wanyu/IteraTeR_v2 huggingface dataset:
Original:  That the past is a psychological matrix which is not chosen, but , simultaneously is not deterministic of his or her personal identity, which results in the condition of Geworfenheit— the social alienation against which the human being struggles, which, paradoxically, leaves an opening towards freedom: 4th Edition: 2003.
Revised:  That the past is a psychological matrix which is not chosen, but at the same time not utterly binding or deterministic, results in the condition of Geworfenheit— the social alienation against which the human being struggles, which, paradoxically, leaves an opening towards freedom: 4th Edition: 2003.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  That the past is a psychological matrix which is not chosen, but , simultaneously is not deterministic of his or her personal identity, which results in the condition of Geworfenheit— the social alienation against which the human being struggles, which, paradoxically, leaves an opening towards freedom: 4th Edition: 2003.
Revised:  That the past is a psychological matrix which is not chosen, but , simultaneously is not deterministic of his or her personal identity, which results in the notion of Geworfenheit— the social alienation against which the human being struggles, which, paradoxically, leaves an opening towards freedom: 4th Edition: 2003.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  That the past is a psychological matrix which is not chosen, but , simultaneously is not deterministic of his or her personal identity, which results in the condition of Geworfenheit— the social alienation against which the human being struggles, which, paradoxically, leaves an opening towards freedom: 4th Edition: 2003.
Revised:  That the past is a psychological matrix which is not chosen, but , simultaneously is not deterministic of his or her personal identity, which results in the condition of Geworfenheit— a kind of alienation that human beings struggle against, 4th Edition: 2003.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  New York City: Fordham University Press. being's+non-+mastery+of+its+own+origin+and+its+referential+dependence+on+other+beings,+by+the+single+term,\%22\%22thrown-ness\%22\%28Geworfenheit\%29 p. 37. . .  The philosopher William J. Richardson said that Geworfenheit, the condition of being there by accident, “  must be understood in a purely ontological sense , as wishing to signify the matter-of-fact character of human finitude .” Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37.
Revised:  New York City: Fordham University Press. p. 37. . . The philosopher William J. Richardson said that Geworfenheit, the condition of being there by accident, “ must be understood in a purely ontological sense , as wishing to signify the matter-of-fact character of human finitude .” Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  New York City: Fordham University Press. being's+non-+mastery+of+its+own+origin+and+its+referential+dependence+on+other+beings,+by+the+single+term,\%22\%22thrown-ness\%22\%28Geworfenheit\%29 p. 37. . .  The philosopher William J. Richardson said that Geworfenheit, the condition of being there by accident, “  must be understood in a purely ontological sense , as wishing to signify the matter-of-fact character of human finitude .” Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37.
Revised:  New York City: Fordham University Press. being's+non-+mastery+of+its+own+origin+and+its+referential+dependence+on+other+beings,+by+the+single+term,\%22\%22thrown-ness\%22\%28Geworfenheit\%29 p. 37. . . The philosopher William J. Richardson said that Geworfenheit, the condition of being there by accident, “ For William J. Richardson, Geworfenheit " must be understood in a purely ontological sense , as wishing to signify the matter-of-fact character of human finitude .” Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  New York City: Fordham University Press. being's+non-+mastery+of+its+own+origin+and+its+referential+dependence+on+other+beings,+by+the+single+term,\%22\%22thrown-ness\%22\%28Geworfenheit\%29 p. 37. . .  The philosopher William J. Richardson said that Geworfenheit, the condition of being there by accident, “  must be understood in a purely ontological sense , as wishing to signify the matter-of-fact character of human finitude .” Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37.
Revised:  New York City: Fordham University Press. being's+non-+mastery+of+its+own+origin+and+its+referential+dependence+on+other+beings,+by+the+single+term,\%22\%22thrown-ness\%22\%28Geworfenheit\%29 p. 37. . . The philosopher William J. Richardson said that Geworfenheit, the condition of being there by accident, “ must be understood in a purely ontological sense as wishing to signify the matter-of-fact character of human finitude .” Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  New York City: Fordham University Press. being's+non-+mastery+of+its+own+origin+and+its+referential+dependence+on+other+beings,+by+the+single+term,\%22\%22thrown-ness\%22\%28Geworfenheit\%29 p. 37. . .  The philosopher William J. Richardson said that Geworfenheit, the condition of being there by accident, “  must be understood in a purely ontological sense , as wishing to signify the matter-of-fact character of human finitude .” Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37.
