wanyu/IteraTeR_v2 huggingface dataset:
Original:  Oubre%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% (1994) The Founding of New Acadia: The Beginnings of Acadian Life in Louisiana, 1765-1803 (1987) French, Cajun, Creole, Houma: A Primer on Francophone Louisiana (2005) "Scattered to the Wind": Dispersal and Wanderings of the Acadians, 1755-1809 (1991) Stir the Pot: A History of Cajun Cuisine with Marcelle Bienvenu and Ryan A. Brasseaux%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% (2005) See also Center for Louisiana Studies Notes
Revised:  Oubre%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% with Marcelle Bienvenu and Ryan A. Brasseaux%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% (2005) See also Center for Louisiana Studies Notes
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Oubre%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% (1994) The Founding of New Acadia: The Beginnings of Acadian Life in Louisiana, 1765-1803 (1987) French, Cajun, Creole, Houma: A Primer on Francophone Louisiana (2005) "Scattered to the Wind": Dispersal and Wanderings of the Acadians, 1755-1809 (1991) Stir the Pot: A History of Cajun Cuisine with Marcelle Bienvenu and Ryan A. Brasseaux%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% (2005) See also Center for Louisiana Studies Notes
Revised:  Oubre%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% (1994) The Founding of New Acadia: The Beginnings of Acadian Life in Louisiana, 1765-1803 (1987) French, Cajun, Creole, Houma: A Primer on Francophone Louisiana (2005) "Scattered to the Wind": Dispersal and Wanderings of the Acadians, 1755-1809 (1991) Stir the Pot: A History of Cajun Cuisine %DIFDELCMD < ] %%% (2005) See also Center for Louisiana Studies Notes
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Oubre%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% (1994) The Founding of New Acadia: The Beginnings of Acadian Life in Louisiana, 1765-1803 (1987) French, Cajun, Creole, Houma: A Primer on Francophone Louisiana (2005) "Scattered to the Wind": Dispersal and Wanderings of the Acadians, 1755-1809 (1991) Stir the Pot: A History of Cajun Cuisine with Marcelle Bienvenu and Ryan A. Brasseaux%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% (2005) See also Center for Louisiana Studies Notes
Revised:  Oubre%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% (1994) The Founding of New Acadia: The Beginnings of Acadian Life in Louisiana, 1765-1803 (1987) French, Cajun, Creole, Houma: A Primer on Francophone Louisiana (2005) "Scattered to the Wind": Dispersal and Wanderings of the Acadians, 1755-1809 (1991) Stir the Pot: A History of Cajun Cuisine with Marcelle Bienvenu and Ryan A. Brasseaux%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% See also Center for Louisiana Studies Notes
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Oubre%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% (1994) The Founding of New Acadia: The Beginnings of Acadian Life in Louisiana, 1765-1803 (1987) French, Cajun, Creole, Houma: A Primer on Francophone Louisiana (2005) "Scattered to the Wind": Dispersal and Wanderings of the Acadians, 1755-1809 (1991) Stir the Pot: A History of Cajun Cuisine with Marcelle Bienvenu and Ryan A. Brasseaux%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% (2005) See also Center for Louisiana Studies Notes
Revised:  Oubre%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% (1994) The Founding of New Acadia: The Beginnings of Acadian Life in Louisiana, 1765-1803 (1987) French, Cajun, Creole, Houma: A Primer on Francophone Louisiana (2005) "Scattered to the Wind": Dispersal and Wanderings of the Acadians, 1755-1809 (1991) Stir the Pot: A History of Cajun Cuisine with Marcelle Bienvenu and Ryan A. Brasseaux%DIFDELCMD < ] %%% (2005) See also Center for Louisiana Studies References
Edit intent: coherence
Original: Background After Tsar Nicholas II abdicated the throne, the resulting February Revolution led to the establishment of the Provisional Government and its counterpart, the Petrograd Soviet.
