wanyu/IteraTeR_v2 huggingface dataset:
Original:  Residents and business owners will still fight Despite the Council's approval, organizers have scheduled another protest that will be held this Saturday  March 25, 2006 at 2: 00pm on Forest and Elmwood.
Revised:  Residents and business owners will still fight Despite the Council's approval, organizers have scheduled another protest that will be held this Saturday March 25, 2006 at 2: 00 p.m. on Forest and Elmwood.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Some citizens are even considering legal action and are considering an "injunction in State Supreme Court  " going "pro se, meaning I am going to present the case myself," said Clarence Carnahan to said Wikinews , a concerned citizen and local business owner who is opposed to the hotel  .
Revised:  Some citizens are even considering legal action and are considering an "injunction in State Supreme Court , " going "pro se, meaning I am going to present the case myself," said Clarence Carnahan to said Wikinews , a concerned citizen and local business owner who is opposed to the hotel .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Some citizens are even considering legal action and are considering an "injunction in State Supreme Court  " going "pro se, meaning I am going to present the case myself," said Clarence Carnahan to said Wikinews , a concerned citizen and local business owner who is opposed to the hotel  .
Revised:  Some citizens are even considering legal action and are considering an "injunction in State Supreme Court " going "pro se, meaning I am going to present the case myself," said Clarence Carnahan , a concerned citizen and local business owner who is opposed to the hotel .
Edit intent: coherence
Original: Carnahan also wrote a "notice of cease and desist" that was also presented to the Council at today's meeting.
Revised: Carnahan wrote a "notice of cease and desist" that was also presented to the Council at today's meeting.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Carnahan also wrote a "notice of cease and desist" that was also presented to the Council at today's meeting.
Revised: Carnahan also wrote a "notice of cease and desist" which was also presented to the Council at today's meeting.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Patty Morris, co-owner of Don Apparel with Nancy Pollina  said, " we are going to fight the good fight to the bitter end, but we cannot afford it [legal action].
Revised:  Patty Morris, co-owner of Don Apparel with Nancy Pollina , said, " we are going to fight the good fight to the bitter end, but we cannot afford it [legal action].
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Patty Morris, co-owner of Don Apparel with Nancy Pollina  said, " we are going to fight the good fight to the bitter end, but we cannot afford it [legal action].
Revised:  Patty Morris, co-owner of Don Apparel with Nancy Pollina said, " We are going to fight the good fight to the bitter end, but we cannot afford it [legal action].
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Now its a legal matter, and its in the hands of the law  and I know there are some people very interested in hiring a lawyer."
Revised:  Now it's a legal matter, and its in the hands of the law and I know there are some people very interested in hiring a lawyer."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Now its a legal matter, and its in the hands of the law  and I know there are some people very interested in hiring a lawyer."
Revised:  Now its a legal matter, and it's in the hands of the law and I know there are some people very interested in hiring a lawyer."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Now its a legal matter, and its in the hands of the law  and I know there are some people very interested in hiring a lawyer."
Revised:  Now its a legal matter, and its in the hands of the law , and I know there are some people very interested in hiring a lawyer."
Edit intent: fluency
Original: January 25, 2005 The FBI has won a battle making it so that there is limited access for the public to see the government's "Classified" files.
Revised:  The FBI has won a battle making it so that there is limited access for the public to see the government's "Classified" files.
Edit intent: coherence
Original: The FBI has won a battle making it so that there is limited access for the public to see the government's "Classified" files.
Revised: The FBI has won a battle making it so that members of the public have only limited access to see the government's "Classified" files.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation - an internal security organisation - has won a battle making it so that members of the public  have only limited access to see the government's "Classified" files.
Revised: The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation — an internal security organisation - has won a battle making it so that members of the public have only limited access to see the government's "Classified" files.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation - an internal security organisation - has won a battle making it so that members of the public  have only limited access to see the government's "Classified" files.
Revised: The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation - an internal security organisation — has won a battle making it so that members of the public have only limited access to see the government's "Classified" files.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation - an internal security organisation - has won a battle making it so that members of the public  have only limited access to see the government's "Classified" files.