Revised:  New York City: Fordham University Press. being's+non-+mastery+of+its+own+origin+and+its+referential+dependence+on+other+beings,+by+the+single+term,\%22\%22thrown-ness\%22\%28Geworfenheit\%29 p. 37. . . The philosopher William J. Richardson said that Geworfenheit, the condition of being there by accident, “ must be understood in a purely ontological sense , as wishing to signify the matter-of-fact character of human finitude ". Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  That the word Thrown-ness is the most accurate translation of Geworfenheit to English , because “ [ other ] attractive translations , such as ‘abandon’,‘dereliction’,‘dejection’,etc ... . Are ]  [ inaccurate for being ] too rich with ontic, %DIFDELCMD < [%%% and anthropological connotations.
Revised:  That 's why "thrownness" is the best English word for Geworfenheit. Richardson: " [ other ] attractive translations , such as ‘abandon’,‘dereliction’,‘dejection’,etc ... . Are ] [ inaccurate for being ] too rich with ontic, %DIFDELCMD < [%%% and anthropological connotations.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  That the word Thrown-ness is the most accurate translation of Geworfenheit to English , because “ [ other ] attractive translations , such as ‘abandon’,‘dereliction’,‘dejection’,etc ... . Are ]  [ inaccurate for being ] too rich with ontic, %DIFDELCMD < [%%% and anthropological connotations.
Revised:  That the word Thrown-ness is the most accurate translation of Geworfenheit to English , because “ [ Other ] attractive translations , such as ‘abandon’,‘dereliction’,‘dejection’,etc ... . Are ] [ inaccurate for being ] too rich with ontic, %DIFDELCMD < [%%% and anthropological connotations.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  That the word Thrown-ness is the most accurate translation of Geworfenheit to English , because “ [ other ] attractive translations , such as ‘abandon’,‘dereliction’,‘dejection’,etc ... . Are ]  [ inaccurate for being ] too rich with ontic, %DIFDELCMD < [%%% and anthropological connotations.
Revised:  That the word Thrown-ness is the most accurate translation of Geworfenheit to English , because “ [ other ] attractive translations such as 'abandon,' 'dereliction,' 'dejection,' etc. ... . Are ] [ inaccurate for being ] too rich with ontic, %DIFDELCMD < [%%% and anthropological connotations.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  That the word Thrown-ness is the most accurate translation of Geworfenheit to English , because “ [ other ] attractive translations , such as ‘abandon’,‘dereliction’,‘dejection’,etc ... . Are ]  [ inaccurate for being ] too rich with ontic, %DIFDELCMD < [%%% and anthropological connotations.
Revised:  That the word Thrown-ness is the most accurate translation of Geworfenheit to English , because “ [ other ] attractive translations , such as ‘abandon’,‘dereliction’,‘dejection’,etc ... ] [ inaccurate for being ] too rich with ontic, %DIFDELCMD < [%%% and anthropological connotations.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  That the word Thrown-ness is the most accurate translation of Geworfenheit to English , because “ [ other ] attractive translations , such as ‘abandon’,‘dereliction’,‘dejection’,etc ... . Are ]  [ inaccurate for being ] too rich with ontic, %DIFDELCMD < [%%% and anthropological connotations.
Revised:  That the word Thrown-ness is the most accurate translation of Geworfenheit to English , because “ [ other ] attractive translations , such as ‘abandon’,‘dereliction’,‘dejection’,etc ... . Are ] are [ inaccurate for being ] too rich with ontic, %DIFDELCMD < [%%% and anthropological connotations.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  That the word Thrown-ness is the most accurate translation of Geworfenheit to English , because “ [ other ] attractive translations , such as ‘abandon’,‘dereliction’,‘dejection’,etc ... . Are ]  [ inaccurate for being ] too rich with ontic, %DIFDELCMD < [%%% and anthropological connotations.
