then have an open dialogue based on accurate figures and sound empirical research.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  For more information: Associate Professor Martin Sevior School of Physics Tel: 03 8344 5438 Mob: 0425 828 278 Email: msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au Website: nuclearinfo. net UR
Revised:  Associate Professor Martin Sevior School of Physics Tel: 03 8344 5438 Mob: 0425 828 278 Email: msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au Website: nuclearinfo. net UR
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  For more information: Associate Professor Martin Sevior School of Physics Tel: 03 8344 5438 Mob: 0425 828 278 Email: msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au Website: nuclearinfo. net UR
Revised:  For more information: Website: nuclearinfo. net UR
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  For more information: Associate Professor Martin Sevior School of Physics Tel: 03 8344 5438 Mob: 0425 828 278 Email: msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au Website: nuclearinfo. net UR
Revised:  For more information: Associate Professor Martin Sevior School of Physics Tel: 03 8344 5438 Mob: 0425 828 278 Email: msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au Website: nuclearinfo. UR
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  For more information: Associate Professor Martin Sevior School of Physics Tel: 03 8344 5438 Mob: 0425 828 278 Email: msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au Website: nuclearinfo. net UR
Revised:  For more information: Associate Professor Martin Sevior School of Physics Tel: 03 8344 5438 Mob: 0425 828 278 Email: msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au Website: nuclearinfo. net ne
Edit intent: fluency
Original: A group of scientists from the University of Melbourne , led by Associate Professor of Physics Martin Sevior, has released a study of the energy problems confronting Australia in the future.
Revised: A new study by a group of Melbourne scientists has released a study of the energy problems confronting Australia in the future.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  A new study by a group of Melbourne scientists endorses the use of nuclear energy and attacks some of the data used by anti-nuclear campaigners.
Revised:  The study endorses the use of nuclear energy and attacks some of the data used by anti-nuclear campaigners.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Associate Professor Sevior says his study has exposed serious flaws in a European study into the limits of the uranium industry.
Revised:  Associate Professor Sevior says his study has exposed flaws in a European study into the limits of the uranium industry.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  "   We're not all-out saying yes, we must do this, is that part of that credible case depends on nuclear power industry living up to its promises, and one of the promises it makes is that the next generation of power plants that it has on the boards and are touting around the world, live up to their expectations," he said.
Revised:  " " We're not all-out saying yes, we must do this, is that part of that credible case depends on nuclear power industry living up to its promises, and one of the promises it makes is that the next generation of power plants that it has on the boards and are touting around the world, live up to their expectations," he said.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  AUSTRALIA should embrace nuclear power as a cheap and environmentally friendly energy source, according to a Melbourne University study.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  "The indications are that these reactors will deliver power cheaply and safely, but until they are tested somewhere in the world we won't know," he said.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Victoria would need eight nuclear reactors to provide its power needs.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  "It's really something we have to decide on over the next four years or Victoria will start experiencing blackouts and power shortages," he said.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  They compared the environmental impact, health risks, economic effects and social implications of the use of fossil fuels, renewable energy sources such as wind and solar energy, and nuclear power.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The study concluded that previous research by Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen and Philip Smith - widely considered the industry standard in Australia - had overestimated the energy cost of mining uranium by as much as a factor of 10.%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% "This previous research overestimated the energy costs and carbon emissions generated by the construction of nuclear power plants and for mining uranium," Prof Sevior said .
Revised:  %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% "This previous research overestimated the energy costs and carbon emissions generated by the construction of nuclear power plants and for mining uranium," Prof Sevior said .
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The study concluded that previous research by Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen and Philip Smith - widely considered the industry standard in Australia - had overestimated the energy cost of mining uranium by as much as a factor of 10.%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% "This previous research overestimated the energy costs and carbon emissions generated by the construction of nuclear power plants and for mining uranium," Prof Sevior said .
Revised:  The study concluded that previous research by Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen and Philip Smith - widely considered the industry standard in Australia - had overestimated the energy cost of mining uranium by as much as a factor of 10.%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% As energy consumption and the resulting pollution continue to grow, Associate Professor Sevior said that alternative energy sources need to be looked at in detail by impartial researchers, and academics with expertise in such areas have a responsibility to become involved .
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  New investigation shows nuclear power will last longer, cause less emissions Media Release, Wednesday 21 December 2005%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Nuclear power would be a cheaper and more environmentally friendly option in Australia than commonly thought, a University of Melbourne study has shown.
Revised:  Media Release, Wednesday 21 December 2005%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Nuclear power would be a cheaper and more environmentally friendly option in Australia than commonly thought, a University of Melbourne study has shown.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  New investigation shows nuclear power will last longer, cause less emissions Media Release, Wednesday 21 December 2005%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Nuclear power would be a cheaper and more environmentally friendly option in Australia than commonly thought, a University of Melbourne study has shown.
