wanyu/IteraTeR_full_sent huggingface dataset:
Original: NASA in Star City The "Prophylactory" (aka the "Prophy"),  a three-floor dormitory to house Americans during the Apollo-Soyuz Project, was built by the Russians  during the Apollo-Soyuz Project.
Revised: NASA in Star City The "Prophylactory" (aka the "Prophy"), a three-floor dormitory to house Americans during the Apollo-Soyuz Project, was built by the Russians to house Americans during the Apollo-Soyuz Project.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Many of the proposals in the document, such as opposition to racism, opposition to weapons of mass destruction, support of human rights, and a proposition of an international court are fairly uncontroversial and are widely accepted today in the Western world.
Revised: In addition to its absolute rejection of theism and deism, various political stances are supported, such as opposition to racism, opposition to weapons of mass destruction, support of human rights, and a proposition of an international court are fairly uncontroversial and are widely accepted today in the Western world.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: Many of the proposals in the document, such as opposition to racism, opposition to weapons of mass destruction, support of human rights, and a proposition of an international court are fairly uncontroversial and are widely accepted today in the Western world.
Revised: Many of the proposals in the document, such as opposition to racism, opposition to weapons of mass destruction, support of human rights, a proposition of an international court are fairly uncontroversial and are widely accepted today in the Western world.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: Many of the proposals in the document, such as opposition to racism, opposition to weapons of mass destruction, support of human rights, and a proposition of an international court are fairly uncontroversial and are widely accepted today in the Western world. However, in addition to its absolute rejection of theism and deism, various controversial stances are strongly supported, notably the right to unrestricted abortion and contraception.
Revised: Many of the proposals in the document, such as opposition to racism, opposition to weapons of mass destruction, support of human rights, and a proposition of an international court , and the right to unrestricted abortion and contraception.
Edit intent: coherence
Original: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL . And, in Jan 1st 2020  the state of California passed the most linent ADU 's laws in the country allowing not one but two accessory units .
Revised: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL On Jan 1, 2020 the state of California passed the most linent ADU 's laws in the country allowing not one but two accessory units .
Edit intent: coherence
Original: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL . And, in Jan 1st 2020  the state of California passed the most linent ADU 's laws in the country allowing not one but two accessory units .
Revised: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL . And, in Jan 1st 2020 , the state of California passed the most linent ADU 's laws in the country allowing not one but two accessory units .
Edit intent: fluency
Original: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL . And, in Jan 1st 2020  the state of California passed the most linent ADU 's laws in the country allowing not one but two accessory units .
Revised: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL . And, in Jan 1st 2020 the state of California passed the most lenient ADU laws in the country allowing not one but two accessory units .
Edit intent: fluency
Original: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL . And, in Jan 1st 2020  the state of California passed the most linent ADU 's laws in the country allowing not one but two accessory units . One called ADU and the other called JADU. State exempt ADU can now be at least 800 sqft, while JADU is limited to 550 sqft.
Revised: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL . And, in Jan 1st 2020 the state of California passed the most linent ADU 's laws in the country allowing not one but two accessory units , one called ADU and the other called JADU. State exempt ADU can now be at least 800 sqft, while JADU is limited to 550 sqft.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL On Jan 1, 2020, the state of California passed the most lenient ADU laws in the country allowing not one but two  accessory units, one called ADUand the other called JADU. State exempt ADUs can now be at least 800 sqft , while JADUs are limited to 550  URL The states of Vermont and New Hampshire have also adopted a number of bills that promote accessory dwelling units and reduce regulatory barriers to ADU construction.
