wanyu/IteraTeR_v2 huggingface dataset:
Original:  Danie Visser Jim Grabb Richey Reneberg 4–6, 5–7Winner 9. 1992 Johannesburg, South Africa Hard Danie Visser Wayne Ferreira Piet Norval 6–4, 6–4Runner-up 10. 1992 Nice, France Clay Danie Visser Patrick Galbraith Scott Melville 1–6, 6–3, 4–6 Doubles performance timeline Tournament 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 Career SR Career Win-Loss Grand SlamsAustralian OpenANHAA3RW1R3R1 / 410– 2French OpenAAA1RAQFA2R0 / 34 –
Revised:  Danie Visser Jim Grabb Richey Reneberg 4–6, 5–7Winner 9. 1992 Johannesburg, South Africa Hard Danie Visser Wayne Ferreira Piet Norval 6–4, 6–4Runner-up 10. 1992 Nice, France Clay Danie Visser Patrick Galbraith Scott Melville 1–6, 6–3, 4–6 Doubles performance timeline Tournament 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 Career SR Career W-L Grand Slam tournaments Australian OpenANHAA3RW1R3R1 / 410– 2French OpenAAA1RAQFA2R0 / 34 –
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  3WimbledonAA3RQFQFFA1R0 / 513– 5U.S. OpenAA1R1R3RWAA1 / 46 –3Grand Slam SR0 / 00 / 00 / 20 / 30 / 32 / 40 / 10 / 32 / 16N/AAnnual Win-Loss0– 00 –02– 23 –36– 219 –20– 13 –3N/A33–13 Year End Ranking7934061411612''' 127873N/A
Revised:  3 WimbledonAA3RQFQFFA1R0 / 513– 5U.S. OpenAA1R1R3RWAA1 / 46 –3Grand Slam SR0 / 00 / 00 / 20 / 30 / 32 / 40 / 10 / 32 / 16N/AAnnual Win-Loss0– 00 –02– 23 –36– 219 –20– 13 –3N/A33–13 Year End Ranking7934061411612''' 127873N/A
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  U.S. Hard Danie Visser Jorge Lozano Todd Witsken 3–6, 6– 7Runner-up 4. 1989 Sydney Outdoor, Australia Hard Danie Visser Darren Cahill Wally Masur 4–6, 3– 6Runner-up 5. 1989 Stratton Mountain, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Mark Kratzmann Wally Masur 3–6, 6–4, 6– 7Winner 2. 1989 Indianapolis, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Peter Doohan Laurie Warder 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 6. 1989 Cincinnati, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Ken Flach Robert Seguso 4–6, 4– 6Winner 3. 1989 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Revised:  U.S. Hard Danie Visser Jorge Lozano Todd Witsken 3–6, 6– 7Loss 4. 1989 Sydney Outdoor, Australia Hard Danie Visser Darren Cahill Wally Masur 4–6, 3– 6Runner-up 5. 1989 Stratton Mountain, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Mark Kratzmann Wally Masur 3–6, 6–4, 6– 7Winner 2. 1989 Indianapolis, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Peter Doohan Laurie Warder 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 6. 1989 Cincinnati, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Ken Flach Robert Seguso 4–6, 4– 6Winner 3. 1989 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  U.S. Hard Danie Visser Jorge Lozano Todd Witsken 3–6, 6– 7Runner-up 4. 1989 Sydney Outdoor, Australia Hard Danie Visser Darren Cahill Wally Masur 4–6, 3– 6Runner-up 5. 1989 Stratton Mountain, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Mark Kratzmann Wally Masur 3–6, 6–4, 6– 7Winner 2. 1989 Indianapolis, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Peter Doohan Laurie Warder 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 6. 1989 Cincinnati, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Ken Flach Robert Seguso 4–6, 4– 6Winner 3. 1989 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Revised:  U.S. Hard Danie Visser Jorge Lozano Todd Witsken 3–6, 6– 7Runner-up 4. 1989 Sydney Outdoor, Australia Hard Danie Visser Darren Cahill Wally Masur 4–6, 3– 6Loss 5. 1989 Stratton Mountain, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Mark Kratzmann Wally Masur 3–6, 6–4, 6– 7Winner 2. 