Revised: Background After Tssar Nicholas II abdicated the throne, the resulting February Revolution led to the establishment of the Provisional Government and its counterpart, the Petrograd Soviet.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The Provisional Government feared the Soviets immense growing power, and through  this fear they tried to appease them as much as possible.
Revised:  The Provisional Government feared the Soviets immense growing power, and through out this fear they tried to appease them as much as possible.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Lenin mentioned that a Proletariat Revolution is necessary, and expressed that he has no interest in cooperating with the Provisional Government or the other Soviet leaders who are willing to compromise.
Revised:  Lenin mentioned that a Proletarian Revolution is necessary, and expressed that he has no interest in cooperating with the Provisional Government or the other Soviet leaders who are willing to compromise.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Other  Soviet leadership were skeptical to Lenin's ideas since they were afraid that Lenin and the Bolsheviks were advocating for anarchism.
Revised:  Other members of Soviet leadership were skeptical to Lenin's ideas since they were afraid that Lenin and the Bolsheviks were advocating for anarchism.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Other  Soviet leadership were skeptical to Lenin's ideas since they were afraid that Lenin and the Bolsheviks were advocating for anarchism.
Revised:  Other Soviet leadership were skeptical of Lenin's ideas since they were afraid that Lenin and the Bolsheviks were advocating for anarchism.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Lenin also criticized the Petrograd Soviet for governing alongside the Provisional Government, and accused them of forgetting and abandoning socialist ideas and the proletariat revolution.
Revised:  Lenin also criticized the Petrograd Soviet for governing alongside the Provisional Government, and accused them of forgetting and abandoning socialist ideas and the proletarian revolution.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: "Dual power" () was a term first used by communist Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin (1870–1924) in the Pravda article titled "The Dual Power" which described a situation in the wake of the February Revolution, the first of two Russian Revolutions in 1917.
Revised: "Dual power" () was a term firgywyyehdhhbdbebwbbs offfddst used by communist Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin (1870–1924) in the Pravda article titled "The Dual Power" which described a situation in the wake of the February Revolution, the first of two Russian Revolutions in 1917.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: "Dual power" () was a term firgywyyehdhhbdbebwbbs offfddst used by communist Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin (1870–1924) in the Pravda article titled "The Dual Power" which described a situation in the wake of the February Revolution, the first of two Russian Revolutions in 1917.
Revised: "Dual power" was a term firgywyyehdhhbdbebwbbs offfddst used by communist Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin (1870–1924) in the Pravda article titled "The Dual Power" which described a situation in the wake of the February Revolution, the first of two Russian Revolutions in 1917.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: "Dual power" () was a term firgywyyehdhhbdbebwbbs offfddst used by communist Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin (1870–1924) in the Pravda article titled "The Dual Power" which described a situation in the wake of the February Revolution, the first of two Russian Revolutions in 1917.
Revised: "Dual power" () was a term used by communist Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin (1870–1924) in the Pravda article titled "The Dual Power" which described a situation in the wake of the February Revolution, the first of two Russian Revolutions in 1917.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:   Subscribe:- Noobscape
Revised:  Promotion- Subscribe:- Noobscape
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Two powers coexisted with each other and competed for legitimacy: the Soviets (workers  councils), particularly the Petrograd Soviet, and the continuing official state apparatus of the Russian Provisional Government of social democrats.
Revised:  Two powers coexisted with each other and competed for legitimacy: the Soviets (workers ' councils), particularly the Petrograd Soviet, and the continuing official state apparatus of the Russian Provisional Government of social democrats.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Temporal parts are  used in contemporary metaphysics in the debate over  persistence of material objects.
Revised: Temporal parts are a concept used in contemporary metaphysics in the debate over persistence of material objects.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: Temporal parts are  used in contemporary metaphysics in the debate over  persistence of material objects.
Revised: Temporal parts are used in contemporary metaphysics in the debate over the persistence of material objects.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Some metaphysicians believe objects have temporal parts as objects usually have spatial parts (such as hands, feet, legs etc. ) .  A temporal part would thus be something like  the first year of my life, or all of a table from between 10.00am on June 21  1994 to 11.00pm July 23 1996.
