wanyu/IteraTeR_v2 huggingface dataset:
Original:  In  solid state structure, distance of Sb-C  between Sb and  Cp*  are 2.394(4) ~ 2.424(4) Å, but distance of Sb-C  between Sb and  toluene are 2.993(5) ~ 3.182(5) Å. This longer Sb-toluene distance implies the toluene lability in solution.
Revised:  In the solid state structure, distance of Sb-C between Sb and Cp* are 2.394(4) ~ 2.424(4) Å, but distance of Sb-C between Sb and toluene are 2.993(5) ~ 3.182(5) Å. This longer Sb-toluene distance implies the toluene lability in solution.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In  solid state structure, distance of Sb-C  between Sb and  Cp*  are 2.394(4) ~ 2.424(4) Å, but distance of Sb-C  between Sb and  toluene are 2.993(5) ~ 3.182(5) Å. This longer Sb-toluene distance implies the toluene lability in solution.
Revised:  In solid state structure, the Sb-C between Sb and Cp* are 2.394(4) ~ 2.424(4) Å, but distance of Sb-C between Sb and toluene are 2.993(5) ~ 3.182(5) Å. This longer Sb-toluene distance implies the toluene lability in solution.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In  solid state structure, distance of Sb-C  between Sb and  Cp*  are 2.394(4) ~ 2.424(4) Å, but distance of Sb-C  between Sb and  toluene are 2.993(5) ~ 3.182(5) Å. This longer Sb-toluene distance implies the toluene lability in solution.
Revised:  In solid state structure, distance of Sb-C between Sb and Cp* are 2.394(4) ~ 2.424(4) Å, but the Sb-C between Sb and toluene are 2.993(5) ~ 3.182(5) Å. This longer Sb-toluene distance implies the toluene lability in solution.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In  solid state structure, distance of Sb-C  between Sb and  Cp*  are 2.394(4) ~ 2.424(4) Å, but distance of Sb-C  between Sb and  toluene are 2.993(5) ~ 3.182(5) Å. This longer Sb-toluene distance implies the toluene lability in solution.
Revised:  In solid state structure, distance of Sb-C between Sb and Cp* are 2.394(4) ~ 2.424(4) Å, but distance of Sb-C between Sb and toluene are 2.993(5) ~ 3.182(5) Å. This longer Sb-toluene distance implies toluene lability in solution.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  3 coordination Sb(V) [SbPh3]2+ (4) is not isolated.
Revised:  3 coordination Sb(V) [SbPh3]2+ (4) was not isolated.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Instead, its lewis adducts, [SbPh3(OPPh3)2]2+ and [SbPh3(dmap)2(OTf)]+, are isolated.
Revised:  Instead, its Lewis adducts, [SbPh3(OPPh3)2]2+ and [SbPh3(dmap)2(OTf)]+, are isolated.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Instead, its lewis adducts, [SbPh3(OPPh3)2]2+ and [SbPh3(dmap)2(OTf)]+, are isolated.
Revised:  Instead, its lewis adducts, [SbPh3(OPPh3)2]2+ and [SbPh3(dmap)2(OTf)]+, were isolated.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  In  trigonal bipyramidal [SbPh3(OPPh3)2]2+, two OPPh3 are located in axial positions and  Sb-O bond distance (2.102(2) Å) is similar with the sum of the covalent radii of Sb and O (2.05 Å).
Revised:  In the trigonal bipyramidal [SbPh3(OPPh3)2]2+, two OPPh3 are located in axial positions and Sb-O bond distance (2.102(2) Å) is similar with the sum of the covalent radii of Sb and O (2.05 Å).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In  trigonal bipyramidal [SbPh3(OPPh3)2]2+, two OPPh3 are located in axial positions and  Sb-O bond distance (2.102(2) Å) is similar with the sum of the covalent radii of Sb and O (2.05 Å).
Revised:  In trigonal bipyramidal [SbPh3(OPPh3)2]2+, two OPPh3 are located in axial positions and the Sb-O bond distance (2.102(2) Å) is similar with the sum of the covalent radii of Sb and O (2.05 Å).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In  trigonal bipyramidal [SbPh3(OPPh3)2]2+, two OPPh3 are located in axial positions and  Sb-O bond distance (2.102(2) Å) is similar with the sum of the covalent radii of Sb and O (2.05 Å).
