wanyu/IteraTeR_v2 huggingface dataset:
Original:  Opponents have given detailed instructions that voting witnesses should check whether the machines correspond exactly to an approved type ( including software versions ) and fulfill all legal conditions.
Revised:  Opponents have given detailed instructions that voting witnesses should check whether the machines correspond exactly to an approved type , including software versions ) and fulfill all legal conditions.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Opponents have given detailed instructions that voting witnesses should check whether the machines correspond exactly to an approved type ( including software versions ) and fulfill all legal conditions.
Revised:  Opponents have given detailed instructions that voting witnesses should check whether the machines correspond exactly to an approved type ( including software versions , and fulfill all legal conditions.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The machines delivered to the city are of a yet unapproved type.
Revised:  The machines delivered to the city are of a yet-to-be-approved type.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  LeMonde.fr reports that other municipalities have already replaced their recent machines by an older, approved, model.
Revised:  Le Monde reports that other municipalities have already replaced their recent machines by an older, approved, model.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  voters isolate themselves in a booth, put a pre-printed sheet of paper of their choice, bearing the name of a candidate,in an envelope, then they walk to the ballot box, demonstrate that they are entitled to vote to the voting office staff, sign the voting roll, then put the envelope into the ballot box  .
Revised:  voters isolate themselves in a booth, put a pre-printed sheet of paper of their choice, bearing the name of a candidate,in an envelope, then they walk to the ballot box, demonstrate that they are entitled to vote to the voting office staff, put the envelope into the ballot box .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  voters isolate themselves in a booth, put a pre-printed sheet of paper of their choice, bearing the name of a candidate,in an envelope, then they walk to the ballot box, demonstrate that they are entitled to vote to the voting office staff, sign the voting roll, then put the envelope into the ballot box  .
Revised:  voters isolate themselves in a booth, put a pre-printed sheet of paper of their choice, bearing the name of a candidate,in an envelope, then they walk to the ballot box, demonstrate that they are entitled to vote to the voting office staff, sign the voting roll, then put the envelope into the ballot box , then sign the voting roll .
Edit intent: fluency
Original: In France, traditionally, voting has been a relatively low-tech experience: voters isolate themselves in a booth, put a pre-printed sheet of paper of their choice, bearing the name of a candidate, in an envelope, then they walk to the ballot box, demonstrate that they are entitled to vote to the voting office staff, put the envelope into the ballot box , then sign the voting roll.
Revised: In France, voting has traditionally been a low-tech experience: voters isolate themselves in a booth, put a pre-printed sheet of paper of their choice, bearing the name of a candidate, in an envelope, then they walk to the ballot box, demonstrate that they are entitled to vote to the voting office staff, put the envelope into the ballot box , then sign the voting roll.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: In France, traditionally, voting has been a relatively low-tech experience: voters isolate themselves in a booth, put a pre-printed sheet of paper of their choice, bearing the name of a candidate, in an envelope, then they walk to the ballot box, demonstrate that they are entitled to vote to the voting office staff, put the envelope into the ballot box , then sign the voting roll.
Revised: In France, traditionally, voting has been a relatively low-tech experience: voters isolate themselves in a booth, put a pre-printed sheet of paper indicating their candidate of choice. After officials verify the voter's identity, the voter drops the envelope into the ballot box , then sign the voting roll.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: In France, traditionally, voting has been a relatively low-tech experience: voters isolate themselves in a booth, put a pre-printed sheet of paper of their choice, bearing the name of a candidate, in an envelope, then they walk to the ballot box, demonstrate that they are entitled to vote to the voting office staff, put the envelope into the ballot box , then sign the voting roll.
Revised: In France, traditionally, voting has been a relatively low-tech experience: voters isolate themselves in a booth, put a pre-printed sheet of paper of their choice, bearing the name of a candidate, in an envelope, then they walk to the ballot box, demonstrate that they are entitled to vote to the voting office staff, put the envelope into the ballot box and signs the voting roll.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Since 1988, ballot boxes must be transparent , so that people can witness that no envelopes are present at the start of the vote and that no envelopes are added except those of the duly counted and authorized voters.
Revised:  Since 1988, ballot boxes must be transparent so that voters and observers can witness that no envelopes are present at the start of the vote and that no envelopes are added except those of the duly counted and authorized voters.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  But this year, as presidential elections loom (the first round is on April 22, the second  on May 6), France is shaken by a controversy about machines supposed to count about 1.5 million votes.
Revised:  But this year, during presidential elections (the first round is on April 22, the second on May 6), France is shaken by a controversy about machines supposed to count about 1.5 million votes.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  But this year, as presidential elections loom (the first round is on April 22, the second  on May 6), France is shaken by a controversy about machines supposed to count about 1.5 million votes.
