wanyu/IteraTeR_v2 huggingface dataset:
Original:  LV is a totally open project, so where the volunteers go  we go. we have books in german, italian, french, spanish, hebrew, finnish, japanese, old english ... and possibly a few more. we also have a wiki, and our response to such questions is to encourage any non-anglos to make translations there, and we can incorporate into the site as needed. we have a language policy here:
Revised:  LV is a totally open project, so where the volunteers go we go. we have books in German, Italian, French, Spanish, Hebrew, Finnish, Japanese, Old English ... and possibly a few more. we also have a wiki, and our response to such questions is to encourage any non-anglos to make translations there, and we can incorporate into the site as needed. we have a language policy here:
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  LV is a totally open project, so where the volunteers go  we go. we have books in german, italian, french, spanish, hebrew, finnish, japanese, old english ... and possibly a few more. we also have a wiki, and our response to such questions is to encourage any non-anglos to make translations there, and we can incorporate into the site as needed. we have a language policy here:
Revised:  LV is a totally open project, so where the volunteers go we go. we have books in german, italian, french, spanish, hebrew, finnish, japanese, old english ... and possibly a few more. We also have a wiki, and our response to such questions is to encourage any non-anglos to make translations there, and we can incorporate into the site as needed. we have a language policy here:
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  LV is a totally open project, so where the volunteers go  we go. we have books in german, italian, french, spanish, hebrew, finnish, japanese, old english ... and possibly a few more. we also have a wiki, and our response to such questions is to encourage any non-anglos to make translations there, and we can incorporate into the site as needed. we have a language policy here:
Revised:  LV is a totally open project, so where the volunteers go we go. we have books in german, italian, french, spanish, hebrew, finnish, japanese, old english ... and possibly a few more. we also have a wiki, and our response to such questions is to encourage any non-anglos to make translations there, and we can incorporate into the site as needed. We have a language policy here:
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  URL which basically says that in general the forum language is english (so that admin know what's going on) but that if a non-english book project is started, the language in that thread can be whatever volunteers wish to use.
Revised:  URL which basically says that in general the forum language is english (so that admin know what's going on) but that if a non-English book project is started, the language in that thread can be whatever volunteers wish to use.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:          Text-to-speech software is getting better every year, with an increasing focus on "natural" voices.
Revised:  In order for this to happen we need volunteers willing to do it. We have no budget (literally zero) and our structure is totally loose and open, so if a volunteer or group of volunteers offer to do this, we will find a way to help make it happen. There is the constraint that we'd be most comfortable with active volunteers doing it, who understand the project and its particularlities. Also, Text-to-speech software is getting better every year, with an increasing focus on "natural" voices.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  I don ; t find text-to-speech very interesting.
Revised:  I don ' t find text-to-speech very interesting.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  LV is about people reading to you, which is very different than having a computer - no matter the naturalness - read to you. our recordings have mistakes, fumbles, coughs, and beautiful human voices being human, reading wonderful works of literature. it 's not *just* transmission of audio info , it's something much more, and something no computer, robot etc  could ever replicate.
Revised:  LV is about people reading to you, which is very different than having a computer - no matter the naturalness - read to you. Our recordings have mistakes, fumbles, coughs, and beautiful human voices being human, reading wonderful works of literature. it 's not *just* transmission of audio info , it's something much more, and something no computer, robot etc could ever replicate.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  LV is about people reading to you, which is very different than having a computer - no matter the naturalness - read to you. our recordings have mistakes, fumbles, coughs, and beautiful human voices being human, reading wonderful works of literature. it 's not *just* transmission of audio info , it's something much more, and something no computer, robot etc  could ever replicate.
Revised:  LV is about people reading to you, which is very different than having a computer - no matter the naturalness - read to you. our recordings have mistakes, fumbles, coughs, and beautiful human voices being human, reading wonderful works of literature. It 's not *just* transmission of audio info , it's something much more, and something no computer, robot etc could ever replicate.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  LV is about people reading to you, which is very different than having a computer - no matter the naturalness - read to you. our recordings have mistakes, fumbles, coughs, and beautiful human voices being human, reading wonderful works of literature. it 's not *just* transmission of audio info , it's something much more, and something no computer, robot etc  could ever replicate.