Revised:  In trigonal bipyramidal [SbPh3(OPPh3)2]2+, two OPPh3 are located in axial positions and Sb-O bond distance (2.102(2) Å) is similar to the sum of the covalent radii of Sb and O (2.05 Å).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  This bond distances imply that lewis adduct formation.
Revised:  This bond distance implies Lewis adduct formation.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The experimental results indicate that [SbPh3]2+ is lewis acidic counterpart of lewis adducts.
Revised:  The experimental results indicate that [SbPh3]2+ is the Lewis acidic counterpart of lewis adducts.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The experimental results indicate that [SbPh3]2+ is lewis acidic counterpart of lewis adducts.
Revised:  The experimental results indicate that [SbPh3]2+ is lewis acidic counterpart of these adducts.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  4 coordination Sb(V) Tetrahedral stibonium cations show lewis acidity.
Revised:  4 coordination Sb(V) Tetrahedral stibonium cations show Lewis acidity.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The 31P Chemical shift of  OPEt3 adduct (Gutmann-Beckett method) of Sb(C6F5)4+ is comparable with one of B(C6F5)3  in CH2Cl2 (76.6 ppm).
Revised:  The 31P Chemical shift of the OPEt3 adduct (Gutmann-Beckett method) of Sb(C6F5)4+ is comparable with one of B(C6F5)3 in CH2Cl2 (76.6 ppm).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The 31P Chemical shift of  OPEt3 adduct (Gutmann-Beckett method) of Sb(C6F5)4+ is comparable with one of B(C6F5)3  in CH2Cl2 (76.6 ppm).
Revised:  The 31P Chemical shift of OPEt3 adduct (Gutmann-Beckett method) of Sb(C6F5)4+ is comparable with that of the B(C6F5)3 in CH2Cl2 (76.6 ppm).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The 31P Chemical shift of  OPEt3 adduct (Gutmann-Beckett method) of Sb(C6F5)4+ is comparable with one of B(C6F5)3  in CH2Cl2 (76.6 ppm).
Revised:  The 31P Chemical shift of OPEt3 adduct (Gutmann-Beckett method) of Sb(C6F5)4+ is comparable with one of B(C6F5)3 adduct in CH2Cl2 (76.6 ppm).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  5 coordination Sb(V) Neutral Sb(V) complexes are also lewis acids.
Revised:  5 coordination Sb(V) Neutral Sb(V) complexes are also Lewis acids.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  A bis-antimony complex (9) has C2 symmetry and each antimony (V) centers are square pyramidal geometry.
Revised:  A bis-antimony complex (9) has C2 symmetry and each antimony (V) centers have square pyramidal geometry.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Inductive effect Antimony bonding with more electron-withdrawing substituents are more acidic .
Revised:  Inductive effect Introduction of electron-withdrawing substituents are more acidic .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Inductive effect Antimony bonding with more electron-withdrawing substituents are more acidic .
Revised:  Inductive effect Antimony bonding with more electron-withdrawing substituents on antimony results in increased acidity .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Electron-withdrawing substituents on Sb (V) leads to an increased P-Sb bonding covalency (o-C6H4(PPh2)(Sb(C6F5)2(O2C6Cl4): electron density at the bcp : 0.054 e/rBohr3, delocalization index: 0.38, o-C6H4(PPh2)(Sb(C6H5)2(O2C6Cl4): electron density at the bcp: 0.0.35 e/rBohr3, delocalization index: 0.24).
Revised:  Electron-withdrawing substituents on Sb (V) lead to an increased P-Sb bonding covalency (o-C6H4(PPh2)(Sb(C6F5)2(O2C6Cl4): electron density at the bcp : 0.054 e/rBohr3, delocalization index: 0.38, o-C6H4(PPh2)(Sb(C6H5)2(O2C6Cl4): electron density at the bcp: 0.0.35 e/rBohr3, delocalization index: 0.24).