1989 Indianapolis, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Peter Doohan Laurie Warder 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 6. 1989 Cincinnati, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Ken Flach Robert Seguso 4–6, 4– 6Winner 3. 1989 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  U.S. Hard Danie Visser Jorge Lozano Todd Witsken 3–6, 6– 7Runner-up 4. 1989 Sydney Outdoor, Australia Hard Danie Visser Darren Cahill Wally Masur 4–6, 3– 6Runner-up 5. 1989 Stratton Mountain, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Mark Kratzmann Wally Masur 3–6, 6–4, 6– 7Winner 2. 1989 Indianapolis, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Peter Doohan Laurie Warder 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 6. 1989 Cincinnati, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Ken Flach Robert Seguso 4–6, 4– 6Winner 3. 1989 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Revised:  U.S. Hard Danie Visser Jorge Lozano Todd Witsken 3–6, 6– 7Runner-up 4. 1989 Sydney Outdoor, Australia Hard Danie Visser Darren Cahill Wally Masur 4–6, 3– 6Runner-up 5. 1989 Stratton Mountain, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Mark Kratzmann Wally Masur 3–6, 6–4, 6– 7Win 2. 1989 Indianapolis, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Peter Doohan Laurie Warder 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 6. 1989 Cincinnati, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Ken Flach Robert Seguso 4–6, 4– 6Winner 3. 1989 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  U.S. Hard Danie Visser Jorge Lozano Todd Witsken 3–6, 6– 7Runner-up 4. 1989 Sydney Outdoor, Australia Hard Danie Visser Darren Cahill Wally Masur 4–6, 3– 6Runner-up 5. 1989 Stratton Mountain, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Mark Kratzmann Wally Masur 3–6, 6–4, 6– 7Winner 2. 1989 Indianapolis, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Peter Doohan Laurie Warder 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 6. 1989 Cincinnati, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Ken Flach Robert Seguso 4–6, 4– 6Winner 3. 1989 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Revised:  U.S. Hard Danie Visser Jorge Lozano Todd Witsken 3–6, 6– 7Runner-up 4. 1989 Sydney Outdoor, Australia Hard Danie Visser Darren Cahill Wally Masur 4–6, 3– 6Runner-up 5. 1989 Stratton Mountain, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Mark Kratzmann Wally Masur 3–6, 6–4, 6– 7Winner 2. 1989 Indianapolis, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Peter Doohan Laurie Warder 7–6, 7– 6Loss 6. 1989 Cincinnati, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Ken Flach Robert Seguso 4–6, 4– 6Winner 3. 1989 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  U.S. Hard Danie Visser Jorge Lozano Todd Witsken 3–6, 6– 7Runner-up 4. 1989 Sydney Outdoor, Australia Hard Danie Visser Darren Cahill Wally Masur 4–6, 3– 6Runner-up 5. 1989 Stratton Mountain, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Mark Kratzmann Wally Masur 3–6, 6–4, 6– 7Winner 2. 1989 Indianapolis, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Peter Doohan Laurie Warder 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 6. 1989 Cincinnati, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Ken Flach Robert Seguso 4–6, 4– 6Winner 3. 1989 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Revised:  U.S. Hard Danie Visser Jorge Lozano Todd Witsken 3–6, 6– 7Runner-up 4. 1989 Sydney Outdoor, Australia Hard Danie Visser Darren Cahill Wally Masur 4–6, 3– 6Runner-up 5. 1989 Stratton Mountain, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Mark Kratzmann Wally Masur 3–6, 6–4, 6– 7Winner 2. 1989 Indianapolis, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Peter Doohan Laurie Warder 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 6. 1989 Cincinnati, U.S. Hard Danie Visser Ken Flach Robert Seguso 4–6, 4– 6Win 3. 1989 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Danie Visser Paul Annacone Christo van Rensburg 6–4, 6– 3Winner 4. 1989 Frankfurt, Germany Carpet (i)
