wanyu/IteraTeR_full_sent huggingface dataset:
Original: PIE 's official project website  Depending on the English level of the user, PIE offers three modes, Full, Lite and Extra Lite, to show diacritics to different extents.
Revised: PIE 's official project website ; the satirical magazine Speculative Grammarian questioned the appropriateness of diacritics and overall clarity of the spelling system in a featured articleSpeculative Grammarian (satirical linguistics magazine) story on PIE. Depending on the English level of the user, PIE offers three modes, Full, Lite and Extra Lite, to show diacritics to different extents.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  The Full mode shows pronunciations to a great detail ( e.g. even the silent g and h as in "light" are marked with a "silence mark") . More advanced learners may prefer the Lite mode (e.g. the silence marks on w, h, y and e will be omitted, as in "low", "she", "bay" and "take") . Very advanced learners can use the Extra Lite mode , which will further omit all schwa marks (e.g. the second and third a in "Canada" will have no marks).
Revised:  The Full mode shows pronunciations to a great detail ( such as silent g and h as in "light" are marked with a "silence mark") . More advanced learners may prefer the Lite mode (e.g. the silence marks on w, h, y and e will be omitted, as in "low", "she", "bay" and "take") . Very advanced learners can use the Extra Lite mode , which will further omit all schwa marks (e.g. the second and third a in "Canada" will have no marks).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The Full mode shows pronunciations to a great detail ( e.g. even the silent g and h as in "light" are marked with a "silence mark") . More advanced learners may prefer the Lite mode (e.g. the silence marks on w, h, y and e will be omitted, as in "low", "she", "bay" and "take") . Very advanced learners can use the Extra Lite mode , which will further omit all schwa marks (e.g. the second and third a in "Canada" will have no marks).
Revised:  The Full mode shows pronunciations to a great detail ( e.g. even the silent g and h in "light" are marked with a "silence mark") . More advanced learners may prefer the Lite mode (e.g. the silence marks on w, h, y and e will be omitted, as in "low", "she", "bay" and "take") . Very advanced learners can use the Extra Lite mode , which will further omit all schwa marks (e.g. the second and third a in "Canada" will have no marks).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The Full mode shows pronunciations to a great detail ( e.g. even the silent g and h as in "light" are marked with a "silence mark") . More advanced learners may prefer the Lite mode (e.g. the silence marks on w, h, y and e will be omitted, as in "low", "she", "bay" and "take") . Very advanced learners can use the Extra Lite mode , which will further omit all schwa marks (e.g. the second and third a in "Canada" will have no marks).
Revised:  The Full mode shows pronunciations to a great detail ( e.g. even the silent g and h as in "light" being marked with a "silence mark") . More advanced learners may prefer the Lite mode (e.g. the silence marks on w, h, y and e will be omitted, as in "low", "she", "bay" and "take") . Very advanced learners can use the Extra Lite mode , which will further omit all schwa marks (e.g. the second and third a in "Canada" will have no marks).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The Full mode shows pronunciations to a great detail ( e.g. even the silent g and h as in "light" are marked with a "silence mark") . More advanced learners may prefer the Lite mode (e.g. the silence marks on w, h, y and e will be omitted, as in "low", "she", "bay" and "take") . Very advanced learners can use the Extra Lite mode , which will further omit all schwa marks (e.g. the second and third a in "Canada" will have no marks).
Revised:  The Full mode shows pronunciations to a great detail ( e.g. even the silent g and h as in "light" are marked with a "silence mark") ; the so-called Lite mode simplifies the notation (e.g. the silence marks on w, h, y and e will be omitted, as in "low", "she", "bay" and "take") . Very advanced learners can use the Extra Lite mode , which will further omit all schwa marks (e.g. the second and third a in "Canada" will have no marks).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The Full mode shows pronunciations to a great detail ( e.g. even the silent g and h as in "light" are marked with a "silence mark") . More advanced learners may prefer the Lite mode (e.g. the silence marks on w, h, y and e will be omitted, as in "low", "she", "bay" and "take") . Very advanced learners can use the Extra Lite mode , which will further omit all schwa marks (e.g. the second and third a in "Canada" will have no marks).