Revised:  New investigation shows nuclear power will last longer, cause less emissions %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Nuclear power would be a cheaper and more environmentally friendly option in Australia than commonly thought, a University of Melbourne study has shown.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  New investigation shows nuclear power will last longer, cause less emissions Media Release, Wednesday 21 December 2005%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Nuclear power would be a cheaper and more environmentally friendly option in Australia than commonly thought, a University of Melbourne study has shown.
Revised:  New investigation shows nuclear power will last longer, cause less emissions Media Release, Wednesday 21 December 2005%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% 
Edit intent: coherence
Original: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% They have presented their results on a new website: nuclearinfo.net.
Revised: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% 
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Their investigation significantly impacts the nuclear debate, with findings showing that hundreds of times more uranium could be available than was predicted in a widely quoted study by van Leeuwen and Smith.
Edit intent: coherence
Original: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Associate Professor Sevior says Van Leeuwen and Smith also seriously overestimate the energy needed to mine uranium and construct nuclear power plants.
Revised: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Associate Professor Sevior says Van Leeuwen and Smith also seriously overestimate the energy needed to mine uranium and construct nuclear power plants.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  As energy consumption and the resulting pollution continue to grow, Associate Professor Sevior said that alternative energy sources need to be looked at in detail by impartial researchers, and academics with expertise in such areas have a responsibility to become involved.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  " Website: nuclearinfo.ne
Revised:  Website: nuclearinfo.ne
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  " Website: nuclearinfo.ne
Revised:  " 
Edit intent: coherence
Original: Ignore this mess A new study by a group of Melbourne scientists has released a study of the energy problems confronting Australia in the future.
Revised: right A new study by a group of Melbourne scientists has released a study of the energy problems confronting Australia in the future.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Associate Professor,  Martin Sevior, of Melbourne University's school of physics claims a recent study bolsters the case for Australia to invest more in nuclear energy.
Revised:  Associate Professor, Martin Sevior, of Melbourne University's school of physics , claims the recent study bolsters the case for Australia to invest more in nuclear energy.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The study compared the environmental impact, health risks, economic effects and social implications of the use of fossil fuels, renewable energy sources such as wind and solar energy, and nuclear power.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Associate Professor Sevior says his study has exposed flaws in a European study into the limits of the uranium industry.
Revised:  Prof Sevior says his study has exposed flaws in a European study into the limits of the uranium industry.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Associate Professor Sevior says his study has exposed flaws in a European study into the limits of the uranium industry.
Revised:  Associate Professor Sevior says his study has exposed flaws in the European study into the limits of the uranium industry.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  He also acknowledges that debate about nuclear energy has some way to go.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  "We're not all-out saying yes, we must do this, is that part of that credible case depends on nuclear power industry living up to its promises, and one of the promises it makes is that the next generation of power plants that it has on the boards and are touting around the world, live up to their expectations," he said.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The Australian Conservation Foundation's  nuclear campaigner, Dave Sweeney, says the Melbourne University study appears flawed and does not provide a sound argument for the use of nuclear energy.
Revised:  The Australian Conservation Foundation's (ACF) nuclear campaigner, Dave Sweeney, says the Melbourne University study appears flawed and does not provide a sound argument for the use of nuclear energy.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The Australian Conservation Foundation's  nuclear campaigner, Dave Sweeney, says the Melbourne University study appears flawed and does not provide a sound argument for the use of nuclear energy.
Revised:  The Australian Conservation Foundation's nuclear campaigner, Dave Sweeney, says the study appears flawed and does not provide a sound argument for the use of nuclear energy.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  "It glances over some really key concerns of proliferation, key areas of reactor safety are not delved into too deeply and they have direct links to industry websites for further information .
Revised:  "It glances over some really key concerns of proliferation, key areas of reactor safety are not delved into too deeply and they have direct links to industry websites for further information ," said Mr Sweeney. "
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  I'm not sure it's altogether appropriate or altogether balanced to be referring people to the nuclear industry's own websites for further information on such matters as radioactive waste, nuclear weapons and nuclear reactor safety." - The Australian Conservation Foundation's Dave Sweeney.
Revised:  I'm not sure it's altogether appropriate or altogether balanced to be referring people to the nuclear industry's own websites for further information on such matters as radioactive waste, nuclear weapons and nuclear reactor safety." 
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  But while he says nuclear energy investment would be more beneficial than investment in sustainable energy sources, he also acknowledges that debate about nuclear energy has some way to go.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The six-month study found Australia has much more uranium than was  thought.
Revised:  The six-month study found Australia has more uranium than was thought.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The six-month study found Australia has much more uranium than was  thought.
Revised:  The six-month study found Australia has much more uranium than was previously thought.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  "We have enough uranium in Australia to power the country for thousands of years," the study's head, Associate Prof Martin Sevior, said .