Revised: The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation - an internal security organisation - has won a battle that could allow members of the public have only limited access to see the government's "Classified" files.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation - an internal security organisation - has won a battle making it so that members of the public  have only limited access to see the government's "Classified" files.
Revised: The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation - an internal security organisation - has won a battle making it so that members of the public to have only limited access to see the government's "Classified" files.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Many people feel that this is a violation of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)  which states that the public may view files of the classified nature, and in the FBI's case this may be being denied.
Revised:  Some feel this is a violation of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) which states that the public may view files of the classified nature, and in the FBI's case this may be being denied.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Many people feel that this is a violation of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)  which states that the public may view files of the classified nature, and in the FBI's case this may be being denied.
Revised:  Many people feel that this is a violation of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) , which states that the public may view files of the classified nature, and in the FBI's case this may be being denied.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation— an internal security organisation —has won a battle that could allow members of the public to have only limited access to see the government's "Classified" files.
Revised: The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation— an internal security organisation —has won a battle that could make it much harder for the public to have only limited access to see the government's "Classified" files.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation— an internal security organisation —has won a battle that could allow members of the public to have only limited access to see the government's "Classified" files.
Revised: The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation— an internal security organisation —has won a battle that could allow members of the public to access its files.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Some feel this is a violation of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which states that the public may view files of the unclassified category , but from the perspective of the FBI, the burden of doing complete searches is unreasonable.
Revised:  Some feel this is a violation of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which states that the public may view files of the unclassified category . From the perspective of the FBI, the burden of doing complete searches is unreasonable.
Edit intent: coherence
Original: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Critics of the government case, from the fields of journalism and academic law, contend that it is possible that the transferring of files from paper to electronic records is being used as an excuse to avoid doing complete searches that may turn up evidence of official wrongdoing. Referenc
Revised: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Referenc
Edit intent: coherence
Original: Less than a week after the ad was banned and  cleared for screening in the U.K. the ad, which features a bikini clad girl asking prospective tourists "Where the Bloody Hell are you?", has been banned in Canada.
Revised: Less than a week after it was banned and cleared for screening in the U.K. the ad, which features a bikini clad girl asking prospective tourists "Where the Bloody Hell are you?", has been banned in Canada.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Less than a week after the ad was banned and  cleared for screening in the U.K. the ad, which features a bikini clad girl asking prospective tourists "Where the Bloody Hell are you?", has been banned in Canada.
Revised: Less than a week after the ad was banned and then cleared for screening in the U.K. the ad, which features a bikini clad girl asking prospective tourists "Where the Bloody Hell are you?", has been banned in Canada.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  This line was ruled unnaceptable by the Canadian regulator as it shows an unbranded beer.
Revised:  This line was ruled unnaceptable by the Canadian regulator as it refers to an unbranded beer.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: Less than a week after it was banned and then cleared for screening in the U.K. the ad, which features a bikini clad girl asking prospective tourists  "Where the Bloody Hell are you?" , has been banned in Canada.
Revised: Less than a week after it was banned and then cleared for screening in the U.K. , the ad which features a bikini clad girl asking prospective tourists "Where the Bloody Hell are you?" , has been banned in Canada.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Less than a week after it was banned and then cleared for screening in the U.K. the ad, which features a bikini clad girl asking prospective tourists  "Where the Bloody Hell are you?" , has been banned in Canada.
Revised: Less than a week after it was banned and then cleared for screening in the U.K. the ad, which features a bikini clad girl asking prospective tourists , "Where the Bloody Hell are you?" , has been banned in Canada.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Less than a week after it was banned and then cleared for screening in the U.K. the ad, which features a bikini clad girl asking prospective tourists  "Where the Bloody Hell are you?" , has been banned in Canada.
Revised: Less than a week after it was banned and then cleared for screening in the U.K. the ad, which features a bikini clad girl asking prospective tourists "Where the Bloody Hell are you?" has been banned in Canada.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned- the line was described as "Warm, friendly and inviting , " - but the opening line  "We've poured you a beer."
Revised:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned — the line was described as "Warm, friendly and inviting , " - but the opening line "We've poured you a beer."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned- the line was described as "Warm, friendly and inviting , " - but the opening line  "We've poured you a beer."
