wanyu/IteraTeR_full_sent huggingface dataset:
Original:  Once known as the most polluted city in the world, it is now   one of the cleanest.
Revised:  Once known as the most polluted city in the world, it is now one of the key barriers to wider development of geothermal resources. A power plant must have production wells to bring the hot fluid (steam or hot water) to the surface and must also have injection wells to pump the liquid back into the reservoir after it has passed through the power plant. Drilling geothermal wells is more expensive than drilling oil and gas wells of comparable depth for several reasons: Geothermal reservoirs are usually in igneous or metamorphic rock, which is harder than the sedimentary rock of hydrocarbon reservoirs. The rock is often fractured, which causes vibrations that are damaging to bits and other drilling tools. The rock is often abrasive, with high quartz content, and sometimes contains highly corrosive fluids. The formation is, by definition, hot, which limits use of downhole electronics. Casing in geothermal wells must be cemented from top to bottom, to resist the casing's tendency to expand and contract with temperature changes. Oil and gas wells are usually cemented only at the bottom. Because the geothermal well produces a low-value fluid (steam or hot water) its diameter is considerably larger than typical oil and gas wells.J. T. Finger and D. A. Blankenship, “Handbook of Best Practices for Geothermal Drilling”, Sandia Report SAND2010-6048, Sandia National Laboratories, December 2010 (for the International Energy Agency)
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Approximately 270 petajoules (PJ) of geothermal heating was used in 2004 of which more than half went for space heating, another third was used for heating pools and the remainder supported industrial and agricultural applications. Global installed capacity was 28 GW, but capacity factors tend to be low (30\% on average) since heat is mostly needed in winter. Heat for these purposes may also be extracted from co-generation at a geothermal electrical plant .
Edit intent: coherence
Original: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Liquid-dominated plants Liquid-dominated reservoirs (LDRs) are more common with temperatures greater than and are found near young volcanoes surrounding the Pacific Ocean and in rift zones and hot spots. Flash plants are the common way to generate electricity from these sources. Pumps are generally not required, powered instead when the water turns to steam. Most wells generate 2– 10 MW of electricity.
Revised: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% In total, electrical plant construction and well drilling cost about € 2– 10 MW of electricity.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Most wells generate 2– 10 MW of electricity. Steam is separated from a liquid via cyclone separators, while the liquid is returned to the reservoir for reheating/reuse. As of 2013, the largest liquid system is Cerro Prieto in Mexico, which generates 750 MW of electricity from temperatures reaching . The Salton Sea field in Southern California offers the potential of generating 2000 MW of electricity.
Revised:  Most wells generate 2– 
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Lower-temperature LDRs (120–200 °C) require pumping. They are common in extensional terrains, where heating takes place via deep circulation along faults, such as in the Western US and Turkey. Water passes through a heat exchanger in a Rankine cycle binary plant. The water vaporizes an organic working fluid that drives a turbine. These binary plants originated in the Soviet Union in the late 1960s and predominate in new US plants. Binary plants have no emissions.Low-Temperature and Co-produced Geothermal Resources. U.S. Department of Energy.
Edit intent: coherence
Original: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Enhanced geothermal systems Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) actively inject water into wells to be heated and pumped back out.
Revised: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) actively inject water into wells to be heated and pumped back out.
Edit intent: fluency
Original: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Enhanced geothermal systems Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) actively inject water into wells to be heated and pumped back out. The water is injected under high pressure to expand existing rock fissures to enable the water to freely flow in and out. The technique was adapted from oil and gas extraction techniques. However, the geologic formations are deeper and no toxic chemicals are used, reducing the possibility of environmental damage. Drillers can employ directional drilling to expand the size of the reservoir.
Revised: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Enhanced geothermal systems 
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Economics%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Geothermal power requires no fuel (except for pumps) , and is therefore immune to fuel cost fluctuations.