Edit intent: fluency
Original: |365x365px Bis-antimony compounds vs mono-antimony compounds A bis-antimony complex (9) is stronger lewis acid than a mono-antimony compound (8) because both lewis acidic site cooperatively contribute to the lewis base binding.
Revised: |365x365px Bis-antimony compounds vs mono-antimony compounds A bis-antimony complex (9) is stronger lewis acid than a mono-antimony compound (8) because both Lewis acidic sites cooperatively contribute to the lewis base binding.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: |365x365px Bis-antimony compounds vs mono-antimony compounds A bis-antimony complex (9) is stronger lewis acid than a mono-antimony compound (8) because both lewis acidic site cooperatively contribute to the lewis base binding.
Revised: |365x365px Bis-antimony compounds vs mono-antimony compounds A bis-antimony complex (9) is stronger lewis acid than a mono-antimony compound (8) because both lewis acidic site cooperatively contribute to the Lewis base binding.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Electrostatic potential map of 9 shows positive charges on Sb centers facing each other.
Revised:  The electrostatic potential map of 9 shows positive charges on Sb centers facing each other.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  It is also found that  Sb-(μ-F)-Sb moiety in solid state structure of F- binding bis-anitimony compound.
Revised:  It is also found that the Sb-(μ-F)-Sb moiety in solid state structure of F- binding bis-anitimony compound.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Fluoride anion sensor A feature of high fluoride ion affinity is utilized as fluoride anion sensing. 9-anthryltriphenylstibonium cation (5) shows weak emission (Φ = 0.7 \%), but a corresponding fluoride adduct, fluorostiborane, shows strong anthryl-based emission at 427 nm (Φ = 9.5 \% in CHCl3).
Revised:  Fluoride anion sensor Owing to their high fluoride ion affinity is utilized as fluoride anion sensing. 9-anthryltriphenylstibonium cation (5) shows weak emission (Φ = 0.7 \%), but a corresponding fluoride adduct, fluorostiborane, shows strong anthryl-based emission at 427 nm (Φ = 9.5 \% in CHCl3).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  1 ppm of F- can be detected with  naked-eye.
Revised:  1 ppm of F- can be detected with the naked-eye.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Previously reported fluorescent boron compounds with high FIA is not applicable to fluoride sensor because fluoride binding results in fluorescence turn-off response. center|364x364px|Fluoride binding turns on emission.
Revised:  Previously reported fluorescent boron compounds with high FIA are not ideal fluoride sensor because fluoride binding results in fluorescence turn-off response. center|364x364px|Fluoride binding turns on emission.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In addition, fluoride-selective electrodes were developed by using lewis acidic antimony compounds as ionophores.
Revised:  In addition, fluoride-selective electrodes were developed by using Lewis acidic antimony compounds as ionophores.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Catalysis center|538x538px|Examples of catalytic activity of lewis acidic antimony compounds in (top) transfer hydrogenation and (bottom) Ritter reaction.
Revised:  Catalysis center|538x538px|Examples of catalytic activity of Lewis acidic antimony compounds in (top) transfer hydrogenation and (bottom) Ritter reaction.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Strong acidity of antimony complounds are able to catalyze the transfer hydrogenation using Hantzsch ester and the Ritter reaction.
Revised:  Strongly acidic antimony compounds are able to catalyze the transfer hydrogenation using Hantzsch ester and the Ritter reaction.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Interestingly, Sb(C6F5)3 shows high catalytic efficiency compared to its acidity because  π-acidity of  aryl ring also plays a role in catalysis.
Revised:  Interestingly, Sb(C6F5)3 shows high catalytic efficiency compared to its acidity because the π-acidity of aryl ring also plays a role in catalysis.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Interestingly, Sb(C6F5)3 shows high catalytic efficiency compared to its acidity because  π-acidity of  aryl ring also plays a role in catalysis.
Revised:  Interestingly, Sb(C6F5)3 shows high catalytic efficiency compared to its acidity because π-acidity of its aryl ring also plays a role in catalysis.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Tetraaryl stibonium cations catalyze cycloaddition between epoxides and CO2 or isocyanate to produce oxazolidinones.