Revised: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL On January 1, 2020, the state of California passed the most lenient ADU laws in the country allowing not one but two accessory units, one called ADUand the other called JADU. State exempt ADUs can now be at least 800 sqft , while JADUs are limited to 550 URL The states of Vermont and New Hampshire have also adopted a number of bills that promote accessory dwelling units and reduce regulatory barriers to ADU construction.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL On Jan 1, 2020, the state of California passed the most lenient ADU laws in the country allowing not one but two  accessory units, one called ADUand the other called JADU. State exempt ADUs can now be at least 800 sqft , while JADUs are limited to 550  URL The states of Vermont and New Hampshire have also adopted a number of bills that promote accessory dwelling units and reduce regulatory barriers to ADU construction.
Revised: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL On Jan 1, 2020, the state of California passed the most lenient ADU laws in the country allowing not one but two types of accessory units, one called ADUand the other called JADU. State exempt ADUs can now be at least 800 sqft , while JADUs are limited to 550 URL The states of Vermont and New Hampshire have also adopted a number of bills that promote accessory dwelling units and reduce regulatory barriers to ADU construction.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL On Jan 1, 2020, the state of California passed the most lenient ADU laws in the country allowing not one but two  accessory units, one called ADUand the other called JADU. State exempt ADUs can now be at least 800 sqft , while JADUs are limited to 550  URL The states of Vermont and New Hampshire have also adopted a number of bills that promote accessory dwelling units and reduce regulatory barriers to ADU construction.
Revised: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL On Jan 1, 2020, the state of California passed the most lenient ADU laws in the country allowing not one but two accessory units, the accessory dwelling unit (ADU) and the junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU). State-exempt ADUs can now be at least 800 sqft , while JADUs are limited to 550 URL The states of Vermont and New Hampshire have also adopted a number of bills that promote accessory dwelling units and reduce regulatory barriers to ADU construction.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL On Jan 1, 2020, the state of California passed the most lenient ADU laws in the country allowing not one but two  accessory units, one called ADUand the other called JADU. State exempt ADUs can now be at least 800 sqft , while JADUs are limited to 550  URL The states of Vermont and New Hampshire have also adopted a number of bills that promote accessory dwelling units and reduce regulatory barriers to ADU construction.
Revised: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL On Jan 1, 2020, the state of California passed the most lenient ADU laws in the country allowing not one but two accessory units, one called ADUand the other called JADU. State exempt ADUs can now be at least 800 square feet , while JADUs are limited to 550 URL The states of Vermont and New Hampshire have also adopted a number of bills that promote accessory dwelling units and reduce regulatory barriers to ADU construction.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL On Jan 1, 2020, the state of California passed the most lenient ADU laws in the country allowing not one but two  accessory units, one called ADUand the other called JADU. State exempt ADUs can now be at least 800 sqft , while JADUs are limited to 550  URL The states of Vermont and New Hampshire have also adopted a number of bills that promote accessory dwelling units and reduce regulatory barriers to ADU construction.
Revised: SB 1069: URL 2299: URL On Jan 1, 2020, the state of California passed the most lenient ADU laws in the country allowing not one but two accessory units, one called ADUand the other called JADU. State exempt ADUs can now be at least 800 sqft , while JADUs are limited to 550 square URL The states of Vermont and New Hampshire have also adopted a number of bills that promote accessory dwelling units and reduce regulatory barriers to ADU construction.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In Iyengar Yoga, the pose, also called "Legs-up-the-Wall Pose", is described as "a restful practice, where the body is inverted without effort", and the lower back and buttocks are supported with a pile of blankets, while the legs are rested against a wall, either together or allowed to fall outwards  .
Revised:  In Iyengar Yoga, the pose, also called "Legs-up-the-Wall Pose", is described as "a restful practice, where the body is inverted without effort", and the lower back and buttocks are supported with a pile of blankets, while the legs are rested against a wall, either together or allowed to fall outwards into a straddle .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  In Urdhva Prasarita Padasana, the back is on the ground, the arms are above the head, and the legs are raised either partly or to the vertical    .
