wanyu/IteraTeR_v2 huggingface dataset:
Original:  A receiver device alerted as if the seismic intensity might have reached to Scale 7  , the largest of JMA scales.
Revised:  A receiver device displayed a Scale 7 , the largest of JMA scales.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night  and news conference on the following Tuesday, for one seismograph near the focus , a criteria of acceleration to call an alert was mistakenly set at 10 gals, not correctly at 100 gals.
Revised:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night , and news conference on the following Tuesday, for one seismograph near the focus , a criteria of acceleration to call an alert was mistakenly set at 10 gals, not correctly at 100 gals.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night  and news conference on the following Tuesday, for one seismograph near the focus , a criteria of acceleration to call an alert was mistakenly set at 10 gals, not correctly at 100 gals.
Revised:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night and news conference on the following Tuesday, one seismograph near the focus , a criteria of acceleration to call an alert was mistakenly set at 10 gals, not correctly at 100 gals.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night  and news conference on the following Tuesday, for one seismograph near the focus , a criteria of acceleration to call an alert was mistakenly set at 10 gals, not correctly at 100 gals.
Revised:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night and news conference on the following Tuesday, for one seismograph near the focus , a criteria of acceleration to call an alert was mistakenly set at 10 gals, instead at 100 gals.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  That resulted in the first warning with false information, which was soon denied by another warning.
Revised:  That resulted in the first false warning.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Maybe it was a bit of luck that the same simple human mistakes were not committed at other points.
Revised:  Maybe it was a bit of luck that the same simple human error was not committed at other points.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In another EEW scheme for the general public , the same mistake could not cause the same trouble, because the latter releases a warning based on data from plural observation points, and not by the criteria of acceleration
Revised:  In the other EEW scheme - for the general public , the same mistake could not cause the same trouble, because the latter releases a warning based on data from plural observation points, and not by the criteria of acceleration
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In another EEW scheme for the general public , the same mistake could not cause the same trouble, because the latter releases a warning based on data from plural observation points, and not by the criteria of acceleration
Revised:  In another EEW scheme for the general public - the same mistake could not cause the same trouble, because the latter releases a warning based on data from plural observation points, and not by the criteria of acceleration
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In another EEW scheme for the general public , the same mistake could not cause the same trouble, because the latter releases a warning based on data from plural observation points, and not by the criteria of acceleration
Revised:  In another EEW scheme for the general public , the same mistake could not cause the same trouble, because it releases a warning based on data from plural observation points, and not by the criteria of acceleration
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In another EEW scheme for the general public , the same mistake could not cause the same trouble, because the latter releases a warning based on data from plural observation points, and not by the criteria of acceleration
Revised:  In another EEW scheme for the general public , the same mistake could not cause the same trouble, because the latter releases a warning based on data from multiple observation points, and not by the criteria of acceleration
Edit intent: fluency
Original: One of the world's pioneering earthquake warning systems in Japan has been found to have some practical use issues .
Revised: One of the world's most advanced earthquake warning systems in Japan has been found to have some practical use issues .
Edit intent: clarity
Original: One of the world's pioneering earthquake warning systems in Japan has been found to have some practical use issues .
Revised: One of the world's pioneering earthquake warning systems in Japan has been found to have some practical use problems .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  There was in fact no suspicion that huge tremors would occur.
Revised:  There was , in fact, no suspicion that huge tremors would occur.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The root cause was a simple human mistake that happened while operating one seismograph.
Revised:  The root cause was a simple human mistake that happened while operating a single seismograph.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The accidental release of the warning also revealed that some receiver devices couldn't handle warnings properly under certain conditions.
Revised:  The accidental release of the warning also revealed that some receiver devices could not handle warnings properly under certain conditions.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Two EEW schemes were put into practise in 2006 and 2007.
Revised:  Two EEW schemes were put to practical use in 2006 and 2007.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The warning was released to the EEW scheme for advanced users such as railway operators, workers in factories, managers at some offices or schools, and some local cable TV broadcasters.
Revised:  The error affected the scheme for advanced users such as railway operators, workers in factories, managers at some offices or schools, and some local cable TV broadcasters.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The warning was released to the EEW scheme for advanced users such as railway operators, workers in factories, managers at some offices or schools, and some local cable TV broadcasters.
