wanyu/IteraTeR_full_sent huggingface dataset:
Original:  In 2020 the Carrier Sekani Tribal Council in Prince George, British Columbia moved from organizing its library with the Dewey Decimal Classification to  a version of the BDC, adding new categories for topics of local interest such as the  Missing and murdered Indigenous women epidemic .
Revised:  In 2020 the Carrier Sekani Tribal Council in Prince George, British Columbia moved from organizing its library with the Dewey Decimal Classification to a version of the BDC, adding new categories for topics of local interest such as the crisis of Missing and murdered Indigenous women epidemic .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  In 2020 the Carrier Sekani Tribal Council in Prince George, British Columbia moved from organizing its library with the Dewey Decimal Classification to  a version of the BDC, adding new categories for topics of local interest such as the  Missing and murdered Indigenous women epidemic .
Revised:  In 2020 the Carrier Sekani Tribal Council in Prince George, British Columbia moved from organizing its library with the Dewey Decimal Classification to a version of the BDC, adding new categories for topics of local interest such as the Missing and murdered Indigenous women .
Edit intent: clarity
Original: Politics: cooperation and knowing-as-inquiry The branch of philosophy recognized as "politics" concerns the governance of community and group interaction, not merely that of the state as conceived when thinking of a local or national government.
Revised: Politics: cooperation and knowing-as-inquiry The branch of philosophy recognized as "politics" concerns the governance of community and group interaction, not merely the governing over a state or group as conventionally conceived in thoughts about local or national government.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:   ] ]  ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Revised:  Transactionalists view politics as a cooperative, genuine interaction between all participating parties whether buyer-seller, student-teacher, or worker-boss; we are biological as well as social subjects involved not merely in "transacting" for our own advantage or gain but connected to other entities. " ] ] ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:   ] ]  ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Revised:  S] ] ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Edit intent: fluency
Original:   ] ]  ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Revised:  ]ocial phenomena cannot be understood except as there is prior understanding of physical conditions and the laws of their ] ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:   ] ]  ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Revised:  ] socio-biological] ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:   ] ]  ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Revised:  ] ] interactions," wrote John Dewey in Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. Furthermore, he added, "inquiry into ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:   ] ]  ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Revised:  ] ] social phenomena] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:   ] ]  ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Revised:  ] ] ], with respect both to data that are significant and to their relations or proper ordering, is conditioned upon extensive prior knowledge of physical phenomena and their laws. This fact accounts in part for the retarded and immature state of social subjects." Thus, cooperation and knowing as inquiry is foundational to governing communal affairs of any kind including economic trade and our educative process. In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:   ] ]  ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Revised:  ] ] ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" (or trans-action) used here. His conception is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:   ] ]  ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in a trade or analogous situation.
Revised:  ] ] ] In Laws of Motion (1920), physicist James Clerk Maxwell articulated the modern conception of "transaction" used here—one that is not exclusive to an economic context or limited to the opposition of a buyer-seller in trade or some analogous situation.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  In the educative process, acting without knowing (described below) is a separation or fracturing of the same enjoined phenomenon . Without inquiry acting does not work .
Revised:  In the educative process, acting without knowing (described below) is a separation or fracturing of the enjoined phenomenon (e.g., knowing is doing, organizing the mental or physical acts in a pragmatic way). Without knowing-as-inquiry, blindly acting as an organism in an environment often does not work .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  both  must essentially involve inquiry into things that have happened and are happening  : Knowledge – if the term is to be employed at all – is a name for the product of competent inquiries, and is constituted only as the outcome of a particular inquiry.
Revised:  both knowing and acting must essentially involve inquiry into things that have happened and are happening : Knowledge – if the term is to be employed at all – is a name for the product of competent inquiries, and is constituted only as the outcome of a particular inquiry.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  both  must essentially involve inquiry into things that have happened and are happening  : Knowledge – if the term is to be employed at all – is a name for the product of competent inquiries, and is constituted only as the outcome of a particular inquiry.
Revised:  both must essentially involve inquiry into things that have happened and are happening challenging our assumptions and expectations which will wrong in some context : Knowledge – if the term is to be employed at all – is a name for the product of competent inquiries, and is constituted only as the outcome of a particular inquiry.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  It is not "a process taking place , " or some "status" located in an organism  ]  . Knowledge arises from inquiry and the testingof that inquiry to insure the fitness of not only the solutionbut the organism-environment .
Revised:  From the constitutive process of knowing and doing, knowledge is more than "a process taking place , " or some "status" located in an organism ] . Knowledge arises from inquiry and the testingof that inquiry to insure the fitness of not only the solutionbut the organism-environment .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  It is not "a process taking place , " or some "status" located in an organism  ]  . Knowledge arises from inquiry and the testingof that inquiry to insure the fitness of not only the solutionbut the organism-environment .