Revised:  In Urdhva Prasarita Padasana, the back is on the ground, the arms are above the head, and the legs are raised either partly or to the vertical In pregnancy, the pose can be practised as "Wall Butterfly", with the buttocks and feet against a wall, feet together as in Baddha Konasana, the knees falling to the sides. The hands can be used to press the knees. .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  In Urdhva Prasarita Padasana, the back is on the ground, the arms are above the head, and the legs are raised either partly or to the vertical    .
Revised:  In Urdhva Prasarita Padasana, the back is on the ground, the arms are above the head, and the legs are raised either partly or to the vertical Variations include bringing the soles of the feet together , or letting the legs fall outward into a straddle .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: Roderick  Maclean ( – 8 June 1921) was a Scotsman who attempted to assassinate Queen Victoria on 2 March 1882, at Windsor, England, with a pistol.
Revised: Roderick Edward Maclean ( – 8 June 1921) was a Scotsman who attempted to assassinate Queen Victoria on 2 March 1882, at Windsor, England, with a pistol.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:   Tried for high treason on 20 April, the Scotsman was found "not guilty, but insane" by a jury after five minutes' deliberation,  and he lived out his remaining days in Broadmoor Asylum.
Revised:  At his trial, Dr. Charles Vernon Hitchins testified that MacLean had been certified insane in June 1880, two years before the attempted assassination, and he had been sent to Somerset Lunatic Asylum. He was living 14, Wadham Street in Weston-super-Mare. Dr. Hitchins stated that Maclean was complaining of headaches and believed that all the people in England are against him, and he felt he must injure someone because they are conspiring to deceive him. He had also sent letters to his sister in 1880, Caroline Maclean, stating that, "If I cannot commit a murder one way, I will another way, and all can add is, if there is more difficulty, there may be more victims." Multiple doctors also testified that Maclean was insane and "did not believe he was capable of appreciating the nature or quality of any act which he might commit." Tried for high treason on 20 April, the Scotsman was found "not guilty, but insane" by a jury after five minutes' deliberation, and he lived out his remaining days in Broadmoor Asylum.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:   Tried for high treason on 20 April, the Scotsman was found "not guilty, but insane" by a jury after five minutes' deliberation,  and he lived out his remaining days in Broadmoor Asylum.
Revised:  Tried for high treason on 20 April, the Scotsman was found "not guilty, but insane" by a jury after five minutes' deliberation, overseen by Lord Chief Justice Coleridge. and he lived out his remaining days in Broadmoor Asylum.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: Imam Nasr ad-Din was a Lamtuna Berber religious and military leader, who from 1644 to 1674 led an alliance of Sanhadja Berber tribes in an attempt to repulse the Maqil Arabs then entering their areas of the western Sahara desert (mainly today's Mauritania, southern Morocco and Western Sahara).
Revised: Imam Nasr ad-Din was a Lamtuna Berber religious and military leader, who from 1644 to 1674 led an alliance of Sanhadja Berber tribes against the Maqil Arabs then entering their areas of the western Sahara desert (mainly today's Mauritania, southern Morocco and Western Sahara).
Edit intent: clarity
Original: Imam Nasr ad-Din was a Lamtuna Berber religious and military leader, who from 1644 to 1674 led an alliance of Sanhadja Berber tribes in an attempt to repulse the Maqil Arabs then entering their areas of the western Sahara desert (mainly today's Mauritania, southern Morocco and Western Sahara).
Revised: Imam Nasr ad-Din was a Lamtuna Berber religious and military leader, who from 1644 to 1674 led an alliance of Sanhadja Berber tribes in an attempt to repulse the Maqil Arabs of the western Sahara desert (mainly today's Mauritania, southern Morocco and Western Sahara).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The conflict, the Char Bouba war (or 30-years war) was eventually lost by the Berber tribes , and they were reduced to subordinate roles in the elaborate tribal hierarchy that was then developed by the Arabo-Berber Moorish people that resulted from the fusion between indigenous and immigrant peoples. 