Revised:  The warning was released to the EEW scheme for advanced users such as railway operators, workers in factories, managers at some offices and schools, and some local cable TV broadcasters.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Another Earthquake Early Warning (Japan)| EEW scheme for the general public, which is utilized by nationwide broadcasting networks (of NHK, for example), was unaffected by this error .
Revised:  Another EEW scheme for the general public, which is utilized by nationwide broadcasting networks (of NHK, for example), was unaffected by this error .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Another Earthquake Early Warning (Japan)| EEW scheme for the general public, which is utilized by nationwide broadcasting networks (of NHK, for example), was unaffected by this error .
Revised:  Another Earthquake Early Warning (Japan)| EEW scheme for the general public, which is utilized by nationwide broadcasting networks , such as NHK, was not involved in this incident .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  One receiver at a junior high school boarding house in Aichi Prefecture displayed an alert as if it were on the Scale 6 Lower (the third largest of 10 JMA scales), causing some girl students to cry.
Revised:  One receiver at a junior high school boarding house in Aichi Prefecture alerted as if the seismic intensity might have reached to Scale 6 Lower (the third largest of 10 JMA scales), causing some girl students to cry.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The device didn't say that the students were far away from the focus.
Revised:  The device didn't tell the fact that the students were far away from the focus.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night , and news conference on the following Tuesday, one seismograph near the focus point of the earthquake was incorrectly set with the criteria of acceleration at 10 gals , instead at 100 gals  .
Revised:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night and news conference on the following Tuesday, one seismograph near the focus point of the earthquake was incorrectly set with the criteria of acceleration at 10 gals , instead at 100 gals .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night , and news conference on the following Tuesday, one seismograph near the focus point of the earthquake was incorrectly set with the criteria of acceleration at 10 gals , instead at 100 gals  .
Revised:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night , and news conference on the following morning, the seismograph in question, had been set to a criteria of acceleration at 10 gals , instead at 100 gals .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night , and news conference on the following Tuesday, one seismograph near the focus point of the earthquake was incorrectly set with the criteria of acceleration at 10 gals , instead at 100 gals  .
Revised:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night , and news conference on the following Tuesday, one seismograph near the focus point of the earthquake was incorrectly set with the criteria of acceleration of 10 gals , instead at 100 gals .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Reportedly JMA confessed that the seismograph has not undergone a check since it was placed in December, 2003.
Revised:  Reportedly JMA confessed that the seismograph has not undergone a check since it was installed in December, 2003.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Maybe it was a bit of luck that the same simple human error was not committed at other points .
Revised:  So far it is not known if the same simple human error was not committed at other points .
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Maybe it was a bit of luck that the same simple human error was not committed at other points .
Revised:  Maybe it was a bit of luck that the same simple human mistakes were committed at other points .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In the other EEW scheme - for the general public - the same mistake could not cause the same trouble, because it releases a warning based on data from multiple observation points, and not by the criteria of acceleration
Revised:  In the other EEW scheme - for the general public , the same mistake could not cause the same trouble, because it releases a warning based on data from multiple observation points, and not by the criteria of acceleration
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  At a private railway company, an EEW receiving system crashed, apparently because of the incredible data.
Revised:  At a private railway company, an EEW receiving system crashed, apparently because of the extraordinary data.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: According to JMA's announcement on the same night and news conference on the following morning, the seismograph in question was incorrectly set with the criteria of acceleration at 10 gals , when it should have been set at 100 gals instead .
Revised: According to JMA's announcement on the same night and news conference on the following morning, the seismograph in question was incorrectly set with the criteria of acceleration at 10 gals . This was an incorrect setting; it should have been set at 100 gals instead .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In the parallel EEW scheme for the general public, the same mistake could not cause the same trouble , because it releases a warning based on data from multiple observation points, and not  by the criteria of acceleration
Revised:  In the parallel EEW scheme for the general public, the same mistake would not cause the same trouble , because it releases a warning based on data from multiple observation points, and not by the criteria of acceleration
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In the parallel EEW scheme for the general public, the same mistake could not cause the same trouble , because it releases a warning based on data from multiple observation points, and not  by the criteria of acceleration
Revised:  In the parallel EEW scheme for the general public, the same mistake could not cause the same problems , because it releases a warning based on data from multiple observation points, and not by the criteria of acceleration
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In the parallel EEW scheme for the general public, the same mistake could not cause the same trouble , because it releases a warning based on data from multiple observation points, and not  by the criteria of acceleration
Revised:  In the parallel EEW scheme for the general public, the same mistake could not cause the same trouble , because it releases a warning based on data from multiple observation points, and not solely by the criteria of acceleration
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  There was, in fact, no suspicion that huge tremorswould occur .