Revised:  Danie Visser Paul Annacone Christo van Rensburg 6–4, 6– 3Win 4. 1989 Frankfurt, Germany Carpet (i)
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  5– 7Winner 5. 1990 Australian Open,
Revised:  5– 7Win 5. 1990 Australian Open,
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  4–6, 6–1, 6– 4Runner-up 8. 1990 Wimbledon, London Grass Danie Visser Rick Leach Jim Pugh 6–7, 6–7, 6– 7Winner 6. 1990 Stuttgart Outdoor, Germany Clay Danie Visser Per Henricsson Nicklas Utgren 6–3, 6– 4Winner 7. 1990 US Open, New York Hard Danie Visser Paul Annacone David Wheaton 6–2, 7–6, 6– 2Winner 8. 1990 Berlin, Germany Carpet Danie Visser Kevin Curren Patrick Galbraith 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 9. 1992 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Revised:  4–6, 6–1, 6– 4Loss 8. 1990 Wimbledon, London Grass Danie Visser Rick Leach Jim Pugh 6–7, 6–7, 6– 7Winner 6. 1990 Stuttgart Outdoor, Germany Clay Danie Visser Per Henricsson Nicklas Utgren 6–3, 6– 4Winner 7. 1990 US Open, New York Hard Danie Visser Paul Annacone David Wheaton 6–2, 7–6, 6– 2Winner 8. 1990 Berlin, Germany Carpet Danie Visser Kevin Curren Patrick Galbraith 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 9. 1992 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  4–6, 6–1, 6– 4Runner-up 8. 1990 Wimbledon, London Grass Danie Visser Rick Leach Jim Pugh 6–7, 6–7, 6– 7Winner 6. 1990 Stuttgart Outdoor, Germany Clay Danie Visser Per Henricsson Nicklas Utgren 6–3, 6– 4Winner 7. 1990 US Open, New York Hard Danie Visser Paul Annacone David Wheaton 6–2, 7–6, 6– 2Winner 8. 1990 Berlin, Germany Carpet Danie Visser Kevin Curren Patrick Galbraith 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 9. 1992 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Revised:  4–6, 6–1, 6– 4Runner-up 8. 1990 Wimbledon, London Grass Danie Visser Rick Leach Jim Pugh 6–7, 6–7, 6– 7Win 6. 1990 Stuttgart Outdoor, Germany Clay Danie Visser Per Henricsson Nicklas Utgren 6–3, 6– 4Winner 7. 1990 US Open, New York Hard Danie Visser Paul Annacone David Wheaton 6–2, 7–6, 6– 2Winner 8. 1990 Berlin, Germany Carpet Danie Visser Kevin Curren Patrick Galbraith 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 9. 1992 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  4–6, 6–1, 6– 4Runner-up 8. 1990 Wimbledon, London Grass Danie Visser Rick Leach Jim Pugh 6–7, 6–7, 6– 7Winner 6. 1990 Stuttgart Outdoor, Germany Clay Danie Visser Per Henricsson Nicklas Utgren 6–3, 6– 4Winner 7. 1990 US Open, New York Hard Danie Visser Paul Annacone David Wheaton 6–2, 7–6, 6– 2Winner 8. 1990 Berlin, Germany Carpet Danie Visser Kevin Curren Patrick Galbraith 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 9. 1992 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Revised:  4–6, 6–1, 6– 4Runner-up 8. 1990 Wimbledon, London Grass Danie Visser Rick Leach Jim Pugh 6–7, 6–7, 6– 7Winner 6. 1990 Stuttgart Outdoor, Germany Clay Danie Visser Per Henricsson Nicklas Utgren 6–3, 6– 4Win 7. 1990 US Open, New York Hard Danie Visser Paul Annacone David Wheaton 6–2, 7–6, 6– 2Winner 8. 1990 Berlin, Germany Carpet Danie Visser Kevin Curren Patrick Galbraith 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 9. 1992 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  4–6, 6–1, 6– 4Runner-up 8. 1990 Wimbledon, London Grass Danie Visser Rick Leach Jim Pugh 6–7, 6–7, 6– 7Winner 6. 