Revised:  It is not "a process taking place " or some "status" located in an organism ] . Knowledge arises from inquiry and the testingof that inquiry to insure the fitness of not only the solutionbut the organism-environment .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  It is not "a process taking place , " or some "status" located in an organism  ]  . Knowledge arises from inquiry and the testingof that inquiry to insure the fitness of not only the solutionbut the organism-environment .
Revised:  It is not "a process taking place , " or some "status" located in an organism 's ] . Knowledge arises from inquiry and the testingof that inquiry to insure the fitness of not only the solutionbut the organism-environment .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  It is not "a process taking place , " or some "status" located in an organism  ]  . Knowledge arises from inquiry and the testingof that inquiry to insure the fitness of not only the solutionbut the organism-environment .
Revised:  It is not "a process taking place , " or some "status" located in an organism of person's] . Knowledge arises from inquiry and the testingof that inquiry to insure the fitness of not only the solutionbut the organism-environment .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  It is not "a process taking place , " or some "status" located in an organism  ]  . Knowledge arises from inquiry and the testingof that inquiry to insure the fitness of not only the solutionbut the organism-environment .
Revised:  It is not "a process taking place , " or some "status" located in an organism ] mind . Knowledge arises from inquiry and the testingof that inquiry to insure the fitness of not only the solutionbut the organism-environment .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  It is not "a process taking place , " or some "status" located in an organism  ]  . Knowledge arises from inquiry and the testingof that inquiry to insure the fitness of not only the solutionbut the organism-environment .
Revised:  It is not "a process taking place , " or some "status" located in an organism ] . Knowledge arises from inquiry . It arises out of a kind of testing; an iterative process of inquiry into what we know and expect, that insures a suitable fitness of not only the solutionbut the organism-environment .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  It is not "a process taking place , " or some "status" located in an organism  ]  . Knowledge arises from inquiry and the testingof that inquiry to insure the fitness of not only the solutionbut the organism-environment .
Revised:  It is not "a process taking place , " or some "status" located in an organism ] . Knowledge arises from inquiry and the testingof that inquiry to insure the fitness of not only in solving problems (finding a solution). It insures the fitness of the organism-environment .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  It is not "a process taking place , " or some "status" located in an organism  ]  . Knowledge arises from inquiry and the testingof that inquiry to insure the fitness of not only the solutionbut the organism-environment . While a human being is central  or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part  and never outside it that cosmos or environment  . Each situation  —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism  to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Revised:  It is not "a process taking place , " or some "status" located in an organism ] . Knowledge arises from inquiry and the testingof that inquiry to insure the fitness of not only the solutionbut the organism-environment which may vary dependent on the situation, the time and place, or the culture. or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part and never outside it that cosmos or environment . Each situation —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  While a human being is central  or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part  and never outside it that cosmos or environment  . Each situation  —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism  to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Revised:  While a human being is central While a person is central ( or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part and never outside it that cosmos or environment . Each situation —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  While a human being is central  or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part  and never outside it that cosmos or environment  . Each situation  —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism  to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Revised:  While a human being is central or "nuclear" as in a nucleus) to a conception of organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part and never outside it that cosmos or environment . Each situation —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  While a human being is central  or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part  and never outside it that cosmos or environment  . Each situation  —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism  to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Revised:  While a human being is central or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, human beings as organisms must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part and never outside it that cosmos or environment . Each situation —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  While a human being is central  or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part  and never outside it that cosmos or environment  . Each situation  —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism  to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Revised:  While a human being is central or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over their social-biological cosmos. Being human is but a part and never outside it that cosmos or environment . Each situation —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  While a human being is central  or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part  and never outside it that cosmos or environment  . Each situation  —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism  to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Revised:  While a human being is central or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part , and never outside it that cosmos or environment . Each situation —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  While a human being is central  or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part  and never outside it that cosmos or environment  . Each situation  —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism  to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Revised:  While a human being is central or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part and never outside , that cosmos or environment . Each situation —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  While a human being is central  or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part  and never outside it that cosmos or environment  . Each situation  —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism  to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Revised:  While a human being is central or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part and never outside it that cosmos or environment which they need to survive and they need to adapt to to thrive . Each situation —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  While a human being is central  or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part  and never outside it that cosmos or environment  . Each situation  —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism  to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Revised:  While a human being is central or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part and never outside it that cosmos or environment . Each situation and assumptions about it —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  While a human being is central  or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part  and never outside it that cosmos or environment  . Each situation  —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be examined and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism  to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Revised:  While a human being is central or "nuclear" to the conception of an organism-environment, they must abdicate any sense of dominion over the socio-biological cosmosof which being human is but a part and never outside it that cosmos or environment . Each situation —and this transactionalists assert is radical way of thinking—must be tested, examined, and determined by a construction of moves and action based on the capacity of that organism to fulfill its intentions and eventually thrive (or not).
Edit intent: clarity