Revised:  But this year, as presidential elections loom (the first round was April 22, the second on May 6), France is shaken by a controversy about machines supposed to count about 1.5 million votes.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  But this year, as presidential elections loom (the first round is on April 22, the second  on May 6), France is shaken by a controversy about machines supposed to count about 1.5 million votes.
Revised:  But this year, as presidential elections loom (the first round is on April 22, the second is on May 6), France is shaken by a controversy about machines supposed to count about 1.5 million votes.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  But this year, as presidential elections loom (the first round is on April 22, the second  on May 6), France is shaken by a controversy about machines supposed to count about 1.5 million votes.
Revised:  But this year, as presidential elections loom (the first round is on April 22, the second on May 6), the country is shaken by a controversy about machines supposed to count about 1.5 million votes.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  But this year, as presidential elections loom (the first round is on April 22, the second  on May 6), France is shaken by a controversy about machines supposed to count about 1.5 million votes.
Revised:  But this year, as presidential elections loom (the first round is on April 22, the second on May 6), France is shaken by controversy about the machines intended to count about 1.5 million votes.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  All main political parties , except Mr Sarkozy's ruling party, UMP, oppose the voting machines.
Revised:  All main political parties except UMP, Mr Sarkozy's ruling party, UMP, oppose the voting machines.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  All main political parties , except Mr Sarkozy's ruling party, UMP, oppose the voting machines.
Revised:  All main political parties , except Mr Sarkozy's ruling party, oppose the voting machines.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Sign of the official frenzy on the issue,  the Ministry of the Interior issued a last-minute , April 12, authorization for a specific model (hardware, firmware).
Revised:  In a sign of the frenzy over the issue, the Ministry of the Interior issued a last-minute , April 12, authorization for a specific model (hardware, firmware).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Sign of the official frenzy on the issue,  the Ministry of the Interior issued a last-minute , April 12, authorization for a specific model (hardware, firmware).
Revised:  Sign of the official frenzy on the issue, on April 12 the Ministry of the Interior issued a last-minute , April 12, authorization for a specific model (hardware, firmware).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Sign of the official frenzy on the issue,  the Ministry of the Interior issued a last-minute , April 12, authorization for a specific model (hardware, firmware).
Revised:  Sign of the official frenzy on the issue, the Ministry of the Interior issued a last-minute authorization for a specific model (hardware, firmware).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The stakes are high: votes on unapproved machines should be cancelled by the Constitutional Council for the official count.
Revised:  The stakes are high: votes on unapproved machines should be canceled by the Constitutional Council for the official count.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The opposition is now crystallized on the Paris suburb of Issy-les-Moulineaux.
Revised:  The opposition has crystallized on the Paris suburb of Issy-les-Moulineaux.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Proponents of the machines, such as the French company , France Élection, claim they are being defamed and dispute the competence of the computer scientists who dispute the machines . Elected officials supporting the machines claim the machines save on paper, time, and the need to find volunteers to count votes
Revised:  Proponents of the machines, such as the French company France Élection, claim they are being defamed and dispute the competence of the computer scientists who dispute the machines . Elected officials supporting the machines claim the machines save on paper, time, and the need to find volunteers to count votes
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Proponents of the machines, such as the French company , France Élection, claim they are being defamed and dispute the competence of the computer scientists who dispute the machines . Elected officials supporting the machines claim the machines save on paper, time, and the need to find volunteers to count votes
Revised:  Proponents of the machines, such as the French company , France Élection, claim they are being defamed and dispute the competence of their critics . Elected officials supporting the machines claim the machines save on paper, time, and the need to find volunteers to count votes
Edit intent: clarity
Original: Lucinda Roy, claims that after Cho wrote a disturbing peice for an English class, "I was so uncomfortable that I didn't feel that I could leave him in the classroom."
Revised: Lucinda Roy, claims that after Cho wrote a disturbing peace for an English class, "I was so uncomfortable that I didn't feel that I could leave him in the classroom."
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Virginia Tech was warned about gunman Cho Cho Seung-hui A former professor at Virginia Tech has said that she informed the university authorities about Cho Seung-hui and his unusual behaviour in 2005 Lucinda Roy , claims that after Cho wrote a disturbing piece for an English class,  " I was so uncomfortable that I didn't feel that I could leave him in the classroom."
Revised: Virginia Tech was warned about gunman Cho Cho Seung-hui A former professor at Virginia Tech has said that she informed the university authorities about Cho Seung-hui and his unusual behaviour in 2005. Lucinda Roy , claims that after Cho wrote a disturbing piece for an English class, " I was so uncomfortable that I didn't feel that I could leave him in the classroom."