Revised:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned- the line was described as "Warm, friendly and inviting " - but the opening line "We've poured you a beer."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned- the line was described as "Warm, friendly and inviting , " - but the opening line  "We've poured you a beer."
Revised:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned- the line was described as "Warm, friendly and inviting , " — but rather it was the opening line "We've poured you a beer."
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned- the line was described as "Warm, friendly and inviting , " - but the opening line  "We've poured you a beer."
Revised:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned- the line was described as "Warm, friendly and inviting , " - but the opening line , "We've poured you a beer."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  This line was ruled unnaceptable by the Canadian regulator  as it refers to an unbranded beer.
Revised:  This line was ruled unnaceptable by the Canadian regulator , as it refers to an unbranded beer.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Less than a week after it was first banned and then cleared for screening in the U.K., the ad which features a bikini clad girl asking prospective tourists , "Where the Bloody Hell are you?" has been banned in Canada.
Revised: Less than a week after it was first banned and then cleared for screening in the U.K., an ad featuring a bikini-clad girl asking prospective tourists , "Where the Bloody Hell are you?" has been banned in Canada.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Less than a week after it was first banned and then cleared for screening in the U.K., the ad which features a bikini clad girl asking prospective tourists , "Where the Bloody Hell are you?" has been banned in Canada.
Revised: Less than a week after it was first banned and then cleared for screening in the U.K., the ad which features a bikini clad girl asking prospective tourists "Where the Bloody Hell are you?" has been banned in Canada.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned — the line was described as " Warm , friendly and inviting" — but rather it was the opening line, "We've poured you a beer."
Revised:  Ironically , it wasn't the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned — the line was described as " Warm , friendly and inviting" — but rather it was the opening line, "We've poured you a beer."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned — the line was described as " Warm , friendly and inviting" — but rather it was the opening line, "We've poured you a beer."
Revised:  Ironically it is not the controversial question — the line was described as " Warm , friendly and inviting" — but rather it was the opening line, "We've poured you a beer."
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned — the line was described as " Warm , friendly and inviting" — but rather it was the opening line, "We've poured you a beer."
Revised:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned — a line described as " Warm , friendly and inviting" — but rather it was the opening line, "We've poured you a beer."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned — the line was described as " Warm , friendly and inviting" — but rather it was the opening line, "We've poured you a beer."
Revised:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned — the line was described as " warm , friendly and inviting" — but rather it was the opening line, "We've poured you a beer."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned — the line was described as " Warm , friendly and inviting" — but rather it was the opening line, "We've poured you a beer."
Revised:  Ironically it is not the controversial question that has caused the ad to be banned — the line was described as " Warm , friendly and inviting" — that got the ad banned, but its opening: "We've poured you a beer."
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  This line was ruled unnaceptable by the Canadian regulator, as it refers to an unbranded beer.
Revised:  This line was ruled unacceptable by the Canadian regulator, as it refers to an unbranded beer.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Australian Tourism Minister Fran Bailey was "quite astonished , " by the move but has thanked the Canadian government for providing free publicity for the ad, saying, "As far as this particular Canadian regulator is concerned, I'd love him to come out here and I'll buy him a beer and say thank-you.
Revised:  Australian Tourism Minister Fran Bailey was "quite astonished " by the move but has thanked the Canadian government for providing free publicity for the ad, saying, "As far as this particular Canadian regulator is concerned, I'd love him to come out here and I'll buy him a beer and say thank-you.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Some analyists have been say this could put some computer manufacturers into turmoil.
Revised:  Some analysts have said this could put some computer manufacturers into turmoil.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Originally due out by the end of 2006, Windows Vista now has a release date for January 2007.
Revised:  Originally due out by the end of 2006, Windows Vista now has a release target of January, 2007.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  One of the main reasons behind the delay was security issues.
Revised:  One of the main factors behind the delay was security issues.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Some analysts have said this could put some computer manufacturers into turmoil.
Revised:  Analysts have said this could put some computer manufacturers into turmoil.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  A new  version will be available for November 2006 to the corporate customers.
Revised:  A new version will be available in November, 2006 to the corporate customers.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  A new  version will be available for November 2006 to the corporate customers.