Revised:  Objects typically have parts that exist in space—a human body, for example, has spatial parts like hands, feet, legs etc. ) . A temporal part would thus be something like the first year of my life, or all of a table from between 10.00am on June 21 1994 to 11.00pm July 23 1996.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Some metaphysicians believe objects have temporal parts as objects usually have spatial parts (such as hands, feet, legs etc. ) .  A temporal part would thus be something like  the first year of my life, or all of a table from between 10.00am on June 21  1994 to 11.00pm July 23 1996.
Revised:  Some metaphysicians believe objects have temporal parts as objects usually have spatial parts (such as hands, feet, and legs . A temporal part would thus be something like the first year of my life, or all of a table from between 10.00am on June 21 1994 to 11.00pm July 23 1996.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Some metaphysicians believe objects have temporal parts as objects usually have spatial parts (such as hands, feet, legs etc. ) .  A temporal part would thus be something like  the first year of my life, or all of a table from between 10.00am on June 21  1994 to 11.00pm July 23 1996.
Revised:  Some metaphysicians believe objects have temporal parts as objects usually have spatial parts (such as hands, feet, legs etc. ) . A temporal part would thus be something like " the first year of my life, or all of a table from between 10.00am on June 21 1994 to 11.00pm July 23 1996.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Some metaphysicians believe objects have temporal parts as objects usually have spatial parts (such as hands, feet, legs etc. ) .  A temporal part would thus be something like  the first year of my life, or all of a table from between 10.00am on June 21  1994 to 11.00pm July 23 1996.
Revised:  Some metaphysicians believe objects have temporal parts as objects usually have spatial parts (such as hands, feet, legs etc. ) . A temporal part would thus be something like the first year of a person's life", or " all of a table from between 10.00am on June 21 1994 to 11.00pm July 23 1996.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Some metaphysicians believe objects have temporal parts as objects usually have spatial parts (such as hands, feet, legs etc. ) .  A temporal part would thus be something like  the first year of my life, or all of a table from between 10.00am on June 21  1994 to 11.00pm July 23 1996.
Revised:  Some metaphysicians believe objects have temporal parts as objects usually have spatial parts (such as hands, feet, legs etc. ) . A temporal part would thus be something like the first year of my life, or all of a table from between 10:00 a.m. on June 21 1994 to 11.00pm July 23 1996.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Some metaphysicians believe objects have temporal parts as objects usually have spatial parts (such as hands, feet, legs etc. ) .  A temporal part would thus be something like  the first year of my life, or all of a table from between 10.00am on June 21  1994 to 11.00pm July 23 1996.
Revised:  Some metaphysicians believe objects have temporal parts as objects usually have spatial parts (such as hands, feet, legs etc. ) . A temporal part would thus be something like the first year of my life, or all of a table from between 10.00am on June 21 , 1994 to 11.00pm July 23 1996.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Some metaphysicians believe objects have temporal parts as objects usually have spatial parts (such as hands, feet, legs etc. ) .  A temporal part would thus be something like  the first year of my life, or all of a table from between 10.00am on June 21  1994 to 11.00pm July 23 1996.
Revised:  Some metaphysicians believe objects have temporal parts as objects usually have spatial parts (such as hands, feet, legs etc. ) . A temporal part would thus be something like the first year of my life, or all of a table from between 10.00am on June 21 1994 to 11:00 p.m. on July 23 1996.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Some metaphysicians believe objects have temporal parts as objects usually have spatial parts (such as hands, feet, legs etc. ) .  A temporal part would thus be something like  the first year of my life, or all of a table from between 10.00am on June 21  1994 to 11.00pm July 23 1996.
Revised:  Some metaphysicians believe objects have temporal parts as objects usually have spatial parts (such as hands, feet, legs etc. ) . A temporal part would thus be something like the first year of my life, or all of a table from between 10.00am on June 21 1994 to 11.00pm July 23 , 1996".