Revised:  %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Geothermal power requires no fuel (except for pumps) , and is therefore immune to fuel cost fluctuations.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Economics%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Geothermal power requires no fuel (except for pumps) , and is therefore immune to fuel cost fluctuations.However, capital costs are significant. Drilling accounts for over half the costs, and exploration of deep resources entails significant risks. Atypical well doublet (extraction and injection wells) in Nevada can support 4.5 megawatts (MW) and costs about $10 million to drill, with a 20\% failure rate. A power plant at The Geysers As noted above, drilling cost is a major component of a geothermal power plant's budget and is one of the key barriers to wider development of geothermal resources. A power plant must have production wells to bring the hot fluid (steam or hot water) to the surface and must also have injection wells to pump the liquid back into the reservoir after it has passed through the power plant. Drilling geothermal wells is more expensive than drilling oil and gas wells of comparable depth for several reasons: Geothermal reservoirs are usually in igneous or metamorphic rock, which is harder than the sedimentary rock of hydrocarbon reservoirs. The rock is often fractured, which causes vibrations that are damaging to bits and other drilling tools. The rock is often abrasive, with high quartz content, and sometimes contains highly corrosive fluids. The formation is, by definition, hot, which limits use of downhole electronics. Casing in geothermal wells must be cemented from top to bottom, to resist the casing's tendency to expand and contract with temperature changes. Oil and gas wells are usually cemented only at the bottom. Because the geothermal well produces a low-value fluid (steam or hot water) its diameter is considerably larger than typical oil and gas wells.J. T. Finger and D. A. Blankenship, “Handbook of Best Practices for Geothermal Drilling”, Sandia Report SAND2010-6048, Sandia National Laboratories, December 2010 (for the International Energy Agency) In total, electrical plant construction and well drilling cost about €2–5 million per MW of electrical capacity, while the break-even price is 0.04–0.10 € per kW·h. Enhanced geothermal systems tend to be on the high side of these ranges, with capital costs above $4 million per MW and break-even above 0.054 per kW·h in 2007.
Revised:  Economics%DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% 5 million per MW and break-even above 0.054 per kW·h in 2007.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Enhanced geothermal systems tend to be on the high side of these ranges, with capital costs above $4 million per MW and break-even above 0.054 per kW·h in 2007.
Revised:  Enhanced geothermal systems tend to be on the high side of these ranges, with capital costs above $4 million per MW of electrical capacity, while the break-even above 0.054 per kW·h in 2007.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  Enhanced geothermal systems tend to be on the high side of these ranges, with capital costs above $4 million per MW and break-even above 0.054 per kW·h in 2007.
Revised:  Enhanced geothermal systems tend to be on the high side of these ranges, with capital costs above $4 million per MW and break-even price is 0.04–0.10 € per kW·h. Enhanced geothermal systems tend to be on the high side of these ranges, with capital costs above $4 million per MW and break-even above $ 0.054 per kW·h in 2007.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  the remainder is attributed to higher radioactive decay rates that existed in the past.
Revised:  the remainder is attributed to past and current radioactive decay of naturally occurring isotopes. For example, a 5275 m deep borehole in United Downs Deep Geothermal Power Project in Cornwall, England, found granite with very high thorium content, whose radioactive decay is belied to power the high temperature of the rock.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: In other media A loose adaptation of Pariah appears in live-action television series set in the Arrowverse , making his debut in the sixth season of The Flash , portrayed by Tom Cavanagh.
Revised: In other media A loose adaptation of Pariah appears in live-action television series set in the Arrowverse during the live-action adaptation of Crisis on Infinite Earths , portrayed by Tom Cavanagh.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  In the series, Nash Wells is a multiversal traveler whose objective is to find and kill Mar Novu / The Monitor, as he believes Novu ’s warning of the impending crisis are nothing but lies.