1990 Stuttgart Outdoor, Germany Clay Danie Visser Per Henricsson Nicklas Utgren 6–3, 6– 4Winner 7. 1990 US Open, New York Hard Danie Visser Paul Annacone David Wheaton 6–2, 7–6, 6– 2Winner 8. 1990 Berlin, Germany Carpet Danie Visser Kevin Curren Patrick Galbraith 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 9. 1992 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Revised:  4–6, 6–1, 6– 4Runner-up 8. 1990 Wimbledon, London Grass Danie Visser Rick Leach Jim Pugh 6–7, 6–7, 6– 7Winner 6. 1990 Stuttgart Outdoor, Germany Clay Danie Visser Per Henricsson Nicklas Utgren 6–3, 6– 4Winner 7. 1990 US Open, New York Hard Danie Visser Paul Annacone David Wheaton 6–2, 7–6, 6– 2Win 8. 1990 Berlin, Germany Carpet Danie Visser Kevin Curren Patrick Galbraith 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 9. 1992 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  4–6, 6–1, 6– 4Runner-up 8. 1990 Wimbledon, London Grass Danie Visser Rick Leach Jim Pugh 6–7, 6–7, 6– 7Winner 6. 1990 Stuttgart Outdoor, Germany Clay Danie Visser Per Henricsson Nicklas Utgren 6–3, 6– 4Winner 7. 1990 US Open, New York Hard Danie Visser Paul Annacone David Wheaton 6–2, 7–6, 6– 2Winner 8. 1990 Berlin, Germany Carpet Danie Visser Kevin Curren Patrick Galbraith 7–6, 7– 6Runner-up 9. 1992 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Revised:  4–6, 6–1, 6– 4Runner-up 8. 1990 Wimbledon, London Grass Danie Visser Rick Leach Jim Pugh 6–7, 6–7, 6– 7Winner 6. 1990 Stuttgart Outdoor, Germany Clay Danie Visser Per Henricsson Nicklas Utgren 6–3, 6– 4Winner 7. 1990 US Open, New York Hard Danie Visser Paul Annacone David Wheaton 6–2, 7–6, 6– 2Winner 8. 1990 Berlin, Germany Carpet Danie Visser Kevin Curren Patrick Galbraith 7–6, 7– 6Loss 9. 1992 San Francisco, U.S. Hard (i)
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Danie Visser Jim Grabb Richey Reneberg 4–6, 5– 7Winner 9. 1992 Johannesburg, South Africa Hard Danie Visser Wayne Ferreira Piet Norval 6–4, 6– 4Runner-up 10. 1992 Nice, France Clay Danie Visser Patrick Galbraith Scott Melville 1–6, 6–3, 4–6
Revised:  Danie Visser Jim Grabb Richey Reneberg 4–6, 5– 7Win 9. 1992 Johannesburg, South Africa Hard Danie Visser Wayne Ferreira Piet Norval 6–4, 6– 4Runner-up 10. 1992 Nice, France Clay Danie Visser Patrick Galbraith Scott Melville 1–6, 6–3, 4–6
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Danie Visser Jim Grabb Richey Reneberg 4–6, 5– 7Winner 9. 1992 Johannesburg, South Africa Hard Danie Visser Wayne Ferreira Piet Norval 6–4, 6– 4Runner-up 10. 1992 Nice, France Clay Danie Visser Patrick Galbraith Scott Melville 1–6, 6–3, 4–6
Revised:  Danie Visser Jim Grabb Richey Reneberg 4–6, 5– 7Winner 9. 1992 Johannesburg, South Africa Hard Danie Visser Wayne Ferreira Piet Norval 6–4, 6– 4Loss 10. 1992 Nice, France Clay Danie Visser Patrick Galbraith Scott Melville 1–6, 6–3, 4–6
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Some have proposed that morning sickness may be useful from an evolutionary point of view, arguing that morning sickness may protect both the pregnant woman and the developing embryo just when the fetus is most vulnerable , and can show that the embryo and fetus is developing normally and is healthy . Diagnosis should only occur after other possible causes have been ruled out.
Revised:  Some have proposed that morning sickness may be useful from an evolutionary point of view, arguing that morning sickness may protect both the pregnant woman and the developing embryo just when the fetus is most vulnerable . Diagnosis should only occur after other possible causes have been ruled out.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Nausea and vomiting may also occur with molar pregnancy   .