Revised:  The Full mode shows pronunciations to a great detail ( e.g. even the silent g and h as in "light" are marked with a "silence mark") . More advanced learners may prefer the Lite mode (e.g. the silence marks on w, h, y and e will be omitted, as in "low", "she", "bay" and "take") ; and the Extra Lite mode , which will further omit all schwa marks (e.g. the second and third a in "Canada" will have no marks).
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The Full mode shows pronunciations to a great detail ( e.g. even the silent g and h as in "light" are marked with a "silence mark") . More advanced learners may prefer the Lite mode (e.g. the silence marks on w, h, y and e will be omitted, as in "low", "she", "bay" and "take") . Very advanced learners can use the Extra Lite mode , which will further omit all schwa marks (e.g. the second and third a in "Canada" will have no marks).
Revised:  The Full mode shows pronunciations to a great detail ( e.g. even the silent g and h as in "light" are marked with a "silence mark") . More advanced learners may prefer the Lite mode (e.g. the silence marks on w, h, y and e will be omitted, as in "low", "she", "bay" and "take") . Very advanced learners can use the Extra Lite mode further omits all schwa marks (e.g. the second and third a in "Canada" will have no marks).
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Media coverage PCWorld (English) PCWorld (Albanian)PCWorld (Albanian) story on PIE Computerworld / IDG News ServiceComputerworld / IDG News Service story on PIE Bitelia (Spanish)Bitelia (Spanish) story on PIE Speculative Grammarian (satirical linguistics magazine)Speculative Grammarian (satirical linguistics magazine) story on PIE AM PM (Spanish)AM PM (Spanish) story on PIE WikiNoticia (Spanish)WikiNoticia (Spanish) on PIE Software Headline (English)Software Headline (English) story on PIE Prva Vijest (Croatian)Prva Vijest (Croatian) story on PIE Solidot (Chinese)Solidot (Chinese) story on PIE See also Reading education in the United States Phonics Whole language International Phonetic Alphabet References External links PIE's official project website PIE at Chrome Web Store The PIE schemes
Revised:  See also Reading education in the United States Phonics Whole language International Phonetic Alphabet References External links PIE's official project website PIE at Chrome Web Store The PIE schemes
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  story on PIE AM PM (Spanish)AM PM (Spanish) story on PIE WikiNoticia (Spanish)WikiNoticia (Spanish) on PIE Software Headline (English)Software Headline (English) story on PIE Prva Vijest (Croatian)Prva Vijest (Croatian) story on PIE Solidot (Chinese)Solidot (Chinese) story on PIE See also Reading education in the United States Phonics Whole language International Phonetic Alphabet References External links PIE's official project website PIE at Chrome Web Store The PIE schemes
Revised:  story on PIE AM PM (Spanish)AM PM (Spanish) story on PIE WikiNoticia (Spanish)WikiNoticia (Spanish) on PIE Software Headline (English)Software Headline (English) story on PIE Prva Vijest (Croatian)Prva Vijest (Croatian) story on PIE Solidot (Chinese)Solidot (Chinese) story on PIE See also Reading education in the United States Phonics Whole language International Phonetic Alphabet References 
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: Category:  Nepalese legendary creatures Category:Newar Category:Mythic humanoids Category:Demons Category:Legendary creatures in popular culture Category:Asian folklore Category:Nepalese fairy tale
Revised: Category: Bogeys Category: Nepalese legendary creatures Category:Newar Category:Mythic humanoids Category:Demons Category:Legendary creatures in popular culture Category:Asian folklore Category:Nepalese fairy tale
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  The other factor that allowed for the native emu to facilitate the growth the bush fly (Musca vetustissimaIbid, Milewski, Antoni, 2016: 21-23.) larvae is their estimated pre colonial population.
Revised:  The other factor that allowed for the native emu to facilitate the growth the bush fly (Musca vetustissimaIbid, Milewski, Antoni, 2016: 21-23.) larvae is their estimated pre-colonial population.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The disease affects cattle and other farm animals (including pigs, goats, deer, sheep, alpacas and llamas), some species of wildlife including badgers and deer, and some domestic pets such as cats.
Revised:  The disease affects cattle and other farm animals (including pigs, goats, deer, sheep, alpacas and llamas), species of wildlife including badgers and deer, and some domestic pets such as cats.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  The disease affects cattle and other farm animals (including pigs, goats, deer, sheep, alpacas and llamas), some species of wildlife including badgers and deer, and some domestic pets such as cats.
