wanyu/IteraTeR_full_sent huggingface dataset:
Original: REDIRECT State o                                   
Revised: REDIRECT State o Agustin Guzmán, freed by Morazán when the latter had seemingly defeated Carrera in Guatemala City, had gone back to Quetzaltenango with the good news. The city's liberal criollo leaders rapidly reinstated the Los Altos State and celebrated Morazán's victory. However, as soon as Carrera and the newly reinstated Mariano Rivera Paz heard the news, Carrera went back to Quetzaltenango with his volunteer army to regain control of the rebel liberal state once and for all. 
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: REDIRECT State o                                   
Revised: REDIRECT State o On 2 April 1840, after entering the city, Carrera told the citizens that he had already warned them after he defeated them earlier that year. Then he ordered most of the liberal city hall officials from Los Altos shot. Carrera, then forcibly annexed Quetzaltenango and much of Los Altos back into conservative Guatemala. 
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: REDIRECT State o                                   
Revised: REDIRECT State o After the violent and bloody reinstatement of the State of Los Altos by Carrera in April 1840, Luis Batres Juarros — conservative member of the Aycinena Clan, then secretary general of the Guatemalan government of recently reinstated Mariano Rivera Paz — obtained from the vicar Larrazabal authorization to dismantle the regionalist Church. 
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: REDIRECT State o                                   
Revised: REDIRECT State o Active priests of Quetzaltenango — capital of the would-be-state of Los Altos — Urban Ugarte and José Maria Aguilar, were removed from their parish and likewise the priests of the parishes of San Martin Jilotepeque and San Lucas Tolimán. Larrazabal ordered the priests Fernando Antonio Dávila, Mariano Navarrete and Jose Ignacio Iturrioz to cover the parishes of Quetzaltenango, San Martin Jilotepeque and San Lucas Toliman, respectively. 
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: REDIRECT State o                                   
Revised: REDIRECT State o Proclamation Coin 1847 of the independent Republic of Guatemala During his first term as president, Rafael Carrera brought the country back from excessive conservatism to a traditional climate. However, in 1848, the liberals were able to force Rafael Carrera to leave office, after the country had been in turmoil for several months. Carrera resigned of his own free will and left for México. The new liberal regime allied itself with the Aycinena family and swiftly passed a law which they emphatically ordered the execution of Carrera if he dared to return to Guatemalan soil. 
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: REDIRECT State o                                   
Revised: REDIRECT State o In his absence, the liberal criollos from Quetzaltenango — led by general Agustín Guzmán who occupied the city after Corregidor general Mariano Paredes was called to Guatemala City to take over the Presidential office- declared that Los Altos was an independent state once again on 26 August 1848; the new state had the support of Vasconcelos' regime in El Salvador and the rebel guerrilla army of Vicente and Serapio Cruz who were declared enemies of general Carrera. The interim government was led by Guzmán himself and had Florencio Molina and the priest Fernando Davila as his Cabinet members. 
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: REDIRECT State o                                   
Revised: REDIRECT State o On 5 September 1848, the criollo altenses chose a formal government led by Fernando Antonio Martínez. In the meantime, Carrera returned to Guatemala and entered by Huehuetenango, where he met with the native leaders and told them that they had to remain united to prevail. The leaders agreed and slowly the segregated native communities started to develop a new Indian identity under Carrera's leadership. In the meantime, in the eastern part of Guatemala, the Jalapa region became increasingly dangerous; former president Mariano Rivera Paz and rebel leader Vicente Cruz were both murdered there after trying to take over the Corregidor office in 1849. 
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: REDIRECT State o                                   
Revised: REDIRECT State o Upon learning that officer José Víctor Zavala had been appointed as Corregidor in Suchitepéquez, Carrera and his hundred jacalteco bodyguards crossed a dangerous jungle infested with jaguars to meet his former friend. When they met, Zavala not only did not capture him, but agreed to serve under his orders, thus sending a strong message to both liberal and conservatives in Guatemala City, who realized that they were forced to negotiate with Carrera, otherwise they were going to have to battle on two fronts — Quetzaltenango and Jalapa. 