Revised:  Nausea and vomiting may also occur with molar pregnancy . .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Generally, mild to moderate cases have no effect on the baby , and most severe cases also have normal outcomes.
Revised:  Generally, mild to moderate cases have no effect on the fetus , and most severe cases also have normal outcomes.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Defense mechanism Morning sickness may be an evolved trait that protects the baby against toxins ingested by the mother.
Revised:  Defense mechanism Morning sickness may be an evolved trait that protects the fetus against toxins ingested by the mother.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  This relationship between the time at which the embryo is most susceptible to toxins lines up exactly  when the most severe NVP symptoms are seen, suggesting that this NVP is an evolutionary response developed in the mother, to indicate the sensitivity of the fetus hence making her wary to her health and in turn protecting the fetus.
Revised:  This relationship between the time at which the embryo is most susceptible to toxins lines up exactly with when the most severe NVP symptoms are seen, suggesting that this NVP is an evolutionary response developed in the mother, to indicate the sensitivity of the fetus hence making her wary to her health and in turn protecting the fetus.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: Early life Kiir was born in 1951 into a pastoral Dinka family in the village of Akon in the Awan-Chan Dinka community in Gogrial County, in the historical Warrap state, South Sudan, as the eighth of nine children (six boys and three girls) in the family.
Revised: Early life Kiir was born in 1951 into a pastoral Dinka family in the village of Akon in the Awan-Chan Dinka community in Gogrial County, South Sudan, as the eighth of nine children (six boys and three girls) in the family.
Edit intent: coherence
Original: Controversy of alleged marriage to daughter of William Nyuon In a politically charged social issue, it has been claimed that Kiir secretly married the daughter of former comrade, the late William Nyuon Bany, an ethnic Nuer and former leader of the SPLA.
Revised: Marriage controversy In a politically charged social issue, it has been claimed that Kiir secretly married the daughter of former comrade, the late William Nyuon Bany, an ethnic Nuer and former leader of the SPLA.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  He now rarely makes public appearances without his hat   .
Revised:  He now rarely makes public appearances without his hat . .
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Zvi "Zvika" Greengold (born 1952), national hero in Israel Zvika Hadar (born 1966), Israeli actor, comedian and television host .
Revised: Zvi "Zvika" Greengold (born 1952), national hero in Israel Zvika Hadar (born 1966), Israeli actor, comedian and television host 
Edit intent: clarity
Original:    Criticism Critics have voiced concerns about screen reading, though some have taken a more positive stance.
Revised: Comparisons to Reading Printed Text Since the first notion of screen reading, many studies have been performed to discern any differences between reading off of an electronic device and reading off of a paper. In a 2013 study, a group of 72 high school students in Norway were randomly assigned into one of two groups: one that read using PDF files on a computer and one that used standard paper. The students were put through various tests involving reading-comprehension and vocabulary. The results indicated that those who read using the PDF files performed much worse than those reading off of a paper. A conclusion was reached that certain aspects of screen reading, such as scrolling, can impede comprehension. Criticism Critics have voiced concerns about screen reading, though some have taken a more positive stance.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:    Criticism Critics have voiced concerns about screen reading, though some have taken a more positive stance.
Revised:  However, not all experiments have concluded that reading from a digitized screen can be detrimental. The same year, another experiment was conducted on 90 undergraduates at a college in Western New York involving paper reading, computer reading, and e-book reading. Like the children in the Norwegian experiment, the students were tested for comprehension upon reading a number of passages: five focused around facts and information and the other five based on narratives. No significant difference was found between any of the different forms of reading for either type of passage. However, the researchers noted that due to the participants being college students who were accustomed to using technology, they may react differently to reading on electronic devices than older individuals. Criticism Critics have voiced concerns about screen reading, though some have taken a more positive stance.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:    Criticism Critics have voiced concerns about screen reading, though some have taken a more positive stance.