Revised:  LV is about people reading to you, which is very different than having a computer - no matter the naturalness - read to you. our recordings have mistakes, fumbles, coughs, and beautiful human voices being human, reading wonderful works of literature. it 's not just transmission of audio info , it's something much more, and something no computer, robot etc could ever replicate.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  LV is about people reading to you, which is very different than having a computer - no matter the naturalness - read to you. our recordings have mistakes, fumbles, coughs, and beautiful human voices being human, reading wonderful works of literature. it 's not *just* transmission of audio info , it's something much more, and something no computer, robot etc  could ever replicate.
Revised:  LV is about people reading to you, which is very different than having a computer - no matter the naturalness - read to you. our recordings have mistakes, fumbles, coughs, and beautiful human voices being human, reading wonderful works of literature. it 's not *just* transmission of audio information , it's something much more, and something no computer, robot etc could ever replicate.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  LV is about people reading to you, which is very different than having a computer - no matter the naturalness - read to you. our recordings have mistakes, fumbles, coughs, and beautiful human voices being human, reading wonderful works of literature. it 's not *just* transmission of audio info , it's something much more, and something no computer, robot etc  could ever replicate.
Revised:  LV is about people reading to you, which is very different than having a computer - no matter the naturalness - read to you. our recordings have mistakes, fumbles, coughs, and beautiful human voices being human, reading wonderful works of literature. it 's not *just* transmission of audio info , it's something much more, and something no computer, robot etc . could ever replicate.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Do you  sometimes get worried that your work might eventually be made obsolete by technology?
Revised:  Do you not sometimes get worried that your work might eventually be made obsolete by technology?
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  see above, but we are not in competition with anyone. personally , I am very much interested in what the *readers* get out of the process, as much as the listeners. if there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. there are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. i think that's great. the beauty of LV, podcasting etc  is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Revised:  See above, but we are not in competition with anyone. personally , I am very much interested in what the *readers* get out of the process, as much as the listeners. if there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. there are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. i think that's great. the beauty of LV, podcasting etc is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  see above, but we are not in competition with anyone. personally , I am very much interested in what the *readers* get out of the process, as much as the listeners. if there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. there are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. i think that's great. the beauty of LV, podcasting etc  is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Revised:  see above, but we are not in competition with anyone. Personally , I am very much interested in what the *readers* get out of the process, as much as the listeners. if there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. there are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. i think that's great. the beauty of LV, podcasting etc is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  see above, but we are not in competition with anyone. personally , I am very much interested in what the *readers* get out of the process, as much as the listeners. if there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. there are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. i think that's great. the beauty of LV, podcasting etc  is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Revised:  see above, but we are not in competition with anyone. personally , I am very much interested in what the readers get out of the process, as much as the listeners. if there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. there are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. i think that's great. the beauty of LV, podcasting etc is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  see above, but we are not in competition with anyone. personally , I am very much interested in what the *readers* get out of the process, as much as the listeners. if there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. there are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. i think that's great. the beauty of LV, podcasting etc  is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Revised:  see above, but we are not in competition with anyone. personally , I am very much interested in what the *readers* get out of the process, as much as the listeners. If there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. there are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. i think that's great. the beauty of LV, podcasting etc is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  see above, but we are not in competition with anyone. personally , I am very much interested in what the *readers* get out of the process, as much as the listeners. if there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. there are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. i think that's great. the beauty of LV, podcasting etc  is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Revised:  see above, but we are not in competition with anyone. personally , I am very much interested in what the *readers* get out of the process, as much as the listeners. if there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. There are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. i think that's great. the beauty of LV, podcasting etc is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  see above, but we are not in competition with anyone. personally , I am very much interested in what the *readers* get out of the process, as