Revised:  "We have enough uranium in Australia to power the country for thousands of years," said Prof Sevior .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The study concluded that previous research by Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen and Philip Smith - widely considered the industry standard in Australia - had overestimated the energy cost of mining uranium by as much as a factor of 10.%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Prof Sevior called for an immediate debate on nuclear power in Australia.
Revised:  %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Prof Sevior called for an immediate debate on nuclear power in Australia.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  But Friends of the Earth nuclear campaigner Dr Jim Green said nuclear power should never be considered as an energy source.
Revised:  Friends of the Earth nuclear campaigner Dr Jim Green said nuclear power should never be considered as an energy source.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  He said an energy debate in Australia was necessary, but it had to go beyond just the nuclear alternative .
Revised:  Dr Green said an energy debate in Australia was necessary, but it had to go beyond just the nuclear alternative .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  He said an energy debate in Australia was necessary, but it had to go beyond just the nuclear alternative .
Revised:  He said an energy debate in Australia was necessary, but it had to go beyond just the nuclear alternative 
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  "Our electrical energy needs are forecast to increase by 50 per cent in total by the year 2020 - meeting this demand requires building the equivalent of 20 large power-plants over the next 15 years." Prof Sevior said that if this was not done and energy demand grew as expected, Australia would face large scale blackouts such as those which occurred in NSW in 1981.
Revised:  "Our electrical energy needs are forecast to increase by 50 per cent in total by the year 2020 - meeting this demand requires building the equivalent of 20 large power-plants over the next 15 years." 
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  "Nuclear power would not only cause less damage to the environment than proposed by van Leeuwen and Smith, but would provide enough energy for everyone on Earth for well over 200 years, even if current nuclear power plants continue to be used, which is unlikely."%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% The University of Melbourne research group investigated the energy required to build and operate a nuclear power plant.
Revised:  %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% The University of Melbourne research group investigated the energy required to build and operate a nuclear power plant.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Associate Professor Sevior said that the methodology used by van Leeuwen and Smith, which is often cited during debates on nuclear power in Australia and overseas, was flawed, with some figures utilised off by over a factor of 10.%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% "This previous research overestimated the energy costs and carbon emissions generated by the construction of nuclear power plants and for mining uranium," he said.
Revised:  %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% "This previous research overestimated the energy costs and carbon emissions generated by the construction of nuclear power plants and for mining uranium," he said.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Associate Professor Sevior said that the methodology used by van Leeuwen and Smith, which is often cited during debates on nuclear power in Australia and overseas, was flawed, with some figures utilised off by over a factor of 10.%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% "This previous research overestimated the energy costs and carbon emissions generated by the construction of nuclear power plants and for mining uranium," he said.
Revised:  Associate Professor Sevior said that the methodology used by van Leeuwen and Smith, which is often cited during debates on nuclear power in Australia and overseas, was flawed, with some figures utilised off by over a factor of 10.%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% 
Edit intent: coherence
Original: right A new study by a group of Melbourne scientists has released a study of the energy problems confronting Australia in the future.
Revised: right A group of Melbourne scientists has released a study of the energy problems confronting Australia in the future.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: RMT general secretary Bob Crow is quoted (BBC News) as saying that the vote for industrial action  because of "back-door attempts to displace hundreds of safety-critical station staff under spurious cover, ...
Revised: The vot for industrial action because of "back-door attempts to displace hundreds of safety-critical station staff under spurious cover, ...
Edit intent: coherence
Original: RMT general secretary Bob Crow is quoted (BBC News) as saying that the vote for industrial action  because of "back-door attempts to displace hundreds of safety-critical station staff under spurious cover, ...
Revised: RMT general secretary Bob Crow is quoted (BBC News) as saying that the vote for industrial action is because of "back-door attempts to displace hundreds of safety-critical station staff under spurious cover, ...
Edit intent: fluency
Original: The vot for industrial action is because of "back-door attempts to displace hundreds of safety-critical station staff under spurious cover," said Bob Crow, RMT General Secretary, to the BBC.
Revised: The vote for industrial action is because of "back-door attempts to displace hundreds of safety-critical station staff under spurious cover," said Bob Crow, RMT General Secretary, to the BBC.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  London Underground responded to the move by stating "There are no staff cuts across the Tube network.
Revised: The London Underground responded to the move by stating "There are no staff cuts across the Tube network.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  This means some staff being redeployed from ticket offices to station platforms and ticket halls,which can also boost reassurance for our passengers and security.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  "  The Mayor of London Ken Livingstone has condemmed the move, "There can be no justification for the RMT now reneging on its agreement and trying to ruin New Year's Eve for thousands of Londoners . "  The agreement mentioned by the Mayor is a deal reached between the RMT and London Underground last year
Revised:  " "There can be no justification for the RMT now reneging on its agreement and trying to ruin New Year's Eve for thousands of Londoners . " The agreement mentioned by the Mayor is a deal reached between the RMT and London Underground last year
Edit intent: clarity