Revised:  Tetraaryl stibonium cations catalyze cycloadditions between epoxides and CO2 or isocyanate to produce oxazolidinones.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Transition metal complex center|626x626px|Examples of Z-type ligand antimony compounds.
Revised:  Transition metal complexes center|626x626px|Examples of Z-type ligand antimony compounds.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Lewis acidic antimony compounds can act as Z-type ligand .
Revised:  Lewis acidic antimony compounds can act as Z-type ligands .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Owing to strong σ accepting ability of dicationic Sb ligand, gold complex catalyzed styrene polymerization and hydroamination after  activated by AgNTf2
Revised:  Owing to the strong σ-accepting ability of dicationic Sb ligand, gold complex catalyzed styrene polymerization and hydroamination after activated by AgNTf2
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Owing to strong σ accepting ability of dicationic Sb ligand, gold complex catalyzed styrene polymerization and hydroamination after  activated by AgNTf2
Revised:  Owing to strong σ accepting ability of dicationic Sb ligand, gold complex catalyzed styrene polymerization and hydroamination after being activated by AgNTf2
Edit intent: clarity
Original: Among pnictogen group Lewis acidic compounds, unusual lewis acidity of Lewis acidic antimony compounds have long been exploited as both i) stable conjugate acids of non-coordinating anions ( SbF6− and Sb2F11−) and ii) strong Lewis acid counterparts of well-known superacids (magic acids, fluoroantimonic acid).
Revised: Among pnictogen group Lewis acidic compounds, unusual lewis acidity of Lewis acidic antimony compounds have long been exploited as both stable conjugate acids of non-coordinating anions ( SbF6− and Sb2F11−) and ii) strong Lewis acid counterparts of well-known superacids (magic acids, fluoroantimonic acid).
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Among pnictogen group Lewis acidic compounds, unusual lewis acidity of Lewis acidic antimony compounds have long been exploited as both i) stable conjugate acids of non-coordinating anions ( SbF6− and Sb2F11−) and ii) strong Lewis acid counterparts of well-known superacids (magic acids, fluoroantimonic acid).
Revised: Among pnictogen group Lewis acidic compounds, unusual lewis acidity of Lewis acidic antimony compounds have long been exploited as both i) stable conjugate acids of non-coordinating anions ( and ii) strong Lewis acid counterparts of well-known superacids (magic acids, fluoroantimonic acid).
Edit intent: coherence
Original: Among pnictogen group Lewis acidic compounds, unusual lewis acidity of Lewis acidic antimony compounds have long been exploited as both i) stable conjugate acids of non-coordinating anions ( SbF6− and Sb2F11−) and ii) strong Lewis acid counterparts of well-known superacids (magic acids, fluoroantimonic acid).
Revised: Among pnictogen group Lewis acidic compounds, unusual lewis acidity of Lewis acidic antimony compounds have long been exploited as both i) stable conjugate acids of non-coordinating anions ( SbF6− and Sb2F11−) and ), and strong Lewis acid counterparts of well-known superacids (magic acids, fluoroantimonic acid).
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Also, Lewis acidic antimony compounds have recently been investigated to extend the chemistry of boron because of i) the isolobal analogy between  vacant p orbital of borane and σ*( Sb-X ) orbitals of stiborane and ii) the similar electronegativities of antimony (2.05) and boron (2.04).
Revised:  Also, Lewis-acidic antimony compounds have recently been investigated to extend the chemistry of boron because of i) the isolobal analogy between vacant p orbital of borane and σ*( Sb-X ) orbitals of stiborane and ii) the similar electronegativities of antimony (2.05) and boron (2.04).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Also, Lewis acidic antimony compounds have recently been investigated to extend the chemistry of boron because of i) the isolobal analogy between  vacant p orbital of borane and σ*( Sb-X ) orbitals of stiborane and ii) the similar electronegativities of antimony (2.05) and boron (2.04).
Revised:  Also, Lewis acidic antimony compounds have recently been investigated to extend the chemistry of boron because of the isolobal analogy between vacant p orbital of borane and σ*( Sb-X ) orbitals of stiborane and ii) the similar electronegativities of antimony (2.05) and boron (2.04).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Also, Lewis acidic antimony compounds have recently been investigated to extend the chemistry of boron because of i) the isolobal analogy between  vacant p orbital of borane and σ*( Sb-X ) orbitals of stiborane and ii) the similar electronegativities of antimony (2.05) and boron (2.04).