Revised:  Nasr ad-Din was killed in battle in 1674 and the Char Bouba war (or 30-years war) was eventually lost by the Berber tribes , and they were reduced to subordinate roles in the elaborate tribal hierarchy that was then developed by the Arabo-Berber Moorish people that resulted from the fusion between indigenous and immigrant peoples. 
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  The conflict, the Char Bouba war (or 30-years war) was eventually lost by the Berber tribes , and they were reduced to subordinate roles in the elaborate tribal hierarchy that was then developed by the Arabo-Berber Moorish people that resulted from the fusion between indigenous and immigrant peoples. 
Revised:  The conflict, the Char Bouba war (or 30-years war) was lost by the Berber tribes , and they were reduced to subordinate roles in the elaborate tribal hierarchy that was then developed by the Arabo-Berber Moorish people that resulted from the fusion between indigenous and immigrant peoples. 
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The conflict, the Char Bouba war (or 30-years war) was eventually lost by the Berber tribes , and they were reduced to subordinate roles in the elaborate tribal hierarchy that was then developed by the Arabo-Berber Moorish people that resulted from the fusion between indigenous and immigrant peoples. 
Revised:  The conflict, the Char Bouba war (or 30-years war) was eventually lost by the Berber tribes . They were reduced to subordinate roles in the elaborate tribal hierarchy that was then developed by the Arabo-Berber Moorish people that resulted from the fusion between indigenous and immigrant peoples. 
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The conflict, the Char Bouba war (or 30-years war) was eventually lost by the Berber tribes , and they were reduced to subordinate roles in the elaborate tribal hierarchy that was then developed by the Arabo-Berber Moorish people that resulted from the fusion between indigenous and immigrant peoples. 
Revised:  The conflict, the Char Bouba war (or 30-years war) was eventually lost by the Berber tribes , and they were reduced to subordinate roles in the elaborate tribal hierarchy that was then developed by the Arabo-Berber Moorish people that resulted from the fusion between indigenous and immigrant peoples. References
Edit intent: coherence
Original: Agnosticism is the view that the existence of God, of the divine or the supernatural is unknown or unknowable . (page 56 in 1967 edition) Another definition provided is the view that "human reason is incapable of providing sufficient rational grounds to justify either the belief that God exists or the belief that God does not exist."
Revised: Agnosticism is the view that the existence of God, of the divine or the supernatural is not certainly known. If the question is "Does God exist?", yes would imply theism, no would imply atheism, and "I'm not sure" would imply agnosticism; that God possibly can or cannot exist . (page 56 in 1967 edition) Another definition provided is the view that "human reason is incapable of providing sufficient rational grounds to justify either the belief that God exists or the belief that God does not exist."
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: Theological noncognitivism is the position that religious language – specifically, words such as "God" – are not cognitively meaningful. It is sometimes considered synonymous with ignosticism  .
Revised: Theological noncognitivism is the position that religious language – specifically, words such as "God" , are not intelligible or meaningful, and thus sentences like "God exists" are cognitively meaningless. It may be considered synonymous with ignosticism .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  Martin, Michael. Atheism: A Philosophical Justification. Temple University Press, 1990. Martin, Michael. "Positive Atheism and The Meaninglessness of Theism", Infidels.org George H. Smith uses an attribute-based approach in an attempt to prove that there is no concept for God: he argues that there are no meaningful attributes, only negatively defined or relational attributes, making the term meaningless.
Revised:  George H. Smith uses an attribute-based approach in an attempt to prove that there is no concept for God: he argues that there are no meaningful attributes, only negatively defined or relational attributes, making the term meaningless.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  It is asserted by Steven J. Conifer that to be a positive atheist, one who not only lacks a belief in gods but who furthermore denies that gods exist , is to give credence to the existence of a concept of something for God to refer to, because it assumes that there is something understandable to not believe in.