Revised:  That the word Thrown-ness is the most accurate translation of Geworfenheit to English , because “ [ other ] attractive translations , such as ‘abandon’,‘dereliction’,‘dejection’,etc ... . Are ] [ dangerous because they are ] too rich with ontic, %DIFDELCMD < [%%% and anthropological connotations.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  That the word Thrown-ness is the most accurate translation of Geworfenheit to English , because “ [ other ] attractive translations , such as ‘abandon’,‘dereliction’,‘dejection’,etc ... . Are ]  [ inaccurate for being ] too rich with ontic, %DIFDELCMD < [%%% and anthropological connotations.
Revised:  That the word Thrown-ness is the most accurate translation of Geworfenheit to English , because “ [ other ] attractive translations , such as ‘abandon’,‘dereliction’,‘dejection’,etc ... . Are ] [ inaccurate for being ] too rich with ontic, %DIFDELCMD < [%%% anthropological connotations.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  We retain %DIFDELCMD < [%%% the word Thrown-ness as closest to the original , and, perhaps, least misleading %DIFDELCMD < [%%% English translation .”
Revised:  We retain %DIFDELCMD < [%%% Thrown-ness as closest to the original , and, perhaps, least misleading %DIFDELCMD < [%%% English translation .”
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  We retain %DIFDELCMD < [%%% the word Thrown-ness as closest to the original , and, perhaps, least misleading %DIFDELCMD < [%%% English translation .”
Revised:  We retain %DIFDELCMD < [%%% the word 'thrown-ness' as closest to the original , and, perhaps, least misleading %DIFDELCMD < [%%% English translation .”
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  We retain %DIFDELCMD < [%%% the word Thrown-ness as closest to the original , and, perhaps, least misleading %DIFDELCMD < [%%% English translation .”
Revised:  We retain %DIFDELCMD < [%%% the word Thrown-ness as closest to the original and, perhaps, least misleading %DIFDELCMD < [%%% English translation .”
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  We retain %DIFDELCMD < [%%% the word Thrown-ness as closest to the original , and, perhaps, least misleading %DIFDELCMD < [%%% English translation .”
Revised:  We retain %DIFDELCMD < [%%% the word Thrown-ness as closest to the original , and, perhaps, least misleading %DIFDELCMD < [%%% .”
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  We retain %DIFDELCMD < [%%% the word Thrown-ness as closest to the original , and, perhaps, least misleading %DIFDELCMD < [%%% English translation .”
Revised:  We retain %DIFDELCMD < [%%% the word Thrown-ness as closest to the original , and, perhaps, least misleading %DIFDELCMD < [%%% English translation ."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% In The Principle of Hope ( 1954–1959), Ernst Bloch presents an anti–Heideggerian interpretation that correlates the human, existential condition of thrown-ness with the life of a dog: “ Hope will not tolerate a dog ’s life , which feels itself only passively thrown into ‘What is’ , which is not seen through, even wretchedly recognized .”
Revised:  Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% 210px|"Into this world we're thrown / Like a dog without a bone" In his main work The Principle of Hope ( 1954–1959), Ernst Bloch presents an anti–Heideggerian interpretation that correlates the human, existential condition of thrown-ness with the life of a dog: “ Hope will not tolerate a dog ’s life , which feels itself only passively thrown into ‘What is’ , which is not seen through, even wretchedly recognized .”
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% In The Principle of Hope ( 1954–1959), Ernst Bloch presents an anti–Heideggerian interpretation that correlates the human, existential condition of thrown-ness with the life of a dog: “ Hope will not tolerate a dog ’s life , which feels itself only passively thrown into ‘What is’ , which is not seen through, even wretchedly recognized .”
Revised:  Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% In The Principle of Hope ( Hope will not tolerate a dog ’s life , which feels itself only passively thrown into ‘What is’ , which is not seen through, even wretchedly recognized .”
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% In The Principle of Hope ( 1954–1959), Ernst Bloch presents an anti–Heideggerian interpretation that correlates the human, existential condition of thrown-ness with the life of a dog: “ Hope will not tolerate a dog ’s life , which feels itself only passively thrown into ‘What is’ , which is not seen through, even wretchedly recognized .”
Revised:  Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% In The Principle of Hope ( 1954–1959), Ernst Bloch presents an anti–Heideggerian interpretation that correlates the human, existential condition of thrown-ness with the life of a dog: “ Hope will not tolerate a dog 's life which feels itself only passively thrown into ‘What is’ , which is not seen through, even wretchedly recognized .”