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  This view was contrasted with endurantism which was taken to be the claim that objects are 'wholly present ' at any one time (thus not having  temporal parts at different times).
Revised:  This view was contrasted with endurantism , the claim that objects are 'wholly present ' at any one time (thus not having temporal parts at different times).
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  This view was contrasted with endurantism which was taken to be the claim that objects are 'wholly present ' at any one time (thus not having  temporal parts at different times).
Revised:  This view was contrasted with endurantism which was taken to be the claim that objects are wholly present at any one time (thus not having temporal parts at different times).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  This view was contrasted with endurantism which was taken to be the claim that objects are 'wholly present ' at any one time (thus not having  temporal parts at different times).
Revised:  This view was contrasted with endurantism which was taken to be the claim that objects are 'wholly present ' at any one time (thus not having different temporal parts at different times).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  This claim is still common place but philosophers like Ted Sider believe that even endurantists should accept temporal parts.
Revised:  This claim is still commonplace, but philosophers like Ted Sider believe that even endurantists should accept temporal parts.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:   Not everyone was happy with the definition by analogy from above : some philosophers, such as Peter van Inwagen argued that even given the definition by analogy , they still had no real idea what a temporal part was meant to be (1981: 133), whilst others have felt that whether temporal parts existed or not is merely a verbal dispute (Eli Hirsch holds this view).
Revised:  Definition Not everyone was happy with the definition by analogy from above : some philosophers, such as Peter van Inwagen argued that even given the definition by analogy , they still had no real idea what a temporal part was meant to be (1981: 133), whilst others have felt that whether temporal parts existed or not is merely a verbal dispute (Eli Hirsch holds this view).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:   Not everyone was happy with the definition by analogy from above : some philosophers, such as Peter van Inwagen argued that even given the definition by analogy , they still had no real idea what a temporal part was meant to be (1981: 133), whilst others have felt that whether temporal parts existed or not is merely a verbal dispute (Eli Hirsch holds this view).
Revised:  Not everyone was happy with the definition by analogy : some philosophers, such as Peter van Inwagen argued that even given the definition by analogy , they still had no real idea what a temporal part was meant to be (1981: 133), whilst others have felt that whether temporal parts existed or not is merely a verbal dispute (Eli Hirsch holds this view).
Edit intent: coherence
Original:   Not everyone was happy with the definition by analogy from above : some philosophers, such as Peter van Inwagen argued that even given the definition by analogy , they still had no real idea what a temporal part was meant to be (1981: 133), whilst others have felt that whether temporal parts existed or not is merely a verbal dispute (Eli Hirsch holds this view).
Revised:  Not everyone was happy with the definition by analogy from above : some philosophers, such as Peter van Inwagen , argued that— even given the definition by analogy , they still had no real idea what a temporal part was meant to be (1981: 133), whilst others have felt that whether temporal parts existed or not is merely a verbal dispute (Eli Hirsch holds this view).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:   Not everyone was happy with the definition by analogy from above : some philosophers, such as Peter van Inwagen argued that even given the definition by analogy , they still had no real idea what a temporal part was meant to be (1981: 133), whilst others have felt that whether temporal parts existed or not is merely a verbal dispute (Eli Hirsch holds this view).
Revised:  Not everyone was happy with the definition by analogy from above : some philosophers, such as Peter van Inwagen argued that even given the definition by analogy — they still had no real idea what a temporal part was meant to be (1981: 133), whilst others have felt that whether temporal parts existed or not is merely a verbal dispute (Eli Hirsch holds this view).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  So there has been work on giving a more specific definition.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The early attempts included identifying temporal parts with ordered pairs of times and objects, but (a)
Revised:  The early attempts included identifying temporal parts with ordered pairs of times and objects, but 
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  it seems relatively unproblematic that temporal parts exist given the definition and (b)
Revised:  it seems relatively unproblematic that temporal parts exist given the definition and 
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  ordered pairs seem unsuitable to play the role that perdurantists demand, such as being parts of persisting wholes ( how can a set be a part of a material object? ) . Later perdurantists identified persisting objects with events, and as events unproblematically had temporal parts (such as the first and second halves of a football match)  it was imagined that persisting objects could unproblematically have temporal parts.