Revised:  Also, Lewis acidic antimony compounds have recently been investigated to extend the chemistry of boron because of i) the isolobal analogy between the vacant p orbital of borane and σ*( Sb-X ) orbitals of stiborane and ii) the similar electronegativities of antimony (2.05) and boron (2.04).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Also, Lewis acidic antimony compounds have recently been investigated to extend the chemistry of boron because of i) the isolobal analogy between  vacant p orbital of borane and σ*( Sb-X ) orbitals of stiborane and ii) the similar electronegativities of antimony (2.05) and boron (2.04).
Revised:  Also, Lewis acidic antimony compounds have recently been investigated to extend the chemistry of boron because of i) the isolobal analogy between vacant p orbital of borane and σ*( Sb–X ) orbitals of stiborane and ii) the similar electronegativities of antimony (2.05) and boron (2.04).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Also, Lewis acidic antimony compounds have recently been investigated to extend the chemistry of boron because of i) the isolobal analogy between  vacant p orbital of borane and σ*( Sb-X ) orbitals of stiborane and ii) the similar electronegativities of antimony (2.05) and boron (2.04).
Revised:  Also, Lewis acidic antimony compounds have recently been investigated to extend the chemistry of boron because of i) the isolobal analogy between vacant p orbital of borane and σ*( Sb-X ) orbitals of stiborane , and the similar electronegativities of antimony (2.05) and boron (2.04).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Origin of acidity NBO of Sb(C6F5)3-P(O)Ph3 adduct describing donor-acceptor interaction between lp(O) and σ*(Sb-C6F5).
Revised:  Origin of acidity NBO of Sb(C6F5)3-P(O)Ph3 adduct describing donor–acceptor interaction between lp(O) and σ*(Sb-C6F5).
Edit intent: fluency
Original: |282x282px σ*( Sb-X ), where X describes substituents on Antimony , contributes to the Lewis acidity of antimony compounds in two ways: Donor-Acceptor orbital interaction and Electrostatic interaction.
Revised: |282x282px σ*( Sb–X ), where X describes substituents on Antimony , contributes to the Lewis acidity of antimony compounds in two ways: Donor-Acceptor orbital interaction and Electrostatic interaction.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: |282x282px σ*( Sb-X ), where X describes substituents on Antimony , contributes to the Lewis acidity of antimony compounds in two ways: Donor-Acceptor orbital interaction and Electrostatic interaction.
Revised: |282x282px σ*( Sb-X ), where X describes substituents on antimony , contributes to the Lewis acidity of antimony compounds in two ways: Donor-Acceptor orbital interaction and Electrostatic interaction.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: |282x282px σ*( Sb-X ), where X describes substituents on Antimony , contributes to the Lewis acidity of antimony compounds in two ways: Donor-Acceptor orbital interaction and Electrostatic interaction.
Revised: |282x282px σ*( Sb-X ), where X describes substituents on Antimony , contributes to the Lewis acidity of antimony compounds in two ways: donor–acceptor orbital interaction and Electrostatic interaction.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: |282x282px σ*( Sb-X ), where X describes substituents on Antimony , contributes to the Lewis acidity of antimony compounds in two ways: Donor-Acceptor orbital interaction and Electrostatic interaction.
Revised: |282x282px σ*( Sb-X ), where X describes substituents on Antimony , contributes to the Lewis acidity of antimony compounds in two ways: Donor-Acceptor orbital interaction and electrostatic interaction.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Each contributions are studied by calculations, and the acidities of theses compounds are quantified by the Gutmann-Beckett method, Hammett acidity function, pKa, and fluoride ion affinity (FIA).
Revised:  Both contributions are studied by calculations, and the acidities of theses compounds are quantified by the Gutmann-Beckett method, Hammett acidity function, pKa, and fluoride ion affinity (FIA).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Each contributions are studied by calculations, and the acidities of theses compounds are quantified by the Gutmann-Beckett method, Hammett acidity function, pKa, and fluoride ion affinity (FIA).
