wanyu/IteraTeR_full_sent huggingface dataset:
Original:  The experimental results on several benchmark data sets for long-form document matching show that our proposed SMITH model outperforms the previous state-of-the-art Siamese matching models including hierarchical attention, multi-depth attention-based hierarchical recurrent neural network, and BERT for long-form document matching, and increases the maximum input text length from 512 to 2048 when compared with BERT-based baseline methods .
Revised:  The experimental results on several benchmark data sets for long-form document matching show that our proposed SMITH model outperforms the previous state-of-the-art models including hierarchical attention, multi-depth attention-based hierarchical recurrent neural network, and BERT for long-form document matching, and increases the maximum input text length from 512 to 2048 when compared with BERT-based baseline methods .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The experimental results on several benchmark data sets for long-form document matching show that our proposed SMITH model outperforms the previous state-of-the-art Siamese matching models including hierarchical attention, multi-depth attention-based hierarchical recurrent neural network, and BERT for long-form document matching, and increases the maximum input text length from 512 to 2048 when compared with BERT-based baseline methods .
Revised:  The experimental results on several benchmark data sets for long-form document matching show that our proposed SMITH model outperforms the previous state-of-the-art Siamese matching models including hierarchical attention, multi-depth attention-based hierarchical recurrent neural network, and BERT . Comparing to BERT based baselines, our model is able to increase maximum input text length from 512 to 2048 when compared with BERT-based baseline methods .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  The experimental results on several benchmark data sets for long-form document matching show that our proposed SMITH model outperforms the previous state-of-the-art Siamese matching models including hierarchical attention, multi-depth attention-based hierarchical recurrent neural network, and BERT for long-form document matching, and increases the maximum input text length from 512 to 2048 when compared with BERT-based baseline methods .
Revised:  The experimental results on several benchmark data sets for long-form document matching show that our proposed SMITH model outperforms the previous state-of-the-art Siamese matching models including hierarchical attention, multi-depth attention-based hierarchical recurrent neural network, and BERT for long-form document matching, and increases the maximum input text length from 512 to 2048. We will open source a Wikipedia based benchmark dataset, code and a pre-trained checkpoint to accelerate future research on long-form document matching .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We denote by {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal A {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal _k ({\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} ) the set of all graphs that are k-apices of{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal G {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal . In the first paper of this series we obtained upper bounds on the size of the graphs in the minor-obstruction set of{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal A {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal _k ({\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal G {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal ), i.e., the minor-minimal set of graphs not belonging to{\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal A {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal _k ({\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal G an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal ). In this article we provide an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that , given a graph G on n vertices, runs in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G \in {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal A {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal _k ({\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} ), or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that (k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} G\notin {\cal {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal A {\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal _k ({\cal .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal G .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  We prove that if {\cal  {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal  {\cal   an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal  {\cal G}  or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal  {\cal   .
Revised:  We prove that if {\cal {\cal G} is minor-closed, then there is{\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal {\cal an algorithm that (k)}\cdot n^3-time and } either returns a set S certifying that G is a k-apex of {\cal {\cal G} or reports that such a set does not exist, in 2^{{\sf poly(k)}\cdot n^3 time} \notin {\cal {\cal ) .
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  Here {\sf poly} is a polynomial function whose degree depends on the maximum size of a minor-obstruction of {\cal G} , i. e., the minor-minimal set of graphs not belonging to%DIFDELCMD < {\cal %%% G . In the special case where {\cal G} excludes some apex graph as a minor, we give an alternative algorithm running in 2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^2 time .
Revised:  Here {\sf poly} is a polynomial function whose degree depends on the maximum size of a minor-obstruction of {\cal G} %DIFDELCMD < {\cal %%% G . In the special case where {\cal G} excludes some apex graph as a minor, we give an alternative algorithm running in 2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^2 time .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Here {\sf poly} is a polynomial function whose degree depends on the maximum size of a minor-obstruction of {\cal G} , i. e., the minor-minimal set of graphs not belonging to%DIFDELCMD < {\cal %%% G . In the special case where {\cal G} excludes some apex graph as a minor, we give an alternative algorithm running in 2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^2 time .
Revised:  Here {\sf poly} is a polynomial function whose degree depends on the maximum size of a minor-obstruction of {\cal G} , i. e., the minor-minimal set of graphs not belonging to%DIFDELCMD < {\cal %%% . In the special case where {\cal G} excludes some apex graph as a minor, we give an alternative algorithm running in 2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^2 time .
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Here {\sf poly} is a polynomial function whose degree depends on the maximum size of a minor-obstruction of {\cal G} , i. e., the minor-minimal set of graphs not belonging to%DIFDELCMD < {\cal %%% G . In the special case where {\cal G} excludes some apex graph as a minor, we give an alternative algorithm running in 2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^2 time .
Revised:  Here {\sf poly} is a polynomial function whose degree depends on the maximum size of a minor-obstruction of {\cal G} , i. e., the minor-minimal set of graphs not belonging to%DIFDELCMD < {\cal %%% G . In the special case where {\cal G} excludes some apex graph as a minor, we give an alternative algorithm running in 2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^2 -time .
Edit intent: clarity
Original: The total number of COVID-19 infections is critical information for decision makers when assessing the progress of the pandemic, its implications, and policy options . Despite efforts to carefully monitor the COVID-19 pandemic, the reported number of confirmed cases is likely to underestimate the actual number of infections.
Revised: Understanding how widely COVID-19 infections is critical information for decision makers when assessing the progress of the pandemic, its implications, and policy options . Despite efforts to carefully monitor the COVID-19 pandemic, the reported number of confirmed cases is likely to underestimate the actual number of infections.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: The total number of COVID-19 infections is critical information for decision makers when assessing the progress of the pandemic, its implications, and policy options . Despite efforts to carefully monitor the COVID-19 pandemic, the reported number of confirmed cases is likely to underestimate the actual number of infections.
Revised: The total number of COVID-19 has spread is critical for examining the pandemic's progression . Despite efforts to carefully monitor the COVID-19 pandemic, the reported number of confirmed cases is likely to underestimate the actual number of infections.
Edit intent: clarity
Original: The total number of COVID-19 infections is critical information for decision makers when assessing the progress of the pandemic, its implications, and policy options . Despite efforts to carefully monitor the COVID-19 pandemic, the reported number of confirmed cases is likely to underestimate the actual number of infections.
Revised: The total number of COVID-19 infections is critical information for decision makers when assessing the progress of the pandemic, its implications, and policy options . Despite efforts to carefully monitor the pandemic, the reported number of confirmed cases is likely to underestimate the actual number of infections.
Edit intent: fluency