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Virginia Tech was warned about gunman Cho Cho Seung-hui A former professor at Virginia Tech has said that she informed the university authorities about Cho Seung-hui and his unusual behaviour in 2005 Lucinda Roy , claims that after Cho wrote a disturbing piece for an English class,  " I was so uncomfortable that I didn't feel that I could leave him in the classroom."
Revised: Virginia Tech was warned about gunman Cho Cho Seung-hui A former professor at Virginia Tech has said that she informed the university authorities about Cho Seung-hui and his unusual behaviour in 2005 Lucinda Roy claims that after Cho wrote a disturbing piece for an English class, " I was so uncomfortable that I didn't feel that I could leave him in the classroom."
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Virginia Tech was warned about gunman Cho Cho Seung-hui A former professor at Virginia Tech has said that she informed the university authorities about Cho Seung-hui and his unusual behaviour in 2005 Lucinda Roy , claims that after Cho wrote a disturbing piece for an English class,  " I was so uncomfortable that I didn't feel that I could leave him in the classroom."
Revised: Virginia Tech was warned about gunman Cho Cho Seung-hui A former professor at Virginia Tech has said that she informed the university authorities about Cho Seung-hui and his unusual behaviour in 2005 Lucinda Roy , claims that after Cho wrote a disturbing piece for an English class, she " I was so uncomfortable that I didn't feel that I could leave him in the classroom."
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Virginia Tech was warned about gunman Cho Cho Seung-hui A former professor at Virginia Tech has said that she informed the university authorities about Cho Seung-hui and his unusual behaviour in 2005 Lucinda Roy , claims that after Cho wrote a disturbing piece for an English class,  " I was so uncomfortable that I didn't feel that I could leave him in the classroom."
Revised: Virginia Tech was warned about gunman Cho Cho Seung-hui A former professor at Virginia Tech has said that she informed the university authorities about Cho Seung-hui and his unusual behaviour in 2005 Lucinda Roy , claims that after Cho wrote a disturbing piece for an English class, " was so uncomfortable that I didn't feel that I could leave him in the classroom."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Roy , also indicates that she felt that repeated warnings she gave concerning Cho should have been considered more seriously.
Revised:  Roy also indicates that she felt that repeated warnings she gave concerning Cho should have been considered more seriously.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Roy , also indicates that she felt that repeated warnings she gave concerning Cho should have been considered more seriously.
Revised:  Roy , also indicates that she felt the repeated warnings that she gave concerning Cho should have been considered more seriously.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The company urges owners to stop feeding their pets the food immediately  
Revised:  The company urges owners to stop feeding their pets the food immediately . 
Edit intent: fluency
Original: The   cause of the recall is believed to be melamine which appears to be a rice protein concentrate.
Revised: The The cause of the recall is believed to be melamine which appears to be a rice protein concentrate.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:   The brands that are recalled include Venison & Brown Rice Dry Dog Food and Venison & Green Pea Dry Cat Food.
Revised:  The brands recalled include Venison & Brown Rice Dry Dog Food and Venison & Green Pea Dry Cat Food.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The company states that the food, Venison & Brown Rice Dry Dog Food and Venison & Green Pea Dry Cat Food, are the only brands affected by the recall .
Revised:  The company states that the food, Venison & Brown Rice Dry Dog Food and Venison & Green Pea Dry Cat Food, are the only brands affected by the recall 
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The company urges owners to stop feeding their pets the food immediately .
Revised:  .
Edit intent: coherence
Original:   Büyükanıt's visit in Greece is his first in the country, after he became chief of the Turkish Army Forces.
Revised:  Gen. Büyükanıt's visit in Greece is his first in the country, after he became chief of the Turkish Army Forces.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Image:Aegean Sea map.png| Aegean Sea , between Greece and Turkey.
Revised: Image:Aegean Sea map.png| , between Greece and Turkey.
Edit intent: coherence
Original: ]] Turkey's Chief of General Staff, Gen. Yaşar Büyükanıt proposed that Greek and Turkish fighters should fly unarmed flights over the Aegean .
Revised: ]] Turkey's Chief of General Staff, General , proposed that Greek and Turkish fighters should fly unarmed flights over the Aegean .
Edit intent: style
Original:  This follows reports that Greek and Turkish fighters held mock dogfights during Russian President Vladimir Putin 's visit to Athens last month,
Revised:  This follows reports that Greek and Turkish fighters held mock dogfights during President 's visit to Athens last month,
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  This follows reports that Greek and Turkish fighters held mock dogfights during Russian President Vladimir Putin 's visit to Athens last month,
Revised:  This follows reports that Greek and Turkish fighters held mock dogfights during Russian President Vladimir Putin 's visit to last month.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Gen. Büyükanıt's visit in Greece is his first in the country, after he became chief of the Turkish Army Forces .
Revised:  Gen. Büyükanıt's visit in Greece is his first in the country, after he became chief of the .