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: REDIRECT State o                                   
Revised: REDIRECT State o Carrera went back to the Quetzaltenango area, while Zavala remained in Suchitepéquez as a tactical maneuver. Carrera received a visit from a Cabinet member of Paredes and told him that he had control of the native population and that he would keep them appeased. When the emissary returned to Guatemala City, he told the president everything Carrera said, and added that the native forces were formidable. 
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: REDIRECT State o                                   
Revised: REDIRECT State o Agustín Guzmán went to Antigua Guatemala to meet with another group of Paredes emissaries; they agreed that Los Altos would rejoin Guatemala, and that the latter would help Guzmán defeat his hated enemy and also build a port on the Pacific Ocean. Guzmán was sure of victory this time, but his plan evaporated when, in his absence, Carrera and his native allies occupied Quetzaltenango. Carrera appointed Ignacio Yrigoyen as Corregidor and convinced him that he should work with the K'iche', Q’anjob’al, and Mam leaders to keep the region under control. On his way out, Yrigoyen murmured to a friend: Now he is the King of the Indians, indeed! 
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original: Litigation public relations, also known as litigation communications, is the management of the communication process during the course of any legal dispute or adjudicatory processing so as to affect the outcome or its impact on the client's overall reputation (Haggerty, 2003).
Revised: Litigation public relations, also known as litigation communications, is the management of the communication process during the course of any legal dispute or adjudicatory processing so as to affect the outcome or its impact on the client's overall reputation .Haggerty, J. F. ( 2003).
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  Plaintiffs and prosecutors have long used mass media to get their side of the story out to the public  , but the formal practice of litigation PR, a sub-specialty of crisis communication, first emerged in the  early 1980s with Alan Hilburg, a pioneer in litigation communications representation of U.S. Tobacco in the Marsee case.
Revised:  The use of mass media to get their side of the story out to the public , but the formal practice of litigation PR, a sub-specialty of crisis communication, first emerged in the early 1980s with Alan Hilburg, a pioneer in litigation communications representation of U.S. Tobacco in the Marsee case.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Plaintiffs and prosecutors have long used mass media to get their side of the story out to the public  , but the formal practice of litigation PR, a sub-specialty of crisis communication, first emerged in the  early 1980s with Alan Hilburg, a pioneer in litigation communications representation of U.S. Tobacco in the Marsee case.
Revised:  Plaintiffs and prosecutors have long used mass media to present a particular narrative to the public , but the formal practice of litigation PR, a sub-specialty of crisis communication, first emerged in the early 1980s with Alan Hilburg, a pioneer in litigation communications representation of U.S. Tobacco in the Marsee case.
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Plaintiffs and prosecutors have long used mass media to get their side of the story out to the public  , but the formal practice of litigation PR, a sub-specialty of crisis communication, first emerged in the  early 1980s with Alan Hilburg, a pioneer in litigation communications representation of U.S. Tobacco in the Marsee case.
Revised:  Plaintiffs and prosecutors have long used mass media to get their side of the story out to the public has been used by both plaintiffs and prosecutors for a long time , but the formal practice of litigation PR, a sub-specialty of crisis communication, first emerged in the early 1980s with Alan Hilburg, a pioneer in litigation communications representation of U.S. Tobacco in the Marsee case.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  Plaintiffs and prosecutors have long used mass media to get their side of the story out to the public  , but the formal practice of litigation PR, a sub-specialty of crisis communication, first emerged in the  early 1980s with Alan Hilburg, a pioneer in litigation communications representation of U.S. Tobacco in the Marsee case.