Revised:  There was, in fact, no possibility of huge tremors .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The root cause was a simple human mistake that happened while operating a single seismograph  .
Revised:  The root cause was a simple human mistake that happened while setting a single seismograph .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  It is designed to analyze seismic waves and issue a warning as soon as possible after an earthquake is detected, or if large tremors are expected to happen.
Revised:  It is designed to analyze seismic waves as soon as possible after an earthquake is detected, or if large tremors are expected to happen.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  It is designed to analyze seismic waves and issue a warning as soon as possible after an earthquake is detected, or if large tremors are expected to happen.
Revised:  It is designed to analyze seismic waves and issue a warning as soon as possible after an earthquake is detected, and issue a warning if large tremors are expected to happen.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The warning was released to the EEW scheme for advanced users such as railway operators, workers in factories, managers at some offices and schools, and some local cable TV broadcasters.
Revised:  The warning was released by the EEW scheme for advanced users such as railway operators, workers in factories, managers at some offices and schools, and some local cable TV broadcasters.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Another EEW scheme for the general public, which is utilized by nationwide broadcasting networks , such as NHK, was not involved in this incident.
Revised:  Another EEW scheme for the general public, which is utilized by nationwide broadcasting networks such as NHK, was not involved in this incident.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  All four subway lines operated by the Tokyo Metropolitan Bureau were suspended in response to the first false warning, even though it was retracted within 11 seconds.
Revised:  All four subway lines operated by the Tokyo Metropolitan Bureau were suspended in response to the first false warning, even though it was corrected within 11 seconds.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  At a private railway company, an EEW receiving system crashed, apparently because of the extraordinary data.
Revised:  At a private railway company, an EEW receiving system crashed, apparently because of the wrong data.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In addition to taxing corporations , the warning also caused distress to some individuals as well . Some commercially-sold receiver devices which failed to handle the warning appropriately.
Revised:  In addition to troubling railway companies , the warning also caused distress to some individuals as well . Some commercially-sold receiver devices which failed to handle the warning appropriately.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In addition to taxing corporations , the warning also caused distress to some individuals as well . Some commercially-sold receiver devices which failed to handle the warning appropriately.
Revised:  In addition to taxing corporations , the warning also caused confusion among people . Some commercially-sold receiver devices which failed to handle the warning appropriately.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In addition to taxing corporations , the warning also caused distress to some individuals as well . Some commercially-sold receiver devices which failed to handle the warning appropriately.
Revised:  In addition to taxing corporations , the warning also caused distress to some individuals as well . Some commercially-sold receiver devices failed to handle the warning appropriately.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  One receiver at a junior high school boarding house in Aichi Prefecture displayed an alert as if the intensity of the quake were within Scale 6 Lower (the third largest of 10 JMA scales), causing some girl students to cry.
Revised:  One receiver at a junior high school boarding house in Aichi Prefecture called an alert as if the intensity of the quake were within Scale 6 Lower (the third largest of 10 JMA scales), causing some girl students to cry.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  One receiver at a junior high school boarding house in Aichi Prefecture displayed an alert as if the intensity of the quake were within Scale 6 Lower (the third largest of 10 JMA scales), causing some girl students to cry.
Revised:  One receiver at a junior high school boarding house in Aichi Prefecture displayed an alert as if the seismic intensity could have reached to the Scale 6 Lower (the third largest of 10 JMA scales), causing some girl students to cry.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  One receiver at a junior high school boarding house in Aichi Prefecture displayed an alert as if the intensity of the quake were within Scale 6 Lower (the third largest of 10 JMA scales), causing some girl students to cry.
Revised:  One receiver at a junior high school boarding house in Aichi Prefecture displayed an alert as if the intensity of the quake were within Scale 6 Lower (the third highest of 10 JMA scales), causing some girl students to cry.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Such failures show that recipients of an EEW alert for " advanced users" are not always trained well enough to react appropriately.