Revised:  The disease affects cattle and other farm animals (including pigs, goats, deer, sheep, alpacas and llamas), some species of wildlife including badgers and deer, and even domestic pets such as cats.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Geographically, bTB has spread from isolated pockets in the  late 1980s to cover large areas of the west and south-west of England and Wales in the 2010s.
Revised:  Geographically, bTB has spread from isolated pockets in the UK in late 1980s to cover large areas of the west and south-west of England and Wales in the 2010s.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Due to the changes in proliferative and apoptotic processes the total number of cells increases in the synovium, and significantly increases also the number of fibroblast-like synoviocytes  .
Revised:  Due to the changes in proliferative and apoptotic processes the total number of cells increases in the synovium, and significantly increases also the number of fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  These processes are influenced by microvesicles derived from platelets, which can contribute to the activation of fibroblast-like synoviocytes through secretion of IL-1   .
Revised:  These processes are influenced by microvesicles derived from platelets, which can contribute to the activation of fibroblast-like synoviocytes through secretion of IL-1 The aggressive phenotype of FLS in RA and the effect these cells have on their microenvironment can be summarized into hallmarks that distinguish them from healthy FLS. These hallmark features of FLS in RA are divided into 7 cell-intrinsic hallmarks and 4 cell-extrinsic hallmarks. The cell-intrinsic hallmarks are: reduced apoptosis, impaired contact inhibition, increased migratory invasive potential, changed epigenetic landscape, temporal and spatial heterogeneity, genomic instability and mutations, and reprogrammed cellular metabolism. The cell-extrinsic hallmarks of FLS in RA are: promotes osteoclastogenesis and bone erosion, contributes to cartilage degradation, induces synovial angiogenesis, and recruites and stimulates immune cells .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: Epidemic model (1927) In its initial form, Kermack–McKendrick theory is a compartmental differential-equation model that structures the infectioned population in terms of age-of-infection, while using simple compartments for people who are susceptible (S)  and recovered/removed (R).
Revised: Epidemic model (1927) In its initial form, Kermack–McKendrick theory is a partial differential-equation model that structures the infectioned population in terms of age-of-infection, while using simple compartments for people who are susceptible (S) and recovered/removed (R).
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: Epidemic model (1927) In its initial form, Kermack–McKendrick theory is a compartmental differential-equation model that structures the infectioned population in terms of age-of-infection, while using simple compartments for people who are susceptible (S)  and recovered/removed (R).
Revised: Epidemic model (1927) In its initial form, Kermack–McKendrick theory is a compartmental differential-equation model that structures the infected population in terms of age-of-infection, while using simple compartments for people who are susceptible (S) and recovered/removed (R).
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Epidemic model (1927) In its initial form, Kermack–McKendrick theory is a compartmental differential-equation model that structures the infectioned population in terms of age-of-infection, while using simple compartments for people who are susceptible (S)  and recovered/removed (R).
Revised: Epidemic model (1927) In its initial form, Kermack–McKendrick theory is a compartmental differential-equation model that structures the infectioned population in terms of age-of-infection, while using simple compartments for people who are susceptible (S) , infected (I), and recovered/removed (R).
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  Specified initial conditions would change over time according to  Only in the special case when the removal rate and the transmission rate are constant for all ages does the substitution transform their theory into the simple SIR model.
Revised:  Specified initial conditions would change over time according to This formulation is equivalent to defining the incidence of infection . Only in the special case when the removal rate and the transmission rate are constant for all ages does the substitution transform their theory into the simple SIR model.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  Specified initial conditions would change over time according to  Only in the special case when the removal rate and the transmission rate are constant for all ages does the substitution transform their theory into the simple SIR model.
Revised:  Specified initial conditions would change over time according to Only in the special case when the removal rate and the transmission rate are constant for all ages can the epidemic dynamics be expressed in terms of the prevalence , leading to the standard compartmental SIR model.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  Instead, minimum credible deterrence is a policy that falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, unlike in 1971, when India defended itself after Pakistan had started a war.
Revised:  Instead, mCD is a policy that falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, unlike in 1971, when India defended itself after Pakistan had started a war.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Instead, minimum credible deterrence is a policy that falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, unlike in 1971, when India defended itself after Pakistan had started a war. (see: Indo-Pakistani war of 1971) Pakistan refuses to adopt No first use policy , while the other regional powers  India and China had adopted the policy.