Revised:  Plaintiffs and prosecutors have long used mass media to get their side of the story out to the public , but the formal practice of litigation PR, a sub-specialty of crisis communication, emerged in the early 1980s with Alan Hilburg, a pioneer in litigation communications representation of U.S. Tobacco in the Marsee case.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Plaintiffs and prosecutors have long used mass media to get their side of the story out to the public  , but the formal practice of litigation PR, a sub-specialty of crisis communication, first emerged in the  early 1980s with Alan Hilburg, a pioneer in litigation communications representation of U.S. Tobacco in the Marsee case.
Revised:  Plaintiffs and prosecutors have long used mass media to get their side of the story out to the public , but the formal practice of litigation PR, a sub-specialty of crisis communication, first emerged in the United States in the early 1980s with Alan Hilburg, a pioneer in litigation communications representation of U.S. Tobacco in the Marsee case.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  Thus, parties to cases, whether civil or criminal, cannot ignore the impact of negative publicity on public opinion (Reber, Gower, Robinson, 2006) . Given the often complex matters at stake in litigation, practitioners need to digest and simplify these to ensure media and public interest in the story, without diluting any of the meaning in legal documents (Maltin, 2018) .
Revised:  Thus, Robinson, 2006) . Given the often complex matters at stake in litigation, practitioners need to digest and simplify these to ensure media and public interest in the story, without diluting any of the meaning in legal documents (Maltin, 2018) .
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Thus, parties to cases, whether civil or criminal, cannot ignore the impact of negative publicity on public opinion (Reber, Gower, Robinson, 2006) . Given the often complex matters at stake in litigation, practitioners need to digest and simplify these to ensure media and public interest in the story, without diluting any of the meaning in legal documents (Maltin, 2018) .
Revised:  Thus, parties to cases, whether civil or criminal, cannot ignore the impact of negative publicity on public opinion (Reber, Gower, many seek to limit the negative publicity associated with their cases . Given the often complex matters at stake in litigation, practitioners need to digest and simplify these to ensure media and public interest in the story, without diluting any of the meaning in legal documents (Maltin, 2018) .
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  Thus, parties to cases, whether civil or criminal, cannot ignore the impact of negative publicity on public opinion (Reber, Gower, Robinson, 2006) . Given the often complex matters at stake in litigation, practitioners need to digest and simplify these to ensure media and public interest in the story, without diluting any of the meaning in legal documents (Maltin, 2018) .
Revised:  Thus, parties to cases, whether civil or criminal, cannot ignore the impact of negative publicity on public opinion (Reber, Gower, Robinson, 2006) . Given the often complex matters which are the subject of litigation, practitioners need to digest and simplify these to ensure media and public interest in the story, without diluting any of the meaning in legal documents (Maltin, 2018) .
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Thus, parties to cases, whether civil or criminal, cannot ignore the impact of negative publicity on public opinion (Reber, Gower, Robinson, 2006) . Given the often complex matters at stake in litigation, practitioners need to digest and simplify these to ensure media and public interest in the story, without diluting any of the meaning in legal documents (Maltin, 2018) .
Revised:  Thus, parties to cases, whether civil or criminal, cannot ignore the impact of negative publicity on public opinion (Reber, Gower, Robinson, 2006) . Given the often complex matters at stake in litigation, practitioners need to digest and simplify these to ensure media and public interest in the story, without diluting any of the meaning in legal documents .
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  Definition of litigation pr Litigation PR is the management of the communication process prior to and during the course of any legal dispute or adjudicatory processing so as to affect the outcome or its impact on the client's overall reputation (Haggerty, 2003)
Revised:  Definition Litigation PR is the management of the communication process prior to and during the course of any legal dispute or adjudicatory processing so as to affect the outcome or its impact on the client's overall reputation (Haggerty, 2003)
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Definition of litigation pr Litigation PR is the management of the communication process prior to and during the course of any legal dispute or adjudicatory processing so as to affect the outcome or its impact on the client's overall reputation (Haggerty, 2003)
Revised:  Definition of litigation pr Litigation PR is the management of the communication process before and during a legal dispute or adjudicatory processing so as to affect the outcome or its impact on the client's overall reputation (Haggerty, 2003)
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  Definition of litigation pr Litigation PR is the management of the communication process prior to and during the course of any legal dispute or adjudicatory processing so as to affect the outcome or its impact on the client's overall reputation (Haggerty, 2003)
Revised:  Definition of litigation pr Litigation PR is the management of the communication process prior to and during the course of any legal dispute or adjudicatory processing so as to affect the outcome or its impact on the client's overall reputation 
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  . Basic Concepts of Litigation Public Relations— The First Concept—'Litigation PR is to influence the outcome of the court case by encouraging early or favorable settlement or by pressuring the prosecution into bringing lesser or no charges (Haggerty, 2003).