Revised:  Such failures show that recipients of an "EEW for advanced users" are not always trained well enough to react appropriately.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  A receiver device displayed a Scale 7 alert, the largest of JMA scales.
Revised:  A receiver device displayed a Scale 7 alert, the highest of JMA scales.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night and news conference on the following morning, the seismograph in question was incorrectly set with the criteria of acceleration at 10 gals.
Revised:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night and news conference on the following morning, one seismograph was incorrectly set with the criteria of acceleration at 10 gals.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night and news conference on the following morning, the seismograph in question was incorrectly set with the criteria of acceleration at 10 gals.
Revised:  According to JMA's announcement on the same night and news conference on the following morning, the seismograph in question was incorrectly set with the criterion of acceleration at 10 gals.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: That resulted in the first (false) warning alert , which was soon withdrawn by a second alert .
Revised: That resulted in the first (false) warning , which was soon withdrawn by a second alert .
Edit intent: fluency
Original: That resulted in the first (false) warning alert , which was soon withdrawn by a second alert .
Revised: That resulted in the first (false) warning alert , which was soon corrected by the second warning .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  So far it is not known if the same simple human mistakes were  committed at other points, but none have turned up thus far .
Revised:  The same simple human mistakes were committed at other points, but none have turned up thus far .
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  So far it is not known if the same simple human mistakes were  committed at other points, but none have turned up thus far .
Revised:  So far it is not known if the same simple human mistakes were not committed at other points, but none have turned up thus far .
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  In the parallel EEW scheme for the general public, the same mistake would not cause the same problems , because it releases a warning based on data from multiple observation points, and not solely by the criteria of acceleration
Revised:  In the parallel EEW scheme for the general public, the same mistake would not cause the same error , because it releases a warning based on data from multiple observation points, and not solely by the criteria of acceleration
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In the parallel EEW scheme for the general public, the same mistake would not cause the same problems , because it releases a warning based on data from multiple observation points, and not solely by the criteria of acceleration
Revised:  In the parallel EEW scheme for the general public, the same mistake would not cause the same problems , because it releases a warning based on data from multiple observation points, not depending on the criterion of acceleration
Edit intent: clarity
Original: A boy  who says he is 14  has been arrested after hijacking a bus with ten people on board in Japan.
Revised: A boy , who says he is 14 has been arrested after hijacking a bus with ten people on board in Japan.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: A boy  who says he is 14  has been arrested after hijacking a bus with ten people on board in Japan.
Revised: A boy who says he is 14 , has been arrested after hijacking a bus with ten people on board in Japan.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The bus was in a rest stop in Okazaki at the time.
Revised:  The bus was at a rest stop in Okazaki at the time.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  He said to officers  "I was scolded by my parents so I did this to cause them trouble," according to Jiji Press.
Revised:  He said to officers , "I was scolded by my parents so I did this to cause them trouble," according to Jiji Press.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  He said he hijakced the bus to cause trouble for his parents.
Revised:  He said he hijacked the bus to cause trouble for his parents.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The vehicle was travelling along the Tomei Expressway between Tokyo and Nagoya.
Revised:  The vehicle was traveling along the Tomei Expressway between Tokyo and Nagoya.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: The ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers)  , approved a plan Wednesday to create a new top level domain , .XXX . They are working with the ICM Registry to make domains available as early as fall or winter.
Revised: The ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) , approved a plan Wednesday to create a new top level domain , .XXX . They are working with the domain registrar, ICM Registry, to make the domains available as early as fall or winter.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  ICM plans to sell these domains with the XXX extension for $60 a year.
Revised:  ICM plans to sell registrations of XXX domains for $60 a year.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The new top level domain was one of ten recently under consideration. .jobs and .
Revised:  The new TLD was one of ten recently under consideration. .jobs and .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The stated reason a new TLD has been approved is to protect children from pornographic sites , a filter could simply block all .xxx pages.
Revised:  The stated reason a new TLD has been approved is to protect children from pornographic sites ; a filter could simply block all .xxx pages.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  It was later revealed that it was not her, but Chuck Kroll, her husband, who sent the email from the default address on her computer.
Revised:  It was later revealed that it was not her, but Charles (Chuck) Kroll, her husband, who sent the email from the default address on her computer.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: After the press release, Myers started receiving death threats.
Revised: Professor PZ MyersAfter the press release, Myers started receiving death threats.
Edit intent: clarity