Revised:  Relationship to other non-theist perspectives Steven J. Conifer that to be a positive atheist, one who not only lacks a belief in gods but who furthermore denies that gods exist , is to give credence to the existence of a concept of something for God to refer to, because it assumes that there is something understandable to not believe in.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  It is asserted by Steven J. Conifer that to be a positive atheist, one who not only lacks a belief in gods but who furthermore denies that gods exist , is to give credence to the existence of a concept of something for God to refer to, because it assumes that there is something understandable to not believe in.
Revised:  It is asserted by Steven J. Conifer contrasts theological noncognitivism with positive atheism, which describes not only a lack of a belief in gods but who furthermore denies that gods exist , is to give credence to the existence of a concept of something for God to refer to, because it assumes that there is something understandable to not believe in.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  It is asserted by Steven J. Conifer that to be a positive atheist, one who not only lacks a belief in gods but who furthermore denies that gods exist , is to give credence to the existence of a concept of something for God to refer to, because it assumes that there is something understandable to not believe in.
Revised:  It is asserted by Steven J. Conifer that to be a positive atheist, one who not only lacks a belief in gods but furthermore denies that gods exist , is to give credence to the existence of a concept of something for God to refer to, because it assumes that there is something understandable to not believe in.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  It is asserted by Steven J. Conifer that to be a positive atheist, one who not only lacks a belief in gods but who furthermore denies that gods exist , is to give credence to the existence of a concept of something for God to refer to, because it assumes that there is something understandable to not believe in.
Revised:  It is asserted by Steven J. Conifer that to be a positive atheist, one who not only lacks a belief in gods but who furthermore denies that gods exist thereby giving credence to the existence of a concept of something for God to refer to, because it assumes that there is something understandable to not believe in.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  It is asserted by Steven J. Conifer that to be a positive atheist, one who not only lacks a belief in gods but who furthermore denies that gods exist , is to give credence to the existence of a concept of something for God to refer to, because it assumes that there is something understandable to not believe in.
Revised:  It is asserted by Steven J. Conifer that to be a positive atheist, one who not only lacks a belief in gods but who furthermore denies that gods exist , is to give credence to the existence of a concept of something for "God" to refer to, because it assumes that there is something understandable to not believe in.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Conifer, Steven J. "Theological Noncognitivism Examined" (archive) See also Newton's flaming laser sword Problem of religious language References%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% External links Atheism, Agnosticism, Noncognitivism (1998) by Theodore M. Drange The Argument from Non-Cognitivism, by James Lazarus, is a discussion of Smith-style noncognitivism.
Revised:  See also Newton's flaming laser sword Problem of religious language References%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% External links Atheism, Agnosticism, Noncognitivism (1998) by Theodore M. Drange The Argument from Non-Cognitivism, by James Lazarus, is a discussion of Smith-style noncognitivism.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Conifer, Steven J. "Theological Noncognitivism Examined" (archive) See also Newton's flaming laser sword Problem of religious language References%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% External links Atheism, Agnosticism, Noncognitivism (1998) by Theodore M. Drange The Argument from Non-Cognitivism, by James Lazarus, is a discussion of Smith-style noncognitivism.
Revised:  Conifer, Steven J. "Theological Noncognitivism Examined" (archive) References%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% External links Atheism, Agnosticism, Noncognitivism (1998) by Theodore M. Drange The Argument from Non-Cognitivism, by James Lazarus, is a discussion of Smith-style noncognitivism.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Conifer, Steven J. "Theological Noncognitivism Examined" (archive) See also Newton's flaming laser sword Problem of religious language References%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% External links Atheism, Agnosticism, Noncognitivism (1998) by Theodore M. Drange The Argument from Non-Cognitivism, by James Lazarus, is a discussion of Smith-style noncognitivism.
Revised:  Conifer, Steven J. "Theological Noncognitivism Examined" (archive) See also Newton's flaming laser sword Problem of religious language %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% External links Atheism, Agnosticism, Noncognitivism (1998) by Theodore M. Drange The Argument from Non-Cognitivism, by James Lazarus, is a discussion of Smith-style noncognitivism.
Edit intent: fluency