much as the listeners. if there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. there are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. i think that's great. the beauty of LV, podcasting etc  is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Revised:  see above, but we are not in competition with anyone. personally , I am very much interested in what the *readers* get out of the process, as much as the listeners. if there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. there are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. I think that's great. the beauty of LV, podcasting etc is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  see above, but we are not in competition with anyone. personally , I am very much interested in what the *readers* get out of the process, as much as the listeners. if there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. there are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. i think that's great. the beauty of LV, podcasting etc  is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Revised:  see above, but we are not in competition with anyone. personally , I am very much interested in what the *readers* get out of the process, as much as the listeners. if there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. there are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. i think that's great. The beauty of LV, podcasting etc is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  see above, but we are not in competition with anyone. personally , I am very much interested in what the *readers* get out of the process, as much as the listeners. if there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. there are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. i think that's great. the beauty of LV, podcasting etc  is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Revised:  see above, but we are not in competition with anyone. personally , I am very much interested in what the *readers* get out of the process, as much as the listeners. if there are computer-generated public domain audiobooks, so much the better. there are also many other audiolit projects, and we all seem to be doing parallel stuff. i think that's great. the beauty of LV, podcasting etc . is that it's all so cheap to do - you can have your choice.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  I will choose a real human reading over a computer reading any day, but others might not agree. that 's fine.
Revised:  I will choose a real human reading over a computer reading any day, but others might not agree. That 's fine.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  LVers read out of love of literature, and nothing more. we 're aware of some of these projects, and have corresponded with some of these and others. there 's so much to do! it 's great that so many are doing this stuff, and that people can choose the things that interest them. this is the thing about LV (as with wikipedia etc) ... we can ;
Revised:  LVers read out of love of literature, and nothing more. We 're aware of some of these projects, and have corresponded with some of these and others. there 's so much to do! it 's great that so many are doing this stuff, and that people can choose the things that interest them. this is the thing about LV (as with wikipedia etc) ... we can ;
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  LVers read out of love of literature, and nothing more. we 're aware of some of these projects, and have corresponded with some of these and others. there 's so much to do! it 's great that so many are doing this stuff, and that people can choose the things that interest them. this is the thing about LV (as with wikipedia etc) ... we can ;
Revised:  LVers read out of love of literature, and nothing more. we 're aware of some of these projects, and have corresponded with some of these and others. There 's so much to do! it 's great that so many are doing this stuff, and that people can choose the things that interest them. this is the thing about LV (as with wikipedia etc) ... we can ;
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  LVers read out of love of literature, and nothing more. we 're aware of some of these projects, and have corresponded with some of these and others. there 's so much to do! it 's great that so many are doing this stuff, and that people can choose the things that interest them. this is the thing about LV (as with wikipedia etc) ... we can ;
Revised:  LVers read out of love of literature, and nothing more. we 're aware of some of these projects, and have corresponded with some of these and others. there 's so much to do! It 's great that so many are doing this stuff, and that people can choose the things that interest them. this is the thing about LV (as with wikipedia etc) ... we can ;
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  LVers read out of love of literature, and nothing more. we 're aware of some of these projects, and have corresponded with some of these and others. there 's so much to do! it 's great that so many are doing this stuff, and that people can choose the things that interest them. this is the thing about LV (as with wikipedia etc) ... we can ;
Revised:  LVers read out of love of literature, and nothing more. we 're aware of some of these projects, and have corresponded with some of these and others. there 's so much to do! it 's great that so many are doing this stuff, and that people can choose the things that interest them. this is the thing about LV (as with Wikipedia etc) ... we can ;
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  LVers read out of love of literature, and nothing more. we 're aware of some of these projects, and have corresponded with some of these and others. there 's so much to do! it 's great that so many are doing this stuff, and that people can choose the things that interest them. this is the thing about LV (as with wikipedia etc) ... we can ;
Revised:  LVers read out of love of literature, and nothing more. we 're aware of some of these projects, and have corresponded with some of these and others. there 's so much to do! it 's great that so many are doing this stuff, and that people can choose the things that interest them. this is the thing about LV (as with wikipedia etc) ... we can '
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  t control our volunteers, nor do we want to. we just give a framework, and hope for the best. to be honesti haven't listened to a full book in a long while!