Edit intent: clarity
Original: The US Supreme Court on Wednesday April 18 has upheld the federal 2003 Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act .
Revised: The Supreme Court of the United States on Wednesday April 18 has upheld the federal 2003 Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act .
Edit intent: clarity
Original: The US Supreme Court on Wednesday April 18 has upheld the federal 2003 Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act .
Revised: The US Supreme Court on Wednesday April 18 has upheld the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act .
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The 5-4 vote reflected the change in vote count resulting from the retirement of Justice O'Connor and the confirmation of Justices Roberts and Alito.
Revised:  The 5-4 vote reflected the change in vote count resulting from the retirement of Justice O'Connor and the confirmation of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In the Concurring opinion Justice Thomas stated that he joins "the Court’s opinion because it accurately applies current jurisprudence, including Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U. S. 833 (1992)" . In dissent Judge Ginzburg wrote that the decision improperly "applauds, federal intervention to ban nationwide a procedure found necessary and proper in certain cases by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists."
Revised:  In the Concurring opinion Justice Thomas stated that he joins "the Court’s opinion because it accurately applies current jurisprudence, including Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U. S. 833 (1992)" . In dissent Judge Ginsburg wrote that the decision improperly "applauds, federal intervention to ban nationwide a procedure found necessary and proper in certain cases by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists."
Edit intent: fluency
Original: The swing vote was cast by Justice Kennedy who stated that it has not been "  demonstrated that the Act would be unconstitutional in a large fraction of relevant cases '' .And that "  Respondents have not demonstrated that the Act, as a facial matter, is void for vagueness, or that it imposes an undue burden on a woman’s right to abortion based on its overbreadth or lack of a health exception.
Revised: The swing vote was cast by Justice Kennedy who stated that it has not been " respondents have not demonstrated that the Act would be unconstitutional in a large fraction of relevant cases '' .And that " Respondents have not demonstrated that the Act, as a facial matter, is void for vagueness, or that it imposes an undue burden on a woman’s right to abortion based on its overbreadth or lack of a health exception.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: The swing vote was cast by Justice Kennedy who stated that it has not been "  demonstrated that the Act would be unconstitutional in a large fraction of relevant cases '' .And that "  Respondents have not demonstrated that the Act, as a facial matter, is void for vagueness, or that it imposes an undue burden on a woman’s right to abortion based on its overbreadth or lack of a health exception.
Revised: The swing vote was cast by Justice Kennedy who stated that it has not been " demonstrated that the Act would be unconstitutional in a large fraction of relevant cases . " Respondents have not demonstrated that the Act, as a facial matter, is void for vagueness, or that it imposes an undue burden on a woman’s right to abortion based on its overbreadth or lack of a health exception.
Edit intent: coherence
Original: The swing vote was cast by Justice Kennedy who stated that it has not been "  demonstrated that the Act would be unconstitutional in a large fraction of relevant cases '' .And that "  Respondents have not demonstrated that the Act, as a facial matter, is void for vagueness, or that it imposes an undue burden on a woman’s right to abortion based on its overbreadth or lack of a health exception.
Revised: The swing vote was cast by Justice Kennedy who stated that it has not been " demonstrated that the Act would be unconstitutional in a large fraction of relevant cases '' .And that " Further, he said, " Respondents have not demonstrated that the Act, as a facial matter, is void for vagueness, or that it imposes an undue burden on a woman’s right to abortion based on its overbreadth or lack of a health exception.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  In the Concurring opinion Justice Thomas stated that he joins "the Court’s opinion because it accurately applies current jurisprudence, including Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U. S. 833 (1992) " . In dissent Judge Ginsburg wrote that the decision improperly "  applauds, federal intervention to ban nationwide a procedure found necessary and proper in certain cases by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists."
Revised:  In the Concurring opinion Justice Thomas stated that he joins "the Court’s opinion because it accurately applies current jurisprudence, including Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U. S. 833 (1992) ." In dissent Judge Ginsburg wrote that the decision improperly " applauds, federal intervention to ban nationwide a procedure found necessary and proper in certain cases by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists."
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In the Concurring opinion Justice Thomas stated that he joins "the Court’s opinion because it accurately applies current jurisprudence, including Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U. S. 833 (1992) " . In dissent Judge Ginsburg wrote that the decision improperly "  applauds, federal intervention to ban nationwide a procedure found necessary and proper in certain cases by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists."
Revised:  In the Concurring opinion Justice Thomas stated that he joins "the Court’s opinion because it accurately applies current jurisprudence, including Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U. S. 833 (1992) " . In dissent Judge Ginsburg wrote : " applauds, federal intervention to ban nationwide a procedure found necessary and proper in certain cases by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists."
Edit intent: coherence