Revised:  . Objectives The First Concept—'Litigation PR is to influence the outcome of the court case by encouraging early or favorable settlement or by pressuring the prosecution into bringing lesser or no charges (Haggerty, 2003).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  . Basic Concepts of Litigation Public Relations— The First Concept—'Litigation PR is to influence the outcome of the court case by encouraging early or favorable settlement or by pressuring the prosecution into bringing lesser or no charges (Haggerty, 2003).
Revised:  . Basic Concepts of Litigation Public Relations— One objective of litigation PR is to influence the outcome of the court case by encouraging early or favorable settlement or by pressuring the prosecution into bringing lesser or no charges (Haggerty, 2003).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:  . Basic Concepts of Litigation Public Relations— The First Concept—'Litigation PR is to influence the outcome of the court case by encouraging early or favorable settlement or by pressuring the prosecution into bringing lesser or no charges (Haggerty, 2003). The Second Concept—'Litigation PR  is to protect the client's reputation before and during the trial.
Revised:  . Basic Concepts of Litigation Public Relations— The First Concept—'Litigation PR is to influence the outcome of the court case by encouraging early or favorable settlement or by pressuring the prosecution into bringing lesser or no charges . is to protect the client's reputation before and during the trial.
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  In this regard, litigation PR is akin to reputation management . Reputation management is about managing public perception of an organization or individual . It is about attitude toward the individual and not knowledge itself. An essential aspect of reputation management is influencing attitude about the individual and corporation, which can encourage positive activation to the benefit of the organization (Haywood, 2002).
Revised:  In this regard, litigation PR is akin to reputation management . Reputation management is about managing public perception of an organization or individual , rather than information itself. A key aspect of reputation management is influencing attitude about the individual and corporation, which can encourage positive activation to the benefit of the organization (Haywood, 2002).
Edit intent: clarity
Original:   Litigation pr and media    coverage Litigation PR on the part of defendants is needed , especially in high-profile cases because the media have an inherent bias in  favor of plaintiffs and prosecutors.
Revised:  Managing your reputation: How to plan public relations to build and protect the organization's most powerful asset (2nd ed.). London: Hogan Page. Litigation pr and media coverage Litigation PR on the part of defendants is needed , especially in high-profile cases because the media have an inherent bias in favor of plaintiffs and prosecutors.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:   Litigation pr and media    coverage Litigation PR on the part of defendants is needed , especially in high-profile cases because the media have an inherent bias in  favor of plaintiffs and prosecutors.
Revised:  Author Kathy Fitzpatrick identified six objectives of litigation public relations:Fitzpatrick, K. (1996). Practice management: The court of public opinion. Texas Lawyer, P.30. coverage Litigation PR on the part of defendants is needed , especially in high-profile cases because the media have an inherent bias in favor of plaintiffs and prosecutors.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:   Litigation pr and media    coverage Litigation PR on the part of defendants is needed , especially in high-profile cases because the media have an inherent bias in  favor of plaintiffs and prosecutors.