Revised:  In the series, Nash Wells is a multiversal traveler whose objective is to find and kill Mar Novu / The Monitor, believing the latter ’s warning of the impending crisis are nothing but lies.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  During his travels, Nash travels to Earth-1, in which he finds a gate beneath Central City . After accidentally opening it , he frees Novu’s evil counterpart the Anti-Monitor from his confinement.
Revised:  During his travels, Nash travels to Earth-1, in which he finds a gate beneath Central City . After accidentally opening it , he frees Novu’s evil counterpart the Anti-Monitor from confinement.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: In other media A loose adaptation of Pariah appears in live-action television series set in the Arrowverse during the live-action adaptation of Crisis on Infinite Earths , portrayed by Tom Cavanagh.
Revised: In other media A loose adaptation of Pariah appears in live-action television series set in the Arrowverse , making his debut in the sixth season of The Flash , portrayed by Tom Cavanagh.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  In the series, Nash Wells is a multiversal traveler whose objective is to find and kill Mar Novu / The Monitor, believing the latter ’s warning of the impending crisis are nothing but lies.
Revised:  In the series, Nash Wells is a multiversal traveler whose objective is to find and kill Mar Novu / The Monitor, as he believes Novu ’s warning of the impending crisis are nothing but lies.
Edit intent: coherence
Original: In other media A loose adaptation of Pariah appears in live-action television series set in the Arrowverse, making his debut in the sixth season of The Flash, portrayed by Tom Cavanagh.
Revised: In other media A loose adaptation of Pariah appears in live-action television series set in the Arrowverse, portrayed by Tom Cavanagh. First appearing the sixth season of The Flash, portrayed by Tom Cavanagh.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: In other media A loose adaptation of Pariah appears in live-action television series set in the Arrowverse, making his debut in the sixth season of The Flash, portrayed by Tom Cavanagh. In the series, Nash Wells is a multiversal traveler whose objective is to find and kill Mar Novu / The Monitor, as he believes Novu’s warning of the impending crisis are nothing but lies . During his travels, Nash travels to Earth-1, in which he finds a gate beneath Central City.
Revised: In other media A loose adaptation of Pariah appears in live-action television series set in the Arrowverse, making his debut in the sixth season of The Flash, Nash Wells is a multiversal traveler whose objective is to find and kill Mar Novu / The Monitor, as he believes Novu’s warning of the impending crisis are nothing but lies . During his travels, Nash travels to Earth-1, in which he finds a gate beneath Central City.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  In the series, Nash Wells is a multiversal traveler whose objective is to find and kill Mar Novu / The Monitor, as he believes Novu’s warning of the impending crisis are nothing but lies . During his travels, Nash travels to Earth-1, in which he finds a gate beneath Central City.
Revised:  In the series, Nash Wells is a multiversal traveler whose objective is to find and kill Mar Novu / The Monitor, believing him to be a false god . During his travels, Nash travels to Earth-1, in which he finds a gate beneath Central City.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  As a consequence, Nash becomes a “Pariah” and is forced to witness the destruction of the multiverse by the Anti-Monitor . Just before the Anti-Monitor can destroy Earth-1, Nash sends the recruited Paragons to the Vanishing Point under Novu ’ s orders.
Revised:  During the events of the Arrowverse crossover "Crisis on Infinite Earths", Nash became a "Pariah" for releasing the Anti-Monitor and is forced to witness the destruction of the multiverse by the Anti-Monitor . Just before the Anti-Monitor can destroy Earth-1, Nash sends the recruited Paragons to the Vanishing Point under Novu ’ s orders.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  As a consequence, Nash becomes a “Pariah” and is forced to witness the destruction of the multiverse by the Anti-Monitor . Just before the Anti-Monitor can destroy Earth-1, Nash sends the recruited Paragons to the Vanishing Point under Novu ’ s orders.