Revised:  A study conducted in 2014 by Tirza Lauterman and Rakefet Ackerman allowed subjects the option to choose between reading digitally or reading printed pages. The results found that those who chose to read digitally performed worse than those who used print. However, by practicing with PDF files, subjects that preferred to read on computers were able to overcome what researchers labeled as “screen inferiority” and managed to score just as well as paper readers, who did not improve with practice. Lauterman and Ackerman concluded that the study supported the idea that screen reading is shallower than paper reading, but that with practice the shallowness can be removed as an impediment. No conclusion has yet been reached among professionals regarding whether or not reading on a screen is significantly different than reading printed text. Criticism Critics have voiced concerns about screen reading, though some have taken a more positive stance.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Anne Mangen holds that because of the materiality of a printed book the reader is more engaged with a text, while the opposite is true with a digital text in which the reader is engaged in a "shallower, less focused way".
Revised:  Anne Mangen holds that because of the materialist nature of a printed book the reader is more engaged with a text, while the opposite is true with a digital text in which the reader is engaged in a "shallower, less focused way".
Edit intent: clarity
Original: Comparisons to Reading Printed Text Since the first notion of screen reading, many studies have been performed to discern any differences between reading off of an electronic device and reading off of a paper.
Revised: Comparisons to reading printed pext Since the first notion of screen reading, many studies have been performed to discern any differences between reading off of an electronic device and reading off of a paper.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  It is often contrasted with the act of reading a text on paper, in particular a printed text.
Revised:  It is often contrasted with the act of reading a text on paper, 
Edit intent: clarity
Original: Google Golden Triangle A similar study , using search results from the Google search engine, determined that readers primarily looked at a triangular area of the top and left side of the screen.
Revised: Google Golden Triangle A similar study , using search results from the Google search engine, indicated that readers primarily looked at a triangular area of the top and left side of the screen.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: F-Pattern In a 1997 study conducted by Jakob Nielsen, a leading web usability expert who co-founded usability consulting company Nielsen Norman Group with Donald Norman, it was discovered that generally people read 25\% slower on a computer screen in comparison with a printed page.
Revised: F-Pattern In a 1997 study conducted by Jakob Nielsen, a web usability expert who co-founded usability consulting company Nielsen Norman Group with Donald Norman, it was discovered that generally people read 25\% slower on a computer screen in comparison with a printed page.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: The muscle damage is most often the result of a crush injury, strenuous exercise, medications, or drug abuse .
Revised: The muscle damage is most often the result of a crush injury, strenuous exercise, medications, or a substance use disorder .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Crush and other physical injuries cause damage to muscle cells directly or interfere with blood supply, while non-physical causes interfere with muscle cell metabolism.
Revised:  Crash and other physical injuries cause damage to muscle cells directly or interfere with blood supply, while non-physical causes interfere with muscle cell metabolism.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Crash and other physical injuries cause damage to muscle cells directly or interfere with blood supply, while non-physical causes interfere with muscle cell metabolism.
Revised:  Crush and other physical injuries cause damage to muscle cells directly or interfere with blood supply, while non-physical causes interfere with muscle cell metabolism.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Blood tests show a creatine kinase  greater than 1,000 U/L, with severe disease being above 5,000-15,000 U/L.
Revised:  Blood tests show a creatine kinase activity greater than 1,000 U/L, with severe disease being above 5,000-15,000 U/L.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: Critical medical anthropology is a branch of medical anthropology that considers the political economy of health  and the effect of social inequality on people's health.
Revised: Critical medical anthropology is a branch of medical anthropology that considers the political economy of health , and the effect of social inequality on people's health.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Critical medical anthropology  is a branch of medical anthropology that applies critical theory in the consideration of the political economy of health, and the effect of social inequality on people's health.
Revised: Critical medical anthropology (CMA) is a branch of medical anthropology that applies critical theory in the consideration of the political economy of health, and the effect of social inequality on people's health.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  It puts emphasis on culture histories , rather than purely biomedical and social explanations of analyzing health .
Revised:  It puts emphasis on the structure of social relationships , rather than purely biomedical and social explanations of analyzing health .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  It  starts with the idea that every essential component of a human being reside in a biological structure   ]   . Thinking about health and medical treatment,there isa tendency to naturalize the process of health and illness.
Revised:  It starts with the idea that every essential component of a human being reside in a biological structure and texture] . Thinking about health and medical treatment,there isa tendency to naturalize the process of health and illness.
Edit intent: coherence