Revised:  Litigation pr and media Counteracting negative publicity. Making a client's viewpoint known. Ensuring balanced media coverage. Helping the media and the public understand complex legal issues. Defusing a hostile environment. Helping resolve the conflict coverage Litigation PR on the part of defendants is needed , especially in high-profile cases because the media have an inherent bias in favor of plaintiffs and prosecutors.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:   Litigation pr and media    coverage Litigation PR on the part of defendants is needed , especially in high-profile cases because the media have an inherent bias in  favor of plaintiffs and prosecutors.
Revised:  Litigation pr and media To achieve those objectives, the PR agent has to establish credibility with the media as an information source. The next step is to control the flow of information to the media to ensure the preferred narrative is disseminated. The third step is to develop a message that supports the client's position and spread that message to the media and the public. coverage Litigation PR on the part of defendants is needed , especially in high-profile cases because the media have an inherent bias in favor of plaintiffs and prosecutors.
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  In such situation, “ working with the media to create more balanced, accurate, and less sensational coverage of a lawsuit is  necessary element in defending high profile defendants" (Hantler, Schwartz, & Goldberg, 2004, p. 8 ).
Revised:  In such a situation, " working with the media to create more balanced, accurate, and less sensational coverage of a lawsuit is necessary element in defending high profile defendants" (Hantler, Schwartz, & Goldberg, 2004, p. 8 ).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In such situation, “ working with the media to create more balanced, accurate, and less sensational coverage of a lawsuit is  necessary element in defending high profile defendants" (Hantler, Schwartz, & Goldberg, 2004, p. 8 ).
Revised:  In such situation, “ working with the media to create more balanced, accurate, and less sensational coverage of a lawsuit is a necessary element in defending high profile defendants" (Hantler, Schwartz, & Goldberg, 2004, p. 8 ).
Edit intent: fluency
Original:  In such situation, “ working with the media to create more balanced, accurate, and less sensational coverage of a lawsuit is  necessary element in defending high profile defendants" (Hantler, Schwartz, & Goldberg, 2004, p. 8 ).
Revised:  In such situation, “ working with the media to create more balanced, accurate, and less sensational coverage of a lawsuit is necessary element in defending high profile defendants" .Hantler, S. B., Schwartz, V. E., & Goldberg, 2004, p. 8 ).
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  In such situation, “ working with the media to create more balanced, accurate, and less sensational coverage of a lawsuit is  necessary element in defending high profile defendants" (Hantler, Schwartz, & Goldberg, 2004, p. 8 ).
Revised:  In such situation, “ working with the media to create more balanced, accurate, and less sensational coverage of a lawsuit is necessary element in defending high profile defendants" (Hantler, Schwartz, & Goldberg, P.S. (2004). Extending the privilege to litigation communication specialties in the age of trial by media. Communication Law Conspectus, 13, 7-34. p. 8 ).
Edit intent: meaning-changed
Original:  In such situation, “ working with the media to create more balanced, accurate, and less sensational coverage of a lawsuit is  necessary element in defending high profile defendants" (Hantler, Schwartz, & Goldberg, 2004, p. 8 ).
Revised:  In such situation, “ working with the media to create more balanced, accurate, and less sensational coverage of a lawsuit is necessary element in defending high profile defendants" (Hantler, Schwartz, & Goldberg, 2004, p. 8 
Edit intent: fluency
Original: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% To achieve those objectives, the first step is to establish credibility with the media as an information source. The next step is to control the flow of information to the mediaso that the right message gets out. The third step is to develop a message that supports the client's position and get that message out to the media and the public (Fitzpatrick, 1996, Haggerty, 2003, Reber, Gower, Robinson, 2006).
Revised: %DIFDELCMD < %DIFDELCMD < %%% Robinson, 2006).
Edit intent: coherence
Original:  The third step is to develop a message that supports the client's position and get that message out to the media and the public (Fitzpatrick, 1996, Haggerty, 2003, Reber, Gower, Robinson, 2006).
Revised:  The third step is to develop a message that supports the client's position and get that message out to the media and the public (Fitzpatrick, 1996, Haggerty, 2003, Reber, Gower, 
Edit intent: coherence