Revised:  t control our volunteers, nor do we want to. We just give a framework, and hope for the best. to be honesti haven't listened to a full book in a long while!
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  t control our volunteers, nor do we want to. we just give a framework, and hope for the best. to be honesti haven't listened to a full book in a long while!
Revised:  t control our volunteers, nor do we want to. we just give a framework, and hope for the best. To be honest, I haven't listened to a full book in a long while!
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  last chapter i listened to was from whitman's "leaves of grass.
Revised:  Last chapter I listened to was from whitman's "leaves of grass.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  last chapter i listened to was from whitman's "leaves of grass.
Revised:  last chapter i listened to was from Whitman's Leaves of Grass
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Hugh McGuire, a writer from Montreal, decided that he did not only want to read these voices from the past -- he wanted to hear them.
Revised:  Hugh McGuire, a writer from Montreal, decided that he did not only want to read these voices from the past — he wanted to hear them.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Last chapter I listened to was from Whitman's Leaves of Grass  
Revised:  Last chapter I listened to was from Whitman's Leaves of Grass . 
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Fernando Alonso for the first time in his career won the FIA Formula-1 Monaco Gran Prix.
Revised: Fernando Alonso for the first time in his career won the FIA Formula-1 Monaco Grand Prix.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  During the saturday's qualification Michael Schumacher made a strange mistake in the La Rascasse corner, when this german driver blocked the wheels and stopped his car, causing the drivers behind him to spoil their fast laps.
Revised:  During the saturday's qualification Michael Schumacher made a strange mistake in the La Rascasse corner, when this german driver blocked the wheels and stopped his car, causing the drivers behind him to lose time on their their fast laps.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  After a long investigation FIA decided to cancel all his fast laps as a penalty for an unsporting behaviour .
Revised:  After a long investigation FIA decided to cancel all his fast laps as a penalty for the unsporting behaviour displayed by him .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Article 112 of the regulations, applied by FIA, prevents the F1 team (Ferrari ) to appeal this decision.
Revised:  Article 112 of the regulations, applied by FIA, prevents the F1 team Ferrari to appeal this decision.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Thus, Schumacher and Felipe Massa, who crashed his car earlier in the qualification, closed the starting grid.
Revised:  Thus, Schumacher and Felipe Massa, who crashed his car earlier in the qualification, were last on the starting grid.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:   Ferrari team decided to change all two engines, because it couldn't lead to any worse penalty .
Revised:  The Ferrari team decided to change all two engines, because it couldn't lead to any worse penalty .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:   Ferrari team decided to change all two engines, because it couldn't lead to any worse penalty .
Revised:  Ferrari team decided to change all two engines, because there was no more stringent penalty that could have been imposed on them .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Michael started the race from  pit-lane.
Revised:  Michael started the race from the pit-lane.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Alonso had a great race, driving in the lead for the most of the race.
Revised:  Alonso was in the lead for the most of the race.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Tough luck for Kimi Raikkonen and Mark Webber, who were the only serious competitors to Alonso for the first part of the race and who lost their cars (due to engine failure) almost simultaneously, one by one.
Revised:  Kimi Raikkonen and Mark Webber, who were the only serious competitors to Alonso for the first part of the race and who lost their cars (due to engine failure) almost simultaneously, one by one.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Tough luck for Kimi Raikkonen and Mark Webber, who were the only serious competitors to Alonso for the first part of the race and who lost their cars (due to engine failure) almost simultaneously, one by one.
Revised:  Tough luck for Kimi Raikkonen and Mark Webber, who were the only serious competitors to Alonso for the first part of the race lost their cars (due to engine failure) almost simultaneously, one by one.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  After that Alonso finished the race all alone .
Revised:  After that Alonso drove to victory with little opposition from the other drivers .
Edit intent: clarity