Revised:  Each contributions are studied by calculations, and the acidities of theses compounds are quantified by the Gutmann–Beckett method, Hammett acidity function, pKa, and fluoride ion affinity (FIA).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  FIA is defined as the amount of energy released upon binding a fluoride ion in  gas phase.
Revised:  FIA is defined as the amount of energy released upon binding a fluoride ion in the gas phase.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:   FIA of two popular strong Lewis acids, BF3 and B(C6F5)3, are 81 kcal/mol and 106 kcal/mol, respectively.
Revised:  The FIA of two popular strong Lewis acids, BF3 and B(C6F5)3, are 81 kcal/mol and 106 kcal/mol, respectively.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Donor-Acceptor orbital overlap Since Lewis adducts are formed by dative bond between Lewis bases and Lewis acids, the orbital overlap between the Lewis base and σ*( Sb-X ) orbital is the source of the acidity.
Revised:  Donor–acceptor orbital overlap Since Lewis adducts are formed by dative bond between Lewis bases and Lewis acids, the orbital overlap between the Lewis base and σ*( Sb-X ) orbital is the source of the acidity.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Donor-Acceptor orbital overlap Since Lewis adducts are formed by dative bond between Lewis bases and Lewis acids, the orbital overlap between the Lewis base and σ*( Sb-X ) orbital is the source of the acidity.
Revised:  Donor-Acceptor orbital overlap Since Lewis adducts are formed by dative bond between Lewis bases and Lewis acids, the orbital overlap between the Lewis base and σ*( Sb–X ) orbital is the source of the acidity.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  According to the Gabbai and coworkers , NBO analysis of the Sb(C6F5) 3-P (O)Ph3 adduct indicates a donor-acceptor interaction between lp(O) and σ*( Sb-C6F5 ).
Revised:  According to Gabbaï et al. , NBO analysis of the Sb(C6F5) 3-P (O)Ph3 adduct indicates a donor-acceptor interaction between lp(O) and σ*( Sb-C6F5 ).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  According to the Gabbai and coworkers , NBO analysis of the Sb(C6F5) 3-P (O)Ph3 adduct indicates a donor-acceptor interaction between lp(O) and σ*( Sb-C6F5 ).
Revised:  According to the Gabbai and coworkers , NBO analysis of the Sb(C6F5) 3P (O)Ph3 adduct indicates a donor-acceptor interaction between lp(O) and σ*( Sb-C6F5 ).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  According to the Gabbai and coworkers , NBO analysis of the Sb(C6F5) 3-P (O)Ph3 adduct indicates a donor-acceptor interaction between lp(O) and σ*( Sb-C6F5 ).
Revised:  According to the Gabbai and coworkers , NBO analysis of the Sb(C6F5) 3-P (O)Ph3 adduct indicates a donor-acceptor interaction between lp(O) and σ*( Sb–C6F5 ).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Lowering the LUMO (σ*( Sb-X )) energy increases the Lewis acidity.
Revised:  Lowering the LUMO (σ*( Sb–X )) energy increases the Lewis acidity.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  For example, Sb(C6H5)3 has  higher LUMO energy ( -0.55 eV) and weaker FIA (59 kcal/mol) than Sb(C6F5)3 ( LUMO: -1.76 eV , FIA: 89 kcal/mol).
Revised:  For example, Sb(C6H5)3 has a higher LUMO energy ( -0.55 eV) and weaker FIA (59 kcal/mol) than Sb(C6F5)3 ( LUMO: -1.76 eV , FIA: 89 kcal/mol).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  For example, Sb(C6H5)3 has  higher LUMO energy ( -0.55 eV) and weaker FIA (59 kcal/mol) than Sb(C6F5)3 ( LUMO: -1.76 eV , FIA: 89 kcal/mol).
Revised:  For example, Sb(C6H5)3 has higher LUMO energy ( −0.55 eV) and weaker FIA (59 kcal/mol) than Sb(C6F5)3 ( LUMO: -1.76 eV , FIA: 89 kcal/mol).
Edit intent: fluency