Revised:  As a consequence, Nash becomes a “Pariah” and is forced to bear witness to the destruction of the multiverse by the Anti-Monitor . Just before the Anti-Monitor can destroy Earth-1, Nash sends the recruited Paragons to the Vanishing Point under Novu ’ s orders.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  As a consequence, Nash becomes a “Pariah” and is forced to witness the destruction of the multiverse by the Anti-Monitor . Just before the Anti-Monitor can destroy Earth-1, Nash sends the recruited Paragons to the Vanishing Point under Novu ’ s orders.
Revised:  As a consequence, Nash becomes a “Pariah” and is forced to witness the destruction of the multiverse . Just before the Anti-Monitor can destroy Earth-1, Nash sends the recruited Paragons to the Vanishing Point under Novu ’ s orders.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  As a consequence, Nash becomes a “Pariah” and is forced to witness the destruction of the multiverse by the Anti-Monitor . Just before the Anti-Monitor can destroy Earth-1, Nash sends the recruited Paragons to the Vanishing Point under Novu ’ s orders.
Revised:  As a consequence, Nash becomes a “Pariah” and is forced to witness the destruction of the multiverse by the Anti-Monitor . Just before the Anti-Monitor can destroy Earth-1, Nash sends the recruited Paragons to the Vanishing Point under Novu ' s orders.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Following the Anti-Monitor's defeat, Nash ’s body is taken over by Eobard Thawne / Reverse-Flash until he is freed by Team Flash. Nash continues assisting the team after they reconcile with Nash for freeing the Anti-Monitor .
Revised:  Following the Anti-Monitor's defeat, Nash is restored to his original self and temporarily lacked his memories as Pariah until the Martian Manhunter restored them to remind him of what he did .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: 218x218px |Raymond B. Cattell: British-American Psychologist alt=John Leonard Horn: American Psychologist|John Leonard Horn: American Psychologist The Cattell–Horn–Carroll theory (commonly abbreviated to CHC), is a psychological theory on the structure of human cognitive abilities.
Revised: 128x128px |Raymond B. Cattell: British-American Psychologist alt=John Leonard Horn: American Psychologist|John Leonard Horn: American Psychologist The Cattell–Horn–Carroll theory (commonly abbreviated to CHC), is a psychological theory on the structure of human cognitive abilities.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: 218x218px |Raymond B. Cattell: British-American Psychologist alt=John Leonard Horn: American Psychologist|John Leonard Horn: American Psychologist The Cattell–Horn–Carroll theory (commonly abbreviated to CHC), is a psychological theory on the structure of human cognitive abilities.
Revised: 218x218px |Raymond B. Cattell: British-American psychologist 128x128px| alt=John Leonard Horn: American Psychologist|John Leonard Horn: American Psychologist The Cattell–Horn–Carroll theory (commonly abbreviated to CHC), is a psychological theory on the structure of human cognitive abilities.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: 218x218px |Raymond B. Cattell: British-American Psychologist alt=John Leonard Horn: American Psychologist|John Leonard Horn: American Psychologist The Cattell–Horn–Carroll theory (commonly abbreviated to CHC), is a psychological theory on the structure of human cognitive abilities.
Revised: 218x218px |Raymond B. Cattell: British-American Psychologist alt=John Leonard Horn: American Psychologist|John Leonard Horn: American psychologist 128x128px|John B. Carroll, American psychologist The Cattell–Horn–Carroll theory (commonly abbreviated to CHC), is a psychological theory on the structure of human cognitive abilities.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  (In another words every being has a sufficient reason for its existence and every true proposition has a reason to explain why the proposition holds true) Leibniz argued, even if someone is able to tell a being or true proposition's sufficient reason (a reason that explains why the proposition holds true), he can keep asking the question "why?" to explain the reason why the explanation for a certain being, event or a proposition holds true.