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% In The Principle of Hope ( 1954–1959), Ernst Bloch presents an anti–Heideggerian interpretation that correlates the human, existential condition of thrown-ness with the life of a dog: “ Hope will not tolerate a dog ’s life , which feels itself only passively thrown into ‘What is’ , which is not seen through, even wretchedly recognized .”
Revised:  Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% In The Principle of Hope ( 1954–1959), Ernst Bloch presents an anti–Heideggerian interpretation that correlates the human, existential condition of thrown-ness with the life of a dog: “ Hope will not tolerate a dog ’s life , which feels itself only passively thrown into What Is , which is not seen through, even wretchedly recognized .”
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% In The Principle of Hope ( 1954–1959), Ernst Bloch presents an anti–Heideggerian interpretation that correlates the human, existential condition of thrown-ness with the life of a dog: “ Hope will not tolerate a dog ’s life , which feels itself only passively thrown into ‘What is’ , which is not seen through, even wretchedly recognized .”
Revised:  Richardson, William J. (1963). p. 37. %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% In The Principle of Hope ( 1954–1959), Ernst Bloch presents an anti–Heideggerian interpretation that correlates the human, existential condition of thrown-ness with the life of a dog: “ Hope will not tolerate a dog ’s life , which feels itself only passively thrown into ‘What is’ , which is not seen through, even wretchedly recognized ".
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The musical band The Doors presented Bloch’s correlation of thrown-ness and Hope in the song Riders on the Storm  (1971): “ Into this world we ’ re thrown / Like a dog without a bone ”, which lines refer to the existential condition of thrown-ness presented by M. Heidegger .
Revised:  Such a connection had been picked up by The Doors in a verse of their song " Riders on the Storm (1971): “ Into this world we ’ re thrown / Like a dog without a bone ”, which lines refer to the existential condition of thrown-ness presented by M. Heidegger .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The musical band The Doors presented Bloch’s correlation of thrown-ness and Hope in the song Riders on the Storm  (1971): “ Into this world we ’ re thrown / Like a dog without a bone ”, which lines refer to the existential condition of thrown-ness presented by M. Heidegger .
Revised:  The musical band The Doors presented Bloch’s correlation of thrown-ness and Hope in the song Riders on the Storm " (1971): “ Into this world we ’ re thrown / Like a dog without a bone ”, which lines refer to the existential condition of thrown-ness presented by M. Heidegger .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The musical band The Doors presented Bloch’s correlation of thrown-ness and Hope in the song Riders on the Storm  (1971): “ Into this world we ’ re thrown / Like a dog without a bone ”, which lines refer to the existential condition of thrown-ness presented by M. Heidegger .
Revised:  The musical band The Doors presented Bloch’s correlation of thrown-ness and Hope in the song Riders on the Storm (1971): " Into this world we ’ re thrown / Like a dog without a bone ”, which lines refer to the existential condition of thrown-ness presented by M. Heidegger .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The musical band The Doors presented Bloch’s correlation of thrown-ness and Hope in the song Riders on the Storm  (1971): “ Into this world we ’ re thrown / Like a dog without a bone ”, which lines refer to the existential condition of thrown-ness presented by M. Heidegger .
Revised:  The musical band The Doors presented Bloch’s correlation of thrown-ness and Hope in the song Riders on the Storm (1971): “ Into this world we ' re thrown / Like a dog without a bone ”, which lines refer to the existential condition of thrown-ness presented by M. Heidegger .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In  Understanding Computers and Cognition : A New Foundation for Design (1986) the computer scientist Terry Winograd and the engineer Fernando Flores present an application of Thrown-ness to the field of software design , from the perspective of phenomenology .
Revised:  In In their 1986 book Understanding Computers and Cognition : A New Foundation for Design (1986) the computer scientist Terry Winograd and the engineer Fernando Flores present an application of Thrown-ness to the field of software design , from the perspective of phenomenology .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In  Understanding Computers and Cognition : A New Foundation for Design (1986) the computer scientist Terry Winograd and the engineer Fernando Flores present an application of Thrown-ness to the field of software design , from the perspective of phenomenology .