Revised:  Instead, minimum credible deterrence is a policy that falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, unlike in 1971, when India defended itself after Pakistan had started the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971) Pakistan refuses to adopt No first use policy , while the other regional powers India and China had adopted the policy.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Instead, mCD is a policy that falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, unlike in 1971, when India defended itself after Pakistan had started the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971.
Revised:  Instead, it is a policy that falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, unlike in 1971, when India defended itself after Pakistan had started the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Instead, it is a policy that falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, unlike in 1971, when India defended itself after Pakistan had started the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971.
Revised:  Instead, the policy of the Minimum Credible Deterrence falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, unlike in 1971, when India defended itself after Pakistan had started the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  Instead, it is a policy that falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, unlike in 1971, when India defended itself after Pakistan had started the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971.
Revised:  Instead, it is a policy that falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, unlike in 1971, when India defended itself after Pakistan had started the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Instead, it is a policy that falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, unlike in 1971, when India defended itself after Pakistan had started the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971.
Revised:  Instead, it is a policy that falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, as it did in 1971, when India defended itself after Pakistan had started the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Instead, it is a policy that falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, unlike in 1971, when India defended itself after Pakistan had started the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971.
Revised:  Instead, it is a policy that falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, unlike in 1971, when Pakistan started the war. (see: Indo-Pakistani war of 1971.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Instead, it is a policy that falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, unlike in 1971, when India defended itself after Pakistan had started the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971.
Revised:  Instead, it is a policy that falls under minimal deterrence as an inverse to the mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is widely regarded as designed to dissuade India from taking any military actions against Pakistan, unlike in 1971, when India defended itself after Pakistan had started the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971)
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  That led the creation of formation of defence mechanism systematic programmes, known as National Command Authority (NCA), Joint Special Forces (JSF) , under the control of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee , which is led by its designated Chairman.
Revised:  This led the creation of formation of defence mechanism systematic programmes, known as National Command Authority (NCA), Joint Special Forces (JSF) , under the control of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee , which is led by its designated Chairman.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  That led the creation of formation of defence mechanism systematic programmes, known as National Command Authority (NCA), Joint Special Forces (JSF) , under the control of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee , which is led by its designated Chairman.
Revised:  That led the creation of formation of defence mechanism systematic programmes, known as National Command Authority (NCA), Joint Special Forces (JSF) under the control of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee , which is led by its designated Chairman.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  That led the creation of formation of defence mechanism systematic programmes, known as National Command Authority (NCA), Joint Special Forces (JSF) , under the control of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee , which is led by its designated Chairman.
Revised:  That led the creation of formation of defence mechanism systematic programmes, known as National Command Authority (NCA), Joint Special Forces (JSF) , under the control of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee which is led by its designated Chairman.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  On 20 May 1999, in his address at the National Defence University (NDU), Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif used the term "minimum credible deterrence" in speaking on the Pakistani nuclear stance.
Revised:  On 20 May 1999, in his address at the National Defence University (NDU), Prime minister Nawaz Sharif used the term "minimum credible deterrence" in speaking on the Pakistani nuclear stance.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  On 20 May 1999, in his address at the National Defence University (NDU), Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif used the term "minimum credible deterrence" in speaking on the Pakistani nuclear stance.
Revised:  On 20 May 1999, in his address at the National Defence University (NDU), Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif used the term "minimum credible deterrence" while speaking about Pakistan's nuclear stance.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  It is effectively an ideal form of Nash equilibrium (named after the mathematician John Forbes Nash , Jr.) in which both India and Pakistan, once they are armed, have no rational incentive to  initiate a conflict  or to disarm.
Revised:  The MCD theory is effectively, an ideal form of Nash equilibrium (named after the mathematician John Forbes Nash , Jr.) in which both India and Pakistan, once they are armed, have no rational incentive to initiate a conflict or to disarm.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  It is effectively an ideal form of Nash equilibrium (named after the mathematician John Forbes Nash , Jr.) in which both India and Pakistan, once they are armed, have no rational incentive to  initiate a conflict  or to disarm.
Revised:  It is effectively an ideal form of Nash equilibrium (named after mathematician John Forbes Nash , Jr.) in which both India and Pakistan, once they are armed, have no rational incentive to initiate a conflict or to disarm.
Edit intent: fluency