Revised:  (In another words every being has a sufficient reason for its existence and every true proposition has a reason to explain why the proposition holds URL Leibniz argued, even if someone is able to tell a being or true proposition's sufficient reason (a reason that explains why the proposition holds true), he can keep asking the question "why?" to explain the reason why the explanation for a certain being, event or a proposition holds true.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Others who credit Rohn for his influence on their careers include authors  Mark Victor Hansen (Everton Edwards) founder of Hallmark innovators Conglomerate company limited and Jack Canfield (Chicken Soup book series), author/lecturer Brian Tracy, Todd Smith, and T. Harv Eker.
Revised:  Others who credit Rohn for his influence on their careers include authors /lecturers Mark Victor Hansen (Everton Edwards) founder of Hallmark innovators Conglomerate company limited and Jack Canfield (Chicken Soup book series), author/lecturer Brian Tracy, Todd Smith, and T. Harv Eker.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Others who credit Rohn for his influence on their careers include authors  Mark Victor Hansen (Everton Edwards) founder of Hallmark innovators Conglomerate company limited and Jack Canfield (Chicken Soup book series), author/lecturer Brian Tracy, Todd Smith, and T. Harv Eker.
Revised:  Others who credit Rohn for his influence on their careers include authors Mark Victor Hansen and Jack Canfield (Chicken Soup book series), author/lecturer Brian Tracy, Todd Smith, and T. Harv Eker.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Others who credit Rohn for his influence on their careers include authors  Mark Victor Hansen (Everton Edwards) founder of Hallmark innovators Conglomerate company limited and Jack Canfield (Chicken Soup book series), author/lecturer Brian Tracy, Todd Smith, and T. Harv Eker.
Revised:  Others who credit Rohn for his influence on their careers include authors Mark Victor Hansen (Everton Edwards) founder of Hallmark innovators Conglomerate company limited and Jack Canfield (Chicken Soup book series), Everton Edwards (Hallmark Innovators Conglomerate), Brian Tracy, Todd Smith, and T. Harv Eker.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: Rogerian argument (or Rogerian rhetoric) is a rhetorical and conflict resolution technique based on empathizing with others, seeking common ground and mutual understanding and learning, while avoiding the negative effects of extreme attitude polarization.
Revised: Rogerian argument (or Rogerian rhetoric) is a rhetorical and conflict resolution strategy based on empathizing with others, seeking common ground and mutual understanding and learning, while avoiding the negative effects of extreme attitude polarization.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:    Origin alt=Burton Tower, with Hill Auditorium (left) and the Rackham School of Graduate Studies (right), at the University of Michigan|The University of Michigan is where Rogerian argument was given its name by Anatol Rapoport and others.
Revised:  For example, they concluded that Rogerian argument is less likely to be appropriate or effective when communicating with violent or discriminatory people or institutions, in situations of social exclusion or extreme power inequality, or in judicial settings that use formal adversarial procedures. Origin alt=Burton Tower, with Hill Auditorium (left) and the Rackham School of Graduate Studies (right), at the University of Michigan|The University of Michigan is where Rogerian argument was given its name by Anatol Rapoport and others.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:    Origin alt=Burton Tower, with Hill Auditorium (left) and the Rackham School of Graduate Studies (right), at the University of Michigan|The University of Michigan is where Rogerian argument was given its name by Anatol Rapoport and others.
Revised:  Some empirical research has tested role reversal and found that its effectiveness depends on the issue and situation. Origin alt=Burton Tower, with Hill Auditorium (left) and the Rackham School of Graduate Studies (right), at the University of Michigan|The University of Michigan is where Rogerian argument was given its name by Anatol Rapoport and others.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:   In practice In oral communication ,
Revised:  They also said that classical rhetoric is used both in situations—when two parties are trying to understand and change each other—and in situations—when one party is responding to an opponent but is trying to influence a third party such as an arbitrator or jury or public opinion—but Rogerian rhetoric is specially intended for certain dyadic situations, not for triadic situations.; later, concluded: "Rogers' principles have been treated most persuasively when applied to argumentation in dyadic rather than triadic situations." In practice In oral communication ,
Edit intent: meaning-changed