Revised:  In Understanding Computers and Cognition . A New Foundation for Design (1986) the computer scientist Terry Winograd and the engineer Fernando Flores present an application of Thrown-ness to the field of software design , from the perspective of phenomenology .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In  Understanding Computers and Cognition : A New Foundation for Design (1986) the computer scientist Terry Winograd and the engineer Fernando Flores present an application of Thrown-ness to the field of software design , from the perspective of phenomenology .
Revised:  In Understanding Computers and Cognition : A New Foundation for Design , authors Terry Winograd and the engineer Fernando Flores present an application of Thrown-ness to the field of software design , from the perspective of phenomenology .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In  Understanding Computers and Cognition : A New Foundation for Design (1986) the computer scientist Terry Winograd and the engineer Fernando Flores present an application of Thrown-ness to the field of software design , from the perspective of phenomenology .
Revised:  In Understanding Computers and Cognition : A New Foundation for Design (1986) the computer scientist Terry Winograd and the engineer Fernando Flores present an application of Thrown-ness to the field of software design .
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Thus, the Lord of Monaco was required to give feudal homage, but Lucien I of Monaco requested that requirement be removed from the treaty and obtained for the final proclamation of November 1524 to recognise the autonomy of Monaco.
Revised:  Thus, the Lord of Monaco was required to give feudal homage, but Lucien I of Monaco requested that requirement be removed from the treaty and obtained for the final proclamation of November 1524 to recognize the autonomy of Monaco.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  References                     The Microstates of Europe History of Monaco retrieved 9 February 2007
Revised:  References References The Microstates of Europe History of Monaco retrieved 9 February 2007
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Meanwhile, Augustin Grimaldi , younger brother of Lucien and then bishop of Grasse, rose to the throne of Monaco as a regent in favour of his nephew Honoré by dispositions of his mother Claudine Grimaldi.
Revised:  Meanwhile, AugustineGrimaldi , younger brother of Lucien and then bishop of Grasse, rose to the throne of Monaco as a regent in favour of his nephew Honoré by dispositions of his mother Claudine Grimaldi.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Fearing for the sovereignty of his Principality, Augustin Grimaldi obtained from Pope Clement VII a papal bull promulgated on February 19, 1524, which consecrated the autonomy of Monaco.
Revised:  Fearing for the sovereignty of his Principality, AugustineGrimaldi obtained from Pope Clement VII a papal bull promulgated on February 19, 1524, which consecrated the autonomy of Monaco.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  However, despite the support of French King François I, Augustin Grimaldi was blocked by the superseding influence of Andrea Doria at the Court of France, impeding him from prosecuting Barthélémy Doria for his crime.
Revised:  However, despite the support of French King François I, AugustineGrimaldi was blocked by the superseding influence of Andrea Doria at the Court of France, impeding him from prosecuting Barthélémy Doria for his crime.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In order to obtain justice, Augustin Grimaldi obtained the vassality of Genovese territories under the influence of Andrea Doria and on November 3, 1523, the citizens of Dolceaqua came to pledge allegiance to the Grimaldi.
Revised:  In order to obtain justice, AugustineGrimaldi obtained the vassality of Genovese territories under the influence of Andrea Doria and on November 3, 1523, the citizens of Dolceaqua came to pledge allegiance to the Grimaldi.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Following the defeat of Guillaume Gouffier, seigneur de Bonnivet, at the battle of Gattinara in 1524, François I was losing influence in the area while Andra Doria's gallera plundered the Monegasque coast and Augustin Grimaldi was almost killed by the bombardments of these galleras in Menton.
Revised:  Following the defeat of Guillaume Gouffier, seigneur de Bonnivet, at the battle of Gattinara in 1524, François I was losing influence in the area while Andra Doria's gallera plundered the Monegasque coast and AugustineGrimaldi was almost killed by the bombardments of these galleras in Menton.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  These events "forced" Augustin to pick up on the negotiations that his brother Lucien Grimaldi had began with the the lieutenants of Charles Quint.
Revised:  These events "forced" Augustineto pick up on the negotiations that his brother Lucien Grimaldi had began with the the lieutenants of Charles Quint.
Edit intent: fluency