Revised:  ordered pairs seem unsuitable to play the role that perdurantists demand, such as being parts of persisting wholes — how can a set be a part of a material object? ) . Later perdurantists identified persisting objects with events, and as events unproblematically had temporal parts (such as the first and second halves of a football match) it was imagined that persisting objects could unproblematically have temporal parts.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  ordered pairs seem unsuitable to play the role that perdurantists demand, such as being parts of persisting wholes ( how can a set be a part of a material object? ) . Later perdurantists identified persisting objects with events, and as events unproblematically had temporal parts (such as the first and second halves of a football match)  it was imagined that persisting objects could unproblematically have temporal parts.
Revised:  ordered pairs seem unsuitable to play the role that perdurantists demand, such as being parts of persisting wholes ( how can a set be a part of a material object? . Later perdurantists identified persisting objects with events, and as events unproblematically had temporal parts (such as the first and second halves of a football match) it was imagined that persisting objects could unproblematically have temporal parts.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  ordered pairs seem unsuitable to play the role that perdurantists demand, such as being parts of persisting wholes ( how can a set be a part of a material object? ) . Later perdurantists identified persisting objects with events, and as events unproblematically had temporal parts (such as the first and second halves of a football match)  it was imagined that persisting objects could unproblematically have temporal parts.
Revised:  ordered pairs seem unsuitable to play the role that perdurantists demand, such as being parts of persisting wholes ( how can a set be a part of a material object? ) . Later perdurantists identified persisting objects with events, and as events having temporal parts was not problematic (for example, the first and second halves of a football match) it was imagined that persisting objects could unproblematically have temporal parts.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  ordered pairs seem unsuitable to play the role that perdurantists demand, such as being parts of persisting wholes ( how can a set be a part of a material object? ) . Later perdurantists identified persisting objects with events, and as events unproblematically had temporal parts (such as the first and second halves of a football match)  it was imagined that persisting objects could unproblematically have temporal parts.
Revised:  ordered pairs seem unsuitable to play the role that perdurantists demand, such as being parts of persisting wholes ( how can a set be a part of a material object? ) . Later perdurantists identified persisting objects with events, and as events unproblematically had temporal parts (such as the first and second halves of a football match) , it was imagined that persisting objects could unproblematically have temporal parts.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  ordered pairs seem unsuitable to play the role that perdurantists demand, such as being parts of persisting wholes ( how can a set be a part of a material object? ) . Later perdurantists identified persisting objects with events, and as events unproblematically had temporal parts (such as the first and second halves of a football match)  it was imagined that persisting objects could unproblematically have temporal parts.
Revised:  ordered pairs seem unsuitable to play the role that perdurantists demand, such as being parts of persisting wholes ( how can a set be a part of a material object? ) . Later perdurantists identified persisting objects with events, and as events unproblematically had temporal parts (such as the first and second halves of a football match) it was imagined that persisting objects could have temporal parts.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Of the definitions closest to those commonly used in the literature, the earliest was Thomson %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%%  x is a cross-sectional temporal part of y =df (∃T)[y and x exist through T & no part of x exists outside T & (∀t)(t is in T ⊃ (∀P)(y exactly occupies P at t ⊃ x exactly occupies P at t))] (Thomson 1983: 207).
Revised:  Of the definitions closest to those commonly used in the literature, the earliest was Thomson %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% : x is a cross-sectional temporal part of y =df (∃T)[y and x exist through T & no part of x exists outside T & (∀t)(t is in T ⊃ (∀P)(y exactly occupies P at t ⊃ x exactly occupies P at t))] (Thomson 1983: 207).
Edit intent: fluency