Revised:  A new version will be available for November 2006 to corporate customers.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The second reason , as a result of this delay, is that computer hardware manufacturers and resellers will generally not have enough time to prepare for a holiday 2006 launch.
Revised:  The second reason , as a result of this delay, computer hardware manufacturers and resellers will generally not have enough time to prepare for a holiday 2006 launch.
Edit intent: coherence
Original: The Queen of the North,which is not normally used on this route, is larger than the normally used vessel, the Queen of Prince Rupert.
Revised: The Queen of the North,which is not normally used on this route, is larger than the normally used vessel, the Queen of Prince 
Edit intent: coherence
Original: At approximately 12:43 a.m. on Wednesday, March 22, the ferry Queen of the North hit a rock off Gill Island in Wright Sound  .
Revised: At approximately 12:43 a.m. on Wednesday, March 22, the ferry Queen of the North hit a rock near Gill Island in Wright Sound .
Edit intent: clarity
Original: At approximately 12:43 a.m. on Wednesday, March 22, the British Columbia ferry MV Queen of the North hit a rock near Gill Island in Wright Sound, off the coast of Port Hardy in British Columbia after veering off course (the captain was not on the bridge at the time of the accident) .
Revised: At approximately 12:43 a.m. on Wednesday, March 22, the British Columbia ferry MV Queen of the North hit a rock near Gill Island in Wright Sound, off the coast of Port Hardy in British Columbia after veering off course .
Edit intent: coherence
Original: At approximately 12:43 a.m. on Wednesday, March 22, the British Columbia ferry MV Queen of the North hit a rock near Gill Island in Wright Sound, off the coast of Port Hardy in British Columbia after veering off course.
Revised: At approximately 12:43 a.m. on Wednesday, March 22, the British Columbia ferry MV Queen of the North hit a rock near Gil Island in Wright Sound, off the coast of Port Hardy in British Columbia after veering off course.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  "It will also make sure that all airlines operating in Europe's skies meet the highest safety standards.   
Revised:  "It will also make sure that all airlines operating in Europe's skies meet the highest safety standards. " 
Edit intent: fluency
Original: A permanent end to hostilities by ETA was a condition set by the Socialist Government of Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero for beginning negotiations with the organisation . ETA Statement%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Following is the full text of ETA's statement translated by Reuters: "A message from Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (ETA) to the Basque people.
Revised: A permanent end to hostilities by ETA was a condition set by the Socialist Government of Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero for beginning negotiations with the organisation ETA Statement%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Following is the full text of ETA's statement translated by Reuters: "A message from Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (ETA) to the Basque people.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: A permanent end to hostilities by ETA was a condition set by the Socialist Government of Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero for beginning negotiations with the organisation . ETA Statement%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Following is the full text of ETA's statement translated by Reuters: "A message from Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (ETA) to the Basque people.
Revised: A permanent end to hostilities by ETA was a condition set by the Socialist Government of Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero for beginning negotiations with the organisation . %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Following is the full text of ETA's statement translated by Reuters: "A message from Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (ETA) to the Basque people.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: A permanent end to hostilities by ETA was a condition set by the Socialist Government of Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero for beginning negotiations with the organisation . ETA Statement%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Following is the full text of ETA's statement translated by Reuters: "A message from Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (ETA) to the Basque people.
Revised: A permanent end to hostilities by ETA was a condition set by the Socialist Government of Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero for beginning negotiations with the organisation . ETA Statement%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% "A message from Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (ETA) to the Basque people.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Finally, we call on Basque citizens to become involved in this process and fight for the rights we deserve as a people."%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% "ETA has shown its desire and will that the process now begun should reach a conclusion and thus achieve true democracy in the Basque country, overcoming long years of violence and constructing a peace based on justice."
Revised:  Finally, we call on Basque citizens to become involved in this process and fight for the rights we deserve as a people."%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% 
Edit intent: coherence
Original: Full text of ETA cease-fire statement (Translated from Spanish) Euskadi Ta Askatasuna  has decided to declare a permanent cease-fire from 00:00 AM on the 24 of March 2006.
Revised: Full text of ETA cease-fire statement (Translated from Spanish) Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (ETA) has decided to declare a permanent cease-fire from 00:00 AM on the 24 of March 2006.
Edit intent: clarity